Comments on: Do we want “President Hasselhoff”?

By: Tom Fairbairn

Tom Fairbairn — Sat, 26 Jul 2008 03:57:37 +0000

I am very disturbed that Obama has become a Rock star due to our American Media, that is owned by a few rich people who want to make him president so they can control him’

THE WAY THEY (THE media and the Democratic party loosers TREATED HILLARY WHO IN MY OPINION HAS BEEN TRAINNED BY EXPERIENCE TO BE PRESIDENT is not my kind of party even though I have always voted Democratic.

If Obama would get off his rock star status and get smart he would choose HILLARY FOR HIS VP

If he does not choose her, the republicans will tear him to shreads. AN I WILL VOTE INDEPENDENT OR WRITE HER NAME IN.

By: DancingOpossum

DancingOpossum — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 15:37:12 +0000

he got more people to a single event than any other Presidential nominee or President in history!

Back this up, please. And say whether those people had hugely popular musical acts give a free concert to lure people in.

As another poster noted, Hillary drew 150K people in Scranton, no musical act necessary.

How many people do you think will show up for Bon Jovi’s free concert in Central Park? Should Bon Jovi be POTUS? (Actually, he’d be far preferable to Obambi.)

By: Indyvoter

Indyvoter — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 15:18:58 +0000

Absolutely don’t want that! That’s why I pick McCain over Obama.

Inexperience, hubris, spying on Americans with no FISA court, accepts no criticism or responsibility, supporters are mad cultists who think their candidate is picked by God…

By: Postmaster

Postmaster — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:56:44 +0000

he doesn’t need to picture the crowd naked, he just has to keep his eyes on the teleprompter and his ears to the headset. Any fool can do that as he has proven.

By: Postmaster

Postmaster — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:51:19 +0000

do you always just pick and choose what part of an answer you will quote? He did not say we would be in Iraq for a 100 years. Give your posts some credibility by being accurate.

By: Postmaster

Postmaster — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:40:29 +0000

Is that the best you can do? Attack McCain’s age? How petty and stupid.

By: Postmaster

Postmaster — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:35:16 +0000

Affirmative Action comes to mind.

By: HillGirl

HillGirl — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 13:55:30 +0000

I am shocked. Shocked that Obama didn’t give his speech in German. What languages does he speak again?

By: BernieO

BernieO — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 13:25:49 +0000

I have heard Hasselhoff talk about how weird he found it that the Germans wanted him to do this. At least he has the sense to not take himself too seriously.
Here is a great article about Obama’s hubris (from a conservative site but well reasoned):
“A Runaway Ego is Obama’s Blind Spot”
http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/07/a_runaway_ego_is_baracks_blind.html

Also read their article “Obama on Jerusalem Properly Phrased”. It is an eye opener and shows just how Obama deliberately talks out of both sides of his mouth then fudges and says things like his speech was “poorly worded” when he had told Jewish audiences them same thing before - IN WRITING. The dishonestly is blatant. At least the much-maligned Katie Couric pressed him on this.
(http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/07/obama_on_jerusalem_properly_ph.html

By: permad

permad — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:14:55 +0000

I think that some (particularly his campaign) are saying exactly that: “Look at the crowds! He appeals to everyone!” Perhaps not in your mind, but why else would it matter if 200,000 or 1,000,000 or 10 people came out to see him? There seems to be some promotion from his campaign about his ability to draw crowds. Why else would the convention have to change venues? If this is not intended to imply crowds=appeal/competence/readiness, what is the intended message? Enlighten us, please!

Train wrecks and other disasters also often attract large crowds, mind you. It ain’t always becuase of love people are drawn in. The poster you replied to has nothing to be embarrassed about.