<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Indiana &amp; N.C. Results Thread</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/06/indiana-results-thread/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/06/indiana-results-thread/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 09:32:38 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: beebop</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/06/indiana-results-thread/#comment-228626</link>
		<dc:creator>beebop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 13:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/06/indiana-results-thread/#comment-228626</guid>
		<description>When the rest of them start reporting facts rather than tingling down their legs, they will get my viewership back.

I watch ABC because Charlie and George took shit for their debate.  I haven&#039;t had the others on in two months.

I read the newspapers on line.

&quot;Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but they are not entitled to their own facts.&quot; 
Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the rest of them start reporting facts rather than tingling down their legs, they will get my viewership back.</p>
<p>I watch ABC because Charlie and George took shit for their debate.  I haven&#8217;t had the others on in two months.</p>
<p>I read the newspapers on line.</p>
<p>&#8220;Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but they are not entitled to their own facts.&#8221;<br />
Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitchman</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/06/indiana-results-thread/#comment-228621</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitchman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 13:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/06/indiana-results-thread/#comment-228621</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Watch Fox News...    ...and Karl Rove’s analyses are quite fascinating since he knows the country so well&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I don&#039;t question Rove&#039;s ability to understand the electorate - but after what he helped do to Valerie Plame &amp; Joe Wilson, do you really think we should give him or his network any exposure at all...???    I feel like my head is going to explode after reading some of these pro FOX News posting...?!?!?!

I personally think Rove&#039;s a treasonous pr*ck and should be in jail - but hey that&#039;s just me...

I know I could pull dozens of articles from this site alone that support my disgust for this guy...

-- Mitchman</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Watch Fox News&#8230;    &#8230;and Karl Rove’s analyses are quite fascinating since he knows the country so well</p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t question Rove&#8217;s ability to understand the electorate &#8211; but after what he helped do to Valerie Plame &amp; Joe Wilson, do you really think we should give him or his network any exposure at all&#8230;???    I feel like my head is going to explode after reading some of these pro FOX News posting&#8230;?!?!?!</p>
<p>I personally think Rove&#8217;s a treasonous pr*ck and should be in jail &#8211; but hey that&#8217;s just me&#8230;</p>
<p>I know I could pull dozens of articles from this site alone that support my disgust for this guy&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8211; Mitchman</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/06/indiana-results-thread/#comment-228608</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 13:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/06/indiana-results-thread/#comment-228608</guid>
		<description>Fox? The Ministry of Propaganda for the Republican Party.

Rove? A criminal who should be in jail by now--if it weren&#039;t for the Bush dictatorship preventing his prosecution.

Drudge? A fascist liar and muck peddler.

Now I get it.  This blog is for right-wingers who like Hillary.  Nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fox? The Ministry of Propaganda for the Republican Party.</p>
<p>Rove? A criminal who should be in jail by now&#8211;if it weren&#8217;t for the Bush dictatorship preventing his prosecution.</p>
<p>Drudge? A fascist liar and muck peddler.</p>
<p>Now I get it.  This blog is for right-wingers who like Hillary.  Nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: workingclass artist</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/06/indiana-results-thread/#comment-228463</link>
		<dc:creator>workingclass artist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 11:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/06/indiana-results-thread/#comment-228463</guid>
		<description>ACCORDING TO DONNIDIOT... The New Democratic party does not need HISPANICS AND WORKING CLASS VOTERS.....
The Entire lower half OF THE UNION will go GOP.....Sheeeeeesh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ACCORDING TO DONNIDIOT&#8230; The New Democratic party does not need HISPANICS AND WORKING CLASS VOTERS&#8230;..<br />
The Entire lower half OF THE UNION will go GOP&#8230;..Sheeeeeesh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HillGirl</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/06/indiana-results-thread/#comment-228461</link>
		<dc:creator>HillGirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 11:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/06/indiana-results-thread/#comment-228461</guid>
		<description>Do you think that they conveniently &quot;forgot&quot; to count votes?
Let&#039;s say all is true - that all the votes (other than a few stragglers...) have been counted in IN.  Is it possible that the counties where Hillary was going to, for sure, do good in were counted first only to show Obama&#039;s leading gaining? 
And, I still don&#039;t get declaring Obama the winner in NC with 0% of the precincts counted. That is some BS there!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you think that they conveniently &#8220;forgot&#8221; to count votes?<br />
Let&#8217;s say all is true &#8211; that all the votes (other than a few stragglers&#8230;) have been counted in IN.  Is it possible that the counties where Hillary was going to, for sure, do good in were counted first only to show Obama&#8217;s leading gaining?<br />
And, I still don&#8217;t get declaring Obama the winner in NC with 0% of the precincts counted. That is some BS there!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama Idiot</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/06/indiana-results-thread/#comment-228460</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama Idiot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 11:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/06/indiana-results-thread/#comment-228460</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t care
I don&#039;t read
I don&#039;t think
I don&#039;t learn

