RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

“From Milk Toast Internationalist to Brave McCain-Like Warrior. . . In under 24 hours.”

1) Kudos to Gateway Pundit for my title. That is how Gateway Pundit characterized Obama’s switch on the Georgia / Russia crisis.

Reuters has Obama’s flip flop on the Georgia / Russia conflict.

“I condemn Russia’s aggressive actions and reiterate my call for an immediate ceasefire,” Obama said in a statement.

“Russia must stop its bombing campaign, cease flights of Russian aircraft in Georgian airspace, and withdraw its ground forces from Georgia.”

Here at NQ, Larry did a great piece about Obama’s initial statement and how weak it was.

badgelion3merged.jpg

PatRacimora informs me Obama got his courage medal recently. That would explain it.

2) The Telegraph in the UK offers its list of Best Obama Jokes in an article about how the public may be tiring of All Obama All the Time.

BEST OBAMA JOKES
Craig Ferguson: “Barack Obama was in Germany” today, and “he did this speech and 100,000 people showed up. There were so many Germans shouting and screaming that France…surrendered just in case.”

Jimmy Kimmel: “They really love Barack Obama in Germany. He’s like a rock star over there. Impressive until you realize that David Hasselhoff is also like a rock star over there.”

David Letterman: Signs Barack Obama Is Overconfident.
Proposed bill to change Oklahoma to ‘Oklabama.’
Offered Bush 20 bucks for the ‘Mission Accomplished’ banner.
Asked guy at Staples, ‘Which chair will work best in an oval-shaped office?’
Having head measured for Mount Rushmore.
Offered McCain a job in gift shop at Obama Presidential Library.

Jay Leno: “Of course, Obama’s supporters got him his usual birthday gifts of gold, frankincense, and myrrh.”

Jay Leno: “Obama’s people are trying to portray McCain as cranky, and McCain is trying to portray Obama as arrogant, you see. And when Obama was asked what he thought about being called arrogant, well, he said he was ‘above having to answer that question.’”

Jay Leno: “See Barack Obama on the news? He’s becoming a workout fanatic. He’s at the gym, like, twice a day, sometimes three times a day at the gym, yeah, according to his staff. Well, he has to stay in shape to do those flip-flops.”

Jay Leno: “Barack Obama back from his big European tour. Did you see him in Europe? People were cheering him, holding up signs, blowing him kisses. And that was just the American media covering the story.”

3) Meanwhile, back in the trenches, the LATimes publishes a wet kiss to Obama. This piece tries to turn the Obama = celebrity theme into a positive. Hey, movies are the highest form of myth, right?

It is axiomatic that the more powerful the theme a star embodies, the more powerful his or her stardom. Obama’s theme is a potent one. Whether one buys into it or not, he promises to cross divides — political, ideological, racial, geographic — and to transcend the old politics of fear and hate that has commandeered recent elections. He believes that America can — and should — be the moral beacon for the world by returning to its core values. In analyzing his own appeal, Obama says he has become a symbol — which, again, is exactly what all stars are. He is providing a really good, uplifting movie.

OK, maybe this is really a wet kiss for the movie industry. Either way, blech. It is really vacuous.

4) The WaPo has an article today about how Obama’s message has changed from a post-partisan theme back in 2004 to whatever it is today. I hoped the writer would address the schisms in the Democratic Party, but that NEVER SURFACED. WTH? Anyway, it’s not a terribly interesting piece. I read it so you wouldn’t have to.

5) The London Times published a piece by Andrew Sullivan that had an interesting point (I know, I know). Sullivan talks about how the race between Obama and McCain is shaping up and the fact that it is so close when Democrats across the board are doing much better. He says that cautious Democratic voters have some pause about “going all the way.

The choice has evolved to that between an all-Democratic government, headed by a senator whose newness is still one of the most striking things about him, and an old, familiar warhorse who irritated all the right Republicans at one point or another and has a record of bipartisan achievement. Seen in that light, the voters’ reluctance to swing behind Obama in landslide numbers is understandable.

Several folks at NQ have used this vary argument as a justification for switching to McCain. Maybe Sullivan reads NQ?

6) Another good piece speculating about how race is playing out in the Richmond Times-Dispatch. After briefly rehashing the “racial Kabuki” the McCain and Obama campaigns have engaged in, the author has this to say:

THIS Kabuki invites the question: What is Obama’s rationale?

