Obama Freakout Over Michelle Video: The Ticking “Whitey” Time Bomb
By Larry JohnsoncloseAuthor: Larry Johnson
Name: Larry Johnson
Email: larry_johnson@earthlink.net
Site: http://NoQuarterUSA.net
About: Larry C. Johnson is a former analyst at the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency, who moved subsequently in 1989 to the U.S. Department of State, where he served four years as the deputy director for transportation security, antiterrorism assistance training, and special operations in the State Department's Office of Counterterrorism. He left government service in October 1993 and set up a consulting business. He currently is the co-owner and CEO of BERG Associates, LLC (Business Exposure Reduction Group) and is an expert in the fields of terrorism, aviation security, and crisis and risk management, and money laundering investigations. Johnson is the founder and main author of No Quarter, a weblog that addresses issues of terrorism and intelligence and politics. NoQuarterUSA was nominated as Best Political Blog of 2008.[1] He has worked as a private consultant on issues of international terrorism and security for the U.S. Government and private companies. Johnson has appeared as a consultant and commentator in many major newspapers and news programs.[2]
Contents [hide]
1 Background
2 Views
2.1 1996
2.2 1998
2.3 1999
2.4 2000
2.5 2001
2.6 2003
2.6.1 Plame affair
2.7 2008
3 Notes
4 References
5 External links
[edit]Background
Larry Johnson moved to Washington, D.C. in 1979 to begin work on a Ph.D. at the American University. Although he completed successfully all coursework and comprehensive exams, he did not write a dissertation. In 1978 and in 1983-85 he worked in Latin America on community development projects as a community organizer. Returning to the United States in 1985 he joined the Central Intelligence Agency, thanks in part to a letter of recommendation from Republican Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT) that helped to "open doors" for him at the Agency.[3] Johnson entered on duty at the CIA in September 1985 and was a classmate of Valerie Plame. Every member of that class was undercover. After a year in the Career Trainee program, which included a stint with the Afghan Task Force, Johnson was assigned as an analyst in the Middle America Caribbean Division in the Latin American Affairs Office of the Directorate of Intelligence. He received two Exceptional Performance awards and was promoted ultimately to Senior Regional Analyst for Central America.
Johnson remained undercover in the CIA until October 1989, when he resigned from the CIA and started a new job in the Office of Counter Terrorism at the Department of State. Johnson played an instrumental role in launching the Terrorism Rewards program international advertising campaign (working with Diplomatic Security officers Brad Smith and Michael Parks). [4] Johnson also was involved in a variety of crisis management response operations, including the release of hostages from Lebanon and liaison with the Pan Am 103 families. He left government service in October 1993 and started his own business as a consultant.
After leaving government service, Johnson became a frequent guest on many major television news shows when a question of terrorism came up. He was first interviewed by CNN following the capture of Carlos the Jackal. Johnson subsequently appeared on CNN, ABC's Nightline, CBS, the BBC, MSNBC, the Jim Lehrer News Hour, NBC, and NPR. In December of 1999, for example, Johnson was hired by NBC to serve as its terrorist expert for the Y2000 and was in Time Square with Tom Brokaw and Katie Couric ("a lot of fun and the best way to see in the New Year"). Johnson also was hired in January 2002 as a Fox News Analyst and remained under contract until February 2003.
Since 1994 a significant focus of Johnson's consulting work has been with the U.S. military special operations forces in scripting and conducting military counter terrorism exercises. He traveled under orders from the U.S. military to Iraq in May 2006 to work on a short term project.
A registered Republican who supported President Bush in 2000, Johnson became a strong critic of the Bush administration in May 2003 for its conduct of the war in Iraq and, a few months later, for its role in the outing of CIA operative Valerie Plame.[5] He was also featured in the 2004 political documentary Outfoxed: Rupert Murdoch's War on Journalism. Since Robert Novak's controversial disclosure of Valerie Plame as a CIA operative in July 2003, Johnson has contributed to public discourse on intelligence matters, often sparking further controversy. He has been interviewed by both the mass media and the alternative media and published commentaries on a variety of issues, including the Plame affair, the controversy concerning Mary McCarthy, and the resignation of Porter Goss as Director of Central Intelligence.
[edit]Views
This article or section may contain an inappropriate mixture of prose and timeline.
Please help convert this timeline into prose or, if necessary, a list.
