RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

How To Handle an Obamabot: Part I

Ladies and gentlemen, I give you Mr. Larry Johnson’s Lesson I in how to respond to e-mails from Obamabots. First, I give you the Obamabot e-mail, in which I will daintily obscur the real words used:

On 6/6/08 9:57 AM, “Ben B….”

Subject: you sir, are a flaming asshole

Crawl in a hole and bury yourself. You f–king toolbag.

Larry Johnson replied:

Ben,
Thanks. Sounds like a fascinating new treatment for hemorrhoids. Do you have any recommendations on soil type? Should the hole be in red clay or is sand okay? Glad to know Senator Obama is surrounded by such articulate, intelligent souls. I want to be like you when I grow up.

Best
LJ

Lesson II will be published soon.

Ben’s e-mail, I regret to inform you, is typical of the Obamabots.

Well, I am not informing our faithful readers of anything new since they so often have to e-mail me and Larry to let us know about the latest hate-filled, sexist, vicious comments posted by these THUGS.

If only someone in the MSM would write about the THUGGERY of the Obamabot hordes.

(The joy is in now much Larry’s response made me laugh. And, the idiocy and thuggery of these vicious dolts inspire me to keep doing what we’re doing here at No Quarter.)

Trackback URL

RSS Feed for This Post176 Comments »

Comment by Cindy | 2008-06-06 11:33:00

You are so courageous, Larry,to put up with them.
After Tavis Smiley talked openly about the death threats he and his family rec’d (after Tavis publicly dared to act unhappy that Obama had snubbed his State of the Black Union Convention in N’Orleans), my husband wrote to Tavis. He applauded his courage and told him how much people like him (Tavis) mean to our society.
Tavis wrote back, a handwritten note of thanks!!! We were so impressed. He is so classy. And so are you!

Comment by Strawberry | 2008-06-06 11:40:28

So True. When you see acts of courage, you MUST speak up and offer thanks. That way folks like Tavis, Larry, Susan and others will keep speaking out for those of us whose voices aren’t being heard. I called and e-mailed Nutter’s office after he was overun with Obama venom. Another great American.

Comment by Tom | 2008-06-06 15:50:36

Here’s Part 2:

http://reason.com/blog/show/126883.html

In his peddling of this story, Johnson has altered his description of what was in the tape. I e-mailed Johnson, asked about the holes in the HillBuzz story, and called him a liar. He e-mailed me back.
You and Reason in the same sentence? Now that’s funny. I don’t recall soliciting an email from you so fuck off.

Stay classy, Larry. You’re so courageous! And honest! And not at full of BS! Riiiiight…

 
 

Comment by Maddie | 2008-06-06 12:16:27

Comment by cal | 2008-06-06 12:26:20

Maddie, Great find, but you are unfortunately wasting your time trying to reason with the biggest bunch of lost soles since the Freepers came to town. Reason with them and they’ll call you “troll”, “Obamabot”, etc. Vent on them and they’ll try to portray you as a pimply faced teenager supported by your parents (I’m 48yrs old and in the highest income bracket). You just need to let these folks burn themselves out because out of political expediency, HRC will disassociate with them too. The rest of the world will soon see what GOP tools these folks really are.

Comment by hillarysmygirl | 2008-06-06 12:53:39

Vent on them and they’ll try to portray you as a pimply faced teenager supported by your parents (I’m 48yrs old and in the highest income bracket).

Venting is an immature act of taking one’s frustrations out on an innocent party, something only children or emotionally challenged adults do. Time to grow up, 48 year old! And since you’re in the “highest income bracket,” you can donate LOTS of money to the DNC and Obama’s campaign, won’t you? I’m SURE you will.

Comment by AnninCa | 2008-06-06 13:04:01

I agree. There’s a difference between enjoying expressing your viewpoint and finding places where that’s OK and venting.

I always want to be safe, of course. I want to expose my gaps in knowledge without being blasted.

I also would like to live in DisneyLand and have my family really love one another on holidays without strings attached. LOL*

Sheesh*…….you jump into this pool, you better have your floaties.

 

Comment by Maddie | 2008-06-06 13:19:54

Looks like you are venting there. Hypocrisy much?

Comment by drkate | 2008-06-06 17:17:40

you really are an idiot. stupid much?

no credibility with the big orange sewer, no one one but obama stooges will click it. You’re not worried? Then why are you still here?

oh yes, you get off on insulting people and thinking you’re upsetting them. you know we’ve got a whole bunch of tools for obamabots like you and it doesn’t take any energy at all to completely dismiss you.

 
 
 

Comment by MessyMarcy | 2008-06-06 12:57:06

biggest bunch of lost soles

Oh, look — it’s another couple of lonely Obamabutts with nothing to do but come over here and talk to each other.

Maddie, we would never click on your link. We realize orange koolaid rots the brain. You and Cal are exhibits A and B.

And Cal, please take some of your mythical money, enroll in a good night school somewhere and learn the difference between “soles” and “souls.”

For your further enjoyment, here is McCain’s new ad: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1OUxBvlLr0

Comment by Maddie | 2008-06-06 13:42:31

Don’t you want to know that you have been had? That you are being played by Larry for some insane reason? Yes, go ahead and give him more money.

If you are so delicate and weak, let me send you to this site that is from the conservative National Review blog that has the same story with factual back up – I know factual backup and sources is a unfamiliar and scary concept to you guys, but try it out some time.

Here, this will better suit your delicate frames:

http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com

Comment by drkate | 2008-06-06 17:19:26

roflmao! why the fuck do you care? get out of here with your faux rage and stupidity.

 
 
 

Comment by Clinton Fan | 2008-06-06 13:19:47

So, why are YOU here, asshole?

You’re a masochist, is that it? Or you’re as stupid as you seem? See, unless you’re talking about the bottoms of your shoes, the word is SOULS, there, genuis.

And speaking of GOP tools, idiots like you have done more to ensure a McCain Presidency than anyone.

Asshole. Idiot. Yep–that’s what I think of you. Now take a hike, since it’s plain we can’t be reasoned with by people like you.

Comment by cal | 2008-06-06 13:24:10

Thanks for pointing out the typo. . .as for the rest, better get back on your medication.

 

Comment by Maddie | 2008-06-06 14:37:02

because there may be some Clinton Supporters who are coming out of the fog and need to be aware that they have been taken advantage of people like Larry and Sue.

Comment by drkate | 2008-06-06 17:20:48

you mean and are nothing.

