Some I am told (like Ayers), were violent thrill-seekers behind the scenes who directed the violent activities of others, yet didn’t participate in the actual violence because they were thinking of their lives beyond the 60s.

And while I don’t condone murdering people in the name of justice (which is what our government has done and continues to do in wars and conflicts all over the world), I find Ayers’ ilk to be the most reprehensible because they have neither the courage nor the stomach for their convictions. They are A- Class bullies - so dangerous because they will urge others to undertake their violent ideas and impulses and find countless sociopathic ways to justify and/or excuse their behaviors.

I smile every time I think of him because I know he is dead and I am alive. It’s all good.

Peace baby

Uniquely American.

I mean, Vietnam was really bad. It even ruined that guy’s acid trip.

Yeah, a real bummer. Maybe we should lobby the United Nations to make that a crime against humanity.

Buzz Kill = Capital Offense

And look at Ayers, et al now: bloated, upper middle class college professors reminiscing about the good ol’ days. They could appear in the dictionary under “The Man.” It would be laughable if they weren’t still so convinced that they were not the very thing they despised all those years ago.

I mean, Vietnam was really bad. It even ruined that guy’s acid trip. “Organizational piracy” sounds about like what’s happening to the democratic party right now. The elitist Obamites vs the working class. What a spin. At least they’re not using sex at the core of their “revolution.” (Probably not by choice; let’s be honest, most of the guys pimpling the “progressive” blogs these days wouldn’t be so furious but for the fact that no woman in her right mind would screw them)

The sheer logistical needs of conducting a war appear to have escaped he pea brain.

boutique revolution and daffy slogans.

Sounds prophetic about current events.

From savagepolitics: this is interesting..

As a curious side-note, if you go to William Ayers’ main website (CLICK HERE), you will notice a very prominent name in the middle of the page: ABU-ZAYD. For those of you who are not familiar with Islamic culture, the name means “FATHER OF ZAYD” and it is Ayers OTHER name. As you may have noticed above, Ayers has two children which he raised as Muslims (Malik and Zayd), a fact that he openly exalts by applying to himself an honorary Muslim name.

Nonetheless, as Obama stated in ABC’s debate, if we simply suspend our reason and knowledge of how politics ACTUALLY works, then we must assume that being associated to Rev. Jeremiah Wright and William Ayers is not sufficiently substantive to ascribe to him the same and exact philosophical views of the world that they have. But, even if this was absolutely true (for the sake of argument), these unwholesome friendships and partnerships, at the very least, open the possibility of interpreting Obama’s own political policies through the same lens that his friends and their views have established for him (thus their friendship and support of Obama).

As the Castillian saying goes; “tell me with whom you are with, and I will tell you who you are”.

What if you did a survey who’d they’d all be voting for now? I’d guess that half of them voted for Bush and are now swinging back to Obama.