Comments on: Lesson for the Day: Pumas Can Sneak Up on You

By: BigDog

BigDog — Sat, 28 Mar 2009 13:34:32 +0000

BigDog…

I am So Lucky That I found your blog and great articles. I will come to your blog often for finding new great articles from your blog.I am adding your rss feed in my reader Thank you…

By: Jerry Kennedy

Jerry Kennedy — Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:44:18 +0000

This is Wright on! How in the world did the general public overlook this very important list of cronies?

It is a sad sad situation at best Jimmy Carter’s second term and worse!

By: Melody

Melody — Sat, 28 Jun 2008 04:24:05 +0000

In the Nevada Caucus in January, the Unions not only endorsed BO, but they took pictures of every single person standing for Hillary throughout the state. Hillary won by a very small margin - people were crossing over to BO when the pictures started being taken. For the Convention, Hillary couldn’t get enough delegates to attend the State Convention.

By: j in TX

j in TX — Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:52:16 +0000

Your not missing it, everyone is trying to do the same thing … get Hillary elected. A new site is just starting for just the purpose you ask … go to http://www.hillaryclintonsupportteam.com The purpose is one point, one site for all, regardless of what other Hillary site you belong to. No one believes there are millions … this site wants to collect the names to show that this is not a game, along with doing several other things. I’m sure a few good suggestions will help.

Anyone can email me if they have questions… edkha@hot.rr.com

By: kris

kris — Tue, 24 Jun 2008 05:52:06 +0000

I see on the “Just see no deal” site a million blogs which are for the PUMA folks like me. However it seems like this is splintering the effort to organize the PUMA crowd. We need one common place on the web all PUMA supporters can aggregate our efforts to take effective action which can ensure Obama’s defeat. Is there such a place and Im missing it? Or the separate blogs is all that we have?

By: Marilyn Monohan-Hopkins

Marilyn Monohan-Hopkins — Mon, 23 Jun 2008 19:34:01 +0000

DOES ANYONE KNOW WHAT EXACTLY THIS IS ALL ABOUT?
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY

Jamie Ader vs Barack Obama

Defendant: OBAMA, BARACK

Additional Party: ADER, JAMIE MERLE, PLAINTIFF/TO BE PROTECTED-HARASMNT

Filing Date: 1/15/2008

Case Number: 1265766

Court: SANTA BARBARA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT

Filing Type: CIVIL

Case Type: CIVIL OTHER

County: SANTA BARBARA

State: CALIFORNIA

By: Marilyn Monohan-Hopkins

Marilyn Monohan-Hopkins — Mon, 23 Jun 2008 18:22:47 +0000

>>>OBAMA IS A POST TURTLE. WHAT’S A POST TURTLE?
Subj: FW: Post Turtle
While suturing a cut on the hand of a Texas Rancher whose hand had been caught in a gate while working cattle, the doctor struck up a conversation with the old man. Eventually, the topic got around to Obama and his bid for the presidency.
The old rancher said, Well, ya know, Obama is a ‘post turtle’.
Not being familiar with the term, the doctor asked, ‘What is a post turtle’?
The old rancher said, When you’re driving down a country road and you come across a fence post with a turtle balanced on top, that’s a ‘post turtle’.
The old rancher saw a puzzled look on the doctor’s face, so he continued to explain.

‘You know he didn’t get up there by himself, he sure as heck doesn’t belong up there, he doesn’t know what to do while he is up there and you just wonder what kind of an idiot put him there in the first place.’

By: Marilyn Monohan-Hopkins

Marilyn Monohan-Hopkins — Mon, 23 Jun 2008 18:19:31 +0000

Friends and Associates of Barack Hussein Mohammad Obama
William Ayers - American Terrorist
Raila Odinga - Cousin, Radical Islamist
Raul Reyes - Columbian Terrorist
Antonio Rezko - Muslim Slum Lord
Professor Khalidi - Muslim Terrorist Supporter
Reverend Wright - Racist Muslim Supporter/Preacher, Anti-American
Reverend James Meeks - Racist
Reverend Louis Farrakhan - Racist Nation of Islam / Faux Preacher
Reverend. Jesse Jackson - Racist - Anti-Semetic
Nadhmi Auchi - Muslim Billionaire
Sohaib Abassi - Muslim Millionaire
>>>AND THESE ARE JUST THE ONES WE KNOW ABOUT RIGHT NOW!! OBAMA NO DEAL!

By: Michael

Michael — Mon, 23 Jun 2008 17:57:32 +0000

“Instant Party Unity???”

Are you joking?

By: Will Bower

Will Bower — Mon, 23 Jun 2008 13:06:24 +0000

Pat! I love it! Might we post your cartoon at JustSayNODEAL.com?

