RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Obama-Rezko Redux

Barack Obama was recruited to become a community organizer in Chicago twenty years ago. After three years of doing this work, Obama realized that he could have far more influence in Illinois if he pursued a career in politics as had Chicago’s first black mayor, Harold Washington. In furtherance of this notion, Obama began to attend Harvard Law School.

During his third year at Harvard Law, Obama was offered a job by a Chicago real estate developer named Tony Rezko. Obama turned down this opportunity in order to become an attorney with the Davis, Miner and Barnhill law firm.

It was probably no coincidence that one of this firm’s biggest clients was Tony Rezko. The firm’s senior partner, Allison Davis, was also a power broker behind the rise of Harold Washington to the mayor’s seat in the city of Chicago—again, probably no coincidence as far as Obama was concerned.

Allison Davis subsequently left his law firm in order to go into the real estate development business full-time. He became a 51% owner of DV Urban Realty Partners along with Robert Vanecko who owned the remaining 49% of the firm. Vanecko is Chicago Mayor Richard Daley’s nephew. Two of Allison Davis’ sons, Jared and Cullen, work with their father in the real estate business.

Davis and his associates have received more than $100 million in taxpayer subsidies to build and rehab apartments and houses in Chicago. They have also been paid over $4 million dollars in development fees. As Tim Novak, a Chicago Sun-Times reporter, noted in a November 7, 2007 article for his paper, “Davis has gotten deal after deal from the mayor, helping to make him one of the Chicago’s top developers.”

In 1993, the same year he was hired by Davis’ law firm, Obama began serving on the board of Woods Fund, a Chicago charity foundation. After Allison Davis left his law firm, he went to the foundation for money and Obama voted to invest $1 million of the organization’s assets in a Davis real estate partnership.

Ties such as those described above run rampant in the career of Barack Obama from 1993 to the present. Obama has a long history of working with Allison Davis, Tony Rezko, Mayor Daley and Illinois’ Democratic governor, Rod Blagojevich, to obtain government funding for housing development in Chicago. Davis, Rezko, Daley and others have, in return, help fund Obama’s rise to political prominence. It has been classic, Chicago machine politics with the requirement that people “pay to play.”

Without the funding from political Godfathers like Tony Rezko, Obama’s career in politics would never have gotten off the ground. But without the aid of corrupt government officials, slumlords like Tony Rezko would never have made the money to contribute to politicians such Obama, Daley and Blagojevich in the first place.

U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald’s Federal Indictment of Tony Rezko

The U.S. Attorney for Northern Illinois, Patrick Fitzgerald, has made quite a name for himself in recent years. He has successfully prosecuted Dick Cheney’s former chief of staff, Scooter Libby, and former Illinois Republican governor, George Ryan, within the past year. Fitzgerald also convicted several former members of Mayor Daley’s administration for “pervasive fraud” in city hiring practices. This spring he successfully concluded a trial against Tony Rezko, convicting him on corruption charges.

In Fitzgerald’s indictment of Rezko, he lists eight persons that he refers to as “Co-Schemers.” Virtually all of these people have been major contributors to the political campaigns of Barack Obama, Rod Blagojevich and Richard Daley.

Additionally, Fitzgerald’s indictment makes specific references to Blagojevich and Obama. The governor is referred to as “Public Official A” and the senator is called a “political candidate.”

The fact that Obama, Blagojevich and Daley are all mixed up together in the Rezko affair is not surprising. Favored politicians of both parties in Illinois are often joined at the hip when it comes to political fundraising. For example, a recent analysis done by the Chicago Tribune revealed that Obama has taken in more than $1.5 million dollars for his various campaigns from over seven hundred people who have also contributed to Mayor Daley’s candidacies.

Fitzgerald’s case against Rezko involved two state regulatory boards. One controls the Teachers Pension System (TPS) and the other, the Health Facilities Planning Board, reviews all proposals for construction projects that involve medical facilities in Illinois.

After Rod Blagojevich was elected governor of Illinois, the “Co-Schemers” stacked the TPS board so that favored investment firms were allowed to invest parts of the retirement fund’s $30 billion in assets. The “Co-Schemers” then demanded kick-backs and worked to funnel money into the political organizations of Blagojevich and Obama.

Next the “Co-Schemers” worked to reduce the Health Facilities Planning Board from fifteen members to nine members. Subsequently, they proceeded to stack the board with a bloc of five members that would guarantee them a majority. Three doctors, Imad Amanaseer, Michel Malek and Fortunee Massuda, were named new members in order to secure the necessary majority votes. All three became large contributors to the various campaigns of Barack Obama from this point forward.

On April 21, 2004 the Health Facilities Planning Board approved the building of a new hospital in Crystal Lake, Illinois even though state analysts had said the new facility was not needed. The builder of the hospital, Jacob Kiferbaum, was to have paid bribes to those who made the construction of the hospital possible. The hospital was never built because Fitzgerald’s investigators blew the case wide open and even secured a guilty plea from Kiferbaum who is now cooperating with the Feds. Throughout much of this time, Barack Obama was the chairman of the Senate Committee on Health and Human Services and was copied in on e-mails and other correspondence regarding these matters.

The Trial of Tony Rezko

At the recently concluded trial of Tony Rezko, the star witness for the prosecution was a Chicago business man named Stuart Levine. This individual sat on the board that controls the TPS and the Health Facilities Planning Board. He testified that Tom Rosenberg’s investment firm, Capri Capital Advisors, was to have received approval to invest a total of $320 million of TPS assets in exchange for a $500,000 kickback to Levine and $1.5 million in political contributions to Governor Blagojevich. Rosenberg was also a producer of Hollywood films and was so close to Allison Davis on a personal level that he had Davis make a cameo appearance in one of his movies.

Obama also has strong ties to investment companies that seek to do business with the state of Illinois. Once the Democrats took over the state legislature in 2003, Obama was assigned to an Illinois senate committee that began looking into public retirement plan matters. Four firms with close relationships with Obama were subsequently awarded hundreds of millions of new dollars to invest on behalf of these plans. Executives of these firms helped raise $300,000 for Obama’s U.S. senate seat race in 2004 and even more money for his presidential campaign.

The Daley-Obama Machine

Mayor Richard Daley’s office hired Michelle Obama as an assistant to his chief of staff, Valerie Jarrett, in 1991. Daley later appointed Jarrett chairperson of the Office of Planning and Development where Michelle became her assistant.

