RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

The Larry Sinclair Saga

Up to this point we have stayed away from the Larry Sinclair story. Larry alleges he did drugs and had consensual sex with Barack Obama. The Obama folks have gone crazy over the Sinclair allegations. Larry had a press conference today at the National Press Club. It was well attended. Shortly after the press conference ended, Larry was arrested. (I am sure this will encourage other folks to come forward and speak out (snark).) Here is Larry’s statement. Decide for yourself.

Good afternoon, my name is Larry Sinclair and I am a former recreational drug user and trafficker, a convicted felon for crimes of forgery, bad checks and theft by check. I am also an American who loves this country and I cannot stay silent regarding Barack Obama knowing what I know.

Today I will discharge my obligation as a citizen to witness this knowledge to you and raise questions for others to investigate and consider. I am going to briefly describe my background, my experience with Senator Obama in 1999, what appears to me to be a coordinated effort to discredit me and finally a list of questions. After this brief statement, I will take and try to answer any reasonable questions.

Background

I am 46 years old and I currently reside in Duluth, MN. I am a US Citizen, and I have made mistakes in my lifetime. I have been convicted and served prison sentences for writing bad checks, forging checks, using stolen credit card numbers in Arizona, Florida and Colorado. These event’s occurred over twenty (20) years ago between 1980 thru 1986. After going public on the internet with these claims against Senator Obama earlier this year, I became aware of a warrant out of Florida from 1986 which I have resolved and it has now been dismissed. I also have an active “Colorado Only” warrant for alleged “Theft and Forgery”. I am not ignoring this warrant but am addressing it with the Court in Colorado as well as with the DA’s office. I have a pending motion to dismiss this warrant which I am waiting to have calendared by the Colorado Court.

I have lived and worked under three different names. My birth name is Lawrence W. Sinclair. Later on, I had my name legally changed first to La-Rye A. Silvas, and then La-Rye Vizcarra Avila. The last two were legal name changes granted by the court in Penal County Superior Court, Florence Arizona. I legally returned to my birth name in the Fremont County District court, Canon City, Colorado in 1997. Obama Incident

I flew out of Colorado Springs, Colorado to Chicago on November 2, 1999, arriving in O’Hare early in the morning of November 3, 1999. I went to the Chicago area to attend the graduation of my god son (my best friend’s son) from basic training from the Great Lakes Navy Training Center. I made reservations at the Comfort Inn and Suites in Gurnee, IL based on location to the Navy Training center. On November 5, 1999, I hired the services of Five Star Limo. I had hired them for both November 5 and November 6. On November 6, 1999, I asked the limo driver – whose name I now reveal for the first time – Paramjit Multani, if he knew anyone who would like to socialize and show me Chicago. Paramjit Multani understood that I was not looking for someone who knew Chicago and would enjoy socializing. Paramjit Multani said he knew someone who was a friend of his.

On November 6, 1999 after picking me up at the Hotel in Gurnee– and this is significant – Paramjit Multani used his cellphone to make a call. That call was made to then-Illinois State Senator Barack Obama to set up an introduction between me and Senator Obama. Upon arriving at the bar and exiting the Limo, Senator Obama was standing next to Paramjit Multani and I was introduced to Senator Obama. Later that evening at a bar which I believe was called Alibis, I mention I could use a line or two to wake up. Senator Obama asked me if I was referring to “coke” and after stating I was, Obama stated he could purchase cocaine for me and then made a telephone call – and this too is significant — from his cellphone to a presently unknown individual during which Senator Obama arranged the cocaine purchase.

Senator Obama and I then departed the bar in my limousine and proceeded to an unknown location where Senator Obama exited the limousine with two hundred fifty dollars ($250) I had given him and returned a short while later with an “eightball” of cocaine which he gave to me. I did ingest a couple of lines of cocaine, and shortly thereafter Senator Obama produced a glass cylinder pipe and packet of crack cocaine from his pants pocket and Obama smoked the crack cocaine. I performed fellatio on Senator Obama in the limousine during the time Senator Obama was smoking crack cocaine, after which I had the driver take me to the my hotel, The Comfort Suits, Gurnee, Illinois.

The following day, November 7, 1999, Senator Obama appeared at my hotel room where we again ingested cocaine and I again performed fellatio on Senator Obama. Significantly, both the driver’s telephone call to Senator Obama and his call to the drug dealer should appear on the driver’s and Senator Obama’s cellphone billing statements. Fall 2007

In September 2007 I contacted the Presidential Campaign of Barack H. Obama, to request solely that Senator Obama publicly correct his stated drug use record to reflect his use of crack cocaine with me in November 1999. When I made that first contact I left with the Presidential Campaign of Senator Barack H. Obama a telephone number for the campaign to return my call. The first number I provided was a Texas cell phone number. From the period of Labor day weekend 2007 through November 18, 2007 I did rovide a total of four (4) different call back numbers to the Obama campaign, as I had moved and had changed the numbers to reflect locally my place of residence at the time. In late September to early October 2007, I received a call from a male who identified himself as a “Mr. Young” stating he was calling in regards to calls I had made to the Obama campaign. This first call was in fact an attempt by “Mr. Young” to obtained from me the identities of anyone I had contacted concerning my 1999 allegations against Senator Obama. This first called shocked me in that this “Mr. Young” asked me why I had not asked Senator Obama to disclose the sexual encounters I had with Mr. Obama in 1999. I was shocked as I had never mentioned to the campaign or anyone working for the campaign any sexual encounters as my call was prompted by drug allegations only. The call ended with “Mr. Young” stating I would hear from someone in a few days.

In mid to late October 2007, I received a second call from this “Mr. Young” at which time I clearly became aware that this individual was personally involved with Senator Obama rather than just an employee of his campaign. The tone of the conversation had a sexual nature. “Mr. Young” did not once advise me how he obtained my phone number which by this time had now changed to a Delaware number.

In late October 2007, I received a text message from the gentleman identified as “Mr. Young” in which he stated he was intimately involved with Senator Obama and that Obama was discussing with him and his pastor how to publicly acknowledge Senator Obama’s drug use in 1999 and that Obama wanted to be sure I had not discussed the sexual encounters or drug incidents with any media at that time.

In mid to late November 2007, in another text message from “Mr. Young” , he advised me that Senator Obama will publicly correct his statement as to he last time he used drugs and I did not need to concern myself with publicly disclosing it myself. The last contact I had with “Mr. Young” was in early December 2007 when he made it clear to me that Senator Obama had no intentions of publicly acknowledging his 1999 use of crack cocaine and that “Mr. Young” was in fact doing nothing more than milking information from me for Senator Obama’s use.

I later learned that a Donald Young was the choir director of Reverend Wright’s Trinity United Church of Christ – Obama’s now-former church — and was openly a homosexual. I also learned that he was murdered on December 23, 2007. I have cooperated with the Chicago Police Department in this matter by providing them the telephone numbers I was using during the fall of 2007 and I release them now publically in the hope that someone may be able to connect the dots between these telephone numbers and Mr. Young. Those numbers are: 954-758-1105; 956-758-1885; 956-758-8002; 302-685-7175; 612-466-1043. 2008

In what I now realize was a naive and un-counseled decision, I posted in January 2008 a video on YouTube.com where I related the above information regarding my liaisons with Senator Obama in 1999. The response was overwhelming and I quickly became the recipient of what in hindsight appears to have been a coordinated attack on my character with ever increasing falsehoods circulating on the internet.

In response I agreed to take a polygraph test from Whitehouse.com. The results of that test have been partially revealed to the end of labeling me a liar and taken as gospel by all. I would like to make the following comments about that polygraph test. First, I have been subsequently advised that Whitehouse.com was a website dedicated to anti-Clinton pornography until earlier this year. Second, I have now come to understand that lie detectors are junk science at best which is why courts of law refuse to use them. Third, a review of the results by George W. Maschke, Ph.D. of AntiPolygraph.org raises serious questions about the legitimacy of the examination. Indeed, overlooked by almost everyone is that hitehouse.com’s own examiner, Dr. Gordon Barland, observed that on the drug question regarding Senator Obama that the computerized score found that there was less than a 1% probability of deception by me. That’s about as high a passing score as one can possibly attain.

Finally, in February 2008 I was told anonymously that Dan Parisi of Whitehouse.com received $750,000 from the Obama campaign through AKR Media to organize an effort to publically discredit me. When I confronted Dan Parisi with this allegation, he did not deny it but instead withdrew the second exonerating polygraph report of Dr. Gordon Barland, failed to post the video of my polygraph as he and Whitehouse.com promised they would do, and even removed posts from their web site altogether, claiming that they had “had enough of the attacks by Sinclair’s supporters and Sinclair himself.”

The polygraph results – as misrepresented – were immediately seized upon by the blogger community and I became the subject of vicious lies about me. I was forced to file a lawsuit in an attempt to stop those lies about me that have been circulating. That lawsuit sought to obtain the proof of what I was saying about my contact with Senator Obama through subpoenas for the identities of the anonymous bloggers so they could be linked to the Obama campaign and relevant records of the cellphone companies to prove the truth of my allegations. To date, though the lawsuit is now over ninety days old, Judge Kennedy has refused to permit the suit to move forward so this evidence may be obtained. Conclusion

In sum, you can discredit my story and then make your decision on who should be the next President of the United States. The burden is now off me as I have told my story without the distortions that have been intentionally heaped on me in what my lawyer tells me is an ad hominem attack – shoot the messenger so you don’t have to hear the message he is bringing. I am now done. It is for others to find the corroborating evidence of my story by locating the limousine driver – Paramjit Multani – and the telephone numbers related to Donald Young and/or Senator Obama. I leave you with these questions that I have asked of Senator Obama but which he – who wants to be the next President of the United States – has refused to answer:

1. Why won’t Senator Obama provide his cellphone numbers and telephone records for all his personal and official cell phones held by him for the time period of November 3, 1999 thru November 8, 1999, when we met?

2. Why won’t Senator Obama provide his cellphone numbers and telephone records for all his personal and official cell phones held by Senator Obama or September 2007 – December 23, 2008, the murder of Donald Young?

3. Why won’t Senator Obama provide all email communication both personal and campaign related to and/or from AKP Message & Media from January 18, 2008 through February 29, 2008 for Senator Obama, David Axelrod and David Plouffe?

4. Why won’t Senator Obama provide proof of all payments made from AKP Message & Media, Obama for America, David Axelrod, David Plouffe, and Senator Obama’s accounts for the period of January 18, 2008 through February 29, 2008?

On my website – larrysinclair.org – you will find the documents that I have referred to in this statement. A copy of the home page for that website is attached. Thank you for your time and attention this afternoon and I will now take any questions.

And, here is a snippet of the press conference:

Trackback URL

RSS Feed for This Post896 Comments »

Comment by Pavlov's Dog | 2008-06-18 22:22:05

Where is the “whitey” video sparky?

Comment by Madam DeFarge | 2008-06-18 22:25:29

Three gay men in Obama’s church will never tell.

Comment by Kent | 2008-06-18 22:48:13

But where’s the whitey tape??

Comment by Joe | 2008-06-18 22:53:20

Why don’t you ask McCain’s campaign manager?

Comment by WildChild | 2008-06-18 23:33:55

So much to choose from he has. The whitey tape over here or the crack smoking man sex allegations over there. Decisions, decisions … so many decisions.

Comment by Quartermaster | 2008-06-18 23:42:48

Lime green background? Or make Rudy Giuliani, who I claimed had no national security experience, my point man on national security? Decisions decisions.

We come for the tape, Larry. Where’s the tape?

Comment by Joe | 2008-06-19 00:26:21

Admit it, you’re here for crack cocaine, just like your Messiah.

Comment by btintaos | 2008-06-19 09:27:31

Buy Crack Obama.

 
 

Comment by WildChild | 2008-06-19 00:29:09

We’re not sure. It really depends how many man whore crack addicts BOBO could have handed the tape it off to.

 

Comment by Ai1een | 2008-06-19 01:49:38

Larry never once said he had the whitey tape. In fact, he always went out of his way to say that he did not have it & had not personally seen it. However, why don’t you ask Democratic Strategist and strong supporter of Barack Obama, Bob Beckel. HE CONFIRMED THAT THERE WAS A “WHITEY” TAPE as told to him by what he called his totally reliable Republican resources. Bob Beckel LOVES Obama – he does not want there to be a “whitey” tape, believe me and yet he said there IS a whitey tape out there. Larry never claimed to have the whitey tape so you might want to quit rehashing the Grand Inquisition night after night. It only reinforces everyone’s belief in your profound ignorance.

Comment by WildChild | 2008-06-19 01:59:57

Please don’t try to confuse the BOBOweenies with facts. They have talking points to talk and point.

 

Comment by undercoverblackman | 2008-06-19 02:14:00

Actually, Aileen, Bob Beckel said on Fox News’ “Strategy Room” on Sunday that the “whitey” tape was an unfounded rumor that he’d tried to “knock down,” and he criticized Fox for having GOP smear artist Roger Stone on their air spreading the lie.

So you are woefully ill-informed, milady.

Comment by Karma | 2008-06-19 02:23:48

Bob Beckel was trying to back pedal.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4RwE9QWhtE

He first statement wasn’t about ‘knocking down’ a smear, but reporting that he was concerned.

Comment by undercoverblackman | 2008-06-19 04:47:29

Ah. Right you are. Now… why would Beckel “try to back pedal” if he were convinced that the “whitey” tape exists? Wouldn’t that make him look like an idiot when the tape is eventually released?

(Comments wont nest below this level)

Comment by Deep Truths | 2008-06-19 06:27:30

Quit trying to deke and change the subject. Crack cocaine and illicit sex with a man TOPS WHITEY.

 
 

Comment by Karma | 2008-06-19 11:35:51

No, it would make him cautious.

Larry Johnson has actually been more cautious about the tape, unfortunately reading comprehension isn’t a strong suit among Obama trolls. ;)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 

Comment by stodghie | 2008-06-19 09:27:47

i saw the original statement. you are a liar.

 
 

Comment by whatiswrong | 2008-06-19 08:41:25

What are we supposed to make of this and then the absence of any tape -

“New and dramatic developments. This is a heads up. I’ll post the news Monday morning by 0900 hours. Now I know why people who have seen the videotape say it is stunning. Barack’s headaches are only starting.”

Well his headache didn’t start now did it?

 
 

Comment by roseeriter | 2008-06-19 04:42:13

Now the obamabots apply DIVERSION tactics.
If there is a whitey tape it PALES in comparison if Larry Sinclair is telling the truth. Sure is a lot of details for a lie.

If Nobama is still doing crack that would explain a lot of the hems and haws when he speaks without a teleprompter.

Comment by undercoverblackman | 2008-06-19 04:49:41

“Sure is a lot of details for a lie.”

But just the right amount of details for a psychotic delusion, no?

Comment by Tyrione | 2008-06-19 14:08:06

But just the right amount of details for a psychotic delusion, no?

Is this a professional evaluation or your laymen’s attempt at impersonating a psychiatrist?

 
 

Comment by Karl Rove | 2008-06-19 11:08:40

“If there is a whitey tape it PALES in comparison if Larry Sinclair is telling the truth.”

And if Larry Sinclair isn’t telling the truth?

What next, pray tell, will be the next “outrageous accusations!!” that you’ll all cling to like shit on a stick?

“OBAMA’S SECRET THREE WAY WITH NORQUIST AND DeLAY ON FLOOR OF SENATE!”

“OBAMA PERSONALLY TRANSPORTS ILLEGALS INTO COUNTRY TO WORK ON MITT ROMNEY’S LAWN”

“OBAMA FLEW PLANE INTO WTC”

You guys are utterly hilarious. You make the tin-foil industry proud.

Comment by ulahane | 2008-06-19 11:10:58

That Obama just broke his promise on public financing? Oh wait, that’s not an accusation, that’s documented.

Comment by Karl Rove | 2008-06-19 12:00:40

How does that answer the question:

And if Larry Sinclair isn’t telling the truth?

What next, pray tell, will be the next “outrageous accusations!!” that you’ll all cling to like shit on a stick?

So much outrage towards Obama’s public financing issue. I trust you will be addressing McCain’s own public finance issues as aggressively as Obama’s, no?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Comment by jack, too | 2008-06-19 00:01:44

The limo driver called Obama.

Nuff said, whitey!

 

Comment by alee21 | 2008-06-19 07:04:13

keep on topic: this is sinclair.
Obamaites are deluded and delusional, following like sheep their cult leader.

Comment by Darwin | 2008-06-19 07:17:41

Wow, it’s true. This is the freak-show website. You people do exist, but your lines will not. Natural selection has a way of ending your contributions to the gene pool.

Amazing.

Comment by bodemokrat | 2008-06-19 07:31:24

Hey Darwin, Barry should be more concerned about us ending our contributions to the DNC and his lame-o cmpaign-o!
please remember BOWL big time in November!

Comment by Tom Hilton | 2008-06-19 10:30:26

Hey Darwin, Barry should be more concerned about us ending our contributions to the DNC and his lame-o cmpaign-o!

Oh, I imagine they’ll do just fine without that $1.37.

 
 

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-06-19 07:55:25

The opposite is actually true. If we’re truly as recklessly idiotic as you suggest, then our genes triumph. Such is life. As for you, Darwin…
We all sprang from apes, but you didn’t spring far enough.

 
 
 
 
 

Comment by Leisa | 2008-06-18 23:30:09

Dear Pavlov’s Dog,

Are you really using a conditioned animal as a posting name?

Do you salivate as KO or Mathews do at the mere thought of reporting a smear against Hillary?

Drool all you want at the idea that you are somehow discrediting this site…

Many know that the MSM is refusing to do their job yet again… just like when GWB was pushing for action in Iraq…

 

Comment by Give Me Hill | 2008-06-19 00:24:36

Hmm, I’m not sure what to make of it. (And I am the farthest thing you can get from being an Obama supporter!!) I live in Gurnee, where Mr. Sinclair said he stayed because of the proximity to the naval base. It’s about a 15-20 minute drive, and there are closer motels to the naval base. The other things I question are, why would the limo driver call Obama, a public official to bring what Mr. Sinclair was “looking for”? And, again with the geographics, Gurnee is an hour from Chicago, I certainly know that. A public official traveling an hour to bring someone an illegal substance? It’s certainly possible, and I wouldn’t put anything past Obama at this point, but I’m not sure how likely. If only we could see the phone records I feel the story would hold more water. At the same time, however, I’m not sure Mr. Sinclair is just doing this for publicity… so I’d love for the phone records to be released. Until then, we can only (unfortunately) speculate.

Comment by Joe | 2008-06-19 00:40:38

If you are dying of a brain tumor as he reveals in his press conference, you don’t really have much reason left to lie in public, especially if your last days are going to be turned upside down by the Obama zombies craving to tear you to shreds.

BTW, a couple of pictures from the press conference were posted at hillaryclintonforum.net. Looks like the Obama zombies will have a harder time trying to squash this sordid story about their Savior.

http://tinyurl.com/3w3j2h

Comment by schtum | 2008-06-19 01:12:07

Unless of course, he’s lying about the brain tumor. The crimes he’s been convicted of–writing bad checks, forging checks and using stolen credit cards–are all just different forms of lying. The man is a convicted liar. Let’s see his medical records.

Comment by Ms. Independent | 2008-06-19 02:17:22

Don’t bother arguing facts with this crowd. This website was derided by none other than the New York Times for the obviously fake “whitey” tape. It continues to lose credibility by talking about this story which is frankly so unbelievable that a toddler should be able to see through it.

Comment by Joe | 2008-06-19 02:23:25

Then why are you here if you think this and the people in it are so beneath you, Ms. Elitist?

Comment by Ms. Independent | 2008-06-19 02:45:45

It makes me laugh.

 
 

Comment by Karma | 2008-06-19 02:48:18

Oh you mean the NYT that carried the Bush Admin’s water about the Iraq war?

That NYT has insulted this site? LOL

It doesn’t matter if Sinclair is lying or not, the real issues with Obama still stand.

Ayers, Auchi, Rezko, Pritzker, Palmer, Exelon, Daley, etc

Comment by Ms. Independent | 2008-06-19 02:51:31

Yeah, those issues haven’t really panned out either so if by “Stand” you mean are completeny tenuous, then I guess maybe there’s a problem. Me, I deal with facts.

Comment by Karma | 2008-06-19 03:09:23

Those issues haven’t panned out!? LOL

Thanks for letting me know, just what type of ‘facts’ you prefer.

 
 

Comment by Ms. Independent | 2008-06-19 02:57:40

By the way, not so much “insulted” as “exposed”

Comment by Karma | 2008-06-19 03:13:00

How exactly do you expose an October Surprise as a lie in May/June when they tape hasn’t been released? LOL

 
 

Comment by beebop | 2008-06-19 06:02:33

The former home of Judith Miller? PUHLEZE … Jayson Blair, anyone?

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-06-19 07:57:49

Ha ha ha ha. The NY Times should promote William “Always Wrong” Kristol to editor.

 
 
 

Comment by Deep Truths | 2008-06-19 06:40:08

Obama lied about his neighbor Ayers, five billable hours to ‘that individual’ Rezko, never hearing a discouraging word from Rev. KKK Wright…

Do you see a pattern here? Larry S. isn’t running for president of the United States.

 

Comment by ultra | 2008-06-19 11:32:34

Not just the NYT. Even Michelle Malkin said that Larry Johnson is not to be trusted.

http://michellemalkin.com/2008/06/03/where-is-the-purported-michelle-obama-whitey-video/

 
 

Comment by alee21 | 2008-06-19 07:06:18

schtum-
Sounds like you may have a brain tumor, let’s see your medical records.

 
 

Comment by hillarylover | 2008-06-23 13:47:15

But sinclair failed the lie detector test and has a history of extortion.If you take this mans word for anything it says much more about you than it does about him!

 
 

Comment by NURSERATCHET | 2008-06-19 02:14:34

I THINK YOU BETTER READ/LISTEN TO THE STORY AGAIN. YOU HAVE TOO MUCH MIS-INFORMATION. THE LIMO DRIVE TOOK LARRY TO DOWNTOWN CHICAGO WHERE HE WAS INTRODUCED TO OBAMA BY THE DRIVE. OBAMA DID NOT GO TO GURNEY UNTIL THE NEXT DAY. THE DROVE TOGETHER IN THE LIMO TO PICK UP THE COCAINE AT OBAMA’S DIRECTION. AND WHY WOULD ANYONE GO THROUGH THE HELL AND DEATH THREATS AND PERSONAL SUFFERING FOR 9 MONTHS “FOR PUBLICITY”. GOOD GRIEF!

Comment by hillarylover | 2008-06-23 13:52:23

Why did so many people say the clintons were guilty of murder and drug dealing??Dont you remember the good old days of whitewater and the rose law firm??What is wrong with you people youl believe ANY disgusting rumor thrown into the wind?

 
 
 

Comment by Kneecap | 2008-06-19 01:56:17

“The Obama folks have gone crazy over the Sinclair allegations.” lol. Larry Johnson: being a morbidly obese, pathetic loser, so you don’t have to.

Comment by Perry Logan | 2008-06-19 06:09:34

Sounds like we stepped on a corn.

 

Comment by alee21 | 2008-06-19 07:07:11

Did someone kneecap you? Is that why you are whining away?

 
 

Comment by alexei | 2008-06-19 08:45:43

The Obama followers continue their cry for “the tape, the tape” and of course Larry has consistently stated that the tape would be out after the Dem convention. The Repubs know when to release their ammo and not “shoot their wad” too soon (or they would be facing Clinton).

Why did you Obama followers come out with that ridiculous explanation of Michelle saying “Why’d he” if there was no tape?

Comment by Why'd He | 2008-06-19 13:00:50

So what happens when there’s no tape after the convention? and still no tape in October?

Are you like one of those crazy End of the World folks who keeps coming up with excuses why the rapture hasn’t happened as you predicted a thousand times over?

 
 
 

Comment by AnninCa | 2008-06-18 22:22:07

Sorry……we sorta hijacked the other threads. :)

 

Comment by Tumby J | 2008-06-18 22:22:09

The arrest was related to Sinclair’s past criminal record:

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0608/11164.html

Comment by NURSERATCHET | 2008-06-18 23:50:33

NO, SORRY WRONG. NOT RELATED TO COLORADO AT ALL.

Comment by schtum | 2008-06-19 01:05:41

IT’S IN ALL CAPS SO IT MUST BE TRUE!

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-06-19 07:59:14

Some people have eye trouble… ?

 
 
 
 

Comment by Medusa | 2008-06-18 22:25:29

It seems like a lot of information and disclosure from someone just making stuff up. He’s been hauled off to jail, so it doesn’t seem like he has much to gain from this story, if it is false.

One thing that jumps out at me is the lack of documents and information that BO has released, including his medical records. Why not?

I don’t know if the story has merit but it seems like it would be fairly easy to prove one way or the other if some neutral party would check it out.

Comment by AnninCa | 2008-06-18 22:27:07

ohhhhhhhhhhhh…….I never knew why you guys wanted his medical records. I see where you’re headed now.

Comment by beebop | 2008-06-19 06:09:16

First — you are using a jacked screen name.

Second — medical records from a candidate whose parents died young, who is a heavy smoker (formerly), and has bragged in a novel about drug use should be mandatory.

Third — anyone on the downlow not using condoms would be an ass …

Comment by TheViking | 2008-06-19 10:06:11

OMG — I pray to Jesus that Obama didn’t catch HIV from his illicit gay sex days — If he did, it was WHITEY trying to bring him down like Uncle Wright says!

 
 
 

Comment by Tumby J | 2008-06-18 22:29:49

Because the last thing you want to do responding to unsubstantiated rumors is give them traction by reacting to them.

Comment by Mel | 2008-06-18 22:38:46

Like Rev Wright and Nafta and Ayers….lol

Comment by Tumby J | 2008-06-18 22:46:03

Right…those are substantiated events, which lots of people could verify.

Who’s backing up Sinclair on this one? Considering he failed his lie detector test, I think the number of people currently stands at 0.

Comment by AnninCa | 2008-06-18 22:52:07

The Limo Driver….someone published the guys information on the other thread. He’s a cab driver now.

Comment by WildChild | 2008-06-18 23:40:51

apparently tumby gets together in a group when smoking crack and having paid man sex.

 
 

Comment by Leisa | 2008-06-18 23:42:03

Yes, the company that offered to give the lie detector test did just happen to have a vested interest in having him fail the test…. in the tune of $100,000.00…

I used to work for a security co and happen to know that these tests can be manipulated, just as polls and academic “studies” can be made to report what ever the researcher wants to report.

:/

 

Comment by John House | 2008-06-19 03:30:09

Let’s see:

Wright: When the bulk of us savvy bloggers were talking about Wright and pointing towards Hannity’s and Carlson’s exposés about Wright and Obama’s Church they did in 2007 in JANUARY AND FEBRUARY, you asshole Obamatrons called us rumormongers and mudslingers. FAST FORWARD TO MARCH 2008.

NAFTA: When the inklings of Goolsbee’s conversations came out, asshole obamatrons got scared. When the facts were being HASHED out, i.e., substantiated, you asshole Obamatrons called it smearing. Yet the final story is that Goolsbee DID tell the Canadians that Obama’s NAFTA talk was “just talk”.

Ayers: When Taylor Marsh brought up Ayers BEFORE Clinton did in the debates, you asshole Obamatrons pitched a fit about how it wasn’t relevant because Ayers is now a professor. As if you’d never heard of professors with BAD CHARACTERS. Someone setting off bombs and then saying that they didn’t do enough? Ought to be stripped of their teaching credentials. That is NO role model for young minds. Oh but hey, I’m sure if Tim McVeigh hadn’t been such a hick/had been an intellectual and had somehow gotten out of prison to earn a teaching degree, it would’ve been all right? Right?

You asshole Obamatrons are INSANE. It frightens me to think that I might’ve actually at one point been a “far left progressive”, if this is what it means to be a “progressive” today.

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 03:31:51

actually, u frighten me more.

Comment by NY still loves Hillary | 2008-06-19 07:09:17

Good! Be afraid. Be very afraid.

 
 

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-06-19 08:08:08

I was thinking of the Unabomber. He was quite intelligent but still very very crazy. Why couldn’t he teach at U of C? No rich, evil father.

 
 
 
 

Comment by HillaryDidWin | 2008-06-18 23:34:07

How do you know it’s a RUMOR..Have you or any media person ask OBAMA…NO…if it’s a lie..why has he not sued Larry Sinclair for Slander…This is why I believe Larry Sinclair…but you go back to repeating the yes we can cheer and maybe one day you will wake up from your coma state and have a mind of your own!

Comment by Fred C. Dobbs | 2008-06-19 02:45:36

Oh, baby, stop hitting the Grade C bait these sub-Prime clowns dish up.

Make this your mantra, re: Obamabots

“Fuck ‘em, they’re trash.
Fuck ‘em, they’re trash.
Fuck ‘em, they’re trash.
Fuck ‘em, they’re trash.
Fuck ‘em, they’re trash.
Fuck ‘em, they’re trash.
Fuck ‘em, they’re trash.
Fuck ‘em, they’re trash.”

See? Wasn’t that simple?

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 03:33:07

wow, how original….

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-06-19 08:09:27

but not off base.

 
 
 
 
 

Comment by HillaryDidWin | 2008-06-18 23:15:55

Why would two US marshals show up for a bench warrant from CO that was only limited to within 30 miles of the state with no order for extradition back to CO?? Such a small thing considering Larry Sinclair was in fact in contact with CO regarding the warrant and was taking care of the issue…so Why was he arrested…Ask Obama!!

From his website and from todays press conference this man has admitted every illegal thing he has ever done and has not hidden anything…This man must be telling the truth…Now..let Obama pony up!!

Comment by Whatever | 2008-06-18 23:33:01

Well, actually they were from NJ. If you want to believe Sinclair, that’s fine, just don’t believe it because you hate Obama.

Comment by HillaryDidWin | 2008-06-18 23:36:53

Well..I don’t hate Obama..Nice to meet you..Mr. Know it all!!

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 03:35:37

yeah, u really sound convincing…lol!!!!!!!!!!!

Can I have some that Hater-ade too?

