Comments on: According to Obama, Hillary is Winning http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/14/according-to-obama-hillary-is-winning/ Sun, 08 Nov 2009 12:12:30 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1 hourly 1 By: http://shkaf-ru.ru http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/14/according-to-obama-hillary-is-winning/#comment-758658 http://shkaf-ru.ru Sun, 21 Sep 2008 23:21:34 +0000 http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/14/according-to-obama-hillary-is-winning/#comment-758658 <strike>шкаф</strike> шкаф/link> шкаф
шкаф/link>

]]> By: Шкафы купе http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/14/according-to-obama-hillary-is-winning/#comment-758641 Шкафы купе Sun, 21 Sep 2008 23:14:18 +0000 http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/14/according-to-obama-hillary-is-winning/#comment-758641 Шкафы купе у городе Шкафы купе у городе

]]> By: ламинат http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/14/according-to-obama-hillary-is-winning/#comment-602134 ламинат Mon, 25 Aug 2008 00:02:47 +0000 http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/14/according-to-obama-hillary-is-winning/#comment-602134 6vThank's.1f I compleatly agree with last post. cms <a href="http://skuper.ru" rel="nofollow">ламинат и паркет</a> 8l 6vThank’s.1f I compleatly agree with last post. cms
ламинат и паркет 8l

]]> By: Denise http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/14/according-to-obama-hillary-is-winning/#comment-282214 Denise Tue, 27 May 2008 03:19:04 +0000 http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/14/according-to-obama-hillary-is-winning/#comment-282214 I'm with you! I’m with you!

]]> By: Denise http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/14/according-to-obama-hillary-is-winning/#comment-282208 Denise Tue, 27 May 2008 03:17:40 +0000 http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/14/according-to-obama-hillary-is-winning/#comment-282208 This was from a previous post Who are the Super delegates? Elected Congressmen & Congresswomen, Governors, State Party Officials, Former High Ranking Party Officials, and State-level congressional leaders. Despite all of the early talk about these leaders voting with the people, it is surprising how many of them have not. For Instance Below is the list of House Members, Senators, and Governors not voting along the lines of their constituents, along with any recorded contributions from Clinton or Obama. (Isn’t their obligation first and foremost to their constituents?) Elected Officials Voting for Clinton Who’s Constituents Voted for Obama Michael Thompson – California (Obama won by 500 votes) Doris Matsui – Cal. Lynn Woolsey – Cal. Diane Watson – Cal . Maxine Walters – Cal. Laura Richardson – Cal. Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger – Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley – Maryland Elected Officials Voting for Obama Who’s constituents voted for Clinton Robert Cramer – Alabama Gov. Janet Napalitano – Arizona George Miller – California Gerald McNerney – California - Obama Donation $5,000 Fortney Pete Stark – California Zoe Lofgren – Cal. Howard Berman – Cal. Adam Schiff – Cal. Henry Waxman – Cal Linda Sanchez – Cal Joe Donnely – Indiana - Obama $7,500 Donation Baron Hill – Indiana – Obama $12,500 Donation Ben Chandler – Kentucky – wow Obama drew less than 10% Bill Delahunt – Massachussetts Gov. Deval Patrick Mass. Sen. Ted Kennedy Mass. - $10,000 from both candidates Sen. John Kerry – Mass. Gov. Bill Richardson – New Mexico Carol Shea-Porter – New Hampshire Gov. Brad Henry – Oklahoma Patrick Murphy – PA Donations from Clinton $2500 Obama $18,826 Sen. Bob Casey – PA Patrick Kennedy – RI Charlie Gonzalez - Texas Eddie Johnson - Texas Rick Boucher – Virginia Nick Rahal – WV Sen. Robert Byrd –WV $10,000 from both candidates Sen. John D. Rockefeller IV – WV - Obama $5000 Donation Here’s some interesting one’s that are undeclared whose constituents voted for Clinton (please note the donations): Sam Farr – Cal. Jim Costa – Cal. - Obama Donation $5,000 Bob Filner – Cal Joe Courtney – Connecticut - Obama $5,000 Donation Gov. Steve Beshear – Kentucky Rep. John Oliver – Massachussetts Rep. Niki Tsongas – Mass. – Obama $5,000 donation John Tierney – Mass. Ed Markey – Mass Travis Childers – Mississippi Sen.. Frank Lautenberg – New Jersey - Obama $9,000 Gov. John Lynch – New Hampshire Charlie Wilson – Ohio – Obama $7,000 Marci Kaptur – Ohio Dennis Kucinich – Ohio Zack Space – Ohio - Obama $7500 Sen. Sherrod Brown – Ohio $10,000 from both Dan Boren – Oklahoma Jason Altmire – PA - Obama $10,000 Tim Holden – PA Gabriel Gifford – Arizona Obama Donation $9,000 Michael Honda – California Sen. Jack Reed – RI – Obama $5,000 Lincoln Davis – Tennessee Bart Gordon – Tennessee Gov. Phil Bredesen – Tenn. Nick Lampsen – Texas - Obama $5,000 Alan Mollohan – WV Gov. Joe Manchin – WV This was from a previous post
Who are the Super delegates? Elected Congressmen & Congresswomen, Governors, State Party Officials, Former High Ranking Party Officials, and State-level congressional leaders.