Today Jarrett is the CEO at Habitat, a real estate development and management firm. It manages the housing program for the Chicago Housing Authority. Jarrett was also a member of Obama’s U.S. Senate Finance Committee in 2004 along with Tony Rezko, Rita Rezko and Allison Davis. Jarrett currently serves as an advisor to Obama’s presidential campaign.

Trackback URL

RSS Feed for This Post148 Comments »

Comment by sjl106 | 2008-07-10 20:21:28

The msm won’t report on any of this until obama the fraud has secured the nomination. Pretty outrageous on what the DNC has done to our party. So be it, they will reep what they sow. If not Hillary then McCain.

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-07-10 20:35:16

Considering DENVER anyone??

Please take the Poll!

1. I’m now a PUMA (can’t go to CO, wish I could) 1 100%
2. I’m a PUMA and I’m GOING TO DENVER BABY 0 0%
3. Not a PUMA, not going 0 0%
4. Not a PUMA but I’d love to go! 0 0%
5. HILLARY w/b chosen in DENVER (puma or not) 0 0%
6. I’m a Republican n/a 0 0%
7. I’m a DEM 4 Obiwan – please TRY the koolaid 0 0%

Comment by YoNoForObama | 2008-07-10 21:13:57

I’m a PUMA and would love to go to Denver but can’t get the time off work.

Comment by Factcheck2 | 2008-07-10 23:40:58

It will be too late to change anything by the time Denver rolls around. Civil disobedience should be happening now at the DNC headquarters, since what Howard Dean, Donna Brazile and the rest did is tantamount to treason. They perpetrated a fraud on the American electorate, but as of May 31st, all the groups protesting the Florida and Michigan aspect of this packed up and went home. A protest at the convention, after the nomination has already been poured into cement will at most advance the cause of the G.O.P., which means nothing at all will change in Washington. The only possibility now is to press Clinton to run as an Independent (and no one is doing this) and/or rub the DNC’s noses in their crime so hard that the public repudiation that comes with the publicity forces them to back down from their fictional nominee declaration. If you are connected to any group, please suggest this to your leaders, or if you live close to D.C. get in a car with some friends and go down there. (Bring tea.)

As for Obama’s ties to Rezko, this is just the tip of the ice berg. He’s been a shill for the corporate establishment since he took office. Here’s a new article with lots of source links.

http://www.thecityedition.com/Pages/Archive/Summer08/BushThirdTerm.html

 
 

Comment by Latte liberal for McCain | 2008-07-10 21:18:50

#1 I’m a PUMA and I want to go but I can’t afford it. But if I can find some local folks to travel with, I’ll be a #2!
Go Hillary!

Comment by YoNoForObama | 2008-07-10 21:26:27

Have you contacted PUMA? They’re taking names of people who want to go to Denver and they’re getting buses together.

 

Comment by belltoll | 2008-07-10 23:25:21

Puma is arranging buses! I’ll be there.

Comment by Patti | 2008-07-11 00:02:25

And, don’t forget your Homeowners/Tenants Insurance policy. The liability secion provides bail bond. I am sure they have “plans” for us. I’ll be wearing my Obamarama gear* over my Hillary stuff so I can get into (welcomed) to the vicinity.

PUMA

*burque

 
 
 

Comment by Sprout | 2008-07-10 21:39:45

I’m a 100% PUMA and would love to go, unfortunately, thanks to dumbya, I can’t afford to go to the gas station, let alone Denver :(

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-07-10 21:53:18

 
 
 

Comment by elise | 2008-07-11 03:25:49

I’m not offically a PUMA, live in Colorado, strongly support Hillary and will be going to Denver.

 
 

Comment by jerzyernie | 2008-07-10 23:01:45

more from the chosen ones fowl mouth!

Comment by jerzyernie | 2008-07-10 23:02:17

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-07-10 23:34:51

LMAO @ cigarette burn marks all over the white house!!! That’s funnnnnny! (or it would be if it was a joke and NOT a real possibility)

what a FREAK he is!

 
 
 
 

Comment by Hope | 2008-07-10 20:24:26

Hopefully someone reports it..better late than never.

 

Comment by Lorey | 2008-07-10 20:25:55

This guy is a clear anhd present danger for the USA.

 

Comment by Buddy | 2008-07-10 20:26:38

This post makes me homesick for Chitown. I grew up there and left the two years after Daley I died. Chitown makes local politics in every other city I have lived in look amateurish.

Comment by Chicago Joe | 2008-07-10 20:54:47

No kidding. But it’s not the same as it used to be. Back in the day, Walter Jacobson would call out the corrupt politicians, and the “Council Wars” were played out every night on the news. But now, you don’t hear so much about that and it is all generic news. They don’t go after them like they used to.

Comment by Buddy | 2008-07-10 22:35:56

I should add that I had the distinct pleasure of working for one of the judges who was a few years later named in Operation Greylord. Those were fun times, ahhhh memories.

 
 

Comment by hank48188 | 2008-07-11 08:01:12

I live in the Detroit area and the Gov’t in the City of Detroit is something to see. The Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick wants another $150,000 of Taxpayer money to pay his lawyers because he has been indicted on about 12 counts of lying and corruption. The City Council is getting ready to have most of the members indicted on bribery charges for taking money to vote for a Sludge Deal. I can’t wait to see John Conyers wife, Monica, led out of City Hall in handcuffs. Detroit is like Chicago but they have less money to steal

 
 

Comment by Patti | 2008-07-10 20:27:54

Why is this being ignored? This is crazy.

Are there “veiled” threats or what?

I don’t get it.

When it does blow, who is going to be held responsible?

Comment by Mandelay | 2008-07-10 21:22:59

All of this info has been available for a long, long time at the sites of the Chicago Tribune and the Chicago Sun Times. These papers have archives of articles going back to 2005. The NY Times, Washington Post, LA Times and other major papers ignored the investigative reporting from the Chicago papers. But this posting from Kirk Tofte is a great summary of a very detailed, complex story and is much appreciated. Thanks much! If you have friends and family who might vote for Obama or who are sitting on the fence, this posting by Kirk is a great way to introduce them to the real Barack Obama, the player from Chicago.

Comment by Kirk Tofte | 2008-07-11 03:52:26

I want to thank Mandelay for his compliments about my piece but have to admit its posting got out ahead of me a bit. It is (without apology or, unfortunately, attribution)a summary of Ms. Pringle’s work that I wrote for friends I have in Iowa.
I sent the piece along with another about the Iowa caucuses to noquarterusa.com as examples of my writing. They decided to post both by Friday night. Had I know this, I would have made sure to pay homage to Ms. Pringle’s prior efforts.

