RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Not Illegal But Is It Moral?

One thing they omit was that the challenging of petitions was done on the last day depriving the others of a response. Obama sent in a team of lawyers and they stayed until everyone was off the ballot, not just Alice Palmer, but everyone.

There is no such thing as coincidences in Chicago politics. Blair Hull, Jack Ryan, Alice Palmer. I might add John Edwards to that list. Who leaked the haircut story? Who worked for John Edwards previously but now works for Obama?

From my blog, By The Fault.

Trackback URL

RSS Feed for This Post243 Comments »

Comment by wodiej | 2008-07-17 06:40:11

Obama and the Obamamites don’t care if it is moral or not because they have none. They are still reciting the mantra that their master won-doesn’t matter that he cheated to do it.

Comment by BJ | 2008-07-17 07:49:04

if the people in this country had any sense, (which they don’t because they put bush near the wH in 2000 not fully vetting him), they’d be scared shitless of what obama really is.

amazes the hell outta me that people are so damned blind and don’t seem to care or realize what is happening here-

i have no doubt there is big money behind obama’s campaign that doesn’t get seen by the public and the kind of power brokers that they don’t want the public to know about

Comment by BytheBeardofZeus | 2008-07-17 07:59:22

Taking control of Government by storming the institutions.

History is chocked full of examples, none have turned out very well for the people.

I am reminded of the Republicans who stormed the Court House in Palm Beach during the 2000 election cycle, and the flood of Lawyers who desended on Tallahassie, the Atlanta Circuit Court, and protestors at the V.P. Residence in D.C.

All very coordinated.

Do you remember how Bush assumed POTUS even before the courts decided the matter. The transition team.

Yes this all gives me deja vue.

Comment by JozefAL | 2008-07-17 10:52:41

Well, there was also a very complicit media which constantly peppered articles with “President-elect Bush” from the day following the General Election all the way to the Supreme Court’s decision. Gore was always described as being a “challenger” (whether with that word or a similar word).
The media used the 2000 Election to set themselves up as the “kingmaker”, remarking how friendly and folksy and down-to-earth Bush was but using terms like aloof and intellectual when describing Gore. Where Bush was “personable”, Gore was “standoffish”.

 
 

Comment by Dave | 2008-07-17 09:19:40

“i have no doubt there is big money behind obama’s campaign that doesn’t get seen by the public and the kind of power brokers that they don’t want the public to know about”

Hahaha, conspiracy theorists unite! and 9/11 was a setup by our government!

I think the best evidence of your theory is reflected in Bacrackhead Oblowme’s newly released fundraising numbers- the average donation decreased from an average of $100 in February (his previous highest raising month) to $68 in June (his 2nd highest month).
The bastard has those billionaires locked up in his back pocket, I tell ya.

Comment by Faustina | 2008-07-17 10:11:30

The scientific evidence clearly shows that the Twin Towers came down by controlled demolition. If they weren’t set up as part of the attack on 9/11, then they were pre-wired perhaps as a direct result of the first attack on the Twin Towers. That would be a plausible explanation if the Port Authority or whoever thought that the structural stability of the Towers would be so undermined by any reattack that it would be “cost-effective” and/or safer to bring the Towers down by controlled demolition rather than bear the cost of either repair or piecemeal demolition. In any case, the order to demolish the buildings would have had to have come from the top and whoever gave it has blood on his hands.

As for the money pouring in Obama’s campaign, I myself don’t pay a whole lot of attention to numbers because they can always, repeat ALWAYS be manipulated. I think it is obvious by looking at the big picture that there is some serious power, which in this day and age means money, behind Obama. How else could a nobody nothing from the back streets of Chicago get the political support he has. It isn’t because of his so-called charisma, talent, accomplishments, oratorical skills, wisdom, honor, or any substantive character or quality.

He is a paid puppet.

Comment by Dave | 2008-07-17 10:18:47

There you guys are!! Phew- and I was thinking for a second that the troofers would never be stupid enough to be hanging out here with the rest of us dimwitted fools.

 

Comment by Zee | 2008-07-17 16:35:45

Give it a damned rest.

You’re wrong. You lost. Your conferences were run by HOLOCAUST DENIERS. That means you get to hang out with LaRouche and the Grand Poobah of Iran.

 
 
 
 

Comment by roseeriter | 2008-07-17 07:55:50

“If we want to win we have to ACT like republicans.”
and “Anyone but Clinton.”

That was the early mantra at many progressives sites before the primary even started. The thuggery and anti-Clinton talking points was used by most of the progressives who did not pick Clinton, long before Obama became Clinton’s only competition.

If Obama’s campaign was behind the ’sabotage’ of Edwards, Biden, Dodd , Richardson, Kucinich etc., it would be an interesting investigation and might open the idiots in the democratic congress.

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-07-17 08:20:11

Ya know, you are 100 percent correct about how the DNC (especially the open thread bloggers) felt about HILLARY long before BO open his big old can of stink!

I think I am more angry with Donna, DFA, MoveOn & the RULES & BYlaws NON committee than I am at BO.

They had me chiming right along with them that Hillary was never anyone’s first choice over there. I never bothered to even check her out very much until the FIRST INSULT after the FIRST or 2nd DEBATE

“you’re likable enough Hillary”

oh man that just pisssssssssssed me off BIG TIME!!!!! (things started getting deleted) it has not stopped! Woe Betide the Democrats! Right Perry? lol ;-)

 

Comment by voterinexile | 2008-07-17 09:24:24

If Obama’s campaign was behind the ’sabotage’ of Edwards, Biden, Dodd , Richardson, Kucinich etc., it would be an interesting investigation and might open the idiots in the democratic congress.
—————————————–
I never knew or felt the depth of Anything But Clinton until primaries unfolded this year…came as one of many earsplitting shockwaves.
Not sure if BO sabotaged the also-ran’s campaigns - I think they ALL ganged up on Hillary after she consistently hit it outta the park in the debates - The ‘guys’ couldn’t take it so they piled on. At first, it wasn’t that obvious…but by the last debate - when all were still on stage - it was clear not even Biden would support her.
She won by all measures with her hands tied behind her back and only Bill, Chelsea, her campaign team and US!
The Act Republican part is chilling.

 

Comment by Zee | 2008-07-17 16:38:14

Obama was not behind it, but he benefited and LET it stand.

It became crystal clear when they were down to three: the MSM ignored Edwards out of the race so they could get their Black Man vs. White Woman match that they wanted. And divide the two biggest constituencies the Dems have.

 
 

Comment by Dan | 2008-07-17 08:03:04

I think they see it more like “We have complete faith that Obama is going to be the right President, so we support any means to get to the ends of having the ‘right president’ elected”.

The trouble is, it does seem to take blind faith to not see why he is not suitable for this job!

Comment by Betty | 2008-07-17 09:05:39

I remember reading on Open Left about how he agreed with Digby that even though Obama’s Health Care Plan was sadly lacking, once they got him elected they could hold his feet to the fire to get a better one.
I wrote a comment about how he kicked the South Side voters to the curb after he was elected to the state senate, then he kicked the anti-war activist to the curb after he got elected to the US Senate and I asked them what on earth made them think they could hold Obama’s feet to the fire. Kicked to the curb/tossed under the bus, think of the list I could make now.

Thing is I’m not smart nor did I follow politics that much, I just recognized an Obama when I saw one.

Comment by Zee | 2008-07-17 16:44:02

Good point, Betty. I was sneery and dubious from the start when they were swooning over a mediocre speech at the 2004 convention, but I watched and waited. And sure enough….the second Obama hit the US Senate, same old, same old. No fiery antiwar stance, nothing. So I was majorly unimpressed.

Then, when Edwards led the way to boycott the Fox debate, Obama the waffler kept his finger in the air measuring which way the wind blew before FINALLY getting on board….some leader. I was justified in sneery and unimpressed.

It wasn’t until he gave that interview trashing the Clinton presidency and extolling REAGAN and Reagan’s SOUTHERN STRATEGY and called Hillary “likable enough” that I knew I detested him….and subsequent research has borne out that he is the rankest of opportunists and a fraud.

 
 

Comment by chris | 2008-07-17 09:06:03

If the public doesn’t see it on TV or in the headlines they don’t ever see it until it’s too late. We are a small portion of the voting public and we are the ones who care enough to really research the facts. If the message doesn’t get out, in a big, obvious, loud, meaningful blast then it will be a tough go for McCain due to OB campaign and behind the scene financiers. He better fight fire with fire and start soon. As has been stated, this probably won’t happen until after the conventions. The general public is not tuning in to most of the stuff going on now and won’t unless it is plastered all over the media. We are the lucky ones who know already why OB should never get near the WH. I sure hope we can get our message across to some voters who don’t have accesss to the things we have access to. Hope this is successful and I for one am trying hard to convey this to everyone I can. If Hillary somehow got back into the race as the dem candidate then things will change because everyone knows her and her record without having to broadcast it everywhere. She and McCain are well known. OB can still hide because no one knows him yet and all they see is the glare. He and his minions can still sneak in the shadows to do bad things to our country and what we believe in. People need to know and right now.

Comment by Zee | 2008-07-17 16:49:01

This is true, chris, but the heartbreaking thing is how our compatriots in the so-called REALITY-BASED community, refused to look at the facts, vet, research and THINK, choosing instead to embrace a FRAUD just like the Bushites did, simply because he was SOLD as their BRAND.

 
 
 

Comment by tish | 2008-07-17 08:31:00

warning this film reveals things some may find disturbing, i just watched it, there is violence, in it, but this is what we face today, and how could the dems, leadership promote the obama farce knowing this? could it be they want it?
film by Geert Wilders–quite long but must be seen

He’s a Dutch writer who is now under protection from the Islamists in the Netherlands.

This is the film that has the EU and the muslim world with their pants in a wad.. Most websites have removed it, including You Tube. All bowing to threats. Google still has it posted as of today but, will probably bow to pressure soon. It is about 16 minutes long but, worth the time.

Can be a little tough to watch in spots. But this is what we are up against . I think we better get REAL serious.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3369102968312745410

Comment by Dave | 2008-07-17 09:23:56

We’ll never let a Muslim terrorist in the White House- NEVER!!!

I bet if that gay Islamist Obamamambi wins he’ll make us all convert to Muslim!!

Comment by DeaninMI | 2008-07-17 09:39:04

Um….I know you Obots aren’t really that smart to begin with, but Muslim’s practice Islam.

So….You should have said “he’ll make us all convert to Islam!!”

Duh.

Comment by DeaninMI | 2008-07-17 09:39:50

And no. I don’t know why I put an apostrophe in Muslims. (heh.)

 

Comment by Dave | 2008-07-17 09:43:19

My sarcasm was lost on you, obviously.

You did see my “Islamist” reference just prior to that…right?

