Obama never does anything that is not on display.

It’s bad enough that people can’t grasp the Separation of Church and State which protects the beliefs of diversity within the Mind’s Eye, but it’s completely Egomaniacal and a hit of Messianic Dimentia to classify your Secular Commander-in-Chief as a Lightning rod for some Will of Infinity Existence.

It’s rather insulting to the concept of Infinity to center on the Will of Infinite Space as if it were Human in limitation, but that’s well within the realm of Cosmology, Metaphysics and Occult Sciences to debate.

We’re discussing the next President of the United States of America whose “job” is to serve the People of the United States of America, not some disincarnate entity mythologically worshipped as the embodiment of Creation while driving from the Oval Office..

Please post an update.

The link to the Krieger post appears above, in case you missed it in your haste to show off your ignorance. Read it, read a random few of her blog entries about Obama, tell me she has a reason to lie in his favor. Case fucking closed on this ridiculous smear: Obama didn’t authorize the prayer to be published, it was the action of some attention-hungry seminary student who has now apologized.

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3575001,00.html

[The rabbi overseeing the Western Wall, Shmuel Rabinowitz, sent a letter on Tuesday to US Democratic presidential hopeful Barack Obama, in which he expressed his sorrow over the removal of the note written by Obama from the wall and its subsequent publication in local media

In addition, the Yeshiva student who removed Obama’s note from the Wall also apologized and asked for Obama’s forgiveness. He said the note had been returned to its place with Rabinowitz’s help.

In the letter, Rabinowitz wrote that as the Western Wall and Holy Sites Rabbi he deeply regrets the aberrant act.

He also said that many people visit the Western Wall; Jews and non-Jews alike and their honor and the honor of their prayers are top priority.]

Oh, Grandma, what big ears you have!

First of all, what utter hypocrisy for an orthodox adherent to invalidate the sanctity of a major religious premise by removing Barack Obama’s prayer from its niche in the Wailing Wall and passing it on to the media.

But experience has taught me that religion pretty much encourages hypocrisy because the mere humans who set themselves up as being the voices of God, while in reality desiring to control ” the masses”, have laid down life-sucking, mind-destroying rules that no human, including themselves, could possibly live up to, so that when one sees one’s chance to deviate, one first looks this way and that way, and then quickly snatches it - and worries what God will say later.

That being said, logic would have told Obama that his missive to God would be of keen interest to the media, which may well have influenced to a certain extent the careful choosing of his words. They do make him look awe-fully sincere, don’t they?

How do I know the words were carefully chosen? Not just because he is mindful of wooing evangelical America, but because his handwriting reveals that he is logical, careful (cautious), and mildly intuitive. I had an uncle, see, who as an avocation earned a diploma in grapho-analysis and passed his knowledge and his books on to me.

Obama’s intuition is revealed in breaks in some words (such as “pro-tect, wi-sdom and in-strument), and logic in lots of unbroken words. His carefulness is shown in the placement of his “i” dots.

People who exhibit spontaneity, imagination and originality, for instance, tend to use what are called “flying ‘i’ dots” - the dot is high and way off to the right. Those whose dots are way off to the left are notorious procrastinators.

Listen, some quack graphologist (or “grapho-analyst” - there is as much bickering over language in that field as in any other) is going to publish an analysis of Obama’s handwriting, so why shouldn’t I? But I will also let you know my sources so as not to appear to take credit for my own brilliance.

Obama generally places his “i” dots directly over the letter, and only occasionally a tiny bit to the left or right.

From Between the Lines by Hannah Milner Smith (Pg. 23)
“The person who places dots carefully and directly over the letter is a person who is very precise and not too original. This person hates change and would stay with any job that calls for detail work; he could not be an administrator nor plan detail work for others.”

There are, of course, other indicators of Obama’s avoidance of veering from the traditionally accepted path. When there is a “t” at the beginning of a word, Obama joins it to the next letter by looping to the left and then back to the right. But he makes no effort to cross any of the t’s that come at the ends of words. Forgetting to cross t’s is generally said to show absent-mindedness and, if done too often, carelessness, but Smith says on Pg. 22:

“Some schools used to insist that the final t remain uncrossed so I do not call this absent-minded or careless, but rather immature in some cases and hidebound in others, depending on the rest of the writing.”

In other words, Obama’s handwriting is heavily influenced by how he was taught to write, while most people, through maturation and experimentation, eventually develop their own style.

