Drink This In With Your Coffee!
By SusanUnPC on August 5, 2008 at 8:33 AM in Barack Obama, Electability, John McCain, Race Card
ATV/Zogby Poll Toss-Up! McCain 42%, Obama 41% as Undecided Voters Increase… … “Obama loses support among his strongest demographic groups. …”
DON’T CHOKE NOW:
Bob Herbert: Why is everyone missing the phallic symbols in McCain’s Britney ad?
(As I wrote to some friends, perhaps the problem is that Bob Herbert is the only person in America who sees ANY phallic symbols in those ads.)
Herbert read a book’s worth of meaning into this single phrase by John McCain last spring: “Mr. McCain had himself touted as the ‘American president Americans have been waiting for’.”
There was nothing subtle about that attempt to position Senator Obama as the Other, a candidate who might technically be American but who remained in some sense foreign, not sufficiently patriotic and certainly not one of us — the “us” being the genuine red-white-and-blue Americans who the ad was aimed at.
That is heavy. Quite frankly, Herbert is near hysteria: “The racial fantasy factor in this presidential campaign is out of control.”
And could it be that there is a RELATIONSHIP between Mr. Obama’s falling poll numbers and his playing of the race card? The American people — even white people — are decent, good people who overwhelmingly abhore REAL cases of racism. But they also detest the race card being flapped about, especially when a candidate is cornered because of his inability to handle the job of being a presidential candidate, let alone being a president.
Then I read this self-pitying drivel by Mr. Herbert — despite the fact that it is Obama’s OWN campaign that has promoted him as a hip pop icon!
Mr. Obama has to endure these grotesque insults with a smile and heroic levels of equanimity. The reason he has to do this — the sole reason — is that he is black.
Mr. Herbert, you’re an able (albeit not great) essayist, but your hypersensitivity is getting the best of you.
By your standards, there is nothing we can say against Mr. Obama that cannot be construed by you as racist.
Why can’t YOU see what most of America sees? That it is Mr. Obama and his campaign who have turned him into a “pop icon.”
That it is HE who has replaced the American flag with his giant O on the tail of his campaign plane? (While we’re speaking of symbols, just what is that giant O a symbol of, Mr. Herbert?)
That it is HE who put the word “President” on his plush seat on his incredibly expensive campaign plane.
That it is HE who okayed the use of a faux presidential seal on his lecturn.
Yet you twist Mr. McCain’s correct satire of Mr. Obama’s own iconic campaign strategy into somehow being highly sexualized, featuring two white blonde women. No. That’s not it at all.
Speaking of icons, why don’t you take to task the vile, misogynistic “lyrics” of Ludacris and Snoop Dog, both of whom Obama admires and listens to?
But, then, those are only insulting to women, and they had better get used to it, right?
:::::::::::::::::::::::::
NoQuarterUSA Action Of The Day: We ask that you take part in the I Own My Vote Virtual Platform Committee Meeting now! It takes five minutes. Click here to start. If you have not yet signed the pledge, click here to do so.










































I am getting sick of this bogus racism.
This is the true face of racism.
http://www.metacafe.com/watch/291638/clayton_bigsby/
Is Bob Herbert secretly a paid staffer for John McCain? If so, he is not being paid enough.
Thanks Bob for doing everything you can to sink Barack.
I’m wondering why Bob Herbert didn’t ask BHO why he felt a need to give a speech in front of a giant German … er, penis, then!
I agree with you–I never thought Herbert was quite as much of an idiot as he suddenly appears to be! The only explanation is he’s taken a check from McCain, or something!
Of course the Der Siegel is phallic. Most monuments and skyscrapers are, but that one in particular has a distinct following. German leather daddies probably relish the column’s Nazi history.
OH FOR CRYIN OUT LOUD !……SHEEEEESH!
That said….Good Post Susan….This is getting hysterical….LOL
Pet Rocks…Chia Pet…Hula Hoops… They all come and go.
maybe we should just write in pet rock for POTUS. We’d get better results than from Obama. The pet rock might actually somehow fix the economy.
LOL. I found my mood ring from the seventies in the back of a drawer when I did my spring cleaning. It turns black every time I watch Obama on television. (OOPS!!! Maybe I should call that color really, really dark gray now.)
Hmmmm. I must be getting old as I missed that BIG O that he’s promoting. i guess he’s never really “turned me on”.
(Actually, I always thought it was the BIG BO – and all that BO connotes!).
I have said all along, Obama has set race relations back years as now we’re all treading on eggshells least we be called racists. SHAME ON HIM.
That o is actually a zero.
I think it is a sexual symbol degrading to women.
(just joking — but, between me and Bob, one of us has to have a sense of humor)
Ha!!!!
lmao! now that makes sense!
Bob Herbert sounds like he’s off his nut. All this bother over nothing. Britney and Paris are vapid, pop icons. So is Barack. Anyone reading anything more into that ad is grasping for straws to drink more Obama kool-aid with.
Too much viagra..its everywhere OY!
Add Eugene Robinson to the Bob Herbert list.
