“Foot and Mouth” Disease Epidemic In Democratic Party
By NancyA on September 20, 2008 at 11:33 PM in Barack Obama, Current Affairs, Democratic Party, Democrats, Joe "Bro" Biden, Obama, Sarah Palin, Women
It is official. The Democratic Party has once again been attacked by a dangerous epidemic of “Foot and Mouth” disease. There have been so many cases diagnosed that Democratic Party is in danger of becoming extinct. First there is SusanUnPC here at NoQuarter with the following story, Here’s the Video of Biden on Clinton. Biden is quoted as saying this in a Boston Globe article:
“Hillary Clinton is as qualified or more qualified than I am to be vice president of the United States of America,” Biden said. “Let’s get that straight. She’s a truly close personal friend; she is qualified to be president of the United States of America. She’s easily qualified to be vice president of the United States of America and quite frankly it might have been a better pick than me, but she is first-rate.”
Of course then there is Obama’s very famous gaffe, and the first gaffe of the Obama/Biden ticket. Here is that video:
And then of course there is the famous line from an ABC interview: “You are right, John McCain has not talked about my Muslim faith.” In Obama’s own words again:
Now just when I thought the epidemic was under control, along comes Charlie Rangel. He certainly stepped in it, didn’t he. Let’s see what he had to say about Sarah Palin:
Yeah! Rangel says, “You have to be kind to the disabled.” Needless to say I am very disgusted…with Rangel.
I am a disabled female Navy veteran….and yes! I want an apology! The best kind of apology for me would be to fire Rangel’s a$$ for his tax troubles, misuse of Congressional stationery, and just for being a narrow-minded, bigoted man towards disabled people.
(Release: November 13)
on sale for only $16.95.
has a spatula.)
8% Off at $11.95, with a rare five-star ranking by 294 customers: 
And check out these: 
("This crazy redhead is on to something. Her pink Rambler story alone is worth the price of the book," writes 
- “Richard Sale’s reportage on Washington, the CIA, the American armed forces, and foreign intrigue has created a perfect background for this account of the steady growth of President Clinton as a master of the game of nations.”--W. Patrick Lang, former head of Middle East Operations, DIA
"Anne C. Heller's stunning biography of Ayn Rand" uses a "plethora of newly unearthed research and fresh insight."
Let’s hope it be fatal.
Esperemos que sea fatal.
http://marklevinshow.com/wp-content/themes/levin/player/?url=http://podloc.andomedia.com/dloadTrack.mp3?prm=2824xhttp://abcrad.vo.llnwd.net/o1/levin/rss/levin09192008.mp3
de aquerdo.
I used to like him a lot but now I hope he goes under the bus also.
Pleae read my commentary, below.
All this Charlie Bashing is WRONG. Charlie Rangel is an Army Korean War vet/hero, a great congressman, a wonderful leader, and a GOOD GUY.
He’s a true friend to both Clintons, and he has the heart of a PUMA.
People seem to forget he sat with Hillary and Chelsea at the convention. He was the guy cheering beside them as Bill gave his speech.
We know where his heart is–it’s with Hillary. Funny how he’s in all sorts of hot water, for “backing the wrong horse,” as it were, now. Wonder how many “Team Obama” assholes stirred those pots?
And that is why he said what he did about Palin, to get himself OFF the OBAMA fundraising rolls; to make himself “too controversial” for Barack and Biden–he’s WAY smarter than most people, which is why he’s survived in politics for so long.
And he’ll survive this, too. The House has already voted NOT TO remove him from his chairmanship….too bad, Barack–you can’t punish the guy and pretend to blame it on the GOP!
I don’t care about his history or his heart.
He tried to take Sarah down a notch by attacking her personally. That is the lowest level of politics.
Obama has inspired the worst in all of his followers and it will only get more vile as the season progresses.
I do not and will not forgive the old stink pot mouth man from New York.
He can just sit in his shit.
He said it. He can’t clean it up.
I could give a shit about (whine) SARAH. I’m a CLINTON SUPPORTER, a PUMA.
Sarah, like McCain, is a useful tool. A four year PLACEHOLDER. Someone who will fill the bill until President Hillary Clinton’s running mate replaces her.
If you want to go cheer on poor Sarah, you’re in the wrong place. She’s a SUBSTITUTE, a pale imitation, while we await the real thing.
And she doesn’t need people like you sobbing for her–she can take care of herself, I’m sure.
If you really want to whine about her, do it on an RNC board, not here.
It’s offensive.
Oh, and sit in your own shit–Charlie is a good guy, a good Democrat, and a staunch Clinton supporter–which makes him OK with me and most people who call themselves PUMAs.
Do you make rambling your profession?
No–that wasn’t a ramble, either. It was right on point.
Do you make WHINING yours? Sure seems that way.
Like I said, you wanna cry about Palin, there’s better places than here to do it.
This site has NOT endorsed the McCain ticket. They simply find it less offensive than the Obama ticket.
I am with you, Clinton Fan
I think you are missing the bigger picture
here. It is not ok to make those type of
remarks about anyone, period. What Charlie
Wrangel said about Sarah Palin was unconscionable whether you like her or not.
This is the typical rhetoric that is being
resorted to by Obama supporters and it simply
should not be tolerated or overlooked. Your
disdain for Sarah Palin should not excuse
Charlie Wrangel in any way. This is selective
morality – which is really no morality.
Clinton is OUT OF THE RACE! That runner is back in the barn! GET OVER IT! She was stabbed in the back YES! But she is OUT OF IT NOW! You want to support obassole, then you are NO PUMA! This is NOT abouot Hillary ANYMORE. DEAL WITH IT!
He’s totally corrupt and is exactly why people don’t think much of politician.
If you don’t live in Harlem, no one gives a shit what you think about the man. Your opinion doesn’t MATTER, see?
His constituents LOVE him. He’s a great leader, an American war hero, and a fantastic politician.
Do you work for Rangel or a member of his family? How can you ignore his words and actions? He’s a crook and is taking his political efforts into the gutter.
Voters in his district may opt to reelect him but that is no reason for the other members of Congress to allow him a seat has chair of the Ways and Means committee. Surely there are a few other more respectalbe legislators around to head that committee with out scrapping the bottom of the barrel by keeping him in the position.
His WORDS were sheer GENIUS.
And the TRUTH.
Palin IS “disabled–politically speaking.”
So is Obama.
I feel no need to defend Palin. Why do you? If you’re an ardent GOP booster, you’re in the wrong place, pal. This site isn’t a Republican site, you know. Notice the pic of Hillary prominently displayed? The one that asks you to help retire her debt? That’s no accident.
The McCain-Palin ticket is slightly “better than” the Obama-Biden ticket, but both tickets SUCK. That’s the truth.
The BEST TICKET was CLINTON-Any Asshole. The DNC decided to cheat the American people out of that ticket. We’ll have to wait four years for it, and the lousy (but not as lousy as Obama/Biden) McCain/Palin ticket will have to do as a SUBSTITUTE. A POOR substitute–until we can elect a decent leader like Hillary Clinton.
BTW, the House has already voted (along party lines, natch) in Rangel’s favor–he stays in his Chairmanship.
And he’ll beat any charges they throw at him–he may get a wrist slap, but nothing beyond that.
Get over it–that dog ain’t hunting.
Charlie has friends who love him, and back him, for a reason–he’s a brilliant politician, a sharp, smart, and decisive legislator who is always on the right side of history, and a loyal, wonderful human being.
Oh, and he’s a good friend to the Clintons.
Charlie’s all right.
I think it was an insult to the disabled, but then again, I don’t expect you to get that.
Like being disabled is a bad thing.
Get an effing clue. It is NOT brilliant. It is more liberal BULL SHIT.
Well, I think you’re completely BLIND to the truth of the entire situation.Now tell me–did I just insult the blind?
Or do I think you’re actually BLIND? That your beady eyes do not work?
Go back to English class, dear, and learn a little bit about METAPHORS, OK?
And get over your faux poutrage.
I’m not buying it.
He’s a crook, deal with it.
