Hillary’s Path to Victory

That’s all Hillary is asking for: ‘Let my people vote’ and ‘Count every Vote’. Nothing ‘Democratic’ about not counting the MI and FL votes.

Problem is Howard and Donna have swallowed the Kool-Aid. They really believe Barry can win.

But in the GE a timid, fumbling, ill-prepared Barry will take three strikes:

Wright, Rezko and Auchi and whiff them all.

And frankly if President McSame is what we have to put up with to get rid of…

Barry and Michelle..

Pelosi….

Hoyer….

Reid…

Schumer….

Brazile….

Dean…

and the rest of these Dead Loser Caucus scum….

I’ll make that trade.

Every day and twice on Sunday pal.

Exactly David. I find it absolutely incredible that Hillary supporters really think that superdelegates should just overturn the will of the people to install Clinton as the Dem. nominee. First of all - why even have a nomination process? Why even vote if the votes don’t count? Second of all if they think they are angry about Obama winning then they should see how angry people would be about the nomination being taken away from Obama for no good reason. That would cause a serious revolt among people who otherwise would have no problem supporting Clinton. That would just be too dirty, too low down. It would destroy the Democratic party.

That’s what it comes down to - Does Clinton care more about her party/country or does she care more about her own ego & ambition. The sense of entitle she (and her supporters) are showing is astonishing. It takes the term “sore loser” to the next level.

Yours is too simple an argument — all states, all votes count. However, at the end of the day, the big question is who won the states that matter most electorally in the GE. I would actually welcome a democratic candidate who will win those red states and turn them blue. But historical evidence suggests that it is not an easy task. On the other hand, some states do go either way. It is only smart to focus your limited resources on such states. Running a campaign everywhere requires money and people. Before you say Obama has that, I want to point out that he is no longer that magical messiah who would turn red into blue, not with all his baggage of Wright, Ayers — GoP will eat him for lunch and at the end of that process, people in those red states would have walked away from him (if they have not already done so.)

You claim the Democratic party wants to be Democratic but the obamabots and Dem. party leaders want to stop the vote? Obama lost Indiana when he should have won and of course he won NC that was a no brainer. What about FL & MI? the rules committee pulled the nuclear option and according to the DNC rules only half of the delegates were supposed to be taken away, what was that about? Of course it was rigged it was obama supporters who pushed that red button because they wouldn’t do caucuses. Oh and lets not forget NONE of the caucus states have “PLEDGED” ANY DELEGATES and won’t do so until the middle to the end of this month. Hillary picked up 13% more delegates during the county convention and will pick up more during the state convention on the 17th of this month, that is when either Hillary or obama can claim any delegates from my state of Colorado. You want Democracy David tell obamabots, the media, and the pundits who have been completely out of their element this elections to shut the hell up!

Do you think that caucuses are democratic? Do you think that disenfranchising millions of voters in FL & MI is democratic? Do you think that having delegates and super delegates instead of the popular vote is democratic?

Do you think that perhaps when over 90% of black votes for the black candidate that it’s not racist?

Obama supporters are such hypocrites. You don’t wan’t democracy. You just want Obama to win and you don’t care how it’s done. It’s a joke.

I think you mean REPUBLICAN, Einstein. Hillary has had the DEMOCRATIC vote all along. The MAJORITY. (If you don’t know what that word means then go look it up. But we won’t wait.) Your boy has been encouraging Republicans to vote in Democratic primaries. That makes a lot of sense, doesn’t it? Basically what you’re saying is it’s OK for your boy to crash caucuses, bully Hill people away from them, hijack votes, bus people over state lines to vote in other people’s primaries, avoid debates because they highlight his lack of substance and zip legislative record and his connections with sordid underworld criminals, and so forth.

Presuming you have two brain cells (admittedly a bit of a stretch inasmuch as the US government have documented evidence Obama-Aid™ destroys them) you might want to sit down with your pocket calculator widget and ask yourself why on earth he would do that and what the Republicans in such case see in him. Clue: it’s not a candidate of HOPE and CHANGE.

We’ll be here again tomorrow in case you’re back and think you’ve figured it out.

And no, no one here is interested in trading Barack Obama cards.

The is we are so democratic, count the votes in the 2 states of Florida and Michigan!!!!!!!!!!!
Obama ran ads in Florida which was against the rules, and he told supporters in Michigan to vote uncommitted!!!!!!!!!!!

