<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ANATOMY OF A DIVIDER: PART 1A. WHY OBAMA CANNOT UNIFY</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/11/16/anatomy-of-a-divider-part-1a-why-obama-cannot-unify/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/11/16/anatomy-of-a-divider-part-1a-why-obama-cannot-unify/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 07:08:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tricia</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/11/16/anatomy-of-a-divider-part-1a-why-obama-cannot-unify/#comment-1151971</link>
		<dc:creator>Tricia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 14:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=6053#comment-1151971</guid>
		<description>My opinion:
  I don&#039;t believe they were duped, I think the folks who voted for Obama didn&#039;t really care and they knew.  It seems to me that people voted for a man who is clearly not ready and gave no solid answers as to who he really is (6th graders noticed it - but grown up people didnt- thats a lie they knew). They voted for him because they think that a minority as President will help race relations.  I also think these folks felt safe voting for him cause he&#039;s half white and speaks well. I these folks are the biggest racists of all. 
  My Opinion - I got some news for my fellow African Americans voters I think that many of the white people who voted for Obama are the most giant racists of all.  I dont trust these frauds, I think they&#039;ll be the first to turn on our President because they only voted for him for one reason. 
  It&#039;s really sad, very sad that many of these white folks who voted for him based on the reasons listed above are really ignorant .
   Mark my words it will be &quot;we&quot; the voters who voted against him that will stand up and defend him because of honor and respect. 
  You see we knew he wasn&#039;t ready and we knew that Mr. Emmanuel, Zbignew and others are really the force behind this entire scam. These are the guys telling Obama what to do.  They are running things.  
   We will see a shift from Iraq to Afganistan (not an end to war as promised but a sneaky quiet shift).  The Obama voters will pretend that its not happening until maybe 2011 and we get close to next Pres. Election and then suddenly the cool aid will go poof and disappear and the claws will come out of these same white voters who voted for Mr. Obama in 2008. And bam they will turn on him. Why&quot; I&#039;ll tell ya why because in thier eyes they will have achieved some crazy stupid goal and then they will vote him out. These  people scare me because they are full of S.... and they put an entire nation at risk to serve some crazy cause that only makes things worse. 
   