A comment found on Robinson’s article today —
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/04/AR2008080401824.html?hpid=opinionsbox1
>>>If Obama gets elected President, there will be no way to criticize him, oppose him on any issue or question him. At any moment he chooses, he’ll trot out traumatized black voices who will beat their chests and cry “racist” and “victim” to whatever hapless politician is trying to oppose Obama on an issue for his constituents.
Obama’s going to use the dysfunction of black trauma to smack down any white person who doesn’t fall in line.
Hi Joseyj
I could not find this comment in the article thatyou reference above.
Who said it? Robinson? or a blogger?
I agree strongly with comment. Based upon Sen Obama’s track record in Chicago style politics, his recent FISA vote I am very concerned that IF he wins in November- he (and his puppetmasters) will do everything possible to destroy any peaceful, democratic venues for public dissent on his policies or decisions. Sick as the thought is, there are many billionaires and billionaire wanna bees that would look forward to violence and physical (vs just ideological) revolutions INSIDE our country. When you destroy the middle class, eliminate freedom of speech and slowly strip away our constitutional rights…well…this is a recipe for violence in our society- kind of reminds one of what happened in the 60’s and 70’s here. The elimination of Peaceful dissension will breed violent outbursts and thoughts of physical revolutions . There are many citizens in this country who are very experienced in this from of physical versus ideological and cultural revolution-based upon their past actions-so- they wont be too worried to see this form of dissent rise up again. Now, they are just waiting for the right ‘issue’ to surface to cause domestic chaos so that we can revert to behaving like animals towards each other- and they can redistribute wealth and snatch political power be slowly and deliberately destroying our US constitution. And democracy? Oh well, that will just have to be collateral damage…
I always liked snObama.
What will this loon see next? The black helicopters with muffled rotors hovering over Obama supporters?
Great post Susan! LUDACRIS!
I thought Herbie was off his race baiting game.
The easier go to is they are WHITE symbols.
Okay, all this tells me is that Bob Herbert has phallic symbols on his mind.
I totally agree KC. Herbert’s head is excessively preoccupied. Even Freud said that often, a cigar in a dream is “just a cigar.”
Yesterday Ed Schultz explained why McCain attended the biker rally in Sturgis SD with these words: “Maybe McCain’s noticed Obama’s big lead with those hard-workin’ WHITE MEN in the heartlan’…”
Please, someone show me a poll that has Obama leading among white men, let alone leading by a big margin. He’s barely ahead among WOMEN.
Ed Schultz, pulling stats out of his ass, AGAIN.
Herbert writes: “Mr. Obama has to endure these grotesque insults with a smile and heroic levels of equanimity. The reason he has to do this — the sole reason — is that he is black.”
In actuality it has been President Clinton and Hillary who have ‘endured…grotesque insults with a smile and heroic levels of equanimity.” Both were labelled racist and nothing is further from the truth. And Hillary was attacked with the worst sexism I have ever seen yet you never heard her whine or complain like Obama does every minite of every day. Where was Herbert when that was going on?
“…just what is that giant O a symbol of, Mr. Herbert?)”
O ver
“with a smile and heroic levels of equanimity?”
Are you kidding me. He whines and cries at the least slight, and the media comes screaming to his defense. Heroic level of equanimity?” ROTFLMO!
“equanimity”
That’s what BO does every morning. He sits and
instructs himself to:
“Focus, Visualize, and say I’ll win’ Ommm Ommm Ommm”
(his O)
“Obama lost 16% of voters 18-29″
There’s “Hope” for some of those kids after all.
Maybe having them hang around here wasn’t such a good idea.
I think some have gone out door knocking and gotten an earful from eductated voters and it isn’t as fun as they thought it would be! I plan to educucate as much as possible!
I am also having fun with different groups who call me. Last night I got a call from the Human Rights Campaign (HRC) and went on their schpeil about GLBT rights and we need your help…I said, Oh, who are they endorsing for President? The guy said: Obama (in a kind of like Duh tone) and I said: Oh, that’s too bad. Obama makes me puke and I would never support him or any group who does. You can just wait all eternity and pray he helps you. Bye.
I have never gotten calls from groups like this before, just mail and email requests for donations. Now they are calling. Are the numbers down? Probably because of the economy and probably because of these endorsements. NARAL also called me. I gave then the same headache. I will continue to do so and suggest they support Hillary Clinton.
“….heroic levels of equanimity…”
Bob Herbert is an asshole and a fool. Obama is nobody’s hero and he is not suffering from some conspiratorial racial attack. He is an inexperienced light-weight who had no business even running for president. I mean really think about that. Some of us posting on this very board (not me) have more experience and qualifications than Obama, but we aren’t running for fugging president. The only reason he is running is because he’s been propped up. Not because he has any accomplishments that make him a good candidate. He’s a propped up, shouldhaveneverrun phony.
Herbert had better get a prescription for Xanax fast because as BHO’s numbers continue to fall (even in Massachusetts they are free-falling! lol http://www.washtimes.com/news/2008/aug/04/poll-obamas-lead-whittling-mass/), he’s going to need it.
LOL…I’m with you sister Sugar ! You are righteous…..
Lemme guess….hmmmm…..Herbert is White…Male….Full of Phony Guilt….Has a Man Crush on Barry…..aaaaand some serious unresolved MOMMY Issues….
Oh and an OBVIOUS PHALLIC OBSESSION….DO I GET FREUD GENIUS POINTS NOW….chuckle….
