Wow, REALLY???

He’s only toast if the MSM gets the guts to call him on it–which they won’t. He wouldn’t even be in this race if the MSM reported on half of his disgusting activities.

REMOVED BY ADMIN. INAPPROPRIATE LINK

Clair McCaskill. I can say no more. Other than
they are currently digging a hole in hell just for her because hell isn’t deep enough to put that kind of toxic waste into the ground safely– even by hell’s standards.

sorry- but you did show a picture of satan’s handmaiden there, you know.

As for Obama? Mean spirited? wow. really? no, really? I mean, really? Obama? really?
sheesh, how about that. Somehow this glaring fact seems to elude the media. How does the media keep up their ignorance. I know they must have media support groups for members who accidentally try and think for themselves.

Mediaperson: “um, did you notice Obama just gave Hillary the finger?”

Mediagroupmembers: “no, no, hey sit down and relax.
remember step one– ‘came to believe that there was no power higher than obama.’”

Where is the Whitey tape? You are all being taken. Always remember that Jhonson was the guy that provided cover to the Bush administration by saying in July 2001 “While terrorism is not vanquished, in a world where thousands of nuclear warheads are still aimed across the continents, terrorism is not the biggest security challenge confronting the United States, and it should not be portrayed that way.” You are being taken by a poseur looking to make a buck.

Breaking!!!
Breaking!!!
Breaking!!!

YOU MUST READ THIS!!!!

ABC edited out multiple sections of the Palin Interview and her responses to make her appear ignorant and a war monger!

THose of you who saw the 20/20 interview would have noticed even ABC beginning to walk back from their youtube like bullshit from day 1 of the interview by rebroadcasting the answer on how energy independance affects foreign policy by palin, this time unedited and remarkable intelligent sounding:

abcnews.go.com/video/playerIndex?id=5793192

See it here and compare it to the one shown earlier where he cuts her off and says thats not foreign policy which is strangly not easily found on abc anymore.

Now here are three stories hitting about how much of the transcripts where left on the cutting room floor:

ABC News Edited Out Key Parts of Sarah Palin Interview
newsbusters.org/blogs/p-j-gladnick/2008/09/13/abc-news-edited-out-key-parts-sarah-palin-interview

ABC Busted On Hiding Sarah Palin’s Full Answers- Updated with ABC News Contact URL

wwwwakeupamericans-spree.blogspot.com/2008/09/abc-busted-on-hiding-sarah-palins-full.html

and here from Mark Levin Show are the transcripts of the interview showing where they edited out chunks to try and make Sarah Palin look like The Baby Maker With a Bazooka!!!
marklevinshow.com/gibson-interview/

EXCERPTS: Charlie Gibson Interviews Sarah Palin (September 11, 2008)

THE BOLDED & UNDERLINED PARTS WERE EDITED OUT OF THE INTERVIEW

Let me repeat:

THE BOLDED & UNDERLINED PARTS WERE EDITED OUT OF THE INTERVIEW

Really?

THE BOLDED & UNDERLINED PARTS WERE EDITED OUT OF THE INTERVIEW

Holy SHit!!

THE BOLDED & UNDERLINED PARTS WERE EDITED OUT OF THE INTERVIEW

Ok on with the story:

GIBSON: Governor, let me start by asking you a question that I asked John McCain about you, and it is really the central question. Can you look the country in the eye and say “I have the experience and I have the ability to be not just vice president, but perhaps president of the United States of America?”

PALIN: I do, Charlie, and on January 20, when John McCain and I are sworn in, if we are so privileged to be elected to serve this country, will be ready. I’m ready.

GIBSON: And you didn’t say to yourself, “Am I experienced enough? Am I ready? Do I know enough about international affairs? Do I — will I feel comfortable enough on the national stage to do this?”

PALIN: I didn’t hesitate, no.

GIBSON: Didn’t that take some hubris?

