NPR’s Scott Simon on Obama’s Exploitation of the Race Card
By SusanUnPC on June 27, 2008 at 10:35 PM in Barack Obama, John McCain, Race Card
Eloquent, elegant, and eminently fair — to John McCain who, Simons makes very clear, has NOT attacked or in any way insinuated Obama’s race. Instead, as we know here, it is Barack Obama who has played the race card.
I can only imagine the torrent of nasty e-mails that Scott Simon, a revered longtime NPR reporter and commentator, had to endure for having the courage to speak his mind.
If I could read between the lines, I’d say that Mr. Simon is very disappointed in Obama exploiting race.
Obama is also doing this, I believe, as a preemptive strike — to intimidate anyone who attacks him on his record. The unspoken message is that any attack is open to charges of racism.
What an ugly way to run a campaign, Mr. Obama.
View this and other videos at our No Quarter USA channel at YouTube.
(Release: November 13)
on sale for only $16.95.
has a spatula.)
8% Off at $11.95, with a rare five-star ranking by 294 customers: 
And check out these: 
("This crazy redhead is on to something. Her pink Rambler story alone is worth the price of the book," writes 
- “Richard Sale’s reportage on Washington, the CIA, the American armed forces, and foreign intrigue has created a perfect background for this account of the steady growth of President Clinton as a master of the game of nations.”--W. Patrick Lang, former head of Middle East Operations, DIA
"Anne C. Heller's stunning biography of Ayn Rand" uses a "plethora of newly unearthed research and fresh insight."
Thank heavens for Scott Simon! If it weren’t for him, they would be calling it National Obama Radio.
wow, scott simon really nailed it. terrific piece.
Skip all the comments by treason pete holds the elephant’s seat. It’s a complete waste of time.
He’s only trying to scare us away from Senator McCain. Typical Obama tactics!
We can talk about McCain when Hillary is the nominee.
In the meantime, let’s just concentrate on Obama’s dirty laundry.
He posted 28 or 29 comments totally off topics. His goal is to derail the topics and build doubt about McCain.
If someone decides not to vote at all – instead of voting for McCain, he already won a vote for his candidate!
THIS is why I can’t stand “obama” the “post-racial” candidate.
BS!!
He had a golden opportunity to really bring people together..but I guess that’s not possible when you’re knee deep in dirty money, and you have to invent your entire life to make it acceptable for the people you say you’re representing.
How right you are. NPR and PBS have both become very disappointing to me, giving Obama a total pass and ganging up on the Clintons. I’ve been a liberal all my life, but I’m really starting to look at liberals in a new light. I could never be one of those neocons, but it appears there’s some very icky, undemocratic stuff on the other side as well.
Right ON NPR you are WAKING THE HAIL UP!!!
SIGH! ABOUT TIME DUDES! :-/
Too late for our Lady Hillary?
me thinks NOT!
Why isn’t McCain being vetted, too?
Even the republican trolls seem obtuse to the dangers McCain can present.
Shouldn’t he at the very least be vetted so people are at least aware of Rick Davis relationships to Russia, isn’t this just common sense?
It’s very difficult to sit here and read about Ayers, but not even investigate Davis relationship to Deripaska..
Are Russia and it’s loose nukes not a threat anymore, or Russia, Iran and oil, no longer a threat to America?
Col Lang has a front page diary today about oil prices and the implications, are we choosing to stay willfully ignorant, cause everything will be OK, really, it’s OK to run two batshit cripples for President, while Russia is gaming us, asymmetrically, in part, with oil, and in cyberspace, because really, how can the US fail?
Even the idiot republcain trolls, (I call this one, “Eliot,”) miss it.
Which should explain everything…
IMO, Russia is gaming us with it’s business community, in part.
And our best game player has the intellect of failed businessman Dick Cheney, and his good buddies from Enron, or Halliburton.
The Republicans and their democraitc can’t see past the money, and it’s a clog in the sink.
Huh?
You should read, google is your friend.
Of course, if you’re simply saying people are uninformed, with our MSM failure, I guess you’ve given me the answer.
No. I’m saying try to be clear and concise in making your points. Don’t haphazardly state names and ideas without constructing them in some in a focused framework. You’re throwing out thoughts and references with not the slightest exposition.
This is my third post in regard to this issue.
Secondly, any informed voter would know who these people are, perhaps it was my mistake assuming you were informed in regard to Mccain, Russia and the issues facing the US.
Or should I just say “Obama sucks?”
Hey- everybody- this is his THIRD post- wakeup everybody. Go through all the other threads to find them. This guy sounds important.
It’s actually his fourth.
Actually one was zapped, so that makes it five, but who is counting?
You dont strike me as smart enough to count.
Distort, and dance, and expose and confuse and we have the same old troll plan of attack see every time they bump into a problem…
A gang troll pile, ugly girls gone batshit!
Goodbye, Treason Pete.
– I received too many complaints about you –
Most smart people are informed about McCain.
You’re not, nuff said.
So you’re not only a bad troll, you’re a flaming shithead, too.
Truth about you.
See how you’re fleshed out, moron, you and your lil troll tactics of attack?
You suck.
A functioning intellect, and critical reasoning are your friend.
Now dig that hole, MO.
Pete’s been drinking again…can’t suppress his bestiality urges. Finds girls ugly…prefers pachyderms.
Told Michelle Obama to dig a ditch, I think, hard to decipher that line.
PETE HAS LEFT US. I ATTEMPTED CONTACT BY E-MAIL. IT BOUNCED. That’s a big no-no. If someone posts something questionable — which I heard about yesterday about Pete — we like to give them a chance to reply by e-mail. But if they post a fake e-mail, they’re done here. And, from these last few comments, I would have eliminated him without sending him an e-mail anyway.
We do not mind contradictory viewpoints. Those, in fact, are welcome. But they must be reasoned and without sexist or racist terminology.
Your writing is incoherent. The previous poster was politely calling you on it.
“Comment by treason pete holds the elephant’s seat | 2008-06-28 00:20:33
Actually one was zapped, so that makes it five, but who is counting? (Zapped? Why not just say “disappeared, or deleted”
You dont strike me as smart enough to count. (does that mean count literally, or just doesn’t “count” as a valid contributing member?)
Distort, and dance, and expose and confuse and we have the same old troll plan of attack see every time they bump into a problem…
(distor’s ok, but dance? expose? what are they exposing? confuse? what are they confusing? who’s being a troll here?)
A gang troll pile, ugly girls gone batshit!” (gang troll pile? wtf is that? the last sentence is just plain offensive; there are ugly GUYS responding to your lame ass too, dummy.)
With that said, barackula DOES suck!!!
McCain has one shining attribute; he’s not barackula!
F-off. Do your Oblahblah research. We have. He’s a disengenuous and dangerous man who (if he is a Democrat) is the worst sorth.
Somehow I don’t think we need to worry John McCain will be too soft on the Russkies. Frankly, I’d prefer McCain to be the one dealing with Putin.
Make your argument, prove me wrong, I’m open to it, nothing I’d love more than a President with no ulterior motives, or a staff full of nitwits who have no respect for the Constitution.
But because you say so?
With all due respect, no.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GCeImyvNnZ0
I think you are on the wrong thread Peter. Scroll up and read- You are on a tangent.
No, Kelly, not.
As a regular poster here at NQ, I use different names, though my IP stays the same, I’ve seen the trends over the past year, and we are simply not vetting McCain the way we did Obama. I see relentless repeated attacks on Obama, but McCain given a free pass. He’s not a saint, he’s got some dirt, too, perhaps some that threatens national security, just like Obama. We do not have a functioning MSM, anymore, and Larry’s blog is the closet I’ve seen to a free press.
And I respect his blog.
And if there’s a chance Larry is open to really vetting both candidates, I’ll take it.
If not, I understand.
But you know, if the trolls want to light up their defense, again, and again, and again, and again, that’s Ok, too…
Patterns.
I’m getting it. And you’re right.
Larry is no fan of McCain, if you have read what he has written you would know this.
He’s just working to get him elected.
No. We’re all just working to ensure that obama is NOT ELECTED. Big difference.
And that difference is what?
Gee. Home schooling isn’t working out so well for you is it there sleepy? Being opposed to Hopey doesn’t necessarily make you the supporter of McCain. Logic is not your forte, is it?
What part of NO OBAMA don’t you understand? If you are so mentally challenged it’s better to stay quiet.
It must be only me, but I don’t understand your point.
We are stuck with him. He is half as good as Hillary Clinton and a thousand times better than Obama.
If you really want to know about him, read his bio, his voting record. It is pretty easy to find the data – unlike about Obama.
He will make a very decent President. From all what I hear and see, he is a patriot, a hero, and a politician who cares about the people of the country. He even seems to improve on issues, such as economy, women’s interests, etc.
It is good enough for me.
If you have a problem, why don’t you ask him? He seems to be pretty accessible. We would love if you shared the results with us.
And we are not the free press. We are bloggers. Some of us (like me) are not particularly well versed in the nuances of politics – we just started. Do you think that my support worth nothing because I don’t know everything?
At least McCain won’t have to turn to Hillary to find out the name of Putin’s “successor” — as BO did so obviously, and sadly, in that debate.
The question was posed to both candidates. BO immediately looked at Hillary like, “You’re the smart one here who knows the answers. You go first.” She did, of course.
McCain on Putin: “when I looked into his eyes, I saw three letters — K…G…B…”
And one’s campaign manager shouldn’t do business with the KGB.
He can throw his campaign manager under a bus. Can Obama throw himself under a bus?
I’ll trust a candidate tortured by commies over one who sought out Marxist friends in college and had a commie mentor.
Get that weak sh*t out of here. No-one in his right mind will believe McCain has any love for Russia and its commie holdovers.
Hi Treason Pete! We’re not voting for Obama!
Kim, they have medication now, for your level of schizophrenia.
Maybe your paranoia will no longer compel you to engage in worthless trolls, over and over.
Pete, I’m sorry. For you, there is no cure. Asshole-ism. It’s terminal.
