Barack, Michelle, Bill Ayers, and Bernadine Dohrn—It’s Not Just The Lies
By Matthew Weaver on September 7, 2008 at 10:15 AM in ACORN, Alice Palmer, Annenberg Chicago Challenge, Arab American Action Network, Ayers, Barack Obama, Bernardine Dohrn, Bill Ayers, CAC, Chicago School Reform Collaborative, Chicago politics, Corruption, Emil Jones, Father Michael Pfleger, Illinois senate, John Kerry, Larry Johnson, Louis Farrakhan, Media, Michelle Obama, Minister Louis Farrakhan, Rashid Khalidi, Rev. James Meeks, Rev. Jeremiah Wright Jr., Rev. Michael Pfleger, Richard Daley, Terrorism, Tony Rezko, Weather Underground, William Ayers, Woods Fund
Why is Barack Obama and his campaign lying about his relationship and association with William “Bill” Ayers? Consider what Obama said on April 16, 2008 when asked about Ayers at the ABC Primary Debate in Philadelphia:
“This is a guy who lives in my neighborhood, who’s a professor of English in Chicago who I know and who I have not received some official endorsement from. He’s not somebody who I exchange ideas from on a regular basis. And the notion that somehow as a consequence of me knowing somebody who engaged in detestable acts 40 years ago, when I was eight years old, somehow reflects on me and my values doesn’t make much sense…”
The very next day, the Obama campaign posted on its Web site under the title “Fact Check on Obama and Ayers” the following, each prefaced with “Reality” and backed up with one or media reports:
- Obama was eight years old when the Weathermen were active
- Ayers connection is “phony,” “tenuous,” “a stretch”
- Ayers comments were published on September 11; the interview occurred prior to publication
- Ayers is a tenured professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago and was a “respected adviser” to Mayor Daley on school reform.
- Charges against Ayers were dropped and he served no time
Obama continued his lies about Ayers when he appeared on Fox News Sunday, April 27. Barack repeated the claim that, “Mr. Ayres (sic) is a 60 plus year old individual who lives in my neighborhood…” (Fox News, April 27, 2008).
The campaign to persuade the public that Barack barely knew Ayers got a boost on August 21, 2008 from TruthFightsBack.com (John Kerry’s Web site for the Obama campaign). The site trumpeted, “Barack Obama Barely Knows William Ayers” and wrote that “The Republicans, desperate to smear Barack and try to build on their lies about his religion, insinuate that Barack Obama has a deep relationship with William Ayers. William Ayers was once a member of a radical group in the 1960s.” TruthFightsBack.com calls this lie “The Truth” under the title Barack Obama Barely Knows William Ayers:
“Barack Obama lived in the same area of Chicago as Ayers, and Ayers has been a politically active member of that community for years. Considering that, it’s actually remarkable how little the two have to do with each other. Early in Barack Obama’s career, he attended one reception in his honor at Ayers’s house. They also were separately asked by a charitable organization to serve on that organization’s board. And that’s it. There’s no friendship between the two, no relationship, no history of working together.”
The Obama team’s effort to cover up Barack’s ties to Ayers included an organized campaign to intimidate a Chicago radio station (WGN) that planned to interview Stanley Kurtz, who had succeeded in examining documents from the Chicago Annenberg Challenge (CAC). The campaign emailed an Obama Action Wire to its supporters encouraging them to call in to the show and use following talking points (as found on the report form for supporters to log their call):
- William Ayers was involved with the Weather Underground when Barack Obama was eight years old, and Barack has roundly condemned their actions.
- Last night on Fox News, Kurtz tried to radicalize an education reform program in Chicago called the Annenberg Challenge. The Challenge was funded by Republican Walter Annenberg, introduced by Mayor Daley and Republican Governor Jim Edgar, and one of its initiatives was even praised by John McCain.
- Kurtz claimed on Fox News that William Ayers recruited Obama to the Annenberg Challenge — a flat out lie. Ayers did not serve on the board of the Challenge, and he had nothing to do with Barack’s recruitment.
Lies, big lies, and damned lies. The Obama team offers a disingenuous blend of fact and fiction in trying to cover up the true relationship between Obama and Ayers. The devil is in the detials and details do matter:
Ayers is just a guy who lives in my neighborhood, a tenured professor, and adviser to the local mayor
Ayers does live in Barack’s neighborhood (or vice versa). In fact, Barack and Bill currently live about two blocks apart on Greenwood Avenue and 50th Street. And before Barack’s “boneheaded” deal with convicted felon Rezko to purchase the Greenwood mansion, Obama lived about 1-1/4 miles from Bill. But the dismissive “just a guy who lives in my neighborhood” is a lie because Ayers was not just some fellow Barack bumped into at the corner market. They have a relationship that goes back nearly 20 years. Ayers was Barack’s friend, employer, colleague, and political supporter.
Ayers also is a tenured professor and multiple reports indicate he also is a buddy of Chicago’s Mayor Richard Daley. In fact, Mayor Daley has defended him during the campaign saying they’ve worked together, that Bill Ayers is a respected educator, and valued member of the Chicago community (Chicago Tribune, April 17, 2008).
It is unfair to say that Ayers’ actions 40 years ago when I was only eight should reflect upon me; anyway, charges against him where dropped and he did not serve any jail time. Plus, I’ve condemned the group’s actions
False. It is entirely fair to judge Barack by the people he surrounds himself with. Bill Ayer’s may have beat the terrorism charges but he has remained resolutely unrepentant about his actions. In 1981 David Horowitz quotes him bragging “Guilty as hell. Free as a bird. America is a great country.” In 2001 he is quoted saying “I don’t regret settings bombs. I feel we didn’t do enough.” (New York Times, September 11, 2001). Bill’s wife, Bernadine Dohrn went to jail rather than aid the government after the deadly Brinks armored car robbery. I like the comment at Hot Air (February 24, 2008) where See-Dubya expresses concern about Barack’s “…frightening tone-deafness toward terrorism, and a blithe ignorance of the evil and chaos these radicals represent.”
Any connection to Ayers is phony, tenuous, or a stretch. It is ridiculous to suggest any tie with Ayers
False. Everything discovered to date undeniably document that Barack Obama and Bill Ayers have personal, professional, and political ties that span nearly 20 years. Steve Diamond believes they likely first met in 1988 following Chicago’s teacher’s strike. Barack was hired into a Woods Fund sponsored position with Developing Communities Project that was a member of Bill Ayers’ Alliance for Better Chicago Schools (ABCs) (Global Labor and Politics, June 7, 2008).
