RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Ballistic Obama Supporter Assaults Middle Aged Woman With Stick From Her McCain/Palin Sign

I tell you, I never worried much for the Second Amendment but now I am beginning to truly understand why people have weapons to protect their lives and property. You just don’t know what these nutcases are going to do any longer. Especially to women, since Obama and his followers truly hate them with deep passion. This from the party that pretended all these years to actually care what happens to women, thus duping them into carrying their water for them.

While the Democrat-leaning media continues to scare undecided voters with bedtime stories about some mythical angry McCain supporter whom nobody has seen, here is a real district attorney’s complaint documenting an unprovoked assault by an enraged Democrat against a McCain volunteer in midtown Manhattan: “Defendant grabbed the sign [informant] was holding, broke the wood stick that was attached to it, and then struck informant in informant’s face thereby causing informant to sustain redness, swelling, and bruising to informant’s face and further causing informant to sustain substantial pain.”

These are some sick bastards. I Just cannot comprehend how any woman could possibly support their enabler. It’s like they are almost deliberately voting for their own future oppression. Like a co-dependent thing.

Starting all the way back to the Primaries, Barack Obama has given a wink and a nod to the bashing of women any time someone feels like it. Young women are worried about Roe v. Wade? Women would have a lot more than that to worry about with Barack Obama as President. This man is a major misosgyny Enabler. He has set gender relations back a minimum of 40 years. I honestly can’t imagine what more some women need to see come out of this campaign short of a telephone pole on their heads—in order for them to Get It.

Here’s a shot of the woman’s eye injury, a copy of the DA’s complaint and a photo of the slimeball who beat up on a woman, shielding his “brave” self’s face.

Of course, you won’t hear about this on CNN or MSNBC. They are too busy investigating a plumber. But it’s just as well because the bloggers would probably make up some stories about the woman this sack of crap hit and somehow manage to make it her fault. Later they will all go home and kick the crap out of their wives and dogs.

Aren’t you a Real Brave Man, dirtball? We really want cool guys like you picking Presidents. I only regret I wasn’t the woman standing there, because you would be grabbing your sorry crotch instead of covering your face in this photo, you bastard. Somebody ought to take YOU in a room and only one of you comes out.

Trackback URL

RSS Feed for This Post161 Comments »

Comment by georgiapeach | 2008-10-17 21:35:13

I’ll volunteer for that assignment, if somebody can talk him into coming to Georgia. He looks like the type to run away crying the first time you hurt him.

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-10-17 21:40:07

NO, no, no send him over here to NC.

That fat bas*ard won’t know what hit him!

ARGH!

Comment by dpvegas | 2008-10-17 22:07:05

Pass him on to Nevada, ’cause I have some frustrations to take out on his sorry ass!

McCain/Palin ‘08

Comment by Baba Rum Raisin | 2008-10-17 23:35:49

I got a Jeep with a full gas tank over here in Henderson. What say we give him a moonlight tour of the Valley of Fire and leave him out there?

Comment by BettsAZ | 2008-10-18 00:54:35

We’d tie him to a saguaro out here in the desert.

 
 

Comment by TeakWoodKite | 2008-10-18 01:20:58

DPvegas drop kick his sorry @$%, when your done, over over the Sierras K?

And so it begins in ernest.

Comment by No Way, No How NoBama | 2008-10-18 05:36:07

Please send him next to the “D”…I’ll drop him off at the a stop on 8 mile.

Comment by No Way, No How NoBama | 2008-10-18 05:37:51

that was supposed to be….
I’ll drop him off at a bus stop on 8 mile.

…need more caffeine.

 
 
 
 
 

Comment by LoveObama | 2008-10-20 22:48:06

You people really are crazy….wow.

 
 

Comment by WasLNbutNoBamaBotsKeepStealingMyName | 2008-10-17 21:37:09

Yes, what did we see during the nobama campaign…Precious brushing Hillary off his shoulders…Bro’s before Ho’s tee-shirt…sexist rappers invited to campaign rallies…nobama giving Hill the finger during debates…

For the life of me, I cannot understand why one single American woman (except MO and Nancy P.) would vote for the nobama slimeball.

Comment by Salida | 2008-10-17 23:04:52

Thank you. I wonder too. I think he has no respect for women except MO. Even watch him, he’ll deal with Nancy one of these days. Do you remember Hillary Campaigned for him for his senate run?

Comment by BettsAZ | 2008-10-18 01:05:21

Obama has a passive-aggressive anger towards women.He knows MO could kick his skinny butt,and his inner-child seethes.

 
 
 

Comment by devilish | 2008-10-17 21:38:21

Why is it that Obama seems to bring out the misogynist in his supporters? From everyday-joes to the media (Hey, Chris “Tingly Leg” Matthews!)

I generally lean conservative, but even I was appalled at the treatment so many people perpetrated on Hillary Clinton. It was awful!

Obama – Yes We Can (beat and belittle women)

Comment by GrapeApe | 2008-10-18 09:55:37

I’m sorry, but why was it necessary to redact his name out of the document? He wasn’t the victim, and he’s not a juvenile.

 

Comment by a12 | 2008-10-18 10:20:00

Devilish:

“Why is it that Obama seems to bring out the misogynist in his supporters?”

I think this election has brought out the worse in a lot of people. We have the youth wearing ugly t-shirts, my s/o mentioned his son had on an “I hate Sarah Palin” t-shirt yesterday. Which is certainly mild compared to others we’ve seen. And I’m not going to get my panties all knotted up over his son’s t-shirt since I wore an “Impeach Reagan” button through the first few years of his administration. “I hate Sarah Palin” isn’t a warm and fuzzy sentiment, but we do have free speech and at least his t-shirt has words that can be used on the Disney channel.

Senior citizens are physically fighting each other. There was the 73 year old Democrat woman who jumped on the 75 year old Republican man’s back and started hitting him while the two were over seeing voting in an Ohio nursing home last week. The two in this story both appear to be over 50. In my quiet little area in northern Michigan, two over 40 women went on an Obama sign swiping spree two weeks ago. Swiping signs isn’t exactly the most mature way to express one’s political views.

The actions I’m seeing reported that physically harm a person or a person’s property tend to be by people who are mature and should know better. It’s usually the youth who swipe signs and hit each over the head. But not in this election. Either the nerves of people are really frayed or we’ve all lost our minds.

Comment by AnninCA | 2008-10-18 10:23:54

I agree. I blame campaign tactics, frankly. It’s entirely too many lies about the other guy.

People get really upset and way too involved.

Politics has long been a way for people to express indignation, etc. But it’s over the top this year.

 
 
 

Comment by SnarlingCur | 2008-10-17 21:39:27

His thoughts:

“I’m a progressive liberal, and she’s a racist conservative, it should be perfectly all right to beat her up!” “We isn’t everybody cheering for me?”