PALIN: I — I answered him yes because I have the confidence in that readiness and knowing that you can’t blink, you have to be wired in a way of being so committed to the mission, the mission that we’re on, reform of this country and victory in the war, you can’t blink.

So I didn’t blink then even when asked to run as his running mate.

GIBSON: But this is not just reforming a government. This is also running a government on the huge international stage in a very dangerous world. When I asked John McCain about your national security credentials, he cited the fact that you have commanded the Alaskan National Guard and that Alaska is close to Russia. Are those sufficient credentials?

PALIN: But it is about reform of government and it’s about putting government back on the side of the people, and that has much to do with foreign policy and national security issues Let me speak specifically about a credential that I do bring to this table, Charlie, and that’s with the energy independence that I’ve been working on for these years as the governor of this state that produces nearly 20 percent of the U.S. domestic supply of energy, that I worked on as chairman of the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, overseeing the oil and gas development in our state to produce more for the United States.

GIBSON: I know. I’m just saying that national security is a whole lot more than energy.

PALIN: It is, but I want you to not lose sight of the fact that energy is a foundation of national security. It’s that important. It’s that significant.

GIBSON: Did you ever travel outside the country prior to your trip to Kuwait and Germany last year?

PALIN: Canada, Mexico, and then, yes, that trip, that was the trip of a lifetime to visit our troops in Kuwait and stop and visit our injured soldiers in Germany. That was the trip of a lifetime and it changed my life.

GIBSON: Have you ever met a foreign head of state?

PALIN: There in the state of Alaska, our international trade activities bring in many leaders of other countries.

GIBSON: And all governors deal with trade delegations.

PALIN: Right.

GIBSON: Who act at the behest of their governments.

PALIN: Right, right.

GIBSON: I’m talking about somebody who’s a head of state, who can negotiate for that country. Ever met one?

PALIN: I have not and I think if you go back in history and if you ask that question of many vice presidents, they may have the same answer that I just gave you. But, Charlie, again, we’ve got to remember what the desire is in this nation at this time. It is for no more politics as usual and somebody’s big, fat resume maybe that shows decades and decades in that Washington establishment, where, yes, they’ve had opportunities to meet heads of state … these last couple of weeks … it has been overwhelming to me that confirmation of the message that Americans are getting sick and tired of that self-dealing and kind of that closed door, good old boy network that has been the Washington elite.

GIBSON: Let me ask you about some specific national security situations.

PALIN: Sure.

GIBSON: Let’s start, because we are near Russia, let’s start with Russia and Georgia.

The administration has said we’ve got to maintain the territorial integrity of Georgia. Do you believe the United States should try to restore Georgian sovereignty over South Ossetia and Abkhazia?

PALIN: First off, we’re going to continue good relations with Saakashvili there. I was able to speak with him the other day and giving him my commitment, as John McCain’s running mate, that we will be committed to Georgia. And we’ve got to keep an eye on Russia. For Russia to have exerted such pressure in terms of invading a smaller democratic country, unprovoked, is unacceptable and we have to keep…

GIBSON: You believe unprovoked.

PALIN: I do believe unprovoked and we have got to keep our eyes on Russia, under the leadership there. I think it was unfortunate. That manifestation that we saw with that invasion of Georgia shows us some steps backwards that Russia has recently taken away from the race toward a more democratic nation with democratic ideals. That’s why we have to keep an eye on Russia.

And, Charlie, you’re in Alaska. We have that very narrow maritime border between the United States, and the 49th state, Alaska, and Russia. They are our next door neighbors.We need to have a good relationship with them. They’re very, very important to us and they are our next door neighbor.

GIBSON: What insight into Russian actions, particularly in the last couple of weeks, does the proximity of the state give you?

PALIN: They’re our next door neighbors and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska, from an island in Alaska.

GIBSON: What insight does that give you into what they’re doing in Georgia?

