RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Senator Hillary Clinton at HRC Board Meeting (2007)

[youtube]http://youtube.com/watch?v=bSPxGmePSiA#[/youtube]

You know, I am pretty tired of having to write about Barack Obama and whatever crapola he is claiming/twisting/changing today. I am sick of him and his duplicity. Not that I am surprised by it - not one iota. I am just sick of it. And I miss hearing Hillary Clinton. I miss her speeches, I miss her rallies, I miss her passion, I miss her personality. So, I thought I would pull up a great video of her speaking to the HRC board. So, if you have been missing her like I have, sit back and enjoy listening to her, and appreciating all that she has done (and would have done as president) for the LGBT community. As has often been noted, she has been a stalwart supporter of this community. And has long been a friend to the HRC.

If only HRC had been as good of a friend to Senator Clinton. On June 6, HRC endorsed BARACK OBAMA. Yes, they did. Why? Oh, their director, Joe Salmonese said it was because of his Civil Rights record (which is what, exactly?), his strong support of the LGBT community (which he has demonstrated HOW exactly?), and all of the other hooey people generally spew then. I terminated my membership to HRC. After over 20 years. For HRC to not endorse HRC after all of the accolades they have bestowed upon her, and after her COMMITMENT to our community is simply reprehensible. I have lost all respect for them (and frankly, I was never all that thrilled with Salmonese anyway, and even less so now).

So, Obama - oh, yes - what a great friend he is to the LGBT community - NOT! Let’s just look at ONE of his closest friends and advisers. Yes, I am talking about James Meeks, IL state senator, and Baptist minister. Another organization to which my partner and I are long-term members is the Southern Poverty Law Center. In an article in Chicago Pride, it was reported:

A spring 2007 newsletter from the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) named Meeks one of the “10 leading black religious voices in the anti-gay movement”. The newsletter cites him as both “a key member of Chicago’s ‘Gatekeepers’ network, an interracial group of evangelical ministers who strive to erase the division between church and state” and “a stalwart anti-gay activist… [who]… has used his House of Hope mega-church to launch petition drives for the Illinois Family Institute (IFI), a major state-level ‘family values’ pressure group that lauded him last year for leading African Americans in ‘clearly understanding the threat of gay marriage.’”

The SPLC newsletter also noted that, “Meeks and the IFI are partnered with Focus on the Family, the Family Research Council and the Alliance Defense Fund, major anti-gay organizations of the Christian Right. They also are tightly allied with Americans for Truth, an Illinois group that said in a press release last year that ‘fighting AIDS without talking against homosexuality is like fighting lung cancer without talking against smoking.’”

Oh, goody - a twofer! He hates gay people, AND he wants to eradicate the line between Church and State! That makes Obama’s recent statements about expanding Faith Initiatives even more telling, doesn’t it?? If one of his CLOSEST friends/advisers/mentors is actively working to eradicate that line, I think it highlights quite starkly the influence someone like Meeks has in his life. And did you CATCH the connection to James Dobson’s outfit, “Focus on the Family?” Telling. Very, very telling.

But wait, there is more:

On a more personal level, Meeks has reportedly blamed “Hollywood Jews for bringing us Brokeback Mountain” and actively campaigned to defeat SB3186, an Illinois LGBT non-discrimination bill, while serving in the Illinois state legislature alongside Obama. According to a 2006 Chicago Sun Times article, his church sponsored a “Halloween fright night” which “consigned to the flames of hell two mincing young men wearing body glitter who were supposed to be homosexuals.”

Oh, what a charmer! And then there is Donnie McClurkin and HIS rabid anti-gay activity…

So you can see why HRC would have endorsed Obama, right? Yeah, me neither.

And speaking of HRC, here is a little tidbit from its FORMER Director, Elizabeth Birch, whom I did like. This comes from a report on the LA Gay Pride Parade:

In an LGBT Obama outreach call Friday (which openly gay Deputy Campaign manager Steve Hildebrand said included 1,200 participants), former Human Rights Campaign executive director Elizabeth Birch talked movingly about her pain and disappointment - not just at Clinton’s defeat and the complexities of having two role models for her two bi-racial children, but also from the perspective of the “scrappy 12 year old” she once was who dreamed of changing the world.

That resonated with a number of Hillary-supporting lesbians with whom I spoke later. “Was Elizabeth the only woman on the call?,” they asked. “Where are the lesbians in Obama’s campaign?”

This is more than just pained disappointment - it’s a belief that Obama is keyed into the A-Gay white boys network that still tends to - perhaps unconsciously but from a sense of entitlement - dismiss women.

Huh - Obama is paying especial attention to the men but not the women?? It was mainly men on his GAY outreach call? Wow - who could have seen THAT coming? Oh, right - ALL of us.

Sigh.

So, take a listen to Hillary Rodham Clinton, the ORIGINAL HRC. Watch the person who SHOULD be president. Maybe there is still time. No, there IS still time. Forget the Ego-Sized Stadium for Obama - we CAN make a difference in Denver. We must make a difference in Denver.

Trackback URL

RSS Feed for This Post287 Comments »

Comment by fred | 2008-07-08 13:10:10

July 8, 2008
Gallup Daily: Obama 46%, McCain 44%

Obama up ONLY 2…With all that Money, Media, and “The Movement” hahahah McCain and The RNC have just started to shoot back……Obama is going to lose BIG

Comment by believe | 2008-07-08 13:15:31

And yet you ignored the 6 point Gallup lead a few days ago and all the other polls out there. Random fluctuation is to be expected.

Cherrypicking is not the way to analyze polls, that is if you really want honest analysis.

Comment by tampagurl | 2008-07-08 13:35:59

Believe, it looks to me like you are the cherry picker!!!!wahahahahahah

Comment by Factcheck2 | 2008-07-08 15:44:36

Amy, thank you for writing this. The LGBT community could turn this election around in five minutes, given the activists and money available. What do YOU think about launching a full-court press against DNC headquarters to challenge the coup d’etat of letting superdelegates “vote” 3 months early after stealing delegates from Michigan and Florida because their states voted 1-2 weeks early? Don’t you think we have them there? The party is committing treason against the United States and the American public knows it!

Waiting for August, when all the anger will be disssipated and the propaganda campaign to cover up what happened is 8 weeks along, it’s hard to see how anything will be accomplished then.

I’ve just posted a new article on this election scam, if anyone’s still interested in actually electing Sen. Clinton.

http://www.thecityedition.com/Pages/Archive/Summer08/BushThirdTerm.html

Comment by Lou | 2008-07-08 16:26:29

Oh Boy. We are in for bigtime trouble if Obama steals the general..Yes we want Hill for nominee. The story about Obama and Lugar manipulating the gas prices for wall street has alot of people going hungry or out of work.

 

Comment by KarenAnn | 2008-07-08 18:33:57

Anyone still voting for Obama after reading this is in serious need of mental health care.
Need I say more?

 
 

Comment by politicsIsdirty | 2008-07-08 16:15:01

Yeah, believe, who is the cherry picker now?

You are so blind to the faults of your Messiah. For the sake of our country, wake up before it is too late.

 
 

Comment by NoObamislamists | 2008-07-08 13:40:11

80+% of the country feels we’re heading down the wrong track.

The Dem congress has SINGLE DIGIT APPROVAL RATINGS. Worst. Congress. Ever.

Where’s the Obama love?

Comment by scorbs | 2008-07-08 15:22:45

And Congress is mostly Democratic, granted not so with the Senate. Pelosi and Reid tried to passively usher a Dem into the White house, by doing nothing and allowing the country to go to rot. Problems today are now under the Democratic watch in Congress, and in Pelosi’s, Reid’s laps.

 

Comment by Perry Logan | 2008-07-08 16:42:18

No way!

I agree the Dems have screwed up, but The Worst Congress Ever™ had to be the Repub 109th–the ones we threw out in 2006. They’re the ones who worked two days a week and let our wounded vets lie around in their own urine.

Woe Betide the Democrats
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aP3q8dHA4Hk

Comment by doctorate | 2008-07-08 22:14:56

The current Congress has a 9% approval rating, one of the lowest ever.

 
 
 

Comment by LuigiDaMan | 2008-07-08 13:58:30

It’s okay, believe that Nobama will win Ohio & FLA. It just ain’t happening, happy!

Comment by tish | 2008-07-08 16:54:46

im from fla, and tell everyone not to vote for the fraud, i hear hes irish today! yeah right..tommorrow he will be italian or german.., we all know what and who he is..he is doing so well he has to come up with a high school gimmick to get people to send him $5, and a trip to see the all and wonderful irish, kansas, hawaiian , indonesian, african, muslim, christian, white hater by assc of course and also in his words, and american hater by associations of course, birds of a feather flock together.., drug toting, backseat biteer larry sinclair holder…rev wright, and pfleger are all the same in that way, ive been told..there is also information on how obama was sent here to undermine this country on one of the sites on here..next time ill write down the link..the dems are all in on the bank subprime loan bailout, with their sweetheart deals im sure they promised to get the bailouts in return, and now they not only want to bailout , but then they will have a loophole for us to bailout all the bad loans the subprimes will give to the fha, wonder why this economy went south in the last 18 mos! so the dems can blame bush to win obama selection? why do they keep lying about the 68 millons acres , that do not have enough oil to drill? why is it such a big deal to let the oil companies spend their money instead of ours to drill offshore while china is doing it! could it be because they plan to turn this country into the hands that have been trying to take us down for centurys? is that why they love moveon.org so much? soros owns moveon.org…i dont know about you, but im voting straight republican, they may not be perfect but they dont want to sell us out!

 
 

Comment by Helen S | 2008-07-08 14:38:34

Believe, I agree with you cherry picking is no way wo analyze the polls…So why do YOU do it…just saying….

 

Comment by BluDawg | 2008-07-08 15:13:07

 

Comment by Hillcrat | 2008-07-08 15:20:54

Believe, Uhh…uhhmm…as much as Americans are disgusted with the Repubs, shouldn’t Barky O-Waffle be aheard at least by 15%???

McCain should be polling low….in the 20’s or 30’s…??! Could it be we see right through the empty suit? LOL!

