Buy Vosges' famous Bacon and Chocolate bar
Adobe Education Store

RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

It’s Official: The LEMMINGCRAT Party Begins

lemmingcrat
There have been less than subtle hints all along. First Obama makes a deal with the DNC to help them raise money. Then Obama gets the word out that none of his supporters should be contributing to any other causes except his. Next we find out that an Obama surrogate is being pushed to become the new head of the Democratic party. And now we find out that Obama is seriously looking for a Vice President.

Even though he hasn’t even won the nomination yet. Can you say Audacity? Sure, sure you can.

Officials say Obama starts search for running mate

Likely Democratic nominee Barack Obama has begun a top-secret search for a running mate, fresh signs that the general election campaign is well under way and the primary race against Hillary Rodham Clinton is basically over.

Some people would call this confidence or inevitability. I call it arrogance and lack of respect for the process. Just look at how the nomination race is being portrayed. Who are these loons?

The campaign did not want to discuss the effort because they are still engaged in a fading primary campaign against Hillary Rodham Clinton, with three primaries left in Puerto Rico, South Dakota and Montana.

A fading primary campaign? The guy gets his butt whomped in West Virginia and Kentucky and it is a fading primary campaign? I am all for the moderate use of attitude adjusters by adults. But someone has been drinking WAY to much of the Cult-Aide if you ask me.

I wonder if these numbskulls have thought this thing through. The most recent polls suggest that at least 40% of the current Hillary supporters will not vote for Obama under any circumstance. Do Howard Dean and Donna Brazile think it is in the best interests of the Democratic party to have nearly 25% of registered Democrats voting for a Republican candidate? Do they honestly believe that Obama’s appeal with Independents and Republicans can make up for our defection? Or rather, their defection from the democratic process.

My own theory in this is that the DNC has been in the tank for Obama from the start. They want to run the black guy. And that is why they turn a blind eye to the obvious serious problems an Obama candidacy carries with it into a general election. Number one being Obama’s close and long standing relationship with Bill Ayers.

Surely the DNC has lost what little of a mind it has left if they think the American people are going to elect a President that is best buds with a terrorist. Homegrown or otherwise. And Bill Ayers was and is still a terrorist. It was because of Ayers and his insane terrorist organization that the love and peace movement of the 60s and early 70s died a premature death. They weren’t a part of the getting along crowd. They were and are the enemies of peace.

I don’t give a damn whether Obama wears a flag pin or not. I don’t. But then again I don’t hang with terrorists. And this isn’t just some casual association. Their kids don’t go to the same school like Axelrod blatantly lied about. Michelle and Barack Obama are FRIENDS with Bernadine Dohrn and Bill Ayers, the terrorists. Michelle worked with Bernadine and Barack worked for Bill. And Obama started his first political campaign at the home of these terrorists. In their residence.

So to Howard Dean and Donna Brazile and Barack Obama I only have this one thing to say. You have alienated many people during this campaign season. And many, if not most of us will never forgive you. And a strong percentage of us are going to actively work against you. So I HOPE you are happy with what you have created. The only good news to any of this is that you will be taking your cult off the cliff with you.

Trackback URL

RSS Feed for This Post215 Comments »

Comment by Sugapea | 2008-05-24 14:25:00

Article from Newsweek.

‘They’re Both Electable’
A Democratic superdelegate on why he came out for Clinton this week.

http://www.newsweek.com/id/138454/output/print

Comment by Hope | 2008-05-24 15:16:24

That was a ridiculously biased interviewer.

Comment by Arius | 2008-05-24 15:56:18

So what else is new!

 
 
 

Comment by sumgun | 2008-05-24 14:27:03

The present-voting empty suit, the arrogant attitude, the racist tactics, the idiotic chants, the vacuous slogans, the unthinking CULT. You want this to be president?

Comment by Bill | 2008-05-24 14:30:27

Yes. Yes I do.

Comment by HARP | 2008-05-24 14:33:48

Hey Bill.

If I throw a stick, will you go away.

 

Comment by Uppity | 2008-05-24 14:35:33

How young are you?

 

Comment by Tom Plumb | 2008-05-24 15:03:38

Well, good for you Bill!

 

Comment by Obama_is_Weak | 2008-05-24 15:18:15

I am sure you do Bill; but noone was talking to you. You are irrelevant here.

Bye now; hope you have a good life.

Comment by Bill | 2008-05-24 15:37:11

not irrelevant enough for you not to chime in.

But you are correct, how relevant could I be trying to post some sanity on this, the most irrelevant site on the net.

Maybe I like poking at retarded republicans pretending to be democrats.

How much traction do you wing nuts think you’d get at the university of Chicago calling Ayres a terrorist?

Let me guess Colleges are full of rabid anti-American liberals. Right?

Comment by Ulahane | 2008-05-24 15:51:08

“Colleges are full of rabid anti-American liberals. Right?” If you had had much contact with the humanities departments of many colleges you would not ask that. The answer is yes to the anti-American, in many departments But Marxist is a better term. Anti-Americans, like Noam Chomsky, dominate many fields.

You are clever to sneak the word liberal in there, but none of us are anti-liberal. Many of us are anti-neolib, or Marxist.

Comment by Bill | 2008-05-24 15:54:37

ah.

So your are rightwing nut jobs.

Chomsky anti-american?

That says it all.

Love it or leave it.

ps. Clinton Inc. IS Neo-Liberalism.

Moron.

Comment by Ulahane | 2008-05-24 16:01:32

Bill, any defense of Chomsky outs you as being not a Democrat and not a liberal. You are a Green party member at best or a leftest at worst.

And genius, Neolib is more commonly used to refer to the extreme, authoritarian views of the left, such as those often expressed at the Daily K**, than it is used to describe the center-left reforms of the Clintons.

 

Comment by TeakWoodKite | 2008-05-24 17:36:37

So your are rightwing nut jobs…

Notice the grammer on this one…my typing sucks (sorry) but this is not even GED material.

No actually I am the proud owner of a Hillary NutCRACKER…

 
 
 

Comment by Obama_is_Weak | 2008-05-24 21:37:16

Hey Yo ignorant Bill:

Ayres is not at the University of Chicago.

He is an education Prof. at a university in Chicago; namely UIC.

Too subtle for your cracked head.

 
 

Comment by JKR | 2008-05-24 17:30:14

Dear Obama is Weak - This is not all directed towards you by no means. It’s just that it was a good place to start saying this. I am on your side. I’m not a punk kid, I am 60 years old, SO LISTEN TO YOUR MOM!!!!
(I just said that, because that is what my 83 yr old mother tells me.)

I feel that it is you and others like you who make him relevant. Why don’t you ignore him, and all the others, they are throwing you bones, and you’re chasing them all over the place. Ignore these guys, all of them. Don’t feed them, I know it’s hard not to be smart with these guys, but let them show THEIR a**. It’s almost like you try and OUT GROSS each other, and no one wins with that. You get a whole screen of that stuff, it’s detrimental for me to find out any worth while news. Stay with the program, find the news, bring it back and share it. Just leave them alone, please.

 
 

Comment by JM | 2008-05-24 15:34:21

Don’t let that tingle running down your leg confuse you. It might just be tinkle.

 

Comment by Arius | 2008-05-24 15:57:53

Sadly I feel like you are saying you’re happy to just take a shit and wipe your ass with the american flag…it’s pretty much the same thing.

 
 

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-05-25 08:56:12

Good Post Pagan…OBAMA DISPLAYS TYPICAL FASCIST BEHAVIOR…

*** THIS IS STRAIGHT OUT OF THE NAZI HANDBOOK BERLIN 1933 ***

When bullets fly…Kindly fall neatly into pit…
Rule # 34…FASCISM FOR DUMMIES (Also known as the Obama Supporters Training Manual )

 
 

Comment by Kathleen | 2008-05-24 14:27:44

Larry, I call it a coup.

Comment by RosWa | 2008-05-24 14:29:42

No empty suit with big ears for me….it is Hillary or McCain 08.

 
 

Comment by HARP | 2008-05-24 14:30:14

I knew there was a coup going on in the party when it was revealed that only 2 states would be penalized for moving up their primary. They are going to push him through no matter what happens because their own careers depend on it.

Comment by Bill | 2008-05-24 14:34:13

But how is this a coup when clinton’s people were the ones that voted to strip the delegates?

Stripping the delegates was supposed to help clinton front load the primary so she could win before someone like Obama could get name recognition.

She and her team just misjudged the anti establishment feeling this year and lost Iowa.

Comment by HARP | 2008-05-24 14:41:00

Bill, you are such an idiot. The DNC voted to strip delegates. Not Hillary.

Comment by Bill | 2008-05-24 14:56:11

sorry but they were hill’s people when they voted to strip.

I know that might be hard to contemplate, but the fact is Ickes was working for Hillary’s campaign when he voted, and 12 other members had already come out in support of hill.

Are you arguing they voted against their candidates best interest?

Comment by HARP | 2008-05-24 15:05:37

Bill,You’re like one of those “idiot savants,” except without the “savant” part.

