The Clowns of the Circus: Flip Flops and Shenanigans
By medusa on August 24, 2008 at 5:33 PM in Backtrack Obama, Bamboozling, DNC idiocy, Flip Flopping, Joe "Bro" Biden, Misogyny, Politico, Sexism
With all the media hype surrounding Barry’s “very personal” choice for VP (snark), Backtrack’s flip flops have been neatly swept under the rug. Let’s review. From the July 5 edition of Politico:
Obama has been espousing positions anathema to the left on several issues.On Iraq, Obama said Thursday that his upcoming trip there might lead him to refine his promise to quickly remove U.S. troops from the war.
He now supports broader authority for the government’s eavesdropping program and legal immunity for telecommunications companies that participated in it, after opposing a similar bill last year.
After the Supreme Court overturned the District of Columbia’s gun ban, the handgun-control proponent said he favors both an individual’s right to own a gun as well as government’s right to regulate ownership.
Read the rest ->
Obama became the first major-party candidate to reject public financing for the general election after earlier promises to accept it.
He not only embraced but promised to expand Bush’s program to give more anti-poverty grants to religious groups, a split with Democratic orthodoxy.
He objected to the Supreme Court’s decision outlawing the death penalty for child rapists, even though he has been anti-capital punishment.
Obama also said “mental distress” should not count as a health exception that would permit a late-term abortion, saying “it has to be a serious physical issue,” addressing a matter considered crucial to abortion rights activists.
I’m sure Backtrack has flip flopped more since July 5. In fact, his choice of Joe Biden makes obvious Obama’s blatant disregard for ethical and moral integrity. We know Obama engages with the most unsavory types, as Bud White’s piece on Obama’s good buddy, Bill Ayers, reminds us, and Melissa McEwan at Shakesville minces no words about his choice of Joe Biden:
The DNC is just f**king with the press, who’s dumb enough to fall for the suggestion that Joe Fookin’ Biden is “believed to be at the top of” Obama’s veep shortlist. Because there’s no way in blue hell that Obama could be foolish enough to be seriously considering for one blinking second putting on his ticket the bankruptcy bill voting, Bush-coddling,racist, sexist asshat Biden, a consummate gaffe machine who launched his own ‘08 presidential bid with a screeching dog whistle that declared Obama “the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy.”
The fabulous writers at Tennessee Guerilla Women put it like this:
Obama Picks a Bro: It’s Biden
And there goes the last chance for party unity. Hillary Rodham Clinton, the candidate who earned 18 million votes, was not even vetted. We’re sure Biden’s 200 voters are simply thrilled. The rest of us, well, just call us marginalized and invisible.
Back in the 1990s, Biden was the leader of the pack of 14 white male senators who conducted the Clarence Thomas-Anita Hill hearings. The committee of 14 men threw every sexist stereotype in the book at Anita Hill. Like Hillary, Joe Biden voted to authorize the war in Iraq, but that’s so not a problem when a bro does it.
And why does this matter to Democrats who hope the circus act in Denver will unite the party? Well, for one thing, as Rasmussen reports today, women’s opinions remain marginalized and invisible to the Obama campaign:
Women are notably less enthusiastic [about Obama's selection of Biden] than men—33% of women say Biden was the right choice while 27% disagreed. Men, by a 46% to 24% margin, said that Obama made the right choice….Just 16% of women have a Very Favorable opinion of Biden while 19% have a Very Unfavorable view. …Not surprisingly, Democrats were more supportive of Obama’s decision than anybody else—52% of those in his party agreed with his pick while 19% disagreed. However, just 43% of Democratic women said the presumptive nominee made the best pick while 23% disagreed.
on sale for only $16.95.
also comes with a special spatula.)
(List Price: $27.95 - Your Price: $15.47)
“The story of poker is that of risk-loving America ... a crazy ride in unparalleled detail, driven by wit, wisdom, true love, and sizzling style. As analyst, historian, devotee, and no mean player, James McManus is poker’s most eloquent advocate.”