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-07-17 10:32:02

No we see your sarcasm. So now you admit that you’re only here to mock instead of adding comments to a discussion. Is that what the Obama message is? Go around and mock people? That’s Obama’s idea of a good time? Is that how Obama gets his jollies? Mocking people with passive aggressive sarcasm? That’s not the kind of person I want in the White House. We need a leader, not a childish bully.

Comment by Dave | 2008-07-17 10:35:50

“So now you admit that you’re only here to mock instead of adding comments to a discussion.”

Hahahaha, NOW I admit?!? I admitted that over a week ago when I first started seeing how crazy some of the looney toons on this “blog” are. I believe the analogy was to the tune of “kind of like when you’re driving by a really bad accident and just can’t help to slow down and stare.”

Hillary Hussein Clinton Supporters= Really Bad Accident

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-07-17 10:58:49

What happened to the hope and change candidate. Is that what your messiah teaches you? I thought he was the uniter Dave. You don’t have a very positive message for a follower of the messiah.

Comment by Dave | 2008-07-17 13:26:07

The supporters of this blog are the LAST people we would want to unite with. Your ilk belongs with the Republicans where you should stay.

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-07-17 13:56:51

I would hazard a guess that the feeling is mutual Dave. The Obama supporters I have encountered are rude, vulgar, vile and just plain mean. I don’t hang out with people like that Dave, no matter what letter of the alphabet goes on their voter registration card D or R. I don’t think it matters anymore democrat or republican. I admit, I used to think that too. Sadly, this primary season it seems the division is not that simple. Perhaps the qualifier will be an Obamademocrat and a Hillarydemocrat. I for one will continue a nice dialogue with Hillarydemocrats and I guess continue to be insulted and annoyed by obamademocrats.

(Comments wont nest below this level)

Comment by Dave | 2008-07-17 14:57:43

That is all perfectly fine with me.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Comment by Dave | 2008-07-17 09:26:23

“Most websites have removed it, including You Tube.”

Hahahahahaha, oh reeeaaaaaaallly:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=jjFh4wR2QcM

Idiot.

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-07-17 10:33:47

Hmm…calling people idiots, disrupting blogs, hope and change. I don’t think I like this change. Rude arrogant thugs in office, I don’t think so.

Comment by Dave | 2008-07-17 10:38:30

I’d much rather have the candidate who’s supporters insist on calling Obama a gay Muslim.
Larry Sinclair is the kind of company I want hanging around my kids. Good grief.

Comment by Dave | 2008-07-17 10:39:08

whoops- ‘whose’- wouldn’t want to get attacked for a spelling error.

 
 

Comment by Dave | 2008-07-17 10:42:15

“Hmm…calling people idiots”

For fun, feel free to count the # of times the word ‘idiot’ has been thrown out by all of the adoring Hillary supporters here. And those are the tame ones.
There are several posters here with a very sick addiction to posts involving anal sex with children- gotta love it.

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-07-17 10:52:41

No Dave, I don’t go through comments and count words for fun. I have noticed that it’s the trolls who make the most condescending rude comments on this blog. Trolls come here with an superiority complex and continually harass and mock the posters on this blog.

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-07-17 10:54:15

And I never attack anyone for spelling errors or typos but I do notice the trolls do that quite frequently to divert the discussion from the original post.

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-07-17 10:56:38

Also Dave none of the regular posters here have called Obama a gay muslim. But the Obama trolls like you bring it up frequently.

Comment by Dave | 2008-07-17 13:45:57

Comment by WildChild | 2008-07-17 07:09:28

BOBO pays for man sex in the back of the limo.

…wait for it….
“But WildChild isn’t a regular poster!!!!”

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-07-17 14:04:08

I won’t speak for WildChild because she is quite capable of speaking for herself. In fact, very capable!! However, the quote you cited didn’t say that Obama was a gay muslim. I believe the event she was describing was reported by Larry Sinclair and there was even a press conference about it before the Obama thugs had him hauled off. Many death threats against Larry from what I understand. Obama followers like to make death threats don’t they Dave. Dave why do you associate with people who make death threats against Americans who practice free speech? Dave, why do you hate free speech? Dave, the threats, with the exception of Larry, are made against women in particular. Dave, why do you hate women? Or is it women who speak out? Or women who disagree with you?

(Comments wont nest below this level)

Comment by Dave | 2008-07-17 14:40:07

OK, I give up- there’s absolutely no hope for idiots like you. Keep defending YOUR messiah- a convicted felon with a rap sheet of fraud that seemingly goes on forever.

Why do you associate with felons I must ask?

Oh yeah, found some more (and I apologize for not being able to find a post that identifies Obama as both gay AND a Muslim). Why individual references to each is not good enough is beyond me, but then again, nothing is ever good enough for you guys.
Hell, I GUARANTEE the day after the election this place will be filled with accusations of vote tampering and stolen elections.
GUAR-AN-TEED.

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-07-14 22:55:18
(in re: to the New Yorker cover)

The cartoon failed, because there is more than a kernel of truth to it.

Comment by The Real Hope | 2008-07-15 01:12:40

For millions of us out here this cartoon didn’t fail. It validated.

Comment by Southern Lady | 2008-07-15 11:32:32

Undercover black man,
What you talkin bout fool? THE CARTOON SUCCEEDED. IT IS RIGHT ON TARGET IN EVERYWAY RIGHT DOWN TO THE FLAG BURNING AND THE SIMILARITY OF OBAMA’S NAME TO OSAMA’S NAME.
YOU CAN SEE OSAMA SMILING DOWN ON OBAMA FROM ABOVE THE AMERICAN FLAG BURNING IN THE FIREPLACE. HOW APPROPRIATE, BOTH OBAMA AND OSAMA WANT TO DESTROY AMERICAN AND WOULD IF THEY COULD, but they can’t now can they?

Comment by BJinChicago | 2008-07-14 22:19:56

Yep, the cartoon accurately portrayed everything the MSM has refused to investigate.

Comment by WildChild | 2008-07-14 23:32:22

exactly , if the suicide bomber vest fits, wear it.

Comment by morgan | 2008-07-15 10:44:57

Obama’s father was muslim…right? His family in Kenya are muslim…right? Obama has a muslim name that he chose to use after using barry sorento …right?…
Don’t tell me I have no reason to see any truth in this cartoon. Obama was born to a muslim man so when he was born he was a muslim…

Comment by Percy11 | 2008-07-14 21:43:10

Truth hurts …..is this satire too close for comfort? Why else would they be all up in arms. maybe because people feel this way about them to begin with and they are trying so hard to convince people we are CRAZY for thinking that Barack is not a muslim and Michelle is not a radical racist and that they don’t have best friends that are terrorists….

When I picture the White House… this is what I see ….

Comment by mimi | 2008-07-14 21:57:02

Oh cry me a river!

What was that trip to Pakistan & India about in college?

 

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-07-17 14:58:10

Dave, a lot of words…..words, just words where have I heard that?? Oh, no matter..Dave those comments were discussing the satire of the New Yorker cartoon cover. The commenters were comparing what is known about obama and his family and how that can be embellished to make satire. One comment was from a troll, Undercover Blackman. Anyway, Dave you can’t compare apples and oranges here Dave. My original comment was about your use of the word idiot. Dave I’ve been on this blog when it’s pretty much troll free. The only time insults get hurled around is when the trolls show up. Trolls for Obama seem very hostile and self righteous Dave. Arrogant is I word I would use to describe most of the trolls on this blog. I just don’t understand why your here unless you just like to bully people Dave. Dave, why do you like to bully people?

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Comment by Heather | 2008-07-17 10:37:00

Great film. At first I thought it racist … inflammatory against Muslims just for the sake of being mean. But as the film went on, and especially the newspaper headlines, I started to think maybe this *is* a problem in the Netherlands and elsewhere …

Comment by Zee | 2008-07-17 17:10:17

Heather, it is a “problem” for WOMEN around the world.

Gendercide and Gender enslavement must not be tolerated.

Imagine if the Salem Witch trials were STILL going on.

Islam can either adapt to HUMAN STANDARDS. Or die.

Killing, maiming and enslaving women is no “religion of peace” as I’ve seen some here still refer to Islam as. As IF.

 
 
 

Comment by destardi | 2008-07-17 08:35:16

Ok, people…wtf?! obama pulled in 52 mil in June according to headline on CNN.

Where’s it coming from?

Comment by Jon | 2008-07-17 08:36:27

Former Hillary supporters. You know. Supporters. Not “supporters” like you all.

 

Comment by Dave | 2008-07-17 09:27:57

They cooked the books!! It’s a lie!! We need to cover our asses somehow for blabbing this whole week about Obambi’s fundraising failures! We may very well be…gasp…INCONSEQUENTIAL!!

Comment by DeaninMI | 2008-07-17 09:42:55

No need to worry, Dave. You ARE inconsequential!! (And so is your candidate).

 

Comment by Heather | 2008-07-17 10:38:04

You stick out like a sore thumb, Dave. People here don’t talk like that. But obamabots do.

 
 

Comment by jadwiga | 2008-07-17 09:46:43

Comment by Dave | 2008-07-17 09:58:30

I think it was Osama and Al Qaeda injecting their millions in funds into the campaign- how can they succeed without their Manchurian candidate in office?

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-07-17 11:05:53

There you go again Dave, injecting hate into this blog. Then you’re going to blame it on us. Sounds a lot like your messiah Dave. The master has trained you well grasshopper.

Comment by Dave | 2008-07-17 14:44:01

Yep, exactly- I am the only one injecting hate into this blog.

“Don’t believe his lies.”

 
 
 
 

Comment by Heather | 2008-07-17 10:42:12

I was called (at work, no less) by an Obamabot asking for money. He was very pushy and wouldn’t say exactly how he got my work phone number. I said “I don’t take political calls at work so please mail me an envelope to send a contribution.” He wanted me to commit to an amount on the phone. He literally argued with me, refusing to take ‘no’ for an answer. It went on for … well, it would’ve gone on forever if I hadn’t ended the call.

I think this is one way they cook their numbers. They try to force people to commit to a number on the phone, and just like the public radio stations with their pledges, they can now “count” that contribution even if there’s no check in the bank, or even in the mail.

Comment by Zee | 2008-07-17 17:15:03

Thanks for the report, Heather.

They are much more cowardly in person. I made one run like a girly man.

 
 
 

Comment by Susan | 2008-07-17 09:36:01

I can’t tell you how shocked I have been when Obama supporters I know (thank God there are only a few)hear this story. Their response? always? Well, he runs a good campaign!

WTF?????

I heard this story months before CNN did it, but told very few people because no one believed it! Well, once CNN did it, they finally believed it and then quickly decided it didn’t matter. Again I say, WTF???????

That is one of the major problems with Oslima. When the MSM won’t report things, people don’t believe it. Then when they do, supporters of the chosen one say, Oh, well. It must not be important or more would be made of it on the news!

I really loathe Ofraudma! He is not a nice man and far from a messiah!

Comment by Dave | 2008-07-17 14:44:52

Careful Susan…wouldn’t want to be accused of “injecting hate into this blog” would ya?

