<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Credibility on the Commander-in-Chief Front</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/06/more-credibility-on-the-commander-in-chief-front/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/06/more-credibility-on-the-commander-in-chief-front/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 12:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tommy&#38;Wendy now Mccain/Palin 08</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/06/more-credibility-on-the-commander-in-chief-front/#comment-694430</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy&#38;Wendy now Mccain/Palin 08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 00:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/06/more-credibility-on-the-commander-in-chief-front/#comment-694430</guid>
		<description>(So stupid. So ignorant. So clueless.)Obamabots are out tonight.What did Obama put on his site"Fight the smear" John McCain isn't ahead of me-Sarah Palin isn't heard of me-lol Get a life!Stay off our blog if you don't like what we say. And you are being so nasty.We didn't ask you to come here.So you can just leave! 


McCain/Palin 08</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(So stupid. So ignorant. So clueless.)Obamabots are out tonight.What did Obama put on his site&#8221;Fight the smear&#8221; John McCain isn&#8217;t ahead of me-Sarah Palin isn&#8217;t heard of me-lol Get a life!Stay off our blog if you don&#8217;t like what we say. And you are being so nasty.We didn&#8217;t ask you to come here.So you can just leave! </p>
<p>McCain/Palin 08</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smilin' Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/06/more-credibility-on-the-commander-in-chief-front/#comment-688469</link>
		<dc:creator>Smilin' Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 23:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/06/more-credibility-on-the-commander-in-chief-front/#comment-688469</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;The neocons can relate to how obtuse Obama supporters truly are because they have bought into Obama’s lies&lt;/em&gt;

This is fascinating.

The nucleus of the neocons was formed from Democrat hawks disgruntled by Jackson's defeat by McGovern in the 68 primaries.  Jeane Kirkpatrick is the best female example of that group which comes to  mind.

The self-described feminists on this blog passionately supported Hillary Clinton, a Democrat liberal (American Conservative Union (ACU) Lifetime Rating 7.71) against Barry Obama, a Democrat liberal (ACU Lifetime Rating 7.67).  They are disgruntled by Obama's defeat of Clinton in the 2008 primaries.

They now just as passionately support John McCain, a conservative Republican (ACU Lifetime rating 82.1). 

The new neocons are being born before our very eyes on the 40 years later to the day..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>The neocons can relate to how obtuse Obama supporters truly are because they have bought into Obama’s lies</em></p>
<p>This is fascinating.</p>
<p>The nucleus of the neocons was formed from Democrat hawks disgruntled by Jackson&#8217;s defeat by McGovern in the 68 primaries.  Jeane Kirkpatrick is the best female example of that group which comes to  mind.</p>
<p>The self-described feminists on this blog passionately supported Hillary Clinton, a Democrat liberal (American Conservative Union (ACU) Lifetime Rating 7.71) against Barry Obama, a Democrat liberal (ACU Lifetime Rating 7.67).  They are disgruntled by Obama&#8217;s defeat of Clinton in the 2008 primaries.</p>
<p>They now just as passionately support John McCain, a conservative Republican (ACU Lifetime rating 82.1). </p>
<p>The new neocons are being born before our very eyes on the 40 years later to the day..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pink Panther</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/06/more-credibility-on-the-commander-in-chief-front/#comment-688134</link>
		<dc:creator>Pink Panther</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 22:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/06/more-credibility-on-the-commander-in-chief-front/#comment-688134</guid>
		<description>The neocons can relate to how obtuse Obama supporters truly are because they have bought into Obama's lies.  The neocons bought into Bushes lies and look what happened over the last 8 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The neocons can relate to how obtuse Obama supporters truly are because they have bought into Obama&#8217;s lies.  The neocons bought into Bushes lies and look what happened over the last 8 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smilin' Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/06/more-credibility-on-the-commander-in-chief-front/#comment-688095</link>
		<dc:creator>Smilin' Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 22:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/06/more-credibility-on-the-commander-in-chief-front/#comment-688095</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I am finding this site more and more amusing&lt;/em&gt;

It's why I keep coming back.  It's fascinating.