 

Comment by cowgirlblues | 2008-06-07 01:03:18

What you see coming out of the “fog” is the ghost of LIZZY BORDEN axe in hand dripping with blood, you named the devil in the primary contests now you can live with what you created in the general election “I want to drink your blood”

 
 
 

Comment by kenoshaMarge | 2008-06-06 17:31:41

Good heavens if you are really 48 years old and in the highest income bracket why on earth would you be wasting your time and energy bothering to insult people that don’t agree with you. As for you saying that HRC would disassociate with the people here, you are an Obamacrat and thus have no idea what a classy,politician like Senator Clinton will. Why don’t you take all that money you’re bragging about, actually people with lots of money aren’t usually so tacky as to brag about it, and buy yourself some class. Then come back and we’ll talk. Or not.

Oh and Maddie, posting a link to kos is dumber than a box of rocks since the people who come here regularly, not Obamatroll that pop in to pee on the carpet, wouldn’t touch kos with a plague infected pole. Poor little Obamatroll too damn dumb to know that.

Comment by cowgirlblues | 2008-06-07 01:06:45

damn-I like your style!!!

 
 
 

Comment by lastlemming | 2008-06-06 12:26:30

So does this mean that Obama denies Michelle ever used such a word. Or are we above responding to direct questions in this campaign.

Comment by cal | 2008-06-06 12:29:21

Have you stopped beating your wife? Same type of construction. . .

Comment by MessyMarcy | 2008-06-06 12:46:03

No, Cal, it’s more like this: Q. Did you beat your wife? Answer by innocent man: No I did not. Answer by guilty man: Before I respond, do you have any evidence?

Comment by cal | 2008-06-06 12:55:24

No, the correct response is to ignore the inuendo in the first place and realize the questioner is just dealing in subterfuge.

Comment by MessyMarcy | 2008-06-06 12:58:08

Then why did he not do that?

Comment by cal | 2008-06-06 13:01:35

He basically did. . .

Comment by drkate | 2008-06-06 17:23:41

“basically”, umm, no! He nuanced it when he could have been straight forward. His answer leaves people still guessing. Be a man, obama, stand up! Stand up for the First Lady who blames whitey? He needs to put up or shut up, dont put out talkng points and then claim it doesn’t exist.

you see, too smart for his own ass.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Comment by Oh NOes! | 2008-06-06 13:07:14

Well that has got to suck. You mean the story about this tape was lifted from a novel by Stephen Frey called the ‘Power Broker’ ?

 

Comment by Al | 2008-06-06 13:55:03

The writer of that diary not so long ago wrote the following about Senator Clinton: “She is a filthy sow.”

That’s all you need to know.

 

Comment by TeakwoodKite | 2008-06-06 14:25:40

Sorry, Art imitating life is not a pedestrian reality.

 

Comment by haypops | 2008-06-06 18:15:00

Thanks for the link. The blog would indicate that Obama’s candidacy is a hoax, not that Larry Johnson’s tape is the hoax. Which acme first the chicken or the egg.

 
 

Comment by Jen | 2008-06-06 13:34:56

LMAO, that made me laugh out loud. Great response :D

 
 

Comment by Strawberry | 2008-06-06 11:33:28

When all else fails, hit ‘em with humour, baby. Damn Larry and Susan, you crack me up.

Comment by claribel borden | 2008-06-06 12:02:45

It isn’t hitting them with humor, they’re really fucking idiots, who couldn’t fine their assholes with a flashlight and a map, and a walk through..

It’s contempt, strawberry.

Unbridled contempt.

Don’t misread.

Comment by claribel borden | 2008-06-06 12:03:45

find, sorry.

Another typing error.

Again?

Oh jeez…

 
 
 

Comment by Ellen Tenn | 2008-06-06 11:33:47

You got to love those Obama supporters!!! They are just so smart.

Comment by MessyMarcy | 2008-06-06 13:01:01

And rich, too. Cal says so, and an Obamabutt would never lie.

Comment by Fred C. Dobbs | 2008-06-06 21:19:18

If I was in cal’s tax bracket I wouldn’t be bothered to blog myself.

I’d have one of My People do it.

Perhaps he missed the “West Wing” episode where Josh Lyman blogs on his own…

 
 
 

Comment by VJCMAJD | 2008-06-06 11:36:55

Ann Coulter: Barack Obama was selected, not elected: http://www.anncoulter.com/

Constitutional lawsuit against the DNC alleges corruption, violation of the Equal Rights Amendment:
http://tinyurl.com/5breud

Comment by SusanUnPC | 2008-06-06 11:41:48

Ann admires her Plucky Hillary.

Comment by yttik | 2008-06-06 12:19:52

See? Obama’s building unity already, LOL. We’ve got people from every part of the political spectrum coming together to call BS on his BS.

Comment by TeakWoodKite | 2008-06-06 15:56:18

No need for translation when it comes to BS.

Looks and sounds the same in any language.

 
 
 

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-06-06 11:50:30

ann like a broken clock can be correct twice a day

but no more lol argh she’s heinous - tick/tock

Comment by corage | 2008-06-06 11:53:31

now that’s funny. thanks for the laughs.

 
 

Comment by Margaret | 2008-06-06 12:23:22

Thanks for both of these.

I’m a lawyer and I’ve read the lawsuit against the DNC and I think it’s a strong case. The case argues Florida Democrats made efforts to have the primary within required time period, but as minorities in a Repub legislature w/ Repub governor were unable to do so. DNC, by stripping the whole Florida delegation, violates it’s own rules that say it won’t punish states to made good faith efforts to comply.

The case also makes a strong argument that DNC has violated the equal protection clause in the Constitution, because three other states also violated the “timing rule” but were not punished.

We’ll see what happens. The Supreme Court “selection” of George Bush in 2000 was a pitifully weak case without a legal leg to stand on. Sometimes politics trumps compliance with the law. Hope that won’t happen this time.

Comment by hillarysmygirl | 2008-06-06 12:58:45

Margaret, although I understand the point involving equal protection, I thought the other lawsuits had been thrown out because the court didn’t want to get involved in the party’s internal decisions?

Comment by AnninCa | 2008-06-06 13:00:46

I think the lawsuit approach has been thoroughly discouraged by the courts.

You are correct.

It’s a dead end.

 

Comment by AnninCa | 2008-06-06 13:00:46

I think the lawsuit approach has been thoroughly discouraged by the courts.

You are correct.

It’s a dead end.

 
 
 
 

Comment by Pat Hickey | 2008-06-06 11:36:58

Lawrence,

Old Ben is veritable emporium of mixed metaphors and imperative stylistics!

Ben, I’ll bet that you are grinning like a Golden Lab with pot-roast flavored a$$hole!

Well done, Ben!

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-06-06 11:52:28

I wonder which BEN it is?

Ben Stein?

Ben AFfleck?

