Why I Believe the Michelle Obama Tape Exists
By Larry JohnsoncloseAuthor: Larry Johnson
Name: Larry Johnson
Email: larry_johnson@earthlink.net
Site: http://NoQuarterUSA.net
About: Larry C. Johnson is a former analyst at the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency, who moved subsequently in 1989 to the U.S. Department of State, where he served four years as the deputy director for transportation security, antiterrorism assistance training, and special operations in the State Department's Office of Counterterrorism. He left government service in October 1993 and set up a consulting business. He currently is the co-owner and CEO of BERG Associates, LLC (Business Exposure Reduction Group) and is an expert in the fields of terrorism, aviation security, and crisis and risk management, and money laundering investigations. Johnson is the founder and main author of No Quarter, a weblog that addresses issues of terrorism and intelligence and politics. NoQuarterUSA was nominated as Best Political Blog of 2008.[1] He has worked as a private consultant on issues of international terrorism and security for the U.S. Government and private companies. Johnson has appeared as a consultant and commentator in many major newspapers and news programs.[2]
Contents [hide]
1 Background
2 Views
2.1 1996
2.2 1998
2.3 1999
2.4 2000
2.5 2001
2.6 2003
2.6.1 Plame affair
2.7 2008
3 Notes
4 References
5 External links
[edit]Background
Larry Johnson moved to Washington, D.C. in 1979 to begin work on a Ph.D. at the American University. Although he completed successfully all coursework and comprehensive exams, he did not write a dissertation. In 1978 and in 1983-85 he worked in Latin America on community development projects as a community organizer. Returning to the United States in 1985 he joined the Central Intelligence Agency, thanks in part to a letter of recommendation from Republican Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT) that helped to "open doors" for him at the Agency.[3] Johnson entered on duty at the CIA in September 1985 and was a classmate of Valerie Plame. Every member of that class was undercover. After a year in the Career Trainee program, which included a stint with the Afghan Task Force, Johnson was assigned as an analyst in the Middle America Caribbean Division in the Latin American Affairs Office of the Directorate of Intelligence. He received two Exceptional Performance awards and was promoted ultimately to Senior Regional Analyst for Central America.
Johnson remained undercover in the CIA until October 1989, when he resigned from the CIA and started a new job in the Office of Counter Terrorism at the Department of State. Johnson played an instrumental role in launching the Terrorism Rewards program international advertising campaign (working with Diplomatic Security officers Brad Smith and Michael Parks). [4] Johnson also was involved in a variety of crisis management response operations, including the release of hostages from Lebanon and liaison with the Pan Am 103 families. He left government service in October 1993 and started his own business as a consultant.
After leaving government service, Johnson became a frequent guest on many major television news shows when a question of terrorism came up. He was first interviewed by CNN following the capture of Carlos the Jackal. Johnson subsequently appeared on CNN, ABC's Nightline, CBS, the BBC, MSNBC, the Jim Lehrer News Hour, NBC, and NPR. In December of 1999, for example, Johnson was hired by NBC to serve as its terrorist expert for the Y2000 and was in Time Square with Tom Brokaw and Katie Couric ("a lot of fun and the best way to see in the New Year"). Johnson also was hired in January 2002 as a Fox News Analyst and remained under contract until February 2003.
Since 1994 a significant focus of Johnson's consulting work has been with the U.S. military special operations forces in scripting and conducting military counter terrorism exercises. He traveled under orders from the U.S. military to Iraq in May 2006 to work on a short term project.
A registered Republican who supported President Bush in 2000, Johnson became a strong critic of the Bush administration in May 2003 for its conduct of the war in Iraq and, a few months later, for its role in the outing of CIA operative Valerie Plame.[5] He was also featured in the 2004 political documentary Outfoxed: Rupert Murdoch's War on Journalism. Since Robert Novak's controversial disclosure of Valerie Plame as a CIA operative in July 2003, Johnson has contributed to public discourse on intelligence matters, often sparking further controversy. He has been interviewed by both the mass media and the alternative media and published commentaries on a variety of issues, including the Plame affair, the controversy concerning Mary McCarthy, and the resignation of Porter Goss as Director of Central Intelligence.
[edit]Views
This article or section may contain an inappropriate mixture of prose and timeline.
Please help convert this timeline into prose or, if necessary, a list.
[edit]1996
In 1996, Johnson noted that terrorism worldwide was on the decline. "Terrorist incidents [both internationally and in the US] have fallen to levels not seen since the 1970s. Whether measured by the number of incidents, the number of fatalities, or the number of groups, raw statistics demonstrate that the level of terrorist violence has declined since the mid-1980s. In fact, the evidence suggests terrorism was more widespread and deadly 10 years ago."[6]
He also wrote an op-ed piece for the New York Times suggesting that the newer and more deadly terrorist threat to the U.S. was embodied by "networks of terrorists, mostly foreign, working within its borders." Exemplifying this threat was Ramzi Yousef, one of the masterminds behind the 1993 attack on the World Trade Center. In the article, Johnson suggests that enhanced cooperation between intelligence agencies, particularly the FBI and CIA, is mandatory to meet the growing threat of terror networks.[7]
[edit]1998
In 1998, Johnson argued that while overall terrorism was declining, the threat from bin Laden and al-Qaeda should be the focus of American counterterrorism policy:
The nature of the threat posed by Bin Ladin is highlighted by my final chart, number 7. Osama Bin Ladin and individuals associated with him have killed and wounded more Americans than any other group. This chart also illustrates that groups such as Hamas and the Tamil Tigers (LTTE) prior to 1998 have killed more foreigners in the anti-US terrorist attacks. If we take into account the bombings of the US Embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, Osama's status as the most lethal terrorist is certain.[8]
In addition, he told USA Today that bin Laden had participated in "virtually every major attack of terrorism against the United States" in the 1990s. Johnson underlined the threat posed by bin Laden, saying that he was possessed by "hatred and craziness." If left unanswered, "he would continue to terrorize Americans around the world. He has no compunction about killing women and children. He's a complete egalitarian in his murderous attitude."[9]
[edit]1999
In an interview with PBS's Frontline for its 1999 program, Hunting bin Laden, Johnson discussed Osama bin Laden.[10] According to Johnson, Americans had "tended to make Osama bin Laden sort of a superman in Muslim garb." "Actually," he continues, "Osama bin Laden, in my view, represents more of a symptom of a problem, and the problem is this: the Saudi Arabian government, not just Osama bin Laden but many people in Saudi Arabia, have been sending money to radical Islamic groups for years." Johnson continued:
When you look at who's killed Americans in the last 10 years, the individuals he's supported and backed--I'm basing that upon the initial information that's been released in the indictments and conversations with others in the intelligence communities--Osama bin Laden has been the one killing Americans. No other terrorist group in the world has been out killing Americans except for Osama bin Laden.... Osama bin Laden remains out there as the one really targeting us. So, we recognize that he's the threat. He's serious about wanting to kill Americans, but as long as he's in Afghanistan, as long as he doesn't have access to a cell phone, as long as he can't just hop on a plane and travel wherever he wants without fear of being arrested, his ability to plan and conduct terrorist operations is extremely limited. We have to recognize [that] he would like to do a lot of damage. He would like to kill Americans, but wanting to is different from being able to, having the full capabilities in place.[11]
In the interview, Johnson doubted the ability of members of bin Laden's organization to plan and put their lives on the line:
There's not another Ali or Mustafa out there at this point and Osama bin Laden in my view has not been a very effective organizer or leader. He talks a great game and puts out terrific threats as far as stirring the passions in the United States and maybe firing up the imaginations of some young Muslims throughout the world. But when push comes to shove, can he get a group of people who are together who will say: we are going to plan an operation, we're going to put our lives on the line, we're going to go out and try and kill people and we don't care what the consequence is? It hasn't happened.[12]
Frontline asked:
[Is it] ... fair to say what you're saying is that the president of the United States, his national security advisor, his deputy national security advisor for counter-terrorism, are basically blowing smoke [about the danger posed by bin Laden] and his followers]?