Comment by Amalia | 2008-07-11 12:06:19

no need for your statement because your summary is WAY
clearer that EP’s work. clarity is necessary to drive home the message. thanks for helping.

 
 
 

Comment by elise | 2008-07-11 03:34:23

Everyone except CNN and MSNBC.

 
 

Comment by Andrew | 2008-07-10 20:34:45

I’m feeling depressed. The polls keep moving in Obama’s favor. It doesn’t make any sense. Maybe this is how it was meant to be, America collapses from the inside. The radicals have finally gotten the reins and we are headed for a fall just like that of Rome. I hope it isn’t so, but I am beginning to feel it is.

Comment by Archimedes, give me a place to stand... | 2008-07-10 21:07:33

You have to stick to the reliable polls like Rasmussen and Gallup. They paint a different picture, todays Gallup had Bambi only up by 2pts.

Rasmussen its 4pts and get this, fasten your seat-belts….only 3pts in N.J.!!! In New Jersey? Any Dem who is’nt leading by 20-30pts in Jersey is headed for the rocks.

Comment by Mandelay | 2008-07-10 21:24:10

Yes, the poll taken for Jersey is amazing. Obama’s lead has all but evaporated.

Comment by joe | 2008-07-10 23:34:48

Look at Illinois!! He’s only up 11 pts when you include leaners. He should be double that at this point. And, leaners break 2 to 1 for Mac.

Rasmussen and Gallup are definatley the reliable polls, especially Gallup. They are the only ones that have been doing these daily presidential tracking polls for decades. They know how to get it right.

 
 

Comment by believe | 2008-07-10 22:01:28

You always see this sort of thing in NJ. Republicans think they can win, they invest huge amounts of money in the state, and then they always lose big.

Always happens.

Comment by Archimedes, give me a place to stand... | 2008-07-10 22:39:52

Always? Do you not remember Reagan, he won it and 48 other states and thats because he ran against a candidate that relied on the youth vote and the far-left. Again you have no sense of history and are there-fore doomed to repeat it.

Comment by believe | 2008-07-10 22:53:30

OK, not always, just the last 4 election cycles.

Comment by Seattle Moss | 2008-07-10 23:02:50

This year reminds me of 1980
Carter was such a wimp that we couldn’t wait to get Reagan in to bring back a sense of patriotic pride.
Same thing this year. Obama is a wimp tied to the anti-American ,blame America first radicals and McCain will win on patriotic pride.

Why did Obama wish for defeat and retreat in Iraq?

Comment by wry | 2008-07-10 23:31:18

Sorry Seattle, I voted for Carter in 1980. Never wanted a B movie actor and his astrology obsessed wife.
Of course this “street cred” doesn’t prevent my dumbass nephew from calling me a Republican. : )

Comment by Seattle Moss | 2008-07-10 23:38:54

The Republican party is realigning itself.
They have thrown off the yoke of the right wing and are meeting the Clinton Clan in the middle
The Clinton wing is absorbing into the McCain campaign.
The new Republicans party will be for equality fairness and against sexism to women
McCain will select more women than ever in his cabinet and they in turn will affect policy change.
The Republican party will be the party for women.
I see it happening and I’m a guy

 
 
 
 

Comment by Carolyn Mann | 2008-07-11 01:53:44

I think Nixon won my a 49 state margin against McGovern, though I don’t remember which state went blue.

Comment by MaryPat | 2008-07-11 02:27:15

Massachusetts.

 
 
 
 
 

Comment by Latte liberal for McCain | 2008-07-10 21:20:41

All will be well. In October it’ll all happen, fast and furious. It’ll be awesome. Obama is going down.

 

Comment by alibe4hillary | 2008-07-10 21:21:13

I was just polled by Quinnipac. I felt that it was biased in favor of Obama. In some ways it was like a mild push poll. Like would you be definitely, somewhat or less likely to vote for an old man who is 72 and would be the oldest person ever elected! Only it was broken down into 3 parts. Then there was that part of the poll that tried to make one think you had to give the edge to Obama or one was a racist. It was really pathetic. And there had to be 6 questions about gay marriage. Anyway, I can see why Obama is ahead after the way the questions were worded. But wording questions won’t give Obama do didley squat in November!

 

Comment by The Real Hope | 2008-07-10 22:09:05

No I looked at Gallup today. Obama’s lead is closing. You are watching the nutwing polls. Go to Rasmussen, Zogby and Gallup.

Comment by joe | 2008-07-10 23:39:48

Zogby’s polling hasn’t been very good this cycle. They had a history of dramatically over polling Obama in the primaries. Zogby himself always seemed to estimate the right margin based on his opinion, but the polling was usually about 4-6 points high for Obama compared to final vote tally.

Rasmussen, based on my observations, had the most consistent polling, but Zogby’s personal analysis was always spot on.

 

Comment by HRocks | 2008-07-10 23:46:09

Zogby is pro Obama, turns out Zogby’s is owned by an Arab family and has always turned out the polls to be in an overwhelming favor for Obama.

 
 
 

Comment by nobamainbama | 2008-07-10 20:39:02

i had heard some of this,as i lived there 2 yrs.will someone please wake up the media…why did fitzgerald not go farther,before b.hussein obama is potus…this is disturbing on so many levels….

Comment by Archimedes, give me a place to stand... | 2008-07-10 21:02:14

P.F. is agonizingly methodical, remember how long it took him to bag Scooter.

 
 

Comment by Cooney | 2008-07-10 20:41:09

All of this is very well know to many. Evelyn Pringle expose was extensive and covered every connection. No one cares, the Precious has money, and the DNC is seeing green, so they don’t care. This is above the intellect of the MSM so they won’t bite. It is up to us to keep this information circulating, eventually when BO is vulnerable someone will pounce, hopefully Fitzgerald. A PAC needs to put it in a full page ad accross the country and then it can’t be ignored, and it sure as hell won’t be MoveOn the Obamabot, I have my money on PUMA.

Comment by 30yrdem-not any more | 2008-07-10 21:26:39

Did anyone ever think maybe the DNC is just as dirty as Obama and his friends…why else would they throw away our democracy and make Obama the nominee?

Comment by Carolyn Mann | 2008-07-11 02:06:42

I think Cooney called it right. The DNC has been a miserable failure at fundraising under Howard Dean. In fact, Obama will probably have to pick up part of the tab for the convention himself. Obama was raising buckets of money during the primaries. Hillary’s fundraising lagged for awhile, causing her to go into debt. Dean, et al., saw Obama as a cash cow that could bail their butts out of their financial problems. Probably seemed like an easy decision for them. After all, the old broads will just “get over it” and go along.

