Two debates coming up with week. ABC at least reports Rezko, seems more balanced. CBS debate was requested by BHO - a strange change of stand on his usual debate evasions - which sounds like a set-up. Which brings up this question:

Am preparing a list of questions these networks should ask Obama in these debates. It includes unanswered, overlooked or media blocked information. I want to make this QUESTIONS TO ASK OBAMA ON AIR list available to ALL, as an email campaign to these networks on the part of any interested in participating - and(complete with email addresses of the four debate moderators and news desks.)

It is categorized by: Biographical contradictions; Questionable Supporters; Quotes of Concern to Voters; Vital Policy & Platform Issues. Even keeping it brief, I think it’s too long for your comment section.

I’m working on a blog site but the debates are this week and that might not be up in time.

So, is there some other way for your to post this? If so, I will send comment links to viewers of other like minded sites to come here for a copy, with forwarding addresses to CBS and ABC.

I realize that MSM might ignore it. . . but it’s worth a shot, espec. if they get repeat email requests. Can you help? (You are so well informed, that if you do post it, you are more than welcome to edit as you see fit first.) It will be ready by tonight - none too soon. Is there an email address where I can send to you, this LIST OF DEBATE QUESTIONS FOR OBAMA to you?
(I’ll check my inbox for your reply.)

I’ve been looking at some of the math, and the way I see it, Wright has made a:

1. Loss of $37,000 (probably not his own money so it can hardly be called a loss)

2. Gain of a $1,500,000 real estate land and house

3. Gain of at least $1,500,000 from not having to pay interest on the mortgage over its lifetime.

4. Gain of $10,000,000 for his house expenses over his time in that house (divide by 20 years, provides about $500,000 for expenses like heating, hydro, water, taxes, landscaping, snow removal, maintenance, renovations, travelling around the country and thus, air flights, hotels, restaurants, etc…)

I’m curious how he was living before his lawyer Obama became a US senator with the intention of running for president, thanks to the “donations” of campaign money by Rezko, a Syrian national, who if he was wealthy in Syria, means he was a Bath party member there, the same party as Saddam Hussein. Since Rezko loves politics so much, there can be no doubt of his connections to the Syrian and Iraq Bath parties - and since he was Obama’s principal backer, no surprise Obama would side with Saddam’s Bath party against the US Wash. parties.

It’s not a coincidence that Obama also got to expand his real estate, at a loss for the seller Rezko, a slum lord real-estate thief, so that Obama could increase his mansion. These two real estate losses and crooked deals both have one thing in common: Obama. It’s interesting that Obama got to live in a mansion thanks to the poor people sucked dry by Rezko and Wright gets to do the same thanks to the suckers who went to his church. All of them are predators that steal from the poor to make themselves rich.

But it fits in with the signs from God that have been non-stop for months, warning about Obama.

The most notable sign is Obama’s first and middle names. One is “barrack” and the other is “house in”. The “housing” crisis is a sign of, and tied to, “hussein” crisis. The housing crisis is about whether the “house in” which people live, they get to keep.

I’m not surprised to see Obama tied to a pair of twin real estate thefts.

Bush got rid of one Hussein supported by the Bath Party. Hopefully, McCain will get rid of the other one if Hillary can’t.

Again, thank you for the article.

http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/03/27/obamas-former-pastor-builds-a-multimillion-dollar-retirement-home/

“FOX News has uncovered documents that indicate Wright is about to move to a 10,340-square-foot, four-bedroom home in suburban Chicago, currently under construction in a gated community.

While it is not uncommon for an accomplished clergyman to live in luxury, Wright’s retirement residence is raising some questions.

“Some people think deals like this are hypocritical. Jeremiah Wright himself criticizes people from the pulpit for middle classism, for too much materialism,” said Andrew Walsh, Associate Director of the Leonard E. Greenberg Center for the Study of Religion in Public Life with Trinity College in Hartford, Conn.

“So he’s entitled to be tweaked here. So the question really is, how unusual is this? Somewhat unusual,” he said.

According to documents obtained from the Cook County Register of Deeds, Wright purchased two empty lots in Tinley Park, Ill., from Chicago restaurant chain owner Kenny Lewis for $345,000 in 2004.

Documents show Wright sold the property to his church, Trinity United, in December 2006, with the proceeds going to a living trust shared with his wife, Ramah.

The sale price for the land was just under $308,000, about $40,000 less than Wright’s original purchase two years earlier.

Public records of the sale show Trinity initially obtained a $10 million bank loan to purchase the property and build a new house on the land.

But further investigation with tax and real estate attorneys showed that the church had actually secured a $1.6 million mortgage for the home purchase, and attached a $10 million line of credit, for reasons unspecified in the paperwork.

There is apparently nothing wrong with that, according to non-profit tax expert Jack Siegel of Charity Governance Consulting, who examined public documents FOX News obtained from the Cook County Register of Deeds and the Village of Tinley Park.

“At least looking at it from a public document standpoint, there’s clearly not a problem that jumps out or some sort of wrongdoing,” Siegel said.

Siegel characterizes the transaction as unusual, however, because of the way Wright sold the property to Trinity and the way the deal was financed, with the attached $10 million line of credit.

Because churches are classified as private businesses, Trinity isn’t required to reveal its intended use for the line of credit. Nor, because it’s a non-profit entity, is it required to provide that information to the IRS.

A spokesman for ShoreBank, the Chicago-based financial institution that secured mortgages for the loans, said the deals were aboveboard.