I was listening to him on Morning Joe when he made that statement, thank god for tivo. I rewind to make sure I heard him correctly. Bob Herbert can now officially commit himself next to Eugene Washington in the “frecking nut house.”
Sheeesh!……I kinda feel like a TITANIC Berg Spotter….
lol so true about some of us having more qualifications. I dunno who I’m going to vote for yet, but maybe I’ll just write myself in since I think even I’d be a better Pres. than Obama.
Actually…if I was Pres. Hillary would be my VP and then I’d step down! lol
I also enjoyed Zogby’s explanation for Obama’s “slippage” (losing 9 points among women is called “slippage” in Zogby’s world, he is so in the tank for Obama:) “part of the reason may be Obama’s perceived reversals of his positions on issues such as the war…..”
HAHAHAHAHA. Perceived? No, Mr. Zogby, they are ACTUAL REVERSALS. And there are actually people out there who supported Obama because of these issues and will NOT support him as he abandons them. GET IT?
Is that like shrinkage?
ROFLMAO…..and a sputter ! I love that episode…..George is a favorite.
” WORLDS COLLIDE!…..THEY JUST DO….” – George Costanza / Seinfeld
They’re in the tank.
He was in the pool.
The only person who is possibly more arrogant about ob than ob himself, is Herbert. I glanced at his column occasionally, when I still read that rag, and every single time I did it made me cringe. He is a cheerleader and he is blinded by color, period.
Reminds me of the projection used by ob’s campaign itself constantly. Whenever they are guilty of something they point that same finger at the opponent.
It is easy to see what scandal or misstep is coming up next from ob when we pay attention to his attacks.
He is the ultimate phallus, as in big stupid prick.
No offense meant to phallic bearers or their packages.
If Mac wanted to go phallic, he could have just posted a picture of Jesse with a surgical knife!
Can you imagine some of these pundits when Ofraudma loses by the landslide? Are they all going to cry and have hissy fits?
notify sean hannity of new developments on colb.
if several people do this he might just check it out.
Thanks Susan for another great post.
I especially appreciate the warning not to choke. I made sure to put my coffee down, and good thing or I would have spit it right back up laughing!
If he selects Bayh, you were way ahead of the curve, Obama Bayh! I love it. Reverse it Bayh Obama.
LOL !! That’s funny!!
Could also be :
Obama Bayh bye !!
Exactly!!
And Obamabots excoriated Hillary for being a Centrist – and then if Obama picks Bayh, a Centrist….
Obamabot kids were soooo duped!
Obama Bayh bye!! love it
I feel like the Obama camp is intentionally making this stuff up (even though it’s weird stuff) just to keep themselves in the news.
It does distract people from looking at issues and having real debates, which is a benefit to Obama.
Obama is the one who always puts that race card out there and the media makes him out to be the victim but I think that people are starting to catch on. In his own words they will bamboozle you just like he does.
Perhaps the reason obama’s poll numbers slip every time he plays the race card is because even his supporters realize that they could be labeled as “RACIST” if they say or do anything that obama and his minion don’t agree with. Maybe they are asking themselves, if he gets elected will we have the 21st century adaptation of McCarthyism?
Obama supporters are really, really reaching with this accusations. Phallic symbols? Moses a racist symbol? I’ve often read Herbert’s essays in the NY Times and for the most part, I’m aligned with his pov. He’s a good writer. But on this subject, he’s gone to the far side.
And I agree, there’s a frantic edge to the remarks. I think the Obama camp feels the shift in the public’s mood, which is reflected in the poll numbers. Obama manages to shine in the short run, but this over-exposure has been damaging. Voters are hearing more, seeing more and it ain’t pretty. All the slack Obama was given during the primaries is now catching up, and people aren’t willing to give him the benefit of the doubt. Nor should we, not when the risks are so great.
As HRC noted earlier in the primary: running for POTUS isn’t a tea party.
Aaaaand…..THAT KITCHEN GETS AWFULLY HOT…..This is a riot….Hysterical…
Susan, I thank you again for all you do and for the laugh.
Another thing just hit me about the non-penile ad.
While Herbert is imagining phallus symbols from other countries and forgetting all about ob’s poor choice of location in Germany, there was speculation a few months ago about insertions or should I say penetration of anti-Hillary material into her own ads. Pun intended.
Whether they were subliminal messages or just poor advertising gimmicks, the inclusion of such things as “trooper gate” into her ads is highly suspicious, eh?
Well, now it is water under the bridge, but if anybody has the right to claim subliminal unconscious tampering it is Hillary, and with her own advertising dollars.
Hemmer on FoX News just teased “can Hillary take the nom away from BHO”……can’t wait to hear what this is about.
If they arm wrestled for it.
Or had a battle of wits.
Or bowled.
Or debated.
Or voted.
You win.
SCORE!
lol you two are brilliant!
After watching Bob Herbert go on and on about the “phallic leaning tower of Pisa” on Morning Joe, some may think that he’s bat-shit-crazy.
Personally, I think he’s a racist who harbors deeply-held prejudices against Italians with erectile dysfunction.