Consider as well:
- In November 20, 1997. Michelle Obama, then Associate Dean of Student Services and Director of the University of Chicago Community Service Center, organized and participated in a panel that included Barack and Bill, Should a child ever be called a “super predator?” at the University of Chicago. See also, Chicago Tribune.
- In 1997 Barack wrote a review of Bill’s book “A Kind and Just Parent: The Children of Juvenile Court”. Chicago Tribune published a blurb from Obama about books he was reading. See also USA Today.
- April 19-20, 2002, Barack, Bill, and Bernadine participated in a conference and panel “Intellectuals: Who Needs Them?“. See also, Chicago Tribune.
- February 2005. Barack and Bill participated in a conference and dinner for Rashid Khalidi at Columbia wherein they offered testimonials to Khalidi. Mayor Daley also attended this hate-fest. (See The Sun and Campus Watch for some commentary. Khalidi subsequently lost his position at Columbia because of his comments, see New York Times.)
Ayers did not help launch my career
False. Back in 1995 after Barack Obama had returned to Chicago upon graduating from Harvard Law School, Bill Ayers hired the young Barack, then a third year associate at Davis, miner, Barnhill & Gallad. Together they spent upwards to $160 million dollars over the next seven years. As well, Bill and his wife Bernadine Dohrn feted him to the community as then-State Senator Palmer’s successor.
Early in Barack Obama’s career, he attended one reception in his honor at Ayers’ house
Not the whole truth. This was not a meet and greet reception. And Barack had more than one isolated sit down with Ayers and Dohrn. The Ayers/Dohrn home is where Barack Obama launched his campaign to oust then-State Senator Alice Palmer. This reception is reported in numerous articles including Ben Smith in Politico (February 22). Maria Warren writes about this gathering in her blog Musings & Migraines on January 27, 2005, “When I first met Barack Obama, he was giving a standard, innocuous little talk in the living room of those two legends-in-their-own-minds, Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn. They were launching him–introducing him to the Hyde Park community as the best thing since sliced bread.” Ari Berman also reports in The Nation (May 1) that Bill hosted a fundraiser for Barack in 1996. (Possibly an error on Berman’s part as this might be the 1995 event since there is no other mention of a 1996 fundraiser.)
Ayers had nothing to do with my joining Annenberg Challenge. He did not recruit me, nor did he serve on its board
False. Bill Ayers founded the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, secured the initial $50 million from Annenberg Challenge, and claims to have co-chaired the Collaborative it with Barack Obama. While there is nothing to explicitly prove that Bill recruited Barack, it is simply not credible to say that Bill Ayers had nothing to do with Barack Obama joining the organization.
I do not exchange ideas with Ayers
Really? Can you say the same thing about your communications director, David Axelrod? According to a source who attended the Democratic National convention in Denver, an old friend of Ayer’s bragged that Axelrod and Ayers are in regular contact and coordinating on how to respond to the claims about the Ayers/Obama relationship.
Ayers has not ‘officially’ endorsed me
Really? So he’s backing McCain? The issue is not who Ayers has endorsed. The issue remains–why did Barack hang out for so many years with a guy like Ayers. Endorsement or not, it is a question that matter.
Ayers has been a politically active member of that community for years
True. First, as a home-grown domestic terrorist, then since around 1987 as a community activist, organizer, and financier. As Lynn Sweet wrote in the Chicago Sun-Times (March 3), “Hyde Park welcomed William Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn to the neighborhood after they resurfaced as local civic leaders following their years on the lam as members of the Weather Underground.” She notes Ben Smith observing in Politico (February 22), “While Ayers and Dohrn may be thought of in Hyde Park as local activists, they’re better known nationally as two of the most notorious — and unrepentant — figures from the violent fringe of the 1960s anti-war movement.”
Considering that, it’s actually remarkable how little the two have to do with each other
Oh yeah?! Now this is where the lying really begins. As is increasingly clear, they worked together and shared the same circle of friends and families, same business associates, and same political associates.
They also were separately asked by a charitable organization to serve on that organization’s board
Not true. They were involved in at least three different “charitable” organizations. There was the Woods Fund of Chicago, which Barack joined 1993 and Bill Ayers joined in 1997. But what about the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, which Ayers founded and worked on with Barack Obama from 1995 through 1999. While Barack chaired the Challenge, Bill co-chaired its Collaborative arm. This was actually three connected organizations: Chicago Annenberg Challenge (CAC, the Board), Chicago School Reform Collaborative (the Collaborative, and Consortium of Chicago Schools Research (CCSR).
And that’s it. There’s no friendship between the two…
Ben Smith in Politico (February 22) writes that Dr. Quentin Young, a prominent Chicago physician, told him that they were “friends”. At the time Smith dismissed this for lack of supporting information and the denial by Barack Obama. (I wonder if Smith has since reconsidered?). Mayor Daley now says they are friends. Even Bill Burton acknowledges that they were friends.
…no relationship
False. They have family, community, business, and political ties. The only tie they appear to not share regards religion.
…no history of working together
False. Why is the media so reluctant to explore the CAC relationship?
At the risk of being redundant, sometime in 1987 Bill and Bernadine returned home to Chicago, where both had family. Michelle likely already knew both through her Robinson family ties and then in her 1988 work at Sidley Austin, where Bernardine was also employed. It is likely that Barack at least knew of Bill Ayers because he was already involving himself among with the Ayers family and their players in the community. Bill Ayers operated in relative obscurity until February 2008 when his ties to Barack and Michelle Obama became a matter of discussion in Barack’s presidential aspirations.
As a community organizer in Chicago from 1985 to 1988 Barack Obama received funding from and worked with numerous groups, such as Developing Communities Project. Bill Ayers joined in this arena upon his return in 1987 through his own group, Alliance for Better Chicago Schools (ABCs). They both surely crossed paths as Ayer’s father, Tom, provided funding to Barack and Bill through Chicago United, a group of businessmen concerned about race and education issues in Chicago. Tom Ayers was once CEO of Commonwealth Edison (now Exelon) (Steve Diamond, Global Labor and Politics, June 18, 2008). Michelle, the Robinson daughter, continued her own involvement but details are murky at best. Barack Obama shows up again in Chicago after graduating from Harvard Law School, ends up at Davis Miner Barnhill & Galland, and joins the Woods Fund board, 1993, as a freshly minted 32 year old law school graduate, where he remained through 2002 and continued association with until gaining a seat in the U.S. Senate. Bill Ayers formally joined the board in 1999 but had ties throughout the earlier years, including receiving funds from the group.