The ONLY ONLY reason he doesn’t agree to a revote in either place is because it’s not to his advantage. And I PRAY that if he is the nominee, that Florida and Michgan DON’T VOTE - WHY SHOULD THEY - IF THEY AREN’T GOOD ENOUGH FOR HIM NOW, THEN HE WON’T BE GOOD ENOUGH FOR THEM IN NOVEMBER.

THERE ARE 50 STATES IN THIS COUNTRY.

If there weren’t rampant voter fraud, this thing would be over long ago and Hillary would be the nominee. Oblah blah really only has 20-25% support. Chew on that one. And that’s being generous. NOW it’s all making sense.
1 vote plus 1 vote = 2 votes
1 plus 1 does not equal 1 OBLAH BLAH!

David, let’s talk some actual democracy. Do you really care about “being democratic”? Let’s talk about Voter Suppression on a Massive Scale in Caucus States. This gruesome story of shocking though hidden voter suppression in the 21st century should make you howl — weep — in disbelief. The Awful Caucus Skew twisted History in this 2008 election. People generally know generally that Caucuses Stink, but no one knows this specific huge number of suppressed, cheated housebound older-women votes, the Greatest Story Ever Untold about the 2008 election.

The punch line is that in Texas, Hillary’s voters were plus 4 in the Primary and minus 12 in the caucus on the same day. A 16% swing! Suppose we’d only seen the caucus results in Texas? As we did in Iowa and all the other caucus states. Fie, you should cry, For Shame.

87-yr-old Vera in Iowa told me, “Oh no, honey, I can’t caucus for Hillary. I’m a cripple.” I said, “Well, you could vote-by-mail Absentee!” She said, “Not in a caucus state. No Absentee Ballot. If I can’t get there in my body, I don’t count.” “Don’t count”? In America? In the Democratic Party?

As I made 2400 volunteer phone calls, I began to keep track. Every 8th caucus phone call got me Lorna, “I don’t dare go out to caucus, I’m off balance.” There’s an epidemic of housebound older women in America who are cheated of their votes by their terrible fear of falling and because the appalling caucus system does not allow them an Absentee Ballot. No ‘ride to the polls’ helps these housebound and bedbound voters. THEIR votes don’t show up in those ballyhooed pledged delegates and popular vote.

Did you never wonder why Mr. Obama won mainly in caucus states? I wish Obama supporters would be honest. Suppose 15% of black voters were prevented from participating? Would there not be an outcry for voting justice. Of course.

This kind of Mockery of Democracy in Caucus States is exactly why superdelegates were created.
Despite the Parroted Media Myth in pseudo-reporting, Hillary did NOT lose the women’s vote in Iowa. She did NOT ‘get back the women’s vote’ in New Hampshire because she teared up in a diner. Nonsense. They got back the Absentee Ballot in primary New Hampshire.

The Will of the People? Which people? The Will of (Only the Healthy) People, apparently.

David,
By your own logic the legitimate votes cast by FL and MI should be counted to be exactly that, DEMOCRATIC!

The focus is to win the November election against John M. Any meaningful argument can be made to support a candidate’s case to win these states based on their record in these states and proven voting record of these states. This is the argument that any super delegate for the party would care to weigh against.

Obama -
Advantages:Smart, plans well.
Disadvantages: Not a lot of experience and visibility on what he has accomplished - so far. The press has really done us public a disfavour in not providing us the right information.
Troubling: Appears to treat the primaries like a class exam.

Clinton -
Advantages: Learnt Knowledge of US and world leadership; Learns quickly; adoptable and pursues goals with a zeal like no other. Appears to be have well prepared health care reform plan.

DisAdvantages: Some of her Populist policies appear to pander to people.
Troubling: None.

If I were to handle this hiring for the top US job, I would want to know more about Obama’s past accomplishments. It must have brought significant benefits to the people that depended on him.

The same goes for Mrs. Clinton and would ask some tough questions about some of her policies.

