RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

if it’s not hate, what is it?

I read this article, Sarah Palin’s a Brainiac, and I wanted to share it, because I really liked it. Trying to do a write up about it, I kind of veered somewhere I didn’t intend to go. Once I start writing, I never know where I wll end up….
The writer, Elaine Lafferty, was discussing this video of Palin, as well as how smart she found Sarah Palin to be. Something that anyone who took the time to actually do, would realize. Things that Sarah said in this video kind of dictated where this post went.

That said, I can’t tell you how many times I heard and read during the primary that people were, “not opposed to a woman President, just not THAT one.”

I can’t tell you how many disparaging, sexist, misogynistic, hateful, violent, horrific, insulting attacks I heard and read about Hillary Clinton, during the primary.

Every day four women die in this country as a result of domestic violence, the euphemism for murders and assaults by husbands and boyfriends. That’s approximately 1,400 women a year, according to the FBI. The number of women who have been murdered by their intimate partners is greater than the number of soldiers killed in the Vietnam War.

There were threats of violence towards her, and a belittling of her accomplishments, and insulting comments on her looks. And these were just the ones from the media!

Some of the attacks I heard:

She only got to where she is because of her husband.
She is too old, too ugly.
She cried. She’s a whiner.
She didn’t shed enough tears. She’s cold hearted.
She was racist.
She didn’t have any experience, she just hosted tea parties.
She was a liar.

The attacks went on and on.

So, now what? Now we have a female candidate, who, for all intense and purposes, is the complete opposite of Hillary Clinton. And we find ourselves right back where we were during the primary.

Sarah Palin is the victim of disparaging, sexist, misogynistic, hateful, violent, horrific, insulting attacks. There are threats of violence towards her, a belittling of her accomplishments, and insulting attacks on her looks.

Although only 572,000 reports of assault by intimates are officially reported to federal officials each year, the most conservative estimates indicate two to four million women of all races and classes are battered each year. At least 170,000 of those violent incidents are serious enough to require hospitalization, emergency room care or a doctor’s attention.

But, she did not get where she is on the back of her husband. She is self made. She worked hard, and got where she is on her own. (As did Hillary, in my opinion.)
She is not old, and she is not ugly. (and neither is Hillary)
She has shown an emotional side, and she is tough as nails (with polish) (as has Hillary)
She is a working mother, with a large family, and a loving husband. (well…Hillary and Bill are loving partners with issues, and they have raised an outstanding daughter)

They differ on party, issues, age, accomplishments, successes, family life, personality and looks. They both have major accomplishments, and they are both intelligent. I don’t think either of these women would be where they are now, if they were not smart as whips.

They have different styles, and they have had different paths. They have had different educations, and different life experiences.

But the thing that these two have in common, above anything, is that they are both women. Women who have chosen to serve the people. Women who have dedicate their lives, to serving others.

They are both women, who have been the victims of disparaging, sexist, misogynistic, hateful, violent, horrific, insulting, personal, personal, personal attacks. Attacks coming from both men and women.

Every year approximately 132,000 women report that they have been victims of rape or attempted rape, and more than half of them knew their attackers. It’s estimated that two to six times that many women are raped, but do not report it. Every year 1.2 million women are forcibly raped by their current or former male partners, some more than once.

Why? We can disagree on policy, but this is not what these attacks are about.

What links these two women is that they are both smart, successful women, who have managed to maintain a family and career, and have chosen to serve the public, through political office. Long story short – they are women.

So, when Hillary haters claimed, *it is not that they are opposed to a woman, not just THAT woman*, they were really saying – *I am opposed to a woman*.

So, I ask, if not now, when? If not Geraldine, or Hillary, or Sarah, then who?

As I see it, if we don’t put a stop to these attacks, if women don’t stop attacking each other, and until women are treated with respect and equality, we will never get passed this. Women will never *overcome* if they are treated this way, and if they attack this way.

Violent juvenile offenders are four times more likely to have grown up in homes where they saw violence. Children who have witnessed violence at home are also five times more likely to commit or suffer violence when they become adults.

And the attacks are not just aimed at Clinton or Palin. They are aimed at women who support them. The ugly attacks that are left on blogs are beyond the pale. Absolutely disgusting.

I am not a psychiatrist, or socialigist, or expert in any way, but I do see a direct correlation in the way women are treated publically, to how they are treated behind closed doors. And, until something changes, we will keep digging those graves. Four women a day.


“Los Angeles County sheriff’s officials said the mannequin sporting a beehive hairdo, glasses and a red coat does not rise to the level of a hate crime. If the same display had been made of a Barack Obama-like doll, for example, authorities would have to evaluate it independently, Whitmore said. “That adds a whole other social, historical hate aspect to the display, and that is embedded in the consciousness of the country.”

“Morisette acknowledged to FOX 11 news that had he depicted Barack Obama in the same scene, it would not have gone over as well, because the history of a hanged black man in America is a lot more intense than a hanged white woman.”

Trackback URL

RSS Feed for This Post147 Comments »

Comment by Doc99 | 2008-10-28 15:34:19

McCain Camp demands LA TImes release the Obama, Khalidi video.

Comment by barry bums a ciggie | 2008-10-28 16:03:03

 
 

Comment by kelley in virginia | 2008-10-28 15:37:56

Really? The McCain campaign demanded that the LAT release the Khalidi video? cite please.

Comment by Doc99 | 2008-10-28 15:38:28

Comment by Elle | 2008-10-28 16:45:25

Thanks for providing the link Doc99.
Believe that this is a vital key in the remaining days before the election.
This tape will speak volumes as it can show Obama in action.There will be no denying it or downplaying it as it is visually documented.
The LA TIMES need to feel the pressure from all over.Releasing it, is the only right thing to do.

 
 
 

Comment by Rah-Rah | 2008-10-28 15:38:35

Great post. Thank you. I must comment on this quote by Morisette:

“Morisette acknowledged to FOX 11 news that had he depicted Barack Obama in the same scene, it would not have gone over as well, because the history of a hanged black man in America is a lot more intense than a hanged white woman.”

Clearly, Morisette has a selective view of American history. Ever hear of the *Salem Witch Trials,* Mr. Morisette? You and your partner are hateful, pure and simple. I lived in West Hollywood for 14 years and in one move you have completely obliterated my favorable views of that community.

Comment by Lizzie Struthers | 2008-10-28 15:46:42

West Hollywood is exclusively gay, innit?

Comment by Rah-Rah | 2008-10-28 15:54:42

Comment by makeji | 2008-10-28 18:22:40

Not exactly, but pretty much. There is a large Russian American community there, but the demographic is primarily gay/lesbian.

 
 

Comment by Ani | 2008-10-28 16:40:39

Most ironic is the fact that Palin’s first act as Governor was to protect the rights of gay partners while Obama is a homophone — campaigning down south with the likes of Donnie McClunkin — “ex-gay man reformed through prayer.” He also would not allow himself to be phontgraphed with Gavin Newsome, the gay-friendly mayer of S.F. and Obama is now backtracking on repealing don’t ask don’t tell.

Does anyone even check out these candidates before voting?

How terrible of anyone in West Hollywood to do this and think it is remotely amusing.

I wonder if an effigy of an openly gay man was hung up there with a noose around his neck — would they find that funny?