PUMA!

 

Comment by TeakWoodKite | 2008-07-08 15:56:58

Random fluctuation is to be expected.

Which accounts for you materializing on this plane.

 

Comment by Cappy | 2008-07-08 17:05:35

Why don’t you give us a little shout-out when it’s okay to post a poll number?

 

Comment by btintaos | 2008-07-08 19:05:59

Random fluctuation disguised as a precipitous drop, perhaps? A four-point drop from a few days ago would put him nearly outside the margin of error, which means things are getting very real, eh? Pesky.

 

Comment by Jeremiah God Damn AmeriKKKa Wright | 2008-07-08 21:22:38

I am surprised that Adolf Axelfraud allows his paid probama blog trolls to even mention the word honest as it brings up so much questionable material to discuss about Your Holy Oblahblah.

Really you should never use that word.

 

Comment by NoBama | 2008-07-08 21:39:31

I dont believe anything Believe says–it’s simple.

 
 

Comment by vinnie | 2008-07-08 13:27:55

but but, according to ‘believe’ 91% of hillary’s supporters are backing barakie now. Reminds me of a conversation I had with a Chinese national years ago…according to her, Tiananmen Square never happened. Funny how propaganda can affect one’s thinking.

Comment by andySF | 2008-07-08 14:30:34

Stop talking about something you know nothing about. Other than what the MSM feed you with.

It happened, but not in the way you think. The original spirit of the movement was replaced by power hungry student leaders at end, and became a sad sad day for chinese. There are are similarity to the Obama crowd. By refusing to back down after the intervention and promise of the then priminister(a very strong reformist), 6/4/89 took placed. The pro reform priminister was removed and democracy advance was stalled. If you go to China now to ask those same educated people who supported that movement, they look at it queit differently. Don’t alway buy what they tell you from MSM. Infact, China is a lot more capitalist thean they are socialist. Forming an opinion before knowlege don’t make you any better than Obama supporters. Do I agree with what the goverment was doing? No! Do I want democracy in China? Yes! But let’s deal with facts. That inccident also made the leadership move fast on embracing free market to take attention from political reform, which drove their economy. There is a sizeble middle class in that country that will deman political reform in the next 10 years or so. Just wait and see. Democracy mean nothing when people are more concerd with food and warmth but are not educated.

Comment by doctorate | 2008-07-08 22:22:54

Comment by andySF | 2008-07-09 16:46:03

Most Chinese know waht took place then, it was full of it to say otherwise. The only one who are that naive are the uneducated villager in remote part of the country.

Not buying the MSM feed of BO and do the opposite regarding China, What’s that word again? And your piont?

 
 
 
 

Comment by nancysabet | 2008-07-08 13:34:33

Kerry was up 11 points at this time and he lost, and he really did not have that much negatives on him at all compare to this guy!

Comment by tish | 2008-07-08 16:59:13

with obama and the dems agenda you better be praying they dont win,,,unless you like living like a third world country, oh it will be a slow change,,to be sure..but that is their change..and theyve only just begun,,,try watching fox cable news to see more than just the gays on msnbc side,, they get the willys when they hear obama..woooo

 
 

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-07-08 13:46:31

huh? I swear earlier MSNBO had GALLUP stats saying Obama had a 30 pt lead with Latinos!

I remember stopping in my tracks “SHOCKED” of course not believing it.

Your stats sound more sane.

Comment by Mickey | 2008-07-08 17:05:37

What a joke and I am latino. Where are they getting these polls?

Comment by doctorate | 2008-07-08 22:28:02

Polls of Obama-supporting Latinos.

 

Comment by Elle | 2008-07-09 08:53:34

May be, just may be, they are making up these polls to manipulate people’s expectations, so when they steal the GE in November (with those voting machines that could be easily hacked with a hotel bar fridge key), it’d look plausible.

NoQuarter had a post last month, I think, about how these polls can be easily manipulated, simply by their sampling which is based on the assumptions they make etc.

Comment by AnninCa | 2008-07-09 08:56:13

Be informed.

That’s the key.

Gallup is indicative of trends.

Today?

Obama hasn’t come close to beating McCain.

 
 
 
 

Comment by dee4hill | 2008-07-08 17:20:32

I’ve been saying it for weeks… where’s the bounce? Oh I know! The “bounce” is going the opposite way! hahahahahahahahaha!!!!

Hillary or McCain ‘08!!!

 
 

Comment by BoboBolinsky | 2008-07-08 13:10:49

We have to do everything we can to defeat Hillary in her next Senate race. She is like Lieberman. We need to find a Ned Lamont to run against her.

Comment by HARP | 2008-07-08 13:12:36

Snap out of it!!

Comment by Nicole | 2008-07-08 14:13:57

Bobo’s a clown.

 

Comment by politicsIsdirty | 2008-07-08 16:19:04

In other LANGUAGES the name Bobo means “STUPID”.

 
 

Comment by scott in jupiter | 2008-07-08 13:14:19

You’re in the wrong place to be saying WE!

 

Comment by Steven Mather | 2008-07-08 13:15:41

Don’t you mean Ned Flanders?

Comment by scott in jupiter | 2008-07-08 13:16:51

 
 

Comment by believe | 2008-07-08 13:16:07

No real Obama supporter supports that. Faking again!

Comment by McCain & Obama=Imbeciles | 2008-07-09 12:19:52

so, are there any REAL Obama supporters?!

They are all Obamabots or 20-somethin thugs!
Ageists and Sexists = Obamabot Cultists

GO PUMAS, ROAR!

 
 

Comment by Betty | 2008-07-08 13:16:37

You are such a fool. How much are you getting paid. I ask the Ghost of Patrick Henry to stalk you for as long as you live.

Comment by believe | 2008-07-08 13:25:13

I don’t believe in ghosts. Do you?

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-07-08 13:29:46

I believe ghosts are obama’s core constituency.

Comment by Duck | 2008-07-08 13:33:38

 

Comment by lute | 2008-07-08 14:18:10

Oh shit. It’s a Bob Johnson Troll infestation.

 
 
 
 

Comment by nancysabet | 2008-07-08 13:18:34

shut your big mouth please.

 

Comment by ginaswo still says no to Uhhbama | 2008-07-08 13:32:23

BWAAHAAAAAAAA!!

that Troll messge brought to you by:

Threats and Thugs, the Uhhbama Way..

Comment by Patti | 2008-07-08 16:29:03

OMIGOD!!! NEWS FLASH!!!!

IT’S BEEN DONE! BELIEVE’S IDENTITY UNCOVERED….

IT’S MICHELLE!

HOLD ONTO YOUR POCKETBOOKS, PEOPS!

 
 

Comment by Objective analysis | 2008-07-08 13:34:28

Bobo needs to get a life.

Why don’t you worry about apostate muslim, unpatriotic Obama before you try to attack Hillary in the NY senate?

I guess you forgot how liberman won in Conn. to still be in the senate.

Comment by RoryBellows | 2008-07-08 14:51:08

USA! USA! USA!

 
 

Comment by tampagurl | 2008-07-08 13:38:34

BOBO’s name is befitting. Try to follow along BOBO!

 

Comment by Susan | 2008-07-08 14:13:34

It would be nice if she’d run independent, BOBO. Then you are right, she wouldn’t be a Senator anymore. She would be POTUS!

 

Comment by fif | 2008-07-08 14:52:29

Bobo, you are a dodo.

HRC won her Senate seat by 67% in NY, because WE LOVE HER HERE!! She gets the job done, period. She has even won over conservative upstate NYers, because she visits every county, listens, and addresses their needs.

It’s called leadership. Don’t mess with NY.

 

Comment by Jude | 2008-07-08 15:01:06

You go ahead and try there Bobo. And, while you’re at it, spend lots of money trying.

LOL!

Hillary will be a Senator from NY for as long as she wants to be. You are apparently suffering from delusions of grandeur.

 

Comment by hank48188 | 2008-07-08 15:12:58

Where has Ned been?, haven’t heard from him in a while. I see Joe Liberman all the time though.

 

Comment by brodie | 2008-07-08 15:27:24

Bobo- piss off. troll on over to Nobama’s site & get the heck outta here.

 

Comment by doctorate | 2008-07-08 22:31:59

Comment by BoboBolinsky | 2008-07-08 13:10:49

Where’s the “Report This!” button?

 
 

Comment by believe | 2008-07-08 13:13:38

How has Obama shown his support for LGBT people? Just recently he announced his opposition for the attempt to overturn gay marriage in CA. In other words, he supports equal marriage rights.

His opponent, the only other person from a major party on the ballot in November, doesn’t think gay men and lesbians should be allowed to marry.

How can anyone who cares about GLBT rights support McCain?

Comment by gerard nedich | 2008-07-08 13:15:18

i can!

a. hillary
b. mccain

america first!

Comment by believe | 2008-07-08 13:18:35

For McCain, it’s straight America first.

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-07-08 13:24:33

At least with McCain, America is in the equation.

 

Comment by tillthen | 2008-07-08 15:21:18

Take your dick out of your brain.

 
 
 

Comment by scott in jupiter | 2008-07-08 13:15:42

barky should be, after all he is bi-sexual.

Comment by HARP | 2008-07-08 13:18:57

You mean the Tele-tubbies will visit the White House ?

Comment by btintaos | 2008-07-08 19:16:12

Mmm. I wanna see Barky with a purple purse for his crack pipe.

 
 

Comment by nobama | 2008-07-08 13:31:43

barky should be, after all he is bi-sexual.

what a stupid, moronic, homophobic comment from SCOTT IN JUPITER. Hey, Scott: Why are you a homophobe?

Comment by gerard nedich | 2008-07-08 13:34:49

whoa!

why is he homophobic?

the simple fact is it appears that Obama had some homosexual encounters with several men… the choir director of trinity church and that other dude…

nobody is saying its a bad thing, or a crime…

it just happens to be a fact…

why are you so upset about it? maybe you yourself are homophobic?

a. hillary
b. mccain

america first!

Comment by scott in jupiter | 2008-07-08 13:50:18

Thanks gerald, I stepped away to bash 75% of my client base.

