RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Barack Punts on Denial of Michelle Tape

If someone was accusing my wife of saying something racist that was not true, and you asked me in public, I would say emphatically and clearly, “it is not true.” So what is Barack’s problem. He was asked about this today and here is his reply:

We have seen this before. There is dirt and lies that are circulated in emails and they pump them out long enough until finally you, a mainstream reporter, asks me about it,” Obama said to the McClatchy reporter during a press conference aboard his campaign plane. “That gives legs to the story. If somebody has evidence that myself or Michelle or anybody has said something inappropriate, let them do it.”

Asked whether he knew it not to be true, Obama said he had answered the question.

Huh? Are you kidding me? If it ain’t true say so.

But when a politician tap dances on nuance–Baby it is true. My sources have not backed off. They maintain they have a tape and will drop it on the Dems in the fall. Now if Barack said, “No, and hell no” I would be wondering about my sources. But he punted. He went for the weasel word. The non-denial denial.

It also is curious that the Obama folks put out the word that Michelle didn’t say “WHITEY”. Nope, according to them she said, “WHY DID HE.” Hmmmm. Why would you put that out if the recording of the event did not exist? Then you have the frantic scrubbing of Trinity websites. How about efforts to check the video files of Chicago TV stations? Stymied. The local ABC station says they will only give up a video if there is a subpoena.

So, sure looks to me that there a recording of Michelle’s racist rant exists in the hands of folks working to help elect McCain. Obama is hoping they won’t use it. But if you call what he said a denial then you yourself are in a state of (denial that is).

Trackback URL

RSS Feed for This Post584 Comments »

Comment by Destardi | 2008-06-05 16:56:14

I’m just a racist, typical white person…so my opinion doesn’t count, but I think that was not a denial at all.

Double-speaking, Obamabush!

Comment by Rob in Chicago | 2008-06-05 18:19:48

That was Barackula’s version of “Bring it on!” How did that one work out ?

Comment by Karma | 2008-06-05 21:58:52

Just to add a little more details about the Rainbow/PUSH Coalition and it’s founder Jesse Jackson.

I thought reposting this article up here would help explain more about the setting in which Michelle’s comments were made.

It’s really a don’t miss for those who are unaware of how Jesse Jackson and his coalition operates. And even more vile is just exactly how he got his start.

“Unmasking Jesse Jackson”
Geoff Metcalf interviews ‘Shakedown’ author Ken Timmerman

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=27032

Comment by David Axisrutt | 2008-06-06 02:00:59

OMG I had no idea. The book’s available at Amazon. The interview seems a bit OTT but the book’s got great reviews.

Steinbeck once said Los Angeles (or California) is like a drain filter on a bath tub. Or something like that. All the debris gets caught in it. But Chicago must be worse. The disenfranchised migrate to California for a new start – a new ‘promised land’. But all the crooks set up shop in Chicago.

Note especially the proposed deal with Libya to start blowing things up for considerable remuneration. Also the business about objecting to CBS/Viacom – seems taken out of the Barry-O playbook when it turns out it’s precisely the other way around. (Think Exelon, Ayers, Weathermen, et al.)

 
 
 

Comment by s. hall | 2008-06-05 18:29:58

destardi — Obama is now in victim mode — we have seen this all before. Next it will be they don’t want people who look like me to be President. Are his 4 years over yet? Oops I forgot he hasn’t been president yet. He has only just begun to iritate me. Lies, bribes and election thefts. Come on McCain you can do this.

Comment by tzada | 2008-06-05 20:06:12

I agree with you on all points.

 
 

Comment by terri | 2008-06-05 18:56:24

ObamaBush. I love it! You have to give credit where credit is due–Obama is a master of Doublespeak. Must have studied Orwell at Harvard instead of law.

Comment by bambi's brother | 2008-06-05 20:06:42

or that’s just how he thinks? He’s a great liar, and a natural at playing the victim. But don’t blame him, blame the party that made sure to allow him to run like a pug against a fellow dem and to put on harry and louise ads. We’ve been had, and in plain sight. We should put out a petition asking him to promise to step aside and give his place to Hillary when the tape he doesn’t deny breaks.

Comment by Tom Callanan | 2008-06-05 22:00:09

Agree 100%. Have you seen the ‘Caucus vs. Primary’ article at talkleft.com?

Read it…and send it to everyone you know. Barack won based upon 1.1 million voters; Hillary won based upon 34.5 million voters. He won ‘red’ states; she won states which Dem’s have to win in the fall.

Obama cannot win, despite being propped up by party elders (including three white men who couldn’t do once, what the Clinton’s did twice).

I can’t believe it , but I’m voting for McCain (unless Romney is his running mate).

 
 

Comment by David Axisrutt | 2008-06-06 02:02:44

He sure didn’t work very much for the HLR.

 
 

Comment by John Aravosis | 2008-06-05 21:15:50

Why are you guys always picking on my man Obama, is he not white enough for you?

You can’t prove anything about him and Rezko etc., at least not before he is elected, so take that!

By the way I get personal email from the Obama campaign so I KNOW my talking points, you can’t fool me.

Another thing, don’t bother posting at my blog with garbage because I screen ALL POSTS and will pick what works for me, Obama, and my readers. I have an in to CNN so don’t mess with me!

http://www.americablog.com

tootles

Comment by Ten Inches & Thick | 2008-06-05 21:46:49

John Aravosis ,

First off, don’t let my screen name cloud your judgment, unlike you I’m straight, lol. Secondly you run a blog like a third world dictator. You and your queer friends have bashed Hillary Clinton for months in the most vile and disgusting way I have ever seen, without allowing ANY retorts from Hillary supporters. Apparently it takes a real man or woman to allow and engage in real discussion , without resorting to blatant censorship geared to your one side views for Obama. What is so telling is that you proclaimed Tues. night that the Obama camp emailed you and asked you to thanks your bloggers. So Obama obviously is into the vile and vulgar shit you guys have spewed for months about Hillary Clinton, why does that not surprise me in the least, he says one thing to the masses but it’s a different story behind the curtain.

I also notice that you script your pages so they are ” NO ARCHIVE ” , in other words the search robots can’t find and ARCHIVE your content for others to find via a GOOOGLE search, what are you so worried about, lol.

So others can see here is what the Obama campaign sent this scum:

Obama’s Deputy Campaign manager just asked me to thank all of you guys
John Aravosis (DC) · 6/03/2008 10:56:00 PM ET · Link
Make a comment · reddit · FARK · Digg It! ·

I just got a text message from Steve Hildebrand, the Deputy Campaign manager of the Obama campaign, and he asked me to thank all of you guys, our readers, for your support. Here is Hildebrand’s message to you guys:

Give a shout-out from all of us in the Obama Campaign to your readers. You were there early.

We need 110 percent from everyone and anyone who cares about who controls the Supreme Court, who will stand up for those who need a little help. 110 percent.

Thanks for everything.

This is a BIG moment.

Classy people.
http://www.americablog.com/2008/06/obamas-deputy-campaign-manager-just.html#disqus_thread

Yep, that’s real classy Obama, having your surrogates on http://www.AmericaBlog.com spend months talking about Hillary Clinton in the most vile and disgusting way. I dare Obama to renounce http://www.AmericaBlog.com , he won’t.

Comment by DirOfTheObv | 2008-06-06 12:32:15

Ain’t No DNC’s Ho no mo!! Women should leave the DNC in droves!! The DNC bet that the fallout from disenfranchising women would be less than if they attempted to kick Obama to the curb over his racist pastor. It is a bet they are stuck with now.

Women will make a political mistake if they still think asking will get them respect from the DNC. Women MUST demand it by using their POWER…..and that POWER resides in their votes THIS VERY FALL. NOW….not later!!

 

Comment by texas latina! | 2008-06-22 03:31:34

amen! thank you! i am sick of these moronic bobo wusses!

 
 
 

Comment by johntannen | 2008-06-06 00:13:16

There is such a gulf of reason between racists and our multicultural reality that is America. To racists Obama is of course black. You can’t be white once an ounce of black blood has entered your genes. Nevermind how stupid it sounds that Michelle Obama hates white people yet she married someone who’s mother is white and who was brought up exclusively by his mother’s side of the family. Most of us just shake our heads to realize that some people just can’t accept the cultural reality of our country. Sorry to say, it is what it is.

I guess Michelle Obama is full of self loathing as well, hating white people while marrying one and having children with him.

Comment by David Axisrutt | 2008-06-06 02:05:02

Michelle is black oriented and hates whitey because it pays better.

And she learned that from Barry.

Comment by dpvegas | 2008-06-06 06:06:18

Now that’s the truth! Sad, though, because those kids have a white grandmother and Michelle can’t take that out of them.

 
 
 

Comment by SMS | 2008-06-06 13:11:42

you guys really crack me up…desperation is not a good look on you.

 

Comment by KP | 2008-06-12 13:17:29

Who cares if she did say “whitey”? Every on of you has said racist stuff, including things like, “I’m glad I’m not black.” She grew up in a country that was adamently racist against her, a basic white culture that only has begun to modernize. I doubt there is one objector on this site who has not said racist junk. All of you are pretty much liars and scoundrels from what I can tell. If you want to identify a real problem, go after the creationists. Go after people who are visually illiterate about modern art; its been around for over 100 years! Go after the common man for supporting our terroist war in Iraq. Oh, you don’t have the guts to do that! You don’t even know what I’m talking about, do you?

Comment by elinor m walker | 2008-06-12 21:24:40

so…can we see the tape,dvd, or recorded remarks in any format where Michelle says EITHER “Whitey” or “Why’d he”?
You’re right–what if she did say whitey? Howzabout you Newspeakers let the voters decide BEFORE the convention. We’ve already been suckered by one MisLeader/Decider who cherry-picked information in order to shape events while LYING by omission or commission, depending on what was deemed neccessary to accomplish the intended mission. Do we really need another?????

 
 
 

Comment by bigfoot | 2008-06-05 16:57:24

I need to start a countdown clock of how many days it has been since this tape was promised and not produced.

It is almost sad at this point.

Comment by Tigger12 | 2008-06-05 17:14:29

why are you still here?

Comment by Carolyn | 2008-06-05 17:22:31

“If somebody has evidence that myself or Michelle or anybody has said something inappropriate, let them do it.”

Sounds like a flat-out denial to me.

I don’t think this exists.

Comment by Peter | 2008-06-05 17:36:17

It sounds to me that it does exist and he’s accepted it’s going to come out… he has just given permission….

“let them do it” he’s ready for it. Whether he survives what ‘it’ actually is will remain to be seen. I still think the Repubs will hold on to it until after the convention if nothing takes him out beforehand. They are very obvious in their desire to run against Obama.

Comment by Carolyn | 2008-06-05 17:42:30

Oooh, that’s a good way of looking at it. Thanks Peter!

Actually it sounds like a masked admission!

Comment by Citizen Sane | 2008-06-05 20:06:00

Ha Ha Ha. Keep up the denial. Obama is the nominee and will be prez.

BTW, where is that tape? Haven’t seen it yet. Guess what? We won’t see it. It doesn’t exist. Larry’s credibility rests on it. He hasn’t been able to produce it, so he’ll just drag this out talking about it.

Has been. Too bad he’s ending his career this way.

Comment by SergeiRostov | 2008-06-05 20:16:56

If the tape exists, we won’t see it until after the Dem Convention and before Election Day .

If the GOP releases it sooner than that, then it won’t have the intended effect of scuttling Obama’s chances in the GE. It’ll just result in what they fear the most: having to go up against Hillary.

Comment by abfabdem | 2008-06-05 22:19:41

Exactly, if it is released before the convention, the DNC could correct their egregious mistake and name Hillary the nominee. The Repubs will wait until it is too late and we are stuck with him.

 
 
 

Comment by Gloria | 2008-06-05 21:15:02

Reminds me of Gary Hart daring reporters to follow him on his boat with his gal pal…

 
 
 

Comment by meileen | 2008-06-05 18:20:01

I have a hunch he’s bought and paid for the tape to be buried. I also have a hunch he did not bury the only copy. Guess we’ll see in October, but I also have a hunch the GOP won’t even have to reveal it. They’ll take BO down with constant reminders of the company he has kept. Middle America does not like the thought of home grown terrorists dining in the White House.

 

Comment by alibe4-Hillary | 2008-06-05 18:36:28

Reminds me of the challenge Gary Hart issued to the press. And how did that work out for him and the “Monkey Business”?

 

Comment by jadwiga | 2008-06-05 18:43:45

“If somebody has evidence that myself or Michelle or anybody has said something inappropriate, let them do it.”

This is not a denial and not and admission. What it suggests however is that they know that Michelle has said something like this, but not sure is the tape exists or not.

Their reasoning might be that ‘if the tape exists, somebody would have produced it by now.’ They don’t calculate the finely oiled republican demolition machinery.

If the Clinton campaign heard of it, it could explain why Hillary doesn’t want to be on the ticket with BO.

This is only theorizing, I know.

Comment by BA | 2008-06-05 20:02:16

Not bad theorizing either.

 

Comment by elinor m walker | 2008-06-12 21:32:43

It’s also a classic “guilt signature”, as trained investigators know. During an interrogation by an experienced professional, such a lawyerly and artful attempt to parse a denial is the signal that they are on the right track. As one wag put it, “Where there’s smoke and someone with a fire extinguisher, there’s fire.”
True dat.

 
 

Comment by Mahatma X | 2008-06-05 20:29:27

Unfortunately, among the kool-aid drinkers, there is no way that they will subject their premise to falsification. Even failure to produce evidence is to them “proof” that the allegation is “true.”

My money is on the whole thing being a hoax.

 
 

Comment by justinb | 2008-06-05 17:22:57

Because the tape hasn’t been produced?

Comment by Uppity Woman | 2008-06-05 17:53:19

In spite of what people on TV said, why would Republicans produce such a thing before Obama’s nomination is sealed, which, in spite of all the museum and moose poop, doesn’t happen till August. After all, the goal is to make him lose is it not?

Comment by angelita | 2008-06-05 18:02:39

The Republicans don’t want to face Hillary(strongest candidate) so they are not going to bring the tape out now because the goal is to beat Obama in the general election.

Comment by Ginger | 2008-06-05 19:06:32

And I’m gonna help them….afterall the dems don’t want my white, typical racist bigot bitt….so welcome to the general election. I will never vote for Obama. And the DNC RBC will never have control of my vote ever again…who the heck knows who they may decide to give it to….can’t trust them any more.

 
 

Comment by Mark | 2008-06-05 19:06:50

But Larry said it was coming out this past Wednesday.

Comment by *== President & Commander-in-Chief Hillary Clinton **== | 2008-06-05 19:07:24

He never said that.

 

Comment by Steve | 2008-06-06 01:44:21

No he didn’t. He said it wouldn’t come out until time for the general. The goal of the Republicans is to critically injure Obama’s campaign. Why would Republicans do this when Hillary could just take Obama’s place? It will probably be unleashed on Obama in October. And I will laugh, and laugh, and laugh.

After all his race baiting and lies, having the truth dropped on him like an atom bomb will be the most delicious political event in modern history.

But that’s why we need to get our hands on the tape NOW… So we can get someone with half a chance of winning on the ballot.

 
 

Comment by LikeH2O | 2008-06-05 21:08:05

At the same time, if and when the either existing/non-existing tape does rear it’s ugly head in the fall, with all the buzz about it out there in the public realm now, the response to it may not be so predictably damaging. If it isn’t until fall that this now-infamous tape goes public, a case could be made for it being a dirty trick. Obama does seem real capable of turning things to his advantage. I mean, look at all of the people who don’t see through him. Then again, if this tape is as bad as rumored, who can say? Someone is having great fun with a cat and mouse game.

 

Comment by stodghie | 2008-06-06 00:02:02

i just watch george will on fox. at first i thought what kind of fool are you george. he was saying having hillary as veep would be terrible. she is so awful, blah, blah, blah. then he mentioned sam nunn and georgia. i thought “nunn”? it took a minutes but then i figured that will is spinning the obama supporters. he hints that getting nunn is the thing to do. he hopes they go for it. that would so not work. the repubs are having fun with these obama supporters. figures.