I suppose next Pete will tell us McCain works in cahoots with the little gray space aliens.
That’s why we should concentrate on nominating HRC at the convention. She can stand up to the Russians, she has been vetted, and she has all the requisite experience required to be a great president. FL and MI can be seated fully and fairly and the will of the people can be fulfilled. That’ll help eliminate all these big Democrat fundraisers and pols from become GOPers…all because BO terrifies them and us and we recognize him as a danger to America.
That’s not going to happen, Ann, though it sure would be nice. Unless something phenomenal happens, Obama is the nominee.
I agree, you’re right, he is, and that election was stolen from Clinton, and should be exposed.
It’s OUR government, we’re going ot sit back and allow this?
I joined PUMA, and I’m supporting Women for Fair Politics. We’re still very young, but I think there’s a lot we can do.
Exactly. If we let the talking heads tell us that BO is the nominee because they want him to be, then it is our fault. I mean he may end up being the nominee but we need to make them do it against our wishes…if delegates vote for HRC and make our choice clear…supers will have to override the will of the voters.
This is the way all revolutions go. The colonists were told that independence wasn’t possible as well. The Democratic Party is not a fascist regime (or it didn’t use to be.) and the rules state that nominees are elected at the convention by the delegates.
So right. We need some pledged Hillary delegates who can scream into a mic. They will roll right over you if you can’t make enough noise. Any delegates here? If there are, you probably know what to do. It will be crowded and noisy. Find the person with the loudest voice, make sure you are there for the critical vote, nominate her and get a second. I would imagine there will be a caucus of her supporters and you can decide what to do, but don’t let time get away from you because they play dirty. If they try a vote by aclimation, scream your heads off. You only get one chance. I hope something will work. There may be problems with the credintials commettee too. It’s still two months until Denver so who knows what will happen. Challenge everything.
Russia has no need to game anything, but they can name the game. Their economy is stronger and they have no obligation to take sides with the US on Iran. You seem to be under the illusion that doing business with another country amounts to treason when American companies do business all over the world.
If you are against free trade, well bully for you. There are many people who feel that way, but to single out Russia because they do business with Iran is, well, excuse me, none of our business. These days only fools manage to piss off every oil producing country in the world. Trading with them certainly makes more sense than invading them and one place we have a meeting of the minds would be on the current administration and Dick Cheney.
One thing that would be helpful is for you to investigate Obama’s position, through his foreign policy advisers, what he will do with Bush’s plan to establish missile bases in Poland. Even if it doesn’t pose a threat now, it probably will after four years of Obama.
Get this. I am not defending John McCain and if you have a reasonable argument to make you don’t need obscuration. Come on. Just spit it right out there. Could you, for example, explain to me how McCain is responsible for “loose nukes”? Obama is the only candidate to minimize the threat from Iran and some exaggerate. Maybe you have a solution?
As far as Russia gaming cyberspace, when I look at your post I can believe it’s true.
here’s an idea, why dont we try to stop General Electric frm doing business with Iran and with Russia when we can control our own corporations? Cause right now our corporations are cog our election..
Maybe then GE and Sam NBC will go back to journalism, business and Nunn well I dont care Nunn goes as long as its not to the WH or God Forbid as VP..
Of course, Nunn is also on the board of Chevron who IS also full of interests with dictator Chavez for example..so yeah, Uhhbama has connections too and Zbieg Uhhbamas foreign adviser is so anti Russia he still calls it the Soviet Union.
Excellent point. I couldn’t remember his name.
Hey! I told you! Stay away from here until tomorrow! It’s sfhillary has this blog until then! Now get lost!
And how many Obama trolls see the pitfalls in Obama? Obama has NEVER BEEN VETTED, that’s not John McCain’t fault. I’m really tired of the two wrongs approach to politics. If Obama is looked at objectively then we are diverted by suggestions of wrong in McCain. It all really doesn’t matter, though, because Obama is just a puppet the same way that Dubya was just a puppet.
Good someone is speaking out.
AnninCa, What’s Pete talking about, I’m lost here?
Hey typical troll move to ostracize, this is old, batshit.
Still don’t know what you’re talking about Pete.
McCain’s campaign manager, Rick Davis, is a lobbyist, a major lobbyist for a Russian aluminum billionaire, who arranged for a meeting between McCain, and his client, Oleg Deripaska.
Deripaska is loyal, and connected, to the Kremlin, and Putin, and given Putin’s’ relationship to the middle east, Iran and such, Russia is still a threat to America, if one looks at it in terms of an asymmetrical war. Even McCain has started Russia still presents a threat to America, which it does, from what I have read.
To me, Rick Davis clearly has a conflict of interest, business tends to do what is best for it’s short term gain, as opposed to whats best for the country, America.
Meaning Davis has McCain’s’ ear, and Deripaska pressures him, pays him to tell the future president to enact policy in Russia’s best interests, against the US, say, and MCCain, like Bush, has to rely on his advisers.
They should be subject to the same scrutiny Obama’s people are, right?
All sorts of cracks in that relationship.. It’s Obama’ Ayers connection, say, but with businessmen, instead of political ideology.
At the very least, it should be outed, and discussed, if only to hold McCain’s feet to the fire.
Common sense.
We’d like to think this is not an issue, but it is, unfortunately, and this is why there were laws against this, until, Reagan, probably,Putin is ex KGB, this is still relevant.
http://www.robertamsterdam.com/2008/01/the_mccainderipaska_link_expos.htm – 21k
Qe went through this with Bush, already, don’t they ever learn?
This is the first I’ve heard of this. I will keep an open mind and look into it but I will tell you that McCain loves this country and is no idiot.
Yeah but Pete’s an idiot so he doesn’t get it. Try to get him to leave, OK?
The problem is, Pete, there’s really no one left that’s worthy of my vote. We’re screwed either way, but I figure if I put an unpopular Republican in the White House, then he’s easier to unseat in 4 years.
Of course in 4 years I’d like to be supporting a strong candidate running on a centrist 3rd party, but alas it ain’t happening this year.
I agree with you about holding McCain’s feet to the fire, though. I think there’s going to be a lot of that. What’s really important is the down line races. We need to unite to be sure that all of the weak minded idiots that put us in this situation (Dems and Reps alike) are ousted at the earliest possible opportunity.
Now, yes, but rather than co opt Mccain, or Obama, why can’t we have a functioning press that exposes them both?
For a start.
And maybe within 12 years we can finally get a President worthy of American law?
Thanks for refocusing. Your points are quite valid.
I did not need to refocus, the problem is yours, period.
Stop zapping the rebuttals, take it like a man.
Wuss.
NO wonder your’e so weak.
SHUT UP you jerk.
THis thread is bout Obama playing the race card.
You trolls are jerks — grow up and change your diapers.
WE are not voting for an inadequate male for Prez.
So shut the fuck up.
don’t encourage him.
The media isn’t going to be responsible. That’s clear. It’s entertainment only.
Today, vetting is being done by bloggers. For no pay, I might add.
Clever of them……
Unfortunately, the answer to that question is simple. Money.
As long as we keep eating tripe, they’ll keep serving it. I’m open to ideas, though…
It’s the blogs. Go around the mainstream media.
Quality will be the next step. Blogs that are solid journalism and will charge us for news.
AP is trashing itself. It’s an open market.
Small publishers have always found a way to spout up in our history. And if someone isn’t horribly greedy, there’s a market waiting to be tapped.
Look at Craig’s List. Total success. Not greedy. Making huge money anyway.
The Blogs will provide the alternative to the mainstream news media.
The next big site will be similar to Huffington Post but with a more reasonable focus.
And I really mean…..charge. Get the corporate ads out of the picture.
That gives true freedom of the press.
And many thanks to Larry for providing that to us. Probably a good time to mention the Donate button on the main page…
And add a few clicks on the ads down the right side too. BTW, I bought one of the hand made backpack pieces made in Seattle, advertising on this site and it is well made and a very clever design.
Gave it as a graduation gift.
pete,
In 12 years, with the many and complex issues facing us today, and the advent by a DNC coup of a candidate, who is being supported by George Soros and Zbigniew Brezinski, I have very little confidence that we will have any resemblence of a real democracy by then.
I agree the American people and the MSM need to keep McCain’s feet to the fire, however, for some strange reason BO has been given a free pass thus far.
I find it to be a huge red flag everytime the MSM exclusively supports, protects, makes excuses, looks the other way, when one candidate constantly flip-flops on issues they swore they would never flip-flop on; distorts their opponent’s record and plays the race card against them with not one scintilla of evidence to back it up and the MSM laps it up as the gospel truth. This should concern you because as I have stated in prior posts, the progressive community has always considered the media to be owned by corporations. However, now that they are in the tank for BO, these very same progressive individuals and groups are no longer critical of the press.
The last time the press was in the tank for a candidate was with GW bush. They helped market him ast the “compassionate conservative” to the American people.
Now the press is helping market BO as the candidate of “hope and change”.
In essense, we aren’t electing a president. Instead, the MSM is treating this election much in the same vein as how people elect the next American idol, which is based on a subjective opinion of how a particular person makes them “feel” and not whether this person is qualified to be the president of the U.S.
I hope that the American people look beyond the image that the media is projecting of BO and look behind the curtain and see who’s calling the shots. That’s where we’ll find the truth about BO.
So you’re talking about McCain and a guilt by association deal.
My only concern with this type of worry is that it gets absurd after awhile. All consultants today are global. How many will we throw out due to their global connections? And why do we assume it’s necessarily bad?
Is this not Bush paranoia because of how his buddies benefited from the war?
I’m not big on worrying about Ayers and Obama either.
I think Obama is the worst case of marketing package only that I’ve seen in my lifetime. What’s horrid to me is that when he actually talks, he lacks clarity to the point that I know he’s deliberately trying to obscure his position.
I’m tolerant of politicians being tactful. But it bothered me a lot that Hillary was skewered because she was clear about her positions. That’s what I want.
But it was definitely used against her.
McCain is clear on a lot of issues.
Obama, rarely.
But it is a problem, this man does business with enemy, is this sound policy?
