Buy Vosges' famous Bacon and Chocolate bar
Adobe Education Store

RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

RNC Comes Out Blazing: “Guilt By Participation”

“Guilt By Participation”

Writes Politico about this ad:

The Republican Party on Monday morning will make a new push to convince voters that distant ties between Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) and former radical William Ayers are somehow disqualifying for the presidency.

The Republican National Committee plans to e-mail “an audience of tens of millions” the link to a new video on the subject called “Guilt by Participation” and encourage recipients to forward it to friends and family, aides said. …

[...]

The title comes from a Wall Street Journal opinion piece by conservative scholar Stanley Kurtz, who wrote on Sept. 23: “The Obama campaign has cried foul when Bill Ayers comes up, claiming ‘guilt by association.’ Yet the issue here isn’t guilt by association; it’s guilt by participation.”

Here is the title and link to Stanley Kurtz’s September 23rd WSJ story:

Obama and Ayers Pushed Radicalism On Schools

Newsbusters.org’s Rich Noyes noted on September 23rd that Kurtz had two stories published that day:

Writing in today’s Wall Street Journal and National Review Online, Ethics and Public Policy Center senior fellow Stanley Kurtz traces Barack Obama’s partnership with former domestic terrorist William Ayers when the two collaborated at the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, a charity established to help Chicago’s public schools that was commandeered by Ayers to promote his radical agenda.

The association between Obama and Ayers has received virtually no attention from the three broadcast networks, with the conspicuous exception of a primary-season debate sponsored by ABC when George Stephanopoulos asked Obama about his relationship with Ayers. Out of 1,365 broadcast evening news stories about Obama prior to the end of the primaries, only two mentioned Ayers — one a brief mention of the debate question on the April 17 Nightly News, and the other a World News Sunday story about McCain raising the Ayers issue on This Week.

With just 42 days left until Election Day, the broadcast networks have not presented a single in-depth report on Obama’s relationship with Ayers. But Kurtz’s review of the documents at the Chicago Annenberg Challenge (CAC) shows the two “worked as a team to advance the CAC agenda,” which “flowed from Mr. Ayers’s educational philosophy, which called for infusing students and their parents with a radical political commitment, and which downplayed achievement tests in favor of activism.” …

Of course, here at NoQuarter, we know that our own Larry Johnson and Steve Diamond have been on this story, in-depth, for months. Both Steve and Larry have written innumerable articles about the Chicago Annenberg Challenge (CAC) — and that Bill Ayers HIRED Barack Obama as CHAIRMAN of the CAC.

Would Bill Ayers have hired Barack Obama as chair of the CAC if Ayers were not sure that Obama would implement Ayers’ radical ideas about public education?,” I always ask those who don’t seem to get the connection, or why it is important.

But this isn’t about getting credit. This is about getting the story out. And this new RNC ad is going to help make voters stop and think.

Here is the link to the YouTube. Send it to your own e-mail list.

Trackback URL

RSS Feed for This Post198 Comments »

Comment by gerard "Barracuda" Nedich | 2008-10-13 04:16:02

what i find amazing is that at every turn when the american people have been given a chance to say yes or no to Baracktrack that american’s have pretty much always said no.

we voted in record numbers for hillary yet the DNC kept shoving Obama on us…

the media keeps trying to sell us Obama

american’s don’t want Baracktrack but Soros and the Chicago machine and their criminal gang keep stealing votes and buying the media…

how far will they go?

i sure hope enough people vote for Mccain so that the vote stealing they have planned won’t succeed…

a. hillary
b. mccain

america first!

Comment by joseyJ | 2008-10-13 04:55:55

>>>we voted in record numbers for hillary yet the DNC kept shoving Obama on us…

Well of course. The nomination was fixed for Obama - evidenced by SDs rolling out for Obama after Hillary won states by 20-30-40 points.
The fix was completed when the RBC took delegates from Hillary and gave them to THE ONE.

 

Comment by tzada | 2008-10-13 06:39:06

Many convicted felons remain on voter rolls, according to Sun Sentinel investigation

More than 30,000 Florida felons who by law should have been stripped of their right to vote remain registered to cast ballots in this presidential battleground state, a Sun Sentinel investigation has found.

Elections workers are now reviewing more than 3,800 possible felon voters but have more than 108,000 others still to be checked. “We’ve not touched those records yet,” Browning said.

Recently registered
John Teate, who lives west of Boca Raton, remains on the voter rolls after registering as a Democrat in July despite felony drug and theft convictions dating to the early 1990s. He said someone he thinks was a Democratic supporter signed him up while he waited for a bus at the central terminal in downtown Fort Lauderdale.

“I said, ‘I’m a convicted felon. I can’t vote,’” recalled Teate, 45. “I figured when the paperwork came in, there would be a red flag.”

One readers comment: Why isn’t Congressman Robert Wexler all over this Voter Outrage Issue? Wexler’s gets his face on the tube at any mention of VOTE problems. Why is Wexler hiding? Maybe it’s cause if they remove convicts and the like from the rolls, Wexler will lose those votes and lose the election.

http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/local/southflorida/sfl-flbfelons1012sboct12,0,3762352.story

Comment by lark | 2008-10-13 08:36:33

when the american people have been given a chance to say yes or no to Baracktrack that american’s have pretty much always said no

That is simply not true. Obama is running for president because he has a very convincing message.

Comment by Zee | 2008-10-13 10:58:09

You know what the real outrage is?

If a felon’s served his time he’s served it. He ought to be allowed to vote as a citizen once he’s served his time. How unchristian and unpatriotic and uncharitable and UGLY of you to think otherwise.

Especially since the HUGE felons who bankrupt our nation go free while some schmuck caught with marijuana is incarcerated and tarred for life.

Not to mention the reason we got Bush was because they PURGED the Florida voter rolls of many who merely had similar names as felons.

This has to change, and the first step is for people here to denounce UGLY Republican crap like this.

Comment by tommy077 | 2008-10-13 12:25:50

Uhhh… it’s the constitution, it’s the law. Yes, I know liberals like you would call obeying the constitution and the law “UGLY Republican crap”, but most of America believe in the “rule of law”. I know a fancy phrase but look it up you might learn something.

 

Comment by Goblintrain | 2008-10-13 12:33:14

lol, calm down & drink your koolaid! Your going to pop a bloodvessel in your eyeball!

 
 
 
 

Comment by Melisa | 2008-10-13 11:53:37

I am perplexed, but understand, Hillary’s efforts on Obama’s behalf. Hope this doesn’t rub off on her.
Ayer’s involvement here is way beyond just “association”…his fingerprints are all over Obama. There is some speculation that he may have participated in writing Obama’s autobiography, and, frankly, the writing style would indicate he wrote it entirely. Who is the puppetmaster?
This would explain why so many capable, intelligent african-american individuals have been passed by as canidates….they had to choose someone to mold….how insulting.

 

Comment by susan | 2008-10-13 12:16:06

I agree, and thank God the RNC is finally taking charge of the McCain campaign, because if McCain isn’t willing to speak the truth about Obama and friends, then the RNC needs to do so, and QUICKLY, or this nation is doomed!

 
 

Comment by johnqpublic | 2008-10-13 04:19:12

Obama didn’t write ‘Dreams from My Father’
he is caught in another lie it seems

http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=77815

Comment by Touchet | 2008-10-13 04:38:05

This would explain his gaffe’s about his life’s history.

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-10-13 08:54:49

Hmmmm….MILLI VANILLIBAMA…LOL…

SOMEONE ALERT THE MEDIA

 
 

Comment by Stray | 2008-10-13 07:02:24

I guess ayers found a way to knock America down by proxy.

Comment by Jeremiah God Damn Barack Amerikkka Wright | 2008-10-13 08:15:52

He himself admits that planting bombs left him an outsider so he decided to go into education instead to achieve his goals of overthrowing capitalism and replacing it with a kinder gentler socialism.

He stopped planting bombs and started planting the seeds of a presidential candidate.

Comment by Jeremiah God Damn Barack Amerikkka Wright | 2008-10-13 08:17:41

In a speech in venezuela recently he even declareed that the Revolution is through Education…much like Adolf himself espoused in the 1930s, he who controls the youth gains the future.

 

Comment by oowawa | 2008-10-13 13:27:23

O how I long for the days when my little kids would sit laughing in front of the TV Set watching Fred Rogers and listening to his sweet songs.

Nowadays, when someone can be the frontrunning candidate for president and shrug off a decades long association with an unrepentant terrorist as just a guy in the neighborhood, my memories are polluted by a new version of the old song:

“O the Terrorist’s a person in my neighborhood,
In my neighborhood, in my NAY-BOR-HOOD,
O the Terrorist’s a person in your neighborhood,
A person that you see each day.”

 
 
 
 

Comment by secularhumanizinevoluter | 2008-10-13 04:27:32

Larry and crew, no thanks neccesary for the donation, just wish it could have been more. After watching site after site being assimilated by the obamazoid infection it is sure nice to still have an island of sanity to come back to.
I was begining to wonder if McCain was going to pull a Kerry and just wait to long before aggressivly addressing the messiah’s past “judgement” in associations.
He claimed it was all about his superior judgement. I would use that clip of him in his arrogance saying that and then just run a slide show of all his mentores.