PALIN: Well, I’m giving you that perspective of how small our world is and how important it is that we work with our allies to keep good relation with all of these countries, especially Russia. We will not repeat a Cold War. We must have good relationship with our allies, pressuring, also, helping us to remind Russia that it’s in their benefit, also, a mutually beneficial relationship for us all to be getting along.

Sarah Palin on Russia:

We cannot repeat the Cold War. We are thankful that, under Reagan, we won the Cold War, without a shot fired, also. We’ve learned lessons from that in our relationship with Russia, previously the Soviet Union.

We will not repeat a Cold War. We must have good relationship with our allies, pressuring, also, helping us to remind Russia that it’s in their benefit, also, a mutually beneficial relationship for us all to be getting along.

GIBSON: Would you favor putting Georgia and Ukraine in NATO?

PALIN: Ukraine, definitely, yes. Yes, and Georgia.

GIBSON: Because Putin has said he would not tolerate NATO incursion into the Caucasus.

PALIN: Well, you know, the Rose Revolution, the Orange Revolution, those actions have showed us that those democratic nations, I believe, deserve to be in NATO.

Putin thinks otherwise. Obviously, he thinks otherwise, but…

GIBSON: And under the NATO treaty, wouldn’t we then have to go to war if Russia went into Georgia?

PALIN: Perhaps so. I mean, that is the agreement when you are a NATO ally, is if another country is attacked, you’re going to be expected to be called upon and help.

But NATO, I think, should include Ukraine, definitely, at this point and I think that we need to — especially with new leadership coming in on January 20, being sworn on, on either ticket, we have got to make sure that we strengthen our allies, our ties with each one of those NATO members.

We have got to make sure that that is the group that can be counted upon to defend one another in a very dangerous world today.

GIBSON: And you think it would be worth it to the United States, Georgia is worth it to the United States to go to war if Russia were to invade.

PALIN: What I think is that smaller democratic countries that are invaded by a larger power is something for us to be vigilant against. We have got to be cognizant of what the consequences are if a larger power is able to take over smaller democratic countries.

And we have got to be vigilant. We have got to show the support, in this case, for Georgia. The support that we can show is economic sanctions perhaps against Russia, if this is what it leads to.

It doesn’t have to lead to war and it doesn’t have to lead, as I said, to a Cold War, but economic sanctions, diplomatic pressure, again, counting on our allies to help us do that in this mission of keeping our eye on Russia and Putin and some of his desire to control and to control much more than smaller democratic countries.

His mission, if it is to control energy supplies, also, coming from and through Russia, that’s a dangerous position for our world to be in, if we were to allow that to happen.

Sarah Palin on Iran and Israel:

GIBSON: Let me turn to Iran. Do you consider a nuclear Iran to be an existential threat to Israel?

PALIN: I believe that under the leadership of Ahmadinejad, nuclear weapons in the hands of his government are extremely dangerous to everyone on this globe, yes.

GIBSON: So what should we do about a nuclear Iran? John McCain said the only thing worse than a war with Iran would be a nuclear Iran. John Abizaid said we may have to live with a nuclear Iran. Who’s right?

PALIN: No, no. I agree with John McCain that nuclear weapons in the hands of those who would seek to destroy our allies, in this case, we’re talking about Israel, we’re talking about Ahmadinejad’s comment about Israel being the “stinking corpse, should be wiped off the face of the earth,” that’s atrocious. That’s unacceptable.

GIBSON: So what do you do about a nuclear Iran?

PALIN: We have got to make sure that these weapons of mass destruction, that nuclear weapons are not given to those hands of Ahmadinejad, not that he would use them, but that he would allow terrorists to be able to use them. So we have got to put the pressure on Iran and we have got to count on our allies to help us, diplomatic pressure.

GIBSON: But, Governor, we’ve threatened greater sanctions against Iran for a long time. It hasn’t done any good. It hasn’t stemmed their nuclear program.