Comment by Deep Truths | 2008-06-19 09:30:23

I hate him and Obamabots.

 

Comment by TheViking | 2008-06-19 10:10:34

Hate is the New Common Sense I believe…

 
 
 
 

Comment by NURSERATCHET | 2008-06-18 23:54:52

THERE WAS NO COLORADO BENCH WARRANT.

Comment by Air heads are Everywhere! | 2008-09-17 00:52:19

If there was no bench warrant then he could not have been arrested by any authorities, yet the records indicate he was. Stop lying trailer trashhead!

 
 
 

Comment by rosered56 | 2008-06-19 01:03:02

If this story is true, there may be others like Larry Sinclair that shared drugs and had sex with Obama.
Surely Larry would not be the only one he was doing it with. Maybe others will now come forward with more proof on Obama’s addiction to causal sex and drugs. Who knows!

Comment by Fred C. Dobbs | 2008-06-19 02:48:18

Limo hummers from guys and crack smoking?

Is Hope-a-Dope a freaking REPUBLICAN, or what?

Comment by Zee | 2008-06-19 11:33:50

Bingo. He hearts Reagan.

 
 

Comment by Air heads are Everywhere! | 2008-09-17 00:54:36

How do you know there weren’t others. One of his two Pakistanis best buds was a homosexual. Maybe in NYC he was living with other Gays. He won’t answer questions about his time there. What or who was he doing?

 
 

Comment by Deep Truths | 2008-06-19 06:46:38

He probably has an Sexually Transmitted Disease and can’t pass the piss test. Birth Certificate, born in Kenya to an unmarried teenage girl (IMO).

 
 

Comment by Saddened | 2008-06-18 22:26:04

What happened to you Larry Johnson? I used to watch and respect you when you appeared on the news. Now, in my opinion, you have as little credibility as Larry Sinclair. Its a shame. Here’s to hoping you see the light again one day.

Comment by AnninCa | 2008-06-18 22:27:49

Why is that? You don’t think this story is news?

Comment by Quartermaster | 2008-06-18 22:32:55

No more “news” than a claim by a tinfoil millner that the moon landing was faked. Christ you people are nutjobs.

Comment by WildChild | 2008-06-18 23:43:29

But no one is saying that BOBO’s crack smoking man sex for hire hobby is fake.

Comment by grlpatriot | 2008-06-18 23:55:08

OMG, you “crack” me up. No pun intended.

 
 

Comment by Fred C. Dobbs | 2008-06-19 02:50:24

Welllllll…Moondoggled may be just as accurate as Dreams of My Father, might’n it?

 
 

Comment by chuck | 2008-06-18 22:33:40

Why is that? You don’t think this story is news?

If Fox News won’t show up to an “I’ve got dirt on Obama” press conference then, no, it’s not news.

 

Comment by Donald from Hawaii | 2008-06-18 23:51:40

Frankly, no.

But it IS clearly beneath contempt. This is worse than the swiftboat crap from the 2004 campaign.

Comment by C D Ward | 2008-06-19 01:31:44

Donald from Hawaii sez:
This is worse than the swiftboat crap from the 2004 campaign.

Funny you should mention the Swiftboat Veterans for Truth, Don. Can you guess who one of the donors to that fine effort is donating to these days. Think real hard now, Don.

[Hint: do the initials Barack Hussein Obama ring a bell?]

Yup. Your messiah, O-bummer; the pre-emptive nominee.

As Rezkowatch reports:
Blogger Anna Belle at Peacocks and Lilies discovered a connection between Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) and another corrupt campaign contributor, Jared Abbruzzese, who was a donor to the anti-John Kerry Swift Boat Veterans for Truth and, who, in March 2007 the Chicago Sun-Times reported as “being investigated by the FBI in New York for public corruption.”

[. . .]

As Anna Belle pointed out, the Abbruzzeses routinely contribute to Republican candidates. Unexplained is why they would contribute to Sen. Obama’s Hopefund — with the exception of one possibility — Abbruzzese’s connections to the internet and business interests with satellite communications and wireless cable television. Sen. Obama has gone to great lenghths to court members of the internet industry.
[. . .] (emphasis added)

 
 

Comment by undercoverblackman | 2008-06-19 01:23:11

Is the rumor of Hillary’s lesbianism “news”??

Comment by WildChild | 2008-06-19 01:36:26

nope. no witnesses.

 

Comment by alexei | 2008-06-19 09:00:07

Plus, it isn’t the sex part (unless it is unprotected and why won’t your master release his medical records?); it is the drugs.

So, even if true about Hillary – why is that news?
Is it illegal activity like doing illegal drugs? Is it an activity that can cause serious health problems?

Comment by boomchickaboom | 2008-06-19 10:57:16

Oh the drugs, so does that mean President Bushleague should quit since he was a coke head?

 
 

Comment by alexei | 2008-06-19 09:01:00

Plus, it isn’t the sex part (unless it is unprotected and why won’t your master release his medical records?); it is the drugs.

So, even if true about Hillary – why is that news?
Is it illegal activity like doing illegal drugs? Is it an activity that can cause serious health problems? Is it an activity that she has had people who are against it by her side?

 

Comment by Deep Truths | 2008-06-19 09:34:02

I detect a hint of jealousy. You want to watch I bet.

 
 
 

Comment by Medusa | 2008-06-18 22:29:17

Does “seeing the light” involve drinking kool aid? If so, we’re allergic to the stuff over here.

Comment by Quartermaster | 2008-06-18 22:36:15

No, you quaff it by the gallon.

Comment by WildChild | 2008-06-18 23:44:50

at least were not smoking crack and quaffing loads of fresh hot semen like your boy BOBO.

Comment by skepticle | 2008-06-19 00:20:43

Wow, you sure spend a lot of time thinking about “fresh hot semen”.

Comment by Mel | 2008-06-19 00:24:20

You must as well considering it is the only post you have spoken about.

Guess you have a real fettish, like BOBO huh….lol

Comment by WildChild | 2008-06-19 00:33:33

It’s a strange twist don’t you think Mel? Here we were thinking that BOBO and the BOBOweenies were sucking down the koolaid. But they had something much more salty to enjoy between hits off the crack pipe.

Comment by schtum | 2008-06-19 01:19:14

Wait, let me guess, was it fresh hot semen?

Comment by WildChild | 2008-06-19 01:33:57

Why are you asking me? Lick your lips.

Comment by btintaos | 2008-06-19 09:46:49

Oh, my god. That exchange had me laughing so hard I gagged. Same as I do on fresh hot semen.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Comment by Madam DeFarge | 2008-06-18 22:29:41

Why does such silly business upset you so?

Obama had lots of girlfriends before Michelle. Didn’t he?

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-06-19 00:11:02

Ha ha. MO is a bit manly looking, too. BO has tastes.

Comment by WildChild | 2008-06-19 00:34:15

salty ones at that.

Comment by schtum | 2008-06-19 01:20:09

Salty like fresh hot semen?

Comment by WildChild | 2008-06-19 01:35:38

Really? semen is salty? Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha no kidding.

Comment by Rob in Chicago | 2008-06-19 10:12:24

 
 
 
 
 

Comment by beebop | 2008-06-19 06:17:11

Yes. He lived with someone when he first moved to Chicago. She probably paid the rent! He’s such a user!

 
 

Comment by Larry Johnson | 2008-06-18 22:34:34

Yes, forgive me for the crazy assumption that you were capable of reading information and making up your own mind whether or not it is true or credible. So jackass, why waste your time here? Go elsewhere. Geez! Who put a gun to your head and forced you to read anything on this blog?

And, for the record, let me note that I’ll be sniffing back tears for the rest of the year because I have lost your respect.

Comment by Johnny Ray (Another Democrat for McCain) | 2008-06-18 22:44:38

Obamacrats don’t think for themselves. They believe what their leader Jim Jones Barack tells them to believe.

 

Comment by Quartermaster | 2008-06-18 22:44:51

Larry, you are a smear merchant. Where’s the tape Larry? Douche.

Comment by WildChild | 2008-06-18 23:47:25

seriously, BOBO is more into enemas then douching

Comment by schtum | 2008-06-19 01:21:23

Also, fresh hot semen. That’s what I heard, anyway.

Comment by WildChild | 2008-06-19 01:54:35

LOL I heard that too Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha

 
 
 

Comment by Lou | 2008-06-19 00:08:12

You are so obsussed with the tape. You sound scared. Well. It’s for us to know and for you to find out.

Comment by schtum | 2008-06-19 01:22:25

Ooh! The suspense is boring me!

 
 

Comment by Joe | 2008-06-19 02:33:26

Sugar, here’s a bottle of bourbon. Now let’s go camping.

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-06-19 08:12:29

LMAO. Ah, male bonding!

 
 

Comment by Rob in Chicago | 2008-06-19 10:20:56

Quartermaster:

For being a smart ass “DC Lawyer making more than $200,000/year”, you sure have a problem with reading comprehension.

 
 

Comment by Anonymous | 2008-06-18 22:48:21

Seeing the abuse Sinclair has taken from the Obamabots we should at least look at his information and decide for ourselves what to think. From what I understand many of the negative comments about Sinclair are filled with misinformation. I’m glad he had his press conference and put his information on the record. All the Obamabots can do now is try and get people to focus on the arrest and Sinclair’s past. But the information is now in the public domain. I doubt the US media will pick up on the story but maybe Europe will.

Comment by Quartermaster | 2008-06-18 22:56:46

Wow. that’s some powerful reasoning you have there, cowboy. Let me see if I can do an analogy:

1. People get online and claim the moon landing is faked and Buzz Aldrin is a liar.
2. Buzz Aldrin gets pissed, and people openly mock the ridiculousness of the moon hoaxers on their website.
3. Because there were people mocking the moon-landing-was-faked conspiracy theorists, there must be truth to it.
4. Someone should check into whether the moon landing was faked. Maybe European press.

You are profoundly retarded. I bet you smell like stale milk. Fucking kook.

Comment by Anonymous | 2008-06-18 23:07:51

You can call me any names you wish but Sinclair has put his information in the public domain. I would be very concerned about that if I was an Obama supporter.

Comment by Quartermaster | 2008-06-18 23:14:26

“You can call me any names you wish but MoonLandingWasFaked.com has put its information in the public domain. I would be very concerned about that if I was a Buzz Aldrin supporter.”

But I will take you up on your offer by calling you any name I wish, and right now that name is unhinged conspiracy theorist who left Reason at the door and put on his silly pants. Fruitcup.

Comment by cajunLandry | 2008-06-18 23:16:41

Obamabots are scared. I believe Sinclair, and I am in touch, not out of touch. Obamabots are scared of the truth. Obama smokes crack and enjoys oral sex with gay men.

Comment by WildChild | 2008-06-18 23:51:15

They have to be out of control if they actually bringing up faked moon landings to change the subject. Imagine going back to the early seventies when you cring going back to the nineties Bwah Ha Ha Ha Ha but then back in the nineties their beloved BOBO was smoking crack and hiring out for man sex, so now I can understand all that BOBOweenie apprehension about the nineties

Comment by schtum | 2008-06-19 01:25:34

There was no fresh hot semen on the moon! Bwah Ha Ha! Stupid Obamolesters!

Comment by Joe | 2008-06-19 01:44:14

Obamolesters simply refuse to believe that their Savior would deign to baptize someone so unworthy as Sinclair’s mouth with His hot esssence instead of their own mouths.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 

Comment by Colin | 2008-06-18 23:27:26

Zecharia Sitchin and The 12th Planet. Now lets talk Moon Conspiracy. Heh.

 

Comment by jack, too | 2008-06-19 00:07:11

When it’s not true, you look silly, kook Quartermaster Wi Fi.

Didn’t you at least TRY to learn WHY simplistic methods of propaganda don’t work?

You live in an underground cave, with simple plumbing?

I guess so….

 

Comment by NY still loves Hillary | 2008-06-19 07:23:24

Funny you should mention this. I just watched a TV program a few nights ago about the Moon Landing being faked. Sure they tried to debunk the theory, but it’s out there now, isn’t it Sugar?

 
 

Comment by beebop | 2008-06-19 06:19:49

Information? They don’t waste their time focusing on information … it disputes their preconcieved notions and isn’t covered in the talking points that are emailed to them.

 
 

Comment by DoroB | 2008-06-18 23:15:38

Wow, you seem represent Obama supporters pretty well.
You know what I’m talking about. The foaming-at-the-mouth ones who are just soo outraged that people dare question His Royal Highness’s background.
Oh poor Barack! What did he ever do to deserve such attacks…?

 

Comment by Leisa | 2008-06-18 23:50:42

Quartermaster,

You are not a master of anything…

Go back and do a little research before you let us all know what a fool you are… you may be able to play again, but not with your current posting name.

This is in response to your tone and complete lack of class… What do you really know? Who cares when you act like a complete a$$!

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-06-19 08:16:10

Im sailing away, set an open course for the virgin sea
Ive got to be free, free to face the life thats ahead of me
On board, Im the captain, so climb aboard
Well search for tomorrow on every shore
And Ill try, oh lord, Ill try to carry on

 
 

Comment by Lou | 2008-06-19 00:10:07

blah blah blah blah. you sound just like BO. Is that you BO?

 

Comment by iam0nly1 | 2008-06-19 00:38:23

You can’t just assume things are false. Someone should look into it, and if it’s false, then fine.

My problem is that barely anyone has given this man the time of day or even looked into his claims. Everyone deserves a chance to be heard and their information judged for validity. To dismiss it out of hand is discriminatory and wrong.

Obama only benefits from this man’s story being checked out by the media and revealed as a lie if it is one.

The media took the time to investigate the “War Room” video smear (after they ran with it and posted it all over the internet) and revealed it as a lie. The same type of investigation should be done with this.

Comment by Deep Truths | 2008-06-19 06:59:57

Perhaps FIGHTTHESMEARS.COM should pony up an answer.

Obama no doubt shut the Whitehouse.com presser down because the reporters were asking cogent questions. They would have ask why Axelrod paid an anti-Clinton operative and former porn king 750K to falsify Larry Sinclair’s lie detection data.

They showed up to a presser, presented no evidence and took no questions. Duh! That raised more questions and should bring greater scrutiny of these Chicago thugs.

 
 

Comment by Fred C. Dobbs | 2008-06-19 02:59:15

>>> You are profoundly retarded. I bet you smell like stale milk.

Or stale Doritos dust and belly button lint. Have mommy start buying pretzels, get some salt into your system.

BTW, one of those loons who saw Capricorn One too many times braced Buzz Aldrin as he left a public function and started that shit in his face.

Ol’ Buzz delivered a well-timed right jab to the stupid bastard’s snot locker and sat him down on his ass with a Thump.

Buzz is older than me, and I would have just kicked the clown in the nuts, but, NOOOOoooo, Buzz has to go SuperGeezer on this squash.

Saw the feed. It was GREAT!!!!

GEEZERS RULE!!!!!

 

Comment by btintaos | 2008-06-19 10:00:20

Is this line of attack actually in the Obamabot handbook? “Drag Buzz Aldrin or goats (or anything goat-related, like milk) into an arguement and you’ll win over a Hillary supporter every time.”

 

Comment by Rob in Chicago | 2008-06-19 10:36:03

Quartermaster:

Apples and Oranges. Surely you learned that these argument tactics should not be employed in court, while on your journey to become a “DC Lawyer making more than $200,000/year”. The moon landing conspiracy theorists, like the 9/11 conspiracy theorists, weren’t “in the limo”, so to speak. I’m not ready to say that I believe Larry Sinclair, but neither am I in any position to state with the certainty that you employ, that his allegations are not true. Hoping and wishing Larry Sinclair is a liar is no different from hoping and wishing that he is telling the truth. Larry Sinclair said it best, that he was just putting his allegations out there, and inviting anyone to dig into them, dig behind them, dig over them, and reach their own conclusions. You have apparently reached your own conclusions, but your conclusions appear just as baseless as those who simply believe Sinclair’s allegations, without further investigation or analysis. And don’t come at me with lie detector bullshit. As a lawyer, even if you just handle dog bite cases, should know that lie detector tests are generally pretty worthless, but they may be a useful tool to sharpen or focus further inquiries and investigations.

 
 
 

Comment by Paul F. Villarreal | 2008-06-18 23:14:23

LOL!

Larry, if you need some Kleenex for your year-long tear episode induced by Saddened I think we readers of No Quarter could help spring for that.

Ha ha ha.

Isn’t it amazing what the combination of fear and Obamabots creates? Stick Man’s Kool-Aiders are scared to death over what Sinclair is talking about, and rightly so.

Comment by Joe | 2008-06-19 02:37:15

They are not scared. They are just furious and jealous that the One True Savior did not squirt his Holy Essence into their mouths.

 
 

Comment by HillaryDidWin | 2008-06-18 23:20:27

LJ…ROFL…TOO FUNNY!!!…

 

Comment by Donald from Hawaii | 2008-06-19 00:07:35

Larry, you’re being completely disingenuous.

Why would you even post such unsubstantiated gossip from some drug-addled queen — and thus confer indirectly upon it a wholly undeserved credibility — if not solely for the purpose of introducing this horrible and repulsive smear into the national conversation?

Shame on you. If you somehow think you’re helping Sen. Hillary Clinton by peddling this fucking bullshit, better guess again. Rather, you’ve once more managed to self-denigrate your formerly respectable public stature to that of a political rodeo clown. Pity …

Comment by iam0nly1 | 2008-06-19 00:42:13

First, cease the insults on the homosexual community.

Second, just in case you didn’t realize Larry Johnson did not “break” this story. Larry Sinclair was given a platform by THE NATIONAL PRESS CLUB.

Larry is simply relating what occurred and has not given an opinion as to whether Sinclair’s testimony is true or false.

That’s how things work in America. Someone tells their story, gives evidence to their side and then we decide based on the evidence and the testimony whether it is true.

Sadly, people like you rather dismiss him because he’s a “queen.” Your homophobia and ignorance is not welcome here.

 

Comment by Fred C. Dobbs | 2008-06-19 03:03:13

>>> rodeo clown

Just so that you get it right, be advised that the entertainers previously known as Rodeo Clowns are now referred to as, “Bull Fighters.”

Please update your files accordingly.

And, please remit the usual Consulting Free in the Regular Billing Cycle.

 
 
 

Comment by iam0nly1 | 2008-06-19 00:32:53

The guy did a press conference with the National Press Club. It’s news.

 
 

Comment by Quartermaster | 2008-06-18 22:31:20

Well, color me not surprised. A press friend who was at the conference called me at my D.C. office after the event, and regaled me for an hour about Sinclair and his conference, and the bizarro disbarred, kilt-wearing “lawyer” who attended to Sinclair and bragged about his large genitalia as the reason for the Scottish garb.

at the end of the conversation I jokingly said, “I bet this is a front-page item on NoQuarter.” My friend the reporter said, ‘On what?” I said, “You know that guy Larry Johnson, the anti-Obama CIA guy?” “Never heard of him.”

“A PUMA type. The one who claimed a friend of a friend of a guy he knew saw the Michelle Obama Whitey tape.” I said. “Ah, that guy!” he replied. “Yeah, they will eat this kind of thing up.”

Then we joked for a couple of minutes about kilts and lunatics and Larry’s INSIDER-SOURCED GOLD LOCK item that Rove had been indicted.

Good times, good times.

Of course, I get home and, bam, here it is, front-paged. This site is ridiculously unhinged and ripe for parody.

Comment by AnninCa | 2008-06-18 22:48:07

Your friend pulled your leg. No kilts today, at least not on the video I saw.

Comment by Tim in Tempe | 2008-06-18 22:49:15

It was the attorney that wanted to wear the kilt but BS, I mean LS told him to wear a suit.

Comment by WildChild | 2008-06-18 23:55:21

more updates on our ever evolving kilt story at 11 on the leader in Crack smoking and spunk Goobling, BNN the BOBO news network

Comment by schtum | 2008-06-19 01:32:44

LOL! Fresh hot semen never gets old! I mean jokes about fresh hot semen. Fresh hot semen gets old fast. But by then it’s neither fresh nor hot. I guess it’s still semen though. LOL!

Comment by WildChild | 2008-06-19 01:52:50

well…. we hope you enjoy your fresh hot semen?

 

Comment by Joe | 2008-06-19 02:39:13

Lip smakin’ good?

 
 
 
 
 

Comment by Last Lemming | 2008-06-19 00:01:24

“A PUMA type” huh?

That can’t be good

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-06-19 00:40:07

Not good for Obama.

 
 

Comment by Fred C. Dobbs | 2008-06-19 03:06:24

>>> A press friend who was at the conference called me at my D.C. office

They have phones in Porta-Potties now?

Wow! Things are just moving too fast!!!

Comment by NY still loves Hillary | 2008-06-19 07:35:48

Stop it! My belly hurts from laughing so hard!

 
 
 

Comment by Slobodaneee | 2008-06-18 22:31:29

Boy, This is sad. Pumping out nonsense like this. This is the first time I’ve been on this site, so I ask you will you publish crap like this about Hillary and Huma? By the way, where the “whitey” tape you promised?

Comment by Lute | 2008-06-18 22:37:00

Three murdered young men is a little more serious than “whitey,” don’t you agree?

 

Comment by Mel | 2008-06-18 22:44:19

This is the first time I’ve been on this site

So it being your first time here, how do you know anything about the tapes?

Guess reading what was said over the Whitey tapes wasn’t interesting enough for you huh?

Also, if it requires a Barry blow job to get you to go to a site to check something out, shows plenty about you as a person doesn’t it?

Sure makes you either a real sad person or a paid troll, either way, it shows the lowness of you as a human being doesn’t it!

Comment by Madam DeFarge | 2008-06-18 22:52:51

Larry, it is so delicious watching Obamites writhe and squirm!

I haven’t had so much fun in a week!

Comment by Quartermaster | 2008-06-18 23:16:55

You really should try sex. Believe me, it beats blogging on conspiracy theory sites. Just ask your boyfriend or husband to–

Oh. Sorry. My bad.

All those cats should have been a sign. But hey, a lot of people are succeeding in life without love. It’s cool.

Comment by Mel | 2008-06-18 23:19:52

Please enlighten us, you being a Quartermaster, does that mean you can only master a quarter of Barry or does iit mean you only bend a quarter of the way for Barry?

Comment by Quartermaster | 2008-06-18 23:33:30

If that’s your come-on line, no wonder things aren’t working out for you, you know, sack wise.

But seriously, can I write that witty repatee down? I have an Optimists’ Club meeting tiomorrow, and I’d love to get ‘em rolling in the aisles with that one! “Knock knock” ‘Who’s there?” “Quartermaster!” “Quartermaster who?” “They call me Quartermaster because I can only master a quarter of Barry or, um, I can only bend over a quarter of the way for Barry!” (Pause) “Wait, that doesn’t even make sense.” “I know! I got it from a sexless cat lady!”

Comment by Mel | 2008-06-18 23:39:57

Bet you got high marks in your ignorance class huh?

And being a male, and not the kind like you who salavates all over a slimey candidate, you can use anything you want to use, since you haven’t the brain to think of anything on your own!

BTW, when you speak next to Axelrod, ask him for the rela birth certificate of Bambi, not the computer generated fake one ok!

 

Comment by jack, too | 2008-06-19 00:09:15

You have nothing new, god you’re a bore.

Might as well read that clueless gasbag DickMorris.

You’re stupid, troll boi.

I keep forgetting how untalented you are, despite your pretensions.

 

Comment by Linda K | 2008-06-19 01:45:22

So Quartermaster, why are you even on this site. You had a really great conversation with a friend and he told you nonsense, and you rushed home to check this blog. Do you really have a life? And really talking about money the way you did – well it’s vulgar, didn’t you know?

 

Comment by Fred C. Dobbs | 2008-06-19 03:11:39

All the “Quartermasters” I’ve ever met spent the war(s) handing out skivvy shorts, making fake “VC” flags and reading fuck books…the very Avatar of a REMF…Rear Echelon MotherFucker.

As a living, I suppose it might beat proctology.

As a screen name…not so much.

Comment by NY still loves Hillary | 2008-06-19 07:49:58

No, Fred, I don’t think you got his witty joke. You know: No Quarter, Quarter Master. Get it? He’s our master! Must be Bambi is selling franchises. Maybe he can franchise his penis too, since none of his trolls have one.

P.S. Most of the high-powered lawyers I know not only don’t have time for the internet (nonetheless an insignificant site like NQ), and have the technical savvy of an 80 year old. They have assistants who type for them, because when they’re not busy dictating briefs or in court they are off with other big money types putting down the low lifes that surf the web. They wouldn’t even understand the snarky cat reference, nonetheless laugh at it.

 
 
 
 
 
 

Comment by StrawberrybitesBarky | 2008-06-18 22:54:47

Bwahahahahaha. This bot is even more stupid than the rest. He shot his own dick off. First time…hahahahahahah.

Comment by Fred C. Dobbs | 2008-06-19 03:13:03

Tough shot to make. And, getting Weaver to make a Macro lens for the gunsight was pretty tricky, too!

 
 

Comment by Tim in Tempe | 2008-06-18 22:54:47

He knows about the tape because the rest of the world is laughing at this site which promised to produce the “Whitey” tape.

That’s how he knows.

Just kidding, we talked about it at the “paid Trolls ” strategy meeting this afternoon, idiot.

The thing is, that this site was respected since its inception and now its become a joke.

It’s Sad because I know Larry Johnson has alot of experience and valuable information to share with us and he’s allowed the site to go off the deep end.

Comment by Quartermaster | 2008-06-18 22:59:32

Tim, did you get your Blogging-For-Dollars check yet? I missed the paid trolls meeting, which I think was held in the Astrodome, given our numbers. I had to go eat babies and swear on Marx, so I missed out. Are the checks coming in the mail? I hope so!

Comment by Tim in Tempe | 2008-06-18 23:15:53

No really I swear, I’m doing this for fun.

Like I said below it’s like shooting dead retarded fish in a barrel.

Comment by Quartermaster | 2008-06-18 23:19:52

Lies! All of us Obamabotazoidatrons are paid bloggers! And vampires! Bleh bleh!

Tim, I’m with you, pal. This is the front-page post that officially pushes this into cuckoo ding-dong bye-bye land. Right there with the flat earthers and the UFO believers. And mocking them is, as you said, like shooting fish in a barrel. I feel sorry for people like this, though, so I’m a little guilty.

No, Larry, not white guilty. Settle down.

Comment by WildChild | 2008-06-18 23:58:29

You guys should get together later and smoke a little crack before the man sex… LMAO optimistically of course

Comment by Joe | 2008-06-19 02:42:34

Quartermaster needs his bourbon first before man sex.

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-06-19 08:20:14

Joe, he prefers to be called ‘Sugar.’

 
 
 
 
 
 

Comment by Jim (Just Say NO to Puppets like Obama/Bush) | 2008-06-19 03:15:08

Oh, so magically this site lost cred because it did its job reporting actual news, unlike our shilled up media, but not the Obamaorgy that is dailypos?

 
 

Comment by AnninCa | 2008-06-18 22:58:19

They are a bit frantic tonight. Let’s not expect congruency. :)

Comment by Paul F. Villarreal | 2008-06-18 23:21:24

Mayn of the Obamabots are yet lamenting the Lakers’ loss last night and/or are upset that Eldrick “Tiger” Woods’ heroics have cost him a shot at two more majors this year. I know the ‘bot named “McBush” falls in this category and there are plenty more in the same boat.

Expect extra testiness from the ‘BamaBorg while they grieve over the downfall of Kobe Bryant and Tigger.

Comment by Quartermaster | 2008-06-18 23:29:22

“Tigger.” Cute. You could be a little less subtle and just call him “Tegro.”

Oh, hey, Bull Connor called, and he’d like his leitmotif back.

Comment by WildChild | 2008-06-18 23:59:54

Can you believe that Tiger broke his knee playing golf?

Comment by Paul F. Villarreal | 2008-06-19 00:23:38

This is the stuff of non-athletes.

Tig plays a game, not a sport, and so it is not surprising that when Eldork tried to imitate an actual athlete, he shattered.

I cannot even tell you how much figures such as The Tigster and Kobiotch mean to many of the ‘BamaBorg collective. It is really troubling to see the level of emotional investment such entertainers command from the Kool-Aiders.

Weak minds and such, I guess.

Comment by schtum | 2008-06-19 01:47:14

Alright, we get it, you hate black people.

Comment by WildChild | 2008-06-19 01:51:28

A gettin it progressive ….. and her I was hoping this year we’d get rid of the gettin it types when the conservatives left.

 

Comment by mahaska | 2008-06-19 02:33:23

Shouldn’t it be spelled schtup?

Comment by Fred C. Dobbs | 2008-06-19 03:18:56

Shtup.

FYI, I saw BLAZING SADDLES last month, with “shtup” and “nigger” bleeped out.

Now, THAT’s funny! A PC version of BLAZING SADDLES!

‘Scuse me…Mongo leave now…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 

Comment by Paul F. Villarreal | 2008-06-19 07:20:22

Quite the contrary, actually. As Jerry MaGuire said, “I love black people!” Just as I love all other people.

I don’t glorify non-athletes as athletes, however, nor do I particularly care for petulant punks who get rid of their superior teammates.

This isn’t about race for me. It’s about being facetious regarding a non-athlete and lionizing a miscreant who should be behind bars.

Pretty simple.

 
 
 
 

Comment by Paul F. Villarreal | 2008-06-19 00:15:41

You’re sad, and based on your own hackneyed “clown crying under her makeup” delivery — or leitmotif if you prefer — I would wager you are being paid for your trolldom. Your comments ooze the disaffect of the employee.

For someone who is servicing a man whose advisers see Winnie the Pooh as some kind of foreign relations Deepak Chopra, you should be well-versed on Deepak’s homeslice, Tigger.

Run along now. You are out of your depth with me, astrotroll. I don’t like having to rebuff women, even rhetorically. Please make this easy on yourself.

Comment by Fred C. Dobbs | 2008-06-19 03:25:27

Aw, when I saw, “leitmotif,” I knew that the miscreant had at least taken Music Appreciation 115 at Crew Cut JuCo.

When someone tells me he/she us an attorney, I usually find that asking who Fred Korematsu is thins out the poseurs.