Comment by Zee | 2008-07-17 17:16:17

Donna, you can KMA.

 
 
 
 

Comment by TeaMug | 2008-07-17 06:40:55

Off topic:

Put this info in the “womens rights are human rights”

BREAKING NEWS:

Obama Campaign raises $52 million in June.

Source Fox news

http://www.tinyurl.com/6xog5v

In the below email to supporters this morning, campaign manager David Plouffe announced that the Obama campaign raised a total of $52 million in the month of June with an average donation of just $68. Combined, the Obama campaign and the DNC have a total of nearly $72 million cash on hand.

Comment by Mel | 2008-07-17 06:58:06

Response to TeaBug -

I don’t believe Obamas campaign raised that much money in June - especially since this was an email to supporters. I have read in several places where it was only about 30 million - this is proganda created by the campaign so their supporters won’t be worried. In other words BS.

The real deal Puma and say No Deal have raised over 10 million + to retire Hillary’s debt but of course the main stream media never reports this.

Hillary ‘08 if not Hillary - McCain ‘08
Hillar ‘12

Comment by kellie | 2008-07-17 08:14:03

You are so pathetic. The mainstream media isn’t covering it because you’re a joke.

PUMA is a punch line and nothing more.

I cannot wait to come to this website on November 5th. Christmas is coming early this year!!!

Comment by HARP | 2008-07-17 08:18:57

You won`t come to this site. You will be too busy crying in your Kool Aid.

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-07-17 08:22:19

HA I was just going to say

PLEASE come back and take a NUMBER cuz you will NOT be alone in your line of miserable MORONS!!

Comment by Dave | 2008-07-17 14:48:52

Dawnelle, on behalf of imustprotest, would you please stop injecting hate into this blog? Only trolls like me can do that here.

Thank you for your understanding.

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-07-17 15:54:06

Dave I believe Dawnelle was responding the hate spewing troll Kellie. Kellie spewed out her typical hateful remarks that were attached to another very nice PUMA who was simply reporting on what PUMAS had raised to help Hillary retire her debt. Then for some inexplicable reason Kellie (who quite possibly has anger issues) started spewing insults! Go back and read the post Dave. Now Dave, if you really want to stop the hateful remarks from trolls as you so sarcastically say, then I would recommend attaching a similar comment about hate to Kellie’s comment.

 
 
 

Comment by kellie | 2008-07-17 08:23:22

Blah blah kool aid, BO, Obambi…

Get some new dialogue.

You are fighting a losing battle, but it is fun to watch.

Looks like your “movement” is going nowhere in California.

80% of Clinton voters are for Obama. 8% for McCain and it’s only July!

Comment by destardi | 2008-07-17 08:42:25

If you think that millions of Dems who have never voted republican in their lives, are now considering voting for a REPUBLICAN after the worst 8 years UNDER a republican, I’d say you’re pretty f*cking clueless on just how much opposition exists for barackula.

Here’s why, lemming:

Press lied about Clintons’
http://mediamatters.org/items/200801130004

barackula capitalized on it, and didn’t lead by example by dismissing this…his campaign PROPAGATED LIES of the most base, disgusting kind!!
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/01/12/obama-camps-memo-on-clin_n_81205.html

Here is getting called on it by Russert!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQY_9ZcsjpQ&feature=related%3cbr

Here’s the truth behind a rumor started by the big orange cheeto (just your type of crowd)
http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/did_clinton_darken_obamas_skin.html

SUCK IT!

Comment by kellie | 2008-07-17 08:52:21

“My friends”:

Obama will be the next President.

Hillary will never be President.

I am sympathetic that you are going through the 5 stages of grief. Acceptance is coming, don’t worry.

Comment by asimon | 2008-07-17 08:53:40

In your dreams.

 

Comment by destardi | 2008-07-17 09:08:37

So basically you’e not addressing the links I posted, and living in dreamworld?

Wow. obamabushbot.

Comment by Donna Brazile | 2008-07-17 09:16:56

She can’t she’s in the first stage of grief- ANGER!

 
 

Comment by Catherine | 2008-07-17 09:48:17

Your candidate is corrupt- hope that makes you proud.

 

Comment by splashy | 2008-07-17 13:15:19

Of so, we kiss universal health care goodbye, and more people will die every year because of it.

Doesn’t that make you feel good? All those poor and almost poor people dying because of your candidate?

 
 
 

Comment by Hank in PA | 2008-07-17 08:42:44

Yes, Obama is truly running away with the election with his 3-4 percent lead at the moment. He is such a run away hit with America! I would not count your chickens before they hatch. Besides, those of us who are not pro Obama will not be jailed if he gets elected — oh, you know, based on his Chicago antics, perhaps we WILL all be exiles — ok, I just scared myself . . .

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-07-17 08:47:33

yea and we all forget the ASS KISSERS for BOBO get “brownie points” when we respond to their nasty asses!!

I say ignore the fecal matter or flush it.

 
 

Comment by btintaos | 2008-07-17 09:18:47

Yes, July–before the Republican war machine smashes your beloved Bobo. If it obliterated Kerry, who kept much of the Democratic base and who didn’t get his butt kicked in the primary (don’t kid yourself, Hillary won the popular vote), then what do you think it will do to Bobo? Play nice? Say, “Never mind, we won’t destroy him because we see the light?” They are not going to be chanting OMbama, that’s for sure. No, the republicans have plenty of material that Bobo himself has given them.

You are fighting the losing battle.

 

Comment by Dave | 2008-07-17 09:47:35

That stat is bull Kellie- why I read right on this blog that latinos will never vote for OCrackhead because Latinos hate ‘the blacks’!

Obamamamabis campaign rigged all of those polls!

Just listen to Dawnelle- she’s willing to bet anyone here he won’t even win 11 states!

 

Comment by CATscratchfever | 2008-07-17 09:50:43

listen you idiot, i live in calif. northern rural calif. is not going for obasm and hes not raising any money or votes here. so, stfu.

Comment by Dave | 2008-07-17 09:56:17

Haha man Obama’s really gonna miss all those electoral votes from “northern rural California”

Man I wish they’d just change the rules and give ALL of the electoral votes for a state to the candidate that wins it. Then Obambi could have a chance in CA- otherwise he’s toast. I mean, seriously, I saw a poll yesterday showing McCain up 98 to 2 in CA!!!

Comment by DeaninMI | 2008-07-17 10:15:15

I totally agree with you Dave!!!

Obama certainly has benefited from the “rules being changed”!

Hell. Why even have an election? Why don’t we all just bow down to him now?!

We’ve tried that nerdy democracy thing, howzabout trying that monarchy thing??? (I think we should vote on it.)

 
 

Comment by TeakWoodKite | 2008-07-17 11:14:53

Trinity Co? Winecountry Ca for me. I saw more Ron Paul signs in Eureka…than anything else.

 

Comment by Dave | 2008-07-17 14:49:56

CATscratchfever, on behalf of imustprotest, would you please stop injecting hate into this blog? Only trolls like me can do that here.

Thank you for your understanding.

 
 

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-07-17 09:54:30

California is not going to vote for a republican so of course Obama will do well in California. He lost the primary though, even after Oprah and Caroline did their stage show with Maria Shriver. Ha ha!

Comment by TeakWoodKite | 2008-07-17 11:28:26

imustprotest; Ca will be a VERY close race.
BO will have to spend more time and money here.

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-07-17 11:46:13

Well, if Oblahma is the nominee after August I plan to work for McCain here in California. We have a republican governor, you know ARNOLD but it’s a very liberal state. I hope you’re right that it’s close here in CA but the polls I’ve seen suggest otherwise.

Comment by TeakWoodKite | 2008-07-17 12:04:14

I am in Ca as well and as you said, For the first time in my life, I will work for McCain. Polls have BO ahead at the moment.

Comment by Dave | 2008-07-17 15:00:36

Hahaha…similar to “Mount Everest is taller than Primrose Hill”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 

Comment by Dave | 2008-07-17 15:01:24

…at the moment.

(Comments wont nest below this level)

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-07-17 15:59:05

That’s an odd comment Dave. Are you feeling well? Teakwood and I were having a perfectly nice chat. Why did you feel compelled to respond in that manner? Are you really Kellie? I haven’t seen many comments from her lately and you seem very hostile like Kellie. Making weird out of nowhere comments like that seems very odd Dave. I recommend a nice cup of tea. That may calm you down.

 
 
 
 
 
 

Comment by no waffles aka drkate | 2008-07-17 10:05:51

ok, is this the new “believe”, or is it pumastic spastic?

troll alert–this one comes with the usual round of ridicule and hate.

too bad for you your comments are nothing but laughing points.

don’t cry in your koolaid dearie. and please change your diapers, they stink.

 

Comment by Heather | 2008-07-17 10:45:15

Kellie, you aren’t reading the polls are you? Oblahma’s numbers are sinking fast and the big mainstream outlets (NYT, etc.) are becoming disenchanted. Not nearly as much drooling idolatry as we saw back in the “let’s all bash Hillary!” days. We’re looking at a trend here … stay tuned.

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-07-17 11:10:32

I agree Heather. The trends are downward. That’s why the bots are here trying to spin and spin the numbers. They are worried in camp Obama and they should be.

 
 
 
 

Comment by destardi | 2008-07-17 08:45:35

****HOLD THE F*CK UP****

Remember the last 8 years of the “mainstream media” NOT REPORTING TRUTHFULLY, or INVESTIGATING BUSH!?!?!?!!?!? Was all of bush’s crap and failed policies “a joke”? Is that why they didn’t report and investigate deeper?!?

My GOD you’re a moron.

As if your comment is true; it’s ONLY important if it reflects positively on YOUR candidate, who is an empty suited, CROOK.

JUST LIKE A REPUBLICAN, bushbot, huh obamabushbot?!

But I guess what you typed, and understanding what I wrote is beyond you.

Good luck!

Comment by Karma | 2008-07-17 11:03:55

Yup, they can’t see that the same media that sold them Dubya and the war…is selling them Obama.

Most sane people would be concerned…lol

 
 

Comment by Andy Lewis | 2008-07-17 09:20:00

You may think we’re a joke, but YOU’RE a piece of shit.

Comment by Dave | 2008-07-17 10:00:41

daaaayyyyyummmm…SNAP!! and he even spelled “you’re” correctly to boot!

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-07-17 11:12:27

See this is what I’m talking about Dave. You’re going on about spelling and you’re still mocking. Why can’t Obama stop mocking people Dave. Why does your messiah teach you these hateful ways Dave?

Comment by Dave | 2008-07-17 15:06:18

I guess it’s just my natural response to those “injecting hate into this blog.”