Johnson responded:
They're grossly exaggerating the problem. They are hyping it. They shouldn't be talking about rising terrorism. Instead of saying "terrorism's rising," it's not. "Terrorism is spreading," it's not. "More people are dying from terrorism," not the case. But what they should be saying is, "There's one individual out there that really doesn't like us, and he's made it his mission in life to kill Americans, and we've gotta deal with him." But we need to have a voice of reason in that process instead of putting ourselves out crying wolf, because this is essentially what's taking place right now. They call it the administration that cries wolf.[12]
[edit]2000
Johnson co-authored an article in 2000 with Milt Bearden which focused on the threat posed by al-Qaeda specifically, rather than terrorism trends in general. Beardon and Johnson note that new information emerging about the bombings at Kenya and Tanzania in 1998 points to the threat posed by Imad Mugniyah and Osama Bin Laden will require "a coordinated policy that will employ a full range of covert, clandestine, diplomatic, and military operations," concluding:
The Clinton Administration has shot its bolt on the terrorist problem with small effect, and no last minute show of force will change the record. A new administration can start afresh with a more sharply defined set of terrorism goals – Mughniyeh and bin Laden and their protectors for starters – and bring the full, coordinated force of American diplomatic, military, and intelligence capabilities to bear on the problem.[13]
[edit]2001
After Johnson's testimony to the special forum at the U.S. Senate, Gary J. Schmitt, executive director and CEO of the Project for the New American Century, refers in the Daily Standard (blog) to an op-ed piece Johnson wrote two months prior to the 9/11 attacks, claiming that Johnson argued that the US had little to fear from terrorism.[14]
In an editorial entitled "The Declining Terrorist Threat," published in the New York Times on 10 July 2001, Johnson says:
Judging from news reports and the portrayal of villains in our popular entertainment, Americans are bedeviled by fantasies about terrorism. They seem to believe that terrorism is the greatest threat to the United States and that it is becoming more widespread and lethal. They are likely to think that the United States is the most popular target of terrorists. And they almost certainly have the impression that extremist Islamic groups cause most terrorism.... None of these beliefs are based in fact.... While terrorism is not vanquished, in a world where thousands of nuclear warheads are still aimed across the continents, terrorism is not the biggest security challenge confronting the United States, and it should not be portrayed that way.[15]
Ten days after the 9/11 attacks, after quoting the above passage, Timothy Noah concludes a post in his "Chatterbox" feature at Slate: "Johnson's analysis, we now see, was bold, persuasive, and 100 percent wrong."[16] Johnson defended himself against such attacks:
The rightwing is resurrecting an op-ed I wrote in July 2001. I stand by the full article. It is still relevant today. I am accused, incorrectly, of ignoring the threat of terrorism. In fact, I correctly noted that the real threat emanated from Bin Laden and Islamic extremism. President Bush, for his part, ignored the CIA warning in August 2001 that Al Qaeda was posed to strike inside the United States.[17]
After September 11, Johnson appeared several times on FOX News to address the question of military action against terrorism. On 14 November, he defended the FBI's proposal to interview 5,000 students in the U.S. suspected of having information relevant to the September 11 investigations:
I think they should talk to everyone that they feel they have a need to talk to. I mean, look, this is war. This is not a legal proceeding. This isn't the O.J. Simpson trial. The folks that attacked us -- they murdered Americans. And we've got to recognize that in wartime, we should do things differently.[18]
[edit]2003
In January 2003, Johnson wrote an analysis of the relationship between the upcoming U.S. invasion of Iraq and the threat of transnational terrorism. According to Johnson, Bremer's response was to tell him that "it didn't matter what Saddam did or didn't do, we were going to war."[19] The paper warned that an invasion would "do little to destroy the infrastructure of radical Islamic terrorism responsible for the 9-11 attacks." Noting that Saddam Hussein's regime has been a longtime supporter of regional terrorist organizations such as the PLO, Johnson examines contacts between Saddam Hussein and transnational terrorist organizations such as al-Qaeda:
There is no doubt that Iraq is a state sponsor of terrorism—i.e., a country that provides financial support, safe haven, training, or weapons and explosives to groups or individuals that carry out terrorist attacks. . . . According to Central Intelligence Agency data, there is no credible evidence implicating Iraq in any mass casualty terrorist attacks since 1991. . . .
Johnson notes that the period immediately leading up to 2003 saw a rise of activity surrounding terrorist Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, suggesting that "Iraq is willing to help a movement that it would otherwise oppose on ideological grounds. Nonetheless," Johnson concludes, "it is important to understand that Iraqi entreaties to Al Qaeda, are most likely intended as a tactic to bolster Iraq’s ability to fight off a U.S. invasion rather than a deep-seated theological and ideological commitment to the terrorist agenda of Bin Laden.[20]
In that analysis Johnson also warns that the U.S.-led invasion was likely to backfire:
In fact there is a serious risk that a U.S. led war against Iraq may crystallize the diffused anger in the Arab and Muslim world — a heretofore unattained goal of bin Laden and his followers — and persuade more Muslim youths to take up the terrorist banner against America and her citizens.... If we decide to invade Iraq we must be prepared for the contingency that our attack will inspire young Muslims to pursue jihad against the West in general and the United States in particular. Just as the 1979 Soviet invasion of Afghanistan rallied many Muslims, especially young adults to the cause of jihad, a U.S. attack may enable Islamic extremists to attract new followers.[20]
Johnson also gave interviews on the topic of what to do with captured al-Qaeda leaders; while he did not condone torture, he suggested that a "sleep deprivation and reward system" might be useful for getting information from Khalid Sheikh Mohammed:
I don't see a constitutional right to have eight hours of sleep. You shouldn't subject someone to freezing but they don't get to wear mink coats, either.[21]
In May 2003, Johnson joined members of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS) in condemning the manipulation of intelligence for political purposes:
It is a misuse and abuse of intelligence. The president was being misled. He was ill served by the folks who are supposed to protect him on this. Whether this was witting or unwitting, I don't know, but I'll give him the benefit of the doubt.[22]
[edit]Plame affair
After Robert Novak wrote a column identifying the wife of former ambassador Joseph C. Wilson as a CIA officer, the media invited Johnson to comment on the ensuing scandal because he had been a member of the same Career Trainee class with Valerie Plame Wilson. For example, in October 2003, he appeared on Democracy Now to discuss the Plame affair. He told interviewer Amy Goodman that Valerie Wilson's cover should have been respected whether she was an "analyst" or a "cleaning lady": "if she's undercover she's undercover, period. If the media allows themselves to get distracted with those kinds of curve balls, they ignore the issue."[23]
He told a Senate Democratic Policy Committee in October 2003, "My classmates and I have been betrayed. Together, we have kept the secrets of each other's identities a secret for 18 years. Each and every one of us have kept that secret, whether we were in the CIA, in other government service or in the private sector. But this issue is not just about a blown cover. It is about the destruction of the very essence, the core of human intelligence collection activities: plausible deniability, apparently, for partisan domestic political reasons."[24]
Johnson testified at a special joint hearing of Congressional and Senate Democrats on 22 July 2005 about the consequences arising from the Plame affair.[25]
[edit]2008
In 2008, Johnson emerged as a staunch supporter of Hillary Clinton and a strong critic of Barack Obama. Larry Johnson's blog, NoQuarterUSA, became a rally point for Clinton supporters wary of Barack Obama's qualifications to be president. Supporters of Barack Obama insist that a story that first appeared on Johnson's blog--a report that Republican operatives have a tape of Michelle Obama making racially insenstive comments about caucasians--has been "refuted" Barack Obama's Fight the Smears website.[26]. However, Johnson never claimed to have the tape and reported that the Republican operatives controlling it intended to release the tape sometime after the Democratic Convention in August 2008. On October 21, however, he asserted that the operative in possession of the tape had been instructed by the McCain campaign not to release it.[27]
[edit]Notes
^ http://2008.weblogawards.org/polls/best-political-coverage/
^ Larry C. Johnson, "About Me," No Quarter (personal blog).
^ "Former CIA Official Larry Johnson Delivers Democratic Radio Address," transcript posted on official Democratic National Committee's website for The Democratic Party, July 23, 2005], accessed November 21, 2006.
^ Interview with Larry Johnson, confirmed by his supervisor
^ "Ex-CIA official Blasts Bush on Leak of Operative's Name: Democrats' Radio Address Focuses on White House Aides' Role," CNN July 23, 2005, accessed November 21, 2006.
