RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

sarah palin it is!

Ok, I got home just in time to see McCain introduce his VP pick. Obama and Biden are SCREWED!

This solidifies my decision to vote McCain.

And it is not just because there is a woman on his ticket. It is because John McCain selected a woman. He put his presidency on the line, he put his faith in a woman. He considers a woman a worthy running mate. And he showed respect for those 18 million Hillary supporters, and he showed that he listened to the women in America, and that he values what we have to say.
Unlike Obama.

Obama made a very big mistake in not selecting Hillary. (although I did not want her on that sinking ship) Obama made a very big mistake telling Hillary supporters to get over it. He made a very big mistake in not reaching out to us. He made a HUGE mistake in never trying to control the vile attacks towards Hillary supporters, from his supporters. And he made a huge mistake in never speaking out to control the attacks on Hillary during the primaries. And his wife made a big mistake when she was asked if she would support Hillary, should she be the nominee. And they made a HUGE mistake when they tried to paint the Clintons as racists. And they screwed up when they tried to threaten us with Roe v Wade.
They are going to have a very hard time going after Sarah Palin, especially on her pro-life stance. You can’t attack a woman who stands by her convictions.
John McCain shook things up, and selected a new kind of candidate, a candidate who will bring change, and who is truly from outside of Washington.

Obama selected Biden, a guy who has been in DC for 35 years. Obama went safe, and mainstream. What kind of change is that?

I am very excited to getting to know her, as a candidate and a person. From what I have read and heard so far, I like.

I am sad, that Hillary is not where she should be. She should be on the Dem ticket – heading the ticket, but on it either way. She truly did break the glass ceiling, but, sadly for her, and her supporters, it is Sarah Palin that will be walking through it.

But, if all goes well – McCain/Palin will win, and Hillary will become Majority Leader, and the most powerful person in the Senate. And maybe then, we truly will have a non-partisan government that will work together, and get things done!
Way to go McCain!

And thank you Hillary Clinton, for enduring all that you have, in these past 18 months, and your whole political life, really, for breaking that glass ceiling, and putting a woman in the White House, one way or another. You truly are an inspiration, a fighter and a hero. And you will never be forgotten.

p.s. Is it just me, or is everyone excited to see Tine Fey on SNL, as Sarah Palin?

Trackback URL

RSS Feed for This Post735 Comments »

Comment by c4every | 2008-08-29 23:54:01

McCain/Palin 08. let’s do this.

Comment by trixta | 2008-08-30 02:10:30

Yes! McCain/Palin it is!

Comment by red_sleeves | 2008-08-30 02:44:13

Comment by WildChild | 2008-08-30 09:57:34

 
 

Comment by Al | 2008-08-30 13:02:54

Are you serious?? You would vote for Palin simply because she is not a he?

Do you realize that her positions are in direct opposition to Hillary’s? That she would roll back progress for women and women’s rights?

We must move beyond identity politics and focus on what each candidate would actually do for us as people, not their gender.

I did not like Kerry in 04, but voted for him because it was in our best interest that he win, it’s really that simple.

McCain/Palin would be a disaster for this country and for women.

Comment by Pandora1 | 2008-08-31 16:09:38

Yes, yes — a complete disaster if the GOP takes over ersatz Clinton supporters. Didn’t you hear what she said???? “Did you do this for me?” Yes and No: I supported Hillary because of who and what she stands for, and PALIN doesn’t even come close.

Who are you people who would have Roe v Wade overturned? Who are you people to focus on Biden’s hair plugs rather than the 35 years of work he has done on our behalf in the nation and across the world at large? Who are you who would vote for McCain who said he admires Scalia most on
the Supreme Court — Republican shills wrapped in Hillary’s sheep clothing? I’M CANCELLING NQ IMMEDIATELY….

 
 
 

Comment by Perry Logan | 2008-08-30 06:00:43

This absolutely clinches it for McCain. The only people voting for Obama now will be the misogynists and the racists.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h4HrSQySus8

Comment by Vic | 2008-09-03 20:52:50

I think you are wrong and the only people who will cross party line are to people who are racist and can’t stand to see a minority President. Those are people who need to search themselves deep within, because a lot of them hide behind the word Christian. True Christians are color blind and God will hold those so called Christians responsible for using him and if you live through this next Presidental term and John McCain do somehow win you will see punishment come upon this country.

 
 

Comment by Kal | 2008-08-30 07:04:34

Sarainitaly: The other thing that totally did it for me is the final theft at the convention itself:

When Jesse Jackson won approx. 465 delegates, he got every one of those votes recorded for history at the convention.

When Hillary won 1,920 delgates, she got less than 20% of them recorded for history at the convention. BO was too afraid to even let the realities of her historic accomplishment be recorded on the roll call. After all this time, and on the day after the 88th anniversary of women’s gaining the vote in the US, the best he could agree to was to let his party record a mere token vote for Hillary.

No, the women in the US are not finished yet!

PUMA!!

Comment by Jim S | 2008-08-30 07:24:03

What we have to do is three-fold. First get McCain and Palin elected. Second get rid of harry Reid and push Hillary to the top spot in the Senate. Third get rid of Nancy Pelosi and put anyone in the spot, she’s gone totally off her rocker. I can easily see these Hillary and Palin sitting down over a cup of coffee and getting things done for the country.

Comment by bert | 2008-08-30 09:04:00

Add Howard Dean and Donna Brazille to that list and you have me on board. And get the DNC out of Chicago too!

 

Comment by Joe Mama | 2008-09-02 23:38:17

Do you really believe what you just said? If McCain and Palin get elected, say goodbye to your reproductive rights and hello to your coat hanger. Everything else you said is about Pelosi, etc. is pure drivel. Hillary would have made a fine president, but she lost to Obama, who is our nominee and will make a fine president in his own right, and do all he can to preserve the grounds women have made throughout the last century. Get over it or give up your rights to your own uterus. It really is that simple.

Comment by Hillaryormccain08 | 2008-09-06 00:45:15

Another idiot man telling me my uterus is in danger when I am smart enough to know that Roe vs Wade will never be overturn no matter how many conservatives are on the bench can you Obots like actually learn how to read before you spout all these so called facts.
Get over it he lost our votes. We moved on you just do not like where we moved too.
McCain/Palin 08

 
 
 

Comment by FloridaDem | 2008-08-30 08:44:21

That was the main reason I couldn’t watch the convention – Obama’s manipulation of the entire event, as if Hillary didn’t really exist.

I agree w/Sarainitaly. We’re going to have to just vote for McCain/Palin and make sure Clinton becomes Majority leader, and get rid of the fruitcake, bitter Botox-queen (Pelosi).

Comment by bert | 2008-08-30 09:09:20

“….as if Hillary didn’t really exist.”

Oh, she existed all right. She existed in order for Obama and his millions of thugs to force her to humiliate herself over and over during the Convention in the service of the biggest most corrupt megalomaniac since Caligula.

 

Comment by reg | 2008-09-01 13:09:55

I was totally sickened by Nancy when she threw herself around Obama’s neck and her eyes were so dreamy that she looked like a teenager at a rock star concert. I would hate to have to do her laundry (under garments) after that orgasmic moment.

 
 

Comment by Amabo Kcarab | 2008-08-30 15:26:59

“When Hillary won 1,920 delgates, she got less than 20% of them recorded for history at the convention.”

Wow. I didn’t watch the convention and didn’t read the news articles, so I didn’t know that less than one-fifth of Senator Clinton’s pledged delegates stayed with her.

 
 

Comment by Dr. bobbi Anne white | 2008-08-30 16:13:22

you know feel like I can rest a bit, now that McCain has made this awesome choice. And, make no mistake about it, Cindy had a hand in this, just like Michelle had a hand in dissing Hillary.
Do you all remember when Hillary’s brother visited McCain a few weeks ago?
I’d bet my bottom dollar that he was acting as a go-between and John asked Hillary to be on his ticket.
But she said no.

Comment by DemtoRep | 2008-08-30 20:37:04

Exactly!! And how many times did Hillary say Country before party?? hundreds!!
MCCAIN / PALIN 08

 
 

Comment by melissa | 2008-08-30 20:02:15

You have got to be kidding me? Was the ONLY qualification that you liked in Hilary was that she was female? Is that all that matters?

Hilary stood for women and their rights – ALL human rights. Sarah Palin stands for reversing those rights.

Do you think Hilary WANTS Sarah to win? I bet she will battle ten times as hard now to make sure Obama wins. The first woman in the white house someone who would take women BACK 50 years?

And Obama could NOT have picked Hilary Clinton. It wouldn’t have worked and I doubt she would have even accepted the nomination even if it had been offered.

I like Hilary and I like Obama, but more importantly, I support WHOMEVER supports my rights as a human being and as a woman – not some no name with no experience and an ULTRA conservative who was given the nod without even being fully vetted.

This will blow up in McCain’s face – mark my words. I think over Clinton’s dead body would she allow Sarah Palin in the White House. No flippin’ way…

Talk about being either a racist or a total man hater or something with no brain to jump from Clinton to Palin. That is the most illogical thing I’ve EVER heard.

Comment by norrismorris | 2008-08-30 20:10:52

Palin is against Choice, is Pro Gun Lobby, Pro Iraq, and I would have to be insane to vote for anyone man or woman who holds these values, and believes in these and other conservative and reactionary issues. Forget Alaska land and converting the rest of what’s left into a vast oil field and destroying our wild life and even more of our planet.

I am a proud Hillary supporter but cannot vote for Palin.

 

Comment by DemtoRep | 2008-08-30 20:34:32

It does not matter now what Hillary wants?? sorry but it is what we want now and that is our vote and this has nothing to do with being a female it has to do with the DNC!!

 

Comment by DemtoRep | 2008-08-30 20:49:01

You are now a Nobama kool-aid drinker thinking Hillary would want us to vote for this IDIOT!!! she was treated so unfair by Nobama and the DNC she said what she had to say–MCCAIN / PALIN 08!!!
PUMA MEMBER

 

Comment by Hillaryormccain08 | 2008-09-06 00:51:16

are you kidding is the only reason why your voting for a Sexist pig is that he is black? I know you are one of Obama’s paid bloggers. They have been going nuts on all the blogs with their pathic crys for UNITY. I have decided to listen to Donna Brizilla and catch the McCain train. He picked Sarah. Why wouldn’t Hillary have saved Obummers ass on that ticket. Yes it would have helped him but he is to stupid to do what he needs to do. He will try to cheat but since we know he does this. It will be impossible to do it this time.
McCain/Palin 08

 
 

Comment by DemtoRep | 2008-08-30 20:29:26

ARE YOU KIDDING ME?? Any Hillary supporter that would now back the NObama and Kool-Aid train–After all the nasty remarks to Hillary and all of us for backing her and saying for us to just go away —-now they expect us to jump on board?? NO WAY-NO HOW-NOBAMA!!! GO PUMA AND CLINTON4MCCAIN MEMBERS–MCCAIN/PALIN 08!!!!

 

Comment by DemtoRep | 2008-08-30 20:41:47

and yes we will- we are PUMAS and CLINTON4MCCAIN MEMBERS!!
MCCAIN / PALIN 08

 
 

Comment by typical.white.person | 2008-08-29 23:55:09

Too “off the deep end” for me:

John McCain’s vice-presidential pick, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, is an evangelical Protestant with a strong record of opposition to abortion and an openness to teaching creationism in the public schools.

Comment by Hillary or Bust | 2008-08-30 00:00:36

She said schools should talk about both creationism and evolution and open up a discussion for children to see both sides. Which is not quite the radical “only creationism” stance some evangelicals take.

Comment by ee | 2008-08-30 00:16:35

umm.

Should we open up the discussion to include pagan, Hindu, Inuit versions of the earth’s creation?

In the science room?

dumb.

Comment by Mr. X | 2008-08-30 00:20:19

She said she was open to having discussion of it in the classroom, but opposed forcing those topics as requirements. My goodness the Obots are dense lately. No logic at all.

Comment by jadwiga | 2008-08-30 00:56:33

Don’t you smell fear? They are in panic mode.

 
 

Comment by AnnieCarmel | 2008-08-30 00:28:39

Actually not so dumb if you want to know how others believe and why. It doesn’t have to be presented as doctrine.

Comment by ee | 2008-08-30 00:39:08

So you are willing to give the others equal time?

Or just fundy 7 day creationism?

Comment by joe | 2008-08-30 02:19:37

She specifically stated in the interview that she was open to allowing different ideas as a topic of discussion, but that it would not be appropriate to codify them in the educational learning standards.

Basically, she said she is open for the free discussion and debate of ideas. What a concept to the O-trolls, right? They have no idea what an honest debate on the issues is. They just “shoot and scoot” with poorly reasoned comments. Grow up!

Comment by alexei | 2008-08-30 05:47:50

I would not object to this in a comparative religion class or studies of belief systems for social studies, but, I would object having this discussion in a science class. And, yes, place the Inuit, Pagan, Hindi, Hopi , etal in the discussion groups.

Comment by tminu | 2008-08-30 07:48:44

I remember in high school covering various cultural beliefs about the beginning of humanity, in a mythology class. Multiple ancient cultures have great flood stories too. In science, it was only evolution but they did mention that some people believed in creation, then back to evolution and Darwin.

 

Comment by bert | 2008-08-30 09:18:20

At the federal level this is really a moot point and should not be an issue at all since school districts are controlled at the local level by locally elected Boards of Education. No matter what Plain believes it will make no difference.

States also have some control through their state educational standards. If individuals want their children to know about creationism they can send their children to a private school or home school them. For me creationism is not a make or break issue for who gets my support. I only have one goal this year.I am only dedicated to making sure Obama and the DNC lose this year.

 

Comment by Raven | 2008-08-30 09:39:07

However, when it comes to schools the
discussion is evolution and creationism.
She, personally may have no problem ex-
ploring the basis of other faiths but, its not on the table. Which is why, she
was the candidate suggested to McCain by
Conservative Richard Land, is supported
Dobson and from their reports all con-
servatives are “giddy” with anticipation.
She supports the pro-life position in all
cases, as I understand it.
She is just what McCain needed. First, to
rev up the conservatives. He needed to
excite them. Get them out working block by block, registering people to vote
Republican. Those of you thinking of voting for him, need to think very care-
fully, of the downticket. Across the
board, Republicans are energized with this Palin Pick. Secondly, they are going
after Hillary Democrats. I would just ask
you to consider the ISSUES FIRST AND
FOREMOST. There is alot that we have en-dured thru these nearly 8 years of Bush.
I do not wish to see Bush tax cuts ex-
tended, continuation of status quo heath
care, possible further arch to right of
Supreme Court which will affect my grand-
children. That’s just the beginning.
There is no doubt that Hillary was the
best candidate. I still hold out hope that OB could be “revealed”. But, we are
where we are.
I celebrate the selection of Gov. Sarah
Palin and her accomplishments. To the
many women who want to think that Sen.
McCain was responding to OUR needs, to
that I’d say think again.