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-10-13 06:32:15

Let Republicans be Republicans…imho…

Democrats have a long and rich history of underestimating republicans…lol…I don’t think this is any different. In fact the worse they say Johnny is doin…the more convinced I am that he’s doin fine…

NOLI NOTHIS PERMITTERE TE TERERE
DON’T LET THE BASTARDS GET YOU DOWN

Comment by Galt, Master Thrall of Planet Triskelion | 2008-10-13 10:11:33

Ding! Yes you are spot on! Ding! Free bucket of popcorn for you!

Uppity warned us during the primary that the Dems by forcing the inept The Precious on the electorate were facing a sure McGovern situation. She said (those who behave like) adults would take over during the election.

Both you and Uppity are correct. Never underestimate the GOP and never underestimate the PUMAs and indy’s who will step up to the plate and whack a home run out of the park for Mac.

Stay focused people. Keep volunteering and donating. Us PUMAs did it before. The rightful nominee was Hillary and in the GE there are no caucus shenanigans, crooked evil RBC and chicken shit corrupt delegates for Howie, Donna, Barky, Nancy and Harry to manipulate. Barky stands no chance. I spit on the polls.

 
 

Comment by tzada | 2008-10-13 06:52:29

Hard hitting ad this AM here in Florida about Ayers and Obama.

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-10-13 07:07:47

TZADA…that’s the kind of news that we need to focus on…thanks…

I refuse to buy into the Barky depression…Go Johnny Go!

COUNTRY FIRST!

Comment by McHope | 2008-10-13 09:34:20

If one more Obama surrogate gets on tv and tells us “people don’t care about Ayers, Wright, etc., they only care about the economy”…uuuggghh!

I resent them telling me what I think is important.Thoughtful people can consider more than one factor at a time. We have the right to have all relevant information and to decide how to prioritize that information.

Just another example of the Dems assuming they are more important and they can decide for us.

Ayers does matter.
Character counts.
Country First!

 
 
 
 

Comment by Diana | 2008-10-13 04:31:41

Now they need an ad with him and Odinga, show him campaigning for Odinga at tax payers expense. The headlines, people running for their lives, the fact that more than 1,500 people were murdered. Then the headlines of Obama taking his calls in New Hampshire. Ending with Odinga saying it’s genocide, but I can do nothing to stop it because people didn’t vote for me.

Obama can’t deny his ties to Odinga there are too many video’s. Too many interviews. Archived news articles on the two. The fact that men, women, and children were burned alive when Odinga lost the election and Obama’s silence to that…much more damaging than Ayers because it’s recent, not 30 years in the past.

People are willing to believe people can change over time. They’re not going to believe people who commit genocide a year ago just because they lost an election, yet are still trying to vie for power are rehabilitated. Obama’s ties with Odinga are as recent as the primaries. Obama condemning the Kenya government which was one of the most peaceful in Africa until Odinga and Obama. Campaigning for his cousin less than 2 years ago at tax payers expense. The genocide of Christian men, women and children, for just being Christian’s because his cousin lost…

This is the first RNC video I’ve seen. It’s about time.

Comment by joseyJ | 2008-10-13 04:43:33

Great commentary.
I know very little about Obama and Odinga, but the Obama camp made a big deal about their call during the NH primary - furthering the deception that Obama would be a savior to the world.

 

Comment by Miss H | 2008-10-13 05:18:41

Here’s your ad; check out my new video:

Obama & Odinga: Cousins of The Kenyan Luo Tribe

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tiC4IO7jluc

 

Comment by tzada | 2008-10-13 06:55:38

That campaigning in a foreign country at taxpayers expense should be against the law for both reasons. Who will arrest him? Who will prosecute him? Can he get away with murder?

Comment by Patience | 2008-10-13 08:19:47

I think Obama’s visit to Kenya was ostensibly a “fact-finding” mission that in reality was his attempt to influence the election there.

Comment by Zee | 2008-10-13 11:10:47

Dick Morris also went there to help Odinga’s campaign…but claims he went as a “tourist” because he couldn’t get a work permit.

It’s too bad this wasn’t covered in the primary.

 
 

Comment by bemused | 2008-10-13 08:38:36

Sure should, and my experience with older voters is that whatever he was doing, it’s the taxpayer money part that gets their attention. I would make an ad showing not just the brutality but emphasize how that money came from us, how much it was, what he could have done with it, etc.

 
 

Comment by lark | 2008-10-13 08:48:49

Odinga is a real terrorist in real time, while Ayers is a wash out terrorist in suspension.

 

Comment by pasmalltowngirl | 2008-10-13 09:57:26

I would like to know why the hell did not only Obama donate to Odinga’s campaign but why did SCUMBAG Dick Morris donate !!!

OT
Obama’s Kenya ghosts
Mark Hyman
About 50 parishioners were locked into the Assemblies of God church before it was set ablaze. They were mostly women and children. Those who tried to flee were hacked to death by machete-wielding members of a mob numbering 2,000.
The 2008 New Year Day atrocity in the Kenyan village Eldoret, about 185 miles northwest of Nairobi, had all the markings of the Rwanda genocide of a decade earlier.
By mid-February 2008, more than 1,500 Kenyans were killed. Many were slain by machete-armed attackers. More than 500,000 were displaced by the religious strife. Villages lay in ruin. Many of the atrocities were perpetrated by Muslims against Christians.
The violence was led by supporters of Raila Odinga, the opposition leader who lost the Dec. 27, 2007, presidential election by more than 230,000 votes. Odinga supporters began the genocide hours after the final election results were announced Dec. 30. Mr. Odinga was a member of Parliament representing an area in western Kenya, heavily populated by the Luo tribe, and the birthplace of Barack Obama’s father.

[[and has numerous ties to Barack Obama, as detailed in the remainder of the story]]

http://www.washtimes.com/news/2008/oct/12/obamas-kenya-ghosts/print/

OMG, Both Obama and Scumbag Dick Morris donated to Odinga’a campaign. I copied this from a blogger at the Wash. Times. Hannity needs to ask Morris about this. I want answers to why Dick Morris would support Odinga? I am soooo sick of all this bull shit crap !!!!

By: Kevin25
Here is some interesting information on Raila Odinga’s campaign that was leaked by ODM party members that were doubled-crossed by Odinga in November 2007 when Odinga supported others for the Bunge (Parliment) seats after those who got screwed donated huge sums of money to Odinga. Read and review:http://www.network54.com/Forum/204096/thread/1200846405/last-1200846405/ODM Friends on Senator BO (yes that is Barack Obama gave 66 million Kenyan Shillings ($1 million) to the ODM. Muammar gaddafi’s pldest son gave 53,450,000 Kenyan Shillings ($825,000) and Dick Morris (yes the Fox News analyst) gave 21,335,000 Shillings ($325,000). In fact Dick Morris held a press conference with Odinga )available on YouTube) in November 2007 to announce his pro bono work for Odinga just before the Odinga pact with the Mombassa based radical Muslims was leaked. Thereafter, Morris being a good Jew quitely exited from the scene once the Muslim MOU revealed that Kenya would become asanctuary for Muslim terrorists. Forget the Shariah law part of the MOU, harped on by many, the sanctuary for terrorists is the problem. Just this month, Odinga was attempting to get known terrorisrs extradicted to Ethiopia back to Kenya. The good news is taht Muammar Gaddafi who bought the Liaco Regency 5 star hotel by bribing Kenyan government officials said he will not give it back, after a popular uprising by the citizens of Kenya. Kenya is a battleground in the war with Islamic terrorists. Mombassa and the Kildini Harbour deep water port is a strategic asset because it is the best harbour in East Africa and the terminus of the Ugandan and Kenyan Railways built by the British when Mombassa was the capitol of British East Africa. It is the choke point for access to the sea for the natural resource rich African interior providing a means to export raw materials needed in industrial production. You Yanks know little about the rest of the world and the role of Muammar Gaddafi to rid East Africa of its two majority Christian countries Kenya and Ethiopia.

America has three weeks to sober up from the intoxication from Barack Hussein Obama, who I hold complicit in the atrocities visited upon the East Indian shopkeepers in Kisumu,Kenya. (Odinga’s thugs resorted to the old Mau Mau tactic of his Communist father of murder, mutilation, arson, rape and pillaging on a peaceful minority.) Obama used a Senate staffer, Mark Lippert, to assist his cousin Raila Odinga in Odinga political campaign for the Kenyan presidency. Obama and Lippert violated the Logan Act, Title 18, U.S. Code, Section 953. Lippert was the “filter” between the ODM and Obama. Will Obama nad Odinga slug down Jonnie Black scotch at the Royal Nairobi Golf Clud or the Stanley or Regency hotels in the future and trade stories how the scunked two democratic nations in gaining power? I fear for America and for East Africa. Don’t let the Obama counter-attack shout down the truth.
http://www.network54.com/Forum/204096/thread/1200846405/last-1200846405/ODM

Raila gets Clinton advisor for campaigns(Morris)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vyprn8P8FaU

 
 

Comment by joseyJ | 2008-10-13 04:35:00

Obama LIED about his relationship with Ayers and Rezko - initially claiming he “barely knew” them. Then we learned Rezko was on Obama’s 2004 Senate campaign Finance Committee. And Obama wrote for Ayers book.

When the Whole Truth is revealed Obama blames opponents for focusing on issues that “don’t matter to Americans.”

It’s the LIES, Stupid!

Comment by Touchet | 2008-10-13 04:41:03

You can throw that back in their face. Anytime they don’t talk about what Obama’s policies are, but go into some spin about bush, remind them that character attacks won’t be tolerated. You then say, “please tell me what Obama plans to do about the current finaincial crisis”. They will stumble everytime.

I must warn you though. You may want to make sure you can defend yourself.