 
 

Comment by wry | 2008-07-10 23:34:38

The problem as I see it Cooney is that it’s all too complicated. Pringle’s articles make my head spin. Think of Joe Regular Coffee reading that…he’ll put it down after the second paragraph.

 
 

Comment by RedDragon62 | 2008-07-10 20:43:12

I wouldn’t put too much stock in those “POLLS”! The very same people that take these “POLLS” are the same people trying to shove this Douche-bag down our throats.
What really gets me is what Obama did today. He VOTED FOR the FISA bill! Where is the outrage from his Disciples on this? That Kool-Aid is awfully powerful!

I was over at some of those “SITES WE DON”T MENTION” and all I read were excuses as to why this Flip Flopping Gas Bag voted the way he did. They are even attacking Hillary for Voting against it! can you F****ing believe that? They are actually attacking her for standing up for the Constitution!

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-07-10 20:49:40

;-) Not MY Robin’s Perch Poll

It’s totally local.

 

Comment by Latte liberal for McCain | 2008-07-10 21:41:02

No, remember the polls before NH saying Obama would take it by a landslide?

 
 

Comment by RedDragon62 | 2008-07-10 20:44:33

I meant…Yesterday! Thats when Obama screwed us all by voting for FISA!

Comment by Teakwood | 2008-07-10 21:00:41

You had me time warping RedDragon62.

I heard Dr Phil endorsed BO today, but only if he could give BO marital advice on national TV…:)

A very clear and concise article, Kirk Tofte. Has anyone checked the visitor logs for Rezko of late?

Comment by Archimedes, give me a place to stand... | 2008-07-10 21:18:50

He better HOPE he does’nt get by modern versions of the Annenberg boys.(Max&Moses)

Gee I wonder where I’ve that name before Hmmmm…as in “Annenberg Challenge” with Bill Ayers. For those you not familiar in Chicago lore, Maxy & Mo got their start in “The Chicago Paper Wars”, a very violent & bloody affair between the McCormick family(Chicago Tribune)& William Randolph Hearst. I suspect this connection in the Trib not outing Obama. Anyways the boys then went to be particularily brutal hitters for O’Banion in his struggle against Capone.

It just keeps getting better by the day does’nt it.

Comment by Archimedes, give me a place to stand... | 2008-07-10 21:22:55

I meant a visit by the boys. Damn typos!

 

Comment by missE | 2008-07-10 21:28:26

Axelrod used to work for the Trib that’s how he got them to petition to unseal the divorce records of two Republican opponents and they went bye bye and Obama got to run against Alan Keys.

Comment by jessinwis | 2008-07-10 22:46:41

Yes, Axel-rove. Read this piece from Newsweek, and you will know more about the Obama campaign’s experience with bamboozling and hoodwinking the public. http://www.newsweek.com/id/138519
We need Hillary (check out the Denver Group).

 

Comment by Amalia | 2008-07-11 00:44:11

you are spot on!

 
 
 

Comment by RedDragon62 | 2008-07-10 22:11:37

Sorry about the Time warp there Teak!

I wonder if Rezco is actually squawking to the Feds? He would be pretty stupid to take the fall all by his lonesome. But then again, look at what happened to that choir director. Maybe he’s thinking he’s be safer in the can than on the SOUTH SIDE of Chicago…LOL

Comment by hank48188 | 2008-07-11 08:12:51

Rezko SURRENDERED to the FEDS as soon as he was convicted. He could have gone home and returned 4 months later for sentencing but he decided jail might be a safer place for him at this time. Lets see how much time he gets but I think he might still turn RAT.

 
 
 

Comment by Mandelay | 2008-07-10 21:25:03

Hopefully, he screwed himself.

 
 

Comment by lastlemming | 2008-07-10 20:46:16

and in the indictment just what was the political candidate accused of doing?

Comment by Steven Mather | 2008-07-10 21:04:14

I recommend reading Pringle’s work. Judge for yourself what seems valid.

Comment by csuzeq | 2008-07-10 22:15:17

Here’s the link to the Pringle articles. A very earth shattering read. I got just completely physically ill and terrified after reading it:

http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0805/S00325.htm

BTW all who have asked about Evelyn’s safety, I emailed her and she is fine! I first emailed her about these articles asking why she has not told the DNC and the delegates and helped Hillary. To my surprise she emailed back and assured me the DNC and super delegates all had gotten copies and she had confirmation of this! WTF is going on with the dems???? Anyway, this was back end of April, so apparently they do not care! Evelyn was just sick over this herself!

 
 

Comment by Teakwood | 2008-07-10 21:07:16

Have you read the indictment?

 
 

Comment by elizinsandi | 2008-07-10 20:57:00

That’s good that they’re talking about Hillary. Means she a force with which they know they’ll have to contend with in August.

 

Comment by Archimedes, give me a place to stand... | 2008-07-10 20:59:00

Great peice of work! I have maintained for quite sometime now, that the motivation of the Chicago crew was to get Fitzgerald yanked out of Atty’s office for northern Illinois. If Obama wins the White House Fitzgerald will gone so fast it’ll make your head spin.

These people have been plundering the coffers of Illinois & Chicago for decades. Now the want the keys to the Oval & our Treasury.

THIS CANNOT BE ALLOWED TO HAPPEN!

Comment by rjj | 2008-07-11 00:41:40

Don’t forget Romney is going to help them out as well and he is top of McCain’s VP short list.

 
 

Comment by HARP | 2008-07-10 21:01:51

Good News Again

Senator Clinton’s delegates have been coordinating on their own, however, which they have every right to do. They are supporting one another and attempting to prepare a nominating petition to be used at the convention if the usual rules apply. Of course none of Senator Clinton’s delegates want to put her in an awkward position, either during the current negotiations or at the party convention itself.

Throughout the day, the Clinton delegates have been preparing a petition, which requires the collection of a certain number of delegate signatures from different state delegations. Then, they need a safe place to send their signatures. It is with real honor that I tell readers of this space that the delegates have asked me to consider to accepting their signatures and to keep the paperwork safe until the time when it can be used to aid Senator Clinton. The delegates know I will guard that paperwork with my life. They also know that I will not release it without being sure that any such release will not harm Senator Clinton, who I continue to hold in the highest esteem.

http://heidilipotpourri.blogspot.com/

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-07-10 21:12:29

also good news (I finally listened to PUMA radio from yesterday)

apparently according to Will, 8 supers changed back to Hillary yesterday!!

It’s a good interview so far. Here’s a quick link for anyone that missed it like I did.