 
 

Comment by Ferdberfle | 2008-08-30 07:56:17

As a scientist I find creation science an oxymoron. If it must be taught, let it be in a class on metaphysics or ontology or better yet, culture. There is no room in science for quackery and dogma. Sorry.

Comment by WildChild | 2008-08-30 10:02:23

I agree to creation science being taught in science class…. but only if Tom Cruise gets to play god. His couch jumping antics during the lecture ought to put it all in the proper perspective.

 

Comment by Steve | 2008-08-30 11:11:48

It doesn’t sound, though, as if she opposes the teaching of actual science in the classroom. That’s the real problem with fundies – the dumbing down of America. I’m watching her with interest. McCain’s choice was brilliant. I am strongly considering voting for him, while voting D down the rest of the ticket to maintain a comfortable balance of power.

 

Comment by boonies | 2008-08-30 15:43:33

chemical evolution of complex life in a hostile environment (as the early earth was) is still what Frederick Hoyle, England’s greatest physicist( and ardent atheist), called prior to his death….’evident nonsense of the highest order’.
Any teacher of science who cannot risk exposing his students to a book like Dr Hugh Ross ‘ “Creation as Science” where he explains how old-earth creation is a Testable and Falsifiable theory – making verifiable predictions , etc- and applies said tests to Naturalism, something you wont do in a public forum…..such a teacher is not worthy of the job title….
PS Any Hindu, Islamic ,etc PhD level scientists who wish to contribute to a series of essays describing the origin of DNA and complex life should be welcomed, at least by the openminded.
I await your ad hominem diversionary insults .

 
 
 
 

Comment by reg | 2008-09-01 14:43:10

I agree, its called education which is suppose to generate logic and rationale.

 
 

Comment by cc | 2008-08-30 00:57:07

better watch what you say there, mr. obot…obarfbag has many plans to open up discussion in the classroom about islam, or are you too drunk on koolaid to see that?

Comment by ee | 2008-08-30 02:28:07

All I see is another racist republican Islamophobe.

Not a single Democrat thinks that. Are all Dems dumber than you?

Hillary and Bill too? Or are they just spineless or corrupt?

 
 

Comment by Obama is a bum | 2008-08-30 01:01:42

Should we have open discussions on Black Liberation Theology that Obama spent 20 years learning and shoving his kids into? How about the backwards teaching of Phleger that Obama has claimed as his spiritual advisor? Why not promote the terrorism of Bill Ayers?

Supporting a radical like Obama and knocking an opponent (even on the VP ticket) is impossible to do. A person’s character does not get any worse than Obama’s.

It all comes down to playing the race card for Obama which is all he has and I have been saying that for six months.

Comment by Uña de Gato | 2008-08-30 01:05:30

Will Obama use funds to create a Juneteenth holiday? Oh wait, he already did that.

Comment by truthtelling007 | 2008-08-30 05:37:27

what? What does Obama have to do with Juneteenth? Thats here in Texas. Why would Obama have anything to do with that?

Comment by chezmadame | 2008-08-30 09:28:46

Juneteenth is also the black liberation theology celebration of the Emancipation Proclamation. It is celebrated in place of the 4th of July.

Ayers and Barky used Annenberg foundation education funding to hold Juneteenth festivals for Chicago’s inner city children.

 
 
 
 

Comment by tommy77 | 2008-08-30 02:17:32

you are so out of touch. all polls show 50% of americans believe in 7 day creation and another 35% believe in intlligent design through evolution, so 85% of americans believe in intelligent design. more people believe in alien abduction than believe in random evolution. So I don’t think she is out of the mainstream or an extremist, she reflects the american people much more then you do.

Comment by Ferdberfle | 2008-08-30 08:34:42

Science isn’t about polls, flat-earther. If it were, we’d still be trying to figure out cycles and epicycles in an earth-centered universe.

 

Comment by Horace Fudpucker | 2008-08-30 14:58:38

Wow, that’s some curious math there Tommy boy. Yes, 50 and 35 do add up to 85; perhaps many of those are the same people?

 
 

Comment by konrad | 2008-08-30 02:24:25

well, I went to high school in Jamaica where they taught everything…all those religions and why. I feel like I’m a wiser person for it and today I believe in non of em…..so it’s actually a good idea :-)

 

Comment by truthtelling007 | 2008-08-30 05:35:29

Dumb?
I learned about those creation myths in college, and yes they could be taught in a science course…only as a historical reference of where we’ve come from to our current post quantum mechanics knowledge.

I’m often concerned that the left have become too afixed to their positions…like a sort of left wing conservatism that must preserve its identity by its own catch phrases like the right wing clings to its god and country.

I’m sick of both extremes. Right about now, I’m all for some bipartisan anarchy.

Comment by dezinegurrl | 2008-08-30 08:31:17

“bipartisan anarchy”…I love it. I’m ready for change too, just not Obama’s leftist version.

Let’s go for it.

 
 

Comment by John | 2008-08-30 15:09:31

Don’t forget to add astrology, alchemy, voo-doo and witch craft along with creationism in the school curriculum!!!

SOmewhere along the line, the line between church and state got broken. It needs to be repaired.

 
 
 

Comment by Mr. X | 2008-08-30 00:06:19

Her opposition to abortion is a PERSONAL choice. She has actually vetoed bills that would ban abortions.

Comment by Susan1968 | 2008-08-30 00:09:47

True- she also signed legislation to give gay & lesbian couples full partner rights.

 
 

Comment by AF catfish | 2008-08-30 00:07:51

Obama said he, too was open to “both creationism and evolution” being taught in schools.

Comment by typical.white.person | 2008-08-30 00:16:26

Mr. X,

I did not highlight her position on abortion, as that would not have affected my view of her. I emphasized her view on creationism.

catfish,

And, I am not voting for Obama either. I think he is six sandwiches short of a picnic.

Not now. Not ever. NoBama.

Comment by Mr. X | 2008-08-30 00:24:53

Gotcha! I’ve seen your posts before, so I only made a clarification for others. I wanted to make sure it was clear for the Obama supporters. It was not intended to be directed specifically at you. Hope that clears it up.

 
 
 

Comment by angie | 2008-08-30 00:57:55

Obama is in favor of teaching creationism in schools too — so what’s your point?

Comment by Clara Barton | 2008-08-30 07:05:55

I had not heard this. Don’t plan to vote for him but it would be a good argument to use against him.

 
 

Comment by WMCB | 2008-08-30 01:12:53

Um, Obama took the same stance.

 

Comment by trixta | 2008-08-30 02:17:46

Spare us the lecture! Obama supports faith-based government and is courting the Evangelicals outright! Heck, he has even proclaimed himself the new messiah!

Also, I don’t recall the Dems rejecting the installation of right-wing, anti-abortion Supreme Court Justices. Stop using the abortion issue as our only issue.

Furthermore, Obama voted for FISA, and thus shredded our constitution!

Comment by hank48188 | 2008-08-30 08:41:29

After Kerry lost in 2004 DONNA BRAZILE wrote this piece, she thought the DEMS problem was that they didn’t get the Church Vote, and Obama would solve that problem. “WHY AMERICANS HATE DEMOCRATS” How To Tap Into The Obama Factor. http://www.slate.com/id/2109328

 
 

Comment by Hijacker | 2008-08-30 02:20:37

You LADY are obviously OUT OF TOUCH with REALITY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Your BIG TOGA party is over! Blow off all the smoke from the BIG screen and all we have left is one hell of a lot of BLOW!

 

Comment by Nancy | 2008-08-30 03:17:33

Go ahead and vote for McCain and Palin-you will get what you deserve. You pumas or whoever really need to get a grip – this woman (and mccain) have no policies even remotely similar to Obama AND your beloved Hillary- NADA! You think you are really following your conscience by not voting for obama? what kind of conscience is that? Think two words: Supreme Court.

Comment by Crystal | 2008-08-30 03:24:38

McCain has to go through Congress to appoint judges to the Supreme Court. I hope your buddy Obama actually shows up to vote that day!

Comment by mlr701 | 2008-08-30 05:22:24

… And that he pushes the right button if he does show up.

 

Comment by Zee | 2008-08-30 07:21:24

Haha! Owned.

 

Comment by Dr. bobbi Anne white | 2008-08-30 16:17:54

after the Berg lawsuit, he will probably have to step down from his Senate position or leave the country

 
 

Comment by MaryPat | 2008-08-30 04:43:18

Blah, blah, blah. Colbert King has an entire article in today’s WaPo rehashing all the reasons PUMAs are shortsighted and, well, just kind of clueless. Then he wraps it all up in a nice racist bow–is their attraction to McCain skin-deep?–to try to embarrass us into voting for Barry. Like we haven’t heard the “r” words–racist and Roe–a zillion times already.

Plus, I see that Rachel Maddow has described us as “post-rational.” If there are so few PUMAs, and our votes won’t matter, why are we attracting so much attention? Including yours, Nancy?

 

Comment by Bigtime | 2008-08-30 07:08:58

 

Comment by bert | 2008-08-30 09:23:01

I see you received your ‘talking points’ from the Obama campaign this morning. Thank you and good bye.

 

Comment by Patti | 2008-08-30 09:26:03

Please that is an OLD arguement. And if thats all you got, you might want to go home.

 

Comment by Tony in Texas | 2008-08-30 09:29:46

What are B. Hussein Obama’s policies Nancy? The guy has more positions than a Las Vegas whore. Go ahead and vote for your little, arrogant punk who has never been anything but a community organizing pimp for ACORN. And don’t tell us about him being a U.S. Senator. He’s spent 173 days in the Senate and we the taxpayers are paying his salary and he has done nothing.

YOU are the one who will deserve what you get with Obama. Just wait until Larry Sinclair comes forward with PROOF in October that your boy Barack did in fact smoke crack in his limo while Sinclair gave him oral sex. But, if I was married to Michelle, I’d get sex somewhere else too.

 

Comment by Postmaster | 2008-08-30 13:02:12

aComment by Nancy: think of these words:

Wright
Pfleger
Ayers
Rezko

need more?

 

Comment by John | 2008-08-30 15:19:26

Obama is an anti-American Marxist, racist pig, who’ll sell his soul to the devil to get fame. His wife alctually LOOKS like a devil herself and has Obambi *ussywhipped. He’s the biggest egomanicac looser to ever be nominated and a complete insult to the Democratic party. The only legend he’ll ever be is in his own empty head.

NOBAMA EVE

 

Comment by reg | 2008-09-01 14:53:44

I personally think that the media and the DNC has caused this rift in the party. It amazes me how women can be so disconnected from the discrimination that we have seen this last two years. I’m African American and female and have spent the majority of my life battling for my rights as a BLACK. I ignored the struggles of being a female simply because I attributed everything to my skin color. Not until this election did I see how politically correct it was to slander women and dismiss them as unequal with not much value. I’m a dem and would never consider voting for a Rep, but this election cycle has opened my eyes. McCain/Palin 08 and Hillary vs. Palin 2012.

 

Comment by Hillaryormccain08 | 2008-09-06 01:00:32

You Obama supporters will get what you deserve. The women will all be dressed in their Burkas their jobs would be given to men. White folks will be paying reparations to black folks for years to come. Course it wouldn’t matter once Sharia law is the law of the land.
I decided to cast my vote for someone who actually loves America.
McCain/Palin 08

 
 

Comment by Clinton Fan | 2008-08-30 06:09:24

She’s also said Roe will never be overturned because women wouldn’t put up with that shit and they’d revolt.

She’s pragmatic. She has a personal view, but she’s smart enough to realize that it isn’t the only view, and she is honest enough to speak plainly about the realities of this wedge issue as well. I give her credit for navigating that issue quite adroitly.

 

Comment by silverfox | 2008-08-30 07:36:03

typicalwhiteperson…

obama passed a bill that condones infanticide. then lies that he did it. then had to come clean about it.

and let’s be real…..roe-wade is not going anywhere. no matter how the obamacans spin it. it’s a fear button that has already been pushed so many time we it’s brushed off like the pesky mosquito it is.

the creationist thing….we’ll just see about that.

the obamacans are soiling their undies. all the sputtering that went on in the “news”media yesterday had me gleefully gloating.

Sen. John McCain has guts. Gov. Sarah Palin is his perfect running mate.
washington insiders of both “parties” are running for cover,

shakeup on the way. no pardon for Rezco. boo-f#@$%$#-hoo.

 

Comment by chezmadame | 2008-08-30 09:21:24

Go to ontheissues.org for an accurate, unbiased description of Palin’s stands. She is opposed to adding creationism to the curriculum, but open to its discussion in the classroom. She is also pro contraception.

I don’t have a problem with a prolife woman who walks the walk, as Palin has.

I do have a problem with a “prochoice” man who suggests that I make my decisions after consultation with my husband, doctor, and pastor.

 

Comment by Andy | 2008-08-30 20:44:41

No, that’s not Palin’s position on evolution.
According to The Anchorage Daily News, she has supported allowing the teaching of the debate between creationism and evolution in public schools, if students bring it up, and not necessarily as part of the curriculum.

 
 

Comment by AF catfish | 2008-08-29 23:55:35

Sorry Dems, I am a Dem but I love this pick by McCain. There are so many pluses that don’t meet the eye at first: she entered government first by running for PTA! When is the last time you heard that? Then city council, then mayor, then Energy and Conservation Commissioner, where she blew the whistle on fellow Repubs, then Governor.

And the sexism lives on “she’s just a beauty contestant” – please, keep up those MILF and GILF jokes. Because I want McCain to win, and you are helping him.

Comment by ee | 2008-08-30 00:18:45

Stop the tom foolery.

No democrats want McPain to win.

Comment by PhxNickD | 2008-08-30 00:23:54

 

Comment by JoseyJ | 2008-08-30 00:30:44

>>>>Stop the tom foolery. No democrats want McPain to win.

Speak for yourself – I’m no longer a Democrat!
Thanks to Obama and his arrogance and willingness to take delegates from Hillary.

Dems for McCain – NO Hussein!

Comment by ee | 2008-08-30 00:40:38

Good, democrats don’t want Islamophobic jerks like you anyway.

And you just reinforced my point.

No Democrats want McPain to win.

Comment by Dr. Kate | 2008-08-30 00:53:30

wrong. this democrat wants McCain and Palin to win for the benefit of our country.

no “islam fear” card works here, troll. not a chance.