It’s racial politics, and goes like this: Because I’m a minority, you can’t use race but I can. If you do, I’ll zap you. And if you don’t and I do and you call me on it, I’ll zap you for even suggesting I’m playing racial games.

But racial politics is loaded with risk.

Obama needs to maximize minority turnout while pulling enough white votes to win. Yet the polls in this campaign are all over the place, meaning there’s no telling how Obama’s racial games will play out.

It ends with this:

Obama’s shameless playing of the race card — his combining of race with liberal ideology — might prove his undoing in what remains a deeply conservative culture. It raises profound questions about his judgment and leadership, and may leave him in voters’ minds precisely the inexperienced, insubstantial, immature celebrity of John McCain’s description.

7) Yet another WaPo story about how the election is going. This article says that things will really heat up after the conventions, but does not talk about anything other than the campaigns’ talking points. Yawn. It does say that polls are pretty meaningless at this point. Yawn again.

Trackback URL

RSS Feed for This Post62 Comments »

Comment by katmandu | 2008-08-10 14:31:40

I found this one interesting — about how Obama’s tax plan is a disaster for the deficit:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/09/AR2008080901860.html

Obama Tax Plan Would Balloon Deficit, Analysis Finds
Democrat’s Promise to Cut Taxes Without Adding to Debt Relies on Bush Fiscal Policy

By Lori Montgomery
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, August 10, 2008; A10

On the campaign trail, Sen. Barack Obama bashes President Bush for “reckless” economic policies that are “mortgaging our children’s future on a mountain of debt.” But the Democratic presidential candidate has adopted a key component of Bush’s fiscal policy: A novel bookkeeping method that guarantees that the $9.5 trillion national debt will get much bigger.

Comment by Mickey | 2008-08-10 15:00:25

A taxpayer’s vote to Obamaflop
is like a chicken voting for Colonel Sanders.

 
 

Comment by katmandu | 2008-08-10 14:33:34

computer glitch — my comment should start “I found this one interesting –”

It’s a long article, but it’s example of Obama fakery. And this is from a liberal newspaper.

Comment by Dawnelle Leona del Puma | 2008-08-10 14:56:49

HAHAhaha @ Leno! I had no idea.

I think I’ll start watching him more often.

and CRAIG’s was the BEST for sure!!
dang ya think people are no longer afraid of the Bambi-bots?

That must be why some of them are snapping! “pop, pop, crackle, snap (insert insult here) and did I mention you are a racist!”

yawn

 
 

Comment by EmptyCheapSuit | 2008-08-10 14:39:25

Remember this joke? Obama says “I’ve campaigned in all 57 states. UHHH 56 states I have one to go.”

I made the connection of the 57 states.
Cosrsi, who wrote an Anti-Obama best seller just out August 1st said on a radio show, “There are 57 Islamic countries that are terrorist supporters. 57 Islamic countries out of over 100 Islamic countries that are terrorist supporters.” {{{{{{creepy}}}}}}

 

Comment by JoseyJ | 2008-08-10 14:41:31

iirc - After Obama’s initial Russia-Georgia statement, a DK front pager asserted McCain mainly targeted Russia because a McCain adviser is a lobbyist for Georgia.
Obamabots continue making excuses for THE ONE.

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-08-10 15:44:15

Politico covered that, too. Outrageous. Obama at one time co-sponsored legislation admitting Georgia into NATO, but he makes a namby pamby statement about the Russian attack, so he seems like a pacifist to the poor fools who still think he’ll immediately pull all US troops out of Iraq. When McCain calls him on this, he says McCain defended Georgia because his foreign policy adviser once lobbied for that country. That has nothing to do with the issue at hand; it’s merely a politically motivated cheap shot.

 
 

Comment by katmandu | 2008-08-10 14:45:48

http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=781576

Apparently, Russ Feingold (Liberal-WI) did not get Obama’s memo. He says McCain is a true maverick, and while he supports Obama

“I think the guy calls ‘em as he sees ‘em, and as president would call ‘em as he sees ‘em, and would make people mad all over the place because it wouldn’t fit anybody’s playbook,” said Feingold, who teamed up with McCain to rewrite federal campaign laws.