Anyway, in 1993 Bill began organizing the Chicago Annenberg Challenge. Despite his unrepentant terrorist past he succeeded in securing nearly $50 million from Annenberg Challenge and immediately named Barack as his co-chair. Together over the next five years they spent at least $110 million for “radical” school reform in Chicago (Steve Diamond, Global Labor and Politics, June 18, 2008 and August 18, 2008). Then, or shortly afterward, the remains of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge was handed over to Chicago Public Education Fund.
This was a small circle of people, families, and businesses. They were figuratively partners in crime, Chicago’s political mafia enriching themselves through their political position, through federal, local, and state funding, and through their positions and funds given from private organizations, especially, of immediately focus here, from the Woods Fund and Annenberg Challenge. It is likely that there are other organizations and people involved and this needs to be explored further. Stanley Kurtz, Steve Diamond, and others are now beginning to look into what Annenberg Challenge did with its more than $160 million in private and federal dollars.
But first, let’s get back to Barack, Bill, and Bernadine. Again, Michelle plays at least a bit role in this but to what extent is still unclear. Over the years Barack, Bill, Bernadine, and Michelle show up together, along with other Chicago figures that include Rev. Wright, Minister Farrakhan, Rev. Meeks, Rev. Pfleger, Sen. Jones, and many, many more. Throughout this Barack also had his early ties with friend, businessman, and political financier Tony Rezko and Rezko’s partners and associates. And finally, let’s also not forget organizations that received funding from Barack and Bill, such as:
- Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN)
- Arab American Action Network (AAAN) founded by husband and wife Rashid and Mona Khalidi.
- Maoist Mike Klonsky, another terrorist member of the Weatherman
- Children and Family Justice Center, Bernardine’s organization.
- Trinity Unity Church and Rev. Wright.
Finally, what role did Barack’s position as a sitting state senator play in all of this?
Summary
Fairly or not, Chicago has a long reputation as a corrupt political city. It is increasingly clear that Barack joined and became a willing partner in this corruption. The families, organizations, and businesses involved enriched themselves off of the private and public funds that Barack controlled. That Barack Obama lied and continues to lie about his relationship with Bill Ayers is a smokescreen and the tip-of-the-iceberg about the depth of his involvement in what are, or may be, corrupt practices among these people and their organizations.
A Bit of Background and Unresolved Items
As long as this post is, it is still embarrassingly incomplete. In writing this I have read every post at Larry Johnson’s NoQuarterUSA and Steve Diamond’s Global Labor and Politics blogs involving terrorist William Ayers. I also dug through scores of articles and posts at various media sites and blogs. While some matters are consistently reported, others vary significantly. I’m sure I’ve missed many salient points.
It is especially dramatic to read earlier compared to newer posts. Consider Ben Smith’s “Obama once visited ’60s radicals” from February 22, 2008. The title alone shows the naivety of Ben and everyone about the level of Obama’s involvement with Bill and Bernadine. That Obama let such false picture spread without correction, including then and now on his campaign Web sites, further reflects his clear intent to deceive voters.
Four unresolved items in an incomplete list of questions are:
- What is Michelle’s involvement in all of this?
- How did Barack’s role in the Illinois Senate affect or was a part of all of this?
- What are Barack’s other board and organization memberships?
- Where did the money go? E.g., to friends, family, personal and professional associates, and political cronies?
Suggested Readings
The body of evidence and discussion on the relationship among and between Barack and Michelle Obama, William Ayers, and his wife, Bernadine Dohrn is growing daily. As we get beyond the lies and begin to follow the money I recommend reading the following:
- Larry Johnson at his Web site NoQuarterUSA and as I have summarized here.
- Steve Diamond at Global Labor and Politics and as often published at NoQuarterUSA.
- Stanley Kurtz at National Review has made a start and it will be worth watching to see what he develops as he researches the Chicago Annenberg Challenge papers he’s now gained access to.
- Selected articles from multiple sources are summarized here.
- My posts at The Problem With Obama and The Independent View.
Matthew Weaver
Reprinted from It’s Not Just a Lie, It’s a Matter of Character









































Very thorough review. I just do not understand why the media didn’t jump on this months ago. Who one hangs with is important–birds of a feather, and all that.
The information is out there but either the journalists/media isn’t interested or they are lazy . . . or???
The reporters are too busy looking for the amniotic fluid from mothers from alaska
Don’t forget Axelrod stated that barky knows Ayers because their kids go to the same school.
You know Ayers 29 yr old kids and barkys elementary school aged kids.
OUTSTANDING REVIEW! Thanks for putting together a litnay (albeit pending further additions) of facts, regarding the association of the Ayers/Dorhn, and Obama couples. Mainstream media should have previously and should be now reviewing all of this and asking A LOT of questions.
Let’s see if mainstream media has the courage to take this challenge on and reveal the reality to the American public.
I am a Registered Republican and my research has shown this article to be completely distorted.
Senator Obama’s connections to a former hippie radical should not be discussed and really doesn’t matter to anyone who isn’t already looking for reasons to hate the half Afro-American candidate.
These types of articles are bad for McCain because it opens the door to the several hundred similar connections to even worse figures. Including the people who work on his campaign and have advised him who used to lobby for Saddam Hussein.
Furthermore I believe that this style of politics, which is clearly “Race Baiting” shows that we should have chosen Romney as our candidate. I have always voted Republican in the past, but I cannot vote for a man who would run his campaign like John McCain has. Integrity is important and it is something that I used to think he had, but he has shown me that he no longer has the level of integrity he once did as a POW. “Perhaps he never had it” is a thought that comes to me when I think about the Keating 5 scandal and his involvement in that.
After reading this article Oblahblah was quoted as saying “Auchi that hurt!”
LOL!
Thanks for gathering this information in one place. I agree with HD4S, too, that bloggers have done the work of the MSM this year.
Please keep it up. We need to know the truth about Bozo and his Chicago pol friends and accomplices.