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-07-17 16:05:26

Again Dave may I remind you that it’s you trolls that spew such hate. We here on NQ are having a nice discussion then from left field, (no pun intended) a troll hurls insults and injects their obamahate into the comments. Why do you hate so much Dave? Its not healthy. I think your messiah is suffering from all of this hate that surrounds him. He’s not looking well these days Dave. Really tired in fact. Keeping all this race baiting and condescending hate towards people seems to be wearing on him. You might just think about that yourself Dave. Hanging around camp Obama probably isn’t healthy for you.

 
 
 
 
 

Comment by Zee | 2008-07-17 17:20:07

Oh, really? The MSM is already covering how the HILL RAISERS met with McCain and are extracting promises from him.

For our SUBSTANTIAL VOTES.

Comment by Zee | 2008-07-17 17:27:02

http://www.newser.com/story/32706.html

I’m so sure these women who can raise 100’s of thousands of dollars are “fringe” elements.

Obamabots….Sen. David Vitter has PLENTY of extra adult diapers if you’re shitting your pants. He’s been cut off from his diaper sex.

 
 
 

Comment by NoBigotry | 2008-07-17 08:28:14

Comment by Mel | 2008-07-17 06:58:06

Response to TeaBug -

I don’t believe Obamas campaign raised that much money in June - especially since this was an email to supporters. I have read in several places where it was only about 30 million - this is proganda created by the campaign so their supporters won’t be worried. In other words BS.

The real deal Puma and say No Deal have raised over 10 million + to retire Hillary’s debt but of course the main stream media never reports this.

Hillary ‘08 if not Hillary - McCain ‘08
Hillar ‘12

PUMA and its 350 supporters will not be able to take credit for squat. You claim to have paid off $10 million - when it was Hillary herself who did that by writing off her own loans. The rest of the money comes from real Democrats - nowhere on the Hillary site does it ask if if you are Democrat or KKK PUMA supporter.

Comment by obamaphobe | 2008-07-17 08:50:30

Nobigotry…you have ZERO class. You are a PIG! If Obama wins the election, I hope you enjoy living and rolling around in your own excrement. You will be neck high in it, and you will have noone to blame but yourself.

Comment by Dave | 2008-07-17 10:03:17

i bet nobigotry is a Moslem as well…and maybe even…BLACK!

Comment by DeaninMI | 2008-07-17 10:18:30

Ah.

The ever present race card.

Nicely played Dave, nicely played.

(Do you think you could get me Gabe Kaplan’s autograph???)

Comment by Dave | 2008-07-17 10:24:18

“The ever present race card.”

Wait a minute…this is the No Quarter blog, right? Seemed to me that post fit right in with the rest of ‘em.
Just tryin to assimilate.

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-07-17 10:39:12

Snappy comeback Dave but you didn’t disagree that you used the race card. And just like your messiah, you deflect the criticism back to us. Obama can’t take responsibility for anything can he? Reminds me of GWB. Very childish and immature for someone who hopes to be POTUS.

 

Comment by DeaninMI | 2008-07-17 12:04:15

Dave,

We certainly encourage others to join us, but we don’t assimilate others. We are all free thinkers here.

You are confusing us with the OBorgs, as you well know. They’ve already gotten to you.

 
 
 

Comment by Heather | 2008-07-17 10:49:10

Dave, your onanism … oops … Obamaism is showing. Trying to make the PUMA folks look like idiotic Obamabots. No one is fooled, ok? So why don’t you just pack your little lunch box and toddle off to the big orange lollipop.

 
 
 

Comment by Zee | 2008-07-17 17:29:49

Who gives a flying diaper fuck if the money came from PUMAs or “real Dems?”

Just like the FAKE 75,000 crowd in Portland Oregon, Obama can only blow smoke up so many asses.

He’s TANKING. Deal with it.

 
 

Comment by Tuppence 411 | 2008-07-17 08:34:04

Ah finally the REAL story comes out. Nobama’s number are inflated for June because he is combining both primary and GE funds in his June total. Let’s see what he’s got on hand to spend right now, before the convention. What he got from his so-called grassroots small donors. (Without adding in what his bundlers are bringing into to his GE war chest from those big donors that maxed out in the primary already.)

He is such a spinning liar. Soon they will be telling us the sky is green and the grass is blue. How many kool-aid drinking Obots will buy that?

Comment by DeaninMI | 2008-07-17 10:20:15

My bet would be:

Every last one of them.

 
 
 

Comment by Jim S | 2008-07-17 07:07:30

More of those under $200 donations that don’t require identification of the donor who send only cash. No checks, money orders or credit cards that could identify them.

Comment by Jon | 2008-07-17 07:09:37

That’s absolutely false. ALL donations require a donation form stating the persons name and address, job, etc.

Comment by Bye bye Obambi | 2008-07-17 07:18:54

If someone sent them cash, somehow I don’t think they’d worry about recording a thing. They don’t have any regard for ethics or laws.

 

Comment by BJ | 2008-07-17 07:46:33

that’s not true -

Comment by NoBigotry | 2008-07-17 08:22:46

The figures are out on the FEC. I see there are still no donations from the supposedly Hillary loyalist, PUMA PAC founder Darragh Murphy.

RNC Front.

$52 million in small donations - not Hillraisers, not lobbyists. That is real public finance.

Comment by kellie | 2008-07-17 08:30:19

Please don’t concern the good people on this website with facts and truths.

They can’t comprehend.

Please only refer to the following:

Fake birth certificates
Limo sex
Whitey tapes

Comment by destardi | 2008-07-17 09:03:44

obama+farakhan+ayers+dorn+rezko+wright+pfleger

You’re an idiot.

Pfleger for instance?
Let’s remind everyone that Pfleger backed up Farrakhan in a 2006 controversy over some remarkable Farrakhan bile. Pfleger criticized a mass resignation of Jewish members on a state of Illinois hate crimes commission: http://www.nbc5.com/news/7782149/detail.html?rss=chi&psp=news
Pfleger said “good riddance” to the people who had left the commission. “Leave, go ahead and go on out, we don’t need that kind of a spirit or mentality and a narrowness on that kind of commission. I’m glad they’re gone,” Pfleger said.
What was the issue? A member of the commission, Sister Claudette Marie Muhammad, was the Nation of Islam’s minister of protocol.
[She] “was under the radar until she invited other commissioners to attend a Farrakhan speech last month. Criticism of Muhammad mounted after the speech, which included references to “Hollywood Jews” promoting homosexuality and “other filth.”
The three Jewish commission members who resigned wanted Muhammad to repudiate Farrakhan’s criticism of Jews, gays and other groups. The Jewish Community Relations Council, representing 46 Chicago-area groups, passed a resolution supporting the three commission members.
Here’s the quote from Farrakhan that Pfleger implicitly supported. http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/objects/pages/PrintArticleEn.jhtml?itemNo=698094
Farrakhan said, “These false Jews promote the filth of Hollywood. It’s the wicked Jews, the false Jews that are promoting lesbianism, homosexuality,” and “Zionists have manipulated Bush and the American government” over the war in Iraq.

yes, THIS is what you support KELLIE! Proud ?

Comment by kellie | 2008-07-17 09:17:50

The connections linking Obama to these people are fairy tales. There ar no solid F A C T S to back them up.

And no, sorry I don’t have time to hang on every word you right. I have a job; I don’t have all day to troll the internet looking for conspiracy theories.

I like to come to this website for a good laugh and to make fun of you Neanderthals.

Now I can’t play anymore kids, it’s almost time for my morning kool-aid dose.

Have a great day, love you guys!!

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-07-17 09:50:39

Wow, so much hope and change with obama….can’t you feel the love from people like Kellie……yeah, obama is such a unifier, he will heal us, just listen to trolls like Kellie, she’s so full of love and peace, obama did that, he projects love, he radiates peace….yeah Kellie a fine example of what a little bit of obama will do for you……

 

Comment by DeaninMI | 2008-07-17 10:22:42

I thought your job WAS to “troll the internet all day looking for conspiracy theories” against the Chosen One.

You Obots sure are contradictory.

 

Comment by DeaninMI | 2008-07-17 10:25:00

Oh.

The obligatory Obot name-calling is always nice, too.

Thank god Neanderthals are allowed to vote in elections. Well, this may be the last election ANYONE is allowed to vote in, but at least we’ll have one last time, eh?

 

Comment by Heather | 2008-07-17 10:54:14

Sounds good. Go “troll” somewhere else Kellie boy.

 
 
 

Comment by btintaos | 2008-07-17 09:04:27

I don’t need fake birth certificates, limo sex, or whitey tapes to know that BO is a liar, a flip-flopper, an egomaniac, and a panderer. So, why not put your face where it’s wanted, like firmly up BO’s butt.

 

Comment by Dave | 2008-07-17 10:06:03

You forgot some:

American Flag Hater

Muslim Extremist

African Sharia Law Supporter

Militant-Marrying Manchurian Candidate

Comment by DeaninMI | 2008-07-17 10:27:25

Dave,

You almost sound like the Kool-Aid is wearing off.

You better follow Kellie back to base for another dose.

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-07-17 10:45:01

Dean I don’t think Kellie was heading back to HQ just yet. Her mom made her start anger management classes so she has to stop by the clinic first. Her mom just can’t understand what’s happened to Kellie since she joined the Obama campaign.

Comment by DeaninMI | 2008-07-17 12:06:36

Well. I think someone should stick a warning label on Kellie.

Like one of my favorite posters says on here, “Just saying.”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
 

Comment by obamaphobe | 2008-07-17 09:22:02

Right, and all donations are an average of $68 per the Obama campaign. Do you honestly believe everything you hear coming out of that camp? $68? Seriously…how completely dense are you? Obviously new to politics. It’s a big game…OBAMA IS A POLITICIAN. He’s a Liar. He’s a dirty player. All he wants from his “supporters” is their money. When he gets where he wants to be….IF he gets where he wants to be, you will be tossed aside like everyone else in his life. Be careful “NoBigotry”. Please dig deeper. This is not about Hillary. This is about an un-qualified candidate running for POTUS. UN-QUALIFIED. He takes credit for things that he had very little or nothing to do with. He has taken on Hillary Clinton’s talking points AND John McCain’s talking points. So, needless to say, both of the other candidates have something he lacks and wants: EXPERIENCE. McCain may have changed his mind (or flip/flopped, whatever you want to call it), but it’s one thing to change your mind/flip-flop after years of seeing how a policy worked or didn’t work…it’s quite another to flip-flop from state to state or primary to general. Seriously. Think about it. DO YOUR HOMEWORK. Don’t believe everything you hear on MSNBC and CNN. Form your own opinion. YOU OWN YOUR VOTE. Be careful and wise with it.

 

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-07-17 09:40:53

Darrah Murphy. Wow, you seem to know that name pretty well. Darrah Murphy the courageous woman who you and thugs like you made a death threat to? I wouldn’t keep mentioning Murphy if I were you especially when you’ve made death threats against her, looks suspicious creepo.

 

Comment by no waffles aka drkate | 2008-07-17 10:09:15

sorry, but obambi is getting his money from overseas. and you can’t even find your wallet because your underpants are in a wad.

