The third word in the last paragraph is supposed to read “the,” not “he.” It was an error of dexterity and typography, not of grammar. But I do apologize, nonetheless, for the appearance of imprecision in the written language, the language in this case being “the Queen’s English,” by which you may infer whatever you wish; either the sexual proclivity of this writer’s language of preference, a descriptive term alluding to the gender of the current inhabitant of the throne of Great Britain, or both.

Sodomites for McCain-Palin, indeed.

The wording above the photo should read, “If you’re still thinking about voting for Obama, I’ve got a question for you . . . ”

In this case you should use the contraction for “you are,” instead of the currently-employed “your,” which indicates possession. Also, a comma, not a semi-colon (which would be half-assed), should follow “Obama” (who’s a complete ass), although the junior senator from Illinois’s used to being followed by the half-assed, judging from the persons on his payroll, including sycophantic spokespeople.

OK, I just noticed someone else also pointed out one of these errors I mentioned in the picture’s caption, but that poster’s assertion the mistakes are indicative of a lack of intelligence on the part of Republicans/conservatives is not a correct assumption.

This poster, a conservative and journalist by profession, who received A’s in his high school and college English courses, noticed the errors, BOTH OF THEM, before seeing the other poster’s corrective comment.

While it may have at one time been true that “just because most stupid people are conservative doesn’t mean all conservatives are stupid” (a quotation I think I recall being attributed to the late conservative author, columnist & publisher, William F. Buckley), these days, with a few generations of Bolshevik-brainwashed Baby Boomers and their brood regurgitating knee-jerk platitudes, it may be more the case of liberals & leftists lacking literacy and factual fastidiousness; less celebrated in their cerebral certitude.

In any case, ’twas I who caught the two errors of my fellow conservative’s photo caption, as well the mistake made by his criticizing, liberal poster in neglecting his other error of punctuation. So, a net gain of 1-0, conservatives vs. liberals.

And regarding he alliterative prose of my paragraph twice preceding this, as the distinguished linguist, Dick Martin, once said, “Look them up in your ‘Funk & Wagnalls!’”

Thanks Clark…..for bringing that issue up in dramatic fashion.

I don’t think Lanny Davis wants Clark considered for VP. I can only guess these Clinton supporters are trying to box Obama into considering Clinton for VP by taking themselves and each other out of contention.

Unfortunately, and in all seriousness, the torture McCain endured is probably a contributing factor in his seemingly endless ability to endure the torturous machinations of the Republican Party & their minions.

Wes Clark is a national treasure. Furter, he is quite literally the gold standard of the Democratic Party.

McCain is a washed up caricature of himself.

If anyone should understand Country first, it should be any person who has served our Country. A political party is just that…a party, with its own vested interests. This democratic party has decided, on its own, to go in a “new” direction (actually, they’ve been caving to the far lefties for years) and they wanted to rid themselves of all semblance of the “old” party, which was defined primarily for working people long ago.

Fine. That’s what they can do. And I, as a citizen, can tell them to go straight to hell, as well as all who support this absolutely dangerous nonsense.

The only way to make Obama look better is belittle everyone else.

Or, you could make a point by point comparison between John McCain and Barack Obama on every important political issue you care about.

Some people actually care more about those issues than specifically who it is that’s promoting them.

McCain’s voting history during the reign of the George W. Bush Administration has been in support of George W. Bush policy 95% of the time. Do you like the George W. Bush policy, or where it’s gotten America to over the last 7 1/2 years?

Want to let them run with it for another 4?

It isn’t the wrapping on the package that’s ultimately important. It’s what’s inside the box. Compare the candidates on their stated policy positions, their entire voting records, and who they’re beholden to. Everything else is advertising, spin, or the static of deliberate disinformation.