 

Comment by lark | 2008-10-13 08:53:09

Hopefully the lies will contradict each other and crisscross path in these last three weeks.

 

Comment by Zee | 2008-10-13 11:17:14

Obama is STILL lying about this. He has an ad out purporting to “correct” the “lies and smears” of McCain.

The ad shows some hotel and says “this is where Obama began his campaign for state senator, not in Ayers’ living room.”

Well, no. Not really. That may have been where he kicked off his campaign once he was a candidate, but it began before that, when Alice Palmer announced that Barack would be the next state senator in her seat, which at that time she thought she was resigning. THAT was in Ayers’ living room.

Of course, once Palmer realized she needed to keep her seat and run for re-election, it was too late to put Obama out of the game and he knocked her off the ballot. But originally she introduced him to the players on the scene IN AYERS LIVING ROOM.

 
 

Comment by wodiej | 2008-10-13 04:35:16

great ad…I suspected that the Republicans were biding their time until the right moment. I think they knew all along Obama was going to steal the nomination from Hillary and so have been circling their wagons and getting all the dirt on him for MONTHS. Gee they have so much ammo, what to use first.

 

Comment by Touchet | 2008-10-13 04:42:39

I really hope they don’t back down. Its revealing when your opponent tries to tell you that the “american people aren’t interested in that”. Why would you want to help your opponent by telling them what not to do. LOL yeah right, sucka!

 

Comment by Hope is the last to die | 2008-10-13 04:47:21

I think this is a bad campaign strategy for McCain. First of all, a quick look at the posts of Obama supporters reveal that his core fans are far-leftists who admire what Ayers did. And the rest of them think Ayers is a non-issue because “Obama was 8 at the time”. The Ayers card works only for those who already dislikes the man.

The best thing for McCain would be hitting Obama’s positions but since he doesn’t have any, it’s very hard. But at least he could show what a flipflopper he is.

For now, McCain should be using the economy card.

Comment by Touchet | 2008-10-13 05:40:53

Yes this move is so bad that obama supporters are freaking out and saying don’t do it because it will help them win. LOL.

Comment by fif | 2008-10-13 08:20:10

And Obama’s “negatives” went up 10 points last week, and the race is tightening again. Yea, Americans don’t care about lies and radical school reform. We’ll see.

 
 

Comment by Liz B | 2008-10-13 08:19:03

I believe someday we will find out that Ayers was still involved in Terrorist Activity as recently as Sept. 11, 2001. I think he told us as much in his NYT Interview on, coincidently, 9/11/01!!

You didn’t have to fly the planes into the buildings to be someone who knew about, in advance, and abetted the crimes.

His Interview could have been a shout out to his brothers in arms, and the answer to “I don’t regret setting bombs, I don’t think we did enough”

After all, he got away with his crimes against the Government once before, with a much better plan, and the Saudi’s piloting the planes, he definitely escaped any suspicion in these attacks.

We never even investigated whether any American terrorists helped these men lay the groundwork, or possibly helped finance these acts.

The date 9-1-1 always seemed to me to be an American suggestion. Ayers is a clever man, who appears to be someone who would attach significance to irony.

Any takers on this theory?

 

Comment by Soldier of Christ | 2008-10-13 09:42:35

No- the nail on the coffin- is to show Odinga with Obama and the dead church members- The Judeo-Christians will get out of bed for this one!

Comment by Liz B | 2008-10-13 09:53:24

I agree with that. I can’t prove any connection with Ayers and terrorists but we know Obama was knee dip in the muck in Kenya. Thanks to Corsi and Hannity tonight, we will have the documents that went back and forth between the two during the violence.

 
 
 

Comment by McAnnie Carmel Baracuda | 2008-10-13 04:50:45

I believe it will be unrelenting for the next 21 days. This is, after all, the same party that never quit slamming Bill Clinton from the day he entered the WH until the day he left.

Of course, they did have some help from the Arkansas crazy publisher who hated Bill…no word from him now since he’s fighting his messy divorce (ya know, cheating on the wife and all). However, Barry is so dangerous, I’d go for no holds barred from wherever the help came from (almost).

Comment by beebop | 2008-10-13 05:49:14

Here in Ohio we get nothing but 0bama ads that are negative on McCain. Not one suggesting how he will RULE after he seizes power. All negative.

Comment by jjsmoof | 2008-10-13 07:51:42

yeah every other commercial (literally) is obama saying how mccain will tax health benefits. have you seen any of the casino commercials. one is quite funny.

Comment by beebop | 2008-10-13 08:26:57

You mean the one from the guy who says I can read? LMFAO …

Comment by jjsmoof | 2008-10-13 15:56:36

Yeah,thats the one! That and when he says ‘you expect me to believe ohio won’t tax the casino’ (paraphrasing). hahaha

 
 
 

Comment by fif | 2008-10-13 08:24:00

But he’s all about the “New Politics” and McCain is the one who is so negative right???

More lies and hypocrisy. At least McCain’s attack ads are factual. Obama lies about his policies and positions, just like he did with Hillary (health care & NAFTA). He can’t tell the truth about their records, because they have served honorably. He’s done next to nothing & has used nefarious connections to advance himself.

Comment by lark | 2008-10-13 09:03:47

Obama is synonymous with lying now. He lies lies lies. He is a dishonorable man. He will stain the WH even more than Bush because he will bring in with him all of this dishonor, tons of dishonor that Bush never brought with him, except for his doubtful service time in Alabama.

 
 
 
 

Comment by sarainitaly | 2008-10-13 05:21:51

I am getting ticked off at all teh Dems who first supported Hillary, and now support Obama. I articles and clips of people like Biden, Lanny Davis, Rendell, Hillary, Bill, Edwards, Dodd, Gravel, etc. all going after Obama on his experience, his judgement, his associations…and now we are supposed to believe it is all changed?

Lanny, Wolfson, Terry, Ferraro and more were all saying that Ayers and Wright were legitimate questions, and need to be addressed, but NOW they are saying McCain is playing dirty?

I am really sad to see them behave this way, for Obama.

Comment by wodiej | 2008-10-13 05:27:10

I agree w you on this….hypocrites and they don’t have to do it. Other Dem’s have stood up and supported McCain. I am more disappointed in Bill and Hillary than any of them. Apparently having a D behind your name is more important than your country. Unless I see and hear them denounce and be critical of Obama and his associations at some point, they will have lost me altogether.

Comment by sarainitaly | 2008-10-13 05:33:16

I know…I don’t know why they are using the very same Dems who said they were legitimate issues, now attacking McCain for it. Why not use the same Dems who were for Obama the whole time?

It makes them look extremely hypocritcal AND crazy.

Sco Joe is great this morning, calling out the hypocrisy in the *mccain is inciting violence* agenda.

 
 

Comment by Touchet | 2008-10-13 05:42:41

Then you should have represented us as the convention. All of my state’s delegates went to Obama. Taxation without representation was the reason this country claimed its independence.

Comment by Touchet | 2008-10-13 05:43:15

this was a miss post sorry

 
 

Comment by Uppity Woman | 2008-10-13 07:32:59

These are consultants who work within the party. It’s what They Do For A Living. They work for candidates. Occasionally they work for a candidate they love. Other times that’s not the case. Many of them are Party People, kind of in the way some people are Company People.

What they are doing is also known as “continuing to be employed”. Think of it as you working for a new boss you don’t like much. Because your old boss moved on, you don’t walk away from your living. You do your job and you still get paid. If your job included up-front work for your boss, you would do it too. Or you could quit and get yourself one of those fantastic unemployment checks.

Life would be a lot leaner for them if Obama loses. Republicans aren’t going to be interested in hiring them.

 

Comment by fif | 2008-10-13 08:27:17

Me too: don’t forget Carville, who used Donna Brazile’s “incendiary” (ie: the charge they are leveling at McCain/Palin) threat that there will be rioting in the streets if BO loses.

Hey, that’s what the national guard is for. If you can’t control yourselves if you don’t get what you want through coercion, then pay the consequences. We didn’t riot when the nomination was stolen from HRC. We will protest at the ballot box.

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-10-13 08:51:03

Pffftt!!…You know I like Carville…But sometimes He Is Just An ASS…nuff said…

 
 

Comment by Liz B | 2008-10-13 08:27:28

You guys have a valid point…so we make an ad about it, and call it HYPOCRITES FOR OBAMA…
show them all, and play their quotes…
WHAT CHANGED? Did they fear their own party?
Then show Brazille with her “We have nowhere else to go” the commercial could end with “Sadly, she’s right, THESE Democrats have nowhere else to go if they want to remain alive Politically. The Bad news is, they were right about Obama, the good news is: You have somewhere else to go. John McCain. Play the good things they said about him and end the ad.

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-10-13 09:02:32

There already are plenty of ads for GOP staring the illustrious leaders of the democratic party…including both Clinton’s and Plageriarizin Joey Biden…

 

Comment by Goblintrain | 2008-10-13 16:09:51

I really like this idea! You should make it, just like you said!

 
 

Comment by Soldier of Christ | 2008-10-13 09:49:57

It is called “Politicians”. They are disgusting. I use to think Ferrora was a fine woman who speaks the truth but she is a lying sack of potatoes in my opinion. Fox should stop showing her on their network. Everytime she comes on- I switch to my own viewing. I hate lies and she is full of them. And that Lanny too. It is a good thing she never made it as a VP- at least Palin tells us “to straight talk” and she doesn’t hold back! If anyone is listening in the Mccain camp- back off the niceness and let the negative ads continue- Get Odinga and Obama linked in an ad- Show the slaughter of the churches in Kenya- show the picture of Odinga and Obama at the stump together and say : Judgment- and associations. Obama to risky for our country! This will be the October surprise! Get on it!