   I did not vote for Mr. Obama  but he is our (my) President and when these animals who voted for him turn on him - it will be the rest of us who defend our President from the smears....
   And they (the folks I refer to above) they are vicious look at what they can do an example: G. Bush.
    So when you see white people jumping up in praise (no at this time) just keep in mind these are really the ignorant... and in a few years they will be the first to turn.....
My Opinion........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My opinion:<br />
  I don&#8217;t believe they were duped, I think the folks who voted for Obama didn&#8217;t really care and they knew.  It seems to me that people voted for a man who is clearly not ready and gave no solid answers as to who he really is (6th graders noticed it &#8211; but grown up people didnt- thats a lie they knew). They voted for him because they think that a minority as President will help race relations.  I also think these folks felt safe voting for him cause he&#8217;s half white and speaks well. I these folks are the biggest racists of all.<br />
  My Opinion &#8211; I got some news for my fellow African Americans voters I think that many of the white people who voted for Obama are the most giant racists of all.  I dont trust these frauds, I think they&#8217;ll be the first to turn on our President because they only voted for him for one reason.<br />
  It&#8217;s really sad, very sad that many of these white folks who voted for him based on the reasons listed above are really ignorant .<br />
   Mark my words it will be &#8220;we&#8221; the voters who voted against him that will stand up and defend him because of honor and respect.<br />
  You see we knew he wasn&#8217;t ready and we knew that Mr. Emmanuel, Zbignew and others are really the force behind this entire scam. These are the guys telling Obama what to do.  They are running things.<br />
   We will see a shift from Iraq to Afganistan (not an end to war as promised but a sneaky quiet shift).  The Obama voters will pretend that its not happening until maybe 2011 and we get close to next Pres. Election and then suddenly the cool aid will go poof and disappear and the claws will come out of these same white voters who voted for Mr. Obama in 2008. And bam they will turn on him. Why&#8221; I&#8217;ll tell ya why because in thier eyes they will have achieved some crazy stupid goal and then they will vote him out. These  people scare me because they are full of S&#8230;. and they put an entire nation at risk to serve some crazy cause that only makes things worse. </p>
<p>   I did not vote for Mr. Obama  but he is our (my) President and when these animals who voted for him turn on him &#8211; it will be the rest of us who defend our President from the smears&#8230;.<br />
   And they (the folks I refer to above) they are vicious look at what they can do an example: G. Bush.<br />
    So when you see white people jumping up in praise (no at this time) just keep in mind these are really the ignorant&#8230; and in a few years they will be the first to turn&#8230;..<br />
My Opinion&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Diego</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/11/16/anatomy-of-a-divider-part-1a-why-obama-cannot-unify/#comment-1049634</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Diego</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=6053#comment-1049634</guid>
		<description>Not sure what you mean about the truth.  I&#039;m not an Obama supporter by any means, but I think Hillary&#039;s statement about a vast right-wing conspiracy while she defended her husband&#039;s deceptions was pretty polarizing.  Of course, she&#039;s done an effective job of putting her finger up to test the direction of the wind, but this new Hillary you are talking about is really pretty much political expediency on her part, isn&#039;t it?  I was shocked to see her drinking in a bar but do you really think that didn&#039;t have political play?  Come on, get serious.  Your assessment of NPD and how Bush exhibited that quality falls flat considering the transparency of his personality surrounding the 9/11 event and the fact that he had a quite excellent economy for 7 years, for which he has gotten no credit from you folks.  We were doing fine economically until the Democrats precipitated the economic downturn by refusing to support drilling and by means of ACORN and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac which are all Democratic controlled organizations.  Are we really being objective here?  I&#039;ve got my problems with Obama and agree that he is not a uniter...his problem will be how to unite a country around socialism and fascism.  I, for one, won&#039;t get a beautiful collective moment over his policies because I know the damage and decline that they represent.  The only way for Obama to be a successful President is for him to embrace free market principles and since we know he won&#039;t that means his Presidency will be a failure...pure and simple.  If you want to analyze his personality, ask how it is that a person could get elected President by appealing to prejudice against the rich, hatred of the rich, envy, military withdrawal, reduced military spending and negotiating with terrorists.  Then you could look at the rise of Hitler and get some parallels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure what you mean about the truth.  I&#8217;m not an Obama supporter by any means, but I think Hillary&#8217;s statement about a vast right-wing conspiracy while she defended her husband&#8217;s deceptions was pretty polarizing.  Of course, she&#8217;s done an effective job of putting her finger up to test the direction of the wind, but this new Hillary you are talking about is really pretty much political expediency on her part, isn&#8217;t it?  I was shocked to see her drinking in a bar but do you really think that didn&#8217;t have political play?  Come on, get serious.  Your assessment of NPD and how Bush exhibited that quality falls flat considering the transparency of his personality surrounding the 9/11 event and the fact that he had a quite excellent economy for 7 years, for which he has gotten no credit from you folks.  We were doing fine economically until the Democrats precipitated the economic downturn by refusing to support drilling and by means of ACORN and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac which are all Democratic controlled organizations.  Are we really being objective here?  I&#8217;ve got my problems with Obama and agree that he is not a uniter&#8230;his problem will be how to unite a country around socialism and fascism.  I, for one, won&#8217;t get a beautiful collective moment over his policies because I know the damage and decline that they represent.  The only way for Obama to be a successful President is for him to embrace free market principles and since we know he won&#8217;t that means his Presidency will be a failure&#8230;pure and simple.  If you want to analyze his personality, ask how it is that a person could get elected President by appealing to prejudice against the rich, hatred of the rich, envy, military withdrawal, reduced military spending and negotiating with terrorists.  Then you could look at the rise of Hitler and get some parallels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doc99</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/11/16/anatomy-of-a-divider-part-1a-why-obama-cannot-unify/#comment-1044098</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=6053#comment-1044098</guid>
		<description>Another &lt;a href=&quot;http://neveryetmelted.com/index.php/category/keyes-v-bowen/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Obama constitutional challenge&lt;/a&gt; filed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another <a href="http://neveryetmelted.com/index.php/category/keyes-v-bowen/" rel="nofollow"> Obama constitutional challenge</a> filed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oo12oo</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/11/16/anatomy-of-a-divider-part-1a-why-obama-cannot-unify/#comment-1044084</link>
		<dc:creator>oo12oo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=6053#comment-1044084</guid>
		<description>Well, all the speeches are over, so let&#039;s hope the President-elect can demonstrate he also has substance too. He at least deserves a chance to try.

