RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

DNC Convention Platform

So, the DNC has been meeting in Pittsburgh over the weekend, determining the Platform for the upcoming Convention. As you know, I Own My Vote had a good survey that enables us to speak out for what WE wanted to be incldued in the Convention Platform. One of the so-called “victories” for the Hillary Clinton camp is the issue of universal health care (H/T to Jeralyn at TalkLeft). I suppose you can call it a “victory” that they discussed it, but as seems to be the case FAR too often with the DNC, it is but a watered-down version of what Clinton wanted, with no guarantees associated with it. Read it for yourself:

All Americans should have coverage they can afford; employers should have incentives to provide coverage to their workers; insurers and providers should ensure high quality affordable care; and the government should ensure that health insurance is affordable and provides meaningful coverage. As affordable coverage is made available, individuals should purchase health insurance and take steps to lead healthy lives.

Well, no freaking DUH that Americans should “take steps to lead healthy lives,” but HOW does this address one of the most PRESSING issues with healthcare in this country: it is PROHIBITIVELY expensive for MILLIONS of Americans! And MILLIONS of Americans DO NOT HAVE IT!!!!! This is yet another mamby-pamby milquetoast declaration from the DNC. Just HOW is this a “coup” for the Clinton Camp???

THIS is what Hillary Clinton said she wanted:

Her policy concept was UNEQUIVOCAL, and would have covered ALL AMERICANS!!!! And there was this completely assholic comment by the author of the TImes article:

Although the Obama campaign had final say on the language, there was pressure to incorporate the views of Mrs. Clinton as a way of placating her supporters, many of whom still harbor hard feelings from the contentious primary fight. The document also adopts Mrs. Clinton’s language to express the significance of her primary performance. “Our party is proud that we have put 18 million cracks in the highest glass ceiling,” it reads, ostensibly referring to her tally of her vote total.

Uh, it wasn’t JUST the horrible way the Obama Camp and the DNC treated Hillary Clinton, along with the MSM. It is the way the DNC has conducted itself during this season: disregarding documented evidence of fixed caucuses (the ONLY way Obama ended up with more delegates – far fewer actual Americans represented, but more delegates awarded.

That’s pretty easy when the candidate breaks election laws like having people INSIDE polling places with literature, or having people ripping down Clinton signs outside polling places, as well as ripping INTO Clinton supporters; or locking out the opponent’s supporters; or stealing packets to get signatures of people NOT in the caucus meeting, etc., etc.); treating states that were more for Clinton disparately from other states in the same situation; and STEALING VOTES FROM ONE CANDIDATE TO GIVE TO ANOTHER NOT ON THE BALLOT are just a FEW of the reasons we are angry.

If Hillary Clinton had lost fair and square, we would accept that. It was that the FIX seemed to be (and SEEMS to be) in for this sham of a candidate. THAT is why we are angry, Ms. Wheaton (of the NY Times). Try actually doing some real journalism next time, will ya??

Anyway, great job, DNC (and NY Times, who used the “coup” word in the first place). Once again, you have managed to take a great idea about Universal Health Care for ALL People, and make it meaningless. (Do these people take classes in how to be the most vague, fence-riding indecisive wimps EVER or something??) And you are proud of yourselves over it! Wow – how DO you people walk around with NO SPINE????? Boggles the mind…

Oh, but there is more, like on Immigration. The platform reads:

We support a system that requires undocumented immigrants who are in good standing to pay a fine, pay taxes, learn English, and go to the back of the line for the opportunity to become citizens. They are our neighbors, and we can help them become full tax paying, law-abiding, productive members of society. At the same time, we cannot continue to allow people to enter the United States undetected, undocumented, and unchecked. The American people are a welcoming and generous people, but those who enter our country’s borders illegally, and those who employ them, disrespect the rule of the law.

Well, okey dokey. What, no we all have to learn Spanish? Huh. I wonder how they missed THAT!!! Anywho – it isn’t anything TOO unexpected, I reckon. That is to say, no major policy shift or stand, for that matter. Same-o, same-o!!

And more will be coming out about the whole caucus concept as the weekend concludes. So, stay tuned!

Trackback URL

RSS Feed for This Post45 Comments »

Comment by BobO | 2008-08-10 16:52:53

Another Democratic Platform Draftreview from an economics view. Conclusion, not good.