I got a Kollege roomie who’s a Federalist Society Nazi (even funnier, since he had the biggest collection of bongs south of Atlanta), and a father-in-law, a son-in-law and son-in-law’s father, all members of the Bar in NY, DC, FL, CA, and a stepson due for LSAT’s soon, after two tours in Afghanistan.

Comment by Paul F. Villarreal | 2008-06-19 07:25:03

Good stuff, man.

Best of luck to your stepson, who sounds like quite a guy.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Comment by Tattie | 2008-06-19 10:07:56

THS IS THE FIRST TIME ON THE SITE AND YOU ARE ASKING FOR THE WHITEY TAPE. HOW WOULD YOU KNOW ABOUT THAT?

 
 

Comment by Pavlov's Dog | 2008-06-18 22:32:53

I’ve heard from at least six very reliable sources that there is a video making the rounds of LJ and Mickey Kaus blowing goats. It would be irresponsible for me to speculate on this before it becomes public. Anyway, it’s news…

Comment by Quartermaster | 2008-06-18 23:03:03

Well, Larry Johnson won’t comment on your accusation, won’t take the time to deny it. Therefore it is true. I doubt your post would be filled with so many details if it wasn’t true. Were these Nigerian Pygmy goats they were blowing? Dwarf goats? Did they have horns or just nubs? The European press should look into this, because the US MSM won’t because Larry paid them off. In free haircuts. With a flobee.

I hope you have Breaking! information on this goat-blowing thing Monday at 0900.

Comment by Mel | 2008-06-18 23:17:38

Boy you sure are one nasty bitter and angry troll!

Since you enjoy accusing people of lying, without any proof as Larry did as he said, that is fine, paid trolls are expected to do that!

So let’s talk about liars, how is that Selma and Kennedy airlift doing that Barry keeps lying about on the campaign trail?

How is Barry doing in regards to Nafta, still double talking?

Hows Barry doing with Rev Wright, he still under the bus after his lying speech on Race?

Should you really be throwing stones when the one you are representing is a pathological liar?

Axelrod say yet when Obama is going to recall all his books of lies yet?

Comment by Quartermaster | 2008-06-18 23:26:56

Mel, sugar, three things. First, I loved you in Alice. Great show. Loved your hat.

Second, the only person who has ever paid me to write is Random House, and not on a blog. That’s a profoundly lame argument, but that, along with your outdated talking points (Wright! Ayers! Buses! Selma!) show a lack of creativity. More left brain and right brain would help you be more persuasive. Unless your goal is just to vent, which is cool. I’d rather you be here angrily pounding away on a keyboard than on some small child. And hey, let’s face it, we all know you’ve pounded children. I heard about a video of it. More details Monday at 0900. Prove me wrong. Just kidding, I know you don’t pound kids. Kids stay far from you. Best friends again?

Third, you really should know–and I say this sincerely–that there are many breakfast cereals on the market with a lot of fiber and great taste. Trust me. Once you unplug the mail route, as it were, you’ll find that your pent up rage and anger just sort of slips out of you. No pun intended.

Comment by Mel | 2008-06-18 23:36:19

First of all ahole I am a man, so you can shove your bullshit talk where you find Barrys place the sun don’t shine!

Second, only to you Ayers, Rezko et al are outdated, but they are not going away!

Third, my constitution is just fine, your might work better if you remove your head from your poop shoot, because you have not said one intelligent thing since you have been on here except the same old same old Axelrod crap of diversion to avoid, and so might be time for you to find yourself another kind of life to lead since yours has shown has no meaning to iit!

Comment by Quartermaster | 2008-06-18 23:49:12

Mel, seriously, I say this with genuine interest and admiration. But have you ever worked for Hallmark? Because the lines you are putting out tonight…I gotta tell you, sugar, pure gold.

Comment by WildChild | 2008-06-19 00:01:38

hmmm, do tell, what card do you send out after a night a crack and man sex?

 

Comment by Mel | 2008-06-19 00:12:06

Strange how you seem to enjoy calling a male sugar and sweetie, you a Barack do’er or a Sinclair do’er?

Honestly, it really gives me the creeps when a guy calls me those things, especially one who is associating and defending someone who is being accused of male on male sex.

So please refrain from using those terms on me, thank you pig!

Comment by WildChild | 2008-06-19 00:38:58

Quartermaster wants you Mel…. in the back of a limo….after a few hits of crack…

Comment by Joe | 2008-06-19 03:06:29

…and bourbon.

 
 
 
 

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-06-19 08:23:29

Don’t call me ‘Sugar,’ and I don’t want your bourbon, either! Ha ha.

 
 

Comment by mahaska | 2008-06-19 02:36:53

“the only person who has ever paid me to write is Random House”

Oh for Christ’s sake, here comes the false flags again. Oh I am a professioal writer. If this were true, your writing would be a lot better. I believe you are lying or delusional.

Comment by beebop | 2008-06-19 06:33:09

It was probably on the book holding up his screen ….

 
 
 
 

Comment by Fred C. Dobbs | 2008-06-19 03:28:08

It was Pete Rose and Mickey Kaus, and it was under the bleachers at the Army-Navy game.

LJ and Charlie Hustle are often mistaken for each other…

 
 

Comment by Tim in Tempe | 2008-06-18 23:20:57

no irresponsible reporting isn’t frowned upon here. It’s the life blood of the blog.

Comment by beebop | 2008-06-19 06:34:52

But never an actual response from trolls to the questions asked … like today’s new and reused NAFTA position that sounds amazingly like the one that was whispered to the Canadians … not old news, sweetie, new news.

 
 

Comment by Donald from Hawaii | 2008-06-19 00:17:35

That’s simply can’t be true! Why, I have it on reliable authority, i.e., two completely reliable yet totally unrelated and anonymous sources on both the east and west coasts, that it was only a liesurely hand-job.

 

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-06-19 00:51:56

Has Mickey Kaus made Obama’s shitlist? I mean Larry’s blog is just for entertainment purposes, but a bright, well-respected journalist with a gift for snark gets the full brunt of tasteless, questionable crap humor. And for what? For calling Obama the next McGovern ‘the pet rock of wealthy liberals.’ For writing about how stupid Obama’s plan to apply the 6.2% Social Security payroll tax to earnings above $250,000… ? Why d’the Obama babies wet their diapers over The Kaus Files?

http://www.slate.com/id/2193674/

 
 

Comment by Loyal Democrat | 2008-06-18 22:33:01

You don’t think this story is news?

Sure, in the same way that Anna Nicole Smith was news or Britney Spears is news. Larry Sinclair is a walking freakshow. I can’t believe any of you are taking this guy seriously.

Comment by WildChild | 2008-06-19 00:03:16

BOBO hired the walking freak show for man sex and crack.

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-06-19 00:14:17

I have more respect for Larry Sinclair than Obama. He can admit a mistake and start on a new path. What he did took a lot of courage.

Comment by WildChild | 2008-06-19 00:42:11

It;s difficult to believe that Larry just walked out of the woodwork and said BOBO had paid man sex with him while smoking crack if he didn’t. Were the later the case BOBO and the BOBO boys would still have that look of bewilderment on their faces as opposed to a orchestrated BLOG response from the BOBO boys.

 
 
 
 

Comment by NomNomNom | 2008-06-18 22:33:24

I’d rather know why he had a one on one meeting with Qazwini in May and now one with Siblani, and failed to acknowledge his political relationship with Odinga.

Comment by jack, too | 2008-06-19 00:11:08

We already did that, during the Clinton campaign.

Obama is a tool, nothing matters, whatever he does, until the people pushing him are eradicated, for good.

And that’s that.

 
 

Comment by fred | 2008-06-18 22:34:56

Larry Sinclair put it out there now its up to some curious reporter to investigate the info…hes gave phone numbers dates, the cab driver name, hotel medical records, arrest records,and credit card receipts. He gave up the farm its up to the media now…Arresting him is going to make some investigated reporter a little curious

Comment by Paul F. Villarreal | 2008-06-18 23:23:01

Excellent comment, Fred. I agree with everything you said here.

 

Comment by Lyn | 2008-06-19 00:19:28

http://larrysinclair.org/ he has pdfs of his reports/letters ect here

 
 

Comment by Susanjane | 2008-06-18 22:35:06

Who arrested him, and for what?

Comment by NomNomNom | 2008-06-18 22:40:25

Some old warrant, apparently in Delaware. Joe Biden’s son is the attorney general there. Oops, I’m sure that’s a coincidence, nevermind.

Comment by AnninCa | 2008-06-18 22:50:52

No, the charge is from CO. Deleware issued the arrest papers. DC carried it out. It’s the same CO charge that he’s been in contact with the courts over.

Someone decided to push the matter.

Wonder who?

Comment by Quartermaster | 2008-06-18 23:05:03

Jack Ruby. Jack Ruby pushed the matter from the soundstage where they filmed the moon landing.

Comment by WildChild | 2008-06-19 00:05:35

You need to adjust your tinfoil a bit. The signal from 1963 is scrambling the signal from 1969.

 
 

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-06-19 08:30:07

The Obamabots keep saying the arrest papers were issued in NJ, so it’s definitely Biden!

 
 

Comment by Tim in Tempe | 2008-06-18 23:23:14

Some old warrant not important, nothing to see here.

It’s colorado not deleware, not important just a minor detail.

nomnomnom on this.

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-06-19 08:32:31

See Anna’s comment three replies up. CO warrant. DE arrest papers. DC police. Privileged information.

 
 

Comment by Gloria | 2008-06-18 23:45:16

Was it a coincidence that Michelle was on The View and the gushing was about her perfect makeup??

All sweetness and light, too…

No, no coincidence. Have to bury anything remotely negative about Obama…

Comment by Fred C. Dobbs | 2008-06-19 03:33:17

Did they bring her in in her coffin before the sun came up?

I thought I saw Babra with a white oak stake and a mallet under the tablecloth.

How come we never Winnie Mandela Michelle Obama outside in the sunlight?

 
 
 
 

Comment by fred | 2008-06-18 22:36:51

Larry Sinclair put it out there now its up to some curious reporter to investigate the info…hes gave phone numbers dates, the cab driver name, hotel medical records, arrest records,and credit card receipts. He gave up the farm its up to the media now…Arresting him is going to make a reporter a little curious

Comment by Johnny Ray (Another Democrat for McCain) | 2008-06-18 22:39:34

No newspaper in America has reported on this story, even on the NPC story.

Obama’s campaign has probably threatened to cut off the access of any media outlet reporting this.

Comment by AnninCa | 2008-06-18 22:46:02

Ah yes, but the National Press Corps gave him his “moment.”

:)

Now, where’s that limo driver?

Comment by Johnny Ray (Another Democrat for McCain) | 2008-06-18 22:54:11

Yeah, getting a NPC platform doesn’t mean much without any news coverage.

Where are the newspapers doing their jobs?

Comment by Tumby J | 2008-06-18 23:00:08

Apparently in places where news is taking place.

Comment by Joe | 2008-06-19 03:08:30

In Obama’s limo.

 
 
 

Comment by Tim in Tempe | 2008-06-18 23:24:22

the limo driver sleeps with the fishes.

right Ann?

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-06-19 08:34:23

Her name is Anna, if you’re going to be familiar. The limo driver works as a cabbie in NY now.

 
 
 
 

Comment by rjj | 2008-06-19 07:29:29

Not any reporter who hopes to remain employed.

Doesn’t matter if it’s true. If it isn’t, it’s toxic.

 
 

Comment by NomNomNom | 2008-06-18 22:36:59

Let me guess obots: all of a sudden talking about Sinclair sounds good, huh?

 

Comment by StrawberrybitesBarky | 2008-06-18 22:37:43

Holy Shit No Quarter…have you EVER seen so many trolls descend so quickly on a diary?????!!!! I thought it was bullshit until this very moment…..GOOD GOING TROLLS, YOU JUST GAVE THIS STORY THE LEGS IT NEEDED. I was going to let this one slide. BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Comment by socalannie | 2008-06-18 22:51:11

Excellent point! Thanks Strawberry!

Comment by Tim in Tempe | 2008-06-18 23:26:02

Yea strawberry you’re awesome, and soooooo funny!!

Those Obamabots are sooooo lame and angry and crazy!

Comment by WildChild | 2008-06-19 00:08:09

 
 
 
 

Comment by Johnny Ray (Another Democrat for McCain) | 2008-06-18 22:37:44

Typical smear job by the Obamacrats.

Who knows what will be done with Larry in that prison by Obamathugs? Mind-altering drugs? torture?

For goodness’s sake, we don’t know why he was arrested and sent to Delaware. And there’s nothing to indicate that he can be arrested and Sent to DC. Last I checked, Washington DC was not part of Delaware.

The accusations are on the table, and let’s see if Obama adds this to his “fight the smears” liesite.

 

Comment by Loyal Democrat | 2008-06-18 22:38:26

This is pathetic. I used to enjoy reading this site, as my son recommended I read this blog regularly. I used to like it when you hit Bush, and I liked when you stuck up for Hillary. I also supported Hillary in the primary.

But now, this site has become completely unhinged. Why are you resorting to Larry Sinclair BS to smear Obama? I wasn’t a big Obama fan before, but the more you all bash him the more I’m ready to defend him. Hillary doesn’t want another GOP President in 2009, and neither do I.

Comment by StrawberrybitesBarky | 2008-06-18 22:40:50

Ok, bye now, have a nice day.

 

Comment by Mel | 2008-06-18 22:50:04

You let your 5 yr old son go to Obama for Kids to I bet, so your values are kind of not worth much now are they, so enjoy the door on the way out, you might get a Barry slap on the butt from it, feel proud if you do…..lol

 

Comment by framecop | 2008-06-18 22:51:13

It doesn’t matter whether it is BS, it will be picked up by the corporate media AFTER THE CONVENTION GUARANTEES THAT OBAMA’S NAME IS ON THE BALLOT IN NOVEMBER, and it will damage Obama.

Every smear will damage a 47 year old black candidate named Barack Hussein Obama.

Should it be that way? No.
Will it be that way? Yes.
Why? Because you can’t change the way VOTERS (people) ARE in the middle of a campaign, something Democrats have still failed to learn.

Comment by Lute | 2008-06-18 23:02:24

Don’t blame Voters.
Obama has no record.
What else is there for Voters to look at?

 
 

Comment by HillaryDidWin | 2008-06-18 23:44:33

Loyal..so you only like the post if they are insulting someone you dislike…LOL

 
 

Comment by Medusa | 2008-06-18 22:40:20

Wow, Larry, you sure have stirred up the Bots with this one!! LOL

I think they’ve been sitting by their computers all evening, checking NQ every ten minutes, just waiting to see if poor old Larry Sinclair’s story is told.

I’m sure BO’s anti-smear troops have their orders. Don’t they realize that reacting to a story is what gives it traction.

With all their whining and insults, I’m now thinking there’s probably something to it.

Comment by AnninCa | 2008-06-18 22:44:52

I think Larry gave into us. LOL*

 
 

Comment by John Smart | 2008-06-18 22:40:48

This story true or not is delicious. It is weird from front to back.

There is oddity all around. Sinclair is odd. The arrest right then and there is odd. (why not arrest him before the presser? or after he was gone – there is some showboating here)
the name changes are hilarious and odd.
why the hell not just dig up the phone records. someone must be able to do this.
the murder of young has always bothered me. But I am not sure sinclair did not fill in “Mr. Young” after the fact.
and it can’t be that hard to to see if whitehouse got six figures from Obama.

Here’s what bothers the most: the insane reaction from the Obama Pods. Good lord, this has all the earmarks of being B.S. The overreaction of the Pod Squad (hey, I like that one) is the most interesting part.

Comment by StrawberrybitesBarky | 2008-06-18 22:46:32

My thinking exactly, it’s like they were hovering over their little laptops posts are all Obots. Like I said I thought this story was BS until I saw the ATTACK OF THE OBAMATRONS! Me thinks thou protest too much.

Comment by AnninCa | 2008-06-18 22:56:11

 
 

Comment by Joe | 2008-06-19 03:14:44

Where there’s smoke, there’s fire. Fire stirred especially in the loins of the Obama Pods over a story of BOBO Man Sex in a Five Star Limo.

 
 

Comment by Evelyn | 2008-06-18 22:40:54

Here is the link to the whole Press Conference. The tape is over 50 minutes and you can hear all of the questions asked and Larry Sinclair answers. The Fbi and DC Police were surprised that a warrant showed up, as they had heard nothing about it until it came in. Mitch and Nan from the Mitch and Nan Show blog are the ones responsible for having him arrested. They tried to get it done before the Press Conference to stop it, only it didn’t work out to their advantage. Will Barrow from Puma was there as were a couple of other’s I know. I spoke to Will on the phone tonight and he said that Sinclair answered all questions straight forward and that his story was definitely worth investigating.

This is not a video version, simply the complete audio!

http://hbeeinc.com/media/papatard_blows_himself_128_stero.mp3

Comment by Anonymous | 2008-06-18 22:53:41

Mitch and Nan from the Mitch and Nan Show blog are the ones responsible for having him arrested.

Assuming they did that, are they connected in any way to the Obama campaign?

 

Comment by AnninCa | 2008-06-18 22:55:31

 
 

Comment by Ignore Nothing | 2008-06-18 22:41:51

Larry,

Thanks for sticking your neck out on this one. Mr. Sinclair provided the name of the limo driver and his phone numbers. Someone is going to check them out. It might be a reporter but it will definitely be an opposition researcher.

 

Comment by Sam | 2008-06-18 22:42:58

Comment by typical.white.person | 2008-06-19 00:51:30

I found five or six individuals named Paramjit Multani (the limo driver). They all live in NY, NJ, MD, and one in Wisconsin, a little north of Chicago.

It took me about thirty seconds to locate him.

 
 

Comment by AnninCa | 2008-06-18 22:43:29

I don’t have to believe it or disbelieve it. He gave the information. I’d like to hear from the limo driver and see if any supporting documents pan out.

He certainly didn’t sound like a nutcase to me. I figured he’s probably a pain pill addict now. Sort of switched it around. But other than that, he answered questions, was coherent, etc.

So who knows what will come of this? Maybe nothing. Maybe it’s actually true.

 

Comment by Loyal Democrat | 2008-06-18 22:46:02

Wow. What happened here? After all the media and the GOP did to trash Hillary, why are we celebrating this smear attack on Obama? What credibility does Larry Sinclair have? And why would any respectable blog obsess over garbage like this?

Comment by Tim in Tempe | 2008-06-18 22:47:59

Because this has become a smear Obama site for the Hillary Pouters.

Hillary has moved on but these people can’t.

Comment by Johnny Ray (Another Democrat for McCain) | 2008-06-18 22:51:32

It’s called karma for how the real Democratic choice was forced out of the race.

Comment by Tim in Tempe | 2008-06-18 22:59:40

You mean the one with the most delegates? Oops!

Comment by Johnny Ray (Another Democrat for McCain) | 2008-06-18 23:23:45

Hillary won more votes and Obama stole the nomination

 

Comment by DoroB | 2008-06-18 23:24:37

The “real Democratic choice” is the one with the popular votes. Democratic–popular votes. Get it?
Obviously you adore the status quo that your master so often denounced…You are not being a very good Obamabot.

Comment by Tim in Tempe | 2008-06-18 23:28:12

Read the party rules DORO. the rules that Hillary wa so very happy with until super Tuesday when she awoke and found that uppity black man was beating her.

Comment by Johnny Ray (Another Democrat for McCain) | 2008-06-18 23:31:14

The Obamacrats didn’t read the rules when they decided to steal delegates from Clinton.

And they didn’t read any rules when they intimidated state after state into giving caucus votes to Obama.

 

Comment by DoroB | 2008-06-18 23:45:22

Again, you are not being a very good Obamabot. What happened with changing the status quo? Your master was promoting that sort of thing until he found that stuffy old rulz and backroom dealings worked pretty well for him. Who cares about popular votes? They’re just people!

So if you want to have any credibility as a good ‘bot you need to start spouting more inspirational campaign talking points–new politics, hope, change, etc…Otherwise you just sound hysterical.

 

Comment by uhh somehow this notion that I am qualified to be president is uhh uhh ridiculous | 2008-06-19 01:13:16

Father Pfleger, is that you?

 
 
 
 

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-06-19 08:39:37

Yeah, how did O bama get delegates in Michigan where his name wasn’t on the ballot? Democratic party charter says Uncommitted is a standing, legitimate vote. Is it also one of Obama’s secret middle names?

 
 

Comment by Fred C. Dobbs | 2008-06-19 03:40:30

Couldn’t sneak it past YOU, could we, you clever little bot?

 
 

Comment by StrawberrybitesBarky | 2008-06-18 22:50:54

Yeah, you said that up thread, we got it, we got it, you’re upset Larry is a loser, this blog has gone down hill you were a Hillary supporter and so on and so forth…you know, you do have the option of leaving, Kos would love to have you, they can use all the former Hillary supporters they can get.

Comment by Tim in Tempe | 2008-06-18 23:00:30

But this is fun.

Comment by StrawberrybitesBarky | 2008-06-18 23:24:31

No it’s not fun Tim, not anymore. You keep defending the most flawed candidate to get this close to the White House in the history of the US. To have this much support for someone with so much obvious baggage is sad really. I loved Jesse Jackson to death, I voted for him…and it broke my heart to give up support for him after the HYMYTOWN comments he made. You should really think about that.

Comment by Quartermaster | 2008-06-18 23:54:57

No, Tim’s right. This is fun.

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-06-19 08:42:43

Fun, huh? A quarter is too much for you, but here’s 20 cents, call all your friends and give me back the change.

 
 

Comment by Tumby J | 2008-06-18 23:57:49

I’m having fun.

 
 
 
 

Comment by AnninCa | 2008-06-18 22:53:52

Payback sucks, eh? LOL*

Or I should say, “Revenge is a dish best served cold.”

*passing the salt*

 

Comment by John Smart | 2008-06-18 22:55:28

alleged loyal democrat – why NOT spend one blog post on it. It is interesting. most likely nonsense. but so what? I can’t stand when people who have stood by and watched the worse trashing we’ve seen in 50 years by obama blogs show up and suddenly get their underwear in a knot. It’s not like the entire blog here is dedicated to sinclair. It is an interesting story on a wednesday night. LJ did not say he bought it. the story was “covered” at Huffpo too. did you get on your high horse over there?

Kos went nuts over the Cindy Mc. recipe nonsense. this is more worthy than THAT.

Comment by StrawberrybitesBarky | 2008-06-18 23:01:40

Kos went nuts over that cookie recipe for real? I thought it was snark? And these guys upthread bitch over this….? OMG they went postal over that hit piece at Vanity Fair and Bill, suck it Obamabits.

 

Comment by AnninCa | 2008-06-18 23:05:17

lol*

And let’s not forget the Mainstream Press who is so above this story and how they dug deeply into those Hillary datebooks to locate precisely where she was when Bill was boinking Monica.

Fine investigative reporters with a keen eye on avoiding trashy articles…..right?

Comment by uhh somehow this notion that I am qualified to be president is uhh uhh ridiculous | 2008-06-19 01:16:50

Excellent point, Ann.

There will come a time, sooner or later, when Obama will be exposed by the media. His fairy tale autobiography is crumbling fast.
Interesting that his followers have as little morality as he does.

 
 
 

Comment by Mel | 2008-06-18 22:56:44

To quote Michelle Obama: if you can’t keep your own house in order, how are you expected to keep the White House in order!

But according to you that was fair game for a Democrat to say such a thing towards another Democrat huh?

Guess Axelrod forgot that speech in his paid blogger manual for this evening!

 

Comment by beebop | 2008-06-19 06:43:49

It doesn’t look, walk or talk like a Democrat to me. And the only one to vote for the Cheney energy plan? Obum.

 
 

Comment by OBAMATROLLSAREIDIOTS | 2008-06-18 22:47:05

Well, I am thinking maybe this needs to be on the fightthesmears website so we can pass it around so people will “know” that obambi is not on the down low.

Or is he? who cares but I sure like seeing these trolls come here to check it out

Idiots Obambi is a friggin empty suit

NO OBAMA
MCCAIN2008 OR UNTIL HILLARY RISES

Comment by Dave_Not_For_Obama | 2008-06-18 23:00:57

Comment by OBAMATROLLSAREIDIOTS | 2008-06-18 22:47:05

Well, I am thinking maybe this needs to be on the fightthesmears website so we can pass it around so people will “know” that obambi is not on the down low.

I’ll bet Obamabi does not put it there, as he will then have to produce his schedule , phone records etc. in regards to Sinclairs time line, like we will ever see that from Obambi.

There was enough info in the Sinclair press conference to give an enterprising individual/group something to chase down.

Comment by Lyn | 2008-06-19 00:31:18

So IF he doesn’t put it on this is a smear site, does that mean it is true?

 
 
 

Comment by warehouse553 | 2008-06-18 22:48:47

Does anyone know whats going on in FL and OH. Obama is leading in 2 polls that just came out. I CANNOT believe that he’s leading in FL or OH. Were Democrats oversampled?

Comment by Tim in Tempe | 2008-06-18 22:58:30

Stunning isn’t it!

You were told that Obama would lose, and it was a lie.

Go here and look at the upper right hand corner. MyDD was totally a Hillary website so you don’t have to worry that the “Obamabots” took over.

The MyDD crew are sensible Hillary supporters who have moved on just like Hillary has.

Comment by StrawberrybitesBarky | 2008-06-18 23:05:31

Hey! Don’t look at that presidentail candidate getting head and doing drugs in that limo over there, look over here at these really keen new polls out and by the way Larry, where’s the whitey tape that doesn’t exist but scares the shit out of us so we have to bring it up every diary.

Comment by Tim in Tempe | 2008-06-18 23:12:06

Ok forget the Whitey tape since you can’t find it.

Where’s the sinclair evidence? Aww can’t find that either?

What’s next? Michelle’s stolen falafel scandal!

The Horror!

Top notch blog you got here!

I see a Bloggie award in your future this year!

Comment by StrawberrybitesBarky | 2008-06-18 23:17:50

Tim seriously dude, I understand, no one can keep shoveling this much bullshit for as long as you have without having some sort of breakdown…poor thing, you need a vacation. I honestly am starting to feel sorry for you guys…I don’t think even Bush had this much shit to hide this early in his career. Most of us are seriously amused now. You can’t keep this pace up forever.

Comment by Johnny at Work | 2008-06-18 23:26:39

O’boys got more skeletons in his closet than the Crypt Keeper.

I get the impression he is braced against a door holding back an avalance of bones.

Not to worry, the Republicans will leave no bone unturned come September.

If O’boy is the Dem Convention Final Answer, sit back with some popcorn and enjoy the show the Repub’s put out.

Comment by StrawberrybitesBarky | 2008-06-18 23:34:00

My problem is, I’m a softy, I hate to see people in pain, and these trolls really have their work cut out for them. if they’re fighting this hard NOW, what are they going to look like when the real fight begins…whew.

 

Comment by AnninCa | 2008-06-18 23:40:32

Yes, there may be clarity now as to just why Rev. Wright was mortified that HE was being thrown under the bus. I kept noticing that little smile of his.

Suppose the good Rev. knows more about this than we think?

Rev. Manning, bless his heart, was at the press meeting today.

I agree. It’s starting to look like the season of Bones here in vetting Obama….

putting the pieces together on just who he is!

 
 

Comment by Tim in Tempe | 2008-06-18 23:32:13

really, don;t worry about me. I really appreciate your concern. I know you care about this country more than I do and you’re obviously so much smarter and better informed than me so let me just wallow in my ignorance.

I do have to use the bathroom about now so so I’ll take my leave and think about you all as I sit on my throne!

Cheers!

 
 

Comment by Mel | 2008-06-18 23:29:23

Wow Axelrod actually pays you, what a waste of money, oh geez Bambi does waste a lot of money doesn’t he, $11 million in PA to lose, $12 Million in Ohio to what? Lose

Hmmmmmm Bambi is really intelligent isn’t he, guess that is why he brokered a deal to buy a mansion for Michelle he couldn’t afford and needed his friend who sits in jail to help him out!

What a guy, shows the sorts of people who are attracted to him, and you guys here makes the credibility of Sinclair all the more real!

Comment by Teakwood | 2008-06-19 01:02:00

Mel, There was an Limo company LLC partnered with Nesbit…you recall the name of the company?

 
 

Comment by DoroB | 2008-06-18 23:31:23

Oh my gosh Obama supporters are going batty! This is kind of amusing.

 
 
 
 

Comment by doctorwang | 2008-06-18 23:03:48

No- it’s just that John McCain is an idiot. Drilling for oil off the beaches of Florida? Any moron* could figure that wouldn’t bode well with Florida voters.

* with the exception of McCain. Are we seeing the early signs of dementia?!

Barr in ‘08 !!

Comment by Johnny at Work | 2008-06-18 23:30:44

Cuba is drilling 90 miles off Florida with help from the Chinese.

Mexico is trying to get deep water technology from the US.

The offshore wells are coming whether the US drills or not.

The questions are, do you want to claim and protect the resource? Do you want to drill with unregulated Chinese and Mexican rigs?

Wake up and get a clue.

Comment by AnninCa | 2008-06-18 23:42:17

 

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-06-19 08:45:07

That nut claims to be in his 40’s, too!

 
 
 

Comment by NoToDisenfranchisement | 2008-06-19 01:47:58

Hey Warehouse – remember this, regarding the accuracy of the propagan…I mean polls – if we were to believe the polls in the primary then Obama won TX and OH! You can read 20+ headlines cited below at this link: http://www.stop-obama.org/?p=88

It began with the stories of Obama’s advance (you can hear the galloping horse in Axelrod’s head)

Clinton’s lead fadesin blue-collar Ohio
Obama leads in Texas and is advancing in Ohio race
Obama Hopes To End Clinton Run

Then polls entered the advance. Lies, damned lies, and statistics!

And juding by Hillary’s victory in Ohio, statistics these were!!