Fox just put up a blurp about question Obama’s Columbia years. Why is there nothing about them?
I found a great blog about that subject called “Wayne Allyn Roots Million-Dollar Challenge”, I found the link at realclearpolitics. This guy went to Columbia and knows many people from there, he was in the same class as Obama, even was poly-sci. He says not one person he knows from that school remembers Obama at all. I guess he is offering a Million for some true info.
I think its information that the Obama should have realeased many many months ago
I’ve often wondered if his educational claims are bogus. Anyone can say they graduated from Harvard and Columbia. Prove it! There is no evidence of it.
I hope people stay on this trail. Why is there no info from his Columbia years? Why are there no classmates to step forward and say something as simple as, he sat behind me in Poli-Sci or some such.
Also, he met Michelle in 1989 at the age of 28. Where are girlfriends/lady friends before this period? None???? I’m not trying to be smart here. He doesn’t seem to have ANY friends. I married late in life, and when you do you usually have close friendships that make up for the companionship of a relationship. Where are his?
It’s wierd to me. He sounds like an absolute loner/recluse. He might as well be a Trappist Monk. I can’t imagine that there’s not an ex-girlfriend lurking around that would want her name associated with having dated the first black presidential nominee.
Where are they?
The conventions are over. Time for a little “HARDBALL”. Excuse me while I get some fresh popcorn.
I feel like i’m in a horror movie / mystery. Like the Republicans and Clinton Democrats are trapped in this mansion .. that’s as much as i can think of.
Other bloggers/NQ contributors, such as Bud White, Uppity, and TexasDarlin, have written extensively about Ayers and conducted quite a bit of research. Bloggers have done some of the best work this year.
Here’s a few recent posts at TD:
http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2008/08/21/obama-ayres-annenberg-and-acorn-a-family-affair/
http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2008/08/21/obamas-partner-in-crime-bill-the-bomber-ayres/
http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2008/08/20/the-anneberg-files-access-blocked/
Since the media can’t be trusted anymore, the job of bringing this out will be up to McCain. I’ve yet to see if McCain will go there. I don’t think he will just yet only because I think McCain is trying to set the narrative. Once the idea has been out there that Obama is not ready to lead, I think these things will start to be brought out as more people are willing to accept the notion.
Right now, people are voting against the Republicans, not FOR Obama. So it doesn’t matter what secrets Obama is trying to hide. That’s why it seems like nothing sticks to him. But if McCain can set the narrative and that Obama would be a disaster, then you’ll see all this stuff start to come out.
This is also why the media flinging all these lies about Palin helps McCain. They’re all out there right now, lies and all. Better to have it come out early, smears and all, than just before the election. Because just before an election, you don’t have time to set things right or challenge the smears.
I think you’re right. Attitudes are very hard to change, opinions are made of attitudes, voters deep down tend to vote on personal attitudes.
So where we’re at, BO/BS started with the winning narrative and the winning opinions. The attitude part is hard to change now because people have invested money and that makes them fight for their investment. Or they have invested arguments, etc. and would face ridicule. Head on is a hard fight. Better to change the narrative, and the VP picks seem to be doing that. This softens the attitude. In that moment of doubt, that’s when it’s time to throw in the counter evidence.
Obama promises:
Government to decide whether elderly need services not doctors. Promises to save money by ending fee for service payments.
Obama on the program ‘This Week’ starting around the 15 minute mark
If it ends up the government deciding medical care then I feel sorry for us people in that category…
ACK
Guys – Many of us, the majority of us on this blog, supported Hillary Clinton’s plan for UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE. The Republican talking points don’t carry alot of weight here.
Sorry, this election is no longer about Hillary. It’s about what the Democratic Party did. It’s about 0bama playing the racist/sexist card along with his supporters and not apologizing. It’s about the msm thinking they can pick the president.
These are huge issues for me and I’m willing to table my other issues for 4 more years, praying that McCain will reach across the aisle and get a couple of things accomplished and surprise me. Then start from square one in 2012.
If we let the Dems, the msm get away with what they did, I will have nothing. Not even my dignity.
Fuck the Democratic Party and their fraud of a candidate.
And that’s just the way it is for me. And if they’re hellbent on not acknowledging that a lot of people feel this way, then let them go down in flames.
They won’t be able to say that the info wasn’t out there loud and clear. They chose to ignore it and create their own narrative.
Now they must OWN their candidate and whatever results he might bring.
Tough!
Mimi – you didn’t read my post carefully. If I didn’t feel the way you do about the Democratic Part I wouldn’t be here.
But Mimi, If we didn’t embrace the CORE of Hillary’s platform, universal health care, then what the DNC did to Hillary would not be of such consequence. But she was the BEST QUALIFIED candidate and Universal Health Care was a significant reason why.
So when I see posts on NQ disparaging Universal Health Care with Mark Levin, Rush Limbaugh type talking points, I question if the writer ever supported Senator Clinton.
The DNC does need to be eradicated, but let’s not through the baby out with the bathwater. I’m assuming you and I share values that drew us to the Democratic Party before it was corrupted. We don’t need to espouse republican values to register our dissent.
I too, am willing to table my issues in the name of democracy, but not forever. Universal Healthcare is too important. Hillary 2012!
Healthcare is an important issue. I stood by my sister as her body deteriorated with MS for 2 years because she couldn’t afford the medicine that prevents the disease from progressing (1700.00 per month). By the time disability was denied, and appealed – she couldn’t walk and lost the use of her hands. I am independent and would have voted for HC if she won the nomination. Now, if she runs in 2012, I will not vote for her. She now supports BO -and I won’t forget that. Anyone that can support a socialist/communist who hides behind liberalism – is Anti American – and this is who BO is. She should have left the democratic party. Party affiliation isn’t worth the sacrifice of democracy. Even my sister won’t vote for her.
Don’t get your hopes up too high. Most national health service wouldn’t pay for that kind of medicine either (see European national health services in UK, Fr etc)
Medicine should be b/t you and your doctor. Government will intrude and tell you what you can and cannot do. HMO’s practice similarly.
What an idiot. The only pay for service for the elderly is if they opt of a Traditional Medicare. If they opt for Medicare part C. Then they have high co-pays, ridicously high copays I might add.
Here’s a YouTube of Obama talking to George Stephanopolous on “This Week” about his Muslim faith:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2zQK_EhDhZQ
George then corrected him, “You mean your Christian Faith.”