Sure - but superdelegates would have to break 3-1 in Hillary’s favor at this point (unless she wins Oregon by 10 points etc. etc). So keep on lobbying them, but at some point the rest of us need to look at the situation and say it’s time to fully go after McLame.

i don’t think the dnc forgets. i think they know exactly what they’re doing. they set up the system to get the nomination for obama, with the early scheduling of south carolina, the punishment of florida and michigan, the public anti-hillary pronouncements while maintaining a pretense of neutrality, etc.

agree that florida will go repub. it’s always close and this insult will ensure it goes that way. if i still lived there i’d work for that result.

the dnc disgusts me. they have hijacked the party for their own personal reasons. what they’ve made it into doesn’t deserve loyalty. so it won’t get loyalty.

screw ‘em.

The DNC seems to forget that BO won mostly caucus states which are hardly representative of the base or how the states will go in the GE.

Consider it psychotherapy for Dean. Because he lost the nomination in a caucaus state due to his “HeeHaw” scream.

He was an idiot then. He’s an idiot now. That Dems still allow him to lead by pushing the worst candidates known — an anti-war Vietnam spitter; to an anti-American Manchurian candidate — shows as long as DNC leadership is this inept, they deserve to lose for the sake of the country!

Come August, march to the convention and demand some changes. No more of these radical rejects. Demand quality candidates with impeccable credentials — not poster boys from the Far-Left that NEVER win the GE!

He didn’t “win” those states. Let’s make this clear. He bamboozled the vote. Hillary would be running at 75-80% win if the votes were counted fairly. Every time you ask yourself “why”…this is the reason Oboob seems ahead.

Most likely. But it doesn’t guarantee us the White House.

Obama is the nominee.

And the sucking sound you’ll be hearing in November will be the GOP gaining new voters, by the bag full.

But then again, you knew this, as that’s what you wish anyway, right Mac?

Well Jonny, you make it hard for someone to compliment your website when you call them a no one - not everyone here plans to vote for McCain should Barack get the nod. You’re making a terrible case for your guy. Think about it.
If Obama was the overwhelming choice, he’d have the nomination by now.

johnny m. does obama have the nomination? does he have the delegates needed for the nomination? when FL & MI are reinstated the delegate count goes up to 2208 is he there, yet? sorry kid, there are still more votes to be cast and if obama can’t win the working class, the hispanics, etc. do you think the party is on a suicide pact? This isn’t over your not entitled to a damn thing, so you need to get over it and stop trying to disenfranchise people as with MI & FL.

Oh boy, Obama is the nominee!! Woohoo!! Everybody get your party hats on…

As if making him the nominee somehow trumps the results we know are coming in November.

Shut up. Stuff is brewing and you are not in charge. You are just a little pee on with a loud mouth. Please take your noise somewhere else. You go drop out.

He does not deserve the nomination. He needs to brish up on his math skills and stop cheating. He is stealing a huge precentage of the votes.

The first AA? Are you forgetting Jesse Jackson & Al Sharpton? *sigh*

Barack Obama is not winning because he’s black. He’s winning because he’s the best candidate. I’m white - I support him over Clinton because of the issues, because of his ability to speak (which is very very important in politics. “just words” indeed!) and because of his judgment (war on Iraq, Gas Tax holiday)… I also support him because he seems to be an honest man who actually thinks about the issues to come up with the best answer rather than just giving the politically expedient answer all the time.

If you remember, he was invited to make the keynote speech at the 2004 Democratic Convention. Such an honor is always given to a important party leader, not a small time state legislator. That speech was the guarantee for his election to the senate and thus the presidency.

It also tied into the movie of that year, called the “Manchurian Candidate”.

Folks really need to go back and watch the movie again. Instead of implants and all, think of the DNC and powerbrokers grooming themselves an empty suit to govern in the White House, instead.

The Elite needed a Harvard man to counter the Yale types of late (you know Teddy couldn’t resist supporting an alma mater mate [despite Teddy almost flunking out anyway], right?). That he’s Black makes him even more viable. He’s also understands what side of the bread is buttered, and what happens to slaves who buck their masters, too.

But Teddy and crew didn’t factor in his wife, that bitter gal who represents everything Black that riles Whites (let alone any other color of the rainbow) to no end. She reminds me of that clerk at the store so full of rage and attitude, that I no longer go to it because of the nasty attitude. If I won’t be returning for that, I’m certainly not going to vote for such a gal to be my First Lady (what will she do, spit in a diplomats face?).

The decision for BO to be the nominee was made in 2004

I’ve thought the same thing. Well said Pam.

