Get a Shovel? Hell Keith, Get a Brain!
By Larry Johnson
Email: larry_johnson@earthlink.net
Site: http://NoQuarterUSA.net
About: Larry C. Johnson is a former analyst at the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency, who moved subsequently in 1989 to the U.S. Department of State, where he served four years as the deputy director for transportation security, antiterrorism assistance training, and special operations in the State Department's Office of Counterterrorism. He left government service in October 1993 and set up a consulting business. He currently is the co-owner and CEO of BERG Associates, LLC (Business Exposure Reduction Group) and is an expert in the fields of terrorism, aviation security, and crisis and risk management, and money laundering investigations. Johnson is the founder and main author of No Quarter, a weblog that addresses issues of terrorism and intelligence and politics. NoQuarterUSA was nominated as Best Political Blog of 2008.[1] He has worked as a private consultant on issues of international terrorism and security for the U.S. Government and private companies. Johnson has appeared as a consultant and commentator in many major newspapers and news programs.[2]
Contents [hide]
1 Background
2 Views
2.1 1996
2.2 1998
2.3 1999
2.4 2000
2.5 2001
2.6 2003
2.6.1 Plame affair
2.7 2008
3 Notes
4 References
5 External links
[edit]Background
Larry Johnson moved to Washington, D.C. in 1979 to begin work on a Ph.D. at the American University. Although he completed successfully all coursework and comprehensive exams, he did not write a dissertation. In 1978 and in 1983-85 he worked in Latin America on community development projects as a community organizer. Returning to the United States in 1985 he joined the Central Intelligence Agency, thanks in part to a letter of recommendation from Republican Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT) that helped to "open doors" for him at the Agency.[3] Johnson entered on duty at the CIA in September 1985 and was a classmate of Valerie Plame. Every member of that class was undercover. After a year in the Career Trainee program, which included a stint with the Afghan Task Force, Johnson was assigned as an analyst in the Middle America Caribbean Division in the Latin American Affairs Office of the Directorate of Intelligence. He received two Exceptional Performance awards and was promoted ultimately to Senior Regional Analyst for Central America.
Johnson remained undercover in the CIA until October 1989, when he resigned from the CIA and started a new job in the Office of Counter Terrorism at the Department of State. Johnson played an instrumental role in launching the Terrorism Rewards program international advertising campaign (working with Diplomatic Security officers Brad Smith and Michael Parks). [4] Johnson also was involved in a variety of crisis management response operations, including the release of hostages from Lebanon and liaison with the Pan Am 103 families. He left government service in October 1993 and started his own business as a consultant.
After leaving government service, Johnson became a frequent guest on many major television news shows when a question of terrorism came up. He was first interviewed by CNN following the capture of Carlos the Jackal. Johnson subsequently appeared on CNN, ABC's Nightline, CBS, the BBC, MSNBC, the Jim Lehrer News Hour, NBC, and NPR. In December of 1999, for example, Johnson was hired by NBC to serve as its terrorist expert for the Y2000 and was in Time Square with Tom Brokaw and Katie Couric ("a lot of fun and the best way to see in the New Year"). Johnson also was hired in January 2002 as a Fox News Analyst and remained under contract until February 2003.
Since 1994 a significant focus of Johnson's consulting work has been with the U.S. military special operations forces in scripting and conducting military counter terrorism exercises. He traveled under orders from the U.S. military to Iraq in May 2006 to work on a short term project.
A registered Republican who supported President Bush in 2000, Johnson became a strong critic of the Bush administration in May 2003 for its conduct of the war in Iraq and, a few months later, for its role in the outing of CIA operative Valerie Plame.[5] He was also featured in the 2004 political documentary Outfoxed: Rupert Murdoch's War on Journalism. Since Robert Novak's controversial disclosure of Valerie Plame as a CIA operative in July 2003, Johnson has contributed to public discourse on intelligence matters, often sparking further controversy. He has been interviewed by both the mass media and the alternative media and published commentaries on a variety of issues, including the Plame affair, the controversy concerning Mary McCarthy, and the resignation of Porter Goss as Director of Central Intelligence.
[edit]Views
This article or section may contain an inappropriate mixture of prose and timeline.
Please help convert this timeline into prose or, if necessary, a list.
[edit]1996
In 1996, Johnson noted that terrorism worldwide was on the decline. "Terrorist incidents [both internationally and in the US] have fallen to levels not seen since the 1970s. Whether measured by the number of incidents, the number of fatalities, or the number of groups, raw statistics demonstrate that the level of terrorist violence has declined since the mid-1980s. In fact, the evidence suggests terrorism was more widespread and deadly 10 years ago."[6]
He also wrote an op-ed piece for the New York Times suggesting that the newer and more deadly terrorist threat to the U.S. was embodied by "networks of terrorists, mostly foreign, working within its borders." Exemplifying this threat was Ramzi Yousef, one of the masterminds behind the 1993 attack on the World Trade Center. In the article, Johnson suggests that enhanced cooperation between intelligence agencies, particularly the FBI and CIA, is mandatory to meet the growing threat of terror networks.[7]
[edit]1998
In 1998, Johnson argued that while overall terrorism was declining, the threat from bin Laden and al-Qaeda should be the focus of American counterterrorism policy:
The nature of the threat posed by Bin Ladin is highlighted by my final chart, number 7. Osama Bin Ladin and individuals associated with him have killed and wounded more Americans than any other group. This chart also illustrates that groups such as Hamas and the Tamil Tigers (LTTE) prior to 1998 have killed more foreigners in the anti-US terrorist attacks. If we take into account the bombings of the US Embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, Osama's status as the most lethal terrorist is certain.[8]
In addition, he told USA Today that bin Laden had participated in "virtually every major attack of terrorism against the United States" in the 1990s. Johnson underlined the threat posed by bin Laden, saying that he was possessed by "hatred and craziness." If left unanswered, "he would continue to terrorize Americans around the world. He has no compunction about killing women and children. He's a complete egalitarian in his murderous attitude."[9]
[edit]1999
In an interview with PBS's Frontline for its 1999 program, Hunting bin Laden, Johnson discussed Osama bin Laden.[10] According to Johnson, Americans had "tended to make Osama bin Laden sort of a superman in Muslim garb." "Actually," he continues, "Osama bin Laden, in my view, represents more of a symptom of a problem, and the problem is this: the Saudi Arabian government, not just Osama bin Laden but many people in Saudi Arabia, have been sending money to radical Islamic groups for years." Johnson continued:
When you look at who's killed Americans in the last 10 years, the individuals he's supported and backed--I'm basing that upon the initial information that's been released in the indictments and conversations with others in the intelligence communities--Osama bin Laden has been the one killing Americans. No other terrorist group in the world has been out killing Americans except for Osama bin Laden.... Osama bin Laden remains out there as the one really targeting us. So, we recognize that he's the threat. He's serious about wanting to kill Americans, but as long as he's in Afghanistan, as long as he doesn't have access to a cell phone, as long as he can't just hop on a plane and travel wherever he wants without fear of being arrested, his ability to plan and conduct terrorist operations is extremely limited. We have to recognize [that] he would like to do a lot of damage. He would like to kill Americans, but wanting to is different from being able to, having the full capabilities in place.[11]
In the interview, Johnson doubted the ability of members of bin Laden's organization to plan and put their lives on the line:
There's not another Ali or Mustafa out there at this point and Osama bin Laden in my view has not been a very effective organizer or leader. He talks a great game and puts out terrific threats as far as stirring the passions in the United States and maybe firing up the imaginations of some young Muslims throughout the world. But when push comes to shove, can he get a group of people who are together who will say: we are going to plan an operation, we're going to put our lives on the line, we're going to go out and try and kill people and we don't care what the consequence is? It hasn't happened.[12]
Frontline asked:
[Is it] ... fair to say what you're saying is that the president of the United States, his national security advisor, his deputy national security advisor for counter-terrorism, are basically blowing smoke [about the danger posed by bin Laden] and his followers]?