Comment by AnnieO | 2008-08-30 00:58:17

“islamophobic” is the word of the day.

Comment by Uña de Gato | 2008-08-30 01:07:23

Brought to you by the letter “i”. also for idiot.

Comment by AnnieO | 2008-08-30 01:11:57

 

Comment by Newly Independent | 2008-08-30 02:19:21

 
 

Comment by ritamary | 2008-08-30 01:07:47

Must be one of the Obot talking points for today.

Comment by Clinton Fan | 2008-08-30 07:03:55

Well, the Roe card, the Old Man Card, the Fear Card and the Race card are all a bit dog-eared. I suppose they’ve got to pull out the Islam card, since none of those others work too well.

I’ve got a winning hand, though, so those cards aren’t going to help them win the pot. Let’s see, I’m holding a “Fuck you, you sexist bullies” card, a “Not Getting Over it” card, a “Switching from Dem to Indy” card, a “Win Without Me” card and the ace high–the “Hillary 2012″ card!

Comment by Dr. bobbi Anne white | 2008-08-30 16:22:28

I think the Hillary 2012 just got derailed too, because Palin and McCain are going to restore the economy and then it’s going to be Sarah Palin 2012

 
 
 
 

Comment by Manda | 2008-08-30 00:59:57

You mean the United States, don’t you? I wasn’t too sure, because you were talking about McCain/Palin being beneficial to something. And I know that can’t be right.

I’m confused. Please clarify.

Comment by Mr. Natural | 2008-08-30 01:09:55

I’m confused. Please clarify.

Looks like Rope-a-Dope is all they’ve got left.

Comment by Clinton Fan | 2008-08-30 07:07:02

That’s because they’re GENUINELY confused…this was supposed to be a steamroller! Any criticism of the candidate was to be met with one response:

Waaaaaaaah, You’re RAAAAAAAACIST!
It stopped working for some reason, like a cheap flashlight!! And you know how that works, they always crap out when you need them most!

Bwahahahahahahahahahahaha!

Comment by Astra14 | 2008-08-30 07:51:25

They expected all the Hillary supporters to just roll over and ignore the sexists remarks, the intimidation, “get over its”, “we don’t need you” and follow their lead.

Yes, they are confused. The cult members can’t understand because they haven’t been programmed to think on their own. That’s what happens in cults. I’ve seen insults, melt-downs, threats, instead of rational talk – and the ones that do act like they’re talking rationally are just recycling old arguments that don’t take in the whole political picture. None of them can tell us HOW Obama is going to fulfill all his promises! All they can say is he stands for Change! – So what’s up with picking Biden?

I actually feel sorry for these youngsters because they don’t understand what’s happening. And they are ANGRY and I can’t figure out where all that HATE is coming from.

I know some AAs who are jumping the Obama ship after what happened at the DNC and after his “coronation.” They see what’s happening.

 
 
 

Comment by jwrjr | 2008-08-30 01:56:45

There is anm old saying “if you can’t dazzle ‘em with brilliance, baffle ‘em with bullsh*t.” This saying describes the Oborg perfectly.

 
 

Comment by Yo | 2008-08-30 01:09:08

I’m with you.

 
 

Comment by Carol | 2008-08-30 01:19:54

I’m a Democrat and I will be voting for John McCain and Sarah Palin. I have become disgusted with the Democratic Party. It is no longer the Party I registered with so many years ago. The gang of three, Dean, Ried and Pelosi has killed the Party with the help of Obama and his legions of thugs.

Comment by NYC | 2008-08-30 07:50:38

I’m a Democrat and I will be voting for John McCain and Sarah Palin too. Can’t stand Obama!

 
 

Comment by NoBamaNoWay | 2008-08-30 05:24:48

if you love islam so much, why don’t you pack up your Ludacris CD collection and move to saudi arabia already. of course the Vice and Virtue police there would confiscate your obscene CDs and throw you in a dungeon for 20 years. you clueless leftist islam-lovers are a lot of the reason why sane democrats are getting fed up with this party. you people will bash christianity and israel six ways to sunday, but legitimate criticism of islam is strictly verboten, under threat of the “bigot” charge. this kind of detachment from reality is what gives democrats a bad name.

Comment by LookingForwardTo2012 | 2008-08-30 05:35:22

My sentiments exactly!

 
 

Comment by Clinton Fan | 2008-08-30 06:16:19

Yeah, they’ll stick to the sexist pigs like you they know and love!

:mrgreen:

You aren’t acquitting yourself very well, you know….

 

Comment by Zee | 2008-08-30 07:29:46

I love how it’s a-ok to make fun of fundamentalist Xtians but if anyone says anything about a religion that makes people grovel on the ground several times a day you’re “Islamophobic.”

 

Comment by Buzz Latte | 2008-08-30 11:13:14

Now it’s Isamophobe. LOL! Calling names how kindergarten of the Obots!!

WAAAAWAAWAAA

 
 
 

Comment by Obama is a bum | 2008-08-30 01:11:39

You are still trying to peddle a racist, anti-American who has failed in every job he has had and is afraid to take a stand on any issue for fear of losing a vote. Trying to peddle this bozo for $7 per hour — pathetic.

 

Comment by kat in your hat | 2008-08-30 01:20:34

Comment by kat in your hat | 2008-08-30 01:21:42

WAY wrong to think democrats won’t vote for McCain/ Palin.

I will.

Comment by Clinton Fan | 2008-08-30 06:19:01

I might, too. I gave his campaign $20.08 and told them Hillary sent me!

Obama’s strategists miscalculated. I’m mad as hell, not gonna take it any more, and NOT getting over it.

Time to put Howard, Donna and company in the “naughty chair.”

 
 
 

Comment by ugo | 2008-08-30 01:39:32

You are wrong.

MacCain is a true American.

 

Comment by truthtelling007 | 2008-08-30 05:40:28

“No democrats want McPain to win”

Fine, so they aren’t democrats anymore.

May I give you a bit of advice from an old kung fu teacher?

“When the enemies are too many, make sure you don’t do the following..make more enemies”

 

Comment by hank48188 | 2008-08-30 10:00:42

I live in Michiganistan and I have voted for DEMS for over 35 years but this year I will vote STRAIGHT REPUBLICAN. The DEMS stole my vote, gave it to Obama and all the other DEMS went along with this because of the money from the TOP, they were all paid off

 

Comment by LindaA1 | 2008-08-30 10:07:53

I am a proud Democrat – and mad as hell that a bunch of thugs have stolen my party. It will take a McCain / Palin win to get it back for us!

With a resounding loss, Obama, Pelosi, Dean and crew will be ousted and centrist Democrats led by Hillary can re-take our party.

I don’t agree with Palin on much of anything but I am really taken by her straight talk – I trust her. I feel the same about McCain.

We’ll depend on the Democratic majority in Congress to keep McCain and Palin from overturning Roe and stop the warmongering. Hillary can be working on the national health care plan for the next four years and inplement it on her first day in office in 2012.

MCCAIN – PALIN! YES!

 

Comment by Postmaster | 2008-08-30 13:05:41

ee obviously you have not been paying attention.

 

Comment by Joe Mama | 2008-09-02 23:44:40

I agree. I don’t think any of these pro McCain-Palin comments are really from feminists or Democrats. They couldn’t be this stupid.

 

Comment by Hillaryormccain08 | 2008-09-06 01:04:32

this Democrat of 26 years wants McCain/Palin to win. I wonder how many real Democrats want Obama to win? None I know of not even her black supporters like me.

 
 

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-08-30 00:25:58

McMILF beats Smug and Plugs hands down.

Comment by red_sleeves | 2008-08-30 01:49:55

Too f’king funny!

I spontaneously erupted with laughter and sprayed spit and snot all over my screen.

McMilf…

 
 

Comment by AnnieCarmel | 2008-08-30 00:36:26

I love it that the good ole guys on the Energy Commission tried to have her fined when she challenged their corruption but she had them thrown out.

How I love the story about the Stevens bridge to nowhere…that’s been a thorn for a lot of people and he was so dug in no one thought it would ever be really addressed legally with a positive outcome. Guess he didn’t count on Sarah. Notice he’s now under indictment for using federal funds for personal gain…sounds like another Sarah project.

 

Comment by trixta | 2008-08-30 02:19:13

Absolutely, Catfish!

 

Comment by Zee | 2008-08-30 07:25:23

Yes, one of the pro-Obama sites has pictures of her up as a beauty queen, as if that is supposed to shame her.

 
 

Comment by JohninCA | 2008-08-29 23:55:40

A stubborn old fellow is about to be voted out, but suddenly… a basketball star steps in to save him.

Are the Republicans borrowing their campaign strategy from the script of Hoosiers?

Comment by Jeremiah God Damn Amerikkka Wright | 2008-08-30 00:46:29

Well the Democrats borrowed their campaign strategy from Invasion of the Body Snatchers.

Comment by Jeremiah God Damn Amerikkka Wright | 2008-08-30 00:48:18

Some unknown entity appears out of nowhere and starts replacing normal rational people with Pod People…isn’t that how it goes?

Comment by Manda | 2008-08-30 01:02:21

Yeah. It’s kinda like this discussion.

Comment by Jeremiah God Damn Amerikkka Wright | 2008-08-30 06:12:54

I am sure you recognize it. Since you see it every time you check in at Pod Poeple Central to get your daily dose of koolaid.

Tell me, do they make you give the secret O hand signal before they let you in or is chanting “obama obama obama” sufficient??

 
 
 

Comment by jwrjr | 2008-08-30 01:59:38

Really? I thought that Obama got his campaign strategy from Animal House.

Comment by Newly Independent | 2008-08-30 02:25:47

 

Comment by Clinton Fan | 2008-08-30 06:23:48

Well, that Greek temple was certainly interesting, wasn’t it.

And it DID sound like the crowd was shouting “Toga, toga, toga…”

 
 

Comment by trixta | 2008-08-30 02:21:02

JGDAW–and thus we have the new species of Pod Dems among us.

I want my Party back!

Comment by JohninCA | 2008-08-30 03:09:38

George Soros bought it.

 
 
 
 

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-08-29 23:56:05

Great pick! I love it. 18 million cracks isn’t enough…. Let’s break that glass ceiling!

McCain/Palin 08

Comment by Obama is a bum | 2008-08-30 01:13:38

Let’s crack Obama in half.

Comment by red_sleeves | 2008-08-30 01:54:10

Do not use the words ‘crack’ and ‘Obama’ in the same sentence.

There is no evidence to support those allegations…

Comment by Jim S | 2008-08-30 07:46:13

Bambi is writing a new book “Things I Remember: My teenage years” Page 1. I was a crackhead!
Pages 2-240 are blank.

Comment by Ferdberfle | 2008-08-30 07:48:21

He has another book in the works, too. Voices in My Head or the Others Names I Am Known By. It’s a biography told from the 14th person perspective.

 
 

Comment by Hillaryormccain08 | 2008-09-06 01:08:48

lmao I just spit pepsi all over my keyboard. I love that.

 
 
 
 

Comment by destardi | 2008-08-29 23:57:29

That’s my girl in Italy!

:)

Nice post!

 

Comment by destardi | 2008-08-29 23:58:00

Ooops..I should say “WOMAN”! My bad!

 

Comment by kgirl1028 | 2008-08-29 23:58:26

http://www.suntimes.com/news/politics/425305,CST-NWS-obama13.article

Look every one chickens are starting to come home roost.

Comment by vinnie | 2008-08-30 00:04:03

As a state senator, Barack Obama wrote letters to city and state officials supporting his political patron Tony Rezko’s successful bid to get more than $14 million from taxpayers to build apartments for senior citizens.

That’s going to hurt.

Comment by ee | 2008-08-30 00:20:27

Really when?

That story is from the middle of June, over 2 moths ago.

June 13, 2007

BY TIM NOVAK

Comment by Uña de Gato | 2008-08-30 00:29:19

God you are dense. There is no statue of limitations on political corruption. It’s called is record, dork, and it stinks, like his feet. Ask Michelle about old Stinky.

Comment by Nancy | 2008-08-30 01:55:13

except that this has been investigated and guess what? NOTHING on Obama. Keep digging!

Comment by Jim S | 2008-08-30 07:54:15

Recently, Rezko has been seen being escorted into a courthouse in Chicago by federal agents. Fitzgerald has a grand jury seated and Rezko has been in front of in on two occasions. Hmmm..do I do 20 years or 3? Tough question.

TICK-TOCK!

 
 
 

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-08-30 00:38:22

Hillary couldn’t hammer those ugly truths home to Democrats impressed with Obama’s race, but after this weekend, the general election voters are tuning in and making up their minds.

Comment by ee | 2008-08-30 00:41:57

lol you really believe that?

Comment by Jeremiah God Damn Amerikkka Wright | 2008-08-30 00:52:20

lol, you think that shits not going to start to stink now that the ENTIRE country is tuning into the election not just the latte liberals in the democratic primary?

You are in for a rude awakening pod person.

 

Comment by Uña de Gato | 2008-08-30 01:09:29

You’re doing everything NOT to believe it.

 
 
 

Comment by Johnny at Work | 2008-08-30 00:43:08

hey rumplestilskin – 2007 was LAST YEAR

But just because Hillary could not get the MSM to investigate does not mean the Repubs won’t.

Comment by trixta | 2008-08-30 02:26:41

O’Reilly is going to start a new feature on FOX called the OBAMA CHRONICLES with 25 installments (i.e. approximately 3 a week from now until the election!)

Let the games begin!

Comment by Jim S | 2008-08-30 07:56:28

He said it would run the full 25 parts or until Obama agreed to come on his show for the full hour and you know that ain’t gonna happen.

 
 
 

Comment by ritamary | 2008-08-30 01:16:37

The story about Obama’s corruption has been out there for anyone to research for several months, in the archives of the Sun-Times and Chicago Tribune. The corporate media has chosen to ignore the facts about Obama and Rezko.

Many of us readers of NQ refuse to support Obama because of his long and corrupt relationship with Tony Rezko. Go to NQ archives to see details about those rehabbed buildings. Many are now boarded up and in foreclosure.

 

Comment by Buzz Latte | 2008-08-30 01:47:56

How about way more that two “moths” ago.

However, most of that information is in the trial records of the federal corruption trial of Antoin Rezko – the one in which he was convicted and now awaits sentencing.

Mr Rezko has been seen talking to the feds. No doubt he is giving them information beyond what was brought out in trial to lighten his prison sentence.

Since Obama was named and this evidence is in place…well it doesn’t look good for Obama.

The juggernaut is closing in on Obama.

