One down, a bunch still to go.

As president of the Harvard Law Review and a law professor in Chicago, Senator Barack Obama refined his legal thinking, but left a scant paper trail. His name doesn’t appear on any legal scholarship.
But an unsigned — and previously unattributed — 1990 article unearthed by Politico offers a glimpse at Obama’s views on abortion policy and the law during his student days, and provides a rare addition to his body of work.

Here it is (and even Obama never mentions it, probably because it shows how little serious scholarly work he did)

Here from http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=E99B0FC2-18FE-70B2-A8749734EF6D25D9
The six-page summary, tucked into the third volume of the year’s Harvard Law Review, considers the charged, if peripheral, question of whether fetuses should be able to file lawsuits against their mothers. Obama’s answer, like most courts’: No. He wrote approvingly of an Illinois Supreme Court ruling that the unborn cannot sue their mothers for negligence, and he suggested that allowing fetuses to sue would violate the mother’s rights and could, perversely, cause her to take more risks with her pregnancy. (read the rest on the site)

Are you saying the The Harvard Law Review has turned up an article he wrote as president of the same?

I do not care about his SS record. I care about his lack of records and questionable character.

Keep on misunderstanding and insulting PUMAs and others with a different opinion from yourself. You learn as well as teach so many that way…

In fact, 4 of the Keating 5 were Democrats; McCain, was the sole Republican. Two of the 5 were acquitted by the Ethics committee: John Glenn and John McCain.

Are you smearing John Glenn, too, now? You Obamabots will stop at nothing to defend your Messiah, if you’re going to smear John Glenn!

Congress, at the time of the Ethic committee investigation, was controlled by Democrats.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keating_Five