Johnson responded:
They're grossly exaggerating the problem. They are hyping it. They shouldn't be talking about rising terrorism. Instead of saying "terrorism's rising," it's not. "Terrorism is spreading," it's not. "More people are dying from terrorism," not the case. But what they should be saying is, "There's one individual out there that really doesn't like us, and he's made it his mission in life to kill Americans, and we've gotta deal with him." But we need to have a voice of reason in that process instead of putting ourselves out crying wolf, because this is essentially what's taking place right now. They call it the administration that cries wolf.[12]
[edit]2000
Johnson co-authored an article in 2000 with Milt Bearden which focused on the threat posed by al-Qaeda specifically, rather than terrorism trends in general. Beardon and Johnson note that new information emerging about the bombings at Kenya and Tanzania in 1998 points to the threat posed by Imad Mugniyah and Osama Bin Laden will require "a coordinated policy that will employ a full range of covert, clandestine, diplomatic, and military operations," concluding:
The Clinton Administration has shot its bolt on the terrorist problem with small effect, and no last minute show of force will change the record. A new administration can start afresh with a more sharply defined set of terrorism goals – Mughniyeh and bin Laden and their protectors for starters – and bring the full, coordinated force of American diplomatic, military, and intelligence capabilities to bear on the problem.[13]
[edit]2001
After Johnson's testimony to the special forum at the U.S. Senate, Gary J. Schmitt, executive director and CEO of the Project for the New American Century, refers in the Daily Standard (blog) to an op-ed piece Johnson wrote two months prior to the 9/11 attacks, claiming that Johnson argued that the US had little to fear from terrorism.[14]
In an editorial entitled "The Declining Terrorist Threat," published in the New York Times on 10 July 2001, Johnson says:
Judging from news reports and the portrayal of villains in our popular entertainment, Americans are bedeviled by fantasies about terrorism. They seem to believe that terrorism is the greatest threat to the United States and that it is becoming more widespread and lethal. They are likely to think that the United States is the most popular target of terrorists. And they almost certainly have the impression that extremist Islamic groups cause most terrorism.... None of these beliefs are based in fact.... While terrorism is not vanquished, in a world where thousands of nuclear warheads are still aimed across the continents, terrorism is not the biggest security challenge confronting the United States, and it should not be portrayed that way.[15]
Ten days after the 9/11 attacks, after quoting the above passage, Timothy Noah concludes a post in his "Chatterbox" feature at Slate: "Johnson's analysis, we now see, was bold, persuasive, and 100 percent wrong."[16] Johnson defended himself against such attacks:
The rightwing is resurrecting an op-ed I wrote in July 2001. I stand by the full article. It is still relevant today. I am accused, incorrectly, of ignoring the threat of terrorism. In fact, I correctly noted that the real threat emanated from Bin Laden and Islamic extremism. President Bush, for his part, ignored the CIA warning in August 2001 that Al Qaeda was posed to strike inside the United States.[17]
After September 11, Johnson appeared several times on FOX News to address the question of military action against terrorism. On 14 November, he defended the FBI's proposal to interview 5,000 students in the U.S. suspected of having information relevant to the September 11 investigations:
I think they should talk to everyone that they feel they have a need to talk to. I mean, look, this is war. This is not a legal proceeding. This isn't the O.J. Simpson trial. The folks that attacked us -- they murdered Americans. And we've got to recognize that in wartime, we should do things differently.[18]
[edit]2003
In January 2003, Johnson wrote an analysis of the relationship between the upcoming U.S. invasion of Iraq and the threat of transnational terrorism. According to Johnson, Bremer's response was to tell him that "it didn't matter what Saddam did or didn't do, we were going to war."[19] The paper warned that an invasion would "do little to destroy the infrastructure of radical Islamic terrorism responsible for the 9-11 attacks." Noting that Saddam Hussein's regime has been a longtime supporter of regional terrorist organizations such as the PLO, Johnson examines contacts between Saddam Hussein and transnational terrorist organizations such as al-Qaeda:
There is no doubt that Iraq is a state sponsor of terrorism—i.e., a country that provides financial support, safe haven, training, or weapons and explosives to groups or individuals that carry out terrorist attacks. . . . According to Central Intelligence Agency data, there is no credible evidence implicating Iraq in any mass casualty terrorist attacks since 1991. . . .
Johnson notes that the period immediately leading up to 2003 saw a rise of activity surrounding terrorist Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, suggesting that "Iraq is willing to help a movement that it would otherwise oppose on ideological grounds. Nonetheless," Johnson concludes, "it is important to understand that Iraqi entreaties to Al Qaeda, are most likely intended as a tactic to bolster Iraq’s ability to fight off a U.S. invasion rather than a deep-seated theological and ideological commitment to the terrorist agenda of Bin Laden.[20]
In that analysis Johnson also warns that the U.S.-led invasion was likely to backfire:
In fact there is a serious risk that a U.S. led war against Iraq may crystallize the diffused anger in the Arab and Muslim world — a heretofore unattained goal of bin Laden and his followers — and persuade more Muslim youths to take up the terrorist banner against America and her citizens.... If we decide to invade Iraq we must be prepared for the contingency that our attack will inspire young Muslims to pursue jihad against the West in general and the United States in particular. Just as the 1979 Soviet invasion of Afghanistan rallied many Muslims, especially young adults to the cause of jihad, a U.S. attack may enable Islamic extremists to attract new followers.[20]
Johnson also gave interviews on the topic of what to do with captured al-Qaeda leaders; while he did not condone torture, he suggested that a "sleep deprivation and reward system" might be useful for getting information from Khalid Sheikh Mohammed:
I don't see a constitutional right to have eight hours of sleep. You shouldn't subject someone to freezing but they don't get to wear mink coats, either.[21]
In May 2003, Johnson joined members of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS) in condemning the manipulation of intelligence for political purposes:
It is a misuse and abuse of intelligence. The president was being misled. He was ill served by the folks who are supposed to protect him on this. Whether this was witting or unwitting, I don't know, but I'll give him the benefit of the doubt.[22]
[edit]Plame affair
After Robert Novak wrote a column identifying the wife of former ambassador Joseph C. Wilson as a CIA officer, the media invited Johnson to comment on the ensuing scandal because he had been a member of the same Career Trainee class with Valerie Plame Wilson. For example, in October 2003, he appeared on Democracy Now to discuss the Plame affair. He told interviewer Amy Goodman that Valerie Wilson's cover should have been respected whether she was an "analyst" or a "cleaning lady": "if she's undercover she's undercover, period. If the media allows themselves to get distracted with those kinds of curve balls, they ignore the issue."[23]
He told a Senate Democratic Policy Committee in October 2003, "My classmates and I have been betrayed. Together, we have kept the secrets of each other's identities a secret for 18 years. Each and every one of us have kept that secret, whether we were in the CIA, in other government service or in the private sector. But this issue is not just about a blown cover. It is about the destruction of the very essence, the core of human intelligence collection activities: plausible deniability, apparently, for partisan domestic political reasons."[24]
Johnson testified at a special joint hearing of Congressional and Senate Democrats on 22 July 2005 about the consequences arising from the Plame affair.[25]
[edit]2008
In 2008, Johnson emerged as a staunch supporter of Hillary Clinton and a strong critic of Barack Obama. Larry Johnson's blog, NoQuarterUSA, became a rally point for Clinton supporters wary of Barack Obama's qualifications to be president. Supporters of Barack Obama insist that a story that first appeared on Johnson's blog--a report that Republican operatives have a tape of Michelle Obama making racially insenstive comments about caucasians--has been "refuted" Barack Obama's Fight the Smears website.[26]. However, Johnson never claimed to have the tape and reported that the Republican operatives controlling it intended to release the tape sometime after the Democratic Convention in August 2008. On October 21, however, he asserted that the operative in possession of the tape had been instructed by the McCain campaign not to release it.[27]
[edit]Notes
^ http://2008.weblogawards.org/polls/best-political-coverage/
^ Larry C. Johnson, "About Me," No Quarter (personal blog).
^ "Former CIA Official Larry Johnson Delivers Democratic Radio Address," transcript posted on official Democratic National Committee's website for The Democratic Party, July 23, 2005], accessed November 21, 2006.
^ Interview with Larry Johnson, confirmed by his supervisor
^ "Ex-CIA official Blasts Bush on Leak of Operative's Name: Democrats' Radio Address Focuses on White House Aides' Role," CNN July 23, 2005, accessed November 21, 2006.
^ Gail Russell Chaddock, "Why Terrorists Pick On the French," Christian Science Monitor (5 December 1996) p. 1.
^ Larry Johnson, "Terrorists Among Us," New York Times (20 August 1996) p. A19.
^ Terrorism Today
^ Lee Michael Katz, "The Hunt for Bin Laden," USA Today (21 August 1998) p. 1A.
^ See Transcript of original interview with Larry C. Johnson, as broadcast on Frontline in 1999. Cf. "Interview: Larry C. Johnson," for Hunting bin Laden, transcript of interview broadcast on Frontline subsequently on 13 April 2001. See also dedicated PBS webpages for media links: Iraq and the War on Terror, Frontline PBS, online featured programs, accessed 19 November 2006.
^ frontline: hunting bin laden: interviews: larry c. johnson | PBS
^ a b [1].
^ As posted in [2].
^ Gary Schmitt, [ 07/25/2005 "Meet Larry Johnson: The CIA official Turned Democratic Spokesman Has a Pre-9/11 Mindset," Daily Standard (blog), July 25, 2005, accessed November 20, 2006.
^ *Larry C. Johnson, "The Declining Terrorist Threat," The New York Times 10 July 2001: A19.
^ Timothy Noah, "(Not Exactly a) Whopper of the Week: Larry C. Johnson," Chatterbox: Gossip, speculation, and scuttlebutt about politics (blog), hosted by Slate September 21, 2001, accessed November 20, 2006. Note the full context of this quotation:
It is, to be sure, a little bit cheap (and slightly at odds with the usual parameters of this feature) to criticize someone for making an erroneous prediction, particularly after a tragedy. Chatterbox is especially reluctant to tag Johnson because Johnson's op-ed was argued forcefully, backed up meticulously with factual data, and bravely at odds with conventional wisdom at the time of its publication. Add in that Johnson now makes his living as a consultant to corporations about terrorism, and therefore had everything to gain by exaggerating the dangers terrorism poses, and the guy practically looks like a hero. Chatterbox, who two decades ago was an editor for the New York Times op-ed page, would have published Johnson's piece had he still been an editor there this past July. In his capacity at Slate, Chatterbox might well have written up Johnson's prediction, and perhaps even endorsed it.
But boy, is he glad he didn't! Johnson's analysis, we now see, was bold, persuasive, and 100 percent wrong. Sadly, a mistake this embarrassing cannot be ignored. As a fellow skeptic, Chatterbox in all sincerity wishes Johnson better luck next time.
^ Larry C. Johnson, "Johnson vs. President Bush," re-posted and updated by SusanHu at DailyKos (blog) July 25, 2005.
^ FOX News Interview with John Garrett (14 November 2001) Transcript #111405cb.260.
^ [3].
^ a b Larry C. Johnson, "Setting the Record Straight on Iraqi Terrorism," posted in Booman Tribune: A Progressive Community (personal blog) 27 January 2003. accessed 19 November 2006.