Comment by Woman Voter | 2008-10-28 18:52:35

Oded Fehr: Stop Violence Against Women
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bdYhmcVgaYI

Amnesty International: Stop Violence Against Women
Every minute of every day all over the world, women are harassed, attacked and even killed just for being women, daughters, Sisters, mothers, children. It doesn’t have to be this way. Amnesty International is working to stop it. Making a difference is easier than you think. The first step is making your voice heard, make some noise to stop violence against women. Take action at Amnesty Internationals’ website:
http://www.amnesty.org/

 
 
 

Comment by wodiej | 2008-10-28 15:47:39

I just can’t belive that someone thinks that was ok. If they think it was wrong done to blacks, why is it not wrong to do this to ANYONE?? This tells me their cause is not really about anything except winning.

Comment by tek | 2008-10-28 16:22:38

Their cause is about getting a puppet in office and having total power.

Comment by makeji | 2008-10-28 18:25:57

Their cause is that Palin came out and said she was against Gay Marriage. It has nothing to do with puppets, however it is spun. The men who presented their Halloween display said it was all in the spirit of the holiday. Obama has also said he’s against Gay Marriage. There is a ballot iniative in California to overrule the court’s interpretation of the CA Constitution that has allowed Gay Marriage in the state.

 
 
 

Comment by barry bums a ciggie | 2008-10-28 16:05:10

Where’s Al Sharpton? Where are the Dems denouncing this BS? That’s right, hate towards women is nothing new.

Comment by Lynda-NoBot | 2008-10-28 16:26:39

Why doesn’t the great one denounce this? He said he is going to bring the country together…

Comment by sharon | 2008-10-28 22:59:08

First of all, what does Obama have to do with this nut in West Hollywood who committed this atrocious act??? Please tell me. And, American Girl, your posting on this blog as well as others continually hammer at the sexist remarks made to Hillary by Obama and the MSM. Please, give some of these? same old same old attacks….would you like to see some of the attacks that YOU and others like you have made on Obama?

empty suit
liar
racist
communist
traitor
anti-American
untrustworthy
ugly with big ears
mother was a whore
father a drunk
wife is an angry black woman
hypocrite
affirmative action baby
lazy
hateful
shameless
throws everyone under the bus

the above is just a start – couple that with all the smears on his associations, whether recent or 25 years ago and for whatever tenuous tie, and I would say Obama has received the worst of the insults throughout the campaign.

Sexism and racism exist – and not just in this country. Hillary and Obama are NOT guilty of either in my opinion and its really shameful to see the attacks from all sides against these two intelligent people.
So don’t vote for Obama…who cares? buy why the continual hammering on these things that have been soooo over for months now.
For someone who lives abroad (I assume you live in Italy), it puzzles me how you can be so narrow-minded.

Comment by kgirl1028 | 2008-10-29 01:21:36

And the only thing not true is lazy, because obama definately is not other than that I think she was pretty accurate, and don’t call me racist you dolt cause i’m black. I guess it would puzzle you, but what she is doing is judging obama by the content of his character. MLK never said I have dream that no black person no matter how shameless, is lauded as something he’s not. The biggest difference between what is said on this board and what obama does is that he lies and he degrades people on a forum where anyone can and will hear it. And for you to say that obama has been attacked more than any other candidate. I beg to differ. Sarah Palin especially has been treated I would say twice as horribly as hillary cliton. As for barack, I have never seen a man have lips planted so firmly to his buttocks. So please don’t come on here whining about how your mental midget has been treated horribly it cause just doesn’t jive, for what any idiot not sopped up on Koolaid could see. Take that bull and the maxed out race card back to the Koolaid gang central and sit on it. Obama has earned his ire and then some. I could find some less pleasent more accurate degrading words than she did to describe him and you worlds like theif, bigoted, trifling, jackass, arrogent SOB. So go back to obamatown and wait for him to heal your soul or pass out the cynide laced koolaid when he looses.

 
 
 
 

Comment by NoBamaNoWay | 2008-10-28 17:03:55

and they wonder why some women aren’t really happy with the whole obama movement. the way that guy blew off the seriousness of sarah palin’s faux lynching is so typical. you can call woman bitches, hos, cunts, etc; hang them in effigy, make a game out of blowing their heads off, and it’s all good. if any of those things was done to a non-white person, every obamabot in the country would have been rioting in the streets.

 
 

Comment by tarma | 2008-10-28 15:44:25

As your article illustrates so well, the history and current realities of violence against women are too easily overlooked and dismissed. I’m sickened.

 

Comment by Lizzie Struthers | 2008-10-28 15:45:11

not opposed to a woman President, just not THAT one

Which is what we’re saying about Obama so on that count we’re all even. Surely we all understand that?

Of course we didn’t attack Obama with cruelty. Not as we see it. He might have found it cruel. If he feels a proper vetting is cruel. But in that regard the man with no history and no credentials can feel whatever he likes. Because it changes nothing.

Comment by Rah-Rah | 2008-10-28 16:02:56

I don’t think anyone has said *just not THAT one* when talking about Obama. To the contrary: I have seen clearly stated commentary from contributors about Obama’s troubling relationships and lack of accomplishment in Chicago and the Senate as reasons for non-support.

I’m confused by your comment.

Apparently, we don’t all *understand that?*

Comment by Docelder | 2008-10-28 16:05:06

Right now I would trade “The One” for Al Sharpton hands down… for what that’s worth.

 
 
 

Comment by Docelder | 2008-10-28 15:48:13

Morisette acknowledged to FOX 11 news that had he depicted Barack Obama in the same scene, it would not have gone over as well

No, the Secret Service would have already had him in for questioning were the display reversed.

 

Comment by AnnieO | 2008-10-28 15:49:45

NAACP protested last year when someone else had a Halloween noose display

http://www.lagrangenews.com/articles/2007/10/13/news/news01.txt

Comment by Northwest rain | 2008-10-28 16:49:15

The message is — it’s fine if victim is female — but the image better not be black or Jewish — because women are getting what is due to them, whereas racism is not tolerated.

Women’s status in America isn’t that much better than in Islamic Countries or in India or Africa. Just a about any anti-female symbolism is allowed in America. Hillary Nut Cracker — for example, and the symbolic hanging of Sarah Palin.

Thankfully I do not blame all men for this behavior — and as many astute men mention — women are part of the hatred toward other women. WHY? Perhaps women feel they need to victimize other women to keep or get the favor of their man?

During the dark ages women were killed by the millions — their crime? Supposedly they were witches — this is a part of history that should never be forgotten — because it could happen again. Obama has unchained the evil residing in the masses and he has directed that evil toward women.

Comment by NoBamaNoWay | 2008-10-28 17:14:05

you mean the image better not be black or muslim – obamanazis are quite okay with anti-semitism. it’s anti-muslim attacks that are not allowed, even if they are simply logical, factual arguments against some or their mistreatment of any number of groups and lack of respect for democracy and freedom of religion.

 
 
 

Comment by Brian_C82 | 2008-10-28 15:50:44

In a 1995 interview, Barack Obama lavished praise on Reverend Jeremiah “God Damn America” Wright, calling him a “wonderful man” and “the best of what the black church has to offer.”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fh7xMhsLnac

Comment by csuzeq | 2008-10-28 16:05:35

Send all this stuff to the McCain campaign. They can get ads out in a hurry or send it to 527s. They will do it!