Comment by Liz B | 2008-10-13 10:04:12

I agree, plus one more ad, too. The children singing their Obama song, The Obama Youth Corp drilling and in uniform (at a Middle School!!), show contrasting pictures with the Hitler youth movement, and any other times that a Dictator used kids to turn into an Army for their propaganda. Then cut to the faces of the children in Africa, show the clips of people running for their lives while their villages burned…”Obama inspires the youth of America, just like other leaders around the world have done in the past century…But in his home country of Africa? Obama inspires fear in the children”…pictures are worth a thousand words, show him with Odinga and make it stick.

 
 
 

Comment by LLL | 2008-10-13 05:52:38

what scares me is how mainstream Ayers is in Chicago. How can he teach at a well-known university?

Comment by hadenough | 2008-10-13 06:27:37

ayers is ultra-wealthy.

obama is a climber. He is going to buddy up to people that will give him a boost. The daley party bosses, ultra-wealthy well connected political fixer rezko, well connected ultra-wealthy ayers, ect. obama is a typical climber. He’ll kiss whatever ass he thinks will move him up.

 

Comment by Khan Krum | 2008-10-13 06:57:17

Our universities and colleges are controlled by these types of washed up ’60s radicals. I spent many years there and have never seen anything like it: McCarthyism from the left, speech/thought control, indoctrination instead of scholarship, active sheltering and promotion of traitors, witchhunts, you name it. It would horrify the average American as much as what is being exposed on Obama bin Biden is horrifying them. And keep in mind, the worst is yet to come…

(I add that one thing that particularly frosts me about the Obammunists is the link to the University of Chicago which was somewhat exceptional in this regard [I'm afraid maybe not now]. When I was there there was both a liberal and a conservative student newspaper and critical thinking based on the Western canon (gasp!) was the core of its philosophy. Its reputation was based on academic rigor and scholarship. The Obammunist tainting of this is yet another reason to disdain and defeat the bastard.)

 

Comment by Uppity Woman | 2008-10-13 07:37:44

Ayers’ father was the CEO of COMED. His family name got him that job. It’s not like that should be a big surprise. It’s done all over the world. Also, universities do not have to follow the same standards of school boards. Ayers would not get a job in a school system. The rules are tougher. But he has managed to infiltrate our schools beyond Chicago via his books and programs. He teaches teachers. The teachers in turn revere him. His talons reach far beyond chicago schools. They would dig in much deeper if Obama were president.

 
 

Comment by Dr Felter | 2008-10-13 05:55:46

Surveying the terrain - standing back - you can see it for the first time: Obama is now losing. Many little things:
- the tightening of even skewed polls;
- the MSM narratives are less substantial on issues, i.e no real interest in what Soetoerobama is saying on the issues;
- increasing hysterical shoutings and expressions of pure hatred from the left;
- the SOB campaign flops on early voting; far too few
- the rumblings on ACORN, Kenya, Ayers, Rezko; SOB’s evil assocations and agenda seeping into American consciousness;
- SOB is campaigning in states where he is supposed to be way ahead; Mac is doing the same in states where he supposed to be way behind. As someone said: look where the candidates spend time!
- the sunny demeanour of Mac/Palin; the empty eyes and phrases of SOB;

All is well; steady on. SOB is wilting. You can see it.

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-10-13 07:00:59

I agree Dr. Felter…McCain is doin better than the MSMPORN is saying…

A lot of exiled democrats and independents are in a new situation..being sudden republicans…lol

Folks if you lived in TEXAS you would be able to see n TEEVEE all those church preachers talkin about this election…Some of these stations are on 24/7…Aaaaand the South is the birthplace of the Megachurch
For every AA church spouting Obamaganda…There are ( I dunno maybe 5…) other churches preachin the standard conservative agenda…chuckle…
Aaaaand although I am not a born again…I have grown up in the bible belt…Barky has pissed off a lot of people…I’m just sayin’…As usual Yankees and moderates from California don’t get it…They are missing this and buyin into the elitist pundits form both sides who have an angle…I’m just sayin’

Every time Barky cries RACIST…another preacher has a heyday…lol…and another voter goes to McCain….christian or not. The Race tactic cuts both ways Barky…and pisses off people…Bullying voters is goin to bite Barky in the ass!

Comment by beebop | 2008-10-13 07:09:37

I worked phones yesterday. People are concerned about the unknown BO. They want a known entity. They are being very quiet. But they are going to early vote, absentee vote and count on it, the Republicans know how to get their base out. The MSM is trying to suppress turnout by claiming that BO has it in a landslide. This is a propanganda move. They know it is not the case. But they hope it works. Kerry was ROLLING to a victory with much higher numbers this time four years ago and has anyone ever addressed him as Mr. President?

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-10-13 07:20:01

You got that Wriiiight Bee…Liberals have a hard time understanding conservative democrats in their own party…Aaaaand of Course St. Ronnie won them over.
Folks forget that whether they like it or not this is mostly a middleaged churchified country at least when it comes to who turns out to vote…If this were not the case why court the preachers over the last 20 years…
Johnny Mac is doin better than folks think…Aaaaand imho…GOP uses lots of mechanisms that are standard for the party and democrats can only envy…Communication aint’ just on the net…It’s in the mail…in the churches…at Boy scouts…I mean Phleeeeeze…GOP saturates the suburbs…And there is a whole lot of real estate outside the Big Urban cities…I’m just sayin’

Comment by beebop | 2008-10-13 08:13:42

The snow job the media has done makes those people we reach from the campaign office SO FREAKING grateful to hear what one woman called a “normal” person. The office knows that I am PUMA and is very welcoming and happy to have me. The majority of the volunteers yesterday were high school aged Advanced Placment students in history who are required to do 20 hours of community activism. They could pick either campaign. While there were no AA faces, there were at least two minorities and three women. They are wonderful inspiration as to why we are fighting so hard for John and Sarah! I have to tell you, watching Hill and Bill out stumping for 0mama is starting to make me sick. I am starting to really question their good judgment.

Comment by fif | 2008-10-13 08:31:06

Hill & Bill did the Scranton event for Joe Biden. They are good friends of his, and Bill said they all decided to meet there and help Joe. They are no big fans of BO’s, and their lack of enthusiasm is visible. I bet they can’t wait until this charade is over.

 

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-10-13 08:36:35

Good news to hear Bee. My kid tells me that most of the kids she knows at U of Arts ain’t having tea in the Obamazebo…lol…And it’s a liberal arts school…Of course a lot of these students are female…
I personally don’t want to talk about either Clinton in relation to Barky anymore…As far as I’m concerned they have her seat held hostage and any effort bythem I’m skeptical about…Kinda like treadin water…You can tread water but to call it swimming…makes me laugh out loud…know what I mean?
Bill & Hill are a non issue at this point…It don’t mean a thang…Barky will lose…Go MacDaddy!

 
 
 
 
 

Comment by Uppity Woman | 2008-10-13 07:40:55

The polls are weighted and the pollsters don’t keep it a secret. They poll more democrats because of the demographics. Also, they have polled “registered” voters up till now. Registered voters and Likely voters are not the same thing. All likely voters are registered but not all registered voters are likely voters. But they had to poll this way because of New registrants. Also, they use phone polling. Parents could be at work when their 17 year old answers the phone and says Yeah! I’m registered!

Comment by beebop | 2008-10-13 08:15:20

I got the weirdest survey via phone. I answered the phone. The caller asked me if I was voting. I said “You bet your life.” That was it. She said thank you and hung up. Never said the organization or anything else.

 

Comment by fif | 2008-10-13 08:32:38

I also read that the normal hang up rate is 40-50%, and Gallup reported an 80% hang up rate right now. What does that say? People are furious and refusing to participate, so how can it be an accurate accounting?

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-10-13 08:38:14

You got that Wriiiight!!!

 

Comment by lark | 2008-10-13 09:17:50

Exactly. The polls are telling really nothing but a mirage. It is an idealistic view of what the electorate would like to have.

Polls = Idealism

Comment by Galt, Master Thrall of Planet Triskelion | 2008-10-13 09:53:41

Polls equal felgercarb.

I trust my own nose. And we know my nose is trustworthy as I have found NQ the most delicious popcorn in the galaxy! Only 50 Quatloos for a large bucket. Includes complimentary butter.

Galt, Master Thrall of Planet Triskelion
Proprietor, the NQ Popcorn Concession
Since circa 2008

 
 
 
 
 

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-10-13 05:59:10

hypocrisy n. the professing of publicly approved qualities, beliefs, or feelings that one does not really possess.
hypocrite n. one who practices hypocrisy. - Webster’s Dictionary

Yep…I agree with you Wodjei…
I am not naive enough to expect purity from public servants…But this blatant hypocrisy has got to be enough to turn this skeptic…into a cynic…(sigh)

 

Comment by LLL | 2008-10-13 06:31:14

how did Ayers become wealthy? His parents?

Comment by gerard "Barracuda" Nedich | 2008-10-13 06:44:43

yes, his daddy is very rich…

a. hillary
b. mccain

america first!

 

Comment by hadenough | 2008-10-13 06:47:15

Yes. His parents were wealthy and powerful enough to harbor a fugitive on the FBI’s most wanted list [their son bill] for years and not be prosecuted for it. That kinda says something doesn’t it.