 
 

Comment by Kat Bee | 2008-06-05 19:01:49

As to the allegation that local stations will only respond to a subpoena, here is more hearsay on a blog that reports ABC’s response: http://cannonfire.blogspot.com

 
 

Comment by Northwest rain | 2008-06-05 17:35:06

the jackass in still here — because Axlerod is paying him to be a jackass.

The tape will hit when the shock value won’t have time to wear off.

Most people haven’t heard this sort of hate speech– I’ve heard black kids on a school bus yelling at whites on the street. These children were fed a steady diet of hate by the Black Panthers — and hearing their hate filled rants was very shocking the first time.

Hearing Mrs. Obama racism rant repeatedly will lose its impact very quickly.

Even if “our” side has the tape — it should not be released until JUST before the dumb dems meet in August. (Hey its fun being an Independent again — I can name call members of both parties now!)

The SHOCK effect is what is important — thus the Obama-crowd is offering an alternative script.

YES the tape/DVD does indeed exist!

And notice NO one — not even Obama is claiming that Mrs. Obama has never uttered a racist word or statement in her life!

Comment by Bud White | 2008-06-05 18:41:11

Northwest,

Indie now? me too.

Comment by elise | 2008-06-05 20:45:51

 

Comment by TeakWoodKite | 2008-06-06 01:58:45

What ever took you so long? :)

How many years have we seen both parties come before country?

 
 

Comment by Mahatma X | 2008-06-05 20:41:58

The urban legends the get circulated here as “truth” are astounding.

 

Comment by OnlyTheTruth | 2008-06-05 21:16:49

This “tape” issue is pure Larry Argumentum ad ignorantiam at his best!

Politico.com, Reason Hit and Run, The Houston Chronicle, The National Review, Sweetness & Light and others say “It’s a hoax.” And that, “We have refrained from commenting on this preposterous rumor because it is such a transparent ploy from a man who is a notorious America-hating buffoon and pathological liar.”

More than just one person are of the opinion that Larry “Crazy” Johnson is a hate-filled lunatic who will say or do anything for attention. You can add the writings of SusanUnPC and Uppity Woman to this same category. And yet so many are willing to believe his, and hers, latest gibberings – like simpleton lemmings marching into the sea on planet Hillary. Why is that? Low information voters! Argumentum ad ignorantiam!!!

First there was a “vast right-wing conspiracy”. Now there’s a “vast left-wing conspiracy”? No one likes a sore loser. Get over it. Move on! We’ve got a host of national and world-wide problems to work on. These issues supersede pathetic, petty, personal laments.

Comment by Daniel | 2008-06-05 22:32:00

I agree with you 100% OnlytheTruth. You and I both know that Politico is a very reliable source. It’s so sad that Larry Johnson and SusanUnPC would act so immature to destroy a man who I believe will turn this country around. Too bad Mr. Johnson’s career would steep this low. Even Michelle Malkin says that he is not a credible source. If Barack Obama selects Hillary Clinton as VP, I would support it because I believe in unity not division as opposed most of you Obama haters especially Larry Johnson. By the way, they met at Mrs. Clinton’s house to discuss unity!

Comment by Steve | 2008-06-06 01:48:42

This doesn’t have as much to do with Clinton now, as it does the despicable campaign Obama ran against her. She might be good enough to forget and forgive to try to win for Dems in November. That’s sweet of her. But I will not forgive the lies, the phoney charges of racism, and the namecalling the Obama campaign engaged in.

It’s called “Winning the battle, but losing the war.”

 
 
 

Comment by OnlyTheTruth | 2008-06-05 21:17:40

This “tape” issue is pure Larry argumentum ad ignorantiam at his best!

Politico.com, Reason Hit and Run, The Houston Chronicle, The National Review, Sweetness & Light and others say “It’s a hoax.” And that, “We have refrained from commenting on this preposterous rumor because it is such a transparent ploy from a man who is a notorious America-hating buffoon and pathological liar.”

More than just one person are of the opinion that Larry “Crazy” Johnson is a hate-filled lunatic who will say or do anything for attention. You can add the writings of SusanUnPC and Uppity Woman to this same category. And yet so many are willing to believe his, and hers, latest gibberings – like simpleton lemmings marching into the sea on planet Hillary. Why is that? Low information voters! Argumentum ad ignorantiam!!!

First there was a “vast right-wing conspiracy”. Now there’s a “vast left-wing conspiracy”? No one likes a sore loser. Get over it. Move on! We’ve got a host of national and world-wide problems to work on. These issues supersede pathetic, petty, personal laments.

 
 
 

Comment by Nadabama | 2008-06-05 17:32:22

Who promised you a tape, clubfoot?

Comment by jobabe | 2008-06-05 18:37:13

So you are making derogatory statements about the handicapped, very enlighted. That’s why Obama is going to have trouble getting Hillary’s people to vote for him because you Obama supports just are so full of yourselves that insulting everyone is OK along as they are you. By the way, the people who actually give to the party and have disposable incomes are old enough to remember the Black Panthers, I am the same age as Obama and I remember the Black Panthers, they were kinda hard to miss if you had a brain. By the way, love their hot sauce.

Comment by Blue Intrigue | 2008-06-05 19:08:17

LOLOLO! You think nadabama is an Obama supporter! He was responding to bigfoot upthread. SO I guess what you meant was that Hillary supporters are so full of themselves that insulting everyone is OK. As if that isn’t painfully obvious already on this hate-filled latrine of a website.

Comment by truthtelling007 | 2008-06-05 19:32:02

So, I’m intrigued…how often do you hang out around latrines for your enjoyment, asshole?

 
 

Comment by A.Citizen | 2008-06-05 19:13:46

I a still remember the night I heard Bobby Seale’s voice crackling with distortion echo across the Berkeley Campus as he kicked off his speach about Barkey’s patron saint, St. Ronnie, what he said was:

‘Mickey Mouse, Republicans like Governor Ray-Gun believe in Mickey Mouse. They livin’ in fantasy land people….’

And on he went….

Ripping St. Ronnie Obama’s patron saint a new asshole. Sad to say that Reagan won that battle. Murkkkans of the time bought his coded propaganda about n#$gers and Hippies and has sat in front of it’s TeeBee screen sukin’ Buds down ever since.

Fun time is over now for the ‘creative class’ and I doubt me not Barkey will run a ‘Mickey Mouse’ campaign complete with Rethug talking points and lot’s O’ Hope.

Jes keep in mind what the Yogi said, Berra that is, ‘It’s never over ’til it’s over…’

All Hail The Magic Man!

 

Comment by Tom Callanan | 2008-06-05 22:11:00

Yeah. We’re also old enough to remember Angela Davis and the ‘fist in the air’.

Has anyone seen Angela & Michelle in the same room?

 
 
 

Comment by Susan1968 | 2008-06-05 18:16:23

This will sell on HuffPo.

Here it just makes us laugh.

We are patient.

In fact, I’m hoping a Hillary supporter does have the tape and keeps it under cover until just before the DNC convention.

If it was released now, the BO camp would have too many months to do damage control.

Besides — there’s plenty for the GOP & 527 groups to throw at him now to soften him up for the KO punch.

Comment by alee21 | 2008-06-05 18:44:14

Let’s keep Obami & Co guessing and then, voila, the bombshell!

Comment by Citizen Sane | 2008-06-05 20:08:49

If there WAS such a tape. Sorry you’ve been fooled. Blame Larry.

 
 

Comment by Karma | 2008-06-05 19:11:51

Maybe a 527 of him denying exactly the same way Bush denies…and then the tape.

Put the Dubya 2 weight around his head at the same time they expose his wife. ;)

 
 

Comment by Patrick Henry | 2008-06-05 19:11:50

The tape was not promised..by Larry..He just said the some eyewitness’s have seen and heard it, and say that it does exist and will be made Public in the fall..

There have been over 2000 eyewitness reports of Bigfoot sightings since the 1800’s..even scientists are convinced now that a Bigfoot Creature does exist..

Is the lack of a BODY real Proof that BIGFOOT does not exist..??

Comment by Gloria | 2008-06-05 21:19:05

The fact that Bob Beckel expressed concern about a tape made me stand up and listen…

Comment by Steve | 2008-06-06 01:51:35

We’re supposed to be pretending that this is one man’s totally unsubstantiated claims. Not something going on behind the scenes that has many strategists becoming very worried.

 
 

Comment by TeakWoodKite | 2008-06-06 02:08:18

Comment by Stephen N. | 2008-06-06 08:32:05

Clintonites are deluding themselves. If copies existed, youtube would be all over it by now.

 

Comment by Stephen N. | 2008-06-06 08:33:17

Clintonites are deluding themselves. If copies existed, youtube would be all over it by now.
You’re all traitors to Democrats.

 
 
 

Comment by Mark | 2008-06-05 19:14:48

HillBuzz seems to be pushing this story too. Guess who wrote on HillBuzz today. C’mon guess. ANN COULTER.

Comment by KJMontana | 2008-06-05 20:04:33

Actually Anne Coulter did NOT write on Hillbuzz. That is a re-post of a commentary that was on the conservative website HumanEvents.com. I despise Ann Coulter… but in this case she makes a good point about the hypocrisy of the democratic party refusing to count votes and “assigning” delegates to candidates who didn’t win them.

 

Comment by Donald from Hawaii | 2008-06-05 20:04:42

Great. She’s certainly an unbiased, unimpeachable, chain-smoking, black cocktail dress-wearing, man-hungry font of political wisdom.

Comment by Gloria | 2008-06-05 21:23:08

You don’t have to be Anne Coulter to see the hypocrisy of the Democratic Party! The facts are plain to anybody.

 
 
 

Comment by Gun665 | 2008-06-06 02:01:34

Just think of it like waiting for Christmas.

 
 

Comment by mlr701 | 2008-06-05 16:58:16

If someone claimed my husband said anything even remotely like the things MO is accused of saying, I’d punch them in the nose. So what’s his problem? I might respect a little bit if he stuck up for his wife.

Either he’s lying or he’s a complete pushover like Kerry was over the whole swiftboat thing.

Comment by Northwest rain | 2008-06-05 17:41:32

I agree! I would absolutely KNOW that my husband would NEVER make a racist statement about anyone! EVER!

THAT’s why we know Mrs. Obama is guilty! No one is saying she would never make a racist statement — it’s just that the tape hasn’t been released or found. BUT it does exist — snObama just let the cat out of the bag.

 

Comment by It's Not Me | 2008-06-05 18:54:31

He’s lying! He knows it’s true that’s why he didn’t flat out deny it. If he denied it and it came out, then he’d have to deal with the entire country knowing he’s a liar and not just us, people in the know.

She’s GUILTY, GUILTY, GUILTY! If a Democrat has the tape, they

should release it a week before the convention. Except we have THIS problem: Fox won’t release it for a Democrat because they are saving their copy for November. BNN and MSNBO won’t release it because they want BO to be the nominee. SO, how the hell do we get the damn thing out id none of the news networks will play it?

 

Comment by It's Not Me | 2008-06-05 18:55:27

He’s lying! He knows it’s true that’s why he didn’t flat out deny it. If he denied it and it came out, then he’d have to deal with the entire country knowing he’s a liar and not just us, people in the know.

She’s GUILTY, GUILTY, GUILTY! If a Democrat has the tape, they should release it a week before the convention.

Except we have THIS problem: Fox won’t release it for a Democrat because they are saving their copy for November. BNN and MSNBO won’t release it because they want BO to be the nominee. SO, how the hell do we get the damn thing out if none of the news networks will play it?

Comment by TeakWoodKite | 2008-06-06 02:17:58

Don’t suppose that came up between Hillary and BO this evening?

 
 

Comment by Ginger | 2008-06-05 19:19:58

He doesn’t stand up for women….any women, not even his own wife.

Comment by Gun665 | 2008-06-06 02:07:04

Hmm, does that make him a typical black person?

 
 

Comment by Kickass Old Lady | 2008-06-06 00:46:15

The reason Kerry did not stand up to those swiftboat attacks was because they were true. I was a lifelong democrat till now, but I am married to a Nam vet who served just below the DMZ at Cua Viet(the farthest north river below the DMZ). He spent two tours there, in a camp taking almost daily artillary fire. He was in three major battles during the tet year of 68,and many other skirmishes where our marines were outnumbered by the NVA by as much as 10 to 1. He was seriously injured twice, but didn’t get his second purple heart, because when they returned to the rear, the hooch(dormitory)next door had been vaporized with the gunny(recordkeeper) inside.Our men prevailed. They won that war, but John Kerry, home after just three months of service because he had three purple hearts for scratches(one of them was refused by his superior, but Kerry applied for it himself after his officer was transfered)was testifying that these brave men still in Nam were baby killers and rapists. John Kerry also went to France and met with the enemy for talks while he was still in the service(treason? Or just the same kind of inflated ego that had Pelosi in Syria?) John Kerry refused to release his DD214, the official form that summerized his military record. Most vets are proud to do so. I have heard that it is because He was originally dishonorably discharged, and that Jimmy Carter changed it to a general discharge. Can that be proven? No, he refused to to release his military record. I believe that some of Kerry’s speeches and testemony were played over the loudspeakers at the Hanoi Hilton. Someone should ask John McCain about that. I hope that anyone who reads this will understand swiftboating a little better. Thanks. Oh, by the way my husband is an independant. He voted for Clinton twice, and Reagan twice. I am an independent, now, too, and will have no problem voting for John McCain.

Comment by Gun665 | 2008-06-06 02:09:11

At least we have proof that Kerry was there.
W didn’t even show up for most of his time in the Air Guard.
At least, no one remembers seeing him there. Maybe he was on vacation?

 
 
 

Comment by Rex Burnett | 2008-06-05 16:58:59

Like you said Larry, it’s the old “Shuck and Jive”. What is so curious is that this is so familiar—-very much like George Bush’s non-answers to specific questions. Looks very much like Rove coached this kid.

 

Comment by AnninCa | 2008-06-05 16:59:43

Interesting…..

I still wouldn’t be surprised to see something in the next week or so. I think Rezko is enough news for now. *haha

Comment by Nadabama | 2008-06-05 17:43:14

Amen! Rezko is poison to NObama, just hope Fitzgerald does not hold back.

Concerning NObama’s comment re Michelle:

He did not say, nor have I ever heard any defenders say “Michelle would never make such remarks, or Michelle would never say anything like that”, etc.

They know damn good and well that such is typical of her, that she did say it, and are praying for it to go away!

Of course, now that it is being pointed out that she has not been defended in such fashion by anyone, expect the Obamidiots to start doing so!

Lemmings to the rescue!

 
 

Comment by lastlemming | 2008-06-05 16:59:53

That gives legs to the story. If somebody has evidence that myself or Michelle or anybody has said something inappropriate, let them do it.

Huh? Do it?

Comment by reality based | 2008-06-05 17:14:30

Bush couldn’t have said it better.

 

Comment by hootnannie | 2008-06-05 17:38:17

Kinda reminds me of Gary Hart daring the press to follow him around and see if he was philandering. Uh huh…
If the transcript is correct (from the other website as well as here) Obama used improper grammar twice. What kind of a fluster was he in? And the old, tired, how-dare-you defense is thread bare. Does he think EVERY news outlet is like his lackey MSNBC? I tell you, his supporters are acting as vicious as cornered rattlers. Wonder why…

 

Comment by Nadabama | 2008-06-05 17:49:43

Surprised NObama did not say “Bring it on”!

He has already done the foolhardy “mission accomplished” thing.

If NObama ain’t got a teleprompter, he can’t talk!

 

Comment by Gun665 | 2008-06-06 02:14:05

Nothing like hearing a guilty kid shout, “Prove it!”

 
 

Comment by HankinPA | 2008-06-05 17:00:20

All I have to say is time will tell. I think there is something out there, but who knows how damaging it will be? He seems to get a pass for just about everything. Perhaps he can say that this is not the Michelle Obama he knows.

Everyone must know the republican play card has been in existance for a long time against Obama and Clinton, but mainly just against a dem in teh white house.

arghhhhhhhhh — find that tape!!!!