 

Comment by Tom Plumb | 2008-05-24 15:06:13

Yes, but that would also have been before people understood Dean’s plan, in regard to Obama.

Trust, and all that, you know.

But we get the picture, so thanx…

And really, Obama plans to throw out Dean?

Too too funny, must be a little jumpy over there, huh?

LOLOLOLOLOLOL

 

Comment by Obama_is_Weak | 2008-05-24 15:20:37

Just wrote to the Obama campaign to drop Bill as a surrogate given he is such a lousy unsophisticated troll.

Boy Bill, are you boring and simple-minded….

 
 
 

Comment by Jeremiah "God Damn AmeriKKKA" Wright | 2008-05-24 14:41:58

Camp Obamboozelama Koolaid Cult members entrance —-> that way

 

Comment by so saddened | 2008-05-24 14:55:13

oh yes, bill, hillary would naturally say, hmmm, i want to win early, so i’ll be sure that two states that everyone knows will vote FOR me bigtime don’t get counted…

obamalogic.

hillary or mccain. no other option.

 
 
 

Comment by HillaryMadamePresident | 2008-05-24 14:30:20


I call it arrogance and lack of respect for the process.

PaganPower, I couldn’t agree more!!! Obama, Axelrod, Dean and Brazile have ruined the Democratic Party, with the help of certain news outlets. They are Bullies with a steamroller. There is nothing Democratic about it. I hope they know what a big surprise the Reagan Democrats, as well as many other groups who have been disenfranchised or just plain shouted down by these bullies, are going to be handed in November. I don’t much think it will be a pleasant surprise for Obamatrons. It’s Hillary or McCain 2008.

Comment by Uppity | 2008-05-24 14:37:00

It does look like they are throwing the General election doesn’t it?

Comment by Dakinikat | 2008-05-24 14:55:50

That’s the thing that is most confusing to me. I can’t imagine what is going through their minds at this time. They think we’re all going to line up like nice little sheep to slaughter behind who ever they anoint. As an optimistic kid, I voted for Dukkakis. I sighed and voted for Kerry even though I knew we were once again snatching defeat from the jaws of what should have been inevitable victory. The DNC does not appear to care that a huge number of their voters WILL walk and pull the lever for McCain. It has nothing to do with this ‘drawn-out’ season or Hillary voting on. I’m sure they’ll blame President McCain on Hillary some how. You cannot keep putting up a candidate that appeals to the anti-war crowd and a few other special interest groups that represent a minority of voters and expect to retake the presidency. Hello? McGovern? Hello? Most average Democrats are average Americans! Hello? DNC? HELLO?

Comment by Ivory Bill Woodpecker | 2008-05-24 15:07:31

Maybe the Democratic establishment suspects the next Great Depression will come during the next Administration, and they want a Republican President there to take the blame when it happens?

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-05-25 09:04:19

Well that would be foolish would’nt it….Although The New Deal saved the Nation from an Ugly Revolution…Poverty is the great leveller after all….WW II is what heaved us out of the grip of the Great Depression…and we able to take advantage of the fact that we had no direct economic/industrial competition in the aftermath for….hmmm….How many Years ?

** Of course I think we are most likely headed for next phase of Empirical Wompass in the Middle East anyway….And it will work in our favor or not depending on who is in the WH…and it cannot be a FASCIST…**

 
 

Comment by Tom Plumb | 2008-05-24 15:10:16

I don’t know, if I were McCain, and if Obama DOES get the nod, and that is by no means certain, AT ALL, I would worry that those who traditionally assist the republican party are now helping Obama, for some god forsaken reason.

Maybe the think he can relate better to the ME and African oil men, who knows?

Obama doesn’t strike me as very bright, though, none in his campaign do, so I have to wonder if they really understand what they’re doing.

I think not.

Comment by Bill | 2008-05-24 15:40:27

you are a moron.

If Obama isn’t that bright, and his staff as well, how is it they defeated YOUR candidate so dramatically when she was soooooooo far ahead when this thing started.

Comment by Deep Truths | 2008-05-24 17:19:37

Rigged caucuses and cheating in Missiouri, North Carolina, and Indiana. Indiana was caught in the act, worldwide. Gary, IN mayor was ‘holding’ votes back to see how much Obama needed to win by. St. Louis had the same ‘hold’ and miraculously he squeeked by. In North Carolina its the ‘one-stop’ voting areas wheres tens of people showed up to vote, but hundreds were ballots were cast.

Chicken’s coming home to roost.

 

Comment by Hillary or Bust | 2008-05-24 19:57:19

What dramatic defeat? Obama and Clinton are neck in neck and she just trounced him in West Virginia and Kentucky. I don’t call that a dramatic defeat…if you are going to be pro-Obama, fine, but don’t hyperbolize, it does not help your cause.

 
 
 

Comment by Uppity | 2008-05-24 15:31:14

That’s how we got Nixon twice. After the Marxist radicals got done offending huge voter blocks, even Nixon looked good to them.

 
 
 

Comment by PaganPower | 2008-05-24 15:44:34

Up until a few weeks ago I have been nothing except a loyal Democrat my entire adult life. I have voted straight Democratic ticket in every election.

Never Again!

Howard Dean, Donna Brazile and Barack Obama stole the party I once supported away from me and many others just like me. I have no problem at all supporting someone that is not a Democrat in the fall election. None whatsoever. And I promise to encourage others to follow suit.

 
 

Comment by Uppity | 2008-05-24 14:33:26

Love this quote from one of the links

But Obama can’t afford to move too quickly toward the general election, or he will risk alienating Clinton supporters who are already emotional about the likelihood of their chosen candidate’s closely fought defeat.

Um, somebody needs to tell barry he needn’t risk alienating anyone. It’s already done and he can’t have us back.

If he plans to put his surrogate to head the Cliff Party, what was he planning to do with Howard? Under the bus with you Howard! Sucker!

Comment by HillaryMadamePresident | 2008-05-24 14:46:58

Barry can count me out. I signed the pledge. I’ll contribute, financially, to McCain and campaign for him, if Hillary is not the nominee. I haven’t heard a peep from Howie. Is he in hiding? I don’t know how often DNC Chairs serve..does the nominee get to install a new leader every 4 years? I prefer to think that he recognizes what a mess he’s made of things, how he has failed the entire party and is getting outta Dodge with his head hung low.

Comment by JP | 2008-05-24 15:11:01

I just got Time Magazine yesterday and it had an interview with Dean the lying pig in it. He says we’ll support Obama. Never No Never never never never. Get it.

Comment by Bill | 2008-05-24 15:44:47

ok, assuming you are smart enough to know an opinion from a lie. What has Howard “lied” about that you could accuse another democrat so viciously?

Comment by Deep Truths | 2008-05-24 17:22:48

Howard, is that you?

 

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-05-25 09:07:38

Hmmm….HOWARD DEAN LIED WHEN HE POSED AS A DEMOCRAT…
…..HOWL !…..nuff said…..

 
 
 
 

Comment by Melissa | 2008-05-24 15:18:34

Can Obama get another bus for Dean and Brazile and the rest of those creeps? It’s crowded under here!

 

Comment by mahaska | 2008-05-25 02:36:08

except dogs and cats, who’s left for him to offend and alienate?

 
 

Comment by Lucinda | 2008-05-24 14:35:33

I’ve come to the conclusion that it’s all about destroying the Clintons. I don’t think it’s about “running the black guy”. It could be any guy they pulled off the street and convinced to run, so long as they could get the Clintons and all of their riff-raff (e.g. elderly people, Latinos, baby boomers without college educations, women of a certain age, black people who won’t get in line, etc.) out of the party. Talk about shooting yourself in foot. Wonder what I’ll wear to John McCain’s inaugural ball?

Comment by sumgun | 2008-05-24 14:45:44

No, it had to be some kind of black because of the race card with the AA block. BO was the perfect fit - postwar postracial postpartisan postrational posthaste and all that crap

Comment by Betty | 2008-05-24 16:25:14

I think you are right. I have thought for a while now that if, for some reason, Hillary had decided not to run for president neither would have Obama. They (who ever “they” are) would have held him in reserve in case Hillary decided to run in 2012. They think he is the Hillary stopper candidate.

“They” are in up to elbows right now and probably have no idea what to do. I wish someone would start leaking how it was arraigned, who was in on it.

To their dismay they now see Hillary’s support is formidable and unstoppable. It is obvious she is a leader in the mold of FDR - both as CiC and as champion of the working class. And Obama is a pansy, with nasty friends and by now “they” must have come to the frightening realization that he is someone Else’s puppet.

And now they know that what was such a sure democratic victory in Nov will turn into a McCain landslide, if they are foolish enough to give Obama the nomination, but they are trapped. And “they” are going to be held accountable - not me and “they” had better not try to pin it on Hillary.