BO’s Takiyah* cover in melt down.
*Taqiyah
Taqiyya (Arabic: التقية – ‘fear, guard against’) is the religiously sanctioned practice of lying or dissimulation. It is usually attributed to Shia Muslim practice.
Originally it was allowed only in order to save lives in the face of religious persecution.
The word “Taqiyya” literally means: “Concealing, precaution, guarding.” It is employed in disguising one’s beliefs, intentions, convictions, ideas, feelings, opinions or strategies. In practical terms it is manifested as dissimulation, lying, deceiving, vexing and confounding with the intention of deflecting attention, foiling or pre-emptive blocking. It is currently employed in fending off and neutralising any criticism of Islam or Muslims.
http://www.islam-watch.org/Warner/Taqiyya-Islamic-Principle-Lying-for-Allah.htm
Obama’s goof was a classic Freudian Slip. I think some 527 group should run this clip as an ad on the networks.
OOPS! There it is…
Bob Beckel is such an idiot — Saying that Obama’s Columbia years are none of our business–Sorry but this guy wants to be our President, it is our business. And why dont they want to release these records-Also saying that we all think its goig to be negative (Yea I think it might be negative, especialy because he wont realease it)
Like the moderator and Jay Townsend said it just makes it worse since they seem to be trying to hide his Columbia years.
Oh man what happened to my post.
Try again.
The weathermen have never ceased to exist as they have taken over WA STATE Primaries along with code pink. Obama will steal your vote if left empty or a ballot not cast. He did it in the primaries from a list of registered voters. Be informed.
Ed O and Kerry’s fierce Debate;
http://
wbztv.com/politics/kerry.senate.debate.2.810996.html
I miss the connection with the latter but I think that the Weathermen became groups like Public Allies and ACORN. Obama used what he learned there and the people from both to fuel his campaign’s bullying tactics. I’m am curious about his nearly $1 million laundered to ACORN recently. While the campaign said they needed to correct the filings, which allowed the media to drop the matter, there was no details on what was going on.
Here’s Obama’s newest, uh, explanation:
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0908/Rephrasing_an_abortion_answer.html?showall
[insert ha-ha-has here]
Good morning! I just read the initial posts here–guess some folks want to talk about other matters, but please give careful thought to the information here–Barack lied and continues to maintain his lies despite incredible evidence to the contrary. His board memberships and “experience” is omitted by him (see Bud White’s post last night), and there is some very, very serious questions about how, to who, and where Obama spent over $160 million. Take a look at Steve Diamond’s articles on this, plus Stanley Kurtz (who is overdue with something new on this). Regarding Kurtz, as has been noted at NoQuarterUSA previously, on the first day he got to look at the records held at UIC that they were “very bad” for Obama.
This is a story that ties Obama to unmistakeable lies, to relationships with multiple terrorists, and money laundering, and to corruption in use of more than $160 million in public and private money.
Weathermen have always existed Matt..Yeah everyone needs to stay on topic.
Yeah, right. I remember reading that in his phony books. (No, it wasn’t there.)
“Obama Been ‘Lyin” was concerned about wasting his blossoming political career with “plain old” military service?!? Instead he chose to pursue folks with scary premises and mantras, adopted them as his own, only to later “repudiate” them, disassociate himself, and claim there is nothing in his background to suggest that he is anything less than honest.
Ayers Dorhn association he claims does not exist, raises some very serious questions about his integrity and judgement, and therefore his ability to lead this country (or anything else). What next, a Mr. President Obama will place Ayers and Dorhn bombers as Secretary of Defense and Secretary of State? Or any other political placement?
Great post…we need to keep these kind of questions out there, the MSM has let the public down…the question is will they swallow their pride and get to work.
Looks like they are now attacking a church that Palin attended yet quit within a few years…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e2uGDKlhtLE&NR=1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KfX1sioxJVg&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8uz_nPFfjYo&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k-Q7fgiNVoc&feature=related
I think the Obama campaign is stretching it. From what I can see it was not for a 20 year period. Nor was this the guy/guys she endeared as her Mentor/religous counselor.
the audacity of hipocrazy…
by Baracktrack Oblahblah
or, I am so desperate because a mayor of 9000 is going to kick my ass
a. hillary
b. mccain
america first!
Yes, the former mayor has helped bump the polls and Nope-bama is well, uh, umm, ugh, ah, SCARED.
I heard Hillary never released her delegates. Is that correct?
From what I understand Hillary didnt…yet from the looks of it they changed their mind for various reasons.
New Jersey’s Floor vonvention floor vote is a good example…Hillary won that state by almost 10% but they all voted for Obama
They didn’t need the votes. They brokered the deal and GAVE it to Obama. They need to pay Hillary’s debts from the primary for stealing this election. We wasted our time and money and would not have if this was fair. Hillary won but didn’t get the nom. Only in America! They ignored our votes entirely but held the voting..for what?
They don’t even know the delegate count in CA and many states! They didn’t feel they needed to.
McCain/Palin 2008-clean up corruption! put environmental laws in place against big oil, get fiscal matters under control.
Brokering the deal only helps to solidify the case against BHO BHO. Not even up to the challenge of a covention roll call. Sad to see big wigs scared of a process/their own rules they so greatly espouse!
Actually, the coronation was well planned by the DNC powers that be; how DARE any insignificant delegates question their judgement? They will find out as the bloggers raise the issues for the lame MSM, come November.
AyersDorn – BarackMichelle Obama. Birds of the same feather, flock together.
and “some people i barely know” are about to launch my political career too…
what a charming coincidence…
-=sigh=-
a. hillary
b. mccain
america first!
Maybe some folks I barely know are going to start giving me tons of money. foot tapping I’m waiting, I’m waiting!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKGdkqfBICw
Here’s a slightly different version of Obama’s “my Muslim faith” gaffe that contains the Stephanapolous correction.
Thanks, bethtopaz
You can see from the expression on his face that was thinking…”Oh shit, what did I just say.”
Now we all know why Stephanopolis and Gibson were shunned for a fall debate. They didn’t give the Obama campaign their (imminently fair) questions in advance.
He just can’t function without his teleprompter.
Just cannot function at all.
Were they sitting in a barn??? Did you see the background? Is he now trying to be small town American? Hahahahah. Let’s show him shoveling manure and feedling pigs slop. Not because I want to watch him be a phoney again. Just because I’d love to watch him shoveling shit with his hands instead of his mouth!