[edit]1996
In 1996, Johnson noted that terrorism worldwide was on the decline. "Terrorist incidents [both internationally and in the US] have fallen to levels not seen since the 1970s. Whether measured by the number of incidents, the number of fatalities, or the number of groups, raw statistics demonstrate that the level of terrorist violence has declined since the mid-1980s. In fact, the evidence suggests terrorism was more widespread and deadly 10 years ago."[6]
He also wrote an op-ed piece for the New York Times suggesting that the newer and more deadly terrorist threat to the U.S. was embodied by "networks of terrorists, mostly foreign, working within its borders." Exemplifying this threat was Ramzi Yousef, one of the masterminds behind the 1993 attack on the World Trade Center. In the article, Johnson suggests that enhanced cooperation between intelligence agencies, particularly the FBI and CIA, is mandatory to meet the growing threat of terror networks.[7]
[edit]1998
In 1998, Johnson argued that while overall terrorism was declining, the threat from bin Laden and al-Qaeda should be the focus of American counterterrorism policy:
The nature of the threat posed by Bin Ladin is highlighted by my final chart, number 7. Osama Bin Ladin and individuals associated with him have killed and wounded more Americans than any other group. This chart also illustrates that groups such as Hamas and the Tamil Tigers (LTTE) prior to 1998 have killed more foreigners in the anti-US terrorist attacks. If we take into account the bombings of the US Embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, Osama's status as the most lethal terrorist is certain.[8]
In addition, he told USA Today that bin Laden had participated in "virtually every major attack of terrorism against the United States" in the 1990s. Johnson underlined the threat posed by bin Laden, saying that he was possessed by "hatred and craziness." If left unanswered, "he would continue to terrorize Americans around the world. He has no compunction about killing women and children. He's a complete egalitarian in his murderous attitude."[9]
[edit]1999
In an interview with PBS's Frontline for its 1999 program, Hunting bin Laden, Johnson discussed Osama bin Laden.[10] According to Johnson, Americans had "tended to make Osama bin Laden sort of a superman in Muslim garb." "Actually," he continues, "Osama bin Laden, in my view, represents more of a symptom of a problem, and the problem is this: the Saudi Arabian government, not just Osama bin Laden but many people in Saudi Arabia, have been sending money to radical Islamic groups for years." Johnson continued:
When you look at who's killed Americans in the last 10 years, the individuals he's supported and backed--I'm basing that upon the initial information that's been released in the indictments and conversations with others in the intelligence communities--Osama bin Laden has been the one killing Americans. No other terrorist group in the world has been out killing Americans except for Osama bin Laden.... Osama bin Laden remains out there as the one really targeting us. So, we recognize that he's the threat. He's serious about wanting to kill Americans, but as long as he's in Afghanistan, as long as he doesn't have access to a cell phone, as long as he can't just hop on a plane and travel wherever he wants without fear of being arrested, his ability to plan and conduct terrorist operations is extremely limited. We have to recognize [that] he would like to do a lot of damage. He would like to kill Americans, but wanting to is different from being able to, having the full capabilities in place.[11]
In the interview, Johnson doubted the ability of members of bin Laden's organization to plan and put their lives on the line:
There's not another Ali or Mustafa out there at this point and Osama bin Laden in my view has not been a very effective organizer or leader. He talks a great game and puts out terrific threats as far as stirring the passions in the United States and maybe firing up the imaginations of some young Muslims throughout the world. But when push comes to shove, can he get a group of people who are together who will say: we are going to plan an operation, we're going to put our lives on the line, we're going to go out and try and kill people and we don't care what the consequence is? It hasn't happened.[12]
Frontline asked:
[Is it] ... fair to say what you're saying is that the president of the United States, his national security advisor, his deputy national security advisor for counter-terrorism, are basically blowing smoke [about the danger posed by bin Laden] and his followers]?
Johnson responded:
They're grossly exaggerating the problem. They are hyping it. They shouldn't be talking about rising terrorism. Instead of saying "terrorism's rising," it's not. "Terrorism is spreading," it's not. "More people are dying from terrorism," not the case. But what they should be saying is, "There's one individual out there that really doesn't like us, and he's made it his mission in life to kill Americans, and we've gotta deal with him." But we need to have a voice of reason in that process instead of putting ourselves out crying wolf, because this is essentially what's taking place right now. They call it the administration that cries wolf.[12]
[edit]2000
Johnson co-authored an article in 2000 with Milt Bearden which focused on the threat posed by al-Qaeda specifically, rather than terrorism trends in general. Beardon and Johnson note that new information emerging about the bombings at Kenya and Tanzania in 1998 points to the threat posed by Imad Mugniyah and Osama Bin Laden will require "a coordinated policy that will employ a full range of covert, clandestine, diplomatic, and military operations," concluding:
The Clinton Administration has shot its bolt on the terrorist problem with small effect, and no last minute show of force will change the record. A new administration can start afresh with a more sharply defined set of terrorism goals – Mughniyeh and bin Laden and their protectors for starters – and bring the full, coordinated force of American diplomatic, military, and intelligence capabilities to bear on the problem.[13]
[edit]2001
After Johnson's testimony to the special forum at the U.S. Senate, Gary J. Schmitt, executive director and CEO of the Project for the New American Century, refers in the Daily Standard (blog) to an op-ed piece Johnson wrote two months prior to the 9/11 attacks, claiming that Johnson argued that the US had little to fear from terrorism.[14]
In an editorial entitled "The Declining Terrorist Threat," published in the New York Times on 10 July 2001, Johnson says:
Judging from news reports and the portrayal of villains in our popular entertainment, Americans are bedeviled by fantasies about terrorism. They seem to believe that terrorism is the greatest threat to the United States and that it is becoming more widespread and lethal. They are likely to think that the United States is the most popular target of terrorists. And they almost certainly have the impression that extremist Islamic groups cause most terrorism.... None of these beliefs are based in fact.... While terrorism is not vanquished, in a world where thousands of nuclear warheads are still aimed across the continents, terrorism is not the biggest security challenge confronting the United States, and it should not be portrayed that way.[15]