 

Comment by RoryBellows | 2008-07-08 14:52:12

Think harder Gerard.

 
 

Comment by scott in jupiter | 2008-07-08 13:53:06

It’s funny but the gay guys I’m friends with have stated they would like barky better if was gay.

barky/closet 08
come for the preening
stay for the prancing

 

Comment by scott in jupiter | 2008-07-08 14:22:32

If mentioning that barky has some explaining to do makes me a homophobe. What does this make me.

barky was the ONLY member of the Illinois State Senate to vote against a bill that prohibited early release for sexual predators. 2003

Comment by RoryBellows | 2008-07-08 14:53:13

Won’t somebody please think of the children!

Comment by hank48188 | 2008-07-08 15:16:14

Obama has been thinking of the children, he now supports the DEATH PENALTY for Child Molesters

 
 

Comment by ritamary | 2008-07-08 15:20:36

Now BO wants the sexual predators executed.

 
 
 
 

Comment by WildChild | 2008-07-08 13:20:15

It’s easy . McCain isn’t going to expand bushes faith program giveaways like BOBO is. Maybe you haven’t noticed but a big chunk of church going America isn’t all that thrilled about LGBT and BOBO wants to feed them more money to do their work.

 

Comment by Steven Mather | 2008-07-08 13:21:18

Please check out Black Agenda Report and a few of the many LGBT positive sites and educate yourself. You will see things like the countdown clock until Barack accepts to participate in Chicago’s Gay Pride parade. It ran out. He didn’t attend. He got his hair cut at that time. Further, you’ll read about how he would not be photographed with SF’s openly gay mayor. How’s that for support!

Then again, will your programming allow you to read these things without changing your mind?

Comment by destardi | 2008-07-08 13:38:38

Don’t forget barackula’s touring sideshow with the “ex-gay” homophobe hypocrite Donnie McClurkin!!!

f*ck obama and his lying, cheating, racebaiting ways.

 

Comment by alee21 | 2008-07-08 14:28:51

Actually Newsom isn’t gay - at least he is divorced and plans to marry again and has had affairs.

Obama just thought he was gay - goodlooking guy from SF.

Obama isn’t too smart.

Comment by andySF | 2008-07-08 14:42:11

That’s right. He’s pro gay, not gay.

Comment by Mickey | 2008-07-08 14:45:34

Newsom has way too much gel in his hair… that is so un-gay.

 
 

Comment by andySF | 2008-07-08 14:45:32

And he’s a strong Hillary supporter. He will get my vote whatever office he run for in the future.

 
 

Comment by ritamary | 2008-07-08 15:22:39

Sorry, but Gavin Newsome is not openly gay. He did support gay marriage before most other politicians.

 
 

Comment by PhxNickD | 2008-07-08 13:36:43

yes he supports it this week when it is convienent for his election. it is his past actions that show his (lack) of real support to our community.

 

Comment by Duck | 2008-07-08 13:36:44

Yes… we all know about Barry’s love for the gays:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=sVeFVtcdSYY

SNAP !!! :grin:

 

Comment by ginaswo still says no to Uhhbama | 2008-07-08 13:37:30

OH believe, sigh

Uhhbama met with the LGBT community group IN THE BASEMENT while he waved with Oprah at adoring fans upstairs in the Staples Center

he took McClurkin on the road in SC

he refused to TAKE A PICTURE with Gavin Newsome, even after Willie Brown asked him again, he just wanted the money from the fundraiser, hmm sounds familiar wot?

he said dont ask dont policy position should NOT be a disqualifyer to his Sec of Defense pick..

his close adviser is SAM NUNN

now go google, you seem pretty uninformed for a 50 year old who is into Democratic politics and watching this campaign season…..

and PS McCain voted AGAINST the Constitutional amend to ban gay marriage

 

Comment by Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy | 2008-07-08 13:43:47

This is a logical fallacy you have used numerous times, Believe. Not supporting Obama does NOT equate to supporting McCain. Of course, I can’t blame you TOO Much - Obama sucks at Logic, too.

Obama has done NOTHING for the LGBT comunity, not one thing. He can say whatever he likes - all evidence shows he will flip or flop on it when push comes to shove.

And frankly, I am wearied of you constantly trying to hijack these threads, Believe. I URGE everyone to NOT ANSWER THIS TROLL. Believe CONSTANTLY hijacks our threads, and disrupts the discussion. Enough. Stop wasting our time.

Comment by RoryBellows | 2008-07-08 14:48:08

Hillary was awesome for the LGBT community during the DOMA and Don’t Ask Don’t Tell periods. Especially when Bill ran radio ads on Christian Radio touting his legal rejection of gay marriage. Oh wait, we’re not supposed to count THAT part of her 35 years of experience are we?

 
 

Comment by tampagurl | 2008-07-08 13:48:13

Words just words! Furthermore, Reverend Amy’s article is about Hillary versus Obamabecile. McCain is not mentioned so please try to keep up!

Comment by tampagurl | 2008-07-08 13:51:42

My comment above is to Believe!!

 
 

Comment by vonay | 2008-07-08 13:48:42

None of them believe in Gay marriage. Obama is afraid to take a stand on anything. He’ll just say, Oh the states need to vote on this.
At least McCain is honets about whathe believes.

Anyway…..95% of the American people are against Gay marriage…they’re not against unions, just calling it “marriage”.

Comment by AliasJohnDoe | 2008-07-08 14:42:23

Actually it’s:

34% for Gay marriage

30% for Civil Unions

36% against Gay marriage (not 95% as you stated)

 
 

Comment by Jude | 2008-07-08 15:06:25

uh, think again, he does not believe in gay marriage, is on the record multiple times stating such. mccain believes it is the right of each state to decide and as such, is supporting ca’s right to put it on the ballot. their positions on this particular issue are not very different.

 

Comment by Babe | 2008-07-08 15:51:48

I can, I’m gay and there is no way I trust Obama.

 
 

Comment by gerard nedich | 2008-07-08 13:13:53

i can’t believe the cowardice and greed shown by these people…

is there no loyalty, honesty and principles anymore?

good for you for canceling your membership!

a. hillary
b. mccain

america first!

 

Comment by gerard nedich | 2008-07-08 13:16:15

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=07u6uffKvpA

another great hillary video…

a. hillary
b. mccain

america first!

 

Comment by tillthen | 2008-07-08 13:16:59

Hillary has not been successful in controlling Bill’s often wayward and offensive tongue. This does not reflect well on her. Bill Clinton’s recent innuendo regarding McCain and the trauma endured by prisoners of war is utterly disgusting. This pot smoking draft dodger should stay away from any subject regarding service to one’s country. It will surely backfire and reflect badly on Hillary. This is just another example of his low standard of morality. What a disgusting pig! She would have been the nominee by now if he had moved to Canada and stayed there.

Comment by HARP | 2008-07-08 13:20:31

And your crybaby whiny-assed opinion would be…?

Comment by tillthen | 2008-07-08 14:45:32

Whining? I’m on this site only because I am fearful of an Obama win in the GE and one way to stop that is by HC winning in Denver, which remains a good possibility if her hubby can just stay out of the way. Why are you here? I have made a constructive criticism. My opinion is clearly stated above or can’t you read? You and you’re buddies, Mather and Nitwit, below are as guilty as the Obama thugs and their threats you are always whining about. Your fear of discourse is a dead giveaway. Try stringing a few sentences together. It might help people understand your thuggish remark.

 
 

Comment by Steven Mather | 2008-07-08 13:24:05

Republican troll.

 

Comment by gerard nedich | 2008-07-08 13:26:23

oh fuck right off…

your an ass…

a. hillary
b. mccain

america first!

Comment by Darryl | 2008-07-08 14:39:50

god I love you. You dare to go where no man has gone before.

 
 
 

Comment by believe | 2008-07-08 13:19:16

Oh my God, I just saw prince Harry on TMZ

 

Comment by Cindie | 2008-07-08 13:20:18

La la la…happily strolling down McCain blvd here. A shame that Clinton Ave. is road blocked! And if you look down Obama Lane - it’s changing it’s look again and again and again…you get the idea.

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-07-08 13:26:35

LOL! I like this!

Comment by AliasJohnDoe | 2008-07-08 13:58:02

It’s not Obama Lane.

It’s Backtrack Obama Alley.

A back alley where all things shadey go on.

Comment by bonnie | 2008-07-09 04:09:57

Barack Swamp is the best way to describe !

 
 
 
 

Comment by birdgal | 2008-07-08 13:21:05

My, my, the trolls are out in force today.

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-07-08 13:27:27

Trolls are always working overtime for damage control.

 
 

Comment by wodiej | 2008-07-08 13:22:39

I do not put much faith in any of these so called leaders of anything. Most of them have shit for brains and no judgment.

 

Comment by believe | 2008-07-08 13:23:47

With all due respect, you do realize that the campaign between Clinton and Obama is over and that Clinton endorsed Obama, is raising money for him, and her staff is working for him, too.

CHICAGO, IL- The Obama campaign announced today that Dana Singiser will be joining the campaign to serve as a Senior Advisor to Senator Obama.

Prior to joining the campaign, Singiser served as the Director of Women’s Outreach for the Hillary Clinton 2008 campaign. Prior to that, she served as Staff Director of the Senate Democratic Steering and Outreach Committee chaired by Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton. In this capacity, she was charged with building support for Democratic party positions through constituency outreach on behalf of the Democratic caucus.

Comment by WildChild | 2008-07-08 13:25:37

actually it’s suspended.

 

Comment by Steven Mather | 2008-07-08 13:32:17

You do not deserve respect because you post lies and you refuse to modify your position when you are given evidence that demonstrates that you have been posting lies.

When you make claims without evidence and evidence is requested, you do not acknowledge or deliver on the request, but you consistently demand that others supply evidence.

You are not here to learn and teach. You are here to propagandize and disrupt. In short, you are a 1984-style internet brownshirt.

Comment by believe | 2008-07-08 13:38:53

What lie? I posted a part of a press release which establishes that Obama hired a Clinton staffer. Are you claiming that he didn’t or that the woman wasn’t a staffer? What is the lie you are pointing to?