Charlie is a turncoat. He forced Hillary into giving her suspension speech because no one, especially Rangel liked the speech Hillary gave the night of the last two primaries. They thought she didn’t say enough. Rangel was on of the go to people who told Obama he should run for president now because later on it would be more ddifficult, in this case words speak louder than actions! And apparently the people in Harlem don’t like Bill very much any more because of the so called racist things he said!
By the way Larry Johnson likes dissenting comments and welcomes all people not matter what their political persuasion is!
I always liked Charlie, but this particular comment was way out of line — disgusting actually. Let’s just call it like it is and not defend people when they do something indefensible, no matter who they are.
This was my first reaction–it was a “wes clark” moment to cause obama shame and to have to apologize. Remember the obots have pressured rangle for not jumping on the obama bandwagon soon enough…so he owes them nothing and knows they won’t come to his defense.
yes it was a vicious unnecessary cut. remember Clark’s unnecessary cut to mccain. all we are seeing right now is strategy and people getting away from obama.
No, it was not vicious, and it was not unneccessary.
It was partisan–but then, Rangel is a DEMOCRAT–he’s not SUPPORTING the GOP ticket, see?
And it was NECESSARY in order to free Rangel from having to stump for Obama.
It was BRILLIANT on Rangel’s part. Flat-out brilliant.
Just as Clark’s comment was EQUALLY brilliant.
Otherwise, Clark would have been stuck fundraising for Obama, something he didn’t want to do EITHER.
There are a lot of obtuse people on this board of late, it would seem.
You do realize this isn’t a PRO-McCain place–it’s simply ANTI-Obama???
Most of us here will tolerate McCain-Palin for four years until Hillary Clinton can run again–but we’re NOT Republicans, and we don’t support most of the McCain-Palin philosophies, and many of us do agree that Palin is about as much of a lightweight as Obama is.
We simply regard McCain-Palin as the LESSER of two evils. That’s something entirely different than CHEERING them on or defending them.
Clinton Fan, I always read your posts with great interest, because they are always intelligent and well written. I hope that you’re right about the reason Rangel made this comment; however, obviously the comment, “You have to be kind to the disabled” is going to be offensive to disabled people. Think about it…its condescending. I don’t know NancyA personally, but I can imagine that she has to put up with quite a lot of crap, one way or another (like getting her VA medical for one–something that I am familiar with). I asked my teenage son what he thought about (he’s mildly handicapped) and his comment was: “those kind of statements aren’t helpful to anyone.”
He pushed RIGHT UP TO THE LINE…and he did it on purpose.
As I’ve said elsewhere, if I call you “ethically blind” I am not insulting the blind, or if I said you were “tone deaf” I am not insulting the deaf…and Rangel very carefully chose his phrasing, so that people would go “Oooooh noooooo…he said something about DISABLED people!!!” but then, he CLEVERLY mitigated the phrase with “POLITICALLY SPEAKING.”
If I call you an EMOTIONAL cripple, I’m not making fun of crippled people, see?
He planned that entire phrasing out. He tossed it like it was a casual remark, but he knew EXACTLY what he was doing.
You don’t spend decades in public life–the man is close to eighty now–without knowing a thing or two. Charlie is SHARP and smart. He’s also an ULTIMATE survivor–he came up when it was tough to be a black man in public life, when the obstacles were high, hard and REAL. Times that most people don’t even remember.
He said what he said for a reason–because it served his purposes in two ways. He made himself a hero to Obama supporters by dissing Palin, AND at the VERY same time he got out of having to fundraise for Obama. That’s GENIUS. That’s a POLITICIAN!!!
I get your point & I hope you’re right about this. The intricacies of political jargon are still somewhat perplexing to me, as I haven’t paid as much attention to elections until the Clintons came along. My husbands job was created as part of a program of Bills, and we are very pro-Clinton ourselves, and like you, would like to see McCain get it this time around, so Hillary can run again ‘12.
I agree with you socalannie. But I have to say that Mr. Rengell’s comment was insensitive to people with handicaps. If what Clinton Fan says is true, that he said it to distance himself from Obama, then I guess I have mixed feelings about that. I would be glad that he moved away from Obama, but disappointed that he chose to insult handicapped people to do it. Seems to me that there would be other ways to distance himself from Obama than insulting the handicapped.
Yes, your thought is similar to the point I was trying to make in my first comment (except you said it better). It is hard sometimes to see the leaders we admire, like Hillary & Bill, have to do or say things we don’t particularly like, in order to keep their standing with the party, but I guess its just one of the strange realities of life.
This has been a very strange and disheartening election year, no? So much for the politics of hope.
Charlie Rangel has been at the FOREFRONT of ADA legislation over the years.
When it comes to people with actual, not POLITICAL, disabilities, he puts his bill sponsoring ass where his trash talking mouth is. He has been a cosponsor of a number of bills to strengthen the capacity of the Americans With Disabilities Act. You can look it up if you don’t believe me.
Rangel is a FRIEND to the TRULY disabled.
He’s just not a friend to the POLITICALLY DISABLED. And why should he be?
Of course, there are none so BLIND as those who will not see….
Any blind people out there INSULTED by that comment?
Thats good to know. I wish he’d craft some legislation to help people like my son, who seem to fall through the cracks of the system. We’ve never gotten any help, financially or otherwise, from the gov. for my sons special physical therapy classes. Not a dime. And we’re not rich either, barely middle class. All my kid has ever gotten is a blue handi placard.
By the way, CF, you seem really hyper tonite. Take some deep breaths. You’re a great defender for your guy, but its not worth having a heart attack or something. We need you to save yourself to fight for Hil in 2012.
So you shouldn’t be insulted when I call him ‘disabled, morally disabled’??? Just wondering.
I really don’t think you have the authority
to speak for all of us. Some of us are McCain
supporters and always considered him a viable
alternative to Hillary. Frankly, Hillary has
lost some of her luster in my view. I am
starting to see her as just another self-serving
politician. I am sure that will send you into
a tailspin as you seem to be loaded with toxic
fumes today.
I believe that some of the outrage here directed at how Palin has been treated is merely a transference of how we felt when Hillary was so disrespected. It’s a feeling of “here we go again” and it doesn’t really matter which woman is the target — it’s a matter of fairness after all, isn’t it?
As far as Rangel is concerned, it does seem bizarre that he wouldn’t know that what he said was offensive but you would think that he also wouldn’t want to offend Pelosi and those who hold his fate in their hands. It’s really a puzzlement if his comment was intentional or not — he’s not a naive guy but overall I don’t think this, as well as other gaffes by that woman in SC, Biden etc. offers a good image of the Democratic Party and could hurt them in the election.
I guess to Charlie Rangel who has been in Washington so long a fresh face with fresh ideas is considered disabled. After all there must be something wrong with a Politician who’s not on the take. Charlie the reality is its your nominee thats disabled. 20 months and he can’t articulate his vision for this country without reading it from a teleprompter. The Titanic Party is going down glub glub glub.
What I didn’t like about Rangel’s comment was that he was offensive using the term ‘disabled.’ And then trying to spin it into a metaphor that she was a ‘disabled politician.’
Gov David Paterson of NYS, a good friend of Charlie along with his dad. Gov Paterson is legally blind. He’s a disabled politician. So what was Charlie trying to say in essence? It’s a bad idea for public figures to be caught as if they are ridiculing the ‘disabled.’
It bothers me that there are no intelligent attacks leveled at Palin. If she’s as inept as they say she is, why can’t they get her on the issues?
Pathetic!
I agree. Notice Rangel’s silence until his tax problems surfaced. Rangel’s been around awhile and doesn’t have a reputation as a back stabber.
So why now? Hw told the press (I watched the video) he couldn’t talk. Yet he turns around and attacks Palin out of the blue. The man isn’t stupid. This was a stupid remark.
“He told the press”.
I have been thinking the same, Clinton Fan. I’ve been looking for info on Bill Gwartney also and absolutely nothing since the write up on his funeral. Shelia Jackson Lee has a primary opponent heavily funded by the DNC and Stephanie Tubbs Jones right before the convention and I wonder if an autopsy was performed. This year has made me paranoid. I like Charlie, but I wish he had stayed away from comments about Palin.