Comment by Dawnelle Leona del Puma | 2008-08-10 17:13:10

awww sniff sniff

I MISS HER RALLIES!!! BAD!!!

I almost had her whole platform memorized I watched EVERY thing. It was something I totally looked forward to and sometimes WISH we DID have 57 states!! The whole thing had turned to HILLARY by Ohio (Texas really) clear to SEE for everyone but the koolaide huffers!! blech!

 

Comment by valsthewoman | 2008-08-10 17:35:08

AOL HAS AN ATICLE UP CALLING PUMAS SCAREY IT IS A BO TANK MAN OBVIOUSLY SORE THAT WE MAY WRECK THE TRAIN!
GO BLAST THE IDIOT WHO WROTE IT!
MY RESPONSE TO THE ARTICLAE WAS AS FOLLOWS:

I am sorry to inform you but it sounds to me like you are in the tank for Obama. PUMAS exist because the Democratic Party failed the United States Citizens by selecting a man that has not been honest with the public. He has a communist background (that McCain briefly insinuated speaking about Georgia), he has hidden homosexual and drug usage as late as 1999, he is an Indonesian and Kenyan Citizen, he has faked his Birth Certificate, he has liberal anti-American associations that committed terror in the name of war protests (William Ayres), he has Ha mas, Chavez, Cuba endorsements. The list could fill many pages of comments. You did not really do your homework when you wrote your article. If you want to educate yourself read http://www.hillaryloyalistnowformccain.com My eyes opened on May 31st 2008 when Obama took Michigan delegates that were not his and he campaigned in Florida when he was not allowed to. It was a farce of a Primary and I sadly regret to say that this Party is no longer a party that represents the small man in government that had no voice. It has become a self serving party to further socialist and Marxist style government. No thank you based on these reasons alone. I will give my vote to John McCain a man who is ready for the 3AM phone call.

Comment by JDW | 2008-08-10 18:21:04

Remember the Dan Rather 60 Minutes story on Bush and the TX National Guard? Rather, his reporters and the producers had enough documentation to prove Bush was a no show and his family connections allowed him to get away with it, even without the one document that seemed to be questionable? The pile of airtight evidence firmly backed up Rather’s allegations.

However when Bush supporters went full force on the single “forged document” it destroyed the credibility of every single other document even though they were all legit. It also destroyed Dan Rather’s credibility and he was pushed out of CBS.

If we wish to be an effective movement that impacts this election we need to be careful what we state as fact. We need to carefully choose our words to put the doubt out there but not allow ourselves to be attacked as liars or tin foil hats.

Larry St Claire has never shown anything that would be taken ascredible by any legit journalist. His story is entertaining and it seems very coincidental that several gay choir members of Obama’s church were executed. However there are thousands of other much more probably explanations and reporters will not report unless this one explaination can be proven beyond doubt. Saying Obama is homosexual hurts the credibility of PUMAs. Also as many PUMA leaders are LGBT, smearing someone with unfounded accusations of being “homosexual” (not a great choice of words) is offensive to many PUMAs. Related to the St Claire stuff, drug usage is accepted as fact, but use the date St Claire gave, 1999, and you will lose credibility.

There is nothing to suggest Obama is Communist. Obama DOES HAVE many associations with people and organizations with radical Marxist leanings like Trinity Baptist and William Ayers. Communism was developed from Marxist philosophy but not all Marxists are technically “Communists.” Throw in the “C” word and you discredit any debate on his proven Marxist ASSOCIATIONS. That’s another point. There has been no “on record” statements from Obama to indicate that he personally is Marxist. I believe his many close connection with Marxism should be an issue raised. Again when we say he “is” rather than he “is associated with” it is easy for his supporters to discredit us.

Even with the birth certificate allegations we need to loudly raise the call for the DNC to do due diligence and make sure their nominee meets the Constitutional eligibility to be sworn in as POTUS. Until TechDude submits his findings and is reviewed by the press we should say there is “a question to the legitimacy of the JPEG image of a birth-certificate.” Unless you personally examined it yourself and are a digital document expert you should not state “BO’s birth certificate IS a forgery.” Same with the citizenship question. I think this is where we could actually see an upset in Denver. However the only people who can make that happen are the press and the supers. Loudly asking or even demanding that the legitimate QUESTIONS about his citizenship in light of the the sketchy areas of Obama’s stated history and the reality of him being able to attend school while living with his step fathe Indonesia, is something they could be pushed to look into. If the press and the supers look and find he is inelligible or they seriously question whether he will stand up to thescrutiy of eligibility, they will demand he step down as nominee. Scream an accusation that he is NOT AN AMERICAN without having solid documentation in your hands and you will be seen as a tin foil hat. Further the press and the supers will get annoyed with the topic and will not look into it any further.