 
 
 

Comment by Tuppence 411 | 2008-07-17 08:37:17

FACT: Names and addresses of donations under $200 are not reported to the FEC.

Comment by Donna Brazile | 2008-07-17 08:47:36

Booyah! Kellie!

Now stop the hate!

Comment by kellie | 2008-07-17 08:55:18

What hate? I love you guys!

You’re as refreshing as an enema!

Comment by Donna Brazile | 2008-07-17 08:57:04

Oh such sweet talk!

Stop the hate! My momma sazs the rulz is the rulz.

 

Comment by destardi | 2008-07-17 09:00:49

You need to address the “logic” of your comment, and my response to it at 8:45 above.

Apparently, logic escapes you.

The mainstream media failed the United States for 8 years during bush’s reign. They didn’t report on facts..I guess the reason “mainstream media” doesn’t report on certain issues makes those issues a “joke” by default.

I’m sure in 2004, bush’s blind followers thought that reporting on his outing plame, and his lies for going to Iraq were ALSO considered “jokes”.

YOU’RE AN IDIOT.

You believe the SAME press that allowed bush to f*ck this country up, and that’s now spinning baracula in a positive light on everything.

you’re smart, huh? FOOL

 

Comment by DeaninMI | 2008-07-17 10:30:06

Wow.

I’ve never had one of those.

You must get them alot to speak so highly of them.

And here…I just thought they gave you people Kool-Aid at Obot camp.

 
 
 
 
 

Comment by HARP | 2008-07-17 08:20:24

Dead people can vote. I guess they can donate too.

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-07-17 10:46:39

They work “miracles” in camp Obama…people rise from the dead. Someone should notify the Pope.

 
 
 
 

Comment by Tuppence 411 | 2008-07-17 06:56:45

The Obama camp moral? Never! That’s an oxymoron.
They are all firm followers of the flawed maxim “the end justifies the means”. Immoral. Pitifully flawed thinking. Undeveloped conscience.
It repulses me. But his young followers? They just break my heart. They are being indoctrinated into his alternative system of morality.

Comment by roseeriter | 2008-07-17 08:01:38

The Bush Administration encouraged immorality, by not following The Rule of Law and ignoring the constitution on so many levels, is it any surprise that the country, the corporations and the gullible young think all Lies, Cheating, robbing is okay?

Obama’s campaign is more proof of the negative new American way..business as usual.

That’s why those of us who see this horrendous immoral behaviour is so against Obama and won’t “Just Get Over it.”

 
 

Comment by Lillian | 2008-07-17 07:01:20

And that’s why he doesn’t want Hillary’s name as an option in Denver. He wants a democratic vote of ONE!!!!

I bet if he could scrub the GOP candidate off the list in November, he would!!! What a wuss!!!

Deep down he knows that if you have options, there’s no reason to vote for him. Solution - NO OPTION!!

 

Comment by WildChild | 2008-07-17 07:01:31

One standard that binds us all. We call it the Law. If it’s legal, that means we can do it. If you have a problem with that, that’s OK. This is the United States of America. You’re allowed to have a problem with that. LOL but that’s your problem.

Comment by John | 2008-07-17 07:48:15

1. Actually, since we use our judgment when we cast our votes, the Morality of the candidates is important. (Thanks for letting us know that “if we have a problem with that, that’s OK.” I was hoping for your permission.

2. “This is the United States of America. You’re allowed to have a problem with that.” I have a bigger problem with incoherent posts. I’m allowed to have a problem with the fact that this is the USA? Huh?

3. “LOL.” LOL? What are you laughing at?

4. “That’s your problem.” WHAT’S my problem? You just TOLD me I’m “allowed” to have a problem with two things- so having a problem is my problem? I suspect Illiteracy is YOUR problem.

You are confusing what is Legal with what is Morally Right. No one here is talking about throwing Obama in jail for his legal actions. We are, however, considering denying him our vote because of his actions. Is that ok with you? Oh, I guess it is, because we “are allowed to have a problem with that LOL.”

Really, I’m sure the Community College up the street has wonderful summer English classes. Check them out, please.

Comment by WildChild | 2008-07-18 12:15:07

LOL You have a problem.

 
 
 

Comment by PuppyDogMom | 2008-07-17 07:02:14

I’ve seen that video before. It begs the question: WHY hasn’t this been a public issue? It was good investigative reporting (better than most we’ve seen lately), and it was virtually ignored.

 

Comment by steveeboy | 2008-07-17 07:02:46

gee, for people that criticize obama supporters as naive, you certainly are ignorant of how big city democratic politics works these days.

in the big city, every petition and signature gets challenged, people are thrown off the ballots for technicalities all the time.

Those that are really organized and have their shit tight are the ones that survive the ballot challenges.

We had a similar situation in philly where a new progressive challenged the machine, they tried to throw him off the ballot based on petition problems, he passed their test and then challenged theirs, theirs were fucked up and he won election to the state house.

Perhaps if Kerry or Gore had similar experience Bush wouldn’t have stolen the two elections. A failure to really play those ballots and such for keeps really hurt in 2000 and 2004.

Comment by Jim S | 2008-07-17 07:10:57

With close ties to ACORN and Daley and Axelrod in his corner, how many Obama signatures were challenged? Probably none!

Comment by Jon | 2008-07-17 08:38:58

Every single one if his opponents were worthy of winning.

Politics is a contact sport.

~WJC

 
 

Comment by C.S. | 2008-07-17 07:28:20

You know, I’ve never heard of a democracy by technicality. Can’t even find it in the Declaration of Independence, nor the Constitution.

If a technicality produces undemocratic results, Democracies change it. But if We the People are slaves to technicalities, then those technicalities of the Democratic party have produced a candidate named Hillary Clinton, NOT Barack Obama.

Comment by yaz | 2008-07-17 08:31:10

you absolutely cannot have democratic elections without strict adherence to technicalities. that is what the rule of law is ALL about. you can’t trust the results if you aren’t assured of the rules under which they arose.

 
 

Comment by Donna Brazile | 2008-07-17 08:49:13

Oh you found a new home since the Confluence sent you home to momma!

 

Comment by destardi | 2008-07-17 08:56:39

READ: Bush knew how to game the system by arcane rules, and baracula knows how too!!

 

Comment by Heather | 2008-07-17 11:02:49

Yes, steveeboy, we must “act like Republicans” in order to win. And as long as you’re playing legal-not-moral, why not just push the envelope a little and realize that by Iowa law it is absolutely legal to bring in folks from outside to caucus, because … after all … they don’t require identification. Right?

If a caucus state doesn’t require ID to caucus, then that must mean it is perfectly legal to bring in people from other states to caucus for your candidate. And if you can’t realize that, then you are “running a bad campaign.” Just like Hillary did. Wow, steveeboy, this is political darwinism to the max. And your boy knows how to game the system.

Thanks steveeboy for opening up my eyes to yet another vile aspect of your lieing, cheating, pandering, unqualified, triangulating, do-anything-to-win candidate.

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-07-17 11:21:03

Heather I agree. This is the change he was talking about. Corruption to the max. Death threats to those who resist. Obama and his corrupt machine need to lose and lose big.

 
 
 

Comment by Perry Logan | 2008-07-17 07:03:58

Obama people are authoritarian personality types–just like the neocons.

For authoritarians, democracy constitutes an obstacle. Elections (and primaries) are simply something you have to rig.

The authoritarian connection explains the remarkable similarity between the tactics of neocons and those of the Obama campaign–the cheating, the character assassination, the Brownshirt tactics. It’s the worst possible thing that could happen to the Democratic Party–and the country.

Comment by roseeriter | 2008-07-17 08:05:52

Man do I agree with what you said Perry!

Democracy seems to be dying on the withering vine of technicalities (which really means CORRUPTION!)

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-07-17 08:26:04

you know how it goes ;-)

repeat after me

“WOE BETIDE THE DEMOCRATS”

:-/

 
 

Comment by destardi | 2008-07-17 08:54:27

I’ve been saying this all along; obama=bush, bushbots=obamabushbots

Highlight this comment, haha.

Google Dr. Bob Altemeyer, Authoritarians

he has a free online book. Great read!

Comment by Northwest rain | 2008-07-17 13:23:51

This is a MUST read book — along with John Deans book on authoritarian personalities.

Right or left — these psychopaths use the same tactics.

 
 
 

Comment by Archimedes, give me a place to stand... | 2008-07-17 07:04:42

Excuse if I am off topic. It has come to my attention that Obama is’nt walking the walk on equal pay. There are no women amongst his top paid staff. None.

By odd coincidence on McCain’s staff, fasten your seat belts, ALL of McCain’s top paid staff are women! I kid you not , this is without exception.

Disclaimer; This is from public records on their senatorial staffs. I am currently looking into their campaign payrolls.

Comment by WildChild | 2008-07-17 07:09:28

BOBO pays for man sex in the back of the limo. The most affection he publicly shows is wife is a fist bump. He condescendingly calls professional woman journalists sweety. BOBO’s aversion to the ladies is coming through loud and clear. My only question is who did he pay to father his children.

Comment by Dave | 2008-07-17 10:27:04

Ladies and Gentlemen…I present to you Exhibit A.
Don’t get too close, the smell can be overwhelming at times.

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-07-17 11:24:25

Ah Dave don’t be so hard on yourself, you don’t smell that bad…..or should I say, you smell good enough.

Comment by Zee | 2008-07-17 17:36:49

All the diapered crowd, Vitters and Obamabots, please stand downwind.

 
 
 

Comment by Heather | 2008-07-17 11:10:58

:) Love it. What you said is mean and ugly and the worst kind of rumor mongering, and yet … it expresses something I’ve suspected all along. I’m all for androgyny, but Obama’s androgyny feels creepy, as it radiates a palpable contempt for women. I think he hates his own feminine side. Michelle is basically mommy figure, as his own mum deserted.

 
 

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-07-17 08:28:04

I know I’ve noticed that.

He’s an old hound dog anyway. Must love it. Keep his old ticker pumping.

If I were a candidate, I’d have a lot of HOT lookin, Will Bower types all around me. hehehehe! JUST kidding!

 

Comment by Heather | 2008-07-17 11:05:48

Can you post a link? I’d love to see it.

 
 

Comment by C.S. | 2008-07-17 07:06:02

So, the “miracle” candidate who is going to “save” us all sprang from the mud of the Orcs.

(The Lord of the Rings You Tube video left that part out.)

 

Comment by rjj | 2008-07-17 07:10:43

with an average donation of just $68.

Wonder if those $0.02 donations are part of that average.

Comment by WildChild | 2008-07-17 07:13:17

They were counting the monopoly money too.