 

Comment by Tom | 2008-06-05 17:00:20

Larry, when I read about this interview first at POLITICO this was by exact reaction: non-denial denial.

Obama was toast in the fall even before this. When this tape arrives in the fall he sure is toast. If he is smart he wil find a way to release this right now and try to put this behind him.

He is going to take the Democratic brand down with him.

Comment by Ann | 2008-06-05 17:21:27

He already has. The Democratic brand is now officially corrupt, far-left, weak, effete and out of touch radicals.

Hillary was or is the FDR brand of the Democratic Party which is, apparently, soooo yesterday. Everyone in the middle class, a sense of social security — yeah, old fashioned. I like it, though.

Comment by Save_America | 2008-06-05 17:41:26

Even of more consequence, if Obama’s radical and corrupt relationships are further strengthened (domestic terrorists, Iraqi/Syrian terrorists/money men, corruption, etc), the Democratic Party will officially be DESTROYED and lose all trust and credibility with the electorate FOREVER as they will have nominated the very first anti-American Manchurian candidate in the history of America. This is the Karl Rove plan – he wants to go down in history as the operative who destroyed an American political party.

Comment by claribel borden | 2008-06-05 18:41:23

John Kass had a wonderful column today, connecting this all back to republicans, too and the white house.

Careful, now, you know the republicans are just as dirty, IL is little Washington.

It hasn’t really worked out for them, either, if you could see the bigger picture, you’d know why.

Should be fun watching them try to parse Obama, if he does in fact last, while avoiding self immolation.

Of course, McCain isn’t Cheney.

 
 

Comment by s. hall | 2008-06-05 18:44:31

Ann — I like Hillary’s FDR campaign. Its safe and smart unlike Obama’s Campaign — Party today and to hell with tomorrow.

 
 
 

Comment by Scott Templeton | 2008-06-05 17:02:25

There is no tape, you think the wife of a man running for Senate would have a racist rant in front of a room full of strangers? You’re a tool Johnson, I’m giving 100 dollars to Obama’s general election campaign for the next 23 days or until you produce your non-existent tape, whichever comes first. Tool.

Comment by Peter | 2008-06-05 17:44:49

you think the wife of a man running for Senate would have a racist rant in front of a room full of strangers?

Strangers? What the hell are you talking about? Strangers to her, to you… who cares. moron.

Apparently the reporters think it looks like she did, and if someone has info he gave permission to have it out there ‘let them do it’…..

Why would your donation depend on what anyone else is doing? Again… moron.

 

Comment by Sam | 2008-06-05 19:13:32

Scott,
Honestly, are you still in high school? I’ve read your other responses and they are similar. Your sentences are poorly structured and comments have little to no substance.

Does the Obama campaign distribute a stand script in which to repeat from one website to the other?

I’m sure the Obama paid trolls cannot do much else with their lives other than throw sophomoric insults at others but at least try to be creative.

Maybe Walmart will hire Obama trolls after November as greeters.

 

Comment by Karen | 2008-06-05 20:58:53

When he was running for the Senate and they did interviews together in Chicago, she was always making fun of him and putting him down. I think she would say any thing she wants.

 

Comment by Ivory Bill Woodpecker | 2008-06-06 04:45:23

How much will you have to steal from people who actually work for a living to get that kind of money, Scotty?

And won’t that cut into your crack fund? ;)

 
 

Comment by Halli Casser-Jayne | 2008-06-05 17:04:51

What did the reporter expect him to say, “Yeah, there’s a tape of my wife ranting about whitey?” Hillaryous!

Halli Casser-Jayne
http://www.thecjpoliticalreport.com

Comment by beebop | 2008-06-05 17:13:55

No. You expect him to say NO … Absolutely not. I challenge the person circulating this rumor to say this to my face!

That is what I would expect. Even from my EX-HUSBAND … much less the father of my children … but hey, that’s me …

Comment by Lucinda | 2008-06-05 17:42:49

How about saying, “Read my lips. There is no tape.” That’s a denial.

I posted this on another thread, but I’ll repeat it since it’s on topic here. My husband told me today that they’re now talking about it on the Republican forums, too. The person who posted it there said almost the same thing that Hillbuzz said, and most of the forum members believe that Rudy Guiliani has it. I’m not going to post a link to that forum, because you have to be a member to read it, and I don’t want to lead all of the whacked out trolls that hang around this site over there.

Comment by s. hall | 2008-06-05 18:48:05

Lucinda I think the Obamas are psychopaths–she acts out and he spends all his time trying to restrain himself. But the fact is both have made racists comments — McCain 08.

 
 

Comment by timepassages | 2008-06-05 18:02:46

He nevers does give a straight answer , so why start now?

 

Comment by joeysky | 2008-06-05 18:09:17

Remind me of “It didn’t happened”.

 
 
 

Comment by Mel | 2008-06-05 17:05:19

Obama is simply Astroturfing

Notice no um’s er’s ah’s in his words, rehearsed speech visa vie Axelrod!

 

Comment by Scott Templeton | 2008-06-05 17:05:28

Oh yeah, and you don’t have to register on your site to comment like it says on the top right corner, you can just make up a fake email and say anything like I’m doing right now. Way to be a “security expert.” Tool.

Comment by Medusa | 2008-06-05 18:17:45

wow, you are soooo 007–you mean Scott Templeton isn’t your real name and the address you gave isn’t real. Of course the ISP that shows up every time you post, under whatever asshole pseudonym you use is the same. Idiot.

All I have to do to know the whitey tape is true is look at the comments from the kool aid drinking trolls.

Oh yeah, it’s true.

 

Comment by s. hall | 2008-06-05 18:50:33

scott — you’re a riot. Must be fun to be a pre-teen again.

 

Comment by claribel borden | 2008-06-05 18:56:46

We read your mind, Scott, and in the flash of an eye we know your past present and future, while simultaneously taking control of your every thought, the ability to anticipate and predict before you can even identify your next thought in pursuit of action.

Secretly, we want to populate the world with Tammy Wynette clones, as we miss her, and have a sudden yearning to hear “stand by your man,” in honor of Jeralyn and Taylor’s switch to Obama, aider of terrorists.

In the meantime, we control all world governments, all world armies,(including yours, bob-o) and the Frog Hop, at Boomers.

Registration?

It’s superfluous.

Comment by claribel borden | 2008-06-05 19:03:34

God Bless America.

 
 

Comment by Sam | 2008-06-05 19:32:37

Scott,
You may want to refine your people skills if you want to get the Walmart greeter job after the November election.

 
 

Comment by Sad | 2008-06-05 17:05:28

Yea, he responds to this lie and malicious rumor then he has to respond them all. Didn’t someone promise to produce the tape yesterday. I think he went to far in even acknowledging it. Larry, I have a tape showing you with a transvestite prostitute do you care to respond to the allegation?

Comment by ritamary | 2008-06-05 18:05:16

Larry is not the candidate for President of the United States, so how is it relevant what Larry does?

 

Comment by MichelleK | 2008-06-05 20:12:31

My multiple sources have seen the tape and I see we have no denial which PROVES the tape of Larry Johnson with a transvestite prostitute must exist.

Comment by Steve | 2008-06-06 02:18:18

And democratic strategists have admitted, on air, that they’ve heard enough about this transvestite tape to convince them it’s serious trouble… Oh wait, it’s the Michelle Obama tape they’ve admitted on air to being worried about.

 
 
 

Comment by artist | 2008-06-05 17:05:59

He had a golden chance to KILL this and he didn’t.

He

Did

NOT

deny

it!

Comment by Dipsomaniax | 2008-06-05 17:14:58

If I accused you of being a bank robber, would you think that asking me to prove it was out of line? If you said “Prove it” does that mean I get to tell everyone that I was right? No, it doesn’t.

Now the onus is on the people trying to spread the rumour. Prove it. The longer it goes on as “My sources tell me” the dumber people saying that look.

Comment by mimi | 2008-06-05 17:52:53

You’re using a screen name that reminds me of a piece of dialogue from the movie “Seven Days in May,” which was about a military coup in the US. The president referred to the last remaining living eyewitness to prove that a coup was about to take place as a “dipsomaniax.”

The fact that you are an Obama troll using this name associated in my mind with a disturbing political movie about taking over the US, gives me the creeps.

Comment by Jillie | 2008-06-05 18:44:28

‘dypsomaniac’ is a drunk.

the reference in the movie was to an alcoholic senator who had signed documents from various members of the military admitting to their
part in the coup.

i do believe there is a tape. i believe it is being held back so that obama won’t have time to do damage control.

Comment by Dipsomaniax | 2008-06-06 00:25:18

Oh, God’s teeth. The reference is to an Asterix book (it’s Asterix in Britain, if you care). It has nothing to do with anything any of you are thinking of. Get over it.

The fact that you refer to someone who has so far only asked polite questions about your motivations as a ‘troll’ tells me more than anything you’ve written in response.

 
 

Comment by Dipsomaniax | 2008-06-06 00:36:23

So, no response? Only insults?

I really do like to think (even still) that I could expect something better. You have not helped me to maintain that expectation.

Hillary struck me as generally articulate and intelligent. You should try that.

 
 

Comment by Peter | 2008-06-05 19:06:26

What an asinine example. No wonder I don’t support Obama. He attracts stupid people.

 

Comment by claribel borden | 2008-06-05 19:14:26

Except if the tape exists, it’s the truth, and it comes out, at some point.

So, if you’re the kind of guy who thinks in terms of news cycles, well, you’re screwed.

But if you look beyond the next three months, or days, or years, well, it doesn’t matter, as it’s the truth, and it will come out.

And if the issue is less about Obama, and more about Obama’s crimes and criminal associations, well, it’s a slam dunk, because Obama WILL KEEP committing crimes, and people are paying attention.

This whole PR push your people attempt is a load of crap, I have never seen people with such a specious understanding of logistics, consequence, and meaning anywhere, other than the PR world of Washington.

It’s crap,the level of thought, and it shows in everything from business, to Congress, to the war.

BTW, if the war isn’t addressed, FLAT OUT, the country goes bankrupt.

And which PR think tank will handle it?

K**?

heh.

Perception is NOT reality when you’re lying, and when you are unable to comprehend.

Comment by MichelleK | 2008-06-05 20:18:27

The evidence is the tape does not exist, Larry Johnson has lied in the past about Rove getting indicted and that his sources told him, bull, see:

http://www.reason.com/blog/show/126883.html

Comment by Pete | 2008-06-05 20:24:36

Obama lied.

*Selma March Got Me Born – NOT EXACTLY, your parents felt safe enough to have you in 1961 – Selma had no effect on your birth, as Selma was in 1965.

*My Father Was A Goat Herder – NOT EXACTLY, he was a privileged, well educated youth, who went on to work with the Kenyan Government.

*I Have Always Been Against Iraq – NOT EXACTLY, you weren’t in office to vote against it AND you have voted to fund it every single time.

*I Have Always Supported Universal Health Care – NOT EXACTLY, your plan leaves us all to pay for the 15,000,000 who don’t have to buy it.

*My uncle liberated Auschwitz concentration camp – NOT EXACTLY, your mother had no brothers and the Russan army did the liberating.

And the list goes on.

Comment by Mahatma X | 2008-06-05 20:47:06

Better consult snopes.com, cochis. This one’s another urban legend.

 
 
 
 
 

Comment by DrMK | 2008-06-05 17:59:27

and the funniest thing that all this talk about a tape of mo, i’ll bet there is a tape of bo in trinity nodding his head in approval of irreverent wrong’s racist anti-american bs. now THAT would be the real october surprise if you ask me. then he’d lose all 57 states, by a landslide.

 

Comment by Citizen Sane | 2008-06-05 20:15:29

No offense, but Obama doesn’t need your strategy to get him through this rumor. He’s done remarkably well (beat out the inevitable candidate Hillary)without advice from the sidelines. He’s doing well and will continue to do so right up until his inauguration.

 

Comment by Gary | 2008-06-06 12:55:43

Idiot. He called it “dirt and lies.” Isn’t a lie something that’s not true?

 
 

Comment by Brian Fearn | 2008-06-05 17:06:47

Is there any chance at all that some Democrats will be able to get their hands on a copy of this video before the convention and turn things around?

I hope so…

Comment by justinb | 2008-06-05 21:01:07

If the video existed, maybe. Because it doesn’t, probably not.

 
 

Comment by oblahma | 2008-06-05 17:07:10

The failure of the Hillary campaign to get their hands on the Wright tapes prior to Super Tuesday did not mean they never existed. They did, and they were devastating. When finally released, it was by a Republican who sought maximum damage upon Obama, goading Hillary to lead the charge. I think those holding the tapes are right to keep their powder dry for now.

 

Comment by Scott Templeton | 2008-06-05 17:08:00

Obama is simply Astroturfing

Notice no um’s er’s ah’s in his words, rehearsed speech visa vie Axelrod! – Mel

————–
That’s not what astroturfing means Mel. Is everyone on this site completely retarded? Tools.

Comment by Tom | 2008-06-05 17:18:32

Are you alwsys this asinine or only once in a while?

 

Comment by Mel | 2008-06-05 17:20:31

Fuck head I know what Astroturfing is and I added the er’s and uh’s so shut your fucking mouth asshole and go back into your Bunker over there in Palestine!

 

Comment by Lucinda | 2008-06-05 18:52:24

That’s not what astroturfing means Mel. Is everyone on this site completely retarded? Tools.

At least half the comments that I’ve read so far are yours, so which category do you fall into—retarded or tool? I vote for tool, because retarded people don’t deserve to be lumped in with you.

 
 

Comment by Mel | 2008-06-05 17:10:36

Why does Axelrod have the trolls out constantly googling for anything on the tapes for and then the droves come running out minutes after something is said about the tape!

Same style as caucus manipulation, with trolls who can’t read, ignorant, but still earnign a buck!

So trolls, have fun earning your Obama pay check, but cash them fast, Fitzgerald isn’t one to just sit around, so your checks might be worthless if you don’t bet them certified and cashed quick!

Comment by catherine | 2008-06-05 17:16:09

Because they know the gig is up. They’re SCARED shitless! That’s why they’re always here.

When they’re not trying to bait us they’re trying to “make nice” hoping we’ll forget by Nov what vicious monsters they have been and what an unelectable POS Obama is.

 

Comment by hootnannie | 2008-06-05 17:46:03

I wonder if they actually get paid. I thought maybe they were just meeeeesssssssssmerizzzzzzzzzzed!

Comment by s. hall | 2008-06-05 19:02:25

hootnannie — it was on CNN these trolls have been recruited by Obama from Palestine. Nice we have a nominee pays trolls from Palestine to come in here to annoy us.

 
 
 

Comment by curious george | 2008-06-05 17:11:13

So where is the tape? Let me guess, releasing tomorrow morning?

Comment by Steve | 2008-06-06 02:24:00

The tape will be released a week or two before the election. Why would Republicans use it now? It’s called an “October Surprise” because it happens, *drumroll*, in freakin’ October.

 
 

Comment by Scott Templeton | 2008-06-05 17:12:29

Obama is simply Astroturfing

Notice no um’s er’s ah’s in his words, rehearsed speech visa vie Axelrod! – Mel

————–
That’s not what astroturfing means Mel:
Astroturfing in American English is a neologism for formal public relations campaigns in politics and advertising which seek to create the impression of being spontaneous, grassroots behavior, hence the reference to the artificial grass AstroTurf.

Also you both misspelled and misused VIS-A-VIS:
1. Face to face with; opposite to.
2. Compared with.
3. In relation to.

Is everyone on this site completely retarded? Tools.

Comment by ulahane | 2008-06-05 17:16:02

Only the Obamabots!

Comment by joeysky | 2008-06-05 18:13:33

do they have to end every comments with “tools”? fucking boring.

Comment by claribel borden | 2008-06-05 19:24:31

Give it a couple of days, someone will write something new, and he’ll steal it, in an attempt to “use his enemies tactics against him.”

Also, he really wants to be cool, and respected.

The Oakland Call Center for Indian Nationals isn’t known to be staffed by the best and the brightest India has to offer.

 
 
 

Comment by Mel | 2008-06-05 17:23:47

Rather be a tool than be like you french kissing Obama’s ass!