And it’s rather odd to see someone writing on the internet compared to brownshirts. Is it so threatening to you to encounter people with whom you disagree? Why not just respond to the ideas expressed with some specificity (what was the lie in my post?) and go on from there?

Comment by WildChild | 2008-07-08 13:40:08

Blinders (Tsk Tsk Tsk)

 

Comment by Steven Mather | 2008-07-08 13:47:44

Today lies.

1. Kerry was not ahead of Bush in election day polling. That is typical NQ falsehood.

Two links to the polls were provided below. You did not respond. You did not apologize.

2. Obama has always said he would base the withdrawal of troops according to ground conditions.

False. Obama’s original position did not include the on-the-ground exception. The exception was added later. Further, he said the war was unwinnable, as noted in the video your post was commenting on.

As noted, your opinions are evidence-neutral. This means that facts have no effect on your position. We can not have a discussion with you because you run away when evidence is requested.

Further, despite the stories here, you remain blissfully unaware of the internet bullying that has occurred during this campaign.

 
 

Comment by Auntie Meme | 2008-07-09 03:23:39

If only HRC had been as good of a friend to Senator Clinton. On June 6, HRC endorsed BARACK OBAMA. Yes, they did. …. For HRC to not endorse HRC after all of the accolades they have bestowed upon her, and after her COMMITMENT to our community is simply reprehensible.

One more tiny fact, which you can easily verify: the primary was over as of June 3. Obama had 2201 delegates on that day.

So of course HRC was going to endorse the winner of the Dem primary. What else were they gonna do? Endorse McCain? Or endorse Hillary even though she’d, like, you know, l-l-l-…. lost?

(But she DIDN’T lose! She really WON, it’s just that everyone else is in denial about it. The HRC should have supported a WRITE-IN candidacy for Hillary! I am so enraged that they did not do this, that I will be writing in Pat Buchanan in November. Or Dick Cheney. Or Margaret Thatcher. Or Robert Mugabe. ANYONE but Obama!!)

 
 

Comment by Darryl | 2008-07-08 13:34:44

It may be over, but it is not dead. The spirit remains. That spirit of Hope and change from obama’s destructive campaign will continue right up till november.

 
 

Comment by believe | 2008-07-08 13:24:56

New Newsweek poll today: Obama 59 mccain 42

Comment by believe | 2008-07-08 13:26:15

Really? I hadn’t seen that yet.

Comment by believe | 2008-07-08 13:26:58

Of course you just love to make things up.

 

Comment by HARP | 2008-07-08 13:29:25

WOW. Thats one point higher than the number of states.

Comment by believe | 2008-07-08 13:34:04

So I’m not good at math, but I make some bitching waffles.

Comment by believe | 2008-07-08 13:40:17

In my case, I’m VERY good at math, particularly statistics (time series, regression, logit, etc.).

Comment by WildChild | 2008-07-08 13:41:29

And you still haven’t figured out that BOBO doesn’t add up.

 

Comment by ginaswo still says no to Uhhbama | 2008-07-08 13:48:59

and yet with your vast skills in mathematics, you somehow think it is fine that the ‘lead’ Uhbama had in the 175 pledged dels,(you know before they crowned him fool for a season, and cut off the process) that 85% of that lead came from just 3% of the total people who voted in the primaries/caucuses?

sad really

do you think your many comments and pasted Uhhbama talking points will affect the people who blog and read here? or are you hoping if you keep putting in misinformation and hopey changey talk that it will somehow make it so in November?

if the country wasnt in such bad shape and Hillary wasnt such an amazing candidate, it would almost be worth the stolen nomination to watch you maroons go down in flames in the GE

ACORN wont be able to file enough PHONY REGISTRATIONS to STEAL the GE the way the THUG patrol stole the caucuses, GOD WILLING

its TOPSY TURVY year at the DNC, nominate the inexperienced newbie over the policy wonk, the wild eyed lefty flip flopper with radical associates over the centrist progressive with years of service and a former POTUS for an associate, pretend you are the GOP and disenfranchise voters, oh ches, topsy turvy year at the DNC!!

http://youtube.com/watch?v=F5F64wuXOco

Lyric:

Crowd:
Come one, come all!
Leave your loops and milking stools
Coop the hens and pen the mules
Come one, come all!
Close the churches and the schools
It’s the day for breaking rules
Come and join the feast of …

Clopin:
Fools!

Once a year we throw a party here in town
Once a year we turn all Paris upside down
Ev’ry man’s a king and ev’ry king’s a clown
Once again it’s Topsy Turvy Day
It’s the day the devil in us gets released
It’s the day we mock the prig and shock the priest
Ev’rything is topsy turvy at the Feast of Fools!

Crowd:
Topsy turvy!

Clopin:
Ev’rything is upsy daysy!

Crowd:
Topsy turvy!

Clopin:
Ev’ryone is acting crazy
Dross is gold and weeds are a bouquet
That’s the way on Topsy Turvy Day

All:
Topsy Turvy!

Clopin and Crowd:
Beat the drums and blow the trumpets

All:
Topsy Turvy!

Clopin and Crowd:
Join the bums and thieves and strumpets
Streaming in from Chartres to Calais

Clopin:
Scurvy knaves are extra scurvy
On the sixth of “Januervy”

Clopin and Crowd:
All because it’s Topy Turvy Day!

Clopin:
Come one, come all!
Hurry, hurry, here’s your chance
See the myst’ry and romance
Come one, come all
See the finest girl in France
Make an entrance to entrance
Dance la Esmeralda
Dance!

Here it is, the moment you’ve been waiting for
Here it is, you know exactly what’s in store
Now’s the time we laugh until our sides get sore
Now’s the time we crown the King of Fools!
So make a face that’s horrible and frightening
Make a face as gruesome as a gargoyle’s wing
For the face that’s ugliest will be the King of Fools!
Why?

Crowd:
Topsy turvy!

Clopin:
Ugly folk, forget your shyness

Crowd:
Topsy turvy!

Clopin:
You could soon be called Your Highness!

Crowd:
Put your foulest features on display
Be the king of Topsy Turvy Day!

Clopin:
Ev’rybody!

Crowd:
Once a year we throw a party here in town

Clopin:
Hail to the king!

Crowd:
Once a year we turn all Paris upside down

Clopin:
Oh, what a king!

Crowd:
Once a year, the ugliest will wear a crown

Clopin:
Girls, give a kiss

Crowd:
Once a year on Topsy Turvy Day

Clopin:
We’ve never had a king like this

Clopin and Crowd:
And it’s the day we do the things that we deplore
On the other three hundred and sixty-four
Once a year we love to drop in
Where the beer is never stoppin
For the chance to pop some popinjay
And pick a king who’ll put the “top” in
Topsy Turvy Day!
Mad and crazy, upsy-daisy, Topsy Turvy Day!
________________________________________________
no offense to the hunchbacks and jesters

 
 
 
 
 

Comment by tampagurl | 2008-07-08 13:59:20

Whatever works for you believe!! You accused someone else of cherry picking…Now who is the cherry picker???

 

Comment by Lin | 2008-07-08 14:29:09

Are you really referring to a Newsweek poll?

Idiot.

Comment by AliasJohnDoe | 2008-07-08 14:57:44

Isn’t Newsweek changing it’s name to Obamaweek?

 
 

Comment by hank48188 | 2008-07-08 15:23:12

A Poll from Newsweek/MSNBC/NBC taken by Keith Olbermann and Chris Matthews

 
 

Comment by wodiej | 2008-07-08 13:27:48

you all know the original “believe” troll is not a 50 yr old, happily married w a nice house don’t you?

Comment by tampagurl | 2008-07-08 14:02:34

Yeah, believe is a punk kid still wetting the bed in his mommy’s basement

Comment by Seattle Moss | 2008-07-08 14:09:36

In order to be an obama supporter after all that has been revealed about him, you must be a taker and leach of society. You’re down on people with jobs and jealous of those more fortunate than you.
You’re so hateful of America that you would enjoy seeing it defeated in the world.
I say get some meds, get out of your parents basement. Brush off the Doritos off your fat belly and get a job Obamabutt.

Comment by Seattle Moss | 2008-07-08 14:13:51

One thing that can never be said about Obama and his followers,

Country before party/Country before self
McCain owns that phrase!

Obama has shown that he wished American defeat in Iraq just so that he could get elected.

 
 
 
 

Comment by gerard nedich | 2008-07-08 13:30:40

ever notice how the trolls come out when a particularly good thread starts or the moron makes a particularly big lie/flip-flop?

you know we are on to something when the trolls come out…

woo hoo!

a. hillary
b. mccain

america first!

 

Comment by Darryl | 2008-07-08 13:32:44

Love the video thanks!

I think Hillary’s support of Obama is on purpose to further divide her supporters. I don’t know about everyone else, but it made me mad as hell seeing her bow to Obama like that, and I’m not even a woman. It screams sexist pig. Every time I see them together it reinforces this feeling. Hillary is the smartest woman I have ever seen in my life.

It was kinda like that comment she made about Iran. All these men were bickering about how Iran was secretly planning to attack with their new nuclear capablilites. She made the obliterate comment, and Iran immediately went to the UN and announced to whole world they didn’t plan on attacking anyone. BAAM instant commitment to the world without a single meeting. Absolutely fantastic how she quickly ended that subject and brought about a firm resolution and the media paid for it all.

She is doing this on purpose. Its called playing to the ego. Let Obama think he has it down. Let him show his arrogance. Let them take her off the ballot and hold a sham nomination. It will only make her base more enraged and in the end, she will get her way. Brillant woman indeed.

Comment by Tricia | 2008-07-08 13:35:30

Its like a hockey game you don’t really want shake hands afterwards but you must.

 

Comment by believe | 2008-07-08 13:35:46

What a strange theory.

BTW, most women support Obama, just like virtually every other presidential race since 1980 in which women support the Democrat.

Comment by Darryl | 2008-07-08 13:42:35

You are absolutely wrong. Up to 25% of republican women supported her. This was known in October of last year.