^ Gail Russell Chaddock, "Why Terrorists Pick On the French," Christian Science Monitor (5 December 1996) p. 1.
^ Larry Johnson, "Terrorists Among Us," New York Times (20 August 1996) p. A19.
^ Terrorism Today
^ Lee Michael Katz, "The Hunt for Bin Laden," USA Today (21 August 1998) p. 1A.
^ See Transcript of original interview with Larry C. Johnson, as broadcast on Frontline in 1999. Cf. "Interview: Larry C. Johnson," for Hunting bin Laden, transcript of interview broadcast on Frontline subsequently on 13 April 2001. See also dedicated PBS webpages for media links: Iraq and the War on Terror, Frontline PBS, online featured programs, accessed 19 November 2006.
^ frontline: hunting bin laden: interviews: larry c. johnson | PBS
^ a b [1].
^ As posted in [2].
^ Gary Schmitt, [ 07/25/2005 "Meet Larry Johnson: The CIA official Turned Democratic Spokesman Has a Pre-9/11 Mindset," Daily Standard (blog), July 25, 2005, accessed November 20, 2006.
^ *Larry C. Johnson, "The Declining Terrorist Threat," The New York Times 10 July 2001: A19.
^ Timothy Noah, "(Not Exactly a) Whopper of the Week: Larry C. Johnson," Chatterbox: Gossip, speculation, and scuttlebutt about politics (blog), hosted by Slate September 21, 2001, accessed November 20, 2006. Note the full context of this quotation:
It is, to be sure, a little bit cheap (and slightly at odds with the usual parameters of this feature) to criticize someone for making an erroneous prediction, particularly after a tragedy. Chatterbox is especially reluctant to tag Johnson because Johnson's op-ed was argued forcefully, backed up meticulously with factual data, and bravely at odds with conventional wisdom at the time of its publication. Add in that Johnson now makes his living as a consultant to corporations about terrorism, and therefore had everything to gain by exaggerating the dangers terrorism poses, and the guy practically looks like a hero. Chatterbox, who two decades ago was an editor for the New York Times op-ed page, would have published Johnson's piece had he still been an editor there this past July. In his capacity at Slate, Chatterbox might well have written up Johnson's prediction, and perhaps even endorsed it.
But boy, is he glad he didn't! Johnson's analysis, we now see, was bold, persuasive, and 100 percent wrong. Sadly, a mistake this embarrassing cannot be ignored. As a fellow skeptic, Chatterbox in all sincerity wishes Johnson better luck next time.
^ Larry C. Johnson, "Johnson vs. President Bush," re-posted and updated by SusanHu at DailyKos (blog) July 25, 2005.
^ FOX News Interview with John Garrett (14 November 2001) Transcript #111405cb.260.
^ [3].
^ a b Larry C. Johnson, "Setting the Record Straight on Iraqi Terrorism," posted in Booman Tribune: A Progressive Community (personal blog) 27 January 2003. accessed 19 November 2006.
^ Qtd. in Toby Harnden, "CIA 'pressure' on al-Qa'eda chief," The London Telegraph 5 March 2003: 16.
^ Qtd. in Nicolas D. Kristof, "Save Our Spooks," The New York Times 30 May 2003:A6.
^ Democracy Now (3 October 2003)[4]
^ U.S. Senate, Democratic Policy Committee Meeting on the CIA Operative Leak, (24 October 2003).
^ Letter to the Senate.[Needs full source citation; see "References" section.]
^ Tumulty, Karen (2008-06-12). "Will Obama's Anti-Rumor Plan Work?", Time Magazine. Retrieved on 20 June 2008.:"a story that apparently first made a big splash on the Internet in late May in a post by pro-Hillary Clinton blogger Larry Johnson"
^ Whitey Tape, API, Phil Berg, and Andy MartinSee Authors Posts (1090) on May 26, 2008 at 1:34 PM in Current Affairs
I understand the skepticism of many about whether there actually exists a tape of Michelle Obama engaged in an anti-white rant. The lady obviously has some anger management issues–just check out her senior thesis she wrote at Princeton–but this sounds too good to be true. However, here is why I think the tape exists.
I have two friends. One is a Democrat and one is a Republican. One lives on the west coast and one lives on the east coast. They do not know each other. Yet each has spoken directly with someone who has seen the tape. In fact, I first heard about the tape from my east coast friend. I thought it was interesting but, without additional proof, not worth mentioning. Later that night I was chatting with a friend, who happens to be an Obama supporter, but is very well connected to the Washington political scene. That person told me he had heard the same thing. He also told me about a separate tape of Barack Obama during an overseas trip that also is in the hands of the McCain folks.
The clincher came when my buddy on the west coast wrote to me that he had a friend who had seen the tape. Given that there are two separate people, completely unconnected, giving the same report, I think it is reasonable to conclude that the tape exists. We shall see.


















I hope they are right
You have a friend that is STILL an Obama supporter?
You trust him to not be “in the mist” and in fear?
I don’t know a single person that is still promoting BO for President. But that’s just in my little world. I only knew a couple to start with…
Yeah, me neither, come to think of it.
And those who are seem so unhappy…
I know a couple of people who support him, both AA. One of them is diehard, but the other one has had their faith shalen a little by events. It may turn out in the fall that he won’t even be able to keep this core group of supporters as more information comes out about Obama and his past relationships.
Whatever happened to the million dollar payoff? Surely someone cashed in? Is the billionaire who was willing to pay the million dollars waiting to release the tape?
I think some one needs to release it for the good of the country NOW and let the chips fall where they may.
You’re rather hastily assuming that it is in fact true, when there’s no evidence to support it. To be perfectly honest, I’m quite skeptical that a sharp woman like Michelle Obama would ever say such a thing publicly, let alone that there’s a video or audiotape of it in existence.
That said, if this “whitey” comment / rant / whatever in fact occurred, it would certainly be in the best interest of the Obama campaign itself to first broach the subject and attempt to diffuse such a volatile issue through self-revelation, rather than be forced to initially respond to the allegation and then do active damage control at the time of actual substantiation.
Oh yeah like he handled Rev. Wright? If he were as smart as you say and he knew he wanted to be president one day, he would have done a sharp 180 in that church the moment Rev. Wright started dry humping the pulpit.
Whatever.
Talk about damage control. Why did Obama come out and tell everyone to lay off his wife right after this story brokw on the internet. Seems suspicous to me.
rather than be forced to initially respond to the allegation and then do active damage control at the time of actual substantiation.
Ya Think? They won’t because they can’t defend it and are to chickenshit to get in front of it. THEY KNOW what is on the tape and have the MSM in their “sails” at the moment.
BO can’t now because it would sink ‘em before he gets to Denver, they can’t after Denver ’cause they will loose by even bigger margins than he is now.
Finally I really do want to see how APE shit BO gets…when the shoe is on the other foot in a rubbernecking way a sad as it will be. The immoral acts of BO and MO will be front and center.
But we will find out when we find out. I feel no pity for any of them. Inferior people should not be employed.
I think this something that sounds EXACTLY like what Michelle Obama say.
Have you read her Master’s thesis?
I have.
You can read it on Politico…that’s the only place I could find it. Very light-weight stuff. You’d think that she’s had a lot of years to mature and have grown-up views about race matters, but clearly has not. It appears that she has been unhappy and defensive, all of her life. Not a good trait for 1st Lady.
I wonder just how sharp Michelle Obama really is.
Recall the ” proud for the first time in my life ” comment.
What I am thinking amidst this brou-ha-ha is that that comment was an indoctrination for the tape, or something like it, or eye witnesses to a racist diatribe.
They’re feeding us little drops of the Kool-Aid so that when a whole vat of it is found we’ll accept it as black rage, liberation theology.
I am wondering how bright she really is and how she got into Harvard. The way she comes across is really mean and angry. She acts pissed off most of the time. I have heard about this tape and that it exists. The Republicans are saving it for October.
It makes Harvard seem more progressive when they have a White hating Black Women roaming their halls.
I mean, a THESIS on Bad-Old-Whitey? Oooooo how original… {puke}
When and If the tape is released I will make sure to have my popcorn ready.
Did your friends let you hear or see it?
Just playing devils advocate.
It may exist, but you have never commented on my own theory: That it is faked.
