Aren’t any of you concerned that Hillary has been railing against economists, and the “elite?” Who is going to advise her on economic issues, then? This was pandering, plain and simple, and Barack was principled enough to call both McCain and Hillary out.

I hope you’re right. I just wish the story could have broken before today’s election.

In short, Obama’s falsely used Krugman’s words against Hillary.

He’s not really someone you want to piss off. He’s no Howdy Dowdy or Rantin’ Frank. He’s a wonk and respected.

I can’t wait for him to take Snoboma to task for being a typical politician willing to say or do anything to get elected.

Funny how the folks in next door Indiana ain’t buyin’ it. So, how many states near and around Illinois have voted for Snoboma?

it’s a gimmick. a hollow, cynical gimmick.

Now for those who do, would you want fries to go with that order? You’d save enough from a fill up to buy lunch or breakfast if you commute and are in a hurry.

This is the same response Obama had to capping the credit card interest at 30%. He voted No, claiming it wasn’t good enough. No shit, Sherlock, but it was better then the nothing your “no” vote gave us.

So if you’re poor in this country and Obama becomes your Prez, be prepared to wait a long, long time for relief. He won’t try anything until the perfect plan comes along. And where do we keep perfect plans? I don’t know, I’ve never seen one.

boy, there’s a ringing endorsement.

‘harmless’ as in ineffective? inconsequential? insignificant?

So Obama’s economists may be right.

However, discretionary spending for other items would still occur in light of savings for gas, we’re talking about 11.5-13.5% taxation rate there. Oh, the economy also drives more items, less shelf life, etc.

So it still gets a return on similar numbers in efficiency with regard to generating revenue, only this revenue spreads across more markets than just the oil producers.

Let’s take Exxon’s word for it instead, and keep paying an extra .18 per gallon. Every cent gasoline reduces in price adds a billion a day to our macro economy.

That’s eighteen billion a day Hillary’s proposal would put back into the economy. That money would be taxed at a sales rate and help demand for other financial sectors, in addition to relieving shipping costs that produce higher prices at retailers and grocery stores.

He said a more constructive oil policy is needed, all around, nationally, and he’s right, particularly after the dimmer twins.

A gas tax holiday, courtesy of Shell, Krugman has said, apparently, is harmless.

Do you understand this, or should I explain it more.

And the dimmer twins are Cheney and Bush, a take off on their soulful brothers, Mick And Keith, the glimmer twins.

Then there are the “chemical brothers,” but I’ll save that for “famous politicians who use a lot of drugs to make it through the day” day…