But she’s not progressive! Listen to the way she talks about Iran (”obliterate”) she sounds way too much like George W. Bush for my tastes. I want a President who doesn’t think it’s a bad thing to talk to your enemies. Talking to your enemies is better than starting wars with them.

I think Dean sees a possibility for a HUGE Democratic landslide this November powered by combination of Barack Obama and the enormous excitement and fund raising he is bringing to the Democratic party and of course by the extreme distaste for George W. Bush. I think it’s very possible that Obama could beat McCain by double digits with a 60% Democratic Senate & Congress. Then this country could finally move in a progressive way - to catch up with the rest of the world on issues like health care. This is a time of excitement for true progressives.

And so does everyone else who turns a blind eye to him not counting 50% of Hillary’s votes.

Agree, Northwest.

Somehow, I can’t see Cindy McCain allowing her 2 daughters to sit in a congregation where the pastor HUMPS the church pulpit and screams “Clinton was RIDING US DIRTY!!,” can you?

Michelle Obama didn’t have a problem with that at all.

First Lady material, she AIN’T.

Hell, watching Laura “DUI” Bush talking about Burma, it made me think, “Damn, let George clear some more brush and let Laura make some decisions!”

So much better than Michelle First-Time-Proud™ Obama…..

I’m surprised that prosecutor hasn’t been run over by a bus yet.

I do believe that Rezko will be counting on getting a presidential pardon from Barky, and wont sing.

She doesn’t care what they think. I’m sure everything she has done in her life was in spite of male resistance. You do that for enough years and their crap rolls off you like rain.

I urge all of you to write to media outlets complaining about them pressuring Hillary to get out now. There is only ONE MONTH LEFT before the last primary. These people also deserve to have a vigorous campaign for once. The media does not truly believe in democracy which is often messy. They bemoaned the low level of voting in this country for years but the minute people get engaged they swoon over the divisiness. They seem to prefer a Russian-style “democracy” where elections are decided in advance. Much more civilized.

If the media stopped saying how divisive this process is and started saying how healthy it is for our democracy, it would not be damaging for Dems because it would make it clear that we are the party that welcomes true democratic processes. Republican leaders like to select a candidate in advance then sell it to the public the way they did with Bush. Dems traditionally are more democratic. For this they get ridiculed because the process is more messy.
This year has seen a weird reversal. Democratic leaders have tried to annoint Obama and push others out, while Republicans got stuck with McCain who is not a party player. If the media understood how true democracy works they would welcome the fact that the public is not willing to passively allow the elite to choose their candidates for them.

Stand Strong for Hillary. We are with her all the way.

Obama is desperate. It’s all noise. Don’t listen. Stay focused. It’s all a fantasy. He does not have the support he pretends to have. Stand strong. Hillary knows what she’s doing.

We need to stand strong for her now more than ever.

Hillary will be the nominee.

I’m absolutely for it.
The media would become empowered to blast her as the person who cut the democratic party in half.
In fact, the media is doing this.
Some Obama supporters booed Clinton today. The NYT loves to report this.

Sen Clinton should withdraw from the nomination and run as Independent or Centrist Democratic Party of America.

She will not need to. And I do understand where you are coming from and why.

But our enemies (not accusing you as being an enemy) are planting seeds of doubt in order to sap our strength. To be quite frank, talk of a third party right now does not help Hillary, it hurts her in my opinion.

I mean no disrespect. I’ve taken it upon myself to help keep people focused on victory.

I do agree wholeheartedly the D party has some major issues to work on. With Hillary as our President, she will address our concerns I am sure.

Hillary is inevitable!

You don’t know Fitzgerald.

For all of the self-styled “left” leanings of Frank Rich and Mareen Dowd over there, you are correct in assuming that they want McCain to win. Dowd and Rich did nothing but say disparaging things against Gore in the run-up to the 2000 election. If things were going really well in this country, and we had a leader with the expertise to get things done for all Americans, then Frank Rich would be off reviewing Gilbert and Sullivan revivals and Dowd would have to sit up in her townhouse in Georgetown and determine why men will sleep with her but never marry her. (Like Michael Douglas for example, before Catherine Zeta Jones came his way)

Oh I’m sorry; and David Axelrod gets paid in Chuck-E-Cheese tokens? My Bad!!

what’s your excuse

The Derailment of Barky Obama. You are over here on this forum and you have to ask?

