RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Presidential Transition on the Precipice [UPDATED]

Does Barack Obama’s political future hinge on Hillary Clinton? Has he painted himself into a corner? The leak of Hillary Clinton’s name as the leading candidate to become Secretary of State has thrown Washington into an uproar. In fact, Barack must now follow thru and name Hillary as Secretary of State or risk blowing up his transition. Why? Both John Kerry and Bill Richardson believe they were promised the Sec State job. I was on Capitol Hill for lunch the other day with a friend on the Senate Foreign Relations committee. At that time it was widely assumed among key committee staff that Kerry had the job nailed down and that Russ Feingold would wind up as the new chairman of Foreign Relations. Hold your horses.

Hillary’s name did not just “happen” to leak out. It was a deliberate act and sends a clear message to others who thought they had the Sec State job in the bag. This news has come as a complete surprise to many in the Hillary camp. Unless Hillary comes forward in the next few hours and knocks down these rumors and insists that she wants to stay in the Senate, you must assume she wants the job. The move makes sense on several levels. Hillary and Bill could have sabotaged his Presidential campaign but did not. While some of us who backed Hillary in the primaries declined to board the Hopium Changey Express, she worked hard to get Barack elected. This also will put her in a position particularly suited to her talent and abilities.

But if she is not given the job, oh, oh!!

Trotting her name out like this and then not giving her the job will be viewed as one more insult of a woman who has been the consummate team player. Rather than sit and sulk at the betrayals inflicted on her by the likes of Howard Dean and Bill Richardson, she sucked it up and campaigned enthusiastically for Barack. In fact, some of her supporters were put off by the support for Obama and credit her efforts with helping him seal the deal on election day, particularly in Pennsylvania and Ohio. So to dangle this new opportunity and then give it to a Kerry or a Richardson would be another slap in the face. That in turn would further enrage Hillary fans and supporters.

Putting Hillary’s name out there and then not following through will create a story-line that the Obama transition effort is inept and amateurish.

Conversely, giving Hillary that job would be seen by most Hillary supporters as a great peace offering and the kind of gesture that many believe should have been extended when she suspended her campaign. It would go a long way in healing the rift among many of the Hillary backers who voted for McCain. This will not remove all of the bitterness, but it is an important first step. Of course, this won’t make Kerry and Richardson happy, but neither of those guys can claim any credit for helping turn Pennsylvania and Ohio into a Barack victory.

The economic crisis Barack Obama inherits is so severe and so pervasive that he will need a steady, experienced hand at State Department. With Hillary in place he will be certain that the Senator from New York and her husband, Bill Clinton, will be in the boat with Obama rowing for their lives to try to rescue the Republic. Putting Hillary in place also will send a reassuring message to Israel that a guy named Barack Hussein Obama can be trusted to deal fairly with Israel.

Unless Hillary turns this down, she should be the one. If, by chance, the Obama folks floated her name and then go in a different direction, that will ignite a new and furious round of criticism raising the question about President-elect Obama’s competence. I cannot imagine that Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel and Chief of the Transition team, John Podesta, are that stupid or vindictive. It looks like Hillary will be Secretary of State come February.

UPDATE–This is not a rumor started or fanned by Clintonistas. Important to note that Hillary is not a weak sister like Colin Powell. Powell had his cojones clipped in a Bush Administration because he was too weak to go to the President and push back against the bullying of Don Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney. Powell was and is the quintessential butt snorkeler aka brown nosing ass kisser. A competent, smooth guy but he perfected the role of catering to those above him. Cheney and Rummy conspired together and effectively walled off Powell.

No way in hell the same thing happens to Hillary. There is no comparable Rumsfeld/Cheney lash up in the Obama Administration that I can see. Also, Hillary is not a weak personality like Powell. She does not have an inner need to cater to the every whim of a President Obama. She will give honest, smart advice. If she is confronted with a situation where she is asked to do something or represent a position that is diametrically opposed to her core values she will not just go along.

I think Hillary has the potential to be the best Secretary of State since James Baker and will leave a positive mark on history if she is offered the job.

Trackback URL

RSS Feed for This Post339 Comments »

Comment by Julianne Barbato | 2008-11-14 14:56:02

She had better get the job….

Comment by havoc | 2008-11-14 16:08:39

Comment by Judy L. NC | 2008-11-14 16:55:45

or I might have a stroke.

Comment by Judy L. NC | 2008-11-14 16:57:06

No. Wait, wait. How many down is Sec. State in the presidential succession lineup? Anybody know?….I’m heading to google.

Comment by Judy L. NC | 2008-11-14 17:00:55

President

Vice President

Speaker of the House

President pro Tem of Senate

Secy. of State

I’m starting to see a scenario where this might work out. . .

 

Comment by Sis | 2008-11-14 17:02:13

It’s number 4, after Vice President, Speaker of the House, and President pro tempore of the Senate.

Comment by Ani | 2008-11-14 21:03:52

Well since Sen. Robert Byrd (Pres. Pro Tem of the Senate) is about 100 years old, I think he would pass on the line of succession…

 
 
 
 
 

Comment by Miss H | 2008-11-14 16:19:08

Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton should stay as far away as possible from “THE ONE”. Look at how many people have been utterly destroyed by his political machine.

Comment by Shainzone | 2008-11-14 16:32:16

I agree completely.

Run, Hillary, Run. As far and fast as you can!

 

Comment by axelrod is a nazi | 2008-11-14 18:46:59

I agree too. Hillary should stay away. He is going to screw her over. She should stay in the senate.

Comment by retire05 | 2008-11-14 20:29:29

I am in total agreement with you. Hillary, in line to take over the “Lion of the Senate” position when Tubby Teddy retires, would lose any power she would have in the senate to stop Obama.

Sure he wants to give her the State job, then send her off on some errand to a nation no one ever heard of.

Hillary would be wasted as State. But what better way to shut her up. She will have no alternative than to carry out his wishes.

Tell him to pound sand, Hillary. Don’t be fooled into thinking he has decided to play nice.

Comment by Ani | 2008-11-14 21:07:15

Tell him to pound sand, Hillary.

Yeah, that’s a good way to put it.

 
 
 

Comment by NoBamaNoWay | 2008-11-14 19:25:21

agreed. if she is SOS she will partially own barky’s fuck-ups, and there will be many.

 

Comment by ginaswo | 2008-11-14 22:15:30

I disagree, I believe HRC will once again put the country first and accept. I will sleep better knowing Hill is there and it will also give me a new view of the One.

go for it Hillary!

:0)

 
 

Comment by ame | 2008-11-14 16:36:47

Agree. I would like to see Clinton get the job for two reasons. One…I believe she would do an excellent job and two….vindication, Obama needs the Clintons.

Comment by salliort | 2008-11-14 18:45:01

Hillary will have to defend Obama’s view of the world, which conflicts with her own. Looks to me like it’s another way for the President Elect to put her in a constant humiliating position.

She can do much more good in the Senate.

Comment by Cinie | 2008-11-14 19:48:04

Obama doesn’t have a worldview, he has academic theories, and a team of Harvard professors as advisers. He needs somebody with practical experience.

 

Comment by FranSC | 2008-11-15 01:05:24

While it is an impressive idea and would be a step forward I couldn’t help but think it was a way of getting rid of Hillary as a threat to his reelection. But then, unless he falls on his face, she is not going to have a chance to challenge him anyway. He is very insulated from colossal failure at this point with all the former Clinton people making sure he doesn’t make the same mistakes as their former boss.

I believe Hillary thought this was the only time for her. She would have a hard time competing with the Hi-tec more modern image he now claims that makes him seem something he really is not.

She was royally screwed by many of her senate peers, including the NY delegation, led by Hillary’s ‘good’ friend, Charlie Rangel that came out just hours after her campaign suspension, chomping at the bit for her to concede it all to O so they could happily jump onboard the campaign train they really wanted to be on for months. I have wondered how she could ever go back to that.

The worst part is conceding anything to this man who stole the nomination from her and was able to win no matter who it would have been thanks to the economic collapse. Nothing he could ever do can undo how his campaign has nearly shattered our democracy.

Comment by jawbone | 2008-11-15 11:51:57

Getting Hillary out of the Senate removes a strong, well-known senator with a national following–and lessens the ability of the legislative branch to challenge the Obama administration.

I see this as a way of marginalizing the political clout of the Democratic wing of the Democratic Party and also keep Bill and Hillary under firm control of Obama/Axelrod.

I hope Hillary will Just Say No. She promised all of her followers that she would be there to fight for all of us. I depended on that promise.

I have no idea how Obama will govern. I don’t think he is a far lefty–I think he used whomever and whatever would advance him toward his goals. I see him taking a centrist to center right crouch–doing only what the MCM/uberwealthy see as permissable. But I may be wrong.

I have no idea what his real goals are for his presidency–other than cementing his power. He seems to use jobs to get ahead, to go forward–where does he go from the presidency of the US?

So, no, I do not want to see Hillary as Secty of State. The cabinet members can only do what the president and his team want them to do–and also take the brunt of mistakes made by the president and his team. If they disagree, they have to hide it publicly–or resign in protest.

She will be politically weakened–and will serve as the lightning rod for the MCM.

And, on a selfish level, I feel we who supported her lose a strong voice in the Senate, someone who could try to push him toward doing the progressive programs she proposed in her campaign.

Interesting times, folks, interesting times.

 
 
 

Comment by Chicago Joe | 2008-11-14 20:50:49

Yeah, and so he can fire her when something goes wrong and she is his scapegoat. Barf. I still can’t believe that he is going to be POTUS.

 

Comment by jangles | 2008-11-14 21:14:36

I understand the purpose of HRC as SOS would be to free up her Sen. seat for Caroline Kennedy and a Kennedy pay back. One little upside of this would be the heart murmur to Kerry and Richardson. I would rather see HRC as Sec. of Treasury or Defense—two positions never in the hands of women and that would break some real glass ceilings.

 
 

Comment by nancy sabet | 2008-11-14 16:59:04

If you say so Larry, but I am still skeptical, I don’t trust him.

 
 

Comment by Cyn NY | 2008-11-14 14:56:23

I totally agree. If they don’t give it to her, there will be hell to. There is no wrath…

Not that I am so sure she should take it, but once it was confirmed she was being considered, if it isn’t offered, it is highly offensive.

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-11-14 16:00:12

Hey my Friend CYN !! :mrgreen:

I’m not so sure she should take it. Wasn’t Condi at the beckon call of W :-?

Wouldn’t Barry USE that against her. :-(
“Hillary do this and Hillary do that”
I mean don’t they have to really kinda like each other like Rice and W did?

Seeing them together would make me want to vomit every time :hurl:

(there goes another 8 yrs of NOT viewing TV when ever the Pretzeldent or his minions are on although JOE the BIDEN may be entertaining)

Comment by truthisgold | 2008-11-14 16:04:59

Yes but…never forget this: Condi is NO HILLARY CLINTON and never the twain shall meet. Never. Ever.

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-11-14 16:07:24

oh of course not (paha) never would equate those two EVA!

silly thought ;-)

Comment by Dawnelle | 2008-11-14 16:08:38

how about Hillary as Majority leader?

time for the old nevada man of the desert to step down?

Comment by BernieO | 2008-11-14 16:48:00

I have a feeling if she does this, the media will constantly criticize her because she will have to be “political” to so the job well and they will pretend to be shocked. Secretary of State gets more respect.
I do have a problem with her working for Obama - once again a more qualified woman has cowtow and help a younger, inexperienced guy, but Secretary of State is very prestigious. And she can hit the ground running because she knows a lot of world leaders, unlike Obama.

 

Comment by tek | 2008-11-14 19:36:59

Hillary could never be Majority Leader. Don’t you understand anything about the way Congress works? Well, not in our lifetimes, anyway.

 
 
 

Comment by kgirl1028 | 2008-11-14 16:19:17

If she takes that job she will.

 
 

Comment by susan | 2008-11-14 17:39:33

Dawnelle - 4 years, not 8 years

Comment by DawnellesTIREDoFpolitics | 2008-11-14 18:20:13

heh correction duly noted and agreed indeed!

 
 

Comment by Cyn NY | 2008-11-14 19:16:28

Sista Dawn!

I don’t think Hillary would be at the back and call of anyone. That said, I think she is better off in the senate, where she will have a ton of clout.

I love my senator from NY! ;-)

 

Comment by tek | 2008-11-14 19:38:17

Condi was at the beck and call of Bush because they were a twosome. Get it?

 

Comment by cc | 2008-11-14 20:47:27

me personally, if blowhard offers her the sec of state job and she accepts, I can’t support hillary any longer. I am done with these people not standing up for the security of our country and only angling for the top power position they can get. I’m done….either have a backbone like lieberman, stand up for what’s right, or don’t get my support.

 
 
 

Comment by csuzeq | 2008-11-14 15:01:35

I’m stating to go with this being a great thing. I don’t trust Odrama, but I think Hillary would not accept at risk to her political career. I would feel more comfortable about Israel and our country in general.

I drank the kool aid!

go Hillary SOS!

Comment by csuzeq | 2008-11-14 15:02:35

It is fitting to say Hillary SOS, isn’t it?

Hillary, don’t leave us. Save us Hillary! SOS!

Comment by snosandy | 2008-11-14 16:08:54

Even if Hillary were SOS for only one term, I think it would secure her political career as being vastly experienced in foreign relations and she will be able to do anything whe desires in the future. I think we need Hillary to represent us to the rest of the world.

Comment by Steve_in_KC | 2008-11-14 19:17:00

Hillary the SOS. Barky the POS.

 

Comment by Snickers | 2008-11-15 02:15:36

If Hillary accepts the SOS (which I hope she doesn’t), when (and not if) The One decides to get rid of her she won’t have her Senate seat any more and it will be the end of her political career. I concur with the post up thread: run Hillary run. As far away and as fast as you.

 
 
 

Comment by oowawa | 2008-11-14 16:23:50

I drank the kool aid!

Csuzeq, say it isn’t so! BO the SOB names HC the SOS. Doubtful. Remember, even if you took a few sips of KA, there’s still time to gag yourself with a spoon.

I’m afraid I’ll be one of the last left outside, howling at the moon. Destined to disturb the happy neighborhood.

Comment by csuzeq | 2008-11-14 17:16:38

You know, just a sip of the kool aid. It was kind of bitter, but I would give Obama 1 point. That si way more than he had yesterday and the counter goes to 1,000,000 so there is a long way to go for Obarfy to earn my respect. I just figure, he is going to be the _OT__ and so I don’t know how to give him a chance. I’d just feel safer about the Israel thing with Hillary as the gatekeeper.

I can throw up the kool aid still, just like I threw up that hairball that was shoved down my throat for months if need be.

 
 

Comment by NoBamaNoWay | 2008-11-14 19:28:48

she’s in a bind; she could definitely help america by providing a counter to barry’s idiocy, but only at the expense of her own political reputation and future.

Comment by cc | 2008-11-14 20:51:23

sorry, but bo will concoct some failure to pin on hillary and send her to Antarctica. PLEASE HILLARY RUN FOR YOUR LIFE!

 
 
 

Comment by Brigitte N. | 2008-11-14 15:02:20

I agree with the post and the above comments. Making Hillary secretary of state would put the best qualified person into this important position and go a long way to reunite Democrats. There are plenty of positions for Kerry and Richardson–I happen to believe that neither one comes even close to Hillary’s qualities for secretary of state.

 

Comment by gaindenpendent | 2008-11-14 15:06:40

Look, Obama lied about helping her pay off her debt. Obama lied about considering her for VP so I would assume that he’s lying once again.

He won’t offer it to her and the incompetence story line is going to stick is my prediction.

Comment by snosandy | 2008-11-14 16:11:25

She told him not to bother vetting her for VP if he wasn’t seriously considering her, so for him to meet with her in Chicago may mean that he is serious about this.

Comment by beebop | 2008-11-14 17:51:24

He didn’t seriously consider her but she arguably brought him more voters than the guy he did pick? Please. The judgment of this guy is so bad that if he offers it, she should RUN RUN RUN RUN RUN.

Comment by Snickers | 2008-11-15 02:18:36

yes, Beebop, run away Hillary, stay in the Senate.

 
 

Comment by gaindenpendent | 2008-11-14 19:49:47

I doubt it. There’s lots of other reasons for her to go to Chicago. For one, to talk him into finally helping retire her debt.

 
 

Comment by Betty Lou | 2008-11-14 16:34:33

I’m with you, I’ll believe it when I see it.

They are so into the Atwater angle on Obama’s team, I would see them as stupid enough to further alienate and demoralize Clinton by excluding her publicly, in this manner.

Larry gave realistic reasons as to why this would be suicidal, but, then, having gone through eight years of Cheney, and Rove, rationalism and success aren’t really the theme of the day, in Washington.

 

Comment by Liberty Belle not for Obama | 2008-11-14 19:04:23

If Barry doesn’t offer it to Hillary after leaking, pumping the story, i.e., pull the rug out from under her, pundits say then he’ll really rip it with the Clintons.

Bob Scheaffer said something about Pres. Bill Clintons overseas speaking fees would be a conflict of interest, and that might stop her from taking it. But methinks: Bob, don’t you think Hill and Bill have discussed this already?

I’m conflicted - like it hits in the gut. Yes, she would be the best Secretary of State, but damned, how can she trust him? Also, takes her out of a future run should the rest of Barry’s administration, or first and only term, be a total failure. What are the odds of her having a future in 2012?

 
 

Comment by gohillz | 2008-11-14 15:07:34

And that pretense of being an insider is what makes you so cute, Larry!

Comment by Betty Lou | 2008-11-14 16:41:40

Projecting, again?

Poor thing, you really don’t get it, do you?

Comment by gohillz | 2008-11-15 11:19:38

Projecting what, exactly? Larry Johnson is like the crazy homeless guy outside my apartment, except that he has a website and likes to chit-chat about cocktail parties. Keep bringing the lulz, Betty…

Comment by Nellie | 2008-11-15 18:32:33

Gohillz,

Larry Johnson is one dedicated, stand up guy with a character of solid gold.