By Sarah Palin (Release date: November 17. 2009)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5eu2aDCIQYs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h4HrSQySus8
I am really enjoying watching the clowns on TV trying to pretend that they are not worried about PUMA…..They are scared shitless……Pass the popcorn
Poll: Twenty-Eight Percent Of Hillary Supporters Would Back McCain If Obama Wins
By sargent - March 26, 2008, 11:34AM
This, from Gallup, is the first polling I’ve seen on this question — it finds that Hillary supporters say they’re more likely to bolt to McCain if their choice doesn’t end up as the nominee:
Clinton supporters appear to be somewhat more reactive than Obama supporters. Twenty-eight percent of the former indicate that if Clinton is not the nominee — and Obama is — they would support McCain. That compares to 19% of Obama supporters who would support McCain if Obama is not the nominee — and Clinton is.
You hear lots more media attention being paid to the idea that Obama’s supporters would bolt to McCain than to the possibility that Hillary’s would. It’s worth keeping in mind that you can’t take it for granted, as some pundits seem to, that Hillary backers will all support Obama
http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/03/poll_twentyeight_percent_of_hi.php
18,000,000 x 28% = 5,040,000
That is enough to make a difference.
The undecideds will more likely brake for McCain, not Obama.
Yes 28% of Dems will back McCain and 28% are undecided. That’s 56%…FU Pelousy. I hope Cindy Sheehan takes her seat.
Pelosi: Newest GOP ad “insults our intelligence”
DENVER — House Speaker Nancy Pelosi came out swinging at the first official convention event on Sunday, calling John McCain “bankrupt” of ideas after Republicans unveiled a new ad questioning why Hillary Rodham Clinton is not on the Democratic ticket.
On Saturday, Republicans unveiled a new ad insinuating that Barack Obama did not choose Clinton because the New York senator criticized him too harshly, an obvious attempt to drive a wedge within the Democratic Party.
“I think the American people are going to tire of that,” Pelosi said at a press briefing Sunday morning. “Please don’t insult our intelligence, they are saying to politicians. We want answers, we don’t want gimmicks.”
Ya think Nancy Peelousy?
You’ve been insulting our intelligence since your whole Obommunist coronation fiasco started.
And yes, we also want answers and not the gimmicks that you, Dean, Brazille and your Precious have been hurling at us what already seems like forever.
We’re tired of you, your lies and your insults…That’s exactly what we’re tired of and you’ll see how tired we all are of it come Nov. 4.
They’ve been insulting our intelligence since before the Obama Coronation. They’ve been doing so for the past two years with all of their broken promises. Allowing of things to get even worse for the economy and with health care. Health care in this country is now the 4th leading cause of death! Who’s doing anything about it? Look at the figures and the length of time it’s taken for it to get to that point. Their unwillingness to work with the other side for the benefit of the American people. The whole new agenda for the leaders of the Democratic Party is, “It’s all about US!” No wonder they supported and pushed the “ME” candidate down our throats.
Since the G.O.P. fielded the Obama candidacy in Chicago in 2004, his new conservative positions shouldn’t come as a surprise, considering who his strategists, fundraisers, speechwriters, and top donors are. In fact, back in 2005, he supported the Cheney energy bill and the tort reform bill, watered down legislation requiring public disclosure of radiation leaks and voted for nuclear waste storage at Yucca Mountain twice. No one should be offended now, since he’s been consistent in both his lying and voting. Bruce Springsteen didn’t do his homework and should be held accountable for that. If you’re going to put your Good Housekeeping of Approval on a candidate, you should suffer the consequences. Of course, Bruce doesn’t have to worry about a home foreclosure, does he? Here’s more on Obama Bush:
http://www.thecityedition.com/Pages/Archive/Summer08/BushThirdTerm.html
The Obama supporters have sold their souls to Bush 3 but continue to pander for him.
What does that tell you about their ethics?
Well, then we have kids for Obama, proposing that kids to campaign on his behalf, with some activities that make them vulnerable, thus potentially exposing them to people he condemns…
Great post Medusa.
Does Obama even know himself?
A while back, I calculated what would happen if Hillary’s supporters voted for McCain and some stayed home. These are based on old polls, but if you look at the map, you can see that the polls don’t make any difference. MN and MI might have to be updated (MN would lean red, while MI would be blue).