He does not suffer from ED, he suffers from NBAA (no balls at all).
lmao Poor Herbert. He’s become an embarrassing blind apologist for Barry [O] Soetoro. He’s like Keith Obamaman. They tossed their self respect out the window when they sold out journalism to do anythig and all possible to promote B O, and now that it’s becoming clear they did it for a loser, they can’t admit their mistake and are freaking out.
They made their beds. Now they have to sleep with the fleas as the dogs they are.
Is Paul Krugman the only straight guy at the NY Times?
How about sane?
LOL…..Krugman is definitely OK with his Inner Matzo….chuckle….
However….Obama has a serious conflict with his INNER CRACKER…..I’m just sayin’
And Rasmussen shows a second day with McCain holding a one point lead.
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/daily_presidential_tracking_poll
There’s only one way to break this tie — Hillary!
Never liked Herbert
Bill Hemmer on Fox just hinted at a Hillary comeback!
Meagan didn’t like it. Is she a PUG? ARGH!
woohoooo!
lets see what Gallup comes up with.
B O was 2 days with a one point lead, then they actually tied. That’s big for GALLUP. Then yesterday, they went up 3 points. Of course, that’s margin of error, so it looks like they are statiscally TIED in all polls.
mmm hmm
What is it with the manlove by the male media for Oblowme?
I understood Edwards as a pretty, albeit blinky guy, but Oblowme?
Even Mitt Romney looked like one of those stiff Sears models, but Oblowme?
Dumbo ears, cyanide lips and a scrawny bod. Yuck!
That’s no fantasy man.
there’s NO accounting for taste!
right? lol
I know Mechelle!! Not a fantasy at all!! I think Mittens is actually quite attractive. In his “stiff Sears model” way…lmfao Gosh, that is exactly what he looks like!!!!
Anyway, BHO is hardly fodder for a self-love moment. lol
I’m waiting for Obama to come out with his own “O MAGAZINE” ala Oprah style.
Her head, his ears, won’t fit on a news stand.
Alfred E Neuman’s Kenyan Twin!
Actually, he will soon start spelling G’ as gOd
(his O).
KUDOS SUSANUNPC !!! Your post is RIGHT ON.
Bob Herbert needs urgent professional help. And so does the the editorial of the NYT: aren’t they even a bit embarrased to publish this?
There was a very good piece yesterday by Juan Williams
on Obama’s exploitation of the race card and how that
affects polls and is getting old with people.
I recommend it:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121781107977608809.html?mod=opinion_main_commentaries
Now JUAN is RIGHT ON almost every time I hear him! And never afraid to stand up to his co-hosts if he disagrees with them!
I like that! He is true to himself first!
A sign of a secure man. (for some of us women it’s a real turn on)
or at least very much appreciated!
Juan is comfortable in his own skin–a secure man. You feel it and know it when you are in his presence. I can’t even imagine him thinking like Bob Herbert or calling anyone a racist if they disagreed with him or even said they didn’t like him. If Juan was running, I would vote for him in a minute. Not Obama, never, ever.
I saw Bob Herbert on “Morning Joe” yesterday. It was a true CLASSIC! LMAO!
Funny how it’s so blatantly phallic–and not to mention so utterly obvious that it is so, when a white guy uses the image in question in a 30sec ad, but it’s clearly NOT when Obama chooses give a grandiose speech in front of the GIANT PENIS in question for 20-30 minutes before at least 100,000 white women (assuming that 1/2 of the 200,000 attendees were females).
Like Orlando Patterson and scurrilous his race-baiting of Hillary’s Texas ad during the Texas Primary/Caucus, Herbert is totally in over his head.
The day before or so, Donna Brazille said on CNN that the Britney/Paris ad was clearly racist since McCain used two young skanky white women to make comparisons with Obama instead of Denzel Washington who is “a handsome black man”. Talk about another CLASSIC moment. (LOL, now we know what gives Donna wet dreams at night.) WTF?!? Let’s get this straight:
1. IF YOU COMPARE OBAMA TO ANOTHER BLACK MAN, e.g. Jesse Jackson (a great civil rights leader), IT IS BLATANTLY RACIST!
2. IF YOU COMPARE OBAMA TO WHITE WOMEN, THEN IT IS ALSO BLATANTLY RACIST…
3. The obvious remainder than is Jeremiah Wrights comparison of Obama to Jesus, who according to Wright, was a black man living amongst hostile whites. It’s no wonder why the African American community refers to Obama as our “chosen son”.
Nevermind that on stage, Obama has consistently surrounds himself with white women–to the point where he DESPARATELY does NOT want to be seen with toO many blacks in the background, and certainly not those veil-wearing muslims. He constantly has white women introducing him, kissing him, etc. His self-promoting ads conspicuously leave out his lovely brown skinned half-Indonesian sister, his good-for-nothing Kenyan father who abandoned him, nor any of his dark skinned Kenyan relatives. OBAMA’S ADS ONLY SHOW HIM SURROUNDED BY HIS LILY WHITE MOTHER, HIS LILY WHITE GRANDMOTHER (whom he threw under the bus), AND HIS LILY WHITE GRANDFATHER.
It’s abundantly clear that Nader is dead right about Obama: “He’s talking white.”
Obama is deathly afraid of appearing with too many blacks, apart from NAACP functions and the like, which is why he skipped out on the 40th anniversary of the MLK assassination, and instead constantly surrounds himself in both TV ads and on stage with lily white people, particularly lily white women.
