Finally Catching On?
By Larry Johnson on April 13, 2008 at 10:13 AM in Current Affairs
I know some are convinced that I’m a Republican mole conducting advance force operations against Barack Obama, which, in their view, explains my persistent criticism of the presidential aspirant starting in December. Not so. Just call Susan UnPC and me prescient political analysts. We saw early on that Barack has serious chinks in his political armor that Republicans will effectively exploit should he be the nominee. Well lookee here. Some in the Main Stream Media are starting to catch on. Check out the latest from John Harris and Jim VandeHei. Nothing new for those who have been reading this blog. In fact, looks like they’ve been copying us. We have been sounding these warning for the last four months.
Barack may one day be a viable presidential candidate. He needs seasoning. He needs more experience working foreign policy and economic issues. He needs to put firm distance between himself and the radical politics of Jeremiah Wright, William Ayers, and Rashid Khalidi. And he has to purge his campaign coffers of every taint of corruption (call it the Rezko effect). But he has not yet accomplished any of these tasks.
And to make matters worse, his political tin ear remains intact. His latest pandering to the wealthy in Marin California, where he disparaged the bitter church-going, gun-toting folks of Pennsylvania, is but another example that he is not politically plugged in to the average American. The Harris/VandeHei post is a new piece of evidence that suggests the worm is starting to turn on Obama.
(List Price: $27.95 - Your Price: $15.47)
By Sarah Palin (Release date: November 17. 2009)
I think it’s pretty funny watching the collective COVER MY ASS that is beginning to emerge among the self appointed BEKNIGHTED PUNDIT CLASS. Good post.
The Harris/VandeHi article is an important piece and should be read by every super delegate - pledged or not.
Why are CNN and MSNBC doing damage control for the Obama campaign? Isn’t that the campaigns job?
The tide is turning, I wonder if Barry is a good swimmer?
This is not part of their plan. They were set to ride this unity pony right into the Republican camp where they would dismount and get on board the Straight Talk express. Sadly, the Koolaide Kids earnestly believe that the media “GETS” and is for Barack … only until November when there will be more goodies coming from Unkle Karl …
Make no mistake. The MSM would throw Obama under the bus in a nanosecond if they find themselves unearthed by other forms of press and public outrage. Barry is taking care of that all by himself. Time has never been his friend, which explains why he had all his shills out there calling for Hillary to leave the race. They know Time is not his friend.
Besides, if he did finagle the nomination in the end (and that is the correct word, given what he did to Florida and Michigan’s revote efforts), they will put him straight uder the bus once he runs against Their Holy Republican Graile. Remember what they did for that twit George Bush.
because they know faked outrage when they see it…
The only people who think Larry is a Republican mole are the deluded morons who think that if we are all really quiet then the Republican slime machine just won’t notice all these problems Obama has, and he’ll just sneak into the White House under the radar.
Of course, it’s also that part of it is Operation Blame Hillary, to be unveiled next November: If only Hillary and her minions (like Larry) had not pointed out all of Obama’s obvious flaws, the Republicans would not have had a clue how to combat him and he would have ridden to victory. What an absolute crock. Of course, the REAL reason Larry and Taylor Marsh and others are exposing Obama NOW is because it’s NOT TOO LATE to avoid catastrophe and nominate someone who CAN and WILL win in November.
My guess is that at least some of the people catcalling Larry Republican are Republicans. And any others are injecting themselves with Kool Aid.
Yep. That’s it. I for one don’t really want to wake up the morning after and see that the Democratic party has shit on its chance to be in the White House by nominating the only person who can guarantee that that is what will happen. I lived through 10 days with Gore. I’m not really interested in another losing effort, you?
I’ve been called all sorts of names, a corporate shrill, a warmonger, racist, a bigot, etc, etc. Then we progressed to the “fake Democrat.”
Ba-aa-d Democrat.
Now I have finally graduated to “Republican.” Eeewww, them’s fighting words, LOL. Disparage my sexuality, insult my mother, or call me a racist, but don’t you dare call me a Republican! Then to add insult to injury, I’m now a “Rovian Republican,” LOL! Ackk, I am not a follower of the Demonic Cabbage Patch Doll.
Labels are really silly. There are principles and values that we all share as Americans, or we all should anyway. Really basic things, like not condoning lying. Like hating being steriotyped, “typical white person” or a “bitter small town person clinging to guns and religion”.
An experienced politician would know better then to try and steriotype people. They would tread very lightly. It’s way too easy to offend people.
But since Obama has taken it upon himself to label me in so many ways, I have one for him. He is like one of those know it all teen agers who thinks everybody else is just stupid. Not much you can do with that kind of arrogance except wait for them to fall on their face.
The article seems quite fair; it indeed comes to no surprise to us; so the question is how many will pay attention to it. But it’s good that others are starting(?) to write about it.