I agree. It appears that his tax troubles etc. began when he refused to jump on the band wagon for BO back in Feb., to try to blunt Hillary’s burgeoning success in the primaries. I have seen elsewhere that he tried to make amends right after June 3 by then insisting that she withdraw — which she did — but apparently that was too little too late, and all this shit was brought down on his head anyway.
The so-called income tax issue is entirely defensible, its not a situation where he would have schemed to defraud the gvt, his explanation is pretty typical, the amount involved is not gigantic by any means, and it looks overblown for political purposes to me.
And don’t forget that we just saw earlier this week the report that the Jewish group that disinvited Palin was apparently threatened by the BO gang with a complaint to the IRS about the legitimacy of their registered tax status, by which I gather that if they maintained the invite to Palin, the dems would have complained that they were acting ‘politically’ in violation of the terms of their registered charitable status.
Also don’t forget the ongoing deluge of troll phone spamming and actual complaints to the Dpt of Justice being used to silence that WGN Chicago radio talk show host who keeps trying to bring facts about BO, Ayers, etc., to public attention.
Make no mistake about it — the BO/Chicago gang are past masters at gaming the system to coerce people to do what they want them to do. Who knows what the pressure on the Clintons are.
This is just one reason we have to vote McC into office, vote downticket BO dems out of office, and vote as many downticket Clinton dems into office this fall. By my reckoning, we have just one chance to get this right before the whole apparatus of the US government becomes the tool of the BO/Chicago gang. As Chicago and now all-Illinois politics have shown, once that happens, there is no turning back. Look, they already have the olympics, when they come to the US again, locked up in their games.
This is serious, guys!
PUMA!!
KAL has it right, we need to see the bigger picture here. Its the BO gang o’ thugs that are the real culprits villains here.
Rangel’s comment isnt very appropriate, but I think we have other fish to fry here.
STOP with the BEATING UP ON CHARLIE RANGEL….please!!!!
He said Disabled–POLITICALLY SPEAKING. It’s like saying ETHICALLY BLIND, or TONE DEAF, or EMOTIONALLY CRIPPLED–to make it an insult, somehow, against “disabled” people is total BULLSHIT and a stretch.
I’ve explained this elsewhere, and I will say it again:
Rangel made an outrageous statement in order to get OFF Obama’s fundraising short list.
Rangel is an extrememly POPULAR and PROLIFIC fundraiser, and Obama wanted to USE HIM, just as he wanted to USE Wes Clark (after disrespecting the man).
What do Wes and Charlie have in common? THEY ARE BOTH CLINTON FANS.
What do they also have in common? They both made RADIOACTIVE REMARKS (this latest one by Rangel, and Wes said being a POW didn’t qualify McCain to be President) that caused them to be rendered USELESS by Team Obama as fundraisers….and in my opinion, they did this DELIBERATELY. Why? They didn’t want to get stuck raising money for that little shit, that’s why.
I come to PRAISE Charlie Rangel–his making that comment ensures he won’t have to raise money for the guy he doesn’t like much….Barack Obama. He’s still raising money for Congressional candidates, though–and selling out the venues, too.
THINK STRATEGICALLY. Look down the road. Step back and see the BIG picture for a change.
And don’t get hyper-offended over stuff that’s bullshit. Charlie Rangel is a GOOD GUY and a staunch supporter of Bill and Hillary Clinton. I’ll defend him to the death.
And you want to talk DISABLED? You look up Charlie’s military record–there isn’t a soul posting on this board who put up with the bitter cold and the brutal conditions Charlie did during the Korean War….he’s a fucking AMERICAN HERO, and he is modest about it, too. Charlie doesn’t have to beg pardon from any vet, not me, not you, not anyone. He sacrificied BIG TIME for this country–and we’d all be well advised to REMEMBER that.
Sheesh. I have no empathy for faux outrage.
Cinton Fan……….who asked for your empathy?
It’s not EMPATHY.
It’s political facts. Nothing more.
Rangel said what he said to make himself TOXIC to Obama, to get himself off the fundraising merry-go-round that Obama has everyone on.
Obama needs money for these stupid ads. Charlie didn’t feel like raising it for him. Best way out of that chore is to make yourself “undesirable” and that is what he cleverly did.
Wes Clark did the same thing.
They’re both Clinton loyalists.
They’re CLOSE, see?
http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/0ejc8EdgQp3eF/610x.jpg
Clinton Fan, No, you misunderstood me—you said “I have no empathy for faux outrage”—that’s what I was responding to. And i feel bad for you that Rangel is a hero of yours…But, I tell you, I think he must have slept next to a giant pea pod recently, because this is NOT the same ol’ Charlie Rangel.
He’s the same Charlie–smart as ever. A champion of Harlem, a chess player when most fools are playing checkers.
He’s not going anywhere. And when Obama loses mightily, a lot of people who stabbed him in the back will come crawling to him, begging his forgiveness.
It’ll be interesting to see.
Charlie will get reelectd, but he was building respect outside of his district to become a national leader. He lot all that in on statement.
How little they learn.
Sorry. My keyboard is clogging.
He Lost all that in One statement.
No he did not lose anything. And WTF are you talking about with that “become” a national leader nonsense? Where have you been all these years? Charlie has been a national leader for DECADES. He’s been Chair of Ways and Means for the past two years, and ranking member long before that. He’s also DCCC chair–with all the attending party clout that goes with that job. He’s one of the most powerful legislators in DC.
The man is almost EIGHTY, you know–he knows he’s at the pinnacle of his career, this is IT for him. And it ain’t bad. Ways and Means is a good gig.
Palin is a Republican. Charlie is a Democrat. It is to be EXPECTED that he would make a partisan comment or two about her–it’s what politicians DO.
What Charlie said is par for the course.
The fact that everyone is hypersensitized to racism and sexism caused some people to blow the remark out of proportion, and get “faux outraged” about it. The actual result of the remark is that it ensures that Charlie is FREED from having to fundraise for Obama.
Charlie didn’t misspeak. He thought about that comment, and he said it DELIBERATELY. He was very careful to make it an “OOOOOOOOOH NOOOOOO” (disabled) comment….that he MITIGATED just a touch with “politically speaking.”
It was an act of sheer GENIUS on his part. Ardent Dems who support Obama will agree with him, and claim that anyone who beats up on him is being unfair, and ardent Republicans will get all huffy and say he was being sexist, or mean, or insulting to disabled people… which he wasn’t, EITHER–the woman IS POLITICALLY DISABLED, as is the lead candidate on the DNC ticket.
How’s Charlie “lose” in this situation? He gets a boost from diehard Dems who see him (falsely) as supporting Obama strongly, AND he gets out of having to fundraise for a candidate he secretly dislikes. Team Obama knows this, too–but there’s nothing they can do about it–because Charlie has them boxed into a corner. See, they really DO need him to help with the downticket races, because some of those have become contests because Obama as party leader is UNINSPIRING.
Charlie’s still fundraising for downticket candidates–he’s just “off the hook” for Obama–and he doesn’t LIKE Obama, so that’s working out GREAT for him.
I can’t help you if you don’t understand how these things work. All I can tell you is that Rangel emerges stronger than ever, and he’s well on his way to getting past this ethical hump that, a short week or so ago, seemed insurmountable.
Go, Charlie, go!!!
Interesting perspective. Still I wonder if Obama would want Rangel to do anything for him since he is so adept and throwing people under the bus when there is any taint about them i.e. the Rangel tax issue.
I’m still not sure about what happened here but your assessment could be correct — Rangel is no dummy. You do have to wonder if that is the case though, why did he get himself embroiled in this tax evasion problem? Go figure…
Interesting perspective from Clinton supporter about Rangel’s intentions. Still I wonder if Obama would want Rangel to do ANYTHING for him right now since he is so adept at throwing people under the bus whenever there is any taint about them i.e. the Rangel tax issue.
I’m still not sure about what happened here but your assessment could be correct — Rangel is no dummy. You do have to wonder if that is the case though, why did he get himself embroiled in this tax evasion problem in the first place? Go figure…
Hey Clinton Fan!
Is Charlie one of Sandy’s Black Brothers who are going to gangrape Palin if she shows up in Manhattan?
That is the problem with some of you Clinton fans lately, you all are so hung up on Hillary that you are now blinded by what is going on.