Comment by Brian_C82 | 2008-10-28 17:48:54

I emailed the link to the McCain headquarters in PA, but I doubt they’ll even bring up the Wright issue at this point.

 

Comment by J.J. (The PUMA) | 2008-10-28 17:54:48

Did it ever occur to you that maybe the McCain camp is sending this to us???

I mean, we are finally seeing a garbage dump on the “blessed one”. Is all this stuff being leaked by McCain.

I HOPE SO. My campaign contributions at work!!

 
 
 

Comment by Docelder | 2008-10-28 15:51:44

NAACP protested last year when someone else had a Halloween noose display

So where are all the human rights activists now? Or are human rights issues and hate speech like “racism” in that they are one-way streets?

Comment by AnnieO | 2008-10-28 15:53:34

Apparently hanging women is okay, but not white men, monsters, or space aliens.

Comment by Docelder | 2008-10-28 16:02:05

The “woman hate” element makes me think of Islamic fundamentalism. I wonder how this guy feels about public amputations or stoning?

Comment by Tuppence411 | 2008-10-28 16:14:35

Bingo! Thank-you for the excellent observation. Why is it that when we are pushed to be more “tolerant” and “accepting” women get the shitty end of the stick?

Comment by NoBamaNoWay | 2008-10-28 17:16:26

it’s called mindless, leftist orthodoxy, and plain old misogyny.

 
 

Comment by AnnieO | 2008-10-28 16:16:28

Good point. It’s the apathy of the rest of society that bothers me.

 
 
 
 

Comment by kelley in virginia | 2008-10-28 15:53:01

the people posting comments at Politico seem to think that McCain’s campaign is desperate. it doesn’t feel that way to me. In fact, I think to the contrary. Obummer’s group seem frightened.

Comment by AnnieO | 2008-10-28 15:57:56

Agreed. They do seem frightened.

 

Comment by Galt, Master Thrall of Planet Triskelion | 2008-10-28 15:59:54

The majority of the fear is coming from inevitability trolls / Oborgbots posing as Mac supporters and PUMAs. Fark em.

Comment by AnnieO | 2008-10-28 16:05:57

There’s a bunch of trolls on the hillbuzz story regarding PA going for McCain. I don’t recall seeing them at that site before.

It’s been relatively troll quiet lately. I think the tightening polls and the Redistribution of Wealth audio has got them working overtime.

Comment by Galt, Master Thrall of Planet Triskelion | 2008-10-28 16:08:33

I missed the Corbett interview (PA talk jock) of Palin but caught a bit after. He said the emails are flooding in and Der Precious supporters are worried Palin is going to win. :mrgreen:

PA is going to Mac, like it did for Hill.

Comment by AnnieO | 2008-10-28 16:14:14

I particularly liked this quote from over at hillbuzz.

What you are hearing “on the ground” in PA, is also being heard in Missouri, Ohio and get this, Massachusetts. Although known as a “Safe” Democrat state, 51% of those enrolled are: Independents – here’s the deal, after living under Obama’s Twin, Deval Patrick, for the past two years, in concert with a Mass. Democrat Controlled State Legislature – fees (taxes) have increased, the budget is through the roof, cuts are being made, the cost of everything is over the top, the state is hemorrhaging jobs (see tax increases on businesses), the health care program is in shambles, and that middle class tax cut? You got it – never materialized. Guess who is aware of this? The electorate. Yes, there are hard-line Democrats who won’t vote for any other ticket, yet, many of those are refusing to vote for President at all – which, is a vote for McCain. Alternately, those supporting McCain are doing so silently. Internal Polls must be telling Kerry something’s afoot, because he is hammering every editorial board across the state, whining about his image!! When was the last time Barney Frank had to run a campaign ad? Things are not well in “Happy Valley”. I’m not about to predict that Massachusetts will go McCain, but I also would not rule it out. Things are “tight” all over.

Comment by Galt, Master Thrall of Planet Triskelion | 2008-10-28 16:16:24

This makes sense. Massachusetts could go to Mac! That would be gravy!

Comment by AnnieO | 2008-10-28 16:22:14

Here’s the Barney Frank ad running in New England. Does this guy have balls, or what??

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w_w18ywSLKY

Comment by Galt, Master Thrall of Planet Triskelion | 2008-10-28 16:25:09

Wow. Frank having to run an ad is way bad news for my former party. :mrgreen:

 

Comment by Disgusted | 2008-10-28 20:53:46

Wow, Help Barney finish what he started? WTF. They must really think people are stupid.

 
 

Comment by Amazon Queen | 2008-10-28 16:37:07

I live in Massachetts. The more liberal areas. Last election cycle kerry signs were EVERYwhere. this year not so much. Also Nader is running here too. I think a lot of Dems are going to vote for him. I mean what the heck Obama’s gonna win it anyways….. right? Massachetts is blue …. right? My vote for Nader aint gonna hurt a democrat….right?

Please think that way. All vote for Nader and I’ll vote for McCain

Comment by JozefAL | 2008-10-28 17:33:08

Don’t forget that Massachusetts has had a fairly bizarre recent history. Despite being a reliable Democratic state in Presidential elections since 1960 (although there were a couple of notable exceptions–in 1980 and 1984, Massachusetts went for Reagan), until Deval Patrick was elected as Governor in 2006, the previous 16 years had Republicans attaining the Governor’s post (William Weld, Paul Celucci and Mitt Romney; Jane Swift was only Acting Governor–she was never elected any higher than Lt Governor). In fact, from 1900 through the present, Massachusetts has had 30 different people elected governor, 17 of whom were Republicans and 13 were Democrats (two governors–one from each party, GOP John Volpe in the 1960s, and Dem Michael Dukakis in the 1970s/1980s–would serve non-consecutive terms of office). The GOP has held Massachusetts’ governorship for 65 years out of the past 108.

 
 
 

Comment by jbjd | 2008-10-28 17:11:55

I spoke with a co-worker today, a die hard Democrat who lives in the city where the JFK Library is located, and whose family includes workers on the Hill (Beacon). He said everyone in his circle is voting McCain.

 

Comment by McPalin | 2008-10-28 18:55:01

Whoa..Mass. Liberals do not like crooks, liars and thieves…Just as I predicted before the DNC Convention. If they stole this from Hillary, Mass. will go red!
It’s getting down and serious now. Are you ready to Parrr-tey?

Thanks for the Palin Video. That was raving good. Sarah representing women in the whitehouse is a welcomed and novel plan. YES SHE CAN!

President McCain & Vice President Sarah Palin.
It has a nice ring to it.

Comment by McPalin | 2008-10-28 19:01:46

Oh and First lady Cindy McCain…sounds very sweet. The Mavericks will have another Fiscal brainiac in Cindy who will be guiding them on.

 
 

Comment by Deep Truths | 2008-10-28 19:09:09

Hillary won Mass. by 8-10%. This AFTER the passing the torch (barf) from the Kennedy’s and Kerry hoopla.

Barney Frank can’t extracate himself from the bail-out and ACORN.

Ah. I love the epiphany of my fellow citizens. I equally love the revenge factor too. I’m betting my fellow citizens do too.

 
 
 
 

Comment by Ferd McBerfle | 2008-10-28 16:14:17

Those inevitability/downer trolls are the worst. At least you can spot the snipers a mile away.

