I think HRC and Bill may yet outsmart the Pelosi wing of the party. It’s going to be an interesting 4 years.

Obviously it ultimately looked a more productive route than turning down America’s “face to the world” only to speechify and bellyache about misogyny. The truth will come out. Let it be discovered through his actions, not her words.

All politicians are people with agendas–their agendas, which may or may not be the ones they present to the public. We want to believe that we KNOW these people and their motives. We don’t even know our own children, much less the political strangers who tell us what they want us to know. They aren’t telling now, so we’ll have to wait for time to put the puzzle pieces together. After all that happened during the election season, I’m still hoping for the best, but realistically expecting more of the same old same old from all the politicians.

All while China pillages the riches of DR Congo (the Democratic Republic of Congo), and abets the rebel thugs and rapists:

Tell me again why China will be a world superpower?

Not like this.

It’s hard enough when policy strives to establish some form of humanitarian aid to the peoples of a third world dictate, when violent retaliation is enabled due to careless imposition of brutality, an armed, and continual guerrilla type response will be established, one which will never be quelled without superior tactical abilities, one which will drain all profitability away from any (oil) enterprise, whether it be immediate, or gradual.

This foreign policy, on behalf of China doesn’t even rise to the level of Jim Baker.

(Wes Clark said Bakers policies were more of a quid pro quo — you get something, we get something. In part, I think without the US demanding something of the oppressive governments it enriched, it encouraged terrorism, supporting governments that may supply oil, but also insuring they have the means to suppress and torture their people, ie the Saudis, and Saddam, adn Iran. Clark suggested we try to develop better policy, a win win type situation that develops a country’s infrastructure, advancing it’s people, while also benefiting the US through trade. In this way, perhaps future violence and terrorism against the US can be limited, a more proactive approach. Something to think about, anyway…)

Right off the bat, China has established itself as a minor thug, not even providing the humanitarian efforts the US does, so much a part of our nations’ success as a superpower.

but it’s a nice thing you are willing to do NO QUARTER for Hillary! ANd she does deserve it and DOES CARE about this country!

That I would believe over most anything else!

Women, vote as a block next time and put Hillary or Sarah in charge!!!

You really think it doesn’t matter which one of those wins, so long as the winner is a woman?

http://ontheseventhday.wordpress.com/

Also as a Clinton supporter who did not fall in line I feel this is an attempt to silance us.

HAHAHAHAHAAAAAA! Nobody cares about “silancing” you. Obama won handily without you. You are irrelevant. And HRC knows it. It’s why she’s moving on and taking this job.

Sarah is spot on with energy independence as national security. And didn’t USA go begging to a foreign oil regime for 300 BILLION bucks for oil or somthing else? We have to live frugally, quit baling out Wall Street, and stop the Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac bleeding of money.

We cannot borrow our way to prosperity. We used to be a creditor nation. Now we’re a debtor nation, a third rate economic “power” and losing our identity.

Hillary knows what she is doing. I still prefer she stay in the Senate, write her policy prosposals which BHO the puppet and all MALE “leaders” continue to steal w/o giving her credit, and take care of the USA FIRST. Hillary has her own voice as a Senator–as SOS she’d have to juggle her voice with the lying, cheating, stealing, narcissistic fraud.

Women, vote as a block next time and put Hillary or Sarah in charge!!!

Where do you think Inkunda is getting his men and money from? From Rwanda. People won’t seem to expose Rwanda for the local troublemaking they are doing because that would be somehow politically incorrect after civil unrest over a decade ago, largely spurred on by an internal power struggle (although the Congolese civil war at the time certainly didn’t help at all).

The average American citizen has zero idea about what their government is doing in their name abroad and what these activities will bring in the future.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rKvc6aj08g4

Whatever the DNC tries to pull, most Americans, in my opinion, will consider Clinton the foreign policy mastermind about to the extent they think of Iraq as the War of Colin Powell and now Condoleezza Rice. And she will no doubt be a much stronger, more honest voice for stability, moderation and good in the world than either of these footman ever could.

As for the lame reason that she wouldn’t work w a thug, liar and cheater, perhaps as a person of honor she is setting aside thinking the bigger picture is to help the country. Hmmm, honor, wouldn’t that be a rare thing in an Obama administration.