RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Why Is Obama Pushing Daley’s Plan for Chicago to Host Olympics in 2016?

Just as Daley controlled Obama in Chicago, Daley will control Obama in Washington, DC. I quote the Chicago Tribune with added emphasis:

It didn’t take long for Barack Obama to start playing a significant role in promoting Chicago’s bid for the 2016 Summer Olympics.

About 15 minutes into Chicago’s Friday presentation of its bid plans to the general assembly of the European Olympic Committees, the president elect gave an 85-second videotaped address to an audience that included some two dozen International Olympic Committee members….

Chicago Mayor Richard M. Daley arrived in Istanbul Friday and introduced the Obama video….

There also were also four still pictures of Obama, all with Mayor Daley, during the 20-minute presentation, the third of five Chicago is making to annual assemblies of regional Olympic committees.

Obama filmed the video last Friday in Chicago at his transition office in the Kluczynski Federal Building….

With Mayor Daley and president-elect Obama, this bid team now enjoys unprecedented partnership for a U.S. candidate, reaching from City Hall in Chicago to the White House in Washington, D.C.,” Ryan said.

Obama, in other words, is parlaying his status as President elect to help procure the crown jewel of Mayor Daley’s agenda: the 2016 Olympics.

This concerns me for many reasons. According to the Chicago Tribune, Chicago is the only city that made a presentation before the International Olympic Committee that did not have full governmental backing. Chicago has also failed provide a compelling argument that the current economic situation would not make it impossible for Chicago to host such an expensive event. But even worse, it seems backers of Obama were already aware of Obama’s role in Daley’s bid to procure the approval of the International Olympic Committee to host the international event before Obama was elected.

Here is a entry from No Quarter’s Site Meter I captured on 14 September 2008:

No Quarter
Who’s On?> Visit Detail
Visit 5,047,630
[<>]
Domain Name uchospitals.edu ? (Educational)
IP Address 165.68.41.131 ? (University of Chicago)
ISP University of Chicago
Location
Continent : North America
Country : United States (Facts)
State : Illinois
City : Chicago
Lat/Long : 41.7804, -87.6027 (Map)
Distance : 679 miles
Language English (U.S.)
en-us
Operating System Microsoft Windows Server 2003
Browser Internet Explorer 6.0
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.2; SV1; .NET CLR
1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)
Javascript version 1.3
Monitor
Resolution : 1024 x 768
Color Depth : 24 bits
Time of Visit Sep 14 2008 10:45:29 pm
Last Page View Sep 14 2008 10:45:29 pm
Visit Length 0 seconds
Page Views 1
Referring URL http://search.yahoo….e=1&cop=mss&ei=UTF-8
Search Engine search.yahoo.com
Search Words rev. meeks and olympics
Visit Entry Page http://noquarterusa….ory/rev-james-meeks/
Visit Exit Page http://noquarterusa….ory/rev-james-meeks/
Out Click
Time Zone UTC-6:00
Visitor’s Time Sep 14 2008 9:45:29 pm
Visit Number 5,047,630
[<>]
Visitor Path Duration (s)
Referral rev. meeks and olympics
http://search.yahoo.com/search?p…-t-501&toggle=1&cop=mss&ei=UTF-8 0
(1) http://noquarterusa.net/blog/category/rev-james-meeks/ 0

Someone at The University of Chicago Hospitals on 14 SEP 2008 performed a Yahoo search for “Reverend Meeks” and “Olympics,” and they were directed to No Quarter. The University of Chicago Hospitals, for those who have not been reading No Quarter the past few months, employed Michelle Obama from 2002 through 2007, when she resigned in order to campaign for her husband. When she was promoted to the position of Vice President for Community and External Affairs in 2005, her salary increased from $121,910 to $316,962. This was the same year her husband joined the US Senate, where he submitted an earmark request on behalf of Michelle’s employer. I quote the Chicago Tribune:

In among them was a request for $1 million in federal funding in 2006 for a new pavilion at the University of Chicago Hospitals, where his wife, Michelle Obama, was a vice president at the time.