Al</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, all the speeches are over, so let&#8217;s hope the President-elect can demonstrate he also has substance too. He at least deserves a chance to try.</p>
<p>Al</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Kate</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/11/16/anatomy-of-a-divider-part-1a-why-obama-cannot-unify/#comment-1044068</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 20:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=6053#comment-1044068</guid>
		<description>Excellent article, thank  you.  Puts a tangible issue on and behind that mask.  He can&#039;t keep it up forever, imo.  And when a narcissist falls, he falls hard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article, thank  you.  Puts a tangible issue on and behind that mask.  He can&#8217;t keep it up forever, imo.  And when a narcissist falls, he falls hard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IndieDogg</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/11/16/anatomy-of-a-divider-part-1a-why-obama-cannot-unify/#comment-1044035</link>
		<dc:creator>IndieDogg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 20:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=6053#comment-1044035</guid>
		<description>[I copied this from the &quot;Daily Reckoning&quot; newsletter (w/o permission but with attribution). Bonner is one of the more insightful voices around, and hilarious at the same time.]

&lt;blockquote&gt;[Reprinted from The Daily Reckoning; 2008-November-17]
O! BAMA! THE WORLD TURNS ITS WEARY EYES TO YOU…
By Bill Bonner

[Bill Bonner is the founder and editor of The Daily Reckoning. He is also the author, with Addison Wiggin, of the national best sellers Financial Reckoning Day: Surviving the Soft Depression of the 21st Century and Empire of Debt: The Rise of an Epic Financial Crisis. Bill&#039;s latest book is entitled, Mobs, Messiahs and Markets: Surviving the Public Spectacle in Finance and Politics, written with co-author Lila Rajiva.]

Mr. Obama became the president-elect of all the Americans last week. No man’s coffee tasted better on Wednesday morning than it did on Tuesday…no woman’s perfume smelled sweeter. But all over the world, people felt better about themselves, as if the human race had achieved something important.

At least a McCain victory would have caused the press to hold its tongue. Instead, commentators drew all the wrong conclusions and made fools of themselves. Some thought it meant America’s redemption from the sin of slave trade. Others saw a historic transformation that they couldn’t put in words and shouldn’t have tried.

“They did it. They really did it,” wrote the Guardian. “… [T]he American people yesterday stood in the eye of history and made an emphatic choice for change…” It’s the “End of the National Nightmare,” said TIME magazine.

Amid the effervescence came the French. Obama’s victory “arouses a wild yet reasonable hope,” claimed Bernard-Henri Levi in the Financial Times. Mr. Obama’s election will affect us in “at least three concrete ways,” he continued… a decisive turning point in dealing with the ‘racial question’ in the US… hope for an America that began doubting its “famous mission”… and with Obama representing the USA, “anti-Americanism… will have a harder time surviving and it will be forced to revisit its sales pitch.”

Nobody knows what America’s “famous mission” is – certainly not the Americans themselves. And if those are his ‘concrete’ ways, we’re glad Mr. Levi is not building bridges. There was nothing concrete about the hopes Mr. Obama’s victory arouse. Just the contrary…they are all in the ether.

They shouldn’t let French philosophers comment on American politics; they take the whole thing far too seriously. Besides, you never know what they are talking about anyway. But Le Monde saw it clearer. Not only was the paper happy to see the United States finally rinse the stain of racism out of the Stars and Stripes, it was glad to see Americans give free market capitalism the flush too.