 

Comment by Zee | 2008-08-30 07:41:08

really. ee? 2007 was only two months ago? lol

 
 
 
 

Comment by Liz | 2008-08-29 23:59:16

Do you hear that sound in the distance? It’s the Republicans. The Republicans are coming!!!

McCain/Palin 2008. Lock and load.

Comment by Mr. Natural | 2008-08-30 00:13:57

This democrat has always been pro-2nd amendment.

I don’t have an arsenal. I don’t have any crazy paranoias.

But I do object to a government which attempts to limit the latitude of all citizens to the same level afforded convicted criminals, that of no trust and no rights.

Comment by 935 Lies | 2008-08-30 04:32:21

DAMNED Well Said, sir or madam!

 
 

Comment by jbjd | 2008-08-30 09:09:15

I laughed out loud.

 
 

Comment by Pink Panther | 2008-08-30 00:00:58

Hillary has had to endure a great deal of pain from Obama and his minions during the primary. And after Obama was selected by the New Democratic Party, they continued to dismiss Hillary.

Palin gave credit to Hillary and Geraldine for paving the way to the top and making 18 million cracks left by Hillary.

McCain’s New Republic Party: Breaking the Glass Ceiling for Women.

Comment by ee | 2008-08-30 00:23:50

oh wow.

did you miss all the praise for hillary, the prime time spots for her and bill, and the historic roll call?

of course you did.

You also missed PUMA staking claim to the ‘new democratic party’. lol

And its a nice try trying to reframe the party of abramoff when the candidate on the ticket is hip deep in the scam.

Comment by Uña de Gato | 2008-08-30 00:31:33

Yeah, they practically had a gun to her head to make her go out during that travesty of a roll call vote. That looked so honorific.

Comment by ee | 2008-08-30 00:46:42

gun to her head?

You were imagining things.

You people really think the Clinton’s are weak helpless victims don’t you?

However would they have managed in the whitehouse being so limp?

Oh wait, the Clintons don’t let anyone push them around, they are the consummate political street fighters that ran the whitehouse once already.

You see fools, your arguments are as hollow as your skulls, and I for one won’t let you fakes tarnish the Clinton’s with all the bullshit victimization you are trying to lump on them.

Comment by Jeremiah God Damn Amerikkka Wright | 2008-08-30 00:56:46

please dont bother being a revisionist and trying to rewrite the history of the primary season and how the Clintons were treated.

We were all there while you were soaking in your koolaid at pod person central.

We saw it. We lived it.

Just go to daily Kos and hang out with the other pod people and OWN YOUR SHITTY CANDIDATE and wait for November 4.

Being here isnt going to win your messiah any votes. infact your constant reminder of how he and his campaign ride dirty then try to pretend they never did is only going to keep people angry and ready to throw the lever for McCain.

If you really want Obummer to win the best thing you can do is not utter another peep about it and instead spend your time at the local soup kitchen spiking the koolaid and at the local chicago cemetery registering dead people.

Comment by Manda | 2008-08-30 01:08:40

Funny you should mention soup kitchens. McCain is a subscriber to trickle-down economics. Unfortunately for us po’ folk, the so-called trickle-down is nonexistent. So there won’t be much funding for soup kitchens. Oops! I guess all the homeless will have to just fall over dead or something.

Hey! Maybe McCain can put them up in one of his houses.

Comment by Uña de Gato | 2008-08-30 01:14:12

I’m sorry you’re poor. Maybe you should get a job. Perhaps cleaning one of McCain’s houses.

Comment by Manda | 2008-08-30 01:19:01

I thought about it. Really, I did. But I think I’ll just finish my education, and get the master’s degree in social work. Heaven knows that if McCain manages to win, the social work profession will see an increased demand for services. Advocate for change and all that.

Comment by Buzz Latte | 2008-08-30 01:51:01

Deja vu.

Same crap that was being spewed twenty years ago.

Some change.

 

Comment by Zee | 2008-08-30 07:46:36

Fortunately America is not going to let Obama do for the entire country what he did for the “po’ folk” (as you say) in his own district, freezing in the slums he secured for his buddy Rezko.

One little boy died there this year, when an unrepaired gate fell on him.

 
 

Comment by chezmadame | 2008-08-30 09:41:37

Or fixing up one of those public housing projects that Barky helped to privatize.
How much federal funding did Rezko and his buddies get to make them more habitable? Are the improvements going to happen anytime soon, or do Chicago’s southside poor have to wait for Rezko to get out of jail?

 
 

Comment by Obama is a bum | 2008-08-30 01:21:47

What are you going to do when your $7 per hour job ends peddling Obama? You are willing to pick up dirty money selling a racist anti-American. Pathetic.

Comment by Manda | 2008-08-30 01:36:48

Well, I thought I’d become governor of Alaska. It doesn’t sound like it’s that difficult. If anything, I’m over qualified.

Comment by Obama is a bum | 2008-08-30 02:26:31

You have the audacity to think you can become the governor of the biggest state in the nation. They don’t take kindly to bigoted assholes up there who support a racist pig like Obama. If you want to be a governor then ask your emporer to allow you to be governor of one of his mythical 7 or 8 states he claims exist.

You people get dumber by the day. Now go inflate your tires until they explode in your face.

Comment by Undercover Black Man | 2008-08-30 03:29:25

I’m starting to get sick of your stank vibes. You must be the most miserable person alive.

Take a pause, breathe in… and realize that in the process of choosing the next president, we all want what’s best for America.

This blog isn’t a videogame. These are human interactions. And you shouldn’t be lipping off here in a manner that you wouldn’t face-to-face.

(Comments wont nest below this level)

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-08-30 03:32:23

Oh my Undercover such big talk. You forget, we’ve all read your posts here. And we are thinking about how important this election is for the good of the country. That’s why we say, NObama.

 

Comment by Undercover Black Man | 2008-08-30 03:43:29

And we are thinking about how important this election is for the good of the country.

Nope. Just throwing an extended piss-fit because your beloved Hillary got beat.

She and Bill got over it. Why can’t you?

 

Comment by Jeremiah God Damn Amerikkka Wright | 2008-08-30 06:17:33

Because we don’t want people like you controlling what the rest of us do.

You get over it.
Freedom of expression the freedom to choose and espouse our own political and social beliefs without being harrassed into towing the party politik.

Until your beloved Fuhrer is Elected (highly unlikely but you never know, he could steal that election too, i am sure he is trying) the constitution still grants us the right to think for ourselves.

We do not Yet Live in Barack America.

We live in the United States of America

Get over it Comrade. You can make us Goosestep if he wins, until then go choke on a pretzel you obnoxious prick.

 

Comment by Chief | 2008-08-30 08:07:39

Anybody read Undercover Black Man’s blog and the venom he and his followers dish out on a daily basis?

Ironic how he is telling readers here to “get over it” when he hosts Grievance Central 2.0 each and every day.

 
 
 

Comment by e=mchammer | 2008-08-30 06:54:19

“A master’s degree in social work?” That’s funny. Why not get a Ph.D. in “recreational science.” Then you could be Dr. Manda – you pompous ass!

 

Comment by silverfox | 2008-08-30 08:07:32

manda dear….

go home and grow up.

i know that’s a harsh thing to say, but really, manda dear,your obamacrat talking points are not serving you well here. you are out of your league.

you are embarrassing yourself and just can’t see it.

i wish you the all the best.

the field of social work is fraught with pitfalls.

be strong, manda dear.

 

Comment by Jim S | 2008-08-30 08:07:41

You’d never last up there. They don’t have patience for fools.

 

Comment by another dem bites the dust | 2008-08-30 11:44:31

Hey maybe you should try to get a job as McCain’s chef. When you fire up the barbeque you can use Obama’s campaign material as kindling. Those Obama bumper stickers give it that hickory smoked flavor. Yummmm!

 

Comment by Postmaster | 2008-08-30 13:19:17

Manda, you qualified for Gov of Alaska?….wow, you must have eaten stupid for breakfast. Palin would chew you up and spit you out!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Now, how about saying something halfway intelligent for a change?

 
 
 

Comment by Jeremiah God Damn Amerikkka Wright | 2008-08-30 05:12:43

I would try to explain the laws of economics in a supply / demand based society to you, but i fear it would be a worthless endeavor.

Suffice it to say that all those pie in the sky dreams of getting checks from the Ogovernment are nothing more than that.

That hand out you are looking for isnt going to come from Obama. He is just saying what ever he has to say to get elected.

Just ask his pastor.

 

Comment by morganjane | 2008-08-30 09:47:04

I am sure McCain will take BHO’s youngest brother in, just ask him… obviously, Obama’s mansion isn’t big enough for his homeless brother, who is embarassed to tell people Obama is his brother because he lives in one tiny room with another family.

 
 

Comment by Isabelle | 2008-08-30 08:09:28

You are an absolute hooooot!!!!! I just fell off my chair laughing. Thank you for your superb retort to the disrespectful troll.

 

Comment by Hillaryormccain08 | 2008-09-06 01:19:24

I watched the race card be played inappropriately against the Clinton’s. I was enraged by this trick. I have had my tree set on fire and have been recieving death threats from ACCORN. I have reported all these incidences to the FBI. Why am I the target? I live in a neighborhood that Obama thinks is his. I am sick of Obama and the nutcases he has working for him. The election is going to heat up and I am sure that the attacks will heat up for me. I kid you not. I sometimes think they may actually kill me. I am not going to endorese Obama just to stay alive what the hell is the sense of living in a Democracy if you are not willing to die for your beliefs.
John McCain never sent me a death threat.

 
 

Comment by Mr. Natural | 2008-08-30 01:14:30

You see fools, your arguments are as hollow as your skulls, and I for one won’t let you fakes tarnish the Clinton’s with all the bullshit victimization you are trying to lump on them.

When you’ve got nothing, insult ‘em.

Ad hom is the first refuge of the feeb.

 

Comment by Clinton Fan | 2008-08-30 07:16:31

It’s hard to take someone seriously who, when describing two people named Clinton, spells the name of the duo with an apostrophe before the S.

They aren’t a possessive borg. They aren’t a single entity named “The Clinton” either. Are you a child left behind? Slept through that English class, huh?

The Clinton’s ….. what?

House, as in White House that was stolen from Hillary?

The Clinton’s …. campaign, which was sabotaged by duplicitous double agents?

The Clinton’s….media coverage, which was biased in the extreme?

Or The Clinton’s….delightful first and final dinner menu course–it’s revenge, a dish best served COLD.

Eat up!

 
 

Comment by PewL | 2008-08-30 10:02:19

It was quite obvious thru the entire Primary,and it was more obvious in the end..Clinton won the big states,the delegates went to Obama..How many letters did Clinton send to the superdelegates?
She was forced out.imo….Clinton could have been at the top of the ticket…Where she belonged…Michigan another mistake..They gave 4 delegates to Obama that belonged to Clinton…

I love Hillary,but hope Mccain wins,just to prove a point…

Mccain 2008
Clinton 2012

 
 

Comment by AnnieO | 2008-08-30 00:31:46

Apparently, you missed that they played “Addicted to Love” as Bill left the stage. Now, that’s the class we have come to expect from BO’s Dem Party.

Comment by ee | 2008-08-30 00:48:10

What does that even mean?

Please explain how that song was in anyway a slap at the Clinton’s?

You really have nothing of substance do you.

Comment by AnnieO | 2008-08-30 01:01:37

The music selections are very carefully selected for these types of events. It’s not by chance that those songs are played at the times they are played.

Comment by ee | 2008-08-30 01:17:59

but what is the significance of that song?

I think you have made something up in your mind.

 
 

Comment by ritamary | 2008-08-30 01:21:39

The song was a slap at Clinton the same way as Obama using “99 Problems but a Bitch Ain’t One” at campaign events during the primaries.

 

Comment by Clinton Fan | 2008-08-30 07:17:35

Bwahahahahaha!

PLEASE EXPLAIN, eh?

Because you’re a moron?

:mrgreen:

 
 

Comment by Jeremiah God Damn Amerikkka Wright | 2008-08-30 00:58:36

THey also played Dont Stop thinking about tomorrow and were very loud with the YESTERDAY’S GONE refrain. they were definatly trying to rub it in.

But Bill was a champ. He gave a great performance.

Comment by TwoTermObama | 2008-08-30 07:18:50

That (Don’t Stop THinking About Tomorrow) was homage to the Clinton’s convention theme back in 92 you dipshit. Bill loved every minute of his speech the other night and I’m sure he’d agree “Addicted to Love” was appropriate. He said it on television, dumb ass, “I LOVE THIS” when he was getting thunderous applause and couldn’t even speak. Anything else you’re reading into it is just a twisted projection on the part of the beholder.

Comment by Ferdberfle | 2008-08-30 07:30:49

Anything else you’re reading into it is just a twisted projection on the part of the beholder.

You aren’t very educated are you? Bill stuck the knife in an twisted it–hard. He made so many promises for Oblahblah that they will need to put them in a database just to keep track of them. WJC set junior up and you (and all the other mal-programmed obamabots) missed it entirely (just the way Bill planned it).

Comment by Ferdberfle | 2008-08-30 07:33:07

Let me add that it was false praise for the false idol. WJC is smarter than the entire lot of you supporters.

 
 
 
 
 

Comment by tampagurl | 2008-08-30 00:35:50

We didn’t miss it, sorry to little to late and what was so historic about her roll call?

Comment by ee | 2008-08-30 00:50:38

I don’t know you lot were the one all excited about it.

You folks were the ones claiming it would help somehow.

You also claimed your goal wasn’t to overturn anything with the roll call., you just wanted recognition.

Funny how that wasn’t good enough when it was over.

No people are pretending Hillary looked forced.

LOL

Comment by joe | 2008-08-30 04:52:39

Do me a favor and go back and look at what a real convention looks like. Try 1980, for instance, where the procedures and the rules of the party mattered. Or 1984. Or 1968. Or 1972. There are rules to these processes, and as Pelosi said, the rules were suspended for unanimous consent. They could not even acknowledge, on the convention record, that she won almost as many pledged delegates as he did.

Think before you talk. Oh, that’s right. At Camp Obama they teach you to tell people how you feel, not your actual, reasoned approach to policy differences. Very mature. A 17 year old on mom’s computer making $7-$10 an hour.

 

Comment by truthtelling007 | 2008-08-30 05:56:32

“You also claimed your goal wasn’t to overturn anything with the roll call., you just wanted recognition”

No, that is horseshit. Thats what you heard from MSM, not from the advocates for roll call.