Ten days after the 9/11 attacks, after quoting the above passage, Timothy Noah concludes a post in his "Chatterbox" feature at Slate: "Johnson's analysis, we now see, was bold, persuasive, and 100 percent wrong."[16] Johnson defended himself against such attacks:
The rightwing is resurrecting an op-ed I wrote in July 2001. I stand by the full article. It is still relevant today. I am accused, incorrectly, of ignoring the threat of terrorism. In fact, I correctly noted that the real threat emanated from Bin Laden and Islamic extremism. President Bush, for his part, ignored the CIA warning in August 2001 that Al Qaeda was posed to strike inside the United States.[17]
After September 11, Johnson appeared several times on FOX News to address the question of military action against terrorism. On 14 November, he defended the FBI's proposal to interview 5,000 students in the U.S. suspected of having information relevant to the September 11 investigations:
I think they should talk to everyone that they feel they have a need to talk to. I mean, look, this is war. This is not a legal proceeding. This isn't the O.J. Simpson trial. The folks that attacked us -- they murdered Americans. And we've got to recognize that in wartime, we should do things differently.[18]
[edit]2003
In January 2003, Johnson wrote an analysis of the relationship between the upcoming U.S. invasion of Iraq and the threat of transnational terrorism. According to Johnson, Bremer's response was to tell him that "it didn't matter what Saddam did or didn't do, we were going to war."[19] The paper warned that an invasion would "do little to destroy the infrastructure of radical Islamic terrorism responsible for the 9-11 attacks." Noting that Saddam Hussein's regime has been a longtime supporter of regional terrorist organizations such as the PLO, Johnson examines contacts between Saddam Hussein and transnational terrorist organizations such as al-Qaeda:
There is no doubt that Iraq is a state sponsor of terrorism—i.e., a country that provides financial support, safe haven, training, or weapons and explosives to groups or individuals that carry out terrorist attacks. . . . According to Central Intelligence Agency data, there is no credible evidence implicating Iraq in any mass casualty terrorist attacks since 1991. . . .
Johnson notes that the period immediately leading up to 2003 saw a rise of activity surrounding terrorist Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, suggesting that "Iraq is willing to help a movement that it would otherwise oppose on ideological grounds. Nonetheless," Johnson concludes, "it is important to understand that Iraqi entreaties to Al Qaeda, are most likely intended as a tactic to bolster Iraq’s ability to fight off a U.S. invasion rather than a deep-seated theological and ideological commitment to the terrorist agenda of Bin Laden.[20]
In that analysis Johnson also warns that the U.S.-led invasion was likely to backfire:
In fact there is a serious risk that a U.S. led war against Iraq may crystallize the diffused anger in the Arab and Muslim world — a heretofore unattained goal of bin Laden and his followers — and persuade more Muslim youths to take up the terrorist banner against America and her citizens.... If we decide to invade Iraq we must be prepared for the contingency that our attack will inspire young Muslims to pursue jihad against the West in general and the United States in particular. Just as the 1979 Soviet invasion of Afghanistan rallied many Muslims, especially young adults to the cause of jihad, a U.S. attack may enable Islamic extremists to attract new followers.[20]
Johnson also gave interviews on the topic of what to do with captured al-Qaeda leaders; while he did not condone torture, he suggested that a "sleep deprivation and reward system" might be useful for getting information from Khalid Sheikh Mohammed:
I don't see a constitutional right to have eight hours of sleep. You shouldn't subject someone to freezing but they don't get to wear mink coats, either.[21]
In May 2003, Johnson joined members of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS) in condemning the manipulation of intelligence for political purposes:
It is a misuse and abuse of intelligence. The president was being misled. He was ill served by the folks who are supposed to protect him on this. Whether this was witting or unwitting, I don't know, but I'll give him the benefit of the doubt.[22]
[edit]Plame affair
After Robert Novak wrote a column identifying the wife of former ambassador Joseph C. Wilson as a CIA officer, the media invited Johnson to comment on the ensuing scandal because he had been a member of the same Career Trainee class with Valerie Plame Wilson. For example, in October 2003, he appeared on Democracy Now to discuss the Plame affair. He told interviewer Amy Goodman that Valerie Wilson's cover should have been respected whether she was an "analyst" or a "cleaning lady": "if she's undercover she's undercover, period. If the media allows themselves to get distracted with those kinds of curve balls, they ignore the issue."[23]
He told a Senate Democratic Policy Committee in October 2003, "My classmates and I have been betrayed. Together, we have kept the secrets of each other's identities a secret for 18 years. Each and every one of us have kept that secret, whether we were in the CIA, in other government service or in the private sector. But this issue is not just about a blown cover. It is about the destruction of the very essence, the core of human intelligence collection activities: plausible deniability, apparently, for partisan domestic political reasons."[24]
Johnson testified at a special joint hearing of Congressional and Senate Democrats on 22 July 2005 about the consequences arising from the Plame affair.[25]
[edit]2008
In 2008, Johnson emerged as a staunch supporter of Hillary Clinton and a strong critic of Barack Obama. Larry Johnson's blog, NoQuarterUSA, became a rally point for Clinton supporters wary of Barack Obama's qualifications to be president. Supporters of Barack Obama insist that a story that first appeared on Johnson's blog--a report that Republican operatives have a tape of Michelle Obama making racially insenstive comments about caucasians--has been "refuted" Barack Obama's Fight the Smears website.[26]. However, Johnson never claimed to have the tape and reported that the Republican operatives controlling it intended to release the tape sometime after the Democratic Convention in August 2008. On October 21, however, he asserted that the operative in possession of the tape had been instructed by the McCain campaign not to release it.[27]
[edit]Notes
^ http://2008.weblogawards.org/polls/best-political-coverage/
^ Larry C. Johnson, "About Me," No Quarter (personal blog).
