Buy Vosges' famous Bacon and Chocolate bar
Adobe Education Store

RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Booman Blows the Obama Disinformation Campaign

This thread is now closed to comments. GO TO THREAD #2 to continue your discussions.


Our thanks to Martin Longman over at Booman Tribune. He performed a public service last night by disseminating Barack Obama talking points even before I had published my update. Two key points–First, the Obama campaign is admitting the tape exists by ponying up a bogus explanation. Second, they don’t dispute that Michelle is sitting at the table with Louis Farrakhan.

So, here’s what Martin posted:

The Michelle Tape

by BooMan
Sun Jun 1st, 2008 at 11:57:57 PM EST
My old friend, Larry Johnson, knows about manipulating elections from his training with the Central Intelligence Agency. He doesn’t want Obama to win the nomination for whatever reason, and he’s in full propaganda mode to do everything he can to frighten the superdelegates. He claims to have a shocking tape of Michelle Obama ranting in some anti-white diatribe. He promises to produce this tape tomorrow at 9am.

From what I understand, it is a tape of Michelle Obama criticizing the Bush administration.

How you’d write it:

Why did Bush cut folks off medicaid?
Why did Bush let New Orleans drown?
Why did Bush do nothing about Jena?
Why did Bush put us in Iraq for no reason?

How you’d say it:

Why’d he cut folks off medicaid?
Why’d he let New Orleans drown?
Why’d he do nothing about Jena?
Why’d he put us in Iraq for no reason?

How Larry Johnson wants you to hear it:

Whitie cut folks off medicaid?
Whitie let New Orleans drown?
Whitie do nothing about Jena?
Whitie put us in Iraq for no reason?

I’m going to be honest with you. Both SusanHu and Larry Johnson have been friends of mine. They have both done a lot for me and I am grateful and indebted to them. Any issues I’ve had with their activities in this election I have kept private. I haven’t visited their site in four months because I found it too personally painful to read what they were writing and I did not want to be tempted to respond. I thought I owed them that. But loyalty can only go so far. If they publish this allegation tomorrow, I will no longer speak with them. And I say that with great sorrow.

This election has ruined a lot of friendships. I have tried hard not to let it ruin mine. But smears of this type are unforgivable. I have been forebearing. Perhaps, in retrospect, I have been too forebearing. That’s all I say. This is too painful to me.

Martin, buddy. It ain’t a smear when it is true. I have made it clear all along that I do not have the tape but have spoken with good friends who know folks who have seen the tape. Martin, I have never, ever claimed to have the tape or stated that I was going to post same. I also have made it clear that the folks surrounding McCain want to keep this quiet until after August. So get your facts right Booman.

But you, Martin, now claim you have a transcript. How do I know? Because you quoted the transcript in detail. Terrific. Bring it out. Let’s put this to bed once and for all. Let’s show the world that Farrakhan and Michelle were exchanging Kool-Aid recipes.

I also find it fascinating that Martin is part of the Obama blog force. Me, I’m not on the Hillary mailing list. Don’t need it. Capable of thinking for myself. Martin, you got played by your boys. Transcript indeed!

Trackback URL

RSS Feed for This Post163 Comments

Comment by satin.sheets.feminist | 2008-06-02 21:07:12

Martin Longman is a hack. I am not surprised, however, for he is an Obamabot for sale. He calls himself a progressive, but he is simply a paid pamphleteer for the highest bidder.

He is also out of touch.

Comment by ginamc | 2008-06-02 21:26:05

But, he’s also so heartbroken and heart sick over this entire thing, now he won’t talk to Larry and Susan ever again :(

 

Comment by ginamc | 2008-06-02 21:26:37

But, he’s also so heartbroken and heart sick over this entire thing, now he won’t talk to Larry and Susan ever again, poor guy :(

 

Comment by A.Citizen | 2008-06-02 22:09:52

The Booman got the heave ho from my bookmarks a long time ago. Guy is not a serious person as to his blogging. Like Kos, Bowers, Marshall, Jane, Digby, Jeralyn and others he was one of the pioneers of Left Blogistan.

Sadly, he did not turn out to have the skillset needed to do what the very difficult job demands.

Funny how all the guys I mentioned just can not cut it whereas all the women in my list are tough, hard-fighting progressive none of which swallowed the Magic Man’s Poisonous Kool-Aid.

I can’t think of one good women blogger who has.

Funnny….huh?

 
 

Comment by hillarysmygirl | 2008-06-02 21:08:14

LOL! Larry, you are the best. Thanks!

Comment by ginaswo | 2008-06-02 22:12:27

right on Larry you made them tip their hand, Bwaaahaaaaaaaaa!!!!

Comment by Shainzona | 2008-06-02 22:19:01

Yup - Larry gave them a gift…address it now and have no problem in October.

Hey, if Michelle didn’t say “whitey” then Obama should be eager to produce their copy of the Farrakhan event to prove it.

Obviously Obama Campaign responses today indicates that she DID appear with Farrakhan (hmmmm, maybe that’s not such a good thing in and of itself??)…so prove to us what she said and this whole thing will go away.

 
 
 

Comment by AC-n-NC | 2008-06-02 21:10:25

Way to go Larry. Running scared and crapping their pants. they know M. Obama is a hate filled racist.

Comment by Blk4hillary | 2008-06-02 22:12:35

I want to start my comment by saying i am a supporter of Hillary Clinton. I have been and I will remain one. Also i am African American. I feel strongly that Obama is not ready to be president and that Hillary is better prepared. I think all the evidence is there now to support the claim.. I also rail on all of the misinformation from the obama team. One thing bothers me here though. Can you guys accurately define what a racist is. Also as a black man, i can tell you from firsthand accounts that alot of things rev wright and others speak on are true. I also think its absurd to accuse a black person of being racist against a white person. I think history justifies any animosity couple that with current events. The problematic part is this is coming from several prominent democrats. The people who are suppose to be able to relate to this. Its is definitely different being black in this nation and i think its self serving to actually equate an african american’s reality in the country as racism. I didnt spell check this so dont attack grammar.. I am sure you get the meat of my argument. I dont think race needs to be the reason or the angle you attack Obama, he was never properly exposed for being more of the same. He has never been asked to present his resume documenting sweeping chances he has brought about. You cant get him to come up with creative ideas to solve problems he can just complain about them. Obama supporters I can honestly say that I have no idea how you could support Obama and diss Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton when they were the best thing to happen to America in the last 40 years. I will echo Hillary, can you tell me what was so horrible about the 90s? the peace or the prosperity, you guys should have nostalgia for the clinton years. You forget how the republican attack machine was relentless when it came to the Clintons. Amazing, i guess they will wear kid gloves with handling Obama. I just hate you guys have thrown out all rational logic with your Obama support and the rest of us will suffer from your misstake. It reminds me of the Nader crew in 2000, they insisted they knew what was best when the clear evidence was right before them and look with their bull headed idea cost us. This is too important to just turn over to an amateur.