PALIN: We need to pursue those and we need to implement those. We cannot back off. We cannot just concede that, oh, gee, maybe they’re going to have nuclear weapons, what can we do about it. No way, not Americans. We do not have to stand for that.

GIBSON: What if Israel decided it felt threatened and needed to take out the Iranian nuclear facilities?

PALIN: Well, first, we are friends with Israel and I don’t think that we should second guess the measures that Israel has to take to defend themselves and for their security.

GIBSON: So if we wouldn’t second guess it and they decided they needed to do it because Iran was an existential threat, we would cooperative or agree with that.

PALIN: I don’t think we can second guess what Israel has to do to secure its nation.

GIBSON: So if it felt necessary, if it felt the need to defend itself by taking out Iranian nuclear facilities, that would be all right.

PALIN: We cannot second guess the steps that Israel has to take to defend itself.

GIBSON: We talk on the anniversary of 9/11. Why do you think those hijackers attacked? Why did they want to hurt us?

PALIN: You know, there is a very small percentage of Islamic believers who are extreme and they are violent and they do not believe in American ideals, and they attacked us and now we are at a point here seven years later, on the anniversary, in this post-9/11 world, where we’re able to commit to never again. They see that the only option for them is to become a suicide bomber, to get caught up in this evil, in this terror. They need to be provided the hope that all Americans have instilled in us, because we’re a democratic, we are a free, and we are a free-thinking society.

GIBSON: Do you agree with the Bush doctrine?

PALIN: In what respect, Charlie?

GIBSON: The Bush — well, what do you — what do you interpret it to be?

PALIN: His world view.

GIBSON: No, the Bush doctrine, enunciated September 2002, before the Iraq war.

PALIN: I believe that what President Bush has attempted to do is rid this world of Islamic extremism, terrorists who are hell bent on destroying our nation. There have been blunders along the way, though. There have been mistakes made. And with new leadership, and that’s the beauty of American elections, of course, and democracy, is with new leadership comes opportunity to do things better.

GIBSON: The Bush doctrine, as I understand it, is that we have the right of anticipatory self-defense, that we have the right to a preemptive strike against any other country that we think is going to attack us. Do you agree with that?

PALIN: I agree that a president’s job, when they swear in their oath to uphold our Constitution, their top priority is to defend the United States of America.

I know that John McCain will do that and I, as his vice president, families we are blessed with that vote of the American people and are elected to serve and are sworn in on January 20, that will be our top priority is to defend the American people.

GIBSON: Do we have a right to anticipatory self-defense? Do we have a right to make a preemptive strike again another country if we feel that country might strike us?

PALIN: Charlie, if there is legitimate and enough intelligence that tells us that a strike is imminent against American people, we have every right to defend our country. In fact, the president has the obligation, the duty to defend.

GIBSON: Do we have the right to be making cross-border attacks into Pakistan from Afghanistan, with or without the approval of the Pakistani government?

PALIN: Now, as for our right to invade, we’re going to work with these countries, building new relationships, working with existing allies, but forging new, also, in order to, Charlie, get to a point in this world where war is not going to be a first option. In fact, war has got to be, a military strike, a last option.

GIBSON: But, Governor, I’m asking you: We have the right, in your mind, to go across the border with or without the approval of the Pakistani government.

PALIN: In order to stop Islamic extremists, those terrorists who would seek to destroy America and our allies, we must do whatever it takes and we must not blink, Charlie, in making those tough decisions of where we go and even who we target.

GIBSON: And let me finish with this. I got lost in a blizzard of words there. Is that a yes? That you think we have the right to go across the border with or without the approval of the Pakistani government, to go after terrorists who are in the Waziristan area?

PALIN: I believe that America has to exercise all options in order to stop the terrorists who are hell bent on destroying America and our allies. We have got to have all options out there on the table.