What a vacuous idiot…
What was Joe S.’s (and the rest) reaction to Herbert’s comments?
Joe was Laughing his ass off! The only one that got his point was Mika.
You mean Mika agree with Herbert???
funny, but why when it is a black candidate do they always use pics of white blondes?
just like harold ford, they always use the white blonde chicks.
what a weird coincidence!?!?!?
the outrage about one pundit’s read of the subtext of campaign ads is quite rich coming from people that claim that the use of the word “periodically” and scratching your face is evidence of misogyny and that asking debate questions about illegal immigrants and driver’s licenses is akin to “wilding”
shut up shit for brains, go find your imaginary playmate, this isn’t a babysitting service. You’re rambling about nothing.
babysitting service..love. that. wodiej LMAO!
Yeah Stevie why don’t you just crack that ole whip and make us get in line.
Obama compared himself to Paris Hilton longggg before McCain’s ad…
“Andy Warhol said we all get our 15 minutes of fame,” then Senator-elect Obama said at a Gridiron dinner in December, 2004. “I’ve already had an hour and a half. I mean, I’m so overexposed, I’m making Paris Hilton look like a recluse.”
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/07/30/the-paris-hilton-comparisons
I’m so overexposed, I’m making Paris Hilton look like a recluse.”
Good POint!
So you see? McCain’s ad hit the nail on the head! Obama is all about being a “celebrity” and not about being a “leader”.
But nobody anywhere seemed to have gotten the hint!
I read that McCain ad correctly.
This GE is going to be all about “being a celebrity” and nothing about “being a leader”….at least where BHO is concerned.
Good point, again.
Obama is a vacuous idiot. Britney and Paris are the perfect examples of vaccuous idiots. That they are blonde is irrevelvant.
BTW, Britney and Paris get a lot of attention simply because they are blonde–but this is the fault of the vacuous mainstream corporate media. McCain is merely using the the best examples of vacuousness that is out there already.
The anti-Harold Ford ad was blatantly racist since it suggested sex.
The three worst, most racist, most vile stereotypes on African American males is that they are inferior, they are criminals, and they lust after white women. THE MCCAIN BRITNEY/PARIS AD MAKE NO REFERENCE TO ANY OF THESE RACIST STEREOTYPES.
(Y-chromosomal DNA of many black males prove they (about 20-30%) are the descendants of white European males, i.e. the white masters were raping the slave women.)
steveeboy, I thought he “transcended race”? lmao Shut up. Who did you want them to use, Whoopi Goldberg? The point was to show the fawning media and celebrity. Get over it.
Actually it is white blondes who should be offended. They’re always depicted as “air heads” as in “dumb blondes”.
Love Juan Williams….a Lone Voice of Sanity in the MSM Wilderness…
A syndicated columnist in our local rag did an article about the treatment he received from journalist for staying with Hillary. Herbert was one….they were demanding he join the “coronation” and he declined! I say “kudos” to him…and kiss my seat cushion to the rest!
A little more on what’s happening in Massachusetts poll-wise:
http://www.washtimes.com/news/2008/aug/04/poll-obamas-lead-whittling-mass/
That’s what many of us have been saying for months. Where’s his experience doing anything?
I like how these people always put that little tidbit about race in their analysis. The question I have is can any person back up the assertion that being brown skinned hurts Obama in any way, especially in Massachusetts. It always sounds like they are making excuses for the guy, his inane policy flip flops, and his disgusting personality.
Being friends with the governor, who came in on HOPE AND CHANGE and ran the same exact same campaign as BHO on the state level, and who is a HUGE DISAPPOINTMENT, is what is hurting BO in MA.
They’ve been there, done that, and bought the tee shirt.
Deval Patrick was Axelrod’s first test campaign. It’s the same bullshit with Obama, down to the colors on the signs.
Clinton Fan- I agree. You are correct.
Sen Obama hired Axelrod’s boutique PR firm to manage his campaign. This ’boutique’ firm specializes in helping black candidates (especially African American urban city mayoral candidates) package themselves & their message to appeal to sympathetic white and angry black voters.
His -Sen Obama’s -strategy involves promoting race baiting in an effort to get sympathy towards his campaign efforts and anger towards his opponents” so voters will want to vote for him-Sen Obama- the self-proclaimed V I C T I M.
Read all about it…
http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=aa0cd21b-0ff2-4329-88a1-69c6c268b304
The New Republic, “Race Man” by Sean Wilentz
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20070219/hayes “Obama”s Media Maven” by Chrisptoher Hayes. 2/19/08 issue
The public has to understand that we were all ‘played with’. Good people fighting for justice were manipulated.
Sen Obama does not care about AA issues or issues of justice-unless it is politically the right thing to do which can help his career.
Many of us who truly fight for justice could see right through his campaign.
The NAACP should be OUTRAGED at what Sen Obama has done to his own people.
James Baldwin -in “The Fire Next Time” writes a letter to his nephew James.(Page 7 1993 edition) in an effort to provide the young African American 15 year old boy with some insight as to what he will face …AND MUST FACE…as he grows up in our society.
“This innocent country set you down in a ghetto in which, in fact, it intended that you should perish.Let me spell out precisely what I mean by that, for the heart of the matter is here, and the root of my dispute with my country.You were born where you were born and faced the future that you faced because you were black and for no other reason”.