Comment by believe | 2008-07-10 22:03:37

Then how come no news organization knows this – Are they keeping a secret? What’s the evidence?

 
 

Comment by elise | 2008-07-11 05:11:33

Harp, this is something I have been hoping for. It’s great news. I love Hillary and have admired her for so many years. I’ve been politically active since 1973 and I have never seen a candidate as qualified. She is simply amazing. But there is one thing bothering me.

No one wants to cause her any embarrassment or created a difficult situation for her, including me. There is no way to predict exactly what will happen in Denver, but it’s clear the Obama camp. and the DNC want complete control of the proceedings. They have been ruthless so far in crushing opposition and subverting Party rules.

I believe they will try to minimize the Clintons and her supporters and if they do this, there is no hope for a second chance. Denver is it. So I guess my question is does everyone cave in and let them have it or will they fight? It is so important to retrieve control of the Party and I know the Clintons and her campaign want to do that and I’m sure they know better than I where and when to make their stand. I know this sounds confusing and that’s because I am confused. Well, I know this isn’t a popular opinion, but if it is slipping away, why not go all out on a floor fight? Tradition and rules are in her favor as far as getting her name on the ballot. Dawnell commented directly below your post eight SDs have moved to endorse her. If more move in that direction, the DNC will do everything they can to keep her name off the ballot so it’s possible a situation could arise where she could win the nomination, but there won’t be a roll call vote and they can call for a voice vote and everything else will be drowned out.

If her delegates go to the convention unprepared or unwilling to do fight, it will be pathetic and I can’t accept that. I was supposed to be a delegate to the county convention and somehow my name wasn’t on the list and I wasn’t allow in. I hope you are someone else here can understand my concerns and have some answer. I have read the rules and they are long and hard to follow. Sorry this comment is so long.

 
 

Comment by missE | 2008-07-10 21:11:03

Slumlords for Obama:

The developers gave Obama their financial support. Jarrett, Davis, and Rezko all served on Obama’s campaign finance committee when he won a seat in the US Senate in 2004.

The problems with all the developments involved where known long before 2004.

Obama says he “didn’t know”. Nothing pisses me of more about Obama than this public housing story.

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-07-10 21:28:28

Are you a Puma? And are you going to Denver?
Answers Votes Percent
1. I’m now a PUMA (can’t go to CO, wish I could) 8 67%
2. I’m a PUMA and I’m GOING TO DENVER BABY 3 25%
3. Not a PUMA, not going 0 0%
4. Not a PUMA but I’d love to go! 0 0%
5. HILLARY w/b chosen in DENVER (puma or not) 0 0%
6. I’m a Republican n/a 1 8%
7. I’m a DEM 4 Obiwan – please TRY the koolaid 0 0%

 
 

Comment by YoNoForObama | 2008-07-10 21:25:09

I love reading all your intellectual posts BUT

WILL YOU PLEASE, PLEASE NOT RESPOND TO THE TROLLS. Leave them alone. Just scroll past their posts. DO NOT engage them. Let them talk to themselves. They get very desperate when no one, and I MEAN NO ONE responds to them. They are only here because you engage them and it just pisses me off to have them here and spouting their stupid nonsense.

 

Comment by HARP | 2008-07-10 21:27:46

A must read:

Obama not keeping promise to fully disclose fundraising ‘bundlers’

Barack Obama has long been among the most outspoken critics of the influence of money in politics.

Yet records show that in his presidential campaign, he has not lived up to his promise to fully disclose the identities of his top money-collectors who bundle millions of dollars in campaign contributions.

Since November, Obama had added just two new names to a list of more than 326 fundraisers who have bundled contributions of $50,000 or more for him, despite the campaign’s taking in more than $180 million during that time.

After receiving an inquiry from The New York Times, the campaign scrambled Thursday evening to update its list of bundlers, adding 185 names to it — a more than 50 percent jump — and increasing the amounts some were credited with raising.

With individual contributions limited to $2,300, bundlers fuel the fundraising of presidential campaigns by collecting piles of checks from wealthy acquaintances in a practice that critics say gives them excessive influence. While Obama has collected unprecedented amounts in small donations over the Internet, he also has a formidable high-dollar fundraising apparatus.

At least 60 members of Obama’s National Finance Committee, who have each committed to raising at least $250,000 for him, were not on the publicly available bundler list on the campaign’s Web site as of Thursday afternoon. Several of the missing members said in interviews that they began raising money for Obama in early to mid-2007 and already exceeded their $250,000 goal.

http://primebuzz.kcstar.com/?q=node/12928

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-07-10 21:34:29

Ok Will on the PUMA radio just announced that Yesterday Rush Limpbalz announced that he believes Hillary will be the Dem Nominee.

Did anyone else hear him say that? I am allergic to LUSH. lol

 
 

Comment by K Bentley | 2008-07-10 21:31:45

I’ve lived in and around Chicago all of my life. My father was a fireman and my greatuncle was very high in politics–one of Daley, Sr.–I can’t say because it will give my last name–but, my uncle was a judge.

I would like to paint a happy picture, but can’t. The Chicago Combine is very powerful, however, I see Fitzgerald making a big crack in that coalition.

I wish you all could see the part of Chicago that Rezko and Obama turned to deplorable slums. To hear what past tenants say would shock you.

All I can say is we have to do our vetting of Obama, MSN, CNN, and MSNBC, as local TV stations only report a glimpse of what has taken place, not a full account of what you will find out. Money, that’s all it takes, can buy you all the good news you want.

If you have doubts, which I would coming from a comment section, go into the history of the Chicago 7 trial. See what happened to judge, jury, prosecuters, and media. They have an interesting story and is published for your review. Go to your library, you’ll be amazed… or look it up on the net.

Comment by RedDragon62 | 2008-07-10 22:19:41

Comment by K Bentley | 2008-07-10 21:31:45

I’ve lived in and around Chicago all of my life. My father was a fireman and my greatuncle was very high in politics–one of Daley, Sr.–I can’t say because it will give my last name–but, my uncle was a judge.

I would like to paint a happy picture, but can’t. The Chicago Combine is very powerful, however, I see Fitzgerald making a big crack in that coalition.

I wish you all could see the part of Chicago that Rezko and Obama turned to deplorable slums. To hear what past tenants say would shock you.

All I can say is we have to do our vetting of Obama, MSN, CNN, and MSNBC, as local TV stations only report a glimpse of what has taken place, not a full account of what you will find out. Money, that’s all it takes, can buy you all the good news you want.