 
 

Comment by POdVet | 2008-06-02 21:10:26

Like I already said, I trust Larry, and if he is proven incorrect, I will donate $10 to dailykos, if you Obamatons will agree to donate $10 here if Larry is once again proven correct. I notice none of the Obamatons have taken me up on the offer. Obviously they know deep down that it is true!

Comment by JW | 2008-06-02 21:52:57

Yep. I will bet you. Larry’s got nothing. I will up your stakes and bet you $1,000.

 

Comment by s. hall | 2008-06-02 22:11:00

POdVet — I trust Larry too. Why is it a stretch that the whole bunch of them Obama, Michelle, Farahkan and Wright hate white people? Obama’s comments about his grandmother being a typical white person and his rant about Small Town white workers in Pa being bitter and clinging to their guns and churches.

 
 

Comment by eric | 2008-06-02 21:11:22

so she was saying “whitey” all along?

Comment by AngryWhitePerson | 2008-06-02 21:12:48

Do you even read? Pay the fuck attention once in a while.

Comment by whitey | 2008-06-02 21:34:24

It was a confusingly written block of text, I’ll admit. I read it three times and from what I can surmise, some guy saw the tape and said she was saying “why’d he../whitey.”, but since we haven’t see the tape or video we can’t know.

 
 
 

Comment by PaganPower | 2008-06-02 21:13:26

I wrote this earlier this morning when I first read the blog you refer to. My position seemed appropriate at the time. I didn’t appreciate his blatant lies.

Comment by Hillary's Pal | 2008-06-02 21:19:03

Well, hell I know nothing about the aforementioned dimwit. But is he making fun of the way that people speak? Do you know anyone who say
“why’d he?” Why’d he do dat? That sound like Princeton, to you?

As in I wus just in de kitchen and I was de listin to da rad-o and it com in on de news and I sad
“why’d he do dat?”

Did we just go zooming backwards in time to
“I don know nuthin bout birthin no babies?”

What race card is this? Is this the Joker?

The Bo and Mo show really needs to come to an end.

 

Comment by militarytracy | 2008-06-02 21:20:09

Booman tends to mischaracterize almost everything said by anyone who doesn’t adore Obama.

 
 

Comment by militarytracy | 2008-06-02 21:13:45

So Booman is part of a group of Obama bloggers that the Obama campaign disseminated the “Why’d he” story to while at the same time telling the MSM that no such panel and commentary from Michelle Obama ever took place? Has Booman admitted to getting the “Why’d he” information from the Obama campaign?

 

Comment by Nicole | 2008-06-02 21:13:57

I don’t know this “Booman” but he really does sound like a fool. His post is actually quite amusing.

And good point, Larry, about who is on which campaign’s mailing list. The fact that you are independent makes you even more credible.

Comment by hillarysmygirl | 2008-06-02 21:21:33

Okay, so is this the same BooB/troll who’s been following us around all day, yelling at us? If this is the same Martin, what an @ss! No wonder he seemed so angry, he got taken! LOL! That’s terrific!

Oh what a tangled web we weave
When first we practice to deceive. - Sir Walter Scott

 
 

Comment by We Will Remember in November! | 2008-06-02 21:13:59

Actually I thought you wrote previoulsy that the repubs were holding it till October not August…am I wrong?

Comment by Larry Johnson | 2008-06-02 21:16:43

Until after the August Democratic Convention. That’s my understanding.
LJ

Comment by CU4HRC | 2008-06-02 21:30:22

sounds like the “transcript” was brought to us by the very same geniuses who dubbed in Stephanopoulus and Davis a while back. too, too clever! put those under-used ivy educations to work (”let’s see, what else sounds like whitey, “wide-y”, no too blue collar god forbid, “why thee”, no too shakespearean, wait “why’d” he - bingo”)

and yes, wouldn’t you (if a repub) hold back this tape until the stronger candidate was safely gone, and only the weaker one remained? after August?

oy vey

Comment by bcc | 2008-06-02 22:11:53

Ding! Ding! Ding!

We HAVE a winnah!!!

 
 

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-06-02 21:32:12

so no one wants the million dollars?

dammit

this needs to happen B4

unlessssssssss

(ok forget I said that)

 

Comment by cdog | 2008-06-02 21:39:48

At this point, your “understanding” of anything more complex than stirring shit with a stick is highly suspect.

Comment by Clinton Fan | 2008-06-02 21:53:06

Say, do the words “fuck” and “off” have any meaning to you?

Why don’t you put them together and go do that.

 
 

Comment by JW | 2008-06-02 21:56:00

Thirdhand, of course. Top sourcing, Larry!

 
 
 

Comment by MarkL | 2008-06-02 21:14:44

I thought that “transcript” was just a joke.
If not, it’s a very lame coverup attempt.

 

Comment by MP98 | 2008-06-02 21:17:07

Problem:
“I do not have the tape but have spoken with good friends who know folks who have seen the tape.”

Hardly conclusive, and I’m on YOUR side.

Comment by karen for Clinton | 2008-06-02 21:43:59

where there is this much smoke there is fire.

ob said his wife is off limits last week pre-emptively, right after the story started to leak.

there are explanations of the tape and a purported transcript on ob’s site.

He also sent it to his mailing list to some blogs.

He denied such a meeting took place to the msm.

republicans showed it to high rollers and Larry’s sources confirm seeing the tape and said it is stunning.

Fox news is crowing about it and talk radio too.