Comment by SnarlingCur | 2008-10-17 21:41:54

Why not we…Sorry

Comment by rapp | 2008-10-17 22:29:17

She’s married to a eskimo mix. She is not racist. Her friends are of mixed nationalities. Just an Obamabot spreading lies.

 
 
 

Comment by CarlaforHillary | 2008-10-17 21:43:17

I feel so bad for that poor woman. On primary day in Philly, the Obama supporters hunted us down at 12th and Market and got in our faces. Then they followed us to Rittenhouse square and tried to literally start a riot, with the blessing of the campaign person who was there. It was unreal. We were not following Obama supporters around, they were following us. Finally the media showed up and interviewed a bunch of Obots. We didn’t fight back because you that it would be spinned in the media that Hillary supporters went after the Obots.

Comment by latina | 2008-10-17 22:35:51

Don’t be sorry Carla for Hil. she is a real menace to Bamazoids.

Think, would you try to destroy the unimportant?????

 

Comment by libby | 2008-10-18 00:12:31

Just remember to vote for McCain. He needs it in Penn. I got a feeling there a plenty of Hillary Dems who will vote for McCain in Penn. The polls are flawed in their methodology and not to mention that Obama always polled MUCH BETTER in polls than in real voting against Hillary.

I’m a registered voter in Florida and I am making a 2600 mile trip next week from Los Angeles to Orlando, FL to vote for McCain.

I’m a beneficiary of Bill Clinton’s FMLA legislation … out here taking it for taking care of my mom …
I love the Clintons!!!!

 
 

Comment by kgirl1028 | 2008-10-17 21:43:42

You guys don’t get it, obama isn’t bring mysogeny out in people, he is bring the worst parts of his supporters. For some it’s ageism. Do you know how many people call mccain senile, racism in blacks, and in some people it’s mysogany. Natural leaders are like that, what ever they lean towards is where their follwers will go.

Comment by Nobama | 2008-10-17 21:45:33

Don’t forget erratic and unsteady…as the Obama’s campaign spelled out in their talking points the other day.

Comment by latina | 2008-10-17 22:38:48

and warmeonger and baby killer

 
 

Comment by sayitisntso | 2008-10-18 00:31:08

I thought it was about Unity. Whahappened?

Comment by BettsAZ | 2008-10-18 01:12:17

PUMA happened :)

 
 
 

Comment by HARP | 2008-10-17 21:51:49

Maybe the next time New York is attacked, the rest of the country will say…”get over it”

Comment by Baba Rum Raisin | 2008-10-17 23:37:53

Sounds like a plan to me!

 
 

Comment by Lynn | 2008-10-17 21:52:44

Unbelievable! Well, sadly, it’s really not that unbelievable.

 

Comment by DeniseL | 2008-10-17 21:52:49

I hope he’s in jail Nov. 4th so he can’t vote. Some people seem to have no respect for the rights that we have as Americans. How can someone love their country and not respect someone elses right to express their opinion. She could have lost her eye.

Why isn’t the MSM reporting on this A$$ instead of trying to ruin Joe the plumber’s life?

Comment by TxDi | 2008-10-17 23:31:00

Too damn bad his name was blocked out.
Would have love for folks to see who he is and who he works for and a address to contact his employer, like they did to Joe the Plumber.
Sorry a** sumb*tch, probably doesn’t work because he looks like a real lazy a**!!!

Comment by John House | 2008-10-18 04:49:07

His name is Bernard Feurerman. JennQPublic and Politico have published his name.

Comment by John House | 2008-10-18 05:20:18

Feuerman, sorry

 
 

Comment by Gerald | 2008-10-19 11:56:48

His face may be blocked as well as his name (for now). But the way people use their cell phones like cameras these days. I would be very surprised if no one took a few photos. Just give it a bit more time. Something may surface.

 
 
 

Comment by Anee | 2008-10-17 21:58:14

OT – did anyone see this hilarious video of Ed Shultz the radio talk show obamabot? He was on Fox and Friends.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=igoJWs7iDh0

Comment by SnarlingCur | 2008-10-17 22:09:36

That was with out a doubt, the best video I’ve seen all day. :)

Comment by dpvegas | 2008-10-17 22:22:02

Barky supporters can dish it out, but can’t take it, can they? I loved it, because I’ve NEVER liked Ed Shultz, even though I’ve been a Democrat for over twenty years.

 
 
 

Comment by WasLNbutNoBamaBotsKeepStealingMyName | 2008-10-17 21:58:34

people are getting sooooo tired of seeing obambi on tv every other minute. I think by the time his infomercials air, people will just turn off the tvs and go to bed. Yawn!

Comment by jwrjr | 2008-10-17 22:35:19

Since Obama is a known serial liar, I have no interest in anything he has to say. He might, by his actions convince me to vote for him … but first I would have to contact the Pope to verify the miracle.

Comment by latina | 2008-10-17 23:00:56

Not even the Pope, he might be under the Camp Obama filtered responses!!!!

 
 
 

Comment by SJ | 2008-10-17 21:59:57

I see Obama in New Hampshire today told the crowd that he was going to change the world.

Man I think I have heard it all now this man is really going off the deep end, of course am sure all of his supporters there today believed him.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/uselection2008/barackobama/3219308/Barack-Obama-vows-to-change-the-world.html

Comment by latina | 2008-10-17 23:14:10

Well, last time I heard something similar it came from a man whose ego was so big and distorted that he almost got away with it, at the expense of millions of lives, Adolf Hitler. The other side of the coin, is another one who we read was crucified because he did it indeed, Jesus. but some forgot about him. Shall we flip the coin and see what it is?? or can we just figure it out by ourselves. Hate this analogy but we have to face a little bit of reality here.

 
 

Comment by Deep Truths | 2008-10-17 22:01:46

Oh jeezus, it was a MAN! What a putz.

Obama-Nuts are going to need massive doses of Valium, marijuana and crack to get over the COMING DEFEAT OF THE ONE!

Every incident like this only emboldens the righteous (Centrist Democrats and like minded Republicans) to come out in force on November 4th and pull that lever for John and Sarah – The Reformers.

Its approaching something akin to a religious or spiritual awakening to damn Obama to Hell, or back to Hell.

 

Comment by EMJ | 2008-10-17 22:05:42

This is most comprehensive Obama history I’ve read, and it’s quite scary:

http://colony14.net/id41.html

There’s so much that is not widely known.

(and, oh yeah, Obama may not even be eligible to be a US Senator!)

Comment by SnarlingCur | 2008-10-17 22:13:06

Thank you! I’ll sending that out to a few people.

 

Comment by Chicago Joe | 2008-10-17 23:56:55

If you have time, review this. I knew most of it, but there were a few things here I had never seen before. It is stunning that we are in this position three weeks prior to election.

 
 

Comment by 30yrdem-not any more | 2008-10-17 22:09:26

These are some sick bastards. I Just cannot comprehend how any woman could possibly support their enabler. It’s like they are almost deliberately voting for their own future oppression. Like a co-dependent thing.