What is our true position with Russia, what are Russia’s greater goals, how to we integrate this information, analyze it?
Those questions haven’t been answered, it’s not like anyone can read Putin’s mind, it’s not the the CIA owns the KGB, shouldn’t we figure this out, before we accept and trust, at face value?
Cheney and Bush dont do this, the republicans don’t, or they put profit before country.
The democrats?
Who cares, at this point, Obama is so weak…
BTW, Col Lang had a very informative post about oil prices, and future implications for the global economy.
Russia is a player in the oil markets.
Yes, but it doesn’t mean that McCain is guilty of anything. That would require a bit more than just an association. The guy can run a political campaign without tainting the mind of the candidate.
That was my point.
I was glad to see Hillary’s manager go, but not due to his consulting associaton.
I’m just a bit tired, I guess, of all the complex guilt stories based upon associations.
Heck, I know ex-cons. Doesn’t make me a criminal.
yeah, anninca…but you are not running for the presidency, obama’s associations express his bad judgement, not guilt by association…
He should provide an example of McCain actually advocating a policy that would benefit the Kremlin.
He can’t, so it’s conspiracy-mongering mode.
McCain’s policies: We don’t need Russia in G-8; let’s have a League of Democracies so we can bypass Russia’s veto in the UNSC, let’s build electric cars so we don’t prop up the petroruble.
He is an insidious Obama troll smearing McCain.
Rather absurd in light of McCain’s decades-long record of being tough on Russia and communism.
See, Pete, that’s the difference between having a record and not. McCain has credibility. Obama? Not so much.
It really is such a Twilight Zone experience listening to people who claim to have supported Hillary Clinton singing the praises of John McCain for his foreign policy acumen — this a man who doesn’t know the difference between Sunnis and Shiites. You really are around the bend.
So what’s our choice…the man that doesn’t know how many states are in the U.S.A.?
Oh, the Sunni-Shia talking point. Give it a rest, already. This from a supporter of a guy who has dazzled the nation which such foreign policy gems as “let’s attack Pakistan” and “let’s talk to Iran without preconditions.”
Hillary’s campaign has called his foreign policy views “naive” and “irresponsible”, btw. Nothing he has said since provided proof to the contrary.
McCain made the error 3 or 4 times in the space of a few months, leading me to believe he really is confused, which is utterly shocking. As for Obama — he didn’t say “let’s attack Pakistan.” Are you foolish or dishonest? He said that we need to get serious about destroying Al Qaeda, which has had a free ride for the past 7 years while we blundered around in Bush and McCain’s idiotic war in Iraq, and that if as CIC he had actionable intelligence, he wouldn’t hesitate to attempt to take out the Al Qaeda leadership, even if he didn’t explicitly have Pakistan’s permission to do so. I agree with this philosophy completely. I also have no problem with my president talking to the leadership of Iran without preconditions; the only reason to argue otherwise is if one is prey to the sort of foolish strutting American machismo that led to such successful foreign policy triumphs during these wondrous Bush years.
I’m aware of what HRC said while she was running against him. She was wrong then — or let me put it this way; she was either lying then or she is lying now in endorsing him — and you are wrong now in putting such faith in that dumbass McCain, who has clearly demonstrated that his knowledge of pretty much every subject he discusses in public is frighteningly limited, and who has made clear that he supports practically every major foreign and domestic policy priority of our current president. Go ahead — vote for a third Bush term. Enjoy it. Revel in it. As I will revel in Obama’s landslide victory.
Or, put another way — are you such a hardliner that you feel that the U.S. President shouldn’t even speak to adversarial governments unless they meet certain demands in advance — but also such a softie that you feel the U.S. president shouldn’t defend the nation by attempting to defeat Al Qaeda unless he has the explicit permission of the authoritarian, terrorist-coddling thug who passes for a leader of Pakistan?
You do understand how utterly incoherent your position here is, don’t you?
Have you seen that he has CHANGED this position as well? He has changed EVERY position that he used to differentiate himself from HRC in order to get maniacs like YOU to vote for and caucus for him. Now you and everyone like you is under his wheels. He used you for traction and nothing more. Each decision was calculated. Just like the black voice for black audiences and the white voice in San Francisco. YOU HAVE BEEN USED!!!! Doesn’t that stick in your throat just a little bit, sweetie?
Obama’s landslide victory??? I don’t think so…not if we can help it.
I know you don’t think so. You think the candidate of the incumbent party is going to be elected in a year when the economy over which his deeply unpopular party has been presiding is sliding into a deep recession, and the war that he and his party have long supported is moving into another period of increased violence, in an era when the opposing political party is the chosen party of far, far more Americans, against a candidate capable of raising far more money, and whose volunteer network is the most potent in the history of American politics, in an electoral cycle where demographic changes — more Latinos, more Asians, more under-30 voters, more non-affiliated — all favor his opponent, by a very wide margin.
You think Mccain is going to win. This is because you don’t know squat about actual real-world national politics.
Wow, they must pay you to spin for Bambi.
Exactly how is this policy different from Bush? They’ve been going after Al Qaeda in Pakistan. Yet despite all of their mistakes and “machismo” they’ve never been so idiotically tin-eared as to say the words “attack Pakistan” (a country with nukes, no less) publically. If Obama becomes president, you’re going to tell the Muslim world “no, he really meant this” every time he sticks his foot in it? Sounds pretty macho to me. That’s going to win hearts and minds in the Middle East?
As for talking to every tinpot dictator “without preconditions”, that’s something Obambi pulled out of his rear end. That has not been a policy of any US administration, Republican or Democratic to date.
Which is why he eventually had to backpeddle the hell back.
So take your kool-aid BS back to DailyIdiots or wherever it is you dwell. Let Obama move to Fairfield and take over for the Maharishi. The presidency is one job he’s unqualified for.
Sorry — you’ll have to show me the exact quote where he said “attack Pakistan.” And you’ll have to explain why that’s a worse blunder than HRC saying she would “obliterate Iran” — implying the mass murder of tens of millions — or McCain confusing Shiites and Sunnis, or saying he’d be glad to stay in Iraq for 100 years, or that the date that U.S. soldiers come home “doesn’t really matter,” and on and on. This is why you PUMAs come off to most observors as simply silly — you take a minor gaffe by Obama and blow it up into a truism that he’s “unqualified” or “misogynist” or whatever, while utterly ignoring gaffes of equal or greater weight by his opponents. This is not a sign of intellectual seriousness.
Listen…I believe you support obama.
And I’m going to tell you one damn time: the fall of a country, comes about from within.
All of the people obama is associated with are about one thing: divide and conquer. They’re special interests, so special it makes you gag…there is NO preaching for true unity; it makes the generic “white man” into EVERYMAN.
With that said, again..”McCain’s only shining attribute is that (read it with me) NOT BARACK OBAMA!!”
McCain 08, Hillary 12!
Pete, please explain how McCain’s having been downwind of a Russian oligarch for a half hour compromises him?
Why should someone actively engaged in global power politics avoid having a look at an adversary? He talks with Texans, doesn’t he? No onus there.
People have to guess which candidate is more susceptible — willing — obliging — avid — which appears to translate into reliable.
And [it looks to me as if ] reliable candidates get better [establishment] press.
Oh shit.
Munk and Barrick Gold. Isn’t that the guy to whom Bush pappa sold billions of mining rights on US public land for $50K some time ago?*** And weren’t there some curious Barrick Gold accidents involving many dead miners and also a mysterious death of whistleblower a few years later. Can’t remember the details.
*** which did not seem to cause the WaPo the same amount of alarm as did McCain’s dinner and a couple of drinks.
is this like OMalley Uhhbama adviser meeting with Hamas then?
old news….
I don’t either. How many beers have you had tonight pete?
What are you blabbering about now, troll?
Jesus make sense, at least show me you’re capable of constructive, integrated thought.
Wait, let me:
“Cool.”
Conspiracy? Not sure.
It’s hardly conspiracy, if you meant my comment.
And why is it acceptable when we connect the dots in regard to Obama, but not Mccain?
My god, from what I’ve read here, we could be Cheney’s office of special plans, hearing only what we want to hear, when it comes to information supporting our cause.
That doesn’t work.
Sorry, but I’m just not following your posts.
I’m still trying to figure out why pete is holding an elephants butt.
I think he IS an elephant’s butt.
The race card is the only thing BO has to play. And we don’t need to vet McCain because it doesn’t really matter. The Dems that will vote for him will do it as a protest against BO.
My geriatric dog would be a better candidate than Obamafia.
No no, use your imagination, troll.
Treason Pete is holding the republican tail.
Get it?
Oh yeah, you’re not bright, ie “cool.”
Pete,Are you always this stupid or are you making a special effort today?
LOL
I wouldn’t rule out the possibility of conspiracy though, Pete. All of these players have a butt-load of ties to each other. No, I don’t have my foil hat on, but how big a stretch is it to think that the power/money brokers want to offer us 2 parties that are essential the same toothless, mindless, corrupt sides of the same coin?
I think I have read enough of AnninCa’s posts to say she wasn’t talking about you. She’s pretty open minded.
PS – No problem bringing up issues about McCain here (as long as you support it with links like Pete did, trolls!)
NY: this is an old Obamatron trick. Bring up some piece of information which is superficially damaging, then imply equivalence, which in light of the disparity in personal history and background is laughable.
Hence, Rev. Wright is no more racist than grandma. And McCain is the one with the Russia/shady influence problem, not commie-associating, Chicago machine Barack. McCain — the guy who chose to remain at Hanoi Hilton rather than give communists a propaganda win is the one with credibility problems?
ah…the infamous race card, when all else fails and you can’t get your way, blame it on slavery and your race. Obama is a piss poor example of what Martin Luther King stood for.
Senator has never used the race card against John McBush.
He played it just the other day when he announced he was going back on his word about campaign finance.
And how right he was. Who was it today that described Obama as “John Kerry with a tan”? Oopsies!
“Grover Norquist has quite a history of being unhinged. He’s said the Estate Tax is morally equivalent to the Nazi Holocaust; he’s called WWII veterans “anti-American,” and he’s called bipartisanship “another name for date rape.”