Some of you are willing to make excuses for everything and everyone once you feel that they have supported Hillary, what Rangel said has offended a lot of people so don’t try and cover for him he was wrong.
I am getting sick and tired of all this excuse making for Hillary and those around her some of you are so willing to make excuses for her that you are willing to vote Obama just to support Hillary and in your hearts you know that is wrong also.
Time to wake up and stop looking at life as what will be good for Hillary, think for yourselves for a change
I think of my children.
Obama is like the flu.
You seem to have taken a wrong turn.
The majority of people here at NQ do not support Obama. They supported Clinton, they will TOLERATE (I repeat, TOLERATE) McCain as a placeholder for four years.
We don’t think his ideas are great, or his view, either–we simply see him as “more competent” than Obama.
Charlie Rangel dissing Sarah Palin is no skin off my nose. If you’re so fucking upset, cry about it at the RNC blogs.
I support Hillary Clinton for President in four years, and if I have to support a “less evil” GOP ticket to make that happen, I will do it–but don’t fucking expect me to become a Yeee Haw Sarah booster or a McCain advocate. What the RNC ticket is, is simply SLIGHTLY BETTER than Obama, and easy to beat in four years by a Clinton-ANYONE ticket.
Charlie was RIGHT. Palin is politically disabled. So is Obama, though.
At least the GOP’s weakest candidate is at the bottom, not the top of the ticket.
Why is this news? Why is the truth so fucking offensive?
Charlie’s a genius–he spoke the truth, and got out of having to fundraise for the shitty Democratic nominee–with just three (disabled–politicallly speaking) pithy words!
Right on, Charlie!
Right on!!!
I suggest you not attempt to speak for the people at NQ as to whom they do or don’t support! Rangel was out of line & IF he had to speak negative of Palin to appease bo then he really does have a problem; a lack of honesty. You have the right to follow Hillary to the grave BUT facts show that Sarah will possibly be better than Hillary by the time she is Hills age! She has GUTS & common sense.
All I am doing, Mary Dear, is QUOTING THE SITE OWNER, who has said this site is NOT a McCain Supporting site. He was and is, like me, a staunch and devoted Clinton supporter.
So maybe you shouldn’t tell me what I can and can’t say either, OK? Hmmmmm? You’d be better off if you didn’t.
And sorry, Mary Dear, Sarah will always have those batshit crazy ideas, like being proactively anti-choice and a bit lame on the global warming questions and a bit too religious for the mainstream…but see, I “get” what the Executive Branch can, and cannot do, and I can HOLD MY NOSE for four years and exhort a Democratic Congress to do their job. I also get WHY McCain picked her–to satisfy fundy-crazy types and to stick a knife in Obama for being a sexist asshole. It was a clever pick for those reasons, but let’s not make Sarah into more than she is–a politician who is ABOUT AS EXPERIENCED AS OBAMA. Nothing MORE. She IS, like Obama, POLITICALLY DISABLED. Too bad if you don’t like that truth.
If you think that Sarah Palin, in a hundred years, would be fit to shine Clinton’s shoes, I think you’re in the wrong place, Mary Dear. Hillary Clinton is a brilliant leader and a consummate politician–Sarah Palin is simply a stick in Obama’s eye.
All that said, McCain/Palin will have to do until we can elect Clinton/Anyone in four years’ time. Because that IS, like it or not, the goal here.
Back you 100% ClintonFan
Me too Clinton fan, 100% behind you.
Charlie got attacked by the ob forces because he stood up for Hillary. His remark was blown way out of proportion by the Palin devotees.
I’m voting for them but I’m not going to smear a good man like Charlie with lies even if he (like Hillary) is forced to climb on the ob band wagon.
I work with the mentally handicapped and I cringe when the word “retard” is used.
Sarah and Todd understand the mixed blessings special needs humans bring.
obama used the term “mentally deranged” many times when talking about Gun control. He finally stopped when he was told repeatedly it was a terrible slur.
Charlie was talking about POLITICALLY not physically or mentally.
Thanks Clinton fan for standing up.
Supporting Clinton is one thing, but advocating offensive language and apologizing for convicted crooks because they somehow help or help your cause is beyond stupid. I think you are being offensive and promoting the unpromoteable. Again, I ask you, are you a member of Rangel’s staff, family, or paid propagandist for him as you seem so intent, beyond reason, to support him. Rangel made a statement that is beyond the pale in any conversation, especially in a political one–and said about another party or to create distance is not mitigating, put pathetic apologism. Rangel also cheated on his taxes, he abused his congressional position, and much more. Do you want the shopping list of what makes him a crook and dispicable member of congress. I’ll be happy to ablige. Bottom line is that no one is above reproach, no one is above the law. Clinton is not helped by his words and criminal actions. She doesn’t need his support, vote, or baggage. She is, or at least I think she is, a bit smarter, sensitive, and classier.
Yessir, I would like to see that list.
“Obamagate”*
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0qomPp_Y9Ps
*which I will not post inordinately.
What I think we are seeing here is a new variety of the old troll. They have come in here acting one way but wrecking havoc.
Rangel may well be a good man. Something caused his tax problems. Him or is it the DNC going after him as a payback? The timing is suspicious. I too question the deaths of those delegates.
Something is going on with regards to the Clintons. Either the promise to Bill Clinton to head the UN or some kind of threat? Do I think they detest Barack Obama? Yes, yes I do.
Maybe Hillary should have renounced the Democratic party and become a Republican or an Independent. It is not the Democratic party I knew.
PUMA
McCain/Palin
Please dont compare Hillary and Palin. Its a game that the media would love for PUMA’s to get side-tracked on. Many of us do support the McCain/Palin ticket. I am because if Obama gets the nod we are all in deep shit.
Palin is basically a staunch Conservative and Hillary has 30 years wrapped up in the Democratic Party, there really isnt a comparison.
What bothers many of us is the media and the Obama thug patrol going after Palin just as they did to Hillary. It still doesnt sit well with many feminists, women or men.
But many of us would rather be voting for Hillary and will do so in 2012 if there is an option.
You do not speak for me. I am supporting
McCain because I like him. I did support
Hillary and even caucused for her but it
is time to move on. She will be to old to
run again ,our society does not like old
women, or haven’t you noticed
If HRC would be too old, then the same logic could be applied to McCain today. He isn’t–and she won’t be. I am voting for McCain because he is the best second choice. The first was HRC, of course. I look forward to voting for her in 2012.
I love Hillary too but that doesn’t blind me to the fact that Rangel is an *sshole.
I’m with you on this one too Vinnie.
Stop insulting people on this blog Clinton Fan and get off your high horse.
I gave Hillary the max but right now I am not pleased as to how she is going overboard in campaigning for Obama. She is committing political suicide becauase WITH HER EFFORTS she is turning people towards Obama and then what will happen??? Can you answer that? Do you really think she will have a political future if she turns enough people towards Obama?
NO, because then Obama will be in for two terms.
You can scream all you want Clinton Fan but don’t tell me to shut up because I am not at Daily Kos. I voice my opinions here just as you do and you need to stop insulting people because they are voicing their opinions. That’s what NQ is for.
Well that is an interesting take – makes sense, but maybe not. He risked his own political career? Let me ponder on it for a while.
If he was not worried about damagind his career couldn’the have just said, “bleep” you Obama, you are a sham and I will not support you.
I don’t know maybe not since he is black.
Can’t wait to vote of McCain!
ooh- sorry for the typos.
Ok – I thought about it. And as we say here in Texas, No way Jose! NO pass. He is a thief, a con artist and abused his power. Bah-Bye – gotta go. Reform.
McCain/Palin
I am missing Hillary anyone else?
Me, Eastan, all of us.
clinton fan – what happened in south carolina when bill clinton said ‘fairy tale’?
just a thought.
Fairytale was cut, edited and taken out of context. batzilla jumped on that like stink on poop and declared what Clinton was really saying.
We all heard Bill. He was saying the BO giving a speech about being against the war when he had no responcibility or vote I might ad, was a fairytale. BIG DIFFERENCE!
You don’t see Bill leading any fundraising charges for Obama, either, do you?
And he’s HAPPIER not having to….
As is Charlie…and Wes.