“He would be very original,” Feingold said. [snip]

“But the notion that somehow (McCain) is going to get in there and be some kind of ideological Newt Gingrich right-winger is a joke. There’s no way that he would do that,” Feingold said. [snip]

“He’s a very good legislator from my point of view, because when he gets onto something, he doesn’t just want to introduce a bill, he likes to move it. And he’s fearless,” Feingold said of McCain, who once called the Wisconsin Democrat a “philosophical soul mate” on reform issues. (The two partnered on several other bills in addition to campaign finance.)

“People couldn’t believe how long we stayed on McCain-Feingold. . . . We’d come to those press conferences (year after year) and you guys would laugh at us, I mean, literally,” said Feingold, grinning.

“He’s a great guy to fight an uphill battle with legislatively. He keeps his word. . . . I probably shouldn’t be saying this stuff, but to be honest about it, it was one of the better professional experiences I’ve ever had in my life,” Feingold said.

And remember that temper accusation?

Age is not the only rap on McCain that Feingold suggests is unfair. Another is the notion that McCain’s too temperamental to be president.

“Yes, he shows temper. But he burns fast, and he doesn’t let it cloud his judgment. He would not be a loose cannon in the Oval Office,” said Feingold. “It’s not like he’s going to pick up the red phone in a rage.”

As for what kind of Republican McCain is, Feingold makes the argument, not surprisingly, that McCain’s vision of where he wants to take the country is “mistaken.”

But he doesn’t take issue with McCain’s presentation of himself as a politician with a deep independent streak.

“He is not a guy who wants to be chummy-chummy with political leaders of the party. He doesn’t like that sort of constraint. He’s an independent,” said Feingold. “So he somehow managed to become the nominee of the Republican Party. But we all know it’s not because he was somebody that was kissing up to the Republican establishment, to say the least.”

Hillary is #1
Who’s the 2nd best choice?

Comment by gardenvariety | 2008-08-10 16:14:53

Looks like Russ is also going to vote for Maccain. Maybe that’s why after the FISA vote (Obama was for, he was against), he said something like: “Obama had to vote for FISA so that he can change it when he’s president”. Is it possible that he was being sarcastic?

 
 

Comment by simanov | 2008-08-10 14:52:02

Obama is starting to sound bitter. What is he clinging to?

Comment by Dawnelle Leona del Puma | 2008-08-10 14:58:56

a dream

(chuckle)

 

Comment by Amabo Kcarab | 2008-08-10 15:28:30

A birth certificate with the “wrong” name on it?

 
 

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-08-10 14:57:45

Good article Lisa….and accurate.
My favorites of the jokes are #1…Ferguson is a classic. and the last Leno joke about the MSM coddling their favorite porn star…chuckle….Of Course Letterman’s Top 10 is in a class all it’s own….imho….thanks.

 

Comment by JoseyJ | 2008-08-10 15:07:10

Obama partisans block Clinton faction bid to end caucuses
Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
8:55 PM CDT, August 9, 2008
PITTSBURGH - Hillary Rodham Clinton loyalists tried Saturday to kill off the caucus system that proved so damaging to her presidential bid, but were beaten back by a Democratic Party leadership firmly under the command of Barack Obama.
snip

*But the party’s platform committee refused to allow the amendment to come up for a vote or even a discussion.*

CONTINUED -
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-080908-caucus-clinton-obama,0,3234587.story

 

Comment by Bill Dupray | 2008-08-10 15:17:34

Clinton Campaign: Obama Is Not “Fundamentally American In His Thinking And In His Values.”

Turns out Hillary’s campaign had a strategy that would have killed Obama’s fledgling campaign in its crib but didn’t use it in time.

Mark Penn advised her to portray Barack Obama as having a “limited” connection “to basic American values and culture,” according to a forthcoming article in The Atlantic. [snip]

Penn, the presidential campaign’s chief strategist, wrote in a memo to Clinton excerpted in the article: “I cannot imagine America electing a president during a time of war who is not at his center fundamentally American in his thinking and in his values.”

Pay attention Johnny Mac. You are the last line of defense.

More http://patriotroom.com/?p=1074

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-08-10 15:49:02

Kudos to Hillary for not going there. Anyone who thinks the Clintons used coded language to campaign against Obama and make whites uneasy was wrong and out of line to even suggest it.

 
 

Comment by lute | 2008-08-10 15:20:38

Maureen Dowd has a good column on Edward today.
It looks like his floozie has a notorious past.

Comment by MEchelle Hates America! | 2008-08-10 16:49:46

Maureen Dowd is a piece of shit. She’s jealous of every “other woman” under the sun.