The obama troll army keep trying desperately to discredit Larry by repeatedly saying he said he had the tape when everybody here that has read what Larry has said KNOWS he has never claimed anything like that anywhere at anytime.

They are attacking here today in enormous numbers and have been snooping around all week.

It is also right to give Larry the benefit of the doubt at a time like this, the man deserves it for his long strong honest investigations.

He is top notch. Don’t let the obamaidiots tell you otherwise.

One of the links in this thread from an above obamatroll takes you to a site with a virus - so be careful out there folks and only open links from people you know to sites you know.

They are mad as hornets but they can’t suppress the truth from coming out from attacking us personally.

They are thugs and liars and are gullible.

Comment by JW | 2008-06-02 21:59:15

We are here laughing at your gullibility, not “running scared.”

Our candidate will win this week. Your candidate…not so much.

Comment by frisee | 2008-06-02 22:14:12

“Your” candidate cannot win until the convention. There’s this little thing called “voting.”

 

Comment by bcc | 2008-06-02 22:15:34

Good unity strategy.

Keep on with that, won’t you?

 

Comment by Clinton Fan | 2008-06-02 22:18:35

Yeah. That explains why you’re at this website, under a number of sockpuppet names, posting shit repetitively.

Because you aren’t scared, you disrupt a site that plainly doesn’t share your POV.

Bridges for sale, bridges for sale!

 

Comment by Blk4hillary | 2008-06-02 22:18:47

JW hypothethically, if this tape does exist what would you think of it?

 
 
 
 

Comment by Truthteller | 2008-06-02 21:17:08

These Obamabots will do and say anything in order to win an election.

Comment by Hillary's Pal | 2008-06-02 21:26:40

in order to attempt to steal an election?

 
 

Comment by RedDragon62 | 2008-06-02 21:18:18

Hang in there Larry. You will be vindicated. I believe you when you say you have “SPOKEN” to people that have either seen or heard about this tape. What I am witnessing now is the Lemmings jumping to their Master’s call. They KNOW that something is amiss, they just can’t think for themselves. Damn Zombies!

Comment by gimmeabreak | 2008-06-02 22:11:28

Or…Or…

Larry has jumped into bed with Roger Stone who was peddling this story on Geraldo yesterday.

Roger Stone, you know, the guy with the anti-Hillary organization called Citizens United Not Timid that is known by it’s acronym.

Just sayin’.

 
 

Comment by Al | 2008-06-02 21:18:23

Marty is one lousy writer.

 

Comment by POdVet | 2008-06-02 21:19:01

nice link there Hillthewinner you damn Obamaton troll. Don’t you realize yet intelligent people are 4 hillary and dont drink the KoolAid, we are also intelligent enough to use firefox so your site failed to open 480 windows. So sorry, you can go back to HuffPo and swear about Hillary in brail now :D

Comment by HillTheWinner | 2008-06-02 21:26:34

Protip: At least one of the posters above was not, it appears, “intelligent enough to use firefox.”

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-06-02 21:46:24

love firefox! love their themes too!

 
 
 

Comment by factcheck | 2008-06-02 21:20:36

Is not this Booman guy a part of the Philadelphia male bloggers mafia? They are all in the tank for Obama. Someone should investigate the money funneled to his blog and to Open Left and Atrios.

 

Comment by SM | 2008-06-02 21:20:50

Regardless of the words she said, the Obama camp acknowledged that Farrakhan and Michelle Obama were IN FACT together on a panel in Trinity Church.

Try to spin or erase THAT.

Comment by motherinKY | 2008-06-02 21:22:52

Michelle Obama and Farrakhan presided over a discussion together in the God Damn America Church in inner city Chicago? That Michelle Obama does not belong in the White House. Black separatists have no place in our Party, and they certainly do not belong in the White House.

 

Comment by RL | 2008-06-02 21:30:20

When did the Obama camp acknowledge that?

 
 

Comment by MarkL | 2008-06-02 21:20:52

Does the Booman transcript correspond roughly with what Larry’s sources told him? Has this been discussed?

Comment by militarytracy | 2008-06-02 21:33:15

It sounds like it might. Then again Martin wrote things like written like, said like, and Larry wants you to hear and he wrote specific sentences so perhaps that is what Larry is talking about. I can’t tell for sure.

 
 

Comment by mlr701 | 2008-06-02 21:21:57

BooMan is so full of shit. I stopped visiting his site months ago b/c it was so obvious he had sold his soul to the highest bidder. Anything he says isn’t even worth a grain of salt.

Comment by stodghie | 2008-06-02 22:00:35

booman started off at daily kos. figures!

 

Comment by militarytracy | 2008-06-02 22:08:01

Reading some of his recent stuff right now. He’s a lot more full of shit these days than I had suspected.

 
 

Comment by **== President & Commander-in-Chief Hillary Clinton **== | 2008-06-02 21:23:48

I have set up a popcorn concession stand in the blog corner. I have plenty of popcorn and butter to spare as we watch the trolls go totally bonkers now.

Way to go Larry you are an American hero!

Comment by MyTownTalks | 2008-06-02 21:29:59

I wonder if the Obama trolls get overtime as they have been working hard today. I see them everywhere I go of course I always do, but there are a lot more out today.

Comment by Arabella Trefoil | 2008-06-02 21:55:09

No, they work in shifts. Call centers in both hemispheres allow 24/7 coverage. The sun never sets on the Obamadroid empire.

 

Comment by **== President & Commander-in-Chief Hillary Clinton **== | 2008-06-02 21:56:10

Full fledged troll invasion today! Never seen this many trolls here.

Comment by Ulahane | 2008-06-02 22:15:11

It’s the final putsch before South Dakota and Montana. They are terrified that anything but huge Obama wins in these two Western state primaries will completely discredit all those Western state caucuses.

 
 
 

Comment by cdog | 2008-06-02 21:32:21

Aren’t you the same idiot that wrote “Your poop is our fertilizer.” in a previous thread?
Do you even realize how hilariously stupid you are?

Consider yourself fertilized for the evening, jerky. Hope it tastes good with that popcorn.

 

Comment by JW | 2008-06-02 22:01:50

American zero

 
 

Comment by blackmannot4obama | 2008-06-02 21:24:44

This is hysterical!