Ohio was always Clintonland, with Hillary enjoying a solid lead from time immemorial. Then the pro-Obama propaganda set in, beginning with stories of Obama catching up with Clinton:

Ohio poll: Clinton ahead by just 2 percentage points
Obama rides wave into Texas
Clinton viewed as underdog in state
Clinton and Obama tied in Texas, close in Ohio

These escalated into:Poll in Ohio shows Obama gaining on Clinton with a week to go
Poll shows Obama gaining in OhioPolls show Senator Clinton is holding a narrow lead in Ohio but her once large margin in Texas has now evaporated and she is in a statistical dead-heat with Senator Obama for the Lone Star state.

Then shifting to a tie:

Poll shows Clinton with slight lead over Obama in Ohio
Clinton and Obama tied in Texas, close in Ohio
Latest poll: Obama, Clinton split Ohio, Texas

Suddenly breakthrough, a lead. The most notorious poll here was the Zogby poll, (because people like myself trust Zogby)

Zogby Poll: Obama overtakes Clinton in Ohio

Now, there was incessant talk of dominace:

Obama rides wave into Texas
New Texas Poll Shows Obama ahead
Obama Overtakes Clinton
New Polls Show Obama Gaining In Texas, Ohio And Nationally
New CBS 11 Poll Puts Obama Ahead Of Clinton

 

Comment by Fred C. Dobbs | 2008-06-19 03:45:53

Supposedly, they didn’t sample jews and Cubans…

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

I can hear some doofus poll-taker asking his supervisor: “WTF does ‘SCHVARTZER’ mean?”

And, in Myammuh, “Obama” and “communista” are synonymous.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

 
 

Comment by english teacher | 2008-06-18 22:50:08

obama’s jeff gannon moment…

 

Comment by sandy gonzo | 2008-06-18 22:50:17

WHAT INVESTIGATIVE REPORTER? THEY ALL APPEAR DEAD OR WORKING FOR FOREIGN COUNTRIES BECAUSE AMERIKA DOESN’T HAVE ANY ANYMORE. I BELIEVE LS.

HOW MANY OF YOU ATTEND CHURCH’S WHERE 3 PEOPLE ARE MURDERED IN SUCH A SHORT TIME? HELL, THAT ANYONE IS MURDERED!

*61 IS NOT LEGIT AND WILL LOSE. WE ARE FIGHTING FOR THE LAST SHRED OF DEMOCRACY. WE WILL NOT LET THE HITLER YOUTH AND BIG BUSINESS RAM THIS INCOMPETENT,RACIST BAITING, SEXIST, TERRORIST ASSOCIATED FOOL DOWN OUR THROATS. i GUESS THAT WOULD BE A PUN LS, SORRY.

Comment by The Real Hope | 2008-06-18 23:15:35

Please turn off your caps. Thanks.

 

Comment by notmyrealmoniker | 2008-06-19 08:09:41

sandy gonzo, please forgive my ignorance but I have to ask. Why is BO referred to as *61?

 
 

Comment by B | 2008-06-18 22:52:16

Where is Michelle’s whitey video?

Let us see it!

Oh wait, you are nothing but a liar and will never post anything of that sort.

Let’s see it!

I dare you.

Comment by John Smart | 2008-06-18 22:58:11

B – you are a moron. LJ never aid he could SHOW it to you. He reported what he was told. attack THAT if you don’t believe him. Not what your obama pod handlers told you he said.

stop this prattle.

Comment by doctorwang | 2008-06-18 23:08:41

“Prattle”? Are you one of those Renaissance Festival geeks?!

Comment by Fred C. Dobbs | 2008-06-19 03:48:02

It sounded SO much nicer than, say, “Shut the fuck up, ass-face.”

 
 

Comment by beebop | 2008-06-19 06:49:17

What did you expect? A screen name of “B” should tell you all you need to know. He/she would be “A” except that it was already taken!

 
 

Comment by Mandelay | 2008-06-18 23:14:13

You should be asking these questions of the RNC and their biggest fundraisers.

 
 

Comment by nell | 2008-06-18 22:52:47

MSM is so dishonest.

Comment by beebop | 2008-06-19 07:10:08

They have already written their stories. They don’t want to be dissuaded from their endings.

 
 

Comment by janicen | 2008-06-18 22:52:51

I have watched this election cycle closely and I have never seen so many bots so nervous.

Comment by Tim in Tempe | 2008-06-18 23:08:17

Nervous, nah! This is like shooting dead retarded fish in a barrel.

Comment by doctorwang | 2008-06-18 23:12:51

“dead retarded fish in a barrel” – sounds just like a McCain rally!!

Barr in ‘08 !!

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-06-19 08:48:40

Knock knock. Who’s there? Bob Barr. Who the fuck is Bob Barr? Exactly.

Oh, yeah. Stop quoting shit. Can’t you think of anything original to say?

 
 

Comment by DoroB | 2008-06-18 23:33:36

Poor Tim. Please calm down and don’t hurt yourself.

 

Comment by Fred C. Dobbs | 2008-06-19 03:49:29

Hey, Tim: are you the Trannie they busted with Danny Bonaducci? Wasn’t that in Tempe?

 
 
 

Comment by Mandelay | 2008-06-18 22:52:55

If Obama’s “fight the smear” campaign is serious, perhaps they can file a defamation of character law suit because Sinclair’s statement is loaded with accusations. Same goes for Whitehouse.com (they also held a press confernce at the Press Club at the same time as Sinclair’s). Question is, if this story is not true, why would Sinclair make up so many details and documents to prove something about someone he never met (Obama)? Is it possible these two (Sinclair and Obama) have some sort of connection after all?

Comment by Whatever | 2008-06-18 23:51:44

His evidence proves nothing. I checked some of it out, and they are vague.

Comment by StrawberrybitesBarky | 2008-06-19 00:10:30

Oh really, Crimedog McGruff, you checked it out? Will you be sending your report on up to headquarters?

Comment by beebop | 2008-06-19 07:12:02

Don’t read “research” into “checking it out.” He/she read it and it doesn’t agree with their world view so of course it is not truthi …..

 
 
 
 

Comment by sandy gonzo | 2008-06-18 22:53:03

Comment by warehouse553 | 2008-06-18 22:48:47

Does anyone know whats going on in FL and OH. Obama is leading in 2 polls that just came out. I CANNOT believe that he’s leading in FL or OH. Were Democrats oversampled?

And when did the “polls” ever get it right between Hillary and *61? They are not accurate, the pollers are bought and paid for to make people think *61 is leading. he is not. He will NEVER win FL.

Comment by No to B.O.= Body Odor & B. Obama | 2008-06-18 22:58:03

Leading in FL and OH? Wow, that kool-aid is really strong isn’t it?

He can only lead in those states if you discount women, Cuban-Americans, Latinos, and the working class. Yeah – good luck with that.

Comment by blue | 2008-06-19 00:34:03

I’m a 30 year-old Cuban-American woman in Miami (Hialeah… a working class district… to be exact) who will be voting for Obama. Don’t think I’ll be the only one. Many things have been changing here… I wouldn’t count Obama out in Florida just yet.

Cheers

Comment by Fred C. Dobbs | 2008-06-19 03:53:04

That’s depressing enough to make me stop watching Sabado Gigante.

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-06-19 08:50:01

Fred C. Dobbs, you are one funny guy! :)

 
 
 
 
 

Comment by sandy gonzo | 2008-06-18 22:55:14

Where is Michelle’s whitey video?

Let us see it!

Oh wait, you are nothing but a liar and will never post anything of that sort.

Let’s see it!

I dare you.

Time to go to bed “B”..Its past your bed time, I double dare you, what are you maybe 12?

 

Comment by No to B.O.= Body Odor & B. Obama | 2008-06-18 22:55:36

I look forward to the Republicans digging into the murders of those young men and establishing the long-time connection between Obama and Donald Young. As for Sinclair – who the hell cares about the gay sex, people are missing his point! He is talking about the drug use and lies – that a potential president could be using crack cocaine on a regular basis while making some of the most important decisions in the world should bother anyone (not to mention the nuclear codes!). And the murdering to shut people up??? Does no one find this potentially disturbing?

Never thought I would say this – but THANK GOODNESS FOR REPUBLICANS and OPPOSITION RESEARCH – in past years they’ve had to do smear jobs or paint people as elitist, now they actually have good real material. I look forward to seeing the facts – and if he’s just a whack-job, then don’t worry about it, but if it is true – I’m sure Americans don’t want a liar, coke user, and murderer for their leader.

 

Comment by fred | 2008-06-18 22:56:07

This guy Sinclair sounds more believable than Obama who didn’t know Wright was a racist and Rezko a crook. So OB like a little MALE LOVE on the side. OB smoking crack yeah I kinda figure he was on some shit that killed his brain cells

Comment by AnninCa | 2008-06-18 23:00:11

Bingo, Fred. I want that Limo driver to be interviewed.

Comment by Tim in Tempe | 2008-06-18 23:04:32

Uh, Mr. Smart(?), the post befroe this is about a Michelle Obama recipe so don’t get your panties in a bunch a sound all high and mighty.

Comment by StrawberrybitesBarky | 2008-06-18 23:08:21

But it was done in snark AFTER Kos did a Cindy McCain stole a cookie recipe, idiot.

Comment by Tim in Tempe | 2008-06-18 23:33:54

They did it first Mom! They did it first!

Comment by WildChild | 2008-06-19 00:13:38

does your mom know you’re blogging?

 
 
 
 
 

Comment by Tim in Tempe | 2008-06-18 23:06:03

yea that crack really helps you with your law degree.

Comment by StrawberrybitesBarky | 2008-06-18 23:09:13

I’m sure you’d know.

 
 
 

Comment by Hillary or Bust | 2008-06-18 22:57:38

Look in his eyes in the beginning of the video. He’s staring the reporters straight on. I don’t think he’s lying or making this stuff up.

 

Comment by Kent | 2008-06-18 22:58:09

*yawn*
This guy is a life-long liar, which is why you fools like him, and a 2 time polygraph loser, not to mention a media whore.

No Quarter and you saps have zero cred at this point. Who cares what you believe about anything. At this rate, people will not believe anything negative about Barack. YOU have helped innoculate him. Thanks.

Your little whitey tape ruse is getting more attention than you should ever want. Even the msm is snickering about it. Couldn’t happen to a bigger bunch of low-lifes. Nice job. Please keep it going.

Comment by Johnny Ray (Another Democrat for McCain) | 2008-06-18 23:04:00

Polygraphs are not admissable in most courts.

As for the supposed record. That doesn’t mean anything here.

 

Comment by Anonymous | 2008-06-18 23:05:39

2 time polygraph loser

My understanding is Sinclair took only one polygraph test and the results are in dispute.

 

Comment by FLVoter | 2008-06-18 23:32:21

Luckily none of us here are trying to impress you and nor do we care what you think. Please don’t let us keep you up, you are better off anyplace else but here.

Comment by Fred C. Dobbs | 2008-06-19 03:59:02

What oart of Florida, and which way is the wind blowing among real Democrats there?

Everything I hear on the internet is Spanish language and WQAM streamming. No input from JAX or Tampa or Gainesville or (God help me) Tallahassee.

They probably love his ass in Tallahassee…

 
 
 

Comment by Hmm | 2008-06-18 22:58:45

Hillary Clinton Supporters for John McCain is raising money for an ad in the Chicago Sun Times attacking Obama-too funny.

http://hcsfjm.com/

 

Comment by Medusa | 2008-06-18 22:59:31

Really. I don’t care if he’s Christian or Muslim, straight or whatever, a drug user or a recovered drug user. Hell, even the Dubya came out and admitted his substance addiction. I don’t care if he wears a damn American flag pin or thinks we’re all so stupid we don’t know when he’s imitating Jay-Z.

Just tell us something real. Some truth. Stop hiding behind the Obot thugs, the paid for Dem party leaders. BO, answer some damn questions and quit the dodge.

I wouldn’t vote for the inexperienced, incompetent, irresponsible and dishonest BO if he were the last cockroach left on the planet.

Stop the lies!

Comment by destardi | 2008-06-18 23:05:27

I can’t STAND obamination.

Thank God there are alot more like you out there, and yes I’m sucking up to you Medusa, because your writing is great.

:)

Comment by PoorLarrySinclair | 2008-06-18 23:28:48

Thank you destardi. And I like your comments (and your compliments). ;-.

The Obots are so out of control over this. This is more fun than their hypoplexy over the WHITEY TAPE!

 
 
 

Comment by dang librul | 2008-06-18 23:00:30

A diarrea storm in Obamistan!
What’s the matter, trolls? Why so jumpy?
You keep coming here in case Mrs. Grievance’s tape shows up and now this fellow Sinclair, is it too much for ya?

Comment by Lou | 2008-06-19 00:40:44

The tape will be shown when they least expect it by whom thye least expect.

 
 

Comment by gotalife | 2008-06-18 23:01:17

Interesting story.

 

Comment by Johnny at Work | 2008-06-18 23:02:07

I believe it has something to do with free speech, the first ammendment, and no censorship.

You know, the values the Democratic Party used to have.

I have a lot of reasonable doubt about Sinclair, but, anyone who want to should be able to hear the guy out and make up their own mind.

There are many credible reason why Obama should not be President, starting with his Marxist ideology.

O’boys Foriegn Policy advisor and mentor is Zbigniew Brzezinski. Brzezinski is a whole new breed of Marxist. One that already slipped into the mainstream.

Leaving no doubt about Zbig’s Marxism, here are excerpts from Brzezinski’s book “Between Two Ages”.

On page 72, Brzezinski writes: “Marxism is simultaneously a victory of the external, active man over the inner, passive man and a victory of reason over belief.”

On page 83, he states: “Marxism disseminated on the popular level in the form of Communism, represented a major advance in man’s ability to conceptualize his relationship to his world.”

On page 123, we find: “Marxism supplied the best available insight into contemporary reality.”

Obama’s policy advisor advocates that Marxism is a victory, Marxism is a major advance in man’s ability, and Marxism has the best insight for the contemporary world.”

NOBAMA? HELL NO!!

And if that does not scare you enough, google Zbig, and read all about his plan for a “New World Order”, where the US Constitution is quaint and no longer useful.

Then read about his plan to use technology to track the every movement of every citizen, not just the bad guys.

Don’t think so? That is the favorite part of governing for a Marxist, total control of the citizenry. Think Communist China, Soviet Union, Stalin, Mao, Fidel Casto, and Che Guevara.

O’boy is already exerting control of information and trying to censor information. Just look at the trolls on this site.

Our Democracy and Liberties are fragile and we better be vigilent or we will lose it.

Comment by 30yrdem-not any more | 2008-06-18 23:06:25

Hey Johnny at work,
Have you looked into “The Fairness Doctrine”..The dems are trying to bring it back…

Comment by Johnny at Work | 2008-06-18 23:17:44

Moderaate Dems are in favor of Fairness.

But the DNC and O’boy Marxist Democrats are not trying to bring it back anymore. O’boy is bringing in a whole new coalition and is instituting their ideals.

If confronted I am sure O’boy will say he his in favor of the “Fairness Doctrine”, but his history and tactics show that he is no fan of Free Speech or fairness.

 
 

Comment by Fred C. Dobbs | 2008-06-19 04:03:09

You still have the Second Amendment. If you don’t know how to shoot, learn.

If you don’t have a gun, BUY one…private sale, no government reporting.

Gun Control means putting every round in the “10″ ring!

 
 

Comment by 30yrdem-not any more | 2008-06-18 23:02:10

It was a press conference, why would Larry not cover it? It looks like a lot of different reporters were there. Thanks Larry…we haven’t lost our freedom of speech yet..

McCain ‘08

Comment by Gloria | 2008-06-18 23:54:07

Did one identify himself as being from the Voice of America??
Wow….You know, you get straighter news on the VOA than on most of our domestic media.
I listen sometimes via shortwave radio and am amazed at how much better it is than our celeb “journalists.”

Will be interesting if it gets on the VOA website…

 
 

Comment by Zimeeisme | 2008-06-18 23:02:50

This story IS news. I could give a crap what other people say. I mean first off… Whitehouse.com was a porn site until early this year. THEY contacted Sinclair about the lie detector test. Hmmm…how convenient. They basically dropped everything and now show up all of a sudden and then to conduct their own press conference like they did.

It is the media’s job to determine the credibility of the story. Sinclair has provided quite a bit of proof. What more could he do or say really to prove his story?

 

Comment by J in Mn | 2008-06-18 23:03:04

why did he get arrested anyone know why?

Comment by Johnny Ray (Another Democrat for McCain) | 2008-06-18 23:06:15

Unnamed charges in another state, carried out by the Obamacrat mayor of Washington. It’s a total BS charge.

 

Comment by Johnny at Work | 2008-06-18 23:08:00

forgery… he allegedly signed and negotiated an acquaintances’ tax refund checks.

Comment by Johnny Ray (Another Democrat for McCain) | 2008-06-18 23:10:09

How convienient. How can you prove that someone forged someone else’s check?

I hear they’re not going to give him bail either. Presumably not until November 5th, 2008.

 
 

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-06-19 08:54:48

It’s “why d’he get arrested?” Lol.

 
 

Comment by Mr.Murder | 2008-06-18 23:04:34

Sounds like the kind of people Mayor Daley would set you up with to make certain he had your support for anything he wanted….

bizzaroworld.

This is soap opera stuff. Opera, where the fat lady sings.

She hasn’t bellowed yet. The whitey overture awaits.

Karl Rove thinks it’s Christmas in June.

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-06-19 08:56:03

You just perfectly summed up my sentiments on the matter. Thank you!

 
 

Comment by Dave_Not_For_Obama | 2008-06-18 23:04:51

HOW MANY OF YOU ATTEND CHURCH’S WHERE 3 PEOPLE ARE MURDERED IN SUCH A SHORT TIME? HELL, THAT ANYONE IS MURDERED!

Trinity has MILLIONS of $$$$, yet they only offer a $1,000.00 reward leading to the arrest of the person/s of these murders. I find that odd in the whole scheme of things. A frick’in dog owner makes a bigger reward, what’s wrong with this picture? Something smells.

 

Comment by Hillary4Obama08 | 2008-06-18 23:05:36

“Up to this point we have stayed away from the Larry Sinclair story.”

After a disappointing ending to the weeks and weeks of whitey tape hype, I guess you decided you could afford to sink a little lower, huh Larry?

In the meantime, I just donated more money to Senator Obama’s campaign, because I, like the majority of Americans (did you check the polls today?, prefer supporting candidates we most agree with on issues like healthcare, education, war, women’s right to choose, and now, it looks like, throwing billions at the nuclear industry to build more reactors and offshore drilling in our beautiful swing state of Florida and elsewhere. Thankfully, Hillary Clinton, who as you must know by reading the papers, also fervently supports Senator Obama and will be making an appearance with him June 26th to underscore that support. Hopefully you will provide a link?

Comment by Dave_Not_For_Obama | 2008-06-18 23:12:02

Comment by Hillary4Obambi2066 | 2008-06-18 23:05:36

The above is SPAM, lol. Get lost!

 

Comment by Mandelay | 2008-06-18 23:24:08

Go ahead, keep throwin’ good money after bad!

 

Comment by AnninCa | 2008-06-18 23:47:58

Actually, the DNC could use a donation. That is, if you want a convention.

Comment by NY still loves Hillary | 2008-06-19 08:41:36

Why would they want a Convention. They don’t even want an Election. Let’s just skip straight to the Coronation.

Comment by Rob in Chicago | 2008-06-19 11:50:35

Especially since the Obama camp and the DNC are replacing/firing Hillary’s elected delegates who show any reluctance to support Obama. Why hold an election indeed!!

 
 
 
 

Comment by MaryinMissouri | 2008-06-18 23:07:01

I believe Sinclair. Thank you for the information. I plan to share this will all my neighbors.

Comment by OBAMATROLLSAREIDIOTS | 2008-06-18 23:25:12

MaryinMissouri

I have already forwarded this to my outlook address book. Oh, that’s right that was what I was suppose to do at fightthesmearswhackjob website. Sorry, Obambi I guess I messed up ……

fight this smear assidiot empty suit you will be found out along with your Alinsky organizing boys from Chicago who bussed in the people for the Iowa caucus.

Amercia is a mean country …….. MEchelle

NO OBAMA/MARXIST
MCCAIN 2008 OR UNTIL HILLARY RISES

Comment by Tumby J | 2008-06-19 00:02:11

Feel free to e-mail everyone you know. It will make it easier for them to disregard any future smears you send their way.

Comment by WildChild | 2008-06-19 00:17:57

BOBO is on the down low

 
 
 
 

Comment by fred | 2008-06-18 23:07:36

OB is a DOWN LOW brother the ones that Oprah talked about on her show. I think we need some R Kelly Keep It On The Down Low Nobody Has To Know…OB Your Male Lover Is Spilling the Beans…WOOOO HOOOO LOL

 

Comment by Fran | 2008-06-18 23:08:30

OBAMA wants to be the leader of the free world. We know absolutely nothing about this man except what he has chosen to tell through his writing and the lies he has shared about food stamps(never happened),and other events in his life ,etc. Why is he so secretive? The American people want to know who he really is. When people try to hide or cover-up who they really are, people become more inquisitive and are looking for anything to base an opinion.

 

Comment by Pueblo | 2008-06-18 23:10:13

The story seems credible. Lots of Obamabots in this thread.

Comment by AnninCa | 2008-06-18 23:12:17

I was expecting a raving lunatic. He was pretty much a straight-shooter and essentially said, “I just wanted to be heard. Whether you believe me or not isn’t the point. You heard me out and have the information now.”

That’s legitimate.

Comment by Johnny Ray (Another Democrat for McCain) | 2008-06-18 23:14:29

Larry Sinclair was a lot more honest than Barack Obama.

 

Comment by Michelle | 2008-06-18 23:40:35

Absolutely. The problem that I have is that the MSM has ignored this story because they have determined that Larry is not credible – and I get that (his past record, etc.).

BUT still, they should be investigating!

They should be looking into whether there are/were rumors about BO and drug use in Chicago while he was in the State Senate. This reminds me of when the MSM just decided to not look into the rumors about Bush’s cocaine use.

It simply isn’t right – we have a right to know about our president’s health – if he’s got a drug addiction, I want to know!

Comment by WildChild | 2008-06-19 00:19:50

Interestingly enough the MSM found it credible when Haggarty’s man whore came out .

 
 
 
 

Comment by Johnny Ray (Another Democrat for McCain) | 2008-06-18 23:13:07

Mr. Sinclair’s lawyer was a lawyer for the DC Madam too. Hopefully he’s able to avoid having something mysterious happen to Larry, like what happened to the DC madam when she was about to spill the beans on powerful people.

Basically Larry Sinclair needs your prayers, because he could be experiencing torture now.

Comment by StrawberrybitesBarky | 2008-06-18 23:27:35

What better place to be than in jail…if something does happen to him there….

Comment by Johnny Ray (Another Democrat for McCain) | 2008-06-18 23:29:00

it’s a setup. Especially since they will violate his rights by refusing him bail.

 

Comment by Tim in Tempe | 2008-06-18 23:39:16

Nothing will happen to him. Next year he’ll star on some reality show. Isn’t that what he’s angling for?

Comment by Fred C. Dobbs | 2008-06-19 04:12:05

A wise man would have asked them for the $750K they set aside to fight the charges, cross-released each other and skipped along his merry way.

At 4.2% on tax-free municipals, that might not put you in the Liberace/Merv Griffin bracket, but you wouldn’t have to Wide Stance your way through Friday and Saturday nights, either.

Get a trailer and a big screen, mind your own business…

 
 
 
 

Comment by cajunLandry | 2008-06-18 23:13:36

This is crazy. He has details, and someone will investigate. I believe him. Will the MSM report this? This seems real. Where are the cell phone records?

Comment by standard | 2008-06-18 23:15:30

I believe him, too.

 

Comment by Tim in Tempe | 2008-06-18 23:44:47

I suppose if he came to his presser with more thana vague evidence he would be alot harder to ignore, right?

Maybe Jimmyjeffguckertgannon cub reporter from Talon News will dig into this story?

Maybe Larry Johnson could use some of his CIA contacts to track down the story? That would make sense since this story is of such national security import.

The fate of the world depends on it! Right?

maybe StrawberryBarfy could do a public records search for the limo driver? Nah she’s to busy defending freedom right here on the nO Quarter blog.

nevermind wait for the press to do it.

Comment by WildChild | 2008-06-19 00:21:27

it gets to you deosn’t it? LOL

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-06-19 09:17:44

He makes fun of other names, because he lives in Tempe.

 
 
 
 

Comment by Tommy | 2008-06-18 23:14:50

Sinclair has a Discrepancy >>>>>>>> December 23rd 2008 hasn’t arrived yet…He might have meant December 23 2007 ,but he has 2008

Other than the one Discrepancy his story is reasonable,but not conclusive….If his story is true the cell phone numbers will reveal his calls and Obama’s calls they made to the numbers…Cell phone records can be obtained by way of subpoena. If the police want to investigate the murder they will check the numbers and records if they haven’t already.

Cell phone records are Damn accurate,too.

Wonder why his attorney hasn’t tried to get the phone records?

Comment by vee | 2008-06-18 23:33:17

What would be the basis for a judge to grant a subpoena for the cell phone records?

 

Comment by Tim in Tempe | 2008-06-18 23:46:29

Why don’t you get on it Tommy? Every little bit counts! You can do it!

 

Comment by rosered56 | 2008-06-19 00:27:37

Mr. Young was murder on December 23, 2007

 
 

Comment by btintaos | 2008-06-18 23:15:20

I haven’t seen this many trolls since Lord of the Rings. Obviously, Larry Sinclair is dangerous to them or they wouldn’t have lumbered out of their caves to eke out a line or two.
I was dubious about LS at first, but he has continued to push the issue. And for what reward? Estrangement? Ridicule? Death threats? There isn’t enough money to make voluntarily enduring that kind of stress worthwhile. Believe his story, or not. The whole thing makes me curious.
By the way, Obamabots like to point out that Larry Sinclair is a criminal and mentally unstable and therefore not credible. I think his history just makes him sound like Obama’s other friends.

Comment by Mandelay | 2008-06-18 23:26:41

“I haven’t seen this many trolls since Lord of the Rings.”

Yes!!!! LOL!!!!

Comment by Paul F. Villarreal | 2008-06-19 00:31:33

Effing brilliant line by btintaos.

:)

Comment by Fred C. Dobbs | 2008-06-19 04:13:48

I bow to you, sir!

Comment by btintaos | 2008-06-19 09:12:51

Thank you. I’ll be here all week.

Comment by btintaos | 2008-06-19 09:14:51

Now, back to Buy Crack Obama.

 
 
 
 

Comment by mahaska | 2008-06-19 02:03:46

Isn’t it f’ing amazing? The trolls are even arguing with each other. They are scared. hahahahah

 
 

Comment by UniversityofIowaJR | 2008-06-18 23:32:11

Lol, that’s true.

 

Comment by Michelle | 2008-06-18 23:43:16

So true!! I feel like we should throw a “troll party” and make one of them the “donkey” as we try to play “pin the tail on the donkey!”

Comment by Tim in Tempe | 2008-06-18 23:48:35

It’s not alot of trolls. It’s just me. I have 5 computers and I’m disguised as 5 different trolls.

And I get 5 paychecks from the Obama trolling for dollars campaign.

Right Mel?

Comment by btintaos | 2008-06-19 00:03:15

One ugly, warted behemoth masquerading as five. And they balked at Hillary’s math.

 
 
 
 

Comment by Dave_Not_For_Obama | 2008-06-18 23:16:47

Sodium pentathol
+ lie detactor
+ Obambi

= I dare ya Obambi

 

Comment by PoorLarrySinclair | 2008-06-18 23:18:49

I keep thinking about Hugh Grant and Divine Brown, remember that? That blow job ruined his relationship with Elizabeth Hurley, his girlfriend at the time. But poor Hugh didn’t have the Bots to defend him. And Divine Brown was a prostitute–do you think that was her real name?

Comment by Fred C. Dobbs | 2008-06-19 04:15:14

Do you think that was her real, Original Equipment gender?

 
 

Comment by josgirl | 2008-06-18 23:24:50

Sinclair says he has been in contact with the Chicago police about this.
None of the info he gave out is exactly new.
Most of it has been on his website for months.
Including the Colorado warrant.
And the fact that Mitch and Nan have been rabidly agaist him.
Enough people believe him to have donated enough money to pay for his expenses in his quest to get his story out.
I don’t know whether to believe him or not, but I’ve been following his story for a while.

Comment by AnninCa | 2008-06-18 23:28:03

He answered that question. He’s spent a total of 4,100. So it’s not costing much at all.

He may need some help getting bailed out. LOL*

Comment by josgirl | 2008-06-18 23:32:33

He went to Washington twice.
I think he had some other earlier expenses his supporters ponied up for too.
Like I said, it’s all on his website.

 
 

Comment by Marian | 2008-07-11 17:19:34

did you see his blog is inactive this afternoon?
It was there this am sounding better all the time.

 
 

Comment by ritamary | 2008-06-18 23:24:54

How accurate have the polls been so far? November is so too far in the future to worry about what the polls are saying now. Who knows what more information may come out about Obama by then. This is what happens when a candidate is selected without anyone knowing anything about him.
And the Pod Squad is really out in force tonight! Do their parents know they are up past their bed time?

 

Comment by UniversityofIowaJR | 2008-06-18 23:25:15

I think this whole thing is hilarious. True or not, it is funny, and keeps the spectre of his drug use, recent or not, in the spotlight for voters, coke does bad things to ya, ask GWB, only difference is that GWB gets bs from people about his drug use and BHO doesn’t, but time will tell. God I hate defending President Chimpy, er, I mean Bush…We don’t need another recovering drug addict as president.

 

Comment by NOBAMA | 2008-06-18 23:25:29

The GOP will connect the cell phone numbers.

Not too many people want a snorting bisexual for president.

 

Comment by vee | 2008-06-18 23:30:20

Larry Sinclair is a train wreck of a person. He admits freely to an ugly criminal life and yet, when he talks about the incident with Obama, it is hard not to think that he is being truthful. The whole whitehouse.com lie detector test event turned out rather bizarrely and ultimately whitehouse.com undermined their own credibility.
Mr. Sinclair is either an adept pathological liar or he is telling the truth. I can’t determine whether Sinclair’s story is truthful. I’ll have to depend on some investigative journalist for that assessment.