Comment by Hillary or Bust | 2008-10-13 07:06:18

Amazing how he rails against the capitalist system and yet benefits from it. Why didn’t he take all of daddy’s money and donate it to charity?

Comment by hadenough | 2008-10-13 07:09:45

Yup. And why didn’t bill ayers dirty f*cking hippie fighter of the ‘establishment’ bomb his parents house? They were the establishment.

Comment by bemused | 2008-10-13 08:51:58

Why did daddy put up with him anyway? Apparently Bill was the most charismatic of children. Apparently he also knew that when you are out to change the world, it’s so inconvenient to have to go to work. What a hypocrite, but I have to think the whole Ayers family is tainted.

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-10-13 08:59:19

O TEMPORA, O MORES!
Oh the Times!…Oh The Morals!

OR:

OY VAY!

Comment by jwrjr | 2008-10-13 09:24:14

Whar morals? The Obamacrat party appears to have none.

Comment by jwrjr | 2008-10-13 09:25:36

What, not Whar. (You can tell that it is Monday.)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Comment by Uppity Woman | 2008-10-13 07:46:30

His father was CEO of Commonwealth Edison and very powerful man in Chicago. Heavy ties to the Daleys as well. He sat on a zillion boards as well.

http://www.northwestern.edu/newscenter/stories/2007/06/ayers.html
Thomas Ayers

 
 

Comment by tarheelmrp | 2008-10-13 06:51:28

Tom Ayers was CEO of ComEd. (suprise surprise) Was also active real estate investor.

 

Comment by Hillary or Bust | 2008-10-13 06:59:05

Extremely disturbing story about a young Bill Ayers and how he forced his college date to have sex with his roommate and brother:

http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=9e8cd8a7-e90b-4311-8aa9-aefd014a14b2

It’s horrifying to me that this man walks free and actually has a cushy job a a professor. People like this make me wish there really was a hell.

Comment by beebop | 2008-10-13 07:17:13

He’s a disgusting pig … he’s what he used to call other people.

 

Comment by Tuppence 411 | 2008-10-13 08:46:34

OMG! Distrubing is an understatement. I am heart broken for the woman and furious at the scumbag Ayers.

 
 

Comment by Lindsy | 2008-10-13 06:59:38

Look I’m convinced that the best John McCain and Sarah Palin can do is just let this election go. NOTHING is going to stick to Obama. The press will not report anything that damages him- have any of them touched any of the stuff in Hannity’s program last week? NO. The only people who watch FOX are the people who already going mostly for McCain.

I don’t think the MSM will do anything with the Odinga story either. Or they will whitewash it like they did Bill Ayers.

Americans will elect a dangerous pathological liar as our next President. Sometimes we get what we deserve.

Comment by wodiej | 2008-10-13 07:12:34

either you are a troll or just have a piss poor defeatist attitude, neither are welcome here. If you have nothing constructive to add to our goal, why come here?

Comment by beebop | 2008-10-13 07:18:16

I’m thinking TROLL myself … a new style … the you can’t win TROLL

 
 

Comment by pan | 2008-10-13 07:15:37

All this about Ayers, etc. seems to be just raising McCain’s negatives. Obama did the same thing with Hillary - that is, he projected all his negatives onto her. She tried to be respectful like McCain and she lost. The Washington Post reports Obama now has a 10 pt. lead over McCain. It seems unlikely that he will be able to overcome the fact that Obama completely controls the message coming from the MSM.

Comment by hadenough | 2008-10-13 07:21:01

Obama completely controls the message coming from the MSM.

Just one point: The “liberal media” controls obama’s message. What is or isn’t important is decided by the “liberal media.” obama is a “liberal media” creation just like george bush.

Comment by pan | 2008-10-13 07:22:58

I think many people are just brainwashed by this - even members of my own family. I have never seen anything like it.

Comment by hank48188 | 2008-10-13 07:55:36

Why don’t you go to a Blog called USA Survival News and download the FBI Files of Obama’s Mentor in Hawaii, Frank Marshall Davis, a Communist and Pervert. His Grandfather thought Davis would be a good person to advise young Obama. Send it to your friends and Family, let them know where Obama’s been coming from his whole life.

 
 

Comment by alibe4Hillary | 2008-10-13 08:38:18

There is no liberal media. It is a corporate media. Obama is the corporate candidate. He is no Democrat. Have you ever seen the MSM promote a liberal? Be real. Was the media behind Kerry, Gore, Clinton,(Bill or Hillary) Carter etc. It has not happened. There are 10 right wingers for every progressive in the MSM. And yet this year the MSM is pushing Nobama! WHY? Well, Nobama is in the pocket of the corporate America. He is not liberal. It is why the election is bizarre. I, a liberal Democrat, voting for McCain is as strange as anything I can think of!

Comment by Ferd McBerfle | 2008-10-13 08:54:26

Well, Nobama is in the pocket of the corporate America. He is not liberal.

That is the truth. In Oblockhead, the Corporate Welfare Queens have a charlatan who talks the liberal talk–and that is all he has ever done. He will do whatever they want him to do because the office they will give him is center-stage and will feed his egocentric need for complete attention. It hasn’t gone unnoticed that Oblockhead has really done nothing of use for any of his addle-headed supporters. And I won’t give Oblockhead any credit for any ideology, except the ideology of “the One”. He is neither liberal nor conservative–he is an island unto himself and we will be marooned on it if he isn’t defeated.

 

Comment by Monet | 2008-10-13 12:41:11

I agree, it’s not a liberal media - it’s a corporate media. The corporate media wants Senator Obama and their desire has given new meaning to the Reagan Teflon.

Absolutely nothing is sticking to Senator Obama. Nothing. He’s Teflon greased well with cans of PAM. Even on Fox where the corporation’s views are more conservative and geared for the church attending moralistic demographic, at 8pm Mr. O’Reilly mitigates Senator Obama’s friendship and career associations with Mr. Ayers and at 9pm, Mr. Hannity raises the issue. Mr. Hannity didn’t start raising the issue on a daily basis until recently. Which makes it look like Fox is covering all bets just in case Senator Obama wins the election and the Ayers connection comes back to bite Senator Obama and the media.

 
 
 

Comment by Uppity Woman | 2008-10-13 07:49:10

McCain shaved four points off Obamas Gallup lead in three days. They wouldn’t keep doing it if it weren’t working.

 

Comment by Five Thirty | 2008-10-13 07:53:37

Actually, I’m reading that it is now Sen. Obama who is losing advantage, losing points in the polls.

 
 

Comment by Khan Krum | 2008-10-13 07:31:51

You must be a troll because you expose the views you share with Obama bin Biden, i.e., that America deserves because it is a “downright mean country” that is no longer what she was. The America I know and love doesn’t deserve this half-witted closet Muslim commie scum bag. What’s up with that?

 

Comment by fif | 2008-10-13 08:37:21

Lindsy, that’s not accurate. Obama’s negatives went up 10 points last week alone. The only reason he is getting the support he has is because there is a “D” after his name, not because people are wildly excited about him in general. He should be up 20 points after 8 years of Bush and the falling economy.

Also, FOX is the highest rated news program and their viewership includes 30% Dems & 30% Independents. They start the story, and then it spreads. Ayers is being reported on all the networks, including CNN. Like it or not, negative stories work.

 

Comment by bemused | 2008-10-13 08:53:06

Prozac may help you with that defeatist attitude.

 

Comment by lark | 2008-10-13 09:13:36

[ADMIN: You are the troll, and you're gone. To the real Lark: I'll get rid of the imposter's comments.]

Comment by lark | 2008-10-13 09:27:41

Why did you used my name?

Why with millions of names do you have to impersonate my name?

Could the ADMINISTRATOR HAS ANY RECOURSE to see if this person using my ID can get purged from this thread or something?

Comment by AnninCA | 2008-10-13 12:45:26

I had people at Huffpo imitating me, Lark. consider it a compliment. :)

 
 
 

Comment by Dr. Kate | 2008-10-13 09:40:59

yawn. scratch. yawn.

troll–nothing to see here just move along. Not even a good try, troll.

 

Comment by C.S. | 2008-10-13 10:06:30

New version of the old WWII style Tokyo Rose propaganda? Can’t win so just give up and we’ll let you join the party. It’s amusing to see Soertoro/Obama’s infiltrators trying to use mediocre psychology to convince us survivors of Bush’s 8 years that it’s hopeless. If it worked we would have given up 8 years ago and here we are still fighting.

Comment by Ferd McBerfle | 2008-10-13 12:47:12

You’re right on the money. Excellent point.

 
 
 

Comment by bill | 2008-10-13 07:12:52

That does not seem “blazing” to me.

They should include his speech in Venezuela from 2006 where he praised Chavez’s education policy. They should include Odinga’s Luo slaughtering Christian women and children fleeing a burning church and then all the other shady Chicago crooks.

Perhaps it is a fantasy but I do believe America and Americans try to be fair and work hard. We do have terrible incidents in our past like the forced resettlement of and genocide against Native Americans, slavery, internment camps. But we have enough Christian guilt to try to learn and not commit the same terrible behavior again.

Having learned frou our past, why should be elect someone whose cousin slaughters Christians or use mentor/adviser/employee prefers Chavez to the US?