The Roll Call vote was a joke. The game was fixed and thats all their is to it. When they pressured the Superdelegates to Vote The Will of the People,…guess they forgot how manys states Clinton won that this would devastate their numbers (Calfornia and New York for instance)

Votes were converted to Obama against my will in my state and my parents and family in Arkansas had all their votes thrown to Obama, against their will by delegates who didn’t ask if this was cool.

So don’t give me this horseshit about “You Folks” this is not a monolythic site. People differ here and you’d be wise to aim your comments at specific people you disagree with and stop the “you folks” crap.

You can’t even state the goals and aims of the different people because they aren’t the same. You’ve been watching too many cartoons er Keith Olbermann.

 
 

Comment by Jeremiah God Damn Amerikkka Wright | 2008-08-30 01:06:30

what was historic about the roll call was that the DNC and The Obama camp tried to make what was a normal event look like hillary was trying to get something special for 3 months, then played this bullshit game of we will we wont and finally only agreed to let it happen if she released her delegates so that it would look like Obama won by elected delegates not super delegates.

Whats Historic about it is the fraud and scam that it was has never happened before in electoral history.

Then they threatened them with party excommunication if they didnt give ringing endorsements too.

We are all aware that the Democratic party is currently being held hostage by the pod people. Hillary is bravely staying in it to help kick your asses out after obama loses.

Just Say NO to the Cult of Personality.

B.C. = Before Convention
Hope & Change 08

A.D. = After Democratic Process was perverted
Hype & Hairplugs 08

 
 

Comment by wry | 2008-08-30 00:54:18

HISTORIC ROLL CALL? you don’t know much about history, do you?

Comment by dee4hill | 2008-08-30 02:04:31

That’s what kills me about the Bots. They have no clue whatsoever about Roll Call. They honestly think it was a favor from the Barky Club.

Roll Call has ALWAYS been protocol… even when one candidate had little support. But Barky, Pelosi and Dean made it sound like they were doing Hillary such a big favor, bending over backwards for her and for “unity.” BS!!! The fraudulent a@@holes. They can fool the newbies, but us life-long Dems know the truth.

Then they threatened them with party excommunication if they didnt give ringing endorsements too.

I believe this 100%. I think Hillary did what she had to do or be forever cut off from the Party. They strong armed her and Bill.

I have no qualms whatsoever in going into the voting booth as a registered Dem and pulling the lever for Mac and Palin. It is my duty as an American citizen to do everything in my power to eliminate the garbage from the Dem Party. I owe it to the preservation of our Democracy. Screw the pods – I want my party back.

Mac/Palin ‘08
Hillary ‘12

 

Comment by truthtelling007 | 2008-08-30 05:58:36

I do. What would you like to pick out of your ass to examine here in front of us?

How about giving us a History lesson on Roll Calls at conventions there jackass, since you like to snark and run.

 
 

Comment by angie | 2008-08-30 01:02:43

You call that a roll call vote? You must have never seen one before, so I suggest you watch the Republican convention — I’m sure McCain will insist on having a real roll call vote (like the parties always have until the dems this year) just to stick it to Obama some more.

Comment by ee | 2008-08-30 01:20:24

lol

is that why there is no Nevada delegates this time?

Dumbass, McPain won’t even let ron paul delegates in the building. lol

Comment by joe | 2008-08-30 04:57:29

That might change with this Palin pick. I have no idea for sure on this, but they might be able to convince Ron Paul to come on board now.

If they can, and they can tap into his frenzied support, it’s GAME – SET – MATCH

 

Comment by Hillaryormccain08 | 2008-09-06 01:32:20

yes the Republicans had a real roll call vote even though he did actually win his Primary. Lets see one stole his nomination and one won his. I guess I am voting for the one who won his nomination.

 
 
 

Comment by Susan | 2008-08-30 06:14:01

Maybe we were feeling a little down, and then the claws came out.

 

Comment by Clinton Fan | 2008-08-30 06:29:43

Spoken like a truly terrified propagandist!

:mrgreen:

 
 

Comment by trixta | 2008-08-30 02:30:05

You mean the POD DEM PARTY!

BTW, the Denver Group (I think) is trying to launch the New Democratic Party. She’s asking for some input! Actually, I think she should call it the COALITION PARTY, for obvious reasons.

 
 

Comment by vinnie | 2008-08-30 00:01:13

The progressives are the ones doing the sexist remarks and the name calling. The conservatives just added diversity and freshness to the game. A woman on the Republican ticket…not to mention a nice congratulatory commercial from McCain to Obama last night…cats sleeping with dogs…what is the world coming to!

 

Comment by Darryl | 2008-08-30 00:01:49

I am so happy now to vote for Mcain. Have you noticed the big dipper on his campaign signs what does that mean?

Comment by wry | 2008-08-30 00:12:48

Hey Darryl,

That’s Alaska’s flag. I’m a New Yorker. I only know that because my Autistic Kid has some intense interests…like flags.

Comment by StrawberrybitesBarky | 2008-08-30 00:18:53

wry, one of my twins has autism too. His thing is undoing stuff. Toys, locks, doors, windows, DVD players, X-Boxes…an expensive obsession.

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-08-30 00:46:47

Maybe he’s just really brilliant. I won’t argue with a doctor, but my husband did that, too, and he got an MFA and a mechanical engineering degree. Anyway, God bless your child.

Comment by StrawberrybitesBarky | 2008-08-30 01:07:24

Thanks Hope. Yeah he is very bright, adds and subtracts three and four digit numbers instantly. He also has this weird talent for “targeting” he can put a baseball or basketball anywhere he wants without even trying. And he has the most amazing kicks in Martial Arts. Flying back kicks, spinning hook kicks, jump spinning round houses with deadly accuracy…but unfortunatly he has the attention span of a fruitfly. It’s impossible to keep him focused for more than five minutes. Oh well. At least he’s a happy, litle guy.

Comment by 935 Lies | 2008-08-30 04:37:56

I assume the term Asperger’s Syndrome is not foreign to you. As a 58 year sufferer, I can attest to the two very different edges to that sword.

 
 
 

Comment by Clinton Fan | 2008-08-30 06:32:33

Wow, you should go to the Salvation Army and get him his “toys” there–maybe put a sticker on the ones that he’s allowed to take apart?

Does he put them back together, or is it just the deconstruction that appeals?

 
 
 

Comment by StrawberrybitesBarky | 2008-08-30 00:15:09

It’s the Alaskan State Flag. The Big Dipper on a dark blue background.

Comment by wry | 2008-08-30 00:30:33

Mothers of kids with Autism know these things.
I think my little boy’s autism is one of the reasons I hate Barky’s bullies and thugs so much. “Might makes right” is not the kind of world in which he’ll thrive.

Comment by StrawberrybitesBarky | 2008-08-30 01:11:27

wry, have you noticed the way bots throw around the “retard” label as well as the sexist crap? They really have no souls. Makes the hair on the back of my neck stand up.

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-08-30 02:56:36

Me too Strawberry. I also have a special needs child. She has physical disability as well as a developmental delay. When I read these bots posts, like you I am incensed. And I worry for the future my child will grow up in. I’m scared for her.

Comment by morganjane | 2008-08-30 10:07:13

Palin has a child with down syndrome and CNN was trying to say she wouldn’t be able to take care of her baby with the VP role. I was so pissed, for them to use her child’s special need against her. Working mom’s give 300%, they get it all done. That is why I was so thrilled to have Hillary seeming like she never stopped… because I know, as a mother, women never do. There are so many women in my life like Hillary, who seem to never sleep or have a day off.
And Hillary helped Alexrod with something for a special needs child he has, and Alexrod tried to destroy her? Please, if anyone remembers the details reply…

 
 
 
 
 

Comment by James | 2008-08-30 00:30:59

The big dipper and North Star are on the state flag of Alaska.

Comment by Zee | 2008-08-30 07:58:03

Notice how the McCain camp puts an homage to Palin on their sign….as opposed to the Obamessiah camp, which made Biden’s name in blue font against blue background so the letters fade and can almost not be seen!

Comment by Kevin | 2008-08-30 10:10:11

Biden’s name and face were on the web ads for about two days, the polls went down and away he goes.

 
 
 
 

Comment by mel | 2008-08-30 00:02:25

Joe Biden, remind America how to attack a woman again like you did with Anita Hill to hire an inexperienced black man into an important job in America, one your boss even claims he’d never hire and your boss is a prime example of inexperience….lol

Comment by wry | 2008-08-30 00:14:45

I pray to the god of all things republican and unholy…let Anita Hill do an attack ad for Palin against Biden.

Comment by Uña de Gato | 2008-08-30 00:34:36

Let it be done!

Comment by AnnieCarmel | 2008-08-30 00:53:15

She just might. She is a religious conservative. I still have a video of the “Designing Women” episode written by Hill & Bill’s friend Linda Bloodworth Thompson about the hearings. Dixie Carter and Annie Potts are dressed up for Halloween as Joan Crawford and Bette Davis in “Hush, Hush Sweet Charlotte” and together they give a rant that should have had every hair on Joe’s head standing on end. A classic. It ends with the shot of Anita Hill sitting at the table, head bowed at the hearings being demeaned by the great men of the US Senate.

Think I’ll dig it out and watch again.

McCain/Palin 08

Comment by Mr. Natural | 2008-08-30 01:19:33

Spector was the one who really turned my stomach during that episode.

 
 

Comment by trixta | 2008-08-30 02:32:40

Nice touch!

 
 
 
 

Comment by No to B.O. = Body Odor and B. Obama | 2008-08-30 00:05:25

It’s over for Obama – McCain managed to reenergize the base of the Republican party as well as getting all those anti-corruption cut govt waste spending and taxes moderates in those critical 18 swing states. Not to mention, quite a few Hillary supporters as well. Genius move – bold, risky, but with huge potential pay offs.

Should be Hillary as the first woman with a big name in our country, but of course, sadly it will be a Margaret Thatcher type rather than a true progressive Hillary Clinton – well, at least Palin doesn’t seem corrupt and can sure fight for herself and her constituents.

 

Comment by HARP | 2008-08-30 00:08:35

CNN’s John Roberts: Palin Might Neglect Her Disabled Infant?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=049S61jsKhI&feature=related

Those that are different change the world…Those who are ordinary simply keep it that way.

Comment by Medusa | 2008-08-30 00:18:03

I just did a quick surf around the Bots’ sites–and are they scared! The children at the Daily Cuss are so upset about Palin that they’re now criticizing her hair style and saying that she isn’t going to distract from the messiah. And the little ones at MyDD are scrambling to dig up some dirt, any dirt will do, on Palin, her family or anyone in Alaska….

Poor Taylor Marsh, who sold her soul to Bozo, has joined the misogynists, writing that McCain’s pick of Palin is “insulting to women.”

No Taylor, YOU”RE insulting to women.

I can’t stomach Huffpo, but not doubt they too are panicking….

Comment by PhxNickD | 2008-08-30 00:31:51

been lurking at TM site just to see what she is saying these days — I would say she has become the epitome of hypocrisy at it’s highest and intregity at it’s lowest. I wonder if she really believes some of the stuff she writes these days?

Comment by Uña de Gato | 2008-08-30 00:36:51

Doing that 180 so fast made her dizzy and spun her wig around.

 

Comment by wry | 2008-08-30 00:41:08

Did you guys see how she photoshopped Sarah Palin onto the cover of Vogue? Then mentioned that she was a “beauty queen” too?

I remember Michelle Obama was in Vogue, and People, and Time, and Newsweek, and Ebony and National Geographic and Field and Stream and Game Pro and This Old House and…well, people in glass mansions on the south side bought with dirty money, shouldn’t throw stones.

Comment by flummox | 2008-08-30 01:15:28

Marsh is an idiot. Palin herself WAS actually in Vogue, too. Hopefully at least someone on that site is really letting her have it.

 

Comment by Clinton Fan | 2008-08-30 07:25:28

Hillary Clinton did a great VOGUE layout. She looked good, too.

TM is suffering from green-eyed-itis. She’s one of those women who doesn’t know how to be a Sistah, and cheer on another woman who moves up the ladder and keeps the issues important to her gender in mind–she prefers to be the ONLY female in the Boy’s Club.

 
 

Comment by Heather | 2008-08-30 03:25:31

I recall when she turned. I forget the details but it was literally over one day’s time. I had the distinct the feeling that someone had “gotten to” her. It was a time when things were getting ugly on mydd and some longtime members were thrown out of there. Taylor pivoted, and I thought at the time that someone big had basically said “Straighten up or we’ll shut you down” (or worse).

Comment by Clinton Fan | 2008-08-30 10:06:13

The Obama campaign is funnelling money to blogs in some fashion. AMERICABLOG went against their interests to boost Obama, and that place, where debate used to be a highlight, is now “No Dissent” land. Same with Kos–no criticism, same with Democratic Underground, where they throw people out for saying anything bad about the Messiah. I saw at the latter blog that they are trying to raise money for Their Anointed One, I guess the site admins want to be “Big Bundlers” and get an invite to the inauguration. Problem is, I don’t think McCain will send them an invitation.

 
 

Comment by hank48188 | 2008-08-30 11:01:59

She is probably getting money from Soros or someone like him, she jumped on the Obama bandwagon full tilt. That is what is wrong with the DEMS, they depend on Soros for their cash and all the DEMS down the line do as they are told, if you don’t obey you get no money.

 
 
 

Comment by Carmen Purser | 2008-08-30 00:27:22

Does John Roberts think that every woman who gives birth to a Down Syndrome child stays at home and rock them? As a former special education teacher, children like Palin’s son grow up, go to school and are often very socialble and affectionate children. There are many mothers/parents who could benefit from better health insurance to provide the care that children with special needs often require. I don’t think this is the case with the Palins. Maybe John Roberts should do some research and produce a show for network news–he might learn something and teach others with limited knowledge something about Down Syndrome.

Comment by Johnny at Work | 2008-08-30 00:48:01

John Roberts should go bake us all a pie.

Comment by HARP | 2008-08-30 01:09:48

Roberts grew up in Mississauga, Ontario. He attended the University of Toronto at Mississauga, and worked for many years in Canadian media before joining CBS News in 1992.

Roberts first started working in radio at the local college station CFRE-FM, in Mississauga, Ontario. He briefly worked on-air on radio station CJBK in London, Ontario in 1977, moving back to Toronto to top-40 powerhouse CHUM that year, where he was heard as weekday evening host. In 1979, he branched out from his music personality work to function as an entertainment reporter and co-host with Jeanne Beker of the music newsmagazine The NewMusic until 1985. Roberts also worked briefly with CIXK in Owen Sound, Ontario in the 1980’s. He was a video jockey with CITY-TV owned MuchMusic, a music video channel on which he and Christopher Ward appeared as the first on-air personalities when the network launched in 1984. At MuchMusic he also hosted a one hour Heavy Metal video show called “The Power Hour.” He also served as an entertainment reporter and anchor on CITY-TV’s CityPulse, and became anchor of CityPulse Tonight in 1987 when Anne Mroczkowski moved from anchoring that newscast to join Gord Martineau on the 6 pm edition.