Isn’t that what Obama is doing? Trying to make the poor even more dependent?

 

Comment by MrMike | 2008-10-17 22:12:04

Remember when Howie Dean said he wasn’t aware of the misogyny from the likes of Matthews and the MSNBC boys? His excuse was he didn’t watch that much cable TV.
What a poor excuse, how can this man do his job as chair if he supposedly ignores a source a majority of American use for information?
Either he is entirely unsuited for the job or he is lying. Which is it?

Oh and BTW I hear Hollywood is working on a movie about Barack Obama rise to political fame.
The working title is “Mr. Capone Goes to Washington” :)

Comment by latina | 2008-10-17 23:33:02

Comment by JustMe | 2008-10-18 00:47:21

LOL MrMike…. BTW you have been missing!

The lion the witch & the con artists sounds better lol

 
 
 

Comment by hadenough | 2008-10-17 22:14:08

It’s a very good thing for obama that the “liberal media” luvs The Precious cause that means you won’t hear about this on msnobama, abcobama, cbsobama or cnnobama:

Rezko, Obama land-deal: Lawsuit targets

Just weeks before Election Day, a former banker has filed a lawsuit in Cook County Circuit Court claiming he was fired for reporting to his bosses that there had been some shenanigans with the paperwork on a loan involving the purchase of Barack Obama’s South Side home and its neighboring lot.

Kenneth Conner claims in the suit that an appraisal found the vacant lot purchased by Obama fundraiser Antoin “Tony” Rezko was worth $125,000 less than the bank’s first appraisal. The Republican National Committee was peddling the suit today with the apparent hope that Conner’s allegation would lend credence to the suggestion Obama needed Rezko’s help to finance the purchase of the Kenwood home–something Obama has denied.

The suit also includes this intriguing assertion: The Rezko loan file was subpoenaed by a federal grand jury in Chicago, and when the bank responded to the subpoena the lower appraisal wasn’t included in the papers sent to federal investigators.
http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2008/10/rezko_obama_landdeal_lawsuit_t.html

Sounds to me like obama couldn’t afford the house. So the cost of house was lowered by $125,000 and the $125,000 was added to the cost of the land next door. rezko paid the extra for the land and obama got the house.

Here is the “liberal media” trying to cover for obama:
Public records also suggest that the lower appraisal was off the mark. The bank doesn’t appear to have lost any money on their loan on the lot, according to land records. When the lot sold last year, the Rezkos netted roughly $54,500.

obama bought a ten foot strip of the land next door that rezko owned and over paid for it. According to factcheck.org the amount obama over paid for the strip of land just about equals the profit rezko made selling the land:
When the Obamas wanted to increase the size of their yard, they approached the Rezkos about purchasing a strip of the adjacent parcel. Obama told the Sun-Times that a 10-foot strip of the 60-foot lot appraised for $40,000. The Obamas nevertheless paid Rita $104,500 (or 1/6 of the total purchase price of her lot) for the strip. In 2007, Rita sold the remaining lot for $575,000 (or roughly a $54,500 profit on the overall property).

According to an appraisal the land was worth $40,000. obama over paid rezko by $64,000. So the profit was just about the amount obama over paid rezko. Had obama paid rezko the fiar market value for the strip of land rezko might have just broken even seel the lot. Instead obama over paying for the 10 foot strip means rezko made a profit.

At the time obama wanted to buy the house he could not afford it. So part of the house price was shifted to the vacant land next door allowing obama to pay a lower price for the house. Later after obama had received millions in book money he paid rezko back by over paying rezko for a ten foot strip of land. So the “liberal media” is pretending the tit for tat is proof there wasn’t any tit for tat. Amazing.

Comment by Docelder | 2008-10-17 22:26:40

But wasn’t it the case… I think I read this somewhere… that the adjoining lot now smaller in size… is now unbuildable for residential use by building restrictions after having sold 1/6 of it to the Obama’s. If this is the case… having an unbuildable lot next door to your house is the same as having a double yard for all purposes… except your neighbor gets to pay for the taxes on the lot into perpetuity.

Comment by hadenough | 2008-10-17 22:34:28

That could be. Works out well for obama. And the company that bought the land is owned by rezko’s former business attorney.

So rezko over pays for the land which means obama pays less for the house. Then obama pays rezko back by over paying for the strip of land. To finish it off rezko’s attorney over pays rezko for the vacant useless land from rezko.

Rezko does obama favor, obama pays rezko back then just when rezko needs money like crazy rezko’s lawyer launders money to rezko by over paying for the vacant land. It’s the Chicago way.

 
 

Comment by jbjd | 2008-10-17 22:35:56

BO admitted he overpaid for the 10-foot strip of land he bought back from Rezko’s wife, to the tune of 6X the property’s appraisal. Even assuming the purchase of the house in conjunction with the purchase of that adjacent land by soon-to-be-indicted pal Rezko could at worse be characterized as “boneheaded,” how would one characterize a politician who pays 6X the value of an asset being offered for sale to acquire that asset? Is that any way to run a government?

 

Comment by MrMike | 2008-10-17 22:49:19

I think that the site therealbarackobama had something on this, the strip of land that Obama bought off Rezko for over 100k was appraised at 40k.

 
 

Comment by mimi | 2008-10-17 22:14:10

This is the first time in my years of voting that I’ve ever seen a campaign where people erupt into violence over opposing viewpoints.

That in and of itself is reason enough for me to not vote for 0bama. The whole idea of democracy has been kicked to the curb. And to think, it was the Democratic Party who led the charge.

The mere fact that these people can’t even stop themselves has made me wonder about the deep-seated resentments living inside of people. I never realized so many white American males hated women. And white women in particular.

As far as AAs are concerned, well, this election has exposed publicly what I’ve known forever, that the black community is possessed with anger at the white community. And are convinced that all of their problems are the result of racism and racism alone.

But frankly, I don’t care how deep people’s respective anger is. We’re all angry about something. Our anger does not legitimize violent behavior over right as citizens of this democracy to support the candidate of our choice.

I despise Barack 0bama and I’ve had to stomach living in a community where 95% support him. It has not been easy, but I would NEVER try to deprive these misguided people of their right to support him.

That’s what it means to live in a democracy. Evry 4 years we get to choose a president. And up until Barack 0bama showed up on the scene, the process proceeded without threats of violence, riots and chaos. (And that includes 2000 & 2004.)

Why this fact alone does not disturb more people simply boggles my mind.

Comment by mimi | 2008-10-17 22:20:23

That’s:

Our anger does not legitimize violent behavior over our right as citizens of this democracy to support the candidate of our choice.

typo: Every

 

Comment by Ani | 2008-10-17 22:55:26

I have a number of friends, Dems, who are supporting McCain Palin.

I likewise have a few who were for Hillary but now will support Obama by default. What is amazing to me is no matter how much I tell them or show them about Barack’s lies, cheating or abhorrent behavior, they excuse him. I tell them about his violent supporters, they say that’s not his fault.