Larry: what do you think of Sarah Baxter’s article on the London TimesOnline article today (that mentions you) re. Ayers & Obama? (Take a look at the first comment; what an idiot…)
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/us_elections/article3736043.ece
Funny now the Obama campaign explains the connection at the school was not through Obama’s & Ayres kids after all but to Dohrn, Ayres’s wife who worked at the school. …
As Obama’s campaign swirls clockwise (or is it counterclockwise?), his followers will need help with their transition. Here are some guidelines from http://www.helium.com:
MEMBERS WHO LEAVE MAY FEEL
LOST. Cults provide a sense of purpose which former members may find difficult to replace. However, the search for new meaning can be exciting and rewarding. It may help to get back in touch with pre-cult interests.
LONELY. Cults provide instant fellowship, which fades away just as quickly. Former members may need to lower expectations from new relationships, and learn to exercise a measure of trust.
INSECURE. Cults may undermine a member’s self-esteem in order to promote emotional dependence. Former members need assurance of their intrinsic self-worth, in a realistic perspective.
GUILTY. Ex-members may have developed a guilt complex while in the cult, or later blame themselves for joining. They will need to find a balance between self-foregiveness and taking responsibility for actions.
ANGRY. Anger at the cult is a normal reaction, but it should not be allowed to result in loss of self-control or pointless revenge. Instead, anger can be channeled into a desire to recover. The best revenge is living well.
ANXIOUS. Ex-members will have concerns about rebuilding their lives, and some may fear reprisals from the cult. A change of address may help with security concerns. Rebuilding is a gradual process, making a to-do’ list and ticking off each accomplishment helps to give a sense of progress.
DEPRESSED. Depression is often the result of unresolved feelings such as those above. Identifying and tackling the causes will aid long-term recovery. In the short-term, a proper diet, adequate sleep, regular exercise, and opportunities to talk to someone all help.
http://preview.tinyurl.com/585ok2
Wow, this could be the republicans, too, you know the Rove crews.
It will be even harder for them, they have real liability.
But they at least weren’t getting sand bagged upside the head with daily beatings of lying “hope” and “change.”
Wasn’t it conservative compassion, and liberalism as a mental disease, and the terror bogeyman?
It’ s so hard to keep track of the PR talking points.
Would this also apply to the Collective Bewilderment experienced by certain leaders of the DNC as they watch the epic EXODUS of 2/3 of the traditional democratic base? Great way for Bloomberg et,al. to begin that third bi-partisan party don’t you think? I’m not judgin’….I’m just sayin’.
I totally agree with this post. Hillary has the experience, seasoning and platform to be an excellent President at this time.
Obama needs more experience. He’s too green and inexperienced for the job at this time. Talk can only get you so far, no matter how good or persuasive a speaker you are.
It’s a dangerous world. Hillary was called an alarmist for saying that she was ready on Day One and for the 3AM phone call ad but you never know what’s going to happen or when. Has everyone forgotten the lessons of 9/11 already? Better to be safe than sorry.
I also think that Hillary has more of a feel for grass roots values. Obama really is an elitist who connects with those like him, the so-called latte liberals.
And lastly, every election of my life I’ve heard those terms “hope” and “change”. It’s just politco-speak to get elected and doesn’t really resonate with me. Been there, done that.
if he´s green then what does that make Hillary for losing to him?
and if she´s too tired misstaing events from tuzla at 10 am how in the hell is she going to be coherent at 3am buddy?
his personal poise and self-confidence
Ha. It’s all relative, I suppose. I see Obama as an arrogant egomaniac who will destroy whatever or whomever is in his path to get what he wants. Mind you, this isn’t assumption. There’s factual evidence to support the claim.
Larry…thank you for giving us a place to express our concerns and frustrations.
Is it funny how the campaign thinks that Obama will win over the party, the Republicans and the world at large including Ahmadinejad, Kim Jong-il, Bashar al-Assad et al. with his charm, self-confidence and personality?
Do they think that b/c Obama’s charm that worked miracles with Rezko, Ayres, Wright, Meeks, and Co. will also work with these despots as well?
Are they so arrogant to be so naive to the point of stupidity?
wow…I´m at least looking for the links to them there ¨facts¨pal. You could have at least linked some Hillary fan rant.
I don’t think you’re a Republican mole. Just a CIA mole…
And without the CIA, and defense, all legitimate law enforcement, men like Bush, and Obama and the crooks who support them would destroy this country.
Don’t you see the reality of what has happened with Bush, and Congress, all this corruption, what it has done to the country?
Do you think it’s an illusion that will magically go away, “the thing will keep on chugging?”
No, it won’t, magic is for children.
And here, they want to put another incompetent brainless simple minded crook in the presidency, and that’s OK?
Obama and the republicans have ties to very corrupt men, like Auchi, like the Sauds, in addition Obama and Bush’s people aren’t smart enough to understand the dynamics of international play. Bombs and satellites still need to be manned by intelligent men and women, not the half wits they currently have at the helm.
