<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: He who sleeps with dogs&#8230;.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/06/28/he-who-sleeps-with-dogs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/06/28/he-who-sleeps-with-dogs/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 01:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: elise</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/06/28/he-who-sleeps-with-dogs/comment-page-3/#comment-407413</link>
		<dc:creator>elise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 08:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/06/28/he-who-sleeps-with-dogs/#comment-407413</guid>
		<description>It is strange about the sds. Gov. Ritter of Colorado didn't even know his name was on the list of endorsers. The last time I checked the list, there are still 125 uncommitted sds. In her last speech, she said, "I'll never give up and I'll never give in". She suspended her campaign instead of conceding, her campaign reserved the right to challenge Mi. allotment before the credentials committee. If they take her name off the ballot with or without her permission, it only takes two people to get it back on. The only way they could stop it, would be to find a way to shut her supporters down and that won't be pretty on nationally televised convention. I think a floor fight would be a great way to cleanse the party. They can kiss the GE goodby anyway so why not have a show down?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is strange about the sds. Gov. Ritter of Colorado didn&#8217;t even know his name was on the list of endorsers. The last time I checked the list, there are still 125 uncommitted sds. In her last speech, she said, &#8220;I&#8217;ll never give up and I&#8217;ll never give in&#8221;. She suspended her campaign instead of conceding, her campaign reserved the right to challenge Mi. allotment before the credentials committee. If they take her name off the ballot with or without her permission, it only takes two people to get it back on. The only way they could stop it, would be to find a way to shut her supporters down and that won&#8217;t be pretty on nationally televised convention. I think a floor fight would be a great way to cleanse the party. They can kiss the GE goodby anyway so why not have a show down?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elise</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/06/28/he-who-sleeps-with-dogs/comment-page-3/#comment-407396</link>
		<dc:creator>elise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 08:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/06/28/he-who-sleeps-with-dogs/#comment-407396</guid>
		<description>bipolar</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bipolar</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elise</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/06/28/he-who-sleeps-with-dogs/comment-page-3/#comment-407389</link>
		<dc:creator>elise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 07:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/06/28/he-who-sleeps-with-dogs/#comment-407389</guid>
		<description>If I were their parent, I would be worried about the Mother Ship taking them away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I were their parent, I would be worried about the Mother Ship taking them away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elise</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/06/28/he-who-sleeps-with-dogs/comment-page-3/#comment-407384</link>
		<dc:creator>elise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 07:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/06/28/he-who-sleeps-with-dogs/#comment-407384</guid>
		<description>Do you believe, then, she could not have won the general? I disagree. I have no faith in polls, but if they were to be believed, she would have been far ahead of McCain now instead of tied. The base of African Americans which has always supported the Clintons, would have no trouble changing their allegence to her. Her argument to superdelegates was valid. She would have taken the swing states and traditionally Democratic ones as well. The Clinton haters are Republicans, are they not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you believe, then, she could not have won the general? I disagree. I have no faith in polls, but if they were to be believed, she would have been far ahead of McCain now instead of tied. The base of African Americans which has always supported the Clintons, would have no trouble changing their allegence to her. Her argument to superdelegates was valid. She would have taken the swing states and traditionally Democratic ones as well. The Clinton haters are Republicans, are they not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elise</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/06/28/he-who-sleeps-with-dogs/comment-page-3/#comment-407360</link>
		<dc:creator>elise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 07:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/06/28/he-who-sleeps-with-dogs/#comment-407360</guid>