What have you done for America that even comes close to Larry’s Resume? Have you even given 1/10 of what Larry has to us? What about the hard work and deication of Susan HU?

Cracks like you wrote, make we want to slap your face hard if we ever meet.

Your juvenile idiocy is despicable. If you don’t appreciate the quality time and work here at NQ - puhleeze - do us all a favor and go to one of the far left Commie blogs, like Kos, Americablog, TPM or Huffpost. Your purile attitude is more in sync there.

Good bye - Don’t let the door hit you on the way out!

 
 
 
 

Comment by Northwest rain | 2008-11-14 15:07:46

I think this is creepy — in my opinion she should stay as far away from this con artist as possible.

But then I’m not a politician.

No matter what O-zero does — he is a thief and a liar and he is a sexist jerk. So there is no way that I will ever drink the kool-aid. He is so inept and clueless that there is no one that can really “help” him.

What are all the demands to help this guy? Is he a fragile male — I have NEVER before heard so many pleas to “help” this lying traitor.

Look up “fragile male syndrome” in one of the search engines. One of the markers is BIG EARS. After I read the medical description of “fragile male syndrom” — who knows that may be why O-zero refuses to release his medical records.

Obama has so many secrets — which one will sink him?

Hillary please stay away from this crook. Stop being an abused women — you are now a poor role model for women. Hold your head up and WALK away and do not look back.

Comment by Typewriterstreaming | 2008-11-14 15:32:22

“Look up “fragile male syndrome” in one of the search engines. One of the markers is BIG EARS”

LOL

I agree with so much of what you posted. I am sorry Hillary didn’t stand up to the Liar to begin with.
There is no reason to trust him at all.

On the other hand, Hillary’s a genius and would be brilliant.

 

Comment by csuzeq | 2008-11-14 17:20:17

Ok, but here’s the thing. Are we better off with Hillary on the inside, or are we better off if she is out in the cold? Me thinks, we need an inside woman. She didn’t bust her ass for this fool for nothing so I thing she finagled something. That tells me she holds the power in this.

Not to mention Richardson and Kerry getting what they deserve? Priceless!

Comment by Talk2ThePaw | 2008-11-14 18:43:55

I would rather not see Hillary asssociate herself with an administration that will have a legacy as the worst in US history. It is political suicide to be a member of the Cabinet in such an administration.

I do not trust BoMo. I feel he would/will use any SOS as a stooge for public appearance of “unity” with Israel while making backdoor deals with America and Israel’s enemies. Backdoor deals with our enemies will be the norm for a BoMo administration.

Comment by BlueDot in Texas | 2008-11-14 20:27:20

I agree with you guys. Anybody in the Obamination Administration will have to make excuses for him. Hillary should distance herself from him; otherwise, she’ll be one of his many scapegoats.

 
 
 

Comment by Cubs in 09 | 2008-11-14 20:01:32

She does not have an inner need to cater…

Larry, I disagree.

IMO she is a codependent because of her desire to be needed (by men). This stems from her relationship with her father and the type of guy he was. Again, IMO, this is primarily why she has stuck with WMJ and campaigned so enthusiastically for BO after the way he treated her.

Of course, I could be way off base. If she stays in the senate and becomes Speaker then I will say that I am wrong.

BTY… Did y’all just watch the Endeavour lift off?
It gives me chills every time I proudly watch one of our rockets blast off. PROUD TO BE AN AMERICAN! :mrgreen:

 

Comment by Snickers | 2008-11-15 02:22:37

Thank you NWRain, I’m with you.

 
 

Comment by OBAMA IS A FRAUD | 2008-11-14 15:10:31


[Comment from LARRY JOHNSON--I don't like Dick Morris and he is completely full of shit in his analysis. This was not a rumor started by Clinton insiders. The notion that "The DEMOCRATIC PARTY'S TOP BRASS WANTED HILLARY," is completely delusional. In the future, you can publish snippets from Morris but spare us his full articles. He is misinformed.]

HILLARY FOR SECRETARY OF STATE - IS HE KIDDING?

By DICK MORRIS & EILEEN MCGANN

November 14, 2008

Hopefully, it’s just a rumor started by the Clintonistas, but is Barack Obama seriously considering appointing Hillary Clinton as his Secretary of State? If he pulls the trigger on that appointment, he will deserve what he gets!

Obama would do well to remember the history of Harry Truman and Jimmy Byrnes in 1944. Byrnes, known as the “assistant president” in FDR’s third term, was widely thought to be Roosevelt’s choice to replace Henry Wallace as his running mate on the 1944 ticket. At the last minute, FDR re-considered and decided Byrnes, a South Carolinian, was too conservative and went with Truman instead. But the Democratic Party establishment clearly was disappointed. While they wanted to get rid of the almost-Communist Wallace, they wanted Byrnes not Truman. (Just like the party establishment really wanted Hillary, not Obama, to be the presidential nominee).

So Truman named Byrnes to be his Secretary of State after he took office on Roosevelt’s death in 1945. Byrnes, who thought he should have been president, proceeded to make his own foreign policy. He flew to a meeting in Europe with the allied foreign ministers and barely kept President Truman posted on the deliberations. He became a loose cannon who thought he was the president. After a year of this nonsense, Truman fired him and brought in George Marshall to take the job.

If Obama nominates Hillary, he will put himself in the same position as Truman was with Byrnes and the results will be just as predictable.

All of this illustrates the fundamental problem Obama faces within his party: He was not their top choice for the job. The Democratic Party’s top brass wanted Hillary, not Obama. When Obama began winning primaries and caucuses, they fell in line and refused to make a super-delegate goal line stand for Clinton, but that does not disguise the fact that most of them backed Clinton from the outset.

Oddly, their lack of loyalty to Obama puts him in much the same position as Bill Clinton was in when he became president in 1993. He was not his party’s first choice either. New York Governor Mario Cuomo could have had the 1992 nomination for the asking, but he opted out. Faced with a choice among Clinton, cancer-stricken Paul Tsongas, and renegade former California Governor Jerry Brown, they opted for Bill. But their hearts stayed with Cuomo.

So when Clinton faced a Democratic Congress on taking office, he could not count on their support. Neither can Obama. So Clinton had to toe the liberal line in order to round up the votes he needed to pass his programs in the Congress that was nominally under his control. So will Obama. Ultimately, Clinton became the hostage of the Democratic majority in Congress and they became his jailer. He was forced so far to the left that he told me, in 1994 (after losing the Congressional elections) “I was so far to the left I didn’t recognize myself.” Neither will Obama.

Those who embrace the comforting fantasy that Obama will govern from the center and leave the left frustrated are in for a shock. We don’t know if Obama wants to move left or center. But that’s not the key question. The issue is not what he will want to do but what Congress will make him do.

The best example of how this will work is the 1994 anti-crime bill that was one of Clinton’s top legislative priorities. He originally saw it as a conservative bill providing for 100,000 extra police (about a 205 expansion of the nation’s constabulary), handgun and assault rifle controls, expansion of state and local prison construction, and a federal death penalty. But the liberals in the House, particularly the Black Caucus, were inflamed at the idea of capital punishment and demanded a stiff price for their support. Why didn’t Clinton just cross the aisle and pass the bill with Republican backing? First, the GOP wanted the gun controls dropped from the bill and second, the Democratic Congressional leadership threatened to make the president an orphan and pull their support if he sought Republican votes. So Clinton was stuck wringing every last vote out of his House majority. The bill became a Christmas tree with every kind of local pork project decorating. Midnight basketball courts, swimming pools, community centers and all manner of garbage was tacked onto the bill to win the votes, member by member, of every House Democrat. As a result, it became a left-leaning bill that Clinton had to accept. (After passage, it became the central force driving a sharp reduction in crime, but that’s another story).

Obama will face just such a situation and will be forced to the left - if he needs any forcing - just as Clinton was. And selecting Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State will just cede more of his authority.

Comment by Scout | 2008-11-14 15:18:35

Dick Morris’s Hillary Hatred rises again (yawn).

 

Comment by Typewriterstreaming | 2008-11-14 15:35:56

According to Carl Bernstein’s Hillary biography Morris was fired for talking on the phone with then Pres. Clinton and allowing his prostitute for that evening listen in on the other end. I’ve never heard that denied.
Geez, where do you even begin with a history like that? Morris is bitter about the Clintons for some reason. I hate the way he treats Hillary.

Comment by trixta | 2008-11-14 17:26:24

Apparently, in college Morris asked HRC out for a date and she refused him. I think he’s had a crush on her ever since and still lashes out at her because his male ego has been bruised.

 
 

Comment by Northwest rain | 2008-11-14 15:44:16

The Democratic leadership DID NOT WANT Hillary — they are the ones who kept demanding that Hillary quit when she was winning. Obama was chosen by Donna Brazillionist (who is a racist) etc. YEARS ago.

Obama had to be “helped” across the finish line — and Hillary Clinton was forced OUT by the DNC.

Morris is changing history and his Hillary Clinton derangement syndrome is showing.

Comment by PamFlorida | 2008-11-14 17:10:07

Didn’t Dick Morris help with Odinga’s campaign? I think he may have gone there.

 

Comment by PamFlorida | 2008-11-14 17:10:31

Didn’t Dick Morris help with Odinga’s campaign? I think he may have gone to Kenya.

 
 

Comment by bluelyon | 2008-11-14 15:52:37

If Dick Morris hates this idea, then sign me up. Gawd, will his 15 minutes EVER be up?

Comment by nancy sabet | 2008-11-14 17:05:24

Comment by Lee Ruth | 2008-11-14 18:04:40

If Hillary takes the job, Obama can ask her to resign at any time. Now, she is out of the Senate and out of politics. It is a perfect way to get rid of Hillary for good.
I do hope she does not fall for this.

Comment by Trudy | 2008-11-14 19:28:46

I was thinking the same thing today.

 
 
 
 

Comment by stodgie | 2008-11-14 15:57:17

dick morris? please!

Comment by OBAMA IS A FRAUD | 2008-11-14 16:13:59

Guys,

I know, I know. I don’t take everything Dick Morris says as law either. Please. I keep forgetting that I am newer to this site and there are landmines that get you in trouble and people you are supposed to either hate or worship. I’m learning, sorry.

What I thought was interesting was a small part of it about others who have hired SOSs of state in the same position Obama and Hillary are in and what the repercussions were. I’m not advocating Morris as the know it all about the Clintons and of course I realize there was inaccuracy in part of it.

I do think that he was nice and fair to Palin though so I can’t hate him as much as others do.

My bad. I should have just, as Larry said, taken the piece I thought was interesting out of it.

Comment by Betty Lou | 2008-11-14 16:48:11

At a certain point, though, it’s not about US politics, it’s about POLICY, and Morris doesn’t seem to get it.

Who does the work, the real work, past the Hollywood gossip queens, and their projections?

Sometimes, you simply have to fight for what is right, hope people get it, so, within a generation, perhaps, we can have a stable, fairly clean Washington, again.

Meaning, if Clinton is qualified for the job, Morris’ attempts to handicap should be disregarded.

I think of Gates, working under Bush.

Despite the hole of an administration, and cheney’s kooks, he brought stability back to defense, no easy task when one had to still compete with Rumsfeld while cleaning up his mess.

And on top of that, maintain American defense around the world.

Comment by OBAMA IS A FRAUD | 2008-11-14 17:05:54

Hillary is qualified for Obama’s job. More than Obama is. But this isn’t a normal situation. As in a normal human being hiring staff. It’s a lunatic liar, with repeated ulterior motives, and a massive ego, who has his head shoved so far up his azz that he probably won’t get anything done. I think it’s appropriate for people to evaluate this choice by Senator Clinton based on more than just her qualifications to do the job. Another part of it is will Obama LET her do her job? Will he ridicule and humiliate her again in front of the world? Sigh. Yet again something that just looks and smells wrong.

 
 

Comment by AnneinPA | 2008-11-14 21:32:06

Although I’m not a big fan of Morris as a person I am as an author. If you’ve read any of his books on the Clintons and especially on
Hillary they’re quite interesting. After all he
was with them since Bill was Gov. of Ark. He was
called back by Hillary to help win Bill’s second term as Gov. after a devasting loss.
Then he worked in the White House with both of them as a pollster and advisor. I think he’s pretty swift. He does give Hillary credit when
due. He thinks she’s a smart, loyal, and credible leader. He has said so in all his books, even as he criticizes some of her ego problems and her fishy personal stories.

 
 
 

Comment by snosandy | 2008-11-14 16:15:00

This is exactly how I would expect Dick Morris to respond. He is the biggest sleaze in politics.

 

Comment by Andy | 2008-11-14 17:30:36

When Obama began winning primaries and caucuses,

What??? Dick Morris is full of shit: Obama might have been winning caucuses but he was not winning primaries!!
Who’s Dick M. kidding about the “DNC top brass”: where on earth has he been during the primaries???
Morris’s hate of HRC is revolting: he’s one of the worst.

Comment by AnneinPA | 2008-11-14 21:38:00

He’s talking about the old guard. The people who were in Dem. politics when Clinton was Pres. Those
superdelegates owed the Clintons. For campaigning,
for donations, whatever, they supported her and then changed to where they thought they’re biggest gain and reward would be.

I don’t think Morris hates her, but is cynical of
her. He actually thinks she has potential to be great like R. Kennedy or not so great paranoid like Nixon.

 
 
 

Comment by FenelonSpoke | 2008-11-14 15:11:25

Oh, how nice. If she’s selected the Obama campaign hopes that all the sweeties play nicey, nicey, hopey changey and shut the hell up. Not me; Not me. It won’t make me like or respect Obama any better.

Comment by oowawa | 2008-11-14 16:35:34

Hurray Fenelon. There will be a few of us on the outside looking in, watching the happiness abound as the family opens their presents under the watchful gaze of the benevolent patriarchal benefactor.

 
 

Comment by cathnealon | 2008-11-14 15:12:05

BO cannot share the spotlight, not to mention Mechelle’s influence who can’t stand white women in general and was the catalyst for the race card being played against the Clintons in the primaries. The truth is BO can do anything he wants, put her name out there, take it back, laugh about it, he DOESN’T CARE. The people that bought the presidency for him don’t care either–they’ve got what they want and he could have Hillary knocked off, a video to prove it, and the media and the money men would look the other way.

Comment by Arabella Trefoil | 2008-11-14 15:14:25

 

Comment by Typewriterstreaming | 2008-11-14 15:37:25

I agree with this.

Comment by Snickers | 2008-11-15 02:35:53

I agree as well.

 
 

Comment by beebop | 2008-11-14 15:48:41

“all in all you’re just another bump in the road.”

 

Comment by Ldyoung | 2008-11-14 15:55:56

Well said, cathnealon. I won’t believe it even if Obama announces it himself.

Comment by jackie | 2008-11-14 16:25:42

I won’t believe it until she is sworn in and arrives at the State Department.

 
 

Comment by Rob G in Chicago | 2008-11-14 16:31:43

MESHELL may want to send Hillary off to “Foggy Bottom” to keep her busy, under control, and away from her Big Bottom.

 

Comment by trixta | 2008-11-14 17:33:53

HRC, please say NO!

How effective would she be anyway as SOS since she now wears the “RACIST” moniker given to her by Obama himself. Will the nations of Africa or the Middle East want to even deal with her?

 
 

Comment by Nobody Special | 2008-11-14 15:13:19

Personally I think her name being floated just offers insight into what the conversations were between Hillary and Obama that night at Feinstein’s house and on Obama one enroute to Unity, New Hampshire. Also, quite likely the “details” ironed out during phone calls and meetings with Bill.

This didn’t just happen, it’s been talked about for months privately I’m sure. It certainly brings into sharper focus why Hillary and Bill campaigned for “the one”.

I wouldn’t want to do Obama’s bidding as SOS if I were Hillary. She will after all be working for him and will be expected to carry out his policies. Yes she’ll have input, but in the end he will get the final word. How much input do you really think he’ll listen to from Hillary?

One thing though, it will be interesting to see how those that were promised the position will react if it is given to Hillary.

Comment by rollingthunder | 2008-11-14 16:06:16

So if the job is offered and she takes it, ONobama loses in 2012, and Hillary is out of a job!

Comment by cleffnote | 2008-11-14 20:02:19

Hillary don’t take the job, that means you’d be out of the senate. Remember he who hires, fires and I don’t trust Obama. What’s to say he asks Hillary, he accepts and then a few months later he fires her, then she has nothing. We know he’s good a flicking off the shoulder, making his vice presidential announcement at 3:00 am…..you get my drift. Don’t do it Hill, you’d be great but it’s too big a gamble with this guy making the offer.

I figure the only way to get you out of the Senate is to put you in as secretary of state so you leave the senate. Then fire you and you’re out of the Senate. You know the people will keep you in the Senate if you just stay there. They wouldn’t fire you. Think Hillary, think.

 
 
 

Comment by JiffyJML | 2008-11-14 15:17:58

I really don’t know about this at all.

Is the SOS spot REALLY where Senator Clinton can do the most good? The SOS is charged primarily with foreign relations. Now understand that of course I’d trust Clinton to excel no matter where she lands, but is foreign relations really her utmost forte? I feel that her expertise is better served domestically, personally.

She’d be fourth in line for the presidency, which is hardly anything to consider, really, but she’d be beneath Nancy Friggin Pelosi, which sort burns me as an insult.

On the other hand, the thought of either Kerry or Richardson as SOS makes me want to knock my head into my keyboard. I really cannot imagine either of them in the role.

Comment by Ani | 2008-11-14 15:46:49

She would be far better than either Kerry or Richardson. That being said, I think we need Hillary working on economic policy, health care, our domestic agenda — Obarky is clueless.

Wes Clark would make a great SoS also.

Further, I do not trust Obama to have her best interests at heart - she would be at his beck and call, he could blame her for whatever he wanted and then oust her.

I don’t trust this at all.

 

Comment by Andy | 2008-11-14 17:39:59

JiffyJML:

On the other hand, the thought of either Kerry or Richardson as SOS makes me want to knock my head into my keyboard.

LOL !! Me too.