I feel sorry for Elizabeth and John’s a judgmental ass, but it’s a common failing and he will pay a big price.

Picking on the other woman is right up Odowdy’s bitter alley.

I didn’t expect the other woman to be a saint if she was hosing a sick woman’s hubby.

 

Comment by Clinton Fan | 2008-08-10 17:09:12

It’s no secret that the woman was crazy and a cokehead.

That makes it even WORSE for Edwards. Who does he think he is, a 21st Century Jefferson?

Remember, the guy with the “power” was Edwards, not the “floozie.”

I’d respect Edwards SLIGHTLY more if he was schtuping a woman of a certain income and renown, with equal or greater clout than he. Then it wouldn’t look like a Master-Servant banging.

He didn’t help himself in that interview, either. He couldn’t help mentioning that he’s not the only one.

Of course, his commentary about Bill Clinton’s little trouble with Monica was something to hear at the time–he ripped Bill a new asshole. Wonder if Bill will stand up and comment on JE’s hypocrisy?

Here is Edwards on Clinton on Feb. 12, 1999:

I think this President has shown a remarkable disrespect for his office, for the moral dimensions of leadership, for his friends, for his wife, for his precious daughter. It is breathtaking to me the level to which that disrespect has risen.

Later, Edwards debated whether Clinton intended to obstruct justice when he talked with a White House employee:

We have a man who has just been confronted with this problem, who is political by nature. And do we really believe that the first thing he thought about is, “I’m going to go protect myself legally’”? I suspect the first thing he thought about is “I’m going to protect myself politically.” He was worried about his family finding out. He was worried about the rest of the staff finding out. He was worried about the press finding out.

http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/john_edwards_in_1999

 
 

Comment by bert | 2008-08-10 15:21:35

Another Obama joke.

Working people frequently ask retired people what we do to make our days
interesting.

Well, for example, the other day I went downtown to go to the News Stand
for the Wall Street Journal so I could track my investments. I was only
in there for about 5 minutes.

When I came out, there was a cop writing out a parking ticket. I said to
him, ‘Come on, man, don’t you have anything better to do than do than
write a retired person a ticket? Why aren’t you out chasing crooks or
child molesters…that’s out of your league, obviously!!!

He ignored me and continued writing the ticket.

I called him a ‘Nazi.’ He glared at me and wrote another ticket for
having worn tires. So I called him ‘Barney Fife’. He finished the
second ticket and put it on the windshield with the first. Then he
wrote a third ticket.

This went on about 20 minutes. The more I abused him, the more tickets
he wrote. Personally, I didn’t care…I came downtown on the bus.

The car that he was putting the tickets on had a bumper sticker that
said ‘OBAMA’ in 08. I try to have a little fun each day now that I’m
retired.

It’s important to my health.

Comment by simanov | 2008-08-10 15:44:24

 

Comment by pasmalltowngirl | 2008-08-10 18:00:36

LMAO
Good one Bert, Everyone needs a good laugh.

 
 

Comment by fred | 2008-08-10 15:21:37

ATTENTION: Must share this with you guys
live inside of the Russia and Georgia War
Go here: http://www.channelchooser.com/
Click News (for you guys who have been here)
Then select Russia Today

Comment by Karma | 2008-08-10 15:54:36

Cool site….Thanks!

 
 

Comment by no waffles aka drkate | 2008-08-10 15:21:45

Where are the bots today? Birth certificate got them down?

Comment by Joe | 2008-08-10 15:26:41

They are exhausted from doing damage control from the other post Obama’s Impending Pearl Harbor ( http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/08/09/obamas-impending-pearl-harbor). Their lives are getting harder and harder trying to keep the faith in their Messiah and his jihad. They’ll pop back here soon once they’ve gotten their enema infusion of hopium from their handlers.

 
 

Comment by Anon 1 | 2008-08-10 15:22:18

With every Gold AMerica wins in the Olympics, Mccain poll numbers wil increase. It’s all about patriotism and American values. EVerytime, the national anthem is sung, mcccain numbers will improve. Similarly, the story of Mccain courage as POW will resonate with American people. On the other hand, seeing that awefull footage of Obama’s pastor cussing America and using his church to spew hate will not go over well. Obama showed lack of courage when he stayed in that chucrh for 20 yrs just for political gains. . In times of crisis, America needs true patriots and people of courage. Anyone who cannot condemn an unrepentant domestic terrorist is no friend of America.