 

Comment by wry | 2008-06-02 21:24:55

This election has ruined a lot of friendships. I have tried hard not to let it ruin mine. But smears of this type are unforgivable. I have been forebearing. Perhaps, in retrospect, I have been too forebearing. That’s all I say. This is too painful to me.

What the hell is he talking about? I’m sorry, Larry, but you were friends with this guy?

Is FOREBEARING even a word?

 

Comment by Jackson Hunter | 2008-06-02 21:25:42

It seems to me that an Ivy League educated person should be able to speak in a way that differentiates between the words “Why did he” and “Whitey”. By the way BooMan, I only went to Community College, but I’m pretty sure it is spelled “Whitey” dipshit. Sweet Jesus, oh, I’m sorry, if I want to take the Lord’s name in vain, then I should do it right I reckon. “Sweet Barack” is more appropriate I guess.

Oh oh, Obambi is starting to speak, someone grab BooHoo a fainting couch and a new pair of pretty pink panties that he can soak and then throw them at his Tin God.

Fuck this Party, at least on the Presidential level, my downticket is going all Dem though, we’ll need a majority to spar with our next President, John McCain. McCain’s not getting my vote, but I will NEVER vote for Barack Obama, I don’t give a fuck what tools like Ava-trocious and Kos say. Fuck them with a white-hot stalagmite right up their urethra in the Hell of their own making.

Thanks for all your work Larry!

Jackson

 

Comment by abycat | 2008-06-02 21:25:54

Great job Larry. Hillary knows you have her back, and she is in this to the convention. So fight on. This is going downhill fast for the Unity Pony.

Comment by stodghie | 2008-06-02 22:03:24

mccain was complimenting hillary today. me thinks he is hunting voters decamping from the dem party.

 
 

Comment by RedDragon62 | 2008-06-02 21:27:18

I guess this is how Barky intends to “UNITE” us. That was a nice try with the Virus you piece of cowardly shit!

 

Comment by Linda C. | 2008-06-02 21:27:23

Do we really wan’ sumun en da whi howse dhat cain’t speak englesh?

Either it is whitey or a Princeton degree isn’t worth the paper its printed on. The explanation is more lame than the comments.

I am confused about the given reason for the comments when we haven’t heard the comments yet?

 

Comment by Cindy | 2008-06-02 21:27:23

Larry, I’ve said it before, but can’t say it enough: You Are Our Hero!
Thank you!

 

Comment by RL | 2008-06-02 21:28:11

Where’s your proof that the Obama camp acknowledged any of this?

Comment by JW | 2008-06-02 22:04:36

There is none. This is all a big farce with an all-too-willing audience ready to believe anything.

 
 

Comment by Maria | 2008-06-02 21:28:22

“This election has ruined a lot of friendships. I have tried hard not to let it ruin mine. But smears of this type are unforgivable. I have been forebearing. Perhaps, in retrospect, I have been too forebearing. That’s all I say. This is too painful to me.”

Narcissistic much? Oh right. It’s all about him. Him and his magnificent… forebearing. I’m verklempt here.

What is it with these in-the-bag Obama bloggers that makes them so self-important and bloviating, shivering in delight from their own audacious purple prose? It never ceases to amuse. Go, my children! Run! Fly! Make Teh Awesomely Awesome history! Run!

Comment by militarytracy | 2008-06-02 21:42:57

Ivy league education ;) Booman narcissistically clings to his too and bitterly refuses to relinquish his self delusion that he is brilliant and we the masses are idiots. He blogs daily and lives without wealth attempting to nourish our pathetic thought processes with the gift of HIM.

 

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-06-02 21:58:30

LMAO @ verklempt

the blog is so colorful tonight

 
 

Comment by BA | 2008-06-02 21:28:57

Checkmate in three moves. Not bad.

 

Comment by Right On | 2008-06-02 21:29:04

Larry, you’re fantastic. Every superdelegate should definitely switch to Hillary ASAP, since they can be assured of this coming August/October surprise by the GOP. Why would the GOP lie about this? Most Republicans have come to prefer Hillary over McCain. It’s just terrific to know they’re doing everything they can to get her elected! Kudos for everything you do, Larry. (I tried your “donate” button but couldn’t get it to work.)

Comment by JW | 2008-06-02 22:06:13

Sit tight. Tomorrow it will all happen. All the SDs will rush to Hillary’s side thanks to the rumor of this tape.

Obama is toast!

 
 

Comment by jyotinc | 2008-06-02 21:29:28

Hey Mr.Longman,
You’re already jumping to conclusion; you must have seen the tape since you’re already distorting the truth and trying hard to spin for more lies. I want to see Obama throwing Michele under the bus.

Comment by Truthteller | 2008-06-02 21:32:19

I guess Mr. Long-man is frightened of the prospect of a woman President. Castration anxiety, anyone?

 
 

Comment by Peter | 2008-06-02 21:30:54

It makes no sense that people are denying a tape or criticizing the discussion of the existence of a tape. People are just sitting back waiting to see if a tape exists, what might be on it and what the impact might be. So what? Why get your panties in a twist?

Booman embarrassed himself. He gets the blog confused with the visitors. Why doesn’t he just sit back and wait.

too forebearing? painful? Is it just me or are Obama supporters overdramatic.

People are just curious. Get over it.

 

Comment by blackmannot4obama | 2008-06-02 21:32:47

In the examples posted I have a question for MR. Booman. IF he is providing those examples then “why’d he” use “Why did Bush” in the original examples and then “Why’d he”? Because those examples are not equal. Because if I would write it I would put “Why did Bush…” I the grammar tense changes for the examples. I don’t buy the examples that are posted. Larry you sure you quoted your pal correctly? The premise of how it could have easily be mixed up doesn’t make sense to me.

Comment by MyTownTalks | 2008-06-02 21:37:50

Its correct I saw it last night right about the time I got an email claiming it said something else. What boo posted and what I was sent are similar but not exact. Judge for yourself and for the trolls please read my disclaimer.
http://www.mytowntalks.com/politics/michelle-obama-whitey-transcript.php

Comment by militarytracy | 2008-06-02 22:11:42

Who sent you the email, if I may inquire?