Despite all of the early talk about these leaders voting with the people, it is surprising how many of them have not. For Instance Below is the list of House Members, Senators, and Governors not voting along the lines of their constituents, along with any recorded contributions from Clinton or Obama. (Isn’t their obligation first and foremost to their constituents?)

Elected Officials Voting for Clinton Who’s Constituents Voted for Obama

Michael Thompson – California (Obama won by 500 votes)
Doris Matsui – Cal.
Lynn Woolsey – Cal.
Diane Watson – Cal .
Maxine Walters – Cal.
Laura Richardson – Cal.
Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger – Maryland
Gov. Martin O’Malley – Maryland

Elected Officials Voting for Obama Who’s constituents voted for Clinton

Robert Cramer – Alabama
Gov. Janet Napalitano – Arizona
George Miller – California
Gerald McNerney – California - Obama Donation $5,000
Fortney Pete Stark – California
Zoe Lofgren – Cal.
Howard Berman – Cal.
Adam Schiff – Cal.
Henry Waxman – Cal
Linda Sanchez – Cal
Joe Donnely – Indiana - Obama $7,500 Donation
Baron Hill – Indiana – Obama $12,500 Donation
Ben Chandler – Kentucky – wow Obama drew less than 10%
Bill Delahunt – Massachussetts
Gov. Deval Patrick Mass.
Sen. Ted Kennedy Mass. - $10,000 from both candidates
Sen. John Kerry – Mass.
Gov. Bill Richardson – New Mexico
Carol Shea-Porter – New Hampshire
Gov. Brad Henry – Oklahoma
Patrick Murphy – PA Donations from Clinton $2500 Obama $18,826
Sen. Bob Casey – PA
Patrick Kennedy – RI
Charlie Gonzalez - Texas
Eddie Johnson - Texas
Rick Boucher – Virginia
Nick Rahal – WV
Sen. Robert Byrd –WV $10,000 from both candidates
Sen. John D. Rockefeller IV – WV - Obama $5000 Donation

Here’s some interesting one’s that are undeclared whose constituents voted for Clinton (please note the donations):

Sam Farr – Cal.
Jim Costa – Cal. - Obama Donation $5,000
Bob Filner – Cal
Joe Courtney – Connecticut - Obama $5,000 Donation
Gov. Steve Beshear – Kentucky
Rep. John Oliver – Massachussetts
Rep. Niki Tsongas – Mass. – Obama $5,000 donation
John Tierney – Mass.
Ed Markey – Mass
Travis Childers – Mississippi
Sen.. Frank Lautenberg – New Jersey - Obama $9,000
Gov. John Lynch – New Hampshire
Charlie Wilson – Ohio – Obama $7,000
Marci Kaptur – Ohio
Dennis Kucinich – Ohio
Zack Space – Ohio - Obama $7500
Sen. Sherrod Brown – Ohio $10,000 from both
Dan Boren – Oklahoma
Jason Altmire – PA - Obama $10,000
Tim Holden – PA
Gabriel Gifford – Arizona Obama Donation $9,000
Michael Honda – California
Sen. Jack Reed – RI – Obama $5,000
Lincoln Davis – Tennessee
Bart Gordon – Tennessee
Gov. Phil Bredesen – Tenn.
Nick Lampsen – Texas - Obama $5,000
Alan Mollohan – WV
Gov. Joe Manchin – WV