I sense a distinct lack of enthusiasm for Obama on the Clinton’s part (particularly Bill). Their comments are never personal praises about him but rather generic “we need change” pleas etc.
I believe that they clearly see through Obama and really DO NOT LIKE him one bit as they subtly damn him with faint praise much of the time.
Save it. Rangel and all the others who take a cheap shot at McCain or Palin know exactly what they are doing when they do it. They take their que from Obama who thinks he sly and cute when he does it. All it does is secure the base for McCain and Palin pulling independents, and respectful democrats to McCain’s side. The classless and nasty remarks are made for two reasons. 1. The democrats are scared of McCain/Palin and as an act of survival they attack. 2. Beyond the experience issue (which Obama can relate) there is not much else to pick on. The nasty democrats are only screwing themselves with these attacks. Bring um on. McCain if anything can put up a good fight.
They don’t take their “cue” from Obama.
He said that to GET OUT OF having to FUNDRAISE for Obama.
Sheesh….
Democrats are voting for McCain/Palin as an act of REVENGE, some of them. Others have made a tactical decision to vote for the GOP in order obtain an eventual strategic advantage , because that ticket will be easy to knock out in four years, while it would be next to impossible to challenge an Obama ticket (remember what happened when Ted Kennedy challenged Jimmy Carter? That was UGLY….).
If you think the crossover Dems are in love with McCain/Palin, you’re fucking nuts.
They aren’t. They simply find the ticket slightly less awful than Obama/Biden, and easier to knock out in four years.
Ergo, don’t oversell the Hockey Mom. No Democrat or moderate independent is buying it.
Personally, I’ve done much research on McCain’s past and background and have come up with much to admire. Most particularly, he has proven prescient on a number of issues way ahead of the event beginning with his
pleas for Reagan not to make soldier’s sitting ducks in Beirut,
warning about Fannie and Freddie in 2005 by trying to pass a bill that would have headed off that disaster,
seeing that Petreaus would be the man to make the surge work,
calling for the resignation of Rumsfield early on etc.
The man has a lot on the ball and as a former Hillary supporter, I’ve gotten enthused about him despite early misgivings.
As for Palin, despite the fact that she is more right wing than what I would prefer, apparently her previous tenures have shown her to be more of a pragmatist than a ideologue. She also projects a lot of energy, seems like someone who can roll with the punches, appears to be a happy person and I have also grown fond of her.
So you can certainly speak for yourself, but we don’t all fall into your category.
They don’t take their “cue” from Obama.
He said that to GET OUT OF having to FUNDRAISE for Obama.
Sheesh….
Democrats are voting for McCain/Palin as an act of REVENGE, some of them. Others have made a tactical decision to vote for the GOP in order obtain an eventual strategic advantage , because that ticket will be easy to knock out in four years, while it would be next to impossible to challenge an Obama ticket (remember what happened when Ted Kennedy challenged Jimmy Carter? That was UGLY….).
If you think the crossover Dems are in love with McCain/Palin, you’re fucking nuts.
They aren’t. They simply find the ticket slightly less awful than Obama/Biden, and easier to knock out in four years.
Ergo, don’t oversell the Hockey Mom. No Democrat or moderate independent is buying it.
They don’t take their “cue” from Obama.
He said that to GET OUT OF having to FUNDRAISE for Obama.
Sheesh….
Democrats are voting for McCain/Palin as an act of REVENGE, some of them. Others have made a tactical decision to vote for the GOP in order obtain an eventual strategic advantage , because that ticket will be easy to knock out in four years, while it would be next to impossible to challenge an Obama ticket (remember what happened when Ted Kennedy challenged Jimmy Carter? That was UGLY….).
If you think the crossover Dems are in love with McCain/Palin, you’re fucking nuts.
They aren’t. They simply find the ticket slightly less awful than Obama/Biden, and easier to knock out in four years.
Ergo, don’t oversell the Hockey Mom. No Democrat or moderate independent is buying it.
I will say it again..
I don’t care about his history or his heart.
He tried to take Sarah down a notch by attacking her personally. That is the lowest level of politics.
Obama has inspired the worst in all of his followers and it will only get more vile as the season progresses.
I do not and will not forgive the old stink pot mouth man from New York.
He can just sit in his shit.
He said it. He can’t clean it up.
I won’t trash Rangel or Biden; they are forced to walk the Pelosi/Axelrod/Dean Obama Walk, just like Hillary. That said, I’m voting proudly for McCain, 2008, with my eye on the Hillary, 2012, prize.
Bull Shit! Nobody forced them. They ate the campaign money and spit forth the puke. They have no right to continue to exist in politics.
they are forced to walk the Pelosi/Axelrod/Dean Obama Walk, just like Hillary.
Was he wearing an orange tie when he said it?
/snark
Clinton Fan — Disabled is not a phrase anyone should use against Sarah Palin. Unlike your faux outrage — I have real outrage. This is more of the same from the party of women’s rights. They stink of flop sweat. Their real rage is against Obama. Well the Dems bet all their money on the wrong horse. Bill Clinton could say this woman is terrific–cause its the truth. Rangel is no Bill Clinton.
Thank you. A vet.
Clinton Fan,
It was a very inept way to make the point. The word ‘disabled’ is not a word that you want to throw around casually. And as a dear friend of Gov David Paterson and his father he should know better.
He chose his words poorly. As are many Democrats when it comes to Sarah Palin who they claim is not up for the job.
It’s on them to prove that. But they are making mistakes and proving the opposite.
I live in Rangel’s district. He’s not getting my vote this year. I’m sick of the ineptness of the Democrats.
disabled was a terrible choice of words..
Terrible for disabled people all over.
and should not be used to slight Sarah Palin…
However look at it another way this could be his way of really not helping obama with votes knowing it would push people off the fence and vote McCain & Palin….
If he’s so secure in his position and being a true Hillary supporter he may helping the PUMA cause for 4 years!
Just a different view.
You may not be voting for Rangel, but he’ll be repping you nonetheless. He will win his seat again in a landslide. And you won’t be part of it, and no one will care about your vote one way or the other.
Rangel is one of the BEST POLITICIANS in the House, and frankly, you’re lucky to have him–if you even do actually live in his district, which, somehow, I doubt. He is probably one of the most effective of all the legislators in the House, in terms of what he brings to the table for his district, AND for the entire nation.
The fact that you don’t want to vote for him tells me all I need know about you. And what I know does not flatter you.
Tell me, if I call you politically BLIND, does that mean I’m “insulting” blind people? Or that I think that your eyes aren’t working??
Hmmmm?
I can do without the fake “poutrage” over the disabled comment. I don’t buy it, in any event. Rangel clearly mitigated his remark, but you choose not to hear him, because you have a different agenda. Fine. I’m a PUMA–my agenda is the same as the agenda of the siteowners here.
Clinton 2012.
We’ll tolerate Popeye and Moose until then!
excuse me Clinton Fan I was actually aggreeing with you stating Rangel was being in a sense very clever with his words… go back and read… hmmmmmm
Slow down you seem to be angry at any remark related to this post….
I think he was very clever in helping the PUMAS in the coming 4 years…. Thanks!
Like you stated he got off fundrasing for Obama my view was he also helped the Pumas by allowing more on the fence to vote McCain/Palin
Which is what were looking for right?
And what I know does not flatter you.
by the way you have not flattered yourself here either this evening.
I really don’t care what you think of me, shooting from the hip without reading and thinking first does not flatter u.
I see what you’re saying. People do need to take into consideration that politicians, the good ones who want to keep working for the people, need to live to fight another day. Going into open war with your own party isn’t the way. Unless you’re like Liebermann, who has enough credentials and experience, as well as suffered being betrayed by the party, to not give a damn. Regardless, I see your point Clinton Fan, and also share your view of the Repubs “holding” Hillary’s spot until 2012. In the manner in which you explain the tactical aspects of his remarks, I do agree. And yes, while “disabled” is a controversial buzzword, but “disabled politically” is like “emotionally crippled” “done deaf” and all other likenesses.