The losses in Iraq and Afghanistan are very real, as are our economic and political situations.
Who will handle it best?
Love this! Average voters, right or left, have no idea what really pulls the strings.
You know, it’s a damn shame when a bunch of stupid rich people get together and think they can run the country, control the army, be king.
And it’s a direct testament to Jefferson, and Madison, that the people, THE PEOPLE, of this experiment called democracy are putting a stop to it.
Be very grateful you’re American, I am.
I resent the ruling class, when will it end? Have you been watching the Adams series? I read the book as well. These few people were true statesmen, all the while having their own agendas, except for Adams, I believe. The difference for awhile, seemed to be, that you cannot allow a ruling class. I’m not sure that experiment lasted very long even with their idealistic hard work.
Grtphoto knows who pulls the strings because you have tapped into the OPRAHSPHERE using your special internet connection ?
Expand on this please!
you are insane…
it appears you´re just making up stuff.
cultist you people are…
to whom are calling cultists? which one of us is insane and making stuff up?
Larry,
The only problem with this statement is that neither your or Susan have put any effort into looking at or discussing the “chinks in the armor” that Hillary has that you KNOW the republicans will equally attack and exploit.
As I’ve said before - both candidates are merely job applicants, and it’s up to us the voters to weight their strengths and weaknesses and make a decision. What I’ve seen coming from sites that pander to either dem candidate started as mindless cheerleading for their choice and has devolved to mindless demonization of the opposition and their supporters - not a lot of consideration and examination of both candidates and a nuetral judgement of the individuals merit.
I think that the MSM has already covered all the “chinks” in Hillary’s armour. In great detail and ad nauseam.
But I agree with the rest of your post.
As opposed to Obama; the MSM hasn’t even bothered to look at his ‘armor’. If they had, they would see that unless you count “cult messiah” status, Obama doesn’t have any armor to have chinks in.
yet I don´t see anyone here able to express with any coherence Obama´s ¨chinks¨
Those “chinks” have been looked at over and over and over and over again. Ad nauseum.
Barack doesn’t stand a chance…
They are licking their chops. Count on it.
just screaming…´wait for the rezko trial to bust´ or the Jeremiah Wright dead news story yall keep pimping.
Someone posted on another site coined it perfectly…when you keep trying to relive dead news storys…they called it Journalistic Necrophilia.
perfect fit here.
Ironic. So drudging up clinton baggage doesn’t apply?
current relavent baggage sure…there´s no point in bringing up things before her senate bid…travelgate bs….
Hillary has been investigated for the last 18 freakin’ YEARS. There’s NOTHING the Rw, Ken Starr crowd doesn’t know about her OR Bill. Please. No one has had their life under such a powerful microscope as Hillary. G-d knows she’s been THOROUGHLY vetted. Mr. Hope? Not so much. Hillary’s life is known. We’ve seen it all. Remember? The RWers spent $50 MILLION investigating her and Bill?
Do you think they ever stopped investigating the Clintons after they left the WH? NO. Hillary ran for the Senate, TWICE. Do you honestly believe the RW hit men didn’t dig into her life again when she ran for the Senate? You can bet they looked at every nook and cranny, in every closet, at every donor, at every person Bill has associated with since leaving office and no doubt Chelsea has been added to the list of “who to investigate.” Hillary is an open book. Mr. Hope IS NOT.
I can think of 109 million ways to investigate her that haven´t been investigated. Who are you kidding? seriously, you must live under a rock, they´d spend months picking through her earmarks to NY which she still hasn´t released…yes BO has already released his. She is one of the most least transparent senators in washington.
I don´t think you even know what you´re talking about.
you sound like a hillbot version of jonah goldberg
109 million ways? You can post here w/o childish insults. It’s just so funny to read your non sensical words. What is your point, really? Can’t someone vote for one person w/o an attack? He’s released his…hmmm, exactly what work did he do? Oh, do you mean all the legislation he was able to sign his name to without the heavy lifting? Really, SHE is the MOST non transparent Senator? What exactly is so scary about hearing all of his non work? Why would you want to support someone who is eventually going to disenfranchise you as well? You come back after that happens.
I think you´re the non-sensical one that really doesn´t know their candidate. Hillary is the sloppy one 80% of the bills she brought up don´t even have sponsers…she thinks we´re stupid stuffing in bills that no one will sign onto because they´re just there to pad her stats. BO IS THE ONE THAT REACHES ACROSS THE AISLE…no that´s not just a cliche…his bills have teeth and not triangulated like HRC´s to the point where corporations don´t care.
when you get chance go on over to the library of congress website and check for yourself.