Ben Dover? (pahahaha)

what a punk

 

Comment by Fred C. Dobbs | 2008-06-06 21:21:36

Metaphors by MixMaster.

Cliches by De Carload!

 
 

Comment by AnninCa | 2008-06-06 11:39:11

Gotta have some fun some of the time, anyway! LOL*

I employ the agreement method. It’s something I learned along the way to deal with drunks.

“You could be right!”

“I agree with this point!”

But while that response shuts off the poster, it is a bit prissy.

Once in awhile, good girls get to have some fun, too!

Or at least live vicariously through retorts like Larry’s.

Comment by rjj | 2008-06-06 11:56:07

plus it is a really really mean thing to do when someone is spoiling for a fight.

 
 

Comment by VJCMAJD | 2008-06-06 11:42:40

Here’s a partial schedule to the Rainbow/Push Coalition annual conference in question:

http://tinyurl.com/4b5d8r

Greta has demanded the tape be released now, not as some post-August strategy!

 

Comment by Steve | 2008-06-06 11:48:45

These Obama supporters sure like to use the word ‘tool’ a lot. Frequently enough for me to think that at least 60% of them are actually the same person.

Comment by roseeriter | 2008-06-06 12:10:59

No the ‘tool’ is from Bob the Builder as in Yes We Can another cute steal for the Obamabot kids.

Larry and Susan you both are the best!! Thank you.

 
 

Comment by Moo | 2008-06-06 11:51:56

The Obots have tried to strong-arm every forum on the web that does not worship at the feet of the Omessiah. They have attacked advertisers on News Programs and on web sites via emails. Sadly, noquarter is not the first and is actually pretty far down the list….what set the Obots off into a scorch and burn mode was the posts about the ‘Whitey’ tape.

 

Comment by MEE | 2008-06-06 11:52:28

by the way is it true the “good” governor is running an anti-Barrack campaign????I wonder who will be the loudest canary..REZKO or the Governor??? Hope Obama enjoys reading the Chicago papers while he is there ….Good reading SENATOR

 

Comment by Linda | 2008-06-06 11:56:42

ROFLMAO….omg, thank you LR

Comment by Linda | 2008-06-06 11:58:31

*sorry, typo*…I guess I was still laughing too hard, s/b L J

 
 

Comment by corage | 2008-06-06 11:56:48

i like kill them with kindest, but kill them with sarcasm works better for me.

 

Comment by bmc | 2008-06-06 11:57:25

I still don’t know why you don’t publish their full names and IP addresses, for all to see. If someone feels it’s that important to them to say whatever vile thing they have to say, why protect their anonymity? They are such narcissists [like their leader, Barack] that they should reap the public scrutiny they so richly deserve.

That’s my lesson no. 1 in how to handle Obamabots–and cult followers. Shine a big spotlight on them; they are begging for it, so give it to them, let them be “famous” and publish their names.

Comment by norma | 2008-06-06 12:05:36

Yes, just like when you turn the lights on and the all of the cockroaches scatter.

 
 

Comment by Uppity | 2008-06-06 11:58:19

Hell I handled them by making them crazy. They can’t reach me by email. Makes em crazy. Susan gets them from my NQ pieces and throws them in the trash where they belong

 

Comment by BluDawg | 2008-06-06 11:59:25

Ben belongs to a generation of sheep.

Follow the character on the screen!
Just read the flow chart!

 

Comment by uhh somehow this notion that I am qualified to be president is uhh uhh ridiculous | 2008-06-06 11:59:34

Great Job Larry!

Thanks so much for not letting them get to you. You are touching a nerve with your Audacity to Hope people see Obama for what he really is.

Keep up the great work! Susan, too. You are the best!

 

Comment by Uppity | 2008-06-06 12:00:11

I love the “You sir” opening. It’s so Bush Sycophant. THey are so much like Bush’s swooners in every way.

Comment by Clinton Fan | 2008-06-06 12:38:14

They get that shit from that Old Man Olbermann. He thinks it makes him sound like Ed Murrow.

Of course, Ed Murrow only fucked around with women in his age range–he wasn’t shacking up with girls young enough to be his YOUNGEST daughter.

Comment by Fred C. Dobbs | 2008-06-06 21:25:58

AT least he’s messing with girls, and not WIde Stancing his way across America.

KO, however, has begun an inexorable slide down That Loasthsome Road to mediocrity.

Someone needs to strap him into a chair and make him watch, “A Face in the Crowd,” twice.

 
 
 

Comment by Linda | 2008-06-06 12:02:23

Susan wrote “(The joy is in now much Larry’s response made me laugh. And, the idiocy and thuggery of these vicious dolts inspire me to keep doing what we’re doing here at No Quarter.)”

Yes, thank you. I coudln’t agree more and SOOOO appreciate you and the others here.

 

Comment by corage | 2008-06-06 12:03:37

larry, susan - i’m not a regular here, but read more than post. since i don’t hang at tm any longer because of the change of policy, i will be here more often. it’s nice to be here with like-minded people.

and, i’m pretty good at troll stomping if i do say so myself…so count me in as backup support.

Comment by **== President & Commander-in-Chief Hillary Clinton **== | 2008-06-06 12:10:48

Welcome aboard!

 

Comment by karen for Clinton | 2008-06-06 12:26:06

This place will be in full celebration mode when “the anointed one” self-destructs.

How long does he think he can get away with it all?

Comment by Fred C. Dobbs | 2008-06-06 21:28:45

I am willing to start a Proposition Bet at a Las Vegas casino’s Sports Book with the date.

I said, back in January, that he’d be as irrelevant as Gary Hart by 15 April, so it’s easy to see why I’m not a sports handicapper.

 
 
 

Comment by LN | 2008-06-06 12:04:41

Hey Susan and Larry,

Just sent you a copy of the email I just got from Emily’s list begging me to support nobama. Hah! I sent them back a piece of my mind instead.

 

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-06-06 12:07:30

You all know that Keith goober olberdouche blogs at KOS right?

boy that BEN sure sounds like Keith when he gets all crazy and starts shaking

kinda like how tweety gets when he starts drooling

they are hysterical amateur songbirds

singing to any choir that will let them start the hymn

drinking that heavenly white hating joy juice and praising JESUS as they exhale

makes ya want to throw UP and then toss the TV off the balcony

 

Comment by barbh | 2008-06-06 12:11:13

Really sad that you and Susan have to deal with this and the people who had a web page up also. These thugs just don’t get how much damage they are doing to their candidate. It makes anyone on the fence not at all likely to ever support their candidate.

Someone on TL the other day was making a reference to Hitler and the Hitler Youth. It’s not so far fetched considering these kind of acts against dissenters to the OFB (Obama Fan Base).