If you have doubts, which I would coming from a comment section, go into the history of the Chicago 7 trial. See what happened to judge, jury, prosecuters, and media. They have an interesting story and is published for your review. Go to your library, you’ll be amazed… or look it up on the net.

———————————————————-
I live in Chi-Town and I am very familiar with that part of town. I am from 47th and Ashland…you know where that is?
Not too far from the site in question. I know all too well what was done in that part of town. It’s damn cesspool!

 
 

Comment by soldier4hillary | 2008-07-10 21:35:22

I wonder if Senator Obama was for FISA to keep from being on the recieving end? But even more, just think about all the online activities people are constantly stating about the internet thugs. The people calling leaving death threats and harrasing people. I dont think people looked at it from that angle. The information the President can find out….think of all of BOs associations here in the U.S.

How much you wanna bet that they will all of a sudden take “very seriously” all the information that people have constantly talked about but no one spoke up. Maybe thats why the MSM has been giving BO the jesus in a manger treatment. I get the feeling the Democratic Party have just f&%ked themselves over.

 

Comment by soldier4hillary | 2008-07-10 21:39:12

Plus it answered my question of “When will the media do its job”: Answer: FISA. If the Dems feels like Obama has nothing to hide…and are willing to put there political careers on the line…. They can access phone records and now have immunity. Oh I really think shit will hit the fan.

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-07-10 22:40:57

Hey Fellow VET (thanks for your service)

The Shiate is gonna hit WHOSE fan? The PUBLIC or BHO’s team?

Pardon me I’m a bit tired.

 

Comment by Teakwood | 2008-07-10 23:03:12

Good evening Sargent. You have just stumbled in to the DC Blackberry Lounge door; somewhere in the bowels of DC inside all that fiberoptics.

You unlock this door with the key of imagination. Beyond it is another dimension – a dimension of sound, a dimension of sight, a dimension of mind. You’re moving into a land of both shadow and substance, of things and ideas. You’ve just crossed over into the FISA Twilight Zone.

.

 
 

Comment by Sprout | 2008-07-10 21:42:21

chicago got the name “windy city” not due to it’s climate but due to the airbag politicians that reside there

 

Comment by Mandelay | 2008-07-10 21:42:29

Related article from the NY Times, published in the Kansas City Star — Valerie Jarrett is mentioned at the end. Too bad the “context” of the Jarrett connection outlined in Kirk’s posting is not mentioned in this article:

Obama not keeping promise to fully disclose fundraising ‘bundlers’
“Obama was saying he was the most transparent, but it wasn’t even on par with Bush and Cheney.” — Alexander Cohen, senior researcher at Public Citizen.

By MICHAEL LUO and CHRISTOPHER DREW
The New York Times

Barack Obama has long been among the most outspoken critics of the influence of money in politics.

Yet records show that in his presidential campaign, he has not lived up to his promise to fully disclose the identities of his top money-collectors who bundle millions of dollars in campaign contributions.

Since November, Obama had added just two new names to a list of more than 326 fundraisers who have bundled contributions of $50,000 or more for him, despite the campaign’s taking in more than $180 million during that time.

After receiving an inquiry from The New York Times, the campaign scrambled Thursday evening to update its list of bundlers, adding 185 names to it — a more than 50 percent jump — and increasing the amounts some were credited with raising.

With individual contributions limited to $2,300, bundlers fuel the fundraising of presidential campaigns by collecting piles of checks from wealthy acquaintances in a practice that critics say gives them excessive influence. While Obama has collected unprecedented amounts in small donations over the Internet, he also has a formidable high-dollar fundraising apparatus.

At least 60 members of Obama’s National Finance Committee, who have each committed to raising at least $250,000 for him, were not on the publicly available bundler list on the campaign’s Web site as of Thursday afternoon. Several of the missing members said in interviews that they began raising money for Obama in early to mid-2007 and already exceeded their $250,000 goal.

Obama has made transparency a cornerstone of his campaign, even introducing a bill in the Senate last year that would mandate that presidential candidates identify their bundlers.

But Obama’s spotty record in disclosing new bundlers in recent months, despite repeated entreaties from watchdog groups, compares unfavorably to that of George W. Bush during his two runs for president.

“Obama was saying he was the most transparent, but it wasn’t even on par with Bush and Cheney,” said Alexander Cohen, senior researcher at Public Citizen, a nonpartisan watchdog group that recently sent letters to Obama and Sen. John McCain with seven other organizations calling for them to disclose more information about their donors.

Obama campaign officials acknowledged Thursday that they had fallen behind on their plan to update their list quarterly and that they had not added any names since January. “Keeping track of how much our bundlers have raised is not an exact science, and we will be vigilant in updating those names and figures,” Ben LaBolt, a campaign spokesman, said in a statement.

McCain, who has also railed against the influence of money on politics, has also been lax. Despite promising early on to disclose bundlers, it was only in April that the campaign released a list of just over 100 top fundraisers, who had brought in $100,000 or more. Since then, McCain has added only one name to his list, who earn the title of “Trailblazer” if they raise more than $100,000, and “Innovator” if they exceed $250,000.

It is unclear how many bundlers might be missing from McCain’s list. He has enjoyed a surge in fundraising in recent months, after struggling much of last year, and absorbed many former fundraisers for Mitt Romney, Rudolph W. Giuliani and other Republican rivals who were not on his initial list.

Brian Rogers, a spokesman for McCain, said Thursday that staffers were in the process of updating their bundler list, saying he believed it was “reasonable” to except the campaign would add to it “every couple months.”

“It’ll be updated in the next week or so,” Rogers said. “This is something Sen. McCain believes in. He’s committed to being open and transparent.”

Highlighting his commitment to beating back special interests in politics, Obama makes a point of declining contributions from lobbyists and political action committees. And he often cites as his signal accomplishment in the Senate his role in the passage of another bill last year that required lobbyists to disclose their bundled donations — a law that has not yet gone into effect. He also became the first candidate to post a list of his top fundraisers early last year.

At a debate in South Carolina last year, Obama boasted of his campaign’s level of disclosure and his efforts on the issue in the Senate.

“That’s the kind of leadership that I’ve shown in the Senate,” Obama said. “That’s the kind of leadership that I showed when I was state legislator. And that’s the kind of leadership that I’ll show as president of the United States.”

Although there is no legal requirement for candidates to disclose their bundlers, in 2000 and 2004, President Bush identified people who had raised at least $100,000 for his campaign, whom he called “Pioneers.” In 2004, he also listed the names of those who had raised $200,000 or more, calling them “Rangers.”

