<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Barack &#8220;Words Matter&#8221; Obama  [Updated]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/10/barack-words-matter-obama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/10/barack-words-matter-obama/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:58:31 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: b mathews</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/10/barack-words-matter-obama/#comment-713197</link>
		<dc:creator>b mathews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 22:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/10/barack-words-matter-obama/#comment-713197</guid>
		<description>ME THINKS MOST AMERICANS ARE TIRED OF THE &quot;OBAMA SHOW&quot; AND WOULD LIKE TO SEE IT CANCELLED COME NOV. FORTUNATELY WE WILL NOT HAVE TO SEE IT AGAIN IN RERUNS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ME THINKS MOST AMERICANS ARE TIRED OF THE &#8220;OBAMA SHOW&#8221; AND WOULD LIKE TO SEE IT CANCELLED COME NOV. FORTUNATELY WE WILL NOT HAVE TO SEE IT AGAIN IN RERUNS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cathy6224</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/10/barack-words-matter-obama/#comment-712458</link>
		<dc:creator>Cathy6224</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 20:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/10/barack-words-matter-obama/#comment-712458</guid>
		<description>Comment by Skiron &#124; 2008-09-10 22:45:06 
I’m really, REALLY getting SICK and TIRED of people who look for sexist hidden meanings in every single word that comes out of Obama’s mouth. It’s drummed up, faux outrage, it makes you look petty and weak, and it is an F’ING DISTRACTION from the very real and serious issues facing this country. Do you realize the Russians just sent two bombers to Venezuela for military maneuvers, in retaliation for our sending warship to Georgia? We’re inching towards WWIII and all you can talk about is how you think Obama called someone a name. So please, do us all a favor and CUT THE CRAP.
-----------------------------------------------------Excuse me and I am sick of the racial distractions from the Obama campaign that have been going on since the primaries.  His campaign creates more distractions than anyone, but blame everyone else. Why would he do that? Because Obama can&#039;t discuss issues and plans. He has none.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment by Skiron | 2008-09-10 22:45:06<br />
I’m really, REALLY getting SICK and TIRED of people who look for sexist hidden meanings in every single word that comes out of Obama’s mouth. It’s drummed up, faux outrage, it makes you look petty and weak, and it is an F’ING DISTRACTION from the very real and serious issues facing this country. Do you realize the Russians just sent two bombers to Venezuela for military maneuvers, in retaliation for our sending warship to Georgia? We’re inching towards WWIII and all you can talk about is how you think Obama called someone a name. So please, do us all a favor and CUT THE CRAP.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;Excuse me and I am sick of the racial distractions from the Obama campaign that have been going on since the primaries.  His campaign creates more distractions than anyone, but blame everyone else. Why would he do that? Because Obama can&#8217;t discuss issues and plans. He has none.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: navyvet48</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/10/barack-words-matter-obama/#comment-712373</link>
		<dc:creator>navyvet48</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 20:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/10/barack-words-matter-obama/#comment-712373</guid>
		<description>Why are douche and other feminine products advertised on TV? I ask that question all the time Larry. 
As for the douche, at least in the last 2 years of primaries and general election now, to remind us Obama is a douche bag with little respect for women....I truly suspect with little respect for anyone but himself. Biden appears to be the same type of person with little respect for women!

The sexist stuff really blows...and what is wrong with the feminists and feminist groups out there that can&#039;t get past someone&#039;s personal beliefs to stick up for them. Since when did anything feminist have anything to do with party affiliation.....I really thought it had to do with Women&#039;s Rights as a whole!

Take me away Calgon!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are douche and other feminine products advertised on TV? I ask that question all the time Larry.<br />
As for the douche, at least in the last 2 years of primaries and general election now, to remind us Obama is a douche bag with little respect for women&#8230;.I truly suspect with little respect for anyone but himself. Biden appears to be the same type of person with little respect for women!</p>
<p>The sexist stuff really blows&#8230;and what is wrong with the feminists and feminist groups out there that can&#8217;t get past someone&#8217;s personal beliefs to stick up for them. Since when did anything feminist have anything to do with party affiliation&#8230;..I really thought it had to do with Women&#8217;s Rights as a whole!</p>
<p>Take me away Calgon!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: missouridove</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/10/barack-words-matter-obama/#comment-711609</link>
		<dc:creator>missouridove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/10/barack-words-matter-obama/#comment-711609</guid>
		<description>Yes, I heard the clip on the radio, and even without visuals, I knew immediately what he was trying to do--he is so totally NOT innocent, for crying out loud!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I heard the clip on the radio, and even without visuals, I knew immediately what he was trying to do&#8211;he is so totally NOT innocent, for crying out loud!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beebop</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/10/barack-words-matter-obama/#comment-711542</link>
		<dc:creator>beebop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/10/barack-words-matter-obama/#comment-711542</guid>
		<description>from the friendly Chicago newspaper:

&lt;strong&gt;But none of that, none of that, can explain why the words came stammering out of Obama&#039;s mouth the other day.

