Compare this to the other bombings, like the Oklahoma City bombing with Timothy McVeigh who was sentenced to the death penalty. If the Weather Underground were so “bad” as the media have portrayed them to be, then why did they not convicted as criminals when they turned themselves in?

From Bill Ayers’ Blog, posted April 21:

Clarifying the Facts— a letter to the New York Times, 9-15-2001
April 21, 2008
September 15, 2001

To The Editors—

In July of this year Dinitia Smith asked my publisher if she might
interview me for the New York Times on my forthcoming book, Fugitive
Days. From the start she questioned me sharply about bombings, and
each time I referred her to my memoir where I discussed the culture of
violence we all live with in America, my growing anger in the 1960’s
about the structures of racism and the escalating war, and the
complex, sometimes extreme and despairing choices I made in those
terrible times.
Smith’s angle is captured in the Times headline: “No regrets for a
love of explosives” (September 11, 2001). She and I spoke a lot about
regrets, about loss, about attempts to account for one’s life. I
never said I had any love for explosives, and anyone who knows me
found that headline sensationalistic nonsense. I said I had a
thousand regrets, but no regrets for opposing the war with every ounce
of my strength. I told her that in light of the indiscriminate murder
of millions of Vietnamese, we showed remarkable restraint, and that
while we tried to sound a piercing alarm in those years, in fact we
didn’t do enough to stop the war.
Smith writes of me: “Even today, he ‘finds a certain eloquence to
bombs, a poetry and a pattern from a safe distance,’ he writes.” This
fragment seems to support her “love affair with bombs” thesis, but it
is the opposite of what I wrote:

We’ll bomb them into the Stone Age, an unhinged American politician
had intoned, echoing a gung-ho, shoot-from-the-hip general… each
describing an American policy rarely spoken so plainly. Boom. Boom.
Boom. Poor Viet Nam.
Almost four times the destructive power Florida… How could we
understand it? How could we take it in? Most important, what should
we do about it? Bombs away.
There is a certain eloquence to bombs, a poetry and a pattern from a
safe distance. The rhythm of B-52s dropping bombs over Viet Nam, a
deceptive calm at 40,000 feet as the doors ease open and millennial
eggs are delivered on the green canopy below, the relentless thud of
indiscriminate destruction and death without pause on the ground.
Nothing subtle or syncopated. Not a happy rhythm.
Three million Vietnamese lives were extinguished. Dig up Florida and
throw it into the ocean. Annihilate Chicago or London or Bonn. Three
million—each with a mother and a father, a distinct name, a mind and a
body and a spirit, someone who knew him well or cared for her or
counted on her for something or was annoyed or burdened or irritated
by him; each knew something of joy or sadness or beauty or pain. Each
was ripped out of this world, a little red dampness staining the
earth, drying up, fading, and gone. Bodies torn apart, blown away,
smudged out, lost forever.

I wrote about Vietnamese lives as a personal American responsibility,
then, and the hypocrisy of claiming an American innocence as we
constructed and stoked an intricate and hideous chamber of death in
Asia.
Clearly I wrote and spoke about he export of violence and the
government’s love affair with bombs. Just as clearly Dinitia Smith
was interested in her journalistic angle and not the truth. This is
not a question of being misunderstood or “taken out of context,” but
of deliberate distortion.
Some readers apparently responded to her piece, published on the same
day as the vicious terrorist attacks in New York and Washington, by
associating my book with them. This is absurd. My memoir is from
start to finish a condemnation of terrorism, of the indiscriminate
murder of human beings, whether driven by fanaticism or official
policy. It begins literally in the shadow of Hiroshima and comes of
age in the killing fields of Southeast Asia. My book criticizes the
American obsession with a clean and distanced violence, and the
culture of thoughtlessness and carelessness that results form it.
We are now witnessing crimes against humanity in our own land on an
unthinkable scale, and I fear that we might soon see innocent people
in other parts of the world as well as in the U.S. dying and suffering
in response.
All that we witnessed September 11—the awful carnage and pain, the
heroism of ordinary people—may drive us mad with grief and anger, or
it may open us to hope in new ways. Perhaps precisely because we have
suffered we can embrace the suffering of others and gather the
necessary wisdom to resist the impulse to lash out randomly. The
lessons of the anti-war movements of the 1960s and 70s may be more
urgent now than ever.

First and foremost, the only people that have died due to the bombings committed by the Weather Underground were those within their own protest group,

This is absolutely not true. A police officer was killed in one of their precinct bombings. Three officers were killed in the Brinks robbery and one man was paralyzed. The only ones who deserved to be killed where the savages in the Underground who were preparing bombs crammed with nails, which they planned to set off at a military officers event. They blew themselves up and got their own savage butts riddle with their own bomb nails. People cheered that day.

First and foremost, the only people that have died due to the bombings committed by the Weather Underground were those within their own protest group, which occurred while they were making bombs in their own townhouse. Second, no other person has died because of any of the bombings they have committed. Third, the Weather Underground consistently made sure that there were no body present at the buildings while they set the bombs off.

The reasons for their actions were simple, they wanted to get their voice out and they wanted to be heard. What did peaceful protesting do in the 1960’s-1970’s? NOTHING! That’s because no one listened until anything serious happened. This is what they feel was the right thing to do to have their voice heard.

So why are these people being looked at as a group of terrorists who bombed and killed so many people?! This is a lie and people should look into the subject more before they come to conclusions or make false comments.

Also, its interesting that Obama says that anything that happened 40 or more years ago doesn’t count anymore. In that case, we should end affirmative action immediately.

the sad thing about all this is that obamaites are so desperate to continue the myth for their guy that they will even defend unrepentant terrorists.

btw, when someone is killed in the process of a felony, the co-conspirators are all guilty of murder, even if the person killed is one of the co-conspirators. it’s called felony murder. so ayers/dohrn and their pals committed murder when their pals blew themselves up as they prepared for one of their bombings. they just got away with it on a technicality. defending the actions of his murderer friends hardly seems helpful to your guy’s phony claim of being a new kind of politician.

and who consorted with other violent radicals like the Black Panthers.

Not sure you wanna go there…

The most pressing problem after the relationship with Rev. Wright and the demonstrated elitist contempt for other Americans, you mean.

THANK YOU! Also it seems Bill pardoned those two others after they served the usual time for those crimes and just spared them the pile on time.

Hillary is going to pay a high price for her husband’s screw-ups if she is the nominee.

Obama needs to be gagged before sinking anymore Democrats.

He can kiss his presidency ambitions goodbye, too. Once the military rank-and-file learns he’s buddy-buddy with a guy who planted a bomb at the Pentagon to KILL service people, even more so.