Obama will be “reviving the role of regulation in the U.S.; [devising] tax policies to smooth out increasingly wide socio-economic divides; planning a health-care system appropriate to the country’s wealth,” said the paper. In other words, he will be putting in a system of state-directed capitalism, just like they have in France.

None of the commentators we read really understood Obama’s triumph. They saw it in a yearning for truth and a stretch for progress. It was nothing of the sort. The last thing voters want is the truth; they will reject it if it is put in front of them. Instead, what they want is diversion from the real world. What they hope to get from their leaders is a kind of entertainment…in short, a fantasy. Something to cheer them up when they are down. Or something to give them a fright when they are up.

You’ll recall from last week, the last period of Great Calamity – 1914-1945, with its wars, epidemics, Dust Bowls, hyperinflation, Great Depression, mass murders, bankruptcy and revolutions. It was in the middle of this period that Americans elected Franklin Roosevelt, who told them they had “nothing to fear but fear itself.” It was all in their heads! It was a whopper, but it was the whopper they wanted to hear.

And then, on right side of the Atlantic, Britain chose Winston Churchill as prime minister, in May 1940. Churchill crossed his fingers and put his hand behind his back immediately, claiming that Britain was not fighting to save its overseas empire, but to “save the whole world.” He promptly kicked out any official who was “exercising a disturbing or depressing influence,” that is, any who dared to tell the truth about Britain’s disastrous military situation.

Just weeks later – in France, after suffering the most humiliating defeat in their history, the French recalled an old man to power, Philippe Petain. The hero of Verdun made the French feel that they had just regained their national glory, not just lost it. But at the time, France’s fantasy seemed on more solid ground than Britain’s…which just goes to show how unreliable history can be. Sometime make-believe becomes real; usually, it doesn’t. Britain got the backing of the Roosevelt administration – which had promised voters to keep America out of the war – and beat the huns; Churchill died a hero. Petain died in disgrace.

Today, in the U.S.A., the Bush Administration has worked hard to make people fearful – with its torture chambers and preposterous “threat levels.” But the terrorists wouldn’t cooperate; they failed to blow up even a trash truck. Alas, now the mob sweats – and for good reason. People are afraid of losing their houses, their jobs, and their retirements. Losses in equities worldwide top $25 trillion. In U.S. housing alone, some $4 trillion has disappeared. That’s why Obama won; it has nothing to do with national redemption or Sarah Palin. When the world was safe and plush…the mob wanted to feel the frisson of danger. What the public wants now is safety: a movie with a happy ending, not a horror flick. Obama appeared the calmer, more intelligent, candidate. Voters could imagine him as the “black Roosevelt” giving soothing fireside chats and telling the lies they most wanted to hear.