And I know at night I don’t have to put up black out shades and be ready to run into a bunker like you pathetics over there in Palestine do!

 

Comment by Karma | 2008-06-05 17:37:42

First thing. If you think people here are retards, then why are you the jerk standing there insulting retards?

Second. Please explain how Mel used it wrong if everyone understands that two of your examples could be used to define what Mel meant?

Rehearsed speech ‘face to face’ with Axelrod.

or

Rehearsed speech ‘in relation to’/with Axelrod.

Both Mel’s meaning and those definitions match his use of vis-a-vis. So, where did he use it wrong?

http://dictionary.die.net/vis-a-vis

Comment by Northwest rain | 2008-06-05 18:46:53

Oh go to hell — you Obamabots!

You idiots are a bunch of frantic losers!

The tape will come out when it can do the MOST damage to snObama and not before.

Thanks for letting us know that you all KNOW that snObama is a criminal who will be joining Rezko shortly. snObama is far enough up the Pay to Play food chain that there’s probably no one he can squeal on to get his sentence reduced.

Which terrorist training school did you attend?

Comment by Mahatma X | 2008-06-05 20:49:15

The Great Pumpkin will appear when he finds a sincere pumpkin patch. Believe.

 
 
 

Comment by JR | 2008-06-05 19:07:47

Why do you keep repeating that line? Do you think it will come true if you keep wishing for it?

 

Comment by red_sleeves | 2008-06-05 19:15:24

You support Obama, yet you seem unmindful that your constant use of the adjective ‘retarded’ as an abuse against those with whom you disagree will risk upsetting the greater portion of the demographic supporting his candidacy.

 

Comment by Peter | 2008-06-05 19:21:44

That was a very well articulated definition…. seeks to create an impression….

In plain English… what Axelrod and his corp do is hire people (students) for little money and have them pretend to support a client (candidate).

You mean the Obama campaign is all about lying and deceiving people? Say it ain’t so.

Part two of Axelrod’s strategy is to race-bait. Axelrod is particularly fond of using Fr. Pfleger and his ilk.

Axelrod does it for his clients, he did it for Deval Patrick, he’s doing his bamboozle and race-bait schtick for Obama and certain people are lapping it up.

Here’s your candidates long term buddy in action:

http://arcchicago.blogspot.com/2008/03/childrens-museum-battle-moves-to-plan.html

Comment by Five Thirty | 2008-06-05 20:41:37

In plain English… what Axelrod and his corp do is hire people (students) for little money and have them pretend to support a client (candidate).
Is that like what the Meyer Associates were hired to do for the Obama Campaign?

 
 
 

Comment by tootsky | 2008-06-05 17:12:40

Its ludricous to consider the use of “whitey” to be racist.

Comment by Amalia | 2008-06-05 23:09:40

oh, and now the “whitey is not racist” defense. the multiple
defenses against the tape from the Obama camp …..
amazing. fear. if it did not exist, why worry about
whether whitey is a racist term?

 

Comment by dpvegas | 2008-06-06 06:59:25

A racist is someone who discriminates against another person based on gender, skin color, etc., and who has the power to negatively affect that person’s life, i.e. not hiring someone for a job, but hiring someone else with lesser qualifications just because they’re the “right” color. Bill Cosby did that on his show, which he proudly proclaimed in an interview.

Just because you can, doesn’t mean you should. And B.O. is running for what?

 
 

Comment by MichelleK | 2008-06-05 17:13:56

I think this article has pretty much debunked Larry Johnson’s smear job:

http://www.reason.com/blog/show/126883.html

There is no tape of what you are claiming, there never was, Bill Clinton spoke at the same event. No story just a smear. By the way Larry we are still waiting on Rove’s indictment that you claimed was ‘imminent’ according to your multiple sources. You lied then you lied now, it is getting embarrassing.

Comment by claribel borden | 2008-06-05 19:44:20

Um, I would expect the true Bush Cheney Rove Obama, et al corruption scandal to take years, and years in regard to prosecution. IL is only the start.

And remember, Conrad Black was convicted, also, and he relates back to all of this, too, in regard to Chicago.

It’s only just begun, but the country doesn’t get better, doesnt really SURVIVE, until this garbage is OUT of politics.

Like Teapot Dome, I would think.

 

Comment by Gloria | 2008-06-05 21:35:10

No, Bill Clinton DID NOT speak at the same event…He was at the conference on the last day and did not appear with Michelle Obama. Check out my blog post which links up to the official agenda of the conference, which I managed to find….

“A Party Held HOSTAGE: Michele Obama Wasn’t Alone in Her Hostility at the Rainbow/PUSH Conference in 2004–Protests Against Jesse Jackson, Threats Against Democrats/Kerry By Ministers in an Eerie Preview of the Rev. Wright Episode”

http://tinyurl.com/4jealx

You will find out about another minister and how the moves were on against the Democratic Party back in 2004…

Comment by Spambalaya | 2008-06-06 17:06:00

“A Party Held HOSTAGE: Michele Obama Wasn’t Alone in Her Hostility at the Rainbow/PUSH Conference in 2004″

So how could Michelle rant at a 2004 event about Katrina (which didn’t occur until 2005) and Jena (2006)? Personality, I think having a First Lady with that kind of amazing ability to predict future events would be an awesone asset.

Man, and I thought the 9/11 Truthers were an off-the-deep-end bunch…

 
 

Comment by Steve | 2008-06-06 02:45:35

You realize that Rove made a deal, right? The fact that he gave Fitz information isn’t exactly secret.

 
 

Comment by cdog | 2008-06-05 17:15:53

Larry,
Why not post the full story:

Asked whether he knew it not to be true, Obama said he had answered the question.

“Frankly, my hope is people don’t play this game,” Obama said. “It is a destructive aspect of our politics. Simply because something appears in an e-mail, that should lend it no more credence than if you heard it on the corner. Presumably the job of the press is to not to go around and spread scurrilous rumors like this until there is actually anything, an iota, of substance or evidence that would substantiate it.”
———————–

Why don’t you reach back up your ass and see what your “sources” have to say about the fact that you’re a dishonest hack and a jerkoff.

Comment by artist | 2008-06-05 17:18:20

Where is the denial that the tape exists?

 

Comment by thenana1 | 2008-06-05 17:38:02

Oh my, it’s that “OLD E-MAIL” trick again, christ almighty Barack Hussein Obama, get a friggin life your excuses are always the same.

And I KNOW where the nTAPE is so fuc* off!

Comment by MichelleK | 2008-06-05 19:48:35

The tape does not exist and never did. Larry promised it would be out by now, lies.

Comment by Steve | 2008-06-06 02:54:21

Lies is right. Larry never promised it would be out. Larry said he’d never even seen the tape. Larry said he’d only heard the tape existed. That’s the truth. The only one lying here is you – and you know it. I’m going to laugh and laugh when your pathetic fraud of a candidate is blown out of the water.

 
 
 

Comment by Nadabama | 2008-06-05 17:58:06

NObama code to the press:

Please leave me alone! Do not ask me questions!

Just be patient, give me some time, don’t be trying to tighten up the slack you have always given me!

Just wait for the speech!

Comment by Lucinda | 2008-06-05 19:01:38

Can I please just eat my waffle?

 
 
 

Comment by Kevin | 2008-06-05 17:17:10

I had never heard of Larry Johnson before I stumbled on to this non-story, and hopefully I’ll never hear from you again – unless you’re a named party in a libel suit. The reason Obama is not denying the tape exists, is that he is a man of principle who refuses to dignify baseless accusations with a response. The reason you cannot understand his position is that you are not a man of principle, but rather a hack psuedo-journalist with no integrity. The burden of proof is on those making the accusations here – at least that’s how it works in America. Get a life. Scott Templeton is right: you ARE a tool.

Comment by Tom | 2008-06-05 17:22:02

Obama is a politician who will do anything and say anything to get elected. He has no principles. The only principle is naked ambition and pursuit of power by any means necessary.

Unfortunately, this is all going to come crashing down.

 

Comment by Bella | 2008-06-05 17:27:01

 

Comment by american sawbuck | 2008-06-05 17:27:23

nobody “stumbles”
onto this site trollie…go away now go away

 

Comment by Jay | 2008-06-05 18:07:33

men of principles do not get into real estate deals with people (Reszko)who is/was under investigation. There were over 100 stories reported by Chicago newspapers of Reszko’s improprieties before Obambi gets into this very questionable real estate deal… Oh yeah.. “Reszko is not the man I knew”

 

Comment by AnninCa | 2008-06-05 18:31:49

Go back to Huffpo and check out the number of stories she ran that were pure rumor and ugly ones against Hillary.

Speak up there.

If you’re honest, then you’ll do that.

I’m guessing not.

Comment by eric | 2008-06-05 19:00:49

That’s really stupid if Huffpo or anysite is running pure rumor or speculation about any candidate, and I’m including this one.

There’s plenty of issues to discuss with fact, let’s stop holind our breath for scandal and focus on real issues.

Comment by JR | 2008-06-05 19:22:57

No ifs. Huffpost has run rumors against Hillary. Nobody can complain over there because comments must be approved by them first. What makes you think they’d allow themselves to be called out on their lies on their own website?

 
 
 

Comment by Nellie | 2008-06-05 18:32:11

Kevin

Even with a teleprompter Obama would stutter over the word “Principles”.

The Obama scumbag has less PINCIPLE than the sewer rats in NYC

 

Comment by Northwest rain | 2008-06-05 18:53:38

Oh thanks for the laugh — so no snObama is a man of principle?

I was at one the the caucuses where his trained goons took over with a bush load of ringers especially brought in to help their messiah.

snObama was the one who lied about NAFTA to the voters of Ohio.

In fact there is a LONG LONG list of all of snObama lies.

You are so full of shit — your mother needs to change your diapers.

 

Comment by Peter | 2008-06-05 19:30:35

Get a life …. yet here you are.

Leave Obama allooooooooone!

 
 

Comment by k in the northwest | 2008-06-05 17:17:44

Obama just doesn’t answer questions…
Obama just doesn’t answer questions straightly.
Obama just doesn’t answer questions the same way twice.
Obama just doesn’t answer questions the same way twice, especially in regards to his policies.

 

Comment by Judy | 2008-06-05 17:19:37

http://www.sj-r.com/news

Springfield, Illinois political news – interesting blogs.

Think Illinois likes Obama, think again.

Comment by educatedwhitewoman | 2008-06-05 22:31:09

Thanks for the link Judy. From one of the folks in BO’s home state commenting on Rezko:

ritamary6/5/2008 6:38:47 PMObama does not know Rezko???? What are you smoking? Rezko raised $250,000 for Obama’s campaigns and helped him buy a house and you think Obama doesn’t know him?I wish perfect strangers would be that nice to me. According to information from an FBI informant that came out in Rezko’s trial, Obama used to visit Rezko at his office everyday. Obama recommended Rezko’s construction company for millions of dollars in taxpayer money to rehab some buildings on the South Side. Those buildings are now in foreclosure. You can see the letter Obama wrote recommending Rezko in the Chicago Sun-Times online archives.

 
 

Comment by american sawbuck | 2008-06-05 17:22:20

say it ain’t so O

 

Comment by neuromancer | 2008-06-05 17:22:54

I have to agree with johnson here; if the statements did not happen, why hasn’t Obama vehemently denied them? Why equivocate, unless that kind of weasily behavior is just so second nature?

Plus, let’s say you couldhave downloaded it from the Trinity web site up until March. Why would anyone who doesn’t like Obama bother to download it unless they were really digging for dirt. If an Obama hater did have it, why would they leak it now when it helps primarily (no pun intended) Hillary, who is a much more dangerous opponent to McCain? Their best play is obviously to let the dems continue to maul each other and do as much dammage before Obama, who can’t win in November tape or no tape, eventually steals the nomination. Then, release the thing in October, after the Nuanced One has told 15 different lies about it.

Likewise, why would someone who likes Obama, and would be inclined to download or buy it, disclose it now that the heat is on? Their best play is obviously to sit on it and deny or explain it away. Sorry guys, but Obama is shooting himself in the foot over this unnecessarily. If it is untrue, deny it like a man, and not a Bill Clinton, “I did not have sexual relations with that woman,” denial. He needs to call them out and MAKE an issue out of it, or it is going to haunt him the rest of the campaign. And I, for one, couldn’t be happier.

Comment by wtf | 2008-06-05 18:00:35

Typical Larry-Johnson-Bot

Comment by claribel borden | 2008-06-05 19:57:19

Yes, I’ve heard the Chinese have been in search of a typical ” Larry Johnson -bot” since 1955.

They keep getting this “Tammy Wynette” type of man, instead, one formerly affiliated with the US army.

So they set him up in a Washington think tank.

 
 

Comment by DrMK | 2008-06-05 18:07:33

another funny thing jsut hit me, the general public has not even heard about “cousin odinga”, I’m sure that will go over well in the fall.

Comment by Jones | 2008-06-05 18:08:49

I see a fellow Kenyan is in our midst! Habari?

 

Comment by ProudWhitey | 2008-06-05 18:26:16

Interesting what the internet has done to our political discourse. Wish it was around when Thomas Jefferson ran for president.

 

Comment by Northwest rain | 2008-06-05 19:19:12

When I tell people about snObama’s cousin — the one who ordered the slaughter of humans– they are shocked!

There is so much damaging information on snObama that the GOP won’t have to manufacture any dirt on snObama.

The blood shed in Kenya — yep snObama’s toe sucking “advisor” Dick-head Morris was there — ah — “helping”.

This is the “principled” snObama. He is a WORLD class liar– in fact he might even out do GWB in the lying department.

 

Comment by s. hall | 2008-06-05 19:56:41

dr. MK Cousin Odinga is coming to visit in July. He is now part of the Kenyan Govt. While trying to take down the Kenyan President Odinga lopped off alot of heads until the Kenyan President made him part of the Govt. It runs in the family — they will do anything for power.

 
 

Comment by Five Thirty | 2008-06-05 20:55:57

Yeah and with Bill Clinton, it really *was* nobody’s business.

 
 

Comment by paul_lukasiak | 2008-06-05 17:23:33

good lord, its 1988 and Gary Hart all over again..

Obama “If somebody has evidence that myself or Michelle or anybody has said something inappropriate, let them do it.”

Hart 1988: “Follow me around. I don’t care. I’m serious. If anybody wants to put a tail on me, go ahead. They’ll be very bored.”

 

Comment by Bella | 2008-06-05 17:25:21

How many uuuuuuhhhhhs and aaaaaaaaaaands did he give during this non-denial.

 

Comment by anne white | 2008-06-05 17:27:22

If you don’t deny it then is probably true. The tape exhists and is the Ocotber surprise. Another looser for the democrats, I am not surprised.
The Obama’s are racists.

Comment by iam0nly1 | 2008-06-05 18:59:00

But we know from Nafta-gate, Rezko, Questionnaire/Gun Control-gate that if Obama denies it, it’s probably still true.

 

Comment by MichelleK | 2008-06-05 19:51:21

anne white I hear there is a tape of you having sexual relations with a dog, when did you stop having sex with your dog?

Comment by claribel borden | 2008-06-05 20:04:02

I dont know, did you ask Obama the same question, in regard to his wife?

 
 
 

Comment by draeinoregon | 2008-06-05 17:28:24

Larry,

God, it’s like now they can’t spew at Hillary you are the new target.

Anyone with a brain realizes that it would serve no repug purpose to release the tape now. Why help Hillary and seal their fate?

How you put up with all this abuse, how Hillary puts up with it, I’ll never know. They hear what they want to hear, and twist what they want to twist. It is like the twilight zone. I really feel like that’s where we are headed.

Persona;;y I thank you from the bottom of my heart for giving us info as you get it. It shows great strength of character to stick your neck out and speak truth.

I salute you sir!!!

Comment by Vnd | 2008-06-05 17:51:58

I second that!

Comment by DrMK | 2008-06-05 18:10:11

i third that larry! what they said.

 
 
 

Comment by has anyone considered | 2008-06-05 17:29:44

Has anyone considered that he actually answered the question truthfully? Maybe BO & MO don’t think that kind of talk is inappropriate. A bit of taqqiya. He can say it with conviction, while expecting most to not get the true meaning.