I personally think there are MANY solid things we can throw at that stick. Things such as Ayers. Also that the previous owner of the Obama mansion did not have an “adjacent lot” when he bought the property and later when he first put it on the market. We don’t know exactly what transpired but he somehow decided to sell his yard as an adjacent lot AFTER Michelle Obama became interested and was not able to afford purchasing the single piece of property.

No assumptions made in this. I didn’t say “Rezko offered Michelle” or “Michelle asked Rezko” because we really don’t know. I think some serious stuff will be happening soon that will turn everything upside down. It’s crucial that we keep ourselves as credible as possible or we might sabotage those efforts.

Comment by Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy | 2008-08-10 19:15:34

Hey, JDW -

You raise some good points – our assertions have to be beyond reproach or else face the possibility of complete dismissal, even if the statement is mostly accurate.

Just one note – it is Larry Sinclair. And you are quite right, many of PUMA nation are in the LGBT community. As such, it isn’t so much that Obama may have homosexual tendencies or even is actively homosexual – it is the DUPLICITY, the associations with actively ANTI-GAY people, and the drug use that is more the issue with Sinclair. At least for me.

Thanks for the thoughtful comment…

 

Comment by Katmoon | 2008-08-11 07:53:50

I agree, but truly you can be factual and honest as the day is long and someone will work at taking it apart. I can’t tell you how many sites refer to NQ as being associated with the KKK. It again is the racist angle and working it as best they can. The O campaign and supporters take the task of hitting reputation and creating assumptions, about (these werne’t that long ago) whites in general, women in general, specifically middle aged women, then finally defined as Hillary supporters. Next, blue haired women in general, older people in general, which then made the leap to John McCain being too old. Finally, racists in general, then low income, low education, southern in gneral, then specifically, Virginia, Kentucky, TN, excluding specifically, NC (so they could feel good about not being “racists).
It’s an old trick in the courtroom, sweeping generalizations(the bell is rung), enforcing stereotypes, and division, creating a fear of the historical past repeating itself, yet using the very methods of prejudice and racism to achieve the results.
I agree keep to our facts, and also defend ourselves, but I always am suspicious of the trolls who pose as NQ posters, so they can create what looks like we wrote something that can be used as a tool against non-obama supporters, they do this on every anti-obama thread. So while we work at staying honest factual, be aware, some pose in alliance here, and are really in disguise.
Finally, I won’t stray from facts, but I also won’t put up with being attacked anymore from O trolls.

Comment by Katmoon | 2008-08-11 07:55:41

I should have added, I try to not respond to the trolls, but fail sometimes. I know to freeze them out is the best method, it’s hard to argue with yourself, or cause problems when no one responds to you. SO will work at this.

 
 
 
 
 

Comment by sarainitaly | 2008-08-10 17:03:51

Hi – Checking in real quick from France. I HAD to log on after seeing that John finally admitted to the scandal (now, if he will just confess the rest, and give up the goods on whether obama threatened him)

BUt, I wanted to comment real quick – I think John Edwards should be stripped of his delegates. He endorsed Obama and gave his delegates to Obama.

He should be stripped of them, and Obama should be stripped of his JE’s delegates.

I can’t believe Elizabeth KNEW about the scandal, and *allowed* John to run. I have SO much to say about this, but am on vacation, with limited internet.

So – someone should blog about that! Strip Edwards of his delegates!

Ok, ciao, and more later!
Sara in Italy (france for now!) :O)

Comment by Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy | 2008-08-10 18:37:20

Hey, Sara!

Thanks for your comment. GOOD point!!! I’l pass it along…

 
 

Comment by HillaryFan2012 | 2008-08-10 17:07:19

if doh-bama’s healthcare plan goes through, we’ll all be getting medication from hobos on the street!

of course, we already know what kind of “medicine” crackhouse barry wants to foist on this country!

the only medicine he wants to provide our children comes in a pipe or rolled up in a little piece of paper!