 
 

Comment by JW | 2008-06-02 22:08:41

That is because you are a moron.

 
 

Comment by Hillary's Pal | 2008-06-02 21:33:19

This excuse sort of sounds like the joke
“the food in this restaurant is just terrible…hideous…putrid.”

“yeah. And the portions are so small.”

Following the Obama game just makes me head hurt.

Mental twister for the audaciously stupid.

Comment by Maria | 2008-06-02 21:35:07

Hee. And the portions are so small!

 
 

Comment by Not until 9 | 2008-06-02 21:33:38

Since when is passing around third-hand rumor considered “breaking” news? Before Larry accuses others of being on someone’s payroll, he should really figure out who is pulling his strings? Of course, be three degrees removed, he had no clue.

However, he will delete this message because he can’t handle criticism.

Comment by no waffles | 2008-06-02 21:47:56

and you can’t handle the truth. drip drip drip drip drip drip drip

Comment by roger, too | 2008-06-02 21:49:26

They cant handle the truth, they can’t even deal with Odinga’s mass murder…

 
 
 

Comment by Mel | 2008-06-02 21:35:42

Let’s see, Michelle arranges several times for Barack to appear on a panel with Bill Ayers, a friend and associate for 20 years+ promoting failed school reforms and sharing other like ideas!

So question becomes, did Barack arrange for Michelle to sit on panels with Fararakhan?

What is so really funny is Axelrod’s astroturfing is astrofucking himself, the old hack is losing it big time!

 

Comment by NewOrleans | 2008-06-02 21:40:00

So Old Boo Boo is “grateful and indebted” to Larry and Susan because “they have both done a lot for me.”

Yet he finds it perfectly acceptable to lie and misrepresent what Larry has said all along about the tape. And Boo Boo started off his little whine-fest with this:

My old friend, Larry Johnson, knows about manipulating elections from his training with the Central Intelligence Agency.

Nice way for Boo Boo to smear his “friend” and disparage his service to this country.

With friends like him . . .

 

Comment by RL | 2008-06-02 21:41:34

ONE MORE TIME FOR THE CHEAP SEATS!!!

WHERE IS YOUR PROOF THAT THE OBAMA CAMP ACKNOWLEDGED ANY OF THIS?

Comment by Right On | 2008-06-02 21:59:24

You’re just showing your elitist and unpatriotic. Don’t try to shove your grad school mentality down our throats! Get a freakin’ job!!! Fight on Hillary!

 

Comment by stodghie | 2008-06-02 22:07:04

yelling will get you a big stfu!

Comment by RL | 2008-06-02 22:12:39

Will it get me proof first? Or after? Or at any point??? EVER????9/!!ELEVENTY!!!OMGWTFBBQ!!

 
 
 

Comment by frisee | 2008-06-02 21:43:15

The tape does absolutely exist. That is now clear. And what someone said in another thread is also true. Obama sent out talking points like he did when Bittergate happened. It was soooooo obvious over at Politico that the Obamabots were spouting the SAME justification in different words over and over again.

This idea of the mothership sending out “what to think” to various yes-men is frightening in and of itself.

Comment by RL | 2008-06-02 21:45:07

Where’s any proof at all?

Comment by frisee | 2008-06-02 21:55:54

Using “any” and “at all” is so redundant that it allows me to judge that you are not worth replying to.

Comment by Right On | 2008-06-02 22:02:56

He thinks he’s so freakin’ postmodern, with his “any” and “all.” But he’s just an intellectual bully, just like the rest of those Obambi peacenik racists, always thinking they have the right to be demanding things from patriotic Americans!

 

Comment by JW | 2008-06-02 22:10:45

OMG, your rapier logic is spot on.

 
 

Comment by roger, too | 2008-06-02 21:57:35

It would appear Martin gave the proof, right?

Isn’t that Larry’s argument?

 

Comment by Amy | 2008-06-02 22:01:35

There is none. It’s all wishful thinking. Larry’s probably laughing himself color-blind given how easy it was to whip his worshippers - oops, terribly smart independently thinking Democrats - into a frenzy. I heard Saddam Hussein was on this tape, serving coffee to Farrakhan, whilst Fidel Castro was serenading them all with old Cuban melodies. Apparently, Kim Jong Il dropped in too!

Comment by JW | 2008-06-02 22:13:43

I’ve seen the tape. Bin Laden is on the panel, too and boy, does he have some harsh words for “whitey.” Then Me-Chelle agrees and they do the chicken dance together.

Oh. My. God. The Obamas are going down in flames!

 
 
 
 

Comment by Clinton Fan | 2008-06-02 21:43:28

Is that Martin fellow retarded, or simply a typical “Duhhhh, I don’t NEED to know how to REEEEAD” Obamaturd?

Larry, you have made it plain that you do not have the tape, yet the idiot leads off with a big fat lie. Is he stupid, or is that simple mendacity? Or could it be both?

Also, He’s insisting that it’s “Why’d he” …. in a tape that Team Obama hasn’t admitted exists!

Like shooting fish in a barrel.

It doesn’t matter if Michelle is sitting there with Farrakhan singing Ave Fucking Maria–it’s problematic. Especially when Obama has taken such pains to use people like, oh, REZKO, as a cut-out between himself and the likes of Louis F. He never wanted too much of that LF stank on HIM.

But here’s the kicker–he’s turned you into Jim Phelps of the campaign, “scaring the superdelegates” with your…ooooooooh….BACKGROUND.

Will the Secretary disavow any knowledge of your actions?

Comment by RL | 2008-06-02 21:47:30

I thought the Obama camp HAD admitted it existed. I’d like to see proof of any of LJ’s claims. So far he’s supplied zero.

Comment by roger, too | 2008-06-02 22:00:42

But then you would be attributing to him a statement he did not make.

Get it?

Or are you that dumb, this technique of the smear failing, and your inherient, ahem, “intellect” unable to counter?

Indian call center, guy gets off script, and he’s toast…

Comment by RL | 2008-06-02 22:08:55

I would be? Nah. Though that seems to be completely acceptable here so your comment is amusing.