Similar fakes have existed in the past.
A fake would be exposed as such pretty quickly if the video were made public. But that exposure need never happen.
The purpose of the fake would be to assure McCain’s skittish funders that the GOP possesses the means to stop Obama in his tracks. In other words, the footage exists as a money-raising device. Once that function is fulfilled, the thing can disappear.
The BEST rationale to believe in the tape’s existence is Michelle Obama herself. There is nothing we’ve heard about the tape that is out of character for her or Trinity UCC.
That’s not proof, but where there’s smoke…
But someone would TALK. If a few thousand maxed-out funders have seen this tape, some of them would talk. Some would even go on TV and say they saw it.
And if it weren’t released in time to turn the tide decisively, they’d start yelling for it. Those bundlers don’t keep bundling if they aren’t headed for a big win!
I understand the “fake” theory, but at some point, in this situation, there has to be a “put up or shut up.”
Precisely. Put up or shut up.
I really detest gossip — personal and / or political — and until it’s proven otherwise, that’s exactly what this so-called “allegation” is.
This story really doesn’t make any sense logically, there’s no evidence offered in support, and it sounds like a cheap excuse to engage in another round of malicious character assassination. Just because the Obamadroids do it doesn’t mean I have carte blanche to stoop to their level of behavior. I’m simply not going to discuss it further.
Aloha.
So Donald…..how do you see Michelle Obama handling the national Easter egg hunt?
Do you think she’ll let Rev. Wright give the opening prayer?
HAWAII…isn’t that where Barry lived with his SINGLE MOTHER ON FOOD STAMPS?
Oh no, that’s where he lived with his WHITE MARRIED BANKER GRANDMOTHER WHO SENT HIM TO AN EXCLUSIVE PREP SCHOOL.
Is that going to be the Obama line if this comes out? It’s a fake! Why, dear MO would never think such a thing, let alone say it out loud. She loves the whiteys. That’s why she joined the Black Liberation church. To play the victim card and blame the whites for all her troubles.
WOULD a black person say “Whitey” in this day and age?
The point has been raised elsewehre. The phrase seems a little quaint. I recall hearing it as an insult back in the 60s and 70s, but in recent years…?
Hate to break it to you, pal, but it’s still used. Certainly, you hear more people saying either white people or white folks more. Now, the word ‘honky’ is pretty dated.
my, my you are naive.
You say whitey when you’re stuck in a racist frame of mind. Virulent racism is a disease. They get a high from the hatred. TUCC and Rev. Wright fed that high through ritualized preachings, cadence, and music.
The term “whitey” is mild to some epithets used today. It is only slighly pejorative…but
if that is what she (they) were saying publically, imagine what they were saying privately.
Donna Brazile used the term “cracker” which is the equivalent of the “N” word–a true slur,
IMO. She used it during the 2000 campaign when she was managing Al Gore’s White House bid.
Go figure. (When I was young, “White pecker”
was the preferred comeback during any race-inspired territorial clash. Times never seem to change.)
“Anything is possible with Barak”. Axelrod
Does the hire of Ted Griffin by the RNC have any any impact on this? It had to have happened before 22 May.
One way to verify would be to have each tell you EXACTLY what is said… like a memorable line, or what Michelle Obama is wearing in the tape. If they BOTH come up with the same answer or line, then that is VERY good evidence the tape exists.
great idea!
Proof of Life?
If they can authenticate OBL’s infomercials, no prop with MO’s.
You think BO’s ahhh ummms are bad now?
How about a video of her “America is downright mean” comments? The reporter who wrote about it for the New Yorker made it sound like this was something she said routinely in her stump speech. Surely there is video of it somewhere. Also of her talking to the women in Zanesvillem where she whines about spending all that money on her kids lessons.
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008/03/10/080310fa_fact_collins?currentPage=3
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MmEyN2RkNzcwYzgyZDY2MDBiY2U5MjJlZGMwNDM2ODg
and her calling Nevada, NeVaada or vice versa
and him calling Sunrise, Sunshine
and our 57 states
“bitter” “typical” white people
racist grandmothers that can’t help themselves for not loving you cuz you are illegitimate thus you conduct the REST of your life in hopey dreams of becoming a LEGITIMATE man.
But that won’t be enough for you. BO you have to become a man on your OWN. Unload the miserable side kick and try again in 2016.
cuz you WON’T be President in 08
Sincerely,
Dawn in Western NC
I ‘think’ I overheard on Fox that Hannity had a new tape on tonight. I assumed that it was another Wright bit….. but I will be watching.
Hey, I have no problem giving you the benefit of the doubt, Larry. After all, Rumsfeld knew where all WMD’s were, right?
Perhaps he should’ve said where he ‘believed’ they were.
Larry, considering Michelle Obama is a very angry person, who made it in life riding coat tails and had everything basically handed to her when she never deserved it, such as:
Entering Princeton becasue he brother was there on a Basketball Scholorship!
Getting jobs because of friends, especially the last one on the coat tales of Obama and her confident Jarrett who happens to be head of U of C Hospital boards!
Getting a mansion with no money, thanks to Rezko!
Her thesis showing the temperment she holds within, does make her a powder keg ready to explode, imagine that happening in front of an allie at a State Dinner in the WH……..dangerous as can be, when she turns things continually into racial characterizations! America won’t need nuclear bombs when Michelle Obama is around!
Don’t forget the HUGE raise after Barry got elected to the senate.
Don’t forget working with/for Ayers and Dorhn.
Michelle Obama has a serious problem with race. She thinks all of her problems and the reason people don’t like her is because she’s Black (listening to too much of Wright’s “victimization” speech).
Has she ever considered that maybe people don’t like her or the fact that she’s not successful, not because of her race, but who she is as a person? Angry, mean-spirited, hateful? As for her lack of accomplishments, like her husband (mediocre attracts mediocre)- maybe it’s because she’s not talented or gifted? People just told her this to inflate her ego like him, throw them into positions they weren’t ready for for the sake of affirmative action. It’s dangerous and it backfires when we put inexperienced idiots into positions they are wholly incapable of doing because of their skin color or family connections (ie. Dubya) - especially the presidency, which is not an internship nor an entry-level job.
I don’t care for her TONE.
Its crazy to think that you call a college graduate and working mother unsuccessful… Dont care what you think of her. You need to stop letting ur personal feelings control these outlandish comments you making. Im willing to bet if that was your daughter or mother you she wouldnt be labeled as unsuccesful…
Not even gonna get into the Obama bashing… You obviously an ignorant person.
But I just hope you was as heated when your candidate blatantly lied to the world. Is that her plan to get in office? Make up crap that sounds good… Anything to win right?
Or your feelings on her using an assination as a reason to stay in the race…
Is this how successful people accomplish there goals?
And for the record… I am an independent who supports Barack Obama. This aint about parties or skin color… Its truly about wanting to see america change… And of course nothing says change like a ex-first lady making stuff up…
Saying whatever sounds good = Politics as usual. Pretty much why she begging for the VP spot now… Good Day LOL
Didn’t David “Blacksploitator” Axelgoebels issue a nondenial denial regarding the tape? To me that’s the best evidence that it exists, and that he’s in fact seen it. Hell, he probably has a copy himself.
what did Axelrod day?
I’m still looking for the text of the comment in print. Essentially he didn’t deny it exists, by not saying it didn’t exist. A friend of mine saw the quote on CNN I think.
Larry — is there still a million-dollar offer? If so, maybe you should re-publish the details of that.
Until this video is actually released, it is of no help to Hillary at all and Obama supporters will just call it a scare tactic. Therefore, any Hillary supporter who can find a way to get their hands on it should release it ASAP to YouTube and to Fos News and ABC News, which, while not completely neutral, do a better job at airing Obama’s dirty laundry than NBC, CBS or CNN.
Could the Obama supporter be playing hype with it to preempt its actual impact? If everyone things it’s this horrible thing and ends up being just “bad” then it’ll
be discarded by the press.
I have to say that unles this is released –not to me– but to the SD somehow NOW to stop Obama’s coronation; then I don’t care what they do with it in October. For if it is Obama McCain; McCain will win with or without such a tape (imho).
The only value it has from my perspective is making SD waking TF up and support HRC.
After that, well, it will be too late as far as I am concern….
should have been “If everyone thinks…”
sorry.