Please let me know,

Will Bower
PUMA / Just Say NO DEAL

By: Akron

Akron — Mon, 23 Jun 2008 12:46:13 +0000

he won more pledged delegates - and that is it. And… he won those from a disproportional system that outweighs caucus votes. He did not win more votes and he only has the supers because they have been strong armed and threatened….

He won by winning 11 straight states in February. HRC won 500,000 more votes than him - and she won them in the electoral college states that count after March 1.

What I want is for the SD’s to realize they are voting for the weak candidate - to realize he was a flash in the pan. They are NOT going to do that because the whole thing has been rigged by Howard Dean … which means we have two corrupt parties and our democracy is a shambles.

By: Obama to Puma: Get Over it! « Not Your Sweetie

Obama to Puma: Get Over it! « Not Your Sweetie — Mon, 23 Jun 2008 00:14:39 +0000

[...] this graphic& article from No Quarter as [...]

By: Brush It Off

Brush It Off — Sun, 22 Jun 2008 22:54:16 +0000

Michelle Obama is now off limits Really!
Earlier this year when she was on the campaign
trailshe said this about Hillary. “If you can’t take
care of your own house, how can you take care of
the White House”.

She had better be careful she might have to eat
those words some time in August:)

By: Lynn

Lynn — Sun, 22 Jun 2008 22:34:11 +0000

PUMAs are fighting mad. Fortunately the media is now starting to question Obama the way they should have from the beginning. It took his reversal on a number of salient issues for that to come about though. PUMAPAC members are determined to teach the DNC a lesson.; namely, stop assuming we will support whatever you sandction. You, the DNC, are expected to fulfill our wishes, not us fulfill yours. You ignore us at your peril; the Democrats may go the way of the Whigs.

By: ShortTermer

ShortTermer — Sun, 22 Jun 2008 22:30:35 +0000

Larry, how do I send you a graphic that you would want to include on your site here?

shorttermerpuma@gmail.com

By: Tim

Tim — Sun, 22 Jun 2008 19:33:58 +0000

‘When I use a word… it means just what I CHOOSE it to mean, neither more nor less.’ (Humpty Dumpty)

Thus, in “Obama-speak,”

1. A commitment to public campaign financing is not binding when feeding the pig is more important than keeping one’s word. After all, this is the same guy who received a $60,000 contribution from George Soros for his Senate race, thanks to a loophole Soros found in the rules.

2. Surely, Obama didn’t really mean small-town, working class Americans cling to their religion and guns because they’re bitter. The problem must have been our failure to comprehend the nuances of his soaring rhetoric (hence, “What I should have said was…”).

3. So, if we thought we understood the meaning of “without preconditions,” apparently we didn’t. In Obama-speak, there’s a world of difference between “preconditions” and “preparation”.

4. And remember “I can no more disown him [Rev. Wright] than my own white grandmother?” Well, as it turns out, YES HE CAN!

5. So what if this barely-one-term senator has one of the worst records (20%) of missed votes (compared with Clinton’s 8% since Jan. of 2001). So what if he missed the 76-22 vote in Sept. of ‘07 designating the Iranian National Guards Corps a terrorist organization; after all, he did publish a strong objection to the decision on his Senate web page immediately thereafter…. Uh, wait, he’s recently begun to backpedal on that position, too.

6. Should it matter that in a 2004 interview he opposed Israel’s security fence, which since its contruction, has more than proven its efficacy? When did we last hear of a suicide bomber blowing himself up on a bus, in a Jerusalem coffee shop, pizzeria or a Tel-Aviv night club? Uh, he didn’t mean that statement, either.

And when, two weeks ago, he told AIPAC members that Jerusalem will remain the undevided capital of Israel, we must have heard wrong, because that’s not what he was saying last week.

So, given his “enormous emotional attachment and sympathy for Israel” (at least those were his words in a recent interview with The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg), why should supporters of the U.S.-Israel alliance worry that several of his foreign policy advisers are known chiefly for their anti-Israel and/or anti-Semitic views - e.g. Carter cohorts Anthony Lake and Zbigniew Bzrezinski (along with his son, Mark), Ivo Daalder and (formerly) Robert Malley. And, lest we forget the wrath incurred by John Kerry’s 2004 proposal to appoint Carter and James Baker as negotiators in the Middle East peace talks - which he subsequently blamed on his foreign policy advisers - that idea was actually the brainchild of Susan Rice…. That’s right, the same Susan Rice who’s now heading Obama’s foreign policy team. Oops.