Comment by Susan1968 | 2008-11-14 17:50:29

Comment by Cubs in 09 | 2008-11-14 20:15:45

 
 
 
 

Comment by marilyn | 2008-11-14 15:21:38

Obama will pick Hillary because if the phone rings at 3AM he won’t know what to do. He needs her to answer the phone.

Comment by Andy | 2008-11-14 17:54:31

It is 3AM and the phone is ringing in the White House….Instead of picking up BO runs to his cell, quickly dials HRC number and yells: SOS SOS SOS !!!!

 
 

Comment by ownaa | 2008-11-14 15:21:48

I am amazed every time I read some of Hillary’s so called supporters salivating at the prospect of her working under Obama. Either you people believe what you say about Obama to be true, then for her to be working for him would be an insult to the very fabric of your existance. Or you were lying when you said what you did about Obama. There is no 3rd obtion.

Comment by AngryWhitePerson | 2008-11-14 15:34:37

What, ownaa? Do you live life either/or? Then that is your particular problem.

Personally, I think Obama is a scumbag, a lying thug and a sack of shit who hangs with questionable characters and shady, seedy fellows. However, I am not insulted by Hillary Clinton serving as Secretary of State. Why? Because I put my country first, and want at least ONE PERSON in this horrible administration who feels the same way. Why should we watch or let the U.S. flush down the toilet because we hate Obama? America will be taken advantage of with Obama, the narcissistic loser. I will feel FAR LESS ANXIETY with Clinton as SOS than a socially inept moron (Richardson) who will insult half the world’s leaders, or Kerry, a namby pampby dumbass who couldn’t win the 2004 election with a gift ribbon wrapped around the electorate.

However, because Obama and his minions are a complete disgrace and untrustworthy, I do not expect Hillary Clinton to be named SOS.

Comment by snosandy | 2008-11-14 16:26:43

Comment by Betty Lou | 2008-11-14 16:52:41

Obama still has Rezko on his plate, too, lots of stuff, there.

 
 

Comment by Wisewoman | 2008-11-14 17:21:37

angrywhiteperson. While I can understand your sentiments, the bottom line is that Obama is untrustworthy. Please Hillary stay the h*ll away from him, pretty please. I am an AA female. I think her being his SOS is a very bad idea. She will be the scapegoat for all his failures. He truly is a lowlife, Chicago, thug.

Comment by Cubs in 09 | 2008-11-14 20:23:28

Well said, Wisewoman! IMO, BO could easily make her the SOSINO—the Secretary of State in Name Only. That is to say, he and his inner circle would do end runs and undermine her position while she’s “out there” doing the heavu lifting, taking the heat, being blamed, etc. Then he would have “reasons” to dismiss her. I think BO’s offer would be a political trap. Just don’t trust him. Never have. Never will.

 
 
 

Comment by tarma | 2008-11-14 16:06:46

I’m not sure who “you people” are, or what you mean by “so called supporters”. One thing that this election has made crystal clear, is that there are vast numbers of voters who are completely baffled and bewildered by complexity.

Comment by Cubs in 09 | 2008-11-14 20:26:37

…baffled and bewildered by complexity.

What the heck does that mean?

 
 
 

Comment by Craig Della Penna | 2008-11-14 15:22:18

Larry:

Sorry to disagree here but I think it would be a disaster for Hillary to accept a SecState position with Obama… a disaster for her. Hillary was an inspiring figure for many women - and even some men - in this country and they were dismayed to see her supporting Obama in the GE. She is just barely holding on to her status as an advocate for her positions and for womens’ rights in general. If she were to accept SecState she would then become absolutely subject to the Obama STFU brigade and would lose all her independence - her ability to stand up in the Senate and take a position against Obama on any issue. This is exactly what the Obamabots want: control over Hillary.

Worse, if she were to accept the SecState position she would be forced to try to carry out Obama’s ridiculous foreign policy strategy - you know, the one where he gets everyone to sit around a table and just work things out. Hillary then becomes the convenient whipping boy when his plans go down the toilet - she gets blamed for his foreign policy ineptitude.

Worst, if Hillary accepts the SecState position she will lose all credibility with her, now former, supporters. It will effectivly end her political career.

This is a very bad idea for Hillary and another in a long line of bad ideas from Obama, although I guess we should be getting used to those.

That all said, I won’t be surprised if she accepts since she has exhibited a penchant for shooting herself in the foot for the sake of the Democratic party.

If/when this happens I will be dismayed in the same way I am dismayed when I hear about a battered wife going back to her abuser, they always seem to say: “It’s OK, he promised he wouldn’t hurt me again.”

Comment by LAUREN | 2008-11-14 15:57:12

You said exactly what I was thinking!

 

Comment by athy | 2008-11-14 16:59:44

Craig,
I agree.
I was very surprised to hear that Barack Obama was even considering her for this position.

I honestly dont know why she would even consider taking it.

Obama posse has effectively blocked Sen Clinton from any more involvement with health care in the US. If she takes SOS spot whe will be out of the Senate completely.

The ONLY -ABSOLUTELY ONLY-reason I can see her accepting position of S.O.S is if the Democratic party has urged her to do so in case any of these controversies against Barack Obama stick (eligibility to run/serve as pres, draft registration, Rezko etc…)

and Barack Obama is forced to resign. Then…if I am not mistaken…Joe Biden would be pres and Hillary Clinton-as Secretary of State- would move to the VP spot to replace Biden-as per succession rules.

Other than that reason-I honestly can not-in my wildest imagination-see any reason why she should accept the position of Secretary of State.

Comment by Steve_in_KC | 2008-11-14 19:37:54

The succession would not be that way automatically, no way. If you recall, when Nixon resigned, VP Ford became President, he nominated Governor Nelson Rockefeller for VP, and he was barely confirmed by Congress. Nothing automatic.

SOS at that time was Henry Kissinger, who could not become VP or President, by law, because he was foreign-born. How’s that for irony? I say that believing it’s entirely likely BHOII was born in Kenya about a week before his birth was registered in Hawaii.

 

Comment by Donna | 2008-11-14 22:50:19

In order for Hillary to become president from the SOS position, something would have to happen to Obama AND Biden at the same time, like their motorcade drives over a cliff.

 
 

Comment by Uppity Woman | 2008-11-14 17:30:29

I completely agree with Craig.

 

Comment by Andy | 2008-11-14 17:49:33

Craig:

I have to say you make an excellent argument here and I feel the same as you. I agree HRc will lose
her independence and any ability to have an oposing view. After all the role of a SoS is NOT to have a foreign policy him/herself BUT only carrying out the
one the POTUS wants and formulates!!

On the other hand what will be this country’s role under BO’s watch… I don’t know what would be best; not just for HRC, but for us all…

 

Comment by Andy | 2008-11-14 17:50:01

Craig:

I have to say you make an excellent argument here and I feel the same as you. I agree HRc will lose
her independence and any ability to have an opposing view. After all the role of a SoS is NOT to have a foreign policy him/herself BUT only carrying out the
one the POTUS wants and formulates!!

On the other hand what will be this country’s role under BO’s watch… I don’t know what would be best; not just for HRC, but for us all…

 

Comment by Cubs in 09 | 2008-11-14 20:31:07

…he accepts since she has exhibited a penchant for shooting herself in the foot for the sake of the Democratic party.

If/when this happens I will be dismayed in the same way I am dismayed when I hear about a battered wife going back to her abuser, they always seem to say: “It’s OK, he promised he wouldn’t hurt me again.”

My point, exactly. See up thread.

 

Comment by AnneinPA | 2008-11-14 21:44:03

Why Sec. of State? Her passions are women and children’s advocacy. Not foreign affairs. She does best with what she loves. She deserves more.

I hope this is all hooey.

 

Comment by Snickers | 2008-11-15 02:55:42

Craig, I totally agree.

 
 

Comment by Nocturnal Warrior | 2008-11-14 15:22:21

It all makes sense. Obama and Axlerod probably told a number of people that they would be at the top of the list for Secy of State in exchange for their support. It helped him roll up those endorsements when the race was allegedly still in doubt.

Well if he gives the job to Hillary, none of the others can bitch about broken promises. It also removes her from seriously considering a 2012 run unless she spends less than two years in the post and resigns which is only a possibility if the Obama administration is a complete disaster (and if it is, she’ll get blamed for a lot of it).

It gets her out of the Senate where Harry Reid would rather not deal with her and it allows David Patterson to appoint a new Senator for NY who would have 4 years to serve before having to run again in 2012. Patterson could appoint Andrew Cuomo and remove his chief competition for Governor when that seat comes up in two years.

Sure Obama said he knew foreign policy best, but then again his campaign words haven’t meant much.

Comment by Typewriterstreaming | 2008-11-14 15:39:16

“It all makes sense. Obama and Axlerod probably told a number of people that they would be at the top of the list for Secy of State in exchange for their support. It helped him roll up those endorsements when the race was allegedly still in doubt.”

You have that right Nocturnal Warrior. Cats out of that bag.

Comment by gregoryp | 2008-11-14 19:42:55

The very big problem with that approach is that when you jilt someone at the alter they tend to hold a grudge. Someone like Kerry has a lot of pull and influence in Congress. Piss off enough congressmen and they can make your life hell. I remember when I was young one of the big criticisms of Carter was that he butted heads with Congress and couldn’t get anything accomplished. It didn’t matter that Democrats owned everything. All I can say is that Obama better watch his p’s and q’s or else he’ll be just as effective as Carter.

 
 

Comment by Liberty Belle not for Obama | 2008-11-14 20:56:07

Hello, gang - still trying to take in the news of Hillary being offered, and considering, the SOS post.

Here’s another possibility: Barry wants to get Hillary out of the way (out of the country), and out of the Senate seat in NY. Why? To make way for…

Caroline Kennedy Schlossberg. Her brother, JFK, Jr., was considering making a run for the NY Senate seat after Sen. Pat Moynihan announced his retirement, but tragically died in 1999. Hillary ran and won in 2000 instead.

Does Caroline feel Hillary’s Senate seat really belongs to her family? Gov. Patterson is a friend of Barack, and would likely appoint her if Obama told him to do so, I believe.

Do you think Caroline could be pushing Barack to give Hillary a post so she can take her Senate seat? After all, she and Uncle Ted endorsed him, and she was on his VP vetting team (one of those not disqualified from the team).

 
 

Comment by Jason | 2008-11-14 15:22:45

But if she is not given the job, oh, oh!!

Oh oh? Oh oh, what? You won’t vote for him?

Newsflash, the election is over.

If he doesn’t give it to her, so what? She’ll continue working in the Senate doing what she does and someone else will be SOS.

 

Comment by mel | 2008-11-14 15:32:03

Will this be a sign of healing the riff between Clinton supporters and Odumbo?

Hell no, it will be the silencing of Clinton by Odumbo and giving her the appearance of being a turncoat against all principles she stood for during the primaries as to Odumbo’s abilities!

One other bone of contention regarding Hillary leaving the Senate and taking on SOS, she is silenced in her independence and her voice on the foreign commitee will be gone as she does the “pleasures of the POTUS” should Odumbo make it to Jan 20th without qualification removals!

 

Comment by Mercedes | 2008-11-14 15:35:49

I hope that Hillary gets the job. Obama may be an untrustworthy sleaze, but Hillary is not a fool. I have no doubt that she knows exactly what she is dealing with, especially after not only what her fellow Democrats did to her in the primaries, but after 8 years of persecution as First Lady, and after the last 7 years in the cesspool of Bush/Cheny Washington.

The whole scene is beginning to look more and more like a big chess game. Obama may be the King with his multi-directional one move at time, but Hillary is the Queen. She can take off in any direction, clear across the board if necessary. I don’t know how many chess strategies which sacrifice the Queen are successful . I would venture to say probably not too many.

Comment by Northwest rain | 2008-11-14 15:55:30

Sorry at this point Hillary is a fool for helping Obama — she seems to be trying single handedly to kill any progress made by women. The image of the abused women standing up for her abuser is what comes to mind.

Obama will NOT let anyone overshadow him — that’s why he is trying to destroy Palin.

It is better for Hillary to step back and let Obama sink without any help — the faster Obama is exposed and neutralized — the faster American can learn from this horrible mistake.

Comment by snosandy | 2008-11-14 16:33:53

As much as I despise Obama, I want my country to succeed, and I think Hillary Clinton representing us around the world is the one person who can make me regain pride of my country for the next 4 years..

 

Comment by Winston | 2008-11-14 20:59:01

Sorry at this point Hillary is a fool for helping Obama — she seems to be trying single handedly to kill any progress made by women. The image of the abused women standing up for her abuser is what comes to mind.

EXACTLY, you nailed it.

 

Comment by Athena the Warrior | 2008-11-14 21:59:00

Thank you very much Northwest Rain for this comment.

If Hillary was truly doing what’s best for the country, she never would have campaigned for him in the first place. The country always comes first. Protecting America from the likes of Obama would have been a noble sacrifice.

 
 
 

Comment by tarma | 2008-11-14 15:36:53

I don’t know that The Opathological Narcissist could tolerate working so very closely with someone of such high caliber. If HRC is appointed, I would not be surprised if her very presence creates such distress for The One, that he drowns her (figuratively, of course) in his reflective pool.

 

Comment by Iloquim | 2008-11-14 15:37:27

Larry,

This would be disasterous for Hillary. She would become the “Powell” of Obama’s regime.

Obama and Co. will use and abuse her, and dump her under the bus, her reputation will take a huge hit and then her future is toast.

My advise - DON’T TRUST OBAMA. Nothing has changed since Alice Walker.

Hillary should stay in the Senate and be the watchdog on Obama’s time.

It is my opinion that the Republicans did not want to win this election cycle. The mess that we are in and along with Obama, Pelosi and clan now owns the bailout.

The 527 did not come out blazing and McCain was setup to fail. Karl Rove indeed looked pleased with the results as they came in on election night.

The Republicans will sit tight until 2010 and go after Obama hard and recapture both the Senate and the House. I do not think anything will happen to Obama in terms of someone assassinating him or anything like that - they do not want a martyr.

Instead they will seek to discrete Obama and get him out of office before his time is up - and rightly so. This will set the stage for 2012.

Then Hillary would have a real chance of making real effectve “change”.

Hillary - please do not get swayed by the Kool Aid!

 

Comment by Sarracuda | 2008-11-14 15:39:11

Obama is doing this for two reasons
#1. So that there is NO possible way for Hillary to run in 2012, why, because if she is Secretary of State, she can’t run against the guy who hired her, how would that look. Also, she won’t be able to run in 2016 because she would be too old. I believe she would be 69 years old, so she would be done as far as running for President
#2. He wants someone to blame if something goes wrong “Hey it’s not my fault, it’s Hillary’s fault, she answered that 3am phone call and screwed up” he needs a fall guy
If Hillary is smart she will tell Obama to shove it, he didn’t even consider her, didn’t even think about putting her on the VP ticket, now he wants to have her as Secretary of State, Obama is a joke, Hillary better not accept it

Comment by csuzeq | 2008-11-14 17:29:49

I thought of the blame thing, too. This man uses people to get where he wants to be and he will use her also.

I think there is another motive as well and I think he’sll do it because he knows us no kool aid drinkers are still sharing info, evidence and trashing him. We may cause him to need to answer for something he doesn’t want to. He may think if we are pacified then we will stop watching him and watch Hillary instead. That is the way, distract, distract, distract. If we are no longer watching him he is in the clear.

What he doesn’t know is that I will still watch and judge him, but let him think I drank a keg of kool aid. Now I have distracted him!

 
 

Comment by hedy | 2008-11-14 15:40:12

I thought that Obama was the candidate of change. If he is why is his cabinet already 75% from Bill Clinton era. He has promised so many people positions that he will be running out soon. But he can start making up some new one because he is the one.

Comment by tek | 2008-11-14 19:32:27

yes, I thought maybe Congress would make a new rule and let him keep his senate seat and POTUS!

 
 

Comment by Typewriterstreaming | 2008-11-14 15:41:02

“1. So that there is NO possible way for Hillary to run in 2012, why, because if she is Secretary of State, she can’t run against the guy who hired her, how would that look.”

How would that look? Geez. No matter what Hillary does the media laughs at her.

Comment by Ldyoung | 2008-11-14 16:07:23

Hillary can’t run in 2012 no matter what. You don’t ever run against the incumbent in your own party — never, ever. She can only run in 2016 and, as someone pointed out, she will be 69. She either has to stay in the Senate or take another role. The 2012 dream ended when McCain lost unfortunately.

 
 

Comment by Benjamin | 2008-11-14 15:42:42

Who is this guy, Obama, and do people think he can really win Iowa? Oh wait, that was a year ago.

The past year DOES seem like kind of a nightmare. I must say that I think Hillary would be fabulous as Secretary of State. She has instant international credibility. But do I really trust Obama? No. Part of me sees this as Obama trying to get her out of the Senate, where she could possibly be more of a “thorn” in his side. He would have more control over her if she is serving at his pleasure as SOS.

In any event, will be interesting to see where this goes. I definitely agree with Larry - I don’t think the Obama people would let this leak and then not follow through. The Rahm-bo appointment was leaked for a few days - and then turned out to be true.

Comment by Diana L. C. | 2008-11-14 15:53:46

Benjamin,

Those are my thoughts exactly. He knows he has created a powerful force in her if she stays in the Senate. She could either help OR hurt him more there.

I think he’s afraid to have her in the Senate. I want her to have Reid’s position. I want her to be a gnat, a tornado, a hurrricane, an angry momma razorback–whatever it takes–in the Senate to keep him in line.

But, she would be fabulous in any position he appointed her to, if she accepted it.

I’d love to see him offer it and then see her turn it down, saying she likes her Senate seat, where she actually gets things done even when campaigning.

 
 

Comment by WasLNbutNoBamaBotsKeepStealingMyName | 2008-11-14 15:46:56

Even though I am conflicted, I also believe that Hillary Clinton is smart enough and experienced enough to make the decision that she believes will (1) best serve her country and (2) further her own political career.

I will support her in whatever decision she chooses to make.