One wonders why the federal government should have bankrolled a new pavilion at The University of Chicago, a private institution. One also wonders why Michelle received such a large increase after her husband had the ability to secure federal funds for the private hospital. But one also wonders why a computer of Michelle Obama’s former employer, an employer who had what appears to be a political and fiduciary relationship with Barack Obama, would perform a Yahoo search for “Rev. Meeks” and “Olympics” on 14 SEPT 2008.

Reverend James Meeks is a Chicago ally of Obama and an Illinois State Senator. He is also a homophobic minister from whom Obama regularly seeks “spiritual counsel.” Obama will not be seeking Meeks counsel on the Olympics, however, for Meeks believes Chicago business leaders should focus on rebuilding schools and the city’s infrastructure, not on the 2016 Olympics. Notice how the Chicago Sun-Times article I cite was published on 13 SEPT 2008, and notice how someone on a computer of Michelle Obama’s former employer, an employer on behalf of whom Barack Obama submitted an earmark request for a “pavilion,” performed a Yahoo search on 14 SEPT 2008 for “Rev. Meeks” and “Olympics.” Clearly someone at The University of Chicago Hospitals is concerned about Reverend and state Senator Meeks’s opposition to Daley’s latest cash cow, a cow for which Obama is now advocating.

Let us recapitulate:

  • Obama has been and remains Daley’s puppet
  • Daley desires to host the Olympics in Chicago in 2016
  • Obama, now President elect, appears before the International Olympic Committee in a video presentation that Daley introduced in Istanbul, and the two appeared together at least four times in photographic stills
  • Daley has been mobilizing the support of Chicago business leaders for this event for some time, sparking the opposition of Reverend and state Senator James Meeks, who believes Chicago’s business leaders should invest in the city’s infrastructure
  • Someone at Michelle Obama’s former employer, The University of Chicago Hospitals, happened upon No Quarter one day after the Chicago Sun-Times published an article on Meeks’s opposition to Daley’s plan to mobilize support in Chicago for the Olympics. They were searching for information on “Rev. Meeks” and the “Olympics.”
  • Barack Obama attempted to secure federal funds in an earmark for The University of Chicago Hospitals to build a “pavilion.”
  • Michelle Obama’s salary tripled the same year her husband gained the power to submit earmark requests in the US Senate.
  • The University of Chicago also recently built a pool they call “the most prominent feature” of their athletic facility. Olympics officials have already visited the pool to consider it for Olympics 2016.
  • Someone at The University of Chicago Hospitals, Michelle Obama’s former employer and the intended recipient of an Obama earmark, has what seems to be a vested interest in Olympics 2016.

Perhaps I am wrong, but I believe Daley and The University of Chicago pushed Obama in order to obtain financial benefits, namely the ability to host the 2016 Olympics. Why else is an employee of Michelle Obama’s former employer, The University of Chicago, searching for information on “Rev. Meeks” and “Olympics?” Why did Michelle Obama receive such a large salary increase when her husband could secure earmark requests for her employer? Moreover, why is Daley already forcing Obama to cut videos during his transition into the White House? Furthermore, why did The University of Chicago become the beneficiary of an earmark request for a “pavilion?” How much do Michelle Obama’s friends at The University of Chicago Hospitals stand to gain from Olympics 2016? How much does Daley stand to gain? Is this the final culmination of the contracts scandals in Chicago’s City Hall? Are the contracts scandals of Chicago City Hall now to pervade the White House in the name of Olympics 2016? And why is the Obama video already on display at Chicago 2016, the website dedicated to promoting Chicago’s candidacy for the Olympics?

Olympics 2016: not only is it a fraud; it is Daley’s attempt to introduce the world to the Chicago machine and to quid pro quo politics. And Barack Obama and Michelle Obama are at the center of it all.