One explanation damaging to the self-esteem is that this has been a false flag operation from the beginning and we all fell for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>I am finding this site more and more amusing</em></p>
<p>It&#8217;s why I keep coming back.  It&#8217;s fascinating.</p>
<p>One explanation damaging to the self-esteem is that this has been a false flag operation from the beginning and we all fell for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smilin' Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/06/more-credibility-on-the-commander-in-chief-front/#comment-688036</link>
		<dc:creator>Smilin' Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 22:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/06/more-credibility-on-the-commander-in-chief-front/#comment-688036</guid>
		<description>The SCAR is the M-14 we shoud have had, just not as purdy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The SCAR is the M-14 we shoud have had, just not as purdy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smilin' Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/06/more-credibility-on-the-commander-in-chief-front/#comment-688035</link>
		<dc:creator>Smilin' Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 22:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/06/more-credibility-on-the-commander-in-chief-front/#comment-688035</guid>
		<description>The SCAR is the M-14 we shoud have had, just not a purdy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The SCAR is the M-14 we shoud have had, just not a purdy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/06/more-credibility-on-the-commander-in-chief-front/#comment-686998</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 18:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/06/more-credibility-on-the-commander-in-chief-front/#comment-686998</guid>
		<description>So now Larry is a war monger? How does that coorelate with him supposedly once having supported Clinton?

I am finding this site more and more amusing.

The neocons must believe we are all stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So now Larry is a war monger? How does that coorelate with him supposedly once having supported Clinton?</p>
<p>I am finding this site more and more amusing.</p>
<p>The neocons must believe we are all stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monet</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/06/more-credibility-on-the-commander-in-chief-front/#comment-686864</link>
		<dc:creator>Monet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 17:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/06/more-credibility-on-the-commander-in-chief-front/#comment-686864</guid>
		<description>I agree, people are listening to Senator Obama.  I listen to him.  I like what he says, his vision is a wonderful world.  Unfortunately, his plans for getting to that wonderful world is very expensive and in my opinion, unlikely to be all that successful without major tweaking.  The polls show people are unsure of Senator Obama as a person and whether he can bring about the change he advocates.  

The polls also show people know and understand Senator McCain, they aren't unsure about him.  They may disagree with him but feel he's unlikely to make things worse.

In a tight race, people who aren't married to a political party, are more likely to choose the candidate they understand, who isn't going to cost them money and they feel more comfortable with.  In this election, Senator McCain is shaping up to be that candidate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, people are listening to Senator Obama.  I listen to him.  I like what he says, his vision is a wonderful world.  Unfortunately, his plans for getting to that wonderful world is very expensive and in my opinion, unlikely to be all that successful without major tweaking.  The polls show people are unsure of Senator Obama as a person and whether he can bring about the change he advocates.  </p>
<p>The polls also show people know and understand Senator McCain, they aren&#8217;t unsure about him.  They may disagree with him but feel he&#8217;s unlikely to make things worse.</p>
<p>In a tight race, people who aren&#8217;t married to a political party, are more likely to choose the candidate they understand, who isn&#8217;t going to cost them money and they feel more comfortable with.  In this election, Senator McCain is shaping up to be that candidate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pink Panther</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/06/more-credibility-on-the-commander-in-chief-front/#comment-685104</link>
		<dc:creator>Pink Panther</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 06:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/06/more-credibility-on-the-commander-in-chief-front/#comment-685104</guid>
		<description>Nancy,
How about a few of these reasons for not voting for Obama:

1.  UNDIVIDED JERUSALEM AS ISRAEL'S CAPITAL: In a speech before AIPAC Obama said, “Jerusalem will remain the capital of Israel, and it must remain undivided." Soon after Obama said that he "tried to correct the interpretation" of that statement. He switched his position saying that "it's going to be up to the parties to negotiate a range of these issues and Jerusalem will be part of those negotiations.”