Man what a generalization. There are women that are republican as well.

http://aftermathnews.wordpress.com/2007/10/18/25-of-republican-women-predicted-to-vote-for-hillary/

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/430821/survey_republican_women_support_hillary.html?cat=62

 

Comment by ginaswo still says no to Uhhbama | 2008-07-08 13:52:34

I CALL BULLSHIT

:0)

PEW RESEARCH showed that is not the case and the GOP hasnt even started yet
to quote Stevie Nicks, I cant wait!!!

 
 

Comment by nancysabet | 2008-07-08 13:42:48

You’re right, thanks, I never thoght of it like that.

 

Comment by Fred C. Dobbs | 2008-07-08 14:11:34

This is why it’s Bad Business to play poker with women.

Anyone who can fake orgasm five times a week will certainly raise on a pair of Fours…

Comment by athena | 2008-07-08 15:32:00

Comment by etc. | 2008-07-08 16:18:08

HA!!

And pity to the poor man (Obama) who can’t tell the difference.

 
 

Comment by Kickass Old Lady | 2008-07-08 18:26:34

Never needed to fake an orgasm, but the pair of fours works and works and works for me. So hehe, funny. Best post of the day, Fred.

 
 
 

Comment by Tricia | 2008-07-08 13:33:43

Yeah Obama for gay rights that why he would not have his picture taken with a gay politican in SF .

Comment by believe | 2008-07-08 13:38:16

But he loves Sinclair.

Comment by Duck | 2008-07-08 13:50:47

That’s the Believe I believe :grin:

Comment by Duck | 2008-07-08 13:54:35

In all truth…
I don’t know what to believe anymore…

http://youtube.com/watch?v=5ZIR4nTAZaY

 
 
 

Comment by Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy | 2008-07-08 13:48:39

Actually, the politican, Gavin Newsome, is NOT gay, but a strong SUPPORTER of Gay Rights. Obama asked him to hold a fundraiser for him, but then wouldn’t even let a photo be taken of the two of them together. That speaks VOLUMES abt what kind of person Obama is, and what it says ain’t good!!

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-07-08 13:55:49

This is both shocking and sad that Obama could get away with this. Such rude, disrespectful arrogant treatment Mr. Newsome.

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-07-08 13:56:45

treatment of Mr. Newsome. Sorry.

 
 
 

Comment by ritamary | 2008-07-08 15:34:36

Gavin Newsome is NOT openly gay. He supports gay marriage. That means if you openly support gay marriage BO will not have his picture taken with you.

 
 

Comment by Vera Possumus | 2008-07-08 13:34:44

“…the A-Gay white boys network that still tends to - perhaps unconsciously but from a sense of entitlement - dismiss women.”

Here’s the deal, Rev., unconscious discrimination isn’t one iota better than conscious discrimination.

Don’t make excuses for them. Break yourself of the habit.

Comment by Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy | 2008-07-08 13:57:56

I didn’t write that - it was from the ARTICLE I was quoting. Believe you me, I don’t give a crap if it is unconscious OR conscious - the result is the same> And there is very little excuse for that level of sexism in this day and age ANYWAY, IMHO. But thanks for making the point. I appreciate it!

 
 

Comment by Objective analysis | 2008-07-08 13:36:29

Isn’t Obama gay or bisexual any way?

Comment by Duck | 2008-07-08 13:45:34

there have been a couple rumors on the “internets”:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=cV0DvHgMugY&feature=related

 
 

Comment by Vera Possumus | 2008-07-08 13:37:27

Oh, it’s a fact? Please support your assertion with proof.

No, you love to use homophobia as a way to insult your enemies. You say you are against Obama, so you imply that he is gay. Do you understand how offensive that is to gay people who are also against Obama? Or are you just too stupid to get it?

Comment by gerard nedich | 2008-07-08 13:42:28

your projecting here…

we are against obama because is is a common criminal… a sleazy politician… racist and ignorant…

the fact that he has had homosexual encounters with the choir director of his church, and might very well be involved in the choir directors murder are all just side issues…

nobody is saying the homosexual affairs are bad per se, what we are opposed to is the political corruption and murder and lies…

a. hillary
b. mccain

america first!

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-07-08 13:58:21

Also the fact that if he is gay, hes lying about it.

 
 

Comment by believe | 2008-07-08 13:42:35

It’s also offensive to me, a straight woman who is for Obama. But I must say how much I appreciate you speaking up on this. Thank you, Vera Possumus.

Comment by WildChild | 2008-07-08 13:45:49

We don’t care that BOBO is BI. We care that BOBO buys it.

 

Comment by osbama | 2008-07-08 13:47:14

Who cares if you’re gay or straight. The fact that you had to clear that up says you’re a homofob.

Comment by believe | 2008-07-08 13:50:48

What word are you trying to spell?

BTW, most posts are written in response to others. That’s the norm in blogging.

Mine was written to response to another where the poster mentioned sexual preference, and that’s the context for my response.

Comment by WildChild | 2008-07-08 13:53:18

…and to make sure those lesbians don’t get the wrong idea about you.

 

Comment by Kickass Old Lady | 2008-07-08 18:36:14

Believe, then reference your comment by including the name of the commenter that your post answers. Dear, do you have email? Does it irritate you when some of your friends stuff your email box with 5 to 10 posts a day that you have to wade through to get to where you are trying to go? Do you consider them rude? Sweetheart, sometimes less is more. Especially if your goal is to be effective.

 
 
 
 

Comment by ginaswo still says no to Uhhbama | 2008-07-08 13:53:41

project much?? did you even READ THIS PIECE you poltroon?

 
 

Comment by ginaswo still says no to Uhhbama | 2008-07-08 13:40:07

Thank you Rev Amy, I too left HRC and replied to Joe S. emals saying the group had failed to back the candidate who had THEIR back, and whom had worked so hard for so long UP FRONT for their causes

another disappointing group

more dollars for Hill and ACTBLUE good people like BIG ED OREILLY IN MASS

Hey everyone, give a dollar to BIG ED to defeat KERRY!!

http://edoreilly.com/

Comment by believe | 2008-07-08 13:41:09

Oh, yes, that would be a great use of your money.

Comment by ginaswo still says no to Uhhbama | 2008-07-08 13:57:04

thank you, Ed thought so too!!!

but I gave to BIG MAC and Hillary also so dont fret yourself over it

but I SOOOO appreciate your concern

hey while you are managing MY money, vote Mccain so I dont get a whopping tax hike will ya?

gracias!!

BOOYAH!!!

and here is another FABULOUS place to donate for DEMOCRACY, ALL Dems should support this group:

http://thedenvergroup.blogspot.com/

Make your checks payable to:
The Denver Group

Mailing address:
The Denver Group
2118 Bancroft Place N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20008

Comment by Fred C. Dobbs | 2008-07-08 14:03:13

ARe there levels of Giving?

Say, for $100 do I get to carry a torch at the Nuremburg rallies stadium?

Can I sit near Donkey Brassiere for $1K?

For $10K, can I do the next Press Release to exxplain What Obama REALLY Meant?

Sounds sooooooo George Bush-ish.

 
 

Comment by tampagurl | 2008-07-08 14:10:20

Believe seems to have an opinion about everything…even how you spend your money! You know the old saying…Opinions are like assholes, everyone has one!!!!

 
 
 

Comment by PhxNickD | 2008-07-08 13:40:55

Amy, thank you for the post and video. What an amazing President Hillary will make. Several weeks ago bho did a women’s issues rally, you should post that video side by side with Hillary’s video. His speech so was forced I could not even sit thru it to watch till completion. Yes, he really showed how concerned he is about women’s issues by giving a written speech with NO PASSION or personal knowledge of the issues. Obviously did not convince me of anything.

 

Comment by lburg | 2008-07-08 13:41:14

Thank you for posting this. It makes me sad and furious all at the same time. If the “democratic” party follows through on their suicide mission to nominate BO, we truly will have been robbed.

Comment by believe | 2008-07-08 13:43:22

The question is, will America commit suicide with the DNC in the fall.

 
 

Comment by nobama | 2008-07-08 13:41:59

I like this site, but many of the people who comment here are ignorant.

Believe: “Most women support Obama.” He just pulls this stuff right out of his ass. “Believe” is as bat-shit crazy as the commenters who think Obama is a serial killer of gay men in Chicago.

Hey “believe:” what are you going to do when Barry loses to McCain?

Comment by believe | 2008-07-08 13:45:36

No, I pull these data out of national polls.

BTW, data is a plural noun. Datum is the singular form.

Comment by Darryl | 2008-07-08 13:48:26

Give us the polls. Here are some of mine prooving that not all women are democrats.

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/430821/survey_republican_women_support_hillary.html?cat=62

Comment by believe | 2008-07-08 13:52:18

Of course not all women are Democrats. But women as a group - meaning the majority of women - vote Democratic in presidential races since 1980. The Center for American Women in Politics has a great historical data set on that, if you should care to see it.

Comment by WildChild | 2008-07-08 13:55:03

a majority is nothing more than half plus one.

Comment by believe | 2008-07-08 14:00:09

Quite right!

Comment by WildChild | 2008-07-08 14:06:42

it can also be all minus one

 
 
 

Comment by Darryl | 2008-07-08 14:01:40

“Despite the gender gap, President Bush succeeded in increasing his overall share of the women’s vote this
year. Senator John Kerry did win a slight majority of women’s votes (51 percent), but he lost ground from
2000, when 54 percent of women voted for Al Gore. President Bush’s ability to increase his share of the
women’s vote to 48 percent this year (up from 43 percent in 2000) is a major reason why he took the
popular vote this time around.”

Wildchild was right, the majority in the 2004 election of women voting democratic was 1%. this is from the very source you told me to go too.

http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/Facts/Elections/GG2004Facts.pdf

at

http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/Facts5.html

Comment by Darryl | 2008-07-08 14:03:29

Now explain to me based of of these conclusions, if only 20% didn’t vote for Obama because of clinton that would be well BEYOND the 1 to 4% lead democrats has the priveledge of holding in prior elections.

Comment by WildChild | 2008-07-08 14:10:14

first mistake… you asked believe to think :)

 

Comment by AliasJohnDoe | 2008-07-08 14:22:59

And yet another question ignored by “believe”.