Sad, sad, thank you both for putting up with it. Kind of scary when you think about. Trying to shut all dissent down by strong arm tactics.

 

Comment by Thrasyboulos | 2008-06-06 12:11:45

Paul Lukasiak on how the DNC met in secret to hand Obama Clinton’s delegates via the corrupt Donna Brazile.

http://tinyurl.com/4nw4od

 

Comment by Lyn | 2008-06-06 12:13:42

Did you see THIS???

If you want to complain about the title in the article below, please
contact. It refers to Sen. Hillary Clinton.

The Post’s Ombudsman, Deborah Howell, is the readers’ representative
within the newspaper. E-mail her at ombuds…@washpost.com or call
202-334-7582.

email the author
http://projects.washingtonpost.com/staff/email/howard+kurtz/

and

Leonard Downie, Jr. : executive editor
http://projects.washingtonpost.com/staff/email/leonard+downie+jr./

Hey, Ho, Please Don’t Go
By Howard Kurtz
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, June 6, 2008; 9:49 AM
http://tinyurl.com/62a62a

Comment by roseeriter | 2008-06-06 12:25:10

Imus was fired for using that word. Think I’ll send an email to that misogynist Kurtz. When will it ever stop?

Comment by Clinton Fan | 2008-06-06 13:06:50

They have NO FUCKING SHAME. It’s “OK” to fuck with women–Obama has spoken, SWEETIE.

Kurtz is an asshole. So is the entire Washington Post franchise. That headline didn’t write itself, some editors had to see it and OK it.

They’re throwing down. Fuck all the HOs, they have no clout.

Bastards.

 
 

Comment by Susan1968 | 2008-06-06 12:39:56

I sent the emails.

This is horrible yet a prime example of the sexism they claim does not exist.

Maybe we should send complaints emails to all the “journalists” on that site too.

Comment by roseeriter | 2008-06-06 12:48:00

I have too, and I posted this at a few more women group spots. Shame on Howie!

 
 

Comment by Fernschild | 2008-06-06 12:57:04

Lyn, thanks for the heads up. Fired off an e-mail already. I swear to God I feel like my life’s mission consists mainly of pointing out the obvious to people who haven’t a clue. It’s like constantly having to explain why wheels are round.

 

Comment by Kirsten | 2008-06-06 13:05:41

Pretty weak. Right up there with calling Obama something that rhymes with “darky”.

“Wait — it’s supposed to sound like ‘bark’, because he’s all bark and no bite.” “C’mon, it’s an obvious allusion to the Ramones’ ‘Blitzkrieg Bop.’”

It’s the same idea.

“Well, they did it first.” Aren’t we supposed to be able to rise above that? Isn’t that why we didn’t torture criminals, gave them fair and speedy trials, etc., regardless of what they were accused of?

(Sorry, not trying to minimize Kurtz’s title (or presumably his title, although columnists don’t necessarily write their own headlines), but that’s been bugging me for the few days I’ve been here.)

Comment by Clinton Fan | 2008-06-06 13:13:21

Are you a fucking professional apologist, or what?

EDITORS at the POST saw that fucking headline. SOMEONE wrote it.

And calling people HO is NOT acceptable.

Jesus–how the fuck old are you? Don’t you realize, “Kirstin,” that women who came before you were beaten, jailed and abused to give your privleged ass the right to VOTE, the right to own your own PROPERTY, the right to not be sold off in marriage, the right to reproductive choice?

You’re a fucking asshole and idiot if you think this is ‘no big deal.’ You clearly don’t know the history of your own gender–if you even are a female of our species.

You probably don’t think, while picking out your low rise jeans and worrying about who you are gonna “hook up with,” that women STILL–in this fucking country–make seventy five lousy goddamn cents for every buck a male makes.

What’s pretty WEAK is you–for going along and getting along. Push off, ya pushover.

Comment by Kirsten | 2008-06-06 13:22:13

I meant that Kurtz’s headline was weak. Not that Lyn’s comments were. Sorry for the confusion.

 
 
 

Comment by Susan1968 | 2008-06-06 13:20:29

PS: And in addition to sending the emails, I sent it to all my female contacts and asked them to forward it to their female contacts.

Comment by Susan1968 | 2008-06-06 13:22:48

Oh, and here’s a copy of my note to Howard:

Your blatant sexism in the headline, “Hey, Ho, Please Don’t Go,” for your recent article about Hillary Clinton, is an insult to all women including your wife, your mother, your sisters, your daughters and every woman who has ever had a positive impact on your life.

I demand an apology and expect you to use your compromised journalistic skills to tell the truth about the sexist terms used by the press to demean Senator Clinton during the Democratic Primary.

Please know I am circulating your verbal assault to all my contacts in addition to emailing your superiors.

Comment by roseeriter | 2008-06-06 13:31:01

That was way better than mine. I told him he had now been outed as another MSM misogynist pig.

Comment by Where'sTheTape? | 2008-06-06 18:01:12

Good grief. You people are acting like hypersensitive, clueless nuts. I hope Kurtz is laughing about how ridiculous you all are- I know I am. There was NOTHING sexist in that headline.
If you want to talk about sexism (and probably racism) let’s talk about someone who uses rumor and slander to try and smear a accomplished African American female, not to mention a woman who would make a fabulous first lady- and the first First Lady of color.

 

Comment by Fred C. Dobbs | 2008-06-06 21:32:22

I just asked him: “What the f**k are you people THINKING of?”

 
 

Comment by Where'sTheTape? | 2008-06-06 17:56:40

Lighten up. How are you this oblivious to what that headline means? Howard Kurtz grew up in the 60s. In the 60s that was a VERY common chant. It has nothing to do with being a “HOE” or as you say “HO”. Get your mind out of the gutter and quit being so ridiculously hypersensitive. You are acting unbelievably silly. Grow up.

Comment by Fred C. Dobbs | 2008-06-06 21:36:06

Aw, this is where we go when we need to put our goats on short tethers and over-react. If we Grew Up, it’d spoil our Fun!!!!

BTW, I think you are probably correct, but imagining Kurtz getting a few hundred irate e-mails from bloggers on a site owned by a former Republican might have a certain amusement value in itself.

 
 
 
 

Comment by Susan1968 | 2008-06-06 13:34:11

Here’s another email to use:

letters@washpost.com

Let’s use drown them in emails.

Comment by roseeriter | 2008-06-06 13:51:24

Thanks Susan. I’ve sent this to all my female friends. I wonder how Howie will report this on his Sunday show about the media on CNN.

I sent these words, too:

Howard Kurtz calls Hillary a Ho?? If I recall Imus was fired for using that word. I demand no less. Fire that misogynist NOW! Howard Kurtz and the post should be ashamed of them selves!! Or do none of you have wives, mothers, daughters, sisters, neices, grand daughters???