They have drunk the ‘all Republicans are evil no matter what’ kool-aid. Also because their was vote stealing by Repubs is 2000 and 2004, they don’t really care what Dems are doing that is similar or worse in 2008.

Sh*t rolls downhill. Leadership is from the top down — he could easily have put a stop to this kind of behavior back in January but he chose not to since it is the only thing that has advantaged him.

Comment by Ani | 2008-10-17 22:56:11

typo — because THERE was vote stealing…

 
 

Comment by elise | 2008-10-18 02:50:07

Hi mimi. The issues are so complicated, it’s like trying to unravel a ball of string. Every thing I believed to be true about the Democratic Party and our system of government has been brought into question this past year. First is the realization of how prevalent sexism exists here. Thirty five years ago, women were granted, by the Supreme Court, the right to make decisions over their reproduction and I believe this happened shortly after the birth control pill was made available. No matter what your political or moral positions, it is a fact these two things gave women more freedom than we had ever had. It seems impossible to believe only fifty three years had passed between the nineteenth amendment giving us the right to vote and Roe v Wade. Title nine was created about the same time as the Roe ruling. Nothing else has really happened to change the role of women in America. Affirmative Action did little to help and the attitudes didn’t change. Men still walk out on pregnant girlfriends, beat their wives, women are still paid less, are passed over for promotions and define each other superficially according to looks.

Nearly one-third of American women (31 percent) report being physically or sexually abused by a husband or boyfriend at some point in their lives.

· That on average, more than three women are murdered by their husbands or boyfriends in this country every day. In 2000, 1,247 women were killed by an intimate partner.

The Democratic Party is not a refuge for my rights and never was. Every election year, Roe is trotted out by both parties, the Dems expecting us to vote for them to maintain our rights, the Repubs to attract male voters who feel threatened and like the “little woman” to stay in her place. Two women, one from each party, who have dared to reach for more this year, have paid the price and been abused for their efforts. We are enablers every time we call each other names or allow men to do so.

On a recent post on nq, someone traced the origin of c#@t, but the history of the word doesn’t erase the degradation intended by it’s use any more than the study of the “n” word can erase the intent of it’s use.

I lived in Spain for ten years. It is a country many would call “macho” or male dominated society, yet women were treated with more respect there then here in our “enlightened” country. A woman is president of Argentina, another country considered male dominated. India and Pakistan have had women presidents, but they are Muslim countries which we are told are repressive of women’s rights.

In most countries in the world, the aged are respected and valued for their wisdom. In this country, they are often discarded and left to wait out the end of their lives in nursing homes because their familes are too busy to take care of them.

AAs make up about fifteen percent of the population in our country, women fifty percent. They are united by their culture. Women are divided by society. That’s why AA women are more loyal to their race than gender in spite of the fact they are abused in greater number and insulted in Rap music with few objections. There is a whole new generation of young women who have no respect for themselves or other women. They beat each other up in bathrooms of high schools and call each other names. I don’t care about Roe now even though I have voted to preserve it for over thiry years. That’s the one thing I have learned this year.

 
 

Comment by Jean | 2008-10-17 22:15:47

Wouldn’t it be funny if most people tired of seeing Obama, tune him out when he airs his half hour ad.

Comment by 30yrdem-not any more | 2008-10-17 22:18:57

I say turn off your tv and take a walk, play with your kids…get in some quality time with the family for 30 minutes…save electricity for 30 minutes all over America!

Comment by SnarlingCur | 2008-10-17 22:29:31

I’ll be surprised if it’s even a blip on the rating radar.

 

Comment by lisa in va | 2008-10-17 23:34:34

I’m planning on volunteering to clean the toilets at a nearby rest area. lol!

 
 

Comment by hadenough | 2008-10-17 22:37:25

There is a certain type of person that just can’t turn off an infomercial. I think that’s who obama is going for.

Only $19.95! Call now and get two more free!

 
 

Comment by 30yrdem-not any more | 2008-10-17 22:16:20

Sarah Palin is more qualified to be president than Barack Obama and we don’t have to ask if she was born in America. SHE has more government experience than Obama has and that stupid paper had to trash her while endorsing Obama. What else is new….

Comment by Five Thirty | 2008-10-18 01:12:44

and we don’t have to ask if she was born in America…

My question is – how would she respond if anyone, even opponents, *did* ask? And how long would she take about it?

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-10-18 01:14:26

Comment by Five Thirty | 2008-10-18 02:17:15

“what????”

In other words, like Senator Obama, would Sarah Palin not show her documents if asked to in court? (i.e., by asking to stay discovery.)

This whole documents thing might be an elaborate rope-a-dope game by the Obama campaign. But IMO if Sen. McCain can show his papers I don’t see why Sen. Obama doesn’t either. But it’s too late now even if he does – by waiting this long to convincingly show that he’s never held a passport as another national, he just indicates either a unwillingness to be transparent or a willingness to engage in political games.

 
 
 
 

Comment by John | 2008-10-17 22:17:05

The LA Times is owned by the chicago tribune. The la times is a flailing pile of crap that will give up the ghost soon enough.

Comment by socalannie | 2008-10-17 22:24:13

It makes me sad to say…I have to agree with you. The LATimes has let down all of its readers for the last several years.

 

Comment by Baba Rum Raisin | 2008-10-17 23:43:44

Actually the LA Times is owned by Sam Zell, who also owns the Chicago Tribune, and is a… wait for it … Real Estate developer in Chicago!

 

Comment by libby | 2008-10-18 00:14:09

Yeah … I’m out here on FMLA and you might as well call it a part of the Obama campaign.

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-10-18 01:17:52

LA Times has become a rag…takes at most 5 minutes to read it. It is understaffed, underfunded, no research based reporting, no in depth coverage of foreign or domestic affairs….it’s full of ads and fluff.

 
 
 

Comment by Andrew191 | 2008-10-17 22:19:53

Blue is the new brown. The woman that was assaulted was just being introduced to the Obama S.A.(brownshirts/storm troopers), you better get used to them. Obama will not ever criticize the disgusting and now violent actions of his supporters. He will either claim that he knows nothing about it or he’ll quickly change the subject as he did in the debate when the disgusting Palin T-shirts were brought up. The disturbing truth is that Obama is actually flattered when his supporters behave in increasingly anti social behavior. To a narcissist like Obama the more extreme the behavior of his followers, the greater tribute he is given. Pretend that you survive only on the loyalty that other people bestow upon you, wouldn’t you derive a great deal of fuel if your faithful were to ridicule your enemies, more fuel if they assault them, even more fuel if they kill them, and even more fuel if they commit suicide as the ultimate display of devotion?

Obama will put the blackest stain on the Democrat name if this plays out as I sense it will, perhaps he’ll choose a new party name for his particular brand of politics, and let the real Democrats off the hook.