&lt;strong&gt;HILLARY AND MCCAIN/PALIN SUPPORT AN UNDIVIDED JERUSALEM.&lt;/strong&gt;  &lt;em&gt;OBAMA HAS FLIP-FLOPPED.&lt;/em&gt;

 
2.  PUBLIC FINANCING: Barack Obama answered a Midwest Democracy Network questionnaire in September 2007 saying that, "If I am the Democratic nominee, I will aggressively pursue an agreement with the Republican nominee to preserve a publicly financed general election." Obama ended up following the money and opted out of public financing for the general election.

 &lt;strong&gt;HILLARY AND MCCAIN/PALIN SUPPORT PUBLIC FINANCING.&lt;/strong&gt;  &lt;em&gt;OBAMA FLIP-FLOPPED AND IS NOW AGAINST PUBLIC FINANCING.&lt;/em&gt;


3.  IRANIAN REVOLUTIONARY GUARD: Obama's campaign has said more recently that the Senator "has consistently urged that Iran's Revolutionary Guard be labeled what it is: a terrorist organization." But before this Obama spent months campaigning on his opposition to and his vote against the Kyl-Lieberman Amendment which did just that. (HILLARY SIGNED THE KYL-LIEBERMAN AMENDMENT.)

&lt;strong&gt; HILLARY AND MCCAIN SUPPORTED LABELING THE GUARD AS A TERRORIST ORGANIZATION.&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;em&gt;OBAMA VOTED AGAINST THE BILL WHICH LABEL THE IRANIAN REVOLUTIONARY GUARD A TERRORIST ORGANIZATION.&lt;/em&gt;

4. TERRI SCHIAVO: In March 2005, just weeks before Terri Schiavo died from a painful 14-day starvation and dehydration death, the Republican Congress approved legislation transferring the case from state courts to federal courts, delaying her death. When her brain was later autopsied, there was almost NO brain tissue left.  

"An exhaustive autopsy found that Terri Schiavo's brain had withered to half the normal size since her collapse in 1990 and that no treatment could have remotely improved her condition"  www.nytimes. com/2005/ 06/16/national/ 16schiavo. 

But Obama voted along with the Republican Congress, along with pro-life Democrats, to have a court intervene rather than have her husband make a decision regarding her life.  

During an April 2007 debate Obama said: "I think professionally the biggest mistake that I made was when I first arrived in the Senate. There was a debate about Terri Schiavo, and a lot of us, including me, left the Senate with a bill that allowed Congress to intrude where it shouldn't have."
During a February 2008 debate Obama was asked name a regret and he said he would like to take back his vote authorizing Congress to intervene to save the life of the brain-injured Florida woman Terri Schiavo.

HILLARY AND MCCAIN VOTED AGAINST THE REPUBLICAN CONGRESS IN MARCH 2005, &lt;em&gt;WHILE OBAMA SUPPORTED THEM. &lt;/em&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;DO YOU SEE A PATTERN HERE NANCY?