Mccain initial statement was very clear and firm. Had the western world and Obama been firm with Russia on the initial statement, Russia may have pulled back. Now I am sure Russia will take back all of Georgia and not just South Ossetia in this conflict. The Georgians made a mistake but Russia was over aggressive. Obama was hedging his bets and playing it safe. He wants to support both the invader and the victims because he wants both sides to like him.

Come November, the DNC will regret not supporting HRC. A vote for Mccain/Nader 2008 is a vote for HRC 2012.

Comment by Karma | 2008-08-10 16:02:45

OT….but your post reminded me of it.

Did anyone see China cut off our American anthem for Phelps’ gold medal? Both 41 and 43 were there…and the part cut. The very last part of the song.

“Land of the free…home of the brave.”

China pulls off one of the best openings of the Olympics but can’t manage to run an anthem in front of two Presidents who have good relations with their country.

Hmmmm….

Comment by TeakwoodKite | 2008-08-10 17:31:49

 
 

Comment by Dr. bobbi Anne White | 2008-08-10 19:03:41

Cynthia McKinney/Rosa clemente Green Party is starting to go viral with the Black community

 
 

Comment by David Ross | 2008-08-10 15:23:54

Looking at this from afar: The UK press and the parochial press in the South print information. The LAT and WaPo print fluff.

After Obama’s inauguration, I expect the LAT and WaPo to continue to avoid all questioning of this living icon. The UK and the South will continue to run investigative news. The latter will be dismissed as foreigners and factions. As “foreign-backed secessionists”, as time goes by.

Comment by fif | 2008-08-10 16:36:21

What inauguration? You’re assuming he’s going to win. A big assumption–and nightmare.

 

Comment by Clinton Fan | 2008-08-10 17:13:49

Is Obama going to be inaugurated as President of his Country Club? Because he’s not winning this Presidential election.

It’s just not happening.

 
 

Comment by Christy | 2008-08-10 15:24:20

I saw some bots writing over at Obama’s impending Pearl Harbor. They hate Larry, you know.

Comment by Joe | 2008-08-10 15:27:58

Larry must be doing something right. :D

 

Comment by Mary | 2008-08-10 17:22:11

There were several of us on Larry’s Russia/Ossetia thread that were posting better factual information about Ossetia’s invasion by Georgia, and who started what based on the very informative UK press, which disagreed with the Bush administration version of “Russia invading Ossetia.”

But we’re not Bots. Not by a long shot.

Wouldn’t vote for Barak Obama if he was the last candidate on earth. YUK

 
 

Comment by simanov | 2008-08-10 15:25:28

BARRY’S “FRIEND”….DETROIT MAYOR KWAME KILPATRICK……HEADED TO JAIL

2007……in the video….Senator Obama (the man of superior judgment)…. gives his “friend”,Detroit Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick, a ringing endorsement……

http://chicagoagainstobama.wordpress.com/2008/08/07/barrys-good-friend-kwame-headed-to-jail/

 

Comment by Christy | 2008-08-10 15:28:33

OMG Bert! Please tell me that is a true story! ROFLMAO!

 

Comment by jwrjr | 2008-08-10 15:28:37

Note - when Russia/Georgia first started, Obama said nothing. It was only when he started taking hits from the media that Obama took a stand on the matter. Some people think that this is the “judgement” of a President?

Comment by Joe | 2008-08-10 15:36:09

He’s a follower, not a leader. He kept turning to Hillary during the debates hoping she’d answer first when both were asked about issues involving foreign policy, and he’s going to follow whatever McCain says if it sounds like the public agrees with him.

Comment by Ferdberfle | 2008-08-10 16:53:01

It happened at every “debate”. Hillary would give a reasoned and detailed response. Barky would then say that he agreed but blah, blah, blah, which was always some platitude masquerading as wisdom. But only the fools fell for his game, as can be attested by the trolls who lurk around these parts.

 
 

Comment by Dr. bobbi Anne White | 2008-08-10 19:07:39

the president of Georgia is Shaakasvilli and he is also a George soros puppet. the whole thing was orchestrated by Shaakasvili to coincide with Obama’s vacation and the opening of the Olympics

 
 

Comment by Christy | 2008-08-10 15:29:56

Yep! Larry gets to them EVERY time, love it.