7. And, since Obama seems to think that McCain’s pro-life position should be reason enough for pro-choice women to vote for him, ask yourself whether “pro-choice” should mean partial-birth abortions up to and including the third trimester. That’s where he stands - uh, stood - on this issue. Who knows?

Indeed, this lengthy entry confirms that Obama has a record - a record which should erase any doubt that he is “the candidate of CHANGE”. Who can deny his uncanny ability to change his mind, his positions and his commitments on a dime? And, if “words matter,” why should his WORD matter when something greater is at stake?

Therefore, if the RBC meeting on May 31st was not enough to persuade Democrats that our elected officials are thoroughly out of step with - or oblivious to - the will and welfare of their voters, their collective opposition to offshore drilling should. Personally, I’m fed up; I’ve finally printed out a voter registration form and am switching to Independent.

When you go to the polls in November - PLEASE DO! - keep two things in mind: first, a vote for McCain is the only real vote AGAINST Obama, and second, even if you have to hold your nose, a one-term McCain presidency can’t possibly be worse than two of Obama.

By: Steve

Steve — Sun, 22 Jun 2008 19:22:07 +0000

Ole Barky dosn’t get it, but wouldn’t you think the DNC and all CNN etc. etc. etc. paid pals would? but, wait, no, I guess not.

All Barky is doing is making easier for McCain.
He can’t hide the arrogance, aggression and stupidity.

I wish he’d stop trying to insult our intelligence.
No, not all Hillary Clinton supporters are women, no, we won’t fall in line and support him, and Yes, we will remember in November.

By: DaddysDarlin

DaddysDarlin — Sun, 22 Jun 2008 19:15:39 +0000

This blog isn’t long enough to list the inabilities of BO, nor is it long enough to list his racist friends, his criminal friends, his inexperience, his racist beliefs, his inability to speak from his heart, he needs a teleprompter. If one is speaking from the heart, it isn’t with a prepared speech, it is with an honest and heartfelt delivery, BO is incapable of this.
How many more times will you allow this man to flip flop on issues that are extremely important to the American people and our safety and security?
How many more excuses are you willing to make for this man? If you need to make excuses for his behavior, you might not be supporting a man with your moral standards.
BO in no way represents me or my views. He certainly does not represent my views morally, I don’t believe he is a moral man.
BO is willing to say and do anything to be president, Hillary was not, that is why Hillary is where she is, not releasing her delegates to BO because she knows he is not experienced enough to run this country.
With Hillary there is no question about her morality, her friendships or her beliefs. What you see with Hillary is what you get. She was unwilling to compromise herself or her supporters, that is why the DNC is pushing BO on us, they can control him, they cant control Hillary.
Hillary is a woman who has fought hard for every American, regardless of color or creed. Hillary sees people, she sees need, she doesnt decide to help because of the color of your skin, its because of need. Hillary can see a need and do something about it, she wont have to ask the DNC permission to run her own presidency, unlike BO.
BO has sold out, he sold himself out and he sold his supporters out. I hope I never know how that feels, and with Hillary I never will.
I feel sorry for you BO supporters, each day to have to justify something new that BO has done or said, or failed to say. If you are doing that, you are backing the wrong candidate. Ask yourself, would I have to make these kinds of excuses for Hillary’s behavior, for Hillary’s friendships, for Hillary’s religious beliefs? The answer is no.
Hillary Clinton is far and away the best candidate the democrats have had in quite sometime. Her character is not in question, never has been, we Hillary supporters have never had to make one excuse for her behavior, she is a true leader and a woman of grace and dignity.
The DNC has a true winner with Hillary, yet they told us that we will accept BO and like it. I don’t like it, and I never will accept a man without the qualifications to be president.
Simple as that, BO was not qualified to be president before the DNC pushed Hillary out, and he is not qualified now. We are not sheep, we will not follow, Hillary has to do what she has to do for the sake of the party. She is a woman of true character. Hillary knows that we will not follow, but she must do what she promised she would do.
18 million people understand that, we understand that she is not abandoning us, she is keeping her word.
Hillary will have her vote in Denver, and she will emerge like the Phoenix, RISE HILLARY RISE!
Puma Democrat
blog.pumapac.org
People United Means Action

By: Lanlan

Lanlan — Sun, 22 Jun 2008 19:12:47 +0000

It is amazing that someone who proclaims himself to be a uniter would cause so much divisiveness, just like Bush did.

By: 1950democrat

1950democrat — Sun, 22 Jun 2008 18:26:02 +0000

What worries me is that Hillary might take the VP slot. That might turn the election in Obama’s favor, and then she would be stuck for four or eight years! She couldn’t run in 2012. She couldn’t continue as Senator, would give up her chance at Majority Leader.

Pls sign the petitions at
http://www.pumaparty.com/hillarynovp