The media has thus far been so busy cranking out over the top laudatory articles on Obama that I won’t be holding my breath to see whether anyone really does do the leg work necessary to support or debunk Larry Sinclair’s tale of illicit drugs and sex with Obama.

 

Comment by Hillary4Obama08 | 2008-06-18 23:30:36

“Gennifer Flowers came forward during Bill Clinton’s 1992 Presidential election campaign alleging that she had had a twelve-year relationship with him. [1]

At least two Arkansas state police officers, who had formerly guarded Bill Clinton when he was Governor, backed up Flowers’ story.[citation needed] But when Bill Clinton denied having a relationship with Flowers, she held a press conference in which she played tape recordings she claimed were of secretly recorded intimate phone calls with Bill Clinton.[2] Clinton subsequently apologized publicly to Mario Cuomo for remarks he made about the former governor on the tapes.”

You know, there are a few similarities between the rumors that plagued another charismatic, relative unknown whose wife initially had very low approval ratings when he was running for president, Bill Clinton. The main differences I see, are that Gennifer Flowers had proof and the smear campaign against Mr. Clinton, who is a democrat, was fueled by republicans, while this smear campaign against Senator Obama, who is also a democrat, is being spearheaded by fellow democrats.

Whatever the case, just like in 1992 when more Americans decided issues like healthcare, education, reproductive freedoms, the environment, war and the economy were more pertinent issues to vote on than what a candidate does with his free time, they will in 2008 as well.

Comment by UniversityofIowaJR | 2008-06-18 23:34:34

Fellow dems shouldn’t be using right wing bs to attack our last 2 term president since FDR, and last valuable dem president since Johnson.

Comment by IheartBigDog | 2008-06-18 23:39:29

I agree. Bill Clinton was the best! When the Bots start insulting President Clinton, you know they are desperate.

Wow, BO, I hope those few moments in the back of the limo were worth it.

And I’m saying my prayers for Mr. Sinclair’s safety.

Comment by Fred C. Dobbs | 2008-06-19 04:18:30

Betcha The Boys are picking out a nice, well-appointed King Air for his upcoming Wellstone-ing at this very moment!

 
 
 
 

Comment by annagain | 2008-06-18 23:31:56

I don’t know how to feel about this story. He sure has lots of straight line info for someone who is a wacko.

It is curious to me, however, that there are more trolls trying to negate this story than I have ever seen respond to any one of the posts here on NoQ.

If this story is so ridiculous — why even bother to take the time and energy to discredit it?

Comment by UniversityofIowaJR | 2008-06-18 23:37:15

Here here, why even bother bots?

 
 

Comment by William L. Donlon | 2008-06-18 23:33:12

“Thats not the Larry Sinclair I Blew!”

Comment by Johnny at Work | 2008-06-18 23:40:56

That’s funny! LOL

 

Comment by Mel | 2008-06-18 23:56:00

From Sinclair’s story, it was all about Obama, what happened to Obama’s stump words “It is all about you”? another example of Obama just taking and not doing any giving again huh…..lol

 
 

Comment by Dave_Not_For_Obama | 2008-06-18 23:35:11

http://img519.imageshack.us/img519/3254/larry1sb7.jpg

Above pic is from the Sinclair press conference, seems to be 4-5 tv cameras in the back of the room. I wonder who they are. :)

Comment by Gloria | 2008-06-18 23:59:02

Perhaps some GOP operatives getting it all down on tape for future use??

 
 

Comment by Scrapiron | 2008-06-18 23:35:23

This would open up the can of worms. Why did Hussein rush back to D.C. to vote on the bill that made sure McCain was a citizen, when there was no question except in the minds of idiots. Was this a diversion in hope someone didn’t do the same search on him and find out ‘by law’ (when he was born) he is not a natural born citizen. I think someone has the entire file on this for an October surprise. Now scream and holler but then wake up and check it out.

Did I get a hint that Hessein has had someone knocked off in Chicago? Is he that high up in the mob?

Comment by Tim in Tempe | 2008-06-18 23:36:29

Who’s Hussein?

Comment by Tumby J | 2008-06-19 00:05:44

I think they’re talking about Saddam…can’t imagine why, he’s been dead for over a year now.

 
 
 

Comment by SJ | 2008-06-18 23:37:18

I don’t know why the Obama trolls have such a problem with Sinclair, the man said he was giving the media information and all they have to do is investigate if he is lying or not.

He was quiet clear in what he said today, all who do not believe him or feels he is some kind of a nut well they have an option prove that he is, dispute is story, it is as easy as that.

But writing he is liar or making up stuff we will never know unless someone goes and investigates what he is accusing Obama of , until that is done then we all have no reason to doubt it did not happen, they can arrest him all they want the fact is that this information is out that, the phone numbers are there someone can check the records as he is asking them to, check Obama’s cell records for that date its not impossible.

Either prove Larry Sinclair is a liar or not, if Obama cannot show that Larry is a lair then there is no reason to say all that he said did not happen the onus is on Obama to fess up with this story and come with indisputable evidence that what Larry said is not true, if he cant do that then it may well be that Obama does have a drug issue and is a closet homosexual.

Comment by Mel | 2008-06-18 23:51:21

Maybe all the trolls were suppose to be there, or else they are jealous they were not there!

 
 

Comment by jmk | 2008-06-18 23:37:20

I got as far in this troll infused thread as “how could you possibly find fault with Kids for Obama” and had to just skip to the comment box. Yeah,how could you – maybe Hitler or Mao paranoia – but then Farrakan said at least the former of those two was a ‘great man’ too, didn’t he?

ABOUT SINCLAIR:
Now I believe him and here is why. I read tonight how the ‘lie detector” company was previously an internet porn site operator and NOW runs this political blog: whitehouse.

That’s quite a stretch when it comes to vocational changes, don’t you think?

Then I linked to youtube to see L.S. at his press conference. Presented himself politely and seriously enought. Answered all questions with evident honesty, though some were painful.

Then I came here – and THANKS TO LARRY got to read LS actual statement.

But here is the missing link. Larry’s article, above, refers to this porn company as specializing in Clinton porn. Frankly, before tonight, I wouldn’t have an idea what that even meant?!

Now I do. After viewing LS on youtube, checked out the sidebar. Mostly it showed BO in PA, blah, blah – totally unrelated and in the spin zone as usual. But one video has something about LARRY SINCLAIR in the title, so i clicked it on.

Instead of anything related to this story it was the filthiest thing i have ever seen. I won’t give the link because it is too disgusting. Those who want to can get over to youtube and find it.

What the video labeled Larry Sinclair actually was – a porno film with voice-overs, starring Pres. Bill Clinton. It was some footage of him at his desk with all else dubbed in, including a supposed sex partner. (How the hell do these dirtbags not get sued?!)

Here’s the point. Evidently Larry is telling the truth. Ask these questions:

What is a porn company doing posing as a lie detector tester?

Why solicit a liar and offer him 10K (whose money has anybody asked whitehouse??) Obviously, they never intended to come up with the 100K – they just lied about the lie test (It would take an obama camper – espec. a paid one to get that devious – sounds pure Axelrod)

Why not just come up with the records of cell calls for those 2 days in question? That’d be so easy and if LS was lying cell records without these calls would be the end of the story.

Evidently the limo driver is a real person and real driver and in the Chicago area, which LS is not. I have lived in the Great Lakes Gurnee area, know that those logisitics/locations do check out.

Politico’s spin-out on this smacks of so many MSM spins to cover obama, you just get to where you can smell the fish. They don’t response to anything whatsoever in LS complaint, just go on and on for 2 pages about what a crook he is. It’s a far cry for check forging to this story. And they even interviewed a warden at a prison where LS was to dig out a juicy quote on how “he did not respond well to institutionalization”. Neither the hell would I!

The rest of his story about Young, etc. is plausible. Truth being often stranger than fiction and all that being a lot to concoct. Neither anything deceptive in his Press Conf. body language. Rather straightforward. And why are all the obamanot blogs jumping all over this? Also just read that Rev. Manning was there. Think he’s both shrewd and honest, whatever else.

But here is the kicker: why’d obama pay this porno crew such very big bucks to discredit L.S.?

And most of all, if this isn’t a set-up, including arrest at end of Press Conf – then why do viewers who go not to see L.S. at youtube get a FILTHY VIDEO DOING PORN ON A CLINTON??????????

WHAT A SET UP. OBVIOUS NOW. Sounds like he had some poor kid at his church killed, too, pretending he’d come clean and then doing away with the evidence instead.

Barack Obama is humanity’s worst nightmare embodied.

Don’t know if others here saw the death threat Sinclair got about cancelling this press conference. See it at texasdarlin.

Comment by Goodthinking | 2008-06-18 23:44:51

Thanks jmk. I hope someone follows up on your connections. This does smell of RAT. BO RAT, to be exact.

 
 

Comment by Johnny at Work | 2008-06-18 23:38:01

Anbody else note that O’boy lost 7 points overnight in the Ohio polls? McCain once again leads in Ohio.

Do you think it has anything to do with O’boys backflip on NAFTA? Or is it Larry Sinclair?

Comment by Fred C. Dobbs | 2008-06-19 04:22:17

“Hey, this is Ohio. If you ain’t got a brewsky in your hand, you might as well be wearin’ a dress!” -
Heathers

 

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-06-19 09:34:03

When Obama announced his new economic adviser Jason Furman and flipped on NAFTA, my first thoughts were:

1 – Guess he doesn’t need Ohio. Trolls can shut up now, since even Quinnipac can’t fudge the numbers that much.

2 – He must be worried about California. It looks like the RNC has enough in its war chest to compete there. Interestingly, the money started pouring in once Clinton was “out of the race.”

 
 

Comment by maeme | 2008-06-18 23:41:54

If Mr. Obama wants the presidency of the USA, he will learn and soon realize, “everything” and “everyone ever involved” with him whether salacious sexual encounters or absolute lies should be presented to the American people and thoroughly investigated and vetted by the media, and law enforcement.

I read the entire piece and quite frankly there are aspects to this Trinity Church that need further review. It was twenty (20) years after all.

Mr. Sinclair comes across to me as he had nothing to gain since the sexual aspects are not his concerns, but rather the dishonesty about the last time Obama supposedly did drugs, which he has already written and talked about.

It is the choir director’s murder that could be very disastrous for BHO, if true. I didn’t want to believe Paula Jones in the beginning; even called her names too.

You know this election is SO important and REALLY, what do we actually know about him or her? She is fair game in my opinion. Especially, with her sitting on the variance board and the unseemly deal with the Resko mansion.

Plus, I just read of a Reverend from Harlem, who states that Obama and Reverend Wright have been in a long term homosexual relationship? He needs to address this now and stop the thug attacks from his followers.

If Axelrod is behind paying the lie detector artist, it only gets WORSE.

His arrest after the press conference – shadey. His lawyer’s family background is very appropriate.

 

Comment by Dave_Not_For_Obama | 2008-06-18 23:43:02

Now we know why Michelle always looks angry, lol.

35. Some truth, was he well hung?

O is a wanna be black boy with a white boy’s you know what.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2033069/posts

ROFLMAO

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-06-19 09:42:18

I thought the vibrating cell phone story circulated throughout the media was shameless pandering to insecure white males and most probably exaggerating things. No doubt in my mind Obama is a closeted gay, a neolib Trojan horse who it turns out is not hung like one.

 
 

Comment by SJ | 2008-06-18 23:46:55

Sinclair said he came out with the story because Obama is lying about his drug use, and his other life, if he was not running for President I guess Sinclair would of never gone public.

Maybe it is exactly as he said he cant have a man lying to the people and he loves his country and wants the truth out there, that is not so far fetched to understand, or unreasonable to think that an individual may not feel that way especially if a person is running for the highest office in the land, to me all Larry is telling Obama is that he should come clean and stop the games.

 

Comment by Paul F. Villarreal | 2008-06-18 23:48:00

Sinclair sounded sincere, cogent, informed and anything but the “insane” figure which the Obama campaign has attempted to portray him as being.

And now I know why they are trying so desperately to shut Sinclair up (maybe they just have issues with people named Larry).

Sinclair provided clear lines for authorities and investigative reporters to pursue. What he is saying can either be refuted or it can not be. Was the limo driver who Sinclair says he was? Did the limo call a number which belonged to State Senator Obama? Did a number belonging to the murdered Donald Young call Sinclair? Etc.

I am going to say right now that I believe that Sinclair is telling the truth or at least the partial truth. There are too many specifics in his recountings for them to be wholly fabricated, IMO. Further, who is purportedly putting Sinclair up to making these charges? Paula Jones was backed by The Arkansas Project, and she was never arrested following one of her press conferences (at least as far as I can recall).

In other words, Sinclair is going to an awful lot of trouble to make his story heard. As far as I know, he is not receiving a dime for his efforts and is instead putting himself in harm’s way both legally and personally by seeking to tell his tale.

People like Sinclair often fall into two categories: those being bankrolled by an opposition group or who have a personal ax to grind and those who know and are committed to seeing the truth see the light of day.

Until someone demonstrably proves to me that Sinclair falls into the former group I will continue to believe he falls into the latter one.

These detailed and easily-investigated statements Sinclair made today only reinforce my belief that he is telling the truth about Obama, at least to a certain extent.

Comment by Tim in Tempe | 2008-06-18 23:51:22

Paul, lay off the Pump Juice! It’s clouding your judgment.

Comment by Goodthinking | 2008-06-19 00:01:07

Ah Tim in Tempe, is that a Freudian slip? You’re thinking about BO and Larry in the back of that limo, pumping?

Comment by Mel | 2008-06-19 00:03:31

Sounds like Tim is a tad jealous he wasn’t in the limo huh?

Comment by Paul F. Villarreal | 2008-06-19 00:37:11

Indeed, it does.

Tim — Stick Man OFraudma could use some Pump Juice, eh?

I hear that’s what he’s feeding his daughters. He’s trying to turn them into Hanz and Franz.

Great Baby Daddy, he.

 
 

Comment by Fred C. Dobbs | 2008-06-19 04:23:53

It’s a Freudian half-slip, from mom’s closet.

 
 
 

Comment by AnninCa | 2008-06-18 23:55:14

You’re right. He’s not being bankrolled by Hillary, for sure. They were a bit unkind to him, even.

 
 

Comment by UniversityofIowaJR | 2008-06-18 23:48:12

In the death threat to Larry Sinclair there is the word “faggot” numerous times…again with this word by the Obamabots. First a precinct captain, then 2 bots on the street, and now this…..change I can believe in my ass, it’s “change I can puke on”.

 

Comment by Michelle | 2008-06-18 23:55:46

Here’s the thing – the only thing I want out of Larry’s press conference is for (a) the MSM to do some investigating – about Obama, not Larry Sinclair, and (b) Obama to have enough pressure on him about this story that he HAS to respond to it. For goodness sakes, the guy has set up a website to “stop the smears” – and certainly, one would think that he would think that Larry’s story classifies as a “smear!”

And if this is the case, then why the heck hasn’t he (in the six months that this story has been roiling the internet – nearly, 1,000,000 people viewed Larry’s original video) just “shut Larry down” with a CLEAR denial?

Could it possibly be that it is because if he does, then he knows that people will investigate his drug use (I could care less if he is on the “down low” – except I might actually feel bad for MO and their kids “for the first time in my life”) and they’ll find out that college was not the last time he used them??

I also have to say this – whatever Larry Sinclair is or isn’t – there is a part of me that admires him for being willing to subject himself to so much ridicule (and death threats! and now jail!) just to “tell his story.” Maybe it is just me (and I’m not sure that I believe anything about his story), but still – I applaud him for his courage and his persistence.

Comment by vee | 2008-06-18 23:59:33

“…except I might actually feel bad for MO and their kids “for the first time in my life”..”

That was funny and such great use of that MO line.

Comment by Michelle | 2008-06-19 00:05:32

Couldn’t resist :)

 
 
 

Comment by StrawberrybitesBarky | 2008-06-18 23:59:50

Ya know what’s funny? Americablog is the one who dug up the dirt on Jeff Ganon/James Guckert and they were all hailed as heros by the left wing blogosphere, now Larry just puts up a small diary about a press conference and gets invaded by the true believers…nahhhh, no double standard.

 

Comment by NeedProof | 2008-06-19 00:01:18

This is the least credible witness possible. As for the limo driver, er…I’m guessing he’s had a few black men do coke in the back of his car and have sex? That’s not a racist comment, just saying, that would be true of any race of people if you drive a cab.

This is even less credible than the whitey tape.

Comment by Goodthinking | 2008-06-19 00:06:59

You don’t have to believe in the whitey tape for it to be true. Just wait…

Comment by UniversityofIowaJR | 2008-06-19 00:09:33

Yup, just wait….I am sure McCain and Cavuto are working up a way to break it in October as we type.

 
 

Comment by AnninCa | 2008-06-19 00:20:34

Seems to me that it would be expected that he’d have a record.

Seemed pretty credible to me. His story adds up. As many have pointed out, the question is motive, I suppose.

 
 

Comment by LauraInCali | 2008-06-19 00:05:27

I have been following the Sinclair story out of curiosity. I can’t help feeling sorry for him even if
his story is true or not. Is he delusional? I just don’t see what he has to gain from it. I know in politics you are labeled either a nut or a slut if you accuse a politician of anything unseemly. Anyway, I do know is truth is stranger than fiction, right? Anything is possible.

Comment by Michelle | 2008-06-19 00:13:00

So true about how they all “shoot the messengers” – and I guess given how many scandals have come up lately (Gov. Spitzer, Sen. Craig, Rep. Rich, Rep. Jefferson, Rep. Ney, Rep. Delay…and the list goes on and on!!), I don’t find this completely out of the realm of possibility.

Besides, if I were a politician – wouldn’t I want to have my affair with the LEAST credible person possible, just so that it would be easy to throw them under the bus if need be?? That would be the smart thing to do – go for a “slut” or a “felon” who has already got a “rap sheet” so then when it comes down to your word and against his/hers, you look golden!

Comment by uhh somehow this notion that I am qualified to be president is uhh uhh ridiculous | 2008-06-19 01:55:38

Has Barky associated with anyone other than felonious, immoral types?

As with the Whitey tape, the reason these things are so damaging is ,due to the Obama’s own words and deeds,they are completely plausible.

 

Comment by Fred C. Dobbs | 2008-06-19 04:27:56

>>> wouldn’t I want to have my affair with the LEAST credible person possible

For the 41 years I have been unhooking lingerie, lookin’ at the tops of ladies’ heads and bumpin’ bellies, I prefer to have sex with the partner who is the most FUN!!

Of course, Your Results May Vary…

 
 
 

Comment by Michelle | 2008-06-19 00:07:00

BTW – Obambi.com has located a person with the same name as the limo driver

http://obambi.wordpress.com/2008/06/18/could-this-be-the-limo-driver-that-larry-sinclair-stated/

Wonder if anyone will try to contact him?

Comment by UniversityofIowaJR | 2008-06-19 00:13:23

hopefully someone at the RNC is on to this, maybe someone from the right wing talk radio shows? Anyone. Someone probably is.

 
 

Comment by UniversityofIowaJR | 2008-06-19 00:08:16

One thing is for sure, we Clinton supporters have been battle hardened for longer and rougher than any others before, whoever gets our support in upcoming elections….will be lucky lol.

Now, I am waiting for more to break on the murders of the gay guys at Obama’s church…..what did they know, and why were these murders so systematic?

Comment by Michelle | 2008-06-19 00:15:16

Great point. Yes, the murders are pretty darn scary. Executions in their homes!! All members of the Trinity Church. All gay. That goes beyond a “hate crime” – that is as you say, “systematic.”

Comment by Danny | 2008-06-19 00:59:15

I wonder what ex-gay Donnie McClurkin would have to say about all this? Murder, felatio, crack, oh my god call Rev. Wright!

“”"”As religious conservatives gather in Washington this weekend for the “Values Voters Summit,” Senator Barack Obama’s campaign announced its latest effort to attract people of faith to the campaign: a gospel concert tour.
All three of the dates of the “Embrace the Change” tour are in South Carolina, where Mr. Obama is locked in battle with Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton for black voters.

Gospel acts including Mary Mary, Donnie McClurkin and Hezekiah Walker, Byron Cage and the Mighty Clouds of Joy are scheduled to appear.

“This is another example of how Barack Obama is defying conventional wisdom about how politics is done and giving new meaning to meeting people at the grassroots level,” Joshua DuBois, the campaign’s religious affairs director, said in a release.
Yes, sucking up to anti-gay bigots and joining them on stage – no, giving them a stage – is certainly defying conventional wisdom as to how a Democrat becomes president. Oh, and McClurkin also believes that gays can, and need to, be “cured.”
It seems unlikely to me that the Obama campaign was aware of this:

Gospel singer Donnie McClurkin, who has detailed his struggle with gay tendencies and vowed to battle “the curse of homosexuality,” said yesterday he’ll perform as scheduled at the Republican National Convention on Thursday, despite controversy over his view that sexuality can be changed by religious intervention. “I can’t let off. I didn’t call myself — God called me to do what I do,” McClurkin told The Post’s Hamil R. Harris. The Grammy winner declared, “If this is a war, we are willing to fight. Not a war of violence, but a war of purpose.”
I think it is necessary to make one thing clear – this is not Obama reaching out to those who disagree with him — this is “Senator Barack Obama’s campaign . . . latest effort to attract people of faith to the campaign: a gospel concert tour.” This tour represents Obama and his campaign. The singers his campaign choose for this tour represent him.

Frankly, I think Obama has little choice in what he needs to do here. Mr. McClurkin must be asked to not appear on this tour. Accepting support from Mr. McClurkin, while making clear his views on gays and lesbians are abhorrent, is certainly a potentially acceptable action for Obama.

Allowing him to represent the campaign through this tour is not. To the best of my knowledge, the Obama campaign has not responded to the criticism of including McClurkin in this tour. It needs to. Quickly.”"”

 
 
 

Comment by Steve | 2008-06-19 00:12:22

Why does the MSM not investigate these allegations. No they have fluff pieces-Michelle on the view. Who cares about that except for the kool-aid drinking crowd. MSM is so in the can for Obama. Its criminal. I say when this over. We get the monpoly of MSM broken and create new networks that report the ALL the news and not be paid press secretaries for Obama. It is very easy for phone records to be traced and dots connected. Find out what really happened to Donald Young? He had friends and family. What about those all male and drug parties that took place over several years in the Purple Room. Rezko trial testimony. I am so ready to flush this year’s poltical cycle. I really want to have the MSM nailed for its lack of objectivity. How is Obama going to govern with all of the mess that he has created. Yeah-right he is a controlled blackmailed puppet. Others will really control the action. Well as a Democrat, I will vote for Kohn McCain. I march on Denver. I do want to punish Dems by voting against my party all down the line. I know I am not the only one! There is anger!

Comment by AnninCa | 2008-06-19 00:23:49

MSN is not exactly a great source of investigative reporting. Headlines only.

 

Comment by uhh somehow this notion that I am qualified to be president is uhh uhh ridiculous | 2008-06-19 02:00:10

Steve,

Thanks for pointing out that this type of behavior has been substantiated in the Rezko trial, creating less doubt that Sinclair is part of a pattern of behavior connected to Obama and his associates.

 

Comment by Fred C. Dobbs | 2008-06-19 04:30:36

I’m waiting to see if Winnie’s Michelle’s tongue comes out like one of the Visitors on “V.”

Maybe she’ll eat Whoopie Goldberg…or Oprah the Hutt.

 
 

Comment by Sam | 2008-06-19 00:12:27

Sinclair = Shady
Obama = Still Wrong Guy For Prez

http://WWW.OBAMA-WIRE.COM

 

Comment by Ted | 2008-06-19 00:14:06

I just stumbled onto this site. My God. . .you people are absolutely howl-at-the-moon crazy. You need professional help. Seriously.

Comment by LauraInCali | 2008-06-19 00:20:03

Ted: I really think you need think about your own
delusions. We are not crazy, we are just more rational about Obama.

Comment by UniversityofIowaJR | 2008-06-19 00:23:37

Don’t attempt, most bots are way past de-brain washing…

Comment by LauraInCali | 2008-06-19 00:26:11

Yeah, your right better to just ignore the little trollies.

 
 
 

Comment by StrawberrybitesBarky | 2008-06-19 00:36:56

Oh please, you’re like the third person on this thread tonight claiming they just found this site, this is their first time here, I’m new here and we’re all crazy. Gawd. It’s like they all get the same friggin’ script.

Comment by MEchelle Hates America! | 2008-06-19 07:34:31

If you were a homosexual male teenager trolling for MSM quotes re: your hero Barry

And instead of more pics of him grabbing his crotch -

You found this site -

Well, like Teddy and others you just might cry too.

 
 

Comment by mahaska | 2008-06-19 02:13:48

It’s hilarious how these bots always say “I came across this site accidentally” and then start with the insults. Do you jerks not ever notice that you are all saying the same thing? You are boring us to tears.

 

Comment by chief | 2008-06-19 02:43:25

Tom you should check out Kos, Huffpo, DU, or even mybarackobama.com. Plenty of freaks, anti-American, anti-Semitic post can be found daily. You just do not like to hear anything that may tarnish the image you have of the Messiah. Get used to it. If you think Obama is getting a hard time now wait until the conservatives start exposing this Marxist/Socialist. Obama is red meat for many of us. I mean the Democrats kicked our ass in 06, a well deserved defeat for my party, by running moderates. What happened to that strategy? The new Obama party is far from moderate. Hugo Chavez like is more like it.

 

Comment by Fred C. Dobbs | 2008-06-19 04:31:43

You should be here when the Thorazine arrives late!

 
 

Comment by jack, too | 2008-06-19 00:14:22

OT

I learned this evening great generals are born, like great musicians, or artists, or writers, and are not made.

I always assumed they were made, or trained, to be at least minimally competent.

But being a great general is a singular talent not many have, it is an art, and armies are blessed to have them.

Fascinating.

Comment by Michelle | 2008-06-19 00:17:25

You might want to go read Dean Keith Simonton’s book on “Greatness” – that’s not exactly what he found – he’s also done lots of research on “genius” – also very interesting stuff.

 
 

Comment by GoHillary | 2008-06-19 00:19:01

It was interesting that US Marshals took him away right after the conference. Apparently the local police were surprised?

US Marshals are under federal jurisdiction are they not? Was taking him away like this for preventing his getting shot by a police officer “resisting arrest” or whatever? I mean DC police officers answer to local DC politicians.

I bet sinclair will be in federal custody until after the convention with the limo driver and perhaps other witnesses.

Groundwork is being laid for another october surprise.
Karma!!

 

Comment by loving it | 2008-06-19 00:19:50

this. site. rocks.

Comment by UniversityofIowaJR | 2008-06-19 00:21:21

 

Comment by AnninCa | 2008-06-19 00:22:36

We do have our fun at times. :)

 
 

Comment by Michelle | 2008-06-19 00:21:29

Time to sign off – another fascinating night on NoQuarter – thanks to Larry Johnson! BTW – whatever you’ve done on the technical side – it is working great!!

 

Comment by Kickass Old Lady | 2008-06-19 00:22:57

Larry, maybe you should shut the comment sections down for a few days so all these trolls who claim to be lawyers could have more time to log a few billing hours for their firms.

Comment by AnninCa | 2008-06-19 00:25:49

LOL*……that’s great.

 
 

Comment by UniversityofIowaJR | 2008-06-19 00:25:09

Go figure, even his trolls are elitist rich snobs flaunting their wealth and careers.

Comment by Mel | 2008-06-19 00:30:30

Flaunting on the internet, sort of like claiming to be a product of Selma, only being born 4 years before it ever happened……lol

Night folks and enjoy, the trolls will be back later to trash the place as usual, trying to defend BOBO’s honor……lol

 

Comment by Fred C. Dobbs | 2008-06-19 04:33:52

I’ve NEVER met a lawyer or doctor who’ll tell you how much money they make, and I’m pushing 60.

 
 

Comment by Barak Osama | 2008-06-19 00:28:57

So, Obama is a closet homosexual too?… No wonder MO is such an bitter woman.

 

Comment by Teakwood | 2008-06-19 00:29:00

I want to know what relation the driver, Paramjit Multani, had with the Nesbit…

 

Comment by sandy gonzo | 2008-06-19 00:32:23

This is pathetic. I used to enjoy reading this site, as my son recommended I read this blog regularly. I used to like it when you hit Bush, and I liked when you stuck up for Hillary. I also supported Hillary in the primary.

But now, this site has become completely unhinged. Why are you resorting to Larry Sinclair BS to smear Obama? I wasn’t a big Obama fan before, but the more you all bash him the more I’m ready to defend him. Hillary doesn’t want another GOP President in 2009, and neither do I.

this is what 861 supporters ALWAYS SAY “i use to support Hillary, now I am a *61 supporter”. Change your tune, we know who u r.

Comment by StrawberrybitesBarky | 2008-06-19 00:40:20

Oh shut it. You already said this. GO AWAY WE KNOW WHO YOU ARE!

Comment by StrawberrybitesBarky | 2008-06-19 00:41:28

Oh yeah and by the way…BOOGA BOOGA!

 
 

Comment by socalannie | 2008-06-19 00:41:17

this is what 861 supporters ALWAYS SAY “i use to support Hillary, now I am a *61 supporter”. Change your tune, we know who u r.

You know who we are?!? What is that supposed to mean…are you threatening us or something? Nice.

 

Comment by LauraInCali | 2008-06-19 00:42:36

 

Comment by AnninCa | 2008-06-19 00:46:54

Why are you so into repressing his story? You don’t have to believe it.

He could be pulling the great con here. Who knows? But I don’t see why the story shouldn’t be covered.

Heaven knows….people are interested. 400 comments in 2 hours?

People definitely wanted to hear him out.

Now, we have.

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 00:52:15

Apparently, it is not being covered because Sinclair has no credible evidence to back up his baseless allegations.

Really, anyone who actually takes this fella seriously needs to have their head examined.

Comment by WildChild | 2008-06-19 01:21:12

The MSM covered Haggerty’s man whore even though he had the same evidence (he was there). But then Haggerty wasn’t BOBO the magnificent so he didn’t get the free pass like BOBO.