Trackback URL

RSS Feed for This Post39 Comments »

Comment by OBAMA IS A FRAUD | 2008-11-21 20:25:05

And everyone here is getting all touchy feely about Fraudbama? ROFLMAO…He’s not even in the WH yet and the filth of the Chicago Combine is upon us. Good luck with that.

Comment by Kal | 2008-11-21 20:42:06

Hey, come on — you are only getting part of the story; consider these points:

(1) In Chicago, it is known that BO was on the early Olympic feasibility committees that convinced Daley to agree to make another bid (he was known to be reluctant after earlier failures) for 2016;

(2) The pitch made to Daley this time was that the Oly. bid should be pumped up by linking it to promoting ‘minority businesses’ (Rezko and co.) and economic development in the south side of Chicago, which has a global reputation for being in desperate need of economic development (except for the uni and profs real estate, of course);

(3) The BO house that Rezko helped him buy in 2006 is smack dab in the middle of the area where the Oly. development is going, and because BO would have known about where the Oly. bid was going, he and Rezko would have know what that meant in terms of the future value of that piece of property;

(4) Shortly after the bid was announced, BO was interviewed on Chicago tv (WGN?) saying ‘wow I can walk to events, I wonder what my house will be worth then?’ or words to that effect, very jocular, not at all ashamed to be reaping yet another (apparently) untouchable scammy benefit from his entanglement with Chicago politics.

There is way more to this story than your article reveals. But this is a good start, and too bad the msm is dead — it looks like its up to NQ etc. to fill in the rest of the missing pieces.

I just hope that Fitzgerald is working on the same picture.

PUMA!!

Comment by Annie Sweetie Oakley | 2008-11-21 21:04:08

#3 is right. It’s in Obama’s mercenary interests to “aid” in the Olympic bid. He’s even joked about renting his house out during the Olympics. Not only will his home increase in value; so will he homes of all his buds that live a few blocks away: Wright, Ayers, Farrakhan. And lots of other Chicago South Siders.

Plus imagine the favors that will be owed to him (or is he paying off favors this way??)if he can “help out.” And don’t forget Axelrod’s role in all this. Axelrod and his companies will be involved big time if this goes down.

It’s Chicago politics on White House steroids…

Comment by socalannie | 2008-11-22 01:18:27

It’s Chicago politics on White House steroids…

Great line.

Great post, truthteller!

 
 
 

Comment by Greentitan | 2008-11-21 21:45:29

Hi there! I just stumbled across this opportunity where you can make $130 for each person you sign up, $10 for each person that person signs up for you, and $5 for every person that person signs up for you!!! Take advantage of this great opportunity while you can! Make money online now: http://www.lwsfreedom.com/id/greentitan
Merry Christmas!!!

Comment by Northwest rain | 2008-11-22 01:21:59

spam??????????????

 
 
 
 

Comment by Tricia Spiegel | 2008-11-21 20:43:42

H’mm–this does sound suspicious to me!
I also think that Obama’s mind should be focussed on more pressing issues!

Comment by Ani | 2008-11-21 20:54:35

Yes, Tricia, I agree on both counts.

The economy is in shambles and even as president-elect, it would be nice to hear some kind of reassurances from him or more concrete ideas as to what his plans are — could calm the markets some.

Why is he so focused on this?

Thanks for a great post, Truthteller. Fishy indeed.

 

Comment by ritamary | 2008-11-21 20:56:23

Tricia, the value of Obama’s Kenwood mansion is a pressing issue – for him, and for Michelle too.

 
 

Comment by honora | 2008-11-21 20:55:18

How would Chicago get the money to finance the Olympics in this ecomony?

Comment by Kal | 2008-11-21 20:56:52

Duh. From the federal government, naturally.

Comment by Louie | 2008-11-21 21:24:21

The federal government doesn’t have the money.

Even fiat money is suspect, due to the lack of stability in Washington, patronage and mediocrity trumping talent, investors having lost confidence.