Anyone who has been around politics, and is honest, realizes that there are a lot of reasons why a Senator votes one way or another on bills or misses votes. However an examination of the bills that each of these Senators cared enough about to author and introduce revealed much to me: what they care about, what their priorities are, how they tackle problems. And the list of co-sponsors showed something about how they lead, inspire and work with others. Finally, looking at which bills actually passed is pretty indicative of how effective each would be at getting things done.
Let’s all be honest here. It is damn hard to get anything through Congress these days. And Obama and Clinton care about the same issues and have obviously worked together on a lot of legislation, whatever Sen. Clinton’s campaign may imply. She is a frequent co-sponsor on his bills, and he on hers. They are both completely competent senators.
About 40% of her bills dealt with health care and/or kids. But curiously, her big bill to deliver health care to every child, the one she lauds on her website, S.895 : “A bill to amend titles XIX and XXI of the Social Security Act to ensure that every child in the United States has access to affordable, quality health insurance coverage, and for other purposes” had not a single co-sponsor. Not one, according to the Library of Congress. Why is that? Is it a bad bill? Or is she not able to recruit support for her signature issue? Or did she just submit it simply to put in the hopper, so to speak, so she could claim she was working on it. I honestly don’t know the answer, but I find it curious and suspicious that not even Ted Kennedy co-sponsored it. Its sister bill in the house, H.R. 1535, introduced by John Dingell has 42 co-sponsors. It’s just weird. I honestly don’t know what to make of it.
Kevin:
They are calling out to you at the Huffington Post. They need another tenor in the “But, but, but Hillary” chorus.
Beebop LOL….Kevin……Don’t forget your special US Govt. Issue Pipe and you stash of Govt. Issue Crack….They might be running a little low during choir practice….LOL
why would we but but hillary anything? We´re not the one´s in denial and on lifesupport stiffing vendors…reality check…i know this only get´s your hopes up, but life is hard and losing PA by 8 points will be a hard pill to swallow…
when this is over go and vote for McCain or better yet write-in Hillary or Dr. Ron P, because something tells me he´s going to need all the votes he can get. Considering He and Hills have the same talking points. Next thing you know you´ll be eating cocktail weenies and rubbing elbows with Bay Buchanan and Jonah Goldberg.
I´ve been bitter…what are you waiting for.
Love your sight Larry. It really is one of the things I look forward to in my day. All of you have been doing a tremendous job, and that you also manage to keep a sense of humor, well thats just an added bonus!
Thanks for all the hard work
According to many Obama supporters one of the reasons to vote for him is that is will bring along votes for down-ticket Dems.
The GOP is all ready hammering two freshman Congressmen from Pennsylvania, Jason Altmire 4th District and Christopher Carney 10th District. They are both superdelegates that have not endorsed as yet.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/cq/20080412/pl_cq_politics/politics2702539;_ylt=AniFCSzpSFHc39jAnM4kS0myFz4D
Slowly but surely them chickens is coming home to roost. And don’t say we weren’t warned because Larry and Susan and Taylor among a few, a very few, were warning that this would happen.
Of course, that assertion just hold true, at least not here in Texas. I don’t have the link at hand, but I read that the percentage of people who voted for both the presidential candidate of choice AND the other state/local positions was significantly lower among those who chose Obama.
That is, those who voted Obama, ONLY voted Obama and not for the party.
And I’ll add that in my district, there were a number of Hispanic candidates. I can’t help but wonder if Obama voters avoided voting because of “those other people who don’t look like us.” Makes me wonder…
‘just DOESN’T hold true’
she won´t get any new super d´s besides the republicans are lame ducks…their own kids wouldn´t listen to them at this points…
oh…you didn´t get your hopes up pasting this crap…get outta here and come back when you get real news Marge.
It is good that you highlighted this — but people worrying about Obama’s performance in the GE actually damage the meme that this Democratic primary is not yet over.
Of the points made in the politico piece, while I think they get the two themes correct, but both can be addressed by the Obama campaign:
1. WRT> his coalition being small — depends ultimately on how he treats voters who voted for and still prefer Senator Clinton. I don’t think there has been a serious analysis of how this will shift in the coming months, esp. with a weakening economy and energy prices making it into everyone’s budgets.
2. WRT> how he will fare against the Republican campaign — I actually think this is Obama’s strength. He has proven adept at deflection, and using echo-chamber words such as hope and change to combat fear, uncertainty and doubt.