 

Comment by fred | 2008-08-10 17:07:52

What Will Obama Say Next?

Excerpts: With Obama’s lead in the polls disappearing, a steady stream of doubt is now being poured over Obama’s nervous and inverted campaign. The great orator appears ready to crack. Soon, Obama could be flip-flopping so swiftly that the infamous 90 seconds required to break someone through waterboarding will seem like eternity. If swearing to be a born-again conservative would make him president, Obama would find a way to deliver the announcement and still pacify his delusional and government-dependent audience.
http://countusout.wordpress.com/

 

Comment by JDW | 2008-08-10 17:08:49

I was one of the people who attended the Platform Meeting to lobby for amongst other things Hillary’s concept of Universal Health Care. Our goal was to insert unambiguous language that the Democratic Party would make a commitment to nothing less than 100% of all Americans would be covered, no wiggle room with wording that could later redefine what we really meant by “universal.”

This is the amended language.

“”While there are different approaches within the Democratic Party about how best to achieve the commitment of covering every American-with everyone in and no one left out-we stand united to achieve this fundamental objective through legislative process.”

It’s unlikely that Hillary’s platform would contain the actual mechanics of a plan that would have to work it’s way through Congress and be subject to normal changes and compromises any successful legislation goes through.

We did get Hilary’s full objective into the platform “everyone in and no one left out.” We also got the word “commitment” rather than the weaker non-committal word “support.”

Also most important, we don’t like Obama’s health care plan PERIOD! I don’t want Obama and his advisors writing whatever plan the Democrats introduce after 2008. Right now BO is the presumptive nominee and the platform had to be written in that framework. that’s why I’m thrilled with “through the legislative process” this was also a score for Clinton policy people on the platform draft committee. If working out the nuts and bolts of a plan to achieve the goal of every single American being covered, who in Congress would probably take leadership on the issue??????? BINGO!!!

We hit a home run on Health Care in the platform. We still have a lot of work to do.

Comment by Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy | 2008-08-10 18:22:54

Hey, JDW -

Thanks for your first-hand comment. I guess we just have a difference of opinion on this. From what I saw, it seemed prety vague to me. But that’s just me.

And BobO, thanks – I admit, my primary focus was the whole Healthcare thing.

Frankly, if Hillary isn’t in, NONE of the issues that matter most to us are not going to be addressed in any real way. IMHO, that is!

 
 
 

Comment by Vonay | 2008-08-10 17:21:25

The Democratic National Convention Committee and the Obama for America Campaign has just announced that the presumptive nominee’s wife, Michelle Obama, will be the top prime time speaker the opening night of the convention, Aug. 25.

OH joy joy! MO can tell America how mean we are and how she is ashamed of us.

Comment by valsthewoman | 2008-08-10 17:41:17

I believe she has said enough…
It is the first time in my adult life that I am proud to be an American….
We still haven’t been blessed with her Whitey owes her tape….
Enough said!

 

Comment by candymarl | 2008-08-10 18:14:23

But they said Hillary would be the prime time speaker. Now it’s Michelle Obama?

The Obama campaign is too smart to let Michelle say what she really thinks. Her speech will be written for her.

Michelle is in and Hillary is out.

That was quick. Now why am I not surprised?

 

Comment by Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy | 2008-08-10 18:25:35

Oh, holy COW! I saw that she is gong to “kick off” the Convention. I sure as HECK do not remember a spouse of the presumptuous nominee being the one to kick off the Convention! This is just too much. And here I was trying to eat dinner. DARNIT!!!

 

Comment by typical.white.person | 2008-08-10 21:53:17

I noticed. And then I upchucked:

2008 DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL CONVENTION HEADLINE SPEAKERS

* Monday August 25th’s headline prime-time speaker will be Michelle Obama.
* Senator Hillary Clinton, who is a champion for working families and one of the most effective and empathetic voices in the country today, will be the headline prime-time speaker on Tuesday August 26th.
* The headline prime-time speaker on Wednesday August 27th will be Barack Obama’s Vice Presidential nominee.
* On Thursday, August 28th, the DNCC will throw open the doors of the Convention and move to INVESCO Field at Mile High so that more Americans can take part in the fourth night of the Convention as Barack Obama accepts the Democratic nomination.

