New RNC Ad — BarackBook

Why is it “internet only”?
meanwhile, the same media that told us Bush was always a leader on 9.11 is re-writing Obama’s role in the crisis - making it up as it goes along
http://edgeoforever.wordpress.com/2008/10/02/rewriting-the-narrative-obama-was-too-a-leader-so-stop-saying-that/

Flashback: When Bill Clinton was running for President, the head of the RNC warned that he was a dangerous, far-left radical who would have Jane Fonda sleeping in the White House guest room. He actually said that!

Mcain RNC had better come out with even harder hitting ads with an emphasis on personal character assassinations questioning his citizenship and national allegiances EG; Indonesian /Kenyan citizenship passport issues . Namely his school registration from Indonesia listing him as an Indonesian national and Muslim is a document that 99.99% of Americans have never seen or heard about. This type of attack will be very effective!

OT- but I was wondering what would be done or said regarding the caucus fraud during the primaries and the current early voter and acorn voting registration irregularities

It speaks to republicans but it made me think about our civil rights in general, whether they are protected by the DOJ, and what happened during the primaries specifically. Please forgive the length.

Pajamas Media - http://pajamasmedia.com -

Justice Department vs. Republicans

September 19, 2008 - by Anonymous

In the face of the Obama fundraising and media juggernaut, Republicans are worried about losing the presidential election.

They should be even more fearful, however, about being criminally prosecuted by the Justice Department for political speech and activity protected by the First Amendment — a clear effort by partisan career lawyers within the Civil Rights Division to help the Obama campaign.

How did we reach such a disturbing state of events? In 2002, Attorney General John Ashcroft directed the Justice Department to hold an annual training session for lawyers from Civil Rights as well as Assistant U.S. Attorneys and FBI agents. Its purpose was to educate these individuals regarding the requirements of both civil election laws — such as the Voting Rights Act that guarantee access to the polls — and the criminal election statutes that prohibit voter fraud and registration improprieties.

The recent 2008 conference, according to multiple sources, was a radical departure from prior events and quite disturbing. Unlike the past, all of the Civil Rights Division’s presentations were not made by lawyers from the Voting Section. Instead, some were also made by lawyers from the Criminal Section of Civil Rights. While most of the laws enforced by that Division are civil statutes, a small number provide for criminal prosecution for violations of the law that involve the threat or use of force.

The kind of routine violence, targeting civil rights workers in the 60s who were registering blacks to vote, is long gone. The Criminal Section has not pursued a criminal voting-related case in decades. Yet the presentations at this year’s conference show that the Criminal Section has been given the green light to use these same criminal statutes to harass and prosecute political activists (particularly Republicans) who are engaging in protected political activity, not violence or the threat of violence. No candidate for federal, state, or local office should take this unprecedented threat lightly. The entire apparatus of federal election law enforcement was assembled for this conference including every FBI agent and Assistant United States Attorney responsible for election-related matters.

The Criminal Section is headed by a former ACLU attorney, Mark Kappelhoff, who was actually hired by this Administration. So much for the claim that the Bush Administration only hired “conservatives” in the Civil Rights Division. In apparent violation of a memorandum from Attorney General Mukasey that directed employees to be “particularly sensitive to safeguarding the Department’s reputation for fairness, neutrality and nonpartisanship,” Kappelhoff has contributed $2,000 to Obama — not exactly the hallmark of “neutrality and nonpartisanship.” But even worse was the presentation by one of his career lawyers, James Walsh, obviously made with Kappelhoff’s approval.

Walsh is a former Voting Section lawyer who transferred to the Criminal Section after working for Senator Ted Kennedy on a detail. Not surprisingly, Walsh is also a contributor to Obama, which is certainly on par with the almost $150,000 that DOJ lawyers and staff who live in Virginia, Maryland, and the District of Columbia have contributed to the Obama campaign, including John Bert Russ, the lawyer in the Voting Section who is responsible for the observer program that will send out hundreds of federal observers on election day.