Preach to to another Choir…MARK….IN GAZA….PILLOW BITER…..

What you said!

In spades!

Obama had TV ads in Florida. I am sure that’s being saved for a reason.

The MSN is so stupid I can’t even keep my TV on.

I only watch it during breakfast and supper, and only long enough to finish both with family. The pundits to me are but pinheads all trying to justify their salaries, and no better predicting outcomes than the weatherman predicting if 2020 we’ll be in an Global Warming spell or Mini Ice Age.

Turn off the TV, spend the time with family and friends. It’s better to smell the roses than watching the thorns on the tube, anyway. Heck, grab a good book and drink and actually enjoy the time without the shrills.

Can learn MUCH more from a 200 page novel about life and love, than what any bobblehead commentor on TV can talk about!

We shall see….There is some doubt but Larry Sinclair is determined….
Any scandal play is relevant if it makes the meda look deeper into Obama.

The press will ignore it because they can and don’t want to be denied access to Obama — much like how they were scared of losing access to Bush (remember how much CNN bent over backwards to Hussein to get reporting VISAs to Iraq? No telling whatever agreements they signed to get those “exclusives” in other Disneyworlds).

News is a business now, they throw reporters and producers in front of the bus, to gain and keep access (otherwise another network will get it and they’re denied a scoop).

Dog eat dog business. It’s sickening.

I was following this story a few months ago. WhiteHouse.com hired a guy to do 2 lie detector tests on Sinclair and he failed both of them, so they dropped the story and didn’t investigate any further.

It’s interesting to see him still trying to get the story out though. I watched all of his You Tube videos and he really didn’t strike ME as mentally ill (which is what people are saying about him), but what do I know? He seemed legit to me.

I am SURE the Clinton people have looked into this though. IF they thought he is for real, they would leak this story to a trusted journalist (if any still exist???) and get it out. There would have to be OVERWHELMING evidence that the story is true. I’m sure AxelRove has made damn sure no evidence exists.

I do worry about Larry Sinclair committing suicide by shooting himself in the back of the head 3 times.

Don’t watch the media. Don’t waste time being upset or down.

Thanks so much for the reminder, Paul. It makes every bit of difference in the world to just not turn it on. Take up your time, instead, writing to superdelegates and telling them why to vote for Senator Hillary Clinton, and why NOT to vote for Barack Obama. We know the reasons so well, we can pretty much do them off the top of our heads! But backup is good, too, so please include links to pertinent info, if you think that’s called for.

Paul, that’s quite a video you made. I was definitely quite emotional at the end. You can’t let terrorists think you’re an easy target. And that’s what Obama is - an easy target.

On a lighter note: “Cult-alition” - that’s truthalicious!

Wow that has to be one of the most shameful YouTube videos I’ve ever seen. Let’s see, where to start with a racist and bigoted attack. I’ll just make two main points, since I have better things to do than debunk each of your topics that have already been disproved by Obama, the media, and even the Clinton and McCain campaigns at times.

First, you are basing your entire video off of a characterization of all Muslims (even Muslim AMERICANS! which you clearly show in your video) as terrorists. That is one of the most despicable forms of political attacks possible in our society today, and this is coming from a Hillary supporter? I hope you “Clintonistas” are proud of your own, far superior friends to those “whiny Obamabots.” Remember the last time the US tried that approach? Those WWII Japanese internment camps sure were a big hit.

Second, you take things out of context even more than the mainstream media and rely on “logic” flawed to its core. OK, so there are people with signs that say “Islam will dominate the world.” And did these pictures come from Obama rallies…oh wait, no, they came from rallies in the Middle East. Clever work there. I think I’ll try to work up an anti-Hillary video since all I need to do is find some anti-NAFTA pictures from Canada and I’ll be set to go. These pictures (along with the one of Obama in traditional SOMALI clothing on a SENATE trip) aren’t even your most egregious error. So Obama wants: “Once I’m elected, I want to organize a summit in the Muslim world.” Funny how your sentence ends there. You didn’t just take that out of context, you cut the damn sentence in half!

“Once I’m elected, I want to organize a summit in the Muslim world, with all the heads of state, to have an honest discussion about ways to bridge the gap that grows every day between Muslims and the West,” Thursday’s edition of Paris Match quoted Obama as saying,

“I want to ask them to join our fight against terrorism. We must also listen to their concerns,” Obama said in the French-language transcript.