The sooner they understand this truth, the better off they are, the longer they stay in denial the worse it will be for everyone, including them.

Comment by OBAMA IS A FRAUD | 2008-11-21 21:39:47

What money they have left is being spent on Fraudbama’s Toga Party II.

 

Comment by Kal | 2008-11-21 22:00:32

No, minority contractor money. Lots of bits that governments can direct at Olym. funding, easy to justify re ec. development, transportation, road improvement, etc.

 
 
 
 

Comment by Arabella Trefoil | 2008-11-21 20:56:26

Are they changing the name from Olympics to honor Obama? You know “Obamalympics 2016″ or “The Obama Games 2016.” Maybe Obama intends to light the Olympic torch himself. Hell, maybe he’ll award himself five Olympic gold medals.

Nothing would surprise me any longer.

Comment by Northwest rain | 2008-11-21 21:15:50

The images — the images — oh yeck.

But thanks for the laugh — while Rome burned Obama — I mean Nero fiddled.

 
 

Comment by cathnealon | 2008-11-21 21:07:25

What was the title of Sartre’s novel, NAUSEA. This continuous feeling is getting stronger with every revelation When will they move the White House to Chicago? And isn’t that city the murder capital of the U.S.?

 

Comment by Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy | 2008-11-21 21:09:43

Wow, Truthteller, this is incredible! I know I shouldn’t continue to be surprised by Obama’s actions, but honestly – there are so many layers to his duplicity…

Thank you for pulling this info together, Truthteller. It is jaw-dropping…

 

Comment by Steve1 | 2008-11-21 21:12:07

I told, Mr Barry Soetoro is a controlled, compromised, blackmailed puppet! Cess pool politics, Chicago style.

 

Comment by karen for Clinton for PRESIDENT not SoS | 2008-11-21 21:12:44

heh, I knew I’d mentioned the Olympics around that time and just did a google search to find my remark.

It was from the “Throwing Mud – Chicago Style” thread of Sept. 27th:

“And lets not forget Olympics 2016. That is a great big magilla of a payday for all those sewer rats.”

Yepper, they’ve got a friend in high places now.

Comment by Louie | 2008-11-21 21:26:04

Yep.

ROTFLMAO

 
 

Comment by Steve1 | 2008-11-21 21:12:54

 

Comment by athy | 2008-11-21 21:53:38

Here is an interesting fact…
As of May 22, 2008, according to this article:

Valerie B. Jarrett serves as
vice chair, 2016 olympics committee

I wonder if she still holds that position…

http://news.muckety.com/2008/05/22/chicago-muckety-100-most-networked-people/2962

Comment by Kal | 2008-11-21 22:02:05

Yes, and BO was on it earlier. I doubt that it was a wholly confidential process.

Lots to learn from local papers on this one, over the last several years.

 
 

Comment by Louie | 2008-11-21 22:08:27

BTW, can’t IP addresses be hacked?

Just a word of caution, it’s not always prudent to assume what you see is real.

Even a casual hacker might feel a need to mislead you, though that didn’t necessarily happen, in this case.

Site meter info can be tampered with, we had some experience with it, ourselves.

Just careful on how you interpret the info., as a matter of course.

 

Comment by Elizabeth | 2008-11-21 22:46:55

Not to be an apologist or anything, but I seem to recall that Tony Blair meeting with leaders of the IOC in Athens promoting London’s bid when he was Prime Minister. Which means it may be becoming a natural role for a President/Prime Minister/National Leader to play AND at the same time coincidentally benefit the Obama mansion.

I’m for Tokyo, though. Olympics don’t normally mean financial profit, anyway…

 

Comment by Hot Librarian | 2008-11-21 23:33:18

The IOC will not give the Olympics after only a 20 year gap from Atlanta. Atlanta is not remembered fondly.

The pool at the U gf CHIcago is not anywhere near international standard-maybe as a training pool/ officials accommodation only.