^ "Former CIA Official Larry Johnson Delivers Democratic Radio Address," transcript posted on official Democratic National Committee's website for The Democratic Party, July 23, 2005], accessed November 21, 2006.
^ Interview with Larry Johnson, confirmed by his supervisor
^ "Ex-CIA official Blasts Bush on Leak of Operative's Name: Democrats' Radio Address Focuses on White House Aides' Role," CNN July 23, 2005, accessed November 21, 2006.
^ Gail Russell Chaddock, "Why Terrorists Pick On the French," Christian Science Monitor (5 December 1996) p. 1.
^ Larry Johnson, "Terrorists Among Us," New York Times (20 August 1996) p. A19.
^ Terrorism Today
^ Lee Michael Katz, "The Hunt for Bin Laden," USA Today (21 August 1998) p. 1A.
^ See Transcript of original interview with Larry C. Johnson, as broadcast on Frontline in 1999. Cf. "Interview: Larry C. Johnson," for Hunting bin Laden, transcript of interview broadcast on Frontline subsequently on 13 April 2001. See also dedicated PBS webpages for media links: Iraq and the War on Terror, Frontline PBS, online featured programs, accessed 19 November 2006.
^ frontline: hunting bin laden: interviews: larry c. johnson | PBS
^ a b [1].
^ As posted in [2].
^ Gary Schmitt, [ 07/25/2005 "Meet Larry Johnson: The CIA official Turned Democratic Spokesman Has a Pre-9/11 Mindset," Daily Standard (blog), July 25, 2005, accessed November 20, 2006.
^ *Larry C. Johnson, "The Declining Terrorist Threat," The New York Times 10 July 2001: A19.
^ Timothy Noah, "(Not Exactly a) Whopper of the Week: Larry C. Johnson," Chatterbox: Gossip, speculation, and scuttlebutt about politics (blog), hosted by Slate September 21, 2001, accessed November 20, 2006. Note the full context of this quotation:
It is, to be sure, a little bit cheap (and slightly at odds with the usual parameters of this feature) to criticize someone for making an erroneous prediction, particularly after a tragedy. Chatterbox is especially reluctant to tag Johnson because Johnson's op-ed was argued forcefully, backed up meticulously with factual data, and bravely at odds with conventional wisdom at the time of its publication. Add in that Johnson now makes his living as a consultant to corporations about terrorism, and therefore had everything to gain by exaggerating the dangers terrorism poses, and the guy practically looks like a hero. Chatterbox, who two decades ago was an editor for the New York Times op-ed page, would have published Johnson's piece had he still been an editor there this past July. In his capacity at Slate, Chatterbox might well have written up Johnson's prediction, and perhaps even endorsed it.
But boy, is he glad he didn't! Johnson's analysis, we now see, was bold, persuasive, and 100 percent wrong. Sadly, a mistake this embarrassing cannot be ignored. As a fellow skeptic, Chatterbox in all sincerity wishes Johnson better luck next time.
^ Larry C. Johnson, "Johnson vs. President Bush," re-posted and updated by SusanHu at DailyKos (blog) July 25, 2005.
^ FOX News Interview with John Garrett (14 November 2001) Transcript #111405cb.260.
^ [3].
^ a b Larry C. Johnson, "Setting the Record Straight on Iraqi Terrorism," posted in Booman Tribune: A Progressive Community (personal blog) 27 January 2003. accessed 19 November 2006.
^ Qtd. in Toby Harnden, "CIA 'pressure' on al-Qa'eda chief," The London Telegraph 5 March 2003: 16.
^ Qtd. in Nicolas D. Kristof, "Save Our Spooks," The New York Times 30 May 2003:A6.
^ Democracy Now (3 October 2003)[4]
^ U.S. Senate, Democratic Policy Committee Meeting on the CIA Operative Leak, (24 October 2003).
^ Letter to the Senate.[Needs full source citation; see "References" section.]