Walsh made it clear that the Criminal Section intends to use the civil rights statutes to criminally prosecute anyone they consider to be engaging in voter “intimidation” or “oppression.” Now, that might sound like a reasonable idea until you realize that Walsh and Kappelhoff’s definition of “intimidation” and “oppression” goes far beyond what you and I would imagine. Walsh stated that because we have an African-American presidential candidate, there would be voter suppression — a baseless assumption that plays on left-wing stereotypes of America as a racist nation. Every single example of wrongdoing that Walsh and other presenters used in their presentations talked about Republicans: there was not a single example of any wrongdoing committed by any Democrats in the entire two-day conference.

One cited example of a “criminal” violation supposedly intended to “suppress” voting was sending mailers informing voters that you must be a citizen to vote, a requirement of state and federal law. One of the deputy chiefs, Mark Blumberg, told FBI agents and federal prosecutors that the individuals responsible for such a brochure should be brought before a federal grand jury to ask them if they belong to any “anti-immigrant” groups. Not surprisingly, this deputy chief also did a detail with Senator Kennedy.

There are so many things wrong with this abuse of our legal process I am not sure where to start.

The lawyers from the Criminal Section acknowledged that there are no federal criminal statutes that reach non-violent political activities, yet they are proposing to use those statutes to harass individuals engaged in perfectly legal behavior. For telling the absolute truth about citizenship being a requirement to vote, these lawyers want to drag individuals in front of a federal grand jury to ask questions about their political associations. As far as I know, being a member of a group that is against illegal immigration is not a violation of federal law (yet!), although it is perfectly clear that the partisan career lawyers at Justice think it should be.

Under this reasoning, anyone who says we should secure our borders, enforce our employment laws, and deport illegal aliens is engaging in criminal oppression and intimidation. Should anyone who has expressed his views on this subject, particularly in connection with an election, expect to be called in front of a federal grand jury to answer for his “crimes?” While the views espoused by Walsh, Blumberg, and Kappelhoff are well outside the mainstream, they are perfectly aligned with liberal groups who do not believe that voter registration applicants should have to answer questions about their citizenship, and who in fact make a point of not advising registrants of citizenship requirements.

Regrettably, what is going on here is no different than what has happened in the Civil Rights Division for decades. This part of Justice is the depository of the most left-wing career lawyers in the entire department, and for years they have run mostly unchecked by political appointees. These lawyers will do anything they can to help get Obama elected — even if it means harassing, investigating and criminally prosecuting Republicans who are engaged in perfectly legal political activity.

Unfortunately, there do not appear to be any political appointees left in the Division with the political fortitude to do anything to stop it. So Republicans involved in the election should make sure they have their defense lawyers ready to go as we get closer to November. The power and authority of the Justice Department and federal grand juries may come down on their heads with all of the force of a hurricane. Or, even better, folks in Congress who respect the Bill of Rights and the First Amendment should let Attorney General Mukasey know that the use of the criminal process for political ends and to chill political speech won’t be tolerated. He should also require any Justice employees like Kappelhoff, Walsh, and Russ who have contributed to Obama to recuse themselves completely from any involvement in any matter arising out of the election.

The author is an attorney who specializes in election law. The author has requested anonymity to avoid being targeted for prosecution by the Justice Department for exercising First Amendment rights.

——————————————————————————–

Article printed from Pajamas Media: http://pajamasmedia.com

URL to article: http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/justice-department-vs-republicans/

“It’s the corrupt economy, Stupid.”
McCain and Anti-Obama 527 ads need to hit hard, fast, and repeatedly at Barky’s dirty money. His pork for his wife’s employer and Father Pfleger’s church. Rezko and the chicago machine. His ties to Fannie Mae and the subprime mess. Hundreds of millions in illegal donations from foreign counties, fake names, and Wall Street. Acorn and Annenburg Challange. The list goes on. Tie his fraud and bad judgement to the corrupt economy that is ruining this country!

Now if we can just get someone in the media to play Six Degrees of Separation with us perhaps those voters who get their news through Pravda propaganda media will realize how far the tentacles of Mystery Man Soerto/Obama really goes.