 

Comment by McKatmoon | 2008-10-13 07:13:18

Guilt by bad judgement; all O has ever done is run for office or seek some sort of position of gratification to pad a resume devoid of anything substantial. For the msm to scream about connecting O to a real association he has is foolish. To down play it is folly and to declare anyone who feels sickened by it as racist will be the undoing for O. No one likes someone else to get away with something that the rest of us would be spending some serious interrogation time over. Think about FISA, then think about this association. Now really, would this sort of association be alright for anyone else? Hell no, we would be on the no fly list amongst other unsavory things, so it’s pure b.s for anyone to push that this is a non-story because good old MR.Ayers is now a professor. Teaching doesn’t excuse or give dispensation for actions which caused death to other people. IT does how ever bring into focus just how far the media will go, as well as the dem party to excuse for the one, what is not excusable for all other Americans.

Guilt by bad decision, guilt by egomania, and certainly guild by the poorest of judgement.

McCain/Palin 08

Comment by hank48188 | 2008-10-13 08:05:35

You are so right, this is the 6th run for Office in 12 Years for Obama, he’s always running for a better job, never doing the job he has. This guy has been a long term project for his Owners

 
 

Comment by Judy L. NC | 2008-10-13 07:14:03

- Here in Raleigh NC this weekend, we enjoyed heavy airing of the Ayers ad.

- LMAO at NPR this morning–They chalked off the poor attendance (”couple thousand”) at the Biden/Hillary/Big Dawg event in Scranton to two football games on TV. Bwahahahaha!

- So I put my McCain/Palin yard sign up on Saturday along with two little American flags (thanks foxylady) AND my Hillary yard sign. My Cheeto-eatin nephew who rents a suite in my house is royally pi$$ed at me and the 8 year old next door cried, “why, Miss Judy?” when he saw my sign—said his daddy told him Obama was going to stop the war.

Comment by hadenough | 2008-10-13 07:37:43

Ha! I’ll live vacuously through you.

All I’ll say about it is I live in the heart of darkness [dirty f*cking hippie area]. I would love to put up a mccain sign in front of the house but I’m too chicken. Can’t afford to have weaselly oborg vandalize the car and fire bomb the house.

Comment by wodiej | 2008-10-13 07:39:39

I don’t blame you…it’s not worth having your property vandalized. I hesitated putting a sign in my yard but went ahead and went for it. Lots of other McCain signs around so I’ve got company.

 

Comment by bemused | 2008-10-13 08:59:58

Please, I was a hippie before the WU/SDS/BP etc. spoiled everything. These guys aren’t hippies, they are gangstas.

Comment by brodie | 2008-10-13 11:26:10

I’m with you- these folks aren’t anything close to hippies. I was a child of the counter-culture, but I sure as hell don’t approve of ANYTHING Nobama has done or that has been done in his name. The weather underground weren’t “hippies” either- they were were just home-grown terrorists giving everyone else a bad name. Just as Nobama is giving Democrats a bad name… just sayin’

 

Comment by AnninCA | 2008-10-13 12:52:22

Ditto here. I’m appalled by the ageism and sexism of this year by Democrats.

They lost me on that issue alone. I simply worked too hard to watch those principles be tossed aside in favor of hunting down “code” for racism.

Any “ism” isn’t hard to spot, for gosh sakes. And none of it is OK.

I don’t agree with the “Arab” comments. I don’t agree with the “He’s erratic” comments either.

Both are dead wrong and offensive.

 
 

Comment by WestPalm2008 | 2008-10-13 09:02:26

Lol, I know what you meant to say, but the big difference between “vacuously” and “vicariously” TOTALLY changes the meaning!

 
 

Comment by beebop | 2008-10-13 08:05:21

I have been pleasantly surprised not only at the longevity of my McCain/Palin sign but also at the number that have sprung up here in Akron. My sister and her uninformed husband are voting for a “democrat” … I was so tempted to take a yard sign from the volunteer office and put it in their yard for their welcome home, but I am afraid to leave my young nieces without a daddy!

 

Comment by destardi | 2008-10-13 08:39:10

God luv ya!!!!

PUMA, Miss Judy! :)

 

Comment by silverfox | 2008-10-13 09:37:19

Judy L. NC…

you rock!

taking a stand right now in the face of the obama left cover machine re-education process totally makes you a true patriot.

thanks for your courage.

Comment by Judy L. NC | 2008-10-13 09:46:30

***blushing*** I’m old and just don’t give a hoot what most people think of me any more.

 
 
 

Comment by McKatmoon | 2008-10-13 07:16:53

Hiya Judy,

Here in small town TN, our yard sign went up 2 weeks ago, then we say another and another. I haven’t seen one for the O yet. As far as ads, none on networks, some on the odd cable channels for the precious; I would say our state is not in play. ROFL

Comment by Judy L. NC | 2008-10-13 09:16:01

Still running 2:1 for McCain in my subdivision. Supposedly, there are a net 600,000 “new” voter registrations in NC. ACORN is here, so that all remains to be seen. I can tell you they’re NOT in my neck of the woods.

 
 

Comment by cher | 2008-10-13 07:17:34

Why does’t anyone want to see the “real” obama? He is a very “sneaky”"scarey” person. why didn’t the media report last week that his “fired” Islamic Relations rep. had a “meeting” with people with ties to Hamas? That his present “Islamic” rep. was upset by this meeting? The media white-washes everything that they can if it in anyway can harm Obama…Why?? Ayers, Odinga, Rezko, Wright…All Bad judgement on Obama, he downplays them, now its his association with ACORN, again, downplayed. He has only one agenda, that is to lie to us, so he can be President. How can a college educated man be so blind, dumb, and nieve when he picks associations, i wouldn’t want someone so nieve to be the most powerful person on earth, it would be dangerous not only to the U.S. but to other nations. Obama may be his own worst enemy!

 

Comment by Will Smith | 2008-10-13 07:35:40

There it is again excellent post by Jennifer Rubin at commentarymagazine. IMHO if Republicans and McCain are unable to call Obama who he is on Ayers, ACORN and the rest of the Obama three-ring Leftist circus they deserve to get voted out of Congress and Senate.

What Is It With Obama’s Opponents?
Jennifer Rubin - 10.13.2008 - 6:46 AM

Barack Obama certainly has a genius for picking political opponents. First, Hillary Clinton chose “experience” over “change” as a theme and sat atop the most dysfunctional presidential campaign ever seen. She didn’t hone in on Reverend Wright nor plan for post-February 5 primaries. She didn’t organize caucus states. When she finally got her act together and a theme — fighting for the little guy with a robust economic plan — it was too late.

Then along comes John McCain. For a while he runs on biography. Then he comes up with some clever ads to debunk Obama’s popularity and fixes on energy policy. But he doesn’t hone in on strong>Reverend Wright and lets the summer and all of September pass before Bill Ayers, ACORN and the rest of the Obama three-ring Leftist circus make an appearance. Like Clinton, he waits political eons to come up with an overarching economic message ( we are promised one this week). In the meantime he goes to war with the media (strong>Steve Schmidt sounds eerily like Howard Wolfson yelling at the media to do their job), but not personally with his opponent.

Is there some political stun-gun which Obama uses to numb his opponents? It is hard to fathom how not just one, but two opponents could be so haphazard in their approach. strong>Maybe both Hillary and McCain couldn’t in their heart of hearts believe the American people in their infinite wisdom would take seriously an inexperienced, far-Left neophyte with an aversion to specific policy recommendations for very serious problems. But if so, they severely underestimated voters and their willingness to extend him the benefit of the doubt and to accept the most minimal descriptions of both his past affiliations and future plans.
In the case of McCain, we are told over and over again that no matter what McCain did it was an impossible year for a Republican, made more impossible by the financial meltdown. That might be the case. But regardless of the poll numbers no one can look at the McCain effort and say “You can’t fault them for lack of a creative vision!” Or, “They sure set out a viable game plan and executed it with gusto!” Certainly, you can fault the “campaign” — a group of advisors, consultants and staff people. But ultimately the blame — just as it did with Hillary Clinton — rests with the candidate.

http://www.commentarymagazine.com/blogs/index.php/category/contentions?author_name=rubin

Comment by Ferd McBerfle | 2008-10-13 08:00:53

Certainly, you can fault the “campaign” — a group of advisors, consultants and staff people. But ultimately the blame — just as it did with Hillary Clinton — rests with the candidate.

And while that may be true in a direct sense, it is just the more of the same fiction being perpetrated by the MSM. McCain wouldn’t need to go negative (which he doesn’t really like to do) if Oblockhead ran an up-and-up campaign as he promised in the first place (Remember all the prattle about THAT).

And when Mccain does go negative, he is then attacked for so doing. No, the initial (and necessary and sufficient) cause of this fiasco lies directly on the provocateur flimflammer, Oburqa.

McCain is responsible for his campaign; Oburqa is responsible for the entire tone, quality, and content of the election cycle.

 

Comment by hadenough | 2008-10-13 08:49:41

First, Hillary Clinton chose “experience” over “change” as a theme and sat atop the most dysfunctional presidential campaign ever seen.

Except Hillary won the primaries. Despite being outspent usually 3 to 1 sometimes much more Hillary won. Hillary’s “most dysfunctional presidential campaign ever seen” got more registered dem votes and more votes period than obama’s Greatest Campaign In History. The dnc was forced to steal the primary in smoked filled backrooms. Myabe the articles larger point is valid but that “liberal media” talking point stopped me cold.

 

Comment by silverfox | 2008-10-13 09:55:21

will smith….

first Hillary refuses to truly discredit obama, and now McCain follows suit. pretty much. it’s as if they are only “allowed” to push it so far. all the while they are both handicapped by being Caucasian, and challenging an African American to tell the truth about who he is. what a set up for major manipulation of the populace. the almighty race card bludgeoning
everything that comes within whistling distance of blowing the bobo’s cover.

who is the covert force behind obama?

i have a feeling that we don’t really want to know.

it’s just that nefarious.

