It’s hard to tell that, however, when so many of the comments here are so incredibly poorly written and riddled with as much polarizing rhetoric as they are. Thanks for writing in a much more reasonable and effective manner than many of the commenters who post here. It makes your viewpoints much more palatable and understandable to those of us who do not come here agreeing with the pre-established community.

From a policy standpoint, both Clinton and Obama seem to be driving in a similar direction. They may disagree on the specific path, but there seem to be more similarities than differences. I only wish both groups could get over there excessive fawning over their respective candidate long enough to see this. I, for one, will be voting for whomever wins the primary, and I wish all of you would too.

So your best hope is a candidate that can convince others as well as the real Democrats to support his/her goals.

So instead of complaining that he is gaining more support from non traditional Democrats. How about keeping the argument to the issues and ask is he standing for the ideas and principals of the democratic party. If the answer is yes or close enough or even as close as say HRC. Then surly the candidate that can convince both democrats and independents and even some republicans who are fed up with the current party. Is the very candidate you need to build the success of the democratic party.

Oops, watch that sniper fire.

If she’s so great why didn’t she beat Obama way back on Super Tuesday? Because she’s a phony and people are beginning to wake up to the phony politics that elected Bill Clinton and George Bush.

Speaking as one of the Deomocratic base (38, white, family man, and proud gun owner who voted for Bill) I am voting for Obama, and I’m not alone.

I don’t need another president who’s going to lie to me about WMD’s in Iran or sniper fire in Bosnia or flip flop all over about her dealings with NAFTA.

She may have had a 9.3 lead in points, but that’s a far cry from “kicked his sorry behind all over PA” as you say. And even with that lead, Obama still came out with more delegates than she did from PA.

The delegate count is what matters, not the point spread.

I commend you for standing behind your candidate of choice, but the race is nearly over, and Obama is way out in front in the delegate count.

No one here is going to open that link and enrich that bastard … and I mean that in the nicest possible way …

Forgot to ask – how is Hillary loaning $5 MILLION of her own money not Elite?

Hillary has worked hard all of her life, and actually, she sold a book that garnered her millions, just like dare I say?… BO. What? He’s the only one entitled to sell books and make a profit. How silly to be begruding Hillary of making money while Elitist the Dilettante just obscenely squandered close to $1 Million/day in his desperate attempt to squash Hillary. Sorry, some voters just can’t be bought.