Great stuff. Isn’t it amazing that nobody at 60 minutes or any of those other supposed “investigative” media shows is interested in this story? It’s got all the things you’d expect to suck them in: skulduggerry, massive waste of money, thugs, commies, and crooks, oh my!
but the media give it a collective yawn, which leaves it to bloggers who have to make their livings doing other work to figure it out. sad
Note that Dan Rather is no longer at CBS. Hmmm.
the Republicans have plenty of notorius scummy shit on Obama. They will release it at the right time…guaranteed. The punk thugs are not dealing w spineless wimps and racists like Pelosi, Brazile and Dean. Now they are dealing w the big dogs. Shit will be hitting the fan soon enough.
Reprinting as I got mistakenly caught in a “reply”.
Good morning! I just read the initial posts here–guess some folks want to talk about other matters, but please give careful thought to the information here–Barack lied and continues to maintain his lies despite incredible evidence to the contrary. His board memberships and “experience” is omitted by him (see Bud White’s post last night), and there is some very, very serious questions about how, to who, and where Obama spent over $160 million. Take a look at Steve Diamond’s articles on this, plus Stanley Kurtz (who is overdue with something new on this). Regarding Kurtz, as has been noted at NoQuarterUSA previously, on the first day he got to look at the records held at UIC that they were “very bad” for Obama.
This is a story that ties Obama to unmistakeable lies, to relationships with multiple terrorists, and money laundering, and to corruption in use of more than $160 million in public and private money.
I am on line and can talk about my research and maybe we can all discuss the topic?
Thanks Matthew. I think people here are interested in this story…it’s just that it’s not like there is much to say beyond what you, Bud, and Prof. Dimond have exposed.
I just remain in shock that nobody else knows much about this at all. My mom who caucused for Hillary and is going to vote for McCain had no clue.
I’m going to send her this post because I think it’s such a great summary, especially because you start with the lies Obama and Kerry told about the relationship, then use facts to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that Obama’s statements are just flat out lies.
Thanks for keeping this alive. I believe all the information like what you are posting is extremely relevant. PLUS the timing of Obama’s political expansion to include the presideny is particularly suspect.
Excellent reporting. Thank you!
Matthew, do you think the deluge of crazy slanders they have thrown out about Palin are an attempt to make people not believe the Ayers-Obama connection?
The fact that the DNC would nominate a guy with this long term relationship is actually crazier than the Trig is Bristol’s baby, Palin is a book-banning, homophobic wolf slaughterer story in some ways.
it’s an incompletely formed thought….off to get my coffee
I don’t think the anti-Palin trash that would too often started by the nutroots gangs and Obama’s campaign directly have any place in respectable conversation.
I think their opposition–very hysterical–to Palin is separate. They were prepared for Obama to one-up Obama with a viable, experienced, and credible VP candidate. Issues aside, and I am sure many folks here will disagree with some, on the matter of experience, McCain’s VP choices has hands-down more experience than both Obama and McCain combined. Further, on the issue of character–which is a better focus for everyone upset with Obama–Palin and McCain reek of it while you can smell Obama’s stink from miles away.
Please, drop the Obama nutroots BS.
Well fluffy, she is a wolf slaughterer. But Barky ain’t so great on humane issues regarding animals either.
It Kills me, as a vegetarian, to vote for someone who shoots caribou and poses proudly with the bloody carcass, but I have to remind myself that this is how she feeds her family. And Barky gets his (lean) meat from a Chicago slaughterhouse, which is no better.
Expect to see that bloody carcass picture in play in October though.
For Matthew, it’s not so much that folks wander off topic, then others, like me, feel compelled to respond, it’s that what you’ve written here is appalling. I don’t think many of us know what to do with this information. The thought that this guy is inches away from the Presidency stymies me. I’ve stopped watching TV and reading the papers to avoid the horror of this realization, but I don’t know what to do.
Anyone, any suggestions?
For more of Obama’s ties to socialist radicals see the link below:
http://www.ibdeditorials.com/series8.aspx
Yes, there is a lot there and related that I hadn’t seen when I first wrote my post. So, so much material and all in plain site. This really drives home the point that many observe that the mainstream media has either through self-interest, laziness, or inability has not looked at. (And then they wonder why they get scooped by National Enquirer.)
Even Alice Palmer, the woman Obama stabbed in the back, has had ties to radical organizations. The other tie is ACORN, which was an offshoot of the New Party.
http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2008/05/is-acorn-the-ne.html
isn’t it Bernardine? kinda like Obama’s mom Stanley Ann Dunham…Bernard ine may have been named for her dad?
just mind doodling at this point
I’m not sure and rather doubt that Obama and his family had any ties in youth with these folks. Michelle, on the other hand, clearly did. Michelle came from the political elite and monied families in Chicago. She surely knew them all, has involvement with many. Her name pops up many times. She needs a bit of scrutiny because she is likely involved up to her elbows in Obama’s corruption and may have her own–all part of being a direct member of the Chicago Machine.
I think this is going to shift for front page news this coming week. Fox’s O’Reilly has is portion of the interview with Obama last Thursday that addresses Ayers on Tuesday.
There are several avenues very critical to follow:
1. What is turning out to be a 20 year association with not one terrorist, but a whole clique of them. Adds emphasis to his other 20 year associations with Wright and others. I think this will become a very long list of all of the folks in Chicago: Farrakhan, Pfleger, Meeks, Wright, Kahlidi, Jones, and more. In the long run hitting on Ayers, Dohrn, and Klonsky alone misses the big picture of the type of people Obama has surrounded himself with.
2. Obama has serious omitted or lied on his background. There are at least 4-5 know organizations he and often Michelle with him were involved in: CIC and its subsidiaries, Woods Fund, ACORN (yes, he is involved here), Public Allies, and more.
In this, I’ve looked at his released tax returns and no mention of any. Would love to see his earlier ones and details on those folks that paid him via 1099 instead of W-2.
3. And the money. Over $160 million in one group only.
I wish I shared your optimism. I guess I could see Axelrod and Dean giving the press the go-ahead to run the story this week in the hopes that it will then become “old news” by November. It’s such a huge story and has so many details that even you, Bud, and Prof. Diamond haven’t been able to figure out….so the chain reaction could just continue for a very, very long time.