Here is what happens if 1 out of 16 Hillary supporters vote for McCain and another 1 out of that same 16 stays home. The rest votes for Obama. So 2/16 (12.5%) of Hillary’s supporters do not vote for Obama and 14/16 (87.5%) do vote for Obama.
http://files.myopera.com/Vorlath/files/electoral-mapblog16.png
And if 2/8 (25%) of Hillary’s supporters don’t vote for Obama. (1 votes for McCain, the other stays home, and the remaining 6 vote for Obama.)
http://files.myopera.com/Vorlath/files/electoral-mapblog15.png
And here’s what the article is implying. If 28% of Hillary supporters are voting for McCain and another 18% is staying home, you’ll get this:
http://files.myopera.com/Vorlath/files/electoral-mapblog14.png
Again, these are from older polls, but as you can see, the polls don’t even matter anymore. It’s too much to overcome. Anyone who looks at electoral maps knows that a 10% swing toward one candidate means a landslide. That’s exactly what the current polls are indicating, but no one wants to show what such an electoral map would look like. Someone in the Democratic party is noticing and understand the consequences. However, their elitism will continue to frustrate them as their disconnect grows larger.
Also remember that Hillary did better in swing states while Obama did better in red or bright blue states. Hillary’s supporters are concentrated where they will have the most impact.
In case the images don’t show up, it’s update #7 in my article.
http://my.opera.com/Vorlath/blog/2008/05/09/who-is-the-safe-choice-for-the-white-house
The latest edition of Ricki Lieberman’s ELECTABILITY WATCH (EW) daily memo includes this curious paragraph:
I have been flooded with emails from delegates telling me they are staying with Hillary and proud of it! In addition, Hillary delegates are hearing directly from “Hillary people” to please vote for her on the first ballot. There is no longer any ambiguity about that, if there ever was.
http://www.observer.com/2008/politics/hillary-people
I guess you guys heard that HRC just released her delegates.
I think it’s the classy thing.
Many will vote for her anyway.
They all should.
she’s not releasing them until Wed.
Please say it ain’t so. Hillary needs to show she is angry. She ha been treated horribly by th DNC. Why is she the only one working for unity for the party? She has campaigned for Obama and held a fundraiser for him while he took his second vacation of the primaries. She said all the right things when she suspended her campaign. She needs to show O 2 speeches and tell him it’s up to him which gets read on Wednesday–the one for unity or the one that says she’s in it to win it. Maybe then he’ll fulfill his promise and help her with her debt.
You mean you believe big media?
she can release them, but they don’t have to vote for Obama, you know. this is symbolic.
Ed Rendell knows something is up.
Michelle Obama has been turning away poor patients at the University of Chicago emergency room.
http://www.suntimes.com/news/politics/obama/1122691%2CCST-NWS-hosp23.article
You think that’s bad? Check this out:
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=18647
I’m a moderate Republican who’s willing to support a woman’s right to an abortion if the abortion is performed within the first trimester of pregnancy. But even the most ardent “pro-choice” people I know would recoil in disgust from the idea that somehow a baby that’s already out of the womb and is still alive is not deserving of the same legal protections as any other newborn baby. My jaw literally dropped a few days ago when I heard about this for the first time.
Obama’s BS excuse for not supporting the Illinois bill in 2001 was that it didn’t contain language that would ensure that the precedent underlying Roe v. Wade wouldn’t be eroded. But even if one buys that excuse, what’s his excuse for being to one to block the adding of that language to the bill in committee, or for not voting in favor of the bill when it was re-introduced in 2003 AFTER the exact same language contanined in a similar federal bill had been added to ensure that Roe v. Wade wasn’t threatened?!?!
Obama can try and nuance his way out of this one all he likes, but the GOP is going to run ads on this over & over & over again in the swing states for the next 10 weeks. The subliminal message here … that Barack Obama is so cold that he won’t vote to protect newborn infants because that would infuriate his backers in the militant abortion-rights lobby … will not play well at all with the middle-class and lower middle-class white voters who will decide this election.
This single issue is a potential “game winner” for the Republicans if they play it right. If they do so, the release of the “whitey” tape in October will be an afterthought.
Speaking of subliminal, my friend said the first Obama Biden poster she saw, she read as Osama Bin Laden.
HA HA!!! I hadn’t noticed that, but you’re absolutely right!
Too funny.