What was he thinking?

For starters, the Democratic nominee -- for all his many positive attributes -- is not &quot;just plain folks,&quot; as was only highlighted by his awkward delivery of the intended putdown, and therefore should not pretend to be.

But, more important, Obama knew as well as anyone listening to him that Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin has the market cornered on lipstick for this campaign season, even if she puts hers on a pit bull.

By invoking lipstick, Obama invoked Palin. Despite his protestations later, he knew it, or certainly should have known it.

And even though the line got Obama a big laugh from the partisan crowd, which clearly drew the connection, he blew it. 

Maybe Obama or his advisers thought he had cover because they knew McCain had used the line in relation to Clinton. If so, they were wrong. 

Obama is the one with the image problem, unfairly or not, concerning his dealings with women -- the nettlesome aftereffect of his Democratic primary battle with Clinton.&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>from the friendly Chicago newspaper:</p>
<p><strong>But none of that, none of that, can explain why the words came stammering out of Obama&#8217;s mouth the other day.</p>
<p>What was he thinking?</p>
<p>For starters, the Democratic nominee &#8212; for all his many positive attributes &#8212; is not &#8220;just plain folks,&#8221; as was only highlighted by his awkward delivery of the intended putdown, and therefore should not pretend to be.</p>
<p>But, more important, Obama knew as well as anyone listening to him that Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin has the market cornered on lipstick for this campaign season, even if she puts hers on a pit bull.</p>
<p>By invoking lipstick, Obama invoked Palin. Despite his protestations later, he knew it, or certainly should have known it.</p>
<p>And even though the line got Obama a big laugh from the partisan crowd, which clearly drew the connection, he blew it. </p>
<p>Maybe Obama or his advisers thought he had cover because they knew McCain had used the line in relation to Clinton. If so, they were wrong. </p>
<p>Obama is the one with the image problem, unfairly or not, concerning his dealings with women &#8212; the nettlesome aftereffect of his Democratic primary battle with Clinton.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: obamaphobe</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/10/barack-words-matter-obama/#comment-711526</link>
		<dc:creator>obamaphobe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/10/barack-words-matter-obama/#comment-711526</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t care one way or the other if Bristol is pregnant with a black man&#039;s baby instead of her fiance&#039;s.  It&#039;s a family issue.  Is that the worst thing they can dig up?  I mean after all, Obama&#039;s mother was impregnated by a black man.  This would not change my mind about Palin.  I&#039;m sure Palin is being truthful about what she is aware of.  Geesh..Obama&#039;s followers are acting as if it&#039;s a bad thing that the father may be black.  What&#039;s up with that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t care one way or the other if Bristol is pregnant with a black man&#8217;s baby instead of her fiance&#8217;s.  It&#8217;s a family issue.  Is that the worst thing they can dig up?  I mean after all, Obama&#8217;s mother was impregnated by a black man.  This would not change my mind about Palin.  I&#8217;m sure Palin is being truthful about what she is aware of.  Geesh..Obama&#8217;s followers are acting as if it&#8217;s a bad thing that the father may be black.  What&#8217;s up with that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr.Murder</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/10/barack-words-matter-obama/#comment-711439</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr.Murder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/10/barack-words-matter-obama/#comment-711439</guid>
		<description>WORM time once again.

Pig isa synonymous with pork. Wasteful.
John McCain will be the 109th Congress on steroids. 

Fishes rot from the head down.
This is a stick at McCain&#039;s own judgement(Keating, etc.) so it evidences the fact that the walk don&#039;t match the talk.

Too bad Obama doesn&#039;t clarify his own statements when he makes them to avoid controversy. Maybe his teleprompter broke, he should have just ridiculed Miranda rights for all persons, like what the Constitution states.