Thank God Hillary stayed in or we might all be drinking koolaid, congratulating ourselves, thinking we had nominated the first black man to be a viable candidate to the Presidency. That’s what ‘they’ planned, it is obvious “they” think we are stupid. I am going to vote against anyone it is in my power to vote against. I have heard nothing from my representatives, local elected officials or party officials. No one spoke out against the blatant sexism or in defense of our democratic processes and Hillary’s right to avail herself of them. Nothing but a silence. And I take that to be assent to the filth that has gone on. These - my elected representatives and local democratic officials are practicing Obama Chicago Politics - Don’t make eye contact, Don’t get in the way, Let it happen. They mistakenly think they can all sing that fleas song. “There ain’t no bugs on me, there may be bugs on some of you mugs, but their ain’t no bugs on me.”

If I am forced to vote McCain for the good of my country this November, I will also vote straight Republican.

Comment by Kathy | 2008-05-24 17:07:00

You do know that Rove is associated with the Chicago mob. He supposedly is their contact in Washington. Wouldn’t it be funny if this was all planned to keep the republicans in office? They must have known anyone in their right mind wouldn’t vote for Obama.

 
 

Comment by Deep Truths | 2008-05-24 17:27:16

postwar postracial postpartisan postrational posthaste and all that crap

Soon to be post-mortem.

Comment by Deep Truths | 2008-05-24 17:31:51

party wise.

Obama-rats don’t get knickers in a twist. Just saying ‘white’, ‘black’, or you know that word that is derived from hashish, that I don’t want you to come unglued, AGAIN.

 
 
 

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-05-24 15:23:58

yep - we’ve always KNOWN that some hated her in some very irrational ways.

I still don’t get it? Why? Because she stayed with her cheating husband? BFD he was a great President and it was her choice. (if offspring were involved that would not fly)

People’s personal lives - yuck - I don’t want to know. NOT if they are doing an outstanding JOB in OFFICE and their personal life does not involve sword throwing or fire swallowing! LOL
No S & M or bathroom stall stuff! ;-) ew

Comment by jes | 2008-05-24 16:16:54

I think it’s because of Bill’s southern roots and the fact that he comes from a working class background. Bill and Hillary understand the people of this country. Unlike Obama, it’s not an intellectual exercise to them.

 

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-05-25 09:13:54

It is a doomed exercize to apply logic to those that are irrational…This is FASCISM.
FASCISM IS THE ANTITHESIS TO LOGIC AND REASON…AND DEMOCRACY

*** OBAMA IS A FASCIST…AN ORDINARY ONE…NOT EVEN ESPECIALLY GIFTED OR INTELLIGENT….JUST A REGULAR FASCIST AND JUST AS DANGEROUS….***

 
 
 

Comment by Mary Jo Kopechne | 2008-05-24 14:38:36

Great post, PaganPower. And Lemmings are such cute little things. Too bad they run off cliffs in mass suicide.

I think Arrogance is Obama’s real middle name.

I was a Democrat for almost 40 years. Obama’s hijacking of the party has chased me and millions away. They can run off the cliff without us.

Comment by sumgun | 2008-05-24 14:43:25

Hijacking is the best description for what is happening to the Democratic Party - something Hillary was part of before The Messiah was born.

Comment by Jeremiah "God Damn AmeriKKKA" Wright | 2008-05-24 14:46:30

The Messiah wasnt born.

He was lowered down from heaven in a beam of Hope and Change. While the angels sang Hallelujah Yes We Can!!

Comment by sumgun | 2008-05-24 14:58:31

No immaculate conception? That’s even better than Jesus!

Comment by Tom Plumb | 2008-05-24 15:12:11

How is spam conceived?

Because Obama, and his campaign, are no more than spam on the world stage.

 
 
 

Comment by Bill | 2008-05-24 14:59:10

what if you are wrong?

Do you really believe hillary has been a Democrat for 47 years?

I suggest you recheck some of your assumption to see what other errors you are making.

Comment by Tom Plumb | 2008-05-24 15:13:16

Terrorist connections, Bill, terrorist connections, national security issues.

Try to see it as mattering, mkay?

Comment by Bill | 2008-05-24 15:21:24

there are NO terrorist connections.

None that ANY national politician doesn’t make during the course of governance.

If there were Obama wouldn’t be our nominee.

Ayres is a terrorist. Not in the 2008 definition Americans have been conditioned to fear.

The only people calling him a terrorist are rightwing nut jobs like Hannity and larry.

McSame has the same ‘connections’. Yet you say you will vote for him.

Comment by catriley | 2008-05-24 15:28:12

McVeigh was a terrorist. Ayers is a terrorist. Same mentality, different M.O.

It amazes me what OBama supporters will tolerate, ignore, or rationalize, in order to justify their support.

He offers nothing buy pretty words.. pretty words written by two middle-aged white guys. And god.. they aren’t even original words.

It must be so weird to be so completely brainwashed like that. Sadly, this is not something you’re going to look back on and laugh when you see the pics of yourself, Bill, with a ridiculous Obama t-shirt. It’s not like a bad 80’s hairdo, it’s the fucking Country!

Comment by Bill | 2008-05-24 15:51:47

haha.

If Ayers is a terrorist why is he teaching and not being waterboarded at GITMO?

Progressive Liberals are smart enough to see redemption and understand the constitution.

You try and smear Obama with McCarthyesque tactics but completely ignore Clinton glad handing violent despots.

Are you an authoritarian right wing nut job?

Comment by Joseph Cannon | 2008-05-24 16:30:32

Ayers went free on a technicality. He brags to this dy about being guilty as sin. If you brag about your guilt, you are in no sense redeemed.

There is no such thing as a “Progressive liberal.” You can be either a progressive or a liberal; you cannot be both. I am a liberal. Examples of progressives would be Markos Moulitsas, Arianna Huffington, Andrew Sullivan, and John Aravosis — all of whom are LiberTARIAN, not LiberAL. Liberals support the FDR legacy, the New Deal paradigm that ruled between 1945-1980. Progressives, historically, have always despised that legacy.

The Obama movement is the New McCarthyism. I was once an Obama supoorter, but I became disgusted at the smear tactics of his campaign.

 

Comment by Deep Truths | 2008-05-24 17:36:56

Stop obfuscating, Bill. Don’t you care to read anything that’s not from a blog.

Search for Ayers, Dorhn, Auchi, Rezko with Barack Obama.

Google is your friend. Light a candle and all that jazz.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Comment by Uppity | 2008-05-24 14:55:42

To me this really is deja vu. The party ends up fractured every time these Marxist nutcases rear their ugly heads. But in the end, the majority of the party stays quiet till November. The moderates Rule in the end. That’s why we have only elected two presidents in thirty years. And it was Bill Clinton who rescued them last time. So much for their gratitude. When they are done, the party will be in shambles again until a person comes along who is not a wingnut and the party gets a shot of adrenaline again. Overall, 2012 should do it.

The problem is, these crackpot radicals try to “purge” the party every so often when in fact they get marginalized in the end. These are people who know their fringe parties were useless so they want to turn the Democratic party into Them. And for some reason, they imagine they can con Democrats to vote for a wingnut while managing to insult every large voting block in the process. A bunch of smart dumb people, if you will. The problem is the majority isn’t going to “leave the party”. Instead they are just not going to vote for the candidate.

The other problem is, nobody purged THEM instead. Perhaps the next time we actually elect a president, it will come to mind.

In the meantime, you are witnessing the McGovern episode Re-Make, only the media is even more advanced. The shouters and insulters and offensive kids get to be even more offensive, which means the electorate will be even more offended and pissed off at the polls.

As for the swiftboating: At first you will wince watching Barry get nailed if the dump him on the ballot, but later you will actually get to enjoy it. Even McGovern didn’t have the swiftboat problem, and he only got 38% of the vote. Things are far more advanced today. A Marxist Snob can insult larger blocks of voters with just a few words and it flies around the country. Thus, Barry’s little disconnect problem. I predict that the subject of Black Reparations will be hitting the mainstream just to make sure that even more Democrats jump ship at the poll. This is going to be embarrassing.

Ironically, SDs were designed to avoid another McGovern problem. How funny is that?

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-05-25 09:21:44

Uppity…I think Obama is the most dangerous man in America…I fear this is worse than what has happened before although I defer to your greater experience and knowledge…In fact it is my hope that things turn out as you predict ( if Clinton is denied the nod )…That would be the best case in that Obama is defeated and this is contained as simply inter-party bullshit in the vein of those elections you repeatedly site….

*** Occasionally I get a little overwhelemed by similarities to Berlin 1933……Scuse’ ***

 

Comment by ginamc | 2008-05-26 13:56:46

The problem is, these crackpot radicals try to “purge” the party every so often when in fact they get marginalized in the end. These are people who know their fringe parties were useless so they want to turn the Democratic party into Them.

I say that the the naive youth, the radical leftists, the black nationalists, , Elitist dilettantes, and the bourgeoise Professors Ivory-tower types, the wacked out Indies and the Obamacans form their own Party — the Disney-Dysfunctional Party. Leave the working-class, disadvantaged, common, everyday moderate Democratic Party alone, please.