Reporters and watchdog groups pored over Bush’s lists, eventually discovering that 49 Pioneers or Rangers later became ambassadors.

In March, after months of requests from the Chicago Sun-Times, the Obama campaign released to the newspaper a roster of nearly 300 people on its National Finance Committee. But the campaign declined this week to release a more recent roster to The New York Times.

A dozen Obama fundraisers confirmed in interviews that they had either surpassed the $50,000 mark for Obama and were not on the campaign’s bundler list, or were no longer in the correct category on the campaign’s Web site, which divides bundlers by those who have raised more than $50,000, $100,000 and $200,000.

“The conspiracy theory is they don’t want you to know everybody,” said Mitchell Berger, a lawyer in Florida who signed on with the Obama campaign early this year but declined to say exactly how much he has raised, except to confirm it was more than $250,000. “The Mitchell-Berger-I’ve-been-in-campaigns’ theory is, this is not the first I’d do in the morning if I’m running a campaign, update a finance list.”

In late April, one name was actually removed from the Web site, that of Robert Blackwell Jr., a Chicago businessman. Blackwell’s name was taken off the list in late April after Los Angeles Times revealed that he had paid Obama an $8,000-a-month retainer for legal advice for a technology firm he owned and that Obama had written a letter on Blackwell’s behalf so another company he owned could receive a state grant.

The Obama campaign said they removed Blackwell’s name because they learned that he had not met the $50,000 threshold.

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton early last year released a list of her “Hillraisers,” people who had raised $100,000 or more for her. But she also stopped updating her list, of more than 320 names, in November, according to watchdog groups, soon after one of her top bundlers, Norman Hsu, who had raised more than $800,000, was disgraced amid accusations of fraud and questionable fundraising tactics.

While the Hsu case cast a harsh spotlight on the often-hidden nature of bundlers in campaigns, it is not at all clear that the Obama campaign was seeking to hide anything in its sporadic updating of its bundling list.

As of Thursday afternoon, the finance committee members missing from Obama’s list included some of the campaign’s earliest and most high-profile supporters, including Valerie Jarrett, a top Obama aide.

Alfredo J. Balsera, a committee member and a communications consultant in Miami, said he began raising money for Obama in the first half of 2007 and had collected much more than $250,000.

Jonathan Perdue, a business consultant in Mill Valley, Calif., said he had collected checks for Obama’s campaign from several hundred donors since last fall and had also passed the $250,000 mark.

Like several others interviewed, they said they did not know that Obama had posted a bundlers list on his Web site, or that their names were not on it.

“I’m sure it’s just an administrative thing,” Perdue said, adding that he trusted the campaign would fix it.

Submitted by Keith Chrostowski on July 10, 2008 – 8:07pm.
2008 White House Race | Democrats | login or register to post comments | 3000 reads

Comment by missE | 2008-07-10 22:07:21

Blackwell now who is he?

Chicago entrepreneur Robert Blackwell Jr. paid Obama an $8,000-a-month retainer to give legal advice to his growing technology firm, Electronic Knowledge Interchange. It allowed Obama to supplement his $58,000 part-time state Senate salary for over a year with regular payments from Blackwell’s firm that eventually totaled $112,000.

Some suspect the reason his name was removed from Obama’s website is that there is nothing to show for such large payments.

 
 

Comment by HARP | 2008-07-10 21:48:45

Please make room under the bus…Incoming:

Denver to homeless: Why not visit the zoo while the press are here?

Denver wants to put its best foot forward during the Democratic convention, which means they want to get the homeless out of sight while the media focuses on the city. Instead of making panhandling illegal, which might solve at least some of the problem, Denver will pay for its homeless to ride buses and visit tourist sites

“If they don’t want to get caught up in the protests or demonstrations, we’ll find other activities that will keep them busy,” said John Parvensky, President of the Colorado Coalition for the Homeless.

A plan has been developed to provide interested homeless people with free access to cultural activities. They include the Denver Zoo and the Denver Museum of Nature and Science, and they won’t have to worry about paying for transportation.

“We’ll have bus tokens if they need them,” Parvensky said.

Also five, big screen TVs are being donated to a teen day shelter. One hope is to engage some of the homeless children in the political process by allowing them to see convention unfold on television. But another purpose is to draw them away from the streets while the Convention is underway.

http://hotair.com/archives/2008/07/10/denver-to-homeless-why-not-visit-the-zoo-while-the-press-are-here/

 

Comment by AA4HILL | 2008-07-10 21:55:56

Obama’s Lead over McCain Slips a Bit in New Jersey

The gap between the two major presidential contenders has narrowed to 5 percentage points in New Jersey,
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/new_jersey/election_2008_new_jersey_presidential_election

 

Comment by anonymous | 2008-07-10 21:56:44

What Motivates Hate-filled Obamabots?

They love their candidate? The really believe in his message? They care about the country?

These hateful messages being written by Obama supporters, the threats and intimidation tactics, are they learned? Is there a training program for these Obamabots? We think the answer is a bit more simple – and it lies directly with the candidate, Barack Hussein Obama.

Comment by believe | 2008-07-10 22:05:23

I haven’t said anything hateful here but you folks call names, insults, etc. Take a look in the mirror first.

Comment by Seattle Moss | 2008-07-10 22:09:01

We don’t have anything against you!
However, it is frustrating talking to someone who has so little historical knowledge or critical thinking abilities.

I really hope that you might find work and become something of yourself.

Comment by believe | 2008-07-10 22:49:23

 
 
 
 

Comment by RedDragon62 | 2008-07-10 22:21:10

it’s “ACHIEVED” not Achieve!

 

Comment by RedDragon62 | 2008-07-10 22:25:37

Sorry…where are my manners….

HELLO EVERYONE!
How are we doing this rainy night?..( at least it is here in chicago)

Great to see we have the 2nd shift of Obots here with us tonight,,,Just like clock work! Hey if you Obots want to go play on your X0Box, I will punch your time cards for you. Don’t worry, I won’t tell “HIS HOLINESS” that you were mot doing your jobs. can’t have anymore unemployed kids out there can we?

Comment by 30yrdem-not any more | 2008-07-10 22:34:12

Well Hello RedDragon62…we had rain today but it has stopped now…just muggy now…did you get to listen to the BlogTalk Radio show last night? I missed it….I have it playing now….her is a link for those who missed it..
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/NO-WE-WONT

I hope your rain stops soon..

Comment by RedDragon62 | 2008-07-10 22:37:19

Thanks for the link.
It is still raining here. Pretty hard! And it is STILL muggy! :-)

 

Comment by wry | 2008-07-10 23:41:53

the weather is beautiful here in New York as well. The humidity has died down and it’s cool and calm.