Starting in 1989, Roberts began his 17-year association with CBS television and radio. Between 1989 and 1990 Roberts was an anchor/reporter for WCIX-TV (now WFOR-TV), the CBS-owned and operated television station in Miami, Florida. Roberts returned to Canada in September 1990 to co-host the national CTV morning show Canada AM, initially with Deborah McGregor, and later with Pamela Wallin. He also anchored the 5 and 11pm newscasts at CBS’s flagship station in New York, WCBS-TV.

Comment by ee | 2008-08-30 01:25:02

Hey,

I grew up in Mississauga.

Attended Mississauga Valley Public School.

The UofT Mississauga campus is called erindale.

Lovely spot on mississauga road.

Check it out on google maps. Some of the nicest homes in canada are a little south on that same road.

Roberts was the host of a show called Toronto Rocks too.

 
 

Comment by trixta | 2008-08-30 02:35:47

John Roberts should to inflate his tires!

 
 

Comment by Paul | 2008-08-30 00:58:10

John Roberts doesn’t know that stuff; I guess he’s a little slow. Be patient with him.

 
 

Comment by Clinton Fan | 2008-08-30 06:48:04

CNN’s John Roberts: Sexist asshole who doesn’t believe fathers can be nurturing parents?

Comment by Zee | 2008-08-30 08:04:48

Bingo! It’s the mother’s job only?

I heard a phone interview with the governor of South Carolina who said she brought her infant to the meeting of governors. So not only is Roberts sexist, he’s also simply speculating — pulling ideas right out of his arse.

 
 
 

Comment by Seattle Moss | 2008-08-30 00:08:52

McCain gave us a gift!!
What a wonderful labor day weekend.

I’m still getting teary eyed and I’m a big guy.

Comment by ee | 2008-08-30 00:26:55

a big guy with lots of time on his hands to spread smears and lies for someone claiming to be a captain of industry.

Comment by Seattle Moss | 2008-08-30 00:31:27

Having a bad day ee!!

Ha Ha

Comment by ee | 2008-08-30 00:56:07

nope.

just a quiet day here in gaza.

dumbass.

42 million watched the one get crowned emperor of all that is good and you idiots think we are worried because we come here and make swiss cheese out of your bogus claims?

land of delusion for you sir.

Comment by Seattle Moss | 2008-08-30 01:16:15

ee..

I’m having such a great day!
There is nothing you can say to change it.
McCain is a genius and has just reinvented the Republican party.
The democrats are thugs!

and like thugs they disrespect women!

Next week it’s going to be all about patriotism and pride for country.

oh… did I mention the woman’s backlash that you are now going to suffer.

Comment by Johnny at Work | 2008-08-30 01:18:59

And the RACE BAITING backlash.

 

Comment by Hillaryormccain08 | 2008-09-06 01:42:37

yes Oborg he must be unhappy because his check is late. I understand that the paid bloggers are now being paid by the amount of properganda they actually get published. Is that true oh Cult follower.

 
 

Comment by Dave_Not_For_Obabi | 2008-08-30 01:23:57

Dear ee,

Not one thing you have posted today shows you have a clue of what you speak of. I can understand you are upset that we won’t all drink the Obambi kool-aid, but so what, that’s what freedom of choice is all about. I don’t get why you are upset, I mean that’s not a normal reaction for somebody who comes across like their Obambi has it in the bag. It’s almost as if you expect us to bow down because Obambi let Bill + Hillary speak at the convention, lol, come on get real, they only did it so you dimwits don’t use her as a scape goat after Obambi loses Nov.

We can’t have Hillary until 2012, so we will take Palin during the interim , get over it!

 

Comment by Obama is a bum | 2008-08-30 01:38:34

42 million watched the one get crowned emperor of all that is good

Terrorism, anti-Americanism, racism, mendacity. That is quite a list of what you claim is good. Pathetic.

 
 
 

Comment by tampagurl | 2008-08-30 00:41:33

ee, you need to get a life and get your head out of Obullshitartist’s ass.

 

Comment by Clinton Fan | 2008-08-30 06:52:01

Someone’s scared! Awwww. Poor, frightened eeeeeeeeeee!

:mrgreen:

 
 

Comment by The Real Hope | 2008-08-30 00:41:58

Seattle,
If this is a gift to you, your childhood must have been bereft of the normal, presents and such.

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-08-30 00:51:41

The first woman on a national ticket being an inspiration is somehow a sign of PTSD. Wow. Your mom must have been Nurse Ratchet.

Comment by ee | 2008-08-30 01:27:01

first woman on a national ticket?

nope, dope.

 

Comment by The Real Hope | 2008-08-30 02:34:03

Hope,
Nope. Palin is not the first woman on a national ticket.

 
 

Comment by Seattle Moss | 2008-08-30 00:52:52

Let me rephrase..
McCain gave America a great gift today!

When I saw a snippet of Obama today he looked rather pale. Like a Bus drove right over him.

Comment by AnnieCarmel | 2008-08-30 01:02:14

Biden was quite somber too. I thought they were hungover.

 

Comment by Mr. Natural | 2008-08-30 01:28:08

When I saw a snippet of Obama today he looked rather pale. Like a Bus drove right over him.

Snicker.

Obama threw himself under that bus.

So how long before Biden fakes a heart attack ([clutching his chest dramatically]
“Oh, this is the biggest one I ever had. You hear that Elizabeth? I’m coming to join you honey.
) and Obama crawls on his hands and knees to beg Hillary for help?

 

Comment by Heather | 2008-08-30 03:30:43

They DID look hung over. Oblahma’s head looked unnaturally large like it was swollen or something. Ha ha, that sounds funny but I’m serious. It really did look unnaturally large compared to Biden’s. It also looked like he had on too much eye shadow.

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-08-30 03:34:56

Wow, hung over, eye shadow….it sounds like it musta been some kind of night. I wonder if Barry kissed Joe’s wife again? We’d have to check for lipstick smudges to be sure…..smudges on Biden’s wife of course!

Comment by Mr. Natural | 2008-08-30 05:15:33

So leave. Go home. Clean your room in the basement. Ask your mommy to buy you some ice cream.

 

Comment by Mr. Natural | 2008-08-30 05:18:01

Sorry, imustprotest – I misplaced that post.

Comment by Mr. Natural | 2008-08-30 06:02:34

mis-placed.

Is there any way to delete?

 
 
 
 

Comment by Clinton Fan | 2008-08-30 06:57:24

I heard quite a few UNNNNNNNNHs as he disavowed his OWN campaign’s vicious attack. When Obama said he looked forward to debating her, I wondered if he and Biden had switched places on the ticket!

All Biden could say of substance is that he looked forward to meeting her.

This was, I suspect, the one scenario they DID NOT ANTICIPATE.

They really thought it was to be Romney or Pawlenty. There were even rumors going around that the Secret Service had been dispatched to guard Romney (who has private security who act like assholes and dress like MIB).

The GOP, gotta hand it to ‘em, did a great job of misdirecting and keeping the self-satisfied and rather lazy press off-balance.

Comment by mrt721 | 2008-08-30 19:55:55

This was, I suspect, the one scenario they DID NOT ANTICIPATE.

They really thought it was to be Romney or Pawlenty. There were even rumors going around that the Secret Service had been dispatched to guard Romney.

Another rumor I’ve heard is they were so sure about who the pick would be, they had already
spent over $20 million on attack ads just for these two choices.
Heh heh, if true, that’s a REAL “gotcha”!

No Way, No How, No ObOsama bin BiLaden!!

McCain/Palin ‘08

 
 
 
 

Comment by LAMusing | 2008-08-30 01:54:23

I too am thrilled! I was cheering in my car as I heard her speech today. BRAVO McCAIN! Well done.

 
 

Comment by vee | 2008-08-30 00:11:52

Great post AGI. I am excited too.

 

Comment by mel | 2008-08-30 00:12:40

Obama question for you, think McCain is scared of you and your funny name and that you

 

Comment by SFK | 2008-08-30 00:12:51

They keep making mistakes with the continuing sexist attacks on Palin. Her governing experience is more than Bobo’s as pres. candidate. And bring back all those Biden charming statements at the Clarence Thomas hearings. My women friends already remember them well. Others need to hear them. The Dems. were blindsided today and are flailing on air.

Comment by Mr. Natural | 2008-08-30 00:17:33

The Dems. were blindsided today and are flailing on air.

Blindsided, eh?

Not very presidential of them, I must say.

 
 

Comment by beverly leslie | 2008-08-30 00:13:01

Yes, I agree Mccain listened to women. He reached out unlike barky who just demanded our vote. Well, I’ll never forget those words in the Primary, “I know I can get her votes, but I’m not so sure she can get mine.”

Well, for that statement you will never get my vote and you will rue the day you uttered those words.

Mccain proved with actions he is a Maverick and I may not agree with him on all issues but I respect and believe in him. I can’t say the same about barky.

mccain – palin 08
hillary 12

Comment by AnnieCarmel | 2008-08-30 01:08:36

He was certainly right about Hill not getting his votes. He had already filled his supporters with bile and hatred of Hillary.

Frankly, way back when, I would have voted for him as VP, knowing that 8 years with her could prepare him for most offices. But because of his vitriol and ignorance, I have moved on…as they suggested and will vote for Mac…happily.

McCain/Palin 08

 

Comment by Obama is a bum | 2008-08-30 01:48:02

John McCain is a class act, no doubt about it.

 

Comment by Hillaryormccain08 | 2008-09-06 01:50:26

yes and his supporters reaction to Hillary is one of the reasons we will not vote for him. He did that on purpose. He tried to kill her career and now we get a chance to kill his career. It’s funny that the kool aid drinkers think he will get a second run at this. No that would be Hillary no Barky. Once that whitey tape comes out. Obummers and Meesheell will be living under the bus. Neither one of them having a job.
Now that’s change we can believe in.

 
 

Comment by Susan1968 | 2008-08-30 00:13:25

The HuffPo maniacs are tearing her apart.

And some say she must stay home and care for her Down’s Syndrome infant.

I swear – progressives have gone nuts.

Comment by wry | 2008-08-30 00:18:00

Oh but it was OK for John Edwards to campaign dragging poor Elizabeth along, knowing their kids would soon be motherless?

Oh that’s right, he’d already lined up a replacement.

 

Comment by beverly leslie | 2008-08-30 00:18:05

No doubt they have gone nuts. After wittnessing their behavior I have begun to rethink being a progressive. If you are a progressive, yet you have no problem tearing down women, and you will win at all costs (hate, physical threats etc) doesn’t that create some sort of moral conflict?

They of all people love to play the moral superiority card.

Comment by JoseyJ | 2008-08-30 00:45:34

This is one of the BEST diaries ever!!
And looky looky! No wonder Obamabots are scared.

Palin praised Obama’s energy plan on Aug 8!

“I am pleased to see Senator Obama acknowledge the huge potential Alaska’s natural gas reserves represent in terms of clean energy and sound jobs,” Governor Palin said. “The steps taken by the Alaska State Legislature this past week demonstrate that we are ready, willing and able to supply the energy our nation needs.”

In a speech given in Lansing, Michigan, Senator Obama called for the completion of the Alaska natural gas pipeline, stating, “Over the next five years, we should also lease more of the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska for oil and gas production. And we should also tap more of our substantial natural gas reserves and work with the Canadian government to finally build the Alaska natural gas pipeline, delivering clean natural gas and creating good jobs in the process.”

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/08/29/1304936.aspx

Comment by Hope Floats | 2008-08-30 00:54:01

Except Obama, Pelosi and T. Boone Pickens want natural gas from Iran and Russia.

Comment by ee | 2008-08-30 00:57:36

oh t.boone on the freeptard hit list now too. haha.

Comment by AnnieCarmel | 2008-08-30 01:13:45

I saw an interview of him in Denver and the commentator asked him if he was there to support the Dems and he said something to the effect that he wanted support for his energy from both parties and that he’d be going to MN too. When asked if he’d be voting for Obama, he said: “Unlikely”….guess that’s when the bus pulled up!

Comment by hank48188 | 2008-08-30 11:13:15

T. Boone Pickens is just looking out for himself in promoting these deals, but what he says is correct, we have to stop sending our money to other countries. Lets get our energy at home, and support other American production, steel, cars and everything else, lets start promoting AMERICA.

 
 
 
 
 
 

Comment by Adam | 2008-08-30 00:19:21

Any people that say that kind of thing and thinks they are progressive is lying to themselves. But anybody that thinks Hillary Clinton was a great choice for president and thinks that Sarah Palin is a decent alternative is doing the same.

Comment by wry | 2008-08-30 00:23:42

No one here thinks Sarah Palin is a decent alternative to Senator Clinton. Some of us think she’s an excellent choice for John McCain. And we’re all delighted that it steps on Barky’s buzz.

Comment by Adam | 2008-08-30 00:28:25

Whatever. I’m sure Hillary’s delighted, too.

Comment by Newly Independent | 2008-08-30 03:42:28

Shut up.

You Obamabrats spent the entire primary painting Hillary as the anti-Christ.

Now you have the damn nerve to pimp her name in a cheap, transparent attempt to lure back millions of her supporters to prop up your faux “god” Obama.

Shameless, scummy bastards.

 

Comment by Clinton Fan | 2008-08-30 10:30:28

I’ll bet she is.

When McCain wins this contest, that gives her an opening to run again in 2012.

 
 
 

Comment by Obama is a bum | 2008-08-30 01:54:03

Anyone who thinks Obama is an acceptable alternative with all of his lies, sleazy connections, poor work performance, extremist views, etc. is delusional.

Comment by Adam | 2008-08-30 02:01:11

Hey, do you remember all those right-wing people who tried to smear Hillary and Bill? My parents both still believe that Bill is a rapist and that both are murderers.

Comment by Obama is a bum | 2008-08-30 02:32:50

What I remember is all of the left wing radicals who support Obama and vice versa. Obama is trying to hide most of his life and try to exchange it for “hope and change”. 47 years old and 47 years of failure. If Obama wants to change his life he needs to start at the first grade not at the White House. Obama has a long way to go in an effort to redeem himself.