The church he was/is a member of for 20 years has embraced Black Liberation Theology. Read about it people. Start here:
http://imspeakingtruth.wordpress.com/2008/04/29/a-different-gospel-part-9-the-black-value-system-vs-the-bible/

But don’t stop there.

Comment by claribel borden | 2008-06-05 20:06:59

Obama takes money from people who support terrorism.

Let’s start with Farrakhan, and the NOI.

It would appear to be very valid, now wouldn’t it, given Farrakhan’s POV?

I think maybe Axelrod needs something better than a bunch of kids to troll, don’t you?

Or old guys who don’t really get.it.

 
 

Comment by mary | 2008-06-05 17:32:34

key word “inappropriate”…he obviously does not think it is…why would it be…it was “why’d he” sure it was!!! Ha!
;-)

 

Comment by Gigi | 2008-06-05 17:33:17

 

Comment by rjj | 2008-06-05 17:33:26

There is a lot of interest in that there nontape or nonDVD that would be nothing if it were to exist.

These people are spending a lot of time in the subjunctive.

 

Comment by Moonbat Rising | 2008-06-05 17:33:34

Wingnut Logic

Reporter: Mr. Obama, would you like to comment about the Reptilian Overlords now running the Democratic Party and the existence of a tape that proves your wife is an alien space zombie?

Obama: Fuck off you loon.

Wingnuts: Yay. We have proof – He didn’t deny it!

Comment by NY still loves Hillary | 2008-06-05 18:18:13

Damn. I missed another Keith Olberman interview? What time was it on? Did anyone Tivo it?

 
 

Comment by Adam | 2008-06-05 17:34:21

Not a denial? Are you kidding me? You’re telling me that underneath all that bias, you don’t even have an ounce of logic?

Comment by claribel borden | 2008-06-05 20:11:18

Given Obama’s association with Farrakhan, and the NOI, it would stand to investigate Michelle, given her prior comments. And given Rezko and Obama’s relationship, and Rezko’s ties, NOT investigating BOTH Obama’s would be irresponsible.

You have your head up your ass if you think otherwise.

Comment by Adam | 2008-06-05 20:54:39

We’re talking about this tape. You can try and throw all the muck at Obama that you want–the same way the Republicans have been doing to Hillary for years, but you’re still evading what I said. What I said was basically amounts to “You’d have to be lying to yourself if you believe that this isn’t a denial.”

 
 
 

Comment by Ed | 2008-06-05 17:36:24

There is no tape, you think the wife of a man running for Senate would have a racist rant in front of a room full of strangers? You’re a tool Johnson, I’m giving 100 dollars to Obama’s general election campaign for the next 23 days or until you produce your non-existent tape, whichever comes first. Tool.
*****************
Wow, now that’s an intelligent post. Knock yourself out donating to a democrat’s campaign while you’re waiting for this tape to be released. I’m certain the threat of bankrupting yourself is REALLY going put the squeeze on the REPUBLICANS who say they have the tape. Larry never said he had a copy!

Maybe before you spend your money on the Obama campaign, you should invest in reading and English classes. You apparently like to use run-on sentences.

 

Comment by Nancy H. Armstrong | 2008-06-05 17:37:05

So how do we get a subpeona? And what do we use as a reason for it!

 

Pingback by Barack Punts on Denial of Michelle Tape | The Whitey Video | 2008-06-05 17:40:30

[...] Read the full story here… [...]

 

Comment by MarkL | 2008-06-05 17:43:16

why does the TV station refuse to provide the tape, assuming they have it?
Is there something about the job of the media they don’t understand?

Comment by spiro | 2008-06-05 18:23:48

As somebody who’s worked in a few TV newsrooms around the country, they almost never provide video to anyone without a subpoena. One exception might be national security. I know that within minutes of my broadcast of interviews with eyewitnesses at the scene of the Reagan assasination attempt, two Secret Service agents came to the TV station and asked for the tape. The station gladly gave them a copy without a subpoena.

One other note on this, TV stations mostly archive what video has been broadcast. The out-takes are rarely kept.

 

Comment by Obama_is_Weak | 2008-06-05 19:14:57

Some should ask Obama to please ask ABC 7 for the tape to show there is nothing there. Why a subpoena? Is the video “confidential” ? What are they protecting? It makes NO sense ABC 7 would say that. If there is nothing why not simply saying;

(a) Ms Obama never spoke; there is no speech by her there.

Or

(b) we don’t have any recordings of the event?

And if Ms Obama did speak, then

(c) why not release the tape so that this is settled once and for all?

ABC 7 reaction makes NO sense whatsoever.

Comment by Kelly | 2008-06-05 21:56:00

http://cannonfire.blogspot.com/

Finally, a representative of ABC News 7 in Chicago got back to me. Here is the official reply:

ABC 7’s Karen Jordan and Cheryl Burton emceed the 2004 Rainbow-Push Women’s Luncheon. Other employees of ABC 7 attended along with hundreds of Chicago area civic, professional and media representatives. No one recalls Michelle Obama speaking at this luncheon and our archived video does not show Michelle Obama.

 
 
 

Comment by citizenjane | 2008-06-05 17:44:08

So many trolls—so little time. Please go somewhere else. You haven’t understood a word you’ve read, and I don’t think it’s going to happen anytime soon. Go to obambi.com and enjoy yourselves.

 

Comment by Former CIA Collegue | 2008-06-05 17:44:09

Absolutely pitiful. After promising to come up with a video and failing to do so, you still insist on pursuing a non story. A word of caution for you, people with glass houses should never throw stones. Who knows what could be in Larry Johnson’s skeleton closet.

Comment by PadrePio | 2008-06-05 18:55:05

OK pin head when did Mr. Johnson say he had the tape, had seen the tape, or that he was going to release the tape? OBAMABOTS FOR THE LAST TIME ANSWER THESE F@#$KING QUESTIONS. On which day and in which thread did Mr. Johnson say anything about this tape other that it exists according to sources he trusts. All Obamabots go f@#$k yourselves I personally am tired of having to correct you and no there are not 58 states asshats.

 

Comment by Obama_is_Weak | 2008-06-05 19:19:40

If you are a former CIA Colleague that explains the mess we are in the world. For your reading and comprehension and your critical thinking abilities are
miserably lacking.

Comment by claribel borden | 2008-06-05 20:19:13

Yes, but big oil is failing, and that is GOOD.

They support Obama, and Bush.

HTH

 
 
 

Comment by pm317 | 2008-06-05 17:44:43

Sure, they WILL give him the evidence he wants, at the most opportune moment.

 

Comment by gil | 2008-06-05 17:46:42

I hope all this hate will keep you warm once Obama puts you in the muslim/marxist/communist/fascist/hippie/utopian re-education camps you paranoid tools.

 

Comment by Uppity Woman | 2008-06-05 17:47:46

Hahaha Gotta love Obama’s Non-answers.

 

Comment by Shane | 2008-06-05 17:48:14

One more time, if I understand correctly- Michelle Obama said something very bad somewhere in front of a group of people, and while no one has come forward to testify that they indeed heard whatever the bad thing may be, there is apparently one lone tape or DVD that proves it and is being held in some underground GOP bunker. Right? Have I misunderstood any part of this scoop?

Comment by Citizen Rat | 2008-06-05 18:33:21

Yes-you missed the parts where this website kept promising the tape would come up tomorrow and then tomorrow and then finall in the fall.

You also missed the part where Larry said he hadn’t seen the tape, talked to anyone who had seen the tape, but had talked to people who had talked to people who had talked to people who had seen the tape.

I bet I could find someone who has talked to people who has talked to people who has talked to people who has seen a tape of Larry Johnson fucking a German Shepherd.

What a disgusting racist.

Comment by *== President & Commander-in-Chief Hillary Clinton **== | 2008-06-05 18:39:38

Yes-you missed the parts where this website kept promising the tape would come up tomorrow and then tomorrow and then finall in the fall.

Nothing was ever promised. Information was reported as it was received.

You also missed the part where Larry said he hadn’t seen the tape, talked to anyone who had seen the tape, but had talked to people who had talked to people who had talked to people who had seen the tape.

That’s not true either. You have one too many levels. he talked to sources he trusts unknown to each other who knew people who saw the video.

I bet I could find someone who has talked to people who has talked to people who has talked to people who has seen a tape of Larry Johnson fucking a German Shepherd.

This should get you banned from this blog and reported to your ISP. But that’s not my call. They will probably let you continue to make a fool of yourself.

What a disgusting racist.

Falsly accusing Larry Johnson of being a racist makes you the racist.

 
 
 

Comment by sumuchtusay | 2008-06-05 17:48:55

Hello Troll Dolls,

I’m studying you. Do you have long green hair that grows down to your toes? Have you started wearing clothes yet? Is your genitalia ambiguous?

If you are oh-so-sure that your friend didn’t make a boo-boo and get caught saying oh-so-divisive racist remarks on a video-tape, why are you even wasting your precious troll-doll-time at our silly website?

You ladies doth protest too much…what are you hiding from yourselves? You’re feeling insecure? Get used to it troll dolls. Your man is transferring all the anxiety down to you. Fret, fret, fret: When will he get caught? Yes, “when”, no more “ifs”.

Sleep well, visit often. We only want to help.

Comment by gerard nedich | 2008-06-05 17:54:24

i’ll tell you why they are wasting their time…

because instead of talking about Obama looking so presidential when he steals votes or that he is connected to the sleaziest political machine this country has ever known you morons are talking about “whitey”

You are being manipulated…

I normally wouldn’;t give a fuck but i’m kinda upset that the jerk who is stealing votes in a race for the white house might actually get away with it if you can give him enough reasons to use you as an example that he is the victim in all this…

so, perhaps its time all of you idiots grew up…

fucks sake…

 
 

Comment by Faustina | 2008-06-05 17:49:40

Remember when Obama was asked about the NAFTA business? He made an outright denial…at first until someone came up with the goods.

Later he was asked whether he ever heard Rev Wright make racist comments in his sermons. He made an outright denial…until it was convenient for him to acknowledge hearing those rants in his awe-inspiring Checkers speech.

When asked about his wife’s racist rant, he dances around the question like a virtuoso. Yes, this fella is a fast learner.

If the tape exists, he and his team are going to have a lot of explaining to do. Phase One, make the questioner look like a degenerate for asking the question.

Phase two, after the tape appears, probably in the fall if the Democrats are stupid enough to actually nominate him, will probably involve a counterattack on McCain of some kind. McCain is not a saint and has a few uncomely episodes in his past, so I’m sure they’re working on it. And they can’t say no one has given them fair warning.

And maybe, just maybe, voters will recognize all of Obama’s many other negatives well before the election and it won’t be necessary to bring out this ugly incident at all.

 

Comment by J.D. Rhoades | 2008-06-05 17:50:34

It is almost sad at this point

It’s been hilarious for a while.

 

Comment by Shane | 2008-06-05 17:51:27

Also, has anyone compared you guys to 9/11 truthers yet? Not that I’m going to, of course, because that would be unfounded.

 

Comment by jessie | 2008-06-05 17:52:13

OBAMA/MARXIST – BLACK LIBERATION THEOLOGY

One of the pillars of Obama’s home church, Trinity United Church of Christ, is “economic parity.” On the website, Trinity claims that God is not pleased with “America’s economic mal-distribution.” Among all of controversial comments by Jeremiah Wright, the idea of massive wealth redistribution is the most alarming. The code language “economic parity” and references to “mal-distribution” is nothing more than channeling the twisted economic views of Karl Marx. Black Liberation theologians have explicitly stated a preference for Marxism as an ethical framework for the black church because Marxist thought is predicated on a system of oppressor class (whites) versus victim class (blacks).

Black Liberation theologians James Cone and Cornel West have worked diligently to embed Marxist thought into the black church since the 1970s. For Cone, Marxism best addressed remedies to the condition of blacks as victims of white oppression. In For My People, Cone explains that “the Christian faith does not possess in its nature the means for analyzing the structure of capitalism. Marxism as a tool of social analysis can disclose the gap between appearance and reality, and thereby help Christians to see how things really are.”

Now, tell me OBAMA/MARXIST did not absorb this crap after 20 years of sitting in the pews, having Wright as his mentor and donating more money to the church than he EVER gave to Katrina victims.

NO OBAMA/MARXIST
MCCAIN 2008
I AM AMERICAN FIRST

Comment by jessie | 2008-06-05 17:53:41

Oh, yeah, so Michelle Obama/Marxist says you gotta give us a piece of your pie.

NO OBAMA/MARXIST
MCCAIN 2008
I AM AMERICAN FIRST

Comment by Herschel Greenspan | 2008-06-05 18:16:53

No, you are a fool first.

 
 
 

Comment by DEVILSPEAK | 2008-06-05 17:52:15

listen trolls, obama is as dirty as they come…keep your focus on the whitey tape, because that way you will be distracted when obama goes down…….are you living on an island ? the chicago slime machine is getting a great big douche…..go ask obama if he is worried that rezko and “others” will sing some tunes anytime soon….and you are worried about where the whitey tape is ? what dumbass trolls.

Comment by Five Thirty | 2008-06-05 21:12:36

This tape might be more damning that the Rezko thing. Remember the Valerie Plame incident? Fitzgerald had subpoena power right into the White House Iraq Group, or whatever it was called, and had to stop because *one* witness was misleading? I was always a little dubious about that. But then of course I remember Iran-Contra.

 
 

Comment by catherine | 2008-06-05 17:53:06

Larry we know you’re telling the truth. These illiterate trolls are having meltdowns and obsessively stalking this site because they too KNOW Obama is going down and all the hopeychangey wishful thinking is’nt going stop the tape from appearing.

I only hope that tape makes it to the public before August…or Rezko starts singing very soon.

 

Comment by John Rhodes | 2008-06-05 17:53:49

Hey Larry, still on Hillary’s payroll? Or are you waiting for your last check tomorrow?

Comment by NY still loves Hillary | 2008-06-05 18:33:33

You seem to think that’s an insult. Personally I’d be proud to be on Senator Clinton’s payroll, and I’d be proud to see Larry Johnson on it as well.

Seriously, other than amusing us and serving as a game to see who can come up with the best troll putdown, is there an actual purpose to you being here? Larry has proven that try as you might he will not allow you to crash his servers, and it must be obvious to even a troll like you that you’re not going to convert anyone here, so what is your point? You can’t keep up with us, and we’ve all started to think troll bashing is a pretty amusing sport. So save yourself the grief and go back to your porn sites. We really don’t give a rat’s ass what you have to say. Oh, and Have a nice day! :)

 
 

Comment by Hank Roth | 2008-06-05 17:53:50

Larry: Don’t you have access to a frequency spectrum analysis machine? It is easy enough to verify. Get some of your buddies over at the CIA to check it out.

And while you are at it, doesn’t anyone you know have a psychological stress analyzer which we can use to look at what Obama says?

Hank Roth
http://pnews.org/

 

Comment by Hillary or Bust | 2008-06-05 17:54:35

I made an observation of the level of conversation over at Obama’s website…

http://hillaryorbust.blogspot.com/2008/06/barack-obamas-supporters-omg.html

OMG!!!

 

Comment by helen | 2008-06-05 17:56:45

Giuliani has the tape!

His team found it and ABC-7 was at the meeting AND recorded it!
http://www.theobamafile.com/ObamaLatest.htm

That is an absolute fact!

The only question is who will be the highest bidder?

I will never vote for this marxist scum!

Comment by james | 2008-06-05 18:12:27

helen — will you vote for a man who calls his wife a cunt? in front of reporters, even?? “WHY’D HE (whitey) do that??!” . . . . still waiting for the tape. good luck with that.

Comment by IndayHill | 2008-06-05 18:48:19

James, and will you vote for a guy who flipped off a distinguished lady and brushed his shoulders off the dusts while grinning and using the name of his decent, dignified opponent, Senator Clinton?
Will you vote Obama to be the Commander-in-chief of the USA, when he does NOT EVEN KNOW the number of states? 57???? How intelligent!
We do not need the tape, Michelle’s arrogance is more than enough for us to vote McCain!The interior design of the White House will for sure CHANGE!!! Who can stop her?? OBAMA??? ARE YOU KIDDING??? HE IS A HENPECKED ONE, IMO.”Smelly breath & socks” YUCK!!