^ Tumulty, Karen (2008-06-12). "Will Obama's Anti-Rumor Plan Work?", Time Magazine. Retrieved on 20 June 2008.:"a story that apparently first made a big splash on the Internet in late May in a post by pro-Hillary Clinton blogger Larry Johnson"
^ Whitey Tape, API, Phil Berg, and Andy MartinSee Authors Posts (1089) on May 19, 2008 at 2:28 PM in Barack Obama, Current Affairs, Michelle Obama
Today, on ABC’s “Good Morning America,” Barack Obama lost his cool, calling names and making unspecified threats. Why? Ostensibly, it’s because the Tennessee Republican Party issued an Internet video featuring Michelle Obama saying she’s proud of being an American only because her husband is running for president. Well, yes, we all heard that awhile ago.
But the real reason for Obama’s extraordinary freakout is that he fears the release of the videotape, reported here, of Michelle Obama in the pulpit of Rev. Jeremiah Wright’s church railing against “whitey.” And we don’t mean Whitey Ford. Four Republican sources have told me that the tape exists. I’ve also been informed that Karl Rove and his allies have a copy of it and are using it to raise funds for independent expenditure groups. The tape, I’m told, will be disclosed as the GOP October Surprise. It’s a ticking time bomb.
And I’ve learned that a right-wing Republican billionaire has put a $1 million bounty on the video. He doesn’t want John McCain to win, like a number of conservatives, and thinks Obama is a pathetically weak candidate. The billionaire wants that video released now.
Obama, speaking on ABC’s “Good Morning America” showed fear through his name-calling: “If they think that they’re gonna try to make Michelle an issue in this campaign, they should be careful. Because, that I find unacceptable. … The notion that you start attacking my wife or my family — you know, Michelle is the most honest, the best person I know. She is one of the most caring people I know. She loves this country. And for them to try to distort or to play snippets of her remarks in ways that are unflattering to her I think is … just low class.”
Does Obama have a copy of the “whitey” video? We know that he knows that his wife knows. The video really does exist. If we have to wait until October to see it, Obama might explode before then from the tension.

*hehe….I thought it was about you immediately, not about the Tenn. bad ad. That’s been out for weeks.
Your rumor bomb is richocheting. (Funny stuff! Can’t make this up!)
Harold Ickes also continues to talk about a potential October Suprise.
*hooting*
It’s gotta be real. This is just TOO funny!
I cant wait! as Stevie Nicks said
VOTE WITH YOUR FINGER
…………………./´¯/)
………………..,/¯../
………………./…./
…………./´¯/’…’/´¯¯`·¸
………./’/…/…./……./¨¯\
……..(’(…´…´…. ¯~/’…’)
………\……………..’…../
……….”…\………. _.·´
…………\…………..(
…………..\………….\…
VOTE WITH YOUR FINGER
…………………./´¯/)
………………..,/¯../
………………./…./
…………./´¯/’…’/´¯¯`·¸
………./’/…/…./……./¨¯\
……..(’(…´…´…. ¯~/’…’)
………\……………..’…../
……….”…\………. _.·´
…………\…………..(
…………..\………….\…
OBAMA/iPOD ‘08
At work I walked past a TV scroll briefly say unfair to attack ob’s wife and thought the WHITEY video came out. The PROUD one is bad enough but yep, I thought the exact same thing he is freaking out about PROUD and trying to make his racist FLOTUS off limits pre-emptively.
Larry - You scared barfy!
Barackbamboozle - this dance ain’t over yet.
DEMOCRAPS May 31st. We soon to be former DEMOCRAPS have long waited for the RBC. If the democraps screw two states they screw us all and themselves.
Is there no video of the “America in 2008 is just downright mean” comments. From what was reported about that statement it seemed that she had used it more than once when campaigning.
Not as much as your friend “George Bush”, he’s screwed all fifty States and over half of the remaining world out there.
And he only has a third grade education. Now the Pub’s want to put Mac-Cane in there to finish destroying the rest of the world.
He won’t have any problems forgetting all about it and his private nurse will constantly remind him of his name and the country he just blew up.
Bush is the only American president in history to have a masters degree
` I’m pretty sure that Woodrow Wilson had a P.H.D.
His undergrade was done at Yale, and the MBA at Harvard. Also his standardized test scores and GPA where much higher than the supposed brainiac, John Kerry. Also his military apptitude exams where better than Kerry’s.
Bullshit , he had a c- fucking average and his military scores were even worse , thats why it tokk him so long to qualify on the training aircraft the putz … Choice
Hey - REGMAX - remember this, C’s get degrees too. So shut up bitch and learn to spell. Uh, choice…….
Bullshit , he had a c- fucking average and his military scores were even worse , thats why it took him so long to qualify on the training aircraft the putz … Choice
Yeah you like osama!! Not to worry he’ll sell out the Usa to Iran! What experience does he have none!!!!!!! Change what tax the middle and upperclass to give to the poor lazy folks.Sorry I have a REAL PROBLEM with a presidental candidate that is ashamed to wear our flag!!!!!!!! Wake up your being mislead.Sounds like the little woman doesn’t like whitey either!!!!!!!!!
Response to Berrinat….Our country has been very fortunate to have George Bush as our Commander in Chief during the past seven and one half years. It is horrifying to think of Barak Hussein O. trying to fill George Bush’s shoes. Great Orator - please, the guy can hardly put two words together without stuttering and huh.
But, Kenya has named a beer after him…..