 

Comment by EightBelles | 2008-11-14 15:48:35

I agree. If Hillary Clinton’s name was floated out there as a possible choice for Secretary of State only to be shot down, there will be hell to pay. If this appointment is merely a bone dangled in front of Sen Clinton and her supporters only to be yanked away, the Democratic Party will be dead in the water by 2012, while Gov Sarah Palin and the, by contrast, more progressive Repubs will prevail. For an Obama administration to choose yesterday’s news, John Kerry, or that lap dog, Bill Richardson, over Sen Clinton, would only add insult to injury. I would like to give Barack Obama more credit than that, but not so fast. He needs to know that women–and not just Hillary supporters–are looking at Gov Sarah Palin and coming away with the impression that the Democratic Party is a backward place for women, while the Republicans are starting to get it. Until Mr. Obama grasps that reality, the Dems are in deep shit.

Comment by beebop | 2008-11-14 15:53:46

Sorry to break this to you but any pyramid with his name at the top is in deep shit.

Comment by Northwest rain | 2008-11-14 16:00:15

BINGO!

Best summary of the Obamanation!!

 

Comment by Judy L. NC | 2008-11-14 17:09:34

LOL! An O’Ponzi scheme!

 
 
 

Comment by DaddysDarlin | 2008-11-14 15:51:31

This would be the appropriate thing to do, however when have you ever known Obama to do the appropriate thing?

 

Comment by requiredreading | 2008-11-14 15:56:34

I’m filing all of this under: “The only edifying thing about this whole disastrous primary and election season is sitting back now and watching it all fall apart.” I’m not worried about America: the security, military, and financial systems will still be in the hands of the bureaucratic experts, who will prevent the Great One from doing absolutely disastrous things. But the whole political edifice set up to get Obama elected was built on sand. And now I’m watchin’ the tide roll in …….

Comment by Betty Lou | 2008-11-14 17:01:24

The only edifying thing about this whole disastrous primary and election season is sitting back now and watching it all fall apart.” I’m not worried about America: the security, military, and financial systems will still be in the hands of the bureaucratic experts, who will prevent the Great One from doing absolutely disastrous things.
————
We have lost two wars, and certainly you’re aware of the current economic conditions.

We’re in a lot of trouble, the executive still matters, as does Washington.

THAT is why so many of us wanted Clinton to win (I would venture as the transition goes ahead, and the damage is faced, truthfully, many more are wishing Clinton had been elected President, too).

Washington is corrupt, full up with lightweight ass kissers, and mos, all on the take, IMO.

Government can’t survive, and isn’t, corrupt people dont make decisions in the best long term interests of the country.

Comment by Cubs in 09 | 2008-11-14 22:30:18

We have lost two wars…

WHAT have you been drinking?!

 
 
 

Comment by Navyvet | 2008-11-14 16:00:06

I think it is a rumor and strong innuendo. Having Hillary as SOS….how does that help you and me get help? It may save the Nation as a whole but how does it help people in need losing their jobs? We have already lost 500 jobs in the aircraft industry with more to follow. The aircraft companies contract to other industries in our area….once again How will Hillary meet her need to help the people of this country? It doesn’t if she is SOS.

I believe Obama is a one term wonder…it will take 18 months to 2 years for any real recovery of jobs or creation of jobs. Who would want to be aligned with a sinking ship?

I hope she doesn’t take the job. If she does I will lose any respect I have managed to retain for her. As a matter of fact taking the job would prove she is nothing more than a regular old politician! I always thought she was more than that! She will be the consummate professional politician!

Comment by Betty Lou | 2008-11-14 17:03:21

The wars are costing us economically, if Clinton were able to help provide some solution, the need to put so much into those corrupt enterprises would cease.

That alone could make a significant difference.

 
 

Comment by stodgie | 2008-11-14 16:01:36

i want to see the obot’s faces if she accepts. hell obama is bringing on board all the clinton administration. i guess hillary and bill were the the last remaining. obama wants the name in the history books and people hooing and ahhing over him.

 

Comment by Bill Dupray | 2008-11-14 16:02:14

Media Deathwatch: McClatchy Media Stock Near Zero

Suicide by bias.

http://patriotroom.com/media-deathwatch-mcclatchy-media-stock-near-zero/

Comment by Karma | 2008-11-14 16:09:19

They bought Knight-Ridder….the only paper to question the war before it started.

Sigh…oh well…what was left of honest journalism died long ago.

 
 

Comment by Janet | 2008-11-14 16:02:40

I am getting the feeling that this indeed is a chess game, but one that everyone in-the-know already knows the conclusion of.

If Obama cannot take the oath Jan. 20th, the next in line are Biden, Pelosi, then who? Isn’t it Secretary of State?

I think they have all already agreed that Hillary would be placed into Obama’s slot with Biden as VP. I think it’s all part of the original plan, a much bigger plan than we are all really aware of.

By the way, no one has said this yet. I believe the REAL reason why Obama won’t attend the big conference of world leaders this weekend is because he is AFRAID he’ll appear childish and stupid.

Comment by Judy L. NC | 2008-11-14 17:11:37

Pres., VP, Speaker, Pres. pro tem.. Sec/State

 

Comment by Cubs in 09 | 2008-11-14 22:33:56

If Obama cannot take the oath Jan. 20th, the next in line are Biden, Pelosi, then who? Isn’t it Secretary of State?

I think they have all already agreed that Hillary would be placed into Obama’s slot with Biden as VP. I think it’s all part of the original plan, a much bigger plan than we are all really aware of.

Oooh! That’s tooooo delicious to contemplate! :-P

 
 

Comment by snosandy | 2008-11-14 16:04:13

I agree with everything you said, Larry. Hillary deserves to be SOS after everything she did to get Obama elected after her concession. She could have easily stayed away from the campaign trail and given her supporters reason to stay away from voting for Obama. He owes his win to her and I want Hillary to represent me around the world!

 

Comment by LAUREN | 2008-11-14 16:04:24

Dennis Kucinich and Darrell Issa go after Kashkari in angry hearing today.

Read and watch:

http://www.prisonplanet.com/kashkari-accused-of-bailout-bait-and-switch-during-angry-hearing.html

 

Comment by MochaLatteBreve | 2008-11-14 16:07:59

As a disenfranchised voter from Michigan I really don’t think Obama gives a hoot about I feel or think relative to putting out a teaser that Hillary may be considered for SOS or anything else.

It will also be interesting to see what Hillary does. Her actions since giving up the nomination have been disappointing. If Hillary cares what people like me think about her she will reject the position and stay put in the US Senate.

 

Comment by Rah-Rah | 2008-11-14 16:08:19

I worked my ass off for Senator Clinton. When she did not win the nomination, I did not support Obama; I did not vote for him. But this is the reality:

Obama will be our president for four years and then the DNC will support him for another run (unless he implodes in some way before 2012). That is why it was so heartbreaking when he won - I knew that he would be in for eight years and that Senator Clinton’s chance of running in 2012 had evaporated.

However…as SOS she could then run with ENORMOUS experience and public exposure under her belt in 2016. No, she won’t be too old… she has spunk and vitality the way many female politicians do (e.g. Thatcher).

 

Comment by interested party | 2008-11-14 16:14:22

Its not unusual for a candidate (or their organization) to offer the same job to different pols in order to gain endorsements. The question might be: why so many people associated with the name Clinton now part of the Obama transition? Emanuel, Summers, Podesta now in the rumor mill, Hillary herself.

My thinking is this is just another head fake, but I, like the multitude, am not privy to deals being made and am not making any predictions or placing any bets.

One point I’ll add, if Hillary should by some chance come to a cabinet position, this would be another slap in the face for the left who spent the last 1 1/2 years claiming that the election of Obama was the end of the Clinton “machine” [sic].

 

Comment by trist | 2008-11-14 16:17:06

I can’t believe you’re saying this is a good idea Larry. You who have been investigating this man for a year now. Knowing what we know about him and how he treats people, how could you possibly think it would be to Hillary’s benefit to put her career, what’s left of it, her reputation, even her life in that man’s hands?!?!
He hates the Clintons! He wouldn’t come to her defense when she was being smeared as a racist, even accused of plotting to kill him or all the sexist attacks. Or lift a finger, even now to retire her debt. He wouldn’t even consider her as vp. though she got more votes thus more supporters than he did. And everyone tied to Obama wants to get the Clintons out of the party and DC for good. So yeah, give up her seat and hand over her fate to him. Smart move there!

Not to mention the reports of the absolute invasive vetting his camp is doing to anyone who he’s even considering for a position, from his vp. down to the new puppy’s pooper scooper. They were talking about the ridiculous amounts of info he wants on people. Basically from moment of conception onward. And that’s JUST to be considered, no guarantee you’ll even get the job. So EVERYTHING in your life can and will be used against you by Obama whenever he chooses and once more you’re at HIS mercy….of which he has none!

Shame on you Larry and anyone who thinks this is a good idea!

Comment by Larry Johnson | 2008-11-14 16:35:45

Trist,
You need to calm down. There is no dogma on this site. We allow folks who support Obama to freely express their views and extend the same courtesy to those who felt just as strongly about supporting McCain. I do ban folks who are insulting and engage in pure ad hominem attacks.

I think the Hillary choice is great, it if turns out to be true, because she has the smarts and abilities necessary to do the job and she is a good American. She will work to protect this nation and its ideals. So if Barack has come to his senses and decided he needs someone like Hillary in his administration, good on him.

If you have a dog that likes to eat chickens and you are mad at that dog, would you stay mad at the dog if it attacks someone trying to break into your house? Hell no. You still don’t leave the dog alone with chickens. I think there are a lot of unanswered questions about Barack but he is going to be sworn in on 20 January regardless of what you or I like.

Comment by trist | 2008-11-14 16:56:30

I apologize for the “shame” comment but I stand by everything else I said.

Comment by David E | 2008-11-14 18:37:06

I agree with your comment trist.

Hopefully Larry was not implying that you would be banned for having a strong opinion.

 
 
 
 

Comment by Dormaphaea | 2008-11-14 16:18:24

I’m on the side that says it’s purely political, and has more with the old ‘keep your friends close and your enemies closer’ ideology than anything else.

She’s a proven Senate workhorse and a powerhouse. She can obviously be a political center. However, putting her in the SOS chair is an end game, in more ways than one, as far as she’s concerned. One - SOS is one of those ‘last stops on the way out to pasture’ positions. Two - It WILL be a fall-guy position for O’s mis-steps. Three - in Hillary’s case, it’s about legislative capital, or rather, keeping her from showing him up.

That’s what I’m thinking are the political reasons behind such an idea. And now that it’s been floated, it’s a lose-lose for Hillary. If there’s a way she can refuse (if indeed actually asked) gracefully and by doing so not lose political capital in Congress, as well as public support, she can come out of this with her career intact. But that’s going to be tricky, especially with the megaphones of the MSM speculating for at least 72 hours that a refusal is tantamount to a blatant show of disrespect or lack of confidence. (With the second of those two reasons very likely plausible.)

Comment by hadenough | 2008-11-14 16:24:40

Two - It WILL be a fall-guy position for O’s mis-steps.

Yup.

Goes without saying: The press would attack Hillary mercilessly

 

Comment by Cubs in 09 | 2008-11-14 22:40:46

If there’s a way she can refuse (if indeed actually asked) gracefully and by doing so not lose political capital in Congress, as well as public support, she can come out of this with her career intact.

She can say that she wants to work for the people of NY in light of the economic conditions. That would be a legitimate reason.

 
 

Comment by Mandelay | 2008-11-14 16:22:09

How funny. In the primary season he sued to have her calendar as First Lady opened up to reveal how little “experience” she really had. Then he belittled her world travels as First Lady, making an issue of her trips as just “teas at embassies.” And now, after trashing her real experience, he’s saying he wants to entrust her with the office of Secretary of State? Maybe this is what she and Obama chatted about in Diane’s living room? Maybe this is what he and Bill talked about in New York as they lunched on the anniversary of 9-11? Or maybe Obama realizes he’s in over his head and needs both Clinton brains to navigate/negotiate with world leaders? Or maybe he’s just trying to open up a NY Senate Seat for one of his pals? Whatever the reason, it’s to benefit him, him, him. As usual. Barack Obama. Country Last.

Comment by csuzeq | 2008-11-14 17:38:53

Yes, it does sound quite Barackish, doesn’t it?

I am starting to think that is why it will happen.

 
 

Comment by soldier4hillary | 2008-11-14 16:22:15

I would love for Senator Clinton to get the job. It would round off a beautiful day if it was announced today too! To coincide with our first female four star general getting promoted today. I hope this is a serious consideration though and not some bullcrap. It’s bad enough she didnt get to head up the health care reform but if this is just some kind of “gotcha” moment and another attempt to be shitty towards her, it might get ugly. No one can’t be that stupid to put her name out there and give it to someone else. At least I hope not.

 

Comment by tarma | 2008-11-14 16:23:02

And now that it’s been floated, it’s a lose-lose for Hillary.

Agreed.

Comment by tarma | 2008-11-14 16:24:31

And it’s a calculated strategy.

 
 

Comment by Judy | 2008-11-14 16:30:11

It is very sad that Obama has nothing on his own - he is turning to the former Clinton white house staff + the Clintons.

Change. He put Hillary down, accused Bill of racism, never gave Bill any credit for being a good President - now it is all about the Clintons.
I can’t stand how Obama operates - can’t stand it!!!

As much as I would like to see Hillary get a good position - it drives me nuts how she has been treated.

 

Comment by BerlinBerlin | 2008-11-14 16:30:45

This is a comment from tbs on the pat dollard site.
It is a fabulous piece so I decided to pass it on.

Friends,

Will you please take the time to read this, and if you think it worthwhile, pass it along to your email list, and ask them to read it? Even if they voted, with all good intentions, for Mr. Obama?

I am a student of history. Professionally. I have written 15 books in six languages, and have studied it all my life. I think there is something monumentally large afoot, and I do not believe it is just a banking crisis, or a mortgage crisis, or a credit crisis. Yes these exist, but they are merely single facets on a very large gemstone that is only now coming into a sharper focus.

Something of historic proportions is happening. I can sense it because I know how it feels, smells, what it looks like, and how people react to it. Yes, a perfect storm may be brewing, but there is something happening within our country that has been evolving for about ten - fifteen years. The pace has dramatically quickened in the past two.

We demand and then codify into law the requirement that our banks make massive loans to people we know they can never pay back? Why?

We learn just days ago that the Federal Reserve, which has little or no real oversight by anyone, has “loaned” two trillion dollars (that is $2,000,000,000,000) over the past few months, but will not tell us to whom or why or disclose the terms. That is our money. Yours and mine. And that is three times the 700B we all argued about so strenuously just this past September. Who has this money? Why do they have it? Why are the terms unavailable to us? Who asked for it? Who authorized it? I thought this was a government of “we the people,” who loaned our powers to our elected leaders. Apparently not.

We have spent two or more decades intentionally de-industrializing our economy. Why?

We have intentionally dumbed down our schools, ignored our history, and no longer teach our founding documents, why we are exceptional, and why we are worth preserving. Students by and large cannot write, think critically, read, or articulate. Parents are not revolting, teachers are not picketing, school boards continue to back mediocrity. Why?

We have now established the precedent of protesting every close election (now violently in California over a proposition that is so controversial that it wants marriage to remain between one man and one woman. Did you ever think such a thing possible just a decade ago?). We have corrupted our sacred political process by allowing unelected judges to write laws that radically change our way of life, and then mainstream Marxist groups like ACORN and others to turn our voting system into a banana republic. To what purpose?

Now our mortgage industry is collapsing, housing prices are in free fall, major industries are failing, our banking system is on the verge of collapse, social security is nearly bankrupt, as is medicare and our entire government, our education system is worse than a joke (I teach college and know precisely what I am talking about)–the list is staggering in its length, breadth, and depth. It is potentially 1929 x ten. And we are at war with an enemy we cannot name for fear of offending people of the same religion, who cannot wait to slit the throats of your children if they have the opportunity to do so.

And now we have elected a man no one knows anything about, who has never run so much as a Dairy Queen, let alone a town as big as Wasilla, Alaska. All of his associations and alliances are with real radicals in their chosen fields of employment, and everything we learn about him, drip by drip, is unsettling if not downright scary (Surely you have heard him speak about his idea to create and fund a mandatory civilian defense force stronger than our military for use inside our borders? No? Oh of course. The media would never play that for you over and over and then demand he answer it. Sarah Palin’s pregnant daughter and $150,000 wardrobe is more imporant.)

Mr. Obama’s winning platform can be boiled down to one word: change.

Why?

I have never been so afraid for my country and for my children as I am now.

This man campaigned on bringing people together, something he has never, ever done in his professional life. In my assessment, Obama will divide us along philosophical lines, push us apart, and then try to realign the pieces into a new and different power structure. Change is indeed coming. And when it comes, you will never see the same nation again.

And that is only the beginning.

And I thought I would never be able to experience what the ordinary, moral German felt in the mid-1930s. In those times, the savior was a former smooth-talking rabble-rouser from the streets, about whom the average German knew next to nothing. What they did know was that he was associated with groups that shouted, shoved, and pushed around people with whom they disagreed; he edged his way onto the political stage through great oratory and promises. Economic times were tough, people were losing jobs, and he was a great speaker. And he smiled and waved a lot. And people, even newspapers, were afraid to speak out for fear that his “brown shirts” would bully them into submission. And then, he was duly elected to office, a full-throttled economic crisis at hand [the Great Depression]. Slowly but surely he seized the controls of government power, department by department, person by person, bureaucracy by bureaucracy. The kids joined a Youth Movement in his name, where they were taught what to think. How did he get the people on his side? He did it promising jobs to the jobless, money to the moneyless, and goodies for the military-industrial complex. He did it by indoctrinating the children, advocating gun control, health care for all, better wages, better jobs, and promising to re-instill pride once again in the country, across Europe, and across the world.

He did it with a compliant media–did you know that? And he did this all in the name of justice and . . . change. And the people surely got what they voted for.

(Look it up if you think I am exaggerating.)

Read your history books. Many people objected in 1933 and were shouted down, called names, laughed at, and made fun of. When Winston Churchill pointed out the obvious in the late 1930s while seated in the House of Lords in England (he was not yet Prime Minister), he was booed into his seat and called a crazy troublemaker. He was right, though.