The sad part of all this, is when the tape surfaces, it has given Obama months to write a speech blaming it on everyone else again and people will need to listen to another 30+ minutes from Obama on the airwaves blaming everyone and throwing everyone else under the bus!
Geez, won’t this be fun again!
Off-topic, but I just have to share this because it’s Memorial Day, every rightwing chickenhawk radio yakker’s favorite day to talk about Patriotism and how they have it and The Lefties don’t…
Spencer Hughes takes a call from a 22-year old male who is disgusted with the lack of “Patriotism” in America: “Mr. Hughes, what can I do for my country?”
Hughes: “I understand your frustration. I feel it myself. You know, I was patriotic when I was in kindergarten, now kids get to fourth grade, fifth grade, sixth grade, and if you took the flag out of the classroom and if they weren’t told to put their hands on their hearts, would they even notice?”
Caller: “But what can I do?
Hughes: “Look, just….just be…just keep informed. That’s all I can tell you. I’m not even telling you you have too…I mean, just keep listening, just keep informed.”
That’s right. Hughes’s advice to a 22-year old male calling to ask what he can do with his overflowing Patriotism does not include joining the army to fight in a war Hughes supports one thousand percent. It doesn’t involve joining the Peace Corps or even donating time to charity work. Nope, just “keep informed” and “keep listening” (presumably to shows like Spencer Hughes’s.)
Just before the break, Hughes says “look, enjoy your barbecues. But don’t you dare let the day pass withotu thinking about WHY we have this day off….”
Uh huh. Whatever, Mr. Hughes. Whatever.
I wouldn’t suggest ANY ONE sign up to serve until W, Chainsaw and their rotten cabal are OUT OF OFFICE…. FAR OUT!!!
And if McKook wins - I won’t ask anyone to sign up to serve for at least 4 yrs.
to do so now would be suicide for a zero sum cause
larry,
you mentioned the barack obama overseas tape before in a previous blog. do you know what is in the content of the tape? does he engage in a rant of sorts as well?
re: m.o. if that tape of her does exist and he becomes the nominee, it will likely be president mccain come january. it could be a case of the democrats “snatching defeat from the jaws of victory”.
democrats are like the chicago cubs, they can’t seem to win the big prize (world series, or presidency in their case).
Think Iran.
I wish it would have just come out WITHOUT everyone knowing about it. This has given Obama time to come up with an excuse and time to word a speech in such a way as to blame the victim (white people).
I am almost certain the tape exists after watching the interview on GMA where he told them to “lay off my wife” and don’t misconstrue her statements. It’s pretty obvious.
But the deal clincher for many people, as it was for me, is gonna be the overseas tape of Obama directly campaigning for Odinga - followed by footage of Odinga’s Islamic terrorists chopping down men, women, and children with machetes after Odinga lost the election and yelled foul play. Followed by Odinga saying he is Obama’s cousin and they still keep in regular contact. Unlike with Wright, I don’t think disowning Odinga or throwing him under the bus is gonna erase that image of the two of them together and Odinga’s support for Sharia law in Kenya, which was one of the most stable countries in the regions before Odinga came along. Maybe even follow that up with famous US Black leaders threatening riots in the US if Obama doesn’t win. Can anyone say race-wars? That is enough to scare the crap out of the most sincere Obamabot and finally wake them up. Then they’ll eventually look at his inexperience and lack of any significant accomplishments and corruption ties with Rezko to help seal the deal for them to NEVER vote for Obama - in fact, vote against him.
Hillary4eva!
That is what an RNC 527 Ad will look bloody awful but not as bad as BO meeting with “the wrong” people.
Why do you think GW took a shot at him from the well of the Knesset? Think about it. GW almost choked on his pretzels again when viewing it.
Larry,
Those of us who have been with NQ since the beginning, have no doubts about your veracity. In fact I will even go so far to say you usually hold information until it is about to hit the MSM.
You are one of the best and I find the doubting Thomases painful to be around.
Larry, the ideal of asking each of your friends who saw the tape a specific question about the tape and blog the results would be greatly appreciated. All of us know that the dnc and the msm has brewed something rotten with the obama nomination i mean coronation need some relieve.
Thanks and waiting…
The tape is just one leg on the chair. The others are the best hits of Michelle Obama as some have mentioned. The treasure trove of strange present votes in the Illinois State Senate and of course the Rezko trial. Any of these could have a big impact as a chair doesn’t sit well on less than four.
As hillarious as it sounds, it might be interesting to see Mr. O get elected. Love to see the republicans take control of one of the houses because they will investigate the daylights out of this guy and all the shady things he seems to have been involved in.
Certainly we live in a day and time when things can be doctored and spliced, but if you had such a tape wouldn’t you think also that you probably had the authenticity checked before you paid for it?
I hope it comes out, but I don’t think it will unless McCain starts to loose the electorate. I believe Obama is very confident that because of his age, McCain won’t put up a vigorous fight. This is a fellow who gave George Bush a kiss and has been waiting eight years or so for the job. He will be patient enough until Obama makes a mistake and then ride it all the way home.
I can’t wait until the GOP convention when Joe Liebermann announces that he is changing parties to run with McCain as VP. The way I count the senate then is 50-50 who know what could happen before the election, perhaps a special session called by a lame duck president?
I am somewhat surprised that more videos have not surfaced of Reverend Wright, but I suppose that those who have the tapes are waiting until a more opportune time to release them. That’s probably the ONLY reason that I believe that a tape of Michelle spouting off might exist–Hillary would NEVER use it since it would likely backfire, yet the Republicans are getting what they want right now–Obama running in November so why would ANY of them release it sooner than the fall? The answer is crystal clear–they’d wait to use it when it can create the most damage.
Also, the one thing that keeps nagging at me are all those SDs who have not endorsed EITHER candidate, which seems strange to me at this point since I honestly cannot see Hillary overcoming Obama’s lead in pledged delegates–the math just does not favor Hillary at this point. It is possible that the uncommitted SDs are waiting on the May 31st rules committee ruling on Florida and Michigan, but with 287 uncommitted SDs, that seems like quite a lot who are waiting for some reason other than a chance to support the person who is likely to finish ahead in pledged delegates. I really wonder about that–for instance, if there is a lot more dirt on EITHER Obama or Clinton.
I must admit that I would be shocked if something scandalous surfaced about Hillary since the Clintons’ have been under the proverbial media microscope for well over 15 years. So that leaves Obama. Clearly, Michelle is the one in the family who seems to carry a gigantic chip on her shoulder so she seems like the one most likely to get caught on tape saying things that she would rather we not see.
One of the posters here claimed that he had seen the video of Michelle (was on one of the earlier threads about this) and that it wasn’t “all that”. He said that Michelle was actually relating a story about what some older AA woman had said about white people. He claimed that in context, the video would not make so much as a ripple–that Michelle’s “first time” to really be “proud” was far more inflammatory. I dunno–seeing is believing so I will wait and see what happens.
tape or no tape….the majority of democrats have spoken and voted for Hillary. if obama is coronated, mccain wins the GE. they know it and we know it. suoers and dem elite know it. the obamacan coup is unravelling. the tape will only be one more confirmation, of many, that the manchurian in the empty suit will not cut the mustard. the tape would be grand though, wouldn’t it? heh. heh .
laugh is on you Zbig, Donna, Howard, John K., Nancy P. et al…. and all the msm mediabots in the bag for obama… HEH!
Benedict Lieberdouche Arnold!!
Totally agree.
I found out the whole Kenya scenario about 3 weeks ago, and I am still shocked, incensed as I have never been before, and sick to my stomach.
That whole nightmare has me in complete emotional turmoil.
Just think of all the names Hillary Clinton has already been called. I doubt there is anything Michelle Obama can say that would be any worse than what has already been said. Everyone knows the Obamas are racists and despises whitey, that is so obvious. Seems to me that everyone is preaching to the choir. I would like to believe that there are still people out there that could make a difference but I am afraid everyone has already decided and no one is budging one way or the other. The real hope I now have is that Clinton’s voters will not vote for Obama no matter what. As for myself, I would not vote for Obama even if BOTH HILLARY and BILL CLINTON were on the Obama ticket.