^ Qtd. in Toby Harnden, "CIA 'pressure' on al-Qa'eda chief," The London Telegraph 5 March 2003: 16.
^ Qtd. in Nicolas D. Kristof, "Save Our Spooks," The New York Times 30 May 2003:A6.
^ Democracy Now (3 October 2003)[4]
^ U.S. Senate, Democratic Policy Committee Meeting on the CIA Operative Leak, (24 October 2003).
^ Letter to the Senate.[Needs full source citation; see "References" section.]
^ Tumulty, Karen (2008-06-12). "Will Obama's Anti-Rumor Plan Work?", Time Magazine. Retrieved on 20 June 2008.:"a story that apparently first made a big splash on the Internet in late May in a post by pro-Hillary Clinton blogger Larry Johnson"
^ Whitey Tape, API, Phil Berg, and Andy MartinSee Authors Posts (1090) on August 27, 2008 at 9:46 PM in Current Affairs
This is truly astonishing. If the delusional crap spun by Olberman is indicative of all thinking among Obamabots then Barack is truly in trouble. Check out this exchange between Olberman and Scarborough:
Bill Clinton’s performance tonight was masterful. He reminded Democrats of what he accomplished in 8 years and graciously stated that the same could be true of Obama. Bill also set the bar very high for what Obama has to accomplish. Clinton is the master of the intimacy of the convention center, which allows him to make everyone listening feel as if he is talking to them. But he also framed the upcoming election in terms that surely has Obama’s advisors kicking themselves. Why?
For starters they will have to reluctantly concede that Barack’s attacks on Bill Clinton’s Presidency were wrong. Bill has mapped out campaign themes for them. They now have to follow Clinton’s lead or look like the clowns they are. And then there will be the comparison between Bill tonight and Barack tomorrow. But Barack is not speaking in an intimate setting. He will try to match Bill in an outdoor stadium dressed up like a John Belushi Toga Party. Not only will Barack be unable to re-create the sense of “I’m talking just to you” that Bill Clinton demonstrated. Nope. He will be in an outdoor arena that will certainly conjure up something like the public rallies filmed by Leni Riefenstahl. It will be the kind of pageantry that will repel rather than attract many Americans.
Barack would not have as much a problem with most Hillary supporters if he had run a campaign praising the accomplishments of the Clinton era. He could have made the case that he was ready to bring a new vision to build on the foundation laid by Bill, but he did not. He ran against Bill’s legacy but did not mention him by name. Nope. He praised Ronald Reagan for changing the direction of the country. He said Reagan did it in a way that Clinton did not. Don’t take my word. Thank God for video tape.
Let’s give Bill Clinton credit. He had every reason to tell this chump to shove it. Instead, he rose above his personal hurt and the insults, and still tried to help Barack. But Bill can’t win it for Barack. As the days unfold folks will come to appreciate more and more that Barack is no Bill Clinton. We know Bill Clinton. Barack, you ain’t got the stuff.
(small, medium and large sizes; for both dogs and cats)
+ 
Larry,
Barack “coulda, woulda, shoulda”
a LONGGGGGGGGG time ago!
The Clinton’s have proven (yet again) they are an A-Number-One Class ACT
AND the striking polar opposite is in FULL VIEW with MO and her DUPE
walking examples of what 20 yrs of hate speech will do to a face!!!
Larry, Great! I love those comparisons between BO and the Clintons! They are glaring! But only for people who have eyes! Not to mention brains. And we know there aren’t too many brains out there!
My God, Please give me Clintons back! I need to believe again.
Thanks Larry for your right on observations! and great articulation.
JC
And we know there aren’t too many brains out there!
I’d say there a lot of brains out there, Bill Clinton is a great example. In fact, if you take President and Senator Clinton’s remarks as book ends, Bill and Hillary put BO is in a world of “What Happened?”, faster than the time it takes to “up and disappear like a fart in the wind”.
BO won’t have any Shaw Shank Redemtion waitin’ for ‘em.
Bingo! Obama was first and foremost campaigning against the Clinton legacy–which was such a big mistake! He lost a huge chunk of voters because he chose to be so bone-headed. And Obama is supposed to have good judgment!
As you say, Obama could have chosen to build upon the Clinton legacy without delving into nostalgia, etc, but instead chose to make the Clintons the enemy. And he wonders why PUMAS exist!
The Obamas are so small in comparison to the Clintons!
This is Obama’s wet dream…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D8meb3bvFxY&feature=related
Notice that they sing “he’s the ‘one’”…
Sorry, “I can see clearly now…”
Obama has no track record on positions I care about. Present votes and six oops, I made a mistake on “the voting button” does not inspire confidence…
Where is the beef? Where is the Democrat?
Criminy, the guy’s stood firmly on both sides of every issue. Why are you complaining?
Got an other shovel?
Keith Ohlbermann is a piece of trash. Cornell University has no responsibility for this tool.
However, for such a great Applied Sciences [Physics, Math, Engineering, et.al] Research University you don’t think of Broadcast Journalism and Cornell in the same sentence.
For a man who thinks he’s the reincarnation of Edward R. Murrow, my Washington State University alumni would beg to differ and so would the Edward R. Murrow School of Communications at WSU.
I’m glad I studied Mechanical Engineering and Computer Science, particularly the former–you can’t bs your way to a degree.
The bastard’s gotten very FAT along with being most obnoxious, hasn’t he?
And his hair!!! WOW, does it look like greasy, messy shit when he doesn’t have the MSNBC makeup studio at his beck and call–he looks like fatty dogmeat, warmed over!
I know it’s mean to make fun of peoples’ appearances (though men do it about women all the time, and get away with it) but I do think it’s interesting to see a person’s interior viciousness and pure ugliness manifest itself on the exterior they present to the world.
I wonder how Katy Tur is enjoying shacking up with a great big fat bastard? And an OLD, WHINEY, childish, UNPROFESSIONAL great big fat bastard, to boot? Poor thing is wasting her youth on that geezer…tempis fugit, after all!
who’s Katy Turd?
Since tomorrow is supposed to be a big day for Mr. Stinky, lets all wear orange to show that we will not go along with the hand picked nominee.
tinyurl.com/6ozrob
Did I get first again??
OHH i have a perfect Orange T shirt from Jamaica Mon!! No matter how many times I wash it - that BRIGHT ORANGE remains!! haha!
but no that will remind me of the ORANGE SATAN
how about GREEN? weren’t they trying to link us to hamas? PUmas?
Go to tinyurl.com/6ozrob and you will see why it must be ORANGE!
Now that BO is the official Dem Candidate, I hope the Rethugs will give us a little taste of what’s to come. It would be hilarious if MEcHELLe’s Whitey taped were released early Thur. morning. I’d give anything to see BO stutter through his acceptance speech after that. And MEcHELLe……………………
Orange it is!!
Barack Obama is no Bill Clinton, and Michelle Obama is no Hillary Clinton.
At least the Clintons love America. Michelle and Barack, on the other hand, jumped up and down at their pew in the GOD DAMN AMERIKKKA Church in inner city Chicago for twenty years.
Gotta wonder how many months of Reverend Wrong we’ll be treated to courtesy of the Republicans.
I can see it now. Intercut Barky’s smirking lecturing with Reverend Wright’s screaming.
And play that ad every ten minutes from now until election day.
Man oh Man. What a waste of a perfectly dreadful presidency.
I think the biggest stick the republicans will use on the One, will be Rekzo and the other cohorts of corruption the One has surrounded himself with . So many reasons not to vote for The One that it could me a multi-pronged assault.
Nobama!!
cut this garbage…its so unnecessary. how you think obama’s words are so praising of Reagan and attacking CLinton is beyond me. listen to what he says…reagan’s term of officed ushered in a new direction, and it did. big deal, the country was ready for the stupid light on a hill, as RR said. I hated the guy, but there is no denying he took this country out of its pit…that’s not saying that Reagans’ policies were good! Do any of you have a brain??
Yah. We have enough brains to realize that 8 years of a Clinton Presidency left us with money in our pockets and a good feeling about America. Reagan left us feeling broke and scared of the rest of the world. Not much of a choice, IMHO.
If Obama had shown even an iota of “Party Unity” he would never have bashed fellow Democrats. Praising Reagan was just fodder for the Republicans. Face it, the dream of a Democratic POTUS went under the bus last night, and you’re to stupid to even realize it. Fool.
BO in NOT a Democrat…he is NOTHING; he uses people, things, institutions to further personal ambition. The list is long: Ayers, Trinity, AAs, Edwards, his own grandmother, Hillary, Bill, the list is looooong. A man without a soul, and absolutely no principles.
Reagan was a Democrat. Until he felt that the Party was going in the wrong direction.
That’s true. Remember Reagan’s famous words, “I haven’t left the Democratic party. It has left me.” A lot of Dems are echoing those words this year.
The Clintons are shrewd, and even the GOP knows it. Tomorrow the tiny man Barry is will be apparent as he chants hollow slogans to his fervent cultists. The contrast with Hillary and Bill will be too much to surmount.
And the Clinton’s do NOT need props such as
a mock up of a Greek Temple to enhance who
they are and what their message is.
Shame on the Democratic party for forcing this
schmuck onto America.
Can you imagine trying to lay out a platform in that setting? Well, that’s alright since they don’t want the public at large or even Democrats to know just what their agenda or party platform really is.
hmmmm, let’s see note to self: 1. Appoint Minister Farrakhan as head of Treasury and Redistribution. 2. Bill Ayers as Secretary of Education…free anything to anyone of color. 3. MEchille, Secretary of Health and Welfare (cut off SS and unemployment to whitey for Reparations.) 4. Call Ludacris to rewrite that crummy anthem and invite for an overnight in the Lincoln room. No, I don’t think they’d like it to be public.