Disgruntled Dem
May 19th, 2008 at 4:10 pm
Daily Kos Uses Racist Image of KKK Torturing Michelle Obama - Stay Classy Fellas
http://www.patriotroom.com/?p=361
Is that why Sen. Byrd felt compelled to endorse obama. I am giving Byrd the benefit of the doubt and chalking it up to a senior moment.
Sure, Byrd wants to die with a clear conscience. As a former member of the KKK, this was a way to do it. He’d never endorse a black man otherwise!
I think you guys are giving him way too much credit. He’s being hammered in Washington to refute the win by his buddies.
He must prove he’s a USEFUL ONE.
I saw something today that said the SDs are being bullied fiercely right now.
It’s tough having that perk right now.
Senator Byrd’s largest contributor is MoveOn.org , at $88,000.
There’s your motivation.
Wait. Byrd is from West Virginia. Clinton won the West Virginia primary.
Didn’t the Obama campaign say that super delegates should vote the same way their constituents did? In fact didn’t the Obama campaign used to complain about super delegates, arguing that “party insiders” shouldn’t decide the nomination?
Oops, my bad. That was the Obama argument in FEBRUARY. The Obama argument in May is that it’s time to unify and coalesce around one candidate — well, as long as that one candidate is Barack Obama.
Now, mind you, I don’t really mind Obama’s shifting rationale. Part of winning in politics is to press home every advantage and do what you can to minimize the damage from any disadvantages. In this, Obama is pretty much doing what any politician would.
And THAT’S my point. Obama is acting like any other politician would. Not that there’s anything wrong with that. I’m just saying if you support Obama, don’t be fooled into thinking that he’s somehow different from other politicians. He wants to win and he’ll do what’s necessary, even shifting his arguments when the circumstances dictate it.
politics as usual… what a hypocrit… nobama08
You’re thinking of the Obama rules. When states go for Obama then the super-ds must choose him, but the Clinton rules are completely different.
It’s a nice picture! I can almost tolerate her like that. Almost.
that image was posted by an obama supporting website? anyone posting something like that is despicable.
And what you people on this blog post is somehow NOT despicable??
thanks for noticing. am really tired of those who say obama is just another dirty politician. he is much, much worse. lived in a 3rd world country myself. he has been bringing this country’s politics down to a 3rd world level and, given the chance, would do the same to our national policies. he is a fiend that preys on the basest emotions of any he desires to manipulate. he is America’s worst nightmare and people had better wake up.
Here’s a Super Delegate email list. Anyone think it’s a good idea to send them this image? (with which the text on the site calls Southerners KKK- typical low life incitement to divide and generate more anger.)
LemireDahlman@rangeweb.net stephanie_schriock@tester.senate.gov montanaflyfish@yahoo.com joycebrayboy@gmail.com judgebutterfield@aol.com jcouncil@co.cumberland.nc.us jmeek@ncdp.org geri_gaginis@conrad.senate.gov elizabeth_gore@dorgan.senate.gov christy_beach@dorgan.senate.gov dhannaher@hannahers.com maxsonlaw@minot.com reneepf@btinet.net strauss_david@msn.com mwake@medicine.nodak.edu achelpohl@usa.net katfahey@cox.net franklamere@msn.com melanie_rogge@bennelson.senate.gov dostergard@neb.rr.com vimapo@aol.com martha.fullerclark@leg.state.nh.us dnorcross@snjaflcio.org danaredd999@yahoo.com crs@ntuaft.com fharris@unm.edu teresa_benitez@hotmail.com steven@stevenhorsford.com kittyspraggins@aol.com egoubeaux@woh.rr.com m.mallory@att.net lanamclin@aol.com nsonnyn@aol.com tekicatt@aol.com rwhitten@whittenburragelaw.com mzlivability@yahoo.com jen@defazioforcongress.org info@jasonaltmire.com ccampbell215@msn.com
james_brown@casey.senate.gov sara_mabry@casey.senate.gov chafinlawfirm@charter.net pmurphy@murphy06.com celita_a_de_r@hotmail.com gcobbhun@BellSouth.net waringsh@bellsouth.net carol@fowlercommunications.com jackbillion@sio.midco.net drey_samuelson@johnson.senate.gov sonja_dean@johnson.senate.gov mnemec@sullybuttes.net stroschein@nrctv.com rep.loisdeberry@legislature.state.tn.us BrooksViceChair@aol.com ydavis2455@aol.com olga@pgog.net al@aledwards.com chris@chetedwards.com denise_johnson@ibew.org bjenellhamlett@mail.house.gov moses.mercado@ogilvygr.com senfronia.thompson@publicans.com wholland@utdemocrats.org crbenjamin1019@yahoo.com jbevans@coatchworksfarm.com icarleton@vtdemocrats.org kevin_mcdonald@leahy.senate.gov chuckr@gmavt.net patnotter@gmail.com cewaliser@hotmail.com wisgov@gov.state.wi.us mary_irvine@feingold.senate.gov will_sebern@feingold.senate.gov steve@kagen4congress.com ellisshir@sbcglobal.net raejason@yahoo.com lissa7453@yahoo.com wineke10@charter.net beth_provenzano@rockefeller.senate.gov kerry_ates@rockefeller.senate.gov pjorgensen@jorgensenassociates.com jmillin@cheyenneeyeclinic.com constance@cborde.com liv.gibbons@gmail.com boleary1@bloomberg.net
Whites should be proud of this country because they stole everything from other people. They can get caught with drugs ior doing other crimes and get off free.