Again pure ignorance…
Can you pass me the link to all the racist comments Obama and Michelle have said? Since everyone knows im sure it wont be that hard…
take ya time… Ill wait..
You don’t know a damn thing, you’re just like the rest of the real racist trying make Obama and Michelle what you are but that’s impossible because you are one that infected with the “racism germ”.
One thing I must tell you, and this is not an excuse like you have, but Blacks have a right to mistrust white people. This mistreatment of blacks has been going on for more than 300 years. When the Jews were murdered, it was by whites, trying to deport hispanics is being perputrated by whites, killing slaves by thousands, lynching them from a a tree in public, using powerful water hoses to inflict pain, raping of black slave women….all done by the white people.
You need to check your history and shut the hell up.
So blame YOUR white ancestore for MELTING POT IN AMERICAN.
I don’t know a single person that is still promoting BO for President.
I don’t either, except the hypnotized media.
Well, the existence of such a tape would explain Barky’s mood lately. His lack of energy and vigor may be because he is aware of the tape and the problem it poses for himself and the DNC. He should be riding high right now. Hell, I would be. And I’m also sure if there is a tape, Hillary is already aware of it and THAT explains her mood. She seems high spirited and positive. She’s down in PR slamming back cervezas.
Could also be nicotine hangover and anti-depressants.
It’s because he starves himself to keep his naturally fat self thin.
Look at his childhood pictures and his Mother in later years. Barry is a closet eater.
Agreed. Hillary seems way too confident and calm. Obama really does look like he just wants to get away from this. BTW, where’s Oprah? Oh right, her ratings plummeted..she knows when to abandon a sinking ship.
After visiting other blogs, I can say the Obamabots are SCARED! The know at least half of us will not vote for Obama if he’s the nom. So even if the DNC gives it to him against the party’s best interest they already know he can’t win.
Dean and Pelosi should also be very concerned about their careers…way too many dems they’ve pissed off.
i dont think the existance of that tape even matters. it would be spun away and probably wont even make it on pbs…..everybody knows that both of the obummer’s are racists. the only reason he is still in the race is because he got an early lead in the caucus states and racked up delegates before anybody knew who the hell he was. and now, no one dares go against him, they might be a racist ! what sickens me are the gutless supers ….they know about him and still they navigate to the lying racist fraud. i hate him and i dont care who knows it or likes it.
Smearing people by calling them a racist because they don’t vote for your candidate is a form of voter intimidation. What’s really hypocritical about that argument is that +90% of BHO’s AA vote has a racist overtone. They are voting for him because of his skin color. As are many of his white supporters. Not because of his qualifications.
Blatant hypocrisy and a double standard at play here. And voter intimidation and disenfranchisement.
A tape isn’t even necessary. Her quote in the New Yorker in front of a journalist about how she’d like to “scratch his (Bill Clinton’s) eyes out!” (”Just kidding”) was enough for me.
I have heard several people say they can’t imagine her in the White House (and these are not racists, it is based on her character).
it is based on her character
Agreed.
This is where I sound a bit conservative. I just cannot imagine having a First Lady who thought so little of the U.S. that she would make that idiotic statement about this being the “first time” that she was really “proud” of her country! Frankly, if I were a GOP strategist, I would ALREADY be playing that video over and over and over again. And mind you–this is coming from someone who will NEVER vote for McBush. (I may stay home, but voting for McBush is NOT an option for me!) Nevertheless, I know what a visceral reaction I had the first time I saw that video, and by George, that reaction has NOT gone away, even after seeing the video replayed ad nauseum!
“To be perfectly honest, I’m quite skeptical that a sharp woman like Michelle Obama would ever say such a thing publicly, let alone that there’s a video or audiotape of it in existence.
Donald from Hawaii”
Yeah, what you said! She’s to sharp to say anything stupid like”for the first time in my adult life I’m proud of my countery” OOPS, sorry, she actually DID say something as assinine as that didn’t she…got the tape and all. Well I’m SURE a woman as sharp as her would NEVER be stupid enough to say she might bot vote for the nominee if it wasn’t her precious…OOPS! Wait a secind, OOOOH YEAH, she WAS stupid enough to say that, they got the tape and everything. Oh well, who cares, there is NO way! She’s to sharp to say…….They got tape you say??
If Obama or the DNC thinks he is going to win they’re not facing reality. Listen to this to know where he really stands.
http://www.bartcop.com/141-bombshell-sample.m3u
Link doesn’t work for me.
This was discussed yesterday in three fine posts.
The map, the math and the Obama myth.
It’s Windows Media Player
http://www.bartcop.com/141-bombshell-sample.m3u
hahaha
Ever since Obama said to lay off his wife it’s thread after thread about Michelle (the monster) Obama here. Y’all are awesome. If Hillary is the REAL winner how come all the remaining Super delegates keep going to Obama. How does Obama keep beating the “Hillary machine”. I mean, the guy has zero experience according to you compared to Bill & Hill.
If you’re so sure Bambi has it all sewn up, why are you here? Shouldn’t you(the winners) be getting drunk on some beach, partying? Oh wait, that would be Hillary in PR right now, drinking cervasa!
Exactly, the guy has zero experience. That’s why we won’t vote for him, if he is the nominee.
Hillary has only been in the Senate a little bit longer then Obama. I don’t think her being 1st lady gave her as much experience as most believe.
Other shoes far more weightier than even ‘whitey’ are about to drop, that’s why all those SDs haven’t decided. Besides nothing counts until the convention delegates VOTE. The March 31st meeting will push the number of delegates need to win from 2026 to 2210.
When are you Obamabots going to acknowledge Obama’s vulnerabilities. You have been ‘hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil’ since Super Tuesday. All the while waiting to seal the deal. Texas has yet to certify all those ill-gotten caucus votes.
With all this hanging over his head, Obama sure had audacity to think none of his background would not matter. As someone stated on another post, Obama was HOPING no one saw, and will CHANGE the subject when they do.
Larry
Please tell me your CIA skills were a bit more advanced than this diagnosis…? I have 2 friends and they know 2 friends and so on and so on…. :^0
I’m sure you’re right there is another “tape” of the Obama’s in church spouting off comments that are “offensive” - yikes, offensive comments in America…. can you imagine that…?? you know his campaign has smart people in too - maybe they will leak the tape early to minimize the impact…
I’m surprised Hillary hasn’t gotten a hold of the tape - we all know she’d send it out to the media…. my God she is a just a slow motion train wreck in running off the tracks…
Mitchman, no she wouldn’t. The Clintons keep democratic dirt in house for the good of the party. But that doesn’t mean she wouldn’t show it to Obama and his minions and ask him to drop out. Read Primary Colors or better yet rent the DVD.
Better to show it to uncommitted delegates, Dean and the DNC.
Obama is a spineless incompetent. nobama ever!
Larry, no tapes exists, and the mere fact that you keep insisting that there is one makes you come across as a petulant cocksucker. Listen, you lost, and you exposed yourself by you assuming that the “tape” would reveal itself in October.(Way to go Nostradamus, 5 months for people to have smoking gun evidence that you are full of shot. Fucking coward) Didn’t think that this shit-stain of a blog could get any more pathetic, but you continuously prove us wrong.
Homophobia is a great way to show how progressive you are.
STEP RIGHT UP FOLKS! The “New Politics” in action! Obama is SUCH an inspiration to Jay!
WestPalm, all of the Obama guys (age group 18-21) are home from the lake. They picked No Quarter for their “lob and run” campaign tonight. They really have to do all they can do, because they dropped out of school for the semester to help him campaign. The parents will be really ticked, if it was all for naught.
jay, you don’t exist either. you are a legend in your mind and no where else.
Jay your parents must be sooo proud of your vocabulary.
Over seventy comments for a tape that nobody has seen and that probably doesn’t exist? You guys are totally delusional.
I’m a Canadian lurker, and yes, Kos, Huffpost, and most of the media are definitely pro-Obama, so I’ve been looking for some pro-Hillary sites.
But this site is totally bizarre. Is this a Republican site? You’re promoting GOP anti-Obama commercials… I really don’t get it.
Lola Canadian lurker, it’s great you de-lurked. Allow me to say salutations!
Not all is as it seems in today’s world.
It is a world where it is becoming increasing more difficult to view “all sides” and “deal in facts” as the owner of No Quarter, Larry Johnson, has stated.