Considering how sensitive he is about his name….you would think someone would have caught this.
I am strongly pro-choice, Dan R, but even I agree with you.
In fact, I think this is similar to his DP support for sex offenders. He is a cold blooded political panderer with no thought to the human life involved, no empathy for the people affected. Think about a child who had been abused and the emotional burden they would have to deal with if their testimony caused someone to be executed. What if that was a child’s beloved uncle or teacher? You know that kid is going to blame themselves for getting someone killed, they already tend to incorrectly blame themselves for the abuse.
Obama doesn’t give a crap about kids and sex offenders or the lives of women who might be forced to seek illegal abortions, he only cares about Obama and who he panders to. He doesn’t think of them, he only thinks of himself.
Dan,
This election will be decided on the economy, energy and the war.
Those voters for whom right to life is the deciding factor are not going to vote for anyone who supports RoevWade. H*ll, they want to repeal our right to controceptives by severely restricting our purchasing of them. So those are not the voters Obama needs to cultivate. They may call themselves Independent voters, or Undecided voters, but they’d sooner vote for a striped snake.
Actually, I guess they already did, the last two times around.
F*K. This page does not work anymore.
How to we contact delegates?
httpCOLON//wwwDOTlobbydelegatesDOTcom/defaultDOTaspx
You have to drop off the http:// in order for the URL to work.
http://www.lobbydelegates.com/default.aspx
I wouldn’t bother with the site. Almost all of the addresses are closed now
Has anyone heard about a federal lawsuit filed by Philip J. Berg, Esq. Requesting Obama Be Removed as a Candidate as he does not meet the Qualifications for President ?
http://www.nobamanetwork.com/candidate.html
No - but Biden’s son & brother are involved in 2 lawsuits.
In 2006 Biden was trying to find another job for his LOBBYIST son before he ran for president.
Umm - things didn’t go as planned.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/23/AR2008082302200.html?nav=rss_politics
Be prepared poor families because Obama is not going to lift a finger for you. LOL
Maybe one?
The middle one
Hey! Politico, covering Rendell, who’s speaking to the media coverage of Obama (especially MSNBC) is worth checking out. Did he really say “embarrassing”?
PUMA
He must have, he was dissing MSNBC. The bots were all a freaky in their comments. Of couse there is the OBOT who wrote this. According to his freinds on a black social network. There was more before this little gem:
she rode the wave of African American support to get her Senate seat the first time. Blacks will boycott her and it will be pretty difficult to run for a nominee without a job.
His english sucked but apparently he doesnt realize she won the first time with 55% of the vote, then with 67%. I would say the NY wave won her the seat.
Cinton say she would give up her delegates wednesday,thats a long way off!!!!!!
“THE NEW DREAM TICKET” I’m just another intruder, born and raised a Republican…..but I DID PROUDLY VOTE for BILL & HILL TWICE……sounds similar to HILL growing up in Scranton, LOL…..however in lite of the poor performance by the DNC and you’all passing over HILL, I would like to NOW announce the New Dream Ticket! Something on the nature of JOHN MCCAIN/CONDOLLESA RICE. I just can’t wait to see what Joe would have to say to CONDI has to say about IRAQ, now that Ms Rice has brokered the parameters for our final VICTORY STRATEGY and FINAL EXIT, and the beggining of our troop withdrawal PROUDLY and with HONOR. I am personally a Disabled Vietnam Veteran myself. CONDI! CONDI! CONDI! O.K!, So this may very well be out in left field, or should I say RIGHT, HA HA“THE NEW DREAM TICKET” I’m just another intruder, born and raised a Republican…..but I DID PROUDLY VOTE FOR BILL & HILL TWICE……however in lite of the poor performance by the DNC and you’all passing over HILL, I would like to NOW announce the New Dream Ticket! It shall be no other than JOHN MCCAIN/CONDOLLESA RICE. I just can’t wait to see what Joe has to say about IRAQ, now that Ms Rice has brokered the parameters for our final VICTORY STRATEGY and the beggining of our troop withdrawal PROUDLY and with HONOR. I am just another Disabled Vietnam Veteran myself. CONDI! CONDI! CONDI! O.K!, So this may very well be out in left field, or should I say RIGHT, HA! Another of my weird ideas which also is my OWN PERSONAL preference for Mr. McCain to opt for another very ACCOMPLISHED and SUCCESSFUL WOMAN such as MEG WHITMAN who we already know is already right next to JOHN on a very personal basis. Now should I be saying MEG! MEG! MEG!