]]> By: SimonT http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/14/according-to-obama-hillary-is-winning/#comment-253504 SimonT Sun, 18 May 2008 10:01:54 +0000 http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/14/according-to-obama-hillary-is-winning/#comment-253504 Jason, math aside it is a big mistake to have primaries with totally different rules than the general election. Hence, unless we change the winner take all rules at the general election the democratic primaries logically should have the same rules. If it was the case guess who would have secured the nomination a long time ago? Not your candidate Obama. The republicans have the same rules and they have long decided who their candidate will be. Why do the democrats have different rules you might ask. Well, because they wanted to give something to a loser presidential candidate, McGowern, who changed the rules to make it easier for insurgent left wing candidates, like himself, to get the nomination. Its high time to change the rules back. And hopefully we will after we had another loser left wing candidate, Obama. Jason, math aside it is a big mistake to have primaries with totally different rules than the general election. Hence, unless we change the winner take all rules at the general election the democratic primaries logically should have the same rules. If it was the case guess who would have secured the nomination a long time ago? Not your candidate Obama. The republicans have the same rules and they have long decided who their candidate will be. Why do the democrats have different rules you might ask. Well, because they wanted to give something to a loser presidential candidate, McGowern, who changed the rules to make it easier for insurgent left wing candidates, like himself, to get the nomination. Its high time to change the rules back. And hopefully we will after we had another loser left wing candidate, Obama.

]]> By: Nancy Sabet http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/14/according-to-obama-hillary-is-winning/#comment-250163 Nancy Sabet Fri, 16 May 2008 21:09:27 +0000 http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/14/according-to-obama-hillary-is-winning/#comment-250163 Thanks for this post, and the work you did to calculate it. It is so true, she is our nominee. Money+Media=Obama People+Democracy=Hillary Thanks for this post, and the work you did to calculate it. It is so true, she is our nominee.