I never realized the Obama-Rezko-Binen-Cari connection. Wonder where Obama-Ayers-Auchi links would take you, or Obama-Wright-Farrahkan….this could get addictive! And creates a nice simple graph anyone could understand.

This is a great video. Glad to see one finally come out.

Does anyone here know anything about a new fundraising scandal breaking on Obama? The patriot room says that there is a new big time and big$ $$ problems with Obama accepting donations from Europe under obviously phony names, as well as the Middle East which he have heard about before.

http://patriotroom.com/?p=2686

This will come as a surprise to Rev. Jeremiah Wrong.

Perry I have a strong suspicion that you are a troll in sheep’s clothing…

I hope the women of this country are paying attention…

Here is the score card

POTUS MEN 43, WOMEN 0

VPOTUS MEN 43, WOMEN 0

The argument is that none of the women were qualified enough…sound familiar?

LET’S TAKE A PAGE FROM OBAMA’S PLAY BOOK. RECEIVED THIS FROM THEIR CAMPAIGN TODAY.

“I know these are difficult times, but the stakes have never been higher.

If every one of us reaches out to friends, starts organizing, and takes a piece of this campaign into our own hands, we will win this election.

With eight states already voting early — and a dozen more starting in the next two weeks — voters are already making up their minds. This movement needs supporters like you to step up and volunteer right now.

The simplest tasks are also the most important and the most effective.

Here are some easy ways you can get involved today.

Get involved now
Join a local organizing group Find an event near you Create your own fundraising page

This campaign has always been about change — and real change comes from the bottom up, not from the top down. Supporters like you organizing and fundraising at the grassroots level will make the difference, and we have all the tools to help you do that.

Even if you’ve never been involved in politics before, it’s easy and doesn’t require any experience.

This election is too important to sit on the sidelines. And together, there’s nothing we can’t
do. ”

What can we do? We can’t just hope that Rezko will sing. I’m a registered Democrat, living in a Blue state but I know some Republicans here and in other states( extended family members, my landlady). I’m going to contact them to urge them to vote on election day (remind them to register NOW if they’re not already) and urge them to recruit their friends and family members to do the same.
“The stakes have never been higher”.

If McCain loses this election it is because he waiting too long to bring out the dirt on Obama to the MSM. How stupid could his advisors be? They need to hit hard and hit now! It also needs to be on the MSM, not the internet. All this information has been on the internet and it has not done much. It must hit the mainstream media, and it must be NOW! Hit him on all fronts: Larry Sinclair, the origin of birth, his shady friends, the fact no one is allowed to look into his college days and no one has come forward to say they know him from those days, his mysterious trip to Pakistan for 3 months, the list goes on and on! Seriously, I will sue the media if he gets elected and this all comes out afterward. This is ridiculous!

Larry Sinclair is in Grand Rapids Mich. for Nobama’s Rally!! He will pass out flyers and let the people of Michigan know the TRUTH about Nobama.

http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2008/10/01/larry-sinclair-obama-rally-grand-rapids-mi-october-2-2008-take-it-to-the-streets-meet-contact-larry-sinclair/

I love BarackBook.

Democrats don’t care anymore how deep in corruption and wrongdoing, lying, and character assassinations their candidates for office are in or have been. Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Pelozi, Dodd, Frank, et. al, none of them care. The one that surprises on the most about this careless attitude is Hillary Clinton.

For Democrats corruption is now a right of passage. Why? Very very simple. It is definitely an aid when dealing with those that live at the hand of the government largess. For Obama, his corruption and lying practices will be useful when joining the Russians and the Chinese in opposing the United Nations and other foreign powers. Because the difference between Obama and Bush 2 is that Bush 2 seek the approval of the U.N. to invade Iraq. Obama will invade any country that he thinks is democratically elected as a gratuitous gift to his prospective allies, Russia and China.

HA! Good morning. Nice add..