 
 
 

Comment by John McCain | 2008-06-05 17:58:00

We need to support this guy. Obama is going down….

Comment by *== President & Commander-in-Chief Hillary Clinton **== | 2008-06-05 18:45:55

Hillary will be the nominee. There’s plenty of time until the convention.

Comment by MichelleK | 2008-06-05 19:54:07

 
 
 

Comment by vinnie | 2008-06-05 17:58:08

heeeee heeeeeee, true or not, I like to see that the obamabots are hurting themselves defending a tape that does not exist in their minds. C’mon…y’all know wifey is capable of saying these things…she is an angry and mean woman, period.

 

Comment by chklaver | 2008-06-05 18:00:11

What’s interesting to me are these claims he makes about dirt and lies over the internet:

“There is dirt and lies that are circulated in emails and they pump them out long enough until finally you, a mainstream reporter, asks me about it,…”

By somehow calling them “emails” he is completely downplaying the heavy the traffic being discussed over the web — emails sound like “urban legends” where if its on “the web” than it could have some truth to it. He is playing to people’s familiarity (or lack of it) with computers. Got to admit, pretty smooth. And they though slick willy was g

But to me here’s the slip-up — why would you say “story” which could have a nugget of truth instead of “rumour” or “lie”?

Because he know s there is a nugget of truth to this!

 

Comment by Chuck | 2008-06-05 18:02:48

Either produce the fucking video or shut the fuck up, asshole.

Comment by Peter | 2008-06-05 20:21:48

Anticipation is getting to you too! Isn’t it great? I wonder what else is out there? Pop the popcorn. This is going to get good.

Oh? that wasn’t anticipation? Well, shouldn’t you be out selling bumper stickers and making phone calls. Have you maxed out on donating to his GE fund yet?

Stop whi-hi-hi-hiniiiiiiinnnnnggg. sniff.

 
 

Comment by wtf | 2008-06-05 18:02:56

Larry Johnson is so fool of it. He can’t keep his story straight. Michelle Malkin and the National Review knows he’s fool of shit. He just needs to go choke himself. He’s a fake CIA agent with no credibility.

Comment by ulahane | 2008-06-05 18:05:46

That should be “full” not “fool.” I guess they need better English teachers in Gaza.

 

Comment by s. hall | 2008-06-05 20:11:17

wtf — did Obama run out of Palestinian trolls who spoke better English?

 
 

Comment by Bill | 2008-06-05 18:02:57

If “the tape” does not come out soon, one can ONLY assume that it is because some kind of video of Michelle Obama is in the process of being altered in some way. Special effects can do anything.

Michelle Obama clearly is not a racist. And she’d never be stupid enough to launch a “racist rant” in public.

Comment by Obama is scum | 2008-06-05 18:55:19

I never respond to trolls. but you people are so stupid, I’m making an exception.

choose one asshole: either Michelle is “not a racist” OR she wouldn’t do a “racist rant” in public.

You don’t get both–they negate each other. dumbshit.

Jesus. how stupid can any one person be?

 
 

Comment by Bob Doocey | 2008-06-05 18:04:36

Simply hillaryious(pardon the pun) to see all the supporters on either side to protect their candidate! Neither, Hillary, nor Mccain or Obama can save us! That is why I ask you to all join me in Jeff Peckermans petition to reach out to the extra terrestials. They are our only hope!

 

Comment by Nancy H. Armstrong | 2008-06-05 18:06:55

If he violently denies it is true. If he doesn’t answer it is true. As for me, I honestly think it exists. He hopes noone releases it. But released it will be! It will not cause people to vote out of guilt but run for the hills and vote for McCain. Why didn’t MO just call us whitey’s in her thesis which was bad enough?

I really wish we could see BO’s dissertation he wrote while at Harvard. I think that paper would crack the smoke amd mirrors he uses to convince people he is intelligent. I never thought for one minute that he writes his own speeches. If his speech writing is that good, why didn’t the written media quote his 2002 speech. Uninspiring I bet!

I am nobody much but when I got up and gave a speech on the “Broken Promises” of our government and the VA in 1999, I was quoted on TV and in the written media, The Wichita Eagle, Wichita, KS. When there are questions on the VA and veterans I am quoted most recently in March of this year about the Dole VA and additional behavioral health additions.

I am not inspired by Obama’s speeches. I wasn’t even inspired in 2004 when he spoke at the convention. The habit of looking from teleprompter to teleprompter annoys the heck out of me! It reminds me that he really doesn’t have any idea what he is talking about.

 

Comment by rjj | 2008-06-05 18:09:16

By way of SST

Obama shows his Change® + Unity® creds to AIPAC

A mere 12 hours after claiming the Democratic presidential nomination, Barack Obama appeared before the American Israel Public Affairs Committee yesterday — and changed himself into an Israel hard-liner.

He promised $30 billion in military assistance for Israel. He declared that the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps’ Quds Force has “rightly been labeled a terrorist organization.” He used terms such as “false prophets of extremism” and “corrupt” while discussing Palestinians. And he promised that “Jerusalem will remain the capital of Israel, and it must remain undivided.”

Comment by KG | 2008-06-05 18:15:37

What he stands for depends on where he is speaking. He is a chameleon, no less no more.

 
 

Comment by Bill | 2008-06-05 18:09:29

So, the question is: Will a fradulent video now be produced?

 

Comment by Colin | 2008-06-05 18:10:34

I heard there’s a tape of a gerbil having oral sex with Larry Johnson’s wife.

Larry — I’m waiting on your denial.

 

Comment by We Will Remember in November! | 2008-06-05 18:12:18

Larry,
I believe the tape exist. But until it appears you should just drop it. You are on record as one of the first to report it. When (not if), when it is shown you will get your due credit. Until then you should just lay off it.

I Will Remember in November.

 

Comment by wtf | 2008-06-05 18:13:28

people, he’s no hillary supporter. dont be bamboozled by this failure of a cia agent. he’s in the tank with the republicans. that’s what they do best – smear

 

Comment by Stephanie | 2008-06-05 18:14:37

Mr. Johnson, I saw you ask for a commenter’s phone number and say you could probably send him a copy of the video within the next couple of hours a few days ago. What happened?

Comment by Prodem | 2008-06-05 18:18:54

Steph
Did you ever get a response ?

Comment by Stephanie | 2008-06-05 18:26:35

Oh, I never emailed him. I don’t want to communicate directly with someone so obviously unstable. The hostility he shows towards commenters who disagree with him is enough for me. I just wonder how this isn’t a claim that he was going to produce the tape.

 
 

Comment by Kelly | 2008-06-05 21:47:36

I remember that BB exchange too. I wondered if the reply was actually Larry Johnson as I thought it was pretty strange to say he would personally call the guy real soon and that the guy could order the tape. Why would anyone need to “order it” because if it drops- everyone will see. If Larry had that type of info coming, it would have been in a headline and not some snarky post. I do not know.

Every Larry article has been careful to say that he never saw or had a tape and he never gave any release date. At most, I orinally understood that if a tape exists- it would be used by the Rep for the benefit of the Repub. To release now only helps Hillary.

I also think that calling Larry “unstable” just makes you look less sincere.

Comment by Stephanie | 2008-06-06 05:18:12

Oh, I’m sincere — in my incredulity.

 
 
 

Comment by mallard | 2008-06-05 18:15:33

as far as I know, dirt is usually true!

 

Comment by Joel | 2008-06-05 18:16:15

That’s Obama for you. Take 10 minutes to say nothing.

 

Comment by saito | 2008-06-05 18:16:43

whitey punt on that question?

Because he’s HOPING the magic pony will drop the Michelle video off Rainbow Bridge and he will avoid the crushing loss that awaits him.

But it ain’t gonna happen.

 

Comment by adair | 2008-06-05 18:17:32

First of all, I AM SHOCKED THAT SOME OF YOU MAKING RACIST REMARKS ABOUT OBAMA ARE DEMOCRATS. Wow!

Second: think. If this came out now and HRC was “given” the nomination, then she would have stolen it from the Obama supporters. He won fairly and it is he who is our nominee. Whether you or HRC want to face that fact or not.

Third: If it comes out now, the entire Dem party is with him. He is our new nominee. The fact that Larry is a HRCsupporter all these facts will point to an HRC hit job. She did not help herself by behaving in a graceless, classless manner on Tuesday and the dem leadership along with Obama supporters are mad at her.

Fourth: The election is 5 months away. Recall, Rev wright. He came on the scene twice, and once before the north carolina and indiana primaries. and who won those? If they had come before the primaries it would have doen some damage.

Fifth: I believe BO is a savvy leader and will come out of this scandal if it emerges, scathed and yet the winner. The SD know there is a rumour of a tape. The SD ALSO KNOW THE CLINTONSARE DIRTIER THAN DIRT ITSELF. THEY ALSO PLAYED THE RACIST CARD. REPUBS ARE KNOWN RACISTS. He can turn this around and really help himself by turning the tables.

DON’T PLAY THESE GAMES. YOU WILL GET BURNED. HRC DID NOT LEARN HER LESSONS WELL. WHEN THE RIGHT SMEARED THE CLINTONS IT BACKFIRED ON THEM. FIGHT ON ISSUES OR YOU WILL HAVE CHAOS ON YOUR HANDS IN DENVER. THAT IS WHAT THE REPUBS WANT. LETS NOT GIVE IT TO THEM.

Comment by Jeremiah God Damn AmeriKKKa Wright | 2008-06-05 18:20:42

Whitey is coming!!

 

Comment by NY still loves Hillary | 2008-06-05 18:55:15

First of all, I believe Senator Clinton spanked your man in Indiana…

Secondly, many of the people on this site are no longer Democrats.

Thirdly, please stop calling us racists. Your saying it doesn’t make it so any more than Barky saying he’s for change makes him any less of a Chicago thug in a cheap suit.

And lastly, why do you care about HRC? According to you guys, she lost. Who is it that can’t move one here? Go home and talk about how *sigh* dreamy he is and how much you love Michelle’s wardrobe. You are a joke.

 

Comment by drkate | 2008-06-05 18:56:40

you know, fuck off and all your caps too. Hillary did not learn her lesson? Who the hell do you think you are?

You need to go to bed, the street lights are on and your mommy is calling. And don’t come back until you grow up.

 

Comment by Ginger | 2008-06-05 19:00:16

Oh, no, let’s definately give it to them. I’m a repub ow….are you happy? You all said i should leave, you could win alone….what’s the matter? Afraid you were wrong?

 

Comment by JR | 2008-06-05 20:39:10

Who’s making racist remarks? Did you miss all the misogyny out there directed at Hillary? DID YOU SCOLD THEM FOR IT?

 
 

Comment by Jer-dog | 2008-06-05 18:18:04

This is intriguing. Just a question: If the Obama camp knows of the tape’s existence, do yo think they would even allow the repubs to drop an October surprise as Larry suggested? If this was offered as a DVD on the Trinity Web site, I’m sure they would be able to get a copy and release in a way that would mitigate some of the damage.

 

Comment by Jeremiah God Damn AmeriKKKa Wright | 2008-06-05 18:18:21

If Bacrock Obullshit publicly denied that a tape existed, they would have it out in a week after all the MSM had had a chance to run their love-stories about how unfairly Obambi is treated and how its horrible that he has to defend himself of these untruths.

Once all the complicit asskissers were on board defending him, the tape would drop guaranteed.

Something like that would be worth moving it up from october i imagine, thinking as the RNC would…

But for now its better for them to bide their time. if they bump oblahblah now and HRC gets the nod instead they will lose.

Better to wait till Bacrock Obullshit is confirmed as the Head Jackass of the DNC ot the convention.

Then when the time is wrightey they will trot out whitey.

 

Comment by gotalife | 2008-06-05 18:19:36

I was just reading the comments over there at Politico.

Nice work.

 

Comment by Susan1968 | 2008-06-05 18:22:53

Obama said: “Let them do it.”

Freudian slip.

As in “Let them release the tape.”

That’s proof to me there is a tape.

I say hold off on releasing teh tape until about a week before Denver.

Then see those delegates skeddale over to Hillary.

Comment by Five Thirty | 2008-06-05 21:21:16

GOP probably won’t give the full monty until starting september. Maybe leak it first to the msm.

 
 

Comment by james | 2008-06-05 18:22:56

Will you remember? what is the evidence of this tape? larry? c’mon, proven track record of lying. making it up. you want to beleive there is a tape, so you (for once) can call someone else a racist – just like you wanted to beleive Obama is a Muslim (also not true). don’t like his policies? don’t vote for him . . . but spreading flat out lies is just stupid.

Comment by jjran | 2008-06-05 18:29:44

Ok… Obama is not a muslim… I give you that.. He is not a christian neither… He just disowned is church….So what Obama does believe in? So what is Obama’s faith? A faithless lying slimy weasel.

 
 

Comment by jjran | 2008-06-05 18:23:14

What a weasle…. Barack Obama is a slimy bastard. When the tape comes out he will say ” That’s not the Michele I know..” Whatever would possess any person to vote for this faithless liar is beyond anything medical science can do to help them…. To defend America’s values please vote McCain!

 

Comment by rjj | 2008-06-05 18:23:19

Stymied. The local ABC station says they will only give up a video if there is a subpoena.

Why a subpoena? Media archives of public meetings should not need a subpoena. A hefty charge for the document, to be sure – they are a business, not the Ministry of Truth, we’re told.

Comment by mallard | 2008-06-05 18:41:29

can you link me to the place they say to get a subpeona?

Comment by It's Not Me | 2008-06-05 19:46:03

It’s in Larry’s post up above. Second to last paragraph.

 
 
 

Comment by Chuck (the real one) | 2008-06-05 18:23:30

Well.

That was positively Rovian. Impressive. He’s really mastering, “the art of the non-denial denial”.

What’s the next lesson in the book, “These are not the ‘droids you seek?”

‘Nother helping of waffles, sweetie?

 

Comment by zavlin | 2008-06-05 18:25:14

i applaud obama for not giving any credence to the sort of bush-league journalism that came from this site.

 

Comment by Citizen Rat | 2008-06-05 18:26:47

Well, there is one place for sure we can find evidence of people going off on racist rants: here at No Quarter.

And also, this is definitely a place where we can find lie upon smear.

First there was going to breaking news on Monday. Then the breaking news turned out to be Larry Johnson posting more gossip and rumor. Then the tape was going to come out Wednesday. Now it’s not coming out “until the fall.” And Larry hasn’t seen the tape-or talked to anyone who has seen the tape-he has only talked to people who have talked to people who have talked to people who have seen the tape. In other words, this site will say anything, post any smear, any lie, any distortion that feeds into stereotypes about race.

And then this site talks about Hillbuzz’s breaking news, which turns out to be about Larry Johnson’s gossip and innuendo. So the big news is Larry Johnson repeating trast about how Larry Johnson repeats trash and gets his evidence out of his asshole.

Well guess what-shit comes out of assholes.

Obviously, this site has nothing to with electing any Democrat. It’s a front for every right wing extremist smear of the last several decades.

BTW: I would consider it an honor to have my post deleted from this site and to be banned from this site.

Comment by *== President & Commander-in-Chief Hillary Clinton **== | 2008-06-05 18:29:52

Well, there is one place for sure we can find evidence of people going off on racist rants: here at No Quarter.

You just made yourself the racist by falsely accusing everyone here of being racists. And you just lost more votes for Obama. Thanks!

 

Comment by JR | 2008-06-05 20:48:08

Claiming this is a front for the right wing is an insult to the right wing. Have you ever been to a real right wing website?

Comment by ulahane | 2008-06-05 20:51:37

There would have been countless posts about “high” taxes and others denouncing Darwin and science in general.

 
 

Comment by Gloria | 2008-06-05 22:01:21

Bob Beckel seemed pretty worried about it on Monday…he even said that such a tape would make Hillary the nominee. And he’s an Obama supporter.

Why would Beckel even admit the possibility of such a tape? He actually brought it up himself without prompting….