But this clown isn’t done pushing the envelope.”
Norquist describes Obama as ‘John Kerry with a tan’ – Crooks and Liars
“Norquist dropped by The Times’ Washington bureau today and, as part of his negative critique of Obama’s liberal stances on economic issues and other matters, he termed the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee “John Kerry with a tan.”"
L.A. Times
But. That’s not an alias for McCain, is it? So John didn’t say it. Of even someone from his campaign, right? Just some crack pot.
He just did in Florida.
Excuse me, allow me to be more precise,
stinky just did in Florida last week.
Those were Senator McCain’s words? Directly? From his own mouth? Get a life little girl. If the sexism couldn’t be laid at Obama’s door because it was from others, then this can’t be laid at McCain’s door because it comes from others. Rulz? Remember? You bring me a link of racial discrimination directly from Senator McCain. Otherwise, bite me.
Obama will. so will Michelle Obama, whose entire life is a result of her ability to play the race card.
The minute it became clear that Hillary had won NH, the Obama surrogates were on the cable shows blaming her surprise win on the Bradley Effect, whereby voters tell pollsters that they will vote for an African-American candidate but be lying and actually vote for a white candidate. As soon as the Obama minions started using this excuse for Obama’s loss I realized that they were calling Hillary supporters racists. That was just the beginning. Within days they had called both Bill and Hillary Clinton racists and turned the majority of their African-American supporters against them, giving Obama a string of victories, starting in SC. This has been the most divisive Primary race in my lifetime. No one called Obama out on this use of race-baiting. When this strategy worked, the sexism started, and more lies were used to divided the Democratic Party. I don’t care what Obama claims to stand for, but I will never vote for such a divisive man. When you add the divisiveness to the lack of experience, to the questionable acquaintances, to the lack of judgement, to the lies, to the inconsisitencies what we have left is a very weak, flawed candidate who is a danger to our country.
You are so right Karen, this was the beginning of the end.
You’re right. And Clyburn and Kennedy raced to the microphone.
You see, people? They manipulated the voters into voting for Obama unfairly — “a string of victories” caused by the fact that “they” called Bill and Hillary “racists.” This name-calling — you’ll never see an actual direct cituation of this, mind you — but this name-calling caused an illegitimate “string of victories” because the voters who chose Obama, generally by wide margins, in 11 consecutive states thought Bill and Hillary were racists because someone said so. So the victories didn’t count, or shouldn’t have counted. And the caucuses, which have been caucuses for around 50 years now, were also illegitimate. Um, because they are cacuses and Hillary didn’t plan for them so she lost them all, badly. So they aren’t real democracy. Those states were stolen. And Michigan! Totalitarianism! The state that HRC herself publicly said “Everybody knows it won’t count” absolutely must count! Or democracy has been destroyed — destroyed, I tell you — By this dishonest, fraudulent, criminal, inadequate, frightening, dangerous, corrupt, thuggish, arrogant, elitist, communist, racist, sexist, homophobic, unqualified candidate!
Does that cover it?
I’m telling you, I cannot wait to visit this site on November 5th. Absolutely cannot wait.
Ya know, tool, you don’t have to come here.
The story is out there for you to read. Why should we have to reacquaint you with the facts every time you come around acting dumb. Citations have been made all over the place about the details of Obama’s surrogates playing the race card and its effects on the polls when it was done.
And do tell me Barack Obama’s accomplishments–all three of them.
So you’re saying barackula’s winning of caucases only happened because he planned better, that Democracy really didn’t win them for him?
You’re a moron.
“typical white person”
Yes, yes, I’m a “tool,” I’m a “moron.” Anyone who doesn’t agree to play by house rules — which stipulate that Obama is the worst human being since Adolph Hitler — can expect to be subjected to that kind of language. I’m here anyway, at least until someone decides to ban this IP address (like they did my work IP address). That, by the way, is the single most pathetic thing about NQ — the way it’s like an intellectual kindergarten in that the inmates have to be protected from the big bad world of grownups via IP banning of voices that dissent too loudly or persistently.
Pathetic.
which stipulate that Obama is the worst human being since Adolph Hitler
No he is all by himself on that one.
The reason for that is;
Mien Kampf;Propaganda and Organization
I take NO pleasure in quoting this, if only to draw attention to the identical nature of BO and the DNC to Hitler.
I have one question for you. How does it feel to be the traction under the wheels of the bus?
He has abandoned each and every “ideal” that he used to differentiate himself from HRC once he got imbeciles like you to vote and caucus for him. Now, he’s headed for the middle where the real votes are. Where the money is. Where the years and years of Democrats are. YOU’VE BEEN USED AND DISCARDED!!!!! WAKE UP! He was telling you what you wanted to hear. Blowing smoke up your skirt. One by one, FISA, Public financing, poof, gone. The war? Well, judgment before it started doesn’t get the job finished, does it? Let’s see. Hmmmmmm. How many plans has he had? And then there is Ms. Powers telling people in the UK that he wasn’t going to stick to some timeframe that he talked about as a candidate … did you hear her? YOU WERE CONNED, sweetie. Yeah, come back in November. Let’s see how much is left of you and your candidate in November.
I would laugh at you but, hey, I do feel bad … hey … no, I don’t really, you should have seen this coming so … this chortle is for you …. hahahahahahahahahahahahaha. First laugh of the day at a stupid obamabrat. Thanks!
Tool, moron, imbecile, stupid. Typical line of responses from hate-addicted PUMAs.
Yes, Obama has changed a number of his positions. So you go vote for McCain, who has flip-flopped on (all together now) taxes, Iraq withdrawal, immigration, the religious right, etc etc etc.
They’re called politicians. That’s what they do. Only by journeying down your rabbit hole does one get the privilege of hearing that Obama is a menace to the entire future of the nation while McCain is (now) a patriot, a man of honor, a seasoned trusted leader…lol. Let me clue you in to something: McCain’s Senate colleagues think he’s a rage-filled whack job, and at least a few of them have said, on the record, that he has no business being anywhere near the presidency. Well, actually the rage thing is probably why some of you NQ people like him, since hatred is what gets you up in the morning.
Now I’ll move on and see what other nasty names people have called me.
Sure … don’t respond … must really suck to see all of your hard work pushed to the side for the likes of the big business folks he said he doesn’t support …. did you see he got more money from Countrywide than any other Senator? hahahahahahaha
Courtesy of Clarice Feldman,
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008/06/
If they let Lt. Col West on cable news shows, Obama’s gonna have a hell of a problem playing the race card.
This reminds me of the pre-Iraq days where if you did not back Bush’s call to war, you were “unpatriotic”. It seems that this tactic is once again being played only this time by the other village idiot, Obama, where if you don’t support him, you’re a racist.
…..and Senator Obama was one of the few who spoke out against that foolish war. I can’t say the same for John SENILE McBush.
i attended a prayer rally against the war. maybe i should be president.
anyway, you missed the point. obama and his supporters are acting like the Bushies who intimidated people who spoke out against the war.
no wonder some call him “Bush with a tan.”
Good points.
Regarding BO’s so-called opposition against the war. It’s time to revisit an excellent op-ed piece by Kristen Breitweiser. She is 1 of the 4 women from NJ whose husband’s died in the World Trade Center. She clearly calls BO to task regarding his lackluster anti-war stance. After that uneventful speech in 2002, we never saw nor heard from BO again protesting the war:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kristen-breitweiser/you-broke-it-you-own-it_b_101673.html
Thanks DoroB for clarifying the point that the Obamabots clearly missed, namely the intimidation card.
And if we must turn this into Obama’s stance on the war….what was his voting record once he did have voting power? Anti-war? I don’t think so!
…..and Senator Obama was one of the few who spoke out against that foolish war. I can’t say the same for John SENILE McBush.
No actually he wasn’t. Millions of people across the US voiced their disapproval of the war in Iraq. You know what we all have in common? None of us, including Obama, had a vote in the matter. If you want to vote for the Illinois senator who VOTED against the war, write in Dick Durbin (please don’t, just making a point).I am sure somewhere a couple of homeless dudes were against the war. Lets vote for them! Obama’s Iraq story is a fairytale. Just like Bill Clinton said it was.
And we have only Obama’s word for it that he made the ‘anti war’ speech at all. No recordings. No independent evidence. Nothing. Leaving aside Obama’s record of telling the truth (yeah, right), would any thinking person trust any politician that far?
Chicago and Illinois, in general, were against the war. I will even give him the benefit of the doubt that he made such a speech. I bet Rev Jeremiah Wright gave an anti-war speech. The priest in my church ( not Pflegler ) gave an anti war speech too. The drunk at O’Malleys gave an anti-war speech. Bottom line he didn’t have a friggin vote. Talk about getting a lot of mileage out of nothing.
well, here is one interview, pre-war, in which Obama speaks out against the war:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=sXzmXy226po
In case anyone’s interested.
You are missing the point sfhillary. Obama did not have a vote. Your link is a waste of time. If only I could have captured the drunk at O’Malleys on video. He was way more emotional about his opinion about war than Obama was. Then he vomited and passed out. Beside how much credit does one deserve for voicing the opinion of an entire city? What Obama did was akin to standing up and announcing “The Cubs will win the World Series”. That’s what the people want to hear. If they win he looks like a prophet. If they lose life goes on. If Obama had VOTED against the war, that would be something else. He didn’t however, so his opinion is no better than the drunk at O’Malleys and millions of people across the US. Got it?
He can take pride in the fact that his gut feeling was right. However he is trying to get way more mileage from his opinion than just pride. He is using it as the staple of his candidacy. A few words with nothing on the line doesn’t really warrant that. If he had voted against the war or refused funding for the war, maybe. However he has DONE none of those things.
Go back and listen to stink’s jostling around on not having all the facts about that claim.
Senator John McCain has earned the respect and admiration of all his associates in the House and Senate. I do not aggree with all of his possitions on the ecconomy,taxes,healthcare,or education but see no danger to my country if he is elected Presedent. That can’t be said for Senator Obama!