What do you know about serving? Don’t tell me about serving in the cold! What’s more every time I stepped foot off my ship(s) in the 80s my life was in danger. Ask the Navy Seal who was killed onboard a civilian aircraft. Ask the men like my husband who were serving onboard the USS Saratoga when the Achille Lauro hijackers were captured. Ask the USO workers about the bomb that went off in their building….. The terrorists back then ran afoul of the law constantly. They were allowed to operate under the watchful eye of governments with little to stop them, we at war everyday without it being declared by the US, instead it was declared by the terrorists! I remember a particular hangout for the Navy people in Italy….quite often nights when we were there the small alleyway the place was located in was under the watchful eye of the carabinieri! I was a hero and a trailblazer….I received one of the highest personal awards that I directly affected in my actions and words, that was my Surface Warfare qualification.
Anyone who served no matter how long they served nor when they served are heroes or heroines. And noone’s service means any more than the next man or woman.
Thank you for your service. God Bless you.
Double-standard… suppose Obama was actually disabled, Hillary was his VP, and a Republican made the same statement about her. HMMMM, BBQ Republican good!
It is disgusting, but I just love to see the effect. The more they stick their feet in their mouths, the more disgusted people get with them, which means more votes against the inept, charlatan and impostor–Obama.
amirosa — Wonder how many of them are saying they should have stuck with Hillary.
Hey so is this like an open thread or are we supposed to do as Hampster say and stay on topic here in the comments section.
The reason I ask is because there isn’t really much to discuss.
The woman claiming to be a disabled vet wants an apology from a man because he used the word when not referencing her in any way what so ever.
Should we be using this thread to ask how you think you deserve anything from someone that doesn’t even know, won’t know, you have asked for something from him?
If this is an open thread can we talk about the daily kos tracking poll and the gallup tracking poll?
Obama breaks 50 baby. Woo Hoo.
daily kos tracking poll?
Bwahahahahaha – no wait really, seriously. You think they are for real? Daily koolaide is more like it. Step right up the new flavor is – Oh I don’t care you pick.
ok if you think the research2000/Dkos poll is bogus lets talk gallup.
50% baby woohooo
I never talk to trolls.
But this is late night and you just poked a stick in the eye of one of my best friends.
I do not think that you have any place on this planet that you have improved as much as Nancy A has with her service to her country.
Walk softly and be nice.
If ee wasn’t offensive it would have no personality at all.
**********************************************
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!TROLL ALERT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
***********************************************
It’s one of the STUPID ONES, too!!!!
DAILY KOS Tracking Poll….Bwahahahahahahaha!!!!!
Gee, the DISNEY Tracking Poll has Mickey Mouse cracking fifty percent!!!!! Why, he must be a shoe-in!!!!!!
I thought I was paying attention.
Good catch.
Yup. Real math. Like counting beer bottles after a frat party.
Clinton Fan,
para ti’
When you Wish Upon a Star;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58hiNEwgtjY
Teakwood—-I LOVE that recording..Thanks .
Who’s singing it?
MJ? Maybe?
I think this troll was around a couple of weeks ago, saying some really vile things to some of us. We need to ignore it.
I am a disabled veteran, I have been for 8 years. There are those who know me that have seen my military id card that states it on the face of it. I want all disabled people to get an apology not just me!
I am also a fairly well known veteran’s advocate! And I don’t advocate for me I advocate for other veterans who have problems within the scope of the VA medical system! One of the local newspaper reporter calls me when there is another veterans story because I am the go to veteran!
It could not happen quick enough, they have become the Psychotic Party. Obama has enough money to buy some land in Guyana — send them there and let history repeat itself.
Cheack out Fox News, a college professor, assigned his kids an antipalin assignment, and when five chilren experess disdain he allowed their class mates to curse them out.
http://www.foxnews.com/video2/video08.html?maven_referralObject=3102123&maven_referralPlaylistId=&sRevUrl=http://www.foxnews.com/
Obama and his followers are crazy as hell.
Jeebus! And like the student said, this is happening on college campuses (and out on the streets and everywhere) all over America.
Unfortunately, the only even acknowledging it is Fox.
yup – liberal, enlightened education.
after the duke Lacrosse foolishness. people are going to start taking a really hard look at liberal professors.
after the duke Lacrosse foolishness. people are going to start taking a really hard look at liberal professors.
Four of Obama’s top 20 contributors are universities. Where is your education money going?
Including the 4 where Ayers is a professor? And, if Ayers hates America so bad, where’d he get the money for all his education? Who footed the bill?
This is DEAD WRONG!!! Wrong no matter which side of the political fence anyone stands on. That a’hole of a ‘professor’ needs to be fired. And if this is indeed happening all over…gods help us.
Rangel should be stripped of his committee chairmanship and if Pelosi won’t do it, then she should be removed as well. In fact, Rangel has lost all credibility and should resign. He’s cheated on taxes, he’s shown himself to be offensive in a way that is or should be repugnant to everyone. I don’t care what folks may claim he’s done in the past, his actions now disqualify and discredit him, just as Rev. Wright’s past military service was no free ticket to since be a racist, hate-filled preacher.
I live in New York, but unfortunately not in Rangel’s district. Given the opportunity, I’d vote against him and anyone that defends his continued role in Congress as a convicted tax cheat. He’s representative of what is wrong with so many politicians who think they are above the law. They are not.
Striped?
Draw and quarter the bastard.
Fuck him and all the good he has ever done.
He besmirched the WonderCon Princess.
Off with his head.
Hey matt, can I call you matt? Anyway. The thing about ‘outrage’ is you need to show you aren’t a raging hypocrite before anyone gives a dam.
You can him a convicted tax cheat that deserves no offices.
How many other elected officials do you think your standard should apply to?
Do you have a record of aplying it equally you care to link to?
Look, Rangel has shown lack of character by his words and actions–offensive comments about Palin, his tax cheating, and more (if you read the recent news, he’s sorry history of words and actions is getting an airing and it’s not pretty). He is not unique in this and just because he supported Clinton, just because he’s a Democrat, is no reason to not hold him to some minimal level of expectation. Otherwise, and I think this is a big problem of both parties, is that they protect each other and rail at the opposing party for things their own members do.
Rangel needs to go, and soon. Retire and spend more time with his family at his island home.
Eh, and the horse you rode in on.
Charlie is a good guy. He’s a total PUMA.
Move to Harlem and vote against him, if you’d like–you’ll be the only one so doing.
You might want to look at the House vote–it didn’t go your way. Charlie stays at Ways and Means, and that’s where he belongs–he’s a great American, and a war hero to boot–his only crime is that he preferred Hillary.
And how many Democrats will stand to lose for the likes of Rangel? It is absurd and pathetic to give him a ‘get out of jail free’ card because he supported Clinton. Clinton supporters–at least the ones I know and respect–are not a lock-step cult following. Rangel is an offensive, crooked politician. Clinton doesn’t need his support, nor the baggage.
matthew weaver — Charlie is the one who told Hillary to get out of the race. Thats really loyal support, isn’t it. The only ones with any class in the Democratic Party now are Bill and Hillary Clinton.
Yes, he did, didn’t he. What a ‘good’ friend he turned out to be for Clinton.
WTF are you talking about? Charlie Rangel represents HIS DISTRICT–Harlem. They love him, they will return him to his seat.
Charlie is helping other Dems WIN their seats–he is a hugely popular fundraiser, and he’s going to continue to fundraise for downticket Dems. His little “remark” simply ensured that he doesn’t HAVE TO campaign for OBAMA now…something he really didn’t want to do, ANYWAY. NO ONE wants to–they’re being forced to, though, and they’re not too enthusiastic, and it shows.
He’s not representing YOUR ASS, unless you’re living uptown, so get over yourself.
And he’ll keep his chairmanship, because he’s GOOD AT WHAT HE DOES. And too bad if you don’t like that, either.
Charlie Rangel is a great guy–he requested that investigation of himself, and if he’s found to have done anything wrong, he’ll make it right.
You might want to have a look at some of the recent ethical lapses in Congress before you get too harsh on Charlie. His errors look like someone who took an extra napkin in the lunch line, compared to some of his GOP peers’ shenanigans.
Oh, and the Clintons VALUE Charlie’s friendship–because he’s a stand-up guy, a loyal and true friend, and a smart politician. And too bad if you don’t like that, as well….it’s just the way it is.