And so, in the national narrative, one cockamamie bamboozle takes the place of the one that went before. Americans were supposed to be fearful; now they are supposed to be confident. They were supposed to be racists; now they are supposed to colorblind. They were supposed to defend free market capitalism to their last breath; now they turn to the state and beg it to protect their last dime.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[I copied this from the "Daily Reckoning" newsletter (w/o permission but with attribution). Bonner is one of the more insightful voices around, and hilarious at the same time.]</p>
<blockquote><p>[Reprinted from The Daily Reckoning; 2008-November-17]<br />
O! BAMA! THE WORLD TURNS ITS WEARY EYES TO YOU…<br />
By Bill Bonner</p>
<p>[Bill Bonner is the founder and editor of The Daily Reckoning. He is also the author, with Addison Wiggin, of the national best sellers Financial Reckoning Day: Surviving the Soft Depression of the 21st Century and Empire of Debt: The Rise of an Epic Financial Crisis. Bill's latest book is entitled, Mobs, Messiahs and Markets: Surviving the Public Spectacle in Finance and Politics, written with co-author Lila Rajiva.]</p>
<p>Mr. Obama became the president-elect of all the Americans last week. No man’s coffee tasted better on Wednesday morning than it did on Tuesday…no woman’s perfume smelled sweeter. But all over the world, people felt better about themselves, as if the human race had achieved something important.</p>
<p>At least a McCain victory would have caused the press to hold its tongue. Instead, commentators drew all the wrong conclusions and made fools of themselves. Some thought it meant America’s redemption from the sin of slave trade. Others saw a historic transformation that they couldn’t put in words and shouldn’t have tried.</p>
<p>“They did it. They really did it,” wrote the Guardian. “… [T]he American people yesterday stood in the eye of history and made an emphatic choice for change…” It’s the “End of the National Nightmare,” said TIME magazine.</p>
<p>Amid the effervescence came the French. Obama’s victory “arouses a wild yet reasonable hope,” claimed Bernard-Henri Levi in the Financial Times. Mr. Obama’s election will affect us in “at least three concrete ways,” he continued… a decisive turning point in dealing with the ‘racial question’ in the US… hope for an America that began doubting its “famous mission”… and with Obama representing the USA, “anti-Americanism… will have a harder time surviving and it will be forced to revisit its sales pitch.”</p>
<p>Nobody knows what America’s “famous mission” is – certainly not the Americans themselves. And if those are his ‘concrete’ ways, we’re glad Mr. Levi is not building bridges. There was nothing concrete about the hopes Mr. Obama’s victory arouse. Just the contrary…they are all in the ether.</p>
<p>They shouldn’t let French philosophers comment on American politics; they take the whole thing far too seriously. Besides, you never know what they are talking about anyway. But Le Monde saw it clearer. Not only was the paper happy to see the United States finally rinse the stain of racism out of the Stars and Stripes, it was glad to see Americans give free market capitalism the flush too.</p>
<p>Obama will be “reviving the role of regulation in the U.S.; [devising] tax policies to smooth out increasingly wide socio-economic divides; planning a health-care system appropriate to the country’s wealth,” said the paper. In other words, he will be putting in a system of state-directed capitalism, just like they have in France.</p>
<p>None of the commentators we read really understood Obama’s triumph. They saw it in a yearning for truth and a stretch for progress. It was nothing of the sort. The last thing voters want is the truth; they will reject it if it is put in front of them. Instead, what they want is diversion from the real world. What they hope to get from their leaders is a kind of entertainment…in short, a fantasy. Something to cheer them up when they are down. Or something to give them a fright when they are up.</p>
<p>You’ll recall from last week, the last period of Great Calamity – 1914-1945, with its wars, epidemics, Dust Bowls, hyperinflation, Great Depression, mass murders, bankruptcy and revolutions. It was in the middle of this period that Americans elected Franklin Roosevelt, who told them they had “nothing to fear but fear itself.” It was all in their heads! It was a whopper, but it was the whopper they wanted to hear.</p>
<p>And then, on right side of the Atlantic, Britain chose Winston Churchill as prime minister, in May 1940. Churchill crossed his fingers and put his hand behind his back immediately, claiming that Britain was not fighting to save its overseas empire, but to “save the whole world.” He promptly kicked out any official who was “exercising a disturbing or depressing influence,” that is, any who dared to tell the truth about Britain’s disastrous military situation.</p>
<p>Just weeks later – in France, after suffering the most humiliating defeat in their history, the French recalled an old man to power, Philippe Petain. The hero of Verdun made the French feel that they had just regained their national glory, not just lost it. But at the time, France’s fantasy seemed on more solid ground than Britain’s…which just goes to show how unreliable history can be. Sometime make-believe becomes real; usually, it doesn’t. Britain got the backing of the Roosevelt administration – which had promised voters to keep America out of the war – and beat the huns; Churchill died a hero. Petain died in disgrace.</p>
<p>Today, in the U.S.A., the Bush Administration has worked hard to make people fearful – with its torture chambers and preposterous “threat levels.” But the terrorists wouldn’t cooperate; they failed to blow up even a trash truck. Alas, now the mob sweats – and for good reason. People are afraid of losing their houses, their jobs, and their retirements. Losses in equities worldwide top $25 trillion. In U.S. housing alone, some $4 trillion has disappeared. That’s why Obama won; it has nothing to do with national redemption or Sarah Palin. When the world was safe and plush…the mob wanted to feel the frisson of danger. What the public wants now is safety: a movie with a happy ending, not a horror flick. Obama appeared the calmer, more intelligent, candidate. Voters could imagine him as the “black Roosevelt” giving soothing fireside chats and telling the lies they most wanted to hear.</p>
<p>And so, in the national narrative, one cockamamie bamboozle takes the place of the one that went before. Americans were supposed to be fearful; now they are supposed to be confident. They were supposed to be racists; now they are supposed to colorblind. They were supposed to defend free market capitalism to their last breath; now they turn to the state and beg it to protect their last dime.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.S.</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/11/16/anatomy-of-a-divider-part-1a-why-obama-cannot-unify/#comment-1043962</link>
		<dc:creator>C.S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 20:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=6053#comment-1043962</guid>
		<description>Most Christian religions place emphasis on attending funerals as a sign of respect and love.  This says a great deal about his character that he couldn&#039;t be bothered to even show up.  Maybe his grandmother wasn&#039;t religious but I doubt they just let the coroner disposed of the body and, as &quot;good Christians&quot;, he and his wife should have wanted to be there.  