He flipped on torture, a result, no doubt of a consultant’s advice.
He lost my respect when he did that, bowing to marketing concerns as opposed to leading.
Larry has also mentioned McCain employs some of the same neocons Bush does, in regard to the war.
The neocons lost, how will the situation improve for the US if this does not change?
It won’t.
I have no confidence in him, at all, none.
Still, Senator McCain is godzillion times better than Obama.
You’re a moron.
barackula never voted against the IR, because he wasn’t in a POSITION HIGH ENOUGH…he was a part-time state senator. Check it out.
barackula voted EVERY TIME to continue funding the war; as a matter of fact, his voting record is identical to Hillary’s when he actually became a REAL Senator.
barackula missed the Kyl-Lieberman act; never even showed up for it.
barackula voted FOR the FISA immunity for telcoms.
YOU ARE A F*CKING MORON
Did he do anything else? Did he rally? Did he march? Did he protest? Don’t bother. We know the answer. And you know what? After he joined forces with the Democratic Leadership Council, he took the speech down from his website because he was concerned that it would be unpopular. And he took a hit on it from the Black Agenda. You people are so stupid!
You see Obama thinks he is so wonderful — that the only reason ANYONE could have not to vote for him is because he is sort of very tan.
Now if he had used this reasoning to get votes in Hawaii he would be laughed right off the island — which is probably why he left so that he could use the tint of his skin to bully white liberals into voting for his precious/greatness.
Anyway — remember the disreputable GWB used the race card on McCain — so that one trick pony has already been used. But no matter — Obama is a one trick pony and he is going to continue to use race race race.
However — we know that Obama has used the gender card — but he can’t play that card any longer.
Obama will only get away with playing the race card as long as people allow him to use the card — rather then telling him to find another card.
The race issue is HIS problem — NOT ours.
We aren’t voting for him because he is an inadequate candidate — he is inadequate, unqualified, unprepared, inexperienced and just plain lazy. He will NEVER be ready. He needs to go back and learn to be a good lawyer — or a teacher or a Illinois Senator. Or be a good prisoner.
Notice how, a day or two after the only-vaguely-racist public comment calling Obama “Kerry with a tan,” one NQer after another picks up the term and starts calling him “tan,” “sort of tan” “very tan” etc. We archeologists of NQ enjoy watching memes appear and get adopted by you speech — “unelectable” “inadequate” “under the bus” now “tan.” I see people rip phrases off from my own posts all the time. And you call other people “bots?” That’s rich. Most of you aren’t even intellectually aware enough to realize how thoroughly your own language is being shaped by others.
As opposed to, say, deadender? You have no moral high ground to stand on there, slim.
BHO the flip side of the coin GWB
Very well stated.
GWB “with a tan,” maybe? Don’t hold back.
How does it feel to be used by a phoney? Its like a sick feeling each time he abandons a principle that made him appealing isn’t it? See. We were on to him. We knew he was an empty promise in a black suit.
A “black suit,” huh? But it’s Obama who is racist. Uh huh.
Are his suits not black? Can you tell me what color they are ????????? Are you maybe seeing things only the way you want to? Jesus. He was wearing a blue tie yesterday. Should I have mentioned that?
Do you not realize that you are weakening him being taken seriously? You undermind him being seen as a canidate of any position other than race because that is the only position you defend. Try talking policy. Any policy. Just one. ?????
Obama is the one that played the race card not Bill Clinton. That still makes me so mad. The Clintons have done more for the black people then Obama ever has. This whole thing is like a damn nightmare fairy tale. I just hope I wake up and Obama is gone.
You and a whole lot of others!
This is OT but I thought I might post this comment here where it has more of a chance of being read.
At the Cabrini-Green housing complex in Chicago, a three-year-old boy was crushed to death today by a large gate that fell on top of him while he played. The housing complex is managed by Urban Property Advisors. Some residents of the complex say that the property is poorly maintained and that the gate was rusted. The CEO of UPA is Cullen Davis, son of Allison Davis. Cullen Davis contributed $2,300 to the Obama campaign in 2007 and is mentioned in the Boston Globe article.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-boy-crushed-webjun28,0,2203188.story
http://cbs2chicago.com/local/gate.kills.toddler.2.759073.html
http://www.upachicago.com/cullen.html
http://fundrace.huffingtonpost.com/neighbors.php?type=name&lname=Davis&fname=Cullen
Obama worked for the law firm of Allison Davis.
Allison Davis is the nephew of Frank Marshall Davis, Bambi’s Commie-Daddy figure.
I thought they tore Cabrini Green down. Did they rebuild it? I know they had to tear down Robert Taylor homes. They were too shitty to rehabilitate.
Yesterday’s Boston Globe ran a story on Obama’s Public/Private Housing money leeching pals, Allison Davis, Tony Rezko, and senior Obama campaign advisor Valerie Jarrett:
The Boston Globe / June 27, 2008
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/06/27/grim_proving_ground_for_obamas_housing_policy/
Why go from an inexperienced, corrupt, lying, Texas punk to an inexperienced, corrupt, lying, Chicago punk.
Right on NOBAMA!!!
Well, Tampa, it really pays to research both candidates, and make yourself an informed voter.
Otherwise you look ignorant, or you would appear to have an agenda, and neither is conducive to good government.
I mean this last crew of Republicans has been full of flaming moron troll types, fancying themselves little sociologist geniuses, spewing propaganda rather than information, falling flat on their faces, over, and over and over and over, using tactic rather than enlightened strategy, and it’s not good for the country.
Right?
I dont mean to confuse you , I apologize if you don’t understand.
you are a fool if you can’t see that obama is a spineless, incompetent, unqualified, ethica lly-challenged person with a bucketful of unsavory firends, advisors, supporters, and associates.
What the hell is wrong with you people? How blind can you be to the facts?
stinky is a total fraud!
I agree with you, OBama is trash, a POS.
But what about McCain, he gets a free pass?
Does anyone here remember a functioning American press?
This is what they used to do, what I’m doing now, asking questions of both sides.
Oh fuck off, Treasonous Pete, your bullshit is transparent. You’re not asking questions of both sides, you’re a mindless shill for your master, and no one here is fooled.
I would like to point out here that Pete is not for Obama or McCain. If you read his posts carefully, he is basically saying that while Obama is indeed a POS, many of us are just taking McCain on faith because he’s not Obama. He’s got skeletons in his closet as well (as we are aware), Pete is just trying to point a few of them out.
His statements about not giving McCain a free pass are perfectly valid. I believe Larry has made similar statements (albeit somewhat more eloquently), so please don’t call him a troll or trash him. Take a few extra moments and read through his posts slowly, and you may begin to see his point of view.
Pete – no offense intended. I think you have a valuable commentary and I don’t want it to be lost or dismissed. You’ve done well controlling the anger today, though. Keep plugging away…
Peter is talking down to us. OF COURSE what MCain does matters. This thread is about the race card and how Obama has used it and McCain has not.
This is not about Obama plays the race card- well so, McCain this and that.
He called us uniformed if we did not know his particular issue with McCain. He assumed we are idiots.
Then he insults with vile language.
Pete is a bore and he is unable to focus- he just talks down- read his posts… icky… that is why he got the response he did.
You are cool NY Still Loves Hillary. I just think Peter is yucky.
Pete’s not going to win a Pulitzer, but he does make good points now and again. He just needs to work on expressing them more clearly . He also has some pent up anger and focus issues (don’t we all to some degree?), but he is working on it (much better posts than yesterday, Pete) so I just think we should give him a little slack. Just MHO.
Don’t get taken in by this troll. When he starts to lose the argument he uses words like “tunabot” to insult people. I think they use reference to tuna to insult women.
That is no less sexist than the turds on NBC. He is obviously a nasty sociopath sent by axelrod. I have no problems vetting mccain, but this treason guy is doing what the repubs did in 2000 regarding Mccain’s adopted child from Bangladesh.
Oh, good, the paranoid schizo Nick is back.
Thank you for your kind words, ahem, but, no.
If the troll is a fucking idiot moron, I’ll tell him, you see, I speak troll, right johnnie toothslayer?
(you suck).
I dont argue tactics with people I consider enemies of state.
An impediment to a free press, (which is what a troll does as a propaganda measure), is, IMO, treason.
We’ve already seen our MSM decimated by this garbage, connect the dots, it’s like reading Prvada, for gods sake, they’re so patterned in their methods. And now we have the two weakest candidates for President, as opposed to the best, who is Clinton.
This hurts our country.
How do we stop it?
This is his comment from totalitarian tactics thread as he signed off
———————–
Comment by treason pete holds the elephant’s seat | 2008-06-27 22:34:45
I’m not either, but I have to wonder why you’re choosing the other treason.
Made me question your motives.
LOL…
Remember you were trolled this way the first time, ya fucking idiots, but thanks for showing yourself.
And dont try to correct, poetry is not in your vocabulary, tunabot.
Bye, treason bois…
—————————–
I can’t decipher most of it, but I think using words like tunabot (like we use words obamabot, the obamabots use words like hillarybot, or in this case tunabot, obviously using tuna=hillary. This guy is not just drunk, he has a psychopathic personality.
Don’t encourage nasty foul mouthed insulting drunks. He’s been ugly to a half dozen people on this thread so far and you say he’s done well controlling the anger?
Pete, you are the fool to think we EVER had a functioning press.
What you’ve seen is ‘limited hangout’.
How you can delude yourself when financial ties, shared Board of Directors, CEOs, parent companies, etc of these corporations clearly show otherwise? Is quite interesting considering all your insults of other people’s intelligence.
When you point out that McCain meet with the enemy and how does that effect America. I have a bigger concern with Obama’s advisor Zbig and his relationship with Russia than McCain’s.
Having a meeting with Russian billionaire is probably less threatening to Putin than setting up Zbig for the next round with them.
Especially when you consider Zbig’s last plan of attack with Russia resulted in ‘blowback’ that we are still dealing with.