 

Comment by morganjane | 2008-08-30 10:24:43

And Obama peddled those lies to the 17 year olds turning 18 in November. Obama turned his new Democrats against the clintons… his church already hated Bill Clinton for not being black and helping black people.
It is worse when you bite the hand that feeds you. We expect the republicans to attack… but Obama got the lefts against their only successful President…he turned the progressives against progress against democrats, remember Obama doesn’t need Democrats he wants republicans and independents, blacks and radicals.

 

Comment by Clinton Fan | 2008-08-30 10:32:04

Ah, no wonder you dislike Senator Clinton.

The apple doesn’t fall far….

 
 
 

Comment by Bigtime | 2008-08-30 07:11:00

 

Comment by Hillaryormccain08 | 2008-09-06 01:53:15

thinking that Obama would make a good President is also laughable. I know Hillary will make a good President but Obama would be a disaster.

 
 

Comment by Dave_Not_For_Obabi | 2008-08-30 01:31:39

It seems it does not matter if it’s Hillary or Palin, some people just have zero respect for a woman in high office, the Huffing’s, Kossaks, and the like are nothing but VILE, JEALOUS excuses for human beings. Too bad we could not have the biggest mouths from those blogs in the same room as Hillary or Palin and see how long their superficial banter would last before they realize their intellect is severely lacking on all fronts.

 
 

Comment by mel | 2008-08-30 00:14:23

Obama question for you, still think McCain is scared of you and your funny name and that you do not look like those on our money?

Comment by wry | 2008-08-30 00:19:45

he looks like the men on our money to me, except maybe Susan B Anthony or Sacajawea.

Comment by Mr. Natural | 2008-08-30 00:22:11

Don’t we need a face for the three dollar bill?

Comment by James | 2008-08-30 00:35:49

What’s going to be on the back on that bill? A phone?

Comment by 935 Lies | 2008-08-30 04:45:26

 
 
 
 
 

Comment by Adam | 2008-08-30 00:15:13

How many years of Senate experience does one year as Governor cancel out? And how long before she is more qualified than Hillary Clinton in your opinion?

Comment by ee | 2008-08-30 00:29:09

dude, she was always more qualified than Clinton to larry and susan. She is a republican.

Comment by wry | 2008-08-30 00:47:20

Nah, Hillary Clinton is a once in a lifetime candidate in my eyes. Palin pokes her finger in Barky’s eye, that’s all.
I’m loving it.

Comment by Susan1968 | 2008-08-30 01:28:40

Hillary is more qualified in my opinion that all four of the people on both tickets.

But the DNC set out to destroy the Clintons, especailly Hillary, an dthey have succeeded in this election cycle. And Obama never saw the wisdom of choosing Hillary as VP.

So I have a choice between corrupt Obama (Chicago sleeze machine) who has flipflopped on so many issues there’s no way to tell what he will do once in office (except break more promises like he did on FISA). And Joe (My Son is A Lobbyist) Biden & his PRO-Bankruptcy Bill that was written by his credit card buddies in Delaware and started the predatory lending craze. (Did you know Joe has ties to the Chicaho-Daley machine – some saw The Daley’s ordered Obama to choose Joe).

Or, I can vote for TWO MAVERICKS who fought their own parties on important issues.

Hmmm. Gee – what will I do?

Comment by Adam | 2008-08-30 01:39:45

You complain about flip-flops but irrationally absolve McCain of all his own.

Comment by Susan1968 | 2008-08-30 01:59:06

No sweetie. It’s a matter of which flipflops matter most to me. All politians flip flop.

Obama voted for FISA
Obama voted for the Bush-Cheney Energy Bill.
Joe Biden voted for the Credit Card Industries Bankruptcy Bill.

With the DEM ticket voting Republican on these important issues, we may as well vote for Republicans.

Comment by Adam | 2008-08-30 02:08:12

Yep, that makes sense: “We don’t like those things, so we will vote for the guy who brings more things we don’t like.”

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-08-30 02:22:37

No we vote for the guy with real core beliefs who will be true to his beliefs and not sell this country down the river. Actually I wasn’t for the “guys” in the first place….I voted for Hillary!

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-08-30 02:24:17

Oh, I forgot Adam, you’re an Soretoro troll….I better clarify. The guy I was referring to with the core beliefs was McCain, Barry Soretoes has none, he’s just a narcissist.

Comment by Adam | 2008-08-30 02:26:46

Of course. It all makes sense now. It’s not you who is lacking core beliefs, it’s Obama.

(Comments wont nest below this level)

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-08-30 03:21:51

Obama or Soretoes, whatever, has no core beliefs, now you’re getting it Adam. Obama/soretoes is a narcissist. He is incapable of having any core beliefs other than his own self centered, self involved ones of course.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Comment by Adam | 2008-08-30 00:54:23

I don’t think they are Republicans (maybe temporarily), but they are the most irrational I’ve ever communicated with. Each time one of their former heroes showed support for Barack Obama, they systematically decide that they all had had lapses in judgment and that their own was infinitely better in all cases. They, on almost a daily basis are confronted with cognitive dissonance. Larry Johnson recently said “I like Joe Biden”, but when that contradicted his idea of an Obama presidency, he rationalized with the idea that he would become “The anti-Joe Biden”. They stepped out of the land of reason regarding all the players in this election. They need this site. They need constant reinforcement for the shaky foundation that their current contradictory opinions are built upon. It’s almost like a church.

Comment by wry | 2008-08-30 01:01:14

Then why stay in that church, Adam? If my pastor was irrational, I’d leave.

Comment by Adam | 2008-08-30 01:02:53

I don’t attend this church, I just observe the sermons.

Comment by Mr. Natural | 2008-08-30 01:42:56

Yeah, see ya in twenty years.

Comment by Adam | 2008-08-30 01:51:33

The people here who let their real names be known won’t be so proud of this site in twenty years, lemme tell ya. My paranoid schizophrenic uncle is slower to jump to conclusions.

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-08-30 02:26:26

Oh really Adam? How’s Eve by the way? Give her my regards. Was your kool aid apple flavored?

 
 
 

Comment by Clinton Fan | 2008-08-30 10:34:25

That’s kind of what Obama tried to say.

Didn’t work for him either.

You’re afraid.

 
 
 

Comment by ee | 2008-08-30 01:01:32

adam,

susan has a history of infiltration, and racial divisiveness.

google susan + makah + racism

Larry? Well larry has always been a puke.

He is partners with an Ollie North drone that used to head the DEA.

Comment by Adam | 2008-08-30 01:13:57

A link would be better, because I’m not really finding anything with Google. Unlike some people here, I’m a not conspiracy-minded individual. I need solid proof of an accusation to believe it.

Comment by ee | 2008-08-30 01:29:18

Comment by Adam | 2008-08-30 01:35:20

Oh, I didn’t know what a “Makah” was and assumed it was her last name.

 
 

Comment by Heather | 2008-08-30 03:42:27

That screed on anti-whaling racists makes no sense at all.

 
 

Comment by Mr. Natural | 2008-08-30 01:31:55

Nothing but crude innuendo.

If you’ve got any pride, hit the showers and send in a bot who can make a point.

Comment by Susan1968 | 2008-08-30 02:10:25

LOL Mr. Natural!

 

Comment by truthtelling007 | 2008-08-30 06:18:31

(smacking myself in the head)
The point is, since Susan is smart enough to realize what benevolent racism is, she is also against it, but not the Obama supporters, they want to feel good about getting over racism, so they can engage in their new hobby…sexism and ageism.

 

Comment by Clinton Fan | 2008-08-30 10:36:44

Ah, but he hasn’t any pride. He needs the seven bucks an hour for his World of Warcraft habit, er… Dewd!

:lol:

:mrgreen:

Comment by bemused | 2008-08-30 17:51:38

He’s got bots playing WOW for him no doubt, while he works.

 
 
 
 

Comment by Dr. Kate | 2008-08-30 01:05:55

is this FEC Adam from Kos? If it is, you should start scrubbing Obama’s FEC records from Gaza, GA..remember? Doodad, anyone?

Comment by Adam | 2008-08-30 01:09:28

For the last time: NO I don’t even like the Daily Kos.

Comment by AnnieCarmel | 2008-08-30 01:24:01

We use different criteria to make determinations. I’m sorry you don’t understand but we are not speaking the same language. We look at the whole package. We understand that these two women have different stands and issues but they have a lot in common as far as character and depth. We relate to their challenges. I am amazed that Hillary can still stand upright and have a smile on her face. I’m amazed at the challenges Sarah has taken on in her 44 years. She’s a winner in life just like Hillary. I’m going to love voting for this ticket just as I would have for Hillary as President. I would not have supported her as the junior member on Barack’s ticket. That would have been a completely wrong relationship. This one works. I will vote straight Republican ticket this time. The Democrats have seen the last of me.

Comment by Adam | 2008-08-30 01:31:45

Character and depth! I don’t care if McCain reinforced the things I disagreed with. As long as she kind of reminds me of my preferred choice on the surface, it’s fine.

Comment by StrawberrybitesBarky | 2008-08-30 01:39:11

Um you just described every Obama supporter that has slithered in here.

Comment by Adam | 2008-08-30 01:42:11

In what way?

And please, no “in every way”.

 
 
 
 
 

Comment by Clinton Fan | 2008-08-30 10:37:42

Sure SOUNDS like him…

 
 

Comment by msindy | 2008-08-30 01:18:52

Hey, Bunny Pajamas is back…

Comment by Adam | 2008-08-30 01:24:35

Nope. Whoever Bunny Pajamas is, he or she still gone.

 
 

Comment by Mr. Natural | 2008-08-30 05:04:35

They, on almost a daily basis are confronted with cognitive dissonance.

Tell us about the flip-flops, Georgie.

Tell us about Obama’s FISA betrayal.

 
 

Comment by Dave_Not_For_Obabi | 2008-08-30 01:36:23

My lord ee,

We all know Hillary is much much better than Palin BUT because of cheating by Obambi and his crew, and Rezko, and Ayers etc. etc., we won’t get Hillary, hence I’ll be voting McCain/Palin so that Obambi gets the zero he is, now get over it.

Comment by ee | 2008-08-30 02:30:28

what did ayers and rezko have to do with Hillary losing?

 
 
 

Comment by Uña de Gato | 2008-08-30 00:43:44

It’s about what she has DONE in her time in office. She has a long list of accomplishments as a reformer, and Obama has his record of dealings with Ayres and Rezko. We could play this game all night.

Comment by Adam | 2008-08-30 01:47:45

I know, I know. The only reason the mainstream media doesn’t knock Obama down a peg is because it’s again’ ya.

Comment by Buzz Latte | 2008-08-30 02:12:21

The RNC convention isn’t over, yet. Then the real fun begins. Obots, here’s a suggestion from the cold war days.

Light one up and watch the beautiful sunset, then grab your ass and kiss it good-bye!

Obama was officially done running for president on August 29, 2008.

The P waves have hit. The secondary waves will do him in.

Just sayin…

Comment by Adam | 2008-08-30 02:15:10

If the RNC ends, and they do not bring up the craziest of things that are discussed here, will you be willing to give up any of them?

 
 
 
 

Comment by JoseyJ | 2008-08-30 00:52:53

Illinois senators work parttime.
So – Obama’s 10 year Illinois Senate run is actually 5 years.
LOL

Any woman who’s raised 5 kids in a happy marriage – and broken the glass ceiling in an old boy network – can handle the demands of the White House.

Comment by Adam | 2008-08-30 01:53:16

And the real Senators are currently gone until January. I think it pans out to be about the same.

 
 

Comment by Obama is a bum | 2008-08-30 02:01:39

It does not matter how many years of experience someone has it is what they do during that time. Obama could sit his bigoted ass in the Senate for 30 years and in his case he would have 1 year of experience 30 times. The dunce has not done a damn thing yet in the Senate. Obama’s life experience is pathetic, the vast majority he would prefer to hide such as drugs, Wright, Ayers, Phleger, etc. His job experience tells a story of a failure. Obama gets off about writing about himself but his whole life is that of a failure.

Comment by Adam | 2008-08-30 02:10:08

Yes, you don’t like him so he must be bad in every way. I guess every church needs a devil.

Comment by Obama is a bum | 2008-08-30 02:40:43

I guess every church needs a devil.

Guess again. Not every church is like Obama’s which is full of devils. When I saw the congregation applaud and laugh at the vile spewing from Wright, Phleger, and Moss’ dirty mouths I knew that church was evil as is Obama.

The race card is the only option you have with Obama. One needs to have an overwhelming fantasy for a black president to be pushing for that scumbag.

 
 
 

Comment by Zee | 2008-08-30 08:18:28

Palin actually served two years as governor. Obambi started running for prez immediately and couldn’t be bothered to even convene a meeting of the committee he was supposed to chair, or show up to vote half the time.

 
 

Comment by Sojourner | 2008-08-30 00:15:26

While I love Sarah Palin as McCain’s VP pick, this may not bode well for Clinton’s efforts further down the road. Provided there is a McCain win this year, with four years under her belt as VP Palin will only make the McCain-Palin ticket a stronger foe in 2012 when Clinton makes another likely stab at the Presidency. Furthermore, should McCain not opt for a second term (or even after a second term for 2016), Palin would be the likely heir to the Republican nomination and again with more executive experience under her belt, Palin may be better positioned to take the White House. After all, part of her appeal is that she is new and fresh-faced. By 2012 or 2016, Clinton will be even more over-exposed. While I prefer Clinton now rather than later, this does warrant some mulling over. Any thoughts?

Comment by Mr. Natural | 2008-08-30 00:20:47

Yeah. Four years of the DC cesspool will be enough for her. Alaska is a beautiful place. I’d hate to see her corrupted.

It may seem like a good idea to her now, but, man, I wouldn’t wish that meatgrinder on my worst enemy.

 

Comment by AX10 | 2008-08-30 00:21:40

I hear what you are saying.
I was thinking about this.
Maybe Hillary is not meant to be President?!?
I am conflicted.

Comment by socalannie | 2008-08-30 00:31:37

A lot can happen in 4 years. Look how much has happened in the past week. Hillary will have another shot, & hopefully, we’ll have completely different leadership @ dnc.

 

Comment by Seattle Moss | 2008-08-30 01:34:44

I think for now Hillary should focus on becoming Majority Leader of the Senate

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-08-30 02:43:58

woohoo! I like that idea. Buhbye Nancy.

 
 

Comment by trixta | 2008-08-30 02:54:53

If it’s Hillary V. Palin in 2012 its okay by me, because it’s high time women battled it out at the presidential level.

Hillary’s strong suit is the economy, which should be in greater shambles by then. And there is no one like Bill to campaign for her.

She’ll win in 2012 hands down!