 
 

Comment by roseeriter | 2008-08-10 17:27:26

Is that the usual- the spouses speak at conventions? Aside from Hill and Bill, both politicians, why does michelle get to speak? They’ll probably dress her up like Jackie O…groan, gag me with a spoon

 

Comment by valsthewoman | 2008-08-10 17:37:56

AOL HAS AN ANTI PUMA ARTICLE UP SAYING WE ARE SCAREY… OBVIOUSLY AN OBAMA TANK MAN… GO BLAST THEM IN THE COMMENTS!

MY COMMENT TO THEM:
I am sorry to inform you but it sounds to me like you are in the tank for Obama. PUMAS exist because the Democratic Party failed the United States Citizens by selecting a man that has not been honest with the public. He has a communist background (that McCain briefly insinuated speaking about Georgia), he has hidden homosexual and drug usage as late as 1999, he is an Indonesian and Kenyan Citizen, he has faked his Birth Certificate, he has liberal anti-American associations that committed terror in the name of war protests (William Ayres), he has Ha mas, Chavez, Cuba endorsements. The list could fill many pages of comments. You did not really do your homework when you wrote your article. If you want to educate yourself read http://www.hillaryloyalistnowformccain.com My eyes opened on May 31st 2008 when Obama took Michigan delegates that were not his and he campaigned in Florida when he was not allowed to. It was a farce of a Primary and I sadly regret to say that this Party is no longer a party that represents the small man in government that had no voice. It has become a self serving party to further socialist and Marxist style government. No thank you based on these reasons alone. I will give my vote to John McCain a man who is ready for the 3AM phone call.

 

Comment by Joe | 2008-08-10 17:41:42

Maybe they will include in their platform a proposal to amend the Constitution to allow people with multiple citizenships to run for POTUS too.

 

Comment by Firefly | 2008-08-10 17:49:21

A little bit OT, but not much…

Savage Politics today has a video of Reverend Manning saying that Obama HAS OFFERED THE VP POSITION TO HILLARY. (Of course, because Axelrove and friends are finally admitting within their inner circle that he’s toast without her and they need her to bail out the cheap, empty suit.) Rev. Manning says it’s being kept a secret, for now, by both camps (Can’t vouch for the credibility – I don’t know much about Rev. Manning, except for his very public dislike for bambi, so my question is, how does he know this supposedly inside stuff?????)

Anyway, if you want to see it, scroll down the page – it’s the 5th video under “Liberal Morons”

http://savagepolitics.com/

 

Comment by Mandelay | 2008-08-10 17:54:43

Third party needed asap to reflect the ideals of what used to be the Democratic Party. The opportunity might not come again.

 

Comment by UppityTroll | 2008-08-10 18:04:24

Uh-oh. Those pesky internal memos from the Clinton campaign are starting to flow, not leak! Hillary can start picking out her plot in the political graveyard after these puppies come out in their entirety. Here’s a lil’ whiff of how “strong-minded” and “independent” your gal is:

“On the much-criticized 3 AM ad: “In the days leading up to Ohio and Texas, the campaign kept arguing over whether to air the [3 a.m.] ad. With the deadline looming, Bill Clinton, speaking from a cell phone as his plane sat on a runway, led a conference call on Thursday, Feb. 28, in which he had both sides present their case. As his plane was about to lift off, it was Bill Clinton — not Hillary — who issued the decisive order: ‘Let’s go with it.’ “

 

Comment by Dave2009 | 2008-08-10 18:06:40

I have been to TD website, but it appears to block and require username and password? Any idea?

Comment by ALforHill | 2008-08-10 18:12:38

The same thing happened to me Dave. I don’t remember my password. It keeps saying I am invalid. sucks. I don’t know what’s going on unless her site has been hacked.

Comment by Northwest rain | 2008-08-10 19:39:17

I tried two different log in user names and pw (I’ve set up accounts for others on wordpress) — I was JUST on TexasDarlin’s website earlier today while debating Article II of the Constitution and the difference between Natural Born and Naturalized — Natural Born doesn’t mean only born on US soil. McCain was born in Panama, father in military, BOTH parents US citizens — therefore he is a Natural Born (allegiance to USA only).

Damn — TD’s blog is down — the Obamabots are a NASTY bunch of slim slug bastards.

 
 
 

Comment by Dave2009 | 2008-08-10 18:15:32

I heard she was saying that she was threatened by Jason Cannon, the guy who has tried to challenge with TechDude for Obama’s BS forgery. It is was probably her last blog in her new article.