AND, THERE'S MORE TO COME. . . . 
&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nancy,<br />
How about a few of these reasons for not voting for Obama:</p>
<p>1.  UNDIVIDED JERUSALEM AS ISRAEL&#8217;S CAPITAL: In a speech before AIPAC Obama said, “Jerusalem will remain the capital of Israel, and it must remain undivided.&#8221; Soon after Obama said that he &#8220;tried to correct the interpretation&#8221; of that statement. He switched his position saying that &#8220;it&#8217;s going to be up to the parties to negotiate a range of these issues and Jerusalem will be part of those negotiations.”</p>
<p><strong>HILLARY AND MCCAIN/PALIN SUPPORT AN UNDIVIDED JERUSALEM.</strong>  <em>OBAMA HAS FLIP-FLOPPED.</em></p>
<p>2.  PUBLIC FINANCING: Barack Obama answered a Midwest Democracy Network questionnaire in September 2007 saying that, &#8220;If I am the Democratic nominee, I will aggressively pursue an agreement with the Republican nominee to preserve a publicly financed general election.&#8221; Obama ended up following the money and opted out of public financing for the general election.</p>
<p> <strong>HILLARY AND MCCAIN/PALIN SUPPORT PUBLIC FINANCING.</strong>  <em>OBAMA FLIP-FLOPPED AND IS NOW AGAINST PUBLIC FINANCING.</em></p>
<p>3.  IRANIAN REVOLUTIONARY GUARD: Obama&#8217;s campaign has said more recently that the Senator &#8220;has consistently urged that Iran&#8217;s Revolutionary Guard be labeled what it is: a terrorist organization.&#8221; But before this Obama spent months campaigning on his opposition to and his vote against the Kyl-Lieberman Amendment which did just that. (HILLARY SIGNED THE KYL-LIEBERMAN AMENDMENT.)</p>
<p><strong> HILLARY AND MCCAIN SUPPORTED LABELING THE GUARD AS A TERRORIST ORGANIZATION.</strong> <em>OBAMA VOTED AGAINST THE BILL WHICH LABEL THE IRANIAN REVOLUTIONARY GUARD A TERRORIST ORGANIZATION.</em></p>
<p>4. TERRI SCHIAVO: In March 2005, just weeks before Terri Schiavo died from a painful 14-day starvation and dehydration death, the Republican Congress approved legislation transferring the case from state courts to federal courts, delaying her death. When her brain was later autopsied, there was almost NO brain tissue left.  </p>
<p>&#8220;An exhaustive autopsy found that Terri Schiavo&#8217;s brain had withered to half the normal size since her collapse in 1990 and that no treatment could have remotely improved her condition&#8221;  <a href="http://www.nytimes" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes</a>. com/2005/ 06/16/national/ 16schiavo. </p>
<p>But Obama voted along with the Republican Congress, along with pro-life Democrats, to have a court intervene rather than have her husband make a decision regarding her life.  </p>
<p>During an April 2007 debate Obama said: &#8220;I think professionally the biggest mistake that I made was when I first arrived in the Senate. There was a debate about Terri Schiavo, and a lot of us, including me, left the Senate with a bill that allowed Congress to intrude where it shouldn&#8217;t have.&#8221;<br />
During a February 2008 debate Obama was asked name a regret and he said he would like to take back his vote authorizing Congress to intervene to save the life of the brain-injured Florida woman Terri Schiavo.</p>
<p>HILLARY AND MCCAIN VOTED AGAINST THE REPUBLICAN CONGRESS IN MARCH 2005, <em>WHILE OBAMA SUPPORTED THEM. </em></p>
<p><strong>DO YOU SEE A PATTERN HERE NANCY?</p>
<p>AND, THERE&#8217;S MORE TO COME. . . .<br />
</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ming the merciless</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/06/more-credibility-on-the-commander-in-chief-front/#comment-685094</link>
		<dc:creator>ming the merciless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 06:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/06/more-credibility-on-the-commander-in-chief-front/#comment-685094</guid>
		<description>Of course, there's that dreadfully high mortality rate directly related to alcoholism.  12% of all Native Alaskan deaths are directly attributable to alcohol abuse.  