What would the honorable James Baldwin say if he were alive today and saw what Sen Obama did to his own people in District 13 in Chicago?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Baldwin_%28writer%29
PLEASE EDUCATE YOUR FELLOW VOTERS.
http://vodpod.com/watch/857180-why-chicagoans-are-against-obama
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hP-YoB5mnZs&eurl=http://formerobamasupporters.com/
BO is going to have to fight for Blue MA.
That eleven point spread is fungible. Plenty of people in MA are simply lying to pollsters because they don’t want to be dealt a race card.
Also, MA has already had the BO experience…with the governor (that YES WE CAN shit has been played out before). The man came in on a chorus of Hope and Change, and now he’s drifting on a sea of … irritation and incompetence.
Fooled me once, heh heh, won’t git fooled agin!!
Clinton Fan wrote: “That eleven point spread is fungible. Plenty of people in MA are simply lying to pollsters because they don’t want to be dealt a race card.”
In the past, one might say that people who lied to pollsters vis-a-vis the “Bradly-Wilder effect” were slightly racist on top of being afraid of being seen as racist.
HOWEVER, FOR OBAMA, THERE’S A NEW PARADIGM: THOSE WHITES WHO WOULD LIE TO POLLSTERS ARE NOT RACIST AT ALL, BUT MERELY ARE AFRAID OF BEING SEEN AS RACIST. TRUTH IS, OBAMA’S FLIP-FLOPPING IS NOW AT EPIC PROPORTIONS. NO ONE CAN ACCUSE MAYOR TOM BRADLEY OR VIRGINIA GOV. DOUGLAS WYLDER OF SUCH A THING. AND WORSE, THEY DIDN’T REPEATEDLY & BLATANTLY RACE BAIT, PRE-EMPTIVELY SAYING GARBAGE LIKE: “BY THE WAY, DID YOU I MENTION THAT HE WAS BLACK?”
Nor did they ever say “TYPICAL WHITE PERSON”.
Nor did they ever accuse working class whites who don’t vote for them of being: “bitter… clinging to ANTIPATHY towards those that are NOT like them… ANTIPATHY TOWARDS IMMIGRANTS.” (RACIST OR NOT, NOBODY LIKES TO BE CALLED A “RACIST”. AND THOSE THAT ARE NOT RACIST HAVE EVERY RIGHT TO BE PISSED OFF AT BEING LUMPED IN WITH RACIST.)
Nor did Bradley and Wilder ever defend a degenerate (reverse) racist like Jeremiah Wright who said “Bill Clinton did us like he did Monica!” WTF?!? When did Bill Clinton screw over the black community?!? Bill’s policies enabled 22,000,000 poor people to enter the ranks of the middle class, many of whom were black. Under Bush43, 1 MILLION people have sunk back into poverty.
As well all know, Jeremiah also race-baited and gender-baited the Hell out of our girl, Hillary. He verbally brutalized her and Bill.
For working class whites, Bill and Hillary are a known quantity: Eight glorious years of unprecedented peace and prosperity. The Clinton-Gore administration is probably the most honest of all time: Only about a half a dozen officials were indicted and convicted of corruption. I can’t remember the exact number, but there were at least 10-20 times more people indicted and convicted under Ronald Reagan and Bush 41. Perhaps much more than that! Funny how the corporate media always portrays Clinton-Gore as corrupt, but Reagan-Bush as paragons of virtue.
Further, for working class whites, that whole $70 Million Ken Starr episode was nothing more than a rightwing political assassination attempt at a damn good President.
Obama is an unknown quantity, or rather was. Now he is increasingly seen a degenerate flip-flopping race-baiter. And a arrogant one at that.
When the Obama-Bradley-Wilder effect kicks in, and it will, Obama will need more than an 11 point cushion to win. What a friggin’ loser.
Harold Ford had some good advice for Bob Herbert this morning on Scarborough. The essence of it was this:
Shut up about it. Stop the narrative about race already. You’re hurting Obama more than helping him by whining and carping about the RACE issue. By doing so, they make it all the MORE ABOUT RACE. That doesn’t help Barack Obama.
That was exactly Juan Williams’ point as well on his
excellent piece yesterday (I posted the link in another comment above).
Harold Ford is a smart guy. A really good one too. He should have slammed those racist bastards who race-baited him but he didn’t. Ford is not one to play the race card even when he should have.
But then again, in Tennessee, race-baiting is suicidal for black candidates. The same is true for the general election.
Obama got too cocky: Race-baiting only works in the primaries, and even then, it is dangerous, i.e. Why do Puma’s exist?
I am one of those Zogby pollees they send my and email every week or two and I make sure I say NO BO!
I USED to get them up until the last few months
and I was always pro HILLARY in my answers
I’ve not received one from them in ages! I guess they didn’t like my kind of “CHANGE”
lmao – zogby is rarely accurate (that I’ve noticed)
neither is gallup
So you guys are basically saying that Zogby doesn’t do random sampling? If they use the same people over and over then their sampling technique is highly flawed and completely inaccurate. If all of these polling companies are using similar deceptive techniques then there really is no telling what the true numbers are. We all know that they use loaded or misleading questions and other techniques to derive their favored results; however, I always thought they did some sort of random sampling just to give their data more credibility.