All I know is
Hope!
Change!

Gimme more!
Gimme more!
Gimme more!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t care<br />
I don&#8217;t read<br />
I don&#8217;t think<br />
I don&#8217;t learn</p>
<p>All I know is<br />
Hope!<br />
Change!</p>
<p>Gimme more!<br />
Gimme more!<br />
Gimme more!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: workingclass artist</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/06/indiana-results-thread/#comment-228456</link>
		<dc:creator>workingclass artist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 11:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/06/indiana-results-thread/#comment-228456</guid>
		<description>I just read the transcript over at talk left on Donnidiot&#039;s MELTDOWN on TV last night.....According to Donnidiot the new democratic pary oes not need WORKING CLASS VOTERS OR HISPANICS......
SHE JUST DELEVERED THE LOWER HALF OF THE UNION TO THE GOP !
THE HISPANIC PRESS WILL BE ALL OVER THAT !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read the transcript over at talk left on Donnidiot&#8217;s MELTDOWN on TV last night&#8230;..According to Donnidiot the new democratic pary oes not need WORKING CLASS VOTERS OR HISPANICS&#8230;&#8230;<br />
SHE JUST DELEVERED THE LOWER HALF OF THE UNION TO THE GOP !<br />
THE HISPANIC PRESS WILL BE ALL OVER THAT !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kourian</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/06/indiana-results-thread/#comment-228455</link>
		<dc:creator>Kourian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 11:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/06/indiana-results-thread/#comment-228455</guid>
		<description>Yep. Wait for the MSM to start digging. Those that don&#039;t get shivers up their middle legs that is. But don&#039;t hold your breath. Fact of the matter: nobody in the MSM gives a shit. About anything. Much less fairness and democracy. Screw it. Kids will be able to read about democracy in history books - published and used only in other countries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep. Wait for the MSM to start digging. Those that don&#8217;t get shivers up their middle legs that is. But don&#8217;t hold your breath. Fact of the matter: nobody in the MSM gives a shit. About anything. Much less fairness and democracy. Screw it. Kids will be able to read about democracy in history books &#8211; published and used only in other countries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kourian</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/06/indiana-results-thread/#comment-228448</link>
		<dc:creator>Kourian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 11:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/06/indiana-results-thread/#comment-228448</guid>
		<description>You are correct. The results were rigged.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are correct. The results were rigged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kourian</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/06/indiana-results-thread/#comment-228444</link>
		<dc:creator>Kourian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 11:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/06/indiana-results-thread/#comment-228444</guid>
		<description>I personally think both results were rigged. I suppose a recount could be good but somehow this doesn&#039;t seem like what the HRC offices can tackle. I think they&#039;ve lost important margins over the past months because they&#039;re just not as well organised. And it&#039;s a shame. But that Indiana and North Carolina return results so at variance with all polls - no. I do not buy that. The results were rigged and I can detect the stench of organised corruption far away. US democracy RIP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally think both results were rigged. I suppose a recount could be good but somehow this doesn&#8217;t seem like what the HRC offices can tackle. I think they&#8217;ve lost important margins over the past months because they&#8217;re just not as well organised. And it&#8217;s a shame. But that Indiana and North Carolina return results so at variance with all polls &#8211; no. I do not buy that. The results were rigged and I can detect the stench of organised corruption far away. US democracy RIP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kourian</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/06/indiana-results-thread/#comment-228441</link>
		<dc:creator>Kourian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 11:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/06/indiana-results-thread/#comment-228441</guid>
		<description>More.