Hillary has served this nation with HONOR and you dare demean and belittle her day in and day out!

Shame Shame Shame!

A pox on the lot of you!

Comment by ulahane | 2008-06-06 13:58:50

Is Obama on CNN yet saying that Howard Kurtz should be fired, like he did with Imus?

 
 

Comment by Where'sTheTape? | 2008-06-06 18:08:01

Boo hoo. Drown them in emails. They’ll think what a bunch of oversensitive, crazy, crybabies- who don’t even know that was a common chant in the 60s. What planet are you people from that you don’t know that?

Comment by Denise | 2008-06-07 14:55:39

We are are the planet earth in 2008 not the 60’s. I lived once through that time and do not intend to do it again.Has anyone noticed that throughout Obama’s campaign he and his wife have tried to be Jacki and John Kennedy. Look at the way she dresses, its for effect. the whole thing is planned that way. They have the youth vote because the youth are effected by the media more than any other generation. Statics just out say that this is the dumbest generation in the history of American education. Thats why everyone wants to change it. This generation missed at lot of Civics classes. They have no idea that Obama will not be able to change the things he says he will, without Congress backing him. If you notice also, the congress this week has been passing bills in the house, that we have been trying to get passed for years. If Obama realy wanted to change things, the place to be is in the Senate, where changes starts and stops.

 
 
 

Comment by Susan1968 | 2008-06-06 14:14:46

UPDATE ON HOWARD KURTZ!!!

He sent me an email, one sentence, complete with weird breaks and no punctuation at the end:

I have just posted a note saying I certainly didn’t mean people to read the
word “ho” and I’m sorry if I gave anyone
the wrong impression

Huh? Here’s his headline:

Hey, Ho, Please Don’t Go
By Howard Kurtz
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, June 6, 2008; 9:49 AM
http://tinyurl.com/62a62a

Anwyay, in answering me he provided his direct email which is:

kurtzh@washpost.com

Comment by John | 2008-06-06 14:44:38

The headline has been edited and
here’s the lamest excuse of the century now posted in the body of the article:

“( Note: The original headline on this column was “Hey, Ho, Please Don’t Go,” which is, of course, a play on Vietnam-era antiwar chants that often began “Hey Hey, Ho Ho.” It frankly never occurred to me that some readers would seize on the “ho” and view that as a disparaging remark about Hillary Clinton. As someone who has criticized some of the sexist treatment she has received, I regret if anyone took that the wrong way.)”

Yeah, and I have a couple of bridges to sell you.
Please don’t insult our intelligence!

Comment by roseeriter | 2008-06-06 14:51:14

Yeah, we’re stupid…NOT! They thought it would go unnoticed. Imus regretted it and he was joking around. An article in the Washington Post is pretty serious stuff. If Kurtz is that stupid that must be why he is part of the MSM.

 
 

Comment by Kirsten | 2008-06-06 14:54:46

Pretty weak apology by Kurtz as well. It has even worse scansion than “Hey, ho… let’s go!” and makes just as little sense contextually. These are the kinds of things that editors are supposed to catch.

*sigh*

 
 

Comment by John | 2008-06-06 14:26:55

Here is what I wrote to the above links individually:

You sir owe an apology to

1. Mrs. Clinton
2. your readership, especially women
3. your own mother, wife, sister, daughter, et. al

for this disgusting headline that ran in your paper over Howard Kurtz’s byline. If the article were about Obama and entitled “Hey N*gg*r please don’t go” would you have published it? This type of verbiage is unacceptable in civilized discourse. One might expect it from the Taliban but not an American newspaper. You should all hang your heads in shame.

 

Comment by cowgirlblues | 2008-06-07 01:24:20

Thanks, I just snt him an e-mail asking if he got his journalism degree at the South Park kindergarten

 
 

Comment by typical.white.person | 2008-06-06 12:17:59

Psychologists have determined the level of denial in Obamatrons is at record levels in proportion to other psychological illnesses.

There is much concern as to what can happen when these Obamatron’s bubble of denial finally bursts.

According to the most recent FoxNews Alert, these Obamatrons will most likely riot when the truth about The Chosen One is published and their leader’s heretofore embellished image meets reality.

The Chosen One will become A Man of Rhetoric. A Blower of Hot Air. Only it is confusing sometimes which end the hot air is coming out of.

Due to these findings and the impending riot that will follow, a 12-step program for Obamatrons-in-Denial is being rapidly created.

A 1-800 number will be provided shortly for Obamatrons seeking assistance.

Sadly, Obamatronitis is like heroin. It is only treatable, not curable. These delusional fanatics will be inflicted the rest of their lives by their psychosis.

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-06-06 12:20:11

(serious snicker)

 

Comment by catherine | 2008-06-06 12:23:16

Kind of like those Nazis who always found ways to justify what they did because “If only you had heard the fuhrer speak! If only you had been in his presence you would understand!” Sad.

Comment by Fred C. Dobbs | 2008-06-06 21:42:14

Ja! Der Fueher vass missundershtood!

Und der Kaiser vass a Chentleman!

I had NO idea vere dose boxcars were going with der Juden aboard!

Shoulda given those shitballs to the Russians to use for pets. Sixty five years of taking it up the giggy from Ivan would have humbled the little kraut-munchers right down, eh?

 
 

Comment by Hillcrat | 2008-06-06 12:45:15

(hehehee…)

I just heard on the radio *Kool-aid* will be experimenting with *low-sugar Kool-aid* with live oblahmarats. Trial will end in August.

 

Comment by typical.white.person | 2008-06-06 16:09:49

Here it is:

One of the Obamatrons going nuts

 

Comment by cowgirlblues | 2008-06-07 01:28:51

Oh MY GOD, they are shooting up the koolaide instead of drinking it-Kicks just keep getting harder to find-I hear they are “huffing” it over at the “post”

 
 

Comment by Hillcrat | 2008-06-06 12:20:13

Ooohh….”toolbag”!
I guess we took all the good ones…Lol!

Good response Larry!

I don’t know if I will be able to watch Hillary’s speech tomorrow. I know she will ask for unity but I just can’t do it. Sorry, Hillary…No can do.
NObitter EVER!!

 

Comment by Jill | 2008-06-06 12:24:50

Any advice on how David Weigel at Reason should handle an e-mailer who, after being called out as a liar, would say something like this:

“You and Reason in the same sentence? Now that’s funny. I don’t recall soliciting an email from you so fuck off.”

I believe his name was Larry Johnson. Thanks.

 

Comment by Margaret | 2008-06-06 12:26:29

Larry, LOL how do you do it? You are the best.