My what a terrible idea for a presidential candidate. We don’t need a courageous new approach to foreign policy and peace, we need to “TOTALLY OBLITERATE” our enemies.

Finally, your logic is so bizarre, I don’t think a five year old would understand it. So if a person says they support Obama, that means he automatically supports them right? Well I think I’ll try to go find a few serial killers and child molesters from the local jail that are looking for a little gas tax relief this summer and like Hillary’s plan. That’d be terrible for her wouldn’t it since that means she supports those kinds of people. The only clearly established tie is that of Obama to Rev. Wright, and has been repeatedly hashed out in the media, this tie has been cut. I could also go into extensive detail about how out of context this entire issue has been (Wright took the inspiration for the sermon from a US ambassador and said during the sermon, that it was from this man and not his own), how Wright has been misinterpreted on some points (I’m not defending his more absurd comments), and how other Americans have said the exact same things and taken no criticism (Pat Robertson, John Hagee, Ron Paul, a candidate himself!). These other ties are radicals that are doing no differently than when Al-Qaeda announced in 2004 they’d love to see Kerry win over Bush since Bush frightened them. Looks like their reverse psychology won out. And what’s wrong with Obama reaching out to traditional enemies? Our current standoffish policy clearly doesn’t work and we cannot afford wars with Iran and North Korea, especially when there is evidence that the majorities of each nation don’t actually agree with their leaders’ anti-American rhetoric. Why not have a president that can do things like this?:

Reuters: Rebels who have stepped up attacks on Nigeria’s oil industry in the last month said on Sunday they were considering a ceasefire appeal by U.S. presidential hopeful Barack Obama.

The Movement for the Emancipation of the Niger Delta (MEND) has launched five attacks on oil facilities in the Niger Delta since it resumed a campaign of violence in April, forcing Royal Dutch Shell to shut more than 164,000 barrels of oil per day (bpd).

“The MEND command is seriously considering a temporary ceasefire appeal by Senator Barack Obama. Obama is someone we respect and hold in high esteem,” the militant group said in an e-mailed statement.

There are so many other things to condemn on your video, but I would say the relative apathy shown toward you already proves how meaningless your work is.

Thanks for sharing your thoughts and perspective. I have a lot of respect for principled leftists and those principled on the other “side.”

Hillary appeals to me because she is willing to consider the bipolar nature of our country and form a consensus that does its best for all peoples.

What supporters? Paid workers? Porfessional Hecklers?

He has only the AA’s. Serial voting will go down on record as Obama’s invention.

He doesn’t have a fraction of the support he claims to have. His audience is paid minimal wage workers and teens who attend in lieu of a “steak dinner”.

Don’t be fooled.

Wake up!

Stand strong for Hillary.

She’s working hard.

That is a good article truth…thanks for the link….I knew there was going to be this kinda shit in In. ( particularly Gary ) ….I used to live in Indianapolis.
I do live in Texas and there was a lot of ILLEGAL OBAMA CRAP HERE….

Want more on how to rig an election?

Notice how Obama camp always pushes for early voting, that is an old Chicago trick to sway outcomes as needed by a precinct captain! Something along what was going on in Lake County!

Now some info for you, Indiana and most states use the Diebold Accu vote machine, as pointed out on the Indiana Sec of State website, so check this out:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R5VeaMZ9Fb0

Now how can you sway the paper ballots? watch this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZKfP1ObSaU

Now go back to the leaked Obama spreadsheet forcast on the election outcomes, how can someone predict so far in advance all the outcomes that is almost right on the money? Only way, fix is in Chicago style!

Same happened with caucuses, stack them knowing you will have enough people to win, done easily!

All it takes is a Precinct captains with a rigged pass card to do what you saw above!

If the prediction isn’t coming out as planned state wide, the early votes swing it to the candidate and take Lake county, 10% in one city of early votes of an entire county, enough to swing things!

Take a look at the maps in each Primary state, who won the major areas and the rate of the wins are high enough to make the outcome close enough to win!

Missouri had a major blimp towards the end in non reporting areas, and it went to Obama, strange outcome, like Indiana, yet not caught, as an example, Ohio, two counties held back, Obama counties, same thing, Texas same thing, the hold back counties were always Obama counties!