The mud would definitley cost Dean his job and Axelrod would not be able to publicly serve as any serious candidate’s campaign manager ever again. John Kerry would again look like a complete fool. I’m all for all 3 results, of course, but I imagine that Dean and Axelrod don’t share my enthusiasm
Does any of this have anything to do with his Columbia years? Is this why they wont release any information about those years.
Im sorry but the more they refuse to release makes me even more leary of Obama.
Thanks MW for your thoughtful and quite analytical posts.
Agree Ayers and Dorhn behold a boatload of unanswered questions, in the very real, albeit hidden relationship with Obama (and wife M), that he continues to “misrepresent” (aka, lies).
Dear Bill,
NO need to worry about our continued close friendship and potential implications. The lord (the media) is on our side.
ps FUC* fox news though
Sincerely,
Barrack Obama
Having read Diamond’s works, and having read far more important reports about the school reforms of the 1980’s, all the talk of Obama being the chair of the Annenburg Challenge is nothing.
If it wasn’t for Obama and his community organizing, Bill Ayers was a dead duck in the 1980’s school reforms in Chicago. Ayer’s ABC group was meaningless without having parents backing his coalition up and the only one to bring parents into the fold was Obama and his DSP.
So this working on the Annenburg Challenge is a good story, but it wouldn’t be worth a damn had it not been for Obama giving Bill Ayers the tools to make Bill Ayers a somebody in the Chicago arena.
So basically, you can say that it was Obama in 1987 who was the major cause of Ayers rising like a Phoenix and giving him stature in the Chicago world of dirty politics.
Yes, the earlier ties are significant. It is almost a matter of where to start first. I wish I had a lot more time to assemble and organize material but I’ve got a day job. The media is not doing their self-proclaimed job. They are often conspirators covering up information.
Regarding Ben Smith’s Feb. 22 report, for example, and the others. None have ever posted a correction or admitted they were misinformed or lied to.
The earlier ties are more than significant, they are the primal scream because if it wasn’t for the 1987 collaboration of Bill Ayers and Obama on the ABC school reforms, the 1995 Chicago Annenburg Challenge likely never would have taken place, simply because without Obama’s supporting Bill Ayers with people, Ayers had absolutely no credibility what so ever for the ABC coalition to organize thus there would be no Annenburg Challenge in Chicago in the 1990’s.
Yeah, but who had the money to bring in the other guy. I still think Ayers in 1987 waved his big money and large network of radicals under Barry’s nose, not the other way around.
At that time Barry had very little to bring to the table.
Here read this, I agree Tom Ayers was involved in bringing Obama into things, but my point happens to be that the key dates in the Ayers OBama relationship is not the 1990’s Annenburg Challenge, but the 1987 ABC coalition and yes Obama brought the most important thing to the table for Bill Ayers, people!
http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/29/ayers-obama-philanthropy-corruption-what-big-media-refuses-to-disclose-about-obamas-checkered-past-in-chicago-machine-politics/
http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/06/02/obama-we-are-smarter-we-follow-the-money-and-it-links-you-to-bill-ayers-in-the-1980s/
Ah, OK. Tom/William Ayers had to money and connections, Barry knew the people in the neighborhood.
At least the voters are starting to realize that the vast majority of the media is over their head in the tank with Obama.
Huh? In 1987 Obama was 26 or 27 years old. He didn’t have a wealthy and well connected father like Ayers. I suggest you read Prof Diamond’s work again, especially the stuff he wrote in June/July time frame.
It appears the guy who brought them all together is William Ayers’s rich dad Tom. Tom got Bernardine Dohrn her first big job in Chicago, and then got her the job at Northwestern. Tom may have helped Obama get jobs/internships with law firms in Chicago.
Ayers hired Obama to run the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, not the other way around.
Obama does have pretty clear ties with everyone starting back in 1987 before he went to Harvard. This was likely critical upon his return where he immediately starting taking up serious money roles with them–CAC, for one.
Understanding more about his experience in the 80s is important. Getting the info is not so simple. I wish I still lived in northern Virginia where I had access to the Library of Congress.
How many feel that even with the Media biasness that Obama will implode prior to General Election
Absolutely. But it has to be pursued. I am already reseaching and writing more, I know others are as well. I don’t know what to expect from O’Reilly. I think the focus has to be more toward the lies and money. The ties to terrorists only goes so far and has more meaning, as I wrote a few minutes ago, as an aggregate–also because Ayers has worked hard and successfully to become a positive member of the Chicago community and national education scene.
Yep. Follow the money, because numbers never lie.
As long as General “Pinhead” asks questions that cause BO to speak to what he is avoiding, then it doesn’t matter so much the outcome.
BO is his own worst enemy. Where can he go with it? If he backpeddles he projects himself as shallow and un able to project “leadership”.
If he answers honestly (fat chance) he opens the can o’ worms.
He can say “no,no,no,no, Bill…” all he wants.
Karma will not be delayed.
I am counting on it.
The One slips up about his religion on ABC today:
Says his ‘muslim’ religion, then ‘corrects’.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2zQK_EhDhZQ
That is a commercial waiting to happen. I saw that and nearly choked on my coffee. These debates are gonna be good.
He’s not a muslim. He was just trying to work in his new and improved formulation of the race card. Google “we won’t be bullied” and Bon Jovi to see when the press first reported it.
George Stephanopolis is a bright fellow. kudos to him for catching it….
So. That is really not part of this thread and, personally, other than he might have lied, I personally don’t care what his religion is. This pursuit of it is disgraceful in so many ways. It betrays a bias you have.
yep, and it makes it easy for him to discount his critcs as loonies. I feel the same about the birth certificate stuff too, actually.
the trail of money and trail of lies from his associations in Chicago is a really important story….with hard evidence that will be immune to accusations of bias if the evidence ever fully sees the light of day.
OMG, that does it for me. I don’t need anymore and anyone else to try to convince me otherwise that he is a Christian. His Christianity is a fake, as everything else. I am convinced that he is a Muslim.
Me! Me! Me!
I’m not normally the schadenfreude type, but all is changed this year: I not only want obama to implode, I want him to be discredited, disgraced and humiliated – not at the hands of the republicans (although they’ll obviously be the messengers) but by his own hand (meaning his own corruption, his own lies, his own and his wife’s criminal and radical associations, his own minions in the media and the blogosphere). I should add that I am confident bambi’s downfall WILL HAPPEN.