! Another of my weird ideas which also is my OWN PERSONAL preference for Mr. McCain to opt for another very ACCOMPLISHED and SUCCESSFUL WOMAN such as MEG WHITMAN who we already know is already right next to JOHN on a very personal basis. Now should I be saying MEG! MEG! MEG!
I would like to see Rice as VP as well, but I think that she would be perceived as being too closely tied to the Bush administration, and that’s something that McCain can’t afford right now.
I think the most likely choice is Mitt Romney. He’s who I’m hoping for. But if it’s not Romney, then I hope McCain picks a woman, maybe Kay Bailey Hutchinson of Texas. She’s very experienced, the conservative wing of the party would have no problem with her, and she’d peel off an awful lot of Hillary supporters.
Ick… Romney turns me off.
Better choices to possibly move some dems to vote for him, IMHO, are (the winning ticket for dems is #1, #2 is a possible winner overall, others are interchangeable with mixed results).
1. Clinton
2. Kay Bailey Hutchinson (she is more moderate)
3 Marsha Blackburn
4. Bobby Jindal
5. Tim Pawlenty
6. Rob Portman
7. Sarah Palin
8. Tom Ridge
1) Ain’t gonna happen
Not a bad choice, but his pro-choice stand probably makes him unacceptable to conservatives who are already dubious about McCain.
2) Would be a great choice
3) Who?
4) Promising name for the future, but doesn’t add anything to the ticket and doesn’t pass the “ready to be president” test
5) Ditto
6) Who?
7) Tempting choice, but she may not pass the “ready to be president” test either. Besides, not many people outside of Alaska know anything about her. (But on the plus side, she’s pretty hot!)
I’m pretty plugged in to Republican Party politics, and I can tell you that Romney probably has more support within the rank & file of the GOP of any of the serious candidates that have been mentioned. The most compelling factors for me in support of Romney are his experience, his knowledge of the financial markets, and the fact that he can deliver botgh Michigan and Colorado for McCain.
Just so you know: in my state, MN, home of Gov. Tim Pawlenty, poss candidate for McCain’s VP: his “no taxes” program let an Interstate Bridge fall down. 13 People died; some survived, and he actively campaigned against finding them some healthcare/help. And/but you’ll want to know that he caused to be accepted the highest possible bid for Get-the-bridge-rebuilt-before the Repub-convention. Living in MN, looking at the national picture, you’d never know the bridge fell down on his watch. It sucks. Better Romney than Pawlenty. A lifelong Dem, I can’t vote for the empty suit/Chicago thug. I really want to vote for McCain, but Pawlenty sticks in the craw.
What an absolutely stupid @#$%^&* Godforsaken mess this is, this year. Thanks, DNC. At least I have
PUMA
“THE NEW DREAM TICKET” I’m just another intruder, born and raised a Republican…..but I DID PROUDLY VOTE for BILL & HILL TWICE……sounds similar to HILL growing up in Scranton, LOL…..however in lite of the poor performance by the DNC and you’all passing over HILL, I would like to NOW announce the New Dream Ticket! Something on the nature of JOHN MCCAIN/CONDOLLESA RICE. I just can’t wait to see what Joe would have to say to CONDI has to say about IRAQ, now that Ms Rice has brokered the parameters for our final VICTORY STRATEGY and FINAL EXIT, and the beggining of our troop withdrawal PROUDLY and with HONOR. I am personally a Disabled Vietnam Veteran myself. CONDI! CONDI! CONDI! O.K!, So this may very well be out in left field, or should I say RIGHT, HA HA! Another of my weird ideas which also is my OWN PERSONAL preference for Mr. McCain to opt for another very ACCOMPLISHED and SUCCESSFUL WOMAN such as MEG WHITMAN who we already know is already right next to JOHN on a very personal basis. Now should I be saying MEG! MEG! MEG!