 
 
 

Comment by Jeremiah "God Damn AmeriKKKA" Wright | 2008-05-24 14:45:11

Its all about destroying the clintons for a lot of the peon party insiders who suddenly see this as the opportunity they have been waiting for to curry favor with the rising new power.

Little do they know this is the same old dirty political pay for play machine that runs chicago.

They aren’t just selling their votes, they sold their souls and their party with it.

My Friends you are witnessing the destruction of the Democratic party from the inside out.

Time for a new party.

 

Comment by Catharine | 2008-05-24 14:48:11

Here is an interesting solution to the entire problem (I mean if Obama can court potential VPS - why can’t Hillary)?

“I was listening to Rush (oh My God)! A valid point was brought up - who do you want to disenfranchise more - women or black voters? One of his listeners brought this up, and said no one wants to talk about it - if BO does not get the nomination, the race card will be pulled and there will be riots in every US City. The Superdelegates fear this as well as the DNC. THey are being held hostage by the race card.

You know, there may well be something to that. Ok,

I have read that both John McCain and BHO would love to have NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg as a running mate. Many US Citizens would like Bloomberg to step up to the plate and run Independent…

So…Hillary should get with Bloomberg and try to get him to be her running mate and they should run as Indpendents together. I think they could easily win. This would get the Dems off the hook.

Michael…step up to the plate and save the country!!!!”

Comment by Manamongst Hussein | 2008-05-24 14:57:52

wow you are now officially republican…congrats!

 

Comment by Deep Truths | 2008-05-24 17:41:24

Nonsense. Black Americans have been fooled just like those latte liberals.

MLK is worth rioting over, Obama is not worth broken fingernail.

 
 

Comment by fred | 2008-05-24 14:48:27

The DNC will try and seat Fl and MI to advantage Obama..The DNC violate there own rules as we have been pointing out for months they did not do and investigation or they would have learn the primary move up date was pass by a Republican Majority. Florida must be seated by it voters preference. MI Obama took his name off the ballots and was given an extension to put his name back on he refuse he didn’t want the exit polls to reflex the large MI Muslims votes he would have received, he gambled. so he didn’t want MI votes and they should not be allot to him because he was not on the ballot. Dean did no investigation, he didn’t follow the rules that if after an investigated and its proven that the Democrat Party could have stop the move they get penalized 50% of the delegates. seat Fl and MI the way the voters voted. anything else would be ELECTION FRAUD

Comment by Tom Plumb | 2008-05-24 15:14:32

 

Comment by Uppity | 2008-05-24 15:33:09

Florida’s lawsuit is a black cloud over their heads now.

Comment by Uppity | 2008-05-24 15:33:58

What they want to do is count their votes AFTER they endorse Barky. That way……..ooops! Too late!

 
 
 

Comment by jen | 2008-05-24 14:49:01

What I wonder…

Do the DNC powerbrokers backing O! and all his starry-eyed supporters think the press is going to keep giving him a pass IF he’s the nom and is up against McCain? Or do they honestly not see any problems with his associations and dealings with terrorists, and the corrupt Chicago political machine?

And yeah, my dad, who has voted Dem for 60 years will be leaving the top of the ticket blank for the first time in his life if O! is the nom. I won’t be working against O! but I certainly will enjoy watching him be knocked down off his self-made pedestal and won’t lift a finger to help him.

Nevada doesn’t allow write-ins but they do have a “none of the above” option, which is what I will use.

Nope. Me and dad aren’t leaving the Democratic Party — the Democratic Party is leaving us.

Comment by PaganPower | 2008-05-24 15:39:40

Me and dad aren’t leaving the Democratic Party — the Democratic Party is leaving us.

Absolutely SO true.

 
 

Comment by HARP | 2008-05-24 14:50:46

I have a question for anyone who knows the system better than I. Is it to late for Hillary to run as an Independent,since that would ensure a defeat for Obama ?

Comment by Jeremiah "God Damn AmeriKKKA" Wright | 2008-05-24 14:56:44

no but she has to gather signatures to be on the ballots, although her documented voting numbers should be able to be used in lieu of that for most if not all the states.

But Hillary running as an independant would be equivalant to an asteroid hitting the political landscape.

Nobody knows what would happen.

But we all know that they would be attacking her from all quarters. oh wait they already do that no>?

Comment by HARP | 2008-05-24 15:07:27

Thanks, and you are spot on for the attacks.

 
 

Comment by PaganPower | 2008-05-24 15:47:53

I really don’t think that Hilary would ever do that as much as I wish she would. The only way I see her doing it is if the Democratic leadership comes down on her hard as has been rumored and she politely tells them to F*** off!

Comment by Deep Truths | 2008-05-24 17:45:37

One good thing from this chaos though, there is a Hillary wing of the Democratic. A huge chuck of it too.

 

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-05-25 09:27:12

Hmmm….It is fun to think about though in these trying times…If anyone has the capabilities to start a new FDR type party….It would be her…
Bill Clinton led the wave with the Centrist New Democrats with both Hillary and Al alongside many others….Hmmmm

 
 
 

Comment by Joseph Cannon | 2008-05-24 14:52:48

Lemmings don’t really commit suicide. In American schools, they used to show students a Disney nature movie in which lemmings were shown leaping off of a cliff. That was staged. Yes, offscreen guys actually tossed lemmings.

Obama’s move is not THAT outrageous. Reagan picked a vice-president going into the convention in 1976. I can’t recall who it was. Reagan was actually behind in the delegate count when he pulled that stunt.

Comment by Obama_is_Weak | 2008-05-24 14:59:01

Okay. So Joseph, what do you think would the media reaction be if HRC were doing a VP selection process; choosing the next head of the DNC; redirect all donors to any democratic cause to his own chest, etc etc etc?

Should HRC start doing that also? Maybe it’s a good idea she announces her VP selection committee; what do you say?….

Comment by Tom Plumb | 2008-05-24 15:17:59

I’d say rather then respecting the electoral process, Clinton would appear to be engaging in some childish attempts at psy ops, ala Obama, and she would lose credibility.

Obama looks like a GOOF, cmon, was it Pluto or Goofy with the big ears?

Maybe Dumbo.

Clinton is maintaining a sense of electoral dignity.

Comment by Obama_is_Weak | 2008-05-24 15:34:41

Agree. I was being cynical for Joseph ;-)

 
 

Comment by bwana | 2008-05-24 15:20:34

at this point, no one would take her seriously.

Comment by Obama_is_Weak | 2008-05-24 15:24:28

at this point, no one would take takes her wannabe bwana seriously.

LOL wannabe bwana down’t understand the meaning of 17 Million people.

You go back to first grade sweetie.

 
 

Comment by Joseph Cannon | 2008-05-24 16:35:11

Hey, I wasn’t defending Obama. Don’t you guys know me better than that? I’m just saying that, by historical standards, this move isn’t much of a stunner.

As I recall — and memory may be faulty; this was a very long time ago — not many people were outraged by Reagan’s attempt to pick a veep. The reaction was more along the lines of amusement at the sheer cheekiness of his gesture.

Jeez, who DID he pick in ‘76? I know that it was someone better than Poppy. I could look it up, but I wanna try to do this one from memory…

 

Comment by AnninCa | 2008-05-25 09:30:53

Hillary has beld all along to a much higher standard. That is because more is expected of the top-quality candidate, frankly.

It’s a back-handed compliment when it isn’t overt sexism. :)

 
 

Comment by Uppity | 2008-05-24 15:02:56

Reagan had a strong moderate appeal. Who knew he was sneaky though? Anyways, he won handily with DEMOCRATs voting for him, because Mondale was just too damned left. The rest is history. Now the party wants to make more of the same history. It’s like watching an episode of Ground Hog Day.

Comment by blueasthesky | 2008-05-24 15:40:58

At the end of his first term, Reagan was enormously popular, with approval ratings in the 60s. Nobody could have unseated him.

Comment by Five Thirty | 2008-05-24 17:34:45

Yes - and he was the Teflon President. Reagan had the MSM’s support all the way.

 
 

Comment by alibe4-Hillary | 2008-05-24 15:59:39

The reason Mondale lost to Reagan was the Iranian Hostage Thing. And who made the Pisspoor foreign policy decisions that led to that debacle??? None other than Zbig Brezinski, Jimmy Carter’s National Security guy. He allowed the exiled Shah of Iran to enter the US for medical treatment. Despite dire warnings of problems this would cause, he was allowed to enter, even though he could have received treatment elsewhere. And of course the hostages were then captured and international incident escaleted to destroy Carter. And guess who is Obama foreign policy adviser? And who else is connected to Brezinski? Besides MSNBC’s Mika Brezinski, her brother is advising John McCain. I believe Mark Penn was connected to Brezinski in some way too.

 

Comment by Chuck | 2008-05-24 16:14:28

McCain will continue the Republican assault on the New Deal. Obama, in the interest of “unity,” will cave in and abet the Repubican assault on the New Deal. I’m going third party, and it’s certainly not because Obama is “too damned left.”