 
 
 
 
 

Comment by WildChild | 2008-07-08 13:49:15

and a date is a fruit produced by the date palm (Phoenix dactylifera).

 

Comment by Darryl | 2008-07-08 13:52:23

a Datum would be one specific piece of data, such as one number like 42. In science a Datum wouldn’t ever be used becuase science requires mutiple Datum–DATA.

You are really very dumb. The simple fact that you have to show your ass and try to seam intelligent proves that you really aren’t. The statement was not neccessary and certainly was a call to authority. Stay on Target as Captain Kirk says.

 

Comment by Darryl | 2008-07-08 13:53:04

a Datum would be one specific piece of data, such as one number like 42. In science a Datum wouldn’t ever be used becuase science requires mutiple Datum–DATA.

You are really very dumb. The simple fact that you have to show your ass and try to seem intelligent proves that you really aren’t. The statement was not neccessary and certainly was a call to authority. Stay on Target as Captain Kirk says.

Comment by believe | 2008-07-08 13:59:15

Well, the report of a single person’s opinion, their response to one question would be a datum. The collection of datum in polls are called data.

1. a pl. of datum.
2. (used with a plural verb) individual facts, statistics, or items of information: These data represent the results of our analyses. Data are entered by terminal for immediate processing by the computer.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/data

See, data is plural, and is used with a plural verb.

So you like the orginal Star Trek? I saw that as a kid. I think The Next Generation is much better - and Picard far more interesting than Kirk.

Comment by WildChild | 2008-07-08 14:05:05

I thought it was funny when you said “these data” and then went on the define Data as plural.

 

Comment by Darryl | 2008-07-08 14:07:53

Dude! the note from your own source said EXACTLY what I told you LOL. I can’t believe it! Its like you didn’t read the whole thing.

—Usage note Data is a plural of datum, which is originally a Latin noun meaning “something given.” Today, data is used in English both as a plural noun meaning “facts or pieces of information” (These data are described more fully elsewhere) and as a singular mass noun meaning “information”: Not much data is available on flood control in Brazil. It is almost always treated as a plural in scientific and academic writing. In other types of writing it is either singular or plural. The singular datum meaning “a piece of information” is now rare in all types of writing. In surveying and civil engineering, where datum has specialized senses, the plural form is datums

“IN OTHER TYPES OF WRITINGs” see that sentence. Thats what I said, DUH!.

 

Comment by Darryl | 2008-07-08 14:10:40

data is used in English both as a plural noun meaning “facts or pieces of information” (These data are described more fully elsewhere) and as a singular mass noun meaning “information”:

 

Comment by Darryl | 2008-07-08 14:16:00

So you like the orginal Star Trek? I saw that as a kid. I think The Next Generation is much better - and Picard far more interesting than Kirk.

Nah that one thing we can agree on. I like the newer star trek.

I use “Stay on Target” in World of Warcraft, when I am leading a group, and they get distracted. Its a cliche more than a statement of honor towards a tv series.

Comment by AliasJohnDoe | 2008-07-08 14:26:44

I preferred Star Trek: Voyager. A woman was in charge.

 
 
 
 
 

Comment by believe | 2008-07-08 13:46:53

If Obama loses, I’d be disappointed. I wouldn’t DO anything in particular.

Comment by WildChild | 2008-07-08 13:51:00

you’d be paralyzed. OK

Comment by believe | 2008-07-08 13:55:14

Not really. I never have been before when my preferred candidate lost, whether it was a candidate I supported for a nomination or in the general election. If you’ve been involved in politics as long as I have, you really don’t lose it over such things. Sometime they win, sometimes they lose.

Comment by WildChild | 2008-07-08 13:56:41

paralysis would put a big damper on losing it.

 

Comment by tampagurl | 2008-07-08 14:21:45

And believe continues the charade of being a 50 year old woman.

Comment by Seattle Moss | 2008-07-08 14:23:57

Believe is a know it all emasculated kid who can’t get off this blog to go find itself a job

 
 

Comment by Seattle Moss | 2008-07-08 14:29:12

Once again Believe you miss the point.
It’s not about Hillary
It’s about saving this country form a party that uses undemocratic tactics familiar to third world dictatorships.

No matter what you say everyone I know saw the democrats for the fraud they perpetuated on the people.

Country before party/Country before self

McCain Rising!!

Comment by tampagurl | 2008-07-08 14:43:32

Seattle, believe doesn’t want to get the point. His objective is to keep hammering at us in an attempt to get us to contradict ourselves. However it is he who keeps contradicting himself.

 
 
 
 
 

Comment by gerard nedich | 2008-07-08 13:50:46

who said anything about obama being a serial killer???

do you know something we don’t???

a. hillary
b. mccain

america first!

 

Comment by wodiej | 2008-07-08 13:56:15

and I have a low tolerance for stupid people!!

 
 

Comment by fred | 2008-07-08 13:54:28

scratching my head here. Obama 46 McCain 44
Obama has all the money and attention. Ran ads in 18 states b4 McCain launched 1 and hes only up 2…McCain will crush him in the debates ( he will try and duck debates of course) I see a landslide disaster waiting to happen…Obama should have a 10%-19% Lead with Bush approval in the tank, Republicans losing seats. Here we go again Dems run another LOSER 2 wins in 37 years and we see why

Comment by Darryl | 2008-07-08 13:56:15

Obama will never hold another debate. He can’t even answer questions on the fly by the press unless he knows the answers ahead of time.

Bush never held any debates either toward the end.

Its a simple commom old school political strategy.

Comment by scott in jupiter | 2008-07-08 14:39:57

Darryl, I’m sure you meant know the questions ahead of time because he doesn’t know the answers to anything.
Ahh, ummm, huuh.

Comment by Darryl | 2008-07-08 15:43:29

Actually both he has to be feed the questions and answers in rehersal.

 
 
 

Comment by believe | 2008-07-08 14:01:27

Why is it that the only place one can find optimism about McCain’s campaign is at NQ? It’s really quite striking.

Comment by osmana | 2008-07-08 14:08:00

And in Gaza, on the other hand, Hamas is optimistic about Obama.

 
 
 

Comment by believe | 2008-07-08 13:56:17

Obama Campaign Site: Zionists = Mafia, Crips and Bloods, AIPAC = Nazis

http://www.israpundit.com/2008/?p=1497

 

Comment by Fred C. Dobbs | 2008-07-08 13:57:29

Hey, I saw that, “Brokeback Mountain,” flick.

I was a little disappointed.

What, no Show Tunes?

 

Comment by Bella | 2008-07-08 14:05:12

‘believe’ is what you would call a boring Obamabot. An Obore. All canned messages when they are not cut and paste. No humor, no snark, no wit. A cold person that doesn’t even sound human. Has an answer for everything and is neither funny or inviting.

There’s more..

How to identify an Obama supporter: As you are navigating your daily business, you may come across Obama supporters. They have been known to attack (mostly verbal threats and ad hominem) unprovoked. Preferring thought over emotion and facts over slogans is something of a blasphemous crime to an Obama supporter. In addition, if you should form an opinion about Obama without his express permission, you may be accused of being a racist. The purpose of this guide is to help you identify Obama supporters before they get the chance to dampen your day.

It should be noted that there are several species of Obama supporters.

O’Zombies: With glazed eyes and vacant stares, these subdued types can generally be found online. Their speech consists of incoherent rehashes of Obama phrases and, “like” and “y’know”. After having surrendered most cognitive ability to be used as seen fit by the Obama campaign, they generally possess just barely enough to be able to upload a video to Youtube. However, some aren’t so lucky and eventually starve to death having forgotten how to eat. They are not particularly dangerous, often not even aware of your presence when you are standing next to one. Some have suggested that merely being near one or watching their videos can be detrimental to one’s IQ. Avoidance recommended.

Obamatons: Also known as obamabots. Ever since Lenin nurtured the first breeds of useful idiots, communists have continually strived to create better useful idiots - ones that were stronger, faster, more useful than the previous generation. The obamaton is one which has been upgraded to the predictability of a machine. The obamaton seeks out communications relevant to Obama on the internet then responds. There are only two known responses. If the obamaton detects a statement which is positive regarding Obama, the obamaton will respond with requests for money. If the obamaton detects a statement which is negative or even neutral regarding Obama, the obamaton will respond by shrieking “RACIST!” repeatedly. Obamatons are only found online. They are sometimes known as “trolls”. The fact that they have yet to have a spine installed prevents offline activity.

O’lattes: To understand an O’latte, you must put yourself in his shoes. An O’latte believes he’s better than everyone else. And while he enjoys sneering at poor people and chastizing those who dare to question his supreme intellect, he is somewhat depressed. “Why can’t the world be more like me?” he wonders. Then, like a ray of sunlight, Obama appears. “Hey, he thinks he’s better than everyone else just like me!” exclaims the O’latte. Finally, the O’latte finds hope, knowing he is no longer alone in his narcissism. O’lattes are not dangerous, but nevertheless extremely annoying.

Obombers: These are Obama’s enforcers. Brutish and mute, these not-so-gentle giants have been known to become physically aggressive. While their actions range from roughing up old women at rules commitees to blocking camera shots for Fox News, they invariably use force. Little is known what motivates them to serve Obama unquestioningly. Some speculate that Obama supplies them with a daily ration of gruel and they reward him with unfaltering loyalty. They are moderately dangerous.

Yeswecans: Hailing from the make-believe land of Yesweca, these Obama supporters live in a fantasy world. In that world, Obama can heal the sick, stop wars by waving his hand, fly, summon unicorns, and coat the landscape with Obama-rectal derived pixie dust. When they are suddenly torn from their parallel dimension and thrown into our world, (known as reality), they tend to exhibit wild mood swings and the negative behaviors which often accompany them. For the most part, they have a surreally optimistic view of Obama and bubble with enthusiasm. However, when confronted with Obama’s mortal enemies, facts and logic, they will lash out in defense of their deity. There have been many speculations as to the true nature of Yeswecans. Some opine that Yeswecans are best understood as cultists, (see: The Church of Obamism), while still others suggest the root to be a mental disorder, (see: Obamitis). Regardless of the cause, Yeswecans can be extremely dangerous and should be avoided whenever possible.