 

Comment by audacity | 2008-06-19 01:29:10

“anyone who actually takes this … fella … seriously needs to have their head examined.”

u meant fallatio?!

 
 
 

Comment by mahaska | 2008-06-19 02:16:29

You say the same thing every time you come here. I’m sick of hearing about your dimwitted son. Go away.

 

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-06-19 10:13:44

See. Obama doesn’t have as much trouble with the “turkey neck, dry pussy” crowd as the media says.

 
 

Comment by Retired | 2008-06-19 00:33:15

It will be interesting to see if Sinclair somehow has s fatal accident. That would be the surest way for his accusations to end. I have little doubt that some deep pockets Obama supporter would be monetarily grateful. That’s way it’s done on either side of the aisle.

Comment by Joe | 2008-06-19 01:00:18

I’m sure they can find a way to make him have a seizure and die from it, blaming his death from his brain tumor.

 

Comment by mahaska | 2008-06-19 02:19:50

Yeah, he’ll probably “commit suicide” in jail. The CO warrant was supposed to be a CO only warrant. The type they issue for deadbeat dads. Meaning if he shows up in our state, grab him.

 

Comment by Fred C. Dobbs | 2008-06-19 04:35:43

A Wellstone-ing in the offing, methinks.

 
 

Comment by LauraInCali | 2008-06-19 00:39:20

The infamous Rev. Manning was supposed to be at Sinclair’s press conference today. He just cracks me up. I’m waiting for his next video to come out tomorrow. “Obama’s a pimp and black people are pimp lovers!” Ummm…was that not PC to say? Sorry, makes me chuckle. LOL

 

Comment by Tommy | 2008-06-19 00:41:38

What would be the basis for a judge to grant a subpoena for the cell phone records?>>>VEE the reason is below….

I’m not an Attorney,but common sense gives basis for the subpoena…..That is of course if the authorities are concerned a murder took place.

I’m sure not one activists judge will allow anyone to have a subpoena.

The truth remains if Sinclair wants his phone records, him or his attorney can obtain them without a subpoena and this is one reason I’m skeptical of the entire story.

Anybody can obtain their own phone records….It seems weird Sinclair and his attorney haven’t released Sinclair’s phone records..

Sinclair did say Young called him and Obama called the numbers…Phone records show incoming and outgoing calls….

Sinclair needs to obtain his phone records,not just plant phone numbers all over…

Hell no I’m not voting for Obama….I have more reason not to vote for him than using Sinclair’s BS…

Security of this country is hanging in jeopardy. And I don’t like Obama’s Gas prices either….And I’m not getting VIP treatment from Countrywide like Dodd,Conrad and other playmates of Obama.

Comment by socalannie | 2008-06-19 00:48:40

Interesting point, Tommy, about the phone records. Still, there are cases where the phone company won’t release them. Some friends of ours son died last year in an auto accident. There was some mystery involved & the parents requested his phone records. The phone co (verizon) sent them the sons records for all but the last day of their sons life. When they demanded the records for the last day, verizon kept insisting “there were none”, even tho my friends had copies of their own & their sons friends which showed he had made & received calls that day. This was a year ago & they still have not gotten them. Sinclairs story happened almost 10 years ago, might be harder to get them…not that I’m saying I believe his story either.

Comment by audacity | 2008-06-19 01:31:23

the phones with the choir boy happened a few months ago

Comment by socalannie | 2008-06-19 02:25:14

True! I hadn’t thought of that!

 
 
 

Comment by MEchelle Hates America! | 2008-06-19 07:43:14

You mean Daley’s and Obama’s Chicago? GOOD LUCK!

Why do you think the guys were killed in their homes to be found and not just possibly carted across the state line like with a kidnapping never to be found again?

The FBI would have jurisdiction then.

 
 

Comment by Karma | 2008-06-19 00:43:29

As it stands now.

Sinclair says…I don’t care if you believe me…do the research for yourself.

Obama says…Believe only me…research my website and my book for my ‘truth’.

~~

The probelm is that Obama has repeatedly lied and continues to insult people’s intelligence by stating that the truth is at his website. While at the same time implying they are unable to navigate the internet and their own emails.

Sinclair – 1
Obama – 0

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 00:48:08

Apparently, your intelligence is lacking.

Sinclair has a rap sheet a mile long, has provided no credible evidence whatsover, and has already failed lie detector tests about his baseless allegations.

Hey, if you are easily persuaded, can I borrow $500? I promise to pay it back. Trust me.

Comment by AnninCa | 2008-06-19 00:52:29

Half of the prosecution cases in our country relies upon the testimony of ex-cons.

Evaluate the story…..add a lot of skepticism….

and see if it adds up to being reason enough to find the Limo Driver.

Now, if the Limo Driver also sounds credible….then Obama has a bit of a situation.

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 00:57:54

half of the prosecution cases rely on testimony of ex cons? where in the world did u get that nonsense?

Sinclair has NO credible evidence to prove his baseless allegations.

Comment by WildChild | 2008-06-19 00:59:03

Sure he does. He was there.

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 01:07:36

yeah, and this is based on what? other than his word, which does not count for anything, he has zilch.

Comment by WildChild | 2008-06-19 01:10:35

of course his word counts for something. He had BOBO’s dick in his mouth.

 
 
 

Comment by Steve | 2008-06-19 07:28:45

Fury Do you remember mob cases, where the criminal, murderers, the hit men turn state evidence. Testify to covict the hisher ups.. Mr. Valachi…it is done all the time..MEAThead-Homobanabibot.

 
 
 

Comment by Joe | 2008-06-19 00:55:43

If Tony Rezko, a convicted felon many times over, comes out and rats on Obama, will his record dissuade you from believing him? It is you who should be donating $500 to help pay Hillary Clinton’s campaign debt.

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 01:00:35

If?

uh, what in the world would he rat out on Obama? u reek of desperation.

hey how about the $500? i’m just as credible as sinclair.

Comment by WildChild | 2008-06-19 01:04:06

nobody believed you when you said you’d pay the 500 back

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 01:10:08

…and u believe the word of a convicted felon with a long rap sheet who has NO credible evidence?

man, u have pretty low standards. no surprise for an Obama hater like yourself:)

really, try taking off the Obama hater sun glasses. u might actually see better.

Comment by Joe | 2008-06-19 01:13:04

Hardly, the light from his Holiness would fry a hole in your skull.

 

Comment by WildChild | 2008-06-19 01:16:25

Sinclair is a hooker. Hookers have rap sheets. Hookers also have sex for money so when a hooker says he had sex for money with BOBO, we can take it seriously.

 

Comment by audacity | 2008-06-19 01:33:52

it is like saying that a senator always speaks the truth

 

Comment by Miss H | 2008-06-19 01:45:55

Strange how those who support and/or come in contact with Barack Obama have bad things happen to them:

1. Rezko conviction

2. Iowa flooding

3. Senator Edward Kennedy brain tumor

It makes good sense to stay as far away as possible from BO.

Comment by Fred C. Dobbs | 2008-06-19 04:38:40

4. Tim Russert heart attack.

 
 
 
 

Comment by LauraInCali | 2008-06-19 01:04:59

Nick: maybe to reduce his sentence. Duh!

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 01:11:49

that’s a pretty laughable excuse.

Comment by WildChild | 2008-06-19 01:13:02

why? Cons make deals all the time to get a lighter sentence.

 
 
 
 
 

Comment by Karma | 2008-06-19 02:02:13

No Nick, apparently your intelligence is lacking.

Sinclair has provided evidence that can be verified while refusing to waste taxpayer’s money on trials for his rap sheet. His polygraph expert is a liar about his credentials, so Sinclair still has more credibility.

Obama has consistantly lied on close to everything that comes out of his mouth, which can be verified thanks to Google and YouTube. He has no probelms wasting/stealing taxpayer’s money for people such as Rezko. And felt the need to audit Rezko trial, just in case. The truth doesn’t change based on what is presented in court, further eroding Obama’s credibility.

And in the future, if YOU can’t tell when YOU’VE been lied to, that doesn’t reflect on MY intelligence. LOL

 
 
 

Comment by not bitter | 2008-06-19 00:44:54

wow…just WOW!

I believe it’s possibly true. There is a list somewhere of misdeeds and crimes committed by congressmen and women and members of the Senate by percentage of the total membership. It is staggering.

 

Comment by Danny | 2008-06-19 00:46:47

Well now that was interesting. I wander if there could be a blue dress in the limo drivers trunk? Or have Obamathugs found the driver first.

Find the driver. Pay him big bucks you know he has the goods.

 

Comment by CLF from AL | 2008-06-19 00:47:07

Obama is evil… I just feel it with every bone of my body. Everything about him gives me the “willies” I think he’s fake and will do anything to get power and he’s showed that already.

 

Comment by StrawberrybitesBarky | 2008-06-19 00:47:54

Good night, you children of No Quarter, Larry and Susan and all the rest of you nutter butters…it’s good to be the crazy ones in a world full of Bushbots and Obamatrons. Sleep well and for God’s sake don’t let WildChild’s barky visuals give you nightmares.

Comment by socalannie | 2008-06-19 00:49:43

Nite Strawberry!

 

Comment by WildChild | 2008-06-19 01:00:22

dream well my friend :)

 
 

Comment by ritamary | 2008-06-19 00:49:38

Something else which could be checked out is the hotel records to confirm Larry Sinclair was registered at the hotel on the dates he stated. Has anyone tried to do that?

Comment by Joe | 2008-06-19 00:53:00

He posted his hotel receipts at larrysinclair.org.

 

Comment by LauraInCali | 2008-06-19 00:57:02

Yes, he obtained a copy from the hotel and posted it on his website awhile ago. Looks like it was faxed to him. I’m sure a reporter could look into it if he or she so desires.

 
 

Comment by not bitter | 2008-06-19 00:58:55

This is so absolutely hilarious! I can imagine the Obatsh** campaign is nuts…this plus the hijab debaucle and the poohbeargate. Jeez, it’s like no rest for the wicked! Make ‘em weep!

 

Comment by Dave_Not_For_Obama | 2008-06-19 01:00:05

Somebody might want to look into this:

There was a young reporter that covered Obamabi way back and for some reason Obambi didn’t like the reporters one article, hence Obambi cut him off from further interviews.

The young reporter made mention that Obambi changed his cell number and the reporter could no longer contact him. It might be interesting to get a time line and a cross reference of cell number/s the reporter may have in old documents. ;) ;) ;)

 

Comment by NOBAMA | 2008-06-19 01:00:17

The trolls are disgusting, brainless, perverts. They’re so bad it really makes you wonder about the person they are for, Obama.

I don’t like Obama and his big-mouth wife because they idolize black militants. And, he is a lying, cheating, thief. But, now I wonder if they’re perverts like their followers, too.

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 01:03:38

a cheat? maybe u should save that John SENILE McBush. as far as i know, he is the only candidate to cheat on wife and then marry his lover.

Senator Obama has always been faithful to his wife. i can’t say the same for McBush.

Comment by Joe | 2008-06-19 01:06:23

I guess having gay sex with other men doesn’t count when it comes to determining the question of fidelity to one’s wife. No wonder you’re so jolly!

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 01:19:21

uh, if u r into gay sex, that’s your deal. i’m just dealing with facts here.

John SENILE McBush came home from Nam and had an affair with Cindy I LOOK LIKE A WITCH McBush. He then left his first wife for the home wrecker and the rest is history.

Senator Obama has remained faithful to his wife. I have to admire a man who lives up to his marital vows:)

Comment by WildChild | 2008-06-19 01:24:51

I see your point, there isn’t a vow that says the groom won’t have paid man sex.

 

Comment by Joe | 2008-06-19 02:18:43

You like to watch, don’t you?

 

Comment by Jeremiah God Damn AmeriKKKa Wright | 2008-06-19 03:00:10

Obama cheated on Michelle several times.

They even had a screaming match over the other woman that the staffers were exposed to.

Your faithful despot has had his dick in more places than larry sinclairs mouth.

 
 

Comment by audacity | 2008-06-19 01:37:35

only if it was the bachelor party, then is OK

 
 

Comment by WildChild | 2008-06-19 01:08:51

you can’t really say BOBO is faithful to his wife when BOBO is off buying man sex, now can you?

 

Comment by LauraInCali | 2008-06-19 01:12:43

What makes you an expert on Obama’s love life. How the hell would you know if he ever cheated on her? Nick, you need to calm down and get some sleep, no need to hangout here. Just wasting your time. No Kool-Aid Zone

Comment by Joe | 2008-06-19 01:16:25

He’s just another nerdy unemployed geek who lives in the basement of his mom’s house. What does he know about sex between men and women other than from his porn collection?

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 01:24:10

ah….the “he must be an unemployed geek who still lives with mommy” card.

really, r u always this unoriginal on a comeback?

I’m only stating a FACT….John SENILE McBush had an affair with Cindy The Witch and eventually left his first wife for the Home Wrecker:)

Senator Obama….always faithful:)

Comment by WildChild | 2008-06-19 01:26:57

This is great. You support a crack smoking man whore for president but have a problem with a guys marriage breaking up after 5 years as a POW in Vietnam. This is a change we can believe in.

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 01:40:07

I’ll take a faithful husband in Senator Obama over John SENILE McBush who screwed around on his wife and then left his wife for the home wrecker.

Comment by WildChild | 2008-06-19 01:47:26

Then that should work out well. BOBO would like to take you oh faithful one, in the back of his limousine for a little crack smoking and man sex.

Comment by Joe | 2008-06-19 02:55:09

Nick,

BOBO will even go to your hotel room so that you can apply the proper suction.

The best part is, you won’t even feel guilty for being a home wrecker!

 
 

Comment by Jeremiah God Damn AmeriKKKa Wright | 2008-06-19 02:54:45

Nick.

I would like to invite you to chew the barack off my big fat log.

but you are so full of shit already, i dont think it would be of any nutritional value to you.

 
 
 
 
 

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 01:21:00

Unless u have evidence to the contrary, Senator Obama has been faithful to his wife:)

Comment by WildChild | 2008-06-19 01:22:56

We have the testimony of man whore Larry Sinclair.

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 01:25:07

a “whore”? thank you… i rest my case…next…

Comment by WildChild | 2008-06-19 01:28:01

Man whore’s are the best eyewitnesses witnesses for allegations of paid man sex.

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 01:35:04

….and this is based on what? your experience?

Comment by WildChild | 2008-06-19 01:38:56

Cops. Bad boys bad boys what you gonna do what you gonna do when they come for you…

 
 
 
 
 

Comment by LauraInCali | 2008-06-19 01:27:20

Yeah, think about what you are saying. You don’t know shit! Anything is possible.

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 01:33:05

think about what u r saying????

how ironic of a statement coming from a poster who actually thinks a convicted felon with a long rap sheet is credible…lol!!!!!!!!!!

anything is possible??? yeah, i could buy a lotto ticket tomorrow and become a millionaire….not.

Comment by WildChild | 2008-06-19 01:40:02

that sinclair a hooker makes him credible when it comes to paid man sex with BOBO

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-06-19 10:22:43

I never thought the day would come when a politician was considered more trustworthy than a prostitute! The latter is more honest about their line of work than the former.

 
 

Comment by LauraInCali | 2008-06-19 02:11:52

Nick as I always say anything is possible.
What the hell makes you think I said he is
telling the truth. That said, my eyes are wide open and I wouldn’t be shocked if it turns out to be true. I feel no need to defend the chosen one like you do.

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 03:01:11

actually, u r defending the convicted felon with the long rap sheet.

Comment by Mr.Murder | 2008-06-19 09:30:32

Like Tony Rezko?

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Comment by Jeremiah God Damn AmeriKKKa Wright | 2008-06-19 02:58:13

Nick Fury…how do you manage to type so much with obamas proverbial balls in your mouth non stop?

More importantly isn’t Michelle getting irritated that you are hanging around all the time?

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 03:12:21

have u always been obsessed with male sexual body parts?

 
 

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-06-19 10:20:36

Nick, ad hominem attacks are a sign of desperation when one is losing an argument. Obama seems to have suffered more brain damage from years of doping than McCain shows signs of senility.

 
 
 

Comment by Jeremiah God Damn AmeriKKKa Wright | 2008-06-19 01:13:24

I could care less if the MSM never investigates Larry Sinclairs Allegations….

…provided they get their collective nutlicking lips out of obama’s pants and report on and fully investigate relevant matters like his background with rezko and the dirty politics of chicop and his complicity in setting up the pay for play deals.

If they vet him on that then sure ignore Larry Sinclair.

But since the MSM is too much a bunch of pandering pussies and can only think up new ways to say Obambi i want to have your baby, that wont ever happen until its too late to get rid of him before the general.

In any event he will lose in november.

Guaranteed.

and all the trolls coming over here working overtime wont change that one bit.

And when he loses in november, I will toss one back for the Gipper, The Comeback Kid, and the Fighter, knowing i voted for the Hero instead of the jackass.

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 01:27:49

Guaranteed??? somehow, u don’t sound convincing.

ask Hillary how much of a “guarantee” she was in the primary…lol!!!!!!!!!!!!

Comment by WildChild | 2008-06-19 01:29:19

for a few bucks BOBO was guaranteed man sex.

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 01:36:53

hey, if a convicted felon with a long rapsheet and no credible evidence said it, it must be true.

yeah, try using that logic in a court of law and u would be laughed out the door.

Comment by WildChild | 2008-06-19 01:43:29

The courts would love to enter in eyewitness testimony from a hooker concerning allegations about paid man sex the hooker provided, especially when he is a hooker who got paid for man sex by BOBO the magnificent.

Comment by Joe | 2008-06-19 01:49:35

He wasn’t that magnificent, according to Sinclair’s Q&A.

Comment by WildChild | 2008-06-19 02:01:51

It’s an honorary title. LOL

 
 
 
 
 

Comment by LauraInCali | 2008-06-19 01:38:05

Pretty much guaranteed. Obama will lose in November. Plenty of dems will swing the vote for McCain. Nothing you can do about it Nick. But really, you need to get a grip and not worry about it. You might end up with an ulcer.

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 01:41:51

Actually, I’m not worried. Senator Obama should win this one with a comfortable margin:)

Comment by WildChild | 2008-06-19 01:45:05

you had to bring up margarine in a thread about man sex and BOBO didn’t you?

Comment by Joe | 2008-06-19 01:46:57

BOBO prefers butter, so I’ve been told.

 

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 02:55:15

have u always been obsessed w/homosexuals?

 
 

Comment by Jeremiah God Damn AmeriKKKa Wright | 2008-06-19 02:36:35

make sure to come back after the polls close so i can laugh hysterically in your stupified face as you cry like a little kid when they announce McCain the winner.

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 02:53:45

yeah, McBush was a winner….winner of the republican nomination.

Too bad that is not the same as winning the presidential election:)

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-06-19 10:24:09

Bush won the Presidency twice. Are you deranged?

 
 
 
 
 
 

Comment by undercoverblackman | 2008-06-19 01:41:42

And folks wonder why Rev. Wright hates you people.

Comment by LauraInCali | 2008-06-19 01:54:42

You need to knock that chip off your shoulder.
You shouldn’t keep pulling the race card. Every time you do it just makes you sound naive.

Comment by OBushMA! | 2008-06-19 02:39:31

Wright doesn’t need any reason to hate. He got paid to hate.

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-06-19 10:24:38

 
 
 

Comment by Jeremiah God Damn AmeriKKKa Wright | 2008-06-19 02:38:51

I hate you too. Don’t worry. I am an equal opportunity hater.

I got my money off of you poor folk and live in my white neighborhood in my million dollar mansion now with my 10 million dollar line of credit.

hehehe…GOD DAMN AMERIKKKA HAS BEEN BARRY BARRY GOOD TO ME!

 
 
 

Comment by Keir | 2008-06-19 01:13:30

I feel sorry for whoever was reassigned those cell phone numbers. LOL

 

Comment by not bitter | 2008-06-19 01:13:43

He’s disgusting, for sure; but his politics of poohbear is scary and then you have his dispute with the scarved women now.

 

Comment by Tommy | 2008-06-19 01:20:55

socalannie: Something Sinclair apprently is not aware of or he is stupid…750,000 dollars from Obama’s campaign to Whitheouse.org is not hard to trace….If the Republicans thought Obama’s campaign paid 750,000 dollars to shut Sinclair’s mouth it would be hell to pay for Obama….The Republicans would jump all over this….

I understand why the U.S> Marshall has him…He probably is in protective custody alright;but they’re protecting him from his self…Sinclair is a nut case…

This part of his story does not make sense…How in the hell can Sinclair expect his story to be believed with dates mixed up? November 7,1999 and he thinks in the Fall of 2007 Obama’s records should be revealed?

The following day, November 7, 1999, Senator Obama appeared at my hotel room where we again ingested cocaine and I again performed fellatio on Senator Obama. Significantly, both the driver’s telephone call to Senator Obama and his call to the drug dealer should appear on the driver’s and Senator Obama’s cellphone billing statements. Fall 2007

Comment by socalannie | 2008-06-19 02:29:22

I doubt if its true; altho, it would be hilarious if it was. If there’s a shred of truth to any of it, the Republicans will be sure to find out.

I think Obama will lose anyway. The base against him seems to be growing by the week.

Comment by Jeremiah God Damn AmeriKKKa Wright | 2008-06-19 02:51:26

A lot of people say i am voting obama so they dont get harrassed by the nutjobs they have to deal with on a daily basis.

Trust me when the voting booth curtain closes they will be punching that McCain button with a vengance.

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 03:06:24

yeah, and McBush will still end up losing. go figure.

Comment by NY still loves Hillary | 2008-06-19 09:41:11

Hmm, and you don’t think the Fix is on? Right. Even the trolls are admitting the election will be rigged.

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-06-19 10:26:40

Rove knows about fixed elections. Obama’s a lightweight.

 
 
 
 
 
 

Comment by Teakwood | 2008-06-19 01:50:59

Mr Johnson

Thanks for posting this so people can draw their own conclusion and follow up.

One observation, BO does exhibit behavioral indications of previous crack cocaine usage. “Magazines on a Plane”

Comment by Jeremiah God Damn AmeriKKKa Wright | 2008-06-19 02:50:06

as each day passes more crack appears i mean more cracks appear in obama’s manufactured veneer.

 
 

Comment by JoeVeteran | 2008-06-19 01:52:28

Larry W. S. makes sense. Everyone is not wealthy enough to be protected by the law is subjugated to it. Nothing is free and nothing is fair. L.W.S. made no money off of this issue. That is enough evidence to prove that he has nothing to gain but everything to lose over this whole scenario.

 

Comment by Dude | 2008-06-19 01:58:17

Funny thing is Sinclair was arrested right after the press conference.

Comment by OBushMA! | 2008-06-19 02:37:07

Somebody is scared.

 

Comment by Joe | 2008-06-19 02:49:00

He was silenced for being a thorn on His Holiness’ Bottom.

Comment by Ms. Independent | 2008-06-19 03:01:11

Or, you know, because he broke the law.

 
 
 

Comment by loving it | 2008-06-19 02:01:34

“Good afternoon, my name is Larry Sinclair and I am a former recreational drug user and trafficker, a convicted felon for crimes of forgery, bad checks and theft by check”

stopped reading there.

Comment by WildChild | 2008-06-19 02:05:44

good advice.. The riveting testimony about crack smoking and paid man sex with BOBO comes next.

 

Comment by NITEOWL | 2008-06-19 02:11:03

Sounds like the typical Obama- Chicago-criminal- associate.

Comment by Joe | 2008-06-19 02:45:01

That’s the whole point. Sinclair is just another thread in the tapestry of Obama associates.

Comment by Jeremiah God Damn AmeriKKKa Wright | 2008-06-19 02:48:48

thats not a tapestry thats a political death shroud.

 
 
 
 

Comment by Avalon | 2008-06-19 02:14:12

I hope the people that believe this story tell it to all their friends. They’ll just make anti-Obama people look crazy. Theres a reason not ONE single media outlet has reported on this. Heck, not even Drudge has touched this.

Comment by Jeremiah God Damn AmeriKKKa Wright | 2008-06-19 02:40:52

yawn. Puffingtontoilet.com —-> That way

 

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 03:10:06

yeah, even Drudge has a sense of reality.

 

Comment by Democrat | 2008-06-19 07:22:16

Greta Sustern wrote about why she doesn’t cover BS like this…

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-06-19 10:28:36

That made me giggle. Goebbels isn’t a racist. Ha!

 
 
 

Comment by peppermintgirl4145 | 2008-06-19 02:37:23

It seems to me that Larry S. was probably supposed to be silenced and arrested on this old Class D Felony/Class A Misdemeanor warrant BEFORE he spoke. There was a mess up by the Obamabots and he was allowed his First Amendment right. Now we will see if their is any free press in the U.S. up to doing their job to investigate. If no one either proves or disproves this with Larry S.’s info Lord help us. We will know their is no longer truth in Journalism. Larry S. is brave to do this with death threats and being taken to jail on a warrant that doesn’t allow for extradition ( must be class a.b. or C felony)

 

Comment by Brendy | 2008-06-19 02:40:31

Comment by blah3 | 2008-06-18 23:03:02

What on earth could you find to fault in the Kids for Obama program?

You must be grasping.

**

Duh…ever hear of ‘indoctrination’? The younger they are, the easier they are to ‘brain wash’…dig?

And, WHAT business do young children have in politics? Let children be children! Obama and his ‘handlers’ are INSANE – they are reaching out to every single avenue trying to get voters – “Yeah, Mommy, I learned how good Mr. Obama is and I think you and Daddy should vote for him because if you don’t he said my world will be awful if Mr. McCain or Miss Hillary win; you don’t want that for me, do you, Mommy? Waaaa, waaaaa”

Obama and his cult are SCARY and CONTROLLING.

Comment by Jeremiah God Damn AmeriKKKa Wright | 2008-06-19 02:46:13

There is nothing wrong with the Kids for Obama program…

But then they all loved the Hitler Youth program when it first came out too…

To think that democrats who where once so adamant that the republican right did not influence their children by mentioning god in school and where up in arms about those peskey right wing radicals trying to tell them what they could do with their penises…

Are now the same liberal leftists think its ok to hand off their childrens indoctrination to the likes of the obama campaign. No Child left unbrainwashed i guess.

If a politician ever came near my kid and tried to influence him he would get my vote in the form a my foot so far up his ass he would need a surgery to get it back out.

Thank god i dont let my children get exposed to that crap.

Comment by NITEOWL | 2008-06-19 03:01:28

Will the Obama Brown/Orange shirts make you see it their way by any means necessary?

 

Comment by socalannie | 2008-06-19 03:01:39

No Child left unbrainwashed i guess

Hahahaha! Love it! Couldn’t agree more!

 

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 03:08:44

man, i feel sorry for your kids.

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-06-19 10:30:38

Such touching sentiment from someone who probably beats his. “Fury” is such an admirable quality.

 
 
 

Comment by Jeremiah God Damn AmeriKKKa Wright | 2008-06-19 02:47:36

They want to affect the children so that the children ask their parents why they aren’t voting for obama and if not is it because mommy and daddy are racists.

these assholes have no shame.

Comment by notmyrealmoniker | 2008-06-19 08:25:31

Maybe that explains Claire McCaskill??? She endorsed Obama early on because her teenage daughter told her she would never speak to her, again, if she didn’t. I don’t remember being allowed to tell my parents what to do…

 
 
 

Comment by ICD | 2008-06-19 03:08:18

OK, so let’s see what we have… a rambling statement that sounds like it was written by an inmate of an asylum, with wild and outlandish claims, written by a known convicted con-man with at least one more outstanding arrest warrant than the one that actually got him arrested this time… woo. That’s just great. Let’s take all of the federal authorities’ time with important investigations like this one.

Even giving this sort of nut the space in your blog can only mean that your blind hatred is seriously affecting your sanity.

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 03:19:19

…desperate times, call for desperate measures…..

it only goes to show u how desperate these John SENILE McBush leg humpers have become.

they r at the point in where they will grasp at anything, and it is only June.

Comment by LauraInCali | 2008-06-19 04:35:39

Nick you slay me with your wit. Tell me why I should vote for Obama. Come on baby convince me.

 
 
 

Comment by Charles | 2008-06-19 03:21:29

Larry, posting this kind of stuff should be beneath you.

I understand that people are angry at Obama, but that should be no reason for using gutter stuff. This just harms America.

 

Comment by Jesus Reyes | 2008-06-19 03:21:37

Lyndon LaRouche

 

Comment by mike | 2008-06-19 03:25:45

THIS IS AN AUDIO OF LARRY’S PRESS CONFERENCE.

please everybody read the press release where he promised to provide corraborating evidence.

He failed to do this instead claiming the driver was not available.

ALSO BOTICE HOW HE FAILS TO ANSWER SPECIFIC QUESTION LIKE, THE EXACT TIME HE MEOBAMA OR ANY PHYSICAL FEATURES.

THIS GUY CALLS A PRESS CONFERENCE TO ADDRESS HIS CLAIMS AND GOT INTERNATIONAL MEDIA ATTENTION YET ALL HE DID WAS REHASH THE SAME ALLEGATIONS HE HAS MADE FOR MONTHS WITHOUT PROVIDING A SHRED OF EVIDENCE OR PROVIDING ANYTHING THAT CAN BE CORRABORATED.

HE PROVIDES A VERY COMMON INDIAN NAME, HE PROVIDES 4 PHONE NUMBERS THA BELONG TO HIM AND….THAT’S IT.

THIS GUY IS A LIAR AN NEED A LIFE.

LISTEN FOR YOURSELF

http://s16.securedview.com/mandn/papatard_blows_himself_8_mono.mp3

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 03:30:04

Forget trying to persuade the Obama haters. They are in the tank for Sinclair.

I’m sure if Sinclair alleged that he slept with John SENILE McBush with just his word as proof, they would believe him as well.

Quite sad if u ask me.

Comment by LauraInCali | 2008-06-19 06:10:49

Obama haters pretty much sums it up. Sinclair is just a side show. Nick stop trying to convert us. Ain’t gonna happen no way no how. You really tried
though, I’ll give you that. You are so sneaky making comments after people are long gone. Nick do ya always have to get the last word in? No need to reply. LOL

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 10:06:37

uh, not trying to convert you because you are beyond reason:)

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-06-19 10:34:32

Not his job to convert you. He gets paid to lurk around, circulate libel about Obama’s opponent and debunk Muslim rumors.