 

Comment by waldenpond | 2008-10-13 10:08:25

Yes, you can fault the campaign. McCain has done what Clinton did but has failed to follow her example and shake up his campaign. I don’t envision McCain is hands-on in as many areas of his campaign as Clinton but he needed to have gotten rid of several people.

Obama has a huge money advantage over McCain and the Repubs have also delayed doing their job (attacking) to get their candidate elected. The Repubs needed to wait until after the last debate so the moderator doesn’t go after McCain for picking on Obama.

McCain has a challenge fighting the media (that is ‘who’ he is running against) but he needed a strong message. He just doesn’t seem willing to fight. His response to his audience complaints was weak.

 
 

Comment by hadenough | 2008-10-13 07:45:39

halperin goes there. The front page of halperin’s time mag site has the ‘obama as Christ’ photo.

Photo from halperin’s time mag site:
markhalperin.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/obamaohioflg.jpg?w=360&h=235

The halo photos of obama were used by the “liberal media” all through the primaries.

 

Comment by hadenough | 2008-10-13 08:06:29

We have been told over and over again by the “liberal medeia” obama has run The Greatest Campaign In History. Everybody luvs everybody, they are all on the same page, the message control is perfect. Or maybe not.

spokesoborg corzine Sunday morning:
GOV. CORZINE: Now is the time for steady leadership. We can’t have a new economic program each morning we wake up.
blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2008/10/brokaw_on_nbcs_meet_the_press.html

obama Monday morning:
Obama to Deliver Major Economic Policy Address
thepage.time.com/2008/10/13/obama-to-deliver-major-policy-address/

Comment by Ferd McBerfle | 2008-10-13 08:26:00

Obama to Deliver Major Economic Policy Address

Oh, goody! Yet another overblown, officious oratorical collection of uhs, ers, and ahs designed to delude the derelict electorate. How do we shut his gaping maw?

Cripes, I’m going to have to put the dogs outside to keep them from baying along with him. Thanks, a lot, Oblockhead.

Comment by waldenpond | 2008-10-13 10:54:35

He won’t uh and er… the media approves that he is on teleprompter at ALL times. I won’t listen to his speech but it will have to be very generic as the market is rebounding today (it’s up 480)

 
 
 

Comment by Not Your sweetie | 2008-10-13 08:06:48

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-10-13 08:10:53

The last line says it all: “nothing is illegal until you get caught”

Maybe Obama should change his campaign signs to reflect his new motto!

Comment by Zee | 2008-10-13 11:50:32

Well, be sure to credit who WROTE that line…”not your sweetie” who misquoted Jackson.

There IS no “massive voter fraud” because they’re aren’t massive amounts of voters showing up and voting fraudulently.

Try thinking for yourself instead of getting hysterical over manufactured Republican outrages that don’t exist.

All lists have to be vetted. As Alice Palmer found out when she was kicked off the ballot when Obama found enough fraudulent names that she could not run for re-election because she didn’t have the required number of valid voters in order to run. She was a popular state senator, too, so she didn’t NEED to nor was she TRYING to defraud anyone. She was just either careless or too trustful…and Obama knew the FACTS OF LIFE: you can’t trust the public to be 100% truthful.

You’ve got to vet the lists. That’s a given. Accusing people who are vetting the lists when they succeed in finding fraudulent names? That’s a Republican manufactured outrage.

 
 

Comment by Shiloh | 2008-10-13 08:11:01

Yes, this is the new spin that is out there - nothing wrong with fraudulently registering voters as long as they don’t try to vote. In other words, don’t worry it isn’t our intent that they actually vote.

We are also hearing the whine that voter fraud is different than voter registration fraud and the media is being unfair (!) to ACRON by suggesting that they are being investigated for voter fraud.

Whenever you hear this stuff just say it is trying to cheat the election process and the public considers that voter fraud - too bad!

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-10-13 08:26:40

Barky is desperate…Keep defending the IMMORAL & UNETHICAL Jesse…You are a JOKE!!

I think Barky’s new defending the unethical wll go over well with folks over 35…lol…Some political genius….sheeeesh!

 

Comment by Zee | 2008-10-13 11:39:33

ACORN is required by LAW to turn in all the names they gather. They themselves vet the list and flag the dubious ones.

The lists are vetted, and the prosecutions are politically motivated. Witness the state attorneys that BUSH ILLEGALLY FIRED after the last election, because they had too much integrity to go along with this same old scheme last time.

 
 

Comment by Zee | 2008-10-13 11:35:55

Nice freaking try, and would you SHEEP quit bleating in fear when rethuglicans post crap like this?

Try reading for yourselves and then RECOGNIZING when thugs are twisting and rewording and lying to your face instead of running around repeating this crap?

Jackson said it was WRONG, and then he said the OBVIOUS: it’s not voter FRAUD unless someone shows up and votes. This is not only fact, it’s common sense.
All these damned rethuglican trolls infesting this place keep shrieking about “massive” voter fraud. There is NO SUCH THING. It would be impossible to get massive amounts of people to risk imprisonment by showing up to impersonate fraudulent voters.

The voting rolls are being vetted. That’s good and NORMAL. Get a damned clue already.

And whatever “not your sweetie”s agenda is, here is what Jackson REALLY said:

“Obviously it’s not right for a fake ‘Tony Romo’ to be registered in Las Vegas,” Jackson continued, referring to the professional football player whose name turned up on a Nevada voter registration list. “But remember the basic point — it’s not voter fraud unless someone shows up at the voting booth on Election Day and tries to pass himself off as ‘Tony Romo.’

Comment by waldenpond | 2008-10-13 11:49:56

You are correct, this is not ‘voter’ fraud. Fact: ACORN’s activities ARE illegal… it is called ‘registration’ fraud rather than voter fraud. There is not enough time to check all of the fraudulent registrations coming through which is rather the point. The registrations will be checked eventually (extending after the election,) and the typical legal remedy is a typically a fine. Fact: ACORN has lost prior court cases and been fined.

‘Registration’ fraud IS illegal. Get a clue.

 
 
 

Comment by typewriterstreaming | 2008-10-13 08:26:33

I hope they do more than email this around, which I saw elsewhere was the plan. I haven’t seen one national spot in NYC -I understand McCain isn’t going to waste money in this Obamabot zone, but I should be seeing cross overs from national media buys. I see the One’s all the freakin time. Nothing from Republicans. The only tv coverage I see is the occassional Fox news.

 

Comment by WasLNbutNoBamaBotsKeepStealingMyName | 2008-10-13 08:33:14

Hey, does anybody know if Corsi is going to be on Hannity? I thought it was supposed to be on last night?

Comment by Patrick | 2008-10-13 08:40:53

Corsi is on Hannity, tonight (Monday) at 9 pm EST. It has always been scheduled for this day/time. I think Hannity will break all viewing records with this one. I can’t wait!

Comment by WasLNbutNoBamaBotsKeepStealingMyName | 2008-10-13 08:47:18

Excellent! Thanks for the info Patrick.

I’ll get my popcorn ready… :-)

 
 

Comment by fif | 2008-10-13 08:45:06

I heard Corsi was on Hannity tonight.

 
 

Comment by Annette | 2008-10-13 08:39:02

Hey, I was just on another blog and a person stated that the court decided already in the Berg case, that Obama has 3 days to produce his vault version of his certificate! IS THIS TRUE? Did the judge rule?

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-10-13 08:43:37

Bergs site is obamacrimes.com…That is where the accurate info is…No decision yet

 
 

Comment by ford | 2008-10-13 08:44:25

This week is going to turn the worm. It is good that Odingobama is making his pitch Monday, because it will waste more of his assets before the big take down.

Right now Obama is spending huge sums of money…McCain is keeping some of his powder dry.

Remember the difference between a tactic and an over all strategy…Mac does!

 

Comment by workingclass artist | 2008-10-13 08:45:43

http://www.obamacrimes.com/
this is the link to Barg v Obama and the DNC case site

 

Comment by eleana | 2008-10-13 08:47:08

WHY NO MSM COVERAGE FROM AN OFFICIAL HEAD OF STATE?

17 June 2008 -Nairobi

Kenyan Prime Minister Raila Odinga is set to meet US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice in Washington to brief the top diplomat on the success of the Grand Coalition, aides have said. The PM, who is on a three-day visit, is also scheduled to meet top Congressional figures, World Bank officials and the business community who do business in Africa. An Odinga-Obama meeting is “not on the programme” of official talks…..(probably not a good photo-op.)
Perhaps Obama and Odinga met unoffically at Ethel Kennedy’s Hickory Hill, VA. Estate $28,500 a-plate fundraiser on Thursday, June 19.

FYI: Raila Odinga’s official website:
Your “Agent of Change”, “Register For Change”, “Vote For Change” http://www.raila07.com/

Why is it that every semi-controversial person connected to Obama is either marxist, socialist or communist?

Comment by silverfox | 2008-10-13 10:24:30

odinga is the key chess piece for the move into the African continent.

obama is also a key chess piece in the moving in this direction.

how convenient, wouldn’t you say?