 

Comment by Clinton Fan | 2008-06-06 12:31:37

Is it me, or do these assholes seem UNHAPPY to you, too?

It’s as if they cannot be happy, ever…that their only real joy comes in insulting people who aren’t KoolAid aficionados.

You’d think they’d be celebrating amongst themselves, rather than running around calling Clinton supporters the entire alphabet (a/asshole/b/bitch/c/that WORD they love to use).

They have the shrivelled little balls to call us “low information voters” but let’s call it what it is, here–what they are doing is FUCKING STUPID (unless, of couse, the critical mass of them are working for McCain–in that case, it’s clever as hell! Vicious, but clever…). You don’t get people to join your cause by calling them fucking assholes who need to crawl into holes, or any other insults.

When a member of my family was treated to the “C” word for simply stating her support for Senator Clinton, well, that sort of summed it up for my family. We’ve decided that the Obamabots are indeed, subpar mentally, perhaps as a result of poor diet and too many drugs with many of them, and they aren’t worth dealing with, because they can’t even recite a single thing their candidate is actually FOR.

Hope/Change/Believe is NOT a foreign policy, any more than YEEHAW was.

Comment by AnninCa | 2008-06-06 12:45:36

What’s to celebrate? He’s not really won. He even was so crass as to announce his “win” 2 days after he stole 4 of her delegates and timed it so that she’d not be able to enjoy her last win.

He confirmed every mean thought we’ve had that he’s a jerk.

So why would they get to celebrate?

The reaction is the consequence of a dirty and nasty campaign by Obama. In Chicago, they expect this and expect people to go with the flow.

But Chicago politics don’t really resonate with those of us in CA or other places.

There is no glory in stealing the election.

 

Comment by larryfan | 2008-06-06 12:53:19

I wish some of the things that the ObamBiBots are up to is also known by their family…..

Most are shacked up in their parents house, mooching off their parents (explains the amount of time they have for their tomfoolery….)

I have a feeling that if/when you see the ObamBiBots in person who is writing/threatening the crazy stuff online—-they are really harmless, obviously mindless trolls….with empty lives, harboring resentment to society that has rejected them as inept fools……

ALSO———. Probably made fun of in highschool…..friendless…and have found acceptance in the cult like atmoshpere of OBAMALAND.

Comment by roseeriter | 2008-06-06 13:01:29

sounds like many are little Karl Rove wannabees..

 
 

Comment by hillarysmygirl | 2008-06-06 13:10:27

I think that’s Obambi’s new campaign slogan:

Hope, Change, Believe, Yeehaw!

Comment by ritamary | 2008-06-06 15:18:09

Is that replacing their campaign slogan “bros before hos”?

 
 

Comment by cowgirlblues | 2008-06-07 01:35:30

Damn-props to you guys and girls-you could write for SNL-this is good bed time reading except I will be laughing instead of sleeping-Permission to use “hope change believe-is NOT a foreign policy??????

 

Comment by Denise | 2008-06-07 15:03:16

His supporters are for the Black folk.

 
 

Comment by Smith | 2008-06-06 12:40:50

These Obamabots are everywhere they are like coach roaches defending their queen Barack Obama.

Comment by roseeriter | 2008-06-06 12:51:04

Umm that would make Michele the queen bee, Obama is the drone..

Comment by larryfan | 2008-06-06 12:56:41

ObamBI = Queen = L.Sinclair = Angry Michelle Obama

 
 
 

Comment by Judith | 2008-06-06 12:55:38

Too funny!!!

 

Comment by Elaine | 2008-06-06 12:58:07

Here’s 2 things I have made observed…1…Have any of you seen Evan Almighty?? Well,if not here’s a odd coincidence..He is running for congressmen and get this his slogan is are you ready… CHANGE..sound familar??? Guess BO was watching it with his kids and decided it sounded good..just a thought on that one and I am one person who has seen the “change” in people over BO. My best friend is black, democrat and very smart… she was all for Hill and then out of nowhere she started saying this BO is really great (as i scatch my head) so I said what are you saying he is this and that and she BLEW..ripped my head right off.. that was 3 mos ago and we have not spoken about politics since then..I just let it go wasn’t worth getting in a fight over it…MCCain 08 for me and even if Hill takes the VP (please god no) I’m staying with MAC

 

Comment by JDRhoades | 2008-06-06 13:07:27

How to handle a Hill-steric:

Point out that their candidate not only lost, she’s conceding and supporting the man they call “Bambi” , “Barky” and other juvenile names.

Or you could just ignore them. they become more irrelevant by the day.

Comment by Clinton Fan | 2008-06-06 13:32:46

Why don’t you take your own fucking advice, there, smartass?

Because you CAN’T. You’re so “happy” about your candidate that you have to run around sticking a knife in people who don’t agree with you.

How fucking HOPEFUL is that? Is that your idea of CHANGE?

I BELIEVE you have your pinhead up your ass.

 

Comment by David Axisrutt | 2008-06-06 13:38:54

Redneck noir? What kind of a jackass are you?

he claims to have ingested marijuana, peyote, heroin, psilocybin, uppers, downers, screamers, laughers, dried banana peels, glue, paste, mucilage, LSD, DMT, STP, ABC, CNN, TLC, Sterno, Drano, Bondo, Ketamine, Dopamine, glucosamine, Ovaltine, and Krispy Kreme

Just looking at your picture I can tell you’re stupid.

Susan? Zap this troll please.

Comment by roseeriter | 2008-06-06 13:53:38

Obama’s experimented with all that?? For real??

no wonder he has so many followers…

 
 

Comment by Susan1968 | 2008-06-06 13:55:27

You Obama people are STILL attacking Hillary.

You’re caught in a Hate Hillary Matrix.

Your minds have become short circuited.

Try to foucs on this: NO WAY YOU GUY WILL WIN THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE.

No. Way.

Donna Brazile’s “new map” is a fairy tale.

If amyone has handed the GOP this election, it’s Obama supporters.

 

Comment by Blu | 2008-06-06 15:41:26

Hillary has a lot invested in the Democratic party and will back obama. Her supporters are/were Democrats because the party represented their interest up until this selection process.
Walking away from this corrupted party is no harder than switching from MSNBC to Fox News.

I supported Hillary’s campaign, I do not worship her and I will not follow her to the gates of hell.

 

Comment by cowgirlblues | 2008-06-07 01:41:37

Ah Yes, but here you are drawn back into the web, and I am watching you struggle enjoying every minute as I slowly work my way down the web, thinking about whether to pull your legs off first or your wings..decisions decisions-damn I am getting hungry…

 

Comment by Denise | 2008-06-07 15:06:10

DID NOT CONCEDE ANYTHING. LOL SHE SUPENDED CAMPAIGN. IDIOT.