Using blanket condemnations of entire ethnic groups is a clear indicator of tribalism, which leads to bigotry and racism.
Today’s white Americans (or any other ethnic group) are not responsible for the actions of those that lived 100+ years ago.
The genesis of Barack Obama’s Presidential campaign was built upon the charade of his being different, of having gotten past the “race card” issues. Now we know that his long-time preacher and his wife are just as vile as any KKK member. It was all just “nice talk” to hide his Leftist agenda.
I say Michelle should have stayed home if she wanted to be left out of it. Instead she says she may not vote for Hillary if Hillary is the nom (undemocratic, and she wants to be first lady, i don’t think she deserves it for that alone), if there is video, let it lose, because sitting on it and allowing more soldiers to die in Iraq because McCain gets elected is unAmerican and murderously unpatriotic causing soldiers deaths…..whoever releases it should be sued for something for being so unpatriotic. Class action lawsuit lawyers pay attention…there maybe something here. I’m in.
karl rove made some excellent points tonight saying that if Obama didn’t want people to attack his wife, she shouldn’t be out there stumping for him and criticizing BO’s opponents or the bush adminsitration. Basically if MO wants to be fluff in the background and left alone, then she shouldn’t be in front of the microphone making accusatory charges herself. both bo and mo are such hypocrites.
Amen! She made herself a target. All she had to do was stay quietly in the background, she chose not to. They had BOTH toughen up if he gets the nomination. HRC has run her campaign with velvet gloves, the Rethugs don’t know what velvet gloves are…they are familiar with brass knuckles though.
They are going to be running God damn America, proud of my country and the Trinity 9/11 memorial service 24/7. Everybody in the USA is going to have a thorough working knowledge of ‘Black Liberation Theology’ as well, courtesy of the RNC.
cc…. You are right. She should be attack, as She3 attack others. Once sHE GOES ON STAGE, SHE IS NO DIFFERENT. rEMEMBER cLINTONS DOUGHTER, HOW sHE WAS TREATED WHEN ASK; HOW HE FELT ABOUT HER PARENTS PROBLEMS THEN”, THEY TOLD HER , ONCE YOU GET ON STAGE IN NAME OF YOUR MOM, YOU ARE ON YOUR OWN !!!!
SAME TO MICHELLE. WE WONT LIVE MICHELLE ALONE, ESPECJALLY WHEN SHE SHOWE TO US, HOW HATEFUL SHE IS ESPECJALY TOWARD WHITE PEOPLE!!!!
But, but, but I’m not a racist!
I’m beginning to enjoy being called a racist! That’s my badge to indicate that my arguments have substance and are winning.
Obama fools resort to the racist name calling whenever they are dumbfounded and out argued!!
Let’s all aim for the racist tag.
I wish the tape would come out now, too, but I can be satisfied in Oct. if the Obama movement is blasted out of any possible win.
He is inexperienced, unvetted and his long-term relationships (including Michelle) are a bad reflection of his poor judgement.
Are you kidding me? You have, in elected office, all over this country, a TON of whites who have been calling black people the n-word for centuries on end, non-stop, without any kind of judicial intervention whatsoever, and you have the nerve enough to apply a double standard of this nature to MichelleO? There isn’t a black person IN this country who hasn’t said it, so if we’re eliminating people based on racial slurs, you’re going to have to wipe Congress out and start over, starting with Robert Byrd.
Say, wasn’t it the Obama campaign who painted Obama’s opponent’s spouse, Bill Clinton, as racist?
Or am I thinking of another Obama?
A member of his campaign, yes. McPeak did in South Carolina right?
Could this be a preemptive strike to put the media on notice not to pay any attention to his wife? That’s certainly true for the most part, but Obama is afraid for his own political skin?
Why?
Because he then can’t say he was unaware of the racist tone of his church he dutifully attended for twenty years, if it was his own wife vocally participating in it. It undercuts his “Reagan-like” argument about not know what was going on. That undercuts his credibility.
The buck stops here. As president one must take responsibility for the actions of their administration. Obama never does. He plays the plausible deniability lawyer card. That might work to prevent an indictment, but a grand jury is not electing him.
So I blame Obama for what his people do especially when he never disavows their actions. And there are plenty of cases of that in this campaign. Obama and his campaign equals Obama. And since his wife is campaigning for him and Obama pulled the race card on Bill Clinton, she is fair game as well.
Rule of thumb, if it comes from McPeak, it’s fu%%ed.
The guy is AWOL, intellectually.
Like his master Obama.
McPeak punked BO so bad while he was sharing a stage with BO in Oregon, it went right over BO’s head.
Why would a retired general who’s own views are way closer to McCains’ stump for BO?
because he BO is personally not very politically astute.
Hey TeakWood,
What a track record, huh? McPeak went with Dole, then Dean, Kerry and then O. His v neck t shirt is long gone for the USAF.