You know, the Constitution, that document Bush wiped his ass all over the past eight years?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WORM time once again.</p>
<p>Pig isa synonymous with pork. Wasteful.<br />
John McCain will be the 109th Congress on steroids. </p>
<p>Fishes rot from the head down.<br />
This is a stick at McCain&#8217;s own judgement(Keating, etc.) so it evidences the fact that the walk don&#8217;t match the talk.</p>
<p>Too bad Obama doesn&#8217;t clarify his own statements when he makes them to avoid controversy. Maybe his teleprompter broke, he should have just ridiculed Miranda rights for all persons, like what the Constitution states.</p>
<p>You know, the Constitution, that document Bush wiped his ass all over the past eight years?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian_C82</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/10/barack-words-matter-obama/#comment-711385</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian_C82</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 17:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/10/barack-words-matter-obama/#comment-711385</guid>
		<description>The country isn&#039;t even close to &quot;falling apart,&quot; you idiot. You Obamabots are so out of touch with what&#039;s really going on in the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The country isn&#8217;t even close to &#8220;falling apart,&#8221; you idiot. You Obamabots are so out of touch with what&#8217;s really going on in the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheGhost</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/10/barack-words-matter-obama/#comment-711026</link>
		<dc:creator>TheGhost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/10/barack-words-matter-obama/#comment-711026</guid>
		<description>Yes...please explain yourself.

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes&#8230;please explain yourself.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheGhost</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/10/barack-words-matter-obama/#comment-711010</link>
		<dc:creator>TheGhost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/10/barack-words-matter-obama/#comment-711010</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t Biden have some kind of a stroke long ago?

Perhaps he is having some nerve-brain damage symptoms and problems surfacing at his age.

Wasn&#039;t he planning to retire, he is now 65?

He could even have recently had what is called &quot;transient ischemic attack&quot; which is a very small, tiny stroke in the brain which can affect the muscular system in different parts of the body. His speech could be slightly affected.

My mother had that problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t Biden have some kind of a stroke long ago?</p>
<p>Perhaps he is having some nerve-brain damage symptoms and problems surfacing at his age.</p>
<p>Wasn&#8217;t he planning to retire, he is now 65?</p>
<p>He could even have recently had what is called &#8220;transient ischemic attack&#8221; which is a very small, tiny stroke in the brain which can affect the muscular system in different parts of the body. His speech could be slightly affected.</p>
<p>My mother had that problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/10/barack-words-matter-obama/#comment-711004</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/10/barack-words-matter-obama/#comment-711004</guid>
		<description>Obama is the best insincere person that I know that can sound sincere.  If the lipstick thing was so innocent then why was it brought up now?  Obama’s body language, the tone of his voice and his hesitation between the sentences made me gasp and think that he called Palin a pig.  The biggest give away was the smirk on his face.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama is the best insincere person that I know that can sound sincere.  If the lipstick thing was so innocent then why was it brought up now?  Obama’s body language, the tone of his voice and his hesitation between the sentences made me gasp and think that he called Palin a pig.  The biggest give away was the smirk on his face.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beowulf</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/10/barack-words-matter-obama/#comment-710956</link>
		<dc:creator>Beowulf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/10/barack-words-matter-obama/#comment-710956</guid>
		<description>For you Urban,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=URjeS5-NaXY</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For you Urban,</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=URjeS5-NaXY" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=URjeS5-NaXY</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beowulf</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/10/barack-words-matter-obama/#comment-710922</link>
		<dc:creator>Beowulf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/10/barack-words-matter-obama/#comment-710922</guid>
		<description>Yeah, this is you:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rZ-FAV9fBII


:- )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, this is you:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rZ-FAV9fBII" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rZ-FAV9fBII</a></p>
<p>:- )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beowulf</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/10/barack-words-matter-obama/#comment-710890</link>
		<dc:creator>Beowulf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/10/barack-words-matter-obama/#comment-710890</guid>
		<description>Hey numnutz, check below for my response.  I forgot to press the &quot;Replay&quot; button.  Sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey numnutz, check below for my response.  I forgot to press the &#8220;Replay&#8221; button.  Sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beowulf</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/10/barack-words-matter-obama/#comment-710879</link>
		<dc:creator>Beowulf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/10/barack-words-matter-obama/#comment-710879</guid>
		<description>Urban Dipshit,

Touché.  I stand corrected.  LOL, despite my thorough skepticism, I guess I still got caught in the corporate media&#039;s echo chamber of self-evident truths.  