! Another of my weird ideas which also is my OWN PERSONAL preference for Mr. McCain to opt for another very ACCOMPLISHED and SUCCESSFUL WOMAN such as MEG WHITMAN who we already know is already right next to JOHN on a very personal basis. Now should I be saying MEG! MEG! MEG!
We’ll settle for Carly Fiona for the economy aspect.
Mitt Romney would be a much better choice in that regard. He knows the economy and the financial markets at least as well as Fiorina, and he’s never been removed from his job for poor performance. Plus, what has Fiorina done that would make her qualified to be president should something happen to McCain? Romney definitely passes the “ready to be president” test … plus he can deliver Michigan and Colorado for McCain. Winning those two swing states would go a long way towards winning the overall election.
I agree with you 100% Dan!
Romney will not attract former Hillary supporters, if McCain is interested in doing that. He should be. A woman as VP would ensure his election. I’d even support Rice as his VP, and I don’t like her politics a damn bit. But I’ll vote for McCain to keep Bozo from winning.
Sorry, Romney is a no go for me as well. I loathe him. It’s going to take every ounce of determination I have to pull the lever for a republican and I might just have to stay home if JM picks Plastic Man as his VP.
well rice does have foreign policy creds though i don’t much like her.
Truth be told, the VP selections typically have very little to do with the overall outcome of the race. The only time they can really affect the race is when the pick is a bad one (Think Bush 41’s pick of Dan Quayle or George McGovern’s selection of Thomas Eagleton … and even then Bush 41 managed to win in 1988.). The best VP selection is one that generates no controversy, that shores up a perceived area of weakness in the presidential candidate, and that can maybe help deliver a key state or two.
By those standards, Obama’s selection of Biden wouldn’t normally be considered a bad pick. It meets two of the three criteria I mentioned, although Biden probably doesn’t help in any specific red state or swing state. But this is a very unusual situation in that you have a party that’s split down the middle 50/50 with the losing candidate being the person that practically everyone was assuming was going to be the nominee only six months ago.
Now that it’s all over, I have to confess that as a McCain supporter, I was quite worried about an Obama/Clinton ticket. I think she would have been his smartest pick. After her, I would have gone with Bill Richardson. His hispanic heritage could have maybe helped Obama pick off Florida, which would really hurt McCain’s chances. (Although I’ve heard from what I consider to be very reliable sources that Bill Richardson has a “zipper problem” like Bill Clinton.)
But having Obama add Joe Biden to the ticket doesn’t give me any cause for trepidation whatsoever.
Tell us more about Meg.
Isn’t it interesting that the only thing Obama and Biden can think about now is how many houses McCain owns? (Actually, it’s his wife mostly.)
Here’s a bit of analysis on personal wealth of Members of Congress. I’m not a John McCain fan, but the “houses” issue really bugs me.
How rich is John McCain personally? The organization Open Secrets has ranked the wealth of all Members of Congress (data available up to 2006). http://www.opensecrets.org/pfds/overview.php
Using the “average” ranking (you can see Open Secrets’ explanation for using this device) it is interesting that John (“many houses”) McCain, with a net worth of $36.4 million, comes in at number 17, behind Democrats such as:
(in millions)
1. Jane Harman 409.4
3. John Kerry 267.8
5. Herb Kohl 171.4
6. Ted Kennedy 102.8
7. Jay Rockefeller 91.7
9. Dianne Feinstein 79.6
10. Frank Lautenberg 79.1
15. Nita Lowey 39.8
16. Nancy Pelosi 38.5
17. John McCain 36.4
Joe Biden ranks next to last in assets, 576th. (Just reverse the rankings in the search engine.) His net assets are slightly negative, about negative $12,500.
36 years earning a high salary and that’s all he has to show for it? Should he have influence in managing our money?
What a poor choice Biden is.
Yeah, a guy whose liquid assets total the price of a Yugo is NOT THE MAN I WANT RUNNING OUR ECONOMY!!!
Fitting to be in the same company as Obama who needed dirty money to buy a house….lol
Ted Kennedy is worth WAY more than that.
trusts kevin.
Obama/Biden Plagiarizing 08
Obama/Biden all show but no go in 08
Yes, I believe most are from Cindy’s inherited assets. She is also housing some family members I’ve heard…a Great Aunt, Daughter? and there are some for investment…rentals I’d guess. The do have a Phoenix house, a condo for DC and another one they use for vacation.