So true! Both Sen Clinton and Pres Clinton laid out the themes (general and specific) for Obama. They also defined the core concerns of the Democratic Party! The Clintons are a true class act!
If Obama gives one more speech about “hope” or “change” or “we are the ones we’ve been waiting for” I’m gonna scream!
Sadly, the Ozombies don’t realize that this grandiose Greek setting is ripe for satire and parody. I guess I’ve got to pull out my Halloween Greek garb for the occasion. Laura Ingram on Fox is already making fun of the whole Greek spectacle. Didn’t Obama get the memo that the Repugs have already poked fun at this type of PR & staging?
Think of it as the new Bob Newhart drinking game.
For everytime you hear hope and change you have to take a drink. I bet you’ll be on your face in twenty minutes during Bambi’s speech tomorrow night.
“So true! Both Sen Clinton and Pres Clinton laid out the themes (general and specific) for Obama. They also defined the core concerns of the Democratic Party!” Exactly, Trixta!
Hillary and Bill Clinton possibly did more damage to Obama by pointing out what he must do if he wins the election than any outright criticism could ever damage him. The acclaim each of them received from the persons at the convention must have been very intimidating. And the crowd’s reception for Bill Clinton-was it the longest standing ovation in history? Think Brazille, Dean, Obama, and Kennedy are having second thoughts?
Bill Clinton was one of the most successful, intelligent, and compassionate Presidents the U.S. has had. He actually fought a war where oil was not the chief concern — humanity was.
WTF!!!!! Wolfson just said on Greta Van Sustern’s show (Fox) that Pres Clinton’s speech was not shown on the network stations. Is this true?
If so, I guess they were worried he would outshine Obama somehow. The truth is, no one can deliver a speech like Clinton!
i was going to say, no, but come to think of it, I was watching my pbs channel. Hmmmmmm. There was some talk yesterday that the DNC was going to put a 5 second delay on his speech in case he said something naughty. I wonder if they scrapped that idea in favor of shutting him down on networks. I’m curious, too.
It wasn’t shown on the broadcast channels only on the cable news channels, PBS and C-Span. The broadcast channels haven’t been showing any of the convention during primetime. (8-11 p.m.) They’ve been showing their regular programming.
Some Democrat Barack is, praising Reaganomics on the campaign trail — which he did regularly, by the way. He’s trying to tell us Reagan did better for us than Bill Clinton? Good luck with that.
My Economic teacher in college in the l980’s said what it would be like in America today with Reagan policies. We would be a service nation no longer an industrial nation. People would be working 2 jobs to make a living, hospitalization or education would not be affordable and so on. Everytime I hear Obama mention Reagan’s name I just want to puke. To me that is a good reason not to vote for him. The Clinton l990’s were the best years for me, family members and friends and for most Americans. I would give anything to have those years again. After 8 years of Bush, I believed Hillary would have rolled up her sleeves and worked for the middle class on day 1.
You had a good econ. prof. He was right.
( for further, disgusting, reading on this subject, see Kevin Phillips’ “The Politics of Rich and Poor.” )
Guess Obama is at the wrong convention. His takes place next week. I wonder if the GOP will play the video of Obama praising their grand leader Reagan.
Oh, this is rich—a republican nominated Obama today at the convention!
Well I guess Soetoro can make up the rules as he goes along. A Republican nominating a democrat? That is just so wrong — but then Soetoro is a slimy creep.
Since the “convention” is now over —
The next event is —– who will McCain choose as his running mate?
I suppose it’s all meant to pander to the Republican voters that aren’t strong on McCain. Boy, they had better take a good hard look before jumping ship.
I am still angry that President Clinton’s speech was not broadcast during the network’s coverage. What a disgusting insult to the only two-term Democratic president since FDR.
Wow. Not one of the 3 networks covered it?
Did they cover the other speakers?
Larry,
“As the days unfold folks will come to appreciate more and more that Barack is no Bill Clinton. We know Bill Clinton. Barack, you ain’t got the stuff.”
Well then who does??
I’m voting McCain!
You have said you won’t be voting for the war hero.
So who is left?
Time to take a stand!
come on mccain
you could make this so much easier by picking a SERIOUSLY awesome VP (no one comes to mind but hillary and there’s no way she’d accept I realize now)
throw some red meat veggie surprise at the LIBS by acting all moderate and stately and blue collar!!!
it will make them spontaneously combust
make us admire you
respect you
trust you
all the things we can NOT do with Barry!!
buck your neo con nasty backers
make us proud
that would send them into the stratosphere!!!
(I would love it personally)
pay back snicker
Please.. John McCain…
NO ROMNEY!!!!!
Seems like the comparison is between classy (Clintons) and trashy (Soetoro/Obamas).
Keith Olberman looks terrible. Did he just wake up or have an argument or a four hour erection? A completely unprofessional hack.
Maybe the little girl he has been dating left him.
Who in the HELL would want to date Olberman…females that is? Must be a coverup b/c if anyone is on the downlow it’s Olberman who everyone has seen during this entire season has a mancrush on OBAMA. That’s why Matthews and Olberman can’t stand one another - they both kneel down to Obama.
lol you think they’re jealous of each other?
no he loves ME more
noooooo he loves MEEEEEEEEE more!!
did you see? he just looked over here.
yea he was looking at me
noooooooo he was looking at meeeee!
roflmao!
Compared to either one of them, Monica Lewinsky was an amateur.
Why Olberman looked bad? The showers were broken in the funny farm where he spends his days.
Uber mann did not look half as bad as Tweety did….wth?! Has he been sleeping on a park bench? Hunched over, wrinkled clothes, beefy face and the hair!!! Simply splayed across his face as if he were a mental patient who could not even bother to sweep the pieces from his face. Is MSNBC out of hair spray?
But he IS a mental patient!
Maybe Joe can smack Keith and the rest of the clowns with the SHOVEL. God forbid if you are not all man loving on OBAMA. MSNBC AND NBC cooked their own goose.
joe gives back to ko and then what? the sound of crickets! that sounds about right! ko take your dang shovel and bury yourself
Yes, Larry, I find a lot of Obama supporters delusional. They sound like college kids who haven’t lived in the real world. And this business of insulting Clinton supporters and still expecting to win– I’m not sure how that works either.
Yeah, Olberman came off like a douche. Was Matthews laughing at him?
Nice post Larry.
I think there was another testy fight between Matthews and Olbermann after Hillary’s speech.
BTW anyone notice how much Obama digs Biden’s wife?
I was wondering if anyone else noticed the big wet one Obama planted on Biden’s wife. Guess someone did.
you people need to grow up
Should I emulate Michelle Obama and attend the GOD DAMN AMERIKKKA church? Would that make me mature?
We will as soon as our Hope for Change comes true.
Once Obama is taken down by the GOP we’ll happily GROW UP.
Obama’s campaign and the DNC/Bot Fawning and spectacle has been VULGAR! Makes me think of the MTV Sweet Sixteen Birthday Parties for the Spoilest, Snottiest, Rude, children I’ve ever seen
who get the most expensive cars and shows- Such a waste of money.
The thought that THOSE kids will be running OUR country truly makes me SICK.
YOU need to get over the fact that we’re NOT voting for Nobama.
Buh bye.
Oh gee thanks. Maybe growing up is coming in here, posting under the moniker “silly hate site”, not knowing where the fucking CAPS LOCK and SHIFT keys are, and posting with no proper sentence structure, introductory upper case character, or full stop at the end. Are you still practicing printing your name in preschool? How long did it take you to type that comment? Did you have help from a parent or guardian? What are the Obamajugend meetings like?
And you people need to grow a brain.
What polls are Scarborough and Olberman looking at? Likely voters? Bullshit.
I’ll tell you some likely voters - PUMAS that’s who will be likely voters and Rasmuissen, Gallup - all are proving that the Obama campaign needs to be a lot more worried than Scarborough and Olberman are making mention of in this clip.
http://www.gallup.com/home.aspx
Gallup didn’t show a bump yesterday after Hillary’s speech. We’ll have to see what tomorrow brings. It seems that in Obamaland a 4-point lead would be setting the world on fire. Hmmm? Compare that to Bill Clinton’s 16-point post-convention lead.
Bill and Hillary were the stars of this super circus.I know that must hurt Bo and Mos narcisstic egoes but it is time for the Clintons to quit babysitting these two.Who cares if they lose and blame the Clintons—makes no difference to real Democrats.
You’re right. I think the only thing holding them back is the campaign debt. They’re not that rich they can shovel their own way out. As for party fidelity: I think you nailed it. They’re both staunch party members but they need to get a clue: what they’re looking at is not repeat not their party.
Isn’t it time to start busing in all those who will worship at the temple oh-blah-blah tomorrow?
C’mon….time is a wastin’ here!
We know Bill Clinton. Barack, you ain’t got the stuff.
And never will.
There’s more more cat fight. This time, I give you
Keith Obamaman vs Tweety
It’s really fun watching the meltdown of these bozos.
looks to me like the dislike for ko is showing up quite a bit. ko sure does know how to show his butt.
Interesting. That’s the 3rd in-house argument I’ve seen on MSNBC this week (in clips…I never watch that network)! Joe Scarborough gave it to asshole Shuster, Scarborough gave it to Olbermann and this! Looks like all-is-not-wonderful-at-MSBON!
They ACCLAIMED Obama? They sidestepped the entire voting process where Hillary would have looked strong with her 18,000,000+ voters? They hijacked the nomination and held an ACCLAMATION?