Don’t forget that Germany was the most educated, cultured country in Europe. It was full of music, art, museums, hospitals, laboratories, and universities. And in less than six years–a shorter time span than just two terms of the U. S. presidency–it was rounding up its own citizens, killing others, abrogating its laws, turning children against parents, and neighbors against neighbors. All with the best of intentions, of course. The road to Hell is paved with them.

As a practical thinker, one not overly prone to emotional decisions, I have a choice: I can either believe what the objective pieces of evidence tell me (even if they make me cringe with disgust); I can believe what history is shouting to me from across the chasm of seven decades; or I can hope I am wrong by closing my eyes, having another latte, and ignoring what is transpiring around me.

Some people scoff at me, others laugh, or think I am foolish, naive, or both. Perhaps I am. But I have never been afraid to look people in the eye and tell them exactly what I believe–and why I believe it.

I pray I am wrong. I do not think I am.

Best regards

tps

Comment by Betty Lou | 2008-11-14 17:17:37

I think a lot of people saw this coming, though, so it isn’t necessarily a surprise.

We have corrupt business people running Washington, they’re killing themselves, their source of income. (It always reminds me of England, and the colonies, the conditions that forced the revolutionary war, similar).

The country cannot run the way Cheney would like, it’s failing, for any number of reasons.

We need to reinvest in America’s infrastructure, both economic, and social.

We’ve faced tremendous upheaval before, no doubt will again.

 
 

Comment by tfitz | 2008-11-14 16:30:50

I hope she stays in the Senate. We need her there.

 

Comment by notrees | 2008-11-14 16:31:08

Who really cares at this point? Michelle? YAWNNNNN

 

Comment by Pragmatist | 2008-11-14 16:33:33

hope that o is indicted before 1-20-09

Comment by DawnellesTIREDoFpolitics | 2008-11-14 18:28:42

I could even see myself PRAYING for that one.

I’d love to move all of this into the “MOOT” column

 
 

Comment by kgirl1028 | 2008-11-14 16:34:12

This has nothing to do with what Hillary deserves, this has to do with people signing off on obama, period. No one with any sense should sign off on this little sociopaths taking office, exspecially an individual that was smeared and lied on by his campaign staff. there is no way to justify such an all out support of a man reacts so hatefully to women, and thinks the american people are stupid as hell. I”m sorry but i can not let the ayers thing go. This man lies to us because he thinks we especially the democrats are stupid. If hillary excepts a job from this man she officially signs off as being ok with this. I support hillary not because i’m a democrat or a woman because i liked her but because it thought she was the best person for the job. If she takes this job from obama, then i was dead wrong. We have an entire party supporting a man who is laughing in our faces that we are a stupid group of sheeple sorry. I cant get over it. Like i said if Hillary excepts his job then my intial anger with her for supporting the war for her career was right. I’m not looking for anyone to save america. these silly little people need to grow the hell up, let them live with the consequences of their actions.They wanted Obama let them have him, if hillary is smart she will stay out of the way.

 

Comment by Donna | 2008-11-14 16:34:30

I am a dissenter on this one.

I think Obama only wants her out of the senate. Hillary IS qualified for secretary, but her strengths have always been domestic. If she is secretary of state, she cannot voice opposition to his domestic agenda, as that is not in the job description.

Personally, I think it’s another opportunity to throw her under the bus. Get her out of the senate, blame her for anything that may go wrong on the foreign affairs front, then promptly replace her and smear her at the same time. She is then political ashes. Once replaced in the senate (by someone who Obama would of course work behind the scenes to get that he approves of) she may find it difficult, if not impossible to regain her seat in the next election.

Obama doesn’t like her, and he is not above doing whatever he can to get rid of any opposition.

Comment by jackie | 2008-11-14 16:36:55

I think this is a fair assessment.

 

Comment by Arabella Trefoil | 2008-11-14 16:45:58

Seriously, Donna. I am in awe of you. I think you’re right, but I wonder if Michelle will allow Hillary to be that close to her husband.

I would prefer for her to remain in the Senate. (She’s one of my senators so I’m being selfish!)

 
 

Comment by jdona | 2008-11-14 16:34:41

For the country, Hillary is the best choice. But for Hillary herself, its political suicide, and the end of her political career. Where will she go at the end of this hopefully one term administration? Back to the Senate after she gave it up to be SOS? She won’t be able to run against Barsky in 2012 if she is the SOS, so what then? No, she needs to stay away from him, and this toxic, sorry, cheap imitation of the Clinton admin.

Comment by tek | 2008-11-14 19:29:49

She’ll be president. Think Colin Powell, if he hadn’t acted stupid and lied to the UN. He’d be president today.

 
 

Comment by Susan1968 | 2008-11-14 16:34:49

Let me say this — especially to all the Obama-staff workers.

I am an adamant political junkie, so is my husband. Traditionally loyal, centrist Democrats over 30 years, Obama lost our protest votes.

The operative phase is PROTEST VOTES.

Protest votes against Dean-the-scream and the DNC for so blatantly trying to destroy the Clintons who have a high approval rating throughout the world.

If Obama has the COJONES to go against Dean-the-scream; Kerry-the-windbag; Richardson the lightweight opportunist who is incapable of being a true statesperson…

If Obama has the COJONES to go aganist various useless pundits like Dick Morris, Olblabberman and others who just have a bug up their asses when it comes to Bill & Hill …

If Obama has the strength of character to choose Hillary for Sec. of State,
a person more repspected throughout the world than Ricahrdson or Kerry will ever be…

My family, and many loyal Clintonistas I’m sure, will work our asses off to assure he’s a two-term president by a freaking landslide in 2012.

I would do this because Obama’s selection of Hillary would PROVE to me he’s not just a puppet of the Dean/Kennedy/Kerry New England camp who couldn’t ever win an election on their own.

At the moment, I do deeply suspect the Obama presidency could be a Kennedy/Kerry proxy presidency.

I’m hoping I’m wrong.

Please prove me wrong, president-elect Obama.

Select Hillary and I will be there for you in 2012.

Oh - and did I mention I’m in FL?

Florida as a squeaker Obama win because some Born-again republicans stayed home to punish the GOP. As a result, FL is not an Obama lock in 2012.

You’ll need Clintonistas like me in 2012 to count on FL.

Pick Hillary for S.O.S., and I will finally believe you are not under the thumb of the likes of Reid and Pelosi.

:)

Comment by ame | 2008-11-14 16:43:01

I would get a big kick out of watching “tweetie” or “Olblabberman” interviewing the new Secretary of State (HRC?)

Watching them eat humbie pie would be fun :D

 

Comment by kgirl1028 | 2008-11-14 16:44:30

Obama is a family friend with a man who dedicated a book to Sirhan Sirhan who killed Robert Kennedy obama is not and has never been a puppet of anyone inthe democratic party, what he is doing is laughing at them. You and they will see that soon enough with or without hillary clintons nomination.And if he does choose her, he will stuff her behind in the state office until he’s ready to use her to lie to the united nations.

 
 

Comment by KarenG | 2008-11-14 16:37:28

Not sure it would get much change of opinion from me on Obama. It is too late. He should have made her the first female Vice President. Women have been
Secretary of State so there is no glass ceiling to break there. It also seems like Obama’s following his hero Abe Lincoln and his favorite book Team of Rivals. He probably figures that in this job he can keep an eye on her and most likely she wouldn’t run against him in 4 years. The only good side for Hillary is that she needs a lot more seniority in the Senate to get one of the top jobs and with Kennedy saying no to her on heading the
Health Insurance Sub-Committee, she would have a more
challenging and interesting job here. Still don’t want her future tied to Obama. He is always too quick to blame the other person and not take responsibility for himself.

 

Comment by soldier4hillary | 2008-11-14 16:41:09

Yes, my reasoning may be deemed selfish but we are stuck with Obama. Knowing everything I know and knowing no one acts or seems to care or question anything about him. Yes, I would like Clinton in the position. It scares me shitless he is even the president elect. But nothing can be done. I mean when I read they were not going to even QUESTION any of those donations from all of those third world countries with names that didn’t even attempt to even sound legit. I got a lesson in politics that I wish to god now I never knew.

People dont even realize we have given a man the highest job our country has to offer without having to answer ONE question or be accountable for even ONE of his past associations. It’s unprecedented. A president that has not had to answer one thing, ONE THING about ANY of his life. The impact of this election made me realize that we are so vurnerable its literally outrageous.

It has proved that you can make it to the top by using one phrase: “Your racist” and all doors are open to you. Good god you have Ayers who bombed shit up on shows like Good Morning America!

This scenario is a example of how f’d up things are: If I was a terrorist with a name like Hussein Mohamed or something and was plotting some shit. I could make the accusation “there racist” or some sob story saying how I was treated badly because of my name and you would have all of these newspapers and media stations like CNN spinning the story about how a “Obama supporter” was discriminated against because of there name. And like magic everyone would turn the other way.

The point is this: so many people now don’t want to be considered “racist” with a new black president that now they will not be as diligent in there jobs to keep there faces off of CNN. Now they may become more lenient in checking for proper documentation and taking the “word” of these individuals.

Our very own MSM has contributed in lessing our security by back to back episodes over a year portraying anyone who dares question a AA is racist.

Comment by ame | 2008-11-14 17:06:38

Yes, my reasoning may be deemed selfish but we are stuck with Obama.

I’m still not sure who I’m most angry at; the media or the Democratic Party. That being said, I agree that we are stuck with Obama and there’s nothing that can be done about that. If Clinton became Secretary of State, I think that would help mend fences.

Our very own MSM has contributed in lessing our security by back to back episodes over a year portraying anyone who dares question a AA is racist.

I’ll never forget that Obama and the mainstream media played the racecard whenever convenient. I will always remain skeptical.

 

Comment by Andy | 2008-11-14 17:11:53

soldier4hill:

I mean when I read they were not going to even QUESTION any of those donations from all of those third world countries with names that didn’t even attempt to even sound legit.

You are right about this being deeply troubling; I don’t understand why don’t they? Why does the DoJ or the Reps. in Congress choose to allow all this illegal money and worst procedures to just go by? No special prosecutor here? Why? I don’t understand it.
It’s ok to impeach a POTUS for lying about sex but its perfectly fine to elect one that accepted tons of illegal foreign influence & money?

Comment by Wisewoman | 2008-11-14 18:04:00

Andy. The repubs plan to do the same thing in collecting illegal foreign next time and they will be better at it than Obama was that is why thee is no investigation. There goes the “democracy” down the tube, thanks to Obama

 
 
 

Comment by bemused | 2008-11-14 16:45:25

1. Of course she’d be good at whatever job.
2. Of course O. would be a fool not to use her.
3. Of course, O has broken every promise so far so she’d be a fool to believe anything he said about the future, and I don’t think she’s a fool.

She would surely understand how she would be at his mercy. I wouldn’t go there myself, I’d stay in the Senate. Teddy will soon be gone. Deval can appoint a toady, but he/she will have less seniority. I would bet on Hillary in a fight with Reid, any day. If she wants to be a power, it would be a surer thing in the Senate than taking the SOS job even though the latter would burnish her foreign relations creds. After all, she could just make sure her activities get press and preempt lack of experience claims. Although as SOS it would seem that O would have to put up with her until 2011 to preempt her from running for Pres after he disses and fires her, he hasn’t shown himself capable of rising above pettiness, and I don’t think he’d contain himself that long. Then she would be quite justified in running against him. Why not, Teddy ran against his own president.
4. Of course, there will be a shocking switcheroo by next Tuesday ;)

 

Comment by NH | 2008-11-14 16:46:22

I disagree with this statement:

“Conversely, giving Hillary that job would be seen by most Hillary supporters as a great peace offering and the kind of gesture that many believe should have been extended when she suspended her campaign.”

Too late. Most Hillary supporters who did not vote for Obama, did it for many reasons none of them had to do with Hillary. Obama’s offer is viewed mostly with suspicion, and the recognition that carrying Obama’s water as SoS diminishes her. If Obama wants a ‘yes’ man, he has Powell who is already an expert as a lying, water carrier.

 

Comment by R2D2 | 2008-11-14 16:46:36

I see the secretary of state offer as a way to get Hillary out of the senate where she’d be trouble. She could work with other senators to make changes that Obama does not want, imo.

Hillary is smart and I hope she reads the cards she’s been handed and send them back to the dealer for new ones.

Comment by Arabella Trefoil | 2008-11-14 16:51:20

I hope so too!

 

Comment by Winston | 2008-11-14 21:09:38

Hillary is smart and I hope she reads the cards she’s been handed and send them back to the dealer for new ones.

You mean like how she campaigned for Obama setting a new record of 79 appearances?

Hillary is no PUMA. She made a deal with the devil.

 
 

Comment by ame | 2008-11-14 16:53:32

If Obama chooses Kerry over Clinton…Well, that’s just poor judgment on Obama’s part.

 

Comment by Sometime-CIA-Defender | 2008-11-14 16:53:36

Trotting her name out like this and then not giving her the job will be viewed as one more insult of a woman who has been the consummate team player.

True!

It’s not Attorney General, but I wonder what this might mean in terms of investigations…

 

Comment by chris | 2008-11-14 16:53:36

Good analysis, Larry.

What do you think it would mean for VP Biden? Is he — with all his foreign relations credentials — expecting to put major fingerprints on Obama’s foreign policy?

Comment by breeze | 2008-11-14 16:56:54

She will get her 30 pieces of silver from the
‘messiah’, whatever that may be….

As for real Karma, we’ll just have to wait and see
what will be the result of hrc’s going over to the
‘dark side’ in such a spectacular way…

 
 

Comment by kgirl1028 | 2008-11-14 16:56:52

And if hillary takes that position it means she sings off on the notion. It also means she signs off on what he did to governor palin. Honestly I think most people are sick of fighting and looking for a silver lining, I how ever ran out of those before i graduated from high school. SO i have no tolerance for certain things. I could defend John McCain because I know from personal experiecne people act odd when trying to process large information. But there is no reason for Hillary Clinton to sign off on this bafoon and be secretary of state. just like bush did powell obama will stuff her behind in the state department and will not listen to her. Powell never expressed true interest in the presidency and never was a true enemy to Bush, so how do you think obama will act towards clinton. I’m i the only one who remembers michelle obama’s face while clinton gave her speach? Sorry boys and girls but you can forget about obama listening to her.

I’m sorry but wrong is wrong, if hillary takes this job, it says a whole lot more unflattering things about her than it does obama. It says she is so power hungry she will sign off on living life in political cage.

 

Comment by FembotsForObama | 2008-11-14 16:57:15

just consider this…

Berg’s lawsuit. What would make it go away? A possible extension of the olive branch to Hillary supporters, like Berg?

I think it’s a ruse.

Of course, Hillary would make a great SOS, but it would be the end of her career not the beginning. Serving under a BO administration really wouldn’t allow her to run against him or be an effective Dem counter in the future.

Comment by Andy | 2008-11-14 17:03:07

She will never be allowed to run against him– What the party tolerated Ted Kennedy to do will never allow or tolerate in HRC. It is a dream -imho- to think she would even try a run against him in 2012.

 

Comment by Kibby | 2008-11-14 17:41:51

This was my first thought also - Berg is a Clinton supporter, his case is on the Supreme Court docket to be responded to by Obama by Dec 1.

Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment filed. (Response due December 1, 2008)
Oct 31 2008 Application (08A391) for an injunction pending disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Souter.

http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08-570.htm

A writ of cert is rarely granted by the SC - it’s unlikely that the court is going to ignore this, Obama is probably going to have to produce the documents.

Does Hillary have enough pull with Phil Berg to make this case “go away” and withdraw his petition to the SC? I would think that making this case go “poof” is their highest priority right now.

We all know that the Obama group have zero interest in Hillary Clinton anywhere near their administration - so what is really behind the supposed “offer”?

 
 

Comment by Andy | 2008-11-14 16:59:24

LJ:

Thanks for writing this very thoughtful post. I trust you and I appreciate it.

I have one question: I know HRC and Biden have a close relationship. And Biden thinks of himself as “the foreign relations” expert. Now I don’t like many of his ideas but I wonder what do you think his influence will be on HRC were she be SoS ? Would Biden act on behalf of BO to oversee HRC? As a HRC brake so to speak? What’s your take about “the Biden factor” on this arrangement?

Like everyone else here I have mixed feelings about it. Sure the anger at what they did to her and to all of us is hard to overcome yet…I feel some trepedetion about HRC being blamed for all what BO “promised to do but knew he cannot” ie. what people will soon see as failures of his (grandiose) promises being pinned to HRC, etc etc.
But, for the good of this country, I am all for HRC at the helm in State. No matter what I want, nothing will now change what happened and the fact that HRC is not Madame President Elect. So, I will focus in NO KERRY for State and even less that clown named Richardson.

I would pay to be able to see moron Kerry & judas Richardon’s faces if HRC is named and accepts SoS

Funny that BO is thinking of HRC as … SOS: help please help!!! LOL.

 

Comment by oowawa | 2008-11-14 17:02:28

Perhaps the plan is this: offer HC the SOS job with the tacit understanding that she will reject it. Result, PUMAs are mollified, and BO is then free to appoint Kerry or whomever he wants without being reproached by PUMAs. Would Hillary be complicit in such a deal? I don’t know.

 

Comment by Deep Truths | 2008-11-14 17:08:21

Lets’ all face the facts, the Obama team is Clintonian already. I see so many faces of the old Clinton years that, at first I was pissed, but as of now it speaks volumes for the Clintons really.

And thinking back on these eight years and all the mess, wars and economic subterfuge for the 1% of this country, it IS only fitting that an overwhelming Democratic and House and Senate be in place as redemption for those/these dreadful, catastrophic years of Republican rule.

Obama just wants the title and is desparately looking for handlers to make him look good. Its one of his strong suits so to speak.

Comment by oowawa | 2008-11-14 17:12:54

Obama just wants the title and is desparately looking for handlers to make him look good.