 
 

Comment by *== President & Commander-in-Chief Hillary Clinton **== | 2008-06-05 18:27:24

Larry this story just got legs thanks to Obama punting on the question.

I still have lots of popcorn for everyone!

 

Comment by jdona | 2008-06-05 18:28:02

Ok, for those of you who don’t have the web address for PUMA, here it is. Please go and sign up.

http://blog.pumapac.org

 

Comment by Dorothy Buhrman | 2008-06-05 18:28:57

Man, you BO supporters sure have filthy mouths! I’m glad Larry keeps us in the loop about this video. It is frustrating having to wait for it. But hey, the republicans aren’t stupid like the democrats. They’ll swift boat him for sure.

The other advantage the republicans have, you sexist Hillary hater bloggers, is that white women like me have left the party in droves!

I am free of the pathetic party that shoved the competent woman aside for the inept man. Today I registered Independent!

So long jackass party!

db

 

Comment by indypol | 2008-06-05 18:29:00

I knew it. The classic non-denial denial, in the time honored tradition of Watergate. Like I said before, Obama is pond-scum, the most divisive, mendacious, lazy, corrupt, manipulative mainstream Democratic candidate in thirty years. All of these issues will come back to haunt him soon. I can’t wait for the GOP to destroy him.

And I hope and pray that Hillary pursues an independent candidacy. The Democratic party no longer deserves her.

 

Comment by gotalife | 2008-06-05 18:29:38

Whitey punt?

Just answer the freaking question.

Yes or no.

 

Comment by ProudWhitey | 2008-06-05 18:29:44

Interesting what the internet has done to our political discourse. Wish it was around when Thomas Jefferson ran for president..

 

Comment by Zimeeisme | 2008-06-05 18:29:55

The Republicans shouldn’t wait too long. They need to bring it up soon.

I mean does anybody actually believe that Obama would hand over the nomination to Clinton? Does anyone really believe that the Dems will make him?

If they have supported him through what has come out, then nothing will sway them.

I say bring it on…otherwise the Republicans will just be painted as doing their usual “smear” tactics. Obama has a knack for turning everything around…just like he did with the reporter.

Comment by drkate | 2008-06-05 19:17:35

timing. no time to do damage control and play the victim card. that’s why it won’t be until after August. Obama is daring people to release so he can deal with it. right now he’s not denying its existence or the likelihood that michelle said these things.

 
 

Comment by james | 2008-06-05 18:30:02

how do you prove there is not a tape? are you serious? i could say there is a tape of w giving jerry falwell a hummer while hillary made out with laura, and the burden would be on them to prove i don’t? i love it – hey i do have such a tape. it is awesome and I will release it tomorrow at 9:00 am. this is gonna be huge!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Comment by *== President & Commander-in-Chief Hillary Clinton **== | 2008-06-05 18:54:34

how do you prove there is not a tape?

Obama could deny there is a video. But he punted instead.

 
 

Comment by chklaver | 2008-06-05 18:30:33

Obama is a “man of principle”, my ass! The only principle he is for is “don’t use politics on me” but I can use em on you and call em whatever I want. Much like the alturism him and Michelle showed while working for the “public” in the nonprofit sector and what doubling her salary?
Give me a f****g break!Oh yeah, and “lay off my wife” who it seems to me wears more of the pants in that household than the Clintons — they ARE getting a dog.

This is the only time a POLITICIAN has been allowed to get away with being a politician while characterizing himself as something else.

Stop drinking the koolaid.

 

Comment by Ethan | 2008-06-05 18:30:56

The OFB needs its daily fix of bashing. Without Hillary to kick around, they’ve moved on to Larry and No Quarter. Why don’t the Boyz just go genuflect before an image of their Precious, then pick up their nunchuk or maybe even do their homework?

 

Comment by Jo | 2008-06-05 18:31:55

Larry, the one thing that bothers me about all of this is – there has to be more than one tape or dvd if it was for sale. It seems impossible to believe someone would not have offered it for sale by now, especially since 1 million dollars was offered.

 

Comment by Nellie | 2008-06-05 18:32:34

Kevin

Even with a teleprompter Obama would stutter over the word “Principles”.

The Obama scumbag has less PRINCIPLE than the sewer rats in NYC

 

Comment by Raven | 2008-06-05 18:32:38

Can’t wait to see our future “First Lady” pontificating on the state of relations among the
races!

 

Comment by BC1358 | 2008-06-05 18:33:00

I think BO is a hardcore leftist and it would be a disaster if he were elected. That being said, until I hear/see the clip for myself, I’ll reserve judgment. Although I have to say that given the growing list of angry, American bashing comments that MO has uttered, I would not be surprised to find out that this clip is real.

Comment by s. hall | 2008-06-05 20:35:21

bc — so if its only slightly racist you will give her a pass? How low can our standards go? This is the first black man to be nominated for the Presidency and he and his wife hate white people–is that not a deal breaker?

 
 

Comment by myiq2xu | 2008-06-05 18:34:00

The specificity of the information regarding the video supports the conclusion that it exists. We know who said it, as well as when, where and the circumstances under which she said it.

This is not just some shot in the dark rumor.

When the GOP drops this bombshell, they’ll use a Pro-Hillary blog or reporter.

That way they get a two-fer. Destroy Obama and set up Hillary to take the blame.

Comment by JR | 2008-06-05 20:57:23

And Obama’s supporters will, once again, gladly fall for it and blame Hillary.

 
 

Pingback by Obama Denies “Whitey” Rumor : Stop The ACLU | 2008-06-05 18:34:54

[...] Larry Johnson’s credit, Obama never gave a direct answer. It definitely sounded like a punt. I know I would make it [...]

 

Comment by Hillcrat | 2008-06-05 18:35:51

I’ve noticed even the trolls don’t deny it exist. They keep coming to your site Larry to find out if it’s true…LOL!!

Trolls must be clowns on weekends.

Comment by MichelleK | 2008-06-05 20:19:45

I am not a troll and it does not exist, see:

http://www.reason.com/blog/show/126883.html

 
 

Comment by ProudWhitey | 2008-06-05 18:36:06

Here is a suggestion, maybe we should all run for president in future. We seem to be perfect individuals who can speak without a stutter, have perfect wives(are we old enough to have wives? ;) ) . Comeon guys, I can smell your underwears here. Mum needs you to get out of the basement. By the way, how was SpongeBob today?

 

Comment by J.D. Rhoades | 2008-06-05 18:38:26

I’ve noticed even the trolls don’t deny it exist. They keep coming to your site Larry to find out if it’s true…LOL!!

We keep coming to watch the ongoing train wreck this site has become. LOL! LOL! LOL!

Comment by Hillcrat | 2008-06-05 18:56:00

Again….NO DENIAL from the trolls.

Thanks for proving my point! idiot.

 

Comment by Jon | 2008-06-05 19:41:27

Agreed. I love coming over to this cesspool of crap now and then. To see a bunch of losers, a bunch of deranged freak shows led by the bowl cut himself, led by a sick, pathetic, sad ugly little man, screetching TAPE TAPE TAPE makes me laugh my ass off. SusanHu is the best. A old, sad, decrepit, deranged lady who need to check herself into the loon bin along with Larry. And most of the republicans who come her spewing god knows what. LOL.

 

Comment by JR | 2008-06-05 21:06:07

It became a trainwreck after your Obamabot buddies decided to post here. Are you going to post at dailykos and tell them all what a trainwreck that place has been?

 
 

Comment by jjran | 2008-06-05 18:39:08

Donna the airhead at the DNC and CNN just got her wish… The democratic party is now offically the party of AA and coneheads…..Now lets see how many states do these cult of Obama, the faithless weasel live in …. Anybody care to guess?

 

Comment by LIZ | 2008-06-05 18:39:17

Obama’s discourtesy to Lieberman:

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008/06/obamas_discourtesy_to_lieberma.html

WiIl Obama just dismiss this incident as a “distraction”? Will he now claim, in his pattern, that Joe Lieberman is not the man he once knew?

 

Comment by J.D. Rhoades | 2008-06-05 18:41:41

Larry has a list 0f 106 communist moles
in the State Department.

Well, he doesn’t actually HAVE the list, he’s talked to people who have talked to people who know what’s in it. And it’s a BOMBSHELL! A BOMBSHELL! And it’ll all be revealed here on Monday! Or maybe Tuesday. Or maybe October.

 

Comment by shrek | 2008-06-05 18:42:17

Noquarterusa uniting trolls one basement at a time!

Comment by YES HRC | 2008-06-05 19:47:43

Yep, all the way to 18 million who will vote against Obama in the general election.

 
 

Comment by Donovan Fraser | 2008-06-05 18:42:24

face it people, She lost.. all the bitching in the world is just a waste of our time and energy. take a deep breath and have a glass of wine…The pain will recede. hell, i have felt this way since 2000 and it was a total waste of time.Bush still gets to sail off into the sunset to play golf.

Now If you are going to vote for McCain to spite someone ( lets say yourself and your children) I got to ask ..how do you get there logically from Hillary to McCain UNLESS they are one in the same? OR is it the “Samson option” of taking down the tabernacle and everyone with you? this will be the result if you don’t get a grip. Big picture people, remember that.
have fun teeing off on me
:)

Comment by *== President & Commander-in-Chief Hillary Clinton **== | 2008-06-05 18:59:55

face it people, She lost..

There is no nominee until the end of August.

 

Comment by JR | 2008-06-05 21:13:19

Maybe you should have thought about that before you decided it would be so cool to turn the party agains itself just to get your mancrush elected. You didn’t respect those who wanted Hillary and still go on like they are merely a nuisance to brush off. People don’t like being betrayed. Just thought I’d point that out to you.

 
 

Comment by Joel | 2008-06-05 18:43:00

And what’s wrong with fucking a German Shepherd? You got a problem with Germans?

 

Comment by gerard nedich | 2008-06-05 18:43:29

you guys are being manipulated…

lets focus on the real shit… the important shit…

Obama is stealing votes… the Democratic party leaders endorsed it…

Obama is a part of the sleaziest political machine on the planet and all he does is repeat “change” and “not politics as usual”

and he is getting away with it because you idiots have been fooled again by some of the most evil shits around…

there is no tape… yes Michelle hates america… yes she is an elitest

why are you wasting your time?

you are only giving obama what he wants…

now obama finally has a “hardball” question thrown at him and its all a farce…

you think you are finally getting the MSM to ask tough questions?

no, you are being manipulated…

a REAL hardball question would be HOW THE FFUCK DID REZKO ARRANGE THAT MANSION FOR YOU? WHAT DID YOU DO FOR HIM?

OR HOW FUCKING PRESIDENTIAL DO YOU THINK YOU LOOK WHEN YOU ARE STEALING VOTES???

wise up

Comment by JR | 2008-06-05 21:20:05

No wonder the Obots are out bitching in full force right now. They feel guilty for trashing a good Democrat’s chance to fix this mess all so their master could get a chance to change nothing. Deep down, they know he won’t change anything. They just want to watch him speak and adore him like a trophy.

 

Comment by Peter | 2008-06-05 22:02:28

Do you complain to Fox News and tell them to fire Obama supporter Bob Beckel? Beckel said a tape exists and said it is worse than her thesis.

Go rant on Fox.
Go rant to Bob Beckel.

 
 

Comment by Citizen Rat | 2008-06-05 18:46:11

The proof of Johnson’s smear tactics are at http://www.reason.com/blog/show/126883.html (the link command doesn’t seem to work). Reason is hardly a left wing magazine. It shows how Johnson is deliberately, knowingly spreadling lies.

Comment by *== President & Commander-in-Chief Hillary Clinton **== | 2008-06-05 18:48:18

That article is not proof.

Comment by MichelleK | 2008-06-05 20:21:44

It lays out the story pretty well. If you believe LJ after reading the story then you are a fool.

 
 
 

Comment by bigfoot | 2008-06-05 18:46:33

Seriously guys, Obama shouldn’t have to be answering ridiculous questions like this. He is working to become the leader of the free world not trying to stoke your national enquirer level questions.

 

Comment by Where'sTheTape? | 2008-06-05 18:47:06

Larry, did you even bother to read the story at the link you provided? The author provides a link to another article by David Weigel at Reason Magazine that blows you out of the water. He goes through your timeline of postings on this and makes you look like a complete fool. Please respond to Mr. Weigel’s charges.

 

Comment by Prodem | 2008-06-05 18:49:05

LARRY’S CLAIM TO FAME

Larry Johnson Unites All Parts of Political Blogtopia
Created: June 2nd, 2008 |

Even the most hardcore right-wingers are making fun of Larry Johnson and his “stunning” video, aka “the Michelle tape.” Supposedly there was a tape of Michelle Obama using the word “whitey” and other “racist” and “anti-American” language, and supposedly Larry Johnson had a copy of this video, and supposedly he was going to post it on his blog at 9:00 this morning.

This is what he posted on his blog this morning (my bolds):

I learned over the weekend why the Republicans who have seen the tape of Michelle Obama ranting about “whitey” describe it as “STUNNING.” I have not seen it but I have heard from five separate sources who have spoken directly with people who have seen the tape. It features Michelle Obama and Louis Farrakhan. They are sitting on a panel at Jeremiah Wright’s Church when Michelle makes her intemperate remarks. Whoops!! When that image comes out it will enter the politcal ads hall of fame. It will be right up there with the little girl plucking daisy petals in the famous 1964 ad LBJ used against Barry Goldwater.

Wow. He hasn’t seen the tape, his five sources haven’t seen the tape, but “people” to whom his five sources have spoken say that they have seen it. That’s certainly definitive evidence of the tape’s existence and of what the tape shows.

Bruce McQuain quotes SusanUnPC:

FYI, for those expecting to SEE the tape, GET REAL. Read Larry Johnson’s description of what is ON the tape. That is the story.

Comment by *== President & Commander-in-Chief Hillary Clinton **== | 2008-06-05 18:51:30

The story here is Obama punted on the question. Now the story has legs.

Comment by Mahatma X | 2008-06-05 21:00:44

The story is there is no story, except perhaps for the credibility problem Larry Johnson seems to have. Aside from the usual dead-enders, Johnson has succeeded in becoming the laughingstock of the blogosphere.

 
 
 

Comment by Where'sTheTape? | 2008-06-05 18:51:05

Larry, you got your minutes of fame for peddling this bs. Of course you have ruined your reputation and destroyed whatever credibility you had in the process. I like the way you responded to the author of the Reason Magazine article (you do not address the charges he brought up AT ALL):
“You and Reason in the same sentence? Now that’s funny. I don’t recall soliciting an email from you so fuck off.”
Way to go Larry. I can’t believe I used to waste time on what you wrote.

Comment by bigfoot | 2008-06-05 18:53:30

Amen sister!

 

Comment by *== President & Commander-in-Chief Hillary Clinton **== | 2008-06-05 18:56:05

Obama punted on the question which gives Larry credibility on the story. Didn’t you bother to read what he wrote?

 
 

Comment by ulahane | 2008-06-05 18:51:21

Well I found out why we have such a bad troll infestation. Yesterday an Daily K** cretin known by the nom de plume “The Red Pen” published:

Racist “No Quarter” Site Reveals “Michelle Tape”

For about a month now, the militant racists at Larry Johnson’s “No Quarter” have been talking about a “secret tape” of “Michell Obama ranting against ‘whitey.’”

Today, they revealed the tape!

Then it continues with more lies and distortions.

 

Comment by JR | 2008-06-05 21:23:51

And that site is run by a huge Obamabot. What a surprise.

 
 

Comment by Ginger | 2008-06-05 18:52:02

He didn’t say Father Bigmouth was wrong or that he even disagreed, Obama said it didn’t reflect the people he saw campaigning…what does that mean, when Obama didn’t disagree, just said it didn’t reflect people he saw. That was no denial and certainly wasn’t saying “don’t talk about Hillary that way”…McCain did that. Obama didn’t even leave his church because he disagreed, he did it to protect them from us. WTF? He is on Trinity’s side in the white bashing…that should be unacceptable, just imagine Al or Jesse trying to do this in their campaigns…it would have been screamed down, it would never be accepted. So why is this allowed to stand. And all the white dems just rollover and get their bellies scratched….it’s humiliating to even think I used to believe in them. I’m disgusted now.