His business-as-usual attitude toward his last remaining relative&#039;s death (except for half siblings he barely acknowledges)shows a callousness that will translate to his obligation to We the People because we&#039;re just a bunch of strangers he has no respect for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most Christian religions place emphasis on attending funerals as a sign of respect and love.  This says a great deal about his character that he couldn&#8217;t be bothered to even show up.  Maybe his grandmother wasn&#8217;t religious but I doubt they just let the coroner disposed of the body and, as &#8220;good Christians&#8221;, he and his wife should have wanted to be there.  </p>
<p>His business-as-usual attitude toward his last remaining relative&#8217;s death (except for half siblings he barely acknowledges)shows a callousness that will translate to his obligation to We the People because we&#8217;re just a bunch of strangers he has no respect for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mkm125</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/11/16/anatomy-of-a-divider-part-1a-why-obama-cannot-unify/#comment-1043897</link>
		<dc:creator>mkm125</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 19:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=6053#comment-1043897</guid>
		<description>If you need to RANT at me so more and would like to get into a discussion about why I think you make terribly sexist comments about women, please email me directly at bb3@gmail.com.  You clearly have me confused with another commenter as I&#039;ve never been a Palin-hater (just not a STRONG supporter). Feel free to email as I am not going to waste other readers time here on the blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you need to RANT at me so more and would like to get into a discussion about why I think you make terribly sexist comments about women, please email me directly at <a href="mailto:bb3@gmail.com">bb3@gmail.com</a>.  You clearly have me confused with another commenter as I&#8217;ve never been a Palin-hater (just not a STRONG supporter). Feel free to email as I am not going to waste other readers time here on the blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DAB</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/11/16/anatomy-of-a-divider-part-1a-why-obama-cannot-unify/#comment-1043848</link>
		<dc:creator>DAB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 19:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=6053#comment-1043848</guid>
		<description>I saw a documentary on Body Language and Voice Interpretation on The History Channel recently.   

Regarding Obama, they pretty much stuck to his oratory  and voice and concluded that his rhythm and rising cadences had a hypnotic affect on his listeners.  This substantiates another past NoQuarter article (or was it a comment) that cited a study about how Obama incorporates a variety of hypnosis techniques in his presentations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw a documentary on Body Language and Voice Interpretation on The History Channel recently.   </p>
<p>Regarding Obama, they pretty much stuck to his oratory  and voice and concluded that his rhythm and rising cadences had a hypnotic affect on his listeners.  This substantiates another past NoQuarter article (or was it a comment) that cited a study about how Obama incorporates a variety of hypnosis techniques in his presentations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kailyne</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/11/16/anatomy-of-a-divider-part-1a-why-obama-cannot-unify/#comment-1043841</link>
		<dc:creator>kailyne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 19:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=6053#comment-1043841</guid>
		<description>the goal of propaganda, and any non-fact based literature is to de-sensitize the reader/viewer to anything that would remotely challenge the myth being delivered.