Wright did not respond to repeated calls for comment, and Trinity United refused to discuss the specifics of the home it is building for him and the way the deal was financed.

The church referred FOX News to its denominational headquarters in Cleveland, which provided a statement of support:

“It is customary and appropriate in many Christian denominations, including the United Church of Christ, for local churches to offer housing provisions for retiring clergy, especially in cases where pastors have served long-term pastorates. We support efforts by our 5,700 local churches to ensure that retiring pastors and spouses have continuing housing, adequate pension and health care, as an expression of our continuing appreciation for their years of service. Each local UCC congregation is free to honor a retiring pastor in ways it feels most appropriate to address the needs of that clergyperson’s circumstances,” wrote the Rev. J. Bennett Guess, spokesman for UCC’s national office.

“This is about how these kinds of churches work,” notes Walsh. “These pastors who made big successful churches are real valuable commodities. Is it morally wrong? Well, Protestants don’t have the idea that their religious leaders should live modestly or aesthetically. We’re not talking Buddhist monks or Catholic priests here. There’s no tradition that says they have to live poor.”

Tradition at Trinity United centers on a congregation that’s unashamedly black and unapologetically Christian, according to the church’s website. There are also no apologies from the church for the home it’s building for its former senior pastor, who nurtured a religious empire that grew to have more than 8,000 congregants”

Food for thought: The timing of Wright’s “retirement” and his “Victory” tour (as they called it) when spiriting him out of Chicago are clearly no accident. . . the various shuffles of paperwork, surrounding the 2004 property purchase indicate that MORE was paid for the land then it sale price (?) and transfers made possible the TEN MILLION DOLLAR Line of Open Credit requires no explanation for use (because it is “church sheltered”.

All else aside, what the devil do you do with a $10 million dollar credit line ? (start a race war?!)

Remember, don’t let your vote be a lie:

http://www.writehillaryin.com

Obama is doing the buying - just turn on any news channel and you can see his purchased reporter slaves trying to convince the whole world to submit to Obama. If Hillary was the buyer, they’d be working for her instead.

Thanks for the info regarding Wright living in a million dollar mansion. Do you have more information on that?

PLEASE JOIN THE ACTION AND ASK ALL YOU KNOW TO JOIN IN

We at Hillary_Clinton_In_2008@yahoo.com has taken your advise and got active: We’ve join with the April 11 protest of Mainstream Media and let Florida and Michigan be counted by starting a massive simultaneous email campaign on the unfair treatment of Sen: Clinton in the media. On April 11th at 8 a.m. we will let our voice be heard along with the protesters in NY. Please join us and send emails to CNN, MSNBC, ABC on that date in solidarity of WE THE PEOPLE HAVE HAD ENOUGH. thank you

(I am taking this FRI AM off to participate in the above and will flood them from all of my various email addresses. Please pass this on.

http://www.writehillaryin.com

I know who’s the real caring person here. I know who really cares about black lives. And given Wright’s million-dollar mansion bought from the money of his parishioners, I know who’s living large on the labor of others, too.

Don’t get me wrong - I find most of the rhetoric of the NBBP offensive and crazy - and would call it ridiculously funny were it not dangerous and offensive and crazy as noted.

But shy of banning individuals or organizations that sign up as members in the network… I’m not sure what you’d want. As Larry and Susan have noted, they may not agree with some of the views expressed by some of the posters - but they’re not going to outright ban them for that - I know wrong analogy.

Obama is a sorry excuse for a human being. You don’t see those sort of things on the other candidates’ sites.

Same here about the Obamington Post. I used to like Arianna. I respected her as a woman who made lemonade out of lemons. But her total lack of objectivity regarding Hillary borders on psychotic. Same with MoDo. And the NYTimes.

Mp sister bragged to me the other day about how she got this great subscription deal with the Times. I told her about their unfair reporting and she cancelled. Let them eat their words.

I hope all of these people’s profits dry up. I want them to realize that they can’t take us for stupid. You want Frank Rich, Dowd, Herbert? Well at least give us an opposing view on Obama. Bill Krystol ain’t cutting it for me.

I actually love the way the so-called ’savior,’ the uniter, is taking people down with him. Should he get the nom, I’ll be on total new blackout and ditto the Convention coverage and I haven’t missed a Dem Convention since I was a little girl. It will be so easy, too. Summer’s around the corner, baseball, lot’s of outdoor activities and book reading.

Perhaps, they’ll appreciate the irony in what happens to them.

Nah!!!!…. They’ll blame it all on Hillary.

I dare any AA to even be in the same zip code as me and use the words ‘uncle’ and ‘tom,’ ‘house’ and ‘ni**er’, in the same sentence.

The very last thing any black person in this country wants to do is have a dialogue with me on the slave mentality among AAs. Not with the rampant mindless consumerism, still prevalent conflicts of identity issues ranging from self-image, beauty, skin color, hair texture, black-on-black crime that exists in the AA community today. Especially not judging by the photo of the person who posted that nonsense.

The tragedy is that Obama is taking the AA community down with him. If he’s elected look for huge disappointment and even rage in the AA community. I wonder how’ll he’ll handle it?

One thing’s for sure, he won’t have to experience it. He’ll be safe and secure in the White House, protected by the Secret Service. And, as with his entire life, he’ll have no direct experience in what it means to be an African American.

I see where you’re going with this you little sneak! LOL

Good Idea!!!

The link for this in your post is gone this morning:

Hillary vs Obama: The Slavery Perspective

Did you save a screen shot and could you please post it?

Thanks for all you do.