RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Obama & Friends: History of Radicalism (2 of 3)

This is part 2 of a three-part posting of the six videos that comprise all of Hannity’s special last night on Barack Obama’s disturbing associations throughout his adult life. See part one of today’s re-posting of videos 1 and 2: “Obama & Friends: History of Radicalism (1 of 3).” The third post, which will be posted in a few minutes, will have the 5th and 6th videos, the last two segments of the Fox News special. Below are video parts 3 and 4:

Part 3 of 6

Part 4 of 6

Please go to the third post for the remaining parts.

::::::::::::

Note: Here are links to the important comments posted by our readers in open threads last night, during and after the show: first thread, second thread, and third thread. (Readers continued to comment throughout the night.)

Trackback URL

RSS Feed for This Post25 Comments »

Comment by Matthew Weaver | 2008-10-06 13:20:49

In addition to this hour long program, I’d strongly recommend that folks search NoQuarter archives for the many posts previously written on Obama’s character. There are many and in much more detail than what Hannity had to cover in one hour.

 

Comment by tillthen | 2008-10-06 13:28:10

On the front page of FOX.com there’s a picture of the Obama youth taking the Obama pledge. This makes David Duke look like a liberal.

PS: I voted today via Absentee Ballot. It was so scary looking at the ballot. Its beyond incredulous, but there he is. It was the easiest decision I have ever made.

 

Comment by mj | 2008-10-06 13:33:02

Comment by breeze | 2008-10-06 13:38:19

IT WAS A THING OF BEAUTY IN CLEARWATER, FLA.

THIS MORNING!!!

The spectators formed a white, red and blue
humongous flag upon the bleachers!!!

Sarah wasn’t too shabby, either….

WHAT A GLORIOUS MORNING!!!

No, no rock bands, beer and/or hotdogs…..

SARAH IS BIG ENOUGH OF A STAR, HERSELF!

 

Comment by Thinker | 2008-10-06 18:10:23

This is very disturbing.

 
 

Comment by PS | 2008-10-06 13:44:06

You know, Robert, you may think this is a small audience, but I would beg to differ. Alot of people here that post have blogs and share the information that we find here & other blogs to put on our own blogs and talk it up to other people/voters. So I guess you could call it “networking”. I have read items on here, not having heard it on the news yet, and where do you think I heard it next…Fox News! So I think we have more readers & news researchers & lurkers than what you think.

And in case you didn’t happen to catch FN about 2:30, one of your guys really flubbed up his talking points with the interviewer about Ayers and then his reason for being there, Keaton. He clearly blew it. There’s more worry & concern in the Bo-Bo camp than what they want you to believe.

Carry on, NQ!!

Comment by athena | 2008-10-06 13:45:57

I blast the article and videos here to my (please send me information on this election) email list of 1500 with an action item to send to five people. You do the math……..

 

Comment by Deep Truths | 2008-10-06 15:44:30

Well when you are dealing with convoluted messages, you tend to flub up. Bringing up Keating Five is irrelevant 1) because McCain was exonerated and 2) it looks like a desperate attempt to distract from the Ayers issue which is front and center.

That ‘he did it too’ retort is childish at best, dishonest at worst.

Comment by mrt721 | 2008-10-06 17:29:40

Post of the Day:

“Better the Keating Five than the Chicago Seven!”

 
 
 

Comment by hootnannie | 2008-10-06 14:07:44

I’ve heard of people actually deciding who to vote for in the polling places! And there are still plenty of undecided voters and folks who haven’t heard about Obama’s unsavory associates (or weren’t sure whether to believe the charges). It’s October and time for SURPRISES too! And, as for whitey tapes–that wouldn’t even be a surprise–only another reminder that Michelle doesn’t like whites!

Comment by Pennsylvania goes RED! | 2008-10-06 15:55:30

This is why conducting early voting one month ahead of the rest of the nation is unconstitutional.

It disenfranchises the very voters who are supposed to be empowered. What if they change their mind between now and Nov. 4?

 
 

Comment by The Robot | 2008-10-06 14:38:31

It’s amazing that some think bringing up a candidate’s past American hating associations (of which there are MANY) is somehow “going negative” — at least the Obama campaign would love for you to believe it so.

I can’t blame them though, really. Their “Alpha and Omega”; “the One”; their messiah, is being exposed for what he really is: an American hating, unscrupulous, narcissistic thug.

Comment by Pennsylvania goes RED! | 2008-10-06 15:57:14

It’s amazing that some think bringing up a candidate’s past American hating associations (of which there are MANY) is somehow “going negative”

I consider it leadership. Especially in light of the fact that the MSM has dropped the ball.

 
 

Comment by mary | 2008-10-07 00:06:57

When, oh when, will someone pick up on BBC’s and foreign press clippings last year when Obama was admonished by Kenya’s President for INTERFERING IN HIS SOVEREIGHN COUNTRY OF KENYA’S AFFAIRS.

Kenya’s president told the press that “Sen. Obama should not interfere in Kenya’s politics to support his cousin Odinga as he is just an inexperienced, immature young Senator who doesn’t know the country’s dangerous poliltical scene…..”

Obama should have been told by the Senate to apologize and but out of Kenya’s affairs to support his Sharia Law islamist cousin Odinga!

 

RSS Feed for This PostPost a Comment

Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)