It seems you think people here don’t pay attention or seem you think that govt is lacking on watching Russia, Iran, etc. Yet, several provocative acts would suggest otherwise. Such as when Russia shut down pipelines to Europe, resumed bombing flights near Alaska, tested their thermobaric bomb, and had their first missle display in decades, the missle shield, Poland, as well as stating that Bush was close to starting a new arms race. Whatever the case, I guarantee there is more people aware of the issues with Russia beyond a business meeting.
Next topic, ‘loose nukes’ your focus should be on Bush not McCain, but the govt states that DC will be hit by a nuke within 20 years. So, if you haven’t seen the place, I suggest you go now. Especially when considering that the alphabet agencies are already planning to leave.
As far a McCain vs Obama. I trust McCain’s desire to honor his family legacy in the White House, more than I trust Obama’s desires.
I seem to remember you trying to hit people over the head with the same tired argument before, or was it just the newspaper article that tipped you off while you insult the media for not informing you? Either way, it is claiming false political ground in the light of so many other major issues to focus on with Russia. As well as the claim people don’t know about the Russian billionaires and issues they pose to not only their country but others. Everyone on this board is aware of them and Putin’s desire to reign them in.
Now run along and find a new topic to post faux indignation about.
typos.
met…not meet.
missile…not missle
You previously sounded confused, did you just hit the pipe. You should apologize for having been purposely vague and obtuse.
If you’ve got a point state it clearly and don’t be rude.
Mkay, Tuna?
Don’t think so, Nick, all I see is Johnnie Toothslayer, wannabe troll, one voice have they — “we all suck..”
Here, let me:
“I dont get it.”
I know, it’ why you troll for the wrong side.
Hi Pete! We’re not voting for Obama!
kimmy, you’re hallucinating, like a kook.
HTH.
Ha ha, your lost, little boy. This isn’t Dkos.
Kimmy, I hate dull trolls, and you’re one, in a bad sock.
Careful poop, I can see this strategy from a moron two weeks ahead of time, and its’ garbage.
Treachorous Pete, you’re an Obama thug on an anti-Obama blog. What *does* that make you, then, if not a troll? Besides dense and annoying?
Next time, Kim, just say “duh.”
(You and your voices, the royal “we” apparently.)
Cut to the chase, it’s funnier.
There, hope I helped.
I’m sorry. I think I’ve spoken at a level which is beyond your comprehension, trollish bastard. “We”. The first person plural pronoun. In this case, used to refer to readers of this blog, who are easily divided into two camps, the majority of whom do not support Barak Hussein Obama’s candidacy for the office of president of the United States. Then there are the rest…the mindless drooling cowardly Obama-supporting automatons like you! Ha ha!
Pete you’d better go to bed. I’m serious. You are making less sense with every post.
Pete, don’t be an arrogant ass. Quit trying to talk like Jesse Jackson and maybe we can have a debate.
That’s a racist argument, Kay.
Now I know you’re an Obama troll, everything is racist with you assholes.
Nothing but low-rent ad hominem from this troll.
Why do so many of you let Pete hijack the thread. I think I will go hook up my new radio so that I can listen to Scott Simon in the morning. Incidently, Juan Williams, a senior NPR correspondent isn’t in the tank for Obama.
As Obama abandons each principle in order to move to the center for MONEY and VOTES, how does it feel to know that you were only a body under the wheels of the bus so he could get traction to defeat Senator Clinton? Must suck!
While that commentary was a step in the right direction, it falls far short in calling out Obama and his surrogates on the outrageous racism they have engaged in and condoned in their campaign. What about all the threats against AAs who supported Clinton? What about the accusations of racism against a 2 term Democratic president, a Democratic Senator form New York, and a Democratic Attorney General from New York? Oh yeah, there is also the incident of labeling the only woman to ever run for VP in the history of the U.S. as a racist.
When is Obama ever going to be held accountable for those actions?
McCain ‘08
Interesting reading for you legal types.
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0608/A_bullet_dodged_in_Chicago.html
An exceptional commentary. It is so nice to hear actual unbiased intelligent commentary.
Thank you!
I notice Editorial Boards will drop the race card on Obama’s behalf. I quote the Charlotte Observer Editoral Board:
According to the idiots at the Charlotte Observer, an increase of traffic at white supremacists’ websites is a direct result of the Democratic Party’s decision to crown Barack Obama the Democratic nominee. No evidence of a relation between this increase in traffic and the Obama campaign’s attempt to “fight the smears” is established. Instead, it is assumed. But then again, these are the same people who believe Obama is qualified for the Presidency as a result of his “ability to learn.”
wow, that’s dumb. as if having “an ability to learn” is enough to be CIC. if so lots of 5th graders would qualify.
obama does have an ability to learn…how to flip flop and throw people and causes under the bus.
He is a middle-aged man. An indication of his ability to learn is what he knows. Not much. Policy is not his thing.
Thank god at least someone in the media is willing to acknowledge this bullying bigot’s tactics. May Hussein Obama “GODDAMN THE U.S. OF KKK A.” go down in flames. Along with his angry, bitter, illiterate wife.
I am an Obamabot who hates women. I also hate myself, which is why I support Barack Obama. I am also a low information voter who beats my wife.
Anyone who sat and listened to Wright for 20 years is definitely a bigot.
Oh boy. I’ve read her, uh, thesis. She’s illiterate alright. No bros, no hos, the bigots have got to go.
Please seek help before anything happens. It is not too late.
The Barak Hussein Obama of Thursday night wouldn’t recognize the Barak Hussein Obama of Friday at half past midnight.
I hate women, which is why I support Obama. I also feel the need to compensate for my racism.
in your Kool-Aid induced dream…
Put the cork back in the bottle
How does it feel to be the traction under the wheels? He makes history by lying to people like you as he moves to the center to get the REAL voters and the REAL money? Must suck to be you.
God Damn Michelle Obama for playing the race card. God Damn Michelle Obama for implying Bill Clinton is a racist. God Damn Michelle Obama for implying Hillary Clinton is a racist. God Damn Michelle Obama for stating she would not support Hillary Clinton. God Damn Michelle Obama for exploiting misogyny for electoral gain. God Damn Michelle Obama for her radical black separatism. God Damn Michelle Obama for attending the God Damn America Church in inner city Chicago. God Damn Michelle Obama for manipulating the African-American community.
GOD DAMN MICHELLE OBAMA.
To be fair to Obambi (even though it makes me cringe) he was talking about Republican surrogates using 527 group money to demonize him. His huge problem though is that because he has no platform of achievement or accomplishment he’s completely vulnerable to demonization, and therefore unelectable. This train wreck of a nomination has to be stopped.
Actually, what Obama is trying to do is establish the idea that any criticism of him, whether by the repub 527s or anybody else, is racist. The problem is that tactic is more racist than anything that the repubs or PUMAs might do.
Yes. When he last week (again) reminded us he was black, he did not specify just 527s will try to scare the people with his blackness.
Another Rep. (Gov of KS? or IL?) explained what Obama told us by using his words. She said the following are code words for racism:
If anyone says he is inexperienced- that is racist.
If anyone says he is too liberal- that is racist.
If anyone says he is too young (what an ego!)- that is racist.
Like no one can say his formal name- because that is racist. (Even McCain supported BHO on this.)
We just all to need to keep up with what is racist so that we do not offend him. Apparently, I did not get the memo so I will need to learn as I go.
A fine effort by Scott Simon…I hope he is correct about how “insinuations” about racism can actually backfire. I’m sick of this crap from Obama…one has to wonder how many more will find it tiresome, especially when people are losing their homes, etc.
I’d be asking who is going to care about ME, and not too happy about race being the constant theme…
It’s already backfired. There’s a backlash now. It will get worse. But Obama will repeat the race card crap. He falls back on it for most everything.
stinky has to, it’s really all he’s got.
Gloria
How right you are. While we are all diverted by charges and counter charges of racism, sexism, race baiting, etc. (and of course, worrying about who is the real Nick Fury) no one is asking Obama or McCain “What are you going to do to make my life better?”
Suddenly, the topic isn’t the economy, the Iraq war, or even Universal Health Care anymore. And that’s precisely what the puppet masters want.
Has it occured to anyone Obama has a point?
I mean, read all of the headlines and smears on this blog. Are these not attacks made against Obama, most of which are baseless? Isn’t implying that he is a muslim and not born in this country a tactic used to scare voters?
That’s what he was saying in FL.
Apparently you haven’t read the comments carefully enough.
Most people here, including me, do not have a problem with Obama being Muslim or any other religion. We do have a problem with Obama lying about having been Muslim as a child (if you don’t believe that you need to stop drinking Kool-Aid). He is throwing his childhood, and also Muslims, under the bus.
This makes what you’re implying offensive. Do you have problem with Muslims?? A lot of Obama supporters freak out whenever anyone questions his honesty about that issue.
It’s against the law for non-native-born citizens to be president. That’s an important issue, and anyone can see that Obama’s birth certificate just doesn’t look authentic enough. Voters have a right to know.
There is nothing wrong with being a muslim. There is something wrong with people lying about him being a muslim.
Your only proof of him being a muslim is he lived in Indonesia for three years. For most of his life, he lived in Hawaii with his mother and grandparents who come from Kansas (hardly a muslim stronghold).
As for the birth certificate thing, the Hawaii department of Health confirmed he was born in Hawaii. So uh that’s a lie too.
You have a right to your own opininon (i.e. you hate Obama). However you don’y have a right to your own facts.
Libya’s Qadhafi, 6-20-2008:
I know- this just shows the world perception of him.
However, his school records in Indonesia recorded him as muslim and he admitted attending Islamic classes, he went to mosque, he can recite the Koran in Arabic. His cousin said his family went to general services.
Obviously, he was only a child and Islam is not a crime. We are supposed to require the truth. If he had not claimed he was never Muslim, we would not make an issue of it.
I think most of us assume he just found his true path at Trinity.
Please post the website where I can see his school records from Indonesia. Oh what, you can’t…your just taking Larry’s word for it? Didn’t he attend a Catholic school? I went to Catholic school and I don’t remember Islamic classes as an elective!