Comment by 30yrdem-not any more | 2008-10-17 22:22:30

Its all a part of the “GET IN THEIR FACE” that he ordered them to do…He got in her face alright.

 

Comment by SnarlingCur | 2008-10-17 22:32:22

Obama isn’t blue,…he’s Burnt Orange!

 

Comment by Docelder | 2008-10-17 22:54:15

I have spent a good deal of time agonizing over this election… and what this election will mean to this country. I fear for this nation the impending “triad” of “Pelosi-Reid-Obama” and the far reaching impact of an imposed leftist fascism. For the life of me… I could not see why the right would ever let this series of events transpire. Look at the way we came here… “Monicagate” which begat “Bush”. Followed by 9-11 which begat Afghanistan and the “Patriot Act” followed by Iraq and followed by FISA… point being see how one thing has led to even larger things? Now we are seeing the “anointing” of “The One” accompanied by adulation of him by the MSM. This brings me the long way back to the impending “triad” of “Pelosi-Reid-Obama” and why we are or may be here… My best educated guess at this point… and I admit a guess is all I have is this… Think this through at least… this is way “out of the box” here it is the theory… The quickest shortcut to a right wing fascist state… is a failed left wing fascist state and the backlash from it. I think people are making a mistake of seeing “left wing fascism” on one end of a spectrum “right wing fascism” on the other. I see it as more circular like a globe where democracy is in the northern hemisphere and fascism is in the Southern hemisphere. In this view, right and left wing fascism are bordering nations on the other side of the world from where we want to be as a democratic nation. Changing from one to the other is really just crossing an imaginary “border”.

Comment by NoBamaNoWay | 2008-10-18 03:41:46

i think it’s very true that if obama gets elected his radical leftist authoritarian tendencies will discredit every decent thing that the democratic party has ever stood for. this is my biggest concern; he and his movement will do almost irreparable damage to the democratic party. then we’re really screwed. frankly, if i was a republican i’d be less worried about an obama victory than i am as a democrat.

 
 
 

Comment by remember | 2008-10-17 22:29:06

The blogs are saying Powell will endorse Barky. Ha! Things must suck over in Barkyland…he always looks for an endorsement to change the narrative…ha!

Comment by ohio | 2008-10-17 22:36:48

Actually, I wouldn’t be surprised as I heard him during an interview several months back and he basically said then that he would find it interesting to be able to vote for an AA in his lifetime. Said it might be his only chance. I knew then that he would do so. So this wouldn’t surprise me.

Comment by SnarlingCur | 2008-10-17 22:41:32

It’s a shame too, I love Colin Powell, except, not as much after Bush ruined him.

Comment by Baba Rum Raisin | 2008-10-17 23:45:25

Powell, who USED to be a Dem, stinks all the way back to the My Lai coverup.

 
 

Comment by remember | 2008-10-17 22:42:15

I believe he will be on Meet the Press.

Comment by Galt, Master Thrall of Planet Triskelion | 2008-10-17 23:45:32

Maybe Powell will “endorse” him but pull a Wes Clark? :mrgreen:

Comment by Baba Rum Raisin | 2008-10-17 23:51:08

If I heard that Powell was endorsing GRAVITY, I’d find a way to levitate myself around. His public life proves that being a mendacious fool, liar and ass-kisser is no respecter of Race in this country.

 
 
 

Comment by QUEENIE | 2008-10-17 23:43:28

one liar supporting another..no surprise there…Powell is a filthy liar who lied us into war..so Barky should be happy with his endorsement???????? and dems should be???????

wow ..the leap to the bottom has been swift!!

 
 

Comment by Five Thirty | 2008-10-18 01:16:48

The blogs are saying Powell will endorse Barky

A *lot* of people, major players in the government and in the media, are trying to distance themselves from the Dubya years.

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-10-18 01:21:08

Well isn’t that nice. Sorry, Powell was part of the Dubya years. He can try to “distance” himself, but history will show the truth.

Comment by Five Thirty | 2008-10-18 01:29:57

Well isn’t that nice. Sorry, Powell was part of the Dubya years. He can try to “distance” himself, but history will show the truth.

The complicity of the msm protects people like Powell, if only for the short run. Remember the Plame case? Remember how no one ever really got in trouble for that except Scooter Libby? The msm was involved in that.

 
 
 

Comment by NoBamaNoWay | 2008-10-18 04:25:36

what a joke. if it walks like racism…

 
 

Comment by Liz | 2008-10-17 22:33:38

Someone should publish his name, address and phone number just like HuffPo did for Joe the plumber. What a low down snake this guy is!

Comment by hadenough | 2008-10-17 22:45:29

If someone bombed joe’s house [bill ayers maybe] or God forbid hurt joe huffpo would be happy about that. In fact I’d say that’s exactly why web sites like huffpo publish personal info on people they hate. We aren’t like that [are we]. Let the law handle freaks like that asshole.

 
 

Comment by jbjd | 2008-10-17 22:36:41

Comment by jbjd | 2008-10-17 22:38:58

This refers to my comment above about BO overpaying for the strip of land adjacent to his house, which he re-purchased from Rezko.

 

Comment by hadenough | 2008-10-17 22:58:49

obama’s reason for getting the house cheap was the owners were desperate to sell the house. What obama hasn’t said and what nobody will ask him is why did rezko pay full price for the vacant lot next door if the sellers were so desperate to sell?

My theory: The sellers were desperate to sell. obama still could not meet the price. So they shifted part of the house price to the vacant land. obama gets the house cheap rezko over pays for the land next door.

 
 

Comment by KC | 2008-10-17 22:39:53

The Obama campaign inspires hate. Hate againt women. Hate against Jews. Hate against anyone who does not worship their messiah. It’s a cult of hate that can easily become a cult of violence.

 

Comment by Peggy Sue | 2008-10-17 22:42:34

You know the worst part of this is we’re “just” hearing about this case, yet the complaint was filed on September 15th. I would guess that those who read and post at No Quarter and elsewhere on the web are pretty well-informed and try to keep abreast of what’s going on. But here’s a case where a woman is beaten in public for political reasons, and it takes us over a month to read about it.

Imagine for a moment, the numbers of people who do not surf the net, read the blogs, the newspapers and endless articles out there and are relying on the mainstream media, the major networks for their information.

For me, that’s the scariest part of all because I absolutely believe [from everything I've read and responded to and focused my attention on and thought about for the last six months] that this campaign, specifically the Obama campaign, has set back the agenda regarding racism and sexism a good two decades, if not more.

But do enough people know?

This incident is a case in point. A thug bashes a woman over the head because she’s holding a McCain/Palin sign. And when he’s confronted, caught by the cops, does he express regret? No. He blames the election. He blames the sign the woman was carrying because “those people” make him so-o-o mad, just drive him crazy.

Those people.