Money+Media=Obama
People+Democracy=Hillary

]]> By: joann http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/14/according-to-obama-hillary-is-winning/#comment-249426 joann Fri, 16 May 2008 14:52:44 +0000 http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/14/according-to-obama-hillary-is-winning/#comment-249426 LETS BE REAL HERE, THE TRUTH ! THE MEDIA,THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY DO NOT WANT A FEMALE IN CHARGE!CHRIS MATTHEWS,AKA ,BIG MOUTH ,KIETH OLBERMAN, DONT YOU LOVE THOSE BROWS? WOLF BLITZER, JOHN KING, AND THE LIST GOES ON AND ON .ELECTIONS ARE NOT ABOUT THE PEOPLE OR THEIR CHOICES ITS MONEY AND WHO CAN DO WHAT FOR ME! JOHN EDWARDS, BILL RICHARDSON ARE TRUE EXAMPLES OF THAT ! THE ONE GOOD THING ABOUT THE MEDIA IS THAT THEY HAVE OPENED OUR EYES TO THE TRUTH ABOUT WHAT POLITICS IS REALLY ALL ABOUT AND THE MEDIA PLAYS A BIG PART IN THIS POLITICAL CORRUPTION.THE AMERICAN PEOPLE SHOULD SAY ENOUGH! I AM REALLY STARTING TO WONDER WHY ANY OF US SHOULD VOTE DEMOCRAT? THE DEMOCRATS SCREWED UP 2000. THEY TOOK MILLIONS OF PEOPLES VOICES AWAY FROM FLORIDA AND MICHIGAN.OH, BUT WAIT, THEY WILL INCLUDE THEM AFTER SUPER DELEGATES FLOCK TO OBAMA AND TRY TO MAKE FLORIDA AND MICHIGAN FEEL AS THOUGH THEIR VOICES ARE BEING HEARD AND REPRESENTED. WHAT A JOKE! TOO LATE! THE DEMOCRATS REALLY THINK THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE DUMB!I SAY, WE, THE PEOPLE, NEED TO PROVE WE WILL NOT TOLERATE THIS UNAMERICAN BEHAVIOR ANYMORE! WE NEED TO ABANDON THE DEMOCRAT PARTY AND ALL SUPPORT INDEPENDENCE! THE DEMS,THE REP THEY ARE ALL A BUNCH OF ARROGANT IDIOTS!I SAY TO HILLARY SUPPORTERS DO NOT VOTE FOR OBAMA, VOTE INDEPENDENT OR DONT VOTE AT ALL.THE DEMS DONT DESERVE OUR SUPPORT! OR,WE CAN SEND A LOUDER MESSAGE AND VOTE MCCAIN.THATS HARD TO STOMACH BUT LETS FACE IT,HE WILL ONLY BE A ONE TERM PRESIDENT AND IT WILL TAKE FOUR YEARS TO GET US OUT OF THE MESS WE ARE IN ANYWAY. solutions,lets take back our voices!lets talk really loud in november! ..........joann LETS BE REAL HERE, THE TRUTH ! THE MEDIA,THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY DO NOT WANT A FEMALE IN CHARGE!CHRIS MATTHEWS,AKA ,BIG MOUTH ,KIETH OLBERMAN, DONT YOU LOVE THOSE BROWS? WOLF BLITZER, JOHN KING, AND THE LIST GOES ON AND ON .ELECTIONS ARE NOT ABOUT THE PEOPLE OR THEIR CHOICES ITS MONEY AND WHO CAN DO WHAT FOR ME! JOHN EDWARDS, BILL RICHARDSON ARE TRUE EXAMPLES OF THAT ! THE ONE GOOD THING ABOUT THE MEDIA IS THAT THEY HAVE OPENED OUR EYES TO THE TRUTH ABOUT WHAT POLITICS IS REALLY ALL ABOUT AND THE MEDIA PLAYS A BIG PART IN THIS POLITICAL CORRUPTION.THE AMERICAN PEOPLE SHOULD SAY ENOUGH! I AM REALLY STARTING TO WONDER WHY ANY OF US SHOULD VOTE DEMOCRAT? THE DEMOCRATS SCREWED UP 2000. THEY TOOK MILLIONS OF PEOPLES VOICES AWAY FROM FLORIDA AND MICHIGAN.OH, BUT WAIT, THEY WILL INCLUDE THEM AFTER SUPER DELEGATES FLOCK TO OBAMA AND TRY TO MAKE FLORIDA AND MICHIGAN FEEL AS THOUGH THEIR VOICES ARE BEING HEARD AND REPRESENTED. WHAT A JOKE! TOO LATE! THE DEMOCRATS REALLY THINK THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE DUMB!I SAY, WE, THE PEOPLE, NEED TO PROVE WE WILL NOT TOLERATE THIS UNAMERICAN BEHAVIOR ANYMORE! WE NEED TO ABANDON THE DEMOCRAT PARTY AND ALL SUPPORT INDEPENDENCE! THE DEMS,THE REP THEY ARE ALL A BUNCH OF ARROGANT IDIOTS!I SAY TO HILLARY SUPPORTERS DO NOT VOTE FOR OBAMA, VOTE INDEPENDENT OR DONT VOTE AT ALL.THE DEMS DONT DESERVE OUR SUPPORT! OR,WE CAN SEND A LOUDER MESSAGE AND VOTE MCCAIN.THATS HARD TO STOMACH BUT LETS FACE IT,HE WILL ONLY BE A ONE TERM PRESIDENT AND IT WILL TAKE FOUR YEARS TO GET US OUT OF THE MESS WE ARE IN ANYWAY. solutions,lets take back our voices!lets talk really loud in november! ……….joann

]]> By: Hillary Win with Nichols Method « The Proletariat http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/14/according-to-obama-hillary-is-winning/#comment-249195 Hillary Win with Nichols Method « The Proletariat Fri, 16 May 2008 11:55:42 +0000 http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/14/according-to-obama-hillary-is-winning/#comment-249195 [...] or state. It looks like now if we apply the Nichols Method Hillary wins under every scenario. NO QUARTER The Obama campaign has argued that Super Delegates ought to vote in accordance with the “will” [...] [...] or state. It looks like now if we apply the Nichols Method Hillary wins under every scenario. NO QUARTER The Obama campaign has argued that Super Delegates ought to vote in accordance with the “will” [...]