His cousin from Kenya said he was muslim? How would he know? Did Obama ever live in Kenya?
I rest my case.
This is nothing new so calm down.
There is no “one site”- it is all over- just not at Obama’s site.
In his autobiography, Dreams of My Father , Obama relates how he got into trouble for making faces during Koranic studies.
“I Studied the Koran.” Dreams of My Father
http://www.infoisrael.net/cgi-local/text.pl?source=4/b/viii/070520083
I bet you did not attend a catholic school in Indonesia that was open to all religions.
You have a right to be informed or drink the Kool-Aid.
Sure, Obama isn’t a Muslim now, but interviews with his childhood acquaintances in Indonesia showed that at one time he was Muslim. His claim that he has “always been a committed Christian” is such an obvious lie. Didn’t he write in his book that he joined a church to get street cred. If he has always been a committed Christian, he must already have been going to a church.
Maybe he was only Muslim for 3 years, but that’s enough to make Obama’s statement a lie, and a very sad one. The fact that you’re so upset about the thought of Obama being Muslim says something negative about you.
So why didn’t Hawaii issue a real birth certificate then? Did they forget to put a seal on it or something? And where are his health records? His Senate schedules? What did he do as a state senator, besides befriending slum lords?
He never lied about being a muslim! Think people, why would his mother and grandparents from Kansas raise their son as a muslim??? Does that even approach a logical thought?
Yes he lived in Indonesia and went to Catholic school there. So what?
All we know is that his two dads were Muslim and his mother enrolled him as Muslim. The step-dad not devout- but went to mosque.
Then mom shipped him off to HI when he was nine or 10 so she could be a professional student.
I have no idea what he did while with his grandmother. Only my guess, she probably did not raise him Muslim.
We know he attended every Sunday service at Trinity for twenty years- according to Obama.
No one here thinks he is currently Muslim. That is a totally different subject.
Thank again for the opportunity.
His mother was an atheist who married 1-2 muslims, you dumbsh^t. She couldn’t have cared less if her kid was raised as a muslim.
How do you look at yourself in the mirror without crying? Seriously, dude?
You were all about the hopey and changey and now, he has discarded the principles and you right there to get to the center and the REAL voters and the REAL, BIG MONEY. What did you personally believe in? That he would support FISA. Well, that’s history, right? That he meant what he once said about NAFTA? Sorry … That he supported gun control like 99% of Democrats? I know, that one shocked me, too! Well, one by one he has flipped each principle off the bus, hasn’t he? And you? Do you know what you were? Traction. That’s right. Traction. UNDER the wheels of the bus. He used you to roll over HRC. And now that she’s out, he doesn’t bat one eye. He knows that you’ll vote for him. After all, where are you going to go, right?
hahahahahahaha
Indeed he is very eloquent. The quiet sanity of his commentary is very moving. And in this year, it’s very rare. Thank you for posting this.
petition against foxnews by the Obama camp
http://pol.moveon.org/stopthesmears/?r_by=-9392761-0cK6Vqx&rc=mailto
The Obama camp is the ones that are racist.. rolls eyes…
FOX: Stop the smears
FOX has really gone over the line this past month–using racism, prejudice, and fear to smear Barack Obama. Each time they apologize–then they do it again.
First, a paid FOX commentator accidentally confused “Obama” with “Osama” and then joked on the air about killing Obama. Next, a FOX anchor said a playful fist pound by Barack and Michelle Obama could be a “terrorist fist jab.” And then, FOX called Michelle Obama “Obama’s baby mama”–slang used to describe the unmarried mother of a man’s child.
FOX won’t stop until it becomes too painful to continue–until the public calls them out and advertisers start getting worried. Nearly 100,000 Americans have already expressed their outrage. Can you express yours by adding your name to his message?
A compiled petition with your individual comment will be presented to FOX
http://pol.moveon.org/stopthesmears/?r_by=-9392761-0cK6Vqx&rc=mailto
no, I won’t sign it. Moveon said nothing about sexism.
Moveon is part of the sexism.
Absolutely. We intersect on issues only, but I want nothing to do with the thugs that trashed Hillary with myths and smears cooked up by Republicans decades ago.
They showed their true colors when they started saying the same type of thing I heard from the right-wingers.
They are no different. Rigid, controlling, and power-hungry.
Even yesterday when I popped in on HuffPo? You can see the kool-aid drinkers versus the jerks from the progressive movement. The progressives are posting they won’t vote for Obama now that he flipped on FISA. I assert that bunch was never going to be placated by any mainstream candidate. They are Greenies or Libertarians who swooped in on the Democratic Party and teased everyone with the idea of attracting the votes.
I must say, I resent them screwing up the party.
But I’d LOVE to see Michael Moore’s face when Obama flipped on FISA. That nasty, nasty endorsement letter of his goes down in history as the rant of the century.
Moveon.org is part of the sexism? LOL. Citation please.
Friday, August 29, 2003
Sexist, anti-democratic MoveOn.org nears $1 million goal for “Defend Democracy in Texas” ad campaign
Obviously well before the instant situation.
Here’s the link. See how easy it is to actually provide information versus be solely opinion driven? “http://beldar.blogs.com/beldarblog/2003/08/sexist_antidemo.html”
No. If Michelle can use it, it is in play. (the fist bump comment- is clearly wrong- but at least not repeated)
Nov. 2, 2004:
MICHELLE OBAMA, WIFE OF BARACK OBAMA: My baby’s daddy Barack Obama. Yeah!
BARACK OBAMA, SENATOR-ELECT, ILLINOIS: Thank you, Illinois. Thank you. Thank you, Illinois. I don’t know about you but I’m still fired up. I am fired up. Look at this crowd. Thank you, Illinois.
…
Let me thank my pastor, Jeremiah A. Wright, Jr. (ph) of Trinity United Church of Christ, fellow Trinitarians out there. . .
Karen,
This is a joke right? Do you really think anyone here wants to sign anything from moveon.org? Soros can kiss it.
Go peddle that crap to dailyidiots.
JUST SAY NO TO BLACK LIBERATION MARXIST THEOLOGY
NO OBAMA
MCCAIN 2008 OR UNTIL HILLARY RISES
NO.. it is not a Joke. I am for John McCain.
I can’t believe they are trying to shut Fox News up.!!
Karen where was your outrage when the other cable news channels hit Hillary with everything they had and their still after Bill Clinton. moveon.org was “Bamboozled, hoodwinked, they’ve been had I tell you.” They have made themselves irrelevant. They can’t even use their PACs anymore because Papa said so. He wants all the money sent to him. I guess you can take the boy our of Kenya but you can’t take Kenya our of the boy.
Not attacks but any legitimate questions on his inexperience or lack of qualifications will be labeled as racist — that is what he is saying and his surrogates — see Sibelius’s comments. We won’t be stifled — we have every right to evaluate each of these candidates on their individual merits and accomplishments, experience, qualifications regardless of their gender or race.
He pulled that on Hillary successfully, and the Democratic party leaders went right along with them.
Not only am I leaving the party due to the way they tacitly condoned sexism, but I’m also leaving because of the way they are defining racism.
I absolutely do not agree, and I think the definition is dangerous for AA’s and for the entire country.
THe AA community will have to fight that battle, but I suggest they do so and do so promptly. Otherwise, this idea that they are AA and cannot be vetted, held to standards, expected to compete on something other than they are entitled because of their race to get a free pass……that will truly harm people who are prepared, work hard, and have earned their positions of responsibility.
Obama is harming his own race with this meme.
That question, and others, ARE being asked of Barak Hussein Obama. He avoids answering them by spewing dense clouds of meaningless platitudes, and even on the rare occasion someone *does* manage to pin him down on some topic or other, it turns out he was LYING all along.
So no, you’re wrong, don’t say “no one is asking Obama…”. That’s a lie, too.
“Suddenly, the topic isn’t the economy, the Iraq war, or even health care anymore”??????
“Suddenly”!????
It’s been 6 months since Barak Hussein Obama dropped *those* topics in favor of inciting racial hatred and promoting divisiveness.
My point was actually more about the game that is being played to divert our attention from our real questions. I didn’t mean the people here at NQ aren’t asking the important questions – that’s the reason we’re all here. I was speaking primarily of the media and the Obama campaign in response to Gloria’s comments about being sick of all the talk of racism. Sorry if I was too general – time for me to get some sleep I guess.
testing
I posted something twice and it did not go through. This has happened to me before. Does anyone know what is the problem?
If it had a link that sometimes happens. If you put the link in quotes, it should help!
It is Barak Hussein Obama’s game to divert our attention from real answers to real questions, and it has been from the moment he entered politics, as has become apparent. It’s why he must not win the general election and must be defeated. Stealing. Lying. Pitting groups against each other. Praising an incompetent (at best) Republican president while diminishing and demonizing a successful Democratic one. Supporting the terrorist organization Hamas. Allowing his constituents in Chicago to live in squalid conditions while receiving kickbacks from the slumlords who were in a position to improve those conditions. Obama. “Give me something here”. “You’re likable enough, Hillary”. “GODDAMN AMERICA”. “GODDAMN THE U.S. OF KKK A.” We can’t afford a guy like this in the White House.
oh my
Listening to the Rev. Wright BS for twenty years is why Obama’s head is empty….Nobamahome! He doesn’t even know commonly known phrases like “dancing backwards and with heels”. He must totally bore himself.
Perhaps McCain should say the same thing about age. It’s pretty easy to figure out that Obama is black, McCain is old and Hillary is a woman. Race, gender and age has never played a part in this election unless it works to Obama’s advantage.
Nobama not now not ever. Puma Power.
Nationalism provided that history, an unambiguous morality tale that was easily communicated and easily grasped. A steady attack on the white race, the constant recitation of black people’s brutal experience in this country, served as the ballast that could prevent the ideas of personal and communal responsibility from tipping into an ocean of despair.
Yes, the nationalist would say, whites are responsible for your sorry state, not any inherent flaws in you. In fact, whites are so heartless and devious that we can no longer expect anything from them. The self-loathing you feel, what keeps you drinking or thieving, is planted by them. Rid them from your mind and find your true power liberated. Rise up, ye mighty race!