See, the way I remember the coverage is that they played the clip of Hillary invoking RFK&#039;s assassination a few times, but as usual there was an avalanche of race-baiting spin by the bots--and the corporate media which was deliberately playing it up.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CB6kAXD4WAA
---Olbermann&#039;s diatribe on the RFK remark.  He mentions 3 different invocations of RFK, by Hillary.  Two in which she immediately brings up the assassination.

Now, I do agree with that local paper&#039;s characterization that she stumbled into it, however dumbass she did NOT say that &quot;Bill Clinton and RFK were BOTH still in it at this point. Then, acknowledged RFK was killed in CA.&quot;

No douchebag, she immediately brought up the assassination when she cited RFK--in the vid I originally linked and in her March 6th reference to RFK.

W.R.T. this incident, like me, you need to clean out your fucking ears.  Indeed, even more so since you claim to have listened to it carefully.

Nice goin&#039; numnutz.


And just to let you know, Hillary should NOT have brought it up so crassly twice.  Why?  Because...

1.  Politically it was just plain dumb--especially since she &quot;walked into it&quot; not once, but twice.

2.  The Kennedy&#039;s have every right to be angry at Hillary for bringing it up like that, &lt;b&gt;including the ones who suppported her&lt;/b&gt;.

3.  There has been a lot of talk about Obama being assassinated.  So much so that...

4.  Obama has always retained a personal bodyguard who is NOT a member of the Secret Service.  Obama clearly doesn&#039;t trust the Secret Service:  His personal bodyguard is &lt;b&gt;black.&lt;/b&gt;  (Bush-Cheney inexplicably do this too.  Although with Bush-Cheney, it obviously has to do with criminal cover-ups of whatever they&#039;re always up to.  Mind you, the Starr investigation hauled in a few Secret Service agents to testify against Clinton.  They were deemed by the then rightwing Supreme Court as law enforcement officers and hence were not immune from having to testify.)

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2008/05/27/us/27reggie0.500.jpg
---Obama and his black personal bodyguard, who still works along side the Secret Service.

-------------------------
 
You Douche.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Urban Dipshit,</p>
<p>Touché.  I stand corrected.  LOL, despite my thorough skepticism, I guess I still got caught in the corporate media&#8217;s echo chamber of self-evident truths.  </p>
<p>See, the way I remember the coverage is that they played the clip of Hillary invoking RFK&#8217;s assassination a few times, but as usual there was an avalanche of race-baiting spin by the bots&#8211;and the corporate media which was deliberately playing it up.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CB6kAXD4WAA" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CB6kAXD4WAA</a><br />
&#8212;Olbermann&#8217;s diatribe on the RFK remark.  He mentions 3 different invocations of RFK, by Hillary.  Two in which she immediately brings up the assassination.</p>
<p>Now, I do agree with that local paper&#8217;s characterization that she stumbled into it, however dumbass she did NOT say that &#8220;Bill Clinton and RFK were BOTH still in it at this point. Then, acknowledged RFK was killed in CA.&#8221;</p>
<p>No douchebag, she immediately brought up the assassination when she cited RFK&#8211;in the vid I originally linked and in her March 6th reference to RFK.</p>
<p>W.R.T. this incident, like me, you need to clean out your fucking ears.  Indeed, even more so since you claim to have listened to it carefully.</p>
<p>Nice goin&#8217; numnutz.</p>
<p>And just to let you know, Hillary should NOT have brought it up so crassly twice.  Why?  Because&#8230;</p>
<p>1.  Politically it was just plain dumb&#8211;especially since she &#8220;walked into it&#8221; not once, but twice.</p>
<p>2.  The Kennedy&#8217;s have every right to be angry at Hillary for bringing it up like that, <b>including the ones who suppported her</b>.</p>
<p>3.  There has been a lot of talk about Obama being assassinated.  So much so that&#8230;</p>
<p>4.  Obama has always retained a personal bodyguard who is NOT a member of the Secret Service.  Obama clearly doesn&#8217;t trust the Secret Service:  His personal bodyguard is <b>black.</b>  (Bush-Cheney inexplicably do this too.  Although with Bush-Cheney, it obviously has to do with criminal cover-ups of whatever they&#8217;re always up to.  Mind you, the Starr investigation hauled in a few Secret Service agents to testify against Clinton.  They were deemed by the then rightwing Supreme Court as law enforcement officers and hence were not immune from having to testify.)</p>
<p><a href="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2008/05/27/us/27reggie0.500.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2008/05/27/us/27reggie0.500.jpg</a><br />
&#8212;Obama and his black personal bodyguard, who still works along side the Secret Service.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>You Douche.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