Reasonable logic, I guess, if you’re a psycho case. And as far as I’m concerned there’s something psycho about this whole campaign cycle when the charge of racism is dropped every moment but the Obamatrons are blind to the raw, ugly sexism, the total disrespect of women that has gone so far that calling a woman a C..T is perfectly acceptable, even funny.

Ha-Ha!

We haven’t learned a damn thing from history. When you reduce any group–men/women, black/white, jew/gentile–to something less than personhood then you can ultimately do whatever you want to them. It starts with the names and public thrashings and then evolves into subtle accusations and then finally goes to places none of us ever want to visit.

Wake up, America! This has to stop. This has to be stopped!

 

Comment by Alien | 2008-10-17 22:46:46

More fun is when overexcited columnists attack candidates.

 

Comment by Linda | 2008-10-17 22:49:19

These folks have no mind so they are easily influenced,as examples consistentl show.

Just like bullies. No brain, just brawn.

I am no longer shocked after what I’ve seen from people we used to call friends. Where they irrationally respond with an “F U” when you question “That One”.

When I was told at the local office not to put stickers on your car if it’s a nice car and no one dares wears buttons in this terratory, because they seem to be mostly radicals and have no problem with the thug tactics Obama advises, I couldn’t resist. I do not take well to intimidation.

When a friend responded so arrogantly sighting Comic shows as though it was fact and because there are many more Obama signs, I went and put 2 signs in my yard.

When I went to the local office 2 days ago, I heard of a woman whose house was broken in to. Mostly damage and didn’t take anything but Ipods. Yes, coincidence I’m sure….but when her car was smashed in to downtown at the Plaza the other day and the only thing that was taken was her McCain signs from the front seat, coincidence is thrown out the window.

The police said it looks like a white pu truck slammed in to the door, broke the glass and took off with the signs.

isn’t Obsma just inspiring such, such, nasty, hateful, criminal activity? Gee, what a nice place with him on the scene.

 

Comment by SnarlingCur | 2008-10-17 22:50:23

 

Comment by Clinton Fan | 2008-10-17 22:50:58

That guy is forty NINE? He’s the most UNFIT forty nine year old I’ve seen in a while. If he keeps sucking back the brews and chowing down on the fatty meats he won’t make it another decade.

He should be ashamed of himself, beating on a woman like that…what a coward.

It’s plain he wasn’t raised right–the fat bass turd covers his face like a chicken, won’t face up to what he’s done…and he can’t even tuck in his shirt!

Jerk!

I don’t like it when EITHER side of the political spectrum gets physical, but it’s particularly outrageous when a big fat guy starts waling on a woman for POLITICAL reasons. That’s sheer THUGGERY, and that is unwarranted and DEMENTED.

 

Comment by Matilda | 2008-10-17 23:01:07

Eerily familiar– this just recently posted on Hillbuzz:

Kenyan insiders say Obama was part of takeover strategy.
Posted by hillbuzz under Uncategorized
1 Comment
DISPATCH FROM NAIROBI
Kenyan insiders say Obama was part of takeover strategy
Used 2006 ‘fact-finding’ trip
to criticize sitting president

——————————————————————————–
Posted: October 16, 2008
By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2008 WorldNetDaily

NEW YORK – Former members of Kenyan opposition leader Raila Odinga’s Orange Democratic Movement party have told WND when Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama visited Kenya on a “fact-finding” trip in 2006, he was carrying out part of a secret election strategy that also included exploiting divisive tribal tensions and ultimately taking advantage of rioting that left 1,000 dead.

The strategy document outlining the campaign earlier was referenced in “The Obama Nation” but could not be fully authenticated at the time of publication.

Now, however, research conducted in Kenya by WND has confirmed the authenticity of the strategy memo, which was prepared by a five-person Odinga “core strategy team” led by Peter A. Nyongo, the secretary general of Odinga’s Orange Democratic Movement party, with the assistance of four key Odinga ODM strategists, including Odinga speechwriter Adams Oloo.

It was reported to have been smuggled out of ODM offices by Christian former-ODM officials.WND’s sources in Kenya included several top ex-ODM officials who played key roles in Odinga’s 2007 presidentialcampaign, only to turn on Odinga when the candidate’s memorandum of understanding with Sheik Abdullahi Abdi, the chairman of the National Muslim Leaders Forum, proved to be real.

In that Aug. 27, 2007, document, Odinga promises within six months of becoming president he would “rewrite the Constitution of Kenya to recognize Shariah as the only true law sanctioned by the Holy Quran for Muslim declared religions.”

Raila OdingaThe former ODM sources in Kenya supported the authenticity of the campaign strategy by noting Odinga did conduct a campaign against President Mwai Kibaki by charging his administration with corruption, advancing anti-Kibaki sentiments aimed at inciting Kenyan youth to vote for Odinga and ultimately calling for protest by Odinga’s fellow Luo tribal members. Kibaki is of the majority Kikuyu tribe.
The “protests” turned violent, and in January and February a brutal wave of Odinga-supporting, machete-wielding Luo mobs killed an estimated 1,000 members of the Kikuyu tribe, displaced over 350,000 Kenyans from their homes and destroyed some 800 Christian churches, all without a single mosque being damaged.

The sources reported Odinga simply was following the script his policy strategists laid out for him in the Nyongo strategy document.

The strategy document remains available at this link.

Obama’s involvement amounted to a coordination with Odinga on the campaign, according to the sources.

The general tone of the strategy was to encourage the Odinga campaign to claim to be leading in the presidentialrace regardless of the actual numbers and be prepared to proclaim victory even if Odinga lost.

The officials poll results showed he lost to the incumbent by about 250,000 votes.

The plan called for “opportunities” for Odinga to pursue, including efforts to “exploit anti-Kikuyu statements,” with a determination to “leverage the vulnerability of the Kibaki administration responses to corruption” and confront Kibaki with “a powerful anti-corruption message.”

The final strategy the document calls for is exploiting ethnic tensions and using “violence as a last resort” to gain power. Among the 1,000 killed, reports say, were several dozen women and children who died when the Christian church in which they had sought refuge from marauding Muslim gangs was burned down around them.

The ex-ODM sources said Odinga followed the strategy script exactly, including his ultimate use of tribal conflict to gain power.

While Odinga never had explicitly demanded violence, the former ODM sources said Odinga used “code language” to his Luo backers to convey the instructions to burn Kikuyu homes, rape women and kill men.

Obama’s part in the strategy was to openly attack the Kibaki administration in meetings where Odinga was in a very public attendance at Obama’s side, the sources said.

WND previously reported a news report by a Chicago WBBM-TV news team of Obama’s 2006 trip to Kenya. The report showed the senator undermining the Kibaki government in a speech delivered to the editorial staff at the Nairobi offices of the Standard, a prominent Nairobi newspaper, and at a separate appearance in which Obama delivered a public speech at Nairobi University of Nairobi, two hours after the appearance at the Standard.

The ex-ODM sources argued Obama and Odinga together were implementing in a coordinated fashion the strategy the Nyongo-led policy advisers had crafted in the internal strategy document.