Another sign of immaturity is revealed in Obama’s “d”s. Smith says on Pg. 25:

“The small letter d which has a high stem belongs to the dignified person who has a high sense of honour. On the other hand, the person who makes a very small stem compared to other letters is one who makes excuses for everything he does and is often lax in his moral behaviour”

Ouch, eh? But, go ahead, compare his “d” stem to the “f” in the first line and the “h” in the third line.

On Pg. 32, Smith deals with the letter “g”:

“The g which forms an 8 shows a person who has natural culture and refinement and who, as a general rule, thinks and speaks quickly.”

So that’s good, right? But the bottom of the “g” is inflated, suggesting sensualism and materialism. Which is not really so bad in somebody who has a lot of self-control, even if it is based on obedience to “authority”.

From Pg. 75 of “What your handwriting reveals - Albert E. Hughes, B.A.”
“Fullness in the lower zone can be interpreted positively as erotic fantasies and behaviour, sensuousness, materiality, country-side interests. Negatively it can be interpreted as perverse fantasies and behaviour, sensuality, earthiness, gross materiality.”

Obama’s handwriting does not reveal perversity or grossness. His overall script is garland style - his “m”s and “n”s look like “u”s and “w”s.

From Handwriting Analysis by Dorothy Sara (Pg 119-20):
The outstanding trait in a garland handwriting is the person’s desire to live in a luxurious manner and not to have to work hard to earn the money to pay for the luxuries. The garland writer is a pleasure-loving individual. But if it is necessary for this person to work for a living, he or she will usually look for a job that has a touch “glamour” to it, where the surroundings are attractive and where there is a chance to meet interesting people, and perhaps to have a good social life as a “fringe benefit” of the job.

The one who writes with garland forms is usually an imitator rather than an innovator. It is much easier to function that way! Sometimes a person who writes with garlands msy work hard, or may live modestly, but this does not mean that he or she prefers that, and if there were enough money, this same person would find it very gratifying to shift over to easy and gracious living patterns.

The garland writers usually have outer manners which are gracious; consciously they have a need to impress other people, so they may use tact and “put on an act” and appear to be much more interested in some people and activities than perhaps they really are. It is important to the garland writer to be noticed and admired, because usually that person does not possess as much real self-assurance as may appear on the surface.

So this would account for Obama’s tendency to be charming and say what people want to hear, but is he really lacking in self-assurance?

According to Smith (Pg. 136) the long ending strokes on some words (”me” in the first line, “and” in the second line) suggest a certain kind of self-confidence:

“The final stroke which is done with a downward curve shows the person to be stubbon, but not in a fixed manner. There is flexibility in this stroke; the writer is generally a conformist even though there may be a tendency to want to do things which are different from the usual conventional pattern.”

Obama’s long ending strokes do end up below the baseline, and so do most of his periods. I would have to say that Obama’s self confidence comes from knowing the rules and sticking to them, period.

Apart from loving the good life, he likes to keep things simple and uncomplicated, with no boats rocked. This is borne out by the lack of beginning strokes on the first letters of lower case words.

Says Smith on Pg. 144:
“The person whose mind wants to be uncluttered, who wishes to eliminate nonessentials and get everything down to a simple formula, is the one who is most likely to eliminate the curved beginning and ending stroke on the upper and lower loops. There is nothing pretentious in this personality, the mind is resourceful, and if necessary to adapt to a new situation this person can usually find a way of doing it.”

So when Obama says one thing in Berlin, and another thing in Israel, he is not being devious, he is just trying to keep things simple and appropriate to the moment..

I leave it to you to determine whether you see in him what the “experts” see in his handwriting.

That was fun, wasn’t it. Who doesn’t like fortune-telling, even when it’s forbidden by God.

Me, I trust my own habit of simply looking into eyes. First I look at the smile, then I cover the mouth and look at the eyes to see if they match. Obama has an affable smile that is reflected in his eyes. He is what he appears to be. Affable, charming, sincere. But not terribly astute or courageous.

Still, it’s much better than seeing a smile with dead, cold eyes attached. Obama doesn’t need to be seen in the company of helpless kittens to appear benign.

PS: Obama’s “a”s and “o”s are tightly closed, indicating that he might be harbouring a secret.

from: http://www.yayacanada.com

Hint: Read, comprehend, respond. Recycling two-day old nonsense in response to a comment that specifically debunks said nonsense is stupid even by this place’s standards.

Quite a scoop you got there, gumshoe.