		<description>Bill will be in better shape to protect his legacy if he doesn't endorse or campaign for this loser. Pres. Clinton is a Rhodes Scholar and the most intellectually superior president, possibly since Thomas Jefferson. I could be wrong, but I don't believe he can be forced to support BO or do anything else he doesn't want to do. His legacy is not in trouble. He is and always will be larger than life. I don't watch CNN or MSNBC so maybe someone who does can tell me exactly what they mean and how what they say matters. Olbermann et al won't even be a footnote when Bill Clinton's history is written.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill will be in better shape to protect his legacy if he doesn&#8217;t endorse or campaign for this loser. Pres. Clinton is a Rhodes Scholar and the most intellectually superior president, possibly since Thomas Jefferson. I could be wrong, but I don&#8217;t believe he can be forced to support BO or do anything else he doesn&#8217;t want to do. His legacy is not in trouble. He is and always will be larger than life. I don&#8217;t watch CNN or MSNBC so maybe someone who does can tell me exactly what they mean and how what they say matters. Olbermann et al won&#8217;t even be a footnote when Bill Clinton&#8217;s history is written.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elise</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/06/28/he-who-sleeps-with-dogs/comment-page-3/#comment-407277</link>
		<dc:creator>elise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 06:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/06/28/he-who-sleeps-with-dogs/#comment-407277</guid>
		<description>Why would he do such a thing? Those are the same people who called him racist. This parade of Hillary supporters going on talk shows beating a drum for Obama is almost comical. All the while saying don't worry, Dems will come home, Obama is out there insulting us again. I truly believe the DNC knows they are in trouble, but they can't fix the general like they did they primaris. You know what, they look like the pictures of hostages reading a prepared statements.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would he do such a thing? Those are the same people who called him racist. This parade of Hillary supporters going on talk shows beating a drum for Obama is almost comical. All the while saying don&#8217;t worry, Dems will come home, Obama is out there insulting us again. I truly believe the DNC knows they are in trouble, but they can&#8217;t fix the general like they did they primaris. You know what, they look like the pictures of hostages reading a prepared statements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elise</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/06/28/he-who-sleeps-with-dogs/comment-page-3/#comment-407106</link>
		<dc:creator>elise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 05:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/06/28/he-who-sleeps-with-dogs/#comment-407106</guid>
		<description>If that is true, why are they turning over every rock. All the talk about Christian Right Wing conservatives and giving felons the vote and maybe the idea of Hillary campaigning with him will turn out not to be such a good idea. There wasn't a lot of enthusiasm at the Unity Rally. Or was that just my imagination?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If that is true, why are they turning over every rock. All the talk about Christian Right Wing conservatives and giving felons the vote and maybe the idea of Hillary campaigning with him will turn out not to be such a good idea. There wasn&#8217;t a lot of enthusiasm at the Unity Rally. Or was that just my imagination?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elise</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/06/28/he-who-sleeps-with-dogs/comment-page-3/#comment-407023</link>
		<dc:creator>elise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 05:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/06/28/he-who-sleeps-with-dogs/#comment-407023</guid>
		<description>Looking for anything making sense in this election will drive you nuts. Gov. Rendell was attacked for his comment on the demographics in Pa. also. He was on some talk shows after and he looked scared to death he would be branded racist the rest of his life. At least he knows PUMA and the word is spreading all over. Everyone has fallen in line except Evan Bayh and Pres. Clinton. How are they planning to get Bill on the same stage with BO? Whatever, it hasn't worked yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking for anything making sense in this election will drive you nuts. Gov. Rendell was attacked for his comment on the demographics in Pa. also. He was on some talk shows after and he looked scared to death he would be branded racist the rest of his life. At least he knows PUMA and the word is spreading all over. Everyone has fallen in line except Evan Bayh and Pres. Clinton. How are they planning to get Bill on the same stage with BO? Whatever, it hasn&#8217;t worked yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitchell Freedman</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/06/28/he-who-sleeps-with-dogs/comment-page-3/#comment-406201</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitchell Freedman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 00:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/06/28/he-who-sleeps-with-dogs/#comment-406201</guid>
		<description>Could someone here help a former Kucinich and Edwards supporter understand why it is that we should not vote for Obama as opposed to McCain?