a repetitive and wide-scale attack on reason, thought and judgment basically disarms the reader/viewer with the cognitive tools to discern fact from fiction.

once comprised, denial usually can only be broken when the reader/viewer is confronted with a personal circumstance that forces him/her to come to terms with facts, and also the coping mechanisms in place to maintain that alternative reality.

i am relatively new to this site, so i apologize if you were being sardonic with your post. but, if you words were sincere, than it would appear that you are on the same trajectory as the president-elect. 

i wish you peace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the goal of propaganda, and any non-fact based literature is to de-sensitize the reader/viewer to anything that would remotely challenge the myth being delivered.</p>
<p>a repetitive and wide-scale attack on reason, thought and judgment basically disarms the reader/viewer with the cognitive tools to discern fact from fiction.</p>
<p>once comprised, denial usually can only be broken when the reader/viewer is confronted with a personal circumstance that forces him/her to come to terms with facts, and also the coping mechanisms in place to maintain that alternative reality.</p>
<p>i am relatively new to this site, so i apologize if you were being sardonic with your post. but, if you words were sincere, than it would appear that you are on the same trajectory as the president-elect. </p>
<p>i wish you peace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No-nonsense-Nancy</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/11/16/anatomy-of-a-divider-part-1a-why-obama-cannot-unify/#comment-1043751</link>
		<dc:creator>No-nonsense-Nancy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 18:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=6053#comment-1043751</guid>
		<description>I have been a psychiatric nurse for most of my long career. It is true that BO is a pathalogical narcissist but he also has several other of the personality disorders, such as borderline personality disorder which is very difficult to deal with. A person can exhibit several of them at one time. They come in clusters and a person can have a cluster of them and even a combination of clusters. I would have to be a psychiatrist to actually diagnose him. He is a very mixed up soul and definately not one to be ruler of the free world. To me BO is a VERY dangerous man!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been a psychiatric nurse for most of my long career. It is true that BO is a pathalogical narcissist but he also has several other of the personality disorders, such as borderline personality disorder which is very difficult to deal with. A person can exhibit several of them at one time. They come in clusters and a person can have a cluster of them and even a combination of clusters. I would have to be a psychiatrist to actually diagnose him. He is a very mixed up soul and definately not one to be ruler of the free world. To me BO is a VERY dangerous man!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AnninCA</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/11/16/anatomy-of-a-divider-part-1a-why-obama-cannot-unify/#comment-1043677</link>
		<dc:creator>AnninCA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 17:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=6053#comment-1043677</guid>
		<description>The &quot;57&quot; state remark was just a mild gaffe, similar to other remarks made by other campaigners.

It&#039;s a grueling deal running for office.  Nobody is going to be perfect.

I don&#039;t think that&#039;s all that important.

Neither were the RNC clothes for Palin.

That&#039;s all silly stuff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;57&#8243; state remark was just a mild gaffe, similar to other remarks made by other campaigners.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a grueling deal running for office.  Nobody is going to be perfect.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s all that important.</p>
<p>Neither were the RNC clothes for Palin.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s all silly stuff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ownaa</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/11/16/anatomy-of-a-divider-part-1a-why-obama-cannot-unify/#comment-1043672</link>
		<dc:creator>ownaa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 17:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=6053#comment-1043672</guid>
		<description>Since Obama is sooo smart why they sealed ALL his academic records.  About geogarphy did you know he was talking during the primaries and said &quot; I already toured all the 57 states&#039;  then he was looking at papers infront of him and said I guess there is one left. If palin had all the MSM working for her, and teams of writters for so many years preparing her she have looked a lot better than he did by a mile. I can&#039;t believe I am defending a republican</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since Obama is sooo smart why they sealed ALL his academic records.  About geogarphy did you know he was talking during the primaries and said &#8221; I already toured all the 57 states&#8217;  then he was looking at papers infront of him and said I guess there is one left. If palin had all the MSM working for her, and teams of writters for so many years preparing her she have looked a lot better than he did by a mile. I can&#8217;t believe I am defending a republican</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AnninCA</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/11/16/anatomy-of-a-divider-part-1a-why-obama-cannot-unify/#comment-1043646</link>
		<dc:creator>AnninCA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 17:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=6053#comment-1043646</guid>
		<description>Everyone is writing a lot of dire warnings right now, because nobody really knows how Obama will govern.  Makes sense to me that people are fidgety.