]]> By: Analy http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/14/according-to-obama-hillary-is-winning/#comment-248936 Analy Fri, 16 May 2008 05:06:24 +0000 http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/14/according-to-obama-hillary-is-winning/#comment-248936 Please send it as soon as possible. Also, ask them for help because you need it. Yes, use your brain... you are being bw. Please send it as soon as possible. Also, ask them for help because you need it. Yes, use your brain… you are being bw.

]]> By: Analy http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/14/according-to-obama-hillary-is-winning/#comment-248926 Analy Fri, 16 May 2008 05:02:02 +0000 http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/14/according-to-obama-hillary-is-winning/#comment-248926 You are the one who does not get it, Aris. The super can change back and forth whenever they want. Also, all the ones that are endorsing him are part of his strategy. Hillary won PA and Ohio, and B. Richarson endorsed Obama. Hillary won WV(run over him,really), and J. Edwards endorsed Obama. Doing this, and with the help of the bias media,he is always on the front page. Big money buys a lot of things, entiendes? He ignored WV and Kentucky to send the message to the voters that they did not need to go out and vote. That this was over, that he was the nominee. His arrogance slapped him on the face, and the voters kicked him on his....... You are the one who does not get it, Aris. The super can change back and forth whenever they want. Also, all the ones that are endorsing him are part of his strategy. Hillary won PA and Ohio, and B. Richarson endorsed Obama. Hillary won WV(run over him,really), and J. Edwards endorsed Obama. Doing this, and with the help of the bias media,he is always on the front page. Big money buys a lot of things, entiendes? He ignored WV and Kentucky to send the message to the voters that they did not need to go out and vote. That this was over, that he was the nominee. His arrogance slapped him on the face, and the voters kicked him on his…….

]]> By: Annagain http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/14/according-to-obama-hillary-is-winning/#comment-248781 Annagain Fri, 16 May 2008 03:55:25 +0000 http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/14/according-to-obama-hillary-is-winning/#comment-248781 No kidding. It's Hillary or nobody. Get this word out far and wide, Larry -- please!!! No kidding. It’s Hillary or nobody.

Get this word out far and wide, Larry — please!!!

]]> By: E. Navarro http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/14/according-to-obama-hillary-is-winning/#comment-248184 E. Navarro Thu, 15 May 2008 23:00:37 +0000 http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/14/according-to-obama-hillary-is-winning/#comment-248184 Right on !!!...There are just too many "Judases" in that DNC Committee. I will vote for any candidate, Republican, Independent, to defeat Obama. Right on !!!…There are just too many “Judases” in that DNC Committee. I will vote for any candidate,
Republican, Independent, to defeat Obama.

]]> By: Dan http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/14/according-to-obama-hillary-is-winning/#comment-248083 Dan Thu, 15 May 2008 21:35:59 +0000 http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/14/according-to-obama-hillary-is-winning/#comment-248083 This thread doesn't make any sense. It assumes that whoever wins the super delegates wins the nomination. As Aris has said several times, Obama is up 150 pledged delegates, so even counting MI and FL in this nonsensical winner-take-all hypothesis, she still doesn't make up enough ground to get the nomination. If you truly want to say that the supers should represent the will of the people, they should represent the will of their districts. Which means the supers would not be winner take all. And the number of supers is not proportional to population. Why should California only get 20% supers to pledged delegates, when D.C. gets twice as many supers as pledged delegates. Hillary agreed to the rules when she signed up to campaign. Proportional representation (the more democratic way, little d), FL and MI don't count, and supers can vote however they want. And for those saying Hillary is leading the popular vote, go back and check you totals, Obama is leading the popular vote by 600,000. Democrats unite against McCain, don't bite off your nose to spite your face. This thread doesn’t make any sense. It assumes that whoever wins the super delegates wins the nomination. As Aris has said several times, Obama is up 150 pledged delegates, so even counting MI and FL in this nonsensical winner-take-all hypothesis, she still doesn’t make up enough ground to get the nomination. If you truly want to say that the supers should represent the will of the people, they should represent the will of their districts. Which means the supers would not be winner take all. And the number of supers is not proportional to population. Why should California only get 20% supers to pledged delegates, when D.C. gets twice as many supers as pledged delegates. Hillary agreed to the rules when she signed up to campaign. Proportional representation (the more democratic way, little d), FL and MI don’t count, and supers can vote however they want. And for those saying Hillary is leading the popular vote, go back and check you totals, Obama is leading the popular vote by 600,000. Democrats unite against McCain, don’t bite off your nose to spite your face.