Gee, mommy, everyone else is doing it, why can’t I?!
Sorry, that BS doesn’t work. Rangel is a convicted crook with offensive views and mouth. Apologizing for him because others have problems is pathetic and destructive.
Worse, making excuses for Rangel suggests you don’t find his criminal activities wrong and that you support his offensive views and words.
Again, shame on his district if the reelect him and shame on the Democrats if they allow him to keep his committee chairmanship.
ditto
I hate to start sounding like my mother’s generation, but is Charlie on drugs?? He has gone around the bend….and apparently he’s a crook, too, just for good measure.
These guys are making it easier everyday to vote Republican.
Speaking of bald faced lies, where is the “whitey tape?”
oh look, it’s on repeat mode.
kick it, that’s what works when most things get stuck
You remember. The TV guy used to hit it on the side.
Hi Friends,
The hopium is going crazy.
The Polls are going the wrong way.
Please look at the “Plans” of Obama and McCain and really understand that Obama will kill the ecomony.
The fundamentals are sound.
Unemployment is still very low. 6.5 million is only 1.5 million short of what is considered fully employed.
Interest rates are low.
There is slow but steady growth (very small)
Inflation is still at historic low rates.
Please help McCain to save us from Barky the Wunderturd.
If Clinton is to have any chance McCain has to win on November 4th.
Obama has managed to infect the democratic party with ‘foot and mouth’ disease, and its getting worse. And he chose a VP nominee who has been a long time carrier of the disease.
benny this is what happens when you give the DNC to an empty suit and allow Obama people to completely take over. The party who had respect for its constituancies becomes a part of the dirty Chicago style politics which Obama embraces.
Back to Nancy’s story.
Obama’s backers lack moral compass. They are shooting in the dark and I do not like anything they are saying.
These are the people I defended in 2004, and now they are sounding like total idiots.
What the hell is going on?
They know that when McCain gets elected they will be voted out of office because they will not be able to bring anymore money back to the people who fund their elections. I guess that is what the earmarks are really for.
Smith. You are right.
obama doesn’t care he uses people and dumps them, the man is a straight up anti social. Hell I even think he’s using michelle. I don’t think she would act the way she does if she wasn’t with him. I think obama always had grand ambitions and a black successful woman beside him is just the thing he needs when manuvering in the black community. and michelle is as happy as a kid in a candy store, cause it’s hard as hell for professional black women to find professional black matles. most of them are either with white women or gay. So trust me, she thanks her lucky stars for obama, and would do anything to keep him. I rather be alone than pander to a man ego, but not all women are like that.
I know what’s going on.
They are being led by a trash talking punk!
He is setting the stage for this garbage.
He started it in Iowa with 99.
Who in the hell would have ever thought that a person running for the President of the United States of America would have a song that called one of his opponents BITCH played at a campaign rally?
This coke head, Obama, is causing all this hate.
agust 304 — I don’t know this Democratic Party. I’m glad I left. You’re right Obama is causing the hate.
Thanks for agreeing. I wish it were not so.
All these people are grown up. They can’t blame anybody but them self.
True, but that doesn’t make them any less pathetic and bamboozled. Some of these people might be saying dumb stuff, cause whne they are bad liars.
The Obama Hopey Theme Song:
This is funny…..
(Sept. 20) “Biden Says Obama Won’t Take His Beretta” (ABC News)
“I guarantee you Barack Obama ain’t taking my shotguns, so don’t buy that malarkey,” Biden said Saturday at the United Mine Workers of America’s annual fish fry in Castlewood, Virginia. “Don’t buy that malarkey. They’re going to start peddling that to you.”
Biden told the crowd that he himself is a gun owner. “I got two,” Biden said, “if he tries to fool with my Beretta, he’s got a problem. I like that little over and under, you know? I’m not bad with it. So give me a break. Give me a break.”
Biden conveniently ignores that Obama has supported a total ban on manufacture and ownership of guns. He’s lied about it, as well. He criticized people for their ownership of guns. Does Biden think he can cover this over?
OK. An over and under is a 14 gauge shotgun on the bottom and a 22 rifle on top.
What is this fool talking about?
For those of you who do not hunt it is a rabbit gun.
A rabbit gun? Well, Joe Biden does resemble Elmer Fudd.
weah hunting wabbits.
http://i165.photobucket.com/albums/u66/FYIAgain/elmer_fudd.jpg
Josh Howard, a forward for the NBA’s Dallas Mavericks, disrespected the National Anthem while invoking Barack Obama. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Opo2rPF_Fg4
When the national anthem is being sung, various participants are shown mugging for the camera. When the camera gets to Howard, he says: “The Star-Spangled Banner is going on. I don’t celebrate this shit. I’m black.”
Howard finishes his unpatriotic comment that references Barack Obama, “Obama all that shit”.
Is it fair to tie Obama to this? Well, consider the following.
Whether or not you believe Obama is patriotic, there are those like Howard, who are willing to imitate what they perceive as Obama’s example. And, Obama’s example inspires disrespect for the National Anthem.
Is that the kind of inspiration we value in a President?
Obama and his campaign, will state that they do not support nor condone the comments by Howard. But, that is irrelevant to the admission by Howard that Obama’s inspired his disrespectful comments.
“Whether or not you believe Obama is patriotic, there are those like Howard, who are willing to imitate what they perceive as Obama’s example.”
AGREED.
No matter how you spin this, it was a slam of the disabled.
Dems Threaten Anti-Iran Rally Organizers With IRS Attack if They Let Palin Speak
By Warner Todd Huston | September 21, 2008 http://www.newsbusters.org
News has emerged that the organizers of that anti-Iran rally that famously got snarled up in Senator Hillary Clinton’s ire at Governor Sarah Palin last week were threatened by New York Democrats with IRS action against their tax-exempt status if they allowed Palin to speak. CBS local NY news reported this little fact and so did NBC but most of the national news has ignored this outrageous threat to use the IRS to silence Governor Palin.
Accusing New York Democrats of using “McCarthyism” to shut Palin down, Democrat Assemblyman Dov Hikind was flabbergasted by the behind the scenes threats against the rally organizers. “It’s an absolute shame that this has happened,” CBS quoted Hikind as saying. “To threaten organizations … to threaten the Conference of Presidents that if you don’t withdraw the invitation to Gov. Palin we’re going to look into your tax exempt status … that’s McCarthyism.”
Free speech won’t be under Obama.
At a rally in Florida this weekend, Barack sang “I’m every woman.” When will we get to see him in a dress? He probably takes a size 1.
Barack is terrified that Sarah Palin is gonna mistake Michelle for a moose.
Biden’s best gaffe (on YouTube) was in Missouri when he told a man in a wheelchair “Stand up, Chuck. Stand up.” Unfortunatly, the Obamessiah was not there to lay on hands.
Just say no to Obama Bin Biden.
Joe Biden and Obama are both rated F by the NRA which will be spending $40 million to defeat them.
If Barack shoots a gun like he bowls, he better not go to a firing range. Maybe his distant Cousin Darth Cheney could give Obama a shooting lesson.
How bout this for an October surprise…………….
Stop your fightin and see what you can verify about the details about how Biden is goin to get ill with so Hillary can step in as VP within the next 2 weeks.
What say you NOQuarters?
Lets keep the faith!
We can still rock with Palen, but we can also hope for Hillary too because she is just fakin her support for Obama to get through this shit.
I personally do not want Hillary anywhere near that disaster known as Obamasoretoro. He’s toxic.
Again, I’m gonna write here that we who are oppossing the “new coalition” that has taken over the Democratic party need to keep a few things in mind, such as seeing the bigger picture. Politicians, like the Clintons, Clark and Rangle, are going to have to stay loyal throughout this process. Some will try and distance themselves by rendering their usability to nill. They must live to fight another day. Going to open war with their own party is merely going to weed out the strongest advocates of the principles that represent us. Those of us that blog on pro-Clinton sites, we moderate Democrats (or whatever term you prefer), have the luxury and the responsability of saying what needs to be said in the most straightforward of speech without any fear of repercussion (save the casual criticism of trolls, which only strengthens our resolve).