 
 

Comment by tampagurl | 2008-07-10 22:36:45

Hi RedDragon, it’s a beautiful night here in Florida. I used to live in Michigan City; Do you know where that’s at?

Comment by Michael Envery | 2008-07-10 23:45:43

Michigan City is a little shit-hole in Indiana.

 
 

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-07-10 22:46:21

Good Morrow your Dragonship!

Comment by RedDragon62 | 2008-07-10 22:47:22

Take care Dawn!

 
 

Comment by tampagurl | 2008-07-10 22:52:53

Many Chicago residents had homes on the beach. I remember hearing story’s of old man Daley’s machine. People used to say if Chicagoans put political signs in their windows that was not part of Daley’s machine, things would happen to them. Things like not getting their garbage picked up or harassed by the police. Was that rumors or did he really do things like that?

 
 

Comment by RedDragon62 | 2008-07-10 22:31:15

Ahhh yes!

The true nature of an Obot! When all else fails, spew profanities!
Yes, take another sip of the Kool-Aid Obot! numb your mind to the realities of “Your Precious”!

 

Comment by RedDragon62 | 2008-07-10 22:38:51

Yes…Michigan City is about 1 1/2 hr drive from me. Depending on the traffic on 90. My Mother in law had a home there a few years ago

 

Comment by RedDragon62 | 2008-07-10 22:46:28

Hehehe….
There is a great story in today’s Chicago SunTimes titled…” Below The Belt”!
Guess the Chicago papers didn’t take to kindly to Jesse Sr. talking about cutting off Obambi’s Gonads!

Funny thing though, I thought OBambi was a Eunuch. He has no balls! So how can he lose what he does not have? I wonder if Michelle keeps those locked in a box like those Chinese balls that you buy in those tourist traps.

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-07-10 22:49:36

I almost no longer care about hearing the Meeeeeshell rant —– I want to hear the rest of what JESSEE had to say because he was apologizing wayyyyyyyy more than was due anything I heard on FOX, etc.

It must be baaaaaaad boi! I’ve got to hear it now! hehee! ;-)

Comment by Sugar | 2008-07-10 22:53:56

Ha! Great point Dawnelle! lol

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-07-10 23:15:09

Ok I see why my posts are not showing up

Again,

Hey Sugar, I like your McKinney cover over at your place! She’s a better choice than Barry for sure!

 
 
 

Comment by 30yrdem-not any more | 2008-07-10 22:55:30

Funny …I thought it was about time someone stepped up and said something about how Obama talks down to black people …so he did not step up but we all know it is true and he meant what he said ..I am sorry it happened the way it did…I just wish Jesse would have stood up for himself and his words….

Comment by belltoll | 2008-07-11 00:33:07

I think it was a planned event to try to divert attention from O’s FISA vote. It did accomplish that pretty much.

 
 
 

Comment by CheatedFLVoter | 2008-07-10 22:47:06

Off subject, but I just got an e-mail from Hawaian Airlines asking me to check out this sight(www.StopOilSpeculationNow.com). It’s worth checking out.

 

Comment by RedDragon62 | 2008-07-10 22:49:16

Gotta fly now….

Take care all, Even you “Believe”.
See you all tomorrow. G’nite!

Comment by 30yrdem-not any more | 2008-07-10 22:56:36

 

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-07-10 23:19:10

I tried posting this at midnight but got all discombobulated and flustered so now I try again……. final night tally for the local poll :-)

Are you a Puma? And are you going to Denver?
Answers Votes Percent
1. I’m now a PUMA (can’t go to CO, wish I could) 20 67%
2. I’m a PUMA and I’m GOING TO DENVER BABY 5 17%
3. Not a PUMA, not going 0 0%
4. Not a PUMA but I’d love to go! 2 7%
5. HILLARY w/b chosen in DENVER (puma or not) 0 0%
6. I’m a Republican n/a 1 3%
7. I’m a DEM 4 Obiwan – please TRY the koolaid 2 7%

 
 

Comment by Sugar | 2008-07-10 22:52:40

This is all just too much! Is the world about to end maybe?! I mean, we’ve seen corrupt politicians before. We’ve dealt with them, polished them up and tried to see the good in them even when they were covered in slime, but we don’t even know who Obama is, but we DO know that he is about as corrupt and covered in slime as all the rest and yet he’s sold himself as something different…and people have fallen for it. I’m sick to my stomach.

 

Comment by ChumpedDemocrat | 2008-07-10 22:57:08

I am not familiar with the name Kirk Tofte. I think I read some irritation by other commenters of yet another summary that did not credit those who did the real digging on this story. Nevertheless, this is a good one — some organizations could boil this down into a punchy story and advertise it in every major newspaper across the country as well as on cable and network news. Great project for a 527 or some other group.

The stench is overwhelming. PUMA POWER FOR CLEAN-UP. Buy your $50 tee shirts to pay off Hillary’s primary debt, or contribute $5 or more to the final push. We PUMA’s have already reduced the debt by half. We have less than $5 mill to go. We do not want this corrupt, narcissistic AH for Pres, do we?

 

Comment by The Whitey tape is here!! Finally!! | 2008-07-10 23:07:58

The tape has finally dropped:

http://whiteytape.wordpress.com/2008/07/10/the-whitey-tape-is-here/

All I can say is, whooaa!! It even includes Rezko smoking meth in the background!!

 

Comment by BillANDHillarySupportObamaNow | 2008-07-10 23:08:08

Did I hear some chatter here earlier about a few busloads going to Denver? Aw, that’s sweet, I knew you’d come around to supporting Mr. Obama!

Comment by Will the Giant | 2008-07-10 23:10:55

No, they’re talking about getting busloads of fat women together to go to Denver so they can eat at that huge taco place.

 
 

Comment by Steven Mather | 2008-07-10 23:11:28

First, they ignore us.
Then, they insult us.
Then, they attack us.
Then, we win.
-M. Gandhi

Your fear is pungent.

 

Pingback by Soulhuntre: Lifestream » Blog Archive » Obama-Rezko Redux (via Google Reader) | 2008-07-12 02:43:05

[...] an item on Google Reader Obama-Rezko Redux Thursday at 9:45 pm – [...]

 

Pingback by The Real Barack Obama - Just Say NObama « Smooth Stone | 2008-07-14 19:39:04

[...] Kirk Tofte, Obama-Rezko Redux, No Quarter, July 10, [...]

 
 

RSS Feed for This PostPost a Comment

Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)