Think the fix was in Chicago style?

Obama’s “votes” are a sham.

Youa re being lied to.

Stand up!

I would love to answer, but I’m under SNIPER FIRE right now! Oh, and I opposed NAFTA from the start. . . and that plan to give driver’s licenses to illegal immigrants- I think it’s a good plan, but I don’t support it, but it should be looked at, though I’m against it. . .

Barky likes to project on Hillary what he is guilty of.

Why do you want to take my vote away? I have a right to vote just as you do.

Hillary offered to pay for a revote in Michigan and Florida. Obama refused to do a revote. Those are the facts.

I have a right to vote and have it counted in a primary election. The DNC does not have the right to take millions of people’s votes away from them.

There are other means of punishment for the Michigan and Florida Democratic parties. They don’t have to touch the votes of the American people. This is America still, isn’t it?

Factually challenged?? Actually I’m being nice. Oh that’s right, facts be damned.

Why would the candidates have to campaign? Obama has been stuffed down our throats by a biased MSM. I know all I want to know about him and Hillary. I just want my vote to count. If I haven’t figured out who would be best for this country by now, I shouldn’t be voting.

If Obama won these states then what? Seat them?

Obama has picked up A LOT more SDs than Hillary since Super Tuesday. He also has MORE elected SDs, while she has more unelected ‘party officials’.

Moreover, if the SDs lined up with their districts- Obama would win handily. He only needs about 38% of the remaining SDs to win, anyway. The Clinton camp is being dishonest and continually moving the goalposts (look at how many times Wolfson said that 2025 was the ‘magic number’- DOZENS! But NOW the NEW NUMBER is 2209!) Popular vote used to be one of their arguments (and is a FALSE measurement-why would any state have caucuses if popular vote mattered? why would any state not have ‘open’ primaries?)

But NOW they know that can’t catch Obama in ‘popular vote’, even THAT argument has disappeared. It’s frustrating when somebody doesn’t play by the rules they agreed to at the beginning of the game! Should the Vikings be able to included their pre-season games in their record because it helps their stats? Should we not measure who wins a game by number of touchdowns, but by how many yards the ball was moved by each team?!?!?

The Clinton camp looks desperate and like sore losers.

We’re just practicing, for soon it will be time for the GE. Gotta speak to disinformation, spin and propaganda at its source. Sharpen up with you guys so we’re ready for the swift-boaters over the summer.

They are desperate. Their boy is going down and they know it. He may not be as successful cheating the vote form here on out.

oh please, i’ve been called feminazi by the more polite and some much less repeatable words by the less polite. and i do not take kindly to pretentious lecturing.

nice try with the distortions and projections.

Sure, this is probably exactly how the vote would turn out if it were Clinton v. Obama in the Fall. But it’s not.

States like Ohio and Florida will most likely be problematic for Obama in the Fall. But he will easily get states like California, New York, and other traditionally “blue” states. Yet Obama has won states like Colorado, Virginia, Nevada, North Carolina, and many others that he will also have a chance to win in November. Hillary would have no chance in these states.

Why should we stick to this game of “red vs. blue” states? Obama has the potential to redefine the electoral map, bring in enormous amounts of fundraising for the party, and energize candidacies at all levels.

everyone knows that general election polls during the primary season are meaningless……..even bill clinton, in 1992, was ranked third.

everyone knows that general election polls during the primary season are meaningless……..even bill clinton, in 1992, was ranked third in many of the states that he ended up winning.

She is not broke. Think what you want. How would you know anyway? ‘Looks like you believe the pundits

You are full of shet

I was ripped to shreds the other day, although I like Hillary, for reminding people that 2 or 3 Supreme Court Justices will be decided by the next President.

Do women trust a man to ensure Roe vs. Wade remains the law of the land? Or do we protect our bodies from what men have done since the dawn of time? The same “men” who on MSNBC showed to us are still Neandertals.

It’s time to break the last glass ceiling.

obama was going to vote yes until his political pals told him it would look bad in his campaign.

obama has no clue about the ramifications of his actions. he’s a tool.

She won NC too! She won by 69%! They held back over half a million of Hillary’s votes.

One good reason to vote Hillary as the nominee. So democracy prevails. We’ve had enough of being swindled out of votes. Let them know she has more votes casted for her than were counted. Way more votes.