Comment by Northwest rain | 2008-08-10 19:41:46

Also she was threatened by a blogger who calls itself “John Dean”. (There was a admin note on one of “John Dean”’s comments.)

That Cannon troll is a particularly nasty piece of garbage.

Comment by StrawberrybitesBarky | 2008-08-11 23:28:17

He’s up a thread and he is calling himself Sluggo or some such crap.

 
 
 

Comment by Dan | 2008-08-10 18:17:05

Hillary is in North country today doing what she knows best, saving 800 jobs and working on providing a 500 dollar heating aid to middle class famillies. While Barry is warning his 85 yearold grandma about his birth certificate.

 

Comment by Phishmelt | 2008-08-10 19:14:33

still awaiting some u-tubes on the caucuses. can’t wait to see them.

 

Comment by yttik | 2008-08-10 19:48:26

This is weak and pointless:

“All Americans should have coverage they can afford; employers should have incentives to provide coverage to their workers; insurers and providers should ensure high quality affordable care; and the government should ensure that health insurance is affordable and provides meaningful coverage. As affordable coverage is made available, individuals should purchase health insurance and take steps to lead healthy lives”.

I believe John McCain has the same plan. Just try diet and exercise. Cross your fingers and hope you stay healthy. If you can afford insurence, buy some.

Gee guys, thanks for nothing.

Comment by yttik | 2008-08-10 19:53:35

 
 

Comment by heather | 2008-08-10 21:12:09

ALERT on Obama tax plan. He is deliberately misleading when he says his tax cuts will not increase the deficit. His comparison is with the projected deficit of BUSH in 2010! Which, of course, includes a huge increase in the deficit. So Obama’s plan will increase the deficit, just not more than Bush’s. I call that being a liar.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/09/AR2008080901860.html?hpid=topnews

And as if you needed more proof that Obama is no Hillary Cinton:

“Unlike his Democratic colleagues, Obama has never made balancing the budget a priority.”

 

Comment by ProudMilitaryMom | 2008-08-10 21:41:07

Reverend Amy- great post! I was at the meeting and it was a sham. You are right- the language is wishy washy and does not commit the party to anything- that way they can back off and do a “that’s not what we meant” meme when they do not perform!

Comment by navyvet48 | 2008-08-11 01:32:48

Remember Kerry said Universal Health Care is a non-starter and who does he support? Obarkalot.

 
 

Comment by SJ | 2008-08-10 23:11:35

Michelle is speaking well I hope there will be enough voice there to boo her ass off the stage, what the hell is she speaking for?

These Obama’s are so full of it, they must really feel that they are god’s gift to America, I have never seen two people that feel that their service to this country is something all Americans should be grateful for, they are doing us all a big favor with just going out there and offering their services for the good of all.

I sure hope Obama gets his butt kicked once and for all by Mccain, and after that I hope not to see or hear one more sentence from either him or his dam wife.

 

Comment by Tricia Spiegel | 2008-08-10 23:45:08

Good post! For me it isn’t even about Hillary anymore. It is about a corrupt party that left me.

 

Comment by Christy | 2008-08-11 07:16:43

Truly. I would LOVE to see the racist, hate-mongering, incredibly rude Obamas skulking away with their tails between their legs, never to be heard from again. Except in some vague reference as losers.

So what if they will shriek forever about BS “racism.” They will NEVER shut up that people who voted for Hillary are racist, and placating hasn’t worked this far. Appeasement never works. If BO won POTUS, they would still whine and complain about racism.

The Nation of Islam wants it’s own separate Black State or whatever, for God’s sake.

 

Comment by SJ | 2008-08-11 09:08:18

I would still love to know and I see no one can give a clear answer as to why is Michelle Obama speaking at the convention?

What exactly is her expertise? Is she a whiz on the economy, oil, housing, health, foreign policy, or has she had prior government experience so she can inform us as to how government should work and what is prudent management for Washington.

Exactly what does the wise Michelle have to tell us, I hope she is not going there to give us her view on Barack, or to tell us how wonderful he will be to all of us, or how proud she finally is because is black man is running for President.

So please someone can you in all wisdom tell me exactly what is the purpose of Michelle Obama’s speech, why is it important to the DNC to have her on the first day of this event speaking, and is this the norm.