 
 

Comment by Tuppence 411 | 2008-07-17 07:16:02

BTW, in addition to being morally ill, NObama looks
physically ill. His color is off, he looks drawn out and exhausted. He is looking sickly. His one page doctors note was a joke! Heck we couldn’t even enroll our kids in youth sports with a note like that, but he thinks he can be POTUS with a doctors note??? Where are his test results? Actual records? Why isn’t the MSM demanding to see them like they did with McCain? Son-of-gun, if we all had to live thru details of Bush’s colonoscopy for Pete’s sake, can we even have some review of Nobama’s records???????

Comment by scott in jupiter | 2008-07-17 07:51:04

Is he looking more white?

Clayton Bigsby would go off on him for that.

Comment by Tuppence 411 | 2008-07-17 08:10:02

He looks like he is not getting enough oxygen!
Heart problems? Lung problems? Blood problems? He looks sick. Perhaps long plane rides overseas is not a smart move for him or his health.

Comment by jadwiga | 2008-07-17 10:15:39

He might be ‘doing’ something to keep him on his feet.

 
 
 

Comment by Dave | 2008-07-17 10:32:16

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/05/30/obamas_doctor_says_hes_fit_to_lead/

“His blood pressure of 90 over 60 is comparable with the under 120 over 80 that is considered optimal. His total cholesterol was 173 (normal is under 200); his bad or LDL cholesterol was 96 (normal is under 130); and his good, or HDL, reading was 68 (normal is over 40). An electrocardiogram showed no signs of a heart problem.”

Then again, this is from the Boston Herald, and we all know OBlowme owns all major newspapers in the US. Personally, I’m not gonna believe results until they come in triplicate typed in gold ink straight out of Hilldog’s ass.

 

Comment by Zee | 2008-07-17 17:38:28

OMG, those BLUE LIPS make me want to retch!

Look up purple lips, blues lips, for what they are symptoms of.

The man IS SICK.

 
 

Comment by candymarl | 2008-07-17 07:16:18

Obama’s fighting spirit, eh? He fought to run unopposed or angainst a weak candidate. Too bad he didn’t fight against Rezko the slumlord that screwed over AA voters in his own district.

Yeah, he’s a fighter that one.

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-07-17 08:35:00

ya know, that’s another good point.

BO has already proved he is WEAK.
His flips, his ums and ahhhs, his surrogates are basically all losers themselves………

if it were any other candidate but McCain (Romney, Huckleberry, Gouliani) there would be NO WAY BAMBI could lose. But I must say, against McCain he looks even more pathetic and puny.

Even though he is ancient. He still looks stronger.

The sheeple usually fall in line with the candidate that appears to be the strongest in the end whether they are or not. Bambi keeps falling down. Bambi’s masters and keepers have ALL been stronger than he has (wright, pfleger, ayers, farrachan(sp)

In Hillary’s world, she’s ALPHA FEMALE boi! No doubt about it!

I like that. I like knowing who is in charge!

 
 

Comment by JudyfromMO | 2008-07-17 07:20:47

Application for President of the United States of America

Sadly there is none.
Just a couple of lines stating that the President must be a natural born citizen and at least 35 years old.
Where is the long list of previous employers, with phone numbers, addresses, length of employment and duties performed?
Sadly there is none.
Where is the list of personal references with addresses, phone numbers and years known?
Sadly there is none.
Where is that long-winded resume showing schooling, every job worked with dates, duties performed, what you accomplished during that employment, and length of employment.
Sadly there is none.
When a person goes to apply for a drivers license they must provide a legitimate copy of their birth certificate. For a Presidential candidate-
Sadly there is none.
In previous elections these things were never necessary. The candidates were people that were well known. They were governors, senators and military heroes. Some we knew by the family name, Kennedy, Roosevelt, Bush. Some were known because they had been a Vice-President: Truman, Bush, Johnson, Nixon. I realize that just being well-known does not necessarily make a good President, but it does give a point of reference. If the candidate was not well known, the press, I mean real journalists like Mike Wallace and Dan Rather, made it their business to find out everything about a candidate from the moment of birth till the date the candidate signed the form to run for President. Wallace and Rather upset a lot of people, but we didn’t wonder for long about candidates.

This year the democratic party is asking us to accept their presumptive nominee with a slim, almost nonexistent resume. It seems that his largest accomplishment is running for President. It has certainly consumed more of his time than any other job he has had. Voting present or not voting at all, because you don’t want to take a stand, does not look good on a resume. Staying in a church for 20 years and not hearing what was said, does not look good on a resume. Hanging around with pentagon bombers and kick-back artists, does not look good on a resume. Showing a fake birth certificate (it has been proven fake by professional graphic artists) on your web site does not look good on a resume. Having your wife say your mother was unmarried when you were born, thereby disputing your fake birth certificate, does not look good on a resume.

When a person puts themselves out there to apply for the hardest, most important job in the United States of America, “We the People” want to see that application and resume. “We the People” want to call former employers and references and ask about that person. “We the People” want to see that legitimate birth certificate. We the people” could care less if the person was born to a single mother, “We the people” just want the truth. THAT’S IT!

The thing that has been sadly lacking since Barack Obama chose to run for President of the United States is the truth. Just tell me the truth and I will decide if I want to vote for you or not. When you tell a lie hoping to cover something undesirable in your past it will always come back to haunt you. Even if you tell the truth later, no one will forget that you lied in the first place. I would like to know why city newspapers, CNN and MSNBC are giving Obama a pass on his lies, questionable friends, elitist attitude, misogyny, racism and willingness to say or do anything to be elected.

Our country is in a crisis: a war, gasoline hovering at $4 a gallon, and food prices going up every day. I do not feel good about putting my country in the hands of a rank amateur who has not proven he can do anything but run for President and speak with a teleprompter.

Comment by wodiej | 2008-07-17 07:25:49

Well said Judy!

Comment by JudyfromMO | 2008-07-17 08:01:24

Thank you, I’m trying to get this published in local papers to wake up some people in MO who only have time to maybe read a local paper or watch local reports on livestock. Most farmers around here only have about 5 minutes a day to find out what is going on with elections. Look what happened, we got McCaskill-can’t let that happen again.

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-07-17 10:02:16

Nicely done Judy. It’s sad that the press is not doing it’s job on this. I hope you are successful in getting this published.

 
 
 

Comment by C.S. | 2008-07-17 08:06:40

Most candidates who are native born citizens develop quite a public paper trail in almost half a century. Barack Obama, citizen of Hawaii for 14 years, traveled to a foreign country and lived there for 4 years with virtually NO paper trails other than that “officially ” released by his campaign. How is this possible?

Every other “babyboomer” (yes, Barack Obama is one of the majority) is followed by a long papertrail even if they never left their hometown. Pile that papertrail into a tower and you could bury its owner - but Barack Obama is uncluttered by the detritus that follows every other citizen. The question is not why but how he did it when you and I and every other citizen is subject to proving we aren’t a “terrorist” every time we step on a plane because until 2004 Barack Obama was just another anonymous citizen.

Comment by Northwest rain | 2008-07-17 13:35:33

WE can be certain that the GOP has searched for and found snObama’s hidden paper trail.

You are correct about the paper trail — from birth to death we generate records. Obama’s birth may have been listed in a local newspaper where he was born — there should be records.

The fact that Obama is hiding his records means that he is hiding something. He wrote those books to cover the fact that he’s managed to hide his records.

But the GOP has 1000 pages of background information on Obama — and they are probably busy putting that information into “Who is this Obama?” tv & Internet ads.

The DNC has insulted Americans, by pushing this unknown, lazy, self centered psychopath on us.

 
 
 

Comment by mimi | 2008-07-17 07:42:19

He’s immoral!

I’m sure he’s figuring a way to keep McCain off the ballot. Unseal his divorce papers?

He might even have something already.

Get this 0bama, I’m voting for McCain even if you have video of him drinking the devil’s blood.

Can I make myself any clearer?

 

Comment by Benny | 2008-07-17 07:46:08

I’m not certain that throwing Axelrod into the mix strengthens your argument. Axelrod did work for Obama’s senatorial campaign in 2004 and for Edwards in 2004. Granted, it’s been suggested there is some bad blood between Axelrod and Edwards, although it is suggested only.

Regarding the FEC error related to Edwards’ $400 hairstyle, even I saw it in the FEC report. I’m not certain it was leaked by the Obama camp. It was flat out carelessness by the Edwards team. Even Mrs Clinton had expensive hairstyling done during her last Senate run, and the campaign paid for it. But it would have been considered sexism if the media, whom at the time, considered her their “girl”, to borrow from her opening remarks in Chicago at a AFL-CIO event.

The better argument is more about the detraction of the media and the blogs concerning the cover of the New Yorker, and the analysis that Lizza did in the story. I am not certain Obama’s team wanted folks to actually read the story, but even if this was not the case, the New Yorker made a coup by selling more copies over a tasteless cover that probably offended more American Muslims as much as it did the Left.

Comment by hank48188 | 2008-07-17 08:50:30

That was a puff piece written by Lizza, I didn’t read much about the two most important supporters he had, he never would have gone anywhere without either. Tony Rezko was the fundraiser,over $250,000, he was Obama’s money Godfather. And then you have William Ayers, who had great political power through his father, Tom Ayers, CEO of Commenwealth Edison (Exelon)and a political power broker in Chicago. Ayers put Obama on the Board at the Woods Fund and made Obama Chairman of the ANNENBERG CHALLENGE GRANT. Why doesn’t Obama brag about this Executive Position on his Website? They had $110 million to improve education in Chicago, the most important position of power he ever had. I would love to see the MSM cover this portion of Obama’s life.

Comment by educatedwhitewoman | 2008-07-17 09:03:03

They spent $110 million and the schools did not improve. Fact. His biggest “job” and he failed. The real motive for Ayers & Obama was to build political power bases in these school districts, not help the children, and to that end, he and Ayers succeeded.

 
 
 

Comment by Christy | 2008-07-17 07:47:22

BO and the DNC make me sick. The DNC is planning to HIDE homeless during the Denver convention! They are giving out movie passes so the poor homeless people won’t offend the eyes of the great “kind” sanctimonious members. PIGS!!!!!

What a bunch of PHONIES!!! I guess the homeless are such an eyesore, they wouldn’t want to help them out or anything. MOVIE PASSES! How about a large charity donation to a church service- give them a hot meal and place to sleep?
http://www.thedenverchannel.com/politics/16900475/detail.html

Comment by Tuppence 411 | 2008-07-17 08:01:10

Movie passes?? A zoo voucher?? And voter registration drives! OMG that is morally repugnant! What’s worst is homeless advocates buying such CRAP!! WTF! If his camp is showing utter disregard for the situation now as a canidate, what makes them think he will care as President?

 

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-07-17 08:37:55

ok before I even bother reading this please tell me you KNOW THE REPUBLICANS will be doing the SAME damn thing in Minnesota!!

Comment by Tuppence 411 | 2008-07-17 08:53:39

Yeah, I know- but aren’t we suppose to be better than Republicans? Lord- if we measure ourselves against the GOP standards on issues of social justice- this country is doomed!

 
 
 

Comment by scott in jupiter | 2008-07-17 07:54:09

Can you imagine if the teleprompter broke at barkys Coronation.