Barry otoh, can’t manage to send a little support to his half brother in Nairobi who lives on $1/mo. Well, you know if you gave to one, you’d have the whole family wanting a hand out. And you know MEchille’s attitude about health care for the poor…go away.
Isn’t there a run-down school in Africa named after Senator Obama which has never received any financial support from him, even though he had promised it a few years back during a visit? If true, that bothers me more than his half-brother.
After having his server attacked by the Obamanuts, and being kicked of the server, it seems….he’s baaaack!!
ATTENTION***ATTENTION***ATTENTION***
LARRY IS BACK UP @
http://larrysinclair-0926.blogspot.com/
Thank you for the link. I had his old link, but not his new one. Last I’d heard they had taken his SSI, he was thrown in jail, denied his medication, etc. I was worried about him. It doesn’t matter to me if people believe what he is saying or not. No human being, especially an American citizen should have to endure what he has had to endure. We’re supposed to have laws in place that protect us from abuse of power. Apparently these laws aren’t the same in Delaware. Did anything happen with Biden’s niece and her trying to put a hit out on him? Something they can’t deny. Too many saw the posts.
Obama a very bad Omen, a Tornado just touched down in Colorado.
Clinton for nominee
eeewww ahhhh that is an Omen. Storms are on the west cost as tropical storm Julios blankets CA & Mexico.
Rain all wek with some sun breaks…rai on Investco?
My relative called from Wisconsin and said that today when Obama spoke he even swore. She said he was antsy and rude - barked that he was hungry while he was up in front of the crowd. She said he was so unpresidential that after he left over half the 300 people there said they would never ever vote for him!
WAtch this video and tell me why the Obama camp has tried to shut Larry up for over a half of year but will never confront him???
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=%20D4X7ehB9kN0&fmt=18
Larse,
I really wish that this video did not claim that Hillary supporters produced this. Some will think that Hillary endorsed it…
Other than that, it asks good questions.
I am Native American. The Gods are Angry and the sure sign of this bad weather here in Colorado means a very very bad OMEN to Obama and his followers. Be afraid now.
for real?? details….
Saw tornado on CNN live and it was a bizarre orange hue. They said that to add to the weirdness of the event, there were no watches or warnings posted because current conditions were not conducive to this type of storm.
If it were Kansas, I wouldn’t think Omen, but Colorado under these circumstances — BIG TIME OMEN!
I agree. I checked it out the internet and found that Denver, Colorado tornadoes are rare and small and usually measure only 10-30 feet wide even when they touch down and that tornado damage in Denver is almost non-existent. I also saw it as an omen.
Ohhh, I think you are correct. We’ve been trapped in a rain and thunderstorms for weeks now. There’s a hot Santa Ana wind blowing up from Ca. and everything feels all out of whack. It is August, isn’t it?
Rumor has it this should all blow over and land in Denver next week. Ha, I’m hoping the skies open up during the Chosen One’s speech. Mother Nature always laughs last.
Great post Medusa! I’ve always hated clowns.
They creep me out!
And…..
Trust me, she will release AFTER THEY VOTE. She is just waiting to see what will happens. But, CNN had to report the delegates themselves CAN CHOOSE WHO THEY WANT TO VOTE FOR.
I love it. Look at Brazile, she looks like someone who is about to shit in her pants b/c her favor bisexual candidate is about to be in deep doodoo.
Dyson tries to talk to intelligently. MLK got it wrong b/c this Obama is only selected for the COLOR OF HIS SKIN by black folks and not for the content (e.g. qualifications) of his character.
This Obama is a blank screen. He has no character. He is no Collin Powell who is MORE QUALIFIED to be president even than Clinton or McCain.
DNC picked this nut b/c of sexism and wanting a black male to prevent the female from making it b/c they know she could.
Make sure and watch the video and rate it. Pass it to everyone you know. Thanks, Get the word out before they vote!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=%20D4X7ehB9kN0&fmt=18
Is this why they don’t want a roll call. Are they afraid the delegates will finally wake up? This story i today’s newspaper has finally broken into the mainstream.
http://www.timesherald.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=20089295&BRD=1672&PAG=461&dept_id=33380&rfi=6