http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=Mzc3ZWNhNThmM2JhMzliZDUxMWNmMmU5M2ZiNmM1YTY=

michelle obama’s going to sock it to “whitey”? you sound like you’re auditioning for the role of the dweeby white villian in a 70’s blaxploitation pic.

you might want to pitch your dog whistle a little higher next time, big guy. either that or you’re just a republican tool. you can take the boy out of the CIA . . .

whitey? jesus.

for some detailed debunking of larry’s spittle-flecked BS:
http://www.reason.com/blog/show/126883.html

After all sometimes where the only 2 countries that see sense somedays…

As for Michelle she has to be checked out 100% after all she wears the pants in the house right?

Since when does a person decide that a house of worship is to be used in an act of political calculation? What does that say about his moral judgement?

Yikes!

I see strong accusations with nothing but hearsay evidence like “the Obama’s are not what they seem,” and “Obama’s past and present is anti-Democrat and anti-American.” Do you folks remember the McCarthy era? You jump to conclusions about a video tape you haven’t even seen! That’s called “prejudging”. It has the same root as “prejudice.”

Yes, there are folks who have drunk the Obama kool aid, and can’t see any flaws in him. But you folks have drunk some sort of anti-Obama kool aid.

This is what I see. He is very bright, and he is a great public speaker (I am happy to see young people active again). He seems quite ambitious. He saw that this was a rare year where a black man might actually be able to win, given the screw-ups of the current administration. He did not follow some unwritten protocol about “waiting his turn”. I think that has angered many. I can understand that, but no one is entitled to the presidency–we deserve the best person we can get.

I think he has far less experience than the other two candidates. On the other hand, he seems to be less entwined in the web of logrolling and perhaps more able to bring diverse people together. Perhaps. I can see voting against Obama because of his lack of experience, or for him because there are fewer special interests to which he is beholden, or his ability to create a diverse majority.

He seems to have had trouble early on connecting with the black community, and so attended a church with a nutcase for a preacher. I don’t see Obama doing this as anti-American, but I do think it was done out of political calculation.

I could do a similar analysis of the other two. They are all complex people, with plusses and minuses. They all are ambitious. They all have brilliant accomplished people who have endorsed them, and will help guide them if they become president. You know, I think we do too much “cult of personality.” It is an entire administration, not one man or woman.

Frankly, it is the party of the administration that matters more than the persona at its head. In November, you will decide whether the next administration will be Democratic or Republican. After the last 8 years, I see a need for change, and I will vote for whichever Democrat gets nominated.

He’s already beaten the best. When he gets going on McCain, he’ll have the old fool looking just like the blithering panderer Bush wannabe he is.

Obama 08!