 
 

Comment by JDRhoades | 2008-06-06 13:15:27

Shorter comments thread:

Waah waah waah everybody’s against us, we’re such put upon victims.

Jesus, people, grow the hell up. You don’t have to be a laughingstock forever, but you will be so long as you refuse to face reality:

1) THERE IS NO TAPE.

2) BARACK OBAMA IS THE DEMOCRATIC NOMINEE.

3) JOHN MCCAIN=4 MORE YEARS OF BUSH

Comment by Clinton Fan | 2008-06-06 13:29:58

Hey, assclown–piss off!

A Democratic Congress will just have to WORK for a change.

You don’t know how your own government works, I see.

Bush didn’t make laws–Congress did.

Bush NOMINATED appointees–the SENATE advised and consented to them.

Bush can’t spend money unless CONGRESS gives it to him.

Barack Obama, if he remains the nominee, will end up as yet another LOSER in the Dukakis-Kerry mold.

And the Democratic Congress WILL have to work. And life will go on.

Comment by anonimousvex | 2008-06-06 21:57:03

Hey, assclown–piss off!

A Democratic Congress will just have to WORK for a change.

You don’t know how your own government works, I see.

Bush didn’t make laws–Congress did.
Bush ignored them.

Bush NOMINATED appointees–the SENATE advised and consented to them.
Bush made recess appointments

Bush can’t spend money unless CONGRESS gives it to him.
Bush declares that Congress has no authority in times of war.

Barack Obama, if he remains the nominee, will end up as yet another LOSER in the Dukakis-Kerry mold.
McInsane = will follow in Bushes footsteps

And the Democratic Congress WILL have to work. And life will go on.
100 years of war… Yeeehaw.

There fixed.

Comment by cowgirlblues | 2008-06-07 01:52:53

thats right a 100 years of war-your Obama butt will be drafted-You will have to serve “God Damn Amerikka” and any genetic trace of you and your kind will disappear from the face of the earth that is plan B for getting rid of you in case plan A doesn’t work-you will pay for your sins and your chickens will come home to roost on your carcus. and I’m having a good day-so don’t cross me when I am having a bad one

 
 
 

Comment by David Axisrutt | 2008-06-06 13:32:42

How come all your books are on sale, marked down to near zero?

 

Comment by Blu | 2008-06-06 15:28:16

Reality is:

1) Tape has not been released for public consumption
2)Obama is the PRESUMPTIVE nominee, the votes that count are not cast or counted until the convention in August
3)McCain has his faults but he loves this country. Obama loves power

 
 

Comment by Blu | 2008-06-06 13:20:36

With new marching orders coming down from the messiah, Obama drones will need a cadence call…

I don’t know but I been told
Obama’s rhetoric getting old

Sound off!
One, two,
Sound off!
Three, four,
Cadence call
One, two, three, four
One, two, three,four

I don’t know but I been told
Clinton’s worth her weight in gold

All those elitist on the Hill
Fed me that Obama pill

If Obama beats McCain,
Life will never be the same

Perhaps he’ll win ‘cause he’s black
But he‘s just a political hack

Got a wife dressed in red
Did you hear what she said?

Called us whiteys one and all,
She‘ll eventually bring his fall.

I don’t know, but it’s been said
Her and the Rev are seeing red

Sound off!
One, two,
Sound off!
Three, four,
Cadence call
One, two, three, four
One, two, three,four

Every time you stamp yo’ feet
The DNC will feel the heat.

Ain’t no use in throwing stones
We are just Obama drones.

Ain’t no use to sit and hope
Barack Obama’s just a dope

We all chanted “yes we can”
Now we see the master plan

Sound off!
One, two,
Sound off!
Three, four,
Cadence call
One, two, three, four
One, two, three,four.

 

Comment by David Axisrutt | 2008-06-06 13:24:12

May I suggest? That you save all these? With full (not partial) headers? And at a later point in time set up a web page or a site where they’re all posted?

 

Comment by cleek | 2008-06-06 13:42:49

Larry Johnson can’t even think up his own smears.

What a hack!

Comment by cowgirlblues | 2008-06-07 01:56:37

Thats funny-coming from a guy with smears in his underwear…

 
 

Comment by Susan1968 | 2008-06-06 13:47:27

How to attempt to irritate an Obama supporter:

If you hate middle-aged white women, blue collar workers, Jews, Isreal, Hispanics and senior citizens, vote for Obama.

I’m going to see if I can fit this on a bumper sticker but — instead of arguing with the Obama ditto-heads here, I invite my fellow anti-Obama supporters to post this all over political message boards, especially on those where INDEPENDENT VOTERS FREQUENT.

Because indy’s are the voting block that will determine.

Comment by Susan1968 | 2008-06-06 13:52:08

Typo alert: Israel is the proper spelling.

If you hate middle-aged white women, blue collar workers, Jews, Israel, Hispanics and senior citizens, vote for Obama.

 

Comment by cowgirlblues | 2008-06-07 01:59:37

Pat Bucanan said tonite if only 25% of hillary voters go for McCain-Obama loses

 
 

Comment by Al | 2008-06-06 13:49:06

High five to LJ. lol

 

Comment by Silver | 2008-06-06 14:01:23

This is what I don’t understand about the constant harassment by Obama fans. Seems like they’re always achin’ to pick a fight—like they’re the reincarnation of guests from the Jerry Springer Show or gunslingers from the wild west.

What’s the point of going to pro-Hillary blogs to stir up trouble? It’s pretty much a sure thing that they’re not going to sway anybody’s opinion towards Obama, especially the rude way they approach it. They should really ask McCain about getting on HIS payroll, because they’re phenomenal at recruiting new voters. If they were tele-marketers, their commission would be in the millions!!

 

Comment by Alex | 2008-06-06 14:03:37

You Obama people are STILL attacking Hillary.

“You people”? What’s that supposed to mean?

Heh.

 

Comment by Susan1968 | 2008-06-06 14:12:23

UPDATE ON HOWARD KURTZ!!!

He sent me an email, one sentence:

I have just posted a note saying I certainly didn’t mean people to read the
word “ho” and I’m sorry if I gave anyone
the wrong impression

Huh? Here’s his headline:

Hey, Ho, Please Don’t Go
By Howard Kurtz
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, June 6, 2008; 9:49 AM
http://tinyurl.com/62a62a

Anwyay, in answering me he provided his direct email which is:

kurtzh@washpost.com

Comment by roseeriter | 2008-06-06 14:44:04

That’s it?? Not enough, barely even an apology. I’m beginning to think that the MSM and Obama use ‘Just Words” as in Sticks and Stones will break my bones but words will never hurt me. WRONG! Verbal abuse is extremely hurtful and hard to forget. Bruises heal and disappear. Words, especially the wrong words always seem to come back to the speaker and bite ‘em in the ass.