Comment by Galt, Master Thrall of Planet Triskelion | 2008-10-28 16:17:51

Hey ferd where have you been? We miss your troll emasculation services! :mrgreen:

Comment by Ferd McBerfle | 2008-10-28 16:30:05

Galt:

It is good to be back. My wife and I were sharing a computer for a several days until I put in a new power supply for her computer. I had to order it and of course, it took a month of Sundays for it to get here.

Hell, if a candidate would simply promise better service all around–he/she would get my vote. LOL.

Comment by Galt, Master Thrall of Planet Triskelion | 2008-10-28 16:32:59

Welcome back!

Now go get them trolls! :mrgreen:

Comment by Ferd McBerfle | 2008-10-28 16:34:48

I’ll be on them like stupid on shovel.

 
 
 
 
 
 

Comment by Firefly | 2008-10-28 16:03:19

They don’t think that at all – they’re paid to flood the online boards with the “it’s over” theme – “McCain’s desperate and pathetic” in order to demoralize the opposition and suppress McCain turnout.

Reposting this comment that was placed here last night (allegedly) from an 0bama campaign operative – for what it’s worth..

Originally posted at Hillbuzz:

# sarah p Says:
October 27, 2008 at 5:04 am

Ok, I want to clear my conscious a little. Hopefully you could make a blog post to help some fellow clinton supporters out.

I work for a campaign and can’t wait for this week to be over.

I was doing it for a job. I was not a fan of any candidate but over time grew to love HRC.

The internal campaign idea is to twist, distort, humiliate and finally dispirit you.

We pay people and organize people to go to all the online sites and “play the part of a clinton or mccain supporter who just switched our support for obama”

We do this to stifle your motivation and to destroy your confidence.

We did this the whole primary and it worked.

Sprinkle in mass vote confusion and it becomes bewildering. Most people lose patience and just give up on their support of a candidate and decide to just block out tv, news, websites, etc.

This surprisingly has had a huge suppressing movement and vote turnout issues.

Next, we infiltrate all the blogs and all the youtube videos and overwhelm the voting, the comments, etc. All to continue this appearance of overwhelming world support.

People makes posts to the effect that the world has “gone mad”

Thats the intention. To make you feel stressed and crazy and feel like the world is ending.

We have also had quite a hand in skewing many many polls, some we couldn’t control as much as we would have liked. But many we have spoiled over. Just enough to make real clear politics look scarey to a mccain supporter. Its worked, alough the goal was to appear 13-15 points ahead.

see, the results have been working. People tend to support a winner, go with the flow, become “sheeple”

The polls are roughly 3-5 points in favor of Barack. Thats due to our inflation of the polls and pulling in the sheeple.

Our donors, are the same people who finance the MSM. Their interests are tied, Barack then tends to come across as teflon. Nothing sticks. And trust, there were meetings with Fox news. The goal was to blunt them as much as possible. Watch Bill Oreilly he has become much more diplomatic and “fair and balanced” and soft. Its because he wants to retain the #1 spot on cable news and to do that he has to have access to the Obama campaign and we worked hard at stringing him a long and keeping him soft for an interview swap. It worked and now he is anticipating more access. So he is playing it still soft.

This is why nothing sticks.

The operation is massive, the goal is to paint a picture that is that of a winner, regardless of the results.

There is no true inauguration draft or true grant park construction going on. There will be a party, but we are boasting beyond the truth to make it seem like the election is wrapped up.

Our goal is to continue to make you lose your moral. We worked hard at persuasion and paying off and timing and playing the right political numbers to get key republican endorsements to make it seem even more like it was over and the world was coming to an end for you all.

There is a huge staff of people working around the clock, watching every site, blogs, etc. We flood these sites. We have had a goal to overwhelm.

The truth is here. I could go on and on, but you get the picture.

I am saying this because I know HRC was better for the country, and now realize this. I was too late by the time I connected to her. To me Barack was just a cool young dude that seemed like a star. I didn’t know him or his policies, but now I understand more than I care to and I realize his interests are more for him, and the DNC and all working like puppets with dean. I always thought a president wanted the better good for the country. The end result I see is everyone dependent on the government, this means more and more people voting for the DNC. This means the future is forever altered. I don’t see this as america, so I am now supporting John Mccain.

Sarah Palin is a huge threat, and our campaign has feared her like you can’t imagine. If it seems unfair how she has been treated, well its because she has had a team working round the clock to make her look like a fool.

this is a big conspiracy and I am so shocked that its not realized.

We released a little blurb the other day that the Obama campaign was already working on reelection and now putting our efforts towards 2012. This was to make it seem like it was above us to continue caring about 2008. Trust me, its a lie. David is very smart, but its a sticky ugly not very truthful kind of intelligence.

Its not over yet, but I think the machine is working. And its a hill to climb.

I will be quitting my post on nov 5th and my vote will be for John Mccain. Fortunately, my position has been a marketing position and I don’t feel I had any part of anything I would feel guilty for. But I look forward to getting out of this as the negativity and environment upsets me.

I wish you all well, and goodluck.

PS my name is not really sarah. but I am a female and I understand your plight.

Comment by Deep Truths | 2008-10-28 19:22:45

This poster sarah has the DNA of a Obamabot and the integrity of a weasel. She defines the macro world of the Obama campaign to a tee and therefore may have 10% chance of being truthful.

A good 45% of Americans’ don’t have the time or access to political sites with the truth instead of MSM propaganda, but I trust in most of this group to have the gut feeling about Obama and Michele. They will make up their minds when they vote and it will inevitably go to McCain/Palin, the safer of the two tickets.

 
 

Comment by Kristen | 2008-10-28 16:15:54

Yes, they are very frightened! Senator Government can’t close the deal. Any other Democrat would be blowing McCain away right now. They are very very scared. And they should be! McCain’s numbers keep going up. They don’t have an answer for it. The koolaid has made them irrational!

Comment by Galt, Master Thrall of Planet Triskelion | 2008-10-28 16:21:37

When Mac wins what about the alleged million showing up to Der Precious’ “celebration?” :mrgreen:

Der Precious’ Field of Dreams “Build it and they will come” theme is so pathetic and transparent.

Comment by csuzeq | 2008-10-28 17:26:13

They can just burn down his little set. What is it this time? He already did his greek columns. Oh, this time I’m sure it’s made of glod with a huge golden throne.

Comment by csuzeq | 2008-10-28 17:34:24

oops-gold, glod!

 

Comment by Doc99 | 2008-10-28 17:55:05

That would be the real “Bonfire of the Vanities.”

 

Comment by McPalin | 2008-10-28 19:03:49

Lets’ be ready to swarm it and trash it when he loses..

 
 
 

Comment by AnninCA | 2008-10-28 19:06:09

Gallup…..down to 2 points. *heh*

 
 

Comment by AF catfish | 2008-10-28 17:55:13

THe people commenting at Politico are paid Obots logged in from Obama’s cyber war room.

 
 

Comment by McHope | 2008-10-28 15:59:13

Reading some of the comments on the original story that was linked, it’s obvious where the lack of intelligence truly lies. Not only lack of intelligence, but lack of maturity as well.
In typical Obot fashion they swamp the comments with negative and disparaging remarks. The very basis of the story was that those calling Gov Palin ’stupid’ have not met her and have no real understanding of her intelligence. The writer is offering this from an inside experience. Still the commentors call her stupid, without the slightest thought to how stupid they sound.