Every motherfucking post from this halfwit is “blah blah blah McBush” or “where’s the tape, Larry?” Wash, rinse, repeat ad nauseum. Pathetic for someone who won’t shut up about how “sane” he is.

 
 
 
 
 

Comment by mike | 2008-06-19 03:27:58

 

Comment by Pragmatist | 2008-06-19 04:08:26

Does he have “five frieds who know people” wha have seen the Whitey tape?
Oh, sorry, wrong Larry.
You do plan to publish the names of your 5 friends, don’t you? Are two of them Moe and Curly?
And didn’t you leave out the part of the Sinclair story where his lawyer announces that he wears a kilt because he is unusually well-endowed?
Hint: You will nto win this election based on fanatsies. People are hurting and they want real solutions to real problems.

Comment by notmyrealmoniker | 2008-06-19 08:20:21

I haven’t heard any solutions….only hope, change, hope, change, hope, change.

 
 

Comment by stop Hussein | 2008-06-19 04:17:45

I’m glad Larry put the information out there. It has been disseminated to the general public now FOREVER. It can NEVER be covered-up or washed away by Obama now. I can see why the Obamabots are going ape-shit over this but they can’t really change anything now. So sorry! If there’s any truth to the matter, which I suspect there is, hopefully someone will put the pieces together. However, I’m sure Obama and the DNC will do whatever it takes to cover this incident up as best they can.

Comment by LauraInCali | 2008-06-19 04:23:43

They can’t scrub this one out of existence.

 
 

Comment by DianeJ | 2008-06-19 04:45:48

It’s an interesting story. I too am glad Larry posted it, however, no way to know at this point if there is any truth to the story. The media should re-open it and investigate. I think another investigation should take place and the police should look into it again.

 

Comment by Robbedvoter | 2008-06-19 05:15:35

The BBC delicious entry seems to confirm my previous selection of “best of Sinclair”
“Obama not pathetic, insists wife:
http://edgeoforever.wordpress.com/2008/06/19/obama-not-pathetic-insists-wife/

 

Comment by BS Detector | 2008-06-19 05:18:57

This is such unmitigated BS.

What’s next? Some gullible fool getting taken in regarding a fictional fiction with the candidate’s wife supposedly saying the word “Whitey?”

 

Comment by politicsIsdirty | 2008-06-19 05:26:11

Wow the Obama cult is in full force regarding this Larry Sinclair allegations.

Looks like they can’t handle the TRUTH.

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 10:11:00

how ironic of you to associate the word “truth” and the name a convicted felon with no credible evidence in Larry Sinclair.

i’m sure if Larry Sinclair claimed he was from Mars u would believe as well.

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-06-19 10:35:39

Yet, not so ironic since he fits right in with the rest of Obama’s entourage.

 
 
 

Comment by Perry Logan | 2008-06-19 05:38:26

What a brave man Larry Sinclair is.

His story sounds totally true to me. I believe him implicitly.

Of course the Obamites are attacking him. But the Obamites have proven themselves to be liars and cheaters, right?

 

Pingback by Never Yet Melted » Responses to Sinclair’s News Conference | 2008-06-19 05:47:26

[...] Larry Johnson isn’t climbing aboard the Sinclair circus train, but Larry did clearly feel that he had a [...]

 

Comment by Bamboozled | 2008-06-19 05:54:57

These Obama lovers don’t seem to understand that their nastiness will not coerce any Hillary supporters to vote for him. In fact, they are the reason I want him to be defeated.

I don’t care a bit about this Sinclair story, but it is amusing to see the number of Obama attack dogs working overtime to abuse us once again.

Go away, idiots! We aren’t supporting your messiah.

Comment by Slim Tyranny | 2008-06-19 09:15:29

Heh, your comment is pretty amusing. Why don’t you read the other comments in this very thread — you will see just as much “nastiness” and “abuse” from the anti-Obama commenters as from the pro-Obama commenters. Or read your OWN comment — do you see the irony of complaining about being “abused” and then turning around and calling people “idiots”?

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-06-19 10:52:26

WAAAAH. It hurts! They call his wife a “bitch” and gossip about him and call the people who come here to harass an online community names like “idiot.”

Is that not, in fact, what you are? Or do you not realize that verbally abusing an online community and violating people’s First Amendment rights is idiotic and politically sleazy?

The Whitey Tape… MO has said worse that we are sure to see this August. The people who hate Obama hated him before the rumored tape. They have reason to based on the conduct of him and his supporters throughout these primaries. No unity. No one wants anything to do with the Democratic party now, because if you can’t trust them to hold fair elections, abortion, gay marriage and the war don’t really amount to a hill of beans.

Whether Obama or McCain are in office, American troops will remain in Iraq and Afghanistan. Whether we bomb Iran or not depends on them and who we have in office. Only you zombies are dumb enough to think the terrorists who would like to see this country go up in flames are just sad, idealistic freedom fighters who will get all warm and fuzzy if we elect a black man with a funny name. Do you know how idiotic that sounds? As for The Tape, the Birth Certificate, etc. This is a blog. There is a balance of what is covered here, and that tilts toward the sensational. Obama has his Fight the Smears website. You should be happy with that and depart. Engaging in childish behavior like name-calling and taunting makes you an idiot, so skip the righteous indignation.

 
 
 

Comment by TheVoiceOfReason | 2008-06-19 06:29:50

There’s only one reason to peddle accusations like this:

http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details/noquarterusa.net

seems some new fodder is needed to keep the masses coming…

 

Comment by ford | 2008-06-19 07:33:05

The reason so many posters allege that they have just stumbled on to this web site is that Obama DOES seem worried about the Larrry saga…

He is paying these people good money to come to this site, and put his smear out there..

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 10:14:09

actually, most people on this board are Obama haters.

maybe if u had actually read the posts u would have figured that out.

 
 

Comment by Whitey | 2008-06-19 08:14:20

Hey, I’ve been away for a few days. Any messages for me?

 

Comment by Judy | 2008-06-19 08:16:44

Obama paid bloggers on here – you look like idiots. Who needs tapes of “whitey” when we have Rev. Wright and Father Pfleger – great tapes.

The more you are here or on other blogs the more determined people like me are to NOT vote for Obama.

You do nothing but harm.

ps. I believe there is a tape, and it will surface, and all of your millions spent on redoing Michelle is worthless. Michelle has already revealed herself.

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 10:17:01

you weren’t gonna vote for Senator Obama anyway.

yeah, sure this is tape. i’m sure u also believe in Martians………….lol!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 
 

Comment by Alice Paul | 2008-06-19 08:22:20

I have done nothing but research Mr.Obama for two weeks trying to talk myself into voting for him. Instead I have found more reasons not to. This is very interesting and I will follow its progression. The only question I have also and it has been noted here already why would the driver know Obama and call him? All Obama would have to do is release his cell records and it would go away if it wern’t true!

Comment by Anonymous | 2008-06-19 09:01:39

Trolls where is your answer?

 

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 10:19:42

why would he do that? Sinclair has ZERO EVIDENCE and is a convicted felon who has already FAILED previous lie detector tests on these allegations.

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-06-19 10:56:26

Lie detector tests administered by a porn company. Oh, the irony is delicious. We can’t take the word of a man who had paid sex, because the people who sell paid sex called him a liar.

 
 
 
 

Comment by david | 2008-06-19 08:37:05

I don’t get it. I really don’t. How can anyone take the word of a man with, at the very least, a shady background and felony warrants out for his arrest? He is, by his own accounts, an admitted drug user, forger and con artist. I don’t even have a dog in this fight and can see how ridiculous this is. If that wasn’t enough all the Hillary supporters who claim that Obama’s supporters are drinking the kool-aid should take a look in the mirror. They seem so blinded by the outcome of the primary that they can’t see the forest for the trees. What was it exactly that the Obama campaign did that was any different then what the Clinton campaign did?

This is a transformational moment in the history of this country. Instead of dragging this process down into the mud we should be embracing this historical moment in our country. To take the word of a known felon over that of a public servant attests to the same blind worship of Clinton that her supporters accuse the Obamacons of having. Let’s elevate the discussion. This country is in trouble. There are serious issues on the table. Why are we wasting our time with this kind of smear?

Comment by Slim Tyranny | 2008-06-19 08:52:34

Great comment.

 

Comment by Steve | 2008-06-19 09:03:03

The governmnet does it all the time to convict higher up mob figures..Valchi case, etc..all the time. These criminals who testify turn state evidence make Sinclair look like a saint. Now you grow-up.

 

Comment by Sugar | 2008-06-19 09:16:45

“He is, by his own accounts, an admitted drug user”

So what David? So is Obama! Now what troll?

Comment by Slim Tyranny | 2008-06-19 09:25:12

The rest of that sentence reads “, forger and con artist”. The later two are the ones that actually destroy Sinclair’s credibility.

Comment by Sugar | 2008-06-19 09:37:22

Ha! So drug use is okay? lmao You guys need to get a dose of reality. This is so sad. I feel really bad for you. I really do. How old are you 20? One day you’ll look back on this with regret. Obama has conned you. He has. Besides, Obama stole some speeches “forger” and he is in fact a con artist. ROTFLMAO

Comment by Slim Tyranny | 2008-06-19 09:47:26

Heh, Sugar, I never said “drug use is okay”. I pointed out that you redacted “forger and con artist”, which clearly are damaging to Sinclair’s credibility.

We do have something in common — we both feel sorry for the other. In my case, I feel sorry for you that you hate Obama so much that you’ll peddle in lies and rumor. I assume you are a Clinton supporter, and it’s sad to think that I would have stood shoulder-to-shoulder with you in defending Clinton against smears if she were our Democratic nominee.

Comment by Sugar | 2008-06-19 09:54:37

Oh fuck you. If that were true, that you would have stood “shoulder to shoulder” with us, you wouldn’t be here at this site harrassing us. You would have your ass at one of your kool aid troughs lapping it up. Instead, you are completing your “smear fighting” shift for that con artist (Obama, not Sinclair). How in the hell does drug use not destroy a person’s credibility as well as forgery? You are a nutjob, plain and simple. I will ignore you from now on because you obviously aren’t well.

Comment by Slim Tyranny | 2008-06-19 10:06:36

Jesus, quite the attack on me. Despite your persecution complex, I am not here “harassing” you — I’m defending the presumptive Democratic nominee from lies and smears, and trying to get Clinton supporters to STOP engaging in those lies and smears. Despite your wishful thinking and denial of reality, that doesn’t make me a “nutjob,” it makes me a Democrat.

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-06-19 11:02:06

No, Democrat now makes you a nutjob. The authoritarian behavior sits just fine with you. Your party appointed a nominee, threw out votes, had its leaders come out and tell you exactly what you would do. This is a civil rights issue more than an election for you, so you can swallow that. You might be a fascist for the black cause, Slim Tyranny, but you’re a fascist by your own admission. In a Republic with Democratic elections, a quaint tradition we’re trying to preserve, that makes you a jerk and an asshole. Fascist pig.

 
 
 
 
 
 

Comment by david | 2008-06-19 09:35:27

Troll? Really? If name calling is all the better you can do than I am wasting my time.

Comment by Sugar | 2008-06-19 09:39:05

Ah, news flash! We’ve been telling you that you are wasting your time for WEEKS now! On Obama and in trying to strong arm us around here too! Kick rocks!

 
 
 

Comment by stodghie | 2008-06-19 09:40:34

transformation? is that the current talking point from the obama blog slugs today?

 

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 10:22:09

It’s pointless to reason with people filled with hate towards Senator Obama. Too bad because he will be President Elect Obama in November:)

 
 

Comment by Susan Nunes | 2008-06-19 08:56:27

It’s rather odd Sinclair was coincidentally arrested the day he gave his press conference.

 

Comment by Sam | 2008-06-19 08:57:05

http://WWW.OBAMA-WIRE.COM

Can you see the change? Not from our perspective. You can’t get away with preaching change and then play the same old political game. If you didnt know already Obama just backed out of public financing (another flip flop).

“In February 2007, I proposed a novel way to preserve the strength of the public financing system in the 2008 election. My plan requires both major party candidates to agree on a fundraising truce, return excess money from donors, and stay within the public financing system for the general election. My proposal followed announcements by some presidential candidates that they would forgo public financing so they could raise unlimited funds in the general election. The Federal Election Commission ruled the proposal legal, and Senator John McCain (R-AZ) has already pledged to accept this fundraising pledge. If I am the Democratic nominee, I will aggressively pursue an agreement with the Republican nominee to preserve a publicly financed general election.”

http://www.obama-wire.com

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 10:25:17

John SENILE McBush is the biggest flip flopper around and we have it on tape:) will the real John McBush stand up please.

Comment by Jeremiah God Damn AmeriKKKa Wright | 2008-06-19 10:56:46

nick dickless fury is just a troll. Can someone help him find a prosthetic please.

 
 
 

Comment by Steve | 2008-06-19 09:00:14

The world knows that Mr. Obama is a closet Homsexual who participates in high risk sexual behavior. Obama smokes crack-meth, highly addictive drug which influences one’s behavior.

Mr. Obama has knowledge of the murder of Donald Young. Gay choir director of Trinity church for twenty years. There are phone records which can be easily traced.

We know that Obama is directly connected to felons Rezko and Levine. Testimony from Rezko trial of all night drug, male parties which occured over a period of several years. Both gentlemen Bo buds for 12-17yrs and fundraisers for Homobana.

Comment by Slim Tyranny | 2008-06-19 09:07:36

Good lord, what is wrong with you? The combination of lies, hate and homophobia in your comment is mind-blowing.

Comment by Steve | 2008-06-19 09:47:10

Slim Not at all. Ijust don’t want to see it in the White House. Now you deal with it. Demand that some honest MSM reporter investigate. This can easily be debunked or confirmed. Matter of fact. I am going to be proactive, I am calling my SD Congressional representative, Senator, US Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald for Ill. This will be addressed. Who are you to decide what is factual or not? Obamibot? You guys loved to dish the dirt out during primaries now you’re all nicey…Too little, too late.

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 10:27:14

…and your local representatives will just hang up on you, which they should.

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-06-19 11:04:29

Yes, when we elect people in office, the least we expect of them is that they hang up on us. I love this new Democratic party. Thanks for fucking up this fine country!

 
 
 
 

Comment by rosered56 | 2008-06-19 13:43:30

The testimony time frame for the drug/sex parties in question was for 1999 and 2000.

 
 

Pingback by Larry Sinclair’s Big Moment (Not Exactly) « his vorpal sword | 2008-06-19 09:00:47

[...] chase to stretch out his 15 minutes of fame. And is anyone surprised to find that Larry Johnson posted Sinclair’s rambling statement in full? What is it about Obama and guys named [...]

 

Comment by Dave_Not_For_Obama | 2008-06-19 09:10:39

Has anybody taken the four phone numbers Larry Sinclair produced at his press conference and found a way to research them to 1999 , to see who belonged to the numbers back then?

Somebody some where has those numbers in their rolodex, notebook, black book, scheduler, phone records, etc., the numbers can’t just go POOF into the night. I wonder how long before somebody speaks up, or how long before somebody with excellent investigative skills uncovers this info. :)

Does Michelle recognize those numbers, maybe Rezko, maybe Rev. Wright, somebody recognizes those numbers, now doubt about that, when will they talk, tick tock, tick tock, tick tock.

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 10:30:44

yeah, they belonged to Sen. Larry Craig (i am not gay and i have never been gay), Rep. Mark Foley (i love congressional male pages), Pastor Ted Haggard (do as i say not as i do), and Liberace’s ex lover (my oh my, u have a big piano).

 
 

Comment by Sugar | 2008-06-19 09:12:56

WOW!!!!!!!!!!! I had some doubts about Larry before, but believe you me! Obama smoked some crack and Obama got his di#k sucked a few times by this dude! This is unreal!

“This first called shocked me in that this “Mr. Young” asked me why I had not asked Senator Obama to disclose the sexual encounters I had with Mr. Obama in 1999. I was shocked as I had never mentioned to the campaign or anyone working for the campaign any sexual encounters as my call was prompted by drug allegations only.”

I’m telling you, that marriage with Michelle “My Belle” is a sham. It’s all a front. I’ve been feeling that way for months now. It looks so forced and the way she so easily speaks ill of him in public forums. Ughh! What kind of crap are they trying to force on us with this guy?!!! Hillary or McCain ‘08!

 

Comment by stop Hussein | 2008-06-19 09:32:52

David-

you said, “I don’t get it. I really don’t. How can anyone take the word of a man with, at the very least, a shady background and felony warrants out for his arrest? He is, by his own accounts, an admitted drug user, forger and con artist.”

Your description matches Obama perfectly! and yes, none of us get him either! BO is a pathological liar and admitted drug user..

All you Obamabots, have some self-respect and take a hard look at your deeply flawed candidate.

Go McCain!

Comment by david | 2008-06-19 09:42:15

Obama is a felon? A check forger? Come on. Is this really the level of intelligent conversation I can expect from this thread. I find it very disheartening to see just how many of the people on this thread are rooting for a man and his family to be ruined by these accusations. These are real people. He has two young daughters. That level of vitriol is frightening.

Comment by Sugar | 2008-06-19 09:50:33

He probably has forged some checks in his day. Hmmm. Maybe that will come out soon. He has admitted to using drugs. You know how those dope fiends can get. LMAO Desperate for the next hit.

B.O.W.L.-Barack Obama Will Lose!

 

Comment by Slim Tyranny | 2008-06-19 09:52:27

It’s definitely depressing to see the hateful attacks aimed at Obama, and the gleeful embrace of any and all rumors, lies, innuendo and smears about Obama, no matter how outlandish and absurd.

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-06-19 11:06:09

Such a shock when he engaged in this same behavior throughout this primary season. Tell me again how Clinton’s “fairy tale” comment was racist…

 

Comment by WildChild | 2008-06-19 15:59:47

My favorite example of he gleeful embrace of any and all rumors, lies, innuendo and smears about Clinton , no matter how outlandish and absurd was when you BOBOweenies bought into the lie spread by BOBO and the BOBO boys that Hillary wanted him murdered.

At least on this one we have an eye witness who was with BOBO during the crack smoking and the dick sucking.

 
 

Comment by Steve | 2008-06-19 09:53:43

David Shut your mouth..Why did’nt you cry your BS when the Obama was race baiting Clinton and her supporters. When people were calling her whore, pimping her daughter. Now you want to pretend you are shocked! You hypocrite! Want to play nicey! What goes around comes around. Little to phoney, too little, too late. Paid Homobana blogger.

Comment by Slim Tyranny | 2008-06-19 10:02:02

Stop with the homophobic name-calling, thanks.

Comment by Jeremiah God Damn AmeriKKKa Wright | 2008-06-19 11:00:57

Slim i think Barry need his nob polished some more. Run along now.

 

Comment by WildChild | 2008-06-19 16:01:35

but it can’t be homophobic. BOBO hearts dick.

 
 

Comment by david | 2008-06-19 10:04:29

Not sure how you know anything about me or my reactions to what happened in the primaries. I am simply saying that I find this thread dissapointing. I find this type of discourse dissapointing. I have yet to be anything but rational and calm. Why is it no one else is able to engage me in the same manner?

 
 
 

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 10:32:32

yeah, go John SENILE McBush, the biggest flip flopper in humankind.

maybe he was having a “senior” moment when he flip flopped.

Comment by Jeremiah God Damn AmeriKKKa Wright | 2008-06-19 11:02:12

better Senile McBush

than

Bacrackhead Oblowme

 
 
 

Comment by stodghie | 2008-06-19 09:43:31

and how can you not take him seriously? how can you trust the media with this story? you can’t. i don’t know how true it is, but considering the downside, it needs to be considered. all transformational bullshit bloggers should too. but first stop drinking koolaid.

 

Comment by Psychosavant | 2008-06-19 09:50:03

Strange, you Obamabots were perfectly okay when Vanity Fair did a piece on Bill with anonymous sources. Gina Gershon even said that story wasn’t true and is going after Vanity Fair. Yet, Larry Sinclair who makes his claims by the light of day, and doesn’t hide from you radid kool aide drinkers. STrage taht that piece about Bill came out the week of the last primaries to put pressure on Hillary to concede. Talk about making someone’s spouse a target to get at them!

The Obama psuedo religious movement has so much in common with so many churches, it’s filled with hypocrites. The new kind of politics that preaches we should be better than that and above that kind of stuff, yet uses slimey tactics and Republican talking points against members of their own party.

Then you want to cry foul when people do the same back to you. Remember, do unto others as you’d have them do unto you. Oh, you can say, “Bill has a history of womanizing!” To which I counter, “Obama has a histoyr of drug use, which he has admitted to himself!”

And lest you be vain and think that Obama, if he were to dabble in gay sex on the down low, would surely choose someone better looking than Larry Sinclair, keep in mind that he was high.

Comment by Slim Tyranny | 2008-06-19 10:00:18

“Talk about making someone’s spouse a target to get at them!”

I hope you see the irony of criticizing (rightfully so) the Vanity Fair piece and its attack on a candidate’s spouse while on a blog that has targeted Michelle Obama with the non-existent “Whitey” tape.

I also hope you see the irony of criticizing (rightfully so) the rumor-mongering Vanity Fair piece while you yourself defend the Sinclair smear.

Here’s the truth — Clinton and Obama have BOTH been targets of unfair, slimy smears. This site has embraced the false attacks on Obama, but that’s just as wrong as other sites embracing the false attacks on Clinton.

Comment by Psychosavant | 2008-06-19 10:34:06

Oh, please, sweetie! It’s what goes around comes around. You all thought you could preach one thing and do another and nobody would catch on. A lot of us aren’t fans of the huggy feely bullshit school of St. Oprah, where we have to be the better people, after having been abused and done wrong. Sorry, some of us prefer revenge, it’s more cathartic. Payback’s a bitch as you are now learning. As that old drug commercial said, which Obama should have watched, ” I learned it by watching YOU!”

And don’t presume to lecture us, I HIGHLY doubt that you were off defending Bill and Hillary against all the crap that was taken out of context and told by anonymous sources. Try that do as I say , not as I do lecture on someon else , we recognize you all for the hypocrites that you are. We never pretended to be wanting a “new kind of politics”, we never went on about how it’s not red states or blue states, that we’re all Americans and wantd to make nicey nice with Republicans, your Messiah did all that.

And now, low and behold that some of us have decided that Obama is right and we’re going to vote for McCain, with our eyes wide open, it’s back to demonizing the Republicans again. LOL, you people truly do talk out both sides of your mouthes. No, you wanted to play a certain way during the primariy so we’ve adopted your tactics. Too bad, soooo sad.

 
 
 

Comment by Deep Truths | 2008-06-19 09:54:05

Larry J. you should do a follow up story on the anti-Clinton/porn site owner Parisi. His Whitehouse.com group was supposed to follow Sinclair’s press conference with LS’s lie detector data. They evidently were told to shut up because they produced no lie detector tests, nor did they answer any reporters questions.

Sinclair says that Whitehouse.com was given $750,000 to fabricate and distort LSs story.

No wonder BO is looking for campaign donations. He overspent in his payoff for lie ledger.

 

Comment by sarainitaly | 2008-06-19 10:09:38

I read on Greatwire that she won’t touch it because of Larry’s criminal past.

You know, but what *upstanding* citizen with no criminal past, a good job, and a family would come forward and admit to these events? It takes a LOT to do what Larry is doing, and it is a HUGE risk. A risk that many average *clean* citizens wouldn’t be willing to do.

The fact that Larry had a criminal past 20 years ago should be irrelevant. These accusation are from 10 years ago (9).

I also think it is funny that they are so *shocked* that LS has a criminal background, and therefore deem him unworthy.

But, Obama can hang out with Bill Ayers and Rezko and all is fine in Hopeville?

Also, people try to discredit Larry by saying he was a crack head (which he says he never did crack, but coke). But when does someone having a drug past make them unworthy of human kindness, or make them worthless? Robert Downy Jr. has struggled with a drug past, as has my cousin. Addictions don’t make people unworthy.

Obama has a drug past, and wants us to crown him POTUS, but Obamabots want to discredit LS because he did drugs?

Also, they try to discredit Larry by saying he has a brain tumor…. Well, my brother in law had a brain tumor and he is normal. And a worthy human being.

Comment by david | 2008-06-19 10:25:05

He’s a felon! Why does that keep getting redacted when we talk about him.

“The fact that Larry had a criminal past 20 years ago should be irrelevant.”

Why does the felon get a pass and Obama doesn’t.

It’s all hate. That’s all I hear from these posts.

Gas is at record prices. Food prices are going up. Unemployment is up. People are dying by violent means all over the world. Iowa is under water. These are real issues. These are the issues that matter. What a waste of time all this hate is.

You can call me names. You can label me a shill for Obama. You can insuiate that I am getting paid to post these. All of it is untrue but that doesn’t even matter. If you don’t believe that we have bigger issues we should be concentrating on instead of wasting our time licking the wounds we supposedly suffered in a heated primary battle than you are all, ultimately, just in the way.

Comment by sarainitaly | 2008-06-19 10:31:00

so, just because he is a felon, it isn’t possible that he did drugs and performed oral sex on someone? sorry, if it is true, i find it completely relevant. and i know more about larry sinclair then I do about Obama. And personally, I find Larry far more credible.

 

Comment by NURSERATCHET | 2008-06-19 10:32:22

SIR: THERE IS NO BIGGER ISSUE THAN WHAT LARRY SINCLAIR STANDS FOR, WHICH IS TRUTH! WHAT POSSIBLY COULD BE MORE IMPORTANT TO THIS COUNTRY THAT TO BE SURE IT’S LEADERSHIP IS NOT PLACED IN THE HANDS OF BARACK OBAMA!

Comment by david | 2008-06-19 10:37:46

Since when did a known felon become the beacon for truth in this country?

Please, don’t yell.

 

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 10:47:38

no bigger issue? hmmmmmmmmmmmm……

unending occupation of iraq?

healthcare?

high gas prices?

OBL still on the lam and sending love messages to his followers?

middle classs tax relief?

oh, I forgot. Larry Sinclair’s baseless accusations are the single most important issue we face today.

Comment by sarainitaly | 2008-06-19 10:50:14

I believe she said *truth* was the most important issue.

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 10:57:01

uh, larry sinclair and truth don’t go in the same sentence.

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-06-19 11:08:08

And they didn’t. “Endless occupation of Iraq” and “truth” don’t go in the same sentence, either.

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 11:18:19

oh my bad…we are still fighting a war in Iraq….after 6 years when it was supposedly Mission Accomplished after a month.

go figure.

Comment by WildChild | 2008-06-19 15:54:50

Word on the street is we are still in Iraq because BOBO kept funding it

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Comment by Steve | 2008-06-19 12:19:49

David, Stop with Mr. Nicey. I am a Core Dem, my family and friends are all Dems. We are voting for McCain. In fact we are organizing other Dems.. You better really look around you because you are going to find that this is happening across the country. We are tired of your, “look at our gas prices”. Well you know the Dems have been in Congress for a while, what have they done? Our party has gone off the deep end.titled way to left..stole the election. Homobana, nothing against gays wants to bring a gun…give me a break, this from the candidate of change. Crap! The only house he is going to get, is the one with bars, he will join his good Bud, Syrian born Tony Rezko, and he can rejoin his Trinity of Hell.

Comment by david | 2008-06-19 12:43:43

Um…what?

I am truly sorry that bringing up an issue like gas prices fatigues you. You seem to have more than enough energy to spout hatred toward anyone with an opinion different than yours. I tried. I tried to engage the fringe on this site in a meaningful way. It seems beyond most of you to see past the nose on your face.

“Homobana, nothing against gays wants to bring a gun…”

I have no idea what this means. How can you inject homophobic rhetoric into the discussion and promptly nullify it. What are you so afraid of? All I hear are innuendos.

Tell the truth. Did you vote for Bush in ‘04?

 

Comment by Whitey | 2008-06-20 05:10:21

Yes! Vote for McCain! FIGHT THE POWER!

If you want to convince your friends and family to vote for this hero, this video is a great introduction to this American man of character.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Euu_DMhsXQo

 
 
 

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 10:38:57

so your equate your brother in law with the likes of convicted felon and habitual liar, Larry Sinclair.

sweeeeeeeeeeet!!!!!!

Comment by sarainitaly | 2008-06-19 10:46:10

no, but to try to discredit someone on the basis that they have a brain tumor is ridiculous.

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 10:51:29

oh yeah, nevermind the fact that they could discredit that by pointing out that Sinclair…

… is a convicted felon with a long rap sheet,

….. has already failed polygraph tests regarding these claims,

…. and has no credible evidence to back up his claim.

oh wait, they already did.

Comment by sarainitaly | 2008-06-19 10:58:25

what is not credible about his evidence? hotel reciepts, phone numbers, name of the limo driver, proof he attended tha graduation… all that is missing is a blue dress. had Larry intended to set Obama up, like Monica seemed to do, he could have hung on to his wardrobe…

why is it that the media runs wth unsubstantiated claims against McCain and Bill (vanity fair) but the Obama loving media won’t touch larry?

and why is it so hard to believe? Larry Craig trolls mens bathrooms and Jim McGreevy trolls interns, and priests and ministers get caught all the time. Why are you so SURE that Obama never went on the *down low*?

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 11:11:21

all that evidence equates to zilch. i have already looked at it on the fella’s website.

there is nothing in it that would substantiate his claims. go see for yourself.

but hey, if u want to give this fella the benefit of the doubt, more power to you.

Comment by sarainitaly | 2008-06-19 11:34:31

That thing that freaks me out is that you give so much benefit of the doubt to obama.

 
 
 
 
 

Comment by sarainitaly | 2008-06-19 10:48:37

and how do you know that Larry is lying? what proof do you have that larry is lying about Obama?

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 10:53:20

i always thought people were innocent until proven guilty in this country?

maybe i was wrong.

Comment by sarainitaly | 2008-06-19 11:01:19

i’m not convicting Obama. I am saying that Larry has a right to state his case. The media/law has the job to investigate. Larry has the right to make his charges. Obama has the right to sue him for defamation of character, if it is unture.