I know this is a long shot, but I am amazed Berg got even this far in the lawsuit against Obama and the DNC-
Obama ordered to produce birth certificate in Berg case: From the comment section by the amazing Uppity Woman blog site:
http://texashillblog.wordpress.com/2008/10/02/federal-judge-orders-ob
ama-to-produce-his-birth-certificate/

Wow, this is good stuff! Finally, some evidence that they’re going to chip away at his clay feet… It’s interesting that Revs. Wrong and Pflamethrower are absent (or at least not highly visible). This suggests that they will make up a separate front in this war (and we all suspect we know what the A-bomb will be in that theatre of operations).

I am really panicky after reading the polls this morning. I actually feel sick to my stomach — this guy cannot be my President! I stop watching anything on TV as of now and no more poll watching. And since we now have a completely biased moderator for tonight’s debate, I will not be watching that either. I truly do not have the stomach for any more distortions.

McCain has slipped in the poll to a degree, but nothing compared to those being touted by the media. My morning newspaper is a good example. It is a right wing rag that is in the bag for obama. Its feature writers on the Opp section, although not very good, are all in that bag with the exception of one. The polls being used are primary the Quinnipiac and CNN/Time polls. These so called results were based on numbers of two days ago. I get a list of polling results almost daily. On this time date and including these two polling organization, there was a list of thirteen companies and here was their findings.The national average was Obama 46% and McCain 43.1% and when its was firgured on a weighted base (adjusted based on Democratic numbers) the national average was 46.5 to 46 percentage points.Yesterday’s Gallup daily tracting poll had it 48 to 44 percent. That is almost the same as the nation numbers I have mentioned here. He has lost some support the last few weeks, but the attack machine of the campaign, the RNC and the 527’s are just getting started. My problem with Obama is not economics, but when I picture him as our Commander in Chief it scares the Sh&t out of me. Two wars, the Russian bear out of hibernation, Iran going atomic, North Korea already there and restarting up again,Pakistan in chaos and if that does not scare you nothing will, just vote for Obama and you may regret it for the rest of your life.

His interview with O’Donnell on 9/30 was better than this ad!

Why isn’t the “internet-only” ad on TV????

PS–Why doesn’t McCain lift from this????? Short and sweet info….

Part 2–The Lineup: A Who’s Who of The Associates of Barack Obama
Posted on October 2, 2008 by insightanalytical | Edit
~~By Grail Guardian

http://insightanalytical.wordpress.com/2008/10/02/part-2-the-lineup-a-whos-who-of-the-associates-of-barack-obama/

Editor’s Note: Part 1 of “The Lineup” has been added to this post to make the information it contains easily available.–See the Part 1 for the comments to the original posting.–GRL

The media is touting the Quinnipiac and CNN/Time polls are way out of line. Both these organizations are in the bag for Obama. I receive a polling report almost daily. Yesterday’s report (same date as above) and including the two mentioned, plus 11 other polling organizations had the nation average with Obama at 46 % and McCain at 43.1 percent. The national average when weighted (including the Democratic numbers) had it at 46.5 for Obama and 46% for McCain. The new Gallup daily tracking poll has it 48 to 43 for Obama. Now, with a solid AA vote, an anti AA vote, anti gender vote and a PUMA vote, no one in hell is going to know at this time how the vote stands. For those of you who are thinking about voting for Obama or some other candidate, just imagine Obama as the Commander in Chief and if that does not scare the sh&t out of you nothing will. With two wars, the Russian bear out of hibernation,Iran going atomic, North Korea restarting its nuclear progran and Pakistan in choas, I am voting McCain and I am a real Democrat!

IS IT POSSIBLE THAT SINCE SO MANY PEOPLE HAVE BEEN HARRASSED, (CARS KEYED FO MCAIN BUMPER STICKERS, HOUSES EGGED FOR MAC SIGNS), CALLED RACISTS AND BIGOTS, HAVING BO SUPPORTERS GETTING IN THEIR FACES (LIKE BO TOLD THEM TO DO) ETC. THAT MANY PEOPLE ARE JUST TELLING POLLSTERS THEY ARE VOTING FOR BO EVEN IF THEY ARE NOT. THIS WOULD CERTAINLY SKEW THE POLLS IN BO’S FAVOR.

Way to much spamming on this site by this multi-consonant poster