I really want to believe this is true, that the empty suit will be satisfied with the title and let others roll up their sleeves and get to work. But if there is really something like a malevolent spirit living in that empty suit . . .

 

Comment by Betty Lou | 2008-11-14 17:59:23

You mean a need to dress up the turkey, by hiring a Clinton? (if he in fact, does)

I was thinking given the lack of confidence in Washington leadership, the lack of movement in the economy, perhaps someone caught a clue and decided to bring in people who could help restore a sense of competency, or at least the illusion, there of.

 

Comment by csuzeq | 2008-11-14 19:41:31

OMG! I had a scary conspiracy thought, which brings me back to my happy place so I have to savor it briefly. We knew Cheney was the puppet master for GW. I have been clueless as to who the real puppet master of BHO is.

What if BHO is the puppet and the Clintons are really the puppet masters.

Me likey! Have to live this dream for a few minutes.

:-)

 

Comment by gaindenpendent | 2008-11-14 20:22:14

You know what? That’s the Bush strategy. Get the “right” advisors and everything will work out, right? Wrong. We’ve had 8 years of these supposed “good” advisors and look where it’s gotten us. The problem is that even if you have good advisors, when you have a President that doesn’t have good judgement, it doesn’t matter. I don’t think Obama has the good sense to know when to listen to these advisors and when not to.

 
 

Comment by catherine | 2008-11-14 17:12:47

It smells like a trap. Obama could fire her in 6 months and politically neuter her for his sake as well as Reid and Pelosi.

Hillary has a better shot at 2012 by not being a member of an administration that’s doomed for failure.

Comment by Jill | 2008-11-14 17:23:41

She has NO shot at 2012 with a Democrat as prez, that’s over. She may as well garner some SOS power.

Comment by Uppity Woman | 2008-11-14 17:29:06

 

Comment by catherine | 2008-11-14 19:17:22

Actually she DOES have a shot when Obama’s administration fails epically and the DNC realizes there’s not a chance in hell that he’ll be re-elected.

That’s if he’s not indicted first. Rest assured the repubs will take back the senate in 2010 and guess what their first order of business will be??

 
 
 

Comment by Eowyn | 2008-11-14 17:15:59

I ask this question in all seriousness and sincerity:

What exactly are the “core values” of Hillary Clinton?

Comment by Susan1968 | 2008-11-14 17:39:43

Hillary’s core values are WOMEN’S RIGHTS & CHILDREN’S RIGHTS worldwide.

Go check out the speech she had the nerve to give to the Chinese in Bejing when she was First Lady.

She called them on the carpet for their treatment of women and kids.

On paper it’s strong — see the video and you HAVE TO respect her because her tone called them on the carpet.

It through everyone into a tizzy because she called China out while she was on their turf.

Love Hillary for that.

Comment by Betty Lou | 2008-11-14 18:08:05

Some of the foreign leaders need to see a SOS who will stand up to them, whom they can’t push around.

THEN they might bargain, maybe.

But if they think you’re a push over, (and look at the male candidates, even Powell, as Larry said), they’ll dismiss you, much like they did Bush, Cheney, the whole of the neocons. Posturing as a warrior is not the same as BEING a warrior, those who need to walk into a room, their gun in their hand, are, let’ face, scared shitless.

And knowing this, others will just push you around, in every way possible.

Clinton doesn’t take any shit, plays to her favor, but she is diplomatic. THAT is courage, and that they can respect, such as it is.

I’ve always thought it was the intellect of the US that other countries respected, our military being an outgrowth of that intelligence.

And I always thought that’s why Cheney failed — he wasn’t smart, and neither were his hand pickeds, no matter the weapons, or the degrees, he could be played.

And he was.

I feel the same about Obama, I feel better when I see a SMART Clinton type around, helping, though, certainly it doesn’t guarantee anything.

This isn’t 1995, sorry.

Comment by BJ | 2008-11-14 18:10:52

Clinton doesn’t just talk the talk, she walk’s the walk.

 
 

Comment by Betty Lou | 2008-11-14 18:08:25

Some of the foreign leaders need to see a SOS who will stand up to them, whom they can’t push around.

THEN they might bargain, maybe.

But if they think you’re a push over, (and look at the male candidates, even Powell, as Larry said), they’ll dismiss you, much like they did Bush, Cheney, the whole of the neocons. Posturing as a warrior is not the same as BEING a warrior, those who need to walk into a room, their gun in their hand, are, let’s face it, scared shitless.

And knowing this, others will just push you around, in every way possible.

Clinton doesn’t take any shit, plays to her favor, but she is diplomatic. THAT is courage, and that they can respect, such as it is.

I’ve always thought it was the intellect of the US that other countries respected, our military being an outgrowth of that intelligence.

And I always thought that’s why Cheney failed — he wasn’t smart, and neither were his hand pickeds, no matter the weapons, or the degrees, he could be played.

And he was.

I feel the same about Obama, I feel better when I see a SMART Clinton type around, helping, though, certainly it doesn’t guarantee anything.

This isn’t 1995, sorry.

 
 

Comment by tek | 2008-11-14 19:28:04

The same as the elements that comprise democracy, only a dunce would even ask that question. Must be a college twit.

 
 

Comment by Galt's Pizza Parlor | 2008-11-14 17:16:19

Just wondering why Emperor Bonaparte would want to hire a “racist” to be SOC? :shock:

 

Comment by Jill | 2008-11-14 17:17:27

This was a done deal for months. Thus, her untiring campaigning for O. That’s how it works. Always has, always will.

You get ‘em Hillary, you’ll be the best SOS ever!

The Prez-Elect cannot do it without a Clinton (nor their ex-staff, apparently). End of story.

 

Comment by Mr. X | 2008-11-14 17:30:15

Obama dissed her once. He’ll do it again.

 

Comment by BJ | 2008-11-14 17:31:27

I’m glad to hear it put Washington into an “uproar”.

YOU GO GIRL!

right now on cnn they are saying the job is absolutely hers if she wants it- “she did not give Barack an answer… ”

interesting- I love it! :mrgreen:

Comment by Jill | 2008-11-14 17:38:50

I must admit, I loved the “uproar” part as well. I wonder when she’ll respond….

At least she’ll make it interesting to watch the world over the next 4 years, it will be Hillary all the time and not so much of O and ‘chelle.

Comment by BJ | 2008-11-14 18:23:10

O’chelle lol, well put

well when I heard the word “uproar” i assumed they meant both positive and negative uproar, and that’s the part i loved.

those who love her are excited, those who hate her are pissed as hell.. and i love that too!

not so much media today but blogs in a frenzy over this keep mentioning Bill Richardson.. the libs (of which I’m one) want him.

some ppl just don’t get it.. I think he’s a nice guy, a sincere guy who wants a prestigious job but truth be told, he is not an intellectual.. he is not a super smart guy..

the world is in criss- I think Hillary or republican Chuck Hagel should be the top 2 even considered for the job.

 
 
 

Comment by Susan1968 | 2008-11-14 17:34:57

I just heard an update on MSNBC from Andrea Mitchell.

Hillary’s hands are tied in the Senate.
Ted Kennedy has a stranglehold on healthcare along with Dodd. Kennedy says he’s staying.

She will never be allowed to work on healthcare.

Hillary heads up ZERO committees and is not likely to get any thanks to party hacks like Reid and Pelosi.

The Dems have essentially a filibuster proof Senate now. How much “power” will Hillary have their for her pet bills?

Nada.

S.O.S. is a perfect placement for her.

And it shows the DNC hacks that Obama is not their puppet because you know DAMN SURE they all want Kerry to get it.

If Obama chooses Hillary it sends a big sign to the DNC hacks that they can’t push him around to play same-old-same-old politics.

And you know they want to.

Comment by BJ | 2008-11-14 17:39:16

they do not have 60 seats therefore they are not fillibuster proof.. which may be a good or bad thing.. we’ll find out soon enough-

either way her seat would be filled with a dem..

as for the health care issue.. no one can deny, no one can turn a blind eye the FACT that many of the ideas he is (now) implementing regarding health care are / were Hillary’s not his.

I hope history doesn’t forget that, whether he accomplishes something in health care or not-

 

Comment by Jill | 2008-11-14 17:45:15

Susan, this is the same-old-same-old politics: He OWES her. The DNC understands. They invented it.

Get ‘em Hillary!

 

Comment by ritamary | 2008-11-14 17:53:11

Ted Kennedy has a fatal brain tumor. How much longer will he be around?

Comment by Susan1968 | 2008-11-14 18:05:53

Dodd is already in line to take his place.

Remember — Hillary does not have senate seniority!

This is only her second term guys.

Comment by catherine | 2008-11-14 19:23:55

Does’nt matter. Kennedy won’t survive beyond 2009 and there’s senate elections in 2010.

“Wait Long By The River and the Bodies of Your Enemies Will Float By.”

Hillary can wait.

 
 
 
 

Comment by BJ | 2008-11-14 17:36:16

as far as this being a “leak”, let’s remember she apparently was seen (by media?) and clearly getting on a plane, heading to a trip to chicago for a private meeting.

the senate doesn’t want to lose a Dem seat but NY is def one place they can be sure that if she gives up her seat, it will be filled by a Dem-

so far media seems to be positive in their comments about the topic saying the clintons are stars around the world and hillary DOES know many world leaders that would be a benefit to us-

Comment by ritamary | 2008-11-14 18:14:37

But didn’t Barack say the only international experience Hillary has is attending tea parties? Plus she and Bill are such racists, right? And she has poor judgment because she voted for the war?

And why should Obama be concerned about us bitter racist undereducated menopausal Hillary supporters as this point? Why doesn’t he offer the position to one of his suck-up followers like Richardson or Kerry?

Appointing Hillary as Secretary of State would not make a damn bit of difference to me. I hope he offers it to her and she says no. I am so done with Obama and the Democratic Party.

 
 

Comment by NomNomNom | 2008-11-14 17:37:57

“Conversely, giving Hillary that job would be seen by most Hillary supporters as a great peace offering and the kind of gesture that many believe should have been extended when she suspended her campaign. It would go a long way in healing the rift among many of the Hillary backers who voted for McCain.”

Jeebus this sounds like the propaganda coming out of the campaign about how Clinton supporters reeeeaaalllly wanted her to accept as vp. No question but you’ve “turned” repuglican, Mr. Johnson.

It’s hard to imagine this was ever a pro-Clinton site if it’s now posting such bullsh#t articles as this.
Why in freaking h#ll would you suggest that the position would be a good one, when she could be fired at whim?
Tell it to Condoleeza Rice, or Colin Powell how well Secy of State is as a means of improving foreign relations. Just as they had no ability to influence Bush (if, indeed they wished it) Clinton would not have any influence over BHO. But she’d be ever so handy to blame for all BHO’s failures. Hey, and she’d have such great company under the bus!

She has a great reputation as a senator. She could well become Senate Majority/Minority leader in time. She serves on 4 separate Senate committees, but you want her to throw that away for BHO? WTF is the matter with you?

Let’s make a comparison. This:
Senator of New York
Senate Armed Services Committee:
Subcommittees:
Airland
Emerging Threats and Capabilities
Readiness and Management Support
Senate Committee on Environment & Public Works
Subcommittees:
Subcommittee on Superfund and Environmental Health (Chair)
Subcommittee Clean Air and Nuclear Safety
Subcommittee on Transportation and Infrastructure
Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor & PensionsSubcommittees:
Children and Families
Employment & Workplace Safety
Senate Special Committee on Aging
vs.
6 months kissing BHO’s a$$

Comment by BJ | 2008-11-14 17:44:09

HEY!

Larry is very Pro Hillary and admires her as do I (and many others).

IMO, and I think in many others, the position of Sec of State is much more prestigious, much more important than VP, which many will agree is a NOTHING job unless he is needed in an emergency situation.

I never wanted her to be VP, many (most) Hill supporters did not want her as VP (aka 2nd fiddle) to his presidency with her having no important use in the adminstration except smiling and nodding in agreement with his furor-

She is a perfect pick, I’m very excited about it. there is not one other Dem that would be better suited to this job-

“firing” isn’t an issue.. if in 2 yrs they can’t see eye to eye and she steps away from the job.. so what? it keeps her in the limelight, adds a powerful position to her resume, and leaves her open for a senate position again.

Comment by NomNomNom | 2008-11-14 18:01:52

It will keep her in the limelight in a negative way, not a positive one. She will be blamed for every setback and portrayed as an incompetent. It will last until she’s scapegoated with some monstrous trumped up disgrace, say the failure to stop Israel from nuking Iran, at a time chosen to maximize the length of time before the next senate race.
BHO is completely evil untrustworthy. She should stay as far away as possible.

 

Comment by Donna | 2008-11-14 18:03:36

It’s only as prestigious for HER as BO allows it to be PERIOD.

Have you guys forgotten who is in charge here?

He’ll dump her inside of a year and she will be left with NOTHING.

Comment by morris1030 | 2008-11-14 18:22:40

It makes no sense for Obama to attempt harming Hillary’s career. She would bring luster and smarts to State. Even if she rejects the offer, she remains an extremely important political ally to Obama as Senator. Her vote and support in the Senate are primo, but she would be an extremely valuable ally to extend US/Obama policies in the dangerous and neglected area of diplomacy in the world we face.

Either way Hillary can only add to Obama. The sexist paranoia still persists as I read some of the comments that show no logic or political savvy. Just distrust and subjective drama.

We have to grow up and get over this distrust.

Comment by Soldier of Christ | 2008-11-14 18:37:31

Morris,

I think the KOS blog is around the corner, I believe you are in the wrong one. Most of us will never bow to the Messiah unless his name is Yeshua.

 

Comment by DawnellesTIREDoFpolitics | 2008-11-14 18:41:25

yea right hilarious - grow up - yea ok see

that’s the thing about cheats, liars, plagerists (SP) & phony’s

once you find out WHO they are you can NEVER really trust them again (growing up makes you realize this)

especially when they keep proving otherwise again and again and again and again and again into infinity

name me ONCE Barry has been consistent & dependable? He couldn’t even be counted to show up prepared to vote on hundreds of issues in the state senate and immediately started running for CIC once he left the state

he’s got NO history

PERIOD

 
 
 

Comment by Soldier of Christ | 2008-11-14 18:34:54

If you think that poor Condi’s job kissing Bush’s ass was great, well, I guess you really don’t love the golden girl that much. A sec of state is a ass kiss person. A person who runs up and down with a pitcher of water for the president. I guess Obama finally put her in her place by thinking of giving her this position and keeping her hopping around countries to shut her mouth. Nope, if I was Hillary, I would say ” take this job and shove it”> She can more as a Senator.

 
 

Comment by Jill | 2008-11-14 17:49:26

Hey NomNom, Senator Clinton could actually get this country (dare I say, the world?) on the right track. She’s smarter than any of “them” and “they” know it. Secretary of State has her name all over it and I, for one, can’t wait. Hillary bows to no one and he wouldn’t DARE fire her I don’t care what ‘chelle says.

GO HILLARY!

Comment by NomNomNom | 2008-11-14 17:55:01

if he dared steal the presidency from her then he will certainly dare to fire her: your optimism is warrantless

Comment by Donna | 2008-11-14 18:10:18

and since the MSM is tanked for Obama they would join with him in smearing her from coast to coast.

Since he would hand pick her successor (of course, without anyone really knowing it) he would make damn sure she never regained her seat.

She would have to fight that much harder for POTUS 2016.

Now, SOS Clinton under a McCain presidency??? That would be a horse of another color.

Sorry, I’m just not anywhere near on board with Obama, and I just don’t know that I can or will be.

 

Comment by morris1030 | 2008-11-14 18:36:36

I am a fervent Hillary supporter, but there were problems with Hillary’s campaign strategy and execution that created weakness and vulnerability.

As competitors naturally she and Obama were ferocious in their opposition to each other.

There is no reason to think that there is any political capital in this for Obama when 18 or more million Democrats voted Hillary. He needs the smartest brains he can get, and Hillary knows how to weigh her options.

She would be a distinguished and powerful Secretary of State that could only add to executing policies that would reflect Obama administration’s goals.

Obama’s attempt to discredit one of the Dems most powerful players would be more than stupid and I don’t see this at all.

Comment by MBC | 2008-11-14 20:29:38

Are you kidding morris 1030, all he did for 7 months was try to discredit on of the Dems most powerful players and he succeeded, handily. Short term memory issues?

 

Comment by Jill | 2008-11-14 20:50:48

morris1030, you are one smart cookie.

You are correct, the he said/she said primary politics is OVER. It happens every 4 years.

Now is the time for serious and SMART people to handle the serious issues and needless to say, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton fits the bill beautifully.

Get ‘em Hillary! The Power is back!

 
 
 

Comment by BJ | 2008-11-14 18:00:38

and you know with the world crisis we are witnessing, whether wars , terror or the world economy in crisis, this is a hugely, important position to fill right now-

it’s not like in calm times around the world and an average economy for counties everywhere.. things are really bad now and it is a highly important position to fill-

i wonder if ppl really understand what this job entails-

I think it’s great :)

 

Comment by ritamary | 2008-11-15 02:43:09

Presidents fire cabinet members very regularly. They are perfect scapegoats when presidential policies go wrong.

Comment by Snickers | 2008-11-15 03:39:26

Oh Gawd, yes they (POTUS) fire cabinet members all the time and let them take the heat of their failed policies or mistakes. Come on, Gonzales wasn’t that long ago. Can we say Colin Powell? I don’t trust The One and neither should Hillary.

 
 
 

Comment by catherine | 2008-11-14 19:27:47

 
 

Comment by ritamary | 2008-11-14 17:48:55

Hillary retains her independence by remaining in the Senate. That is where I prefer to see her. As Secretary of State she can be fired at any time. She would be a convenient scapegoat for his screw-ups.

Also my understanding is that Michelle hates the Clintons and Bill in particular. Isn’t Michelle the only living person that Barack said he would seek advice from? (Typical white person granny was the other one he said he would consult. But unless Barack does decide to hold seances after all, he won’t be consulting granny now.)