Obamelites: They’ve turned politics into a business and Obama is their cash cow. A number of super-delegates fit this mold. They generally cluster around Obama in a protective swarm and rarely consort with the “little” people. They are almost never seen in public but often on TV. Because of their rarity in public, they are not much of a threat in terms of individual confrontation. But regarding the power they intend to wield as a bludgeon, they have great potential to damage America as a whole. In addition, they are known to betray former supporters/supportees on the turn of a dime, or, perhaps more accurately, in exchange for a dime. They should never be trusted.
Under normal circumstances, I would not assume that anyone reaches an opinion through a character flaw or extreme ignorance. But Obama supporters are an exception. Obama supporters continually slander and verbally bully those who dare to think differently than they. That is a clear indication of a character flaw. Obama supporters often know much less about their own candidate (not to mention history and geography) than the average person on the street that doesn’t even follow politics.

These fools are the face of your ‘new’ Democratic Party.

Comment by osmana | 2008-07-08 14:13:57

Obama is the Tom Cruise of the new DNC

Comment by Bella | 2008-07-08 14:17:50

He’ll be jumping on Poperah’s couch :!:

 

Comment by db | 2008-07-08 14:35:50

I’m gay, but the idea of voting republican in Nov. disgusts me. But not as much as if I were to vote for Obama!Ugh!

At least with McCain I know where he’s coming from. With Obama he stands for nothing & he stands for everything.

I probably won’t vote. It will be first time in my adult life that I won’t. That disgusts me too.

Hillary I miss you!

Comment by tillthen | 2008-07-08 15:32:53

You should decide on what’s good for the country, not for your crotch.

 
 
 

Comment by Darryl | 2008-07-08 14:18:29

FANTASTIC POST! I love the Yesweca land–Brilliant!

 

Comment by one eyed jack | 2008-07-08 14:25:20

the new Socialist Democratic Party

 

Comment by WildChild | 2008-07-08 14:26:27

The make believe land of Yesweca Heh Heh Heh :)

 

Comment by tampagurl | 2008-07-08 14:28:44

Bella, ROFLMAO

 
 

Comment by ummm | 2008-07-08 14:16:37

“Obama will never hold another debate.”

There are three tentatively scheduled. Obama had about a dozen debates in the last year. They actually solidified him as “presidential” because he held his own against Clinton.

But don’t take my word for it. I’m just a lying Obamabot…not nearly as truthful as, say, a disbarred lawyer who wears a kilt to a press conference because his balls are too big or an ex-CIA man who talked to a guy who talked to a guy who saw the whitey tape.

Comment by Darryl | 2008-07-08 14:19:49

Oh I will hold you too it. lets see how these “tentataively” scheduled debates happen.

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-07-08 14:34:40

Oh, he’ll have to have a couple of debates, if nothing else for show. Even Bush had a couple of debates. What I doubt you’ll see is any town hall type forums. Oblbahma likes things more controlled and formal.

Comment by ritamary | 2008-07-08 15:48:38

If Obama does have any debates I wonder if he will wear that box under the back of his suit like Bush did? I would really be surprised if there are any debates though. The key word there is “tentatively” scheduled. Notice he refused to debate Hillary again after he made an ass of himself on the ABC debate.

 
 
 

Comment by alee21 | 2008-07-08 14:33:19

There you go again, deluded and delusional. Remember Obama’s last debate hosted by ABC? That was a debacle.

Obama got off easily with the other moderators who never fielded him difficult questions, they always asked Hillary first. Then Obama would say, I agree with Hillary.

What a jerk.

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-07-08 14:37:28

I remember that too. I wonder if he’ll be able to say that too with McCain, “I agree with John”…actually, with his flip flops all over the map approach he probably will, never mind.

 
 
 

Comment by No Obama Not Ever | 2008-07-08 14:19:03

As a gay attorney, I’ve often supported gay-related nonprofits in one way or another, such as donations, volunteer work, memberships, etc. HRC has lost my gay dollars for endorsing someone so enmeshed with vocal members of the anti-gay movement. McCain may not be the LGBT community’s best friend, but at least he’s not smiling to our faces while stabbing us in the back.

Comment by believe | 2008-07-08 14:24:05

I don’t believe that you are gay and you don’t sound like one. Poser.

Comment by tampagurl | 2008-07-08 14:31:30

Oh look….The poser calling someone a poser wahahahah

Comment by Darryl | 2008-07-08 14:44:45

meta poserstering. Thats what that is.

 
 

Comment by Helen S | 2008-07-08 14:48:44

Believe…..How does a gay sound……Hmm…..

 

Comment by eurogirl70 | 2008-07-08 15:00:59

how exactly is a gay person supposed to sound on a blog such as this “believe”?

Was he supposed to throw in some snaps and “girlfriends” in order for you to “believe” that he is in fact gay?

Signed:

someone who is gay but may not sound “gay” enough for “believe”

I believe….”believe” that you are an ass!! And nothing you have said so far has gotten me to deviate from that belief

 
 

Comment by meileen | 2008-07-08 14:35:36

I’m with, and wrote back to Joe’s “Yes We Can” email, the following:

Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 2:44 PM
> To: hrc
> Subject: Re: Elect Barack Obama? Yes we can!
>
> Oh no we can’t!
>
> As an affront to all those LGBT folks that are married, and
> the many
> more that will marry, Obama stated, “I believe
> marriage is between a man
> and a woman.” And that was just 6 days ago! He’s
> back pandering for our
> votes? The same Democratic candidate that is considering
> Hagel as his
> VP?
>
> What’s with you guys? Are you masochists?

To wit they replied some major blah blah blah (I refuse to post propaganda from there here). I couldn’t resist striking back. They got:

I find nothing exciting about this selection process. I miss the Democratic Party I used to work so hard for.

I will either sit out this election, of, if things keep going the way they have been with the DNC shoving this (still presumptive) nominee down our throats (i.e., being crowned in a football stadium and not allowing Senator Clinton on the ballot), I may even jump ship completely and vote John McCain.

You know, during the 2004 election, when President Bush was calling for an amendment to the constitution and not one Democrat stood up tall to fight for us (sans Mayor Gavin Newsom), I was angry at the party. I felt like they knew we had no where else to go, and I understood that we had to eat it and continue to wait for our rights for the greater cause of getting a Democrat elected. But this election season has opened my eyes to the ugliness and underhanded behavior that exists within my own party. We could have had it all this year had the party elders not had it out for the Clintons.

I might not be able to call myself a Republican (yet), but I cannot and will not vote for the candidate the party elite has chosen. Not now, possibly not ever. He is too green, and the more talented, more experienced, more electable female candidate was shoved aside.

I will keep on talking to people, advising them of Just Say No Deal and PUMA. One by one, I am turning people around to realize we don’t have to just take what they give us. The Democratic Party will learn a hard lesson this year.

Sign me,
“No He Won’t.”

 
 

Comment by one eyed jack | 2008-07-08 14:21:46

All of Obama’s friends and/or associates are haters. Even his wife is a hater.Even Obama’s preachers are haters. Helluva uniter for the hate mongers. Hope is his theme, Hope in hate. What can he/they , Obamas, hope to get by hating all the whites and the blacks who do not follow his brand of unamerican campaigning? Must be their Kenya culture because all the politicians in Kenya act just like the Obamas. Or maybe I should say the Obama’s act just like all the black politicians in Kenya.

Comment by osbama | 2008-07-08 14:27:28

Actually campaigned for his murderer cousin there.

Comment by one eyed jack | 2008-07-08 14:31:20

I know. Even as the killings were taking place, Obama was actively supporting his murderous cousin.

 
 
 

Comment by salt | 2008-07-08 14:30:57

Amazing I was thinking the same today, things have been really dumbed down…thanks for the post.

 

Comment by Darryl | 2008-07-08 14:33:14

Okay, I have to say this and I am gay. Sooo gay. Alot of Gay people do not like Obama. I’m not saying all of them, but alot. Gay people love their women. Obama is a diva trasher. Obama did the equivalent of what Ike did to Tina. NO WAY BUDDY.

The change that Obama speaks off…Well he changed alot of gay people to Log Cabin Republicans thats for sure.

 

Comment by ummm | 2008-07-08 14:33:18

“Must be their Kenya culture because all the politicians in Kenya act just like the Obamas. Or maybe I should say the Obama’s act just like all the black politicians in Kenya.”

Huh?

 

Comment by fred | 2008-07-08 14:39:57

All I can Say to the Democrat leadership 2 FUCKING winners in 37 years you Dumb ASSHOLES…And now it will be 2 winners in 40. You forever chose the weakest candidate to run against Republican. You’re the gift that keeps on giving…Hillary won every state, battleground state and swing state that you need to be President. She would be 20 points ahead at this. You deserve to lose and I will help you remain LOSERS

Comment by one eyed jack | 2008-07-08 14:46:14

Yeah it’s time to shit can the new socialist democratic party . Start with a fresh Independent slate. :)

 
 

Comment by ummm | 2008-07-08 14:47:34

“Hillary won every state, battleground state and swing state that you need to be President.”

Except for Illinois, Virginia, Missouri, Washington, Iowa, Vermont, Oregon, Wisconsin, Colorado, Connecticut, and Minnesota.

So…using YOUR logic…none of these states are swing states, or are needed to win in 2008? If what’s true for Ohio should be true for Minnesota… Hillary lost these unimportant states than she can’t win them in the General election.

Comment by fif | 2008-07-08 14:56:29

God you Obots are just plain dumb. Ohio is a MAJOR swing state with 19 electoral votes. Many of the other states have fewer electoral votes and Obama will need to win clusters of them to make up for MAJOR states like Ohio and Florida. You are all living on Hopium fumes.

I can’t wait to see the 527’s pop your balloon.

Comment by ummm | 2008-07-08 15:27:35

YOU added the word MAJOR.

I’m debating a different point altogether. But, congratulations. You beat the crap outta your strawman.

“I can’t wait to see the 527’s pop your balloon.”