Sarah Palin on God:

GIBSON: You said recently, in your old church, “Our national leaders are sending U.S. soldiers on a task that is from God.” Are we fighting a holy war?

PALIN: You know, I don’t know if that was my exact quote.

GIBSON: Exact words.

PALIN: But the reference there is a repeat of Abraham Lincoln’s words when he said — first, he suggested never presume to know what God’s will is, and I would never presume to know God’s will or to speak God’s words.

But what Abraham Lincoln had said, and that’s a repeat in my comments, was let us not pray that God is on our side in a war or any other time, but let us pray that we are on God’s side.

That’s what that comment was all about, Charlie. And I do believe, though, that this war against extreme Islamic terrorists is the right thing. It’s an unfortunate thing, because war is hell and I hate war, and, Charlie, today is the day that I send my first born, my son, my teenage son overseas with his Stryker brigade, 4,000 other wonderful American men and women, to fight for our country, for democracy, for our freedoms.

Charlie, those are freedoms that too many of us just take for granted. I hate war and I want to see war ended. We end war when we see victory, and we do see victory in sight in Iraq.

GIBSON: I take your point about Lincoln’s words, but you went on and said, “There is a plan and it is God’s plan.”

…the story continues at the link…

This story is getting ready to hit the airwaves!!!

THIS IS WHAT YOU CALL MEDIA SPONSORED PROPOGANDA PEOPLE!!!

IF THIS DOESN’T SCARE THE SHIT OUT OF YOU NOTHING WILL!!

Breaking!!!
Breaking!!!
Breaking!!!

Unfuckingbelievable!!

hey fif, I don’t think Barry and the gang ever admit mistakes. It would be a first. They’ll have to think of a way to blame McCain for his injuries.
That’s Bambi’s way!

1970s porn star name?

Randi Rhodes is a f*cking whore. She gets to keep the name since she used it so freely on Hillary Clinton.

very strange post

Rhodes is disgusting, but that comment will help the McCain/Palin ticket tremendously.

Every time the American public hears this type of bile from the left, the contrast between the bitter, cruel, heartless, slandering leftists, and that extraordinary, upright, forthright, principled, strong Governor named Sarah Palin becomes even more clear.

Obama and his thugs keep making themselves smaller and McCain and Palin bigger.

I wonder if Randi Rhodes is actually a Karl Rove plant. I doubt it, but she coudln’t help get McCain/Palin any more if she was.

McCain’s campaign can’t come out directly without looking a little whiney. The RNC or a 527 or Fox will have to do it. Or Leiberman could say something. That’s pretty much it.

yes, mccain or 527. it’s the way to get around the media blackout on obama’s bad behavior.

Okay. Say for argument’s sake that he’s not nefarious … is stupid, rude, out of touch and making fun of Americans better? Do we want a Zeromama as CIC who is 1) a horse’s ass or 2) just.plain.stupid. America gets to decide. Either way, he’s toast.

Bravo, John, bravo!

So now Obama is going to eat a bit of crow…

I have a feeling the Democrats better sit back for a bit and start concentrating on the Policies.

I would like to see these people’s mouths shut once and for all. Especially Mathews, Obermann and Beckell.

Pathetic, Noah. He can barely use a mouse.

Noah -

I do factcheck. McCain can type VERY SLOWLY, so he usually dictates to his wife, who types for him. I guess you are unaware of the damage done to his arms with the 5 1/2 yrs of torture. I checked one of the LA Times links, and it doesn’t really support your thesis. Thanks, though.

uh … saying you will and doing it are a little different. Go back and look at the tape from the news conference. Bill NEVER looks at zeromama. Not once.

I thought it kind of odd that Bill said …”he will win handily.” Not the kind of word you run into - or at least where I live you don’t - on a day to day basis. Just a thought.