&lt;i&gt;It&#039;s remarkable how quickly the psychology in such a marathon campaign swings back and forth. Two weeks ago when Hillary got her double digit victory in Pennsylvania it began to feel like the Obama saga was over. Now when he&#039;s won big in the delegate rich North Carolina and lost by a narrow margin in Indiana it suddenly is Hillary&#039;s curtain coming down.

And even more remarkable how one is influenced by this psychology.

It&#039;s ten o&#039;clock and 80% of the votes are counted. And the media still won&#039;t pick a winner in Indiana. In the beginning when Clinton had a 20 point lead they seemed overly cautious - but not at all.

The margin shrunk successively through the night and when the results from the northwest districts Hammond and Gary come in it can shrink to nothing.

They are namely suburbs of Chicago that happen to be in another state - and Chicago as we know is Obama&#039;s home state.

91% of black voters in North Carolina voted for Obama according to CNN. I shouldn&#039;t report that, write some of the people who&#039;ve sent me mail. Skin colour means nothing and therefore should not be mentioned, they claim.

One might wish it were true but to ignore the importance ethnicity has in this election - when the US can get its first black president - would be to shut one&#039;s eyes to reality out of some misguided political correctness.

And now the magnificent John King is saying it will be until midnight before the Indiana counties in the northwest report their results.

And I&#039;m not waiting that long.

Obama is giving a new victory speech - the first in over a month - that gets the CNN experts to jump for joy over his rhetoric brilliance. Especially for the part about what awaits in a possible campaign against John McCain in the autumn.

&#039;I am not naive&#039;, claims the senator.

&#039;He better not be&#039;, as they say around here.

And what happens now?

This is what I wrote in the commentary to the paper&#039;s hard copy: &#039;logically this should mean Hillary has to give up. It&#039;s been a long time since she&#039;s had a theoretical chance to catch up - and now the situation is even more dismal. And if she against all odds wipes her rival off the floor in the remaining primaries she&#039;ll still lose. Big. But there is no chance in the world the former first lady will admit defeat.

She will continue to demand the results in Michigan and Florida - which were voided before the campaign began according to a decision by amongst others Clinton herself - are counted.

And she will continue to plea with the superdelegates who will be forced to resolve this mess in the end.

They will be told time after time that it&#039;s only Clinton can win the big states, that only she appeals to the conservative Democrats who determine the outcome of ordinary elections and that therefore only she can defeat John McCain in the autumn.

Therefore count on this tedious process to continue until the last voter places a vote in Montana on 3 June.

And then the superdelegates will determine who will be the nominee around midsummer.

So what is this drawn out super expensive painful campaign circus good for?

Good question.

Remaining are West Virginia next Tuesday; Kentucky and Oregon 20 May; Puerto Rico 1 June; and Montana and South Dakota 3 June.

But as stated: no one can count on there being a candidate even on 4 June.

