But, what moved me from being first a moderate, then a conservative to being quite far to the right these days, is the sheer EVIL behind the behavior of the dems.

Oh please. You’re not fooling anyone but you are making a fool of yourself.

This column is a piece of filth.

When you someday reflect on the reasons Senator Obama was so roundly defeated, remember the anger Americans must have felt upon reading the sexist bullying and slack-jawed leering so cleverly written into this column.— and others like it , by your brothers in what no longer deserves to be called journalism.

You said it, Gar nose: This Wolcott’s sick fantasies about McCain and Palin are just bizarre. OMFG, he is all hot and bothered about the idea of Palin with a gun, shooting Cindy McCain. It’s unreal.

Wolcott needs to be told what a freak he is. I need to email asking him to refrain from publishing his sick fantasies. He’s obviously been watching too much porn with incredibly stupid far-fetched plots.

You guys are just waking up to this because of the congnitive dissonance caused by the infighting between two factions of the party….the neo-communists and the fascists.

What you really should be doing is taking a close look at the whole democratic agenda and asking yourself…is this right? Is this really something I want to promote?

Clinton is the best of a bad lot. But, I think the cat was really let out of the bag when her master’s thesis was made public. Her and her husband are deeply corrupt individuals with real plans to dismantle our democracy as a way of enriching themselves and seizing as much power as possible.

But, at least they won’t burn the entire country to the ground, as someone like Obama plans.

So the Wolcott piece didn’t surprise me. What did surprise me, is the way he stood up for HRC during the primary. Around two years ago, I took his blog out of my favorites list. During the primary, he was reinstated but last night when I read that garbage, it sickened me.

I think Wolcott isn’t really a misogynist at heart, but will use whatever words he can to demean those with whom he disagrees, cheap as it is to fall back on that kind of language. I could be mistaken. Perhaps he really is a misogynist.

I have to watch myself as I have always had a bad habit of using the word “bitch,” (yes, I do cuss when I get ticked off) applying it to both males and females, never having considered it a sexist word. It’s hard to break old habits.

But I know it is the rhetoric that is damaging, whether or not the speaker or writer is misogynist or not. And perhaps someone close to Mr. Wolcott will clue him in. Or not. He’s off my Christmas card list again, though.

Re: James Wolcott’s blog topic titled: Soulmate … or fuck buddy?

This is a new low even for Vanity Fair.

Has the Obama campaign’s use of sexism freed you to display your sexist bias in all its glory without a hint of shame?

What’s next — a public stoning of all women who dare to aspire to the White House?

Your message is clear — women who aspire to the highest office in the land will be brutalized for their audacity expecting parity in the USA.

The USA may as well hang a sign over the White House: NO GIRLS ALLOWED.

Then you in the “press” can save the bandwidth online.

Please know I have circulated this to all my women friends.

———

You can send a letter to the editor at Vanity Fair via this link:

http://www.vanityfair.com/contact/emailLetters

THIS HAS GOT TO STOP! MISOGYNY IS WRONG!