Olys hve to be in a place that young people (athletes) & spectators want to go to. Think Barcelona Sydney Athens Beijing London .

NOBODY wants to go to Chicago.

Comment by shannon | 2008-11-22 00:37:01

Excuse me, but Chicago is a world class city that is drawing tourists from around the world every day. With the advent of the messiah, Obama, it has been gaining even more popularity. Have you ever been there?

Comment by Dormaphaea | 2008-11-22 10:25:49

I live here. Sure, it’s nice for about 16 sq blocks around Michigan Ave and downtown. If you like that sort of shopping experience.

But those of us who live and work here and watch our property taxes get swallowed up by Daley’s unaccountable TIF’s aren’t very excited about the prospect of city services and our money being used to fund this shambolic display.

 

Comment by athy | 2008-11-22 11:15:55

Shannon,
Are you aware of the high crime rate in Chicago and the fact that Chicago has one of the world’s worst public school systems in the country?

http://cbs4denver.com/national/chicago.summer.shootings.2.810882.html

Comment by shannon | 2008-11-22 18:08:12

Yep. That has nothing to do with the fact that Chicago attracts visitors from everywhere and is has a lot of positive attributes.

 
 
 
 

Comment by Uppity Woman | 2008-11-22 02:04:53

2016 is the reason Mr. Obama refused to join in on the call for Bush to boycott the opening of the Games. He danced around it left and right, avoiding involvement. What’s a couple of thousand dead people when you can have Chicago 2016 in hand for your friend Valerie Jarrett? I did a piece on this back then. A real journalist actually figured out what was going on and reported it. Not sure she’s working any longer though…

I’m not sure what qualities Mr. Obama actually has, but I am fairly certain conscience isn’t one of them.

Comment by Uppity Woman | 2008-11-22 02:09:25

http://uppitywoman08.wordpress.com/2008/04/10/obamas-boycott-dilemma-genocide-vs-chicago-games-2016/

April 10, 2008. Obama was in on the since Day One. Boycotting Genocide vs. Chicago Games 2016. Guess which one he chose?

Comment by Kal | 2008-11-22 11:28:53

UW — link didn’t work — ??

 
 
 

Comment by bayareavoter | 2008-11-22 03:27:31

Thanks for another interesting story. The level of corruption and pay for play around Obama never ceases to amaze.

 

Comment by mel | 2008-11-22 10:07:44

There is nothing new about Obama and the Chicago Olympics, it has been known for many months that Daley was desperate for Obama to win POTUS because McCain and Clinton refused to aide Chicago on the Olympics and all the crooks of Chicago are involved, read more here:

http://obamafact.blogspot.com/2008/06/what-makes-18-month-totally-unqualified.html

Comment by Kal | 2008-11-22 11:43:25

Wow, Mel, what a great analysis. You ought to see if Larry wants this at the top of a new thread.

I really like the way you spell out the timing of the June 3 and 4 events. I distinctly recall sitting and watching the local news on June 4, with BO wandering around after a rally or press conference about the bid situation, saying to reporters that it would be just down the street from him and grinning about it. At the time it seemed awfully strange that right on the heels of the final primaries, he would be messing around with that particular event, but your analysis spells it all out.

But you missed the significance of where BO’s Rezko house is located in relation to all the proposed Ol. facilities. Not as exciting as the Ayers bundle to be made by this, but probably pretty exciting for BO and MO, since they obviously like the Chg way.

Even if I were an SDS/Weatherperson leftie, which I am not, the sight of Ayers promoting that jerk to promote his families beyond-wealth is just so disgusting, and is what is so wrong with the msm then and now. The rich lefties don’t leave any political room for the not-rich lefties who really want to make things better.

Thanks mel!

 
 

Pingback by Barb’s Blog » Obama’s Bid Rejected | 2009-10-02 13:14:42

[...] In my opinion “politics” is the reason Obama WENT. [...]

 

RSS Feed for This PostPost a Comment

Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)