Alcoholism is a very serious problem in Alaska in general.  A far greater problem than in other states.  Many Alaskan communities have attempted to deal with the worsening problem by outlawing the sale of alcohol altogether.  I suppose that would include Anheuser-Busch products...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, there&#8217;s that dreadfully high mortality rate directly related to alcoholism.  12% of all Native Alaskan deaths are directly attributable to alcohol abuse.  </p>
<p>Alcoholism is a very serious problem in Alaska in general.  A far greater problem than in other states.  Many Alaskan communities have attempted to deal with the worsening problem by outlawing the sale of alcohol altogether.  I suppose that would include Anheuser-Busch products&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crystal M</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/06/more-credibility-on-the-commander-in-chief-front/#comment-685085</link>
		<dc:creator>Crystal M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 06:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/06/more-credibility-on-the-commander-in-chief-front/#comment-685085</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;you realize shooting a gun is easy, right?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Tell that to Dick Cheney!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>you realize shooting a gun is easy, right?</p></blockquote>
<p>Tell that to Dick Cheney!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pink Panther</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/06/more-credibility-on-the-commander-in-chief-front/#comment-685084</link>
		<dc:creator>Pink Panther</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 06:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/06/more-credibility-on-the-commander-in-chief-front/#comment-685084</guid>
		<description>sfhillary adds nothing to this forum but hate.  This is spam.   This troll is not worth responding to any longer .  Ignore it in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sfhillary adds nothing to this forum but hate.  This is spam.   This troll is not worth responding to any longer .  Ignore it in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MaryPat</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/06/more-credibility-on-the-commander-in-chief-front/#comment-685072</link>
		<dc:creator>MaryPat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 06:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/06/more-credibility-on-the-commander-in-chief-front/#comment-685072</guid>
		<description>Jeez, you are one sanctimonious piece of work.  And you're being even nastier and more personally insulting than usual--which is really saying something.  I sense that you're going into full-blown panic mode.

And why shouldn't you?  You may be obnoxious as all get out, but you're smart enough to know that it all slipping away for your hero. 

All. Slipping. Away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeez, you are one sanctimonious piece of work.  And you&#8217;re being even nastier and more personally insulting than usual&#8211;which is really saying something.  I sense that you&#8217;re going into full-blown panic mode.</p>
<p>And why shouldn&#8217;t you?  You may be obnoxious as all get out, but you&#8217;re smart enough to know that it all slipping away for your hero. </p>
<p>All. Slipping. Away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ziggy</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/06/more-credibility-on-the-commander-in-chief-front/#comment-685064</link>
		<dc:creator>ziggy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 06:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/06/more-credibility-on-the-commander-in-chief-front/#comment-685064</guid>
		<description>Obama has never mocked the Pledge of Allegiance, except in your imagination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama has never mocked the Pledge of Allegiance, except in your imagination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sfhillary</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/06/more-credibility-on-the-commander-in-chief-front/#comment-685054</link>
		<dc:creator>sfhillary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 06:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/06/more-credibility-on-the-commander-in-chief-front/#comment-685054</guid>
		<description>You're gonna take back the party by voting for McCain, huh? That'll show 'em. Meanwhile: 

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/08/21/abortion.doctors.ap/index.html

American women, in a matter of days, will see their ability to get a safe, legal abortion diminish considerably in large parts of the country. This isn't a future scare scenario -- this is happening today. Already. And you cretins are going to vote for another Republican because Barack Obama didn't wear a flag pin, or whatever idiotic, meaningless triviality catches your attention and gives you the public excuse you need to reject the guy you were going to reject anyway. And you'll do it all in the name of feminism, or "combating sexism," or whatever idiotic name you choose to put on a vote that will take women backward by a generation if it succeeds. 

Please go read that article. And try to imagine why I feel sick at the idea of Democrats voting Republican in the name of women and HRC. What a sick joke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re gonna take back the party by voting for McCain, huh? That&#8217;ll show &#8216;em. Meanwhile: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/08/21/abortion.doctors.ap/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/08/21/abortion.doctors.ap/index.html</a></p>
<p>American women, in a matter of days, will see their ability to get a safe, legal abortion diminish considerably in large parts of the country. This isn&#8217;t a future scare scenario &#8212; this is happening today. Already. And you cretins are going to vote for another Republican because Barack Obama didn&#8217;t wear a flag pin, or whatever idiotic, meaningless triviality catches your attention and gives you the public excuse you need to reject the guy you were going to reject anyway. And you&#8217;ll do it all in the name of feminism, or &#8220;combating sexism,&#8221; or whatever idiotic name you choose to put on a vote that will take women backward by a generation if it succeeds. </p>
<p>Please go read that article. And try to imagine why I feel sick at the idea of Democrats voting Republican in the name of women and HRC. What a sick joke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IndianaDem</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/06/more-credibility-on-the-commander-in-chief-front/#comment-685047</link>
		<dc:creator>IndianaDem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 06:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/06/more-credibility-on-the-commander-in-chief-front/#comment-685047</guid>
		<description>Actually, Obama &lt;em&gt;has&lt;/em&gt; been speaking to the issues closest to the troubled hearts and minds of mainstream American voters.  He's been consistently countering deepening pessimism with a hopeful, optimistic message.  People are listening.      