As a Canadian and a neighbor to our north, you must have some unique insights you can share.
That said, I came here for national security info because the qualifications of POTUS matter more than BO’s words.
It is not “promoting GOP anti-Obama commercials… ” as you suggest, to acknowledge this stuff is out there and “coming to a theater near you”.
Anti-Obama? YUP; not GOP, American citizen. Now do you get it?
Hey Lola, we don’t stick our noses in your elections and tell you what to do. I’m sure there’s a Canadian politics site you can run off to. I don’t know where they are though because they would be YOUR business, not mine.
It is interesting that Obama’s camp hit Hillary with their best shot this weekend. Its as if they are desperate to destroy her now and not wait even one more week. I wonder what they think is coming that is so bad.
We have some foul-mouthed Obamanians here, tonight. Is there a new rule on calling the host really bad names? Can you find someone to escort them to the door?
Remember if you are critical of anything the Omighty Obama says or does, the Obamaites will say you are: A. really a republican B. a racist C. a racist rupublican. D. all of the above
Back to you!
Obama 08!!!!!!!!!!
Why wouldn’t Hillary be doing anything to get her hands on this video if it exists???? Obviously she needs it to come out now to win and not in October.
You guys are getting nuttier everyday.
This is just pathetic. This site has surely pushed more people away from Hillary Clinton than it has attracted to her side. You deserve this loss, you have worked for it, and you have earned it. Pathetic.
This site has had the opposite effect on me. I’d never vote for Obama now, and I told friends I would after Super Tuesday.
Keep goin’, Larry. We’re behind you.
I have a friend who saw this and I have another friend who saw that and they are both in different parts of the Country. And I also have a friend who actually taped the JFK assination from a diferent vantasge point, sheds new light on it, and he has a friend who saw another tape of the Roswell Aliens. Give me a break, if that many people had seen a “tape” like Whitey, it would be on You Tube by now.
It’s so sad to see that after all of these years… RACE is still an issue. Now if this had been a “C” woman commenting on an “AA” person it would have be pushed under the rug. And let me point out here to MYTOWNTALKS, referencing an African American as an AA was the dumbest thing I’ve ever read… I’m still laughing, thanks for that chuckle for the day.
Until the said tape is seen by any of you or by America, “Stand Down“. History is being made, just be happy that you lived to see a time that will go down in the history books.
Geez
Cindy McCain didn’t even do time like most Americans would have (including Michelle Obama) for the mess she was in to. She helped found a company and stole the drugs from it. Served no time in jail. Serve no time in the White House. Felons can’t vote, she shouldn’t be able to vote much less be our First Lady. And all I hear is a bunch of mess people try to put on Michelle Obama. You know what? If she did say something, so what? You can’t go to jail for that, it doesn’t make you a felon. I will not have a woman the law put above everyone else in the land as First Lady. It’s so stupid. She’s a loser. And her husband’s too old for the job anyway.
Obama 08!!!!!!!!!
I am a Big Obama supporter and very proud of it their are no perfect people in this world and that includes every last one of you it is really time for a change I am proud to be alive to see this day that no one ever thought would happen. Please grow up!
Damn, I heard the same exact argument about Bush when we said he had DUIs, coke problems and failed businesses. You’re in perfect company, there Spanky.
WE HAVE HAD presidents tht have owned slaves.
Im sure many of these WHITE presidents have called Blacks - nigga.
I call yall whitey all the time.
So what.
This is the world we live in.
If she did say it…goood for her….Im still votin OBAMA!
WHAT?????????????
WE HAVE HAD presidents tht have owned slaves.
Im sure many of these WHITE presidents have called Blacks - nigga.
I call yall whitey all the time.
So what.
This is the world we live in.
If she did say it…goood for her….Im still votin OBAMA!
WHAT?????????????
WE HAVE HAD presidents tht have owned slaves.
Im sure many of these WHITE presidents have called Blacks - nigga.
I call yall whitey all the time.
So what.
This is the world we live in.
If she did say it…goood for her….Im still votin OBAMA!
WHAT?????????????
You are correct. And we talk about how great and brilliant these slave holding, rapist presidents were. And you know what? They might have had some ok ideas. They had babies like Obama running all over the place, no one writes in detail about it either. All we hear about is the greatness, etc. OK, I’m over it. They whipped the skin off men and hung them by the necks until they were dead, etc. But they were great men. So, you know what? Obama doesn’t look so bad. He’s a great improvement.
Obama 08!!!!!!!!!
Everyone seems to have “seen” this tape
Yeah right
I Think this is all foolery
and to those who wont support him because Hillary didnt win are not democrats to begin with
Sad and shameful you all are
and to the one who said she and her husband are unsuccessful, i would like to see your Harvard and Yale degrees and i would surely like to see you go out in the community and do some service
Sad you people are. Cant stand to see a black brother doing something good for EVERYONE!
Truth be told, a “nigga” does not refer to a black person. It refers to a ignorant asshole… Which is what some of you up here, sound like!!!
Now, with that said if you all have such a problem with BLACK people, then maybe you should have left us where we were! You reap what you sow… REAP THIS!!! THE FIRST BLACK PRESIDENT
OBAMA- you have my vote!!!
Truth be told, a “nigga” does not refer to a black person. It refers to a ignorant asshole… Which is what some of you up here, sound like!!!
Now, with that said if you all have such a problem with BLACK people, then maybe you should have left us where we were! You reap what you sow… REAP THIS!!! THE FIRST BLACK PRESIDENT
OBAMA- you have my vote!!!
I wouldn’t vote for Obama for dog catcher.
No Way
Hussein Osama has so many skeletons in his closet… Cocaine, prostitution, anti-semitism, homosexuality, a bitter wife… And they will surface one by one… There’s no way America is straying away from Israel like he wants it to. AIPAC’s work begins…
Cindy McCain should be in jail right now for stealing drugs from a company she helped found. She did no time. She shouldn’t be our first lady, not at all. If felons can’t vote, she shouldn’t be voting or running for the White House with her husband. McCain isn’t clean either and he’s too dam*ed old for the job of being president. Mr. Cun* caller. We are all sinners and shouldn’t be throwing stones anyway. We’ve all fallen short. While you’re typing all that bs about Obama, you’re leaving your sins out of the paragraph. Talk about your mother, father, brother, sister, wife, yourself…there’s plenty there, I’m certain.
Obama 08!!!!!
Don’t “fuck” wit Michelle Obama she’s the future first African American first lady.
what happened to what our country was founded on? i dont know about you but i dont want the United States of America become socialistic, and thats where we are heading if obama is our commander in cheif, excuse me… miss use of words, the guy who doesnt put his hand over his heart during the national anthem.
If putting your hand heart over you hand makes you American so staying in country that made my ancestors slaves. All this petty bullshit is ridiculous.
First you fight over immigration, demanding the hispanics be deported, but the middle class whites and above keep hiring illegal to work in their homes and pay them pennies because they know they can’t demand more pay and these whites are the main ones talking about deporting them. So I guess this is what you call being “Amerian”, treat the minorites like crap, work them for little or no money and threaten to deport them if they complain.
Just like they auctioned off slaves.
socialistic = gov leveling the playing field.
whats wrong with that?
- crazy for the blue white and pink
With all the negatives of Obama going forward to the general election, what are peoples’ opinions of McCain’s run if he picks Sarah Palin for his vice-president?
She would fill more of shortcomings of McCain and has plenty of executive experience. I don’t see how he can win by picking a white man. Jindal is too young, but Palin has youth and would captivate the women of the country, especially in many of the swing states.
If the DVD/tape exists, and McCain picks Palin and times it right and goes after the non-black female Oprah voters, I don’t see how he can lose. After doing extensive research on Palin, I think you position her perfectly to be the Veep and become the first female President in 2012.
Anyone that thrives on smear tactics are they themselves has a smear problem.
You talk about this Michelle tape like the “smoking gun” and want to talk about her being a racist. If it bothers you that much then you should be outraged over people in these so-called “rural areas” who are the epitome of racism. Slamming the door in the Obama campaigner’s face saying they won’t vote for a n…ger, having their dogs to run them away their does, screaming they would never vote for a black man. Just who in hell do you consider racist.
One thing this election has proven is that RACISM, especially among whites are very much alive and well.