Didn’t Michelle say she wanted to scratch Bill’s eyes out? Isn’t her “whitey” tape rant supposedly brought on by her hatred of Bill Clinton? Would Hillary tell Bill to stay home from White House events she must attend so he won’t upset Michelle? Just picture Bill upstaging Obama at every event the Clintons attend at the White House.

 

Comment by lucidamente | 2008-11-14 18:04:30

Comment by kgirl1028 | 2008-11-14 18:11:40

It also sheds light on how obama’s fan still feel about her. Sure she ought to take a job from a group of jerks who do not respect her, one small fall down a fight of stairs for women.

Comment by Betty Lou | 2008-11-14 18:25:13

Then they dont understand the position of SOS.

Sometimes, it does pay to get your head out of your ass.

 

Comment by LandOLincoln | 2008-11-14 21:52:21

kgirl1028 (and the others who think Obama will offer Hillary SecState in order to humiliate and control her, then fire her):

I’m not sure about this, but I’m thinking more and more that Hillary as SecState was part what seems to have been a very, very tough bargain the Big Dawg struck with Obama back in September.

The Clintons have long been rumored to have the goods on Obama, something that would destroy him politically, if not actually land him in jail, but didn’t want to use it during the campaign for whatever reason.

I suspect it–whatever “it” is–got used in September, in private, with the threat that it would be made public unless Obama agreed a) to start campaigning as a real Democrat instead of DINO as he had been doing;

and b) if he won the GE, he would put Clintons and/or Clinton people in key positions in his administration.

So Hillary gets State, Hillary supporter Bobby Jr. gets her senate seat–and maybe, just maybe, our first black president gets a third (albeit shadow) term while the guy with the melanin plays prez on television, much as Martin Sheen* did before him. ;-)

*The West Wing was based on the Clinton White House, and Sheen liked to refer to himself as the “acting President.” Acting–get it? ;-)

 
 
 

Comment by Jackarooty | 2008-11-14 18:07:25

Larry,
I didn’t see this article referenced in any of the messages and it is something to consider…

I’m very torn about what she should do. She won’t have very much power in the Senate as long as Nancy is The Speaker. If Harry leaves, the remaining old war horses will big foot her right out of the line. Several days ago there was a blog on NQ about Teddy refusing Hillary to have a subcommittee formed on health care for her to chair.

From The Daily Beast
More on the Hillary-Obama Meeting

Marc Ambinder has more details on the much-discussed Obama-Clinton meeting this morning. The meeting was private, without Rahm Emanuel in the room, and was not a formal interview. Its purpose was to discuss “ways they can work together.” The rumors originated with New York Democrats, who are already angling for their preferred candidates to replace her as senator. In Washington, people are saying Obama wants Clinton in his cabinet more than Hillary wants to be in it—by accepting the post, she gives up her power base, loses her seat forever, and loses her voice on domestic policy. Why might Obama want Hillary? According to MSNBC’s Chuck Todd, “to get her out of the Senate. Just ask George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, and Jimmy Carter what it was like to have a once or future presidential rival in the Senate serving as a one-person Roman tribunal.”

Comment by ritamary | 2008-11-14 18:24:14

What does Nancy Pelosi being Speaker of the House have to do with Hillary’s power in the Senate?

Comment by morris1030 | 2008-11-14 18:44:58

Nothing. Pelosi’s power is as a player but directly she has no bearing on Hillary’s Senate career. Let’s not forget Hillary is a Junior Senator which means she will not get to be Senate leader anytime soon with a cast od senior senators waiting in the wings.

It’s a mistake to think that even if Hillary runs afoul of Obama that her political life is over. There’s Governor of NY, or another run as Senator, or The World Bank, or many other terrific career options.

 

Comment by morris1030 | 2008-11-14 18:45:19

Nothing. Pelosi’s power is as a player but directly she has no bearing on Hillary’s Senate career. Let’s not forget Hillary is a Junior Senator which means she will not get to be Senate leader anytime soon with a cast of senior senators waiting in the wings.

It’s a mistake to think that even if Hillary runs afoul of Obama that her political life is over. There’s Governor of NY, or another run as Senator, or The World Bank, or many other terrific career options.

 

Comment by Karma | 2008-11-14 19:40:26

Pelosi decides what bills come up.

She can sideline everything Hillary puts up.

Comment by Jackarooty | 2008-11-15 08:23:50

Thank you! Very few people understand Nancy The Dragon Lady’s real power. She does NOT want any female competition.

 
 
 

Comment by Karma | 2008-11-14 19:42:21

Thanks for the article Jack.

So they ran her out of the primary, the DNC, and now the Senate.

Geez….how is she still walking with all these knives in her?

I hope someone writes a book about this.

 
 

Comment by BJ | 2008-11-14 18:07:54

Secrets, secrets, secrets!

“The Obama campaign did not immediately return a request for comment on whose motorcade preceded Obama’s out of the underground garage beneath the Kluczynski Federal Building Thursday evening”

“….Other candidates reportedly being considered are U.S. Senator John Kerry, D-Mass., New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson and former senator Chuck Hagel, R-Neb., according to the Washington Post, which also reports that Clinton is now under consideration for Secretary of State.

Ten to 15 minutes after the mystery motorcade emerged from the underground garage, Obama’s motorcade emerged and headed to Obama’s home in Chicago’s Kenwood neighborhood.”

“….Obama returned to his Transition headquarters at 4:15 p.m., when he could have had the meeting with Clinton or whoever else was in the motorcade.”

Chicago-Sun Times

(other media tv sources said earlier today)

“Hillary came away believing the job is hers if she wants it”

(of course we have to take media reports like that with a grain of salt)

finger’s crossed X here :roll:

Comment by Jill | 2008-11-14 18:24:13

Me too, BJ. But as an added bonus: Bill Richardson DOESN’T get the job after he dissed both Bill and Hillary! Oh yeah, and that coward Kerry too.

I’m loving it!

Get ‘em Hillary! The Power will be back!

 
 

Comment by morris1030 | 2008-11-14 18:13:40

Hillary has no shot at 2012. This apparently was a sealed deal or it appears so.

We could not have a sharper or more capable Sec’y as Hillary knows the world and its leaders. Her strength and smarts will be put to great use as head of State.

Kerry is not likeable, and too self centered & diffident. Richardson just isn’t up to this. Next to Hillary he’s a lightweight. This is a job that clearly demands intellect, guts,& hard work along with the unique experience Hillary brings with her knowledge of the players and the stakes. She’s met them all and knows what she’s doing. She also knows the valuable players from Albright and could create a great State Dept.

 

Comment by BerlinBerlin | 2008-11-14 18:16:32

A business man in Berlin once told me:
“In politics and business You find the best people always in the second row. The people at the top have a certain character structure, that stands in the way of being a morally, professional and human being”
seems to be true once again.

 

Comment by Susan1968 | 2008-11-14 18:17:28

Foreign press say the rest the world is THRILLED by Hillary as SOS.

Polls show she is the most famous senate politician in the world with a high approval rating.

They don’t want to listen to Kerry drone on.

And Richardson — he OWES his career to Bill Clinton and Bubba should have never chosen this lightweight.

Richardson is an opportunist with no talent.

Comment by Jill | 2008-11-14 18:32:49

Indeed, Susan. And, let’s not forget Richardson is aka Judas.

Get ‘em Hillary!

 

Comment by kgirl1028 | 2008-11-14 18:41:41

Hold up aren’t these the same wacked nuts who were excited about obama’s presidency? So know we are supposed to care cause they want hillary as SOS. give me a break.

 

Comment by Cubs in 09 | 2008-11-14 23:09:35

They don’t want to listen to Kerry drone on.

He could be a secret weapon against our enemies. He’d talk them to death! :-P

 
 

Comment by IBI | 2008-11-14 18:19:49

If she’s SOS we can kiss universal health care good-bye. Better for her to stay in Senate than to have Obama as her boss.

Comment by ritamary | 2008-11-14 18:29:22

Kerry said during the primaries that universal health care is dead in the water. And Obama never advocated universal health care during the primaries. He always said 15% of the people would be left uninsured under his plan. But 15% of the people are uninsured now. If Obama said he wanted universal health care after the primaries, I never heard it because I had stopped listening to him by then.

 
 

Comment by Choo Choo Magoo | 2008-11-14 18:20:34

Larry - As always I very much enjoy your posts - Can’t help but smile at your writers elbows. With all that we are going to face over the next 4 years due to the economic mess we are in, I truly wish HRC was going to be president but in State she may well have the bigger job since this economic mess is global it will take a knowledgable savy respected person of her calibre to negotiate those difficult foreign waters. And if the grumblings from the political class in Europe and Asia that have been cropping up in the papers are any indication, those foreign water may not be as warm and welcoming for Barack as our media would like to project.

 

Comment by Donna | 2008-11-14 18:20:51

Even the “first read” people at MSNBC see this as a way to get her out of the senate where she could pose a serious threat to Oblamo’s way out there policies, and the same thing goes for McCain, who they report he is meeting with on Monday. Of course they say he’s not offering him a position, but the Obama camp isn’t saying WHO they are offering anything to.

Obama wants them both out of the senate, is my take, and I see them as teaming up IN the senate to protect Americas best interests.
————

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/11/14/1674694.aspx

Comment by Arabella Trefoil | 2008-11-14 18:24:46

Dammit, I hate to agree with MSNBC. I don’t know what to think. I’d prefer that McCain and Hillary remain in the Senate.

On the other hand, it would be great to see the Village People heads explode like pumplins.

Comment by breeze | 2008-11-15 00:01:47

That’s what I thought too, Donna and ChooChoo….

Great way to get a DIM majority in the Senate.

Are Mac and hrc that stupid?

 
 

Comment by Karma | 2008-11-14 20:05:22

“Also, one other thing to keep in mind if Clinton does end up at State, she’ll be off the political circuit; it’s considered unseemly to practice politics while serving in one of the big cabinet posts, especially at State or Defense. So this would mean no more Hillary on the stump for candidates, no more Hillary raising money, no more Hillary collecting chits. OK, we will now take First Read away from Machiavelli and turn it back over to the current authors.”

It also takes her off the stump for down-ticket Dems so she can’t build even more networks supportive of her.

 
 

Comment by Susan1968 | 2008-11-14 18:21:43

Richardson reminds me of a guy in my area who owns a franchise of six Subway Sandwich Stores and walks around gladhanding everyone.

Yet, engage him a conversationa nd his lack of knowedge is painfully obvious.

Richardson with a beard looks like this guy too.

Comment by Arabella Trefoil | 2008-11-14 18:25:52

Ha ha! Good one.

 
 

Comment by PamelaofthePoconos | 2008-11-14 18:22:30

…Conversely, giving Hillary that job would be seen by most Hillary supporters as a great peace offering and the kind of gesture that many believe should have been extended when she suspended her campaign…

Sorry Larry; not me. Those posting at other sites are leaning ‘no’ as well.

 

Comment by Soldier of Christ | 2008-11-14 18:25:37

I think most of you are wrong. Hillary is very agressive and she will not follow the “bid” of the President. The sec of state abides by the rules of the President, and I cannot see her not pushing in her agenda as she visits other countries. I believe Michelle Obama and Barrack is aware of the arguments that might arise from choosing her. To me it is a step down , I believe Speaker of the House is more powerful and also can be flexable in basing their own opinions. I guess it would be a slap now that the Hillary camp is leaking this “not yet” offered position. How hard up can the camp get? I guess they didn’t think he would win, remember, she said he was unelectable, and now are faced with his reign. Hillary in my opinion made the biggest error in her life, she threw the dice and lost. All the dirt out there could have helped her, now she will not have a chance in 2012. I heard from a good source that Lt Gov Steel will win and his intentions concerning getting the republican party to clean up fraud, and bringing back conservatives will be his goal to shape up the 2012 election. I, for one, still believe that Sarah Palin will be the first woman President. I wished it was Hillary, but, she threw the dice in the wrong direction and now is seen by many as a person who betrayed her country. Obama is doing everything even now to make sure Palin is not competing with him. I thank G-d for Steel being the first African American that will represent the moderates, and conservative republicans, independents and even ex-hillary supporters.

 

Comment by SJ | 2008-11-14 18:26:22

I don’t know if this was a deliberate leak or not but the entire affair is disgusting, and does not say much for our politics and the people it surrounds.

What the hell is this wheeling and dealing power play by all of them, this country has enough problems and its time they start to work to fix it, not jockey each other to see who can get the highest ranking post, my god no wonder we are in a mess, how can anyone support people like that.

All they are doing is thinking of what politics has for them and not really the dam country.

Comment by Snickers | 2008-11-15 03:47:53

SJ, yes, there are a lot of problems in this country, and I, too, wish Congress would just get on with doing their jobs. Enough with this flim-flam man and show.

 
 

Comment by kgirl1028 | 2008-11-14 18:35:34

So let’s see we for the last few months we have railed against Barack obama, to the point of voting republicans just so roll over and be all happy with up raised glasses of Koolaid, just because he hints he is nominating hilary? Have we forgotten that even though Hillary Campaigned for this man his campaign strung up sarah palin and gutted her. Do you really think Clinton will able to protect us from obama’s stupidity. think about it! obama was capable of turning feminist into a bunch of rabid Palin hater. i know i have a tendency to be contrary, and go against the grain, but are people in this country that easily bought? I know people are scared, but wake the heck up, it this same mentality that has us caught up an war we never should have been in. Bush was able to scare people in line. Now you are allowing you respect for hillary override a neccesary fear of obama’s treturous nature. iwould also like to point out that Hillary as Sec of State only deals with things out side of the country, who’s gonna stop obama when he tries to bankrupt the coal industry and to increase energy prices to CHANGE OUR BEHAVIOR. this man is crazy, but hey it will all be great if clinton gets SOS. This is a shameless ploy by obama to cover up what was done to palin. One of my coworkers who disliked obama, voted for him because she thought obama would give clinton a high position, she also thought palin was stupid, and was willing to over look what a mysogonist and friends was cause she thinks clinton will get thrown a bone. Obama’s ex defense adivsor called clinton a monster, his wife insulted clintons ability to take care of home. why does know one see that if clinton excepts this position it means that the future is actually more dismal than they thought it was. Cause what is says is that even hillary and most ravenous supporters can be bought. Sorry guys can’t sell myself respect to obama.

Comment by Snickers | 2008-11-15 03:50:54

Kgirl, I agree with you 100 percent. Jeez, I hope Clinton doesn’t bite and accept the job. If she does, that says quite a bit about her.

 
 

Comment by Peggy Sue | 2008-11-14 18:38:34

I have really conflicted feelings about this possibility. Would HRC make a fabulous SOS. Absolutely. And how ironic that the press is admitting that she’s familiar with so many of the world’s leaders and has traveled to all corners of the world.

Remember during the primary, she was laughingly referred to as “‘just’ a First Lady.”

In one way, I’d like to think there would be at least one member of the cabinet I personally could feel confortable with. In another way, I don’t want her in any way attached to this administration.

Something that caught my eye in someone’s post was a comment about the Democratic Party Brass who all wanted Hillary as the nominee. Really?? It sure didn’t look that way to me. In fact, I saw the reverse–a steamroller crushing the whole lily-livered bunch, bowing down down to a faux-prince because they were all so terribly afraid of hearing the one word, a word I’ve heard repeatedly and been called over this past year: racist.

Never in my life have been so ashamed, so appalled by the Democratic Party.

The only person that gives me hope is Hillary Clinton. If she takes the job, I know she’ll be spectacular. And if they try to destroy her? Well, then it’s time for one of Jefferson’s suggested revolutions.

As I said, I’m terribly conflicted at this point. Maybe that’s why I went out and bought a new gun this morning.

Pretty grim.

BTW: the gun stores are doing a hell of a business right now. What does that tell you?

Comment by Betty Lou | 2008-11-14 18:50:32

Oh, I think they’ve been going after the Clintons since the day Bill was born.

I’ve been reading about the founding fathers, the period around the revolution, this country has had to face enemies intent on destroying it, externally and internally, since 1776, some things never change.

Meaning, why would it be weird, or even a threat, at this point, that others would want someone with Hillary’s political philosophy destroyed?

(And why, that’s just strange, she’s such a threat to them? Why?)

It’s real, sometimes I think those who “play” politics dont quite understand what they’re risking, too.

Guys like Cheney, Rove, Obama, say.

 
 

Comment by noproblama | 2008-11-14 18:42:28

I’m not thrilled about the idea, (I won’t be able to bash his administration as much) but I think Hillary will do the right thing for herself and the country, if asked.

 

Comment by JG | 2008-11-14 18:46:10

Great article Larry.

Hillary may just yet save American hegemony for another hundred years.

For anyone interested, the way that world leadership generally trades hands is in roughly hundred year cycles…..

we got the 20th—the question is whether we’ll get the 21st.

Hillary as SOS makes that MUCH MORE LIKELY, and accordingly, makes MUCH MORE LIKELY less deaths worldwide from armed conflict of any kind.

 

Comment by kgirl1028 | 2008-11-14 18:53:41

You know Judas gets a bad rap, don’t get me wrong sellling someone isn’t cool, but if you want to know what stung like a bitch, that was when Peter, Jesus’s friend denied even knowing him. You expect you accountant to screw you but not your firends. Luckly i don’t take friendships seriously, but i do have a very good concept of right and wrong and if clinton aligns herself with obama i will hope for her failure just like i hope for his. Obama’s gotta go in 2012 and he will take his trash with him when he leaves.

 

Comment by Hank | 2008-11-14 18:53:44

Larry what are your thoughts on BO’s birth certificate issues? Do you think any of these lawsuits will stop him before he is sworn in?

 

Comment by tek | 2008-11-14 19:06:09

Hillary should be Secretary of State. She’d be awesome and she’d be the next president. She deserves this and John Kerry would be a disaster! Bill Richardson would be a total disaster.

Then RFK, Jr. for Secretary of the Interior and there would be two good people in the administration. Two great Democrats readying for future president.

Comment by LandOLincoln | 2008-11-14 22:21:17

I understand RFK Jr. was going to go for her senate seat if she won the presidency, so I’m assuming he’ll go for it if she takes State, as well.