But your piece gets it right. He’ll never be able to make up for his lack of experience in time, and there are lots of voters who are plain turned off by his campaign’s ruthlessness and emptiness. Bill Clinton was successful because he w/ the DLC moved the party toward the center, and it will be interesting to see if a “pretend progressive” (see Kate Harding’s post) and a pol who seems to have not made up his mind on several critical issues yet will be able to appeal to a large mass. Some people will eventually ask “what will an Obama presidency look like”, but ultimately it will come down to “do I trust this man”?
see 50 state plan smart guy…
news flash your current ¨move to the center¨theory is failing miserably…yeah you are awake and it isn´t a dream…and Harold Ford did lose…
carry on…and get bitter!
larry johnson-
you have made precisely the argument that needs to be made about obama.
and you have made it with the appropriate qualifier that he may very well be a strong democratic presidential candidate some time in the future
- when he has more experience and
- when the public knows him well enough not to be shocked by some revelation or other about his “persona” , as would certainly be the case in this general election.
harris and venderhei are not reporters i trust in general, but it has certainly occurred to me that clinton might very well be doing exactly what politico’s story says she is doing -
trying to stave of a democratic disaster caused essentially by the obama campaign gaming the democratic primary system, screaming foul on every other play in the game, and stampeding democratic voters in obama’s direction with abundant help form the national media.
i consider obama as a manchurian candidate in the democratic party,
the manchurian candidate of the dlc; joe lieberman’s revenge on the democratic party.
I’ve said it before….Vote OBAMESSIAH = Facism…Vote McCain = Facism Quicker.
thats a bad plan and no one is listening to this guy. Good ole DLC joe is israel´s manchurian candidate.
get back on your meds.
Larry writes: I know some are convinced that I’m a Republican mole conducting advance force operations against Barack Obama, which, in their view, explains my persistent criticism of the presidential aspirant starting in December.
Well, you are a republican, Larry, and therefore [laughing] not to be trusted. Nevertheless, I admire your work here, and having met you, I’d tell anyone who asked that you’re a straight-up guy.
However…
Look, I can’t speak for everyone opposed to what I consider to be a silly set of postings here which play pin-the-tail-on-the-pastor or the rest of the straw-grasping– and you know what I’m talking about– but I do know this:
As an intelligence professional, you were educated to be a servant of truth, not politics.
The current Presidential administration’s disdain for the truth is absolutely central to the case to be made for what’s wrong with the country right now.
See where I’m going here?
well spit chris!
I guess Hills is his handler now.
I´m in the school that think he´s been under burn notice for years and Hills promised him another shot…as if her word is worth much. Wake up larry…good things happen to fair people.
get fair and get bitter!
No Quarter:
I wonder if post-9/11 America is actually ready to elect any President and oddly, it does not seem at all the case that ‘post 9/11 America’ is a major focal point of the candidates.
I suppose the candidates do not want to campaign on an issue that voters do not want to be reminded of or perhaps they do not want to confront what could be construed as Pandora’s Box i.e. a post-9/11 American paranoia.
Have the candidates thought about this issue?
Have they thought about the proof e.g. an emphatic call for increased security and the trend toward isolationism via, in particular, Bush Administration privatization?
What is the way out of this intransigent paranoia?
Well, try Jimmy Carter and his defence of why he is meeting with Hamas this week:
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/04/13/jimmy_carter_defends_meeting_with_hamas/
So, why don’t have candidates have the answers that constitutes what Carter is actually DOING?
Larry is probably right about Barak Obama’s lack of foreign affairs experience. However, I am still waiting from a release from the clutches of what is politically correct. I am waiting for innovation, vision and hope from the candidates e.g. how about an American Department of Peacebuilding or an UN resolution for a global peacebuilding initiative?
This is a very good point. The fields in Shanksville, PA — not a particularly large city — were the final resting place for the heroes on United Flight 93. So it struck me — and I don’t live in Pennsylvania but rather in nearby Ohio — as patently anti patritiotic and insensitive to a fault. But it is in keeping with the garbage that he has listened to apparently without much question in his church in Chicago. If you see “white America” as Reverand White does, then the impersonal “they” discussion is not that much of a leap. Where I can’t agree with Larry is that there is somehow time and experience that Obama can add that will change or add to his slim resume and defeatist view of Americans who are unlike himself. I just don’t see it.
Well said…..Clearly Jimmy Carter may be experiencing senility?
Bush doesn’t want to speak of it, the republicans, Obama have nothing to offer, both Obama’s cronies and the republicans are making a SHITLO*& of money off terrorism and it’s related adjuncts, and the press, well, they keep the attention on Clinton.
They’re all guilty in this mess.
OTOH, I get the impression that group functions in a game of HALO, nothing seems real to them, all children, all PTSD.
It’s those who face reality, those who can understand, confront and handle the problems, those people will win.
But these corrupt kids ( and I count the 70 year old Cheney, and the 100 year old Bill Kristol in that category, what Kristol isn’t 100? It’s early senility?).
Short term shock and awe, long term results?
No, whether it’s Kristol, or Obama.
The corrupt ones SUCK, can’t get the job done, aren’t smart enough.
But theses corrupt kids?
No.
Sorry.
To Larry and Susan;
Even though you are Republicans, you are still “likeable enough”!
Even though you two are “Status Quo”, a few more sips of Kool Aide will change that!
So when you two are reporting to President Barack Obama and giving him advise, we will remember this day too!