MCCAIN/PALIN 08
HILLARY 2012

He’s helping him by playing golf with #41 this weekend in Kennebunkport.
42 “George, you think Mac will appoint Hill to the cabinet”?
41 “Bill, after all the ammo she’s given him, hell, he’ll give her the choice of Sec. State, Sec. Def. or the next Supreme Court opening”
42 “Cool”
41 “Right”
42 “Five bucks a hole, then”?
41 “You’re on”

It’s called building future political capital.

2012

We checked the facts.

The facts say Obama is a low-lie scum.

Yep vote for Obama he can send email wow, now that should make you all sleep better at night.

Your guy said he can’t use the internet. We all know that is because the process is laborious and difficult for him because of his war injuries, so his family and assistants help him - his choice instead of using audio software.

I like it!

The Obama BS needs to be scooped up and flushed down the toilet once and for all!

Without the media reporting anything, alot of people don’t hear things. And for some, if it’s not reported, they don’t know it.

That would be awesome … there are so many leaks breaking out in this titanic fraud that he can’t be every where, raise money, etc. I still think that not taking the public funding was the biggest mistake. It is the thing that looking back scholars will say sunk his campaign.

Need to get New Hampster on the case pronto!

I’d like to go, but I have some work to do in Virginia.

The good news is that Obama is losing. The bad news is that it’s a Zogby poll.

i think he loses PA - too many bitter people clinging to their guns and religion… bitter at barko for questioning their right to have both!

at that is a good thing!

Obama has already lost service men and women.

And don’t forget that Palin DID visit the wounded soldiers in Germany…

Excellent post. Obama has run a very negative campaign throughout and called Hope.

Words? Just words? Yup! Just words.

Thanks, Bud! I appreciate that!

not so fast, there… he did pay people write his memoirs for him…

From now on, we need to demand a certain minimal IQ score before letting people into the party. This will eliminate the whole Obama problem.

Golly gee, Perry, you make a great point, but don’t make it too high, the IQ, I mean. Say 66.

I don’t think backtrack will get too many votes from the NYC fire dept.
Senator and Mrs McCain seems to be welcomed and admired.
backtrack seems to be tolerated.
Do you think sitting in wrights church will be forgotten by New Yorkers? I don’t.

COUNTRY BEFORE PARTY ALWAYS

PUMAS,BUBBAS, AND THOSE PEOPLE RULE

Is that why BO seemed to be p’d at the ceremony and just threw his rose on the pile—he did not get a pin? Maybe they figured he would not wear it so why bother.

I’d say the fine folks there in NYC have a finely tuned bullshit meter.

OK, I need brain bleach after reading that.

Be sure to read Charles Krauthammer on this issue. He is actually the writer who first used the term “Bush Doctrine”. He says Palin was absolutely write to ask what aspect but goes on to say that Gibson’s definition that he gave to her was wrong.

Everyone’s sick of the race-baiting, and McCain has run a clean campaign.

Appropriately where? On Mars? Yeah that has to be it.

I think he has always supported the attack into Afghanistan and actually supports a bigger presence there.

For some reason I have a feeling that BIll is probably laughing about all of the polls turning against Obama.
Obama has treated both of them like pieces of crap.

We shall enjoy every minute of Ohitler’s downward spiral!

Exactly, when has truth ever been a factor with Obama?

Ugh, they make me sick.

Uppity - Well said, comme toujours.

Oh, absolutely, Uppity. I knew that who Obama was would be revealed eventually. WE certainly knew it sooner, but now, other people should see it, too. He is not a nice man, to put it mildly.

THe thing abt this ad is that you know they are going to try and claim it was just abt age. That’s okay, right? TO be ageist? Why not - they’ve been so damn sexist this year. So, they were just showing off to the youngsters how HIP Obama is. Well, you know damn well that they knew McCain was physically incapable of doing those activities on a aregular basis. It was just cruel, heartless, and very, very telling. I hope every military person, veteran or active, sees this, thus SEEING Obama.

And this is the man who wants to be C-i-C. Right.