My fellow uh huh ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.

Comment by JudyfromMO | 2008-07-17 08:02:40

Anybody know how to break a teleprompter?

 

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-07-17 08:38:43

HA! I know, it’s pathetic.

 
 

Comment by elixir | 2008-07-17 07:55:23

Just like Jonathan Papelbon (or like minded closing pitchers), Barack Obama can’t close the game with anyone on base.

Comment by Heather | 2008-07-17 11:16:48

Yeah, and I’m still crying about the fact that the world missed its chance to see our own west coast phenom: Timmy Lincecum. Look for him at the allstars next year!

 
 

Comment by BJ | 2008-07-17 07:56:28

As for the original post by Charles Lemos, of all the things we should be concerned about with Obama, and reason to stop him, this should be way up there on the list. How is it adults in this country don’t have the education, the intelligence, the foresight, the common sense to not see what a dangerous man (group) this is?

It is truly stunning that things like this are right out there in their face to see, observe, and analyze, and they are so fking ignorant that they can’t see what a danger this man’s tactics are and what exactly is/are his agenda.

He sounds more dangerous than any mafia kingpin-

or even Bush aka Rove-

they tried to shut up the naysayers - I’m very concerned Obama can and will actually do it. He’ll be king and anyone who dare to oppose, will be beheaded.

 

Comment by Christy | 2008-07-17 08:16:38

Everything I have seen about Bo is morally repugnant. I guess all those homeless people are just “typical white people” who need to not eat so much, drive SUVs, and leave their thermostats at 78. Oh yeah, and for god’s sake, they need to not be soooo embarrassing and ONLY speak English.

He already bragged about, “bringing a gun to the fight.” He thinks he’s some great “gangsta”, playing his repulsive moronic gangsta music.

The DNC have made a HUGE mistake. BO’s numbers will continue to decline, he isn’t going to win.

Hillary 2008 or 2012.

 

Comment by educatedwhitewoman | 2008-07-17 08:16:54

Have you heard the latest? All three major networks (LOL) are sending their top anchors to accompany BO on his trip to Europe/Iraq. Can you believe it? They claim that it’s not biased, because it’s a “first.”

Well, he was in Iraq before; it’s just been a while (900 days), because his whole platform was built on losing in Iraq and him claiming to be about it (the truth is that he wasn’t even in the Senate to vote on the war and made nary a peep opposing it before it started - not that anyone heard anyway).

When we were losing, the special one saw no point in going because he had no ideas or desire to fix it (did not fit his paradigm), and now that he’s been shamed into going by McCain, because, along with the MSM, Barry’s been trying awfully hard to ignore the fact that things are improving and, god forbid, we might succeed, it’s a “first” - right.

Another transparent excuse put forth by the big three is that Obama is offering them each an exclusive interview. Gag me with a spoon. What absolute bias. I will ignore all MSM coverage of this coronation event.

Comment by educatedwhitewoman | 2008-07-17 08:17:44

clarification: claiming to be “right” about it

 

Comment by Mel | 2008-07-17 08:26:47

Amazing !! McCain went a couple months ago and I don’t know one major network that accompanied him!!

Everytime I see Nobamas arrogant face or hear his voice it makes me more determined than ever to help McCain beat him ( if Hillary truly is not the Nominee). I want McCain to win by a landslide !!
Screw Nobama and his crazy supporters !!

 

Comment by Zee | 2008-07-17 17:40:49

wtf do they mean “first?”

Obambi’s BABY STEPS??

 
 

Comment by Cindie | 2008-07-17 08:21:15

ACKKKKKKKKKKKKKK - this man just ticks me off. PERIOD!

 

Comment by fred | 2008-07-17 08:24:54

Public shouldn’t fall for Obama’s rhetoric

excerpt: The paper hanger, just as the lawyer, delivered wonderful, inspirational public speeches. Both spoke of the “change” and “hope” their election might bring if people would “believe in” their country. Steeped in a similar class warfare rhetoric; their speeches emphasize the rich were keeping the poor people down.
Without a track record to judge the man by, people simply fall for the rhetoric. The German people had to “believe.” They wanted “change.” And through “hope,” they only had to “believe” what Adolph Hitler and the Nazis said; without questioning what Hitler and his Marxist-Socialists pals had really designed behind the scenes.
continue http://countusout.wordpress.com/

 

Comment by scott | 2008-07-17 08:39:33

You guys make me laugh….Here is your ‘golden child’ from Daly’s chitown and using thug politics…You all are behind the crooks in Illinois, it has been that way for decades…You all (your party I mean), is behind all this corruption and more, your party thinks it is great when someone you want is in theere, but let the ‘white guilt’ candidate, the ‘ultimate afirmative action’ candidate get nominated for president, over your more highly qualified Lady, you all get your shorts in ‘bunches’….Your party is behind and defends affirmative action…I voted for Hillary, because this guy is a clown…When are you all going to wake up and take your party BACK from those who have destroyed it…

 

Comment by Christy | 2008-07-17 08:39:38

I think BO IS a lot like Hitler. I don’t believe for a minute he doesn’t hate Whites, just like his whole hate-monger church and good friend Wright does.

Yes, they blame “Whitey” for everything, just the same as Hitler blamed the Jews for everything.

Look, here is one of the Nation of Islam hate-mongers speech, “kill the White babies, etc…” Loved by that stupid hate church that gives awards to hate-monger Nation of Islam leader Farrakhan.

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/456363/khallid_muhammads_speech_kill_the_white_man/

Comment by wodiej | 2008-07-17 09:06:49

nobody sits in a church like Wright’s for 20 years unless you are buyin’ what they’re sellin’. If he didn’t than at the very least his judgment is too shitty to be President.

 
 

Comment by barbara | 2008-07-17 08:40:28

Obama is as corrupted as Resko. Now if the blind Obama supporters don’t wake up now we will have a huge problem when Obama (god forbid) gets into office. He has done nothing as a senator and will bring destruction to our country as a president. We can have a child playing president in the state this country is in.

 

Comment by barbara | 2008-07-17 08:44:22

I would also like to add in response to a story on fox.

Again the Obama camp is using women and birth control to get our votes. Apparently the polls are stating that an ad by moveon is working regarding birth contol. We will not be used by the Obama camp. He treated us with disrespect just as he disrespected Clinton. Now he wants our votes but he won’t get them. I am part of PUMA and will be voting for John McCain. Puma is now getting death threats from Obama supporters. That is why I know what we are doing is working. We have Obama and the DNC very scared. We are calling for a vote on the convention floor in Denver. We will have Clinton part of the nomination process and that scares the begeebees out of Obama and the dnc. Hence the death threats. We not be silenced. We will have our vote.

PUMA for Clinton and if not for McCain08 we will not come back into the fold

 

Comment by DancingOpossum | 2008-07-17 08:45:16

This morning on Morning Joe, Chuck Todd was talking about (wait for it) the similarities between Bush and Obama! Ha! Seems we are not the only ones who have noticed this. And the revelations about Alice Palmer as well as the DNC Disenfranchisement Dance of July 2008, all make Obamabots squeal the same line the Bushies did, “Who cares how we did it? We won!” And of course, just like the Bushies did after Florida 2000, “Get over it!” They are truly separated-at-birth peas in a pod.

Clayton Bigsby would go off on him for that.

10 points for the Clayton Bigsby reference! BWAHHH!!

 

Comment by asimon | 2008-07-17 08:52:12

Did Obama Plant Bogus Dowd Column to Victimize Himself?

I know that at least two daily newspapers have investigative reporters working on this story. Whether someone inside the Obama campaign will have the honesty and integrity of becoming a Deep Throat to expose the Democrat’s campaign trickery remains an open question. But apparently, the age of dirty trickers and “plumbers” has materialized in a new form for a new medium, the Internet. Personally, I sense David Axelrod’s fingerprints all over this fake Maureen Dowd column. If this is what Obama means by “hope” and “change” then I’m terrified about the future of this campaign.

http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/07/17/not-illegal-but-is-it-moral/

Comment by Heather | 2008-07-17 12:17:14

This campaign?! More like “this country”.

 

Comment by Northwest rain | 2008-07-17 13:46:20

I’ve gotten a few of these from different sources. The column published on the same date as the one making the rounds is very different and anti-Hillary.

However, there are valid questions about how an unknown “Senator” was able to open up the donation spigot on full blast.

There is something very fishy about the source of the donations.

Dowd should be pleased — her photo is being seen by thousands.

 
 

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-07-17 08:55:32

PUMA radio coming up! 5 minutes!

Hip, Hip, Hazzah!! :-)

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-07-17 08:57:06

 
 

Comment by Christy | 2008-07-17 09:00:14

DNC and BO to the homeless: “let them have movie passes.”

 

Comment by Ugo | 2008-07-17 09:03:59

So we read or listen to the new group togetherforus.com ’spokewoman’, the former Obama supporter and now ” I will work to make sure democrat is in the White House” well go figure.

The real democrat in this race to the White House now is none other than Sen. John MacCain. Sen. John MacCain is getting my vote. Come 1912, Sen. Hillary Clinton will run again.

 

Comment by fred | 2008-07-17 09:06:14

Obama campaign plant a fake coverup story?
Did presumptive Democratic Presidential nominee Sen. Barack Obama’s campaign plant a fake story accusing itself of campaign finance irregularities, in order to portray itself as victims of right-wing allegations about the campaign’s successful Internet fund-raising?
However, the fake Maureen Dowd column has certain attributes which only persons intimately familiar with the Obama campaign would normally have privy to. The allegations in the fake Maureen Dowd story required the expertise of persons familiar with Internet technology. There are hundreds, indeed thousands of people who would have such IT expertise. But the allegations also require expertise of persons familiar with obscure provisions of Federal campaign finance regulations. Find me one person among the general public who would have intimate knowledge of Section 103.3(b) of Title 11 of the Code of Federal Regulations
http://countusout.wordpress.com/
This Man Is Dangerous

Comment by Heather | 2008-07-17 12:21:10

I’m about 99% certain that Obama planted the “Obama in a turban” story at Drudge (or with help of Drudge) on the very day that Hillary Clinton was giving a big foreign policy speech. The news cycle devoted itself to allegations that Hillay’s campaign was behind the picture, and not a peep came from the MSM on Hillary’s important speech.

Yes, this man *is* dangerous. He’s a gamer, and more than that … he employees thousands of over-testosteronated frustrated and horny young gamers to instantiate his tricks on the internet and in the MSM.

 

Comment by Heather | 2008-07-17 12:22:01

I’m 99% certain that Obama planted the “Obama in a turban” picture at Drudge (or was it HuffPo?) on the very day that Hillary Clinton was giving a big foreign policy speech. The news cycle devoted itself to allegations that Hillary’s campaign was behind the picture, and not a peep from the MSM on Hillary’s important speech.