 

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-05-25 09:34:31

Reagan also took advantage of the simple fact that middle age has a way of forcing maturity on Idealists…It’s easy to be idealist when you are either Uber Rich…or….Uber Poor…or …..Young and ignorant…
The first string of Baby Boomers had grown up and their concerns matured due to life experience…and the UTTER AND COMPLETE FAILURE OF ST. JIMMY…..They were willing to give Reagan a fair shake because the alternative was more WRONG LIBERAL BULLSHIT….Clinton was able to tap into this as well…to a masterful degree….imho

 
 

Comment by PaganPower | 2008-05-24 15:49:05

Comparing Obama to Reagan isn’t exactly helping your case.

 
 

Comment by Andy | 2008-05-24 14:52:55

The only good news to any of this is that you will be taking your cult off the cliff with you.

Indeed so they will.

By the way, there is an interesting post at TL by BTD about the advise Mike Murphy is giving McCain to run against Obama (don’t attack Obama; run as the reform candidate). BTD thesis is that it is bad advise but what is interesting is what he says at the end: that voters do not vote for reform but usually vote against the other guy.

Interesting….for

Against Obama (if they insist on he being the nominee) we will vote in November. And that is something the DNC can take to the bank.

 

Comment by fred | 2008-05-24 14:53:17

My question how do we keep Hillary on the ballot in 50 states as a Democrat in the general election ? I know it can be done how anyone knows?

 

Comment by Jeremiah "God Damn AmeriKKKA" Wright | 2008-05-24 14:53:18

DNC - In the Tank for Barry and Michelle. Dean has hated the clintons for so long and he just cant help himself now. Besides all that arab money disguised as sub 200 dollar donations bundled that you dont have to identify which is 95% of obamas funding as he says - in other words 95% of his fundraising can not be accounted for, goes a long way to buying votes.

Any democrat who didnt know how easily votes are bought sure knows it now.

Mainstream Media - So enraptured with the idea of a black president they dont bother to vet and have now so deeply invested they have no objectivity.

Republicans - Some laughing at this others beginning to worry about what will happen to this country if this nutjob from Chi-town gets in power.

American people - god help you.

Comment by Bill | 2008-05-24 15:10:01

are you crazy?

Do you have a link that proves Obama has taken money we can’t track to the donor?

Comment by HARP | 2008-05-24 15:13:25

Obamas POD people`s brains are like the prison system - not enough cells.

Comment by Kathy | 2008-05-24 17:19:11

The money Obama took from Rezko and his friends, he gave to charity once it was found out that Rezko was indicted.

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-05-25 09:40:05

They have only begun to uncover the $$$ Obama has recieved…This is why Obama and Blagovitch are both named in Rezko’s indictment…THIS IS ONE OF MANY REASONS OBAMA IS HEADED FOR POLITICAL OBLIVION…AND MAYBE PRISON…

DO TRY TO KEEP UP…KATHY…WILL YOU…WE NEED BETTER TROLLS

 

Comment by AnninCa | 2008-05-25 09:45:22

First he gave 17,000. Then, when the story grew, he gave another 30,000. Oops, then they discovered that maybe, maybe they had underestimated.

It’s currently up to 170,000.

Personally, I think that number is a flipping joke.

 
 
 

Comment by Tom Plumb | 2008-05-24 15:20:17

Besides all that arab money disguised as sub 200 dollar donations bundled that you dont have to identify which is 95% of obamas funding as he says - in other words 95% of his fundraising can not be accounted for, goes a long way to buying votes.

He’s dead on, and THIS is why the election has been sold to the highest bidder.

I hope, someday, they are ALL held accountable, and thrown in jail.

Comment by Five Thirty | 2008-05-24 17:38:23

hope, someday, they are ALL held accountable, and thrown in jail.

If Cheney & Co. hasn’t been, who would ever be?

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-05-25 09:43:51

Fallaces Sunt Rerum Species = Appearances of things are deceptive

** Cheney is a convicted ciminal in France…Things change…imho **

 
 
 

Comment by Obama_is_Weak | 2008-05-24 15:32:53

Wrong question: the question is: can you track the money to each and every one of its donors?
The answer to that is NO.

On a related issue:

What do you think of this (note the reporter says “time and money”. That is money being used to benefit Obama doing phone calls to voters from Gaza.)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=21YF7ggCG6g

 

Comment by Uppity | 2008-05-24 15:36:34

You can meet all of barack Obama’s bundlers (and lobbyists too) at whitehouseforsale web site. Don’t forget your calculator to add it all up. Or you can do a search on it for diaries here that contain links. Nobody here is going to do your work for you.

 

Comment by Jeremiah "God Damn AmeriKKKA" Wright | 2008-05-24 18:07:52

Donations under 200.00 do not have to be tracked or disclosed because they are considered too paltry to be worth the time to document.

Come on this guys from chicago.

He set up the kitchen cabinet that rubber stamped Rezkos picks to get contracts for kickbacks to the Obuyme and Blogpaymemoreavich’s campaigns.

You think they dont know how to launder money?

I cant wait for the rezko verdict to come in and the next round where Politician #1 and #2 are indicted.

 
 

Comment by Deep Truths | 2008-05-24 17:52:20

Excellent point.

 
 

Comment by ssmith | 2008-05-24 14:53:55

looks like it took BO, dean, pelosi, kerry, kennedy , dodd 4 months what the GOPs couldn’t do in over 20 years.. THEY HAVE DESTROYED THe DEMOCRATIC PARTY.. good thing I changed my affiliation to indy. I would be embarrassed to call myself a democrat anymore

Comment by Jeremiah "God Damn AmeriKKKA" Wright | 2008-05-24 14:59:40

I have already had to deny being a democrat three times today before the cock crowed.

I am sure the DNC’s new Messiah is very dissappointed in me.

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-05-24 15:31:20

roflmao!!

Peter Puhlease!

 
 
 

Comment by fred | 2008-05-24 15:00:12

lets solve this put both candidates on the ticket and let the winner win

Comment by Uppity | 2008-05-24 15:05:48

Wouldn’t work. People clearly understand what a President’s powers are and what a VP is. I for one wouldn’t vote for Obama if he had my own mother as a VP.

 

Comment by Deep Truths | 2008-05-24 17:56:52

Works for me.

(Choose One)

Hillary

John

Obama

 
 

Comment by Manamongst Hussein | 2008-05-24 15:02:16

So is this all Larry has to complain about these days? I see the numbers are getting thin here…so I guess all of you people are waiting for Barry to get assasinated too? You people are sad.

Comment by Uppity | 2008-05-24 15:06:27

Somebody needs to show this wanker the hit count.

Comment by Ivory Bill Woodpecker | 2008-05-24 15:17:42

And then show the wanker the door. Oh, bouncer… ;)

 

Comment by Obama_is_Weak | 2008-05-24 15:38:07

Manawhatever Hussein is in Gaza and hasn’t gone to school. He does not know how to count poor thing.

 
 

Comment by fooj | 2008-05-24 15:13:25

You people are fucking nuts. What’s the matter? Obama losing his “perpetual victim” status? The guy can’t hold his own unless he creates a “straw man” to fight against. Boo fucking hoo. Grab a clue.

He’s a coward and a liar. That’s what’s sad.

Pathetic, actually.

 
 

Comment by Bill | 2008-05-24 15:07:59

The Rude Pundit

Proudly lowering the level of political discourse
5/23/2008
Hillary Clinton: RFK’s Ass Was Capped All the Way in June, So What’s Your Fuckin’ Hurry?:
An analogy: Hillary Clinton basing her timeline for ending the current nomination process on the June assassination of Robert Kennedy is like a drunk guy saying he’s got time for another whiskey because his girlfriend is busy getting gang raped in the alley behind the bar.

And someone really ought to point out to the Clinton campaign that the presidential campaign of 1968 was not a two- or three-year long process. The New Hampshire primary, the first in the nation, wasn’t until March 12. Kennedy didn’t even get into the running until March 16, 1968. By June 4, 1968, the date of the California primary that Kennedy won, a date that’s four months later than this year’s California primary, there had only been 13 primaries. Indeed, running until the convention was the only choice, especially after Kennedy was killed on June 5. By June 5 this year, every state will have had its primaries or caucuses. It’s not that people were any more patient in 1968. They just didn’t have a choice but to wait and see.

So, like, even leaving out the morbid fucktardery of the statement Clinton made and dealing with it on its alleged merits, it’s deceptive and idiotic and out of context.

To Clinton’s campaign and its supporters, who have been holding out for some gaffe by Obama that would take him down: How’s that working out for ya?

// posted by Rude One @ 5:06 PM| DiggIt!| Del.icio.us|

Comment by Jeremiah "God Damn AmeriKKKA" Wright | 2008-05-24 15:10:50

Well as we said before its not so much about electing Hillary anymore as it is about ensuring Obama doesn’t win.

We know the DNC and MSM are in the tank.

We Know the prospects of getting fair treatment or coverage is nonexistant.

But come november Our Votes will go to John McCain, and your piece of shiite candidate will lose.

Comment by Bill | 2008-05-24 15:16:08

no I really doubt it.