I also wanna see the media implode at its own hands for its own crimes. Same for the corrupt dems and dem leadership. Tar and feather ‘em all!
Yes, step one is Obama, then, time to hold the media accountable. They are facing some backlash already now over their repeat of the Obama and nutroots gangs BS and hysteria about Palin.
What a great, comprehensive and very educational piece, Michael – thank you!
Oops – sorry! The Me Me Me was my response to kinthenorthwest’s question:
What a great exposition of his pathological, compulsive, habitual lying decease. On the basis of this article, Obama should be warned that not only his ’security clearance’ will be revoked but that as President, none of the Security Departments will be giving him any briefings of classified information.
I would like to know what the association of Howard Dean and Obama was in 2004-2006.
And Axlerod. Don’t forget he is from Chicago if I am not mistaken.
I also think all of the names associated with the campaigns–state, U.S., and now president need to be listed and vetted against the groups Obama has worked with and corruption therein.
Superb work, Matthew. It’s a cover-up, and you expose it.
Wow, fantastic work.
This is kinda’ like his non (snark) relationship with Antoin “Tony” Rezko.
When Hillary brought him up in their South Carolina debate and was quite kind in only saying “your contributor” instead of “your longterm friendship”, or “the man who just bought your home for you” or “Senatorial campaign aid” or “long term fundraiser”etc. And Backtrack Barry had the chutzpah to say “I did about 5 hours of work for the man”.
That alone should have shown Backtrack Barry to be the absolute LIAR and FRAUD that he is. He responded that he did about 5 hours work for the man, when he had a 20 year friendship, personally and professionally that their activities intertwined so much with payback and favortism and he said THAT?
Talking of Rezko, he and his associates ARE involved as well. They are recipients of money.
Rezko and company laundered it Matthew.
Money that flowed through the TUCC and St Sabina was only a fration of what the begin amount was. I have not seen any audits from the IRS investigations as of yet.
People who watch MSM have very little idea of what’s going on and don’t even know this election is a fraud.
He disowned the Detroit mayor but not Ayers. No denunciation as he did his minister. Hmm.
There’s a great video out on Obama and the Detroit mayor. Don’t have the link handy.
Following the money
Is this useful? It’s very late/early here and I’m too pooped to say much…
more, Ayers:
http://alegrescorner.soapblox.net/showDiary.do?diaryId=804
Continue posting those stories to the networks well one that i can count Fox and so they can investigate and then bring and ask the stories why have the media not picked them up, and how the race card is next as we have seen in their blogs the Os are throwing it more and more out here, I hope the republicans are prepared, this is what they used against Hill and Bill to defeat, I believe the voters are getting disgusted at the attempts of the O campaign and their false statements about McCain calling O terrorist, can you feel the fear , and the deck of cards being played McCain Palin, Nobama 2008
The media needs to check out Barack Obama’s representation of Public Allies.
Google “Public Allies Obama” and you’ll come up with some interesting information.
You can start here:
http://rds.yahoo.com/_ylt=A0oGkj3XH8RI1uYAVRRXNyoA;_ylu=X3oDMTEzMzdkNXUxBHNlYwNzcgRwb3MDMwRjb2xvA3NrMQR2dGlkA1FSVzJfMTI2/SIG=138gj2b2d/EXP=1220899159/**http%3a//www.hollywoodgrind.com/public-allies-is-a-barack-obama-racist-socialist-army/
Here’s Obama commending Kwame:
http://rds.yahoo.com/_ylt=A0oGknGTIMRIPgIByOxXNyoA;_ylu=X3oDMTEzN3RqZTIzBHNlYwNzcgRwb3MDMQRjb2xvA3NrMQR2dGlkA1FSVzJfMTI2/SIG=120q70q4d/EXP=1220899347/**http%3a//www.youtube.com/watch%3fv=4ZNvC_-RW2Q
Mr. Weaver…
After all the sifting and digging you indicate you did…what strikes you as the most important aspect of the lies BO tells?
There is seamingly no end to BO’s attempt to decieve the voters. What, in your opinion, is the provebial straw? Did you learn anything you did not know, connect anything you had not been aware of?
Exellent review. Thanks.
I think the arrogance that he thinks he can continue with the lie even as evidence mounts showing it as a bald faced lie is a telling point about his character. Add to this his claim to never doubt himself and his repeated unwillingness to admit error. Character is very important and Obama displays a dangerous Bush-like character.
But specifically to his ties to terrorists and roles and spending through their organizations, I think the money trail is most important. What is already found suggests that the money trail is going to lead everyone to people and organizations that Obama has not mentioned. It will also raise questions over how the public and private money was spent.
Last night I tried looking through the few tax returns Obama’s released and none list any W-2s from groups he was employed with, nor are there any details on other income, e.g., 1099 income. The picture is very incomplete.
Wow, thanks for all your hard work in condensing all this and bringing it more into the light.
Very overlooked in all of this are the statements from Bernadine Dohrn that celebrated the Manson murders in 1969.
Vile, just vile.
Matthew,
Since I have spent quite a bit of time on this blog and others for months now quite a bit of what you have referred to is not news to me.
I think how you presented it was really interesting and for any who have not followed this before you summarized it well.
NoQuarter has done an outstanding service bringing all this information to the surface. I applaud all of you for a job well done.
Now please continue to keep this front a center going forward into Nov. since more many are just now tuning into this election and making up their minds.
Michelle worked with Bernadine Dohrn at Sidley
All I can say is – time is not on Obama’s side.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZqcMNA1DGI
Dig It
“The Movement”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_R6gcbC9Hz4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fV_h-XwchkY
Fox News: Weatherman Bill Ayers Was Obama’s “Mentor”
[...] From my original post (September 7 post at NoQuarterUSA): [...]
Im confused as to why this has been held so secretive. This could destroy our freeddom as we knew it. Why is he not being exposed?
[...] http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/07/barack-michelle-bill-ayers-and-bernadine-dohrn-its-not-just-... [...]
[...] Great Article, a must read for anyone considering voting for Barack Hussein Obama. How this does not matter, is ludacris. This is the man running for the president of the United States of America! Wake up people! Click here. [...]
Ha, ha. You dumb ass right wing nutz! Obama won and now you’ll all have to move to a country that shares your values. Like Iran.
http://www.noquarterusa.net – da best. Keep it going!
Thank you
Elcorin