1995 Dreams of My Father
Here’s the actual quote:
“They’re going to try to make you afraid,” Obama said at the fundraiser. “They’re going to try to make you afraid of me. He’s young and inexperienced and he’s got a funny name. And did I mention he’s black? He’s got a feisty wife.”
Check out the blog entries the last two months on NQ, and you may understand where Obama may have gotten these ‘crazy’ ideas.
Yes.
Let’s call them racists before they ever open their mouths or put pen to paper or fingers to keyboards.
That’ll unite us for sure.
Sorry. Obama got that “crazy” idea from Trinity United “Black Power” Church. (Cuz God cares what race you are.)
Troll patrol is fun.
Cat’s already out of the bag, Dean-O! Sites like No Quarter have been smearing Obama with this garbage for months.
Whitey tapes, gay limo sex, fake birth certificates, secret muslim, etc, etc. Most are either gross distortions or flat-out lies.
And when Obama points out your dirty tactics, you say he’s playing the race card?
All Obama was telling his supporters was there’s more to come. No doubt the charge will be led by the fringe elements on this site. HAPPY HUNTING!
You should try to find out what the real definition of smear is. It’s not a smear if it can be backed up by facts.
The cat is certainly out of the bag. It ran screaming out of it when Hillary won NH.
Whitey tape will be out after August. I can’t stand the Republicans, but I don’t think they’re stupid. Obama was the candidate they wanted, and they’ll crucify MO with the tape. No doubt.
Gay limo sex– I think Sinclair is as kooky as a kook can get, but Obama isn’t refuting. Why are you?
Secret muslim?– Not so secret when the people who went to school with him say he most certainly was. Not to mention his brother. (BTW, don’t have a problem with his being a muslim. The lying about it is another matter.)
Regardless. My problem with the big “O” is this: He championed change, then kowtowed to the DNC by taking his name off of my state’s primary ballot. His idea of “change” in my state meant less choices at the polls. Hence, my decision to back Hillary.
That’s right. Initially I backed Obama.
Then I was forcibly made to projectile vomit the Kool-Aid.
Way I see it you’ve got two choices. Support Obama, or support a democracy where every vote counts.
Think carefully. You’re decision now will affect the future of our country.
I’ll vote for Obama, thanks. Because I don’t want a Republican who is beholden to the religious right appointing the next two Supreme Court Justices. End of story. Compared to the direction of the Court for the next 20 or 30 years, everything else is trivial.
The old SCotUS scare. Democrats control the judiciary committee in the Senate, and will do so for the foreseeable future.
You are a fool. Nobody decides which cases the Supereme Court except the Court itself. Almost every Court decision these days is decided 5-4, and the two oldest Justices are two of the liberals. Jesus, you people are a menace. You have no idea the kind of America you are fighting for by supporting McCain.
hahahahahahahahaha
He LIKED the gun decision …
He only voted “present” on issues of reproductive health. I don’t trust him … and since you’re a man, you don’t really give a freak, do you? Don’t beat us with RvW when you don’t have any “skin” in that game!
So. You still don’t get it? There isn’t going to be a liberal court if Obama wins. He will sell it to the highest bidder. Ditto universal health care which he has never intended to implement. Out of Iraq? Do you listen or just swoon because he’s already backing off on that. Fisa, Scott covered that good, but maybe you can take up the KO convluted argument. His economic advisors said last week, they may be lowering corporate taxes if the boys behave themselves. He is making promises, a lot of them, he can’t keep. You will wake up one fine morning and wonder what the hell happened, buy a bumper sticker saying you didn’t vote for him and blame it on someone else.
I thought that way myself until Kelo vs City of New London. Then I realized that liberal justices can also suck.
B-Ho tried to take my right to vote.
That’s more dangerous than McCain’s picks.
So when we scream about Pelosi, its because we’re what? When we call Dean “Coward,” are we anti physicians? You should try to listen to yourself on occaision. You’re freaking hysterical!
Typical Obama tactic: conflate inexperience with race and…woila! Any criticism of his inexperience is racist!
Nudge nudge wink wink. When they say I have no experience it’s the same as using the “N” word.
What a devious, unpricipled POS.
trying to be preemptive in case people attack him on his record. that’s a joke, right? what record? the slum landlord one, or the absent votes, or perhaps taking credit for passing a health care bill for returning iraq vets when he didn’t vote for it — he was absent again — the bill passed 91-3.
it is absolutely true that O and his supporters are playing the race card against any and all criticisms of him. according to them, the only possible reason why anyone would vote against Obama is because they’re a racist. the rest of us need to point this out every time it happens, and make sure everyone we associate with knows it, because you know the MSM is never going to acknowledge it. i personally resent being falsely accused of being a racist, and that alone is about enough to make me not vote for the guy.
Before election:
…the only possible reason why anyone would vote against Obama is because they’re a racist.
After election:
…the only possible reason why anyone would disagree with Obama is because they’re a racist.
Reason #1 to vote against Obama.
Scott Simon is right.
PUMA
Simon is far too easy on Obama.
He says nothing of of the cheating, duplicity, divisivieness, dirty tricks, thuggishness, and raw misogyny of the Obama campaign.
You Are in MY Reality Now:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zuTV4IaVVa0
I’m surprised NPR didn’t stuff a rag in his mouth.
Not only is Obama’s racebaiting bordering on ludicrous, but I want him to keep doing it! Disgusted, insulted and downright pissed of voters will show up at the polls in record numbers. Keep doing it Comrade!
Simon brought up another subject few have expressed but which looms over everything in truth. A half a billion dollars to shamelessly promote the man who keeps trying to pawn himself off as a regular guy who cares, while people struggle to fill up their tanks and meet their mortgages. While people in the state he represents live in poverty under the watchful eye of Obama’s friends known as slumlords.
Shameless doesn’t even begin to cover it. He has been pandering even more everyday. I tell you, he doesn’t care. Power or the struggle for it, can cause maddness.
“I HOPE HE [MCCAIN] DIES BEFORE NOVEMBER!” said Obama Supporter.
When an Obama supporter hears something she didn’t like she decided to call and complain.The problem is she called the wrong radio show. She intended to call The Quinn & Rose Show, but instead got somebody else who also broadcast from the same building. If you need another example of just how tolerant and caring liberals aren’t. Listen to this caller hope McCain dies before November.
http://realdemocrathistory.wordpress.com/2008/06/27/i-hope-he-mccain-dies-before-november-said-obama-supporter/
Every Obama supporter like this deranged women only makes me feel that much better about my McCain vote, count on it.
Don’t lump all liberals into a class with that nut case. These people scare the crap out of me too.
How “liberal” is Barry? What happened to FISA and guns? I’m more liberal than he is …. and I am sure as shit not voting for him. Voting “present” on issues of reproductive choice doesn’t make him a supporter. It makes him a pandering coward.
Obama ia trying hard to draw John McCain into a race war but John is not biting. he LCintons and then blame the LCiontons for talking about race. SO far the Republicans are showing who is smarter and is sticking to issues. Obama wants a race fight because he thinks that’s the only way to win. But the lat thing Americans want is a cadidate so low to exploit race especially after what’s going on in Zimbawe. Empty suit is throwing everything at the Repubs and they are not biting.
Is it true the BO might outspend McCain by 6:1? I thought that the RNC money was going to level the financial playing field. That is a concern for Mr. Public Financing (not).
Do you think there might be a downside to that? I think it’s pretty disgusting myself, and that’s one McCain won’t give him a pass on. He look dirty for asking donors to go directly to his campaign and the announce he won’t accept public financing using the excuse he wants the people to finance his campaign. Every time we get a driver’s licenses, we have the option of giving a dollar so how is what he’s doing better?
Excellent commentary from Scott Simon. Thank you for posting it!!
I had missed it.
Freom Gretawire
June 28th, 2008 at 11:32 am
On top of this..
Those same people that are behind this video
http://www.metacafe.com/watch/456363/khallid_muhammads_speech_kill_the_white_man/
Are also connected to Obama. They have links to Obama’ss website on here.
You don’t have to click on the links, just scroll your mouse down under
Under what is? and The answer center, links to Obama website and under commissons too..
http://www.ncobra.org/donate.htm
If this doesn’t scare the crap out of you, nothing will!!
Wow! A newfound respect for Scott Simon. What a brilliantly aimed corrective at the cheap shot Obama hurled at McCain this week.
As Simon points out – and all of us have here – race cards can come from either direction. Usually only one direction gets criticized.
And on NPR – will miracles never cease?
News Update
Clinton to Obama: “Kiss My Ass”
http://www.obama-wire.com
Jesus H. Christ!!
THAT was on listener supported commie radio?
Old Jim’s gonna have stop trashing the Chardonnay and Brie crowd, maybe eat more granola.
If Obama is post-race than I’m Woody Allen. This guy is pondscum, and I’m going to enjoy watching the GOP destroy him.
He is an utterly mediocre, corrupt, race-obsessed fraud. Ignore these recently manufactured polls. His support in the swing-states in embarrassingly low. Even more of my Obama-supporting friends are deserting him. There is incredible buyers remorse out there for this guy. I’ve never seen anything like it.
And now that he doesn’t have Clinton to kick around anymore, his flaws are painfully apparent for all to see. He’s going to be flip-flopped to death, and when the GOP does decide to engage the race issue, they won’t play games. He’s also ducking these town hall meetings, scared crapless that McCain is going to plaster him. Now that is one thumping that I’m going to enjoy.
Remember : this guy doesn’t not have a general election strategy. He just wanted the nomination. Now that he discharged his responsibilities, he’s done. When he loses, he’ll blame racist white people, just like his long-time minister, and go home.
–
Enjoy the sweet aroma of Obama’s downfall in the morning. It will smell like … change!
Kudos to Scott Simon for this brave peace. Wake Up World before its too late!
I blame Michelle Obama for the race card in this election.
There will be race riots if Obama does not win. it will be scary. He must be stopped.