You folks are the bitter deadenders, two few in numbers to make a difference.

That’s why you post such vile bullshit.

Not all of you are racist throwbacks, but a lot here are.

Most of you are just cry babies looking to blame everyone else for your poor judgment.

Comment by Tom Plumb | 2008-05-24 15:24:48

How the hell would you know?

No one respects a thing you say, you’re as pompous and self important as the half wit K^^.

 

Comment by fooj | 2008-05-24 15:33:17

Bill,

You show me ONE time when Little Lord Obama has taken responsibility for ANYTHING in this campaign. He’s a coward. I certainly wouldn’t want to have HIM backing me.

You know, I’m just a “typical white person”…

“I ceased to advertise my mother’s race at the age of 12 or 13, when I began to suspect that by doing so I was ingratiating myself to whites.”-Barack Obama, Dreams of my Father

“Black politicians less gifted than Harold discovered what white politicians had known for a very long time: that race-baiting could make up for a host of limitations.”- Barack Obama, Dreams of my Father

“I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.”-Barack Obama, Audacity of Hope

You call this “good judgement” on Obama’s part? BWAHAHAHAHA! There goes your credibility, Bill. Take your racist remarks and apply them to the race-baiting cowards that have actively divided this party. Give it a rest. Don’t they require you do some reading on the subject before they cut you loose to make a fool of yourself? Geesh…

Guess it takes all kinds. And I thought that YOU were one of the smarter ones…

BWAHAHAHAHAHA!

Comment by PaganPower | 2008-05-24 15:55:16

Little Lord Obama

Hahahahahaha!

 
 

Comment by catriley | 2008-05-24 15:36:29

Then why the fuck are you here, Bill?

Comment by Bill | 2008-05-24 16:04:14

I’m playing a game with the deadend spook Larry.

He deletes my posts that aren’t replied to and the posts where I highlight his connections and hypocricy.

But at the end of the day I’m just taking names and watching you lunatics.

Larry’s sources are doing him dirty because he was too much of an egomaniac to not to see he is being set up as the fall guy.

Watching it unfold at this level is always fun.

Comment by Deep Truths | 2008-05-24 18:02:02

Ah, so your undercover, incognito, on the down-low.

Gotcha (wink).

Comment by Jeremiah "God Damn AmeriKKKA" Wright | 2008-05-24 18:24:19

doesn’t being on the Down Low mean you boink your bacon with the boys?

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-05-25 09:48:50

Yes…but those on the Down Low don’t call it homosexal behavior either…another reason why The Gay community have these fools number…chuckle…

 
 

Comment by mahaska | 2008-05-25 03:04:49

bet you tell your wife you’re going on secret missions. oooo

 
 
 
 
 
 

Comment by fooj | 2008-05-24 15:16:24

May 31st. Mark it on your calendar. No gaffes necessary but PLENTY of evidence.

Saint Barack ‘aint so saintly afterall. What a fucking pity.

How’s THAT going to work for you?

 

Comment by Kay Green | 2008-05-24 15:20:00

I think you need to look in your own backyard,those who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones. Hillary should have been treated like any other candidate. Being a man you might not understand, that the rules should apply evenly to everyone. Everyone tried to force her out of the race before it has been over. Ok, in a football game do they tell the losing team it’s over until the game ends? The media has committed almost like what I call rape against Hillary. They are not unbiased or impartial. they just wen after her while giving preferential treatment to Obama. What is this country coming to, when people push others around, make death threats on the internet , saying they will slit Hillary’s throat or even worse, attack women in the media and think nothing of it but when anyone makes a “racist” remark, everyone cries,”Foul” and go up in arms.Pretty infantile, women deserve the same respect and consideration as men or people of another race. Sick

Comment by Tom Plumb | 2008-05-24 15:33:39

The arguments Larry and others have made in regard to Obama’s utter obtuse corruption in conjunction with world terrorism are very important when taken in context.

And every time he opens that low IQ mouth, he shows how provincial he is, when he displays a willingness to engage with Tehran, or an Odinga, while Mc Peak (!) spews about the “Miami and NY problems,” Isarel an “open sore,” he’s sending a very strong message.

A collage, if you will, paste the disparate pictures together, include one Ayers, and secret meetings with Imans, what do you get?

Real world, think about it, what do they think the consequences are diplomatically?

They don’t think.

Really disgusting provincial unlearned men, I swear, it’s as if someone feels sorry for Bush, and is trying to make him look better…

Comment by Tom Plumb | 2008-05-24 15:37:17

And when questioned, Obama’s big erudite comeback is “well, maybe Iran will have a new president.”

Who the hell thinks this is indicative of Presidential level thinking?

At the very least, Bush was brought up around Presidents, Obama?

Pouf!

 
 
 

Comment by mariner | 2008-05-24 15:20:59

Even if you could think logically your language would betray your intellect. I suppose that is to be expected by the cultish mentalities that infect the Obama camp. I know it doesn’t “WORK OUT FOR YA” very well. But that your problem to solve :) .

Comment by Bill | 2008-05-24 15:31:58

yea rude pundit gets no respect because he has a pooty mouth.

Comment by mahaska | 2008-05-25 02:49:49

does his “pooty” mouth make you want to kiss it?

 
 
 
 

Comment by Damier | 2008-05-24 15:10:48

Leiberman had it right — the party has been hijacked. I’ll hold out until the convention but afterwards my instinct tells me I’ll be leaving the party that Hillary brought me into decades ago.

It is a sad, sad day when the remaining democratic standard-bearer for democracy (Hillary) is being given the ratchet job that the MSM and DNC has given her. Not only is she a fighter, she is a lady. She won’t have a crying fit and leave the party or switch parties. If the train, doesn’t soon come to a hault we may be soon hit the wall - higher gas prices, dwindling food supply, an expanding recession which Buffet even believes may be here for a while, an energy crises, wars and rumors of wars

… what does the MSM and DNC do … throw the candidate who offers viable solutions off the train … for the establishment candidate … the change candidate would have at least made an attempt to introduce “change” legislation in his first term as a US Senator.

I am deeply saddened. I am also deeply saddened that gender issues are still so wide spread in parts of the US today.

Comment by AnninCa | 2008-05-25 09:33:08

Where did Lieberman say that? Wow, I’ve been saying that since SC!

 
 

Comment by mariner | 2008-05-24 15:12:12

When a political party allows anyone with the character of Obama to be one of it’s candidates it is REALLY TIME for CHANGE. Time to change to another party. Instead of Americans voting for this fraud, Americans should be calling for an INVESTIGATION of him for National Security pruposes.

Comment by Kathy | 2008-05-24 17:28:46

What is hysterical is that the AAs think Obama is going to do something for them. He has totally ignored all of them. He has taken them all for granted. He doesn’t even campaign in AA neighborhoods.

Several AA businesses asked for his business. You would think with all he money he has spent in this campaign, he would seek some AA businesses out so they could be part of his largess.

No, no, he can’t be bothered. He prefers to ignore his people. He only wants to be around them when he needs their votes. The joke is on them, sadly.

Comment by mahaska | 2008-05-25 02:51:08

hey, just like OJ

 
 
 

Comment by JP | 2008-05-24 15:22:27

Obama will never be our president. We will all work to make sure that low life never gets his coronation. I’m still holding out hope that Hillary will be the nominee but if she isn’t, I’ll vote McCain.

Comment by fooj | 2008-05-24 15:37:36

Looks like we won’t have to put much effort into that! McCain has already shown he will wipe the floor with this imposter.

Obama is HIS OWN worst enemy. That’s why he ALWAYS presents himself as the “perpetual victim”…

Too bad it isn’t working. Grown-ups KNOW phony when they see it.

 

Comment by mahaska | 2008-05-25 02:52:26

This will probably be the biggest republican landslide in history if b.o. is the candidate.

 
 

Comment by Ivory Bill Woodpecker | 2008-05-24 15:24:57

Latest from electoral-vote.com:

Obama has pulled slightly ahead of McCain, although Clinton still enjoys a bigger lead over McCain:

O 266, Mc 248, Tied 24 [IN and VA]
C 314, Mc 207, Tied 17 [MI]

I do not belong to any political party, and never have belonged to one, but I have voted mostly Democratic since I became old enough to vote [I'm 45]. I have always voted for the Democratic presidential candidate except in 1996. I live in the Arkanshire, and I knew Big Dog would carry my state in 1996, so I indulged in the luxury of a protest vote for Nader that year–although I voted for Gore in 2000 and Kerry in 2004.

At this moment, I plan to vote for McKinney [Green] if the Dems nominate Plastic Jesus, but if I think Arkansas is sitting on the bubble come Nov. 4, I may vote for a GOP Prez candidate for the first time in my life.

 

Comment by Arius | 2008-05-24 15:27:36

It can’t be that “top secret” if everyone knows about it!

I am at the point of not caring what happens in this country anymore- ignorants and the way they choose the dangerous leaders- Bush and now Obama- I’m gonna love it when they find out just how close his islamist ties in Kenya are.