PS have you two already scoped out your new digs in Kenya for when you repert to the New Kenyan President Barack Obama?
LOL…spoken like a proper little Facist….
comedy…
but seriously when he does win…discontinue the gulping of haterade…it´s a bad look on you and Susan.
Thought you said this site was so uninteresting, yet you are back here like a fly on shit. Are you that lonely?
yes…I am can´t you tell?
can´t you see I´m bitter as well leave me alone.
¨this is excellent news for Hillary!!¨
Larry,
First let me emphatically state that there is just no way this statment could be remotely true:
If anything, I am firmly convinced that first and foremost you are one of the very RARE real American patriots. While you may personally not get all you wish for in an election, you are also superbly well-trained and dedicated to your country. I believe would publicly remain pretty much neutral, unless there were very real and compelling reasons for speaking out. The very fact that you are allowing your site to promote facts in this election year, tells me much, and has inspired me to dig even deeper than I normally would.
If you recall, way back in December, I was NOT a Hillary supporter. However as a New Hampshirite, I do have a strong sense of fairness and right and wrong. Until about the end of January I did feel as you state:
This in spite of the facts he had a bunch of rowdies invade our state, deliberately violated two laws with his robo-calls, insituted “vote buying” among our youth, and left a mountain of trash, which, from Central NH north, is just becoming visibile as the snow melts. So I do not expect “perfection” from out of state candidates. Our standards are obviously much higher for in-state officals.
However I am now convinced to the core of my being that Obama is central to the biggest international money laundering and fraud schemes ever known. And yes the mystery intigues me, which is why, and others on this site continue to search.
On a domestic front, the issues that have firmly put me personally in the NO WAY IN HELL camp, are the viscious attacks on Geraldine Ferraro for saying exactly the same thing Obama said in 2005, his allowing LAWS to be broken in this case and his unbelievable attacks against Mayor Nutter which I am convinced rise to the level of terroist acts, his constant use of the race-card and mysogyny. Wright and the other garbage is just frosting on a very putrid pile.
For me, and many of us, your site is a graduate level seminar, which enlightens and teaches us to think in different ways. At times you generously post, as you did above, something to reach the “saner” Obamzoids.
Character is the first and foremost criteria for me in any Presidential Candidate. Obama, as I have learned, is totally morally and ethically bankrupt, with NO redeeming attributes. Hillary’s strength in the face of the dirtiest and most viscous campaign I have experienced, in 40 years of adulthood, has won me completely over to her side. Hillary also will give me some of what I would like to see in governance as well as policy.
So while you may persist in trying to reach the less intelligent, I am DONE. In fact, let me pointedly state two things.
If Obama is anywhere slated for an executive position, I will NOT vote Democrat for the very first time in my life. My conscience and own values preclude any sort of compromise at this point.
And the second reason is fairly straightforward. We all choose to live in whatever neighborhood for the quality of life it offers. I am no different. If any Obamazoids come into my neighborhood, you can bet the bank, I WILL have them picked up by the police. Further, if they leave anymore trash, I have enough people I know to ensure that the “rule of law” shall be fully applied.
Lastly, my enduring gratitude for you and Susan being the people of Character that you are, and for the opportunities provided by this fantastic site. Thank You sounds trite - but there are not adequate words in English to express the depth of gratitude.
Yes, as simple as that.
No big deal, it’s not as if they’re smart.
so the reason he´s getting more money than Hill is because he is laundering all that rezko money?
wow…
put the crackpipe down…
why don’t you can the smartaxx comments. excuse me, they aren’t smart!
“No big deal, it’s not as if they’re smart.”
This coming from the sharp as marbles crowd….
mercy…..
Follow the money — I’m sure the GOP is doing this — in fact the first article which revealed some of the dirty secrets was posted on a GOP website.
Someone in all my notes I have the link. . . .
Never before have I seen so much money dumped into my state (Washington) by a candidate — from training for caucus leaders to signs and who knows what else.
WHERE THE HELL IS ALL THE MONEY coming from??
The fact that Obama is willing to take money from questionable sources suggests a major character flaw — which to me means he will never be ready for prime time.
Larry, if you were a Republican (and I’ve always gotten the impression that, if anything, you’re an independent–at least, up until the 2008 primary season), you would zip up and watch the Democrats walk off that cliff with Obama!
It was a little disconcerting to me early on that so many conservatives spoke so highly about Barack Obama. For instance, David Brooks may really want a Democrat winning in November, but that seems pretty strange from one of the New York Times resident conservatives. Like many of the other conservatives who have rallied around Obama, “concern troll” Brooks seems to believe that Hillary Clinton has “too much baggage” to win in November. Call me cynical, but I just do not believe that all these conservative “concern trolls” are suddently interested in seeing a Democrat in the White House. And all that “baggage” that Clinton is carrying around is accompanied by the reality that people were doing MUCH better when Bill Clinton was president than they have ever done under George W. Bush! Add to that the fact that there is little that the GOP can throw out about Hillary Clinton that will be “new dirt”. Sadly, we seem to be finding out “new dirt” about Barack Obama every single day, and the GOP has not even gotten their slime machine geared up yet!