And now it&#039;s time to go to sleep in New York. Goodbye.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More.</p>
<p><i>It&#8217;s remarkable how quickly the psychology in such a marathon campaign swings back and forth. Two weeks ago when Hillary got her double digit victory in Pennsylvania it began to feel like the Obama saga was over. Now when he&#8217;s won big in the delegate rich North Carolina and lost by a narrow margin in Indiana it suddenly is Hillary&#8217;s curtain coming down.</p>
<p>And even more remarkable how one is influenced by this psychology.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s ten o&#8217;clock and 80% of the votes are counted. And the media still won&#8217;t pick a winner in Indiana. In the beginning when Clinton had a 20 point lead they seemed overly cautious &#8211; but not at all.</p>
<p>The margin shrunk successively through the night and when the results from the northwest districts Hammond and Gary come in it can shrink to nothing.</p>
<p>They are namely suburbs of Chicago that happen to be in another state &#8211; and Chicago as we know is Obama&#8217;s home state.</p>
<p>91% of black voters in North Carolina voted for Obama according to CNN. I shouldn&#8217;t report that, write some of the people who&#8217;ve sent me mail. Skin colour means nothing and therefore should not be mentioned, they claim.</p>
<p>One might wish it were true but to ignore the importance ethnicity has in this election &#8211; when the US can get its first black president &#8211; would be to shut one&#8217;s eyes to reality out of some misguided political correctness.</p>
<p>And now the magnificent John King is saying it will be until midnight before the Indiana counties in the northwest report their results.</p>
<p>And I&#8217;m not waiting that long.</p>
<p>Obama is giving a new victory speech &#8211; the first in over a month &#8211; that gets the CNN experts to jump for joy over his rhetoric brilliance. Especially for the part about what awaits in a possible campaign against John McCain in the autumn.</p>
<p>&#8216;I am not naive&#8217;, claims the senator.</p>
<p>&#8216;He better not be&#8217;, as they say around here.</p>
<p>And what happens now?</p>
<p>This is what I wrote in the commentary to the paper&#8217;s hard copy: &#8216;logically this should mean Hillary has to give up. It&#8217;s been a long time since she&#8217;s had a theoretical chance to catch up &#8211; and now the situation is even more dismal. And if she against all odds wipes her rival off the floor in the remaining primaries she&#8217;ll still lose. Big. But there is no chance in the world the former first lady will admit defeat.</p>
<p>She will continue to demand the results in Michigan and Florida &#8211; which were voided before the campaign began according to a decision by amongst others Clinton herself &#8211; are counted.</p>
<p>And she will continue to plea with the superdelegates who will be forced to resolve this mess in the end.</p>
<p>They will be told time after time that it&#8217;s only Clinton can win the big states, that only she appeals to the conservative Democrats who determine the outcome of ordinary elections and that therefore only she can defeat John McCain in the autumn.</p>
<p>Therefore count on this tedious process to continue until the last voter places a vote in Montana on 3 June.</p>
<p>And then the superdelegates will determine who will be the nominee around midsummer.</p>
<p>So what is this drawn out super expensive painful campaign circus good for?</p>
<p>Good question.</p>
<p>Remaining are West Virginia next Tuesday; Kentucky and Oregon 20 May; Puerto Rico 1 June; and Montana and South Dakota 3 June.</p>
<p>But as stated: no one can count on there being a candidate even on 4 June.</p>
<p>And now it&#8217;s time to go to sleep in New York. Goodbye.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kourian</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/06/indiana-results-thread/#comment-228403</link>
		<dc:creator>Kourian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 11:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/06/indiana-results-thread/#comment-228403</guid>
		<description>Plucked out of the international press.

&lt;i&gt;It&#039;s three in the morning. Nine in the morning back home. Here&#039;s the latest version of all the articles I&#039;ve written last night. It took six hours until an ornery area in the northwest of Indiana returned their votes.

The final result in Indiana was too close a victory for Hillary Clinton. OK a win is a win but it wasn&#039;t enough. And at the same time Obama won a crushing victory in North Carolina.

Tally: Hillary is in trouble.

The famous NBC journalist felt very confident about the situation.

&#039;We know who the Democrat nominee is going to be.&#039;

And he added:

&#039;The Clintons have a big decision to make tomorrow.&#039;

Dramatic. Hillary&#039;s normal reaction is of course to just push ahead and in such case she&#039;ll be around until June. But she&#039;ll be under a lot of pressure from the leaders of the party. The superdelegates will be fleeing to Obama.

Hillary also has financial difficulties. It would seem she has to use her own money and how much will she dump into a campaign she&#039;s doomed to lose? Should she continue - or not?

She has to work through all of this and give her answers today.

She can say what she wants but now she&#039;s going to get the media against her.

Adam Nagourney writes in the New York Times: &#039;Tuesday&#039;s results did not improve her chances to get the Democrat nomination. Her chances to pass Obama have been further reduced&#039;.

Chief CNN analyst David Gergen thinks it&#039;s over for Hillary. But the moment when she gives up won&#039;t come until June. And she&#039;ll be &#039;very loved&#039;, he predicted surprisingly.

Watergate journalist Carl Bernstein who wrote a book about Hillary:

&#039;She needed to show the superdelegates she had momentum. It didn&#039;t turn out that way. The only way Obama can be stopped is if he&#039;s run over by a truck - in other words if he runs into trouble like his pastor.&#039;

Full speed ahead to the White House for Hillary!