Really.  I want to understand just what Hillary stood for that was so very different from Obama.  Their health care plans were essentially the same in their corporate oriented views (yes, yes, I know about Obama's not supposedly being universal, but Hillary's was hardly any better...).  And other than that...what was the difference?

I saw ridiculous statements coming from surrogates of Hillary, but I also noticed the corporate media was very cruel to Hillary--after making her the front runner way back when she announced.  Hillary took the air out of the room and only Obama seemed to be allowed to fill up the room by our corporate media.

Well, Hillary did not prevail and it's time to make sure we don't have four more years of someone who is an abject idiot.  McCain does not know jack about the economy, and he will sure as hell draft your children to replace our exhausted troops in Iraq.  And God knows what number of bombs he wants to drop over Iran.  And if anyone is satisfied about the 5-4 decisions on the Supreme Court, then by all means, just keep pouting and telling me you might vote for the idiot McCain.

So, please, enlighten me as to why I am wrong here.  Could ya?

PS:  Obama did not swear on the Koran when he became a Senator.  He is not a secret Muslim.  He does not share Rev. Wright's views on race, AIDs or anything else that we've heard Wright say that was off the wall.  He and Hillary are decent bankers and believe earnestly in public policy.  I may not agree with them on some economic issues, and sure as heck opposed the Iraq War from the beginning (as did Obama), and I believe the Democratic Party leadership was spineless in not impeaching Bush and Cheney a long time ago.  But I am also sure I am voting for Obama this fall to ensure McCain does not win.  How about you all?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could someone here help a former Kucinich and Edwards supporter understand why it is that we should not vote for Obama as opposed to McCain?</p>
<p>Really.  I want to understand just what Hillary stood for that was so very different from Obama.  Their health care plans were essentially the same in their corporate oriented views (yes, yes, I know about Obama&#8217;s not supposedly being universal, but Hillary&#8217;s was hardly any better&#8230;).  And other than that&#8230;what was the difference?</p>
<p>I saw ridiculous statements coming from surrogates of Hillary, but I also noticed the corporate media was very cruel to Hillary&#8211;after making her the front runner way back when she announced.  Hillary took the air out of the room and only Obama seemed to be allowed to fill up the room by our corporate media.</p>
<p>Well, Hillary did not prevail and it&#8217;s time to make sure we don&#8217;t have four more years of someone who is an abject idiot.  McCain does not know jack about the economy, and he will sure as hell draft your children to replace our exhausted troops in Iraq.  And God knows what number of bombs he wants to drop over Iran.  And if anyone is satisfied about the 5-4 decisions on the Supreme Court, then by all means, just keep pouting and telling me you might vote for the idiot McCain.</p>
<p>So, please, enlighten me as to why I am wrong here.  Could ya?</p>
<p>PS:  Obama did not swear on the Koran when he became a Senator.  He is not a secret Muslim.  He does not share Rev. Wright&#8217;s views on race, AIDs or anything else that we&#8217;ve heard Wright say that was off the wall.  He and Hillary are decent bankers and believe earnestly in public policy.  I may not agree with them on some economic issues, and sure as heck opposed the Iraq War from the beginning (as did Obama), and I believe the Democratic Party leadership was spineless in not impeaching Bush and Cheney a long time ago.  But I am also sure I am voting for Obama this fall to ensure McCain does not win.  How about you all?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jadwiga</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/06/28/he-who-sleeps-with-dogs/comment-page-3/#comment-405806</link>
		<dc:creator>jadwiga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 21:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/06/28/he-who-sleeps-with-dogs/#comment-405806</guid>
		<description>I know, my english is not very good and I am not our most brilliant blogger. Nevertheless I posted this on HOUND in reply to Gov. Rendell and Sen. Casey's statement:

"Dear Mr. Rendell and Casey,

I find it hopelessly foolis for you to state that Senator McCain is the lesser qualified candidate for the presidency - in the light of the long list of vitally important issues that B.H. Obama has abandoned with blinding speed, in the name of political expediency. Just to mention a few: Iraq, FISA, gun control, public financing of presidential election, death penalty... The list goes on.
Do you seriously accept us to believe that Obama represents anything democratic?

With Obama in the White House (God help us all!), we would witness a third term of G.W. Bush. Maybe worse. Obama is less qualified, less experienced than G.W. Bush. I personally have serious doubts of his patriotism. He doesn't stand for any principle other than winning the presidency. He abandoned almost every important position since the beginning of the race. He will have to learn 'on the job', but he knows less today than G.W. Bush when he first started.

It is my patriotic duty to vote for a candidate that has a chance to navigate the US foreign politics, the economy to less troubeled waters. That candidate should have been Hillary Clinton. Now only one left: Senator J.S McCain.

I have voted for democrats in the last 16 years (except for Arnold Schwarzenegger). I felt that the Democratic Party represents the values that I hold dear.

To vote for a candidate that received his nomination by rigged process, who doesn't represent anybody's values is out of the question for ever. NEVER OBAMA!

This is a historic time. The Democratic Party has abandoned it's core values to cater to a candidate that should be rolled in tar and feathers and driven out of the village.

I will vote again for democrats when the Party stands for democracy again.

We meet again at the voting booths in November."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know, my english is not very good and I am not our most brilliant blogger. Nevertheless I posted this on HOUND in reply to Gov. Rendell and Sen. Casey&#8217;s statement:</p>
<p>&#8220;Dear Mr. Rendell and Casey,</p>
<p>I find it hopelessly foolis for you to state that Senator McCain is the lesser qualified candidate for the presidency - in the light of the long list of vitally important issues that B.H. Obama has abandoned with blinding speed, in the name of political expediency. Just to mention a few: Iraq, FISA, gun control, public financing of presidential election, death penalty&#8230; The list goes on.<br />
Do you seriously accept us to believe that Obama represents anything democratic?</p>
<p>With Obama in the White House (God help us all!), we would witness a third term of G.W. Bush. Maybe worse. Obama is less qualified, less experienced than G.W. Bush. I personally have serious doubts of his patriotism. He doesn&#8217;t stand for any principle other than winning the presidency. He abandoned almost every important position since the beginning of the race. He will have to learn &#8216;on the job&#8217;, but he knows less today than G.W. Bush when he first started.</p>
<p>It is my patriotic duty to vote for a candidate that has a chance to navigate the US foreign politics, the economy to less troubeled waters. That candidate should have been Hillary Clinton. Now only one left: Senator J.S McCain.</p>
<p>I have voted for democrats in the last 16 years (except for Arnold Schwarzenegger). I felt that the Democratic Party represents the values that I hold dear.</p>
<p>To vote for a candidate that received his nomination by rigged process, who doesn&#8217;t represent anybody&#8217;s values is out of the question for ever. NEVER OBAMA!</p>
<p>This is a historic time. The Democratic Party has abandoned it&#8217;s core values to cater to a candidate that should be rolled in tar and feathers and driven out of the village.</p>
<p>I will vote again for democrats when the Party stands for democracy again.</p>
<p>We meet again at the voting booths in November.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