But, have you ever considered, what if it is true?

 

Comment by sarainitaly | 2008-06-19 11:02:35

andyou never answered me. how do you know larry is lying?

 
 
 
 
 

Comment by M. N. | 2008-06-19 10:22:53

Larry,

The only thing I’d like to say is that I’m deeply saddened to see someone of your intelligence and analytic capacity resorting to blog entries of this nature. Yes, you invited us to judge the merits of the accusation for ourselves, but did you ever stop to ask whether there is a case to judge in the first place? This just isn’t what I came to expect from someone who repeatedly demonstrated a keen ability to call bullshit for what it is; who correctly anticipated the surge in late 2006 almost two months before the strategy was announced; and who spent months showing us how to make good, informed decisions based on strong empirical evidence backed by sound methodologies, to name only a few issues.

You were spot-on when you called out David Brooks for peddling crap and for indicting the Bush administration on national television whenever the need arose. That you’ve now sunk to the level of behavior you once (seemingly) abhorred is overwhelmingly depressing.

 

Comment by Dave_Not_For_Obama | 2008-06-19 10:24:15

Does anybody(Obamabots mainly) believe a word that comes out of Obama’s mouth?

Do you Obamabots really deep in your heart believe Obama knew nothing about Rezko being a crook BEFORE Obama did the house deal with Rezko? I mean come on, it was all over the Chicago papers BEFORE Obama did the house deal in June 20005.

Did Obama miss this news March 2005, lol?
http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/rezko/826812,CST-NWS-rezkofile031820.article

Larry Sinclair’s allegations don’t seem so far fetched when taken in context of Obama’s past behavior.

The truth will come out, God help us let it be before Nov 2008.

As a footnote: Is a man more inclined to be gay or bisexual when his father has not been in his life, such as Obama’s situation. Obama did extensively write about his father not being there, interesting to be sure.

 

Comment by OBAMAISATERRORIST | 2008-06-19 10:30:14

You Obamabots sicken me! I have neve before in my life witnessed a more corrupt, craven, drug-addicted, hypocritical politican than Barack HUSSEIN Obama. This is a man who clearly has the stuff in him to mastermind things like…oh I don’t know…hijacking a couple planes and ramming them INTO OUR BUILDINGS!!!

We will NEVER forget 9/11! Your boy Osama…oops, Obama, sorry silly me tee hee…will destroy our great land and country if he is elected.

you people think the attacks on Billary were bad?! Wait till you see what the Obamoids do to a war hero, a former POW!!

They are infiltrating our country from the inside, folks. Wake up. The day Obama is elected is the day we kiss our collective asses good bye. That poor man Sinclair is just the FIRST victim of Hussein Osama’s gestapo tactics. BELIEVE IT!!

Comment by Slim Tyranny | 2008-06-19 10:41:06

These kind of hateful, bigoted attacks on Obama are shameful. I wish more of the Clinton supporters would denounce them (and calling the Clintons “Billary” leads me to believe that this commenter would attack Clinton with the same amount of vitriol if she were up against McCain in the general election).

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-06-19 11:09:40

Your transparent mock outrage is pathetic.

 

Comment by Steve | 2008-06-19 12:41:33

I’m a Clinton supporter and I approve this message!

 
 

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 10:42:13

well maybe u can move to Canada when Obama become President Elect in November:)

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-06-19 11:11:24

Maybe Obama can become PM of Canada since his citizenship is in question until he provides his BC, but we know through his father he is a Commonwealth citizen.

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 11:15:08

i hear the republicans nominated a citizen from Panama…Juan McCain.

 
 
 
 

Comment by samb | 2008-06-19 10:30:20

Maybe this story is not true, But there are more facts that are true. Does McCAIN have a unibomer living down the street from him, Does he refer to blacks as typical black people. Does he go to a Church that puts down the United States of America. These things have happened..

 

Comment by Vnd | 2008-06-19 10:36:52

The computer part of the polygraph evidently showed Sinclair was being truthful at least about the drug allegations.

He really seems to believe it happened; I don’t know why journalists are not checking it out — or at least doing research to discover if Obama was involved in any of these sorts of activities through the late 90’s.

It doesn’t seem like it’s an impossible task to discover whether there is even the slightest bit of truth to the allegations.

People just have to do their jobs. This is a very possible president we’re talking about here.

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 10:59:18

journalists have all become pundits. the pay is better.

Comment by ulahane | 2008-06-19 11:01:39

Sadly true.

 

Comment by Jeremiah God Damn AmeriKKKa Wright | 2008-06-19 11:11:01

does it pay better than trolling the net for Bacrack Oblowme?

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 11:21:36

r u always this unoriginal?

really, quite sad. even my dog could have come up with a better line.

Comment by LauraInCali | 2008-06-19 15:51:46

Come on Nick now your dog speaks to you? That
was pretty weak too. All you ever say is “u r quite sad.” Come up with something better.

 
 
 
 
 

Comment by Garrett Kenyon | 2008-06-19 10:57:54

This is hilarious. The fact that you post this completely discredits your blog. This guy has been proven to be a liar – and his 27-year criminal record shows him to be adroit and addicted to deception. This is a sad, sick man – I really hope he gets help. The fact that you idiots plant your political ambitions (hopeless though they may be) on the ramblings of a sociopathic compulsive liar show just how far you’ve fallen. You right-wingers have lost your party not by not having anonymous fellatio and smoking crack in limos with ex-cons – but by greed, poor management, hatred for anyone who looks or lives differently, poor grasp of world issues, and general confusion about what makes America the greatest country on earth. Thank God you’re about to lose all power in Washington. Now you can all retreat to your bunkers in the sticks live off jelly preserves for the next decade while the rest of us get on with the business of pulling America back from the brink.

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 11:02:55

this is how desperate these people have become.

quite sad.

Comment by ulahane | 2008-06-19 11:06:32

Read the threats by the fake SusanUNpc to see how desperate your side is. (your side, not you personally)

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-06-19 11:12:20

but Nick Fury is a sad POS nonetheless.

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 11:22:59

weep…weep….cry me a river…lol!!!!!!!!!!!!

by the way, Hope Floats was a terrible movie.

 
 

Comment by Jeremiah God Damn AmeriKKKa Wright | 2008-06-19 11:17:10

Nick Fury is pretty desperate. You should look at his posting history and frequency.

I wonder if he will have the balls to show up here after Obama tanks in november.

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 11:25:49

u actually look at posting history and frequency?

do u also watch paint dry on a wall to amuse yourself?

man, u r such a tool…………lol!!!!!!!

 
 
 
 
 

Comment by Garrett Kenyon | 2008-06-19 10:59:05

The fact that you post this completely discredits your blog. This guy has been proven to be a liar – and his 27-year criminal record shows him to be adroit and addicted to deception. This is a sad, sick man – I really hope he gets help. The fact that you idiots plant your political ambitions (hopeless though they may be) on the ramblings of a sociopathic compulsive liar show just how far you’ve fallen. You right-wingers have lost your party not by not having anonymous fellatio and smoking crack in limos with ex-cons – but by greed, poor management, hatred for anyone who looks or lives differently, poor grasp of world issues, and general confusion about what makes America the greatest country on earth. Thank God you’re about to lose all power in Washington. Now you can all retreat to your bunkers in the sticks live off jelly preserves for the next decade while the rest of us get on with the business of pulling America back from the brink.

 

Comment by uncoverthetruth | 2008-06-19 11:03:36

Wow…so now Obama is having people arrested for holding a press conference??? Brings the Chicagoland tactics to a new level. Have the Chicago police done ANYTHING to investigate the Young murder?

 

Comment by Jeremiah God Damn AmeriKKKa Wright | 2008-06-19 11:08:47

wow, the paid obama trolls Nick Fury and SLim Tyranny are working overtime on this thread.

of the 750+ comments, nearly half of them are from these two douchebags alone.

I hope the obama campaign doesnt run out of money paying them their 25 cents a post.

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-06-19 11:14:51

They should have their pay docked since all of their comments are either one comment or the other repeated into infinity. Between the tw of them, it’s like being trapped in a hall of mirrors.

Comment by Jeremiah God Damn AmeriKKKa Wright | 2008-06-19 11:21:17

yeah between the ageism sexism and race baiting they spew, i am surprised they have not been banned yet. But then this isnt Puffingtontoilet where dissent is squashed and dissenters banned.

Of course the closer we get to november the more i expect they will cross the ine of acceptable posting practice.

I cant wait to read their hate filled rants on November 4th eve when the numbers come in and McCain is declared the POTUS.

THe moaning QQing and vile hate filled racist diareah that they will be spewing should be legendary.

 
 

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 11:28:20

i would troll for John SENILE McBush, but he doesn’t pay much.

no surprise since he has been having a hard time convincing donors to throw their hard earned money away on a losing campaign.

Obama 2008

Comment by Jeremiah God Damn AmeriKKKa Wright | 2008-06-19 11:37:17

Nick i truly hope you have something else in your life besides verbally licking barry’s balls ever chance you get. If not you are going to face a very depressing november.

Here let me help you get interested in other things that would be good for you:

http://www.licksomeoneelsesballsbesidesbarrys.com

Comment by Nick Fury | 2008-06-19 11:39:41

apparently, u must lick balls.

sorry, but i will pass.

Comment by Jeremiah God Damn AmeriKKKa Wright | 2008-06-19 11:50:33

COmeon Nick its ok to admit you like having barry’s testiucles firmly intserted in your mouth.

We don’t discriminate here like they do at camp koolaid.

Comment by Mel | 2008-06-19 11:53:23

Nick Fury is really Lick Fury in disguise.lol

 
 
 
 
 
 

Comment by Sugar | 2008-06-19 11:10:42

All of you Obamatrons can close your eyes and cover your ears all you want, but you know deep down inside that there is some truth to this. Obama has already admitted to using cocaine himself. I don’t care one way or another if he’s bi-sexual (which is highly likely). I do care about him using CRACK! And, the American people have the right to know. If Michelle can deal with her man being a switch hitter, that’s her business.

Comment by Jeremiah God Damn AmeriKKKa Wright | 2008-06-19 11:24:33

The question really isn’t did he or didn’t he.

The question is how bad does he have to lose to ensure he never attempts a run at the white house again.

American doesnt need his new style of chicago pay for play sleaze-otics running our country.

we can’t afford it.

 
 

Comment by MPR | 2008-06-19 12:01:08

Let’s be honest. Obama has 0 accomplishments in public service as a doing nothing “present” state of ILL senator and 0 accomplishments as a doing nothing US Senator.

He has never crossed the aisle…as Hillary as to accomplish needed important work!

Frankly, he is a disgrace to the Democratic Party.

We all know he is unfit to be our Commander-in-Chief.

He is a marxist, bigoted elitest. We all know that.

But to be fair to Obama…he is an accomplished LIAR.
Give due when due is earned.

There is so much that will come out on this empty suit.

 

Comment by Sugar | 2008-06-19 12:07:08

Michelle Obama calling BHO her baby daddy. lol

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VnMrJwUCZDk

 

Comment by Alice Paul | 2008-06-19 12:18:59

I have waited many years for this election to come around. I live in Florida and always thought the Dems were the good guys the Republicans the bad. I always laughed when my republican friends spoke of the liberal media etc. Now I’m starting to see what they mean.What disturbs me more than Obama is the money men behind him and their ideology. I even believe they may be manipulating the markets to bring oil prices up and the dollar low so that we would elect whatever candidate they put in. I think they underestimated the American people!

 

Comment by mooaks | 2008-06-19 12:21:00

I just hope that Obama doesn’t have a tatoo in a unusual place. If he does have one or some other mark, perhaps an unusual birth mark that he identifies, Obama is a cooked goose. Sorry for the closing sentence pun.

 

Comment by Mandelay | 2008-06-19 12:30:51

Has anyone heard what has happened to Larry Sinclair? Is he still in jail? Does anyone have any news? I did look at the Sinclair blog and saw guest postings by “citizenwells,” but I wonder what might happen to Sinclair while we’re not looking.

 

Comment by Pete | 2008-06-19 12:32:53

Still waiting for the “whytie tape,” you fool!

lol

 

Comment by Indyvoter | 2008-06-19 12:51:03

Seems to me the resistance to negative facts about Obama has to do with those who have hitched themselves to his star and not about reality.

We saw this with G Flowers and Monica L during the Bill Clinton years.

The story rings true to me, but it doesn’t fit the marketing image the public is being fed. This man is a tough sell for the people and it won’t get any easier. The Dems are making a big mistake in nominating him.

 

Comment by Steve | 2008-06-19 12:57:37

The Tony Rezko trial, Stuart Levine testifies that there were on-going(several years), weekend drug parties in the Purple Room. Married men, these were week-end drug parties, Special K, Crack-meth, Cocaine
with all male friends? Uhmmmm both Levine and Rezko contribute over $250,000k to Homobana’s campaigns. Personal buds with from 12-14 yrs. Yes, Larry Sinclair’s story needs to put in context of Obama’s associations for the past twenty years. Than there is William Ayers, who is also an associate of Bo, who launched his Illinois state senate run from his home. Who himself admitted in his book, participated in Homosexual relationships.

 

Comment by h8gop | 2008-06-19 13:12:43

Larry.. you are a tool. A screw driver to be exact. Take a look in the mirror and you will see a pathetic POS that needs to post lies to appear to be important

Comment by Indyvoter | 2008-06-19 13:41:48

The only one pathetic here is you. Name calling does not add to any discussion.

 
 

Comment by Mandelay | 2008-06-19 13:24:47

Hey look, if Bill and Bernadine can get away with killing two state troopers in upstate NY, why shouldn’t Larry Sinclair go free. Now. Free Larry Now!!!!!

For some really interesting stuff on the real Ayers/Obama connections, go to this story, “Gateway Pundit: The Obama-Ayers Connection: The Big Lie” posted under “Best of the Blogs” on realclearpolitics.com:

http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2008/06/obama-ayers-connection-big-lie.html

 

Comment by doctorate | 2008-06-19 13:34:06

There is nothing inconsistent about Larry Sinclair’s story, and his past crimes revolve around financial issues more than “deceit” per se as editorialized by Politico.

Financial gain does not appear to be at the root of Sinclair’s motivation in sharing his Barack Obama tale; and the story is inconsistent only as to timing with remarks Obama himself has made in his books and elsewhere about prior drug usage. Thus, it is unclear why anyone would find any of it even moderately remarkable. Whether Sinclair makes the perfect witness or not is irrelevant to this discussion, and is in fact a red herring; it is much more important that Obama be credible and well vetted as a future presidential candidate. This is NOT a trial in a court of law.

The presumptive Democratic nominee himself has admitted to cocaine usage; and a late-May Enquirer article discusses their investigation into his potential heroin usage, alluding to a reference in Dreams from My Father. Stuart Levine, a close associate of Obama pal and fundraiser Tony Rezko, admitted at trial to a long-time drug problem – ranging from cocaine to “Special K,” to ecstasy to crystal meth – and hosting regular drug parties with male friends. Such were the crowds Obama associated with in Chicago. Folks connected to the gay community there have also confirmed that Obama is known in certain circles to be on the “down-low,” and there are other corroborating statements circulating about such matters.

While Sinclair is not a prosecutor’s perfect witness, such a beast rarely exists. In a courtroom, defense attorneys use the “credibility” factor to discredit just about anyone making any type of accusation against anyone regarding anything at all. That is their job. In addition, when the facts and history don’t contradict a story, the defense attorney has no other choice but to go after the victim or accuser’s credibility/character. These distracting tactics in criminal defense produce such absurd results as the acquittal of O. J. Simpson over ill-fitting gloves, or R. Kelly walking away from child pornography charges due to the quality of a video recording. If Sinclair had the funds available to these two gentlemen, surely his offensive rap sheet would have been expunged by now.

Since we are not in a courtroom, but rather American citizens trying to elect the best possible and most qualified leader of the free world in an age of media apathy and corporate control, it would be interesting to hear how Greta Van Susteren and others envision Sinclair’s story would sound if it were undeniably true. The timing of Donald Young’s murder and how it appears to be connected to Sinclair’s revelations to Obama is certainly worth examination by the Fourth Estate. Taking Sinclair’s past out of the equation, what would an undeniably true version of this story look and sound like? Without requiring evidence that would never be available under such circumstances, what would be different about Sinclair’s story, if it happened to be absolutely and undeniably true?

Comment by david | 2008-06-19 13:51:17

You’re quoting the Enquirer? Seriously.

His credibility as a witness is irrelevant? So we are suppossed to listen to every nutcase that comes out of the woodwork regardless of their past deeds or associations?

His past crimes don’t revolve around deceit?

What planet do you come from? How is forging checks and using stolen credit cards not deceit?

I will ask this one more time. Why is it that Sinclair gets a pass on his past misdeeds and associations and should be taken at his word but Obama gets villified and called a liar for his?

Hypocrites much?

 

Comment by rosered56 | 2008-06-21 00:55:18

 
 

Comment by Sugar | 2008-06-19 13:38:29

Ohhhh, so now they are using my name? lol Attention, there is a FAKE “Sugar” in the house. I think I have made it clear how I feel about this stuff, so any foolishness that you guys see written by “me” is just that. FAKE. Grow up. This only makes me want to vote McCain TWICE!

 

Comment by T.P. Munrab | 2008-06-19 13:53:03

Hello friends! I am a very trustworthy person even though I have been swindling grannies for three decades! I have reformed now and I come to bring you THE TRUTH about Obama! All I ask is that you send me $50,000 in unmarked bills. Please leave in a duffel bag behind the toilet in the third stall from the back in the west lower-level Men’s Room at Grand Central Station at precisely 10:05 PM tonight!

Make it $75,000 and I’ll throw in a videotape of Michelle Obama saying “you,” by which she is obviously accusing all white people of keeping black folks down!

Thank you and God bless!

 

Comment by vibrolux | 2008-06-19 13:53:59

Wow, Larry. I used to think that you provided a credible voice on issues, especially security related issues. Then came the whitey bruhaha. And now this.

You have become as incredible as your whitey tape, as unbelievable as your fugitive Mr. Sinclair.

What’s next? Subbing for Rush? After all, he was laughed out of KC before finding a bigger stage for his lies and innuendo. Maybe thats all you need, too.

 

Comment by layla | 2008-06-19 14:12:16

For goodness sakes, people – this Larry sinclair story is much more deadly than michelle calling people whitey. Why would he keep at it, all this time, if it is not true. He did not even try to blackmail obama first with this, because that would have surely been reported by the press. Why is he persistent? Because it is true, and obmama is running for the leader of the country. Do you not get that people? He will be our president. That means nothing to you? I care about this country I live in. Bush was a disaster and barack will be an even bigger disaster.

Sinclair has never quit, not once on trying to get this information out public. Why would that be, unless it is true? Just because obamabots don’t want to believe does not make it so! He is being upfront about his medical and criminal history. What else do you want? Even if he HAS real proof, it won’t be accepted by the MSM.
Thanks to NPC for having the balls to put his story out there, if it had been hillary or McCain up against Sinclair, the MSM would be screaming about it months ago, and you know it.

As as for him being arrested? More revenge. Is there not anyone not on barack’s payroll??? Sinclair was in full sight during the May 31 dnc meeting with the delegates. Why did he not get arrested then??? Eh?

 

Comment by Don | 2008-06-19 15:31:28

It’s amazing that Obama is spending campaign money to pay little boys to come to this site to try to cover for him. You know there must be something to the Sinclair story after reading the Obama campaign taliking points here.

Too bad none of them address the issue of the 3 murdered gay people from Obama/Wright’s church. What exactly have the Chicago police done about investigating that? Has the media asked a single question of the Chicago police dept about the investigation?

If this was McCain’s or Hillary’s church you know it would be front page news.

 

Comment by Phil | 2008-06-19 16:01:38

Sinclair’s history is damning; he _might_ be a pathological liar (they can be very convincing)….BUT he raised a legitimate question. What about the cellphone calls? Barack? Back to you.

 

Comment by BA | 2008-06-19 16:02:32

The obvious purpose of this press conference was either to introduce the limo driver as corroboration or to reveal his identity to a larger audience – his family name was known for some time – so as to facilitate searches.

This kind of story goes nowhere without corroboration. Until the limo driver shows up, it is impossible to venture an opinion on the merits of the case.

 

Comment by Duck | 2008-06-19 17:47:40

Larry (Johnson… not be confused with Larry Sinclair :grin: )
PLEASE REPOST THIS ARTICLE !!!!

With over 800 comments…
People are interested…

 

Comment by Grumpy Code Monkey | 2008-06-19 18:38:33

Hmph. Commented on this twice, but those posts have since been removed. I think I know why; we’ll see if this one sticks around.

The reporters at the presser thought Sinclair was full of shit. I invite you to read the Telegraph’s take on it. In short, Sinclair provided little relevant detail, no corroborating evidence or testimony, and had little credibility to begin with.

From the article:

On the details that mattered, Mr Sinclair was vague. He claims to have spent the evening with Mr Obama in the back of a limousine, and then time in his hotel room the day afterwards. Yet there were none of those little details—the wallpaper, the drinks they drank, the things they saw—which are usually deployed by people trying to convince others of their veracity.

What did they talk about? “Pretty much nothing.” For an entire evening?

When one journalist asked at what time on each of the days he had met Mr Obama, answer came there none. “I know where you’re coming from with that,” he said. Yes, testing your claims, as you invited us to do. “I cannot provide that to you,” he said.

and

On the details that didn’t matter, Mr Sinclair was commendably detailed. He knew off the top of his head and without recourse to notes that the press club event had set him back $4,126.89. This shows a bizarre facility for recall not in evidence on the substance of his claims.

He admitted that he is unemployed and lives off disability benefits. There would seem to be a discrepancy between his personal poverty and the cost of the event, the dossiers and the glossy press passes. But no, Mr Sinclair assured us, all the money had come from small donations to his website.

There is a very serious point to all this. Mr Sinclair became visibly unsettled and irritable when questioned about the source of his funds.

If this one doesn’t stick around, then the problem isn’t what I think it is.

 

Comment by will | 2008-06-19 19:16:39

From: [Redacted]
To: [Redacted]
Subject: WHO IS BARACK OBAMA?
There are many things people do not know about BARACK OBAMA. It is every American’s duty to read this message and pass it along to all of their friends and loved ones.
Barack Obama wears a FLAG PIN at all times. Even in the shower.

Barack Obama says the PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE every time he sees an American flag. He also ends every sentence by saying, “WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL.” Click here for video of Obama quietly mouthing the PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE in his sleep.
A tape exists of Michelle Obama saying the PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE at a conference on PATRIOTISM.
Every weekend, Barack and Michelle take their daughters HUNTING.
Barack Obama is a PATRIOTIC AMERICAN. He has one HAND over his HEART at all times. He occasionally switches when one arm gets tired, which is almost never because he is STRONG.
Barack Obama has the DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE tattooed on his stomach. It’s upside-down, so he can read it while doing sit-ups.
There’s only one artist on Barack Obama’s iPod: FRANCIS SCOTT KEY.
Barack Obama is a DEVOUT CHRISTIAN. His favorite book is the BIBLE, which he has memorized. His name means HE WHO LOVES JESUS in the ancient language of Aramaic. He is PROUD that Jesus was an American.
Barack Obama goes to church every morning. He goes to church every afternoon. He goes to church every evening. He is IN CHURCH RIGHT NOW.
Barack Obama’s new airplane includes a conference room, a kitchen, and a MEGACHURCH.
Barack Obama’s skin is the color of AMERICAN SOIL.
Barack Obama buys AMERICAN STUFF. He owns a FORD, a BASEBALL TEAM, and a COMPUTER HE BUILT HIMSELF FROM AMERICAN PARTS. He travels mostly by FORKLIFT.
Barack Obama says that Americans cling to GUNS and RELIGION because they are AWESOME.

 

Comment by Subliminability | 2008-06-19 19:17:50

Larry Johnson, you’re really despicable.

 

Comment by kaye | 2008-06-20 01:21:12

The idiots who keep harping on Larry about the Whitey Tape obviously know absolutely nothing about political strategy. I know for a fact that the RNC has a tape and will be releasing it after the DNC convention, most likely in Oct, when it can have the biggest impact on the general election.

 

Comment by kaye | 2008-06-20 01:28:37

Also, with as much detail as Mr. Sinclari presented in his statements about the alleged events then not only should the MSM being investigating these allegations, but have a journalist duty to do so. Haveing been a former longtime journalist I am appalled at how the MSM has conducted itself. Also why isn’t law enforcement looking into the allegations since obviously crimes were commited. You would think Obama would happily cooperate if indeed the allegations are false. Which makes me think there is some credibility to these allegations since Obama has done nothing to provide documentation to prove otherwise

 

Comment by Garrett Kenyon | 2008-06-20 01:55:34

Kaye,

I can see why you are a “former” journalist. Let me tell you something, Kaye, a real journalist should understand that you don’t simply give credence to every whackjob out there making allegations about famous people. Remember the stalker who thought Jay Leno was sending him secret messages on the Tonight Show? Police get millions of claims like this every year. Anyone can make allegations. Why should anybody be forced to refute allegations made with absolutly NO PROOF WHATSOEVER besides the words of a known ex-convict liar? The fact that you half-wits are so eager to believe this stuff speaks volumes about your intelligence. Haven’t you read that whitehouse.com GAVE MR. SINCLAIR A POLYGRAPH WHICH HE FAILED??????? Polygraphs are not junk science. They are 99.8% accurate. They are not allowed in court simply because they are not 100% accurate.

Here’s some facts. Cindy McCain has admitted PUBLICLY to having stolen Vicodin and Percocet from her own charity. John McCain divorced his wife and mother of two of his children for Cindy (an 18-yr old heiress) after she was in an accident which left her disfigured. Those things are matters of public record which anyone who knows how to Google can verify. Or how about this:

The economy is the worst it’s been since the Great Depression. Almost 5,000 American heroes have been killed in Iraq and tens of thousands wounded (not to mention the hundreds of thousands of Iraqi women and children killed) by Bush’s war. Our Constitution has been completely trashed. Oil prices are the highest ever. Millions of Americans can’t afford healthcare. Innocent people are being detained and tortured by our country. The entire world now looks down on America. Our country has gone from having a surplus (under Clinton) to having a crippling national debt. YOU DON”T HAVE TO LOOK FOR PSYCHOPATHIC COMPULSIVE LIARS to find the people responsible for this. If you voted for Bush ‘04 and plan on voting for McCain ‘08 – simply look in the mirror.

And now where’s your righteous outrage? You people are freaking ridiculously stupid. Enjoy your obvlivion. We can save the country without you.

 

Comment by JS | 2008-06-21 01:28:22

I can’t believe these Sinclair worshipers… It just boggles my mind that they can eat this shit and call it candy.

I wish I knew this crazy nutsucker’s secret for making these idiots support him so fervently and donate so much time and money to his cause, despite the complete lack of evidence or any semblance of credibility. I could rule the world with such a fanatical army under my command!

 

Comment by jazzfan | 2008-06-21 13:51:01

Mitch and Nan took Mr Sinclair out of action.Everyone who visted that web site knew larry was going to jail.No one but a fool would hold a p.c.when they were wanted everywhere.

 

Comment by Billy Batts | 2008-06-24 13:33:21

Why should the burden of proof be with Obama and not with a convicted felon? Kaye says she “knows for a fact” that a tape exists without the credibility of sources. That may explain why she is a “former journalist”.

 

Pingback by No. They. Can’t. | 2008-06-30 15:26:06

[...] Presidential ambitions or Fox News ‘investigative reporting’ on various Obama rumors peddled by the likes of Larry Johnson, it’s no wonder it’s so difficult finding a rational debate on the [...]

 

Pingback by Another PUMA Conspiracy In the Making… | 2008-07-16 18:13:14

[...] but not limited to, the nonexistant Michelle Obama ‘whitey’ tape, the now-defunct Larry Sinclair gay sex and drug scandal, the fraudulent Hawii birth certificate conspiracy/cover up. And now they bring us [drum roll [...]

 

Pingback by Reviving Hillary | 2008-08-01 19:54:47

[...] destroy Obama’s candidacy. They are responsible for selling some of the most ridiculous and poisonous rumors out there- none of which has turned out to have any relation to the truth. Stumble [...]

 

Pingback by The McCain “Hey, What’s That Over There?” Strategy | 2008-10-05 16:16:42

[...] Inseparable in fact- I heard they are gay lovers who do lots of drugs and, ummm, oh, wait, that was Larry Sinclair. Never mind. [...]

 

Pingback by Hear That Flushing Sound, Larry Johnson? | 2008-11-27 23:25:08

[...] then was decidedly pro-Hillary during the primaries to being a hysterical, conspiracy-crazed Obama smear-site. Thank God Hillary had the ethics and good sense to distance herself from this type of poisoning of [...]

 

Comment by kaylee | 2008-11-28 04:40:53

Larry Sinclair has not went away. He is featured in this weeks Globe magazine!!

http://larrysinclair-0926.blogspot.com/

 

Comment by KintheNorthwest | 2008-11-28 04:54:59

Interesing…..
I wonder how long it will be before other people start looking into it, maybe as more than just rumors?

 

Comment by vaproto | 2009-08-02 18:01:55

The Chicago political machine is as corrupt as it gets in politics. Drugs, kickbacks, payoffs and probably a lot worse goes on in the “Windy City”.

Obama was a nobody with no money (as he admitted in his book) taken by we don’t know who from a mediocre West Coast college to New York’s prestigious and expensive Columbia U. After graduation, he was taken to Chicago where he had no family or “connections”.

Within an amazingly short time, he had LOTS of money, a cushy job, VIP connections, a law degree from Harvard and a seat first in the Illinois Senate and then the US Senate. Before he finished his first term, he was President.

Obama has accomplished nothing. He has no “paper trail”. He has never run so much as a lemonade stand. He refuses to produce his birth records, his school records, his medical records or the old passport he used to visit Pakistan when he was at Occidental College.

And folks think that THIS story is unbelievable??? Unless Old Barry has Aladdin’s lamp, his story stinks to high heaven!

 

RSS Feed for This PostPost a Comment

Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)