 

Comment by Right On | 2008-06-02 22:08:55

Too freakin’ funny!!! “RL” sure sounds like an Indian name all right. Go back to India, you grad school freak — always demanding “the facts,” when we all know everything we need to know already. There all just elitists, not even Americans. Obama=Farakhan. Thanks to Larry, the GOP now supports Hillary!!

Comment by RL | 2008-06-02 22:10:37

GO GOP GO GOP!

RL sounds like an Indian name? How do initials sound like an Indian name?

 

Comment by JW | 2008-06-02 22:18:06

Exactly, “RL” sounds like a Hindu name all right. I think “RL,” if that is your real name, is on the tape, too, nodding along to the “whitey” comments along with Wright, Farrakhan, Kim Jong-Il and Bin Laden.

We don’t need you “racists” trying to take over our White House!

 
 
 
 
 

Comment by Dimensio | 2008-06-02 21:43:36

So where, exactly, may the video be viewed?

 

Comment by roger, too | 2008-06-02 21:47:31

Martin doesnt know disinformation.

LOLOLOLOLOL

They’re like a bunch of big headed, puffy, arrogant Bart Simpsons, aren’t they?

 

Comment by Harley | 2008-06-02 21:48:49

Right, Larry. What you’re doing is ‘thinking.’ Just like that weird thing on your head is ‘hair.’

Comment by roger, too | 2008-06-02 22:03:38

right.

Just like what you do is “troll” running a guy “intelligent enough” to be president.

 
 

Comment by MarkL | 2008-06-02 21:49:51

Larry’s strategy appears to be working quite well, thanks to Longman and the idiots in the Obama campaign.

Comment by militarytracy | 2008-06-02 21:59:27

It would seem so. My crystal ball is broken though and I can’t tell what the hell is going on anymore.

 
 

Comment by JoshA | 2008-06-02 21:51:32

This place is reminds me of Redstate during the Domenach debacle.

Comment by roger, too | 2008-06-02 22:06:16

And you remind me of an adult Bart Simpson, thinking he’s smart enough to run Washington.

Real dumb, all puffy, the jesus of spam.

A stupid Jesus.

Comment by Adam | 2008-06-02 22:20:09

Are you retarded? Seriously. That is the worst thing I have ever read.

 
 
 

Comment by one southern girl | 2008-06-02 21:51:46

I’ve seen more than one post like this on the web - by Obama supporters. I definitely think Obama is aware of the tape.

I’ve known about this for a while because a good friend is covering Obama for one of the larger newspapers (I won’t divuge either) - but it isn’t just Obama whose been sitting on this (and other Farrakhan issues) - the media and the republicans are all hip to it. I’m sure it is one of the reasons that hillary refuses to go away. it is a bombshell. and it will do a great deal of damage to a very fragile democratic voting base for the big O.

[Reply] Are you being serious…?

I hate to say that I’m being serious - but short of divulging who told me (which could cost him/her a job) - there are wright and farrahkan issues - though not directly related to barak - are related to michelle and his former pastor that have yet to be fully exposed.

Comment by RL | 2008-06-02 21:54:47

I saw that Bill Clinton did the nasty with Walter Mondale on the internet. Should I believe that?

Comment by roger, too | 2008-06-02 22:08:20

I saw that Bill Clinton did the nasty with Walter Mondale on the internet. Should I believe that?

Well, you would, but you shouldn’t.

Shit, you think Obama is Presidential caliber.

 
 
 

Comment by frisee | 2008-06-02 21:52:44

It’s actually possible to reverse engineer the Obama talking points. So Obamabots: Please keep talking. LOL

 

Comment by sinking ratboat | 2008-06-02 21:53:50

Lynn Sweet from the Chicago Sun-Times says in Chicago being best buds with Farrakhan is considered perfectly acceptable.

If that’s true, Chicago must be even more corrupt than I thought.

 

Comment by Mariah | 2008-06-02 21:53:59

Do you people have any idea how freaked out you look?

You seem like people without emotional control. Irrational.

It’s crazys like you that turned so much of this country off to Hillary in the first place.

What losers.

Comment by frisee | 2008-06-02 21:59:15

It’s the immaturity. They sense that their toys are going to be taken away and are *just* on the verge of throwing a huge fit. The tears are now in their eyes.

At this point, let’s all go to Denver. I’m in an ass-whupping mood and believe me I will not be bullied like those unfortunate enough to live in caucus states.

 

Comment by **== President & Commander-in-Chief Hillary Clinton **== | 2008-06-02 22:08:01

It’s crazys like you that turned so much of this country off to Hillary in the first place.

What country is that? It is not this one. Hillary has been winning big since March. Try less koolaid?

 

Comment by roger, too | 2008-06-02 22:12:27

When you try to reverse your opponent’s position, it doesn’t work if the basic premise isn’t true, you’re trying to prove a negative, really no matter how often you repeat the lie, you harm your own position, in the end.

See, there is a thing such as “counter propaganda,” not outsourced to India.

 

Comment by Right On | 2008-06-02 22:16:17

I don’t know who you’re calling a loser, but I hope you get your head screwed on straight pretty soon. Call all the superdelegates! Tell them to listen to the tape tonight, if not sooner! We can still win this thing!

 
 

Comment by tim | 2008-06-02 21:54:37

Larry,

thanks for posting this letter.. !!!Amazing that these people call themselves the unbiased media.. I wouldn’t be surprised if they do the same thing at CNN and MSNBC
==============

I think you need to tell the Obamabots that their unity pony was at this panel as well. LOL!

 

Comment by Stormy | 2008-06-02 21:55:37

Hello. My name is Stormy and I have a blog at http://www.conservativepolitics.today.com I have been following, and blogging about this topic.

A few minutes ago a comment was left on my blog about the origins of the “why’d he” vs “whitey” transcript.

I would love to know if Mr Johnson, or any others here have received this same comment, and if so what their response is.

Thank you,

Stormy

http://conservativepolitics.today.com/2008/06/02/obama-camp-claims-whitey-tape-does-not-exist-but-releases-transcript/

 

Comment by Uppity | 2008-06-02 21:57:09

I never heard of him or “Booman Tribune”.