And remember, he (and IIRC all but one of his siblings) endorsed Hillary in the primaries.

And I think all of you who are sooo very disillusioned and angry with Hillary (and Bill) are naive, to say the least.

I’ve already posted this upthread, but it bears repeating:

kgirl1028 (and the others who think Obama will offer Hillary SecState in order to humiliate and control her, then fire her):

I’m not sure about this, but I’m thinking more and more that Hillary as SecState was part what seems to have been a very, very tough bargain the Big Dawg struck with Obama back in September.

The Clintons have long been rumored to have the goods on Obama, something that would destroy him politically, if not actually land him in jail, but didn’t want to use it during the campaign for whatever reason.

I suspect it–whatever “it” is–got used in September, in private, with the threat that it would be made public unless Obama agreed a) to start campaigning as a real Democrat instead of DINO as he had been doing;

and b) if he won the GE, he would put Clintons and/or Clinton people in key positions in his administration.

So Hillary gets State, Hillary supporter Bobby Jr. gets her senate seat–and maybe, just maybe, our first black president gets a third (albeit shadow) term while the guy with the melanin plays prez on television, much as Martin Sheen* did before him.

*The West Wing was based on the Clinton White House, and Sheen liked to refer to himself as the “acting President.” Acting–get it? ;-)

 
 

Comment by kgirl1028 | 2008-11-14 19:07:50

You know one thing i must say for obama, he knows everyone has a price, and it took him a while but he has definately found most of yours. maybe i’m just irritable and need more sleep so can go to work, but the idea that at least half of the people on this board are getting in the kooliad line is a bit annoying for me. Let me go to sleep maybe i will wake up refreshed and less annoyed by those jumping on the obama bullsh*t express. night all, i love you dearly but after almost 40 hours of understanding my crazy co worker with another eight hours to go taxes my apathy tank. So i’m probably caring more about this than i should. Night all hope to return later tomorrow or sunday with a better attitude.

Comment by Donna | 2008-11-14 19:42:29

Glad you had the courage to say it.

I’ve been thinking it for a bit here this evening.

 

Comment by Karma | 2008-11-14 19:52:42

Yup….I think it is a trap to finish off the Clintons.

That was his goal in the primaries and nothing has changed from this view.

 
 

Comment by SJ | 2008-11-14 19:15:22

Obama sure knows the trick of the game of politics, throw the masses a bone, give Hillary a big posting then all of a sudden sit back and watch all his minions eating out of his hands.

Brilliant it will he hard for Hillary supporters to say one word against him now after he was so kind to Hillary lol

Comment by Betty Lou | 2008-11-14 19:30:17

Well, no, same with Clinton, even if she were to get the position, she’s still open to criticism, particularly when she screws up, which she will, we all do.

Democracy thrives on honest dissention, not borne of corruption, or adherence to some kook’s POV.

And hope dope is fatal.

 
 

Comment by catherine | 2008-11-14 19:34:19

I’m pretty fed up with all the political Nostradamus’ here who claim Hillary “has no shot at 2012″.

Really? Obama could very well be indicted before his first term is over or fail so miserably at the presidency (in all likelihood) that he’s forced to do an LBJ and not run for re-election.

Comment by Betty Lou | 2008-11-14 19:41:45

I agree, those Rezko type problems are the main culprit in this failed Washington…

 
 

Comment by jen | 2008-11-14 19:44:04

Couldn’t disagree more with you on this one, Larry. Joseph Cannon has it right and I’ve already written Hillary via the links at this Hillbuzz post to warn her off!

 

Comment by SFIndiePUMA | 2008-11-14 20:06:05

Conversely, giving Hillary that job would be seen by most Hillary supporters as a great peace offering and the kind of gesture that many believe should have been extended when she suspended her campaign. It would go a long way in healing the rift among many of the Hillary backers who voted for McCain.

Bullsh*t. I don’t see it as a peace offering, and it goes NO way to healing any rift. Hillary would be crazy to accept the job. She’s just about the only sane voice in the Senate and she’s needed to keep The Pretender and his minions under control. Take her out of the Senate and you open the door for chaos.

I hope he doesn’t offer it to her, and if he does I hope she doesn’t accept.

Comment by Northwest rain | 2008-11-14 20:19:20

Obama is still an abuser — and like any other abuser he will NEVER change.

Obama can never be forgiven for his abusive treatment of Clinton and Palin — because through them he has abused all women (even the ones too d*mwitted to know).

The faster O-zero goes down — the better of America in the long run.

If he needs this much “help” — he doesn’t below in the white house.

 

Comment by IndyBoomer | 2008-11-14 21:00:22

I agree, Northwest rain. Barky NEEDS to fail (it’s karma!), and Hillary has no obligation to keep him from falling flat on his face. Then we will be rid of this evil man. The faster, the better, in my opinion. My greatest hope is that he doesn’t make it through one term. Sorry for the tone, everyone, I have anger issues this week.

 
 

Comment by Hermagoras | 2008-11-14 20:31:10

And the hilarity continues. Larry clearly thinks Hilary would be a great choice — and I don’t disagree — but he can’t saying nasty things about Obama in the process. By this point, the No Quarter response is Pavlovian.

Comment by Betty Lou | 2008-11-14 20:45:05

hm.

Maybe you should look a little deeper.

Problem, some.

 
 

Comment by alee21 | 2008-11-14 21:03:55

I think Hillary should not be secState. As someone who donated the max and campaigned for her, I do not want her to be part of the Obama administration. Obama is a fake, an affirmative action candidate and president elect.
Hillary should have been elected President, she is the best candidate for the job.
Race trumps gender but race is not about all races, only the blacks. Certainly nothing about Asians — always wondered why Asians are not a minority: by numbers they are and by the way they started from the bottom up. So, go figure…

Maybe a silver lining is that affirmative action may be gone forever??

I just moved from Michigan to Texas — I can see affirmative action in full force, much more so than in Michigan.

If you have a black in charge of a department, you will see more blacks hired into that department;

if you have a hispance in charge, you see hispancis hired.

I object to this type of practice, plain and simple.

 

Comment by Trudy | 2008-11-14 21:18:57

Kgirl 1028, I agree with you 100%.

 

Comment by Baba Rum Raisin | 2008-11-14 21:27:02

>>> Powell was and is the quintessential butt snorkeler…

An artful turn of phrasing.

 

Comment by pollpatrol | 2008-11-14 21:40:33

I don’t know where everyone is buying the MSM pablum that HRC could never run against a sitting POTUS. It happens nearly once a decade!

Bobby Kennedy (D) VS. Johnson (D)
Ted Kennedy (D) VS. Carter (D)
Pat Buchanan (R) VS. George Bush I (R)

And so on…

If the sitting POTUS is unpopular they usually have a challenger from their party. Why?

Because IF enough people in the party believes the sitting POTUS will LOSE to the opposing party they will support a challenger to keep the White House.

Bobby Kennedy would have won had he not been assassinated. Ted Kennedy probably would have won had the Iran Hostage situation not cropped up.

It’s nonsense to say that HRC wouldn’t run in 2012 if Obama’s approval rating was horrible and the country was worse off and felt fooled by all his promises.

HRC could resign as SOS and mount a run. She could also announce from the Senate. It all depends on how Obama does as POTUS.

Comment by catherine | 2008-11-14 22:10:57

 

Comment by warehouse553 | 2008-11-15 03:26:37

No democrat will ever challenge an AA incumbent. That is simply a fact of politics now!

 
 

Comment by rickya | 2008-11-14 21:42:18

Obama: I know that I cheated during the primaries, and I don’t think it is a good idea for you to be my vice president but I think that you should take it as an honor that I am offering to you the Secretary of State post.

Clinton: Oh thank you, your highness!

Obama: Remember Hillary, it is part of your job to make me look good so whatever bird-brained idea I come up with you have to sell to the public.

Clinton: Absolutely, your eminence. You can also make me as your scapegoat when things go awry. I’m all yours.

IS THIS HOW WE WANT THIS TO GO?

 

Comment by Texas Playwright | 2008-11-14 21:56:40

Run away from this backstabbing, corrupt fraud as fast as you can, Hillary! He’ll use you and then fire you in a year. You won’t have the power of the people who elected you to the Senate, where you can do the most good for NY and America. BO wants you OUT of the Senate so he can cheat again and put one of his fascist cohorts in your place.

Reject him, Hillary!!!

 

Comment by James (San Jose) | 2008-11-14 22:05:47

Larry again you get it only half right. The dynamic duo of Hillary and Bill Clinton would be a real blessing at State. Hillary could do the heavy lifting while Bill does the glad-handing.

But you forget that more than Daily KOS has it in for the lady in the pants-suite. There is a huge right wing noise machine that still despises the Clintons and will do anything to sabotage Bill and Hillary.

Being totally cynical I can see the rabid right, the rabid left and very secretly both Kerry and Richardson joining together to nix Hillary’s elevation. Being even more cynical I see Obama using the fact of such a cabal to eliminate both Kerry and Richardson from consideration. Kerry stays grumpily in the Senate whilst Richardson dejectedly polishes his resumes in the knowledge that he is completely toxic as part of any national political team. Obama pulls off a nifty if very nasty triple play and the three base runners trudge off the field and into political irrelevance. That’s politics Chicago style.

But then Kerry and Richardson are both players so they are fully aware of such an outcome. If Hillary’s nomination becomes official they will have to plaster on happy faces and look for other positions in the Obama administration. Interior for Kerry perhaps? He can definitely open up opportunities for his fellow wind-surfers from there. And for Richardson perhaps HHS or Homeland Security?

State is open for Hillary if she wants it. Does she want it? Or is she going to play vulture and wait for the “lion of the Senate” to finally lay down in the soft grass? How much of a voice in health care is Ted Kennedy willing to give Hillary? It’s Teddy’ last great performance, he might not want others on the stage for his final bow. Hillary wants a big part in her signature issue, but Teddy might be a bear about that.

As SOS Hillary could make a huge difference. She has spent years on the Armed Services committee and that make her the perfect person to demilitarize our foreign policy. She knows exactly where the low hanging fruit is. She knows the jobs that the military wants State to take back.

Let us not forget Hillary’s other great strength, she is a policy wonk extraordinaire. Exactly the type of person who can submerge themselves in the tedious nit-picking required at State. N.Q. denizen will be surprised how neatly their pant-suited hawk aligns with the President-elect. For you ex-military types Hillary will play X.O. to Barack’s C.O. Barack will be the velvet glove while Hillary will be the mailed fist. This alliance, if it happens ,will go way beyond Israel and the Middle East. Obama and Bill Clinton can play nice-nice while Hillary plays mother superior with the 36 inch steel ruler. “Mr Kim Jong il, show me your hands! Mr. Ahmadinejad stop squirming back there if you know what’s good for you!”

And let us be even more blunt, if she gets this chance it is a way she can covertly erase her support of the Iraq war. She can be the person who brings sanity into Mesopotamia and extracts the U.S. from the quick sand of W’s Mission unaccomplished. Very few people get a second chance to correct such a error. Bonus points in the fact that she does not even have to even admit the error.

For Obama Hillary’s elevation also covers a multitude of sins. He knows that Hillary will lead the charge for women all over the world. He knows she will carry that banner high. And he gets to bask in the reflective glow of Hillary’s other core issue. It’s win-win if both of them have the smarts to make it work.

The large economy-sized fly in the ointment are the Hillary haters. The gaggle at the Big Orange Satan is not much of an issue. They can be sold on the idea of keeping your friends close but your enemies closer. Some MoveOn types might blow a gasket but they don’t have much sway. The folks that can scuttle this have R’s by their name. They have the means (the Fox News/ right-wing radio noise machine) and the motivation ( hurt a Democratic President elect, make him a lame duck before he even gets sworn in.)

Larry, this is a fine how-do-you-do for you and your readers. You and your readers are the best firewall against a right-wing smear attack against the nomination of HRC to SOS. To get “your” gal who is “ready from day one” into her “rightful office”, to really make it happen, you might have to come to Obama’s defense. Isn’t that a kick in the crotch?

Comment by Five Thirty | 2008-11-14 22:36:13

The folks that can scuttle this have R’s by their name.
Also the msm.

 

Comment by ritamary | 2008-11-15 03:02:00

“The folks that can scuttle this have R’s by their name.”

What about Keith Obamaman, Chris “Tingle Leg” Matthews, etc?

 
 

Comment by Hot Librarian | 2008-11-14 22:07:44

Is she a good enough liar to be SOS? Even Condi gave it away -her eyes would wander -when she was telling big porkies.

I do not think Obama would want HRC out there thousands of miles from his control.

Comment by James (San Jose) | 2008-11-14 22:18:32

Never bet against the lady in the pant-suit. SOS is confirmation and redemption for her. She can become the greatest advocate for this nation since Benjamin Franklin; she is that good.

 
 

Comment by TeakWoodKite | 2008-11-14 22:30:46

In the breach is where you find souls like Senator Clinton.

Joe Biden and Hillary see things eye to eye more so than BO and it is an admission of inexperience on BO’s part, but as a choice it would be a good one.

At a minimum Hillary’s counsel would eliminate any possibilty of BO blaming his lack of judgement on anyone else.

“Scary smart” is how Mr. Johnson described Senator clinton. We saw this first hand as she campaigned.

I really want her nominated to the SUPREME COURT.

 

Comment by Mr.Murder | 2008-11-14 22:51:05

The one person who stood up to Obama the most would insulate him from tunnel vision and rose colored analysis. If all he wanted was a$$ kissing he’d probably have named Kerry already.

This is probably the usual symbolic attempt to claim cover off of Clinton’s successful track record. The Democratics have done that before. Use them to bolster the party, then discard them pluasibly.

The news alone could bolster some market uncertainty, but that item is trending to a long recession.

Having a bigger name around to blame when some of this stuff hits the fan, that would be a consideration to reflect upon as well.

 

Comment by Mr.Murder | 2008-11-14 22:55:26

Also, the rumored consideration totally disarms his suppoed piety about war votes and what the world would think. Obama needs someone to blame for the war’s continuation.

We’ll be greeted as occupiers.

 

Comment by IBI | 2008-11-14 22:56:02

Forget SOS. Hillary for President!

This new Calif. lawsuit is worth reading. In addition to questions about BO eligibility based on birth, there are numerous other citizenship (eligibility) questions:

http://americamustknow.com/Documents/Final%20writ%20Keyes%20v%20Bowen.pdf

It just needs to be filed in the other 49 states — especially those that Obama carried that have Republican Secretaries of State.

Ultimately it’s all about whomever the Electors choose in mid-December, whether the person was on the ballot or not.

 

Comment by beachnan | 2008-11-14 22:56:48

We can all agree that BO has a huge ego. I believe that he wants to go down in history as being a great man, a man of “change”. Yet, you see him selecting many of the people who were connected to the Clinton administation, so, so much for change. Does he really want to get rid of the Clintons more than his desire for greatness? I think his ego and desire to go down in history as one of the greatest Presidents, will make him to turn to the Clintons more and more. I believe he realizes he is in way over his head, and needs help. Who better to help him than someone from a Presidency that was truly successful. I’m not sure if this is the best thing for Hillary, but BO would be smart to have her in his cabinet. I would trust Hillary with the SOS, and I would feel better about America’s future with her in that position.

 

Comment by hootnannie | 2008-11-14 23:51:01

Nominating Hillary would be the first smart thing Bobo has done. And the prospect of slapping down Kerry and Richardson fills me with glee!

 

Comment by kgirl1028 | 2008-11-15 00:53:51

Well i have woken up and am at work, and refreashed, I’m not siging off on this. Long ago i set my price at 6.42 billion dollars and I seriously doubt obama can afford me. However i can give those hopping on the BS Express hugs, kisses, flowers and wish you and hillary Bon Voyage. But this chick is sticking with her standards and her expensive price tag. I can not wish you luck but i can wish you well. For obama on the other hand, the third digit on both my hands are raised high, i don’t want him to think i’m scratching my nose. I’m flipping the little snit off not once but twice. One for hillary and the other for sarah palin.

 

Comment by Citizen70 | 2008-11-15 08:05:27

Larry, I agree with you. As much as I can’t stand anything Barky, I think this provides an opportunity for Hillary to create a lasting positive legacy for herself in history. She would be an outstanding Sec. of State because she has the knowledge, intellect, and wisdom for the job. I don’t think she wants to run again for President and there are too many uncontrollable political forces in the Senate. I did want Kerry to be tapped only to get him the hell out of my state but Hillary would be a much better choice!

 

Comment by John House | 2008-11-15 10:30:50

Hmmm…after reading the 300+ comments on this, I have to agree with those who say that this is Obama’s way of “getting her out of the way while keeping an eye on here”. I don’t WANT her to get out of his way, I WANT her to GET IN HIS FACE…the same way he told his effing Obamatrons to get in peoples’ faces.

There is no doubt that Hillary would be awesome at the SOS position. No doubt whatsoever. But when you think about it, Hillary could be hired as White House groundskeeper and she’d still make the position eclipse Obama’s ineptitude as president.

I say stay in the Senate and hedge your bets, Hillary. You’re too good to become Obama’s Colin Powell.

 

Comment by section9 | 2008-11-15 18:07:49

As a Republican, I find this fascinating. Of course, like Larry, I assume this is a “keep your friends close, keep your enemies closer move” by Obama.

Here’s the key: this can only mean one thing-Bob Gates won’t be around Defense for long. However, watch Obama go out and find some ruthless, ambitious sumbitch who could both match Clinton as a strong SECDEF and also tie her up in knots in the Cabinet.

So, I hear Dick Cheney is out of a job come Jan 20th. No, but seriously, a Sam Nunn or, perish the thought, James A. Baker III figure who could hold his ground against Hillary in the Cabinet. Couple that with a strong national security advisor (not Susan Rice or Samantha Power) and you’ve got Hillary boxed in at Foggy Bottom.

Meantime, you buy off Bill Clinton with the ambassadorship to the Court of St. James.

Watch and see if things don’t play out like I think they will. Obama is maneuvering to neuter Hillary Clinton so she doesn’t become Senate Majority Leader.

 

RSS Feed for This PostPost a Comment

Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)