Comment by Karma | 2008-06-05 22:06:33

Excellent points…

 
 

Comment by sherri | 2008-06-05 18:53:29

John McCain received the reward
Profle in Courage Award given by Caroline Kennedy in 1999.Priceless..

 

Comment by Joel | 2008-06-05 18:55:01

Did hell freeze over? Ann Coulter wrote something that made sense!?!!?!!?!!?!

Obama was selected, not elected

——————————————————————————–
Posted: June 04, 2008
6:24 pm Eastern

© 2008

Words mean nothing to liberals. They say whatever will help advance their cause at the moment, switch talking points in a heartbeat, and then act indignant if anyone uses the exact same argument they were using five minutes ago.

When Gore won the popular vote in the 2000 election by half a percentage point, but lost the Electoral College – or, for short, “the constitutionally prescribed method for choosing presidents” – anyone who denied the sacred importance of the popular vote was either an idiot or a dangerous partisan.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=66213

Comment by bigfoot | 2008-06-05 18:58:12

Are you seeriously posting something from worldnetdaily? You have any articles from ICOMPLETELYMADETHISUP.com or whoneedsthetruth.net while your at it?

Comment by Sam | 2008-06-05 19:02:49

You can find that type of rubbish at the Obama campaign website.

 
 
 

Comment by jobabe | 2008-06-05 18:56:25

ok, here’s the thing yesterday ABC-7 was denying they had the tape. In fact, they stated that they had destoryed the tape the day after the event. Now they are saying they have the video but won’t release it without subpoena, Wonder if we can file a complaint against this organization for misuse of the public airwaves.

 

Comment by Larry's Stylist @ Flowbee.com | 2008-06-05 18:57:08

Too funny: Larry exposed -

http://www.reason.com/blog/show/126883.html

On Monday I blogged about the rumors of a video that shows Michelle Obama making hateful comments about “whitey.” I’m now convinced that Larry Johnson, the blogger who’s done the most to make the rumors public, is spreading misinformation. At the least, he’s been unable to stick to his story.

Johnson starts getting attention for this on May 26, recounting intel from “someone in touch with a senior Republican.” ….

In his peddling of this story, Johnson has altered his description of what was in the tape. … Until he comes out with a video tape that shows at least one of the many rumored “Michelle speeches,” I think that’s the last we need to hear from Larry Johnson.

Comment by *== President & Commander-in-Chief Hillary Clinton **== | 2008-06-05 19:04:02

You need to read what he wrote. Obama punted on the question so now the story has legs.

 

Comment by Prodem | 2008-06-05 19:05:25

Stylist:
Can you upgrade his ’style’? Please…

 
 

Comment by Rockymountainway | 2008-06-05 18:58:24

Michelle Obama will be a guest host on “The View”. Maybe she will give a unity speech like this. To the typical Clinton supporter. Hillary is not good. She has divided the party. Supporting her is downright mean, and you are guided by fear. She has turned you into a party of cynics, sloths and complacents. Don’t trust Clinton bloggers, because they lie. So make me proud for the second time in my life and vote for Barack Obama for President. Thank you Whitey. MEchelle

 

Comment by Prodem | 2008-06-05 18:58:47

This fictitious story attacking Michelle Obama is

Larry’s equivalent of Hillary’s sniping fire story

in Tuzla.
It’s stupid, embarrassing, and credibility ending…
A Huge Mea Culpa would be in order…

Comment by *== President & Commander-in-Chief Hillary Clinton **== | 2008-06-05 19:05:47

Obama punted on the question of the existence of the video so now the story has legs. Attacking Larry does not change this fact.

 
 

Comment by jobabe | 2008-06-05 19:00:07

So hope the DNC doesn’t go broke with Obama as the head of the party!

Comment by claribel borden | 2008-06-05 20:22:04

The Middle Eastern big wigs will pump the cash in, as long as the DNC, and the RNC, is useful.

“Texas” seems to be swinging both ways, in terms of oil, and oil men paying to play.

If Soros bails, though, you might take it as a sign.

 
 

Comment by momsword | 2008-06-05 19:00:20

yep. that is what they do! they will say anything that will make the public like them. I believe there is a tape out there and it will come out, just like everything else .

anyone else sick of both him and McCain speaking?? I don’t know but their voices bother me.

http://www.momsword.org

 

Comment by Where'sTheTape? | 2008-06-05 19:05:57

Why won’t you respond to the Reason Magazine charges against you Larry? Unlike you (who has decided to try and Swiftboat a presidential candidate with rumors) the article doesn’t rely on rumors- IT USES YOUR OWN WORDS to destroy your credibility. Maybe the reason you are not responding is because there really is no response. You have said what you said and you’ve done what you’ve done. Have any of your “sources” actually seen the “tape”? Because my understanding is that you’re saying you know someone who knows someone that has seen it- LOL! Real high standards you got there Larry. I think the bigger question is, “Why has Larry allowed himself to get played like this?”

Comment by *== President & Commander-in-Chief Hillary Clinton **== | 2008-06-05 19:08:44

.Obama punted on the question of the existence of the video so now the story has legs. Attacking Larry does not change this fact.

 

Comment by Linda | 2008-06-05 19:28:59

WOW! You sure give legs with a moniker of such? Talk about giving legs to something. roflmao

 

Comment by MichelleK | 2008-06-05 20:28:48

That is the truth, notice no one gives it a proper answer, they can’t you are correct.

Comment by claribel borden | 2008-06-05 20:30:05

Too late, Micki, think!

 
 

Comment by claribel borden | 2008-06-05 20:28:57

And who is behind “Reason Magazine?”

Another of the Jonathan Singer types,left or right, contracted to Obama? Or perhaps some behind the scene money guy, covering both ends of the spectrum?

Yeah, your little head is so deluded, and puffed up, you can be trolled into anything.

Moron.

Someone offers you a some money, a little fishy, say no.

OOPS!

Too late for the bamster.

 
 

Comment by saito | 2008-06-05 19:07:26

AND WHEN THIS RACIST MICHELLE WHITEY TAPE COMES OUT, THE LOSS IN NOVEMBER WILL BE ON THE HANDS OF EVERY OBAMABOT. YOU WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FOUR MORE YEARS OF REPUBLICAN RULE.

 

Comment by BluDawg | 2008-06-05 19:10:23

Jim Jones was not the only one serving the Kumbuya kool-aide.

Here in appalacia (the 57th state), we just drink shine and read the bible, while cleaning the six-shooters. (gotta be ready for duck season.)

Tape or no tape, there is a treasure trove of research, for the fall. The Democratic primaries are over. The GE has no rulz.

America always waits till after Labor Day to do her homework.

Fall Forcast—Bitter weather!

 

Comment by bguy | 2008-06-05 19:11:42

obama didn’t answer the question because he knows damn well it’s probably true. by not answering the question in a confident “no way it’s true” way, this will keep him from looking even worse when it surfaces… in hopes that he can somehow explain it, i.e. “that’s not the michelle i know”… pathetic

 

Comment by saito | 2008-06-05 19:12:31

ROE V. WADE OVERTURNED
NO UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE
IRAQ FOR ONE HUNDRED MORE YEARS
SUPREME COURT JUSTICES—MORE LIKE SCALIA.

ALL BECAUSE YOU SUPPORTED A RIGGED NOMINATION THAT IS FORCING BARACK OBAMA ON US– A CANDIDATE WITH A RACIST WIFE, A RACIST PREACHER, FUNDRAISING FELONS, AND A TERRORIST NAMED BILL AYERS FOR A FRIEND.

BLOOD ON THE HANDS OF ALL OBAMA SUPPORTERS AFTER THIS RACIST RANT IS RELEASED IN THE FALL. YOU WILL HAVE RUINED THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY FOR GOOD.

Comment by MichelleK | 2008-06-05 20:31:06

So it is Obama’s fault that Hilary’s supporters claim they will vote for McCain. Seems it is the people who vote for McCain and not Obama are too blame.

 
 

Comment by S. Foreman | 2008-06-05 19:13:44

How’s the PPP doing today?

 

Comment by MindlessMissy | 2008-06-05 19:16:01

If You Got the Freaking Tape, Bring it out .. Otherwise Just Shut The Fuck Up Until You can Fabricate One .. Retards

Comment by claribel borden | 2008-06-05 20:35:52

Any troll this stupid should be careful.

Honestly, someone should tell Axelrod it would be more prudent to hire SMART people, as opposed to those who work cheap.

It’s pretty easy to counter troll stupid, and Obama has enough trouble to look forward to, wiht Rezko…

Comment by claribel borden | 2008-06-05 20:37:12

Smart outside the PR teams, oh, yeah, sorry.

Pr people aren’t smart.

 
 
 

Comment by Tommy | 2008-06-05 19:18:04

If the accused isn’t guilty,the accused does not punt,pass or fart, he /she says,not no ,but hell no and then makes the accuser prove his /her accusation…Jury just handed America the verdict..Michelle Obama guilty as charged….Not one TV station will say they will not hand anything over without a subpoena if they don’t have the evidence…Guilty as Hell Michelle is!

 

Comment by Linda | 2008-06-05 19:19:43

OMG. This is just so incredible. For Obama to continue, knowing this…and probably even more exists, how it would hurt the Democrats so much, that he doesn’t care, that he is only looking out for himself, that he will have burned every extended hand and he will be shunned by every Democrat…and the heck knows who else, after misleading them. It looks like someone better supboena ABC. When this comes out, it will be known that Obama had been lying and denying America it’s chance for good change, just in his greed to hope to hide truth for a chance at his own personal power gain.

 

Comment by BluDawg | 2008-06-05 19:20:47

Hi Northwest Rain,
ru a tm refugee too?

oyd

 

Comment by Shane | 2008-06-05 19:21:20

Ok, I think it’s time to come out. Due to my superb trolling skills, David Axelrod himself contacted me and told me that the only way to stop the release of this tape is to post insulting comments on No Quarter. I was paid $2,000 in cash. But my conscience can no longer handle the strain. Larry, I am willing to tell my story. Can you guarantee my safety?

 

Comment by stop Hussein | 2008-06-05 19:22:00

support McCain verse this corrupt political charlatan Obama.. this guy is the epitome of political expediency, i wouldn’t want to be his “friend.” With any luck the tape will be produced for all to see this Fall…

Comment by MichelleK | 2008-06-05 20:33:08

Yes, support war with Iran, support overturning Roe v Wade and so on. You clearly never were a Democrat, sign up for the GOP you Bush lover.

Comment by claribel borden | 2008-06-05 20:42:31

Yes yes , let’s hand social security to even more convicted money launderers associated with Obama.

And next, let’s troll Bush into bombing Iran.

I know, let’s start with CNN, get some idiot producer on our side, nobody there can think, either.

So, first thing I do is hire a PR firm?

How’d that work out for them?

 
 
 

Comment by saito | 2008-06-05 19:23:57

How’s Minister Farrakhan these days? The Black Hitler? Loved the photo where MEchelle was cozy with his wife at the Rainbow/Push Coalition of Ranters. What find upstanding people the Obama’s hang out with. Too bad Mrs. Jack The Ripper couldn’t attend the luncheon that day.

Comment by s. hall | 2008-06-05 21:02:47

saito — Anyone who is friends with Louis Farahkan is not good for this country. Farahkan now has a New Black Panther Party and when Jewish leaders told Obama to back away from Farahkan Obama said why should I he is my friend.

 
 

Comment by Obama_is_Weak | 2008-06-05 19:31:48

Why don’t ask/let Brian Ross from (parent) ABC go to Chicago, watch the tape and report back?

Maybe this was not the event; why doesn’t ABC debunk the rumor?

And if there is no tape of Michelle; why not say? Why a subpoena? So something was taped.

And if it was taped and Michelle is not there;l what is it so embarrassing about the tape that cannot be released?

When Bill Cosby talked that year; his harsh criticisms of the AA community were widely reported and available everywhere.

So, ABC 7 : what is the big deal??

Comment by Five Thirty | 2008-06-05 21:48:57

So, ABC 7 : what is the big deal??

RNC told them to wait?

 
 

Comment by jangles | 2008-06-05 19:37:01

Your guy won. Why don’t you celebrate? What is the point of coming here and calling people retarded, tools and using the f-word endlessly? What do personal assaults on comments (on either side of this issue) have to do with whether or not the tape exists and whether or not it is as damaging as the hype about it says? Sometimes I think people go online and just lose their common sense. Maybe there is some neutron stream coming from your ISP. I think Larry has been pretty clear about his position on this—he does not have the tape; does not expect to have the tape; his sources say it exists but is not going to be used until after the Democratic nomination is in place and/or the timing is such to cause maximum damage.

 

Comment by saito | 2008-06-05 19:39:20

Nice job, Obamabots, you fell for the empty suit and are going to lead the Democratic party to slaughter just like the Republicans planned.

Hope! Change! Change you can BELIEVE in! LOL. Spare change, anyone?

Little programmed Obamabots slamming back the Kool-Aid…so naive, so tender. No way would their sweet, sensitive, deeply empathic MEchelle ever say a nasty word about a whitey person. And anyway, if she did say anything you either misunderstood it, or she was addicted to prescription pills at the time and will go into rehab immediately. Plus, Amerikkka is bad and deserves it, right?

MEchelle loves Hillary.
MEchelle loves America.
MEchelle loves everyone equally, regardless of color or creed. If you don’t believe me, The Fruit of Islam guards would like to speak with you.

P.S. Donnie McClurkin is no longer gay. He was saved by black Jesus who has bestowedth Barry uponth us to allow us to receive His redemption.

Amen. Bros before Hos.

97 videos, and a bitch ain’t one (I hope! Or my campaign is toast!)

“Yee Haw!!!!” —Howard Dean.

 

Comment by jessie | 2008-06-05 19:40:04

Typical Saul Alinsky tactics – get rid or discredit the messenger. Trolls go back to Dailyidiots.

If it is not true why you protesting so much?

Anyway, if it is not true, you got gamed by your own tactics because everybody is talking about it and we all know what your camps does

say something long enough and people will believe it to be true

HOW DOES IT FEEL NOW?

but, in this case based on Michell Obama/Marxist past behavior, I believe it is true

NO OBAMA/MARXIST
MCCAIN 2008
I AM AMERICAN FIRST
JUST SAY “NO” TO BLACK LIBERATION THEOLOGY MARXISM

 

Comment by Linda | 2008-06-05 19:42:24

UH, EXCUSE ME….can someone just go to the Trinity Church and ask to see a copy of the session, because YOU KNOW THEY HAVE ONE….THE ARE THE CREATOR WHO WAS SELLING IT, and if they claim still she doesn’t say such things, ask to to a copy of the session, AS PROOF. IT’s a very simple solution. As a matter of fact, if Trinity was selling it for bucks, I bet they would be equally happy to dig it up and produce a copy of this known event, for a much larger contribution than they were originally seeking, just to clear up any unknowns that may be dogging Obama.-Don’t ya’ think?

 

Comment by jangles | 2008-06-05 19:44:28

I see some tm friends here. Nice.

 

Comment by Deborah | 2008-06-05 19:48:51

You’re right Larry, that was NOT a denial. I gleaned that from reading his response before I had even come to this site to see your take of it. That definetly was a political manuevering, NOT A DENIAL AT ALL. I wonder if Obama can stop this video from coming out somehow, I saw the word “supoena” was used. Freakin’ wannabe Stalin, this punk is.

 
 

Comment by RedDragon62 | 2008-06-05 19:55:26

You are asked when you call to order tapes…”who do you represent and “WHICH” sermon would you like?” when you ask about the conference you are told that….
“THEY ARE OUT OF THEM”!
go ahead and call Trinity! Ask them if they will sell you a copy and they play dumb! seems to me they are stashing “SOME”tapes and releasing others!
I wouldn’t put it past Rev. Wright to “RELEASE” one of them just to get back at Obamabamadingdong for throwing 20 years of “friendship” down the toilet!

 

Comment by RedDragon62 | 2008-06-05 19:57:46

I see th