What if all of their contributors were initially drawn from a very large, mechanically-chosen, random sample based upon an accurate sampling frame?
The odds of repeatedly using the same contributors in a population of 300 million would be damned near impossible. Each survey should be independent so to improve the power of their data they would need to generate a random sample every time. At least that is how I would approach the task. Unfortunately, these people do not really give a clear, detailed explanation of their methodology so we are really speculating here. To me it sounds like they have a defined list of contributors, they do a survey with those contributors and then derive their results. After their results are shown to be erroneous or not what they were looking for they go back and massage their contributor list so that they can correct the errors in the future or they can get their survey to fall more in line with what they actually want to find. Remember, somebody has to pay the bills and it isn’t about pure scientific research.
Thanks. I was thinking that there is significant longitudinal value to polling the same group through time, though they would need to add young ones to replenish the youth category.
I appreciate that new surveys limit evolutionary biases in the results.
I agree that there is definite value to longitudinal surveys. I guess it depends on what you are trying to accomplish with your survey. I think they are very effective in many scientific studies where you study a phenomenon over time. I will have to do some research to figure out the efficacy of longitudinal polling though. I must admit that it is something that I am not completely comfortable discussing as my areas of study are science and education and I prefer experimental data to survey laden data but in education we do lots of surveys.
Zogby was way off from the others in primaries because he is affected. his brother Jim is the president of the Arab American Institute and he works for the Obama campaign. This is particularly insteresting because as of today, even Zogby can’t fudge how badly things are going.
What if McCain is actually leading by say a 55-45 margin or 57-43 margin nationally? What if in all the key battleground states McCain really has a huge lead? What is the effect of dishonest pollsters having on our electoral cycles?
Herbert and Obama have got to get a clue. Here’s the clue they got to get: the vast, vast majority of Americans do not care about the color of someone’s skin, when making a decision as to who would best serve them. Thirty five years ago my state of Massachusetts elected a black man US Senator, Edward Brooke, and the color of his skin was a total non-issue, but his political party was (Republican)in this Dem state. He still got elected several times, and became a force in Washington. Maybe that’s why the O-Man could only pull in 37 % of the AA vote in this state, we saw past his skin color to what a phony he is.
Only 37% of AA vote, wow! That is impressive.
I’m guessing that the demographic of the 37% was probably under age 30.
WHAT????
4 real???? I thought I read he never got less than 70 percent of the black vote in ANY state?
really??? wow that would give me MUCH hope! Otherwise I will always be thinking that MOST Blacks think like the people in that congregation of Wright, Pfleger, Moss & Meeks!
And CHECK IT OUT? If it were any other candidate that had more than ONE crazy ass long time PREACHER it would be perhaps ignored. The fact that these kinds of FLAME THROWERS are so abundant in BAMBI’s LIFE HISTORY should be like some FESTIVAL OF RED FLAGS FOR MOST CRITICAL THINKING AMERICANS!!!
put any other candidate’s name in place of Bambi’s (is what I mean)
and said badly
This was before the Obama slime kneecapped clinton and called him a racist over his “fairytale” remark. That’s when they artificially got the AA attention. Without that kneecapping, Obama would be a footnote today and he knows it.
But one thing’s for sure, the Mass people recognized Deval patrick in him and that was enough to make America’s bluest state say Peeeeeeeee uuuuuuuuuuuuu.
John Stewart answered this question for Herbert…because Obama spoke at these places or something…let me get the link for ya…
http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index.jhtml?videoId=178314&title=the-race-genie
30yrdem-not any more
Thanks for this link!!!
This skit is excellent-funny, intelligent, sarcastic.
The message gets through loud and clear.
When I saw that Herbert piece, I could only shake my head. I mean, to think like that, you have to either be a real pig who thinks about phalluses all the time or you are a demented fool looking for anything to protect a candidate who isn’t worth the powder to blow himself up. I was going to blog it, but I couldn’t stop shaking my head at the absurdity of it all. One would wonder how it is that these sycophants grasp at straws and make up subliminal cuts that don’t even exist, but they have no problem with Ludacris avoiding the subliminal and going right for a paralyzed McCain in a wheelchair. These people are nothing more than desperados pimping the despot.
The race card has become a big yawn thanks to its constant overuse by these jerks, so now we will move onto phallic symbols. And somebody needs to let Herbert know that the Leaning Tower of Pisa isn’t in Germany.
As for the polling, the truth is people are just sick and tired of watching Obama prance and preen and waffle his ass everywhere. He’s an arrogant ass and the longer his lips flap the more odious he acts and looks. He’s going down in November and anybody who thinks less is a fool. Wait till he does his Youth Movement stadium pitch in Denver. The adults in this country will be horrified at exactly who this man is starting to resemble. The guy is acting like a despot and people are sick of his assinine racist cracks. They are sick of his wife, even though they have tucked her away, her damage is done. They are sick of his flip flopping and then the denial that he is flip flopping. They are sick of his pandering and basically, they are sick of the longest running Truman Show in history. The McCain campaign is brilliant. I thought they were in a coma all this time. Instead they have been letting this preening Narcissist pee all over himself. They have found his achilles heel. mockery. He hates being mocked. He is far too superior in his Walter Mitty mind to be mocked. They mock him and he hates it. It freaks him out! I am thrilled. He is worthy of mockery. He has become a cartoon.