Is no one going to react?
Can this dangerous DNC be prevented from taking part in the GE?
Indeed. We were disappointed that no one has stood up during the convention and spoken the truth.
Now we’ll have to let the courts work in the matter of Berg Vs Obama and the other lawsuit filed in IL over Obama lying on his Bar application.
Besides that, it wait ’til Nov, don’t stay home and by all means Vote for McCain.
Obama must never reach the WH.
Yep. They made sure they stole the whole thing - from the illegal caucases, Rules and Bylaws Committee shenanigans, and now they’ve “Acclaimed” Barky. What the Hell is that?
Sounds like, looks like and smells a coup d’état to me. And isn’t it funny how they’ve gotten away with it on national television, right under the voter’s noses. It’s mass hysteria. Pitiful.
And did you notice that California and other states passed? I’m sure Pelosi had her hand in that. Must have been that Hillary was going to make The One look weak with all her delegates, so she made them step aside.
Just added more fuel to the fire for me. I will work my heart out for John McCain. I love Hillary and Bill, and when she comes back in ‘12, I’ll do the same for her. But I will not - NOT - vote for The Thief.
McCain ‘08
Hillary ‘12
Dee, Murphy told us that this was planned…California would pass so that Hillary would never be ahead in the count even momentarily.
This is a page right out of the Bush, Rove and corporate media playbook. I remember they did they same thing in 2004, when none of the stations would place NH in Kerry’s until Bush had enough of a count to make sure Kerry was not ahead for even one moment.
One station even turned NH blue only to instantly blink it white again…you can imagine some poor uninformed soul getting screamed at for posting the results because he was not in on the ruse.
I’m with you dee4hill!
Obama wins nomination by Acclamation? It sounds like he won by default.
CA who had 441 delegates passed in the roll call. By the time they got down to NY, Obama had only 1520 or so, then Hillary moves to nominate via acclamation. I don’t think they were worried that Hillary would get it if they let it play out till the very last state had a chance to be heard, but I think their biggest worry was that Obama would not reach the magic number of 2210 which was needed, which would have caused a big kafuffle.
This was rigged, just like the caucuses in Texas and other states. They had to give it to him via acclamation, which is just like affirmative action, they need to lower the bar for him.
There is no way Obama could win the General Election. The GOP will make mince meat out of him now. The Clintons did everything they could for him, which showed class and dignity. Now they can’t be blamed when he loses.
Yes, you’ve got it. Obama’s the affirmative action candidate. He gets the nod just for showing up to the party. I hope he doesn’t expect the same treatment at the G.E.
Seems there is an element of evil in America today. The AAs are being exploited by CORPORATE CONTROLLED Government and MEDIA using all the media GIMMICKS to PROP up Obama and his cult, the Clintons are being DEMEANED. The Democratic Party has OFFICIALLY become a LAUGHING STOCK. WOMEN are mere CHATTEL and BUSHCO gets a free ride for the Occupation and murder of millions of innocent people.
And OUR VOTES DO NOT COUNT. We are witnessing the destruction of DEMOCRACY right before our dumbed down, drug ridden CELEB Idolatry eyes and there is NOTHING the SANE citizens can do about it.
When you phrase our situation like that ,it sounds dire for America and Democracy. I felt this way after the 2000 Supreme Court selection of W and the whole mess was displayed on TV and where were the protests and outrage and Media coverage? I think we have already seen the beginnings of the fall of a great civilization.
Nobama!!
This whole coup was planned YEARS ago. What are the odds that the last night of the Democratic Convention would end on the anniversary of Martin Luther King’s “I Have a Dream” speech?” This is Act IV in the Dog and Pony Show.
They really do believe we’re so stupid we would believe this is all just a wonderful coincidence….an AA is the first Dem nominee and his acceptance speech just happens to be given on the anniversary of Martin Luther King’s speech. Crock-’O-CRAP.
Heads they win. Tails we lose.
I am speechless…
If you lay down with dogs you get up with fleas…
If you lie down with dogs with the wrong type of fleas, you get plague, easily enough.
Not against dogs in any way.
Just sayin’.
Thoughts on a little project: Let’s all write John McCain, who can appeal to a lot more disaffected Democrats by making some plank changes, keeping in mind that repuglies always vote for the person thrust on them (think the idiot bush), so will vote McCain regardless. Hey John McCain, promise you will appoint judges that represent all Americans, not the jerkoffs the now screw over America. Work hard to promote alternative fuels, and go after the fisa criminals, put them in prison where they belong. Stop the offshore oil drilling scam, and work for the immigrants who have given so much for our country, who have had to endure so much lately just for republican political advantage. There is so much you can do to win over true Democrats that will be very good for America. Then more Democrats who recognise what a fraud obama is will vote for you. Oh, and one more thing. Tell Rush, Rove and all the other pieces of shit like them to shove it, that you represent all Americans. If you do this, you’ll be a shoo in. Thanks for listening.
Larry: I’m a PUMA and it’s time we take a stand against the democracy that has been presented to us today.
Many young people really don’t know what it is to struggle every day to make ends meet. They rely on parents or guardians to supply them with they want. You can’t blame them for not vetting Obama, or falling for the hope and change line. It sounds good and that’s what they’re use to.
We, like always, must fight for our country. We can’t let an inexperienced, not trustworthy character pull off this election process and win in November. It will take each one of us to vote against him.
I’m disappointed in the roll call. That was not a roll call; it was a mark against all we Americans stand for. If we let this go without retribution, that means we lose.
>I’m disappointed in the roll call. That was not a >roll call; it was a mark against all we Americans >stand for. If we let this go without retribution, >that means we lose.
This will not go without retribution! There are millions of Hillary supporters and PUMAs that will not vote for Obama and punish the democrats for the way they conducted their primary elections. I for one am not convinced to vote for Obama, and there is nothing he can say tomorrow in his shrine to change my mind.
The democrats know how to lose elections they are suppose to win. They will lose this one. They do not deserve to win. There is too much corruption and sexism that has to be dealt with, corrected and healed. The liberal media has a lot to answer for as well for contributing to the illusion Obama has spun. Leave it to the GOP, one thing they know how to do well is win general elections.
This is a time to put country first above party. Obama is not the right person for the country at this time. It doesn’t matter what party he is attached to. Remember, the reasons the Republicans weren’t that thrilled with McCain at first, is because he’s not a wingnut, and is more of a centrist. One thing McCain has is a consistent record of bipartizenship. He is close to center on many issues.
It can’t stop with Obama. We need to send ALL the Dems that supported him packing. We need to elect Green and Independent candidates in November. Send a message. They certainly can’t do any worse than the 2 parties we’ve allowed ourselves to be stuck with.
Time for a real change.
Agree completely.
Did you notice that Wexler, the rep who sold FL down the drain, was MIA? He’s facing reelection against a Dem (running as an Independent) who is well known in local politics. Hope Wexler isn’t expecting BO to pay him back.
Kick the bums out!!
Any puma’s groups, or site supporting John McCain please let us know in our comment section. Thanks to the many of you who have already
http://countusout.wordpress.com/
Fuck. Right now I’d take Adolf Hitler as McCain’s running mate and still vote for him.
um no
um nooooo :-/
You won’t have to. McCain would never accept that.
Obama, on the other hand, if it would help his limitless personal ambition, would.
I’ve watched Joe for a long time, even though we’re on different sides of the isle. He’s the ONLY show I watch on MSNBC. I’ve always found him to be fair. Sure, he’s a Repug, but you won’t find a more fair and respectable commentator on tv.
Olberman is mental. It’s bad enough to shout down your guests, but to do it to one of your peers is about as disrespectful as you can get. I honestly believe when Barky loses, he’s headed for a complete breakdown.
We could only get so lucky.
McCain ‘08
Hillary ‘12
Don’t call Joe Scar respectable. Dumped his wife for a preggers aide. (No clue what happened to the baby…doesn’t seem to have been born) Ran for office one more time even tho he knew all this. Resigned so as to hand the office over to another rethug. Claimed it was to spend time with his kids during the divorce and promptly dumped them, too, to move to NYC for the TV gig.
Meanwhile another aide of his was bludgeoned to death in his office in Florida and Joe himself called all the news outlets and lied that this young, healthy woman (Lori Klausutis) had a “history of health problems.” I sourced this myself.
Governor Jebby Bush had an unlicensed Medical Examiner who had been kicked out of another state for fraud sign off on this bullshit.
ok so we had BUSH ON THE COUCH
NOW I wonder, who will write
BO ON THE LOUNGE CHAIR?
lol
The convention is over for me. I got to hear Hillary and Bill, and made sure my delegate friends were OK in the sea of Obamabots.Hillary was amazing,
How could any right minded dem have not said “what if ? ”
I was listening in my car to Fox news today to the role call vote. As each state was declaring the tallies, I was shocked at how it wasn’t in line with how the delgates were seated to their candidate.To hear Nancy Pelosi say “can you repeat those numbers again? In the democratic party every vote counts ”
I really was disgusted, especially after the RBC in DC.At least Ma. was close and didn’t completely cave.
Clinton 52, zero 65
Im want a big long break from politics, and think I’ll jump right back on board when and if Hillary runs in 2012.
I’m done now, my mom called last night after Hillary’s speach and informed me she drank the Kool-Aid because Hillary handed her the glass. I’m going to pass.
Nobama…Never
This is my strategy
Obama has to lose BIG or Hillary will never be President in 2012, Madam President that is
McCain ‘08
to sit home is a wasted vote, and a BETTER chance for zero to win
the “Democrats for Mccain” bumber sticker is going on the car tomorrow. right below my “Hillary” sicker Hope some zombie doesn’t mess with my car….