Comment by Ferd McBerfle | 2008-10-28 16:27:32

The selective idignation of the miscreants supporting Oblockhead is appalling. The sexism coming from the campaign itself is enough for me to have cast my vote yesterday for McCain/Palin.

Sexism is the the most base form of bigotry. For any obamalobotobot who disagrees with this statement, imagine yourself being a woman and then black or a woman and Native American. Everything else pales in comparison. This is one reason why I cannot fathom how any woman of any color can support this candidate. As the father of a young woman who is now 20, I could never, ever vote for a bigot, much less a bigot towards women.

His supporters can have that plastic Messiah and when he completes his division of this country and its ensuing havoc, I hope they are in the midst of it, desperately looking for a way out. They have created this monster and they should “enjoy” its full effects.

 
 

Comment by ObamaISaFRAUD | 2008-10-28 16:03:06

Aren’t women still considered minorities? Thus why is this not considered a hate crime?

Comment by Joe Six-Pack | 2008-10-28 16:54:55

B I N G O ! ! ! ! !

anybody know where the National Organization for Women is these days???

i sure would like to know….

pathetic….

a. hillary
b. mccain

america first!

 
 

Comment by wodiej | 2008-10-28 16:05:12

great post and thank you for the youtube of Sarah…never get tired of hearing her speak.

I am so glad that we have someone like Sarah Palin on our side. I have no idea what causes a man to mistreat a woman. I do know that if you don’t stand up for yourself, you will be used as a doormat. I think too many women tie their worth to having a man. Society perpetuates this to an extent.

 

Comment by Pragmatist | 2008-10-28 16:07:58

This is the last straw . . . spread this story far and wide . . . .McCain/Palin MUST PREVAIL. Our country and just plain decency requires it.

OUR COUNRTY MUST BE SAVED!

McCain/Palin 2008

 

Comment by Pragmatist | 2008-10-28 16:10:32

obama and biden are a despicable disgrace; they must be crushed . . .
McCain/Palin

America and Americans First and Always!

 

Comment by Not Your sweetie | 2008-10-28 16:18:53

Politico justifies their bias for Obama. Most revealing argument: his campaign is so much like W!”
http://edgeoforever.wordpress.com/2008/10/28/so-sue-us-were-biased-but-obama-is-sooo-like-w/

 

Comment by Puget Sound Island Girl | 2008-10-28 16:20:18

What if they just had an emapty noose hanging? I’ll bet then they would get a talking to. I am sure then it would all be about the intentions of the empty noose. “what are you trying to say?” Those two guys would then be labled racist, etc.

But, hanging a white woman. Yep. That’s okay because it’s Halloween!

Draw the line. Take a stand and fight for what YOU know is right! It doesn’t matter if it’s Hillary or Sarah. All that means is all woman are fair game.

Take a stand. Do it for your mother. Do it for your daughter, neice, aunt, cousin, sister. Do it for YOU.

Comment by AnnieO | 2008-10-28 16:29:11

Empty nooses got a demonstration, too. From the article I linked above:

Nooses on a schoolyard tree led to demonstrations in Jena, La., and since then there have been other incidents reported in Maryland, New York and Alabama.

 
 

Comment by LisaB | 2008-10-28 16:21:30

Great piece! I’ve also said time and again that the level of gender hate during this campaign has been stunning. I expected some to be honest, but never did I expect the level and brazenness of the woman-hate. TV pundits, elected officials and others thought it a good idea to pile on Hillary, notwithstanding her position on any issue at all.

The Right started the anti-Hillary stuff, but it took the Left to complete the circle jerk.

And the idea that these people only opposed Hillary because of who she was was given the lie when Palin appeared. The same crap, different target.

And Mr. Post-Racial, good feeling, bring us together uber messiah never even protested. When you run as a messiah, one would think you should at least refrain from misogyny.

I’ve been a Dem my whole voting life. No more. They’ve strung me along for too long.

 

Comment by John | 2008-10-28 16:23:44

Then who? It is great question that American Girl asks. They tore down Hillary and they are tearing down Sarah.

Both smart and accomplished women who have, to be sure, different views. If not either one them whom? I guess she would have to be the female version of Obama. That is to say, an empty pant suit…

I am lucky to have many strong and smart women in my life. The one most dear to me is my 15 year old daughter. I don’t know what her future holds but it pisses me off to no end that she may someday be the target of attacks because of her gender.

She may never be Senator or a Governor but what they have done to Hillary and Sarah brings down ALL women. Perhaps my daughter one day. They want to see Obama win at all costs, even if it means setting back any future woman candidate.

It is dishonorable and disgusting what they are doing. Even more sickening is that many of the attack are coming from other women. When they attack Hillary and Sarah, they by extension, are attacking the women I love and making it harder for all women. If not them who, if not now when?

 

Comment by LizfromFL | 2008-10-28 16:25:05

I don’t think of myself normally as a hate-filled person. It amazes me that this campaign has stirred up so much hatred and devisiveness among friends, families, co-workers and strangers. And I don’t even want to think about what it’s done to race relations.

I feel myself building up this knot of resentment with this Palin hanging effigy thing, on top of everything they did to Hillary and all the other things they’ve done and said about Palin. Any normal election will have its disagreements, but this is unprecedented in my lifetime.

You don’t see this type of thing coming from the McCain campaign at all. They may think that talking about Bill Ayers and Wright is negative, but who made it negative? They did, and it’s the truth. Hanging Palin in effigy is hate, pure and simple, and every woman AND man should be offended and it should be removed NOW. The fact that no one in the O campaign speaks out about this, the “C” shirts, etc, tells me all I want to know.

 

Comment by Pragmatist | 2008-10-28 16:26:17

I liken this election to the Second Revolutionary War and we MUST WIN to save our country!

Great Britain (Obama) with its larger and better trained army and navy (i.e., endless campaign funds and groups like acorn) launched a huge land and sea effort to crush the revolution. However, they had to transport and supply its army across the Atlantic Ocean (from the East coast to the West coast of the U.S.). As the war continued, the British won many battles but gained little from their victories. The American patriots (i.e., McPalin’s Army of supporters) always formed new forces and continued the fight to final victory in November 2008.

McCain/Palin 2008!

 

Comment by foxyladi14 | 2008-10-28 16:26:31

so glad the site is back up.didn’t get my daily n.q.fix.yesterday..
could,’t sleep at all last night
puma

 

Comment by Firefly | 2008-10-28 16:26:49

What has to happen for violence against women to be elevated to the level of HATE CRIME? It’s centuries too long in coming – kell surpreeze!

After what’s been done to her, Sarah definitely knows what we’re dealing with here. I think we need to motivate her to get it going – not that a democrat congress will be any help – we know how much respect they have for women – NOT.

Can President McCain do some kind of executive order making HATE CRIMES against women equal to HATE CRIMES against minorities? Or does it have to be congress?

Anybody know?

Comment by NoBamaNoWay | 2008-10-28 17:30:01

most (some?) hate crimes legislation already contains the is language, i.e., “crimes based on gender (male or female);” it seems to me this may just be bias and dereliction of duty by the person in charge there. surprise.

 
 

Comment by Hank | 2008-10-28 16:28:19

$250K has been donated to the Obama campaign by the Justice Department….No wonder those people aren’t doing there JOB.