Yes, this man *is* dangerous. He’s a gamer, and more than that … he employees thousands of over-testosteronated frustrated and horny young gamers to instantiate his tricks on the internet and in the MSM.

 
 

Comment by Mary Lou | 2008-07-17 09:06:43

Democrats who think getting in the dirt with
Republicans is the only way to win just didn’t count on the millions of Dems who will reject
Any Party that resorts to these kinds of tactics.

 

Comment by scott | 2008-07-17 09:13:20

Here is the problem, your PARTY and most of you have scolded America as ‘racist, against equal opportunity, sexist, etc…’

You have stood by and supported various programs and even LAWS that discriminate against a ‘white guy’…all in the name of ‘fairness’ or trying to right past wrongs, or leveling the playing field…alot of you have ’suffered’ from white guilt, or black resentment…and now your own party has ‘powered’ the Black candidate over a more highly qualified white women…’welcome to your nitemare’ You bred it, now it ‘owns’ YOU…You all can rail all you want at Barak, but it is your inner distorted views of the way society should ‘be managed’ that has brought you to the brink of oblivion…

There is no turning back for you…are you going to vote for someone who at times has stood AGAINST you-McCain?

I suggest more reasonably, that all your rhetoric against Obammie, is ‘venting’ and you all like the ‘unthinking LIB DEM Robots’ you are, are going to fall in line with your ‘party elders’ and pay tribute to your ‘messiah’, the proud product of your ‘visionist’ party…and YOU WILL VOTE FOR HIM…because YOU BELIEVE RACE AND GENDER TRUMP QUALIFICATIONS…..you and your PARTY have supported it for so long, why change now?

Is it that your finding out, it all a LIE?

Comment by wodiej | 2008-07-17 09:56:03

You show me an instance of discrimination against a white guy and I’ll show you 50 instances where the opposite is true. I’ll admit that sometimes the most qualified people don’t get the job but it sure is not benefiting white women. Most CEO’s, leaders, mayors, governors, Congress and the President are MEN. And for your information most people on here are not far left.

 

Comment by Heather | 2008-07-17 12:30:20

I disagree that it has been a lie. My belief is that these important reforms were instantiated (job & housing discrimination outlawed, affirmative action in education implemented, opening up the media and sports and politics to people of color leading to more-than-equal positive representation in those areas), and that life for everyone is better as a result.

Now Reverend Wright hits the scene and I see I am still hated by a proportion of the population for what my ancestors did, no matter what reforms were put in place. THAT does not follow logically from the necessary reforms that were implemented. A whole lot of black people were living perfectly happy lives until Barack Obama came along and started whispering ugliness in their ears for his own political advancement.

I imagine that if I had a pastor who ranted every Sunday about how badly the Irish were treated by the English, or an Irish candidate who used such methods to get my vote, I might develop a big old chip on my shoulder, and imagine that I’d be a rich person if only the English weren’t so evil, and that if I just vote for this Irish guy the heavens will open and transport me to wealth and happiness.

That’s what has happened here, and that’s why Obama fits in somewhere below “snake oil salesman” in the great chain of morality.

 
 

Comment by scott | 2008-07-17 09:52:36

Hillary, oh Hillary, wherefore art thou, oh Hillary?

She is playing her ‘position’…

She should BREAK with the ‘party elders’ and either support McCain, turn independent, run 3rd party, or you all need to be QUIET….

‘Your party bosses’ have CHOSEN their ‘knight in shining armor’…Your ‘bosses’ will NOT allow dissension on the convention floor…YOU HAVE NO HOPE of getting Hillary nominated…Your cause is a ‘waterloo’…and for what?

A man who is ‘unqualified’ the ultimate affirmative candidate, the man whose race transcended qualifications, and HE took the helm of your party, because your party WANTS him….Your Party GROOMED him….RACE over QUALIFICATIONS…Why are all you LIBS mad about? Aren’t you for Affirmative Action?

I LOVE IT….I wish Hillary could get the nominee, but she won’t, because you and your parties IDEALS, made this man…There is no turning back for you…

GNAW at the BIT..you all have been BAMBOOZELD by your own ideas and PARTY…’welcome to your nitemare’

Go Hillary, if she can….

Comment by educatedwhitewoman | 2008-07-17 11:40:38

Why ascribe the cheating and gaming of the system by Alexrod & co., and shady backroom moves by party leaders (Dean, Brazille, Pelosi) to all rank and file dems?

 
 

Comment by steveeboy | 2008-07-17 09:58:27

wooo hooo!

dead end nutjobs in full effect this morning!!!!

Nothing like $52 million dollars to drive you all even more insane!

the real immorality is any sore loser proposing to vote for mcsame ’cause they want to fuck over the country as punishment for their own candidate’s loss in the primary.

Comment by Bonita | 2008-07-17 11:25:56

Been to the confluence lately steveboy!

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-07-17 14:14:24

Steveeboy seems a little confused, or more than usual anyway. We are here all the time. We are not here in force because of some cooked up numbers by Obama.. We’re used to that tactic from him, in fact, we expect it. It is the trolls like Steveeboy who are out in force on this blog trying to steal the threads with their talking points from camp obamaland. So predictable you can almost set your watch by them.

 
 
 

Comment by I Will Remember in November | 2008-07-17 10:05:58

How much of the $52 mil is/will be subject to auditing? if obama raised $52mil the majority was raised outside the bounds of the campaign finance laws. I would not buy a stock based on unaudited financial statements (as a matter of fact the sec requires listed companies to have audited financials), if i were a bank i would not lend money without reviewing audited financials statements, if i go to jiffy lube and get a $500 bill for an oil change i am going to want to review the bill. If a candidates ability to raise money is a indication of his/her popularity thus ability to get elected — I want an audited or at last a cursory review of the amounts.

BTW judyfrommo is right on target. But logic goes out the window when voters fall in love and/or worship a candidate.

PUMA

 

Comment by another dem for Mccain | 2008-07-17 10:50:01

Obama has refused to give all donation records to watch groups! mcCain has given more then asked for.I am another dem who will vote McCain.. I want no part of the new anti-American Chicago party.

TIME TO VOTE OUT ALL DEMOCRATS,,,

 

Comment by Kathy | 2008-07-17 10:57:59

Why can’t people understand that Obama is not a person qualified to be president of the United States. It has nothing to do with color. There are so many AAs that have done magnificent work for their communities and the country. Why can’t we have a candidate who is deserving of the post of President of the United States of America. Obama has done nothing to deserve the office.

 

Comment by bart | 2008-07-17 10:59:47

Great piece! Thanks for the video too.

 

Comment by james andrews | 2008-07-17 11:21:48

You women need to get over it. This candidate, like your Hillary, thought she was entitled to the job and didn’t follow the rules. Hillary didn’t like it when the DNC followed the rules. When will you wake up. She lost and if something ever happened to deny BO the nomination she wont get one Obama vote. Get with our party or re register as republicans so you wont vote in the next primary to destroy our new democratic party

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-07-17 14:18:02

Trust me James Andy….we’ll be voting in the next democratic primary, you can bet on it. You little obama troll, who knows what will tickle your fancy by then. The latest Xbox game…perhaps Apple will introduce another new iphone that you can play with and occupy yourself. Politics will be so 08 for you I’m sure.

 
 

Comment by Bonita | 2008-07-17 11:24:46

James: Oh, you talk so sexy and sweet! I bet you have women just swooning over you all the time.

Now, stop the hate!

 

Comment by JPatelis | 2008-07-17 11:39:57

Funny here we go again “rules are rules” sounds a little like the same argument that they are using today.

NObama

Puma

 

Comment by another dem for Mccain | 2008-07-17 11:42:43

Followed the rules lol, you MUST MEAN THE DNC CHANGED THE RULES.

 

Pingback by Hillary’s Voice » Campaign Updates for 7/17/08 | 2008-07-17 11:49:02

[...] Not Illegal But Is It Moral? (by Charles Lemos at No Quarter, from his blog, By The Fault) [Click through to watch a video about Obama’s tactic in his first campaign of knocking his mentor, Alice Palmer, and all the other candidates for the Illinois Senate seat he was seeking.  Even then he was running on change from ordinary politics.] One thing they omit was that the challenging of petitions was done on the last day depriving the others of a response. Obama sent in a team of lawyers and they stayed until everyone was off the ballot, not just Alice Palmer, but everyone. There is no such thing as coincidences in Chicago politics. Blair Hull, Jack Ryan, Alice Palmer. I might add John Edwards to that list. Who leaked the haircut story? Who worked for John Edwards previously but now works for Obama? [...]

 

Comment by NOBAMA | 2008-07-17 12:49:31

What about sending his thugs into the caucuses to steal delegates through the use of fraud, theft, threats, and force.

Why do you think Hillary won the legitimate primarys and he won the corrupt caucuses. TX was a prime example - she won the primaries, he stole the delegates through the caucuses.

Obama is a 2-faced, lying, hypocritical, low-life, criminal, scumbag.

 

Comment by scott | 2008-07-17 16:06:32

You ask me why I subscribe the actions of your democratic party bossess to you all individually? because you all for the most part GAVE us affirmative action politics, either because you were deluded by socialist policies, or you were suffering from white guilt…..

What if Hillary was your daughter, mother, sister, etc, and she got robbed for a job because of an unqualified black man? Oh, that DID happen, and you all sit aound in the denial of your past socialist policiies and blame the party bosses who have only done what you have done in the past…….promote race over qualification….do unto others as you would have them do unto you…..race over qualification….he is YOUR candidate, your political offspring, your socialistic two-headed monster….so get over it……return to the rank and file libs, suck it up like HILLARY and promote ‘your affirmative action candidate’…you have no choice…..you are controlled by your party bosses…..they don’t care for you…..

but there is reprieve for your pasts choices…..vote against the things that have bound you, vote against a party that doesnt care about you…..

and Hillary needs to do the same thing….QUIT supporting the loser…..she probable

 

Comment by scott | 2008-07-17 16:44:57

Get over it pumas…..your lady is proof she is not breaking away from tradional party politics….

she is supporting obammie….so why dont you libs follow suit?

ole hill supports afirmative action and she accepts that an unqualified black man got the position over her….so stop whining and support your parties nominee of choice…..

or are having second thoughts on racial preferences? at least vote for obammie to squelch your white guilt…..

I voted for hill because she is more suited than obammie….

but see, you libs have supported afirmative action policies all your lives, so why are you upset that your ideals are working fully as designed?

‘Welcome to your nightmare’…….you will bow down to your altar of political persuasion….you have no choice….you will do what your party elders dictate…you have no free conscience….the lib democrats own you…..lock, stock, and barrel……they own your vote….for you to vote against obammie, is for you to admit that your parties dogma on affirmative action is wrong, unlawful, and immoral…..what will you do pumas? stick with policy or think rationally for once in your lives….

WELCOME TO YOUR NIGHTMARE……obammie!!!!!!!!!!

 

RSS Feed for This PostPost a Comment

Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)