I am one of those Democrats who really resisted supporting Hillary Clinton because I feared the baggage that she was carrying as well as the sexist bigotry in this country. In addition, I must admit that I was a little disenchanted with some of the things that Bill Clinton did while in office–from Bill Clinton’s failure to achieve any meaningful healthcare reform to Clinton eventually signing onto fairly punitive welfare reform. My first choice was always John Edwards, and when it became increasingly clear that Edwards was not a realistic choice, I was actually leaning toward Obama. (Like Kevin Phillips, I do not care for these political dynasties.) But instead of reflexively choosing the viable “anti-Clinton” candidate, I actually listened to the debates and read the proposals of BOTH candidates (Clinton and Obama). So I actually came to support Hillary Clinton somewhat reluctantly, but she really won me over! Clinton has outperformed Obama in EVERY SINGLE debate, and her proposals are far more thoughtful, substantive proposals for change than Obama’s.
I can certainly understand the anger that many liberal Democrats harbor toward Hillary Clinton over her vote on Iraq (and that abominable bankruptcy bill in 2001 as well). But I must admit that it is hard for me to comprehend how ANY thoughtful Democrat could read the respective proposals from the Clinton and Obama campaigns and follow the debates, and yet, follow Obama like sheep to a slaughter! I will give Obama his props for his massive organizational skills in building such a large, grassroots movement for his campaign. But it’s going to take more than grassroots organization and massive fundraising to deal with the “baggage problem” that Obama seems to have accumulated.
i enjoyed your post. but i don’t think you can give obama credit for managing much of anything. that is being done by others just like with bush. what is their reason? money and power of course. some of them have shown up it seems! some of the so called “dim” leadership who fear and hate clinton power. perhaps some corporations like insurance companies are supplying funds because barry “understands” them.
I don’t think time will make Obama a viable candidate. What will change? He came this far by using his skill set of disabling his opponents and running a one person race. This doesn’t even touch on the fact that he has some political and business relationships that show his lack of foresight and judgement. I personally would not ever vote for him. He has sullied his chances by being arrogant, selfish and stupid in his associations. I just don’t understand how he can “grow” from all of this baggage. I still laugh so loudly at the thought that he will EVENTUALLY unite us Democrats/Independents. HOW? By magic?
I am inclined to agree. No matter how much experience he gets, Obama is and will be “damaged goods” due to the opinions ans associations now being revealed.
And to make matters worse, his political tin ear remains intact
This is what Barak’s basic problem is.
He is so tone deaf from political ambition and indifference, he can’t even understand how McPeek punked him.
And he is stubborn to boot, when caught in a gaaf, he keeps digging.
He also has a demonstrated lack of understanding of constitutional law, in spite of that
‘Constitutional Law Professor’ meme that Brazille was pushing this am.
Why else would he think repealing the AUMF is “convoluted”?
I would be interested in seeing a syllabus from one of his lectures…or find an interview with any students that heard any of his lectures.
(penny bet they were not that insightful.)
Larry , you, SusanUnPc and the fine people who publish at NQ are the advance team. Just not the one some folks projecting assumtions think who for.
Thanks for keepin’ it real.
Take that Barry,
Let the ground swell begin!
Where were you all the other day for the rally against MSNBC and Olberman
http://bettycracker.blogspot.com/
She did some blogging about the HIllary rally in Rockafeller Sq.
¨There was a truly massive and important rally yesterday in NYC: The Protest Against Media Bias, Hate Speech and Voter Suppression. Outraged throngs turned out on Rockefeller Plaza to support Senator Clinton and protest the unfair media bias in favor of Barack Obama. The rally was so huge and important that it made the 1963 March on Washington look like a small-town PTA meeting by comparison.
Didn’t hear about it? That’s because the media hates Hillary Clinton and loves Barack Obama. You have to read “Democrat” Taylor Marsh’s site to get the real news these days. Or confine your media viewing to brave truth-tellers like Joe Scarborough, Pat Buchanan and Bill O’Reilly. Main Stream Media tools like Keith Olbermann don’t want you to know the truth. But the pictures are in, and the outraged throngs are too numerous and powerful to be ignored. Hear (okay, see) them roar!
So where were you, Main Stream Media? Huh? Huh? Were you too busy ignoring the Wright controversy and pretending that Obama didn’t say Pennsylvania voters are a bunch of embittered, god-bothering, racist, gun-fondling morons?