 

Comment by Mike | 2008-06-02 21:58:33

“First, the Obama campaign is admitting the tape exists by ponying up a bogus explanation. Second, they don’t dispute that Michelle is sitting at the table with Louis Farrakhan.”

Where can I find this “admission”? And where can I find the article/statement/video of the Obama campaign conceding that “Michelle is sitting at the table with Louis Farrakhan”?

“But you, Martin, now claim you have a transcript. How do I know? Because you quoted the transcript in detail.”

Yes, his parody of your lunacy is tantamount to “quot[ing] the transcript in detail.”

Shorter Larry Johnson: I heard from someone, who heard from someone else, that this horribly damaging tape exists. It doesn’t matter that I heard of this election-changing development from a bunch of Republicans. And it also doesn’t matter that the rumor has popped up days before Hillary can no longer delay out the inevitable. You, my loyal handful of readers, are smarter than those who insist on seeing actual evidence — as opposed to, say, third-person hearsay — and we alone will have the last laugh when McCain is sworn in and continues the nightmare of George Bush.

Comment by frisee | 2008-06-02 22:03:08

Paradoy? Of what? Where did the quotes come from? Medicare? Where’d that come from?

 
 

Comment by Harley | 2008-06-02 22:00:14

By the way, sharing a platform with Farrakhan isn’t exactly news. Just ask Clinton surrogate Ed Rendell — a good man by the way, and I still think a good Veep choice — who shared one with the man in 1997 when Rendell was the Mayor of Philly, and gave a speech lauding the Nation of Islam for all the great work they had done.

Politics, as they say, makes strange bedfellows. And Farrakhan, particularly back in the 90s, was welcomed onto more platforms than you might think.

So unless the friend of a friend of a friend who saw the Unicorn in the first place can at least bring back some tiny piece of horn? This is yet another failed attempt by Larry to inject himself into the larger narrative. Unfortunate thing is, nobody seems to care.

 

Comment by Jack | 2008-06-02 22:02:19

So a tape exists with some words that you or someone (like Roger Stone…) have been twisting. You can’t actually show the tape because that would be easily debunked, but you can start a whispering campaign, maybe convince enough people that it’s “Whitey” that you get half a news cycle out of it.

You people are fucking degenerates. Go take a look at yourself in the mirror. This is precisely what the GOP did to Hillary in the early 90s, and you’ve become their bosom pal.

 

Comment by Head Spinning Moderate | 2008-06-02 22:04:24

Fact: There is no evidence such a tape exists.

Fact: There is not a single person who has gone on the record saying such a tape exists or that they have seen such a tape.

Fact: There are Republicans blaming Hillary supporters for the existance of such a tape and Hillary supporters blaming Republicans for the existance of such a tape. Both camps benefit from such speculation but neither camp wants to get blamed for starting it.

Fact: Larry Johnson’s claim to have spoken to five people with knowledge of the tape is simply not believable in light of the fact THAT NOT A SINGLE PERSON IN POLITICS HAS BEEN TOLD SUCH A THING and he remains the only source of such a rumor.

Fact: Larry Johnson doesn’t have a dime’s worth of credibility but since he is basing these claims on anonymous Republican sources he can claim he was set up if this tape never surfaces (which it won’t becuase it doesn’t exist.)

Of course if the tape surfaces I’ll be happy to eat crow. But does anyone seriously believe such a tape is ever going to surface? Didn’t think so…

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-06-02 22:18:50

ok

I admit it Obamatrons

I started the rumor
and I’ve got the tape

except it’s NOT a tape
it’s a DVD baby cuz I burned 100 copies for all my BFF’s!

:-P~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 
 

Comment by Don't embarrass Hillary | 2008-06-02 22:04:36

I’m a diehard Hillary supporter and I want her to win as much as or more than anyone else. But reading these comments makes me sick. The blatant racism is sickening and makes me ashamed. I didn’t like the sexism aimed at her, and I don’t like the race-tinged remarks many on this site have aimed at him. I don’t think Hillary would want to be associated with these views. You can dislike Obama and oppose his candidacy without spewing such hatred. Otherwise, you’re no better than what you’re accusing Michelle Obama of.

And Larry, you really need a higher level of proof than a friend of a friend saw the tape. Give more details about what you know, and how you know it. Also, what proof do you have that Booman is reciting talking points, and that he got it from the Obama campaign? An earlier post by Student Guy at mydd.com had similar wording, but he posed it as his own prediction of what such a tape, if it existed, would show.

Larry, you can’t just make stuff up. If it came from Obama, be more specific. Otherwise, don’t say it. (And please monitor your comments; it reflects badly on Hillary.)

We used to criticize the other side for a lot of these tactics. We were the reality-based crowd, remember? Now we’re descending to the level of Freepers.

My desire for Hillary to win, and my distaste for Obama, make me hope the tape is real. But this is all very unseemly and Hannityesque. Unless Larry Johnson can provide some semblance of a journalistic standard of proof, then he should be careful with his “facts.” His, and our, credibility is at stake.

 

Comment by Mel | 2008-06-02 22:06:00

Strange how a transcript has emerged and the typed word as anyone knows holds little to the words being actually said from a persons lips and the context of them being said, along with the expression used in saying them!

So transcripts do not parallel the actual and for the transcript beng out there, does confirm that Obama and Axelrod are trying to astroturf it for damage control, problem is, didn’t work for Wright, won’t for Michelle.

Just Wright’s words in type would astound many, but when actually listening to them from his lips said it to EVERYONE.

Ah but not to fret Obamabots, as your messiah will give a new speech to the world telling them it is everyone elses fault again, just like he did on March 18, how stupid do people have to be to realize just how pathetic the Obama’s and solely selfserving they are!

 

Comment by rochrist | 2008-06-02 22:06:28

You people are embarrassing yourselves.

Comment by roger, too | 2008-06-02 22:19:03

Billador sent a Japanese cruiser.

And I saw an Indian man driving a Honda,
purchased from a car dealer in Oakland.

And here we are, today…

Sorry, OT

 
 

Comment by wtf | 2008-06-02 22:07:28

wait a minute, you said you don’t have a tape larry. now, you know what it says? lol this guy is a liar.

Comment by Mel | 2008-06-02 22:12:51

can you not read, guess that is why you make a living blogging for Obama instead of actually going to class and learning huh!