 

Comment by Wake Up America | 2008-10-28 16:28:52

Obama Affinity to Marxists Dates Back to College Days

Obama in His Own Words:

“To avoid being mistaken for a sellout, I chose my friends carefully,” the Democratic presidential candidate wrote in his memoir, “Dreams From My Father.” “The more politically active black students. The foreign students. The Chicanos. The Marxist professors and structural feminists.”

http://www.audacityofhypocrisy.com/2008/10/28/obama-affinity-to-marxists-dates-back-to-college-days/

Comment by Tuppence411 | 2008-10-28 16:31:00

What the hell is a “structural feminist”?

Comment by AnnieO | 2008-10-28 16:36:11

Good question!!

Comment by Kal | 2008-10-28 17:14:45

It’s a form of feminist thought that looks to the structure of society to explain ongoing gender hierarchies, and recognizes patriarchal privilege, occupational segregation, and womanhating as factors in the continuing disadvantaged status of women. The term does not fit easily with the other marxian terms BO has thrown around in this passage, and does not ring true. Also, his text mentions the word ‘woman’ only 4 times, and his brief discussions of women or feminists all lack context or hook into the dynamic of his larger points. Very ahistorical, decontextualized, and depersonalized — therefore not ‘real’ marxian analysis and definitely paying lip service to feminism for the political payoff.

Perfectly consistent with the womanhating he has supported and participated in all during his campaigns.

I sure hope he loses big time!!!

PUMA!!

Comment by gerard "barracuda" Nedich | 2008-10-28 18:01:00

yes, Obama hates women… especially his mother and grandmother…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4FUq223TGEc

a. hillary
b. mccain

america first!

 

Comment by McPalin | 2008-10-28 19:11:37

They need to stop using that term as it implies something that it is not.
Structural woman sounds better.

 
 
 

Comment by Ferd McBerfle | 2008-10-28 16:38:32

It’s Oblockhead’s code for “built like a female”, I would hazard a guess. He’s a sexist pig.

 
 
 

Comment by Tuppence411 | 2008-10-28 16:29:39

This thought gives me hope….
There are hundreds of of who regularly post here.
For every one poster, there must be a hundred readers
For every one reader, there must be a thousand like minded individuals.

In customer service there is an old adage- imagine every complaint phone call or letter received equals a 1000 unhappy customers. From the traffic on anti-Obama blogs, Barky has a lot of unhappy customers who will voice for the first time their opinion on election day.

 

Comment by candymarl | 2008-10-28 16:32:50

It’s open season on women. I’m just stunned.

 

Comment by Angel | 2008-10-28 16:33:44

On a previous article here, someone posted this link to Michelle’s thesis:

http://www.michelleobamathesis.com

I remember a few months ago, I’d found her thesis online somewhere (before I found NQ!). After reading several pages, I was getting really disgusted and clicked off the link without saving it.

I wonder if what’s on this link is it?

Comment by requiredreading | 2008-10-28 19:06:15

I think from comments upstairs that this is her thesis. I read it a while ago on a different site. It’s badly written and the theme is basically: it’s a travesty when black Americans develop “upper class white values” (such as she might by attending Princeton) and they should, instead, concentrate their efforts on “helping their own.” In other words, racially-based social activism. Real melting-pot Americanism, huh? This is one of the reasons I took against the Obamas early on: instead of the spirit of the racially-mixed civil rights movement, they (Michelle with her thesis; BO with Wright) buy into this race-based view of society and culture, where nobody who’s not black can understand or care about the black experience and all whites are bigots just by virtue of being white (a view propounded by many university orientation programs, by the way). I hated this when it found its way into American academia and it’s even more despicable in the political arena.

 
 

Comment by fleur | 2008-10-28 16:43:00

It is illegal in CT to even display a noose. They had been appearing at random locations throughout CT. Gov. Rell enacted a law forbidding the display of nooses. He would be in trouble in this state.
And the bashing of Gov. Palin is appalling.

 

Comment by fleur | 2008-10-28 16:45:04

It is illegal in CT to even display a noose. They had been appearing at random locations throughout CT. Gov. Rell enacted a law forbidding the display of nooses,as the historical connotation is one of hate. He (the artist)would be in trouble in this state.
(And the bashing of Gov. Palin is appalling and disgusting.)

Comment by AnnieO | 2008-10-28 16:50:09

I live in SE CT. Nice to meet you. I love Gov. Rell!

Comment by demvoter | 2008-10-28 17:29:57

I’m in SE CT, too. There are a lot of quiet Mac supporters here. And they’re all Dems. Can’t wait to see how this shakes out on Nov. 4.

 
 
 

Comment by Peggy Sue | 2008-10-28 16:46:20

American Girl, you nailed it for me. This is exactly the way I feel about how HRC was treated and now Sarah Palin. And the woman on woman bashing is truly disturbing. What is it envy? How dare these women be successful and tough and tireless!

And is this the message we really want to send to our daughters: give it up, Babe. No matter how hard you try, no matter how hard you work or how much better you are than your opponent, you’ll be elbowed out because you’re . . . just a former First Lady, just a Governor, just a mother and wife.

Just a woman.

I was horrified when Hillary Clinton suspended her primary campaign and Gloria Steinam appeared on the Today show [very next morning] and casually said she never believed Hillary would win the nomination in the first place. Why? Because she was a woman.

No mention of how appallingly rigged the whole thing was, how the DNC annointed Obama as “their guy.” No mention of how Hillary Clinton won the popular vote or had been a long and loyal Democratic servant.

Oh no. Steinam flicks Hillary off like yesterday’s leftovers. Time to go with the “winner.” That’s not loyalty. It’s petty and dishonorable, particularly for an elder stateswoman of the woman’s movement.

Madeline Albright once said there’s a special kind of Hell for woman who refuse to support other women.

I’m not a big believer in Hell. But this time? I really hope Albright’s right.

Comment by silverfox | 2008-10-28 17:25:51

peggy sue…

gloria steinem lost my respect a long time ago. her brand of partisan “feminism” is the worst of fakery, and too many leftist women are buying what she sells..

she didn’t waste one minute in her rush to slam Gov Palin, and side with the worst misogynist campaign in memory.

yeah…if that is feminism, i’m the pope.

gladdened my heart to see some of the big wheel radical feminist leaders standing with Palin last week at a rally.
now that is Feminism, with a capital F!

Comment by Tversky | 2008-10-28 17:52:48

ITA about Steinem. It annoys me that she thinks she speaks for all women. It appalls me that she labels women that aren’t pro-choice traitors or more specifically “only a woman biologically.” Pfft.

This year has taught me so much about the intolerance, sexism and stunning hypocrisy of the left. I used to think the far right were the true “bad” guys. Now I know that crap exists on both sides.

 

Comment by Peggy Sue | 2008-10-28 19:10:46

I guess I’ve been running around with blinders on, Silver Fox. This election has opened my eyes in so many ways. This is just one arena. The idea that a woman, an elder stateswoman of the original movement could so cavalier, so totally phony . . . astounded me. I guess I never got the email that only “certain” women qualify for feminine support and congrats. And that if you don’t follow the strict party line, then liberal women will turn on you like barracuda.

I wrote on another thread that in my mind, Sarah Palin is the poster child for what feminists fought for at the start: a successful professional woman, a wife and mother, a woman who could say: I can do it all, maybe not perfectly all the time, but I can juggle like hell and rely on temporary respites from the people around me. Plain’s husband, Todd, is obviously a huge helpmate. She’s a lucky woman.