The only real negative thing you can use againt Obama is this Rev. Wright crap. Telling to leave his church,but yet these catholic priests, which the catholic church have members in the million, only move these pedifile priest from one church to another and you think having priest in church for a continuing 30 years molesting children, especially boys is much better than Obama’s 20 year church membership. I am sure that Hilary camp is the one gave the Rev. Wright tape to Youtube on a sermon that done in Sept.2001 after 9/11….7 years ago.
How do you know how often Obama attended church but who cares, keep pedafile priest and get rid of Obama for attending his church.
You all are so infected with hatred that you really can’t see the forest for the trees.
Viola:
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.
Larry and everyone,
Please check this out at Flopping Aces. The owner of the new Hillary supporters for McCain site says he has heard the tape.
http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/06/08/the-michelle-obama-whitey-tape-update-new-anti-obama-site-owner-says-he-heard-tape/
Don’t know anything about any of these people so cannot comment as to anyone’s credibility.
Not interested! Some know nothing loser said he heard a tape. Big Deal!!!!! McCain called his wife a cunt. His wife, Cindy should be in jail for stealing drugs from a company she helped found. Ms. Obama has done no such thing. She is actual First Lady material. I will be voting Obama in the fall. Not for a first lady who should currently be in the slammer or in a rehab center with Britney, Paris, Lindsey, and Amy Winehouse…maybe she should go on Celebrity Rehab? Get a life and stop bearing false witness, lying, stone throwing, and just being dumb enough to listen to hear say.
Obama 08!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Whether the tape exists or not, I don’t care. It has nothing to do with issues, etc. McCain has said and done so many things and he’s actually the one running. Michelle Obama isn’t running. She didn’t steal drugs from a company she helped found and if she had, she would’ve served time like any normal American. Michelle Obama is a decent American citizen, a wife, a mother, a hard working citizen, she’s intelligent, and beautiful and does not deserve to have know nothing losers slamming her for nothing. So many false Christians out there bearing false witness, lying, stone throwing…all of you are sinners and have fallen short, so in God’s eyes you’re no different than Michelle Obama or even Charles Manson. You think you are, but you are wrong. Just by being on here talking about something like a stupid non-existant tape, shows how low and nasty you are. Just by doing that, you look a million times worse than Michelle Obama. I will IGNORE every negative thing written or said about this fine lady and cast my vote for her husband, Obama in November. I will be PROUD to have her as our First Lady, because that’s exactly what she is.
Obama 08!!!!!!!!
IF YOU WANT INFORMATION ABOUT THIS STORY - YOU CAN GO TO http://WWW.AFRICAINTERNATIONALPRESS.COM
THEY POSTED THE STORY AND THEY ARE RELEASING IT.
THEY WILL NOT ACCEPT ANY MONEY FOR THE TAPE AT ALL.
SO YOU PEOPLE THAT THINK THIS IS A PAY OFF - YOU ARE WRONG.
THE BIG MOUTH MICHELLE REALLY SCREWED UP BAD!
YIPPEE!
BY THE WAY,
DID YOU READ ABOVE THAT THERE IS ANOTHER TAPE OF BARACK OVERSEAS THAT WILL BE GETTING RELEASED.
NOT JUST MICHELLE BIG MOUTH.
YIPPEE
Comment by Vegas | 2008-06-16 12:22:08
Not interested! Some know nothing loser said he heard a tape. Big Deal!!!!! McCain called his wife a cunt. His wife, Cindy should be in jail for stealing drugs from a company she helped found. Ms. Obama has done no such thing. She is actual First Lady material. I will be voting Obama in the fall. Not for a first lady who should currently be in the slammer or in a rehab center with Britney, Paris, Lindsey, and Amy Winehouse…maybe she should go on Celebrity Rehab? Get a life and stop bearing false witness, lying, stone throwing, and just being dumb enough to listen to hear say.
===============================
YOU NEED TO REREAD YOUR COMMENT ABOVE -
YOU HAVE A PROBLEM IN THE HEAD. YOU SAY REALLY NASTY THINGS ABOUT CINDY MCCAIN, AND THEN PURPORT TO CALL YOURSELF A CHRISTIAN - I DON’T THINK SO, NOT WITH THAT POTTY MOUTH OF YOURS.
BETTER GO TO CHURCH AND SAY SOME HAIL MARYS FOR ABOUT 3 WEEKS TO MAKE UP FOR YOUR UGLY MOUTH LADY.
YOUR WHITE-HATER RACIST MICHELLE OBAMA IS FIRST LADY MATERIAL FOR THE OUT-HOUSE IN MY GRANDMAS BACK YARD, AND THAT IS ALL.
BY THE WAY, THE CINDY MCCAIN STEALING DRUGS PART ABOVE IS DEFAMATION OF CHARACTER - BETTER WATCH THAT MOUTH YOURSELF.
GET OVER YOURSELF ALSO.
Video: Republican HQ Manager’s Home Shot Up, Damaged Over McCain
Signs
Republican HQ Manager’s Home Shot Up Over McCain Signs
VIOLA,
Democrats Far More Aggressive in Seminole County,’ Victim Says
POSTED: 11:26 pm EDT October 22, 2008
UPDATED: 10:45 am EDT October 23, 2008
LONGWOOD, Fla. — The home of a Central Florida Republican
headquarters manager was shot up and damaged over his support of Sen.
John McCain, the man told police.
VIOLA, WHAT ABOUT THIS -
PITTSBURGH — A 20-year-old woman who was robbed at an ATM in Bloomfield was also maimed by her attacker, apparently because of her political views, police said.
According to WTAE’s news exchange partners the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review Ashley Todd, of College Station, Texas, was using an ATM at Liberty Avenue and Pearl Street in Bloomfield just before 9p.m. on Wednesday when a man approached her and put a knife to her throat.
Police spokeswoman Diane Richard said the robber took $60 from Todd,then became angry when he saw a McCain bumper sticker on the victim’s car. The attacker then punched and kicked the victim, before using the knife to scratch the letter “B” into her face, Richard said.
The Tribune reported that Todd, who isn’t familiar with the area,drove to a friend’s house and together the pair located the Citizens Bank ATM at Liberty and Pearl where the attack happened and called police.
Todd declined to comment to the Tribune. Friends said she is in Pittsburgh volunteering for the McCain-Palin campaign.
Richard said the woman refused medical treatment after the assault,which happened outside the view of the bank’s surveillance cameras.
The robber is described as a dark-skinned black man, 6 feet 4 inches tall, 200 pounds with a medium build, short black hair and brown eyes. The man was wearing dark colored jeans, a black undershirt and black shoes.
The Obama-Biden campaign released a statement, commenting on the attack. The statement said “Our thoughts and prayers are with the young woman for her to make a speedy recovery, and we hope that the person who perpetrated this crime is swiftly apprehended and brought to justice.”
The McCain-Palin campaign also released a statement saying “The McCain campaign is aware of the incident involving one of its volunteers. Out of respect, the campaign won’t be commenting. The campaign also confirms that Senator McCain and Governor Palin have
both spoken to the woman.”
I hate that this is still sitting on here and people might still believe it. This was proven to be a hoax. The girl did it to herself.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2008/10/23/national/a141614D31.DTL&tsp=1
Ashley Todd, 20-year-old college student from College Station, Texas, admitted Friday that the story was false, said Maurita Bryant, the assistant chief of the police department’s investigations division. Todd was charged with making a false report to police, and Bryant said police doubted her story from the start.
“…here is why I think the tape exists.
“I have two friends. One is a Democrat and one is a Republican. One lives on the west coast and one lives on the east coast. They do not know each other. Yet each has spoken directly with someone who has seen the tape.”
That’s some stellar intelligence analysis, Mr. Johnson. Absolutely stellar. “Two guys I know talked to some other guy who said he saw the tape. QED.”
Sheesh.
Hey, MSN and the LA TIMES just ran multiple stories from a phony blogger, identified as a McCain aide. *hooting*
Worse?
The blog site had been identified as a fake site in the past, when Mother Jones and HuffPo repeated nonsense posted on it.
So you better save your outrage for the mainstream media, sweetie.
They didn’t even bother to verify the story before making sure they continued the smear job on Palin.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/13/arts/television/13hoax.html?hp