Read again before you open your mouth and show just how stupid Obamabots are!

 
 

Comment by Tapeman | 2008-06-02 22:09:44

If they were smart, the Obama bloggers would release the tape of Larry snorting cocaine and screaming obscenities about Jews and Asians.

 

Comment by Kelly | 2008-06-02 22:10:08

6-2-2008 Michelle warns Montana not to trust us.

Long after the general election is over, Americans are going to have to stay engaged if the country’s political environment is to change, Michelle Obama told a Billings crowd Monday.
The wife of Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama told a few hundred supporters gathered at the Billings Hotel and Convention Center they had to remain active in their communities and do their own research on issues in order the change the country’s political path.
“The way this campaign has been run is the way we need to be forever,” Obama said. “Don’t trust bloggers or someone else’s opinion, because people lie.”

posted at 7:17 pm on June 2, 2008 by Allahpundit
http://hotair.com/archives/2008/06/02/michelle-obama-dont-trust-bloggers-because-people-lie/

Comment by wtf | 2008-06-02 22:11:42

you people actually read hotair. what a bunch faux dems

 
 

Comment by Mr.Murder | 2008-06-02 22:11:18

Follow the Money.

GOPers are using the tape to raise funds.

 

Comment by Arius | 2008-06-02 22:12:45

yes it’s amazing he has a “transcript” this is funny is it not? he an obama supporter was given a transcript!

my god are people blind!

this same guy’s post, i read it early today on mydd and left my remarks there of what i thought of regarding these paid for obamabot bloggers.

what will it take for people to open their eyes and see all the lies? as mentioned.. first the obama camp denied any such tape, then suddenly obamabot blogger have access to the transcript? i mean what does a person have to do to get people to wake up and see what’s going on..

and yes the guy is lying about Larry claiming to have the tape… in all Larry’s posts on the topic, I never read once where he claimed to have the tape or have access to it.

spin lies bullshit.. standard anything-it-takes-to-get-elected=Obama bullshit

Comment by RL | 2008-06-02 22:17:20

When did the Obama camp deny the tape existed? Have a link?

 
 

Comment by wtf | 2008-06-02 22:15:31

larry said he doesn’t have the tape, but claims this is a transcript? how does he know this is a transcript? lol you people fall for anything.

 

Comment by Mandelay | 2008-06-02 22:16:21

I saw almost the same “transcript” on National Review Online today. Text below from “The Campaign Spot” at campaignspot.nationalreview.com
Monday, June 02, 2008

“Is the Michelle Obama Tape a Matter of Enunciation?
A really interesting theory about the alleged Michelle Obama tape, which could explain a lot, from the liberal blog Booman Tribune. Michelle, offering a speech critical of President Bush, offers a refrain of “why’d he” — the words “why did he” mushed together — that sounds like “whitey” on the tape.

Apparently, if the tape ever comes to light, her words will sound something like:

Whitey cut folks off Medicaid?
Whitey let New Orleans drown?
Whitey do nothing about Jena?
Whitey put us in Iraq for no reason?*

…when the intended message is,

Why’d he cut folks off Medicaid?
Why’d he let New Orleans drown?
Why’d he do nothing about Jena?
Why’d he put us in Iraq for no reason?

Or so we will be told. The irony is, if the latter interpretation is accurate, we still have a potential first lady accusing her husband’s predecessor of “letting” New Orleans drown.

UPDATE: Contemplating the rumor below, I wondered when and how Michelle Obama and Louis Farrkhan would appear on a panel together. Farrakhan doesn’t seem like the type to voluntarily share the stage. But then I noted that in late 2007, Trinity United gave Farrakhan its lifetime achievement award with a full ceremony — the video shown that evening is still on YouTube, with the feminine announcer declaring, “For his commitment to truth, education and leadership, we honor Minister Louis Farrakhan with the Rev. Dr. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr. lifetime achievement award.” (Before you ask, the announcer is not Michelle Obama.) Is it possible the two are at the head table for a banquet? Is this the circumstance of Michelle Obama’s remarks?

ANOTHER UPDATE: Readers point out that whether this is a question (”Why’d he”) or a statement (”whitey”) should be fairly clear from the intonation of the sentence, if we ever get to hear the audio of the tape. The pitch usually increases for a question, and decreases for a statement.

YET ANOTHER UPDATE: There’s another transcript floating around FreeRepublic and elsewhere that would make it hard to believe that this is a mispronunciation of “why’d he.” I have no idea where this alternative transcript comes from, and note that those who are posting it to various conservative chat rooms, etc., give no sense of where they heard it from.

An interesting point about the alternative explanation posted on Booman Tribune. Whoever felt the need to give that clarifying transcript to a liberal blog is, by that action, confirming that the tape exists.

FINAL UPDATE: I am now a skeptic that this tape exists, for reasons explained here.

06/02 10:10 AM” (end quote)

 

Comment by myiq2xu | 2008-06-02 22:17:52

Apparently, reading comprehension is not an Obamanation skill.

But then it wouldn’t be, would it?

 

Comment by True Slicky | 2008-06-02 22:18:02

Hey Larry- June 2nd has come and gone. No tape. Instead we get a back and forth about a transcript for a tape that may or may not exist. I can’t believe with all the tapes that have popped up, this one is being hid. You said it would be released today. Either put up or shut up. Your wolf-calling is getting a bit tedious.

And for those who call Michelle racist based on rumors posted on a blog speak an awful lot about yourselves.

 

Pingback by Thread #2: BooMan Blows the Obama Disinformation Campaign : NO QUARTER | 2008-06-02 22:18:53

[...] Comments Dawnelle on Booman Blows the Obama Disinformation CampaignBlk4hillary on Booman Blows the Obama Disinformation CampaignClinton Fan on Booman Blows the Obama [...]

 
 

Pingback by The Strata-Sphere » Here Comes The Michelle Tape - Right After The Last Primaries - Updated! | 2008-06-03 10:37:01

[...] and mirrored my view this is not a GOP effort but the last big gasp for the Clintons.  And Larry Johnson has confirmed my speculation from yesterday that the transcripts that hit the leftward blogs yesterday do reflect [...]

 

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.