]]> By: lisa http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/14/according-to-obama-hillary-is-winning/#comment-248036 lisa Thu, 15 May 2008 21:04:23 +0000 http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/14/according-to-obama-hillary-is-winning/#comment-248036 I love you!! Take that, Chuck Todd!!!!!! I love you!! Take that, Chuck Todd!!!!!!

]]> By: kis http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/14/according-to-obama-hillary-is-winning/#comment-247993 kis Thu, 15 May 2008 20:36:18 +0000 http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/14/according-to-obama-hillary-is-winning/#comment-247993 This is kinda ironic. Obama says the supers should follow the will of the people and Clinton says the supers should decide on which candidate would be the best nominee. So according to Obama, Clinton wins. But, according to Clinton, Obama wins. Seems like you can spin this either way. Not a very conclusive examination. This is kinda ironic. Obama says the supers should follow the will of the people and Clinton says the supers should decide on which candidate would be the best nominee.

So according to Obama, Clinton wins.

But, according to Clinton, Obama wins.

Seems like you can spin this either way. Not a very conclusive examination.

]]> By: Nicholas http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/14/according-to-obama-hillary-is-winning/#comment-247866 Nicholas Thu, 15 May 2008 19:23:45 +0000 http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/14/according-to-obama-hillary-is-winning/#comment-247866 If you look closely, it's easy to see the major flaw in these spreadsheets. States are not "winner take all"....so why are Super Delegates in this hypothetical system? She narrowly won Indiana, so why should she receive ALL of their super delegates? The same can be said for each state in the spreadsheet. If you look closely, it’s easy to see the major flaw in these spreadsheets. States are not “winner take all”….so why are Super Delegates in this hypothetical system?

She narrowly won Indiana, so why should she receive ALL of their super delegates? The same can be said for each state in the spreadsheet.

]]> By: Las Vegas View http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/14/according-to-obama-hillary-is-winning/#comment-247849 Las Vegas View Thu, 15 May 2008 19:15:03 +0000 http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/14/according-to-obama-hillary-is-winning/#comment-247849 The Obama campaign has gathered lots of young people into the political process this cycle, which is great provided this represents serious political opinion and analysis. But it is no good if the thought is "What devilish fun this is to get away from the old folks and attend the Obama rock concert with our friends!" The Obama campaign has gathered lots of young people into the political process this cycle, which is great provided this represents serious political opinion and analysis. But it is no good if the thought is “What devilish fun this is to get away from the old folks and attend the Obama rock concert with our friends!”

]]> By: Why Obama Won’t Count the Votes: Hillary’s Winning « Operation Independent…………… Ex-pat Democrats for McCain ‘08 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/14/according-to-obama-hillary-is-winning/#comment-247757 Why Obama Won’t Count the Votes: Hillary’s Winning « Operation Independent…………… Ex-pat Democrats for McCain ‘08 Thu, 15 May 2008 18:28:00 +0000 http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/14/according-to-obama-hillary-is-winning/#comment-247757 [...] TalkLeft, Bud White [...] [...] TalkLeft, Bud White [...]

]]> By: indigo http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/14/according-to-obama-hillary-is-winning/#comment-247739 indigo Thu, 15 May 2008 18:22:43 +0000 http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/14/according-to-obama-hillary-is-winning/#comment-247739 We need to contact the superdelegtes and remind them that the DNC, Pelosi and Obama are saying "it should be the will of the people" Well, Hillary has won more congressional districts. Let's get this out in the media....Superdelegates betraying voters. We need to contact the superdelegtes and remind them that the DNC, Pelosi and Obama are saying “it should be the will of the people” Well, Hillary has won more congressional districts. Let’s get this out in the media….Superdelegates betraying voters.

]]>