PUMA !!!!
I wouldn’t put anything past those thugs!
I wish I could put my bumper sticker on my car here in latte land but my car would get keyed.
Instead I have my bumper stickers on the wall at work
Obama/Marx 08
“I would rather vote for a boring old war hero than an anti-American racist”
and my favorite..which I just made up
“Don’t blame me for your humiliating defeat
I voted for Hillary”
Sad, isn’t it, Seattle?
I always thought I’d have to hide my support of Hillary from the rightwing thugs with CDS. I had no idea I’d have to hide it from my own creative class compatriots.
They’re not your compatriots. They are the dregs who have never voted or cared about participating in the process. They have been brainwashed by their messiah but understand nothing about what he represents.
They are dangerous people like the British soccer hooligans who go out and vandalize and riot when their team loses.
Don’t feel too bad. We’re living history.
Remember reading about Hitler fueling his rise to power by telling his followers that they were the chosen, the superior, and thinking to yourself, no, people couldn’t be that blind?
Remember when Dubya campaigned for the presidency, how outrageous it seemed that people would actually buy a Yale grad’s good ol’ boy act? Remember how we all laughed at the sheer unadulterated credulity of the suckers who voted him in? Remember how superior we felt to them?
Now you know the truth… We have met the enemy, and it is us.
The convention is over for me. I got to hear Hillary and Bill, and made sure my delegate friends were OK in the sea of Obamabots.Hillary was amazing,
How could any right minded dem have not said “what if ? ”
I was listening in my car to Fox news today to the role call vote. As each state was declaring the tallies, I was shocked at how it wasn’t in line with how the delgates were seated to their candidate.To hear Nancy Pelosi say “can you repeat those numbers again? In the democratic party every vote counts ”
I really was disgusted, especially after the RBC in DC.At least Ma. was close and didn’t completely cave.
Clinton 52, zero 65
Im want a big long break from politics, and think I’ll jump right back on board when and if Hillary runs in 2012.
I’m done now, my mom called last night after Hillary’s speach and informed me she drank the Kool-Aid because Hillary handed her the glass. I’m going to pass.
Nobama…Never
This is my strategy
Obama has to lose BIG or Hillary will never be President in 2012, Madam President that is
McCain ‘08
to sit home is a wasted vote, and a BETTER chance for zero to win
the “Democrats for Mccain” bumber sticker is going on the car tomorrow. right below my “Hillary” sticker Hope some zombie doesn’t mess with my car….
PUMA !!!!
Larry, you are dead ON here:
“For starters they will have to reluctantly concede that Barack’s attacks on Bill Clinton’s Presidency were wrong. Bill has mapped out campaign themes for them. They now have to follow Clinton’s lead or look like the clowns they are. …Barack would not have as much a problem with most Hillary supporters if he had run a campaign praising the accomplishments of the Clinton era. … He praised Ronald Reagan for changing the direction of the country. He said Reagan did it in a way that Clinton did not. ”
BINGO.
Clinton was MASTERFUL!!!! And not one news station ran with the never ending standing ovation he got.
He also wrote his own speech. lol Barack must be seething…Michelle, every time they showed her looked like she just swallowed a rotten peanut.
This convention is over. Everyone knows it should’ve been the Clintons cleaning up after another Bush.
Clinton was MASTERFUL!!!! And not one news station ran with the never ending standing ovation he got.
PBS did I gave up on cable news sometime in late May. Something about a special comment from some talking headturned me off to all cable news so its been PBS and C-SPAN
I’m just listening to Bill’s speech again, he was brilliant! Biden was full of it. Get that shovel out and raise your watches above your heads!
The DNC has not given any intelligent, reasonable, thinking person a reason to vote for Obama.
I had intended to vote for neither Obama or McCain. Because of the manipulation and lack of a real roll call vote, I will be voting for McCain.
Country before party.
I don’t think he likes Romney…
Reagan and particularly the Bush family all the way back to Prescott Bush have always hated FDR and were determined to gut the New Deal. Prescott Bush was even a part of an assassination conspiracy against FDR. All of the privatization they’ve been trying to ram through as well as de-regulation is part of that plan. Lucky for us that Bush hasn’t been totally successful. I think Mac will be reasonable without a Republican congressional majority regarding regulations, etc.
After nearly starving for 2 generations after the Civil War, FDR was a beloved hero to my family.
there is a traitor ROOSEVELT on the rules and bylaws committee that fell over backwards for bambi
so if they are related
this ASS did his grandpappy a big dis-service
I think it’s time to unite behind our nominee, Barack Obama. Both Clintons have now given ringing endorsements to Obama. Bill Clinton has said Obama is ready to be president. It’s time for the PUMA folks to follow the Clintons’ lead and support Obama/Biden.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8cNtH1mULo
Just in case you wondered…
We are FDR/Reagan/Clinton/McCain Democrats.
This coalition also includes PUMA..
We are deciding this election as we have decided every election in modern history
Obama doesn’t meet the min requirements for the job of president.
We are looking for a much better experienced candidate in a time great of crisis.
We are looking for a candidate with core values and convictions that have passed many laws and stood behind them despite opposition.
We are looking for a candidate that values country before party, country before self.
We want a candidate who will defend America and will never surrender and will never cause America to be humiliated.
John McCain won the Iraq war for America!
Obama wished defeat for America and therefore is disqualified from being president by all these voters who decide every election.
Ah, how sweet! Get over it! we will NOT vote for the empty suit!
NO WAY, NO HOW, NOBAMA!
is that what you heard? Good. it was meant that you were to just think that.
look below the surface, read between the lines, and you will see that the Clintons set the bar for Obama and McCain…Obama/Soetoro will never meet them.
if you truly were a freedom fighter you would understand this. but you are not, you are a faker just like THE ONE
You will suffer humiliating defeat, and a long hard fall.
Get a life.
The majority of posters are now officially John McCain supporters.
John McCain will become the 44th President of the United States on November 4, 2008.
Get over it.
He isn’t “our” nominee, FF, and if you believe that, or that people naturally fall in line for a party choice, you really have a lot to learn, not only about America, but about freedom. Freedom is choice.
He’s not my nominee. This is no longer my party.
Well, fine, you just go & do that & leave us the HELL alone. Buh-bye
LOL….we aren’t sheeple. We’re DEMOCRATS. We vote our conscience. One person, One vote…remember that? MY vote belongs to ME. NOT the FRAUD “Democratic” Party.
BO is NOT qualified to be President. I will take 2 votes away from the fraud and vote for McCain. At 18 years old I registered as a Democrat. I have voted a straight Dem ticket since then….until NOW. 35 freakin’ years of supporting this fraud of a party and I-AM-FINISHED with it. They slapped me in the face for the last time.
“NO WAY AM I VOTING FOR OBAMA/BIDEN, I WILL VOTE
REPUBLICAN BEFORE I KISS-AZZ AND VOTE FOR OBAMA”!!
BIDEN’S PRO-ABORTION STANCE WILL COST OBAMA ELECTION!
By: George J. Marlin
The Obama campaign knows it is in trouble in the key swing states of Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, Missouri, Indiana, and Wisconsin. Public opinion polls show that many practicing Catholics who voted for Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primaries as the lesser of two evils are now leaning toward the pro-life, pro-gun John McCain.
To blunt this voting trend, Sen. Obama has chosen as his vice presidential running mate, a baptized Catholic from blue-collar Scranton, Pa. – Sen. Joe Biden of Delaware.
The instant media analysis that Biden will help Obama in the heavily Catholic populated rust-belt states, however, may be wishful thinking because of Biden’s pro-abortion stance.
It appears the Democrats never learn. Four years ago pro-abortion Catholic John Kerry received fewer Catholic votes than the 2000 Democratic candidate, Protestant Al Gore.
In 2004, practicing Catholics were the decisive factor in numerous swing states. In Ohio, for instance, 65 percent of them voted for Bush, and in Florida the president’s support from practicing Catholics reached 66 percent. Working-class Catholics, many of whom were of Eastern European origins, stuck with the president, because they agreed with him on cultural and moral issues.
These issues were more important to them then their economic woes.
“OBAMA MADE ANOTHER BAD DECISION WITH JOE BIDEN”!!
WITH BIDEN AS VP IS LIKE HAVING JOHN McCAIN!!
BIDEN IS 65 YRS OLD, BEEN IN THE SENATE 35 YRS, HE’S
VERY VERY LIBERAL AND HAS HAD HEART PROBLEMS TWICE!!
“VOTE COUNTRY FIRST” NO WAY OBAMA!!
McCain = Bush, Bush = Hitler.
Just this one reason alone should make any intelligent and thinking person cast a vote for Obama.
OBAMA = BUSH2
McCain = Bush 1 (maybe)
OBAMA = ALFRED E NEUMAN
BUSH = ALFRED E NEUMAN
Comic Book Characters
and totally MAD
Obama= defeat and humiliation for America and the end of your freedoms coward
No reasoning => no reason.
Sorry putz.
Freedom Fighter - for whose freedom do you want to fight for - if you support Obama, you are supporting someone who has put his stamp of approval on silencing the voice of voters of your own party in this election. This travesty not only happened today at the roll call, but also at the rules committee on May 31 of this year.
There are also reports of fraud at the caucuses - How can you as an American support a candidate who allowed this to happen just to be elected. If he allows the votes of his party to be silenced, what do you think he will do if he is elected president?
That is something you should think long and hard about. If you support these tactics, then you are not really a fighter for freedom. You are someone who would willingly take freedom from your fellow Americans.