I’m the first person to admit that Palin is “not” Hillary Clinton. Nor would I expect her to be. But what happened to women saying, Sister, I do not agree with your political stance, but I have your back because you are where we always hoped women could go.

I, too, was somewhat gladdened when local NOW Chapter heads came to Palin’s support. But there should be more.

If not, that glass ceiling won’t ever be broken and the “frat boy” mentality will continue to rule the day.

And women can look in the mirror and see the reason for that failure.

 
 
 

Comment by brendy | 2008-10-28 16:46:53

in 1995 interview, Obama is shown on tape saying: “Rev. Wright is The Best of what the Black Church has to offer”. Of course, the video talks about RACE – ALWAYS about race…click on the link to hear/see:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fh7xMhsLnac

“The best of what the Black Church has to offer” – Rev. Wright, 1995 Obama

Time for all of us to email the above video to the following newspeople: (the more people email these stories, the more likely that the newscasters will pick up on this – since they receive SO many emails per day)

friends@foxnews.com (megyn Kelly)
cavuto@foxnews.com
oreilly@foxnews.com
hannity@foxnews.com
ontherecord@foxnews.com (Greta)
americas-talking@foxnews.com
http://www.loudobbs.com
brit Hume (Foxnews.com) – online form

Comment by AnnieO | 2008-10-28 17:00:23

“In times of economic scarcity, politicians in this country look for a scapegoat. They want to organize race rather than principles…”
–Barack Obama

Huh? WTF?

Comment by brendy | 2008-10-28 17:07:40

Yep! In Obama’s eyes – ‘race’ has always been THE problem in the USA (see what his great ‘mentor’ teacher/preacher taught him???). Obama STILL believes that way, but of course, after the Wright fiasco was made PUBLIC, Obama ‘had’ to ‘disavow’ Wright. Yeah, he ‘publically’ ‘disavowed’ him but PRIVATELY, in his HEART – Obama STILL holds contempt for Whites and STILL holds Wright in great esteem – that’s MY opinion.

 

Comment by jbjd | 2008-10-28 17:19:29

Quote is, “They want to organize around race…”

Comment by brendy | 2008-10-28 17:33:42

The quote is SOMETHING like this (I keep replaying the video and kept typing at the same time; some words might be left out, like ‘today’, but it’s pretty close): “In times of economic scarcity, generally, the politicians in this country want to look for scapegoats, want to organize around race as apposed to around principles and around values, and I think that’s a mistake but I think that can be encountered by grass roots mobilization, work at a local level…”

Comment by AnnieO | 2008-10-28 17:47:06

Do you think politicians in this country want to organize around race? I found that an odd statement.

Comment by AnnieO | 2008-10-28 17:50:04

Just realized it was your post responding to the quote above. Sorry.

 

Comment by brendy | 2008-10-28 17:56:21

AnnieO, I think the quote “wants to organize around race” IS odd. I wonder why and where Obama got THAT idea?

 
 
 

Comment by AnnieO | 2008-10-28 17:44:21

Ooops, I just noticed I omitted the word “around.” Thanks for the correction.

I don’t think the meaning was lost, and
the “Huh” and “WTF” still applies.

Comment by Ferd Mcberfle | 2008-10-28 17:50:38

Heaven forbid they should organize around the good of the country.

 
 
 
 
 

Comment by Annie | 2008-10-28 16:53:16

Thanks for posting the video… it was quite wonderful to hear Sarah Palin.. and it would be terrific if that were shown on tv the night Mr. Obama gives his pre-written speech ad infinitum on his paid tv.

You can’t believe anything Obama says… why he even copied her ASL I love you shout out to the deaf and hard of hearing. That is what he is good at -copying others. Don’t forget his talking points taken directly from Hillary Clinton’s official site – except he got them mixed up…and so he was found out.

Mr. Obama’s credibility
gap:
Tax deductions today will change
tomorrow. His campaign turns
on a dime, depending on who is listening.
Keeping track.

McCain/Palin – 2008
Hillary Clinton – 2012

Comment by brendy | 2008-10-28 17:38:16

My extended family and I are going to a Sarah Palin rally in Jeffersonville, Indiana tomorrow!!! We are SO excited! She’s supposed to have Hank Williams, Jr. with her (I don’t like country music very much and I esp. don’t like him but THAT is not why I’m going..I’m going to see SARAH. YEA!!!) I hope she draws a big crowd. Jeff(ersonville) is just across the bridge from Louisville, KY – so, hopefully, many WILL show up!

 
 

Comment by Hank | 2008-10-28 16:55:10

Fox is about to talk about the LA Times tape

 

Comment by NOBAMANOWAY | 2008-10-28 17:18:19

SARAH:

GO FOR THE GIZZARD
THE OBAMA CAMP IS CLEARLY ANTI-WOMAN
THEY ARE ENCOURAGING MISOGYNY AND THEY PRACTICE UNEQUAL PAY!!

GO FOR THE JUGULAR ON THIS !!

 

Comment by Tversky | 2008-10-28 17:20:10

The violent hatred people have shown for both Sarah and Hillary this election year has been startling to me. NONE of the male candidates have inspired as much hostility as the two women. I’d say it’s on par with Bush Derangement Syndrome or Bill Clinton Derangement Syndrome.
But here’s the thing with Bush: He had to win a close, contested election; start a pre-emptive war (with dubious intelligence data); egregiously abuse presidential powers; and mess up the fed’s response to Katrina to earn that level of hatred. I still think the left is over the top in their Bush hate, but at least they can actually point to a few thngs he’s done to EARN that vitriol.
My question is: What have Hillary and Sarah done to earn comparable levels of vitriol?
I can’t think of a thing.
Is it because they’re both unapoletically outspoken assertive women that speak the truth about Dear Leader O?
Would they inspire such violent anger if they were opposing anyone else?

Comment by AnninCA | 2008-10-28 18:35:15

It’s what you said. Derangement.

Clinton, Bush, Clinton, Palin….it’s all the same stuff. Some of it is here against Obama.

It’s just over-the-top, to me.

Look at the news shows. They yell at the “other side,” your/my side cheers. Frankly, nobody should cheer. It’s disrespectful behavior, nothing more.

 
 

Comment by piloties | 2008-10-28 17:20:39

Just remember, Big Black won the first two races of the Triple Crown. Ran out of gas in the Belmont, the long one. Since then, hurt his leg and won’t ever race again.

Loved Big Black. The Little o, not so much.

Quit whining. Hitch up your big girl panties. Go vote. Keep the faith. This thing is going to be won.

Comment by Deep Truths | 2008-10-28 19:39:22

The horse’s name is Big Brown. FYI.

 
 

Comment by pewlf | 2008-10-28 17:21:19

Wow Joe the Plumber agrees with someone in the audience and says If Obama wins election It will be Death to Israel…..Should wake up a few people.

http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/10/28/joe-plumber-backs-claim-obama-bring-death-israel/

Comment by AnninCA | 2008-10-28 19:25:09

What a kick that he’s stumping for McCain in Ohio.

GO JOE!