Let the show continue.
Amen you Uppity Woman you! He is a fool and he will be crushed in November. He and his goons will not be able to steal that general election. The MSM is still wary about calling McCain’s campaign genius, but they will have to call them such before we reach mid September. Obama is a phony and McCain might be in his 70’s, but his staff is not and they are going to stick it to Obama raw!
Here’s a nice related piece: Obama as “postmodern” (this term alone is enough to turn off probaby 75% of Americans. Even I, a Ph.D. and self-avowed nerd, hate the term):
http://blogs.usatoday.com/oped/2008/08/obama-the-postm.html
“One reason Obama seems arrogant is that he can never admit he was wrong, a common shortcoming of politicians. But Obama sometimes literally gets exasperated with people who think his words can mean anything other than what he thinks they should mean. Even when he says things he later regrets such as on, say, the North American Free Trade Agreement, he merely says that his rhetoric got overheated, but that he was still accurate. When Jeremiah Wright, his pastor and “spiritual adviser” of 20 years, was caught on videotape (recorded and sold by Wright himself) saying things that contradicted everything Obama ever said about being a post-racial, moderate candidate, Obama simply said that that’s not the Jeremiah Wright he knows, as if his personal perspective settled the issue.
Would that I could have told my math teacher upon receiving a failing grade, “That’s not the math I know.”
On the troop surge, Obama’s position has changed countless times, but he says it’s unchanged. Worse, he has this grating habit of prefacing his new positions with something like “as I said at the time.” But he didn’t say “it” at the time, he said the opposite of “it.” But saying that he said “it” is, to him, the same as having said “it.”
We’re told that Obama is “post-racial,” but he invokes his own race whenever convenient (e.g., to suggest his opponents are racists, to win support of people who want to vote for him on account of his race). Indeed, the very idea that Obama is post-racial is postmodern claptrap, since only a black candidate can be post-racial, right? No one would say John McCain transcends race. If being post-racial is something only a (liberal) black politician can do, what is “post” about it? Post-racial is just another convenient term used to advance a left-wing agenda under the guise of some highfalutin buzzwords.”
Nice post and spot on. Thanks!
and if you play the record backward it say’s “Paul is dead”.
Obama is yesterday’s fad. No amount of negative, or positive for that matter, campaigning by his camp is going to stop the bleeding.
Voters have had it with the race baiting and the used car salesman banter on his non-existent achievements. 16% of his adoring and none too worldly base of 18-29 years olds is already gone. If that many have stopped abusing the kool-aid what will it be 30 days from now?
What Obombout and Co. hasn’t figured out is that for the largest percentage of voters, skin tone is never an issue. But, experience, history, and dubious associations with people and marxism are what counts in this POTUS race.
Obama is simply one of those deals that voters are stepping away from and saying it’s not good enough or the mechanism that is Obama is defective. It’s just that simple.
When I think of racism Obama’s name is the first one that comes to mind! The next name is Clyburn. And in the three times I have watched LBJ’s bio on the Civil Rights movement I bawl like a baby. And LBJ’s line that really gets me (after the Watts riots) “Why can’t they just say thank you?”………he put everything on the line to make Kennedy’s dream come true. (The irony in this is that Kennedy had a lukewarm reception to Civil Rights….at first!)
The big O stands for zero. McCain should use that O in an ad…. summing up Obama’s accomplishment = zero(O).
here is the script…
Obama’s change adds up to zero….
He changes from one positions to another and back..
His record adds up to zero….
Obama = Zero change (0)
It should be pointed out that Bob Herbert made some really-grotesquely amateurish mistakes in his phallic obsessed diatriabe:
1. The Leaning Tower of Piza is not use in the McCain Britney-Paris ad.
2. The Washington Monument was not either.
The giant penis that Herbert fantasized about was actually the Siegessäule, or Victory Column. “The monument was built in 1864 to commemorate Prussia’s victory over Denmark. When it was inaugurated, Prussia had defeated Austria during the Austro-Prussian war in 1866 and the Franco-Prussian war of 1870-71.”
Source: http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/07/20/europe/berlin.php
Herbert has seriously damaged himself. Talk about a dickhead.
Not to sound pompous here but Herbert is what we call a “pseudo-intellectual”. Take his use of the term “phallic symbol”. Rooted in a now-discredited Freudian theory of dream interpretation – anything longer than it is wide, and oriented more vertically than horizontally, could fit the bill. No need to limit yourself to towers (although Herbert does seem to have “seen” two towers that were not even in the ad – the Washington Monument and the Leaning Tower of Pisa) – a telephone pole in the background could suffice. Perhaps Herbert is transferring his need to see racism everywhere to “tower fixation”.
John wrote: “a telephone pole in the background could suffice.”
Legend has it that Freud once said: “Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.” LOL.
Herbert is a pathetic self-fellating dickhead. And so is that Eugene “I’ve-Got-a-Giant-ManCrush-on-Barack” Robinson.
Anyhow, someone posted this link above wherein John Stewart noticed other phallus related symbolism, namely Obama’s “big black balls” and his arrogant tea-bagging of us all! Yikes!
http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index.jhtml?videoId=178314&title=the-race-genie