Freedom Fighter,
Why is you bots continue to nag us. Before you were content to just call us names. Now you want our votes. First the thought of voting for McCain was repugant but a necessity. Now I’m actually looking forward to voting for the war hero.
Have to say I feel the same. Never thought I would see the day I would vote for a Republican, but after watching Obama demean the Clinton’s and send out his race baiter surrogates (always allowing the message to be sent for at least 3 days before denouncing it and making it appear, with the MSMs help that he was “above it all”) I will never vote for Obama and will dance the happy dance when McCain wins. Just hope “liberal” Dems in the House and the Senate learn a lesson from the spanking they are about to get and deserve and can hold onto their small majority.
You are about as disgusting as they come. You say it’s about B0. Then go celebrate “history.”
You must have slept through your world history courses.
You are so on the money here, Larry. And I think Michelle Obama knew it, too. Her expression of rage throughout Bill Clinton’s talk was very telling. She knows her husband cannot match what she saw tonight. I think she was angry at Bill Clinton for putting it on display once again for us to see. The people in the hall had an amazing response to Bill Clinton. It was good to see him again, in charge. He commanded the stage as he reminded us of his own legacy and Hillary’s triumph. Imagine if she had won the nomination? Like the primaries, the convention would have been truly exciting … not this staged pagent. It is said that Michelle is “the brains” of the Obama outfit … if so, she cannot deny what she witnessed tonight. The nomination, delivered by Hillary herself as a “by acclamation” event, went to the weaker candidate.
Susan Estridge and Greta Van Sustern (at Fox) have just said that they’ve been flooded with emails from men and women who still aren’t voting for Obambi!
Also, they’re discussing how the Greek spectacle is a big mistake! Estridge says, Obama should be giving his acceptance speech at a school gym rather than a colossal venue.
Hubris, baby. Need a lotta room for an ego that big.
A speech from our new emperor, the Greek God Narcissis.
It’s taken us a few hours to calm down after what seemed to be a travesty committed by Bill Clinton in his speech tonight.
Now, we realize he just started the death knell on Obama’s bid for the presidency. By praising his enemy, Bill ratted him out!
Obama is none of the things Bill accentuated as strong points. The crowd began to get uncomfortable with all the adulation given to Obama because they fundamentally knew they were lies. Lies slyly spoken to out Obama for the empty suit he really is.
Thank you Big Dawg for the slick stiletto knife right into the guts of Obama and the DNC.
You have once again served us well.
We love you, Big Dawg!!
Hillary 2012
Here, under leave of Barack and the rest –
For Barack is an honorable man,
So are they all, all honorable men –
Come I to speak in Hillary’s funeral.
She was my friend, faithful and just to me.
But Barack says she was ambitious,
And Barack is an honorable man.
O Judgment, thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason!
Bear with me.
My heart is in the coffin there with Hillary,
And I must pause till it come back to me.
Julius Caesar, Act 3, Scene 2, with liberties, and apologies to William Shakespeare
The Obots wanted the accolades and they got it. Now they’re going to have to live with it.
The BIG DAWG ROCKS!
Bill Clinton gave an outstanding speech today in support of Barack Obama. I hope the Obots appreciate it. I can’t imagine what he had to take to keep his stomach settled. Bill was gracious enough to make the comparison between himself and Obama by pointing out that the Republicans had made the same case against him that he (Bill) was too inexperienced. Though, he left out the fact that he had been a successful state governor–he had actually done something substantial. The Clintons have done all they can for him, and now he’s going to have to win this on his own merits. You’ve got that right Larry, he’s no Bill Clinton.
My guess is it was straight vodka in the glass at the podium.
Barack be unable to re-create … 68.
Thanks for the link on Leni Riefensthal. Cool.
So as to your point about the hall vs. the staduim and Bill Clinton…
tonight BO had to run out to close the show. He couldn’t save him…like some MC from the 313.
Think I’ll stick to kite flying, it’s safer than rising up on a platform like some annointed god. Symbol = pedestal, oops.
From Bill Clinton’s speech tonight at the Dem convention: Our — our nation is in trouble on two fronts. The American dream is under siege at home, and America’s leadership in the world has been weakened. Middle-class and low-income Americans are hurting, with incomes declining, job losses, poverty, and inequality rising, mortgage foreclosures and credit card debt increasing, health care coverage disappearing, and a very big spike in the cost of food, utilities, and gasoline.
And our position in the world has been weakened by too much unilateralism and too little cooperation…
(APPLAUSE)
… by a perilous dependence on imported oil, by a refusal to lead on global warming, by a growing indebtedness and a dependence on foreign lenders, by a severely burdened military, by a backsliding on global nonproliferation and arms control agreements, and by a failure to consistently use the power of diplomacy, from the Middle East to Africa to Latin America to Central and Eastern Europe.
(APPLAUSE)
Clearly, the job of the next president is to rebuild the American dream and to restore American leadership in the world.
OK — he just put the bar up there for Obama — and as we know Obama doesn’t have a clue about the economy or “leadership”.
Google Bill Clinton speech - Democratic Convention + transcript. Links aren’t posting here lately.
Read the words — I agree with others who have pointed out that Clinton had several messages within his speech. Mostly he told us that Obama can not deliver on any promises.
Now Clinton needs to go to Africa and continue his work there — THEY need him and appreciate him there.
——— I prefer to read the transcript of speeches — the structure and the order of the words. When I read Obama’s speech on “racism” — I saw that HE was the racists and that he threw his grandmother under the bus. He was disrespectful of his white grandmother — later calling her a typical white women (typical - racist - white women, implied in his remark).
Bill Clinton’s speech was about the REALITY of the world we live in and the problems face by the next President. Then Bill explained the illusion that is Soetoro/Obama — in the last part of the speech. It is significant that the words quoted above came from the beginning of the speech — and then the Obama the illusionist was at the end of the speech.
Read the speech — read it several times — look at the structure and the words chosen by Clinton.
The Obamabots will be quoting the last part of Clinton’s speech telling us that we must “obey” the Clintons and mindlessly vote for the ONE.
But we know that Obama is not prepare for the reality of the world — the FIRST part of Clinton’s speech.
I’d pay money to watch Joey Scar get himself a shovel and then whack Keith Obamamann in the face with it.
Speaking of Keith Obamamann’s face, he’s aged 10 years in about three months. Something has really gone wrong with him.
Certain body fluids are skin irritants. So I’m guessing he’s had too much o’ ‘Bama.
Some vengeful female must have slashed the portrait in the attic?
hahahaha, what another slap in teh face of the clintons, and the show of lack of respect for Bill, not to air him prime time, mmm well if it was such a great speech they should have had a little faith to show it, what will people say, mmm no thank you Bill , A man who wanted to be king , will now be the Greek god that will be raised to speak to his zombies, bow down i say and kiss the feet of your God, boy will Republicans have a field day with Obama, nobama ever, a silent vote is a vote for O, a stay home vote a third party vote, is a vote saying it is ok for the DNC to over look the fact they let sexism occur in a Presidential race and that the selected one was not the candidate to lead with experience, I will not help elect O by staing home, Country before Party.
Biden attempted to say O had good judement, well were was the good judgement on the speech to disarm our nukes, to not give the funding to our American troops, how about all those present votes, that could of help the poor and the middle income, that he did not take a stand to stand up for , the Indians, how about that ayers board that funneled money to terrorist groups ,and a education board that failed, his radical friends of hate, Farahkhan, ayers, Wright, Acorn, what a great group of freinds along with the Chicago thugs, its ok America, lets vote for change , a word that he has re dressed many times, and hope , the hope that he can pull the blinders on the American people by saying I did not know? ya right, more too come, and boy the Republicans are going to have a great candidate that has a proven record who work both sides of the aisles , experience and pride that he will stand up for the troops. No thank you McCain will be the one I will vote for , I own my vote and will vote for the best qualified candidate to lead the country, because we have seen O do very little for the workingclass people, other than a community organizer, a whooping 3 yrs, that he did not accomplish anything, until he meet the Chicago politicians of dishonesty, what others will say, about the Do for me , and Ill do for you candidate is that he was the chosen one , that succeeded very little but kissed lots of butt to get to where he was at. He is no Lincoln, RFK Rober k, Mlk, jessie jackson Sr, , Reagan, or even Bill, who had a life with the conviction to stand up for their true cause,.. Nobama.
As I predictaed a few months back, Keith Obamamann is flaming out in dramatic fashion, just like he always has at every job he’s ever held.
Here are some more stories about him loosing his mind:
‘Let’s Wrap Him Up’: Olbermann Tries To Get Rid of Republican Murphy
By Mark Finkelstein (Bio | Archive)
August 27, 2008 - 22:50 ET
Few Republicans have made it onto MSNBC air during the network’s Dem convention coverage, but even that is apparently too much for Keith Olbermann. As Chris Matthews was interviewing GOP consultant Mike Murphy in the interlude between Bill Clinton and Joe Biden tonight, Olbermann could be heard off-camera angrily demanding “let’s wrap him up, alright?”</em>
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/mark-finkelstein/2008/08/27/lets-wrap-him-olbermann-tries-get-rid-republican-murphy
MSNBC prez defends convention team
By: Michael Calderone
August 27, 2008 10:57 PM EST
DENVER — Amid a spate of awkward on-air conflicts among MNSBC anchors at this week’s Democratic convention, some staff members say there are sharp internal disputes at the cable network over whether its opinion and personality-driven political coverage has crossed the line.
“The situation at our channel is about to blow up,” a high-ranking MSNBC journalist told Politico on Wednesday.