 
 

Comment by pewlf | 2008-10-28 17:24:14

Almost forgot check out the home page on Fox news.com

it has Quotes from Obama’s book on Marxism…

Front page, should be good Oreilly and Hannity and Greta

 

Comment by angry but hopeful | 2008-10-28 17:29:02

great post american girl. if i could add one thing, it is always said that behind every successful man is a supportive women. but in Sarahs case, she has a husband that all men should aspire to be like. Todd has demonstrated how much better this country would be if all men treated their women with respect and dignity. i can honestly say this because the women who stands by me, not behind me, is one of the strongest women i have ever met in my life. after 30 years of marriage, i think my opinion carrys some weight. Of the 4 candidates, i would rather have Sarah as POTUS, but i will be honored to have her as VP.

 

Comment by sassy | 2008-10-28 17:31:18

Don’t blast me please…but I find that there are few women I would vote for.
I am weird among my friends because my focus was never on soaps, clothes, hair, make-up, etc.
Frankly, I find all that stuff boring. I would rather discuss books, politics, world events.
For women to continue to diminish themselves, to garner approval of others, is destructive, and also selective.
As long as another must take the lead, those who follow can play it safe!
That subjective mentality is imposed and adopted!

 

Comment by LizfromFL | 2008-10-28 17:51:07

I don’t know any women who focus on clothes, hair, make-up etc. (maybe when I was thirteen!) Who have you been hanging with? I think that’s a Madison avenue thing.

I’ve always been a bookworm myself, a c-SPAN, Book TV certified geek nerd. But I think there are just as many women, probably a lot more than men, that I would vote for. The problem is the problem that it’s always been in history. How many people know that Mozarts’ sister was just as talented and wrote many of the works accredited to her brother? The guys still get the limelight (except when it comes to sex and Hollywood type attention) and you don’t hear as much about smart, talented and experienced women.

 

Comment by Anee | 2008-10-28 18:14:05

I would think that hanging an effegy of a vp candidate and the presidential candidate consumed in flames would be considered a death threat by the Secret Service.
What kind of person does this? What if this was his mother? A very sad statement on our society.

Comment by Ferd McBerfle | 2008-10-28 18:56:13

And an even sadder statement on the condition of out political system. This should have been roundly condemned; the silence is deafening from those who should be out front on this issue.

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-10-28 19:04:52

I can’t look at the picture of the effigy of her and not feel sick to my stomach.

Comment by La Compania Volante | 2008-10-29 01:19:46

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-10-28 19:04:52

I can’t look at the picture of the effigy of her and not feel sick to my stomach.

Agreed. This is sick, regardless of who it depicts; because it depicts political candidates, it’s also a sign of the political sickness that has infected our nation.

 
 
 
 

Comment by Amirosa | 2008-10-28 18:32:41

The more I hear Sara Palin, the more I like her, even though I do not agree with some of her policies. She is real genuine. I truly believe that she will be president one day, unlike Hillary, who I believe will never have the chance as long as she remains a democrat. So sorry Hillary…I wanted you in the White House because you were the best candidate. For now I am voting McCain/Palin, and I hope they win.

 

Comment by AnninCA | 2008-10-28 19:00:24

I have to admit, I think the display is funny and well done.

I don’t have any sense that this is intended to be against women. It’s a political Halloween statement, and that’s all.

It’s a bit more creative than the moose-shoot on SNL.

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-10-28 19:02:23

What?????? Unbelievable.

Comment by AnninCA | 2008-10-28 19:04:53

Oh well, I liked the Waffle mix sold at the RNC, too.

Have a bit of fun.

Comment by imustprotest | 2008-10-28 19:07:03

Whatever, I’m sickened by the display. You obviously have your own opinion on it.

 
 
 

Comment by Peggy Sue | 2008-10-28 19:21:03

Sorry, AnninCA. On this one I totally disagree. There’s nothing funny about hanging a woman, slugging a woman or killing a woman. Yes, it’s an effigy. But it’s a symbol of the disregard so many of these young men have for women in general. We’ve heard the filthy names in repeated posts.

There’s point at which you say “No!” Pretending that hanging a figure of Sarah Palin is good, clean fun is where I say, “Stop it! Stop it, now.”

If this were a figure of Barack Obama or Michelle Obama no one would be laughing. Why? Because of the history. Take a gander at the stats on violence against women that no one ever wants to talk about. It’s not new. It goes wa-a-y back.

This is not a funny stunt. It’s an insult.

And btw, my older sister died at the hands of her husband. So, I’m clean out of good humor.

 

Comment by Deep Truths | 2008-10-28 19:43:48

Oh, well its ole AnninCA. Desperate for attention – for the 1000th time.

Grow some self-esteem Ann, ASAP!

 
 

Comment by SLW | 2008-10-28 19:19:33

If it’s not hate, what is it— deep seated perversion. This election has brought out the very worst in people and the best; though locating it is like a needle in a haystack and once one does.. watch the sparks fly. I’d also like to point out to the individual that not all Russian American heritages and backgrounds behave in that manner; from the upper Midwest peninsula, we’d very easily shoot several deer, wash the skins, debone, and can the meat. We respect Sarah Palin because she represents survivalism.

 

Comment by Andrew | 2008-10-28 19:26:41

Really psyched. Analyzed the data from the presidential election at our school and discovered two things: The old the students were, the more likely they were to vote for McCain and that young male voters voted overwhelmingly for McCain. Teachers however were kooky!!! Out of 80 teachers and administrators: 23 voted McPalin, 55 voted Obiden, 2 Ron Paul. The most liberal were the Math teachers, the English Teachers, and the Science Teachers. Most conservative were the Social Studies teachers and the Other teachers (Category for people that didn’t fall into a specified department.) Math and English were really bad, all but three were for Os..bama.

 

Comment by AnninCA | 2008-10-28 19:27:39

Political effigies are not new, folks. There were TONS of Bush effigies last year.

What I personally find off-putting? Nobody dares do one on Obama.

Now, THAT bugs me.

*Freedom of speech…..protect it!*

INSIST on it.

It’s just time one of you creative types return the fun of Halloween and do one on Obama and Biden.

Comment by Deep Truths | 2008-10-28 19:48:39

It’s just time one of you creative types return the fun of Halloween and do one on Obama and Biden.

I just read a comment BY YOU that you want to PURCHASE it. WTF!

Its one thing to be schizophrenic in private, quite another to be pasted all over this very popular blog. Feel better now.

 
 

Comment by McPalin | 2008-10-28 19:28:19

Comment by AnninCA | 2008-10-28 19:00:24

I have to admit, I think the display is funny

There is nothing funny about a woman candidate for VP being hung in a noose on a thugs front porch-gay or straight, it doesn’t matter. Halloween is just an excuse to do this. The real motive is hate and not Halloween. FBI needs to pay them a visit.

 

Comment by Anee | 2008-10-28 19:34:08

I read the latest story on the la times website and there is a poll and comments that says a majority think its offensive.

I think Sarah and her family should visit this guy and ask him to his face, why he thinks she’s so scary.

 

Comment by jomama | 2008-10-28 20:28:25

Ask yourself why you can’t get away with hanging a black effigy; then ask yourself how this came to be.

We have a right to free speech. We may not like what the other guy has to say, but he has the right to say it. The problem has become that only certain views are allowed. Neither we nor the government has the right to choose who can say what. I’ve heard many many things in my life that I’ve found offensive. How I chose to react or not react was my decision, no one elses.

 

RSS Feed for This PostPost a Comment

Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)