Well, it can’t be any worse than the “Obama is a murdering-cokedealing-homo-nazi-muslim-radical-christian-felon-liar-liberal-conservative-hitler” crap I read here. For a moment it felt like 1992 again. Got any good Troopergate gossip?

 
 

Comment by Kickass Old Lady | 2008-07-08 21:00:18

Ummm, Please look at Washington a little more closely. The WA primary was within 3 points. The caucases were a joke. The Wa dems called me the other day. I said no $ from me, and no votes till you get rid of the caucuses and become democratic.

 
 

Comment by one eyed jack | 2008-07-08 14:50:24

Just say no to the black liberation party.

 

Comment by fred | 2008-07-08 14:50:48

Lets Get ready to Rumble
McCain HITS Obama HARD

“Don’t ‘hope’ for a better life. Vote for one.
“I’m John McCain and I approved this message.”

Big Mac ATTACK

 

Comment by fif | 2008-07-08 14:54:22

Thanks for the info Amy. I have also been a long-time supporter of Human Rights Campaign, and will let them know how I feel too. Did they hold off their endorsement until after the primaries because of their preference and respect for Hillary at least?

 

Comment by ummm | 2008-07-08 15:01:33

 

Comment by Lee12 | 2008-07-08 15:02:09

To
ginaswo still says no to Uhhbama

meileen

I am with you both. As a member of the GLBT community I :

Did not renew my Human Rights Campaign membership when it came due, and told JS to stick it. I also,

Stopped donating to HRC

Stopped donating to NARAL

Stopped donating to Planned Parenthood

Plan A Hillary 2008
Plan B McCain

 

Comment by ummm | 2008-07-08 15:04:11

 

Comment by barry cheeto | 2008-07-08 15:05:30

Fred is going around posting his “Big Mac Attack” comment on every pro-Hillary site this afternoon.

It’s depressing and silly.

Comment by tampagurl | 2008-07-08 15:16:34

What’s your problem barry? We have no issues with anyone promoting McCain on this site. Most of us will vote for McCain unless we can pull off a miracle and Hillary becomes our nominee!!

Comment by ummm | 2008-07-08 15:37:27

The problem is that McCain stands against pretty much everything Hillary believes. In fact Hillary has endorsed Obama saying:

“I endorse him, and throw my full support behind him. And I ask all of you to join me in working as hard for Barack Obama as you have for me.”

Any reminder that barry cheeto is actually voting against his beliefs and against the wishes of the woman he whole heartedly supports probably tears him up inside…

Also he doesn’t like to be reminded that most of the people that post here and the members of PUMA were actually Republicans all along.

Strange, strange bedfellows.

Comment by WildChild | 2008-07-08 15:42:20

We’ve been thinking the same about BOBO lately, with his expansion of the bush faith program giveaway, his adoption of the bush exit strategy from Iraq, his support of telecom immunity. It’s difficult to image how BOBO could have won the primaries had he not lied about these positions to his mindless following.

 
 
 
 

Comment by Darryl | 2008-07-08 15:05:44

Hillary was the only one of the canidates to vote against the anti-gay marriage ban. Take that to the banks and chew on obama’s pubes and may they give you everlasting hope.

 

Comment by elizinsandi | 2008-07-08 15:05:53

According to one Obama relative, the Obama grandfather (Kenyan) believed so much in discipline that he converted to Islam because he thought Christianity to be too weak, for sissies like women. Something too harsh in this family.

 

Comment by fred | 2008-07-08 15:10:21

John McCain Don’t Hope For A Better Life
” VOTE FOR ONE”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpyOSLZw8qo

 

Comment by barry hussein cheeto | 2008-07-08 15:10:30

I think Barry be needing some psychotherapy to cope with his upbringing. I sense insecurity on a large scale.

Big Mac Attack. Christ. Are we 8 years old?

 

Comment by TexasDarlin | 2008-07-08 15:11:53

Rev. Amy — thanks so much for the video of Hillary. I thoroughly enjoyed it.

You’re right, it’s NOT too late to elect the best candidate for President, the one who refuses to toss convictions out the window on a whim.

It’s NOT too late to pick Hillary.

 

Comment by elizinsandi | 2008-07-08 15:12:51

The family is a nightmare and just because other people lived like that doesn’t mean we need it in the WH.

 

Comment by barry hussein micah marshall cheeto | 2008-07-08 15:13:56

FRED: LISTEN TO ME: Stop campaigning for McCain in the comments section. You are not doing your candidate any favors.

We hatin’ on Barry around here. Either trash Barry or get lost. McCain ain’t my idea of a wonderful choice for Prez, even though he may get my vote.

You’re an unwelcome distraction and you’re acting silly. Nobody wants to watch your damn YOUTUBE.

Comment by tampagurl | 2008-07-08 15:21:15

Speak for yourself Barry, or are you the dude from yesterday that keep demanding to know why we were going to vote for McCain? I think your name was chinofromchicago!

 
 

Comment by barry hussein micah marshall cheeto | 2008-07-08 15:18:20

Sorry tampongirl. I don’t have a problem. Except with the overuse of exclamation marks.

Comment by tampagurl | 2008-07-08 15:23:30

What a greasy pimple face punk you are barry puke!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! more exclamations for you asshole!!!!!!!!!!!!

Comment by BJ | 2008-07-08 15:33:47

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

…here I’ll lend you some of mine :)

 
 
 

Comment by elizinsandi | 2008-07-08 15:20:34

THEOBAMAFILE.COM

Sorry for the caps but this will really scare you people who want to know about his family and early upbringing. It’s kind of like…who needs the birth certificate or any other revelations on the order of Larry S.

This is enough to make hair stand up on fire. Period!

 

Comment by elizinsandi | 2008-07-08 15:27:36

I mean: Who needs anything else?

 

Comment by BJ | 2008-07-08 15:29:50

“the HRC board”

The Hillary Rodham Clinton board? !!! (no clue what hrc is unless i’m suffering a brainfart at the moment from exhaustion of cleaning out my garage in 110 degree heat).

Rabble Rouser YOU should contact this guy personally and ask him specifically what these things are that he says Obama did, that made him choose to endorse the messiah.

People need to directly confront these ppl as much as possible and ask them specifically to show us what are these things they claim the obie-won did that are so great.

 

Comment by elizinsandi | 2008-07-08 15:38:48

H Human
R Right
C Commission

 

Comment by elizinsandi | 2008-07-08 15:39:29

Rights (typo)

Comment by BJ | 2008-07-08 16:16:21

oic - never heard of it

 
 

Comment by nmp | 2008-07-08 15:51:16

I am also dissappointed with the HRC. We have not renewed our membership, nor do we have plans to. As for supporting anyone but Nobama… I’m a PK, yes an evangelical pastor’s daughter, as is my gay brother. Evangelicals don’t scare me. Separation of church and state. Obama’s backtracking, flipflop wafflefest(not surprised btw)does scare me. Cue sound of lockstep.

 

Comment by nmp | 2008-07-08 15:52:11

HRC = Human Rights Campaign

 

Comment by Lou | 2008-07-08 16:40:23

let’s keep chanting President Hillary to ourselves as we go through our day. Everyone please chant president Hillary
Madame president Hillary.

Comment by Lou's KoolAid ummm | 2008-07-09 12:14:37

Hey Lou!

Finish up your Obamabot Koolaid..it’s Toxic!

Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

NoBama ‘08

ummmm

 
 

Comment by ummm | 2008-07-08 17:06:35

“let’s keep chanting President Hillary to ourselves as we go through our day.”

Wait. Whose followers are cultists?

A-Hillary Melaachem to you, too.

Comment by KoolAid Ummmmmm | 2008-07-09 12:13:05

Dear UMMMMMM

How about chanting: God …..America, like Jeremiah Wright? Do you think that’s brilliantly unCultish….come on, drink up the OBAMABOTIC Koolaid the Leader left behind for you plebians…

come on drink up your ObamaramKoolaid there…
that’s the Follower….UMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM

…and keep your hearing tuned up till November 4th

Hear the Pumas roarrrrrrrrrrr

Wake Up, Obamabots Everywhere! You’ve got nothing to lose but your cultish, feverish Leader’s TOXIC KOOLAID UMMMMMMMMMMMM

NOBAMA ‘08
ummmmm

 
 

Comment by llilytoo | 2008-07-08 18:46:38

It’s painful to watch this video and watch the respect Hillary gives this group and then think how they turn around and back someone who thinks very little of them…or anyone .

” We don’t need the people , we just need the checks”

Barry Obama

 

Comment by kat in your hat | 2008-07-08 20:56:17

I didn’t know that HRC endorsed Obama. How the hell could they do that? It’s like NARAL endorsing Obama.

I DON’T GET IT.

Disgusting!!

Probably $$$$$$$

 

Comment by kat in your hat | 2008-07-08 21:05:22

What a horrible, tragic and perverse American lesson: you can get educated, get experienced, do all the hard work, and *actually* CARE about the issues, but it will all not matter…unless you ALSO cheat?

Is that it?

So, if cheating will get you there, what’s the damn point of caring.

Obama is a wicked lesson for America…a lesson that is SO anti-American, so OPPOSITE our American Dream–it should be shunned immediately for fear of cultural corruption…

Obama is wicked. A true villain.

 

Comment by kat in your hat | 2008-07-08 21:14:19

Oh, and I can’t believe that Meeks had that Halloween scene…it’s just so cruel and grotesque!

These people are so hateful…please world, keep these people AWAY from our country!!

NOBAMA!

 

Comment by Mary | 2008-07-09 12:00:15

AMY - THANKS!

WE ALL ARE MISSING OUR HILLARY!

WE WANT HER BACK!

PUMAS, HEAR US ROAR, IN NOVEMBER
IN NUMBERS TOO GREAT TO IGNORE…..

Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

NoBama ‘08

 

Comment by McCain & Obama=Imbeciles | 2008-07-09 12:18:06

To: The Obmabots and McCainocons

GET LOST FROM THIS SITE!

Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

GO PUMAS, GO, LET ‘EM HEAR YOU ROAR IN NOVEMBER….

When the DNC ceiling will shatter from the 18 million cracks…on the heads of the Obamabots and hte DNC thugs

 

RSS Feed for This PostPost a Comment

Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)