Also, while we are fortunate that the Repubs nominated someone who will do as a substitue, McCain and Palin (I could never get behind a Huckabee ticket, or even Romney – I would have voted green party in that case), it is a substitute. We are preparing for Hillary in 2012, or if she shouldn’t run again (I hope this isn’t the case, but just saying) then someone who caries on her message.
Keep the perspective correct. I personally do respect McCain for going against his party to have Rumsfeld removed, as well as his understanding of military and foreign affairs. However, in many aspects I do not share his views, which is why I was a Democrat, until being pushed out to the bounds of “left leaning Independent” from this election process. I, however, intend to take my party back, and wage war like never before against the far left loonies and Chicago Dems that have created their coup in the Democratic camp. To do that, we will need good politicians to vote for, to represent us. They will need to weather through this election.
Does anyone else remember the 400 pound protester at the RNC who was on camera saying, “I’m tired of waking up and not knowing what I’m going to feed my children.”
True…lol…the delusional come in all forms.
I know this is a stale thread at this point but I am absolutely dismayed at the cluesless veracity and remarks supporting Rangel. Rangel is a convicted tax cheat–and he’s in charge of the Ways & Means committee of all things and supposed to be the leading expert on taxes, he also took an interest free loan that may be of questionable circumstances, he’s abused New York’s riculous rent stabilization laws, on at least four instances, intended for people of limited means–one apparently for a campaign office, and one has to wonder about his car just towed from the congressional parking lot in DC. Parked there without valid registration and plates for over four years–another instance of cheating on taxes, plus ignoring house rules as if he’s above the law. He may have done some good things, but they do not put him above the law, nor beyond approach. That he now makes a patently offensive comment only deepens his discredit. Beyond the stupidity of some folks to defend him, I’ve got to wonder if he really thinks that this helps Obama, gives him distance from Obama, helps himself, or Clinton. It does none of the above. It shows him to simply be an embarrassment to not only the Democratic party, but to Congress and the country. He has no place in congress–just as others in similar circumstances have no place in congress. It is a shame that congressional Democrats sided with him and that Pelosi is so spineless to not remove him from his committee chair.
It seems to me that clinton fan doth protest too much!
She appears to be showing her true colors by following the Obama edict of “get in their face” by using Rangle as a stalking horse and following the MSM tactic of taking over the conversation of this blog to covertly shill for Obama. She herself claims that the McCain/Palin ticket is better that Obama but takes a position that would not help to defeat the inferior ticket. So she helps that inferior ticket by either default or design. If you truly wish to see Hillary become the President of this great country how is that best achieved by helping Obama or working for his defeat. The election we have to deal with is the one we have in front of us now in 2008 Not the one you want in 2012. So I would think that the intelligent thing to do to support your convictions is to support the best ticket we have to vote on now in 2008, by you own admission McCain/Palin, unless you have a hidden agenda for to do anything else would against your own best interest!
Here is a “Foot in Mouth”, that I have never seen aired, I was surprised to find it, as well as not surprised the msm never released this.
http://www.redstate.com/diaries/parep/2008/sep/20/obama-is-going-to-have-to-explain-this-video/
What’s with the accent?
He reverts into a different speech pattern, depending on who he is speaking to. This was a group of ministers, etc. I thought he sounded a bit like one there as well, or an effort to, that staccato, over enunciated for emphasis type of speaking.
I’m fed up with people being able to insult everyone in this country except The One. If I say I don’t like his suit, then it’s deemed to be racial. Bobo’s supporters have dissed Italians, the Irish, women, hillbillies, fundamentalist Christians, and white people in general. He and his wife have talked down to black folk and chosen a veep who implied blatantly racist sentiments. I assume Rangel’s dig at Palin had to do with her being an Evangelical who believes in the creation of the world by God (like almost everyone else on the planet, by the way!) If she had simply responded with some remark about him being a big-city pol, people far and wide would be howling racism! (They complained that the term “community organizer” implied it!) The majority of people in this country are tired of having to walk on eggshells when criticizing minorities and having to absorb all the racist, ethnicist attacks that come their way!
Nancy, I agree that remarks like these are unnecessary, and yes inflamatory!
My family were ENRAGED by Rush’s mockery of Michael Fox…we have lost two family members to Parkinsons and a nephew was diagnosed at age 40. These people worked at whatever they could until weeks before their deaths!
Additionally, as I mentioned before, a dear brother-in-law is dying now at age 86. As a victim of polio at age 3, he has spent his entire life in heavy braces and on crutches. He could have spent a lifetime on disability, but chose to become a home builder, and worked until 3 years ago, until my sister had a stroke!
She can no longer even dial a telephone!
Anyone looking to make an enemy?
I’m easy to find!
Hey ‘clintonfan’…
Clinton is OUT OF THE RACE! That runner is back in the barn! GET OVER IT! She was stabbed in the back YES! But she is OUT OF IT NOW! You want to support obassole, then you are NO PUMA! This is NOT abouot Hillary ANYMORE. DEAL WITH IT!
Charlie Rangel is showing his TRUE self… a greedy, political PIG
I am strong supporter of not only Hillary Clinton but also PUMA-pac principles. Hillary endured severe injustice throughout the primaries through the misogynist gangs of Obama. Even though I am not a supporter of Gov.Palin, degrading her (even by Rangel, a Hillary supporter) with the kind of word he used and tried to twist it to make it better, is still downgrading a woman that he don’t support and that is against the PUMA principle.
I think Rangel-hating is a bridge too far. To me, a lot of this rent control apartment and back-tax stuff seems like an invented scandal. The dollar amounts are pretty low and there’s no evidence that he got special favors.
His Palin comment was probably meant to be funny but came across as mean, and he apologized the same day. I don’t turn on anyone for one gaffe and I think Rangel has a pretty good record, and that’s what I look for in a congressman. He’s on the right side or pretty close to it – he is a DLC Democrat.
Some people will defend anyone for anything! And if that is his idea of being funny, then he is a bigger idiot than already shows!
When Rangel said “you have to be kind to the disabled” referring to Sarah Palin, he did, in fact, demean himself. It is not the sort of thing a statesman says, expecially when not personally provoked. As far I can can tell, Sarah Palin’s main offense to the Democrats is that she has had the temerity to accept John McCain’s offer to be his running mate. I don’t expect Rangel to sing the praises of Sarah Palin or John McCain, but his sarcastically ugly remark only makes him look bad, not Sarah Palin.
charlie is another name on the long list of clinton backstabbers. he was carrying on in front of the whole world for hillary to get out of the race before the primaries were over. that jerk is no puma! i liked him up until he showed his true colors
lol- The leadin reporter there on the clip was obviously personaly DISTURBED by the incident, as she inflected the word “disabled” it became apparent.
I see the whole deal as another in the long line of the new breed of democrat the “smart aleck”.
Basically entire hours of this smarting off commentary flows about daily, some of it is prettied up and gussied up with special words and phrases that touch upon the subject matter or even dare to point out what the subject at hand is, astounding as that may be in this day and age, but if you analyze it, it becomes just another pile of smart aleck remarks, which amount ot wasted time on lies.
Of course there are the more coarse versions, like this incident, but nearly all the rest of it, 99% , is the same exact thing, a bunch of blabber that in the end is no thing at all, just partisan hackism, insults, smart aleck punk words spewed out – some more, some less, candy coated.
He is a fat pig that does not represent the views of the democrats.
I am disabled and believe you me this guy is way out of line.
I am sick and tired of my party and its representatives misrepresenting the views of the democratic party.
I want a public apology from this guy, but it would take a little class and we all know class is in short supply in the democratic party.
This man is in no way shape or form a Puma. We do not support him or his put-downs. Puma’s do not believe any woman should be put down simply because of her sex. They did it to Hillary and now to Palin. We in no way support the words or deeds of Charlie Rangel, he is not a Puma and never will be. He is part of the Obama corruption team, just like the DNC. We want no part of him or his lies. He is a crook and a criminal and no Puma I know of associates with such people.
He did not support Hillary, he told her to get out of the race, so what part of this man do you find moral? God we need some real rebuilding of the democratic party and we need it soon! This is no longer a party that I can associate with, I will be back when democracy is once again part of the democratic party.