 
 

Comment by beverly leslie | 2008-08-30 00:26:51

I think 4 years in politics is a long time, so nothing is guranteed. That being said, Hillary is in the position no matter who wins. What I don’t doubt is that Hillary will be a formidable opponet whenever she wants to run. I would support her and I think her base would too.

People wanted Hillary and they will want her in four years. She will work her butt off in the Senate will become more powerful and pass legislation for all americans. This will make her a force even to a sitting Pres.

The important thing is that bambi doesnt’ get in to office, he will try to solidify his power and knock Hillary to the side once again.

Barky is the bigger threat.

Comment by ee | 2008-08-30 00:32:40

bigger threat to what?

Are you calling Al Gore
John Kerry
Wes Clark
Bill Clinton
Hillary Clinton
Ed Rendell
Lanny Davis
Terry Mac
Liars?

What the hell kind of threat do YOU see that these people don’t?

Huh?

Comment by tampagurl | 2008-08-30 01:01:22

ee, they are all under the influence of kool-aid.

Comment by ee | 2008-08-30 01:03:13

lol

everyone is wrong except you people right?

sounds like you are in a cult to me.

Comment by Dr. Kate | 2008-08-30 01:08:54

eewww…no,you even smell like koolaid.

Comment by Mr. Natural | 2008-08-30 01:36:05

The bots are tag-teaming.

Comment by Dave_Not_For_Obabi | 2008-08-30 01:46:52

et em triple team, does not matter, they can’t erase Obambi and Rezko and Ayers and FISA and so on.

I find it hilarious that Palin has done more in her time than even Obambi has, she has cut corruption and not gravitated to it like Obambi, She has managed large budgets and not squandered over $100,000,000.00 like Obambi and Ayers did, that alone shows Obambi is a zero!!

Comment by Adam | 2008-08-30 02:17:35

I’m not part of any team with “ee”. He seems as crazy as you guys.

Comment by ee | 2008-08-30 02:33:14

sure buddy.

(Comments wont nest below this level)

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-08-30 02:45:19

Adam is not with ee…Adam is with Eve!

 
 
 
 
 
 

Comment by tampagurl | 2008-08-30 01:11:14

ee, you live in a glass house, don’t throw stones.

 
 

Comment by Adam | 2008-08-30 01:16:50

You didn’t even read the list, did you? Maybe you’re a little more individualistic than others here, but both Bill and Hillary Clinton were on that list. If you did read it, I guess you are actually slightly more rational than most people here.

Comment by Buzz Latte | 2008-08-30 02:16:48

LOL!!

You Obots are trying to sound rational but lets face it. You losers are trying to sell a Hyundai at a Mercedes lot!

Obama has been out-classed, out gunned, and outed!

RIP

Obama Campaign

August 29, 2008

 
 
 

Comment by trixta | 2008-08-30 02:56:29

Bill Clinton makes your list?—how generous of you!

 
 
 

Comment by PhxNickD | 2008-08-30 00:35:29

I hate that I have to say this but serves the democrats right.

Comment by JoseyJ | 2008-08-30 01:04:16

We have been used and abused – and there’s just so much hurt and anger we’ve endured.
If anyone asks how we could seriously consider voting Republican – just send them this….

>>>>>Obama made a very big mistake in not selecting Hillary. (although I did not want her on that sinking ship) Obama made a very big mistake telling Hillary supporters to get over it. He made a very big mistake in not reaching out to us. He made a HUGE mistake in never trying to control the vile attacks towards Hillary supporters, from his supporters. And he made a huge mistake in never speaking out to control the attacks on Hillary during the primaries. And his wife made a big mistake when she was asked if she would support Hillary, should she be the nominee. And they made a HUGE mistake when they tried to paint the Clintons as racists. And they screwed up when they tried to threaten us with Roe v Wade.

 
 

Comment by Carmen Purser | 2008-08-30 00:36:15

The Democratic Pary only have themselves to blame. Hillary’s experience and work in public service was far superior to BHO’s. Uncle Teddy (Kennedy) and Uncle Tom (Daschle)wanted their ‘fair hair’ child–they got him! With HRC at the top of the ticket the Democrarts could have enjoyed a 16 year run–8 for HRC; 8 for BHO. What do we have to look forward to now–possibly 16 years of a Republican run!

I have found it amazing that we have had all of this public discussion about John McCain’s age (age discrimination). Now the pundits and others annointed by the ‘great one’ are beginning to pronouce McCain’s impending death–like the great one is not going to die at some point even if he is younger and in good health.

Comment by trixta | 2008-08-30 02:58:24

Yeah, and his mother is 95 years old with all of her faculties intact!

 
 

Comment by Johnny at Work | 2008-08-30 00:54:59

If McCain/Palin do such a good job that they get re-elected, why is that a bad thing?

AMERICA FIRST

I wanted Hillary, but I am very happy to vote McCain/Palin, and wish them well.

Wanting them to perform poorly so Hillary gets a better 2012 shot is a little sick.

Comment by trixta | 2008-08-30 03:04:18

No one is wishing that McCain & Palin do poorly in the WH (I like them both!), but the Repugs aren’t very good at fixing the economy and bringing down the deficit. (I don’t have faith in Obama either in this regard.) An economy in shambles is just inevitable, I think. HRC and her smart team can pull us out of such shambles though. I’m just saying . . . .

 
 

Comment by JoseyJ | 2008-08-30 00:58:37

Hillary didn’t just lose. Major players in the Dem Party opposed her candidacy! Politicians that the Clintons had worked to elect!!
Such abandonment! and none of them stood up to denounce the sexist attacks against her – or the ridiculous charges of racism against both Clintons.

Do you really think Hillary wants to go through that hell again? – knowing her own party wouldn’t be supporting her.
Of course, she may have known it this time – before she entered the race.

 

Comment by JP | 2008-08-30 01:17:29

My thought is this: Why is there only a one spot for women in politics? Think about it, if McCain/Palin do shatter the glass ceiling and people get to see a woman VP in action, doesn’t that make it more likely for a woman to become potus? I think Palin paving the way for Presidency will be a blessing for women to come, no doubt.

The bottom line is: Obama spit on the face of Hillary Clinton supporters, while McCain demonstrated that he hears the nation and what is taking place. With his actions McCain showed he is all for change and he is also sick of corruption in the government. McCain is ready to lead by example and he is ready to put his money where his mouth is. Now that is bold leadership to me.

Obama has shown… well not so much backbone. He talks change and then picks Biden… Great choice for change..

Anyway, I got off topic. I think this is a bold choice and it shows women that McCain hears women and takes seriously what women are saying. Of course Palin does not replace Clinton. No way. But what the choice does show is that McCain believes it is time for women to step to the driver’s seat. Now that is change I can believe in! I am very impressed by the McCain campaign and this bold choice.

Comment by Jane | 2008-08-30 01:31:38

It is Hillary who has paved the way for women to be president not Palin.

 
 

Comment by AnnieCarmel | 2008-08-30 01:29:38

What I would look forward to in a challenge between Hillary and Sarah would be a campaign without the evil sexism and hatred that has been overwhelming in this one. I think they’d run on issues and welcome the contest. Wow! So would I. It would be a hard choice…let’s see…hmmm who to vote for? Smart or Smarter?

It’s pretty simple this time…Thug or Hero? Oh! OK.

 

Comment by Heather | 2008-08-30 03:51:41

True enough, but Clinton’s chances if Obama gets elected are even worse:

If McCain/Palin get elected in 2008 and really are “more of the same”, then the country will be even MORE ready for change in 2012 than it is now, thus helping Hillary’s chances. If they ‘rule’ for 8 years, the natural yin-yang of party alternation will also help her.

If Obama/Biden are elected in 2008 and they’re good, then they are in for 8 years and we’ve never had > 8 years of Dem ‘rule’ so she’d have an uphill battle to follow them. If they’re bad then they’re out in 4 years but the country won’t want a Dem to replace them.

 

Comment by Kal | 2008-08-30 07:13:14

Not only that, but having a Downs child has already made Sarah Palin acutely aware of how medical disaster can strike any family, and the importance of supportive care services.

 

Comment by Clinton Fan | 2008-08-30 11:46:04

We’ll see. If McCain inherited his Mom’s constitution and longevity, he might not want to step aside for Palin in four years.

If he does, and Palin is able to hit it out of the park, and be good at it, well, there ya go.

It really IS about “country first” at the end of the day. It’ll be important to work hard for a Democratic legislature in that scenario, to preserve a bit of balance.

If people agree with those who think like me, and want to see Hillary’s vision implemented in four years time, then Clinton will prevail.

I’m not worried.

What will be, will be.

 
 

Comment by Ever Vilgilant | 2008-08-30 00:23:13

I am glad to see that experience no longer matters LOL, or is that only with respect to Sen. Obama? The only thing that Gov Palin has in common with Sen Clinton is that they are both women. She is a social conservative (yes, Roe V Wade as a fact of life will be a huge factor for the next president let’s be real), she supports a constitutional amendment with regards to defining marriage as only between a man and a woman (yes she vetoed a bill but search the GLBT sites for her record here). She is anti national healthcare, contrary to her speech she supported the bridge to no where. How does voting for her honor Sen Clinton in the least? I think the Republican Party had a number of women who were infinitely more qualified than an 18 month governor of one of the least populated states in the nation (Sen Hutchinson, Meg Whitman, Carly Fiorina, etc). Sen McCain is counting on women voting for her, strictly because she is a woman. Just my 2 cents worth.

Comment by mel | 2008-08-30 00:27:01

A troll spending his hard earned minimum wage from Axelrod spewing lies and crap, hmmmmmmm best keep your 2 cents, you will be jobless in 67 days……lol

Comment by ee | 2008-08-30 00:36:15

Lies? Name one.

Speaking of liars…

Hey Larry, care to explain how a national security guy like yourself can justify such a neophyte being one melanoma away from the top job?

Here’s what another “national security expert” has to say…

David Frum…
..
Since the Second World War, 10 men have received the Republican nomination for vice-president. Three of those men – Richard Nixon, Bob Dole and George H.W. Bush – continued on to win the presidential nomination for themselves, and two actually became president. (A fourth nominee, Thomas Dewey’s 1948 running mate, Earl Warren, rose to arguably even greater power as chief justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. And you could add a fifth case: Gerald Ford went on to the presidency after being appointed vice-president in 1973.)

Should John McCain lose in November, Sarah Palin has just pole-vaulted into front-runner status for 2012. Should Mr. McCain win, her grip on the next Republican nomination will become a lock.

So this is the future of the Republican party you are looking at: a future in which national security has bumped down the list of priorities behind abortion politics, gender politics, and energy politics. Ms. Palin is a bold pick, and probably a shrewd one. It’s not nearly so clear that she is a responsible pick, or a wise one.

National Post

Comment by mel | 2008-08-30 00:43:10

speaking of liars, Barry still heading up the banking commitee, still a product of Selma, a product of the Kennedy airlift NAFTA to name a few, opps, is Barry wanting to be POTUS?

His granny he threw under the bus must be so proud huh…..lol

Comment by ee | 2008-08-30 01:04:15

So you couldn’t.

just more bullshit.

You liars are unrepentant.

 

Comment by Dr. Kate | 2008-08-30 01:11:53

yes, didn’t he sit on his father’s shoulders and watch the astronauts, from Hawaii???

Comment by Mr. Natural | 2008-08-30 01:37:22

Heck, I thought he watched them from the moon.

Comment by Buzz Latte | 2008-08-30 02:19:46

Hey he was there in Selma, uh, Kenya too!

And gee he just barely knew Ayers and he did three hours of work for Rezko.

And you Obots think you can spot lies when you see ‘em???

Now that’s funny

RIP Obama campaign August 29, 2008

 
 
 
 

Comment by AnnieO | 2008-08-30 00:46:33

I thought you people were all about the abortion issue. Thanks for all the worry about our uteruses.

Apparently, according to the National Post, this is the beginning of a shift in party platforms. Republicans are adopting women’s issues. Dems are fools!

Comment by ee | 2008-08-30 01:05:05

lol

you misread annie.

Comment by AnnieO | 2008-08-30 01:19:31

So this is the future of the Republican party you are looking at: a future in which national security has bumped down the list of priorities behind abortion politics, gender politics, and energy politics.

 
 

Comment by trixta | 2008-08-30 03:07:46

Yes, how ironic!

 
 

Comment by wry | 2008-08-30 01:05:57

So we have the choice of inexperienced Sarah Palin, if John McCain dies, or inexperienced Barack Obama, if Barack Obama lives.

Hmmm, tough choice. Which is more likely to happen?

Comment by tampagurl | 2008-08-30 01:19:06

 
 

Comment by Jeremiah God Damn Amerikkka Wright | 2008-08-30 01:36:19

well it certainly beats a neophyte having the top job like Obama.

Atleast she will have a heartbeat to learn. Whats his excuse?

MUHAHA

I love the hypocrisy of Obots. Its like warm horseshit on a cold day…you can see the steam rising off it a mile away.

 

Comment by Dave_Not_For_Obabi | 2008-08-30 01:53:40

Comment by ee | 2008-08-30 00:36:15
Lies? Name one.
Speaking of liars…
Hey Larry, care to explain how a national security guy like yourself can justify such a neophyte being one melanoma away from the top job?

Hey ee,

What kind of idiot are you, Larry is not even responding to your posts, are you drunk or something, I mean really, take your cry-baby personal issues to a chat room or something because all you do is waste bandwidth and make yourself out to be a larger and larger fool EVERY TIME you post. God, it almost sounds like you have a tiny blog some where that is not doing good, get over it.

 

Comment by Obama is a bum | 2008-08-30 02:07:33

Obama is looking for you, he said you failed your last Black Liberation Theology exam. According to the Obama rules you get 40 lashes.

 
 
 

Comment by The Real Hope | 2008-08-30 00:39:14

 

Comment by Mr. X | 2008-08-30 00:41:58

She has several years of executive experience. Obama and Biden have none combined. So WTF are you going on about?

 

Comment by AnnieCarmel | 2008-08-30 01:31:20

zzzzzzzzzzzz

 
 

Comment by typical.white.person | 2008-08-30 00:24:44

Here are Palin’s views on a number of different issues.

Comment by Ever Vilgilant | 2008-08-30 00:30:29

She opposes same-sex marriage, but has said she has gay friends. Palin complied with an Alaskan state Supreme Court order and signed an implementation of same-sex benefits into law under protest, stating that legal options to avoid doing so had run out.

This is why she vetoed the benefits bill, no choice!!!

 

Comment by mel | 2008-08-30 00:32:38

Kevin Drum is a joke and is an Obama butt kisser, get someone who doesn’t distort things for Bambi.