The two politicians remained in touch through that time period, as WND also has published a report referencing a copy of a private Dec. 22, 2006, e-mail in which Obama personally informed Odinga that “all our correspondence [be] handled by Mr. Mark Lippert.”

Lippert, at that time, was serving as a foreign policy advisor in Obama’s U.S. Senate office in Washington, D.C.

The Washington Times also reported Odinga visited Obama during three trips the Kenyan politician made to the U.S. in 2004, 2005 and 2006.

The Times also reported Obama sent his Senate office foreign policy adviser, Lippert, to Kenya in early 2006 to coordinate and arrange for Obama’s Senate “fact-finding” visit to Kenya later that year.

As further evidence that Obama and Odinga were coordinating to implement the campaign strategy outlined in the Nyongo-authored document, the ex-ODM sources in Kenya argued that Obama maintained almost daily cell phone contact with Odinga as the post-election tribal violence was unfolding in Kenya, even as Obama was campaigning in the final days of the New Hampshire Democratic Party primary, as has been reported by the BBC.

The ex-ODM sources said Obama worked after the election with former U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan and U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice to argue a position should be created to allow Odinga to share head of state as a compromise to end the violence.

The ex-ODM sources said during the post-election violence Obama did not call on Odinga to drop his charges of voter fraud or to withdraw completely from his efforts to become head of state as a strategy to calm his Luo tribe supporters and bring a halt to the violence.

WND confirmed in Kenya that at one point Annan and Rice actually pressured Kenyan Vice President Kolonzo to step down from his position to bring the Luo-mob protest violence to an end by appointing Odinga vice president so he could assume the nation’s second highest political office.

When Kolonzo refused to step down, Annan and Rice proposed the Odinga-inspired plan to appoint him as prime minister, effectively allowing Odinga to share the head-of-state position with Kibaki, a solution that was adopted.

WND also reported on the authenticity of an Odinga campaign internal finance memorandum documenting that Obama arranged for Odinga to receive in his U.S. trips nearly $1 million in campaign contributions from Obama fund-raisers and donors to assist Odinga in his 2007 presidential campaign in Africa.

The finance memo, prepared by Shakeel Shabbir, the head of Odinga’s campaign finance accounting section, also detailed that among the 72 individuals and organizations that contributed money to Odinga’s 2007 presidential run in Kenya was Saif el-Islam Gadhafi, the second oldest sun of Libyan dictator Muammar Gadhafi, who also was listed as contributing nearly $1 million to Odinga’s campaign.

The Shabbir document lists the Obama-generated campaign contributions from the U.S. as having been donated by “Friends of Senator B.O.”

Obama’s campaign “Fight the Smears” website and a posting by Ben Smith at Politico.com have questioned the authenticity of the Obama-to-Odinga Dec. 22, 2006, e-mail by arguing the e-mails “appear not to have been written by a native English speaker,” without addressing a second similar e-mail WND published, that should not occasion any linguistic quibbles.

Moreover, neither “Fight the Smears” nor the Smith posting disputed the substantive point made in the e-mails, namely that Lippert served to coordinate between Obama and Odinga while Lippert held a staff position in Obama’s U.S. Senate office in Washington.

WND was unable to get a response from Obama with calls to his Washington office and Chicago campaign headquarters.

Comment by SnarlingCur | 2008-10-17 23:18:47

It’s really late. You should re-post this again somewhere tomorrow show everybody can see it.

Comment by SnarlingCur | 2008-10-17 23:20:08

So everybody can see it.

 
 
 

Comment by IndieDogg | 2008-10-17 23:05:17

Speak No Evil or Suffer the Wrath of The Messiah!!!

What is this, something out of Revelations? Are we in the midst of the Apocalypse?

Assuming you have all seen the following but I include it for those who haven’t seen it.

We have lost all sense of perspective in this trip through the bizarre and incomprehensible. It’s Barry in Wonderland and it’s curiouser and curiouser.

I assume, since Barack couldn’t run to his mommie and make the bad man stop being mean to him, he had no choice but to ask the U.S. Attorney General, who should be in court against the Ohio Secretary of State, instead, to open an INVESTIGATION into statements made by Senator McCain and Governor Palin ON THE CAMPAIGN TRAIL!

Okay, I’m speechless. John McCain’s against Stem Cell Research and is on his deathbed from cancer, according to Obama, but it’s a CRIME to suggest ACORN is doing anything the least bit sneaky or that he’s ever eaten, seen or planted an acorn in his entire life. And, if he did, he didn’t know what an acorn really was at the time.

I’m outraged.

This crybaby fascist needs to be spanked and sent to his room, not enabled and babied and handed the Presidency of the United States just so he’ll stop crying. It doesn’t work with children and it won’t work with Baby Barack.

Here’s the McCain response to today’s letter from Baby Doc to the Justice Department. It speaks for itself:

ARLINGTON, VA — Today, McCain-Palin 2008 Spokesman Ben Porritt issued the following statement in response to the Obama campaign’s letter to Attorney General Michael Mukasey:

“After a week of shifting stories and clumsy corrections regarding Barack Obama’s connections to ACORN, the Obama campaign resorted to their now-customary heavy handed tactic of attempting to criminalize political discourse. Today’s outrageous letter to Attorney General Mukasey and Special Prosecutor Dannehy at the Justice Department asking for a special prosecutor to investigate Senator McCain and Governor Palin’s public statements about ACORN’s record of fraudulent voter registrations (including in this week’s Presidential debate) is absurd. It is a typical time-worn Washington attempt to criminalize political differences. For someone who promises ‘change,’ it is certainly only more of the same.

“The letter’s request that the Department of Justice investigate ‘recent partisan Republican activities throughout the country’ is almost a parody of the Obama campaign’s attempt to intimidate their political opponents. In case Sen. Obama’s lawyer did not notice, we are in the midst of a political campaign, not a coronation, and the alleged criminal activity he calls ‘recent partisan Republican activities’ are what the rest of us call campaign speeches and debates. All of this is unfortunately reminiscent of the Obama campaign’s recent creation of a ‘truth squad’ of Missouri prosecutors and sheriffs to ‘target’ people who criticize Sen. Obama. Rest assured that, despite these threats, the McCain-Palin campaign will continue to address the serious issue of voter registration fraud by ACORN and other partisan groups, and compliance by states with the Help America Vote Act’s requirement of matching new voter registrations with state data bases to prevent voter fraud.”

I’m out.

Stand Up!!

Comment by SnarlingCur | 2008-10-17 23:16:13

The next thing you know, Obama will have his layers sue anybody who votes for McCain, because it makes a statement against him.

Comment by latina | 2008-10-18 00:32:18

So that means that to exercise our free speech we will have to go underground?