 

Comment by kcfromtx | 2008-08-10 15:46:58

A few months ago it was reported Barack has not traveled much. Could it be that he did travel extensively but used an Indonesian Passport? What did he use to travel to Pakistan in 1981. He also said he traveled through Europoe in college. Again, what passport? He may have 3 different ones from 3 countries.

Comment by Joe | 2008-08-10 15:56:20

He probably did, which would then mean that his US passport would not contain any mention of the countries he visited.

Comment by gardenvariety | 2008-08-10 18:25:45

An American citizen MUST use American passport when entering the US.

 
 
 

Comment by Jillie | 2008-08-10 16:16:03

not trying to be petty, but i believe the expression is ‘milquetoast”.

Comment by bart | 2008-08-10 17:09:30

Yeah, but the original post at Gateway had it this way.

 
 

Comment by fif | 2008-08-10 16:34:23

It’s very simple: he does not know what he is doing. Why would he? He has NO foreign policy experience, and he is supposed to step into the role of CIC? It’s absurd.

 

Comment by roseeriter | 2008-08-10 16:40:37

Off topic:

Anti-war activist Cindy Sheehan on the ballot
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/08/08/BAC2127RCJ.DTL

Bye Bye Nancy Pelosi

Comment by jangles | 2008-08-10 17:08:23

You have to be kidding about Sheehan beating Pelosi. Sheehan could barely get enough signatures to get her name on the ballot. Pelosi is deeply entrenched in that district and there is no way she is going to lose it.

Comment by trixta | 2008-08-10 23:08:31

True, but progressives/liberals in the Bay are furious at her for taking the impeachment of GWB off the table.” There is another female candidate (forgot her name) from San Francisco running against Pelosi on that very issue. Her ads against Pelosi are witty and biting! Let’s hope she prevails over Madam Speaker.

 
 
 

Comment by jangles | 2008-08-10 17:05:58

I read several pieces over at By The Fault on the Russia-Georgia crisis. It gives some good, factual context and input from around the world. Looks in detail at both candidates statements finding Obama deeply, deeply flawed and McCain better but also off the mark. Compares Obama to Chamberlain; McCain to Churchill and the regrettably absent voice of HRC to FDR. Seems like a good site.

 

Comment by WildChild | 2008-08-10 17:11:23

Obama’s shameless playing of the race card — his combining of race with liberal ideology — might prove his undoing in what remains a deeply conservative culture. It raises profound questions about his judgment and leadership, and may leave him in voters’ minds precisely the inexperienced, insubstantial, immature celebrity of John McCain’s description.

I wouldn’t say that BOBO’s playing the race card could be his undoing because this is a deeply conservative culture. First this isn’t a deeply conservative culture. The consumerism that capitalism needs to sustain it is any but conservative and we have charged and mortgaged ourselves to the hilt in support of consumerism.

It’s the charge of racism alone that will do him in. Most of us have found our way to live at peace with all the peoples that call America home. Some choose segregation. Some choose integration, but most of us live somewhere in between. As such it’s jarring after you have spent so much time living well amongst all the diversity that is America, somebody just hauls off and calls you a racist because you don’t happen to support their candidate for president and he is AA. Your first reaction is What the fuck!? but after that it doesn’t take long for you to resent the people making the charge. Number one they don’t know dick about you other than you don’t support their candidate. Number two, THEY are the ones that are so dead focused on his race. So why am I the racist? People are looking at this charge and rightfully saying, “No, you are wrong.”

If in the most important personal relationship a candidate has with a voter, honesty and trust, the candidate and his supporters can so cavalierly be dishonest about the true nature of the voters just to score some short term political points…how can we ever trust them?

We’re sure not going to vote for him.

 

Comment by Clinton Fan | 2008-08-10 17:34:50

Andre Frigging Sullivan…he makes Obama look resolute, the way he’s been flipflipping.

Andrew has, apparently, only recently discovered that Congress’s jobs include that annoying “checks and balances” role. Who’d a thunk it!!

And yes, he probably has read NQ–he never has an original idea, it’s always something one has seen elsewhere in his essays.

 

Comment by Clinton Fan | 2008-08-10 17:49:05

Good thing he wasn’t born sixty seven years earlier, I guess!

