The third word in the last paragraph is supposed to read “the,” not “he.” It was an error of dexterity and typography, not of grammar. But I do apologize, nonetheless, for the appearance of imprecision in the written language, the language in this case being “the Queen’s English,” by which you may infer whatever you wish; either the sexual proclivity of this writer’s language of preference, a descriptive term alluding to the gender of the current inhabitant of the throne of Great Britain, or both.

Sodomites for McCain-Palin, indeed.

The wording above the photo should read, “If you’re still thinking about voting for Obama, I’ve got a question for you . . . ”

In this case you should use the contraction for “you are,” instead of the currently-employed “your,” which indicates possession. Also, a comma, not a semi-colon (which would be half-assed), should follow “Obama” (who’s a complete ass), although the junior senator from Illinois’s used to being followed by the half-assed, judging from the persons on his payroll, including sycophantic spokespeople.

OK, I just noticed someone else also pointed out one of these errors I mentioned in the picture’s caption, but that poster’s assertion the mistakes are indicative of a lack of intelligence on the part of Republicans/conservatives is not a correct assumption.

This poster, a conservative and journalist by profession, who received A’s in his high school and college English courses, noticed the errors, BOTH OF THEM, before seeing the other poster’s corrective comment.

While it may have at one time been true that “just because most stupid people are conservative doesn’t mean all conservatives are stupid” (a quotation I think I recall being attributed to the late conservative author, columnist & publisher, William F. Buckley), these days, with a few generations of Bolshevik-brainwashed Baby Boomers and their brood regurgitating knee-jerk platitudes, it may be more the case of liberals & leftists lacking literacy and factual fastidiousness; less celebrated in their cerebral certitude.

In any case, ’twas I who caught the two errors of my fellow conservative’s photo caption, as well the mistake made by his criticizing, liberal poster in neglecting his other error of punctuation. So, a net gain of 1-0, conservatives vs. liberals.

And regarding he alliterative prose of my paragraph twice preceding this, as the distinguished linguist, Dick Martin, once said, “Look them up in your ‘Funk & Wagnalls!’”