Talk about “straighten and fly right?” ala Manhatten Transfer eh?
don’t bet on any horses mc peak touts.
McPeak in a speech in Medford Oregon accused Bill Clinton of McCarthism. The guy was Bill Clinton’s Chief of Staff. It wasn’t just the words he used, but McPeak almost sounded like he was a little crazy when he said it. I, like Bill Clinton and a lot of other people have questioned Obama’s patriotism. I don’t trust him. He has too many close ties to people who are Hamas, or like Ayers they are bombers who think 9/11 should have been worse - I don’t trust Obama and McPeak is showing signs of early senility..
It would seem McPeak developed a drinking problem after her retired. Either that, or not having a driver like most Flag and General officers above three stars enjoy after retirement has lifeted the curtain on a preexisting condition.
He was bagged for drunk driving not terribly long ago — he just might be letting the booze impact his judgment.
Noooo, one of my favourite things about Obama is that his policy is “the buck stops, erm, over, uh, there.”
I think that would be a good bumper sticker.
OBAMA ATTACKS MAIN STREAM MEDIA WITH WET NOODLE…chuckle…and assorted snickers with a guffaw….keep up the pressure Larry….
what is it that he constantly says… the notion that… the notion that… the notion that…. uhhhhh…. the notion that… hehe
it gets really old. like he is so self righteous.
Yes that’s another Obama. Barry would never conduct himself in such a fashion nor would he allow anyone in David’s campaign to do so. That’s what his people told the Canadians at any rate.
Racist…yea, nuts, senile, crazy, ranting, heck Mika just smiles and says “Oh, my” and rolls her eyes every time there’s a clip of Bill Clinton. It’s horrible…but if it is “Allowed” then I say line up and take a shot at Michelle….open season on spouses started months ago….for Bill, years ago.
Ginger I agree. And notice how they keep referring to Bill as “red faced” - that’s his skin! Can you imagine calling MO brown faced? Or BO blue lipped?
Why is a ruddy complexion fair game?
because it’s ugly, that’s why. Speakin of complexions I got a question for you neo-nazis, er I mean neo cons — When I’m cold, I’m brown, when I’m hot, I’m brown. when I’m dead, I’m still brown. Now Y’ALL — when you’re cold you turn blue, when you’re hot, you turn red. when you die, you turn gray. So I ask you — WHO ARE THE REAL “COLORED” FOLK????????
(full discloure — that joke was stolen from comedian Michael Collier)
that’s the one! and not just a racist, BO’s campaign tried to make it seem Bill was a devout member of the kkk.
If somebody went after my wife, it wouldn’t be strong words, it’d be bloodied noses.
John,
Merely bloodied noses!
Exactly. I remember the 92 primary when some dirtball candidate tried to slime Hillary. Bill went over the top, stood up and was ready to punch the guys lights out. Told him he was not fit to stand on the same stage as Hillary.
From Obama all we get is the “low class” comment. Is he a wuss?
Hillary was unjustly attacked.
The criticism of Michelle is valid, she’s a racist, blaming her quality of life(!) on others.
BIG BIG difference the Obamarama can’t seem to grasp…
It’s why the Xerox doesn’t work…
how is Michelle racist?
Because larry says there is a video?
Because she said she wasn’t proud of America?
Why?
20 years in a black separatist church. The video will be icing. But we already know who she is.
She is the angriest most graceless women/(man) I have ever seen…She just hates hates hates…Go away obamas and don’t come back until you feel like mingling with us typical white folk.
American Sawbuck
Once she would have been called a clodhopper.
Her racism is found in her college thesis — the whole thesis is laced with racism.
Mrs. Obama is a racist — as is Donna Brazile. She is an angry, bitter woman — who gets a constant booster shot of racism from the minister of her church — Rev. Wright.
This is the sort of church which should be shut down, put out of business just like the white separatists church in Idaho was shut down.
Tax them out of existence. That sort of political religion is evil. Our forefathers knew this that’s why they erected the wall between the church and state!
You are one angry woman northwest rain - must be hard for you with your ‘gal’ not winning thisd time.
Apparently, marianna hasn’t even READ Michelle’s thesis, so she hasn’t a clue what she’s talking about.
Instead, she attacked Rain.
How LOW CLASS.
what’s racist in the thesis? It is about black alumni from Princeton.
did you see the Princeton thesis that was supposedly under lock and key ????
you wouldn’t need to ask alot of these basic questions if you had.
Google is your friend.
What does Michelle’s behavior tell an otherwise reasonable person?
All the arguments given are pertinent, and applicable, but over all, what has been the tenor of the campaign, and the associations of the Obama’s?
Farrakhan, Wright, the campaign has made an issue of racism, my goodness even Farrakhan’s hatred of Jews, and Trinity’s association with Hamas is racism, this is not just about Anglos.
Obama has also delibertaely snubbed Asians and gays.
Tom,
Don’t forget the garlic-stuffed nose Italians, bitter white people and all the sweeties out there!
..Proud to BE an American…until the “gemmie some”…
I have no proof that Michelle is racist she just seems lik