Or could it be that a scrum of deranged cat ladies just isn’t the media draw it used to be? I think we know the truth. Your silence in the face of such concentrated outrage is deafening, Main Stream Media.¨
I´m still bitter why aren´t yall…
Today Wolf Blitzer said Obama had humble orogins. I emailed to ask what he thought was humble about having college educated parents, living with a grandmother who was a VP of a large bank, going to the most elite, expensive prep school in the state of Hawaii, then on to elite Ivy League univerities.
Barak is no more a guy from humble origins than George Bush is a rancher. This is all phony posturing for political gain. Funny how easy our media is taken in by it, at least when their faves are the ones pretending.
yeah and those elitist paying their way through law school…but but…it´s not fair HIllary was annointed.
I´m sure Hillary filled out plenty of financial aid forms between the estate in Illinois and the summer house in Scranton. Not to mention Wellesley and yale law.
Unfortunately, the thrust of the article already assumes that Hillary is DOA.
Great… just f—ing great.
Gore and Carter about to “pull the plug” on Clinton campaign.
http://news.scotsman.com/latestnews/It39s-Obama-stupid-Carter-and.3976738.jp
If they think that there is not going to be problems if they do this, they are seriously wrong. They won’t just lose the election, they will lose it by a bigger margin than you think. The articles mentions that there could be the fear of riots if Obama doesn’t win the nomination. Well, what does that say about Obama’s supporters? There are thugs among them.
Remember, as an Floridian, if you take my primary vote away from me, don’t expect me use MY VOTE for you in November. I haven’t said this before, but I will surely vote for McCain if Hillary is not part of this picture. I will then remove myself from this Democratic party which isn’t so Democratic after all.
you just failed the smell test.
well she all but stuck her head in the forum and blamed gore´s loss on his elitism..gnoring that little Bill Clinton after taste in the mouth of the electorate…the nerve.
Why did he lose his home state? Hillary’s comment was spot on. Mudcats comments have been spot on. Edwards comments have been spot on regarding faith and the “outreach” to that aspect of American Society. You don’t belittle the people you want voting for you and Obama has made it his signiture to aileinate anyone
What about Florida gets you excited? That Gore did not fight for it or that Obama can’t handle the pressure?
Your candidate called EVERYONE in rural and urban life a biggot. “It’s true” he said, he said he was “clumsy” . Good luck with that as he trips over his BS
Oh for heaven’s sake, Larry, don’t hurt yourself as you pat yourself on the back. Your “prescience” isn’t that notable–lots of us figured out long before December that Obama isn’t all that and a bag of donuts. All we got for our trouble was being hounded off DK, AmericaBlog, TPM and other Obama 527s for our trouble.
Let me guess, Bernie, you’re getting all your facts from blogging?
“I emailed to ask what he thought was humble about having college educated parents”
One who abandoned the family when he was two, the other who was on food stamps for a time.
“living with a grandmother who was a VP of a large bank”
She headed the escrow department of the Bank of Hawaii. A professional level job? Yes. A job which ensure a life of wealth and leisure? No.
“going to the most elite, expensive prep school in the state of Hawaii, then on to elite Ivy League univerities”
What do “scholarship and loans” mean to you?
And people might be less suspicious of this blog if it didn’t rely on Pajamas Media, Karl Rove, and Fox News as “credible” (ahem) sources.
You mean CNN is more credible?
thank you…everyone knows thier info is bogus they just like winning better than honor. Unfortunately that frailty is obvious on them like a stench…they´re only fooling themselves obviously. It´s only natural for koolaide drinkers to genuflex their traits onto the majority…every media outlet is biased huh…
nice post Liz!
Over at Stop-Obama.org they’re having the same problem…being accused of running a GOP Obama hit operation. Calumnied by A Nobody “Rovian” tactics they like to call it. Bite me. This is for the presidency. If you’re not baptized in fire, as Obama has not been–you have no claim to anything.
What did he do when the Wright thing broke out? He ran to a cabana on a beach in Antigua. Telling you, the unity pony is John Forbes Kerry on Rev. Wright steroids.
We told you all this man had yet to be vetted. Hillary told everybody months back. The Free Ride express has been derailed, now stop whining.
and hillary´s obviously been vetted…lol
yeah and he went to the beach over a week after he cleared the air…how soon we forget. Hillary needs a vacation some cucumbers under the eyes and a sleep aid…no snark…she looks run down and tired.
Johnson must have really struck a nerve considering the astroturfing going on.
Though the Manonman troll isn’t very convincing, the little fella reeks of desperation.
Nothing like a beauty queen troll eh? Cucumber warts even.
SNOBAMA : ” VOTE FOR ME, YOU CORN-COB SMOKIN, BANJO-STROKIN, CHICKEN-CHOKIN,COUSIN-POKIN,GUN-TOTIN,BIBLE-THUMPIN, INBRED HILLBILLY,RACIST MORONS”.YEAH, HE GETS MY VOTE ! VOTE FOR SNOBAMA 08..