Authentic Democracy is the true enemy of the guys behind the Curtain.

not the small d democracy that has been limping around for some time now.
the big D ship has long sailed.

the Manchurian candidate obama has been groomed for some time. thus no real info on his early years, college years,real birth certificate, etc…ad infinitum. all he really has given us is just the trumped up bios in his books, and his uncanny ability to lie like a rug.

and bill ayers never had to do one day of jail time for bombing the pentagon,killing innocent people, etc.. and he is allowed to write a book, and to teach teachers to propagate a viewpoint that undermines Democracy… Socialism/Marxism is one of the calling cards of thecoming world govt., and i suggest that bill ayers is deep cover for the the moving forward of that government’s agenda.

apology for the tin hat this morning. sometimes wearing it feels so clean.

 
 

Comment by InsightAnalytical-GRL | 2008-10-13 08:50:39

This is what I want to see!!!
***
Today, Grail Guardian has a new post…

Announcing the End of the “PC” ERA
by Grail Guardian

http://insightanalytical.wordpress.com/2008/10/13/announcing-the-end-of-the-pc-era/

Grail has a lesson on language, a few complaints about how it’s been used against us, and some ways we should all be shown respect…

 

Comment by Five Thirty | 2008-10-13 08:51:48

Question: why is the RNC choosing to go the email and You Tube route with this (Ayers connection)? If it is not on tv can it really be considered an ad?

 

Comment by Tuppence 411 | 2008-10-13 08:53:34

I heard a commentator refer to Barky’s radical “associations” as his INCUBATOR of anti-American sentiment. Excellent word choice.

Comment by Shiloh | 2008-10-13 09:05:28

The best tagline for me is what a Clinton aide said: he lacks American roots.

 
 

Comment by Sassy | 2008-10-13 09:05:05

The republicans had better find something that sticks…and SOON!
Yesterday, even Zogby was very dismissive of the Ayers connection, and talking about the dismal week McCain had.
Every one in the media is trying to minimalize BO’s connections to the scumbags he has courted for decades, so voters who don’t seek answers for themselves are in for a rude awakening!
I, for one, think character isssues are important!
A terrorist is a terrorist…period!

Comment by WasLNbutNoBamaBotsKeepStealingMyName | 2008-10-13 09:07:09

Yes, the reason nothing “sticks” to the Teflon One (no offense to the venerable brand!) is that the MSM makes sure that Precious is slicker than a greased pig, as we say down here in Georgia.

 

Comment by Five Thirty | 2008-10-13 09:07:18

Zogby only has 1 vote, just like everyone else.

 
 

Comment by Linda | 2008-10-13 09:05:14

THAT IS A FANTASTIC VIDEO. Now alls they need to do is find a way to trim it down a bit to air in on TV.

 

Comment by Goblintrain | 2008-10-13 09:34:54

Hey, tell me if i’m just smoking dope.

We all know that Obama has been buying 30 minute cable slots for Oct 29, but as yet don’t know exactly why.

We know here about 2 weeks ago, a MSM reporter went to Vietnam to interview one of McCain’s POW captors, but i have heard nothing more beyond that about that story.

Occasionally in the 2000 primaries, i heard those shameless rumors about McCain being some sort of traitor, a “songbird” as the story goes. Never heard them again until this election cycle. Up to now such rumors have only inhabited the darkest recesses of fear mongering conspiracy theories & the silly rhetoric of shock jocks. They have never grown legs & walked.

I’m sure your already see where i’m going with this. Do you suppose those 30 minute network slots Obama has purchased may be for a concentrated effort to discredit McCain as a POW? Maybe the suggestion sounds ridiculous, but isn’t this Election ridiculous? There is little i could put past seeing happen this time.

Now, don’t get me wrong, i’m not trying to start some wild rumor here, i’m just asking if this might be one possible angle. Maybe it’s not. But here is the potential problem i see.

While i may personally have no reason to doubt McCain’s integrity as a POW, the fact is that if i were put into a position of having to defend his story with documented facts, i probably would have a hard time doing it, & here is why. I evaluate him based on his record of public service as a Senator. His actions as a Statesman (whether i agree with all his positions or not) reveal to me a very honest & honorable man who has the moral courage to make difficult decisions. On that basis, i believe his POW account, because they are consistent with what i can observe about him. Tha’ts how i see it.

But, on this i can only speak for myself. If the Obama campaign really did make a concerted effort to discredit him as a POW, how easy would it be to sway the public, & how easy would it be to counter it with facts? Hopefully some of you here with better factual details than me can explain why or why not this would be a potential issue in the final days of this election?

TY, & sorry this post isn’t 100% connected to the topic, feel free to move it elsewhere if more appropriate.

Comment by Pennsylvania goes RED! | 2008-10-13 10:47:00

It’s possible but McCain himself admitted he broke under extreme duress. He said it at his nomination speech. And for every POW who maligns him there’s another two that will stand up for John.

If the 0bama campaign thinks maligning McCain’s service as POW is a winning strategy, I hope they roll with it.

Additionally, they are so stupid to announce two weeks ahead of time the 30 minute media buy.
Now if the GOP has anything really devastating to drop, they’ll do it right before n0bama’s spiel.

What a bunch of n00bs.
n00bama.

 
 

Comment by Andy | 2008-10-13 09:49:44

Politico writes “that distant ties ” : WTF?? What has distant has to do with anyting?? The fact that Obama chose to partner with Ayres EVER is what’s important and the root cause for disqualification.

The MSM keeps slanting the facts.

Someone should start talking about EDUCATION and what a FAILURE Obama has been. He failed by chairing a grant form a profoundly flawed Ayres and even with his millions OBAMA failed miserably to do some good: ask the American people
why would they then trust Obama with teh Education of their children???

I do not understand why the McCain camp does not bring Education into the equation. The American families will then listen carefully, very carefully because it is about their children.

Comment by Galt, Master Thrall of Planet Triskelion | 2008-10-13 10:00:44

Politico writes “that distant ties ” : WTF??

It is spin. It should have been reported at least as “ties” probably better yet as “past close ties.” And even then we don’t know how close these two parasites (Ayers and The Precious) are nowadays. The Precious certainly would never tell us the truth. Someone should ask Ayers what the Kasheestees have told him to do lately.

Comment by Linda | 2008-10-13 10:06:42

The media is now propaganda, using our airwaves and print for THEIR desired messaging and it’s sadly, no truth.

It became clear when CNN on Anderson Cooper 360 did their piece to claim “see, we covered Ayers”. And they actually lied in their piece saying “Ayers said he’s sorry he didn’t do more FOR VIETNAM”. NO NO, he never said FOR VIETNAM, he said he’s sorry he didn’t do more BOMBINGS, only he didn’ add anything after the “I’m sorry I didn’t do more”, because that came after not being sorry about the bombings…I’m sorry I didn’t do more”.

How dispicable CNN has gone in their false messaging.

Comment by Galt, Master Thrall of Planet Triskelion | 2008-10-13 10:17:02

The MSM is a steaming pile of felgercarb. When Barky loses I think our next step as activists should be to reign them in. A massive boycott needs to be organized. Hit them in the pocketbooks. What do you think?

Comment by Goblintrain | 2008-10-13 12:08:01

 
 
 
 
 

Comment by Jason | 2008-10-13 10:22:20

That video didn’t do it for me. When are they going to start stressing what Obama DID with Ayers - i.e. their work in radicalizing schoolkids and thus depriving them of the marketable skills they need to survive in life and without which the American economy will never be able to compete in the future?

I’m getting sick of the lameness of Republicans in dealing with this man. Everyone’s sick of the “unrepentant terrorist” line. Not that it’s not relevant, but it’s become a cliche now and it’s lost it’s bite. People are sick of just hearing that they “associated.” Tell the people what they did! Paint a picture of a man with a radical, socialist past who intends to bring the same agenda to the White House! Dammit!

Comment by Goblintrain | 2008-10-13 12:16:06

Ya, a term i first heard on Rush’ radio show is “not associations, alliances”. It describes it much better, because it is not isolated, it is pervasive, & it is not past, it is present. It encompasses virtually all of his political associations past & present.

 
 

Comment by standard | 2008-10-13 10:23:20

For me, personally, Obama’s Ohio and PA gaffes are way more damaging than his association with an old guy who was a radical decades ago.

I think Obama’s telling the Canadian Embassy not to worry about the the BS he was giving Ohio would hit more people in the gut.

 

Comment by dofogo | 2008-10-13 11:20:10

Great ad! Keep them coming GOP…the American people need to know this stuff and they certainly aren’t going to learn about this from the worthless MSM. And I would also like to add one big HUGE THANKS to everyone here at NoQuarter. You are my refuge in this crazy ass backwards election process!!! Keep up the excellent work!!!

McCain/Palin ‘08
Hillary ‘12

 

Comment by AdrianS | 2008-10-13 13:15:56

The October Surprise—Suit To Remove Barack Obama From The Ballot. Barack Obama And The Democratic National Committee Are Committing Fraud On The American People

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xyspCRmJv7w&eurl=http://obamacrimes.com/

Barack Hussein Obama is dangerous for America:
http://www.nextgenerationcorp.com/NextGenBlog/?p=32

 

Comment by shiloh1kb | 2008-10-13 16:19:31

Please don’t put all Dem’s in the same catagory I have always voted for the person I felt would be best for the job no matter what party. There are still a few good Dem’s out there. And I have been fighting for McCain from the start and will not stop till election day is over. Yes Obama is dangerous for America!!!

 

Comment by Jason | 2008-10-13 19:40:03

WILLIAM AYERS—TIMOTHY MCVEIGH—SAME SAME SAME

USE IT REPUBS….OVER AND OVER !!!

 

RSS Feed for This PostPost a Comment

Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)