He sounded very determined to deliver on key promises made in the campaign, which is OK.  At least he is suggesting that he will have some integrity in his administration, and that not everything was Greek columns and BS.

We&#039;ll see.

I think the one GOOD point about his election is that the country will give him an opportunity to perform.  McCain would never have been granted such a period.

It&#039;s unreasonable to not give a change in administration such a window.

One thing I didn&#039;t like about Obama is that I never saw him as a real Democrat.  The loading up of his staff with Clinton Dems signals to me, anyway, that he&#039;s adopted the party.

Now, in my opinion, he has to ignore Pelosi and Reid, who I personally find far more dangerous than anyone.  Good grief, I can&#039;t stand them.

I&#039;d much prefer what I&#039;m seeing.....a good solid group of Clinton Dems running the White House.

And if he puts Hillary in as SoS?

Icing on the cake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone is writing a lot of dire warnings right now, because nobody really knows how Obama will govern.  Makes sense to me that people are fidgety.</p>
<p>He sounded very determined to deliver on key promises made in the campaign, which is OK.  At least he is suggesting that he will have some integrity in his administration, and that not everything was Greek columns and BS.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll see.</p>
<p>I think the one GOOD point about his election is that the country will give him an opportunity to perform.  McCain would never have been granted such a period.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s unreasonable to not give a change in administration such a window.</p>
<p>One thing I didn&#8217;t like about Obama is that I never saw him as a real Democrat.  The loading up of his staff with Clinton Dems signals to me, anyway, that he&#8217;s adopted the party.</p>
<p>Now, in my opinion, he has to ignore Pelosi and Reid, who I personally find far more dangerous than anyone.  Good grief, I can&#8217;t stand them.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d much prefer what I&#8217;m seeing&#8230;..a good solid group of Clinton Dems running the White House.</p>
<p>And if he puts Hillary in as SoS?</p>
<p>Icing on the cake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OBAMA IS A FRAUD</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/11/16/anatomy-of-a-divider-part-1a-why-obama-cannot-unify/#comment-1043621</link>
		<dc:creator>OBAMA IS A FRAUD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 17:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=6053#comment-1043621</guid>
		<description>From the Black Republican Association - Guess he didn&#039;t unify AAs entirely either....


&lt;strong&gt;White Guilt Emancipation Declaration&lt;/strong&gt;

We, black American citizens of the United States of America and of the National Black Republican Association, do hereby declare that our fellow white American citizens are now, henceforth and forever more free of White Guilt.

This freedom from White Guilt was duly earned by the election of Barack Hussein Obama, a black man, to be our president by a majority of white Americans based solely on the color of his skin.

Freedom is not free, and we trust that the price paid for this freedom from White Guilt is worth the sacrifice, since Obama is a socialist who does not share the values of average Americans and will use the office of the presidency to turn America into a failed socialist nation.

Granted this November 4, 2008 - the day Barack Hussein Obama was elected as the first black president and the first socialist president of the United States of America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the Black Republican Association &#8211; Guess he didn&#8217;t unify AAs entirely either&#8230;.</p>
<p><strong>White Guilt Emancipation Declaration</strong></p>
<p>We, black American citizens of the United States of America and of the National Black Republican Association, do hereby declare that our fellow white American citizens are now, henceforth and forever more free of White Guilt.</p>
<p>This freedom from White Guilt was duly earned by the election of Barack Hussein Obama, a black man, to be our president by a majority of white Americans based solely on the color of his skin.</p>
<p>Freedom is not free, and we trust that the price paid for this freedom from White Guilt is worth the sacrifice, since Obama is a socialist who does not share the values of average Americans and will use the office of the presidency to turn America into a failed socialist nation.</p>
<p>Granted this November 4, 2008 &#8211; the day Barack Hussein Obama was elected as the first black president and the first socialist president of the United States of America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