 

Comment by fred | 2008-05-24 15:27:43

How To Start a Political PartyIf Joe Lieberman can do it, I can do it.
By Daniel Engber

Joe Lieberman will appear on the Connecticut ballot this November despite losing the Democratic primary, said state officials on Wednesday. To get on the ballot, the senator collected more than 7,500 signatures and formed a brand-new political party called “Connecticut for Lieberman.” Wait, can I start a party, too?

You bet. The rules differ depending on where you live, but in general all you have to do to start a political party is gather enough signatures. In the Explainer’s home state of New York, you need to get 15,000 voters spread out across the state to sign a petition to have one or more candidates added to the ballot. (According to the distribution requirements, more than 100 people have to sign in each of at least 15 congressional districts.) Once you’ve got your signatures, you just have to number the pages, have a witness sign the bottom of each one, and then bind the whole package “by any means which will hold the pages together in numerical order.” Send the thing to the State Board of Elections, and voilà!

Of course, you’ll need a name for your party—something like “New York for the Explainer,” for example. And you’ll also need a logo or emblem. If you send in your petition without a party name and logo, the board may pick them on your behalf.

 

Comment by Melissa | 2008-05-24 15:28:29

Great post Pagan! Caught it at your blog earlier and just knew it would show up here. The Lemmingcrat party! How absolutely apropriate! Headlong over the cliff! Full Speed ahead!
The radicals will never prevail over common sense and patriotism!
Or as my Dad always said- “Throw the bums out!”

 

Comment by Catharine | 2008-05-24 15:28:57

When a political party allows anyone with the character of Obama to be one of it’s candidates it is REALLY TIME for CHANGE. Time to change to another party. Instead of Americans voting for this fraud, Americans should be calling for an INVESTIGATION of him for National Security pruposes.

Glad you brought that up as I do not understand how he can get a Top Secret SI Clearance, which I assume is required by a President. He had an admitted drug past (read his books) - and his association with Ayers et al - how can he get one?????? Unless the FBI is also corrupt - it can’t happen!!!!!

Comment by Ulahane | 2008-05-24 15:35:58

The president doesn’t have to do anything except be elected. The clearance is automatic, I believe, so Obama would have no trouble there. Bill Clinton admitted past Marijuana use and had no trouble.

Comment by Uppity | 2008-05-24 15:40:17

Past marijuana use is a far cry from having a domestic terrorist jump start your career.

Comment by Tom Plumb | 2008-05-24 15:42:22

Comment by Jeremiah "God Damn AmeriKKKA" Wright | 2008-05-24 15:48:34

Ayers leader of the Weathermen.

The weathermen were a group of 1960s terrorists home grown ones that bombed the pentagon the capital and nYC police headquarters and declared war on the US government.

Not to be confused with the Weather Girls, a duo of hefty singers from the late 70s during the decline of Disco who sang dance anthrems like its raining men to adoring crowds of gay clubbers.

Comment by mahaska | 2008-05-25 02:54:58

the weathermen also fire bombed a home with a family sleeping in it. I don’t remember the name, but the father was part of the trial.

 
 
 

Comment by Ulahane | 2008-05-24 17:23:28

Absolutely, but at that time it disqualified you from getting a security clearance. The point I was trying to make was that those rules don’t apply to presidents. I wasn’t defending Bambi or even comparing his admitted hard drug use (cocaine) with Clinton’s soft drug use (Marijuana).

 
 
 
 

Comment by Sunshine | 2008-05-24 15:31:25

1100 pages on John McCain’s medical record. Obama will only be releasing a summary, which of course can hide anything. With his constant gaffes, mistakes and not knowing where he is, should we be getting a better record of his physical, mental, and psychological health?

Comment by Uppity | 2008-05-24 15:41:15

I’m sure they have a psychological profile on him already.

 

Comment by fooj | 2008-05-24 15:45:32

Just a summary, eh? WTF does a 46 year old have to hide medically?

Kind of like his refusal to release his birth certificate. That man thinks the world is OWED to him. Why should releasing a birth certificate be a problem?

My birth certificate says Catholic. What does Barack Obama’s say?

While we’re at it, why is Michelle’s thesis under lock and key? Who the hell are these people? Why should we be expected to give them the “keys” to our White House when they absolutely refuse to disclose who the fuck they really are? You tell me.
Who is the last President that refused to disclose a damn thing? How’s that working for us all?

I’m not going down that road again if I can help it. I don’t care how many trolls get sent here. Facts are facts. Deal with it.

Comment by Jeremiah "God Damn AmeriKKKA" Wright | 2008-05-24 15:50:51

Maybe Michelle is a Shemale….she certainly has the build of one.

Oh sorry we are only talking about Obama’s Medical Records….

Well dont they do drug testing in medical checkups now?

If you were consuming cocain you certainly wouldnt want to make that public in your medical records would you?

Comment by Skiron | 2008-05-24 17:50:27

“Maybe Michelle is a Shemale….she certainly has the build of one.”

Classy.

 
 

Comment by No Fraudz | 2008-05-25 08:34:24

If you’re interested in having a look at that infamous thesis by Michelle, you can:

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0208/8642.html

Seems that a coouple months ago, several people got it somehow, so maybe the veil was eventually lifted, ………like eveything else in life, what you do in the dark, inevitably comes to light.

Hang tough!!!!

Don’t surrender!!

 
 
 

Comment by Obama_is_Weak | 2008-05-24 15:41:06

Dear NQ :

Please please please let our mentally challenged
troll “Bill” alone.

The Obama campaign.

Comment by Tom Plumb | 2008-05-24 15:44:04

Ah, who else would function as as the bozo bop bag?

http://www.backtobasicstoys.com/item/productid/5225

 
 

Comment by K Bentley | 2008-05-24 15:43:37

Everyone, please? We’ve forgotten! Hillary has 312 electoral votes… yup! McCain-229; Obama-217 not even a contender!

She will win the election. And thank GOD!!!

 

Comment by Catharine | 2008-05-24 15:44:02

“The president doesn’t have to do anything except be elected. The clearance is automatic, I believe, so Obama would have no trouble there. Bill Clinton admitted past Marijuana use and had no trouble.”

Shouldn’t you have to he able to get one before becoming the nominee???? I mean, is our country that stupid that we don’t require that???? Its not the drug use as much as his associations and foreign relatives that should disqualify him!!!!

I’m moving to another country if he gets a T.S.S.I. clearance just because he was elected!!!!

And I don’t have to worry about having to move as he won’t be elected!!!!!

 

Comment by Tom Plumb | 2008-05-24 15:45:33

The president doesn’t have to do anything except be elected

You know, they honestly think like this…

Sad.

 

Comment by Catharine | 2008-05-24 15:46:38

BTW - have you heard about the contribute $8.28 to Hillary thing???? Send her a message to take it to the convention by contributing $8.28 to her campaign (or 108.28 or 1008.28 - anything that ends in 8.28) :-)

 

Comment by some canadian | 2008-05-24 16:18:35

This is getting kind of sad. You know, it sucks to lose, especially when you go into things with such massive advantages that you seem practically invincible, but… Hillary lost. She didn’t have a plan for anything past Super Tuesday, and by the time she got back on her feet around Texas, she’d fallen too far behind. That may have nothing to do with being the better candidate, but there it is. I can’t imagine what it would take to reverse things now.

And I’m not clear how that’s led to so much bile in places like this because I honestly don’t see the sort of vile intentions from the Obama camp that most of the people here see. Where does it come from? It’s like when you’re reading Andrew Sullivan’s blog and he posts about the Clintons and you can almost sense him starting to twitch and foam at the mouth as he types.

Losing is not the same as being disenfranchised. Hillary can still run in 2016, or heaven forbid, 2012. Obama as president is not the end of the world and I really don’t think he’s as bad a person as commenters (and bloggers) here make him out to be. Looking from a relatively neutral position, the hardcore Obamanauts aren’t the ones who look like a crazed cult right now. Maybe it’s time to just run things out, talk to the people, stop mentioning Obama altogether, and for the love of God, stop comparing the Clinton campaign to stuff like womens’ suffrage or Zimbabwe. If there weren’t statements like that floating around, nobody would have misinterpreted the Bobby Kennedy thing.

Also, as to the Dean thing: is it possible Dean might get replaced so he could take a cabinet post? I’m not sure if it’s a good idea to telegraph that you want to give a post to a guy half the country thinks is certifiable, though.

Comment by American voter | 2008-05-24 16:33:02

I think you should worry about your own country’s politics and just let us sort out ours.

Comment by some canadian | 2008-05-24 16:39:45

I’d like to, but as your closest neighbor and economic partner (and part of the world community) it’s kind of in our best interests that you not go completely to hell in a handbasket. Dollar parity’s not all it’s cracked up to be over here either, the tourists stop coming on the weekends and everything on the McDonalds dollar menu still costs $1.39. Anyways, the upshot of that is we follow US politics pretty closely (also, US politics tends to be a lot more exciting than Canadian parliamentary antics).