Two other MSNBC sources said some of the testy on-air exchanges between Keith Olbermann — whose quick-witted and often caustic commentary has fueled ratings growth — and other network
http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=0647E705-18FE-70B2-A881F2A2BBFFD875
Kieth Olberrman…God, Obama should have picked him as his VP.
Now that would have been a Change Agent ticket.
But seriously, when is the television Mafia going to pick him up take him behind the woodshed and beat him with a rubber hose?
The man is a loose canon.
I saw Clinton’s speech Los Angeles Time around 6 pm on NBC, I think it was live too. It was over at just about 6:30 as I was late to my 7 pm meeting.
DROP DEAD KEITH OLBERMANN and CHRIS MATTHEWS! DROP DEAD!!!!
“Get a shovel”?
Geeze, coming from Olbermann who actually cited Bob “I see Dicks!” Herbert’s NY Times article about nonexistent phallic symbols in McCain’s Britney-Paris ad against Obama, it means absolutely NOTHING.
As a diehard liberal, I normally like Olbermann a lot, particularly for his Bush bashing. But this election season, he’s turned into quite the royal shithead.
The mean season, or swiftboating and whatnot, hasn’t even started yet. Even so, Obama’s polls have taken a nose dive–BIG TIME, particularly in the critical battleground states.
Everyday I hear Olbermann say more outrageous things. Eventually he’ll implode and msnbc will have to get rid of him. He’ll most likely take Matthews down with him.
Keith Olbermann is a blowhard, a poseur, and a misogynist.
Rev Wright said it best “politicians do what politicians have to do”. The Clintons did what they had to do but how many bought it? Please roll Rev Wrights footage. All of it!! Roll Obama speech then roll the footage about the polticians .Priceless.
I listened to Bill on the radio driving home. These things are sometimes better without the visuals. My reaction: the amount of cheer at the opening of his speech was a blow-out, very cool. Second, (agree with Larry) the tone was why fight it? He set the bar incredibly high for the role and tried to put Obama’s awkwardly undeveloped foot into a gigantic shoe. I was sitting there unable to see Barack dealing with the responsibilities the President outlined. This tact was f’n brilliant. Third, his performanc and the downer of Biden forced Obama to make an appearance on stage so that Clinton’s wouldn’t steal the show another night.
Biden - huhhhhh, what an uninspiring downer he is. I’ve never heard him speak and he was a week old balloon.
All 3 cable networks are lame, the only objective place to watch politics is C-SPAN. Cable news are all full of biased blowhards.
I wonder if McCain will select Meg Whitman formerly of Ebay as his running mate? She went to HArvard Business School. What do folks think of her?
Must have been a two headed shovel since Joe shoved it right down keith’s throat and chris’s ass at the same time. Why are these two buffoons still allowed to speak for NBC? ob sure has the arrogant supporters all sewed up.
And a big thank you to Joe for not letting the bullies get the last word this year. His support for Hillary was often a lone voice at that garbage dump news outlet. He cut through much of the rhetoric and just like Hillary, he did it with class.
As for ob and Bill. Bill made ob look like the gnat he is and he did it just by standing there telling the crowd humbly to stop. He came out on stage cool and collected and the audience hit him with more love and support than anyone was expecting.
There are headlines today saying “Bill Redeemed Himself” and that is just a twist of the truth. Bill didn’t need to be redeemed, he’d never really lost support, that was all just a tactical ploy used against him. Before he even spoke the audience said it all and they said it loud and clear.
Screw every single obot who knocked Bill this year, on purpose as a political tool. May they all have instant karma visit them. And that goes double for O.
I’m thinking that what the Clintons have done in their two nights at the convention is to CHALLENGE Obama to be a Democrat.
Carolyn Kay
MakeThemAccountable.com
This Hillary supporter can’t deny these two fine Americans my support in the way they ask. I have sufficient trust in their character and judgment that they would not so whole-heartedly endorse Obama if they did not believe he would deliver on the issues that are important to us.
Maybe Obama could still screw it up, but I’m thinking that I will vote for him as of right now. Hillary’s reminder of who and what her campaign was about, and Bill’s analogy to his own ‘inexperience’ at an even younger age, really got to me.
I recommend more time studying political double-speak and body language. Many observers saw an opposite message. Even if you don’t agree, it’s worth exploring the possibilities, because if anything is true, it’s that politicians are not fully forthcoming, any of them.
Bill was much more experienced than Obama… He was Govenor for 12 years and Attorney General of Arkansaw. Obama was a State Senator for 8 years.
You need to remember that Obama didn’t win, Hillary told the media Mich and Fl would count and if the media counted them … she would have had the nomination all along… OBAMA stole this nomination. What can the Clinton’s do now? They have to do what they did. The media and Obama has fooled eveyone… just like the Iraq War! The Republicans will ruin Obama… I can’t wait. If you really love Hillary, wait and see what will happen after the convention.
Hillary and Bill went to great lengths not to attack John McCain. They never called Obama a friend. But they both called john McCain a friend. They both would not attack McCain the way Obama is already… Falsely. Saying McCain would be a 3rd bush term is just wrong and questions my intellegence! I am not 18 years old. Even Bill Mahr was for McCain in 2000…tell Obama’s infant supports that… they would be amazed.
I will not let Obama do to McCain what they did to Hillary. HIllary is my first choice but I will not let Obama tell me McCain is something he is not. I don’t agree with everything McCain says but I trust him!!
bill was a governor for 8 years. bo has zero experience. there is no comparison.
Are you kidding? Are you some sort of Obot trying to win over support?
Listen to him, he DOES NOT have any issues to deliver on. He doesn’t have issues, period. He’s all empty rhetoric ans b.s.
Even if you are only half intelligent, surely you must be able to see right through him, or maybe you just don’t care what happens to this country.
thats right a shovel for all the crap…….better get a bigger shovel or damn make that a busload….
i love the clintons
to hell with the new nominee…nothing there to love
Larry, that is the video that made me for Hillary Clinton! I was so outraged that he would diss Bill Clinton… and then I woke up from the Move On trance I was in… Democrats that weren’t praising Bill Clinton.. something was up, something was wrong. Then they started saying Hillary and Bill were racist. The media went along with the farce.
Bill almost convinced me last night, and if Obama didn’t run on ruining Bill and Hillary. And steal the nomination (FL. and Mich. counting all along means Hillary really won)… Bill could have convinced me.
Larry, you are “right on”…BO ain’t got the stuff!
His squads have done everything possible to take out the Clintons, and failed miserably!
With the backing of Dean and the “noodle” Pelosi, the party is as weak on every issue as possible.
BO and JOE are headed for a defeat!
Comment by AX10 | 2008-08-27 22:01:55
And the Clinton’s do NOT need props such as
a mock up of a Greek Temple to enhance who
they are and what their message is.
Shame on the Democratic party for forcing this
schmuck onto America.
—————————————————– Anyone notice everything he plans extravagant is always showing a country other than the USA? Does it bother anyone else? First the world tour (skipping a visit to wounded troops in Germany), the Big German display (even faked how many attended by camera angle) and bribed them to show up, Now a Greek Temple?
In all of the speeches (Tues and Wed), just about every one of them praised John McCain as being an honorable person. I don’t think i heard one of them say that about Obama. That to me says a lot.
P.S. anybody got any good jokes out there?
here’s one that might make you laugh to help get over the piece of crap they nominated.
“A Brain, and Experience Is Everything”
The Presidential election was too close to call. Neither the Republican candidate nor the Democratic candidate had enough votes to win. There was much talk about ballot recounting, court challenges, etc.
Eventually, it was decided that because the only thing neither candidate had ever tried,there should be an ice fishing contest to determine the winner. Whoever caught the most fish at the end of the week would win the election.
After much of back and forth discussion, it was decided that the contest take place on a remote frozen lake in northern Minnesota .
There were to be no observers present, and both men were to be sent out separately on this isolated lake and return at 5 P.M. with their catch for counting and verification by a team of neutral parties.
At the end of the first day, McCain. returned to the starting line and he had ten fish.
Soon, Obama returned and had no fish. Well, everyone assumed he was just having another ‘bad hair’ day or something and hopefully, he would catch up the next day.
At the end of the 2nd day McCain. came in with another 10 fish and Obama came in again with none.
That evening, Reid, Dean and Polosi got together secretly with Obama and said, ‘Obama, I think McCain. is a low-life, cheatin’ son-of-a-gun. I want you to go out tomorrow and don’t even bother with fishing. Just spy on him and see just how he is cheating.’
The next day (after McCain. returns with 10 more fish).
Reid said to Obama, “Well, tell me, how is McCain. cheating?”
Obama replied, ‘Harry, you’re not going to believe this, but he’s cutting holes in the ice!
I thought it was particularly interesting when Bill said, “…and this is VERY IMPORTANT…” then stressed the HIV/AIDS problem. (Pause for much applause; pan to Michelle’s just-slapped face).
Poor Michelle. After 20 years of believing that the government (Clinton included) created AIDS just to keep the black man down, that statement alone went against everything the Obama/Black Theology campaign has been preaching for DECADES. Big Dawg stood right up there & defended himself.
For those who have ears, I believe he said, “Obama is a LIAR!”
Murray, you think the Obamas believe the AIDS conspiracy angle??
Her big ass was parked at that tax exempt monstrosity of a Church
for decades all the while they were both
posing for TUCC’s magazine covers (with Nation of Islam’s Louis Farrakhan) and sermonizing there while the hate spewed forth.
That crap is the Oblowmes’ cover for not being Muslim remember?
Like it’s somehow better!
TopDog…
I am So Lucky That I found your blog and great articles. I will come to your blog often for finding new great articles from your blog.I am adding your rss feed in my reader Thank you…