“I strongly condemn the outbreak of violence in Hawaii, and urge an immediate end to armed conflict. Now is the time for the United States and Japan to show restraint, and to avoid an escalation to full scale war. America’s territorial integrity must be respected. All sides should enter into direct talks on behalf of stability in Hawaii, and the international community should fully support a peaceful resolution to this crisis.”

God, he’s a fucking idiot.

 

Comment by Paul F. Villarreal | 2008-08-10 19:18:54

This is really good stuff, Lisa. Thanks for pulling these pieces together for us.

Three things in response to some of the articles.

1. The reason the LA Times writer is trying to walk the horse back into the ‘celebrity is good’ barn is that A) The celebrity meme is accurate and it’s killing Obama; B) It is one of the foundational pieces of his campaign, along with the race card (explicit and implicit); that is, he MUST use it or he has no chance at winning; and, the most immediately relevant point, C) The Invesco Field fiasco is going to be the biggest celebrity event in political history. In other words, Obama is teeing himself up to be destroyed — in true Rovian fashion — by Camp McCain after what is supposed to be his shining moment. The Disaster at Invesco will be a monument to Team McCain’s portrayal of Obama as vacuous celebrity using stunt media ploys.

The writer of the piece knows this, and so they are trying to reverse the meme before the Disaster at Invesco happens. It’s not going to work, however. Team McCain has nailed the essence of Obama and his campaign, and the reason the spots are doing so well is because they are true and people immediately understand them and see them as being correct.

Invesco will haunt Obama. Count on that.

2. I think Andrew Sullivan and other persons of homosexual orientation are really beginning to sour on Obama. I could certainly be wrong about that and I’m not trying to make any blanket statements. However, starting with McClurkin and now the reports that gays are feeling very much put off by the DNC, Obama and Obama’s posse isn’t helping matters any for the feelings of the homosexual community towards Obama. Now, having said that, Sullivan is a conservative. Some will say he was never going to like Obama, anyways. False. Sullivan has been one of Obama’s biggest lauders in all of the media. It seems that period has ended.

3. The Richmond, VA paper is spot on. Obama is taking ENORMOUS risks with his liberal usage of the race card. Team McCain drilled him on this recently, and they will do so again if Obama or punk enablers like Bob Herbert try to play that card another time.

Obama and his loser posse knows they are playing with fire here, and that is why you have seen a number of pieces from his fanboys decrying the crap that Nikki Turner pulled in Tennessee.

However, the real point of these Obama fans’ outrage with Turner is that she got crushed at the polls and she overplayed the race card. That is, she used it (and the religion card) so totally ineptly that it both draws attention to how pols use the card and it makes the environment less friendly for Obama and his peeps to try to play the race card when they want to.

What the Obama people are trying to convey, desperately, is that THEY aren’t using the same vein of tactics Turner did. Sure, a KKK guy in an ad isn’t the same thing as Jesse Jackson, Jr’s “Katrina Tears” nor is it a South Carolina Memo, but the theme is the same: Race card.

What Turner did with a club over the head in the subtlety department the Obama camp is trying to do as a loud dogwhistle. Both camps are trying to manipulate people based on race. And because the Obama camp knows it cannot win without this ploy, its supporters are trying to shoot down the Turner story as fast as possible.

 

Comment by kcfromtx | 2008-08-10 20:33:50

Barky has publicly stated he visited Pakistan. Can you imagine if it doesn’t appear on his Obama passport?
Under the Freedom of Information Act, can someone request another person’s passport info, say Barry Soetero? Information about birth records, naturalization records and passports can be accessed, but I don’t know if you must be related.
I hope someone requested Stanley Dunham’s records. Could be very telling.

 

Comment by Joey | 2008-08-10 22:55:54

It’s spelled “milquetoast”.

Comment by bart | 2008-08-11 08:12:44

Not if you’re quoting someone else who spelled it that way.

 
 

Comment by Sassy | 2008-08-11 11:24:05

WE should have been asking who is on the Credentials Commitee.
We have placed all our emphasis on the SDs and they may have no input on the eligibility issue!
I wonder if only candidates (Senator Clinton) can challenge at the convention.
I would think that eligibility would be the BEST POSSIBLE REASON to challenge!

 

Pingback by Updates on Georgia Crisis + John McCain’s Latest Detailed Statement : NO QUARTER | 2008-08-11 13:45:09

[...] “From Milk Toast Internationalist to Brave McCain-Like Warrior. . . In under 24 hours.” [...]

 

RSS Feed for This PostPost a Comment

Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)