Comment by FLVoter | 2008-05-24 17:05:47

and ‘cuz Canuks don’t have much else to do.

 

Comment by mahaska | 2008-05-25 02:57:44

go back to clubbing innocent baby seals and leave us alone

 
 

Comment by Ulahane | 2008-05-24 17:01:17

I respectfully disagree with you here. As long as people are polite and are open about their citizen status, why shouldn’t Canadians and others give their opinion.

some Canadian: You make some good points BUT Florida and Michigan were disenfranchised and millions of working Americans were disenfranchised by a caucus system that requires missing a day’s work (for many this is an impossibility).

As for the cult thing, how many of us are chanting vapid slogans and fainting at rallies.

The vile intentions are there if you look at Obama’s voting record and the associates he has chosen. He chose TUCC because its philosophy of race hatred appealed to him on some level. His connections with Ayers and Rezco and others only add to the distrust.

Comment by Kathy | 2008-05-24 17:37:08

She hasn’t lost yet. Wait until the second vote at the convention. She must go to the convention.

 

Comment by Skiron | 2008-05-24 17:58:00

“…and millions of working Americans were disenfranchised by a caucus system that requires missing a day’s work (for many this is an impossibility).”

Oh cripes…the caucus system has been set up this way for a while. Don’t go whining about it now, the time to complain was before the process started, and if I had a big pile of money I’d bet it all on you not having done that.

Comment by Ulahane | 2008-05-24 18:05:25

Actually I have complained about the very idea of caucuses for years. Send any money that you feel you owe me to hillaryclinton.com. :-)

Can you and I agree that for 2012 the Democratic party should get rid of caucuses and superdelegates and make all state delegates proportional by state, not district? Let’s not go through this again.

Comment by Skiron | 2008-05-25 00:58:20

I’d get rid of superdelegates for sure. I’d keep the caucus system or some semblance of it though. I think they inspire political activism on the grassroots level and a sense of shared democratic values within the community that you just can’t get with a primary.

Comment by Uppity Woman | 2008-05-25 01:26:41

Oh caucuses inspire all right. They inspire busloads of college kids from other states to arrive and bully people into submission. They also inspire 2% of the population to arbitrarily decide how the other 98% feel and then vote for them. They also inspire an inability of people who actually work for a living to attend caucus. This would include police officers, firefighters, nurses and other useless people who work during the caucus shift at keeping your sorry ass safe. They also inspire an inability for those useless Old People to hang out and caucus. Same goes for usless disabled people. They also inspire an ability for a college student to cut class and caucus, while his parents, who are paying for his education, are at work and can’t caucus. They also inspire creative ways to cheat.

 
 
 
 
 
 

Comment by AnninCa | 2008-05-25 09:36:59

I think Dean will obviously be given a payoff. Who would doubt it? He’s to be rewarded for his efforts to seat Obama and has had to fend off the Democratic Party regulars to do so.

In the meantime, Obama tanks. He’s great in la-la land and in states of heavy AA population. Alas, they are 90% Republican states, so that won’t really help him a lot.

And we can’t stand the guy. So…..McCain is dancing the snoopy dance.

Reminds me of the usual tales of what happens when someone hijacks a plane. Those stories don’t end up pretty either.

 
 

Comment by Peggy Sue | 2008-05-24 16:53:25

So Bill’s taking names? Guess we’re all headed for the re-education camps [or whatever the Obama folks call it in Obamaworld].

Well, I’m not packing or getting in line or shutting up. You want to run with weasels, feel free.

If Hillary is kicked out, I’ll vote for McCain.

Write that down and count on it!

 

Comment by Deep Truths | 2008-05-24 17:07:12

Do they honestly believe that Obama’s appeal with Independents and Republicans can make up for our defection?

Most of the indies and repubs were part of Rush Limbaugh’s Operation Chaos. This was pre-Rev. Wright when Obama won all those red caucus states.

You think their going to vote for Obama post-Wright, Ayers, Rezko and Odinga? No frigging way.

 

Comment by Truthteller | 2008-05-24 17:07:46

Barack Obama, Donna Brazile and Howard Dean are out of touch with Florida values. I sometimes wonder if they are even Democrats.

 

Comment by Kathy | 2008-05-24 17:40:07

For all you readers out there.

The Hunting of the President
The Ten-Year Campaign to
Destroy Bill and Hillary Clinton

By Joe Conason and Gene Lyons

It is a terrific book. A great read if you love the Clintons.

 

Comment by Judy | 2008-05-24 18:26:28

The DNC, Dean, Brazile are all delusional - they really believe the voting block that they have turned their backs on will just forgive, forget, and come home in November. NO WAY - I will never forgive nor forget what I have witnessed in this campaign.

fyi - I called the DNC, again (admittedly a wasted call) but the aide I spoke with did say they have received alot of complaints against Donna Brazile - especially her comments on CNN about not needing the white middle class vote. Also, she is the one pushing not allowing Fl and Mi count - geeeee, let me see - she supports who?

HILLARY we are with you!!!

Comment by Jeremiah "God Damn AmeriKKKA" Wright | 2008-05-24 18:29:41

Donna Brazille is a stated undeclared super delegate…because you know if she stated that she was in the tank for obama, it would hurt her ability to race bait like she has so well against Hillary Clinton on MSNBC while pretending to be a democratic analyst…

…analyst my ass.

 
 

Comment by Judy | 2008-05-24 18:31:00

Obama stole this nomination with superdelegates and caucuses.

UNDEMOCRATIC = SUPERDELEGATES/CAUCUSES

Why have us vote anymore?

I have a vision of Obama busing in people to vote in the caucuses - I can’t get it out of my mind.

Some say that Obama’s campaign out organized Hillary’s campaign - what is the right thing to say is: they out tricked (Chicago style) Hillary’s campaign.

Comment by Jeremiah "God Damn AmeriKKKA" Wright | 2008-05-24 18:33:54

He did bus em in. then they intimidated the hillary supporters and chased many away from the caucuses.

In addition caucuses are ideal for people who have nothing else to do all day.

THe rest of the democratic party, the ones who actually work 9-5 and have responsibilities can’t attend many of these all day events.

The whole caucus concept is just idiotic. but hey thats the DNC

Remember this is make or break week for the Obama-nutjobs.

THey need to do everything the can to get Hillary out before the takes the Popular VOte lead in all counts with a big win in Puerto Rico.

Its their last chance to try and fake the american public into believing that their nomination is legitamate.

In the end it wont matter. Everyone will recognize that they didnt win the popular vote but won with disproportionate caucus rigging and buying super delegate votes with cash or threats of race baiting.

Our revenge comes in november when we join forces and vote McCain against the Obama Ticket.

If we really want revenge against the DNC too we could also Vote Republican Down Ticket.

Handing them losses in the senate and the house along with the rejection of their manchurian candidate would be the kind of hard cold reality based slap in the face the DNC desperately needs.

How did we ever think that putting this nutjob in charge of our party was a good idea???

http://youtube.com/watch?v=nMyMTmcBB4M

 
 

Comment by usedmeat | 2008-05-24 22:20:05

Reid and Pelosi are spineless pushovers ripe for the likes of an Obama take over. Same for Dean and it serves them right. I’ll be laughing my butt off when those three are on the outside looking in.

 

Pingback by Some Democrats Say Obama Will Cause the “Unmaking of the Democratic Party” « New Republican Party Blog | 2008-05-25 06:42:41

[...] two excerpts from an article entitled, “It’s Official: The LEMMINGCRAT Part Begins” by ‘NO Quarter.’ “I wonder if these numbskulls have thought this thing [...]

 

Comment by AnninCa | 2008-05-25 09:23:20

In the meantime, Hillary picked up another SD from Georgia yesterday.

But the real kicker story of the day? An Obama campaign spokesperson said that the only person who could unite the party is……you ready?

BILL CLINTON.

I’m still wiping the coffee off my keyboard here. :)

 

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-05-25 10:02:17

Oh that is Rich…almost spewed coffee on my own keyboard…
The Clinton’s will help Barry Queen of Snots just like Ol’ Bill did after Al Gore started waggin his preachy little finger at Bill over Moneyca…this is a good joke…Politics is a messy affair but Obama and the DNC had gone way beyond the pale…What is the offer…It’s not like either Clinton needs doe or GRAVITAS
The DNC and the Demogliarchy shot themselves in the foot by trying to destroy the only weapon in the Democratic war chest…and that is the Clinton Administation and the Centrist Policies of Senator Clinton…The DNC Blew It and all of Clinton’s supporters know it

Southern Men have long memories…and so do Clinton’s supporters…Those that supported Sen. Clinton…and Those that Supported Ol’ Bill

 

Pingback by The Independent View » Blog Archive » Selected Readings on Barack and Michelle Obama, William Ayers, and Bernadine Dohrn | 2008-09-02 01:54:59

[...] It’s Official: The LEMMINGCRAT Party Begins, NoQuarterUSA, May 24, 2008. Observation: Michelle worked with Bernadine and Barack worked for [...]

 

RSS Feed for This PostPost a Comment

Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)