Unbelievably Indiana have not tallied their votes yet. An area near Chicago is missing.

&#039;Crazy&#039; says CNN analyst Jeffrey Toobin.

Seriously he said it looked like good old fashioned classic corrupt Chicago politics until one sees what type of results are needed and then you arrange for the necessary results. This was of course an exaggeration and his colleagues laughed with him but no one contradicted him.

Hillary didn&#039;t hesitate a second when she finally gave her speech in Indianapolis. Of course she&#039;d won. She told her supporters:

&#039;Thank you. Now it&#039;s full speed ahead to the White House!&#039;&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plucked out of the international press.</p>
<p><i>It&#8217;s three in the morning. Nine in the morning back home. Here&#8217;s the latest version of all the articles I&#8217;ve written last night. It took six hours until an ornery area in the northwest of Indiana returned their votes.</p>
<p>The final result in Indiana was too close a victory for Hillary Clinton. OK a win is a win but it wasn&#8217;t enough. And at the same time Obama won a crushing victory in North Carolina.</p>
<p>Tally: Hillary is in trouble.</p>
<p>The famous NBC journalist felt very confident about the situation.</p>
<p>&#8216;We know who the Democrat nominee is going to be.&#8217;</p>
<p>And he added:</p>
<p>&#8216;The Clintons have a big decision to make tomorrow.&#8217;</p>
<p>Dramatic. Hillary&#8217;s normal reaction is of course to just push ahead and in such case she&#8217;ll be around until June. But she&#8217;ll be under a lot of pressure from the leaders of the party. The superdelegates will be fleeing to Obama.</p>
<p>Hillary also has financial difficulties. It would seem she has to use her own money and how much will she dump into a campaign she&#8217;s doomed to lose? Should she continue &#8211; or not?</p>
<p>She has to work through all of this and give her answers today.</p>
<p>She can say what she wants but now she&#8217;s going to get the media against her.</p>
<p>Adam Nagourney writes in the New York Times: &#8216;Tuesday&#8217;s results did not improve her chances to get the Democrat nomination. Her chances to pass Obama have been further reduced&#8217;.</p>
<p>Chief CNN analyst David Gergen thinks it&#8217;s over for Hillary. But the moment when she gives up won&#8217;t come until June. And she&#8217;ll be &#8216;very loved&#8217;, he predicted surprisingly.</p>
<p>Watergate journalist Carl Bernstein who wrote a book about Hillary:</p>
<p>&#8216;She needed to show the superdelegates she had momentum. It didn&#8217;t turn out that way. The only way Obama can be stopped is if he&#8217;s run over by a truck &#8211; in other words if he runs into trouble like his pastor.&#8217;</p>
<p>Full speed ahead to the White House for Hillary!</p>
<p>Unbelievably Indiana have not tallied their votes yet. An area near Chicago is missing.</p>
<p>&#8216;Crazy&#8217; says CNN analyst Jeffrey Toobin.</p>
<p>Seriously he said it looked like good old fashioned classic corrupt Chicago politics until one sees what type of results are needed and then you arrange for the necessary results. This was of course an exaggeration and his colleagues laughed with him but no one contradicted him.</p>
<p>Hillary didn&#8217;t hesitate a second when she finally gave her speech in Indianapolis. Of course she&#8217;d won. She told her supporters:</p>
<p>&#8216;Thank you. Now it&#8217;s full speed ahead to the White House!&#8217;</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kourian</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/06/indiana-results-thread/#comment-228377</link>
		<dc:creator>Kourian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 10:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/06/indiana-results-thread/#comment-228377</guid>
		<description>Something&#039;s wrong here. I went to bed with Hillary in a twelve point lead in Indiana with nearly half the votes counted. At the same time the major outlets were giving North Carolina to Barry despite no votes being counted. That was strange enough.

I wake up to find Barry&#039;s won North Carolina by double digits? And closed in on Hillary to within two percent?

&lt;i&gt;Whfffffffffffff!

What was that? Did somebody blow one?

