Just my .02 as I really would like to help with this “problem”…..Trying to get Greta at FOX by phone might be worth a try….use a “private” or “matter you’d like investigated”…or whatever you can come up with to get thru to her personally. You might also mention the “PUMA” group.

We know the CEO of the security firm contracted was in O’s pocket.

I smell State Dept. as well. We both know who.

We need the official name changes on him as well.

Documented.

P.S. At this point, I guess he’ll lock gran away just in case someone can get to her.

You sound like you’re getting a bit rattled Strawberry. You’re like a rabbit caught in the spotlight – not knowing which way to turn when a few people start shining a bit of light on the subject

1. Anyone claiming to perform “document analysis” of a scanned image is not credible.

I know what you’re driving at, but no one has claimed they did a document analysis. Everyone involved has made it abundantly clear that they have been examining digital images.

2. If you were a credible professional in document analysis and had concrete, verifiable evidence of document fraud, would you be posting it on message boards or presenting to a court/ the media?

Some would, if they wanted to be sure that the information was circulated immediately and not “lost” or bogged down in red tape. The internet is packed with information like that.

Why would any expert with credible evidence hide behind an internet alias?

Self protection.

3. Formulating theories of why or how something happened when is not credible when there is no solid evidence on which to form the theory. It’s akin to building a house without a foundation.

It makes sense if the object is only to smear a person. Look what happened with Al Gore and the lies that were told about him saying he invented the internet. I only found out last year that it was a fabrication, but I and many others believed that there was something a bit strange about Al Gore.

Look what happened to the Republican leader and that stuff about him being well treated and a traitor in Vietnam while in captivity. Stories don’t have to be true to be damaging.

Fortunately in some countries people are being convicted for that sort of thing, although it hasn’t quite reached the U.S. yet.

Granted, the Obama campaign’s initial reluctance to provide documentation and the subsequent inconsistencies with the documents later provided does raise valid questions. But that is all anyone has- questions.

It wasn’t relevant until Obama became the presumptive nominee, but once that happened, he released the information within about 48 hours. To have done so earlier might have been construed as him having tickets on himself as the next president.

The more people trying to formulate conspiracy theories based on questions and no solid evidence, the less credibility this issue will have. There is no evidence to support name changes, conspiratorial flights or any of these other theories.

Of course there’s no evidence, and there never will be, but like I said – the name of the game is SMEARING. When the CULT of the COLB get the bullet proof info they are seeking they’ll simply move onto something else – shouting Arab, Muslim, Illegitimate, Indonesian, Koran, Consorted with criminals, Consorted with terrorists, blah, blah, blah.

There are only 2 questions: 1. What was the problem with initially producing these documents? 2. Why are the submitted documents inconsistent with others?

There WAS no problem initially. He produced info that satisfied all but a small number of dedicated smearers.

The IS no “inconsistency” between Obama’s 2007 certificate (2nd version) and the other 2007 certificates (2nd version). The marriage certificate has AN IDENTICAL border and we have 6 witnesses who say that Obama’s certificate is either IDENTICAL TO or “looks like” other 2007 (2nd version) COLBS. It has also been verified as a genuine COLB by Hawaii Health.

Since he’s running a meta-campaign, you basically have to show what a clown he is and make him a laughingstock.

He’s so brittle… so making him look dumb really really really annoys him

Things were grim for an illegitimate child – society did not encourage the use of a biological father’s name to illegitimate kids

I merely made an observation and offered my opinions on how to maintain credibility with this issue rather than have it turn into another easily dismissed conspiracy theory.

I fail to see any purpose to your ridiculous attacks or demands, nor your flaming.

1. Anyone claiming to perform “document analysis” of a scanned image is not credible.
2. If you were a credible professional in document analysis and had concrete, verifiable evidence of document fraud, would you be posting it on message boards or presenting to a court/ the media? Why would any expert with credible evidence hide behind an internet alias?
3. Formulating theories of why or how something happened when is not credible when there is no solid evidence on which to form the theory. It’s akin to building a house without a foundation.

Granted, the Obama campaign’s initial reluctance to provide documentation and the subsequent inconsistencies with the documents later provided does raise valid questions. But that is all anyone has- questions.

The more people trying to formulate conspiracy theories based on questions and no solid evidence, the less credibility this issue will have. There is no evidence to support name changes, conspiratorial flights or any of these other theories.

There are only 2 questions: 1. What was the problem with initially producing these documents? 2. Why are the submitted documents inconsistent with others?

The more anyone deviates from these two points, the further you will get from any answers.

If Oblowme was adopted and his name is not what he has on the various state ballots – only a write-in will possibly be accepted.