 
 
 

Comment by Chicago | 2008-10-17 23:26:49

it may sound bad but I sure do hope that Obama supporters keep acting like this. how much votes do you all think this violent attack just caused Obama?

the more of these come out, the more people will get disgusted with Obama.

as we all know, the media would not report this, so the best thing to do here is to forward this story to everyone you know and remind them that while Obama complains about the fictitious “kill him” fiasco during the debate, he NEVER condemns his supporters violent, mysogynist, and disrepsectful actions like this.

 

Comment by libby | 2008-10-18 00:01:51

Whew … this is exciting!

Hillary will get her revenge against the race-baiting thug Obama.

Nothing matters anymore to me … not even the economy … the only thing that matters is defeating the thug Obama!

 

Comment by William L. Donlon | 2008-10-18 00:07:08

Michael Barone got it right last Sunday in the Washington Post when he wrote about “The Coming Obama Thugocracy”

Just look what’s happened since.

Joe The Plumber has been trashed ala Hillary, Sara, Geraldine, Bill Clinton and a four month old Down Syndrome baby, Obama you are a really big F–ing man–NOT!

John McCaine is compared to George Wallace because someone (didn’t) yelled “kill him” so loud that only one in the tank reporter heard it.

But it was Good enough for baby Keith, over at the MSNBC Nursery, to get on his hobby horse and have a twenty minute thumb suck. What a F-ing jerk.

Baby Rachel, the Keith Wanaby with an IQ between zero and nothing, gave an hour long WHAAAAA! and turned it over to —- who gives a flying F, It’s MSNBC, and nobody is watching.

This whole God damn OBAMB BULLSHIT MACHINE is on auto pilot and the rest of America is bored, has long since tuned it out and moved on.

Over at CNN it’s only one or one and a half points better.

McCain is closing which shows the American People see through these electronic A-holes.

Comment by AnninCA | 2008-10-18 08:58:35

Apparently MSN turned the entire staff to dig up dirt on Joe the Plumber.

Meanwhile, Joe is obviously a nice guy who is intelligent and straightforward.

This was a big mistake to trash him.

The stories about people being attacked were underreported badly during the primary.

 
 

Comment by NYC | 2008-10-18 00:41:25

But, MOST OF ALL I am afraid of ignorant, norrow-minded peeople pushing me into their beliefs because they want me to be as miserable as they are.

Who’s pushing you? Nobody invited you here. Go kiss your precious BHO’s @$$. We won’t miss you.

 

Comment by robert | 2008-10-18 05:15:24

YOu people are amazing. McCain is a clueless idiot, with no policy other than to help his rich cronies. Most of us are NOT rich, including most of you I suspect.
McCain will bankrupt this country, keep us in an illegal war started by the world’s most dangerous terrorist-Bush and Cheney. Yes, attacking a country with bombs for NO reason, other than to steal their oil and start up a military industrial complex there is not a valid reason. They should be both tried for war crimes and hung by their balls in Times Square on New Years eve.

the new yorker

Comment by John House | 2008-10-18 05:39:26

It takes a troll to post this bullshit under a post about violence committed by one of their fellow Obamatronic trolls.

YOU are the one who is amazing–amazingly IDIOTIC and SICK.

 

Comment by QUEENIE | 2008-10-18 09:46:35

Robert, Robert, Robert, Robert..

Haven’t you learned yet, not to come here and spew your bullshit???????

Lets see..Team Obama and you idiot trolls..smear Joe the Plumber..and scream loudly..that Joe the Plumber has a tax lien on his home..

Albiet a small tax lien..but you just couldn’t smear enough could you???

And you have the nerve to post here that McCain is an idiot??????

Why don’t you make a wild guess who else has a tax lien on himself..come on Robert..make a wild guess…

( and i will give you a clue..it is not McCain or anyone on his team..)

Come on Robert..wild guess…

I am waiting..

drum roll please Robert…

Obama’s treasury advisor has A HUGE tax lien on himself.

But that would not bother you a snit would it Robert??????????????????

and that would not make Obama an idiot in your eyes would it Robert???????????

But see Robert..we adults here at NQ..do not call Obama and idiot..a crook and a thug yes..but idiot..no..

But after seeing this behavior and the fact that Obama sic’ed his little army of thugs and trolls out on Joe the Plumber..and exposing Joe’s tax lien ..when Obama’s very own TREASURY ADVISOR has a tax lien.. I would now say..Obama and his team of idiot trolls and tools of ignorance ..are idiots!!

Oh and Fox reported on the treasury advisors tax lien this morning..you know ..FOX..that has a huge viewership..way more than the obama networks of O’MSNBC and O’CNN

 
 

Comment by chloe | 2008-10-18 08:30:04

During the primaries (I live in NYC) i had my Hillary hat on and was with my 5 year old son and 3 teenagers approached me and got in my face and starting calling me names, I was called a racist and to my surprise a C..T. Well I a 5′4 but I grew up with 6 brothers so I don’t get intimidated so I yelled at them and told them to get out of my face and I then started to yell at them and they were startled and my 5 yr old said to them, “that’s my Mommy and if you don’t leave I am going to call 911) I was more upset that my son had to witness that but he has since said he thinks that Barack is a bully, his words not mine. It is awful, The kids weren’t even old enough to vote, but that didn’t stop them. I have never been called either thing before and I am 43 years old. Barack’s unity is a nightmare, what will happen if he doesn’t win, will there be riots.

 

Comment by robert | 2008-10-18 08:50:15

I would think Barack’s unity is a good thing. Finally there is a person willing to unite the country, not divide it like the clowns in office.
HIllary would’ve been a good choice, but she LOST.
Hillary voters have to get over it and she classily has offered her
support to Obama, because she has the country’s best interest at hand.
I have more respect for her now.
I have no respect for McCain that moron he selected for a VP, a
woman who cannot list a newspaper she does or does not read, or
any periodical. UGH.

 

Comment by robert | 2008-10-18 08:50:45

I would think Barack’s unity is a good thing. Finally there is a person willing to unite the country, not divide it like the clowns in office.
HIllary would’ve been a good choice, but she LOST.
Hillary voters have to get over it and she classily has offered her
support to Obama, because she has the country’s best interest at hand.
I have more respect for her now.
I have no respect for McCain and that moron he selected for a VP, a
woman who cannot list a newspaper she does or does not read, or
any periodical. UGH.

Comment by AnninCA | 2008-10-18 08:55:28

I think the story indicates pretty clearly why a lot of people aren’t telling pollsters that they are voting McCain.

Who needs that grief?

I have gotten over it.

McCain and Palin represent more ideas and certainly more of the fundamental character attributes that I can support.

I’m proud to be voting for them. The hard part was recognizing the misogyny in the Democratic Party, accepting that it was very supported by the Party members, and moving on.

Life is too short to support a bunch of sexists.

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-10-18 08:59:37

Yea! AnninCA! I live in CA too. I’m not counting on a McCain win here but I’m still voting for him and I have my McCain bumper sticker and yard sign.

 
 
 

RSS Feed for This PostPost a Comment

Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)