As I said before all these spineless democrats that will sit there and accept this knowing quiet well its the most ridiculous idea to be entertained, but then again the democrat party is now filled with men and women that are so hung up on the trappings of office they can no longer stand up for what is correct or right to do, they have all lost their voices.

 

Comment by HillGirl | 2008-08-11 09:54:07

Barack Obama is not legally a US natural-born citizen
Obama running in violation of US election law
By Steve Miller Saturday, August 9, 2008
I have been asked by several readers to stick to subjects that apply only to organized crime and political corruption within Las Vegas. However, these E-Briefs are nationally distributed, and I regularly receive pertinent information from sources outside Las Vegas. The last time I checked, Las Vegas is inside the United States of America, and therefore the following information will definitely affect the welfare of my city, and is qualified to be included in these INSIDE VEGAS E-Briefs.

Barack Obama is not legally a US natural-born citizen according to the law on the books at the time of his birth; a law that was in effect between December 24, 1952 and November 13, 1986, when the law was changed.

However, the new law did not preempt the former law in the cases of those born between the above listed dates when the old law was in effect.

Therefore, Senator Obama may very well be disqualified as the Democratic candidate in the upcoming Presidential campaign.

Presidential office requires the person elected to be a natural-born United States citizen if the child was not born to two US citizen parents.

US Law very clearly stipulates: “If only one parent was a US citizen at the time of your birth, that parent must have resided in the United States for at least ten years, at least five of which had to be after the age of 16.”

Barack Obama’s father was not a US citizen, and Obama’s mother was only 18 when he was born, which means although she had been a US citizen for 10 years, his mother fails the test for being so for at least 5 years prior to Barack Obama’s birth.

In order for her child to have been a natural-born US citizen, his mother would have had to be 21 at the time of his birth.

In essence, Mrs. Obama was not old enough to qualify her son for automatic US citizenship.

His mother would have needed to have been 16+5 = 21 years old at the time of Barack Obama’s birth for him to have been a natural-born citizen.

Barack Obama instead should have been naturalized, but even then, that would still disqualify him from holding the office of President under current law.

At best, Barack Obama is only a naturalized US citizen.

This is an issue that must be clarified before the election.

Naturalized citizens are ineligible to hold the office of President as is the case with Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger.

Barack Obama was sent back to Hawaii at age 10, all the other information does not matter because his mother is the one who needed to have been a US citizen for at least 10 years prior to his birth on August 4, 1961, with 5 of those years being after she became age 16.

If Obama were elected President without being a natural-born US citizen, it would set precedence that would enable Governor Schwarzenegger and other naturalized US citizens to also run for President.

The above information may be presented from the floor at the Democratic National Convention, and my be the impetus of resurrecting Hillary Clinton’s Democratic Presidential campaign.

Steve Miller, is a former Las Vegas City Councilman. In 1991, the readers of the Las Vegas Review Journal voted him the “Most Effective Public Official” in Southern Nevada. Miller writes internationally syndicated columns on organized crime and political corruption for Rick Porrello’s AmericanMafia.com.

Steve can be reached at: letters@canadafreepress.com

 

Comment by Cathy in Ks. | 2008-08-11 23:23:23

The democratic party is preparing for a momentous and historical loss come November if Obama – the presumptive nominee becomes the “actual nominee” for the party at the convention.

No doubt the democratic party leaders, the MSM, and the Obama campaign will blame it on “racism.” In fact “racism” may in fact play a part but probably not “racism” as the aforementionned would interpret it. Rather it will be how Obama, like the “boy who cried wolf”, played the “racism” card too many times and in the end too few believed him and the rest of the populace were just sick and tired hearing the same old excuse every time Obama was faced with any challenge or question.

Although the hour is late, there is still time for the democratic party to nominate a candate who has shown through her “primary” success that she can win. May they see her “light”!

 

Comment by Gina | 2008-08-25 10:02:17

Let us not forget … that in addition to statements like ‘America is a mean country’ … and, ‘this is the first time in my adult life that I’m proud to be an American’ … Michelle Obama also made the decision to expose her children for years, to Jeremiah Wright, Pfleiger, Moss, Farrakhan, and the rest of the radical anti-American racists at the black liberation Trinity Church of Chicago. Is this who we want for America’s first lady … I don’t think so !!!

 

RSS Feed for This PostPost a Comment

Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)