No Basil - that&#039;s the sound of graft. That&#039;s the smell of election rigging. Of Barry&#039;s boys coming over the border to vote in someone else&#039;s election. That&#039;s the smell of Repugs voting in Dem elections to keep Hillary away from the White House. That&#039;s the smell of Obama black shirts hijacking democracy.

So can we do it over? Can we get the stench out of here?

It&#039;s doubtful, Basil. Sorry.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something&#8217;s wrong here. I went to bed with Hillary in a twelve point lead in Indiana with nearly half the votes counted. At the same time the major outlets were giving North Carolina to Barry despite no votes being counted. That was strange enough.</p>
<p>I wake up to find Barry&#8217;s won North Carolina by double digits? And closed in on Hillary to within two percent?</p>
<p><i>Whfffffffffffff!</p>
<p>What was that? Did somebody blow one?</p>
<p>No Basil &#8211; that&#8217;s the sound of graft. That&#8217;s the smell of election rigging. Of Barry&#8217;s boys coming over the border to vote in someone else&#8217;s election. That&#8217;s the smell of Repugs voting in Dem elections to keep Hillary away from the White House. That&#8217;s the smell of Obama black shirts hijacking democracy.</p>
<p>So can we do it over? Can we get the stench out of here?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s doubtful, Basil. Sorry.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/06/indiana-results-thread/#comment-228347</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 09:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/06/indiana-results-thread/#comment-228347</guid>
		<description>The North Carolina and Indiana vote counts do not pass the SMELL test!!!!!  The polls could not have been that far off!  Check out what the polls were reflecting for the past few days(with the exception of Zogby who has been off the mark for the past six months)

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/latestpolls/index.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The North Carolina and Indiana vote counts do not pass the SMELL test!!!!!  The polls could not have been that far off!  Check out what the polls were reflecting for the past few days(with the exception of Zogby who has been off the mark for the past six months)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/latestpolls/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/latestpolls/index.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: requiemforadancer</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/06/indiana-results-thread/#comment-228186</link>
		<dc:creator>requiemforadancer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 06:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/06/indiana-results-thread/#comment-228186</guid>
		<description>Wow.

I&#039;m not interested in pretentious trolls, with the IQ of a watermelon.

The reality is Obama deals with Auchi, who deals with Qaddafi, who blew up a plane full of Americans.

At the very least, it is NOT acceptable to take money from this man, no matter who you are.

That you even think this is acceptable shows a level of stupidity or denial that should be no where NEAR a decision making process for this country.

Period.

If you wouldn&#039;t want your kid around this type of traitor garbage, (and Obama betrays all Americans when he takes money from Auchi) then you have no right making decisions for other people&#039;s kids.

Can you follow it, or is the moral paradigm still out of reach?

Your faux outrage is boring, you&#039;re too slow intellectually, show me some brains, here, meat.

And yes, if he, or his supporters, help to facilitate the laundering of money, either to Palestine, or Pakistan, or worse, he would be classified a middle east op, and I would venture tracked as such. Rezko? Syria? Problem here? 

What do you call people who dally with hamas, say, and Qadaffi, and god knws who else?

Other than Cheney acolytes and business partners?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not interested in pretentious trolls, with the IQ of a watermelon.</p>
<p>The reality is Obama deals with Auchi, who deals with Qaddafi, who blew up a plane full of Americans.</p>
<p>At the very least, it is NOT acceptable to take money from this man, no matter who you are.</p>
<p>That you even think this is acceptable shows a level of stupidity or denial that should be no where NEAR a decision making process for this country.</p>
<p>Period.</p>
<p>If you wouldn&#8217;t want your kid around this type of traitor garbage, (and Obama betrays all Americans when he takes money from Auchi) then you have no right making decisions for other people&#8217;s kids.</p>
<p>Can you follow it, or is the moral paradigm still out of reach?</p>
<p>Your faux outrage is boring, you&#8217;re too slow intellectually, show me some brains, here, meat.</p>
<p>And yes, if he, or his supporters, help to facilitate the laundering of money, either to Palestine, or Pakistan, or worse, he would be classified a middle east op, and I would venture tracked as such. Rezko? Syria? Problem here? </p>
<p>What do you call people who dally with hamas, say, and Qadaffi, and god knws who else?</p>
<p>Other than Cheney acolytes and business partners?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