We should stay on top of Howie.

Comment by Susan1968 | 2008-06-06 14:51:50

If you go to the article link you’ll see he changed the headline but has buried the following apology deep in the text of the article (you have to scroll down to find it). I emailed him back and told him we demand the apology be placed at top.

Howie’s (buried) apology:

( Note: The original headline on this column was “Hey, Ho, Please Don’t Go,” which is, of course, a play on Vietnam-era antiwar chants that often began “Hey Hey, Ho Ho.” It frankly never occurred to me that some readers would seize on the “ho” and view that as a disparaging remark about Hillary Clinton. As someone who has criticized some of the sexist treatment she has received, I regret if anyone took that the wrong way.)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/blog/2008/06/06/BL2008060601601.html

Comment by roseeriter | 2008-06-06 15:09:05

I see what you mean. Not acceptable but a good way to stop the letters as now people will go to the link and wonder what all the fuss was about by seeing a safe title.

Well at least we made an attempt. He’ll remember, I’m sure, so we did some good I hope.

 

Comment by Fred C. Dobbs | 2008-06-06 21:53:10

Another non-sequitur from Howie.

It was:

“Ho, Ho, Ho Chi Min!
The NVA is gonna win!”

That was preceeded by:

“Hey, Hey, LBJ!
How many kids did you kill today?”

It REALLY helps if you were alive and paying attention when all that was going on…

Comment by cowgirlblues | 2008-06-07 02:18:10

I’ve been boning up on the Chicago 68 convention in preparation for the demostrations against the DNC, looking for a fashionable gas mask at gas masks r us, Getting some long nails put on for some serious eye gouging, some brass kneecaps for groining, some Obama pixie dust for turning trolls into turds, some John Denver tunes my best jailhouse rock outfit, a bunch of chickens on a leash, 5 dancing reverands, and well the list goes on and on—denver or bust

 
 
 
 

Comment by Where'sTheTape? | 2008-06-06 17:52:49

Why are you hassling Howard Kurtz? The guy is nice enough to respond to you and you put his email address out there for Larry’s crazy readers to hassle him? Talk about a snake in the grass move. And “Hey Ho We Want Go” was a chant in the 60s! Good grief. Way to be hypersensitive. I’m guessing you just love finding shit to get outraged about.

Comment by cowgirlblues | 2008-06-07 02:21:03

hey Charlie Brown-It was “Hell no-We Won’t Go..inrefrence to the vietnam war

 
 
 

Comment by JDRhoades | 2008-06-06 14:14:25

Remember when?

CNN denies it has picture of Clinton burning flag

NEW YORK, Oct 29, Reuter - Cable News Network denied that it has a photograph showing Democratic presidential candidate Gov. Bill Clinton burning
an American flag.
“We are aware that rumors have been around for some time that such a photograph exists,” said Eileen Murphy, a spokeswoman for CNN in New York. “As
far as we know, no-one at CNN is in possession of such a photograph.”
Traders in the financial markets reported speculation that CNN intended to broadcast a picture of Clinton burning a flag.
Earlier, ABC TV denied rumors it would air footage of Clinton burning a flag in a 1960’s anti-Vietnam war demo.

Same shit, different day. Pity what Hillary learned from these smears was how to repeat them.

Comment by olo | 2008-06-06 16:13:50

…and I firmly deny I have a picture of McBush eating a Mexican baby.

 
 

Comment by Right On | 2008-06-06 14:38:20

ACTION ALERT — FOLKS, folks… the Obambi supporter Jim Gerrity from that Communist smutfest National Review Online is attempting to undermine Lary’s tape http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/!!

Please. please folks let’s hit that site with everythinvery TRUE-BLOODED American knows that tape is real!!

Lary would not make something like this up!! It;s too impotant.

DONATE NOW!! Sell those PLaystations and Bikes! All the way to DENVER!!

Comment by SAIEW | 2008-06-06 16:19:37

NRO? Communist smutfest?

Is this snark?

 
 

Comment by Scarlet | 2008-06-06 15:48:18

Larry and Susan,
Thank you for hosting this site. Your articles are right on. We need more vetting of our candidates, not the minimal cursory job that the MSM has done so far.

The obamabots with their comments are not convincing anyone to stand behind their choice. In fact, most people are repelled by their comments and actions, and have serious concerns about Senator Obama and his ability to handle the highest office in this country.

Larry, always appreciate the humorous way you deal with the obamabots.

 

Comment by SAIEW | 2008-06-06 16:20:43

Larry’s so clever. Wonder why he can’t come up with his own smears and has to steal someone else’s storylines?

 

Comment by JDRhoades | 2008-06-06 16:54:34

What’s the point of going to pro-Hillary blogs to stir up trouble? It’s pretty much a sure thing that they’re not going to sway anybody’s opinion towards Obama, especially the rude way they approach it.

You dickheads have already insisted you’ll vote for McSame because you’re so pissed off that “Barky” beat Sen. Clinton, so what is there to lose by mocking you?

Comment by cowgirlblues | 2008-06-07 02:23:55

YOUR OWN DIGNITY-stupid

 
 

Comment by Where'sTheTape? | 2008-06-06 17:44:56

Wow, Larry really showed that Obamabot. So where’s the tape? Because there’s a post on kos saying this whole fiasco is the result of a book- a made up book. Seeing as how Larry has said he knows someone who knows someone who has seen it (but Larry himself has never seen it) I’m thinking the post on kos is probably more accurate than Larry’s columns- and that Larry’s “sources” decided to play him for a fool. I do thank Larry for allowing all folks to comment. Considering how bad Tapegate has made him look it’s amazing he still allows himself to be called out.

Comment by cowgirlblues | 2008-06-07 02:26:57

seems I heard this same flurry of denials about the Rev Wright tapes-and we all know how that turned out

 
 

Comment by Where'sTheTape? | 2008-06-06 18:04:50

Why are all the SO CALLED FEMINISTS on here giving Larry a pass for his misogynistic attack, fueled by rumor (Larry says he spoke to someone who spoke to someone who saw a tape), on Senator Obama’s very accomplished wife? Are you feminists or…..

Comment by Fred C. Dobbs | 2008-06-06 21:56:36

You mean the wife who channels Winnie Mandela?

 
 

Pingback by Ironic comment of the day « Mad Wombat | 2008-06-18 14:09:50

[...] wife, says that all Obama supporters are “drinking the kool-aid” and call them “Obamabots,” and are otherwise generally [...]

 

RSS Feed for This PostPost a Comment

Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)