“Optimism is the faith that leads to achievement.  Nothing can be done without hope and confidence.” 

Those aren't Obama's words, but they relate to what he's telling us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Obama <em>has</em> been speaking to the issues closest to the troubled hearts and minds of mainstream American voters.  He&#8217;s been consistently countering deepening pessimism with a hopeful, optimistic message.  People are listening.      </p>
<p>“Optimism is the faith that leads to achievement.  Nothing can be done without hope and confidence.” </p>
<p>Those aren&#8217;t Obama&#8217;s words, but they relate to what he&#8217;s telling us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crystal M</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/06/more-credibility-on-the-commander-in-chief-front/#comment-685007</link>
		<dc:creator>Crystal M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 06:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/06/more-credibility-on-the-commander-in-chief-front/#comment-685007</guid>
		<description>Obama has never mocked the Pledge of Allegience. 
Please find a new line of misinformation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama has never mocked the Pledge of Allegience.<br />
Please find a new line of misinformation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crystal M</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/06/more-credibility-on-the-commander-in-chief-front/#comment-684993</link>
		<dc:creator>Crystal M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 06:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/06/more-credibility-on-the-commander-in-chief-front/#comment-684993</guid>
		<description>It's nice that my post which shows that Obama is STILL leading McCain in all electoral vote projections and national polls (Rasmussen, Gallup, Hotline, and CNN) was deleted. 

It also contained links that showed that in the last two elections, it was the Republicans who did all the rigging--by illegally disqualifying registered voters in minority precincts, as well as the former head of Diebold (the maker of the nation's electronic voting machines) promising to deliver Ohio's votes to President Bush. 

I can't understand why my post was deleted, especially when I cited the newspaper articles I took my information from--oh wait. 
Maybe that was my problem. I used actual sources instead of opinion blogs and stump speeches. Silly me! What was I thinking? Doing research...*shakes head*...(when will I learn?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s nice that my post which shows that Obama is STILL leading McCain in all electoral vote projections and national polls (Rasmussen, Gallup, Hotline, and CNN) was deleted. </p>
<p>It also contained links that showed that in the last two elections, it was the Republicans who did all the rigging&#8211;by illegally disqualifying registered voters in minority precincts, as well as the former head of Diebold (the maker of the nation&#8217;s electronic voting machines) promising to deliver Ohio&#8217;s votes to President Bush. </p>
<p>I can&#8217;t understand why my post was deleted, especially when I cited the newspaper articles I took my information from&#8211;oh wait.<br />
Maybe that was my problem. I used actual sources instead of opinion blogs and stump speeches. Silly me! What was I thinking? Doing research&#8230;*shakes head*&#8230;(when will I learn?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IndianaDem</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/06/more-credibility-on-the-commander-in-chief-front/#comment-684980</link>
		<dc:creator>IndianaDem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 06:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/06/more-credibility-on-the-commander-in-chief-front/#comment-684980</guid>
		<description>No, I don't have to post everything in bold font, nor do I have to post everything in regular font.  You are at liberty to use whichever you wish as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I don&#8217;t have to post everything in bold font, nor do I have to post everything in regular font.  You are at liberty to use whichever you wish as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crystal M</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/06/more-credibility-on-the-commander-in-chief-front/#comment-684940</link>
		<dc:creator>Crystal M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 06:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/06/more-credibility-on-the-commander-in-chief-front/#comment-684940</guid>
		<description>What? Should he be "organizing communities"? We all know how ridiculous and pointless THAT is!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What? Should he be &#8220;organizing communities&#8221;? We all know how ridiculous and pointless THAT is!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
